Activities and progress report, 2005

METROPOLITAN NORTH GEORGIA WATER PLANNING DISTRICT
Protecting Water Resources: Elements of Success
ACTIVITIES & PROGRESS REPORT
2005

MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN
December 2005
Protecting water quality and public water supplies is an important goal of the Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District. Local governments, state agencies, water and wastewater utilities, technical experts, basin stakeholders and others are working together to achieve healthy rivers and streams and to ensure adequate supplies of clean water, both today and in the future.
On behalf of the governing Board and our supporters, I am proud of the District's accomplishments during the past year. The District and its partners are working hard to implement the three comprehensive water resource plans we adopted in September 2003.
This year the District offered technical assistance on stormwater ordinances, leak reduction for water utilities, commercial water audit programs, septic systems and floodplain management. Also, the District's regular Board, technical and basin advisory meetings continue to provide a forum where we can talk about the water issues we have in common and where stakeholders have the opportunity to work together. Our nationally recognized education and public awareness efforts continue as well, and more than 85 percent of local governments are actively implementing water resources education programs in their communities.
In addition, the District's planning process has become a model for other planning efforts. The District's framework is being reviewed as part of Georgia's statewide water planning process. Other regions of the country have recognized our organization and plans as a dynamic approach to comprehensive water resources management. The District is influencing actions in our region, and efforts to reduce pollution and use water more wisely are increasing.
2005 was a notable year, and momentum continues to build. We appreciate and look forward to your continued support for the District's efforts and programs.
Sincerely,
Kit Dunlap, Chairman

WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEMBERS
Elected Officials Atlanta: Mayor Shirley Franklin Bartow: Mayor Mike Fields, Cartersville Cherokee: Chairman Mike Byrd Clayton: Chairman Eldrin Bell Cobb: Chairman Sam Olens (Vice Chairman) Coweta: Mayor Robert Hannah, Senoia
DeKalb: CEO Vernon Jones Douglas: Chairman Tom Worthan Fayette: Mayor Ken Steele, Fayetteville (Secretary-Treasurer) Forsyth: Mayor H. Ford Gravitt, Cumming Fulton: Chairman Karen Handel Gwinnett: Chairman Charles Bannister
Hall: Chairman Tom Oliver Henry: Mayor Lorene Lindsey, Locust Grove
Paulding: Mayor Boyd Austin, Dallas Rockdale: Chairman Roy Middlebrooks Walton: Mayor Jim Burgess, Social Circle
Citizen Members Rebecca "Becky" Champion
Robert D. Cheeley Kathryn "Kit" Dunlap (Chairman)
Michael J. Egan P. Martin Ellard Gardiner W. Garrard, Jr. Birdel Jackson Dennis McEntire
Robert Lipson Laura Turner Seydel

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Overview of the District . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 District Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Watershed Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Wastewater Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Water Supply & Water Conservation . . . 11 Education & Public Awareness . . . . . . . . 14
Local Government Activities . . . . . . . . . . 18 Financial Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Official Code of Georgia 12-5-586 provides: The district shall submit a written report not later than December 31 of each year to the Governor, the Lieutenant Governor, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the chairperson of the House Committee on Natural Resources and Environment, and the chairperson of the Senate Natural Resources Committee, which report shall contain a detailed account of the activities and progress of the district throughout the previous year and an accurate accounting of all funds received and expended by the district and of the implementation of plans and attainment of goals.

OVERVIEW OF THE DISTRICT

DISTRICT GEOGRAPHY
16 counties and 94 cities 5 major river basins Over 4 million people 5,250 square miles

COOSA RIVER BASIN

MISSION
The District is a planning entity dedicated to developing comprehensive regional and watershed specific water resources plans that are implemented by local governments in the District. These plans will protect water quality and public water supplies in and downstream of the region, protect recreational values of the waters in and downstream of the region and minimize potential adverse impacts of development on waters in and downstream of the region. (Adapted from O.C.G.A 12-5-571)
DISTRICT BOARD
17 local elected officials 10 appointed citizen members Manages the business and affairs of
the District

Bartow

Cherokee

Paulding

Cobb

Fulto

TALLAPOOSA RIVER BASIN

Douglas

D Clayton

Coweta

Fayette

CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN

FLINT RIVER BASIN

2

CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN

Forsyth Hall

on Gwinnett

OCONEE RIVER BASIN

DeKalb

Walton

Rockdale

Henry
OCMULGEE RIVER BASIN

TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE
Composed of more than 200 water resources officials from local governments within the District
Provides technical assistance to the staff and Board Divided into four subcommittees: stormwater, waste-
water, water supply and conservation, and education
BASIN ADVISORY COUNCILS
Involve more than 150 citizen stakeholders Guide the development and implementation of the
District's plans and policies Divided into six councils: Chattahoochee, Etowah,
Flint, Lake Lanier, Ocmulgee, Oconee
STAFFING AND ENFORCEMENT
Atlanta Regional Commission Environmental Planning Division provides staffing.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) approves plans and ensures local government compliance with the District plans through the permitting process.
THREE COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCE PLANS ADOPTED IN 2003
District-wide Watershed Management Plan Long-term Wastewater Management Plan Water Supply and Water Conservation Management Plan

www.northgeorgiawater.org
3

DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION
The District's plans set forth strategies and recommendations for effective water resource management. Throughout 2005, the District staff administered a number
of programs and activities to support the implementation of these strategies. Many of these programs provide education about our water challenges and the solutions needed to meet these challenges. Other programs provide technical assistance on the details of plan implementation and the necessary local government programs. Lastly, the District continually reviews the plans and their implementation to ensure that the District's goals are being met.
Providing a Water Forum...
Local government officials, water resources professionals and other interested parties attended more than 50 meetings hosted by the District in 2005. These training opportunities and meetings continue to provide a forum where common water issues are discussed and stakeholders have the opportunity to coordinate solutions to the region's critical water issues.
Water Summit
One of the most successful District events of 2005 was a water summit, held in September. This half-day program brought together leaders from the public, private and nonprofit sectors to talk about water issues confronting the metro region. More than 140 persons attended the event. Speakers included Kit Dunlap, Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District chairman; Dr. Carol Couch, director of the Georgia Environmental Protection Division; Rob Hunter, commissioner of the City of Atlanta Department of Watershed Management; Jim Stokes, president of the Georgia Conservancy; Kevin Green, vice-president of environmental affairs for the Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce; and Pat Stevens, Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District.
Newsletter and E-News
In addition to face-to-face meetings, the District continually works to educate and engage our stakeholders through its written and electronic publications. The District newsletter focuses on the District's planning activities, implementation actions of its members and general water resource issues. More than 2,000 District stakeholders receive this publication.
The District launched Water E-News in 2005. This periodic electronic newsletter includes feature stories, events, news, media coverage and updates of District activities.
4

Evaluating the Plans...
The District's plans outline a comprehensive and integrated approach to water resources management within the District. However, these plans are not static documents. The District has a process to review minor amendments to the plans on an "as needed" basis and annually reviews its plans to determine if a major update is needed.
Consideration of Minor Amendments
During 2005 a number of local governments submitted written requests to amend the Long-term Wastewater Management Plan. Most of the requests were related to changes in wastewater capacity or schedule for existing facilities. The Executive Committee considered each proposal and adopted eight amendments to the plan after public review and comment.
2005 Annual Plan Review
The District is required to review the plans annually. During this process the District considered a number of topics identified during meetings and through the Plan Review Survey sent out to local governments in August. In coordination with staff, the Technical Coordinating Committee and Basin Advisory Councils, the Board developed specific recommendations as to how the plans should be amended. The Board released the proposed amendments for public comment in December, and they are scheduled to be adopted at the District's first meeting in 2006.
2005 PLAN AMENDMENT TOPICS
Revised Model Floodplain Management Ordinance Schedule modifications for water quality monitoring, stormwater operations and
maintenance, and watershed improvements Buffer ordinance Septic systems in "critical areas" Septic system maintenance New wastewater facilities Replacement of older, inefficient plumbing fixtures New pre-rinse spray valve retrofit program Sub-unit meters in new multi-family buildings
5

Communicating with Our Partners...
Reporting Our Progress
To track implementation of the plans, the District surveyed local governments about their activities. The results of this survey are used to evaluate progress and report the findings to the director of the Georgia Environmental Protection Division and the Governor. The annual implementation report also allows local governments to compare their progress with other jurisdictions within their county and within the District as a whole.
Building Support
Informed citizens and leaders are key elements of the solutions to the District's water resource challenges. Successful implementation of the plans requires modification
of a variety of ordinances, policies and programs. The District collaborated with diverse audiences from across the region from elected officials in the Georgia House of Representatives to business leaders from several Chambers of Commerce to citizen stakeholders attending community roundtable discussions in order to build support for such policy changes and promote awareness of the region's water resources problems and solutions.
Sharing Our Planning Expertise
In 2004, the Georgia General Assembly passed the Comprehensive Water Management Planning Act, charging the Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division (EPD) with drafting Georgia's first comprehensive statewide water plan. Georgia EPD subsequently asked the District to share its extensive experience and the knowledge it derived from developing and implementing the District plans. In 2005, the District joined Georgia EPD's first technical advisory committee, which addresses water conservation. This committee is charged with answering scientific and technical questions related to water use and evaluating conservation policies and practices being considered for the statewide plan. Dr. Carol Couch, director of Georgia EPD, has asked the District to continue its involvement in 2006 as other parts of the plan are developed. The District has also shared its planning experiences with other groups in Georgia as well as other regions of the country. District Chair Kit Dunlap, Vice Chair Sam Olens and Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin traveled to Columbus to meet with local elected officials, water system professionals and business leaders. The District conducted technical briefings for Georgia EPD's Flint River Basin Planning Group and the Upper Etowah Habitat Conservation Planning Group. Nationally, the District presented its work at conferences in Chicago, Philadelphia and San Antonio.
6

WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
The District-wide Watershed Management Plan sets forth strategies and recommendations for effective watershed management and stormwater control. The Stormwater Subcommittee of the District Technical Coordinating Committee serves as a regional forum for discussing a wide range of stormwater-related topics, including implementation of model stormwater ordinances, extent and level of service for stormwater maintenance, floodplain management and stormwater program funding.
Promoting Best Practices...
Model Stormwater Ordinances
In February, the District held a workshop to educate local governments on the District's six model stormwater ordinances. These model ordinances are part of the District-wide Watershed Management Plan and are designed to address a number of issues related to stormwater runoff and watershed protection. The full-day workshop provided an overview of the model ordinances to local staff and officials, as well as useful information on how to adopt and implement the ordinances in their jurisdictions.
MODEL ORDINANCES
Model Ordinance for Post-Development Stormwater Management for New Development and Redevelopment
Model Floodplain Management / Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance Model Conservation Subdivision / Open Space Development Ordinance Model Illicit Discharge and Illegal Connection Ordinance Model Litter Control Ordinance Model Stream Buffer Protection Ordinance
Floodplain Mapping
More than 60 professionals attended the District's floodplain mapping seminar in August. Presenters shared efforts currently taking place in both Cobb and Gwinnett counties to determine new 100-year floodplain boundaries based on future land use conditions. By updating floodplain maps using expected future land use, District communities can better alert residents of flood risk, as well as more effectively regulate new development to keep it out of harms way.
7

Improving Ordinances...
In early 2005, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Georgia EPD Floodplain Unit asked the District to revise the District Model Floodplain Management / Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance in order to ensure compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Working with FEMA and Georgia EPD, District staff and the TCC Stormwater Subcommittee developed a revised model floodplain ordinance that ensures that District communities that adopt the ordinance are NFIP compliant. In addition, the updated ordinance incorporates a "zero-rise" approach that limits development in floodplain areas outside of the floodway to those projects that can demonstrate no adverse upstream or downstream impacts. The updated ordinance was sent out for public comment in December and will be considered for Board approval in early 2006.
Providing Implementation Assistance...
Stormwater Good Housekeeping Practices
As a component of the District-wide Watershed Management Plan, the District researched stormwater good housekeeping and pollution prevention practices. Staff is currently working with the TCC Stormwater Subcommittee on the best ways to promote and ensure adoption of these practices among businesses, governments and institutions.
Watershed Improvement Plan Guidelines
The District-wide Watershed Management Plan includes a number of complementary strategies designed to help communities in the District meet water quality standards and protect water resources. One of these strategies involves physical improvements to substantially impacted watersheds those watersheds with an effective impervious area of 10 percent or greater. The plan recommends the development of Watershed Improvement Plans (WIPs) that establish the physical improvements required to address problems in these watersheds. In 2005, the District worked with the TCC Stormwater Subcommittee to develop a set of draft guidelines for the Watershed Improvement Plan process.
Water Quality Monitoring Coordination
The District, working with local governments and Georgia EPD, has prepared a set of water quality monitoring protocols and standards. District-wide implementation of the monitoring efforts was to begin in May 2005. However, Georgia EPD requested additional internal review of the monitoring plan and protocols. As such, the monitoring program is scheduled to begin in 2007.
8

WASTEWATER TREATMENT
The Long-term Wastewater Management Plan recommends strategies for more intensive management of privately owned septic systems and the development of high-performance public wastewater treatment systems. The District's Wastewater Subcommittee of the Technical Coordinating Committee and a new Septic System Subcommittee address these issues. The septic systems group includes representatives from local water and sewer departments, county environmental health offices and private on-site wastewater industry. Previously, these groups had little formal opportunity to work together, to share ideas or to develop a coordinated approach to addressing septic systems in the metro area. This group met four times during 2005 to discuss septic system issues, including disposal of septage, minimum lot size, septic system inspection and maintenance, critical areas, septic system education and septic system databases.

Gathering Septic System Information...
District staff surveyed each of the 16 county environmental health departments to gain a better understanding of how septic systems are managed in the District. There are an estimated 550,000 septic systems in the District, 37 percent of which are more than 20 years old. The three main reasons cited in the survey for failures were related to improper design, siting or installation, the age of the system and excessive water use. Historically, septic systems were seen as a temporary wastewater solution until communities extended the sewer line. This is no longer the case. Many communities view septic systems as a permanent wastewater solution. In seven of the 16 District counties, most new development relies on septic systems.
The survey revealed the desirability of involving local environmental health departments at the beginning of the development process (before roads and lots are cut) to identify and set aside the areas of best soils for locating septic systems. Also, lot sizes for septic systems need to be larger and based on septic siting criteria.

Estimated Number of septic systems in the District -- 550,000 Estimated breakdown of the types of septic systems in the District: 90% Residential 9% Commercial 1% Other (schools & churches)

Sharing Local Experiences...
The Long-term Wastewater Management Plan recommends local utilities establish a capacity certification program for their wastewater collection system. Capacity certification programs are a mechanism for local jurisdictions to ensure that adequate wastewater collection and treatment capacities exist within their sewer systems before authorizing new flows and sewer system connections. The Wastewater Subcommittee is a forum for local information exchange. During one such meeting this year, Atlanta and Gwinnett County shared their experiences with capacity certification programs.

9

City of Atlanta
Beginning in 2000 as part of a consent decree, the City of Atlanta put in place a capacity certification program that is tied to the building permit application process. City staff use a dynamic hydraulic model of the sewer system to understand the system's capacity. Where capacity is limited, the City issues a conditional certification. These conditional certifications allow a project to be constructed but not occupied. As part of the consent decree, every linear foot of the 1,500 miles of sewer lines will be inspected as part of the Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES). The City has certified more than 6,000 new sewer connections since 2000.
Gwinnett County
The Gwinnett County Department of Public Utilities uses a computer modeling program called SewerCAD to locate and identify "iffy" pipes. Using current sewer bills to establish actual user flows, as well as permanent flow meters interspersed throughout Gwinnett, the county can model current sewer capacity and flow and use this information to project capacity out to 2015. When a developer proposes a new project, the county runs a "what if" scenario in the model. This enables the county staff to identify any pipe sizes, system improvements or other requirements necessary to ensure that capacity is available for that development. Once the modelers have determined what changes need to be made to the sewer system, the developer is responsible for the cost of installing the larger pipe or other required infrastructure to meet the needs of his proposed development. Once the upgraded sewer line is installed, the pipe is owned by Gwinnett County. Gwinnett County has been using this system for just under a year, and they have a full-time modeling staff to handle this project.
Tracking Wastewater Issues...
It is critical the District be able to utilize the Chattahoochee River and its tributaries for water supply and wastewater treatment. Georgia EPD and the Wildlife Resources Division of DNR are evaluating trout habitats in the river from Buford Dam to Peachtree Creek and have presented their work to the District's Wastewater Subcommittee. The District has asked Georgia DNR to establish a mechanism for the Chattahoochee River stakeholders to stay informed of the study's progress and be given an opportunity to comment during the work. By working cooperatively on this issue, local, District and state partners can ensure that this critical resource is protected.
10

WATER SUPPLY & WATER CONSERVATION

The Water Supply and Water Conservation Management Plan calls for a future of intensive water demand management and an aggressive water conservation program. The water conservation program included in the plan will reduce future demand by an additional 11 percent, beyond the eight percent savings expected with existing codes and appliances, for a total of nearly 20 percent savings. If the District can achieve this level of water savings, the needs of the District can be met through 2030 with some reserves.

RECOMMENDED WATER CONSERVATION ACTIONS
Conservation pricing for all District water systems Water system leak reduction and repair Retrofit of older, inefficient plumbing fixtures Low-flow urinals for new buildings*

Rain sensor shut-off switches on new irrigation systems

Promoting Best Practices...

Sub-unit meters in new multi-family buildings

Residential Water Audits
The District has developed a brochure to show individuals

Residential water audits Commercial water audits

how to conduct a household water audit. This user-

Distribution of low-flow retrofit kits to residential customers

friendly document leads homeowners step-by-step through the process of detecting major household

Education and public awareness programs

leaks and addressing inefficient water use behaviors.

* This measure is under review and will likely be replaced in 2006 with a

The District recommends that each water provider

spray valve retrofit education program.

distribute this information to its highest 25 percent

of residential water users to encourage water conservation. The information is also

helpful to customers who voice concerns about high water bills.

Industrial, Commercial and Institutional (ICI)
Water Audit Workshop
Industrial, commercial and institutional water use is approximately 27 percent of the total water demand in the District. To address water conservation for these customer groups, the Water Supply and Water Conservation Management Plan recommends that each water provider rank their water users according to annual water use and offer a free water survey to those accounts that use the most water. The program should target hotels, motels, hospitals, restaurants and other customers with large needs for water.
The District conducted an ICI Water Audit Workshop in coordination with the Georgia Department of Natural Resources Pollution Prevention Assistance Division (P2AD) in October 2005. National expert Bill Hoffman from the City of Austin's Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Water Conservation Program and Philip Paschke from the Seattle Water Smart Technology Program presented information on how to start a successful ICI Water Audit Program and what to look for in when doing a water audit. Judy Adler and Adrienne Thorpe of P2AD also presented local resources for performing ICI water audits.

11

Assessing Water Conservation Measures...
Retrofitting Older Inefficient Fixtures
One of the original measures in the Water Supply and Water Conservation Management Plan recommended that older residential buildings meet the plumbing codes for new buildings prior to transfer of ownership. This measure was found to be impractical. In 2005, the District convened a Water Conservation Retrofit Steering Committee to develop a new approach.
The committee was composed of leaders in the real estate community, both commercial and residential; mortgage brokers, water providers, environmental groups, representatives from state government and representatives
of the fixture industry. The committee examined a variety of strategies to achieve the results projected from the original measure and recommended a more flexible approach to be implemented by the water providers in the District, beginning by 2010. The steering committee's recommendation is being considered as an amendment during the 2005 Annual Plan Review.
Food Service Spray Valves
The food service industry uses a device called a pre-rinse spray valve to wash off dishes prior to using a dishwasher. According to the 2005 Energy Policy Act, all new pre-rinse spray valves manufactured must be low-flow devices. However, replacing the older, less efficient spray valves could save millions of gallons per day across the District. The District proposes to require local governments or water providers to distribute educational materials on these devices to food service industries. This new measure would replace the low-flow urinal measure originally recommended in the Water Supply and Water Conservation Management Plan. The urinal measure was determined to be neither cost-effective nor technically practical.
Multi-family Sub-Unit Meters
The Water Supply and Water Conservation Management Plan requires all new multifamily buildings be built so that individual tenants are billed for their water use. Studies show that tenants are more likely to conserve water and report leaks when they are responsible for the water bill. Buildings with sub-unit meters save 15 percent more water. During the year, the Water Supply and Water Conservation Subcommittee developed language to clarify that each water local agency could implement this measure through either local policy or ordinance and that responsibility for the management of the sub-unit meters could be with either the utility or the property owner. The subcommittee developed language that can be used in an ordinance or local policy to implement this water conservation measure.
12

Assisting Water Providers...
Reducing Water System Leakage
The District estimates that water providers in the 16-county area could save as much as 29 million gallons of water per day through aggressive water loss assessments and control methods. The District recommends water providers conduct water loss assessments using the American Water Works Association and the International Water Association (AWWA/IWA) methodology for assessing water system losses. This methodology is currently being revised, and the full document will not be available at least until 2007. However, computer software will be available by early 2006 that will allow water suppliers to calculate some elements of the full methodology. The District is monitoring the development of the software and methodology and will provide local water providers with more detailed information once it is available.
Enacting Water Conservation Pricing
Conservation pricing gives customers incentive to reduce excessive discretionary water use by making the cost of water increasingly more expensive. At a minimum, all the District utilities were required to implement uniform price structures by January 1, 2004, and at least three-tiered structures are required by 2006. In 2005, the District provided technical assistance to the water providers on the required conservation pricing structures.
13

EDUCATION & PUBLIC AWARENESS
Raising Awareness Through Mass Media...
In 2005, the District continued efforts to increase public awareness of water issues through two mass media campaigns: the Clean Water Campaign (CWC) and Water Use It Wisely (WUIW). The Clean Water Campaign delivers pollution prevention messages to homeowners and businesses and produces a variety of programs designed to change behavior and reduce stormwater pollution. Water Use It Wisely focuses its messages on water conservation.
The District partnered with WXIA (Channel 11) to air more than 600 Water Use It Wisely and Clean Water Campaign
spots in 2005. The District provided PSAs for both campaigns, and WXIA produced additional spots featuring its chief weather reporter, Paul Ossmann. The campaigns also had an on-line presence on the station's Web site at www.11alive.com with banner ads on highly viewed pages. In addition to the partnership with WXIA, the District ran advertisements on the Weather Channel. The spots ran in August and September during prime viewing hours. The potential viewership was exceptionally high due to the increased interest and focus on hurricanes during the season. Lastly, with financial support from the Alcoa Foundation, the District supplemented the television ads with billboard advertisements for the two campaigns that were placed in prominent locations along interstates and highways throughout the District.
Spreading the Message...
The Clean Water Campaign held 42 workshops throughout the District in 2005. Attendance at the workshops averaged 30-40 attendees; however, some workshops drew more than 100 participants. The District partnered with the University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service to present many of the workshops. Extension agents from each county led the personalized workshops that integrated pollution prevention and water conservation tips for residents.
14

WORKSHOP TOPICS

Rain Gardens Planting Trees to Protect Streams Lawn Care Automobile Service

Xeriscaping Composting Septic System Maintenance

Rivers Alive
Now in its 14th year, Rivers Alive is an annual statewide event during the month of October that draws tens of thousands of Georgians for stream clean-ups around the state. In 2005, an estimated 26,000 volunteers participated in hundreds of cleanups in Georgia's streams, rivers, lakes, wetlands and ocean from Lake Blue Ridge in North Georgia to the Ochlockonee River in the South. District staff coordinated publicity for Rivers Alive, generating newspaper articles and radio and television appearances throughout the District and statewide.
Educational Videos
The Water District, in partnership with Georgia Department of Natural Resources Pollution Prevention Assistance Division and the University of Georgia Urban Agriculture Program, developed a 30-minute video on how to install a rain garden which featured Dr. Rose Mary Seymour of the University of Georgia. Copies have been made available to local libraries, local government access channels, local governments and other interested agencies and organizations.
New "U Fix-It Workshop"
In partnership with the Clean Water Campaign, the City of Gainesville and Hall County Environmental Health Services held a "U Fix-It Workshop" in May 2005. This new, interactive workshop highlighted simple ways to repair leaky appliances and maintain septic tanks that reduce water waste. These "fix-it" methods can help homeowners conserve water and save money. Dozens of residents participated in the workshop, which was successful in teaching practical and "handson" solutions to water conservation.

15

Reaching the Kids...
Essay Contest
Through its annual Clean Water Campaign/Water Use It Wisely Essay Contest, the District hopes to educate children about water quality and conservation efforts in Georgia. Students research and share their thoughts on why conserving water and preventing water pollution are important for the future of their rivers, lakes and streams. The main goal of the essay contest is to challenge students to think of creative ways to conserve water and improve water quality in metro Atlanta.
The essay contest was open to middle school students throughout the 16 counties (grades 6-8). More than 1,000 students participated in 2005. A winner was selected for each county that participated in the contest.
Kelley Miller from North Hall Middle School was the Districtwide winner. In addition to her essay, Kelley puts her words into action by participating in stream cleanup events throughout Hall County. She has worked with various Hall County organizations and has taken part in Rivers Alive cleanups.
Project WET Educator Workshop
The District sponsored a Project WET Educator Workshop that drew educators from around the metro area. Local government representatives and teachers participated in the interactive workshop, which covered the Conserve Water and Project WET curriculum. Participants learned creative ways to reach youth and adults in their schools and communities with messages and activities of how to protect water resources.
Children's Water Festival
The District participated in the 2005 Children's Water Festival, held this year in Dalton. The Georgia Department of Community Affairs organizes and coordinates this festival, which drew students from the 16 counties and beyond.
Hundreds of students participated in games to learn the value of being a responsible steward of the environment. Students learned the difference that they can make individually in their community and how it can affect the health and quality of water resources.
16

Awards and Recognition...
In 2005, the District's Clean Water Campaign public service announcements received several prestigious awards:
Horizon Interactive Award Competition (Bronze) Atlanta Marketing Association's AMY Awards (Bronze) 2005 Telly Awards (Bronze) 2005 Aurora Awards (Platinum-Best of Show) The award-winning public service announcements are available on the Clean Water Campaign's Web site at www.cleanwatercampaign.com/resources/multimedia.html.
Clean Water Campaign Nationally Recognized
The U.S. Environmental Protection Administration has developed a series of stormwater case studies to help Phase II municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) get started on or improve their stormwater management programs. EPA featured the Clean Water Campaign in one case study for its public outreach initiatives, specifically the Campaign's workshop program.
The National Environmental Education & Training Foundation invited the Clean Water Campaign to contribute to its environmental information service for broadcast meteorologists in major U.S. media markets. This service uses simple factoids to explain the link between weather and the environment and offers viewers tips for action. The foundation sent the Campaign's tips to meteorologists and weather anchors across the country.
17

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES
2005 Plan Implementation Questionnaire
The District is required to review the implementation of its plans and report to the director of the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) on an annual basis. As part of this reporting, the District surveyed the implementation activities of local governments in the fall of 2005. A questionnaire, which focused on a variety of local government implementation activities from each of the three District Plans, was sent to 120 District local jurisdictions and water and sewer authorities. Responses to the questionnaire provided the District with significant information about progress at the local level. Local government implementation is critical to the District's goal of ensuring adequate supplies of drinking water, protecting water quality and minimizing the impacts of development on watersheds and downstream communities. Following is a summary of the responses received. A report of the full responses from each jurisdiction has been prepared and is available on the District Web site:
www.northgeorgiawater.org.

District-wide Watershed Management Plan
The District-wide Watershed Management Plan outlines strategies and tasks that cities and counties should implement to manage stormwater and protect watersheds. Eighty-one local governments responded, which represent approximately 98 percent of the District's population.

Stormwater Management Model Ordinances

Six model ordinances are included in the District's approach to protect water quality and address stormwater impacts. All cities and counties within the District are required to adopt either the model stormwater ordinances or ordinances at least as effective. The table on the following page summarizes the status of local adoption of the model ordinances based on the questionnaire responses.

Has your jurisdiction adopted the Georgia Stormwater Management Have youMaadnouptaeldothreeGqeuoirvgaialeSntto?rmwater
Management Manual or equivalent?

NO 16%

YES 84%

The Post-Development Stormwater Management Ordinance is intended to address permanent stormwater runoff control on new development and redevelopment projects in the District. This ordinance provides the stormwater policies and performance criteria for managing stormwater quality and quantity, whereas the technical criteria and design specifications for stormwater controls and drainage design are typically included in a separate manual. Local governments that have adopted the Post-Development Stormwater Management Ordinance were asked if they have adopted supporting stormwater technical design criteria, such as the Georgia Stormwater Management Manual or equivalent technical manual. Fiftyone cities and counties responded that they have adopted and are currently using the manual.

18

Stormwater Model Ordinance Adoption by Local Governments (As of October 2005)

Local governments required to adopt the model stormwater ordinances by 2005

Bartow County (uninc.) I # N Emerson F
Cherokee County (uninc.) G I L # N Canton G I L # N Holly Springs
Woodstock G I L # N
Clayton County (uninc.) G I L # Forest Park G I L N Jonesboro G I L N Lake City L N Lovejoy F Morrow G I L # N Riverdale
Cobb County (uninc.) G I L # N Acworth F Austell G I L # N Kennesaw G I L # N Marietta G I L # N Powder Springs G I L # N Smyrna G L N
Coweta County (uninc.) G I L # N Newnan G I L # N
DeKalb County (uninc.) L # N Avondale Estates G I L # N Chamblee G I Clarkston G I L

Decatur G I L # N Doraville F Lithonia F Pine Lake F Stone Mountain G I L # N
Douglas County (uninc.) * G I L # N Douglasville * G I L # N
Fayette County (uninc.) G I L # N Fayetteville G I L # N Peachtree City G L N Tyrone #
Forsyth County (uninc.) G I L # N Cumming G I L # N
Fulton County (uninc.) # N Alpharetta G I L # N Atlanta G I L N College Park F East Point G I L N Fairburn G I L # N Hapeville G I L # N Mountain Park G I L N Palmetto G I L # N Roswell G I L # N Union City G I L # N
Gwinnett County (uninc) G I L # N Auburn

Berkeley Lake F Buford G I L # N Dacula F Duluth G I L # N Grayson F Lawrenceville G I L # N Lilburn G I L # N Norcross F Snellville G I L # N Sugar Hill F Suwanee F
Hall County (uninc.) G Flowery Branch F Gainesville G I L # N Oakwood L # N
Henry County (uninc.) G L # N Hampton G I L # N McDonough G I L N Stockbridge G I L # N
Paulding County (uninc.) I L # N Dallas I L N Hiram
Rockdale County (uninc.) G I L N Conyers G I L # N
Walton County (uninc.) I L # N Loganville G I L # N

* Stormwater management in Douglas County and the City of Douglasville is handled by the Douglas County-Douglasville Water & Sewer Authority

G Ordinance for Post-Development Stormwater Management for New Development and Redevelopment I Floodplain Management / Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance L Illicit Discharge and Illegal Connection Ordinance # Conservation Subdivision / Open Space Development Ordinance N Litter Control Ordinance Stream Buffer Protection Ordinance
F Did not return questionnaire

Local governments required to adopt the model stormwater ordinances by April 2006

Key

Bartow County Cities
Adairsville F Cartersville Euharlee N Kingston F Taylorsville F White F
Cherokee County Cities
Ball Ground L # N Nelson F Waleska
Coweta County Cities
Corinth F Grantville F

Moreland F Senoia # Sharpsburg G I L # N Turin L N
Douglas County Cities Villa Rica I #
Fayette County Cities Brooks Woolsey**
Gwinnett County Cities Braselton F Rest Haven F
Hall County Cities

Gillsville F Lula F
Henry County Cities Locust Grove G L # N
Paulding County Cities Braswell F
Walton County Cities Between F Good Hope F Jersey F Monroe G I Social Circle # N Walnut Grove G I N

Haralson

Clermont F

** Stormwater management in the City of Woolsey is handled by Fayette County

19

Stormwater Operations and Maintenance Programs

Stormwater O & M Program Elements 2005 Survey Responses

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

10% of Inventory Maintenance Emergency

No

Completed

Schedule

Strategy

Yes

Operations and maintenance activities undertaken by local governments ensure that stormwater drainage, control and conveyance systems are providing for the safe passage of runoff and the removal of non-point source pollution. The District-Wide Watershed Management Plan provides that cities and counties in the District should inventory and map their stormwater system in order to support operations and maintenance activities. At least 10 percent of this inventory was to be completed by this year. In addition, the plan proposes that local communities develop an inspection and maintenance schedule for those system components for which they take responsibility as well as develop an emergency response strategy for threats to public safety.

Water Supply Source Watershed Protection

Have you coordinated your

In the District, the vast majority of public drinking water supplies come from surface

source water protection efforts water sources. Sixty-one percent of survey respondents indicated that they had a

Have you coowrdiitnhatyedouyorucrosmouprcreewheatnesrivpreotpelcatnion effowrtsawteitrh supply source watershed in their jurisdiction. The Watershed Management your comparenhde/nosirvegprelaennasnpda/coer gprleaenns?pace plan?Plan includes a number of strategies for protecting watersheds that serve a public

NO 37%

YES 63%

water supply source, including the implementation of local source water assessment programs (SWAPs), stormwater management activities, Georgia Part V planning criteria, greenspace acquisition, pollution prevention education and integration

with Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) plans.

Stormwater Public Awareness and Education

Local public awareness and outreach activities are critical to preventing stormwater

Does your jurisdiction have a local pollution and protecting or improving the quality of our water resources. By working
Dosetos yrmouwr jautriesrdipctuiobnlihcaivnefaolromcaaltsitoonrmawnadter with the District's Clean Water Campaign, cities and counties can effectively leverage public infoerdmuactiaotnioanndperdougcaratimon?program? the regional efforts in developing their own local stormwater education programs.

Eighty-eight percent of respondents said that they were using materials from the

NO 20%

YES 80%

Clean Water Campaign in their local programs. In addition, almost 75 percent reported that they were performing stenciling or applying curb markers telling

citizens to "Keep it Clean, Drains to Stream" near storm drains and inlets in

their community.

Are you considering a
stormwater utility if you don't Are yaoulrceoandsiydehrainvgeaostnoerm? water
utility if you don't already have one?

NO 37%

YES 63%

Stormwater Program Funding
As cities and counties focus more on stormwater management and watershed protection, it becomes apparent that program funding is critical to implementing an effective and successful program. In 2005, more local governments began to look at the creation of stormwater utilities as a way to provide additional funding. In addition, more jurisdictions are also looking at bond sales, review fees and development impact fees as other options to supplement funding from general revenues.

20

Long-term Wastewater Management Plan

The Long-term Wastewater Management Plan contains a variety of activities that

focus on wastewater collection system inspection and maintenance, septic systems
Has your utility conducted a review
and decentralized systems, and local wastewater planning. Eighty-four percent of of your local wastewater master

sewer systems in the District responded to the plan implementation questionnaireH, as yourpjularinsdfioctriocnocnosnidsutcetnedcya wrevitiehwtohfeyour local

which represent 97 percent of the sewered population in the District.

wastewatDerismtraisctterLpolnang-ftoerrcmonsWistaesntceywwaitthetrhe District

Long-termMWaanstaegweamterenMtaPnlaagnem? ent Plan?

Local Plans
Local utilities need to integrate the District plan into their own local master plans. Thirty-seven District sewer systems have reviewed their wastewater master plan to ensure consistency with the District plan.

NO 21%

YES 79%

Local Policy for Private Wastewater Systems
Local governments are required to develop policies on private wastewater systems specific to their own needs. Some jurisdictions prohibit private wastewater systems, while others may allow them under very limited situations and others may include them as part of a long-term plan. Twenty-five local governments already have local policies addressing private wastewater systems.

Does your local government have a loDcoaelspyooluircyjurfiosdripctriiovnahtaevewaalsotceawl paotliecyr
sfyorstpermivaste(dwoaestsenwoatteirnscylsutedmes (doesinnodtiivnicdluudaelinsdeipvitdiucaslyssetpetimc ssy)s?tems)?
NO 64% YES 36%

Sewer System Maintenance Programs
Each District sewer system is required to establish maintenance procedures and implement a sewer system maintenance program. The purpose of the maintenance program is to ensure that the sewer system is maintained in a manner that minimizes failures and extends the longevity of the system. Forty-one District sewer systems utilize a sewer system maintenance program.
These sewer system maintenance programs should consist of several minimum elements. Because the discharge of grease into sewer systems poses serious clogging problems and substantial costs, a grease management program should be developed. To help ensure adequate protection of human health and the environment from sanitary sewer overflows, a written overflow response program is needed. Sewer rehabilitation is necessary to restore the structural integrity of a sewer system and to reduce the hydraulic loads by eliminating infiltration and inflow. As the first step in developing a sewer system model, each local utility is required to develop a sewer system inventory. Capacity certification programs allow various jurisdictions to determine whether adequate wastewater collection and treatment capacities exist within their sewer systems, before authorizing new flows and sewer service connections. Each local utility is required to develop procedures for certifying available capacity for proposed developments as part of establishing a sewer capacity certification program. Prior to developing inspection and maintenance training programs, each local utility is required to outline training needs for program and employee training.

DoeDsoyesoyuoruur tjuilriitsydihctaiovnehaavSeeawer SSeywsetreSmystMemaiMntaeinntaenacencPe rPorgograramm??
NO 13% YES 87%

21

Sewer System Inspection and Maintenance Elements 2005 Survey Responses

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

No Yes
Grease Management

Overflow Response

Sewer Rehabilitation

System Inventory

Capacity Certification

Training

Does your utility accept septage at Septage Disposal
Dlooceaslywouarsltoecawl gaotveerrntrmeeanttmaeccnetptpsleapnttasge
at loocralpwraosvtiedweataelrtetrrenaatmtievnet tprleanattsmoer nprtovideAn effective method for extending the life of a septic system and insuring its proper alternativleotcraetaitomnesn?t locations? operation is to pump out settled solids from the septic tank before excessive amounts

accumulate and begin to migrate into the absorption field. As more homeowners

NO 61% YES 39%

are educated how to properly maintain their septic systems, local jurisdictions will need to plan for disposing of the septage at local wastewater plants or provide

alternative locations.

HaHsays oyouurrllooccaallggovoevrenrmnemntebnetgubnetgoun

devteolodpelovceallopplanlos ctoaldpetlearnmsinteofudteutreersmewinereed andfuutnuserewesreewd aerreeads oafntdheujunrsisedwicetiroends?

Sewered

vs.

Unsewered

Area

Planning

areas of the jurisdiction?

The Local Wastewater Management Plans should identify areas for long-term

septic system use, as well as those areas where public sewer service will eventually

NO 36%

YES 64%

be available. Forty-two District local governments have already begun to identify future sewered and unsewered areas of their jurisdiction.

Has yoHuarsloycaolugrovuetrinlimtyenbtebgeguunn ttoodevelop Sewer Connection Policy

pdoelviceielsofporpcoolnincieecstinfgotrocpounbnliec csetiwnegr?

to public sewer?

Each sewer system is required to establish policies concerning connection to public

NO 11%

YES 89%

sewers by the end of 2005. Forty-two District sewer systems have already established policies for connecting to public sewer.

22

Water Supply and Water Conservation

Management Plan
The Water Supply and Water Conservation
Management Plan includes a framework for
water supply facilities and strategies for
resource management. There was a 83 percent 100%
response rate to the questionnaire from the 90%
water suppliers in the District. The 53 suppliers
80%
who responded serve approximately 99 percent
70%
of the District's population.
60%

Water Conservation Measures 2005 Survey Responses
No Yes

Water Conservation Actions
A critical element of the District plan is water conservation. The water conservation program includes measures that will reduce water use and water losses and help local jurisdictions.
Conservation Pricing
By January 1, 2006, all District water suppliers

50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
0%

PriCcionngservation

DeSteycsttieomn Leak

PoSlicuyb-meter

Retrofit Kits

are required to adopt a multi-tiered rate

structure. The goal of conservation pricing is to reduce excessive discretionary

water use, especially outdoor irrigation, by making water use increasingly more

expensive. Twenty-five District water suppliers already meet that goal.

W Com

ater

m Auedrictisal

WaRteesr iAdeundtiitasl

EduCcoantsioenrvation

O Meastuhreers

System Leak Detection
A major component of the District's program is leak reduction, which has the potential to provide much of the planned water savings. Water suppliers must identify methods to reduce leakage in their systems and to reduce unbilled water. Twenty-eight water suppliers have on-going leak detection programs.
Multi-family Sub-Unit Meters
Local ordinances or policies requiring that new multi-family buildings (i.e. apartments, townhomes, condominiums) be built with either individual water-utility-owned meters on each unit or sub-unit meters owned and managed by the property owner with a utility-owned master meter. This measure allows water service to each unit to be based on volume of use, thus giving individuals incentive to use water efficiently. Studies show sub-unit meters can save 15 percent. Fourteen water suppliers have already implemented this measure.
Water Audits and Retrofit Kits
The plan contains several water conservation measures that focus on helping individuals and businesses assess their water use and provide recommendations and tools to reduce water use.

23

Water suppliers within the District are required to begin or expand a program for residential customers that provides water audit or leak detection information. It is recommended that the water suppliers target large water users. Twenty-five water suppliers have implemented this measure.
Water suppliers are also required to begin or expand a program to provide water audits to commercial customers. Eleven water suppliers have implemented this measure.
Water suppliers are also required to begin or expand a program to distribute low-flow retrofit kits to customers. These kits could include low-flow showerheads, faucet aerators and other applicable retrofit items. The kits would be distributed to the portion of the service areas that have pre-1992 homes that were built before these low-flow fixtures were required as part of the plumbing code. Six water suppliers currently distribute low-flow retrofit kits.

Water Conservation Public Education
Education and public awareness are critical to achieving support of the District's water conservation goals and, ultimately, the reduction in water use. Each water provider is required by the water supply plan to create or expand its public information campaign. Thirty-eight water suppliers currently provide conservation materials to their customers.

Other Measures

Water suppliers also support water conservation through a variety of other measures,
including the WaterSmart program, showerhead exchanges, Xeriscaping workshops,
water reuse programs, service line replacement and enforcement of the state-wide
Has your jurisdiction conducted "Rules for Outdoor Water Use."
a review of local water plans for Has your jucroisndsicistitoennccoyndwuictthedtha ereDvieiswtroifctlocal water
plans foWr caotnesristSeunpcypwlyithanthde CDoisntrsiectrvWaatitoernSupply
and ConsMeravnataigonemMeannatgPemlaenn?t Plan? Local Water Supply Planning

NO 35%

YES 65%

Local water management plans are needed to support proposed infrastructure and improvements. In some cases, local plans need to be revised to incorporate the District's principles. Thirty-four local jurisdictions have developed local water supply plans that conform to the District plan.

Has Hyoaus ryojuurrijsudriiscdtiicotinonddeevveellooppeeddanan

emergency water plan?

emergency water plan?

Emergency Water Plan

NO 27%

YES 73%

Each water system needs to develop or update its emergency plan. Thirty-eight water suppliers have developed emergency water plans.

Is yIsouyrojuurrisjduircitsiodnicdteiovenlodpeinvgejlooinptiwngater jopilanntswasaitdeerntpifliaendsbyatshiedDeinsttrificiet?d
by the District?

NO 38%

YES 62%

Joint Planning
Water supply efficiency and reliability are enhanced through the interconnection of adjoining water systems. Encouraging interconnections between water systems in the District is particularly important in the event of a drought or emergency situation. Five of the six major joint water supply plans identified in the plan are being developed. In addition, eighteen other water suppliers are working across jurisdictional lines.

24

FINANCIAL OVERVIEW

The Water Planning District operates on a calendar year. On June 3, 2004, the Board approved the District's 2005 budget. A detailed accounting of the funds received and expended by the District are listed below.

Projects Funding
Successful implementation of the plans hinges on the ability to fund both capital improvements and the programmatic measures. Estimated costs for these improvements and activities are expected to reach into the billions of dollars over the next 30 years, with the majority of these funds raised at the local level. The District continues to work to identify additional funding at the state and federal level to supplement these local dollars. The Georgia Environmental Facilities Authority (GEFA) has met with the District to educate local governments on how they can secure financing for District projects using the state's bonding capacity.
In addition, the District is in its fourth year of working to secure federal funding for District projects and has focused on the EPA Appropriations Bill. To date, the District has secured federal grants totaling $2.6 million dollars through the FY 2005 appropriation cycle. This work continued in 2005, and although there was strong support from the Georgia delegation, funds were not secured for this program in the FY 2006 appropriation cycle. While this is a setback, the District and its partners will continue to work with the Congressional delegation to educate the House and Senate Appropriations Committees on the importance of federal funding for the District. In 2006, the District will also investigate additional funding options through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the United States Geological Survey (USGS).

Financial Recommendations
During 2005, the Board and its committees discussed issues surrounding the funding of the District's 2006 budget ($1,116,199). The board agreed to continue to fund the District through the per capita assessment option at a rate of $.15 per capita. This amount generates $596,199 in local dues for the 2006 budget. The Board has requested $250,000 in the FY 2007 Georgia state budget for the District's 2006 calendar year.

Funds Expended (as of December 7, 2005)

2005 Budget

Expended or Under Contract Through 12/7/2005

Remaining Budget

Chairman's Allowance District Special Projects Public Education Salaries Fringe Benefits Water Board Contracts Miscellaneous Operating Expenses Overhead

3,000 135,000 207,000 267,109 157,594
28,000 109,585 164,785

Totals

$1,072,073

0 115,052 206,186 250,425 147,751
28,000 72,137 154,492
$974,043

3,000 19,948
814 16,684
9,843 -
37,448 10,293
$98,030
25

Date

Payor

Receipt Register

Interest

State

Local

1/3/05 1/14/05 1/14/05 1/14/05 1/21/05 1/31/05 1/31/05 2/7/05 2/14/05 2/14/05 2/14/05 2/28/05 3/11/05 3/11/05 3/11/05 3/11/05 3/11/05 3/11/05 3/30/05 3/31/05 4/14/05 4/14/05 4/22/05 4/29/05 5/11/05 5/27/05 5/27/05 5/31/05 6/14/05 6/30/05 7/5/05 7/31/05 8/26/05 8/31/05 9/14/05 9/14/05 9/14/05 9/14/05 9/21/05 9/30/05 10/18/05 10/18/05 10/18/05 10/31/05 10/31/05 10/31/05 10/31/05 11/9/05 11/15/05 11/30/05 11/30/05 11/30/05 12/7/05 12/7/05 12/7/05 12/13/05

City of Cartersville Rockdale County City of Stockbridge Forsyth County City of McDonough Clayton County Interest Income Henry County Henry Water and Sewer Locust Grove Rockdale County Interest Income Fulton County BOC Fulton County BOC Fulton County BOC Coweta County City of Hampton City of Ballground Rockdale County Interest Income Douglasville Douglas County Fulton County BOC Rockdale County Interest Income Coweta County Fulton County BOC Rockdale County Interest Income Cobb County Interest Income Rockdale County Interest Income Henry County Interest Income Hall County City of Atlanta Rockdale County City of Gainesville Fulton County BOC Interest Income Fayette County Paulding County Henry County Cherokee County Hall County Cobb County Interest Income Gwinnett County Walton County DeKalb County Clayton County Interest Income Fulton County BOC Clayton County Fulton County BOC GA Dept. of Natural Resources

2005 Totals

1,280.82 1,155.52
1,444.74 1,587.47 1,642.94 1,618.54 1,428.07 1,330.48
1,351.59
1,230.17 1,637.19
250,000.00 15,707.53 250,000.00

1,753.00
14,761.00
11,826.00
17,901.00
1,753.00
10,733.00 10,733.00 13,382.00
1,753.00
13,826.00 10,733.00
1,753.00
13,382.00 10,733.00
1,753.00
91,163.00
1,753.00
17,901.00
62,471.00
10,733.00
13,689.00 12,252.00 17,901.00 21,285.00 20,892.00 91,163.00
88,267.00 9,103.00
95,414.00 11,826.00
10,733.00 23,652.00 64,396.00
801,369.00

26

Special Purpose Funds

Total

10,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00
35,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00
12,500.00 7,500.00
10,000.00
105,000.00

10,000.00 1,753.00 5,000.00
14,761.00 5,000.00
11,826.00 1,280.82
17,901.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 1,753.00 1,155.52
35,000.00 10,733.00 10,733.00 13,382.00
5,000.00 5,000.00 1,753.00 1,444.74 13,826.00 10,733.00 1,753.00 1,587.47 13,382.00 10,733.00 1,753.00 1,642.94 91,163.00 1,618.54 1,753.00 1,428.07 17,901.00 1,330.48 12,500.00 62,471.00 7,500.00 10,000.00 10,733.00 1,351.59 13,689.00 12,252.00 17,901.00 21,285.00 20,892.00 91,163.00 1,230.17 88,267.00 9,103.00 95,414.00 11,826.00 1,637.19 10,733.00 23,652.00 64,396.00 250,000.00
1,172,076.53

James Abraham Gloria Abram
Judy Adler Bill Andrews Nick Ammons Barry Amos
Reza Aral Laurie Ashmore
Leigh Askew Diane Badger George Barnes
Roy Barnes Johnny Barron
Joe Basista Sally Bates Ellen Bauske Phillip Beard Harmit Bedi Douglas Bennett Tina Bennett Dennis Benz Dennis Bergin Troy Beseech Rick Blackwell Rob Blake Amanda Blowers Derek Bogan Bob Bourne Randy Bowens Wade Brannan Charles Brewer Bob Brice Gwen Brinkley Howard W. Brown Jr. Rob Brown Stan Brown Suzanne Brown Aaron Buckner Suzanne Burnes Robert P. Butler Tim Callahan Gene Camp Tom Campbell Azarina Carmical Tony V. Carnell Jane Chastain David Chastant Rudolph Chen Richard Chime Steve Cole Daniel Conn Pam Conner Cheryl Contant Charles Corbin Tom Couch Ben Counter R.D. Cowan J. Carlyle Cox Bruce Coyle Boyd Cummings Ferrell Curlee John Daniels

Technical Coordinating Committee

Melinda Davies Duane R. Demeritt Corlette Dennard
Doug Derrer Nancy DeShazo David Dockery
Jack Dozier Jeff Eady
Don Easterbrook Rick Eastin Tim Equels Joanne Ellars Katie Epps Lindy Farmer
Nancy Faulkner Rick Fehr
Ron Feldner Craig Ferguson Marvin Flanigan
Roy Fowler Catherine Fox
Pete Frisna Peter Frost Frederick Gardiner Jennifer Gardner Tyrone Gardner Marie Garrett Robert E. Gay Mary Gazaway Thomas Gehl Wendell Geiger Curt Gervich Mike Gippert David Gipson Carl Glover Robert Gore Steve Green Jeremy Greenberg Brad Gresham Sam Gueller Dan Hall Stan Hall Harold Harbert Derrick Harris Kathy Hatcher Doug Hawkins Jon Heard Tom Heard Bill Higgins Keith Higgs Mark Hipp Steven Hogan Renee Hoge Jesse Howard Walter Howard Margaret Howse Harry Hughes Ken Jacob Rick Jeffares Michael Jones Ronnie Jones Lawrence Kaiser Brant Keller

Julie Kemerer Wayne Kennedy
Bryan Kerlin Cameron Kerr
Bob King Anne Kirk Debbie Kirk Joe Krewer David Kubala Eric Lacefield Pat Lacey William Landrum James Lee Phil Lee Steve Leo Mike Leonard Katherine Lewis Brandon Lovett Jim Lubbering Barry Lucas Eric Lunsford Phil Mallon Heather Manry Mike Martin Meredith Mason James Maughon Steve McCullers Eddie McCollum Jennifer McCoy Woody McFarlin Chris McGahee Kevin McInturff Bill McKinley Richard McLeod James H. Miller Sally Mills Becky Mixon Ali Mohajer Lamar Moody Ralph Moore William Moore Stu Moring Bobby Morrow Gene Morton Jeff Morton John Moskaluk Chris New Kathy Nguyen Phil Nungesser Tom O'Bryant Randy Padgett Glenn Page Nathan Parrott Tony Parrott Mike Patton Steve Payne Craig Pendergrast Tim Perkins Ron Peters Guy Pihera Sabrina Piper Jim Poff Martin Poole

Terry Porter Kelly Randall Chuck Rann John Reinhard Ted Rhinehart Eddie Tobinson Barry Robson Kraig A. Rock Richard Rogers Jessica Roth
Juan Ruiz Jerri Russell Susan Rutherford Colby Rutledge
Jim Sapp Jim Scarbrough
Dan Schultz Glenda Scott Wayne Selman Charlie Sewell Rose Mary Seymour Rebecca Shelton Frank Sherrill Majid Shirazi Kim Zimmerman Shorter
Tom Sills Bob Snelson Joseph Spann Jim Stafford Jim Steadman Frank Stephens Shirley Stevenson Shelley Stiebling Harvey Stokes Scott Stokes Clyde Stricklin
Ed Strong Andrew Sullivan Rodger E. Swaim
Bruce Taylor Danny Taylor Greg Teague Mike Thomas Mike Thuss Andy Tsivoglou Larry Turner Steve Turner Scott Uhlich Miguel Valentin Chris Venice Bob Westerfield William White Betsy Whitehead Dwight Wicks Bruce Widener Brian Wiley Keith Williams Eric Wilmarth Lindsay Wood Chris Yancey Siamak Yari Bob Zellner
27

Chattahoochee Basin Alexandra Adams Michael Bennett Sally Bethea Rick Blackwell Birgit Bolton Mark Boner Chris Burke Basil Campbell Steve Cannon Lamonte Carr Howard Carson Doug Carter John Cheek Lancelot Clark Lisa Collins Bill Couch Leonard J. "Jodie" Cox John H. Culbreth Mary M. Davis Mike Dobbins Lee Duncan Mike Dunn James F. Durrett Prescot Eaton Michael C. Farmer Bob Fox Dieter Franz Peter Frost Douglas J. Fulle Doug Gatlin Art Geter Robert M. Giannetti Tal Harber Debbie Hardy Linda Heard Jamie Higgins Kevin Johnson Rick Jones Jo Jones Abby Jordan David Kuechenmeister John T. Lawrence Eric Linton Robert Lynch Russ Marane Chris Martin M. A. "Mack" Martin Edward H. Martin George A. Martin Jim Mathis Robert Mathis Julie Mayfield Doug Mercer Tim Merritt Sally Mills David Moore Charlotte Nash Edward R.Nichols Barbara Noon
28

Basin Advisory Councils

Steve Nygren Adam Orkin Jennifer Pasley Patricia Payne-White Russell Pennington
Tim Perry Larry Phillips Julian Powell Susan Rutherford Pam Sessions Kelvin Simmons Monte Simpson Bettie Sleeth Victoria Sweeny
Bob Tant Ben Taube George B. Taylor Karen Thurman David Tolleson John Turner Shana Udvardy Wayne Vashaw Emil Walcek Anne Webb David Welden Dewey White Connie Wiggins Virgil Williams Michelle Wright Lauri Young Karen Zarin
Etowah Basin Sandy Adams
Gary Ayers Stan Bearden Wayne Biasetti Bruce Biasetti Jonathan Braden
Dan Clark Elyse Cochran Jonathon Cox Joe Lane Cox Bruce Coyle
Carlos Dyer Stan England Angie Farsee Sam Freeman George L. Fricks Doug Gilmore Don Gordon Curtis David Hart Thomas Heard Joe Horton Dexter Jones Kevin Kirby Katie Knowles
John Knox Paul Kreager David M. Kubala

Charles McMillan Diane Minick
Robert Morrison Sean Nicholl Ron Papaleoni Ken Patton Greg Patton Cecil Pruett
Robert J. Puccia Ralph Robinson Don Sackman
Ilona Sanders Steve Simpson James Smulian Candace Stoughton
Bob Sutton Dianne Tate Roy Taylor Lloyd B. "Skip" Teaster Ford Thigpen Drew Tonsmiere Marty Williams Louis Zunguze
Flint Basin Holly A. Brown
Fred Brown Dennis Chase
Chris Clark Lancelot Clark Jerry Donovan Don Easterbrook
Ron Feldner Chad Floyd Scott Formel Carol Fritz Randy L. Harrison Marilyn Johnson Ken Martin Garney Ingram Reid Julius Ross Tori Stivers Bryan Taft Jim Williams Keith Wood John Woody
Lake Lanier Basin James E. Baggett Tommy Bagwell William Bagwell
Darcie Boden Keith Breedlove
Jim Callison John Cunard Kristin Daniel Mack De Vine Denise Deal Chris Ernst Steve Eiberger

Rex Farmer Helen Fincher S.M. Freeman
Jim French Mike Giles Fred Gould Connie Hagler James W. Hazelwood Tom Hensley Tiffanie Hill Blake House Ed Hughes Jackie Joseph Jack Kelly Jim King Emory Lipscomb Deborah Mack Faye Markey Mary Mayhew Frank McGowan Tom O'Bryant Joni Owens Reggie Perry Brian Rochester Lewis Rogers Kirby Scheimann Ron Seder Bryan Shuler Jeff Simmons Tyler Smith Erwin Topper Frank Turk John Watson Daren Wayne Anne Webb Glenn White Sheryl Williams
Ocmulgee Basin Bill Atkinson
David Ausdemore Bill Banks Paul Bowan Mark Brock
Robert A. Burroughs Lowell Chambers Terry Clark Phil Cuthbertson
Beverly Dockeray-Ojo Michael Elliot
Holly Elmendorf Lindy Farmer Mike Horne Jim Hutchens
Richard M. Jeffares Greg Jones
James C. Kinney Kiran Kulkarni
Rick Lipcsei Faye Lyons-Gary

Fox McCarthy Tom McLean Randy Mills Angela Minton Steve Moore Chandra Mysore Elaine Nash
Eric Olson Laura Paul Ken Phillips Kay Pippin David M. Purcell Mike Richter Julius Ross Bill Sands Keith Seiler Russ Spears Bob Troxler Annie Valenty Steve Vance Judy Waters A. J. "Buddy" Welch Greg Williams
Oconee Basin Tim Allen
Frank Armstrong Leigh Askew Benny Bagwell
Sharon Cassidy Sam Chapman Jimmy Echols Peter Gordon Dana M. Heil Jim Henderson Brent Hoffman Tommy Howard Rhett Jackson
Jay Lowery Chris McGahee
James Miller Tom O'Bryant
Tom Oliver Larry Poole Jennifer Scott Chris Semerjian Frank Sherrill Lee Steigele Jim Syfan Annie Valenty Bill White Dr. Dave Wicker

CONTACT US
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District 40 Courtland Street NE Atlanta, Georgia 30303
phone: 404.463.3344 fax: 404.463.3254
WWW.NORTHGEORGIAWATER .ORG