- Collection:
- Scholarly Works
- Title:
- Jurisdiction beyond Our Borders: United States v. Alcoa and the Extraterritorial Reach of American Antitrust, 1909–1945
- Creator:
- Phillips Sawyer, Laura
- Date of Original:
- 2023-11-01
- Subject:
- Law--Study and teaching
Academic writing--Georgia--Athens
University of Georgia. School of Law - Location:
- United States, Georgia, Clarke County, Athens, 33.96095, -83.37794
- Medium:
- chapters (layout features)
- Type:
- Text
- Format:
- application/pdf
- Description:
- Alcoa -- international law -- Learned Hand -- jurisdiction -- antitrust -- Supreme Court -- legal history -- Antitrust and Trade Regulation -- Supreme Court of the United States
Chapter in the book Antimonopoly and American Democracy (https://academic.oup.com/book/55159)by Daniel A. Crane and William J. Novak, eds., Oxford University Press, 2023. In 1945, Judge Learned Hand wrote one of the most influential opinions in modern antitrust law. In declaring that the Aluminum Company of America (Alcoa) had illegally monopolized the industry for virgin aluminum and had participated in an illegal international cartel, Hand both revived and extended American antitrust law. The ruling is famous for several reasons: it narrowly defined the relevant market in favor of the government; it expanded the category of impermissible dominant firm conduct; it interpreted congressional intent as protecting an egalitarian business environment; and it established the extraterritorial reach of US antitrust laws. This essay offers a historical explanation for the origins of antitrust extraterritoriality and advances two arguments: first, right before and during the interwar years, the antitrust doctrine of strict territoriality had been eroded through a series of distinguishing cases and contradictory congressional policies. Second, the well-documented connection between European fascism and cartelization provided strong external pressures to extend American antitrust law and policy abroad and to redouble anticartel and antimonopoly provisions at home. Thus, both internal and external pressures culminated in the Alcoa case, which signaled a new era in American antitrust law—renewing both anticartel and antimonopolization policy while at the same time linking market competition to the protection of American territorial and popular sovereignty. By 1945, extraterritorial antitrust had emerged as an acceptable means of governance to curtail international cartel behavior, discipline monopolies at home, and impose an American-led liberal—and hegemonic—internationalism on its trade partners. - External Identifiers:
- Metadata URL:
- https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/1593
- Holding Institution:
- Alexander Campbell King Law Library
- Rights:
-
