2010 Metro Water District Plan Implementation Review
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District
December 2010
2010 Metro Water District Plan Implementation Review
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District
December 2010
Contents
I. Background and Process A. District History and Reporting Requirements B. Questionnaire Process
II. Overview of Questionnaire Results A. Water Supply and Water Conservation Management Plan Implementation Highlights B. Wastewater Management Plan Implementation Highlights C. Watershed Management Plan Implementation Highlights
III. Full Questionnaire Results A. Water Supply and Water Conservation Results B. Wastewater Results C. Watershed Results
IV. Appendix A Additional Documents Submitted by Jurisdictions
V. Appendix B Sample 2010 Questionnaires
Page
1 1
3 5 8
17 43 63
81
101
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District 2010 Plan Implementation Review
I. BACKGROUND AND PROCESS
A. District History and Reporting Requirements
The Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District (Metro Water District) was created by the Georgia General Assembly in 2001 in order to preserve and protect water resources in the 15-county metropolitan Atlanta area (Bartow, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, Paulding and Rockdale counties). The Metro Water District is charged with developing comprehensive regional and watershed specific water resources plans to be implemented by local governments. Three major plans to guide water resource management decisions were originally adopted in 2003 and updated in May 2009:
Water Supply and Water Conservation Management Plan Wastewater Management Plan Watershed Management Plan
These Plans provide local jurisdictions and state officials with recommendations for actions, policies and investments for water supply and water conservation management, wastewater treatment and watershed protection.
The Metro Water District is required to review the implementation of these Plans and report to the Director of the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) on an annual basis (O.C.G.A. 12-5-582(c), 12-5-583(c), 12-5-584(b)). As part of this reporting, the Metro Water District surveyed the plan implementation activities of local governments in 2010.
B. Questionnaire Process
The 2010 Plan Implementation Questionnaire (see Appendix B) was sent to all Metro Water District Jurisdictions responsible for implementing the Plans, including county and city governments and water and sewer authorities. The questionnaire focused on a variety of local government implementation activities from each of the three Metro Water District Plans.
Responses to the questionnaire were collected in July and August of 2010 and provided the Metro Water District with significant information about progress at the local level. Local government implementation is critical to the Metro Water District's goal of ensuring adequate supplies of drinking water, protecting water quality and minimizing the impacts of development on watersheds and downstream communities.
The Metro Water District Plans contain a number of local government implementation activities that are scheduled to occur during the planning horizon. This report provides an overview of the level of implementation of those activities, as well as the full responses from each jurisdiction.
2010 Implementation Review / 1
2010 Implementation Review / 2
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District 2010 Plan Implementation Review
II. OVERVIEW OF QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
A. Water Supply and Water Conservation Management Plan Implementation Highlights
The Water Supply and Water Conservation Management Plan includes a framework for water supply facilities and strategies for resource management. There was an 89 percent response rate to the questionnaire from the water suppliers in the Metro Water District. The 51 suppliers who responded serve approximately 98 percent of the Metro Water District's population.
Water Conservation The Metro Water District has led regional efforts to make water conservation a priority. Metro Atlanta is the only major metropolitan area in the country with more than 100 jurisdictions implementing a comprehensive water conservation program that is required and enforced. The Metro Water District surveyed water suppliers during 2010 to assess progress toward implementing the conservation measures identified in the Plan. The 2010 responses from water suppliers regarding water conservation are summarized below.
Summary of Metro Water District's Water Conservation Measures Implementation
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Conservation Pricing*
Toilet Rebate Program
Pre-Rinse Spray Valve
Education
Rain Sensor Shut-offs on
Checklist
Submeter Policy
* As reported in the 2010 Water and Wastewater Rate Survey
AWWA Water Audit
Percent of Population
Percent of Utilities
Leak Detection
Residential Water Audits
Retrofit Kits
Commercial Water Audits
Education
Toilet Rebate Program A total of 35 jurisdictions offer toilet rebates, either through individual programs or through the Metro Water District's regional program. Since the establishment of the programs through November 1, 2010, more than 43,900 old toilets have been replaced at a total cost of $9.2 million.
2010 Implementation Review / 3
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District 2010 Plan Implementation Review
Water Loss The Plan update requires water providers to establish a goal for reducing system water losses, and more than half have already set their water loss goals. Approximately 10,000 leaks were repaired in 2010. Over 30 percent of the utilities serving 73 percent of the population have used the AWWA Free Water Audit Software to assess their systems' water loss. The four most common priority areas that were recommended by the software for water systems to focus their improvement efforts are 1) Unauthorized Consumption, 2) Volume from Own Sources, 3) Billed Metered, and 4) Customer Metering Inaccuracies.
Metro Water District utilities reduce water loss through: procedures among departments for timely reports of standing water and potential leaks; meter calibration or replacement; proactive leak detection programs; prioritizing leak repairs for mains and smaller lines; and maintaining accurate billing records to minimize apparent water loss.
Water Supply Management As part of the 2010 survey of local suppliers, the Metro Water District assessed compliance with the required resource management strategies. Eighty-six percent of the water suppliers in the Metro Water District responded to the water supply portion of the questionnaire and these suppliers serve approximately 92 percent of the Metro Water District's population.
Local water management plans and emergency plans are needed to support proposed infrastructure and improvements. Eighty-one percent of the Metro Water District's population is served by a local jurisdiction that has developed local water supply plans that conform to the Metro Water District Plan. Eighty-five percent of the Metro Water District's population is served by a water supplier that has developed emergency water plans.
Local Water Master Plan (by percent of population)
NO 18.8%
Local Emergency Water Plan (by percent of population)
NO 15.0%
YES 81.2%
YES 85.0%
2010 Implementation Review / 4
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District 2010 Plan Implementation Review
B. Wastewater Management Plan Implementation Highlights
The Metro Water District's Wastewater Management Plan addresses the management and maintenance of 92 publicly owned wastewater treatment plants, 16,000 miles of sanitary sewer line, more than 450,000 manholes and over 500,000 on-site wastewater management (septic) systems in the Metro Water District. These requirements are critical in ensuring that local systems have enough capacity to meet future demands and that wastewater discharges do not damage the health of rivers, streams and lakes in the region. Eighty-five percent of the local jurisdictions in the Metro Water District who provide sanitary sewer service or are responsible for onsite-wastewater planning and management responded to the Plan Implementation Questionnaire.
Wastewater Collection System Inspection and Maintenance All local wastewater providers in the Metro Water District must establish or maintain a wastewater collection system inspection and maintenance program. At a minimum, these programs must include the elements identified in Section 7 of the Wastewater Management Plan. The program outlined in Section 7 is related to elements of a Capacity Management Operations and Maintenance (CMOM) Program. Local government wastewater maintenance programs are summarized in the following chart:
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Implemented Inspection and Maintenance Elements
System Map
System
Rehabilitation
Inspection and Program
Maintenance
Capacity Certification
Grease Management
Overflow Response
Staff Training
Percentage of jurisdictions responding "Yes"
Sources of Wastewater Collection System Spills
In order to provide more information on spills, the survey asked the respondents to identify the most common causes of spills. As illustrated in the following chart, the top three most commonly identified causes of sewer spills were grease, root penetration and structural defects of the system. Other causes of spills as reported by the respondents include: pump station failure, vandalism and third party construction damage. Of the 1069 reported sewer blockages that occurred in 2010, fifteen percent were a result of unknown causes.
2010 Implementation Review / 5
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District 2010 Plan Implementation Review
Identified Sources of System Overflows
Construction Damage, 3%
Vandalism 2%
Unknown 15%
Pump Station Failure, 4%
Structural Defect, 11%
Grease, 47%
Roots, 18%
Grease Roots Structural Defect Pump Station Failure Vandalism Third Party Construction Damage Unknown
Grease Management Practices
The discharge of grease into sewer systems contributes to serious clogging problems and costs the local wastewater providers substantial amounts of time and money in unclogging and cleaning the system. Major grease dischargers typically include industrial facilities, commercial facilities (such as restaurants), multi-family residential units, and schools. The cumulative effects of grease discharges from single-family residential units can also be considerable. As illustrated in the previous chart, grease was the number one identified cause of sewer system blockages and subsequent spills in the Metro Water District in 2010.
Fats, oils, and grease (FOG) management systems can ensure the longevity of sanitary sewer system capacity. The Wastewater Management Plan requires local wastewater providers to develop a grease management program. This program must consist of several minimum elements as provided in Action Item 7.7. Eighty-seven percent of the responding utilities have implemented one or more of the required grease management program elements. The degree to which each element has been implemented is illustrated in the following chart:
Implemented Grease Management Practices
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Grease discharge Enforcement Written prevention Facility inspection Overflow tracking System blockage Inspection and
regulatory authority program authority methods and
program
investigation permitting program
procedures
procedures for grease pumpers
Percentage of jurisdictions responding "Yes"
2010 Implementation Review / 6
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District
2010 Plan Implementation Review
Septic Systems and Decentralized Systems The Wastewater Management Plan provides management recommendations for on-site sewage management systems serving a single-family residence as well as recommendations to better manage the use of larger private decentralized systems that treat wastewater generated by more than one property or residence. The most common on-site sewage management systems within the Metro Water District are septic systems.
Approximately one-fifth of residential wastewater and one-tenth of all wastewater generated in the Metro Water District is treated by septic systems. The percentage of wastewater treated by septic systems is expected to decline as population density increases and more sanitary sewer service is made available.
Decentralized wastewater systems are a viable wastewater treatment option for some communities if the decentralized system is owned and operated by a Responsible Management Entity and incorporated into local wastewater master plans. A private decentralized system is defined as any privately owned wastewater collection, treatment or disposal system serving more than one residential lot or business, or which has a daily flow in excess of 2,000 gallons per day, or which transfers flows between more than one parcel or tract of land.
The Wastewater Management Plan provides for continued emphasis on planning, management and maintenance of on-site wastewater systems through requirements given in Sections 8 and 9. These requirements include: identification of future sewered and unsewered areas; identification of septic system critical areas where their use may not be appropriate; development of a plan for the disposal of septage collected by onsite systems; and adoption of a local ordinance to manage the use of private decentralized wastewater systems. The degree to which each requirement has been implemented is given in the following chart:
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Onsite Wastewater Management
Identification of future sewered and unsewered
areas
Identification of septic system "critical areas"
Plan for septage disposal
Percentage of jurisdictions responding "Yes"
Private decentralized wastewater systems
ordinance
2010 Implementation Review / 7
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District 2010 Plan Implementation Review
C. Watershed Management Plan Implementation Highlights
The Metro Water District's Wastewater Management Plan provides the framework for regional water resources protection in the Metro Water District. The Plan prescribes strategies and recommendations for effective stormwater and watershed management through specific tasks and milestones for local jurisdictions, which are the primary entities responsible for watershed protection and surface water management in Georgia. In 2010, 88 of the 106 local jurisdictions within the Metro Water District responded to the Plan Implementation Questionnaire. Stormwater and Watershed Protection Model Ordinances The Watershed Management Plan requires local jurisdictions to adopt a suite of stormwater and watershed protection ordinances or equivalent regulations to address the impacts of stormwater runoff and human activities on Metro Water District watersheds. The figure below shows the status of ordinance adoption through the middle of 2010.
2010 Implementation Review / 8
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District 2010 Plan Implementation Review
Model Ordinance for Post-Development Stormwater Runoff for New Development and Redevelopment All of the jurisdictions surveyed in 2010 except for one have adopted the Model Ordinance for PostDevelopment Stormwater Runoff for New Development and Redevelopment or equivalent regulations which require all new development and redevelopment project to address their long-term (postconstruction) stormwater quality and quantity impacts. Seventy-eight percent of jurisdictions who responded have already incorporated these requirements into their development review process and have a set of procedures for long-term maintenance of stormwater facilities.
Implementation of Post-Development Stormwater Model Ordinance
77%
13%
9% 1%
Adopted ordinance / Incorporated requirements into review process / Have long-term maintenance procedures Adopted ordinance / Incorporated requirements into review process
Adopted ordinance only
Have not adopted ordinance
Model Floodplain Management / Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance All of the jurisdictions surveyed except for one have adopted the Model Floodplain Management / Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance or equivalent regulations. This ordinance is intended to minimize future flooding impacts and integrate floodplain management with stormwater management during the land development process. Ninety-two percent of jurisdictions who responded have incorporated the new floodplain management provisions into their development review process.
As part of the adoption of the model floodplain ordinances, local jurisdictions are required to delineate the future-conditions hydrology floodplains in their jurisdiction through modeling and mapping. Futureconditions flood studies are based on the best estimates of future land use conditions within a watershed. Local governments are responsible, at a minimum, for delineating future-conditions floodplains for all streams with a drainage area of one-square mile or greater.
Forty-three percent of communities that responded have already completed the mapping of futureconditions floodplains within their jurisdictions, while another 30 percent have partially completed mapping in their city or county. Seven percent of those surveyed currently have a RFP or contract in place for the mapping of future-conditions floodplain, and/or they have completed some preliminary technical work. Twenty percent have not initiated any efforts to map their future-conditions floodplain at the time of the questionnaire.
2010 Implementation Review / 9
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District 2010 Plan Implementation Review
Implementation of Floodplain Management Model Ordinance
92%
7%
1%
Adopted ordinance / Incorporated requirements into review process Adopted ordinance only
Have not adopted ordinance
Future-Conditions Floodplain Mapping
30%
40%
7% 20%
Have completed mapping of future-conditions floodplains (drainage areas of 1 square mile and greater) Partially completed mapping of future-conditions floodplains
Currently have RFP/contract for mapping and/or have completed preliminary technical work
Have not initiated any efforts to map futureconditions floodplains
no response
3%
2010 Implementation Review / 10
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District 2010 Plan Implementation Review
Model Illicit Discharge / Illegal Connection Ordinance All of the jurisdictions surveyed except for one have adopted the Model Illicit Discharge / Illegal Connection Ordinance. This ordinance provides local governments with the legal authority to address illicit (non-stormwater) discharges and illegal permanent connections to the stormwater drainage system to prevent water pollution. Eighty-three percent of jurisdictions who responded also have an active program for identifying and eliminating illicit discharges and illegal connections from their stormwater system.
Implementation of Illict Discharge / Illegal Connection Model Ordinance
83%
16%
1%
Adopted ordinance / Have active program for identifying and eliminating illicit discharges and illegal connections Adopted ordinance only
Have not adopted ordinance
Model Stream Buffer Protection Ordinance All of the jurisdictions surveyed except for one have adopted the Model Stream Buffer Protection Ordinance or alternative stream buffer requirements that are as effective. The Metro Water District's model buffer ordinance provides for an undisturbed 50-foot stream buffer with an additional 25-foot impervious surface setback. Seventeen percent of jurisdictions in the Metro Water District have even more protective stream buffer requirements that exceed the Metro Water District's requirements.
Implementation of Stream Buffer Protection Model Ordinance
81%
17%
1% 1%
Adopted stream buffer requirements consistent with model ordinance (50-ft undisturbed w/ 25-ft setback)
Adopted stream buffer requirements that exceed model ordinance
Adopted alternative stream buffer requirements
Have not adopted stream buffer requirements (other than 25-ft state-mandated buffers)
2010 Implementation Review / 11
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District 2010 Plan Implementation Review
Comprehensive Land Use Planning Coordination One of the new measures from the Watershed Management Plan update adopted in 2009 involves coordination between local staff responsible for stormwater and watershed management and local planning staff. This goal of this activity is to encourage the inclusion of land-use related watershed protection measures and sustainable growth policies into local planning efforts and decisions, as these directly impact watershed health. Eighty-eight percent of jurisdictions that responded have undertaken this coordination in the past year.
Comprehensive Land Use Planning Coordination in the Past Year
88%
10%
2%
Yes No no response
Sanitary Sewer and Septic System Coordination Another new measure from the 2009 update adopted in 2009 involves coordination between local staff responsible for stormwater and watershed management, local wastewater provider(s) and the County Board of Health on sanitary sewer and septic system issues that may impact watershed health and water quality. Of the jurisdictions that responded to the survey this year, 73 percent met this coordination requirement this past year.
Sanitary Sewer and Septic System Coordination in the Past Year
73%
25%
Yes No no response
2%
2010 Implementation Review / 12
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District 2010 Plan Implementation Review
Greenspace and Green Infrastructure Tools for Watershed Protection Under the 2009 Watershed Management Plan Update, local jurisdictions are required to implement one or more development and land use policies or practices which encourage the protection of greenspace and/or the use of green infrastructure with the community. This can include:
The adoption of an ordinance or other local mechanism to preserve open space and greenspace for watershed protection
Development and adoption of a greenspace or green infrastructure plan Development of a sustainable growth plan for the community Evaluation of local codes for green infrastructure practices Locally developed program for protecting watershed health through land use and/or growth
management mechanisms All of the jurisdictions that responded except for five have implemented at least one of the options listed above.
2010 Implementation Review / 13
2010 Implementation Review / 14
2010 Plan Implementation Review lll. FULL QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
2010 Implementation Review / 15
2010 Implementation Review / 16
2010 Plan Implementation Review A. Water Supply and Water Conservation Results
Key to responses: = responded "yes" Blank = responded "no" NA = not applicable or no information available NR = no response No Survey = survey not returned
2010 Implementation Review / 17
2010 Implementation Review / 18
Questions 1 & 2: Plan Action Items 9.1 and 9.2, Local Planning
Does your water system have a current long-range local water master plan? Does your water system have a current local emergency water plan?
Population serve d Long-range local water master plan? Local emergency water plan?
Water System
Bartow County Water Department Adairsville Cartersville Emerson Kingston White
Cherokee County Water and Sewer Authority Ball Ground Canton Waleska Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County Water System
Austell Marietta Power and Water Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County Water and Sewerage Authority Grantville Newnan Utilities Senoia Turin DeKalb County Water and Sewer Douglasville-Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority Villa Rica Fayette County Water System Brooks Fayetteville Forsyth County Water and Sewer Cumming Fulton County Department of Public Works Atlanta Department of Watershed Management College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Mountain Park Palmetto Roswell Union City Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Suwanee Flowery Branch Gainesville Henry County Water and Sewerage Authority Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County Public Works Dallas Hiram Rockdale County Water Resources
70,902 3,419 18,965 1,522 680 729 166,268 1,017 23,073 861 23,865 275,772 574,011 7,058 66,953 15,958 50,712 88,652 2,728 31,587 3,720 424 710,491 124,984 12,905 91,063 632 15,093 168,624 5,896 131,960 745,524 20,562 43,441 11,335 6,772 570 5,157 87,719 17,499 730,234 5,924 12,387 29,837 10,946 16,712 4,115 183,628 150,419 5,355 4,989 19,928 14,679 123,692 10,861 2,102 84,569
No Survey
No Survey
NR
NR
No Survey
No Survey
No Survey
No Survey
2010 Implementation Review / 19
Questions 3-5: Plan Action Item 9.3, Source Water Supply Watershed Protection
Have water supply watersheds and priority issues and areas for watershed protection actions been identified? Has the local government adopted Georgia's Environmental Planning Criteria for water supply watersheds? In the last year, has the water provider coordinated with the local government regarding water supply watershed protection issues and priorities?
Population serve d Identified water supply watersheds? Adopted Environmental Planning Criteria ? Coordination on watershed protection?
Water System
Bartow County Water Department Adairsville Cartersville Emerson Kingston White
Cherokee County Water and Sewer Authority Ball Ground Canton Waleska Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County Water System
Austell Marietta Power and Water Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County Water and Sewerage Authority Grantville Newnan Utilities Senoia Turin DeKalb County Water and Sewer Douglasville-Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority Villa Rica Fayette County Water System Brooks Fayetteville Forsyth County Water and Sewer Cumming Fulton County Department of Public Works Atlanta Department of Watershed Management College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Mountain Park Palmetto Roswell Union City Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Suwanee Flowery Branch Gainesville Henry County Water and Sewerage Authority Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County Public Works Dallas Hiram Rockdale County Water Resources
70,902 3,419 18,965 1,522 680 729 166,268 1,017 23,073 861 23,865 275,772 574,011 7,058 66,953 15,958 50,712 88,652 2,728 31,587 3,720 424 710,491 124,984 12,905 91,063 632 15,093 168,624 5,896 131,960 745,524 20,562 43,441 11,335 6,772 570 5,157 87,719 17,499 730,234 5,924 12,387 29,837 10,946 16,712 4,115 183,628 150,419 5,355 4,989 19,928 14,679 123,692 10,861 2,102 84,569
NA
No Survey
No Survey
NR
NA
NA
NR
NA
NR
NA
No Survey
NR
NA
NR
No Survey
NA
NA
No Survey
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
No Survey
NA
NA
2010 Implementation Review / 20
Questions 6-8: Plan Action Item 9.4, Asset Management
Has a map of the water system's distribution system and assets been developed? Has a written asset management program to inspect, maintain and rehabilitate the water system been developed? If yes and applicable, does the asset program coordinate with the leak detection program?
Population serve d Map of water system ? Written asset management program? Coordinate with leak detection program?
Water System
Bartow County Water Department
70,902
Adairsville
3,419
NA
Cartersville
18,965
NA
Emerson
1,522
Kingston
680
No Survey
White
729
No Survey
Cherokee County Water and Sewer Authority
166,268
Ball Ground
1,017
NA
Canton
23,073
NR
NR
Waleska
861
Woodstock
23,865
NA
Clayton County Water Authority
275,772
Cobb County Water System
574,011
Austell
7,058
Marietta Power and Water
66,953
Powder Springs
15,958
NR
Smyrna
50,712
No Survey
Coweta County Water and Sewerage Authority
88,652
Grantville
2,728
NA
Newnan Utilities
31,587
NR
Senoia
3,720
Turin
424
NA
DeKalb County Water and Sewer
710,491
NA
Douglasville-Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority 124,984
NA
Villa Rica
12,905
Fayette County Water System
91,063
NA
Brooks
632
No Survey
Fayetteville
15,093
NA
Forsyth County Water and Sewer
168,624
NA
Cumming
5,896
Fulton County Department of Public Works
131,960
Atlanta Department of Watershed Management
745,524
College Park
20,562
East Point
43,441
Fairburn
11,335
No Survey
Hapeville
6,772
NA
Mountain Park
570
NA
Palmetto
5,157
NA
Roswell
87,719
Union City
17,499
NA
Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources
730,234
Braselton
5,924
NA
Buford
12,387
NA
Lawrenceville
29,837
NA
Norcross
10,946
Suwanee
16,712
Flowery Branch
4,115
Gainesville
183,628
Henry County Water and Sewerage Authority
150,419
Hampton
5,355
NA
Locust Grove
4,989
NR
McDonough
19,928
Stockbridge
14,679
No Survey
Paulding County Public Works
123,692
NR
Dallas
10,861
NA
Hiram
2,102
Rockdale County Water Resources
84,569
2010 Implementation Review / 21
Questions 9-11: Overall Water Use
What is your average single-family per-account monthly winter use? Do you have a separate billing category for multi-family accounts? If so, how are your multi-family accounts defined?
Population serve d Average
single family winter use Separate billing for multifamily? How are multi-family accounts defined?
Water System
Bartow County Water Department
70,902
4,868 gallons
As commercial accounts.
Adairsville Cartersville Emerson
3,419
5,000
NA
Sec. 24-61. - Meters required; rates. No water shall be furnished to any premises except through meters
18,965
5,146 gallons
and shall be charged at the established rates. Each premise or separate business must have a separate
water meter. When a building is subdivided, a separate water meter must be provided for each unit.
1,522
4,595 gallons
Kingston
680
No Survey
White
729
No Survey
Cherokee County Water and Sewer Authority
166,268 4,410 gallons
If one meter serves multiple outlets (i.e. apartment complex) the account is considered multifamily.
Ball Ground
1,017
3,718
Canton
23,073
NR
NR
Waleska
861
7,900 gallons
NA
Woodstock Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County Water System
23,865
4,153
275,772
4.43 k
Apartments, duplexes, or anything other than one distinct residential unit. Mobile home parks are classified separately.
574,011 5,300 gallons
Austell
7,058
9,428
Marietta Power and Water
66,953
4,240
Two or more residential units that are not individually metered.
Powder Springs
15,958
NA
NA
Smyrna
50,712
No Survey
Coweta County Water and Sewerage Authority
88,652
4,589
Grantville
2,728
NA
Newnan Utilities
31,587
NA
NA
We do not have multifamily accounts.
Senoia
3,720
3,400 gallons
NA
Turin
424
NA
NA
DeKalb County Water and Sewer
710,491
NA
By master meter account application.
Douglasville-Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority
124,984
4,436
We use a class code of "A" for multi-family accounts (apartments)
Villa Rica
12,905
2,700
Duplexes, apartments, townhomes or non single family homes
Fayette County Water System
91,063
6,621
Apartments
Brooks
632
No Survey
Fayetteville
15,093
4,608
NA
Forsyth County Water and Sewer
168,624 4,600 gallons
Multi: apartments and townhomes; Private: privately maintained serving more than 1 house or unit
Cumming
5,896
200 gpd
Fulton County Department of Public Works
131,960 9,823 gallons
NA
Atlanta Department of Watershed Management
745,524 3,842 gallons
Residential structures with more than one dwelling unit.
College Park
20,562
NA
5 or more dwelling served by one master meter.
East Point
43,441
1,550
RM - Residential Multi-Unit
Fairburn
11,335
No Survey
Hapeville
6,772
4,300 gallons
NA
Mountain Park
570
NA
NA
Palmetto
5,157
4,405 gallons
NA
Roswell
87,719
8,597 gallons
They are identified as large commercial with special tiered rate structure.
Union City
17,499
6,000 gallons
NA
Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources
730,234
5,300 gpd
We define them as a single meter feeding more than one residence.
Braselton
5,924
4,465 gallons
NA
NR
Buford
12,387
4,000 gallons
Specific Rate Code
Lawrenceville
29,837
NA
NA
Norcross
10,946
2,190 gallons
NA
Suwanee
16,712
4,000 gallons
No separate billing category (only one, 8-unit multifamily facility on the water system).
Flowery Branch
4,115
3,581 gallons
Gainesville
183,628 4,353 gallons
Residential that contains more than 2 units.
Henry County Water and Sewerage Authority
150,419
4,800
Multifamily
Hampton
5,355
5,700 gallons
Locust Grove
4,989
7,110
McDonough
19,928
3,881
By apartment complexes
Stockbridge
14,679
No Survey
Paulding County Public Works
123,692 4,351 gallons
Dallas
10,861
3,708
Apartments
Hiram
2,102
NA
Rockdale County Water Resources
84,569
NA
2010 Implementation Review / 22
Question 12: Reuse Projects
Please describe any water reuse projects in 1-2 paragraphs for each project.
Population serve d
Water System
Emerson Cherokee County Water and Sewer Authority
Ball Ground
Clayton County Water Authority
Cobb County Water System Austell
Coweta County WSA DeKalb County Water and Sewer
Douglasville-Douglas County WSA
Villa Rica Forsyth County Water and Sewer Fulton County Dept. of Public Works
Atlanta Department of Watershed Management
Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources
Braselton Flowery Branch Hampton Locust Grove Paulding County Public Works Rockdale County Water Resources
1,522 166,268
1,017
275,772
574,011 7,058 88,652
710,491
124,984
12,905 168,624 131,960
745,524
730,234 5,924 4,115 5,355 4,989
123,692 84,569
Comments
Currently the City utilizes a water reuse system for the Henry Jordan Wastewater Treatment Facility. This process consists of water being pumped from the chlorine contact chamber back through the plant to reused for operations. The plant has separate potable water system. CCWSA Rose Creek WPCP reuse quality effluent is provided to the Towne Lake Hills Golf Course for their irrigation needs. Other reuse customers could be served with permission from EPD and providing that it is found to be economically feasible to make reuse water available.
The City of Ball Ground does not have a wastewater treatment plant, so reuse is not feasible at current time. The Clayton County Water Authority currently practices indirect potable reuse at two water reclamation facilities, W.B. Casey and Shoal Creek, which discharges high quality effluent into constructed treatment wetlands for natural treatment prior to discharge into CCWA drinking water supply watersheds. The W.B. Casey WRF facility provides advanced secondary level treatment for 24 MGD, of which 9.3 MGD of this treated effluent is currently pumped to the E.L. Huie Jr. constructed treatment wetlands. The Huie wetland discharges to the Pates Creek watershed containing both the Shamrock and Blalock reservoirs. CCWA is currently under construction of an additional 8.2 MGD of wetland cells will bring the total treatment capacity to 17.5 MGD. The Shoal Creek WRF provides advanced secondary treatment with UV disinfection to 4.4 MGD with an average of 1.7 MGD of treated effluent being pumped to the Panhandle constructed treatment wetlands. The Panhandle wetland discharges to the Shoal Creek watershed containing both the Shoal Creek and J.W. Smith reservoirs.
We provide reuse water to the Cobblestone Golf Course and the Acworth Sports Complex for maintenance of their landscapes. The reuse comes from The Northwest WRF.
Rainwater is captured for re-use when water plants in our local parks. We also have an old cistern that allows us to pull water from, too.
Piedmont Hospital is currently under construction & will be utilizing reuse water for irrigation and cooling towers from our treatment facility. The line (purple pipe) has already been installed to the facility.
Recently completed water reuse feasibility study resulting in several alternatives and phased approaches with cost estimates for each. (Magnason order is a driver in which alternative/phase we may have to implement.) The Authority has for years been using high quality reuse/recycled water at our waste water treatment facilities for the following: 1.Aeration system blower sealing water 2.Belt filter press wash water 3.Carrying water for dechlorination feed system 4.Chlorinator injector water 5.Fine Screen spray water 6.Washing down plant components 7.Foam control on clarifiers
High quality reuse/recycle water was also used during the construction of a new wastewater treatment plant (plant came on line September 2008) for testing the following new plant structures/treatment components: 1. Filling a new six million gallon equalization tank 2.Aeration basins with a capacity of nine million gallons 3.Secondary clarifiers 4.Tertiary clarifiers 5.Tertiary filters 6.Ultraviolet disinfection systems 7.Post aeration chamber and pump station
The Authority was also able to receive permission from the Georgia Environmental Protection Division to use high quality reuse/recycle water for dust control at the new wastewater treatment plant while the facility was under construction and for landscape irrigation purposes.
A large water-consuming customer connected to the Authority's water system during 2007 while the Authority was being severely impacted by the drought. The majority of the customer's water consumption was being used for cooling tower make-up water. Given the drought's impact on the Authority's water supply reservoir and the cost of potable water, the customer and the Authority developed a cooperative agreement to construct a tertiary treatment facility to treat a side-stream of effluent at the Authority's existing 3.0 mgd Sweetwater Creek WPCP and pump the re-treated wastewater effluent to the customer for exclusive use as cooling tower make-up water.
Villa Rica does not currently have any reuse water projects but when our new WWRF goes on line in early 2011 we will have reuse water available.
A new County park (Fowler Park) is under construction and will be completed soon. The park will be entirely irrigated by reuse water from Fowler WRF. The park is adjacent to the Fowler WRF.
Fulton County has an active reuse program. The County provides up to 5 MGD of reuse quality water from it's Cauley Creek Plant which provides irrigation water to golf courses, large irrigation users and a few residential properties. Additionally, Fulton County now has up to 17 MGD of reuse quality water available from the Johns Creek Environmental Campus. However, no distribution system yet exists from this facility.
Trees Atlanta Partnership
City of Atlanta has partnered with the non-profit organization, Trees Atlanta, to recycle and reuse water that is routinely flushed from fire hydrants (water quality program) in order to maintain trees on public properties throughout the city. Utilizing 750 1,500 gallon tanks, Trees Atlanta captures 7,000 Gallons a day. Operating in this manner 3 days a week over the past two Years (2008-2009) we have saved 2.1 million gallons of water.
OWE nominated Trees Atlanta for a grant from the Georgia Water Wise Council. They received $2,000 which helped purchase additional water storage tanks and equipment used in the capture and re-use process.
Reuse line to Lake Lanier -- reclaimed water returned to Lake Lanier. About 30 mgd now.
Allowable projects considered for reclaimed water reuse are: Golf Courses, sports Arenas/Complexes, parks, commercial Facilities, schools LEED Buildings, and other consumptive uses that must have water (cooling towers).
Currently these use reclaimed water: Bears Best Golf Course, Bunten Road Park, Environmental Heritage Center, F. Wayne Hill Water Resources Center, Pickneyville Park, The River Club Golf Course, McGinnis Ferry Crossing Mixed Use Development, Mall of Georgia irrigation, Gwinnett Braves Stadium irrigation and toilet flushing, truck loading facility at Hill Plant.
Limited industrial/residential reuse system for irrigation put on-line in 2010.
The City currently has a land applied spray field for the reuse water. The City's building code requires projects to install a separate water supply system for irrigation that will be attached to a pressurized reuse water system in the future.
New WPCP for the City of Hampton - Has a plant water reuse system, which on average has saved the City approx. 75,000 gallons per month.
We are currently evaluating using treated effluent to use as wash water for the belt press at Indian Creek WPCP.
We are presently in the construction phase of a reuse booster pump station and reuse transmission main in the service area of out Pumkinvine WRF. The transmission main will be used to supply reuse water for irrigation to residential area in the Cedarcrest Rd area within the Pumpkinvine basin. At final build out the transmission main could supply reuse water to many as 7000 residential costumers. The reuse booster pump station is located within the Pumpkinvine WRF.
Water reuse is in place at Quigg Branch WWTP.
2010 Implementation Review / 23
Questions 13 & 14: Plan Action Item 5.1, Conservation Pricing
Does your water system have a conservation pricing rate structure? Do your water bills provide customers with their current water use on the bills in gallons? Does your water bill provide customers with their historical water use on each bill?
Population serve d Conservation pricing * Current water use in gallons? Historical water use?
Water System
Bartow County Water Department
68,338
Adairsville
3,205
Cartersville
18,553
Emerson
1,372
Kingston
663
White
703
Cherokee County Water and Sewer Authority
158,134
Ball Ground
931
Canton
21,464
Waleska
856
Woodstock
22,965
Clayton County Water Authority
270,454
Cobb County Water System
553,151
Austell
6,984
Marietta Power and Water
67,021
Powder Springs
15,380
Smyrna
49,534
Coweta County Water and Sewerage Authority
83,341
Grantville
2,608
Newnan Utilities
28,857
Senoia
3,244
Turin
395
DeKalb County Water and Sewer
699,777
Douglasville-Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority 122,601
Villa Rica
12,375
Fayette County Water System
90,359
Brooks
659
Fayetteville
15,126
Forsyth County Water and Sewer
153,072
Cumming
5,842
Fulton County Department of Public Works
124,330
Atlanta Department of Watershed Management
717,902
College Park
20,113
East Point
42,940
Fairburn
10,786
Hapeville
5,971
Mountain Park
560
Palmetto
5,035
Roswell
87,312
Union City
16,771
Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources
707,676
Braselton
3,072
Buford
11,532
Lawrenceville
28,969
Norcross
10,490
Suwanee
14,878
Flowery Branch
3,966
Gainesville
175,569
Henry County Water and Sewerage Authority
143,754
Hampton
5,206
Locust Grove
4,511
McDonough
18,443
Stockbridge
14,123
Paulding County Public Works
115,873
Dallas
10,045
Hiram
1,988
Rockdale County Water Resources
82,052
* Based on the 2010 Water and Wastewater Rates Survey
No Survey
No Survey
NR
NR
No Survey
No Survey
No Survey
No Survey
2010 Implementation Review / 24
Questions 15 & 16: Plan Action Item 5.2, Replacing Older, Inefficient Toilets
Does your water system have a program to replace older, inefficient toilets? If yes, please indicate how your water system replaces older, inefficient toilets.
Population serve d
Toilet rebate program? Metro Water District rebate program Local rebate program We require retrofit on reconnect or resal e Offer toilet distribution or direct instal l Other
Water System
Bartow County Water Department
70,902
Adairsville Cartersville Emerson Kingston
3,419
18,965
1,522
680
White Cherokee County Water and Sewer Authority
Ball Ground Canton
729
166,268
1,017
23,073
NR
Waleska Woodstock Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County Water System Austell Marietta Power and Water Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County Water and Sewerage Authority Grantville
861
23,865
275,772
574,011
7,058
66,953
15,958
50,712
88,652
2,728
Newnan Utilities
31,587
Senoia
3,720
Turin
424
NR
DeKalb County Water and Sewer
710,491
Douglasville-Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority 124,984
Villa Rica
12,905
Fayette County Water System
91,063
Brooks
632
Fayetteville
15,093
Forsyth County Water and Sewer
168,624
Cumming
5,896
Fulton County Department of Public Works
131,960
Atlanta Department of Watershed Management
745,524
College Park
20,562
East Point
43,441
Fairburn
11,335
Hapeville
6,772
Mountain Park
570
Palmetto
5,157
Roswell
87,719
Union City
17,499
Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources
730,234
Braselton
5,924
Buford
12,387
Lawrenceville
29,837
Norcross
10,946
Suwanee
16,712
Flowery Branch
4,115
Gainesville Henry County Water and Sewerage Authority
Hampton
183,628
150,419
5,355
NR
Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County Public Works Dallas Hiram
4,989
19,928
14,679
123,692
10,861
2,102
Rockdale County Water Resources
84,569
No Survey No Survey
No Survey 70% of our homes were built after 1994
No Survey
Install toilets for low income customers through Care & Conserve Program
No Survey
2010 Implementation Review / 25
Questions 17-20: Plan Action Item 5.2, Replacing Older, Inefficient Toilets
How many total toilets have you rebated since your program began? How many of those toilets rebated are WaterSense (1.28 gallons per flush) toilets? How many of those toilets rebated are 1.6 gallons per flush toilets? What is the total funding spent (rebate + staff + administrative)?
Population serve d
How many toilets rebated? How many ar e WaterSense? How many are 1.6 gal/flush? Total funding spent to date
Water System
Bartow County Water Department Adairsville Cartersville Emerson Kingston White
Cherokee County Water and Sewer Authority Ball Ground Canton Waleska Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County Water System
Austell Marietta Power and Water Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County Water and Sewerage Authority Grantville Newnan Utilities Senoia Turin DeKalb County Water and Sewer Douglasville-Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority Villa Rica Fayette County Water System Brooks Fayetteville Forsyth County Water and Sewer Cumming Fulton County Department of Public Works Atlanta Department of Watershed Management College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Mountain Park Palmetto Roswell Union City Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Suwanee Flowery Branch Gainesville Henry County Water and Sewerage Authority Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County Public Works Dallas Hiram Rockdale County Water Resources
70,902 3,419 18,965 1,522 680 729 166,268 1,017 23,073 861 23,865 275,772 574,011 7,058 66,953 15,958 50,712 88,652 2,728 31,587 3,720 424 710,491 124,984 12,905 91,063 632 15,093 168,624 5,896 131,960 745,524 20,562 43,441 11,335 6,772 570 5,157 87,719 17,499 730,234 5,924 12,387 29,837 10,946 16,712 4,115 183,628 150,419 5,355 4,989 19,928 14,679 123,692 10,861 2,102 84,569
NA 7 18
931 17
23 1,266 11,097
19 1,166
32
113
NA 12,816
950
1,239
47 154
5 1,939 8,701
5 103 20 13
1
276 NA 6,589 0 8 45 10 0
1,014 313
3
237 1
NA
NA
7
0
NA
NA
No Survey
No Survey
463
468
14
3
11
12
793
473
4,782
6,315
12
7
477
639
19
13
No Survey
64
49
NA 7,837 816
NA 4,979 134
731
508
No Survey
28
19
88
66
4
1
885
1,054
3,413
5,288
5
0
70
33
16
4
8
5
0
1
113 NA 3,986 0 5 33 6 0
163 NA 2,603 0 3 12 4 0
NA
NA
176
137
2
1
No Survey
NA
NA
1
0
2010 Implementation Review / 26
NA $388.40
$900
$79,010 $3,600
$1,930 $115,610 $834,679
$1,550 $81,524 $2,870
$9,980
NA $1,028,354
$90,500
$110,890
$4,220 $13,640
$550 $160,590 $593,260
$550 $9,680 $2,000 $1,180
$50
$22,210 NA
$594,620 $0
$700 $3,900 $500
$0
$60,000 $27,580
$280
$11,850 $110
Questions 21-24: Plan Action Item 5.3, Pre-Rinse Spray Valve Retrofit Education
Does your water system distribute Metro Water District's pre-rinse spray valve educational brochure to restaurants and other food service establishments? How many active food service establishments do you have? How many food service establishments have you provided pre-rinse spray valve education to? How many total low-flow 1.6 gallons per minute pre-rinse spray valves have been installed at your food service establishments?
Water System
Bartow County Water Department Adairsville Cartersville Emerson Kingston White
Cherokee County Water and Sewer Authority
Ball Ground Canton Waleska Woodstock Clayton County Water Authority
Cobb County Water System
Austell Marietta Power and Water Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County Water and Sewerage Authority Grantville Newnan Utilities Senoia Turin DeKalb County Water and Sewer Douglasville-Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority Villa Rica Fayette County Water System Brooks Fayetteville Forsyth County Water and Sewer Cumming Fulton County Department of Public Works
Atlanta Department of Watershed Management
College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Mountain Park Palmetto Roswell Union City Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources
Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Suwanee Flowery Branch Gainesville Henry County Water and Sewerage Authority Hampton
Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County (unincorporated) Dallas Hiram Rockdale County Water Resources
Population served
70,902 3,419 18,965 1,522 680 729 166,268
1,017 23,073
861 23,865 275,772
574,011
7,058 66,953 15,958 50,712 88,652 2,728 31,587 3,720
424 710,491 124,984 12,905 91,063
632 15,093 168,624 5,896 131,960
745,524
20,562 43,441 11,335 6,772
570 5,157 87,719 17,499 730,234
5,924 12,387 29,837 10,946 16,712 4,115 183,628 150,419 5,355 4,989 19,928 14,679 123,692 10,861 2,102 84,569
Distribute pre-rinse spray valve brochures?
NR
How many active food
service establishments?
NA 20 NA 1
225
2 NR 2 102 835
NA
16 266 29
30 10 200 14 NA 2,250 274 60 73
69 240 80+ 4,000
1,998
45 67
67 0 11 NA 42 1,783
51 103 NA 26
0 5 295 NA 7 25 NA
197 26 50 NA
How many received pre-rinse spray valve education?
150 NA 35 1 No Survey No Survey
35
0
NR NA 50 835 All of them it is a part of our FOG Program. Also included in new restaurant info packets. 16 All 29 No Survey
30
0 90%
5 NA NA 274 NA NA No Survey 69 150 80+ 800
1,998
45 25 No Survey NA 0 0 750 0
1,783 0 - Plan to implement this program
this fiscal year. NA NA 26
N/A - No food service establishments on the water system. 5
150
NA NA Available to all. Brochures available outside water department. 0 No Survey 138 NA Approximately 20% each year. NR
How many low-flow pre-rinse spray valves installed?
NA NA NA 1
Tracking this information has begun, no information to report at this time.
0 - Both are small restaurants that wash dishes by hand. NR NA NA NA
NA
NA NA NA
All. Every restaurant was inspected and they all have the 1.6 gpm rinse valves. NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NR
NA NA NA NA We did a pilot distribution (free) of 35 spray valves. Most restaurants that we contacted had already installed 1.6 gpm spray valves. NA NA
0 0 NA NA NA We gave them the valves but do not know if they use them. 0
NA NA NA No food service establishments are on the water system. NA Study performed with 10 restaurants to determine effectiveness. NA NA
NA
Do not track
NA NA NA NA
2010 Implementation Review / 27
Question 25: Plan Action Item 5.4, Rain Sensor Shut-off Switches on New Irrigation Systems
Does your local jurisdiction's building inspection checklist include rain sensor shut-off switches on new irrigation systems?
Population serve d
Rain sensor shut-off switches?
Water System
Bartow County Water Department Adairsville Cartersville Emerson Kingston White
Cherokee County Water and Sewer Authority Ball Ground Canton Waleska Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County Water System
Austell Marietta Power and Water Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County Water and Sewerage Authority Grantville Newnan Utilities Senoia Turin DeKalb County Water and Sewer Douglasville-Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority Villa Rica Fayette County Water System Brooks Fayetteville Forsyth County Water and Sewer Cumming Fulton County Department of Public Works Atlanta Department of Watershed Management College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Mountain Park Palmetto Roswell Union City Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Suwanee Flowery Branch Gainesville Henry County Water and Sewerage Authority Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County Public Works Dallas Hiram Rockdale County Water Resources
70,902 3,419 18,965 1,522 680 729 166,268 1,017 23,073 861 23,865 275,772 574,011 7,058 66,953 15,958 50,712 88,652 2,728 31,587 3,720 424 710,491 124,984 12,905 91,063 632 15,093 168,624 5,896 131,960 745,524 20,562 43,441 11,335 6,772 570 5,157 87,719 17,499 730,234 5,924 12,387 29,837 10,946 16,712 4,115 183,628 150,419 5,355 4,989 19,928 14,679 123,692 10,861 2,102 84,569
No Survey No Survey
NR
No Survey
No Survey
No Survey
No Survey
2010 Implementation Review / 28
Questions 26 & 27: Plan Action Item 5.5, Require Sub-meters in New Multi-Family Buildings
How does your water system require new multi-family buildings to sub-meter? How many new multi-family buildings have been built in your jurisdiction in the last 12 months and how many are sub-metered?
Population serve d Local
ordinance Water system policy
New MF not required to sub-meter No multi-
famil y zoning
Water System
Bartow County Water Department
70,902
Adairsville
3,419
Cartersville
18,965
Emerson
1,522
Kingston
680
White
729
Cherokee County Water and Sewer Authority
166,268
Ball Ground
1,017
Canton
23,073
Waleska
861
Woodstock
23,865
Clayton County Water Authority
275,772
Cobb County Water System
574,011
Austell
7,058
Marietta Power and Water
66,953
Powder Springs
15,958
Smyrna
50,712
Coweta County Water and Sewerage Authority
88,652
Grantville
2,728
Newnan Utilities
31,587
Senoia
3,720
Turin
424
DeKalb County Water and Sewer
710,491
Douglasville-Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority 124,984
Villa Rica
12,905
Fayette County Water System
91,063
Brooks
632
Fayetteville
15,093
Forsyth County Water and Sewer
168,624
Cumming
5,896
Fulton County Department of Public Works
131,960
Atlanta Department of Watershed Management
745,524
College Park
20,562
East Point
43,441
Fairburn
11,335
Hapeville
6,772
Mountain Park
570
Palmetto
5,157
Roswell
87,719
Union City
17,499
Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources
730,234
Braselton
5,924
Buford
12,387
Lawrenceville
29,837
Norcross
10,946
Suwanee
16,712
Flowery Branch
4,115
Gainesville
183,628
Henry County Water and Sewerage Authority
150,419
Hampton
5,355
Locust Grove
4,989
McDonough
19,928
Stockbridge
14,679
Paulding County Public Works
123,692
Dallas
10,861
Hiram
2,102
Rockdale County Water Resources
84,569
No Survey No Survey
No Survey
No Survey
No Survey
No Survey
Number of MF buildings built in last
12 months
Number that are sub-metered
0
NR
0
8
0
NA
0
0
9
9
0
NA
NR
NR
NA
NA
0
0
0
Not many
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
0
0
NA
None built
0
0
0
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NA
NA
NA
NA
1
NA
0
0
0
0
0
NA
NA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
None
None
0
NA
NA
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
None
0
0
2010 Implementation Review / 29
Questions 28-31: Plan Action Item 5.6, Assess and Reduce Water System Leakage
Has your water system completed a water audit using the AWWA water audit software? If yes, what were the three priority areas for attention recommended by the software? What is your water system's water loss reduction goal(s)?
Population serve d
Water System
Bartow County Water Department Adairsville Cartersville Emerson Kingston White
Cherokee County Water and Sewer Authority Ball Ground Canton Waleska Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority
Cobb County Water System Austell Marietta Power and Water Powder Springs Smyrna
Coweta County Water and Sewerage Authority Grantville Newnan Utilities Senoia Turin
DeKalb County Water and Sewer Douglasville-Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority
Villa Rica Fayette County Water System
Brooks Fayetteville
Forsyth County Water and Sewer Cumming
Fulton County Department of Public Works
Atlanta Department of Watershed Management College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Mountain Park Palmetto Roswell Union City Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Suwanee
Flowery Branch
Gainesville Henry County Water and Sewerage Authority
Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County Public Works Dallas Hiram Rockdale County Water Resources
70,902 3,419 18,965 1,522 680 729 166,268 1,017 23,073 861 23,865
275,772
574,011 7,058 66,953 15,958 50,712 88,652 2,728 31,587 3,720 424
710,491 124,984
12,905 91,063
632 15,093
168,624 5,896
131,960
745,524 20,562 43,441 11,335 6,772
570 5,157 87,719 17,499 730,234 5,924 12,387 29,837 10,946 16,712
4,115
183,628 150,419
5,355 4,989 19,928 14,679 123,692 10,861 2,102 84,569
AWWA Water Audit?
Three priority areas identified
Water loss reduction goal
<15%
1: Volume from own sources 2: Billed Metered 3: Water Exported
Limit losses to 10% or less Maintain an (ILI) of <= 5.0
25%
No Survey
No Survey
1: Water Imported 2: Water Exported 3: Unauthorized Consumption
<10% lost/unaccounted for water
NR
NR
NR
To be under 10% each and every month. Sometimes we are as low as 7%
NA
1: Unauthorized consumption 2: Customer retail unit costs 3: System data handling errors
Continue with comprehensive Leak Detection Program, meter replacement and expand
permanent Leak Detection Device Deployment.
1: Water imported 2: Unauthorized consumption 3: Systematic data handling errors
Below 10% real water loss
NA
1: Unauthorized consumption 2: Total annual cost of operating water system 3: Customer metering inaccuracies
Maintain non revenue water below 10%
8%
No Survey
1: Unauthorized consumption 2: Variable production cost 3: Master meter error adjustment
10%
NR
Currently less than 10% water lost
NA
1: Volume from own sources 2: Billed metered 3: Customer metering inaccuracies
NA NA NA
10% or less
Less than 10%
No Survey
< 10%
1: Volume from own sources 2: Unauthorized consumption 3: Total annual cost of operating water system
Eliminate all unaccounted for water loss.
10%
1: Customer retail unit cost (applied to Apparent Losses) 2: Billed metered 3: Unauthorized consumption
The system has consistently been below the industry standard of 10%. The goal of the system is to continue to reduce the
unaccounted figure to the minimum possible.
1: Volume from own sources 2: Billed metered 3: Total annual cost of operating water system
In the process of developing that goal.
15%
10% or less
No Survey
1: Systematic Data Handling Errors 2: Customer Metering Inaccuracies 3: Customer Unit Retail Cost (Apparent Losses)
1: Volume from own sources 2: Unbilled Metered 3: Unauthorized Consumption
NA NA NA To get below 10% real water losses NA 10% NA
NA
Less than 10%
NA
Software doesn't compute ILI for system our size (~342 connections)
NA
1: Billed metered 2: Volume from own sources 3: Customer metering inaccuracies
Reduce lost water quantities below 15% yearly average
Attached
To locate and repair 20 leaks and recover 17.5 million gallons
NR
NA
Less than 10%
Less than 10%
< 15%
No Survey
1: Water imported 2: Unauthorized consumption 3: Master meter error adjustment
< 10% NA NA
<15%
2010 Implementation Review / 30
Questions 32-34: Plan Action Item 5.6, Assess and Reduce Water System Leakage
Does your water system have an ongoing leak detection and repair program? If yes, how many leaks have been detected and repaired in the last year or 12 month period? If each of them leaked for 24 hours what is the total loss avoided in gallons per minute?
Population serve d
Water System
Bartow County Water Department Adairsville Cartersville Emerson Kingston White
Cherokee County WSA Ball Ground Canton Waleska Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County Water System
Austell Marietta Power and Water Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County WSA Grantville Newnan Utilities Senoia Turin DeKalb County Water and Sewer
Douglasville-Douglas County WSA
Villa Rica Fayette County Water System
Brooks Fayetteville Forsyth County Water and Sewer
Cumming
Fulton County Dept. Public Works Atlanta Dept. Watershed Management College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Mountain Park Palmetto Roswell Union City
Gwinnett County Dept. of Water Resources
Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Suwanee Flowery Branch Gainesville Henry County WSA Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County Public Works Dallas Hiram Rockdale County Water Resources
Leak detection & repair program?
How many leaks detected & repaired?
Total loss avoided in gallons per minute?
70,902 3,419 18,965 1,522 680 729 166,268 1,017 23,073 861 23,865 275,772 574,011 7,058 66,953 15,958 50,712 88,652 2,728 31,587 3,720 424 710,491
124,984 12,905 91,063
632 15,093 168,624
5,896
131,960
745,524
20,562 43,441 11,335 6,772
570 5,157 87,719 17,499
730,234
5,924 12,387 29,837 10,946 16,712 4,115 183,628 150,419 5,355 4,989 19,928 14,679 123,692 10,861 2,102 84,569
Approximately 350
NA
NA
NR
878
73
NR
NR
NA NA NA NA No Survey No Survey NA NA NR
144
69 (July 2009-June 2010)
See spreadsheet
Main leak (about 15); small service leaks (about 100)
208
NA 340 Gallons Per Minute See spreadsheet NA NA
No Survey
41
NR
NR
About 25
At least 15
NA
Unknown since they are not tracked that way
55 service line leaks, 19 meter leaks, 21 main line leaks
Unknown
NR
No Survey
541 (56 mains; 485 service line repairs)
NR
418
8186 NR NA NA NA
125 gpm for service line leaks, 26 gpm for meter leaks, and 57 gpm for main line leaks NA NR
NA NA The question is too vague and cumbersome to calculate. NA
Do not yet have 12 months of data
NA
15
NA
340
3.07 gpm
No Survey
24
NA
12
138,000
NA
NA
92 service line repairs and 22 main breaks.
102
NA
Water main breaks = 178 water main cut by others = 54 water
main leaks = 340 service line leaks 2170 meter leak county side = 395 customer side = 418 fire hydrant repair = 868
NA
estimate 15% leaking
NA
NA
NA
NA
In excess of 300 leaks detected and repaired
NA
Information not complete
Information unavailable at this time.
12 leaks
45
Program will begin September 2010
74
90
No Survey
1,583
12
Four or five in the last twelve months.
NA NA 1,198,880 gallons 70 NR NA 270,000
NA NA NA
2010 Implementation Review / 31
Question 35: Plan Action Item 5.6, Assess and Reduce Water System Leakage
Please identify how your water system reduces leaks. Please check all that apply.
Population served Leak detection equipment and software On-going meter calibration and/or replacement program Current water distribution model System pressure management Work with other departments to inform utility of standing water and leaks Established a strategy for prioritizing leak repairs that include mains & small lines Address leaks or inefficiencies in the water treatment plant Maintain asset management tracking program Maintain accurate billing system records through staff communication
Other (please specify)
Water System
Bartow County Water Department Adairsville Cartersville Emerson Kingston White
Cherokee County WSA Ball Ground Canton Waleska Woodstock
70,902
3,419
18,965
1,522
680
729
166,268
1,017
23,073
861
23,865
No Survey No Survey
Clayton County Water Authority
275,772
Cobb County Water System Austell Marietta Power and Water Powder Springs Smyrna
Coweta County WSA Grantville Newnan Utilities Senoia Turin
DeKalb County Water and Sewer Douglasville-Douglas County WSA
Villa Rica Fayette County Water System
Brooks Fayetteville Forsyth County Water and Sewer Cumming Fulton County Dept. Public Works Atlanta Dept. Watershed Management College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Mountain Park Palmetto Roswell Union City Gwinnett County Dept. of Water Resources Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Suwanee Flowery Branch Gainesville Henry County WSA Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County Public Works Dallas Hiram Rockdale County Water Resources
574,011
7,058
66,953
15,958
50,712
88,652
2,728
31,587
3,720
424
710,491
124,984
12,905
91,063
632
15,093
168,624
5,896
131,960
745,524
20,562
43,441
11,335
6,772
570
5,157
87,719
17,499
730,234
5,924
12,387
29,837
10,946
16,712
4,115
183,628
150,419
5,355
4,989
19,928
14,679
123,692
10,861
2,102
84,569
No Survey
No Survey
No Survey
No Survey
Leak detection equipment, replaced water meters
Currently implementing an Automatic Meter Reading (AMR)
program. All residential meters are being replaced with AMR's
that have an added benefit to help detect possible leaks on
the customer side of the water service. Currently there have
been 32,702 OF 47,030 meters replaced.
Investigate meter read exception reports for high or low reads
GIS program being developed Water audit of fire lines has resulted in many repaired leaks
Residents' reports
We respond to citizen service requests.
2010 Implementation Review / 32
Questions 36 & 37: Plan Action Item 5.7, Conduct Residential Water Audits
Does your water system provide residential water audits or make the "Do-It Yourself Household Water Assessment" available to customers? How many water audits have been conducted and / or how many "Do-It Yourself Household Water Assessment" have been provided to customers?
Water System
Bartow County Water Department Adairsville Cartersville Emerson Kingston White
Cherokee County WSA
Ball Ground Canton Waleska Woodstock
70,902 3,419 18,965 1,522 680 729
166,268
1,017 23,073
861 23,865
Clayton County Water Authority
275,772
Cobb County Water System Austell Marietta Power and Water Powder Springs Smyrna
Coweta County WSA Grantville Newnan Utilities Senoia Turin
DeKalb County Water and Sewer Douglasville-Douglas County WSA
Villa Rica
Fayette County Water System
Brooks Fayetteville Forsyth County Water and Sewer
Cumming
Fulton County Dept. of Public Works Atlanta Dept. Watershed Management College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Mountain Park Palmetto Roswell Union City
Gwinnett County Dept. of Water Resources Braselton
Buford
Lawrenceville Norcross Suwanee Flowery Branch Gainesville Henry County WSA Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County Public Works Dallas Hiram Rockdale County Water Resources
574,011 7,058 66,953 15,958 50,712 88,652 2,728 31,587 3,720 424
710,491 124,984 12,905
91,063
632 15,093 168,624
5,896
131,960 745,524 20,562 43,441 11,335
6,772 570 5,157 87,719 17,499 730,234 5,924
12,387
29,837 10,946 16,712 4,115 183,628 150,419 5,355 4,989 19,928 14,679 123,692 10,861 2,102 84,569
Population serve d
Residential water audits
or do-it yourself water audit?
NR
How many water audits have been conducted and/or how many "Do-It-Yourself Household Water Assessment" made
available to customers?
5000+ Do-It Yourself Assessments NA NA NA
No Survey No Survey The information is on our website and available in public places, it would be difficult to be accurate. 2 NR 1,500 Pamphlets are distributed at events (around 50 this year). The "Do-It Yourself Water Assessment" is available on the CCWA website and field personnel has handed out the information to customers. Total number is not known. 26,000 No audits have been requested. NA NA No Survey 2,500
NA
NA NA Approximately 40,600 NA Literature provided to residents at Water System office and Earth Day function and upon request.
No Survey NA NA Available on line continuously. Stock has been reduced by about 50 over the past year. 1200 water audits NA NA NA
No Survey NA NA NA One residential audit conducted and over 500 brochures distributed. NA NA NA Do it yourself information is available on city's website, therefore the number conducted is not known. Audit forms are available at City hall or upon request. NA Provided via a link on our web page. Over 500 58 15,000 NA 7 0
No Survey 200 NA The City has distributed approximately 15 brochures in the last 12 months. NA
2010 Implementation Review / 33
Questions 38-40: Plan Action Item 5.8, Distribute Low-Flow Retrofit Kits to Residential Users
Does your water system distribute low-flow retrofit kits? How many total low-flow retrofit kits have been distributed since your program began? What are the contents of the kits distributed? Please check all that apply.
Contents of kits
Population serve d
Distribute LowFlow Retrofit Kits ? Total kits distributed since program began? Showerheads Kitchen aerators Faucet aerators Toilet leak detection dye tabs Flow meter bag information not available
Other
Water System
Bartow County Water Department Adairsville Cartersville Emerson Kingston White
Cherokee County WSA Ball Ground Canton Waleska Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County Water System
Austell Marietta Power and Water Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County WSA Grantville Newnan Utilities Senoia Turin DeKalb County Water and Sewer
Douglasville-Douglas County WSA
Villa Rica Fayette County Water System
Brooks Fayetteville Forsyth County Water and Sewer Cumming
Fulton County Dept. of Public Works
Atlanta Dept. of Watershed Management College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Mountain Park Palmetto Roswell Union City
Gwinnett County Dept. of Water Resources
Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Suwanee Flowery Branch
Gainesville
Henry County WSA Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge
Paulding County Public Works Dallas
Hiram
Rockdale County Water Resources
70,902 3,419 18,965 1,522 680 729 166,268 1,017 23,073 861 23,865 275,772 574,011 7,058 66,953 15,958 50,712 88,652 2,728 31,587 3,720 424 710,491
124,984
12,905 91,063
632 15,093 168,624 5,896
131,960
745,524 20,562 43,441 11,335 6,772
570 5,157 87,719 17,499
730,234
5,924 12,387 29,837 10,946 16,712 4,115
183,628
150,419 5,355 4,989 19,928 14,679
123,692 10,861
2,102
84,569
600+
NA
150
100
No Survey
No Survey
50
170
NA
0
11,500
7,000
NR
82
556
Toilet displacement device, diverter clip
No Survey
500
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA - Program began in 1987
Flow Restrictor
NA
682
No Survey
NA
NA
Not supplied
NA
200 full and ~300 partial kits
Shower timers
5,000
NA
NA
NA
No Survey
3
10
NA
1,500
0
NA
2009=18, 2010 to date=100
Rain gage
NA
Brochure
59
25
3
NA
12
120 through the
Plumbing Retrofit
program
1,500
NA
NA
No Survey
534
NA
~100 (1/3 of total customers)
2010 Implementation Review / 34
Questions 41-44: Plan Action Item 5.9, Conduct Commercial Water Audits
Does your water system provide commercial water audits? How many active commercial accounts do you have? How many commercial accounts have you marketed the program to? How many total commercial water audits have you conducted?
Population serve d
Commercial Water
Audits ?
Water System
Bartow County Water Department Adairsville Cartersville Emerson Kingston White
Cherokee County WSA Ball Ground Canton Waleska Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority
Cobb County Water System
Austell Marietta Power and Water Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County WSA Grantville Newnan Utilities Senoia Turin DeKalb County Water and Sewer Douglasville-Douglas County WSA Villa Rica Fayette County Water System Brooks Fayetteville Forsyth County Water and Sewer Cumming Fulton County Dept. of Public Works Atlanta Dept. of Watershed Management College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Mountain Park Palmetto Roswell Union City Gwinnett County Dept. of Water Resources Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross
Suwanee
Flowery Branch Gainesville Henry County WSA Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County Public Works Dallas Hiram Rockdale County Water Resources
70,902 3,419 18,965 1,522 680 729 166,268 1,017 23,073 861 23,865 275,772
574,011
7,058 66,953 15,958 50,712 88,652 2,728 31,587 3,720
424 710,491 124,984 12,905 91,063
632 15,093 168,624 5,896 131,960 745,524 20,562 43,441 11,335 6,772
570 5,157 87,719 17,499 730,234 5,924 12,387 29,837 10,946
16,712
4,115 183,628 150,419
5,355 4,989 19,928 14,679 123,692 10,861 2,102 84,569
How many active
commercial accounts?
How many commercial accounts have you How many total commercial
marketed the program to?
water audits conducted?
250+
NA
NA
250+
NA
NA
1,799
NR
1 - Trial audit on City Hall
33
5
0
No survey
No survey
1,358
NA
NA
23
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
465
NA
0
5,377
6,030
450
NA All of them
NA
NA
10 - mostly schools excluding the County Government Buildings
No audits have been requested.
2,379
Not actively marketed
NA
NA
NA
NA
No survey
614
15
15
NR
NR
NR
~1,700
NR
NR
~100
0
0
NA
NA
NA
6,789
None
None
2,207
NA
NA
734
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
No survey
677
677
4
3,000
NA
349
1,250
0
89
~2,528
All account holders via mailer and website
NA
12,500
NA
NA
481
NA
NA
1,090
NA
NA
No survey
258
NA
NA
0
0
0
149
NA
NA
1,200
Each year we market this to our top 25 highest users.
3
NR
NA
NA
11,300
0
0
280
0
0
620
NA
NA
1,000
NA
0
279
0
0
We do not have
a commercial
NA
NA
account class
58
58
0
3,450
All via internet and local government channel
0
1,300
NA
2
52
None
None
124
3
1
272
NA
NA
No survey
1,143
138
0
166
NA
NA
~5
None
None
NA
NA
NA
2010 Implementation Review / 35
Question 45: Plan Action Item 5.9, Conduct Commercial Water Audits
Please describe any successes, case studies or unique projects that you would like to share on implementation of commercial water audits.
Population serve d
Water System
Cobb County Water System
Forsyth County Water and Sewer
Fulton County Dept. of Public Works
Atlanta Department of Watershed Management
Roswell Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources
574,011 168,624
131,960 745,524 87,719 730,234
Comments
We did audit and retrofit most of the county buildings.
FC conducted an audit of all fire lines that show regular usage. Working 1 on 1 with commercial owners to identify & repair leaks, FC has reduced the number of fire lines with regular usage from 145 to 69. Specific examples:
Forsyth County Schools: An audit of the fire lines on 18 schools identified leaks, check valve deficiencies, and at least one instance where an irrigation system was being fed (un-metered and un-billed) through a fire line. The leaks were repaired resulting in significant water savings.
Dick's Creek WRF: A leak was detected on the domestic line at this WRF. Prior to the repair the average monthly use was over 200,000 gallons; after the repair monthly average is now 2,000 gallons.
C.W. Matthews: Fire line usage of 93,588 gallons per month has been reduced to -0-.
Cousins Properties: Fire line usage of 10,213 gallons per month has been reduced to 150 gallons.
CVS Pharmacy: Fire line usage of 14,225 gallons per month has been reduced to -0-.
A unique project that we worked on was a landscape project that was conducted at the Fulton County North Annex. With the new water wise landscape that will be installed in the fall of 2010 we also conducted an irrigation audit on our existing system that was over 15 years old. With the audit we found that the system had several inefficacies. The old system was using approximately 192,000gpm. These numbers, are assuming that the irrigation system was running 15 times per month. The new design and incorporating drip irrigation and MP Rotator Heads/Nozzles, the new system will use approximately 89,100gpm. This is based on the system running15 times per month. This results in a reduction of 102,900 Gallons per month, or 54% less per month.
In 2006, the City of Atlanta partnered with P2AD on water assessments of city facilities (COA Correction Facility) and several of Atlanta's largest users;
Department of Watershed Management staff received commercial water audit training from P2AD in 2007;
Atlanta contracted with an engineering firm to provide free water audits to large water users of the Atlanta system. Assessments were preformed on Atlanta Public Schools (a typical elementary, middle & high school) in 2008;
Staff of the Office of Water Efficiency conducted water audits in 2009 focusing on six large, older multi-family complexes. This continues to be the focus of our water audit program and will be performed in conjunction with the implementation of the multi-family toilet rebate program.
Under 1 audit of a nursing home facility we were able to identify a leak that was causing high consumption. The customer made repairs to the leak and replaced old toilet fixtures and aerators with low flow fixtures which help to drastically reduce their water bill.
We also audited a child development center which had abnormally high water usage. We were able to identify several ways for this customer to use water more efficiently and they were able to reduce their consumption by almost 50%.
Gwinnett does not perform commercial water audits due to limited resources. However, we offer commercial water audit workshops to our high use customers to promote water conservation annually at the Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources Central Office. Additionally, we encourage our customers to develop water efficiency programs through our website where a Tracking Water Use Form, Water Efficiency Guide, Water Conservation Guide for Commercial and Industrial Users and Industrial Water Fact Sheet are available.
2010 Implementation Review / 36
Questions 46 & 47: Plan Action Item 5.10, Implement Education and Public Awareness Plan
Does your jurisdiction and/or water system have a water conservation education and public awareness program? Does your jurisdiction and/or water system conduct water conservation education at schools? If so please indicate which levels are addressed:
Water System
Bartow County Water Department Adairsville Cartersville Emerson Kingston White
Cherokee County Water and Sewer Authority Ball Ground Canton Waleska Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County Water System
Austell Marietta Power and Water Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County Water and Sewerage Authority Grantville Newnan Utilities Senoia Turin DeKalb County Water and Sewer Douglasville-Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority Villa Rica Fayette County Water System Brooks Fayetteville Forsyth County Water and Sewer Cumming Fulton County Department of Public Works Atlanta Department of Watershed Management College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Mountain Park Palmetto Roswell Union City Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Suwanee Flowery Branch Gainesville Henry County Water and Sewerage Authority Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County Public Works Dallas Hiram Rockdale County Water Resources
Population serve d
70,902 3,419 18,965 1,522 680 729 166,268 1,017 23,073 861 23,865 275,772 574,011 7,058 66,953 15,958 50,712 88,652 2,728 31,587 3,720 424 710,491 124,984 12,905 91,063 632 15,093 168,624 5,896 131,960 745,524 20,562 43,441 11,335 6,772 570 5,157 87,719 17,499 730,234 5,924 12,387 29,837 10,946 16,712 4,115 183,628 150,419 5,355 4,989 19,928 14,679 123,692 10,861 2,102 84,569
Conservation education and
public awareness program?
NR
Elementary
Middle
No Survey
No Survey
NR
NR
No Survey
No Survey
No Survey
No Survey
High
NR
2010 Implementation Review / 37
Questions 48 & 49: Plan Action Item 5.10, Implement Education and Public Awareness Plan
How many education/outreach activities have you done this year? How many public participation/involvement activities have you done this year?
Population serve d
Water System
Bartow County Water Department Adairsville Cartersville Emerson Kingston White
Cherokee County Water and Sewer Authority Ball Ground Canton Waleska Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority
Cobb County Water System Austell Marietta Power and Water Powder Springs Smyrna
Coweta County Water and Sewerage Authority Grantville Newnan Utilities Senoia Turin
DeKalb County Water and Sewer
Douglasville-Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority Villa Rica
Fayette County Water System Brooks Fayetteville
Forsyth County Water and Sewer Cumming
Fulton County Department of Public Works Atlanta Department of Watershed Management College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Mountain Park Palmetto Roswell Union City
Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Suwanee Flowery Branch Gainesville
Henry County Water and Sewerage Authority Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge
Paulding County Public Works Dallas
Hiram
Rockdale County Water Resources
70,902 3,419 18,965 1,522 680 729 166,268 1,017 23,073 861 23,865
275,772
574,011 7,058 66,953 15,958 50,712 88,652 2,728 31,587 3,720 424
710,491
124,984 12,905 91,063
632 15,093 168,624 5,896 131,960 745,524 20,562 43,441 11,335 6,772
570 5,157 87,719 17,499 730,234 5,924 12,387 29,837 10,946 16,712 4,115 183,628 150,419 5,355 4,989 19,928 14,679 123,692 10,861
2,102
84,569
How many education/ outreach activities?
How many participation/ involvement
activities?
4
4
NA
NA
1
5
0
0
No Survey
No Survey
4
11
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
3
2
** Refer to Appendix A for additional
information submitted
** Refer to Appendix A for additional
information submitted
More than 50
More than 30
1
1
7 events / 1123 contacts 4 events / 330 contacts
0
0
No Survey
4
10
NR
NR
4
1
1
0
NA
4 activities impacting 475 individuals
12
NA
10 activities impacting 992 individuals
5
NA
NA
NR
NR
No Survey
3
NR
100+
19
3
2
6
19
144
333
1
1
3
3
No Survey
5
2
4
NR
2
1
11
19
0
0
4
4
0
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
1
40
45
NR
NR
1 Rivers Alive
NR
None so far
None
4
2
No Survey
3
3
2
At least 10 events in 09/10
3
2
At least 3 events in 09/10
NR
2010 Implementation Review / 38
Question 50: Plan Action Item 5.10, Implement Education and Public Awareness Plan
Please describe all education/outreach activities.
Population serve d
Water System
Bartow County Water Department
Cartersville
Cherokee County Water and Sewer Authority
Waleska Woodstock Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County Water System Austell Marietta Power and Water Coweta County WSA Senoia DeKalb County Water and Sewer Douglasville-Douglas County WSA Fayetteville Forsyth County Water and Sewer Cumming
Fulton County Dept. of Public Works
Atlanta Department of Watershed Management
East Point Hapeville Mountain Park
70,902
18,965
166,268
861 23,865 275,772 574,011 7,058 66,953 88,652 3,720 710,491 124,984 15,093 168,624 5,896 131,960
745,524
43,441 6,772 570
Comments
Brochures At Public Facilities Speakers Bureau Website Conservation Information Environmental Management System Programs School Classroom Education Retrofit Kit Distribution Essay Contest Technical Training EMS Program for Public Participation
Education / Outreach: Local Government Expo: This event is held annually during Georgia Cities Week (middle of April). Each department of the City and County government spends a half day available to the public to discuss the service they provide and address customer/citizen issues. The Water Department has participated each year. We provide educational material (conservation, backflow, grease trap, etc), lessons on how to read a meter and address any water or sewer related issues.
Public Participation / Involvement - Tours: Home-school group 9/4/2009: Emily Green and a group of roughly 55 kids ranging from 5-10 years of age and 28 adults toured at 10am. 3rd graders from Mission Road Elementary 10/22/2009:Carrie Mullinax: Plant tour / 2 groups / one at 9:00 and the next at 10:15am. Each group will have about 50 kids (3rd graders).
Employers committee 4/13/2010: We hosted Bartow Employer's Committee at Water Treatment Plant. Approximately 25 adult business leaders. We provided lunch and toured the WTP facility.
Cherokee County Water and Sewerage Authority (CCWSA) meet the requirements for education and outreach activities and public participation and involvement activity for June 2009 - May 2010 through numerous efforts. CCWSA has the "Do it yourself Household Water Assessment" brochures available at the main office and online to all our customers. Water conservation is always mentioned in the Water Quality Report that goes out to all customers and is available on-line. We support the toilet rebate program through our web site. Additionally a press release went out to support the students who won the art contest drawing pictures that embraced the water conservation/water quality theme. We had one water treatment facility tour by a high school group in March. CCWSA partners with the Upper Etowah River Alliance (UERA) on household water conservation workshops. We purchased $500 in rain barrel parts and sink aerators to use in conjunction with the supplies purchased by UERA. At the rain barrel workshops the participants make the rain barrels and receive the literature on indoor and outdoor water conservation along with a sink aerator. The rain garden has been established for seven years and is our ongoing best management practice demonstration that helps keep excess storm water out of the Etowah River. We sponsored a drawing contest for all 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th grade students in Cherokee County. The students had a draw a picture that embraced water quality/conservation. We picked a winner from each grade and gave them $25 and a t-shirts with their drawing on it. We printed up 150 T-shirts for distribution throughout the county at events. Supporting the Cherokee County Science and Engineering Fair is a newer addition to our education program. In January we gave out $500 in savings bonds to students that excelled in the science and engineering field. Career Day is an important part of our education program because we get to speak to so many students. We spoke to approximately 740 students from six different schools about working in the watershed and water conservation.
Brochures and pamphlets are available.
The City's Environmental Manager conducted two activities at area libraries educating the participants about the importance of clean water and water conservation. The Environmental Manager publishes articles in the Towne Hall News quarterly. This newsletter is distributed in the water bills to all water customers. The City's Environmental Manager held a curb drain marking event and a River's Alive Clean up event.
** Refer to Appendix A for additional information submitted
There are too many. Entire staff is Project WET Certified we conducted water festivals at several schools, we do classroom programs. We speak at civic groups, garden clubs, professional organizations, etc. We have held conservation education events, attended green fairs at colleges and senior centers. Participated in County festivals. ** Refer to Appendix A for additional information submitted
Provided information on water conservation practices and distributed 25 low-flow retrofit kits. In addition, we publicize the toilet rebate program on our website.
Conservation Kit Coordination & Delivery- 158 units Earth Day Girl Scout Expo 100 scouts Cool Waters Teachers Workshop- 30 teachers (3 days) Career Day @ Dunleith Elementary- 500 students Water 101- Fire Dept Recruits- 20 students Children's Water Festival- 300 students GAWP Fall Conference H2Opportunity- 40 attendees Water Use & Conservation for 1st graders- 105 students SPSU Career Fair- 200 students
The Coweta County Water Education team sponsors a water conservation workshop one a year for the 4th grade teachers.
Brochures available in city hall and 1 day in the local elementary school.
** Refer to Appendix A for additional information submitted
** Refer to Appendix A for additional information submitted
We have agreement with the Local Extension Service in that we provide them with materials for the classes they teach through their outreach program.
Forsyth County conducts education and outreach primarily through the Keep Forsyth County Beautiful organization, a Department of the Forsyth County government. Activities include:
Adopt-A-Stream workshops, Enviroscape watershed/run-off demonstrations, Healthy Water - Healthy People curriculum presentations, Rain-Barrel workshops.
Bill-Stuffers / Brochures at City Hall / Promote Toilet Rebate Program / Website / Water Treatment Facility Tours / School Classroom Education We have participated in: Green Plumbers 2009 Leadership Academy Burdett Stream Planting 2009 Career Days 2009 and 2010 4th NACO event at the Mills Senior Center Water Wise Landscaping and a Rain Barrel Demo Water Conservation Talk with Garden Club at Atlanta Fulton County Water Resource Commission U Fix It Workshop at Mills Senior Center 2009 Autrey Mill Water Day (Chattahochee Nature Center, Whole Foods Store, Fulton Green Day and Federal Reserve) Children's Water Festival 2009, 2010 Best Management Practices for Municipal Workers (landscaping) (2010) Tours at Johns Creek Environmental Campus and Atlanta Fulton County Water Resource Commission Library and summer camp programs (2009, 2010) 2010 Fix A Leak Week (set up several tables with literature, dye tabs, audits) Continued participation in the Toilet Rebate Program with $100,000.00 in 2010 Town Hall Day on "Being Water Smart" Fulton County Public Works Website has water conservation information and resources
EPA Fix A Leak Week activities (toilet leak repair demonstrations) WaterSmart Workshops Club H2O (school program utilizing Project WET materials) Be Water Wise Atlanta (school program in partnership with the National Environmental Education Foundation) Rain Barrel Workshops Care & Conserve Program National Drinking Water Week activities Earth Day (month) activities Watershed Ambassadors (attending Neighborhood Planning Unit mtgs) Trees Atlanta partnership AMPS (Atlanta Mentorship Program for Sustainability) community-based water efficiency retrofit program in conjunction with Atlanta Workforce Development Agency Water Saver Kit distribution events WaterSense Partnership Town Hall Mtgs Sales Tax holiday/WaterSense promotion Workshops & demonstrations at Senior Centers Health Fairs Youth/Camp activities Bill Inserts (12 monthly inserts w/ variety of conservation messages) Videos (purchased DVDs as well as created several in-house) Brochures (some purchased, some created in-house)
1) Water Festival 2) Town Hall Expo 3) Water Resources Workshop
The City provides occasional bill stuffers and newsletters, brochures at municipal facilities, website with water conservation information, historical water use on water bills, and promotes the toilet rebate program. The City has conducted retrofit kit distribution and technical training to target audiences.
We provide a quarterly water conservation tip on the newsletter that accompanies our utility bills.
2010 Implementation Review / 39
Question 50: Plan Action Item 5.10, Implement Education and Public Awareness Plan
Please describe all education/outreach activities.
Palmetto
Roswell
Union City
Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources
Buford
Suwanee Flowery Branch Gainesville Henry County WSA McDonough Paulding County Public Works Dallas Hiram
5,157
87,719
17,499
730,234
12,387
16,712 4,115 183,628 150,419 19,928 123,692 10,861 2,102
Brochures - The City maintains brochures at City Hall from the Clean Water Campaign such as "Household Solutions for Preventing Water Pollution from Hazardous Wastes" and Do It Yourself Household Water Assessment", and the District's "Pre-Rinse Spray Valve Brochure.
Website - The City maintains useful links on its website to P2AD, the Clean Water Campaign, and Georgia DNR.
Retrofit Kit - The City distributes Low-Flow Retrofit Kits containing the District's recommended contents.
July 2009: Earth Balloon at STAR House Simple Solutions Garden
August 2009: Habitat for Humanity Greening Your Home Simple Solutions Pets Adopt-A-Stream Workshop (2)
September 2009: Roswell North PTA Green Committee Simple Solutions Holidays EverGreen School Meeting Rivers Alive Festival and Cleanup Drippy Dropperson Coloring Book Launch Adopt-A-Stream Workshop
October 2009: Drippy Dropperson Coloring Book Contest Earth Balloon at Chattahoochee Nature Center
November 2009: Drippy Dropperson Coloring Book Contest EverGreen Schools Meeting
December 2009: Simple Solutions- Green Cleaning Drippy Dropperson Coloring Book Contest
** Refer to Appendix A for additional information submitted
The City provides occasional bill stuffers and newsletters, brochures at municipal facilities, website with water conservation information, historical water use on water bills, and promotes the toilet rebate program. The City has conducted retrofit kit distribution and technical training to target audiences.
In 2009 Gwinnett County education and outreach activities have included distribution of bill stuffers to over 250,000 customers, placement of brochures and water conservation display at county offices, updating county website with water education information and participation in a water conservation and reused TV program of Gwinnett TV.
In 2009 Gwinnett County participation/involvement activities have included many tours of the F. Wayne Hill Water Resources Center and the Lanier and Shoal Creek Water Treatment Plants. We had Clean Water Family Day at the Shoal Creek Treatment Plant. Participation in EPD Fix a Leak Week, classroom education held at the Gwinnett County Environmental and Heritage Center adn visits to over 100 Gwinnett County schools and providing education at teacher workshops, PTA meetings, and classroom presentation through Gwinnett Clean and Beautiful.
Bill Stuffers - The City includes educational material from the Clean Water Campaign with utility bills at least once each quarter.
Brochures - The City maintains brochures at City Hall from the Clean Water Campaign such as "Household Solutions for Preventing Water Pollution from Hazardous Wastes" and "Do It yourself Household Water Assessment", and the District's "Pre-Rinse Spray Valve Brochure".
Website - The City maintains useful links on it's website to P2AD, the Clean Water Campaign, and Georgia DNR, as well as educational links to websites tailored to students and teachers.
Toilet Rebate Program - The City implemented a Toilet Rebate Program in February of 2009. This program was deemed ineffective due to lack of public interest and was discontinued in December of 2009.
Retrofit Kit - The City distributes Low-Flow Retrofit Kits containing the District's recommended contents.
Brochures at municipal facilities WebSite with water conservation information Water System Rate Study/Revision and Revised Water Policies Meetings Public participation at two City Public Informational Meetings and one Public Hearing portion of one City Council Meeting to set new water rates and implement new policies for the water system.
Education programs are presented thru Elachee Nature Center programs and thru class room visits if requested. The Better Hometown Society held a stream walk and clean-up day during the Fall.
The City also distributes water conservation education material at City Hall, the Wastewater Treatment Plant and to owners/operators of businesses during business inspections and on other occasions.
From school presentations, adopt-a-stream participation, Captain Conservation deputizing "conservation crusaders", water assessments and workshops, Gainesville has many forms of outreach and public involvement.
Fix-a-Leak activity at Lowes of McDonough Open House at Tussahaw Reservoir Cubihatcha Kids Outdoor Education Day
We send out fliers, pamphlets at City Hall, Open houses, and web site
Paulding staff attended a local farmer's market to give out water saver kits Paulding staff in conjunction with the county extension agent put on an annual Natural Resource Festival at a local elementary school County extension agent organized a river clean up in October.
The City partners with Keep Paulding Beautiful to host educational and cleanup events such as recycling, water conservation, Illicit Discharge throughout the year as well as a River's Alive Stream cleanup.
Hiram partners with Keep Paulding Beautiful (KPB) to host numerous educational and cleanup events throughout the year. Recycling and water conservation programs were held at several area elementary and high schools, Chattahoochee Tech, Sams Club, Cub Scouts, Taylor Farm, West Cobb Mothers Club, the Villa's Retirement Community, etc. in 2008, 2009 and in 2010. An Adopt-a-Stream Program was initiated in 2008 and continues today. The Mayor and City Council participate in an annual Water Resources (water, waste and stormwater) Management Program review at a regular scheduled meeting at which citizens and local businesses owners may pose questions and receive assistance on specific issues. Additional education and public participation/involvement activities are planned for the remainder of 2010.
2010 Implementation Review / 40
Questions 51 & 52: Other Conservation Measures
Are you implementing any other water conservation measures or programs in your jurisdiction? If yes, please describe.
Population serve d
Additional conservation measures?
Please describe any additional water conservation measures you are implementing
Water System
Adairsville
Cartersville
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County Water System Marietta Power and Water Powder Springs
Coweta County WSA
Newnan Utilities DeKalb County Water and Sewer Villa Rica Forsyth County Water and Sewer
3,419 18,965 275,772 574,011 66,953 15,958
88,652
31,587 710,491 12,905
168,624
Fulton County Dept. of Public Works
131,960
Atlanta Department of Watershed Management
Mountain Park
745,524 570
Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources
730,234
Flowery Branch Gainesville Paulding County Public Works Dallas Hiram
4,115 183,628 123,692 10,861
2,102
We have "use water wisely" brochures in lobby
Conservation rates: Tier 1 = base ($1.20) Tier 2 = base + 214% ($2.57) Tier 3 = base + 388% ($4.66) Tier 4 = base + 542% ($6.50).
Tier 1 = 0-10 CCF, Tier 2 = 11-14 CCF, Tier 3 = 15-19 CCF, Tier 4 = 20+ CCF. Has easily been the most effective conservation
measure taken.
** Refer to Appendix A for additional information submitted
We have an irrigation education program "Give them an Inch...Grow a Yard, Fix a Leak Week Program. We distribute outdoor kits and at home irrigation system audits.
Conservation information provided to customers through web site, bill stuffers and newsletters.
Three Tier Water Usage Rate Structure implemented by City
Coweta County Water & Sewerage Authority has teamed up with local industries as well as Stormwater Management
Department, the Extension Office and the Coweta County School System to form the Coweta County Water Education Team.
Together we promote water education with the public.
Reviewing rates
Annual art contest for elementary students of which the winners art is turned in to a calendar and distributed to the community after Board of Commissioner recognition.
Monthly water saving tips on water bills.
FCDWS has an ongoing audit of all commercial sewer. The Forsyth County school system has a strong water conservation
program. FCDWS sends a letter to the top residential water consumers on a quarterly basis, requesting that those customers
examine their water use and encouraging them to adopt conservation measures.
We have offered several rain barrel workshops throughout the year. To date, over 500 rain barrels have been distributed. When
we offer our workshops we always cover conservation inside the home and outside the home and also current rules and restrictions that effect our customers. The workshop is kept very inexpensive so that it is available to everyone and we always
use barrels as giveaways.
Multi-family toilet rebate - Fall 2010 implementation pending. Atlanta's large concentration (108,402 units) of 1993 apartment
dwellings will soon be able to take advantage of the toilet rebate program. Atlanta will provide a $100 rebate for each
WaterSense toilet replaced; recycling of the old toilets will be required as a part of the program.
We are implementing a system-wide wi-fi enabled remote meter reading and shutoff system. It will enable residents to see their usage in 4 hr increments and allow for automatic communication to residents of suspected leaks and remote shutoff if necessary.
Gwinnett has taken a variety of steps to find additional ways to conserve its water resources, from its rates to special studies to
find leaks in the system to implementing LEED Certification. The County's conservation measures include: Conservation Pricing,
Non-revenue water reduction, Leak Detection, Requirement of sub-unit meters in new multi-family buildings, Promoting of residential water audits, Distribution of low-flow retrofit kits to residential users, Promoting of commercial water audits,
Implementation of a Public Education and Awareness Plan, Reclaimed Water Program, Project Saving Water Saving Money and
LEED Certification for County facilities.
Outdoor watering restrictions that meet state restrictions.
Conservation Rate billing system.
Under drought conditions, the City mandates that all customers adhere to the state's water restrictions.
Under drought conditions, the City mandates that all customers adhere to the state's water restrictions.
2010 Implementation Review / 41
Question 53: Other Conservation Measures
Please describe any successes, case studies and unique projects that you would like to share on implementation of any water conservation measures.
Population serve d
Water System
Clayton County Water Authority Coweta County Water and Sewerage Authority
Forsyth County Water and Sewer
Atlanta Department of Watershed Management
Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources
275,772 88,652 168,624
745,524 730,234
Comments
** Refer to Appendix A for additional information submitted
The Coweta County Water Education team has implemented water conservation into the 4th grade curriculum.
The Coweta County Water Education team sponsors a field trip to the Water Plant for all 4th grade classes at the school which conserved the most water throughout the year.
FCDWS has conducted a sewer capacity audit of all commercial accounts that are served by sanitary sewer. Through leak repairs and other conservation measures, many accounts have been able to reduce their water consumption to get below their sewer capacity allotment.
All Forsyth County school rest rooms have been converted to water-less urinals; all new schools are built with water-less urinals. Also, the school system has tied five school campuses onto the reuse system; the reuse water is used for landscape irrigation. Additionally, the five County high schools each have artificial turf on their football fields, eliminating the need for irrigation altogether on those fields.
Care & Conserve Program - assisting Atlanta's low-income citizens with leak repairs, low-flow fixture retrofits, line replacements and payment assistance since 1994 - a separate attachment describes this program.
Be Water Wise Atlanta - an environmental education program in Atlanta Public Schools implemented in conjunction with the National Environmental Education Foundation and multiple other partners, focuses on water conservation activities - a separate attachment describes this program.
** Refer to Appendix A for additional information submitted
Constructed treatment and recycling of backwash water at water treatment plants.
Leak Detection Survey
Greater Gwinnett Environmental Sustainability Program which states all new large county buildings will be LEED Certified.
Reclaimed water program has 10 customers. Gwinnett Braves stadium saves about 100 million gallons of potable water per season.
2010 Implementation Review / 42
2010 Plan Implementation Review B. Wastewater Results
Key to responses: = responded "yes" Blank = responded "no" NA = not applicable or no information available NR = no response
2010 Implementation Review / 43
2010 Implementation Review / 44
Questions 1 & 2: Plan Action Item 7.1, Sewer System Inventory and Mapping
Does your jurisdiction have a map of the entire sewer system? If yes, which of the following best describes your sewer system map?
Jurisdiction
Bartow County (unincorporated) Adairsville Cartersville Emerson White
Cherokee County WSA Ball Ground Canton Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County (unincorporated)
Austell Marietta Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County (unincorporated) Grantville Newnan Senoia Sharpsburg DeKalb County (unincorporated) Douglasville-Douglas County WSA Villa Rica Fayette County (unincorporated) Fayetteville Peachtree City Brooks Tyrone Forsyth County (unincorporated) Cumming Fulton County (unincorporated) Atlanta Chattahoochee Hills College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Johns Creek
Have sewer system map?
Paper
GIS
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Digital
Mountain Park Palmetto Sandy Springs Union City Gwinnett County (unincorporated) Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Hall County (unincorporated) Flowery Branch Gainesville Lula Oakwood Henry County WSA Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County (unincorporated) Braswell Dallas Rockdale County (unincorporated)
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
2010 Implementation Review / 45
Questions 3 & 4: Plan Action Items 7.3 and 7.4, Sewer System Inspection and Maintenance Program
Does your jurisdiction have a sewer system inspection and maintenance program? Please identify which program elements have been implemented under your sewer system inspection and maintenance program. Check all that apply.
Inspection and Maintenance
Program Schedules and procedures for preventive and
routine maintenance Inspection of sewers and manholes Inspection of sewer right-ofways and stream crossings Inspection of stream banks adjacent to sewers and force mains Periodic cleaning of sewers and associated appurtenances
Jurisdiction
Bartow County (unincorporated)
Adairsville
Cartersville
Emerson
White
Survey not returned
Cherokee County WSA
Ball Ground
Survey not returned
Canton
Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority
Cobb County (unincorporated)
Austell
Marietta
Powder Springs
Smyrna
Survey not returned
Coweta County (unincorporated)
Grantville Newnan Senoia
Sharpsburg
DeKalb County (unincorporated)
Douglasville-Douglas County WSA
Villa Rica
Fayette County (unincorporated)
Fayetteville
Peachtree City
Brooks
Survey not returned
Tyrone
Forsyth County (unincorporated)
Cumming
Fulton County (unincorporated)
Atlanta
Chattahoochee Hills College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Johns Creek Mountain Park Palmetto
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Sandy Springs
Union City
Gwinnett County (unincorporated)
Braselton
Buford
Lawrenceville
Survey not returned
Norcross
Hall County (unincorporated)
Flowery Branch
Gainesville
Lula
Oakwood
Henry County WSA
Hampton
Locust Grove
McDonough
Stockbridge
Survey not returned
Paulding County (unincorporated)
Braswell
Survey not returned
Dallas
Rockdale County (unincorporated)
2010 Implementation Review / 46
Question 5: Plan Action Item 7.5, Sewer System Rehabilitation Program
Does your jurisdiction have a sewer system rehabilitation program?
Jurisdiction
Bartow County (unincorporated) Adairsville Cartersville Emerson White
Cherokee County WSA Ball Ground Canton Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County (unincorporated)
Austell Marietta Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County (unincorporated) Grantville Newnan Senoia Sharpsburg DeKalb County (unincorporated) Douglasville-Douglas County WSA Villa Rica Fayette County (unincorporated) Fayetteville Peachtree City Brooks Tyrone Forsyth County (unincorporated) Cumming Fulton County (unincorporated) Atlanta Chattahoochee Hills College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Johns Creek Mountain Park Palmetto Sandy Springs Union City Gwinnett County (unincorporated) Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Hall County (unincorporated) Flowery Branch Gainesville Lula Oakwood Henry County WSA Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County (unincorporated) Braswell Dallas Rockdale County (unincorporated)
Yes
No
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
2010 Implementation Review / 47
Question 6: Plan Action Item 7.6, Capacity Certification Program
Does your jurisdiction have a wastewater collection and treatment capacity certification program?
Jurisdiction
Bartow County (unincorporated) Adairsville Cartersville Emerson White
Cherokee County WSA Ball Ground Canton Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County (unincorporated)
Austell Marietta Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County (unincorporated) Grantville Newnan Senoia Sharpsburg DeKalb County (unincorporated) Douglasville-Douglas County WSA Villa Rica Fayette County (unincorporated) Fayetteville Peachtree City Brooks Tyrone Forsyth County (unincorporated) Cumming Fulton County (unincorporated) Atlanta Chattahoochee Hills College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Johns Creek Mountain Park Palmetto Sandy Springs Union City Gwinnett County (unincorporated) Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Hall County (unincorporated) Flowery Branch Gainesville Lula Oakwood Henry County WSA Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County (unincorporated) Braswell Dallas Rockdale County (unincorporated)
Yes
No
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
2010 Implementation Review / 48
Questions 7 & 8: Plan Action Item 7.7, Grease Management Program
Does your jurisdiction have a grease management program? Please identify which practices have been implemented as part of your grease management program. Check all that apply.
Legal authority regulating discharge of grease from industrial and commercial facilities Legal authority for enforcement program Written methods and procedures preventing/controlling discharges of grease from industrial and commercial facilities Inspection program to ensure routine inspections of grease trap s Tracking of sewer system blockages and overflows associated with grease Process to investigate and identify sources causing blockages in sewer system Inspection and permitting program for trucks used in pumping of grease traps or contract with a private vendor for inspection services
Grease management
program
Jurisdiction
Bartow County (unincorporated) Adairsville Cartersville Emerson White
Cherokee County WSA Ball Ground Canton Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County (unincorporated)
Austell Marietta Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County (unincorporated) Grantville Newnan Senoia Sharpsburg DeKalb County (unincorporated) Douglasville-Douglas County WSA Villa Rica Fayette County (unincorporated) Fayetteville Peachtree City Brooks Tyrone Forsyth County (unincorporated) Cumming Fulton County (unincorporated) Atlanta Chattahoochee Hills College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Johns Creek Mountain Park Palmetto Sandy Springs Union City Gwinnett County (unincorporated) Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Hall County (unincorporated) Flowery Branch Gainesville Lula Oakwood Henry County WSA Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County (unincorporated) Braswell Dallas Rockdale County (unincorporated)
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
2010 Implementation Review / 49
Question 9: Plan Action Item 7.8, Sewer System Overflows
Over the past year, how many sewer spills have you identified that occurred due to grease blockages, tree roots/vegetation encroachment, vandalism, third party construction damage or other causes?
Grease blockages Tree roots /vegetation encroachment Vandalism Third party construction damage Structural Defect Pump Station Failure Unknown
Jurisdiction
Bartow County (unincorporated) Adairsville Cartersville Emerson White
Cherokee County WSA Ball Ground Canton Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County (unincorporated)
Austell Marietta Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County (unincorporated) Grantville Newnan Senoia Sharpsburg DeKalb County (unincorporated) Douglasville-Douglas County WSA Villa Rica Fayette County (unincorporated) Fayetteville Peachtree City Brooks Tyrone Forsyth County (unincorporated) Cumming Fulton County (unincorporated) Atlanta Chattahoochee Hills College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Johns Creek Mountain Park Palmetto Sandy Springs Union City Gwinnett County (unincorporated) Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Hall County (unincorporated) Flowery Branch Gainesville Lula Oakwood Henry County WSA Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County (unincorporated) Braswell Dallas Rockdale County (unincorporated)
2
2
1
0
0
3
2
1 1(partial)
27
68 0 3 2
1(partial) 25 8 0 1
3
0
0
78
9
3
5
0
0
0
Survey not returned 1
Survey not returned
2 3
2
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
6
Survey not returned 2
0
0
0
0
5
14
2
1
3
6
0
0
0
0
40
6
155
17
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
12
3
83
92
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
2
2
Survey not returned
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
1
0
20
50
0
0
0
Survey not returned
0
0
0
Survey not returned
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
Survey not returned
0
0
0
2
1
0
12
18
0
0
1 2
6
7
0
0
0
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
1
4
2010 Implementation Review / 50
5 0
0
0
2 5
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
7
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
25
7
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
122
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 3
4
0
0
2
6
Questions 10 & 11: Plan Action Item 7.8, Sewer System Overflow Emergency Response Program
Does your jurisdiction have a sewer system overflow emergency response program? Annual number of sanitary sewer overflows reaching "Waters of the State"
Jurisdiction
Bartow County (unincorporated) Adairsville Cartersville Emerson White
Cherokee County WSA Ball Ground Canton Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County (unincorporated)
Austell Marietta Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County (unincorporated) Grantville Newnan Senoia Sharpsburg
DeKalb County (unincorporated) Douglasville-Douglas County WSA
Villa Rica Fayette County (unincorporated)
Fayetteville Peachtree City Brooks Tyrone Forsyth County (unincorporated) Cumming Fulton County (unincorporated) Atlanta College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Johns Creek Mountain Park Palmetto Sandy Springs Union City Gwinnett County (unincorporated) Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Hall County (unincorporated) Flowery Branch Gainesville Lula Oakwood Henry County WSA Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County (unincorporated) Braswell Dallas Rockdale County (unincorporated)
Overflow emergency response
program
Annual number
1 0 5 0
Survey not returned 6
Survey not returned 1 2
29 (June 2009 to May 2010) 86 (in 2009) 0 25 0
Survey not returned 2
0 Less than 5
0
136 Public (includes 28 Sept
flood related)
6
1
1
1
Survey not returned
0
2
2
93
222
0
4
Survey not returned
1
Survey not returned
0
0
0
32
0
0
Survey not returned
0
One or less
2
2
3
0
0
0
0
Survey not returned
2
Survey not returned
6
8
2010 Implementation Review / 51
Question 12: Plan Action Item 7.9, Sewer System Inspection and Maintenance Training
Does your jurisdiction have an employee training program as part of your sewer system inspection and maintenance program?
Jurisdiction
Bartow County (unincorporated) Adairsville Cartersville Emerson White
Cherokee County WSA Ball Ground Canton Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County (unincorporated)
Austell Marietta Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County (unincorporated) Grantville Newnan Senoia Sharpsburg DeKalb County (unincorporated) Douglasville-Douglas County WSA Villa Rica Fayette County (unincorporated) Fayetteville Peachtree City Brooks Tyrone Forsyth County (unincorporated) Cumming Fulton County (unincorporated) Atlanta Chattahoochee Hills College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Johns Creek Mountain Park Palmetto Sandy Springs Union City Gwinnett County (unincorporated) Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Hall County (unincorporated) Flowery Branch Gainesville Lula Oakwood Henry County WSA Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County (unincorporated) Braswell Dallas Rockdale County (unincorporated)
Yes
No
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
2010 Implementation Review / 52
Question 13: Plan Action Item 8.1, Septic System Planning
Has your jurisdiction developed a plan that identifies where and under what conditions septic systems are appropriate considering long-term water quality and quantity concerns?
Jurisdiction
Bartow County (unincorporated) Adairsville Cartersville Emerson White
Cherokee County WSA Ball Ground Canton Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County (unincorporated)
Austell Marietta Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County (unincorporated) Grantville Newnan Senoia Sharpsburg DeKalb County (unincorporated) Douglasville-Douglas County WSA Villa Rica Fayette County (unincorporated) Fayetteville Peachtree City Brooks Tyrone Forsyth County (unincorporated) Cumming Fulton County (unincorporated) Atlanta Chattahoochee Hills College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Johns Creek Mountain Park Palmetto Sandy Springs Union City Gwinnett County (unincorporated) Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Hall County (unincorporated) Flowery Branch Gainesville Lula Oakwood Henry County WSA Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County (unincorporated) Braswell Dallas Rockdale County (unincorporated)
Yes
No
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
2010 Implementation Review / 53
Questions 14 & 15: Plan Action Item 8.2, Septic System Critical Area Management
Has your jurisdiction identified septic system "critical areas"? Please describe the factors considered when identifying your septic system "critical areas." Check all that apply.
Small drinking water supply watershed Septic systems found around lakes and other water features Areas with high failure rates Areas with limited soil conditions, rock, steep slopes, or high groundwater levels Problems identified by local county environmental health or local jurisdiction
Identified septic system critical areas
Jurisdiction
Bartow County (unincorporated)
Adairsville
Cartersville Emerson White Cherokee County WSA Ball Ground
Survey not returned
Survey not returned
Canton
Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority
Cobb County (unincorporated)
Austell
Marietta
Powder Springs
Smyrna
Survey not returned
Coweta County (unincorporated)
Grantville
Newnan Senoia
Sharpsburg
DeKalb County (unincorporated)
Douglasville-Douglas County WSA
Villa Rica
Fayette County (unincorporated)
Fayetteville
Peachtree City
Brooks
Survey not returned
Tyrone
Forsyth County (unincorporated)
Cumming
Fulton County (unincorporated)
Atlanta
Chattahoochee Hills
College Park
East Point
Fairburn
Survey not returned
Hapeville
Johns Creek
Survey not returned
Mountain Park
Palmetto
Sandy Springs
Union City
Gwinnett County (unincorporated)
Braselton
Buford
Lawrenceville
Survey not returned
Norcross
Hall County (unincorporated) Flowery Branch Gainesville Lula Oakwood
Henry County WSA Hampton
Locust Grove
McDonough
Stockbridge
Survey not returned
Paulding County (unincorporated)
Braswell
Survey not returned
Dallas
Rockdale County (unincorporated)
2010 Implementation Review / 54
Questions 16-19: Plan Action Item 8.4, Septic Tank Septage Disposal
Has your jurisdiction developed a plan for the disposal of septage at local wastewater treatment plants or alternative disposal locations? If septage is accepted at local wastewater treatment facilities, are septage manifests collected at the time of the delivery? If septage is accepted, which facilities accept it in your jurisdiction? What is the cost to the hauler for disposal at each facility?
Jurisdiction
Bartow County (unincorporated) Adairsville Cartersville Emerson White
Cherokee County WSA Ball Ground Canton Woodstock
Clayton County Water Authority Cobb County (unincorporated)
Austell Marietta Powder Springs Smyrna Coweta County (unincorporated) Grantville
Newnan Senoia Sharpsburg
DeKalb County (unincorporated) Douglasville-Douglas County WSA
Villa Rica Fayette County (unincorporated)
Fayetteville Peachtree City Brooks Tyrone Forsyth County (unincorporated) Cumming Fulton County (unincorporated) Atlanta Chattahoochee Hills College Park East Point Fairburn Hapeville Johns Creek
Mountain Park Palmetto Sandy Springs Union City Gwinnett County (unincorporated) Braselton Buford Lawrenceville Norcross Hall County (unincorporated) Flowery Branch
Gainesville Lula Oakwood Henry County WSA Hampton Locust Grove McDonough Stockbridge Paulding County (unincorporated) Braswell Dallas Rockdale County (unincorporated)
Plan for septage disposal
Septage manifests collected
NA
NA
NA