[Letter] 1825 Dec. 24, Department of War to [the] Georgia delegation / James Barbour, Sec[retar]y of War

Skip viewer

Page: [1]

(Copy)

Department of War
December 24th 1825

Gentlemen,
The Executive influenced by the strongest desire to relieve the controversy with the Creeks so far as Georgia was particularly concerned from the difficulties produced by their determined opposition to the treaty of the Indian Springs, has been negotiating some time past on the basis of a surrender of all their lands within the limits of Georgia. The prospect of success was [added text (appears to be different ink): for a ] [deleted text: at one ] time flattering. Recent events however have entirely dissipated it, as to the whole of their lands in Georgia. They are willing to make a cession to the East of the Chatahoochie -- insisting on the necessity of a natural boundary as a protection against those trespassers which they suffer when separated only from the white population by an artificial line. By reference to to [to] the map it appears, that a very large proportion of the lands within the limits of Georgia will be acquired by the establishment of the Chatahoochie as a line of demarcation.


Page: [2]
They have incumbered [encumbered] this proposition with some conditions which are exceptionable, but which it is hoped might be satisfactorily modified. The Executive has refused to accept any proposition short of an entire cession within the limits of Georgia, and have used all the means in its power consistent with a sense of duty to induce them to yield. To a communication signifying this determination on the part of the Executive they have returned the enclosed reply so as to leave no ground on which to justify an expectation that they will recede further. The Executive is brought therefore to the question whether it is most advisable to refer the Treaty with the objections made to its validity to Congress for their decision, or to accept the new basis of the Chatahoochie and resume the negotiation. As the course heretofore pursued by the Executive has been dictated alike by a sense of duty and a most sincere wish to place the subject on a footing acceptable to Georgia, her wishes on the question which the Executive finds itself obliged to decide would have great influence on its decision. To learn her wishes, therefore is desirable. Her delegation in Congress may be safely resorted to as being able to furnish the most satisfactory information on this point, and the posture of the affair is made known with a view to enable you to make such a communication to the Executive


Page: [3]
as in your own judgment the circumstances may justify or require.

I have the honor to be your Obedt. [Obedient] Servant
(signed)
[Signed] James Barbour


Members in Congress from the State of Georgia. Honble [Honorable]
Thomas W. Cobb
J. McP. Berrien
John Forsyth
George Cary
A. Cuthbert
C. E. Haynes
James Meriwether
Edward F. Tatnall
Wiley Thompson






Page: [4]

Secy. [Secretary] of War to Georgia Delega. [Delegation]