Annual report 2010

Welfare Reform in
Senate Bill 104

DIVISION OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES WELFARE REFORM IN GEORGIA ANNUAL REPORT 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SENATE BILL 104 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
WELFARE REFORM IN GEORGIA, 2010
SECTION A The Total TANF Caseload Count
SECTION B Quarterly and Annual TANF Reports ACF-196 Temporary Assistance to Needy Families-Financial Report
SECTION C Percentage and Number of TANF Caseload Given Hardship Exemption from Lifetime Limit
SECTION D TANF Recipient Transportation Assistance
SECTION E Diversionary Assistance to Prevent TANF Receipt
SECTION F Number of Individuals Denied Assistance Due to a Serious Violent Felony Conviction
SECTION G Number of Mothers Under 19 Who Received TANF Assistance
SECTION H TANF Subsidized Child Care
SECTION I Data on Teen Pregnancy Prevention
SECTION J Number of TANF Sanctions
SECTION K Number of Legal Immigrants Receiving TANF Benefits by Category of Immigration Status
SECTION L Number of Families No Longer Eligible Because of Time Limits
SECTION M Follow-up Information on Job Retention and Earnings
SECTION N Evaluation of the Effect of Code Section 49-4-186 On the Number of Births to TANF Recipients Families

- WELFARE REFORM IN GEORGIA: 2000 2010
Senate Bill 104
The enabling legislation for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program in Georgia was Senate Bill 104, now known as Act 389. The major provisions of the bill included:
Most recipients are limited to 48 months of TANF assistance. All adult TANF recipients and all eligible parents are mandated to participate in approved work activities. All adult TANF recipients were required to sign a personal responsibility plan that emphasized the fact that they must take personal responsibility to better their lives.
Some of the required actions included:
- ensuring that minor children attend school - attending school conferences - attending family planning counseling - participating in substance abuse treatment, if needed
- having children immunized
- obtaining prenatal care.
Teen parents are required to continue to live with a parent or responsible relative, and must remain in school to obtain their GED or high school diploma. Family cap measures were strengthened, so that TANF cash assistance was not increased for recipients who had another child after receiving TANF for ten months. Families who did not meet work or personal responsibility requirements could be sanctioned, with a reduction or termination of benefits for three (3) months or 12 months, depending on the number of infractions.
The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act
In August 1996, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) was enacted. PRWORA eliminated the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) cash entitlement program, and replaced it with the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant. PRWORA effectively ended welfare entitlement, replacing the AFDC program with the time-limited benefits of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The purposes of this legislation were to:

Provide assistance to needy families so that children could be cared for in their own homes;
Reduce welfare dependency by promoting job preparation, work and marriage;
Prevent teen pregnancies; and
Encourage the formation and maintenance of two-parent families.
PRWORA established mandatory work and job training participation rates for recipients and enacted time limits for the receipt of TANF benefits. Moreover, PRWORA afforded states greater flexibility in the design and implementation of the TANF program and provided each state a block grant to fund its TANF program. State Maintenance of Effort (MOE) spending levels were mandated so that states would maintain levels of spending consistent with previous spending for AFDC.
In the fall of 1996, Georgia submitted a state plan for administering the TANF program. Following a 45-day federal review period and a series of public hearings, the plan was accepted by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Georgia was approved to receive its share of the TANF block grant. The first TANF checks were issued on January 1,1997.
In past years, the most important aspect of a caseworker's job was issuing welfare benefits. With the 1996 introduction of WorkFirst the emphasis shifted to helping recipients find work. During SFY 2005 and 2006, Georgia has focused on training the case managers (formerly called case workers) to assist TANF recipients in maintaining employment as well as seeking career advancement. Customers are not just expected to get a job but to keep the job, seek advancement and earn enough money to leave the welfare rolls. As a result, our TANF caseloads are greatly declined.
New Developments
In October 2004, Georgia initiated a new service delivery strategy for TANF called TANF = WORK NOW. This strategy focuses on 3 elements: (1) Education-TANF Clients are educated at the point of application on all the goals and requirements of the TANF program. (2) Engagement-TANF clients with a work requirement are engaged in work activities within 7 days of the approval of their application. (3) Monitoring-TANF clients are monitored consistently and frequently to ensure adherence to program requirements. This concept yielded a significant decrease in the number of Total TANF Cases, in particular the number of Adult Cases on TANF. In SFY07, the monthly average of adult cases was 4,080.
In April 2006, Georgia took TANF = Work Now a step further by focusing on values and beliefs that under gird our work and assist in strengthening Georgia's families. New policies were implemented and case manages were trained on the principles of case management. The values and beliefs that we espouse are:
Welfare is not good enough for any family.

Government cannot and should not take the place of family.
Children are better off when responsible caretakers are able to provide for their families.
There is dignity in work, whether with the hand or the head.
Georgia urges responsible adult behavior and economic self-sufficiency to end dependency on government assistance.
With proper preparation, support and supervision, we can help our customers create a more secure employment future for themselves.
In October 2006, Georgia recognized the need for additional transitional supports to assist customers with job retention and career advancement, thereby, launching the Work Support Program. Details of this program are contained in the Work Supports Section.
In February 2008, the Final Rule for the Reauthorization of TANF was released by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF)/ the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). This rule was based on changes required by the Deficit Reduction Act ( D M ) of 2005. According to the DRA final document (45 CFR, Parts 261,262,263, and 265. pg. 6772), "The DRA reauthorized the TANF program through fiscal year (FFY) 2010 with a renewed focus on work, program integrity, and strengthening families through healthy marriage promotion and responsible fatherhood."
The Deficit Reduction Act retained most of the original welfare reform law. The key changes in the final rule were: (1) defined each of the 12 countable work activities, (2) defined the term "work eligible individual," (3) clarified that a State may count only actual hours of participation, (4) recalibrated the caseload reduction credit by updating the base year from FFY 1995 to FFY 2005, (5) required each State to establish and maintain work participation verification procedures through a Work Verification Plan, (6) established a new penalty for failure to comply with work verification procedures, and (7) allows additional pro-family expenditures to count toward a State's maintenance-ofeffort (MOE) requirement.
Georgia has made the necessary changes to be compliant with the new guidelines stated in the final rule. The most significant changes were the new internal control guidelines which required major system changes. There was no other major impact on the way business is conducted in Georgia, or in the requirements for this report.
In FFY 2009, Georgia DHS began to see an increase in the TANF Adult caseload. The agency believes the increase in caseload to be as a result of the global economic downturn that became evident near the end of 2008. Staff in the field has reported that more applications are being approved as more people exhaust their resources and are turning to DHS for services.

In FFY 2010, the agency rolled out a new business process, Georgia Re-engineering our Work (GROW). The GROW process establishes three functions whereby case managers focus on (1) interviewing applicants, (2) processing applications, or (3) finalizing applications across county lines. An applicant in North Georgia applying for benefits may be interviewed by a case manager in Middle Georgia. The application may then be transmitted to a case manager in West Georgia for processing, and transmitted to another location for finalization or approval. After approval, the case will be transferred back to county where the applicant resides. While enduring reduction in staff and other resources and increases in caseloads, counties and regions are working across physical boundaries to share resources and best practices, as they provide services to families in need. The GROW process symbolizes the concept of doing more with less.
TANF Adult CASELOADS
SFY 2000 thru SFY 2010
Collaborative Efforts
To achieve Georgia's commitment to assisting TANF recipients to fulfill the requirements of Act 389 and to attain self-sufficiency, it was critical to collaborate with other public service agencies, and with entities in the education and business world. Partnerships were formed with the Georgia Department of Labor (GDOL) and with the Technical College System of Georgia (TCSG) to develop a job-ready workforce. Each agency committed to providing specific services to TANF recipients, with the Georgia
Department of Human Services (DHS) (formerly Department of Human Resources -
DHR) providing case management and support services. TCSG is the primary source

for job training, and GDOL focuses on job development and placement. The services provided through these partnerships have contributed greatly to the decline in the number of families receiving TANF since the implementation of welfare reform. TANF customers utilized the job training, job development and job placement resources from our partners to gain or refresh their skills; thus, becoming more marketable, which enabled them to find better jobs and leave the TANF program. Due to the significant decrease in the caseloads, DHS no longer have a contractual agreement with TCSG. However, both agencies still operate in partnership with them to serve the citizens of Georgia.
TANF CASELOADS
SFY 2000 thru SFY 2010
In SFY 2000 Georgia had 54,091 cases on its TANF rolls. The current total number of cases on TANF in Georgia for SFY 2010 is 19,988. Georgia has reduced its rolls by approximately 37% in ten years.
vii

Work Supports
In addition to partnerships with other agencies, the availability of work supports was critical to the success of TANF self-sufficiency efforts. In order to secure and maintain employment, many families required assistance with transportation, childcare, and medical expenses, as well as assistance in obtaining child support. In SFY 2006, Georgia implemented new policies, which provided TANF recipients with two new work support services. They were Employment Intervention Services (EIS) and Transitional Support Services (TSS). EIS is non-recurrent, short-term assistance that is equivalent to four times the maximum grant amount for the AU size. The availability of the EIS must be discussed with all clients during application process. EIS is available only once in a client's lifetime. TSS assistance provides transportation, childcare and various incidentals (occupational licensing fees, special work boots, clothing, tools, etc.) to allow TANF applicants and recipients to seek and/or maintain employment. Applicants who are employed or become employed but remain eligible for TANF cash assistance have an option to choose between EIS or TSS. They cannot receive both. TSS is available only once per 24-calendar-month period. During SFY 2007, we implemented the Work Support Program. The Work Support Program provides Work Support Payments (WSP), Transitional Support Services (TSS) and Job Coaching to working families. In order to address job retention, the work support payments will assist the former TANF recipient with additional work related expenses or incidentals, while the TSS provides transportation, childcare and various incidentals needed to maintain employment. The services of the work support program are available to the former TANF families for a period of twelve (12) months and twice in their lifetime receipt of TANF. There has been a decline in the number of former TANF recipients receiving TANF work support payments in Georgia. The decline in work support payments has been attributed to the downturn in the economy and the fact that fewer families are leaving TANF due to employment.
..q
Vlll

TANF Work Support Payments

Number of Clients

, 1,600

State Fiscal Years 2007 - 2010

I

1,400 1,200 -

I

I800 -

"06:00

BSFY2010 lSFY2009
s ~ 20y08 .SFY 2007

Jul 773 1,149 1,252

Aug 716 1,049 1,353

Sep 680 1,033 1,479

Oct 636 1,019 1,473

Nov
521 1,009 1,446 1,252

Dec 492 962 1,389 1,353

Jan 431 948 1,352 1,479

Feb 452 920 1,418 1,473

Mar 481 884 1,353 1,446

Apr 507 856 1,287 1,389

2

May

Jun

550

472

720

382

1,200 1,352

1,130
1,418 -

WSP The Work Support Payments are paid through a two tiered process:
During the first six months, the former TANF family can receive a cash supplement of $200.00 per month. The family will also be eligible to receive transitional support services for this initial six-month period. During the second six months, the former TANF family can receive a cash supplement of $100.00 per month. The family will no longer be eligible to receive transitional support services during this time. As the caseloads decreased, the WSP also decreased during SFY 2009. NOTE: The family that remains eligible for a reduced TANF check must be given an option to choose between TANF and the WSP.
EIS
Employment Intervention Service (EIS) is available to an applicant who has a short term critical need and she or he:

has a full time job but is temporarily on unpaid leave due to his or her temporary illness or the illness of a family member and is scheduled to return to work within 4 months, and the family unit meets the gross income ceiling (GIC) test, is employed at the time of application and is potentially eligible for less than the maximum amount of cash assistance for the family size, and so declines TANF cash assistance to preserve months of TANF eligibility, obtains employment during Applicant Job Search that reduces hislher potential benefits and slhe decides to withdraw hislher application to stop the TANF clock.
Employment status and amount of earnings must be verified and documented in SUCCESS and the source of verification must be filed in the case record.
TSS is available for a period of six months beginning with the first month of ineligibility for cash benefits or the month in which the TANF case closes due to employment.
TSS is available to: an applicant whose employment obtained during applicant job search causes the family to become ineligible for cash assistance, an a'pplicant who voluntarily withdraws his or her TANF application and chooses TSS because employment obtained during applicant job search has significantly reduced his or her potential TANF grant amount and the client wishes to preserve months of potential TANF eligibility, an applicant employed at the time of application, is potentially eligible for less than the maximum amount of cash assistance for the family size, declines TANF cash assistance to preserve months of TANF eligibility and chooses TSS to meet his or her immediate need to maintain the job, a recipient whose employment causes the family to become ineligible for cash assistance, a recipient whose on-going TANF case is closed due to loss of earned income disregards, or a recipient who voluntarily closes the TANF case because employment has significantly reduced the TANF grant amount and the client wishes to stop the TANF clock and preserve months of potential TANF eligibility.

Comparison of Cash Assistance and Childcare Expenditures in Millions of Dollars
SFY 2000 thru SFY 2010
.
'ANFCash Assistance Childcare Subsidies
Transportation Transportation expenditures greatly increased with the implementation of TANF and subsequently decreased as the number of TANF cases declined. GDHSIDFCS offers two transportation work supports options: direct payment to applicants and clients and transportation services through GDHS' Consolidated Transportation System. Although funds were available for transportation expenses, transportation services were not readily available, particularly in rural areas. In SFY 2000, GDHSIDFCS collaborated with the Georgia Office of Facilities and Support Services to expand the Consolidated Transportation System. TANF funds invested in this initiative have increased from $345,000 in SFY 2000 to $6M in SFY 2010. TANF funds paid directly to applicants and clients totaled $2.1M in SFY 2010.
Childcare Affordable, quality childcare is essential to the success of individuals obtaining and maintaining employment. The average number of children in childcare from month to month increased from 56,313 children in SFY 2009 to 78,289 in SFY 2010. In addition, expenditures in the program increased from $167M in SFY 2009 to $212M in SFY 2010. Childcare continues to be one of the largest programs managed by caseworkers at the county level.

Number of Children in Childcare
(Based on payments processed) State Fiscal Year 2008 - 2010

~ u l A U ~ aep mSFY2010 55,347 59,889 58,531 .SFY2009 52,916 54,270 54,984
SFY2008 56,682 56,162 54,775

Oct 60,264 54,084 56,037

kov 62,439 54,037 54,741

vec 61,684 53,525 55,048

Jan 63,020 52,095 53,235

reb 65,712 52,816 53,296

alar 70,076 54,043 54,637

wpr 72,020 53,989 53,575

wlay 78,371 55,369 54,360

~un
78,289 56,313
- 54,634

Medicaid
Many TANF recipients beginning first-time employment were either unable to afford the medical insurance made available to them by their employers or found that few employers offered the option of medical insurance. The combination of Low Income Medicaid (LIM), Transitional Medical Assistance (TMA), and Right from the Start Medicaid (RSM) or Peachcare for Kids (PCK) provided and continues to provide this necessary coverage. The 12-month continuation of Medicaid in the form of Transitional Medical Assistance (TMA) provides necessary medical coverage for families who become ineligible for LIM as a result of new or increased earned income. Once TMA ends, the children of most families are eligible for additional coverage through RSM or PCK. As of June of 2010, there were 715,924 Georgia families that received Medicaid through ABD, LIM, TMA, and RSM.

Child Support Insufficient child support prevented many single parents from attaining economic selfsufficiency. Increased collections by the Division of Child Support Services (DCSS) program are helping families receive more of the child support owed to them. There had been a slight drop in the amount of child support collected in SF 2008 ($566M) but the collections rebounded in FY 2009 ($595M) and in 2010 ($600M).
Increasing Success in Collecting Child Support
(Collections in Millions)
Additionally, Georgia's Fatherhood Initiative has been expanded throughout the state. The Technical College System of Georgia (TCSG) has taken the lead in this project. Job training is provided to assist fathers in securing employment that will enable them to pay child support and provide for their children. This initiative teaches young men how to be more responsible parents.
Other Work Supports
The future of welfare reform in Georgia will includes a continuing focus on moving families to economic independence through stable employment. Most recipients who are currently remaining on TANF fall into three main categories. The first and largest is comprised of children who receive TANF in "child-only" cases in which a non-parent relative is caring for the children and is not included in the TANF grant. These families are not subject to time limits or work requirements. The second category consists of recipients who are enrolled in an activity and participating at the required federally mandated level for adults receiving TANF for themselves and their children. The third and most challenging category consists of recipients who are dealing with multiple barriers to self-sufficiency. Some of these barriers include substance abuse, illiteracy,
. . .
Xlll

disabilities, and domestic violence issues. The following initiatives continue to assist "
these recipients in attaining self-sufficiency:
The GDHS Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities and Addictive Diseases (MHDDAD) provide substance abuse counseling and treatment through outpatient and residential facilities. Treatment for clients who have been diagnosed with mental impairment and mental retardation is also provided.
The GDOL Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Program provides disability assessments for recipients who allege a disability that impedes their ability to work. VR also places recipients in appropriate VR programs based on assessment outcomes and makes recommendations that assist DFCS in planning services to help recipients overcome barriers to employment.
The TCSG provides expanded adult literacy services.
Domestic violence issues have been emphasized through various measures. Contracts have been signed with local shelters to provide assessments for individuals claiming domestic violence as a barrier to becoming self-sufficient. Waivers from certain program requirements may be granted based on assessment outcomes. Training is provided for DFCS staff. Brochures and posters are distributed throughout local areas to increase awareness of available services.
Lifetime Limits
In Georgia, the receipt of TANF is limited to 48 months in a lifetime for an assistance unit. Beginning in January 1997, each month in which an assistance unit receives TANF, counts toward the 48-month lifetime limit. The federal lifetime limit is 60 months. An assistance unit that is subject to the lifetime limit may have the limit waived if it is determined that the assistance unit meets certain hardship criteria.
Hardship Waivers
Some families will require additional time to prepare for work and some may never be fully self-sufficient. For these families, Georgia has established a hardship waiver policy that is approved on a case-by-case basis. The waiver of the lifetime limit allows for temporary extensions of TANF to families experiencing additional barriers.
The hardship waiver policy was revised in April 2006. There are now three hardship criteria for case managers to use to evaluate each family's situation.
1. A family member is a victim of domestic violence or has been threatened.
2. The applicantlrecipient has an active child protective services case and the circumstances necessitating the CPS case create a barrier to the applicant'slrecipient's attainment of self-sufficiency.

3. The disability of the grantee relative, other eligible adult or a household member is a barrier to employment for the grantee relative or other eligible adults.
Other forms of work supports, including Food Stamps, Medicaid, shelter and utility assistance, are available to families that do not meet any of the hardship criteria.
Georgia's TANF caseload totaled 50,996 cases in December 2000 when the first 1,446 families reached the 48-month time limit. Of those families, 1,094 met a hardship criterion and were eligible for extended TANF benefits through hardship waivers. Since December 2000, the number of families reaching the 48-month time limit has consistently decreased.
In December 2001 yet another milestone in the TANF program was reached when 311 Georgia TANF recipients reached the federally imposed 60-month TANF lifetime limit. Of these 311 recipients, 280 continued to be eligible under a hardship extension. As with the 48-month time limit, the number of families reaching the 60-month federal lifetime limit has decreased. In June 2002 there were 1,566 families receiving a hardship extension, but in June 2005 there were only 230 families receiving extensions. In June of 2006, 49 families received an extension, while in June 2010; Georgia had only 2 families who received a hardship extension.
TANF Hardship Extensions
June of the Year from 2002 to 2010

Teen Pregnancy Prevention

The scope of the problem: In the past 10 years, the birth rate among girls in Georgia 15-19 years old declined 19%, from 63.9 births per 1,000 females in 1998 to 51.7 in 2008. During that same time period, the teen birth rate for non-Hispanic White adolescents declined 36%. The decline in the teen birth rate among non-Hispanic African-Americans was 30%. The rate of teen births has increased among Hispanic adolescents by 17%.

Today, more teen mothers are unmarried than in past generations. In 2008, 86% of teens that gave birth were not married, compared to 77% in 1998. Single-parent families, especially young families, are at a greater risk of emotional and financial instability.

Teen mothers are also at greater risk of receiving late or no prenatal care, having a premature birth (<37 weeks) or low birth weight baby (<2,500 grams), and experiencing an infant death ( 4 year).

In 2006, 6% (1,007) of 15-19 year old mothers had experienced late or no prenatal care. In 2008, 15% (2,850) of births to 15-19 year olds were premature, and 12% (1,973) were low birth weight. The infant mortality rate for 15-19 year olds was 11.06 infant deaths per 1,000 live births for 2003-2005.

Repeat births are common in teens. In 2008, 20.9% of all births among teens 15-19

years old were repeat births. Births to 10-14 year olds made up 1.5% of all births to 10-

I 9 year olds in 2008. While the teen birth numbers have been declining, pregnancy in

this age group remains a serious public health concern. In 2008, 421 girls ages 10-14

became pregnant and 256 gave birth. It is imperative that Georgia reduce the incidence

I

Teenage birth rates for 1519 year olds by racelethnlcity. 19982008

I

i

Proportion of teen births by racelethnicity, age 1519,2008 (N=17.221)

I

Unknown 1,102(7%)

of teenage pregnancy among adolescents in order to reduce the Georgia teen birthrates.

xvi

Progress: Teen birth rates have decreased both in Georgia and nationally. Georgia has made significant progress in reducing teen births and the associated personal and economic costs; but Georgia must continue to reduce the teen birth rate even further by reducing sexual activity and other risky behaviors among unmarried teens. Unintended pregnancies, particularly those occurring very early in a woman's reproductive years, often have adverse health, social, and economic consequences for the mother and her child. Teen pregnancy and out-of-wedlock parenting is linked to poverty and welfare dependency. Teenage mothers are more likely to be unmarried, drop out of school, and rely on Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF).
What is the Georgia Department of Community Health Doing? Preventing teen pregnancy is a priority for the Department of Community Health's Division of Public Health. In partnership with the Georgia Department of Human Services, the Division addresses teen pregnancy through two programs using a comprehensive approach, the Georgia Adolescent Health and Youth Development Program and Georgia Women's Health Family Planning Program.
Georgia Adolescent Health and Youth Development (AHYD) Program: The goal of the AHYD program is to prevent teenage pregnancy by helping adolescents to grow up healthy, educated, employable, and connected to their families and communities.
The Program was established as a result of a teenage pregnancy prevention initiative funded by the Georgia General Assembly in July 1998. The Adolescent Health and Youth Development Program, is housed in the Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Programs (HPDPP), within the Division of Public Health. The AHYD program aims to prevent welfare dependency and improve economic opportunity and responsible parenting.
Currently, funding for the program is administered through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Department of Community Health (DCH) and the Department of Human Resources (DHR). Funds are provided to county health departments and local public health districts to support the planning, development, implementation, and evaluation of successful programs that address the broad range of social and economic factors that affect teen behavior, including substance abuse, violence, tobacco use, obesity, and teen sexual activity.
Specifically, the AHYD program provides funding to 30 Teen Center Programs in 26 counties, and a Youth Development Coordinator (YDC) in each of the state's 18 public health districts. The state office provides ongoing program monitoring as well as technical assistance and training to district and program staff.
Teen Center Programs are operated through county health departments statewide and are located in counties reporting high rates of high school dropouts, HIVISTls, and/or teen pregnancy.
xvii

Youth Development Coordinators (YDC) coordinates efforts between district and county health departments including Teen Center Programs. Youth Development Coordinators form critical partnerships with out-of-school programs and county and community agencies, holding conferences with communities, faith-based institutions, and public health leaders to foster collaboration around key adolescent health and youth development issues.
The state AHYD Consultant provides YDC and Teen Center Program staff with ongoing program and fiscal monitoring, technical assistance, training and resources.
Specific strategies: Research shows that successful teen pregnancy prevention programs address the broad range of social and economic factors that affect teen behavior. No single approach is effective by itself. In Georgia a comprehensive approach is utilized. This approach consists of several strategies including the following:
Coordinated district adolescent health services: Health districts and county health departments actively partner with local youth organizationslproviders to co-sponsor health education and promotion events, and to assure that youth have access to needed services and opportunities within their communities (e.g., legal services; food and housing assistance, dental services; tutoring and academic support; entrepreneurship; mental health counseling; youth development, physical activity, socialization, mentoring and related services). AHYD supports these local partnerships and collaborations by providing funding for a district Youth Development Coordinator to foster collaboration and coordination of efforts in each of the public health districts in Georgia. Annual district and teen center programsJwork plans demonstrate local collaboration.
Comprehensive preventive health services: The Teen center programs provide comprehensive prevention services, including abstinence education, drug and alcohol prevention education, and adolescent reproductive health services. Services are offered in teen-friendly facilities and in locations such as shopping centers, welfare offices, community centers, and mobile units (vans) that go to places where teens feel comfortable. Most of the youth who come to the Teen Centers do so with the knowledge of their parents. Teens come with a wide variety of needs. Teens may ask for information, attend abstinence classes, learn to improve their reaction to stress and conflict, get advice on nutrition and physical activity, obtain sports physicals, be tested for a sexually transmitted disease or pregnancy, join a support group, or just need someone to talk to. These programs also provide youth access to screening for a variety of health problems and when identified, provide or link them to needed services including immunizations and physicals. Teens are referred to Teen Centers by their parents, other teens, school staff, caseworkers, community members, and outreach workers. Some programs also pair pregnant teens with experienced mothers to encourage pregnant teens to access prenatal care, provide them with information and

resources to help them care for their babies, and to prevent additional unplanned pregnancies.
Abstinence education: Abstinence education is the only certain way to eliminate the risk of pregnancy and STDs. It is the primary prevention method promoted across AHYDfunded programs. Abstinence education emphasizes sexual abstinence as the best choice for preventing pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. AHYD Teen Center programs are funded to conduct "abstinence until marriage" education in conjunction with the DHR Teen Center Pregnancy and STDlHlV Prevention Policy (September 2004). The abstinence education must meet federal criteria.
Outreach and community referral: Local adolescent health and youth development programs coordinate with other professionals and agencies to assist adolescents and their families in obtaining needed AHYD services and information. Specially trained staffs with first-hand knowledge of and experience working with at-risk teens are available at Teen Center Programs.
Parent education and involvement: Information and education programs are available to help parents strengthen their parenting and communication skills, build strong bonds with their teens, and understand the developmental changes specific to adolescence. Each DCH Teen Center program has established a Parent Advisory Committee (PAC) to provide parents a meaningful way to participate in planning, decision-making, and opportunities for positive health promotion in the community. PACs, in collaboration with local public health officials, are responsible for determining the programs and activities offered in each local community. The County Board of Health in the county in which the Teen Center is located is responsible for establishing and promulgating the by-laws for nomination, selection, and participation in the PAC. PAC meetings must be held at least quarterly, and each Teen Center must offer a Parent Education Program (PEP) for parents in the community to educate and train them on how to be more effective communicators with their teens about sexual issues and values.
Faithlhealth community partnerships: The AHYD program has formed a partnership with members of the faith community and held conferences with community, faith, and public health leadership to encourage collaboration and working together for positive youth development and health promotion.
Use of risk reduction strategies: Teen Centers using risk reduction strategies that include contraception must follow the DPH "Standard Protocols for Registered Professional Nurses in Public Health", including encouraging parental involvement, signed informed consent, and distribution of contraceptive devices only in a clinical setting by a health care professional.
Best practices for prevention programs: All prevention programs funded by DCH must incorporate best practices for effective teen pregnancy and STD prevention programs. In addition, all programs must have a demonstrated impact on key outcomes related to teen pregnancy and STD prevention.

Georgia's Women Health Family Planning Program:
The AHYD program works synergistically with the Georgia Women's Health Family Planning Program, also located in the Department of Community Health, Division of Public Health (Maternal and Child Health Program). It coordinates family planning services through county health departments. These services are essential to the wellbeing of women, men, adolescents, and the community at large. The Family Planning Program offers opportunities for individuals to plan and space their pregnancies in order to achieve personal goals and self-sufficiency. MCH has developed strategies and implemented services to prevent and reduce repeat adolescent pregnancies, including facilitating referrals to family planning services, increasing community awareness, and promoting life skills and abstinence at the community level. Families, parents, and legal guardians are encouraged to participate in the decision of minors to seek these services. Adolescents are counseled on how to resist coercive attempts to engage in sexual activities. Abstinence as the most effective way to prevent pregnancy, contraceptive and safer sex practice options to reduce the risk for STDIHIV, and pregnancy are discussed with all adolescents. Adolescents are not assumed to be sexually active because they seek family planning services.

In 2010 AHYD-funded programs accomplished the following program specific outcomes:

I ...easure I:
Goal:
. rogres,.

Initial visits for adolescent reproductive health (family planning) services:

8,225

Outcome

6,558

This was accomplished by providing services through the teen

centers and mobile health clinics.

1 Number of community partnerships established with schools,
faith-based organizations, non-profit organizations and other governmental agencies.

34 1

Outcome

473

Some of the community partners include County Drug Task

Forces, Health Departments and Boards Of Education, State

Women's Health Program, local universities, media outlets, Boy

Scouts of America, police departments, Georgia Hispanic

I Network, Girls, Inc., Ramada Plaza Hotel, Center for Racial Understanding, United Way, St. Galilee Outreach Ministries, 4-H,

and Big-Brothers Big Sisters.

u r e3 Goal:
Progress:

--
Number of local AHYD approved youth development programs

(individual activitieslevents) established (implemented) for at-risk

youth populations (e.g. Hispanic, males, and parenting teens).

.. - -

I-3-,3.95

Outcome

I

2,518

-

Youth development opportunities occurred through: community

I and volunteer service events; blood and food drives; Easter Seals

Project; adult to youth mentoring activities; pregnant and

parenting teen support groups; local universitylcollege teen

mentoring programs; curriculum-based educational sessions;

"Firestarter Youth Power"; "Teens Against Tobacco Use";

I

"Postponing Sexual Involvement"; "Smart-Girls" and "Wise-Guys"

which provides abstinence-based education with a target

populations of girls and boys considered significantly "at-risk in

middle and high school; leadership training activities; Red Cross

CPR,and First-Aid certification classes; public speaking

workshops; summer youth leadership program; life skills and

development events; effective communication workshops; weekly

health education sessions; and teen pregnancy and finance

workshops

Measure 4: Goal:
Progress:

-- -
Number of professionals for i n - s e r v i c w

1 1 -

- O-utcome

1,165

Teen Center staff attended and provided in-service training

i

events such as Sexual Assault AwarenesslPrevention, Teen

Pregnancy Prevention, Dropout Prevention, Self-EsteemlPeer

Pressure, Life-Skills Training, Title X online, Training, HIV

Counseling Training, Youth Empowerment Conference, Internet

Safety, Linking Parents and Educators, Drug and Alcohol

Awareness, Working with Hispanic Women in Rural Settings,

CPR, Using What Works: Adapting Evidence-Based Programs to

Fit Your Needs, and Coalition Buildin.g..

- -

-

Number of public awareness and community education events:

2,276

Ic U & ~ L L8[,947

Public awareness and adolescent health promotion included the distribution of a bullying prevention brochure developed with the District Public Information Officer, bulletin boards designed by

Teen Center youth for Alcohol and Drug Prevention to coincide with school proms, "Got Consent" awareness campaign,

community fairs, articles in school newspaper, radio and newspaper advertisements, HIV testing information via Teen

Pregnancy Prevention listserv and Face book.

xxi

For more information about Adolescent Health and Youth Development Unit Programs, please contact us at 404-657-6638 or visit http://health.state.ga.us/programs/adolescentl
Sexual Violence Prevention Program
Office of Prevention and Wellness
Sexual Violence Prevention Program (SVP) is located in the Division of Public Health, Health Promotions and Disease Prevention Programs. The Sexual Violence Prevention Program was created as a result of the Violence against Women Act of 1994. Through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Rape Prevention and Education Program, funds are provided to States and Territories to support rape prevention and education programs conducted by rape crisis centers, state sexual assault coalitions, and other community partners.
The SVP program is guided by a set of prevention principles which are: Preventing first-time perpetration and victimization; Reducing modifiable risk factors while enhancing protective factors associated with sexual violence perpetration and victimization; Using the best available evidence when planning, implementing, and evaluating prevention programs; Incorporating behavior and social change theories into prevention programs; Using population-based surveillance to inform program decisions and monitor trends; and Evaluating prevention efforts and using the results to improve future program plans. 1
The SVP Program provides rural, urban, and suburban areas the opportunity to change sexual violence through the implementation of the following legislatively approved activities:
Educational Seminars; Training programs for professionals; Preparation of information material; Operation of hotlines; Training programs for students and campus personnel designed to reduce the incidence of sexual assault at colleges and universities; Increase the awareness about drugs used to facilitate rapes or sexual assaults; and Other efforts to increase awareness in underserved communities and among individuals with disabilities as defined in Section 3 of the American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Section 12102),

During 2009-2010, the following community based agencies were awarded a contract to carry out the legislatively improved activities:
University Health Services, Inc./Rape Crisis and Sexual Assault Services Augusta Sexual Assault Support Center, Inc. - Columbus Women In Need of God's Shelter, Inc. - Dublin Rape Crisis of the Coastal Empire, Inc. - Savannah Houston Area Drug Action Council, Inc. Southern Crescent Sexual Assault Center, Inc. - Jonesboro Support In Abusive Family Emergencies, Inc. - Blairsville North Georgia Mountain Crisis Network, Inc. - Blue Ridge Carroll Rape Crisis Center, Inc. - Carrollton.
During 2009, the contracted agencies provided educational services to 74,973 school aged children, aged 5-18; trained 2,260 professionals; provided information and referrals to 2,759 hotline callers; and participated in 303 community awareness events.
DHS Afterschool Care Program
Since the fall of 2005, the DHS Afterschool Care Program (formerly DHR Afterschool Services) has expanded out-of-school time services to school age youth throughout the state of Georgia. The program was designed to and continues to support DHS' broader goal of reducing teen pregnancy, promoting self-sufficiency among families and ending intergenerational poverty. Educational attainment and healthy living are key factors in preventing future welfare dependency among today's youth, particularly youth of economically disadvantaged families. Structured out-of-school time services can play a critical role in reducing the opportunity for youth to engage in at-risk behavior, including pre-marital sex, motivating youth to reach a high level of educational attainment, such as on-time grade promotion and graduation from high school, and can provide youth with an opportunity to increase physical fitness activity and gain exposure to good nutrition habits that helps in the prevention and decrease of obesity and other diseases and illnesses that can affect them.
In FFY '06 over $13 million dollars in TANF and state funding were used to expand summer and afterschool programs for children ages 6-19. These funds were distributed to community-based organizations and public agencies and the awards ranged from $28,000 to $800,000 to over $6 million for the GA Alliance of Boys and Girls Clubs, Inc. statewide. Over 200 sites and 19,000 youth benefited from these services. Through a pilot program with the Division of Mental Health (formerly a part of the Department of Human Resources) 5,300 youth with severe emotional difficulty and behavior disorders took part in summer recreation programs. A total of $3.5 million was provided for these programs.
In FFY '07 the budget in TANF and state funding remained at the same level but the distribution was changed. Funds were distributed to community-based organizations
xxiii

and public agencies. The awards ranged from $18,000 to $647,900 to over $6 million for the GA Alliance of Boys and Girls Clubs, Inc. Over 230 sites and 19,000 youth benefited from these services. Through the continued partnership with the Department's Division of Mental Health, 2,800 young people with severe emotional difficulty and behavior disorders (or those at risk for developing such behaviors) took part in summer recreation programs. A total of $1.8 million was provided for these programs.
In FFY '08 the Afterschool Care Program was funded solely with TANF funds. In addition, the maintenance of effort requirement was increased from $20M to $28M. Funds were distributed to community based-organizations and public agencies. The awards ranged from $25,000 to $850,000 to $8 million for the Georgia Alliance of Boys and Girls Clubs, Inc. to continue providing services state wide. Over 300 sites and 23,000 youth benefited from these services. $1M in funding was allocated to continue the pilot program with the Division of Mental Health and service youth with severe emotional or co-occurring disorders.
In FFY '09 the Afterschool Care Program continued to provide funding to programs using only TANF funds and the awards ranged from to $5,000 to $850,000 for community-based organizations and public agencies and $7 million for the Georgia Alliance of Boys and Girls Clubs, Inc. This year, the DHS Afterschool Care Program funds have impacted over 330 program sites and over 38,000 youth have benefited from these programs across the state. Through a partnership with the Georgia Afterschool Investment Council, United Way of Metropolitan Atlanta and the Governor's Office of Children and Families, the Georgia Afterschool Institute was implemented and provided professional development training to staff that work in the out-of-school time field.
In FFY '10, the Afterschool Care Program supported 318 afterschool and/or summer program sites. These sites collectively served over 22,000 youth throughout the state of Georgia. Award amounts ranged from $25,000 to $7 million dollars and each contracting organization and agency that provided afterschool and/or summer services to youth and their families were required to provide a commitment of matching funds. The total commitment of matching funds for FFY '10 was $28M to support DHS' Maintenance of Effort.
THE RESULTS OF GEORGIA'S PRWORA INITIATIVE
Georgia has successfully achieved and in some instances exceeded the goals and requirements of the TANF program as mandated by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, including participation rates, maintenance of effort spending, and reducing the teen pregnancy rates. This effort has enabled thousands of Georgia's citizens to achieve an improved way of life through welfare reform. Children of TANF families observe first-hand the benefits of work, as their parents provide for them a higher standard of living than was possible on welfare. These positive role models will, undoubtedly reduce the likelihood of children becoming future adult TANF recipients. Georgia will continue to demonstrate the successes that have been achieved for its families.

A. The Total TANF Caseload Count

Total TANF Caseload Count
State Fiscal Year 2010

Average Monthly

B. Quarterly and Annual TANF Reports, in Full, Prepared for Submission for the Federal Government
Reports submitted to the federal government during the State Fiscal Year include: ACF- 196 Temporary Assistance to Needy Families- Financial Report ACF- 199 TANF Data Report
TANF-ACF-DI-97-6 dated September 30, 1997 requires a computerized database containing disaggregated case and client record information, as specified in Section 4 11(a) of Public Law 104-193, "The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act at 1996." No Aggregate paper reports are required.

Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families

APPENDIX D

8. TRANSITIONAL SERV3CES FOR EMPLOYED

I $

I$

16

IS

I

9. FEDERAL UNLIQUIDATEOOBLIGATIONS 10. UNOBLIGATED BALANCE

-- QUARTERLY ESTIMhTE
12. ESTIMATE FOR NEXT QTRSNDED

TANF FEDERAZ, J?UNDS
I

I

THIS ISTO CERTIFY THATTHE INFORMATIONREPORTED ON ALL PARTS OF THIS FORM I S ACCUR4TEANO TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEUGEAND BELIEF.

I

TYPED NAME, TITLE, AGENCY NAME

B, r o DATE SUBMITTED:

:jl /

I

SUBMITTAL: [ X X X ] NEW I ] REVISED

Antonia Babb, Director

PAGE I OF 1 APPROVED OMB NO. 0970-0199 FORM ACF-196 (6lMIOZ) PRWEkEO 6V: TEeFK E. BFNHBT 1404 a-1

OFFICE OF FINANCIAL SERVICES OEPARTMENTOF HUMAN RESOURCES
14041 656.207a

1

Department of Health and Human Services
Administration for Chlldren and Famllies

APPENDIX D

f. OTHER REFUNDAEILE TAX CREDmS

$

g. NON-RECURRENTSHORT TERM BENEFiTS

$0

5

$

h. PREVENTIONOF OUT-OF-WDLCK PREG

$19,188,624

$12,307 $

$

i. 2-PARENT FAMILY FORM AND MAlNT

$14,433,795 $

j. ADMINISTRATION

$1,439,611 $

k. SYSTEMS

$783,796

$331,031 $

$

I. NON-ASSISTANCE PRIOR LAW

rn. OTHER

$178,741,300

$134,951,274

7. TOTAL EXPENDITURES

$351,625,639

$173,368,527

8. TRANSlTtONAL SERVICES FOR EMPLOYED

I $

IS

IS

9. FEDERAL UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS 10. UNOBLIGATED BALANCE

, ... . ;;:,:,:.;-;,;8;k:f.;!;,: :, $544 8 9 3

2 .,;....,.,

,,-.,,I', I:.:, ;,=Y..,,,.~>- .;>,,,,;:-: -;* .>-+.:,.

,..

1

QUAREPLY ESTIMATE

! F E S T l M A T E T R . ENDED

TANF FEDERAL FUNDS

'I

THIS IS TOCERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATIONREPORTEDON ALL PARTS OF THIS FORM IS ACCURATE AND TRUETO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGEAND BEUEP.

SUBMITTAL: [ X X X ] NEW [ IREVISED
PAGE 1 OF 1 APPROVED OMB N0.0970~0199 FORM ACF-196 (613W02) PREPARW BY: teRRlt L BEWIETT (404-1
I

Anlonla Babb, DIRECTOR
OFFICE OF FlNANUALSERVlCES
DEPARTMENTOF HUMAN RESOURCES (404) 8562072

$0
1
$0 $0
--

Slate GEORGIA

Department of Health and Human Services
Administration for Children and Families
- Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) ACF 196 Financial Report

2010 I
Federal Funds

June 30,2010

Docembor 31.2010

A s p t I l a $ubmntod as: [ .!a I New [ 1 R w h d t 1Find

State Fundl

Award Aoconclnallon
[ IYEIS
F.k,,,sbOaG YLI)nDhm: _65.10%

ARRA Funds
American Recovery and Amsrlcan Rscov~ryand Relnvoslmenl Act Funds Reinvaslm~nAl ct Fund6

2 Bd*

and TnlnIng

3. O l h ~Wr ork A ~ l W i U e a I E x p s n ~ ) s

b. Child Care

c. Transportallon

1. Job Acease

2. Olher

d. Individual DevsloPmen( Accounls

a. Refundable Earned Incoma Tax Q a d l k

t Olhsr Refundablo Tax Credlts

3 $ 2 3 4 635

$0

0

$10.060.652

5196,341

$0

$0

$0

9 0

IS

$

$

6

S

$

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$ 0.

$

$

$

$

$

$

$0

90

$0

$0

$0

$0,

$ $ $ $ s

95;s

$

$

$

$

9

@

$

$

8. Transillonal Servlcee for Employed 9. Federal Unllguldalad OMiaalions W. U n 6 W l d ~ W W

$ ~ ~ ~ g < 5 ~ ' ~ ~ z z 5 ! ~ ~ ~ i3,i!j,

E:..+rt . P.

- -i1. I .*"qLLF-xrA7

. m=-;RII-

060 ~ $ 2 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ $ ~

- - - 329

. p ;,h,,i.,-G !:!.,:r;+ :.!r;.,-.~x~~, ~.~..i:~:,:+;.;;.,,~s:<~.-::~:ky-~A +,!,+:.:,<.:,~::;,7>':,: :2!:

,,:L.>!.
..!<:>:-Y::f:,:'!:

$0

$52,176,042 $ $10,535,865

1
527,962,421

PAGE 1 OF 1 FORMACF.181 PPPROVWOMB Ho0870D241ErplrHOUSOl2Ol2

The Percentage and the Number of Individuals Given a Hardship Exemption Prom the Lifetime Limit

OLOZ 'OE aunr 40 s v
SNOISN31X3 dlHSatlVH H l l M S3IllWVd J N V l

OLOZ 'OE aunr 40 st,
SNOISN31X3 dlHSatlVH H A M S3lllWVd dNV1

TANF FAMILIES WITH HARDSHIP EXTENSIONS
As of June 30, 2010

O l O Z 'OE aunr 40 s v
SNOISN31X3 dlHSatlVH H U M S3lllWVd dNV1

OLOZ 'OE aunr 40 s v SNOISN31X3 dlHSatlVH H U M S3lllWVd dNV1

D. Number of Individuals Who Received Transportation Assistance
and the Cost of Such Assistance
Transportation received by individuals participating in Application Job Search is shown in (E) Diversionary Assistance.

TANF RECIPIENT TRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE
State Fiscal Year 2010

TANF RECIPIENT TRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE
State Fiscal Year 2010

TANF RECIPIENT TRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE
State Fiscal Year 2010

TANF RECIPIENT TRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE
State Fiscal Year 2010

....--.

. .--.

lients

nds

E. The Number of Individuals Who Received Diversionary Assistance in Order to
Prevent Their Requiring TANF Assistance And the Categories and Cost of
Such Diversionary Assistance and Job Acceptance and Retention Statistics
Note: A diverted individual is defined as one who participates in Application Job Search and whose application for cash assistance is denied because the person either accepts a job or withdraws his or her application. No additional information is gathered on these individuals since they are no longer included in the TANF database.

DIVERSIONARY ASSISTANCE TO PREVENT TANF RECEIPT
State Fiscal Year 2010

nual ents

Annual Funds

DIVERSIONARY ASSISTANCE TO PREVENT TANF RECEIPT
State Fiscal Year 2010

I

(

AsTs~srance

AnInual Clicents

Annual Funds

Average Cost per Client

CALHOUN
I
CAMDEN
CANDLER

2

$394.00

$1

-

- 0 - $0.00 - $0.00

---- Transportation

0

$0.00

$0.00

Childcare

21

$5,140.00

$244.76

---- Incidentals

0

$0.00

---- Transportation

0

$0.00

Childcare

0

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Incidentals

0

$0.00

$0.00

Transportation

0

$0.00

$0.00

CHATTAHOOCHEE

16

DIVERSIONARY ASSISTANCE TO PREVENT TANF RECEIPT
State Fiscal Year 2010
Funds

EVANS
I

Transportation

0

$0.00

Childcare - - - - 0

$0.00

---- Incidentals

1

$40.00

Transportation

14

$605.00

$0.00 $0.00 $40.00 $43.21

17

DIVERSIONARY ASSISTANCE TO PREVENT TANF RECEIPT
State Fiscal ~ e ' a2r 010
Annual

care 2ntals

HARRIS

Childcare

-

---- Incidentals

0

$0.00

$0.00

18

DIVERSIONARY ASSISTANCE TO PREVENT TANF RECEIPT
State Fiscal Year 2010

nual ents

Annual Funds

DIVERSIONARY ASSISTANCE TO PREVENT TANF RECEIPT
State Fiscal Year 2010
I Funds
LOWNDES LUMPKIN MACON MADISON

MURRAY MUSCOGEE

jportatior care mtals

DIVERSIONARY ASSISTANCE TO PREVENT TANF RECEIPT
State Fiscal Year 2010

nual

Aver;

ents

Der

SPALDING

Transportation I 0

$0.00

$0.00

21

DIVERSIONARY ASSISTANCE TO PREVENT TANF RECEIPT
State Fiscal Year 2010
Annual Funds

DIVERSIONARY ASSISTANCE TO PREVENT TANF RECEIPT
State Fiscal Year 2010
Annual Funds
portation

F. The Number of Individuals Denied Assistance Due to a Serious Felony Conviction

NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS DENIED ASSISTANCE DUE TO A SERIOUS VIOLENT FELONY CONVICTION
State Fiscal Year 2010
unty

G. The Number of Mothers Under 19 Years of Age Who Received Assistance and Their
Percentage of the Total TANP Caseload

NUMBER OF MOTHERS UNDER 19 YEARS OF AGE WHO RECEIVED ASSISTANCE AND THEIR PERCENTAGE OF
THE TOTAL TANF CASELOAD
State Fiscal Year 2010

Moms as of June

une 201C

DEKALB

4.6%

1.5%

11.5%

DOUGHERTY

I

34

534

- 6.4%

DOUGLAS

10

240

4.2%

25

NUMBER OF MOTHERS UNDER 19.YEARS OF AGE WHO RECEIVED ASSISTANCE AND THEIR PERCENTAGE OF
THE TOTAL TANF CASELOAD
State Fiscal Year 2010

mber of ms as of June

TANF C

aload

LONG LOWNDES LUMPKIN MACON MADISON

0

32

0.0%

0

- 233 - 0.0%

1

2 7

3.7%

0

34

0.0%

0

58

0.0%

26

NUMBER OF MOTHERS UNDER 19 YEARS OF AGE WHO RECEIVED ASSISTANCE AND THEIR PERCENTAGE OF
THE TOTAL TANF CASELOAD
State Fiscal Year 2010

rnber of Teen ms as of June

TANF Gaaeluau of June 201(

-
eload

27

NUMBER OF MOTHERS UNDER 19 YEARS OF AGE WHO RECEIVED ASSISTANCE AND THEIR PERCENTAGE OF
THE TOTAL TANF CASELOAD
State Fiscal Year 2010
1 Moms as of June

WHITE

1

34

2.9%

WHITFIELD

-

-

p

p

w

W ILCOX

0

101

0.0%

3

29

10.3%

W lLKES

2

29

6.9%

-WlLKlNSON

1

2 5

4.0%

- WORTH - 1 - 45 - 2.2%

TOTAL

691

19,988

3.5%

28

H. The Number of Children Receiving Subsidized Child Care and the Total Average
Recipient Cost of Child Care Provided to TANF Recipients

SUBSIDIZED CHILDCARE
Annual Expenditures State Fiscal Year 2010

SUBSIDIZED CHILDCARE
Annual Expenditures State Fiscal Year 2010

SUBSIDIZED CHILDCARE
Annual Expenditures State Fiscal Year 2010

SUBSIDIZED CHILDCARE
Annual Expenditures State Fiscal Year 2010

SUBSIDIZED CHILDCARE
Annual Expenditures State Fiscal Year 2010

HANCOCK

Transitional

363

$70,496.00

$194.20- -

Applicant Services

0

$0.00

$0.00

--- Pre-K

0

TANFI 0

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

Transitional

0

$0.00

$0.00

SUBSIDIZED CHILDCARE
Annual Expenditures State Fiscal Year 2010
i t Service

SUBSIDIZED CHILDCARE
Annual Expenditures State Fiscal Year 2010

runty

SUBSIDIZED CHILDCARE
Annual Expenditures State Fiscal Year 2010

ONTGOMERY

36

SUBSIDIZED CHILDCARE
Annual Expenditures State Fiscal Year 2010

SUBSIDIZED CHILDCARE
Annual Expenditures State Fiscal Year 2010

SUBSIDIZED CHILDCARE
Annual Expenditures State Fiscal Year 2010

SUBSIDIZED CHILDCARE
Annual Expenditures State Fiscal Year 2010

I. Data On Teen Pregnancy Prevention

- TEENAGE PREGNANCY PREVENTION GEORGIA DECLINING PREGNANCY
Rates for 15 - 19 Years Old
1998 thru 2008 Trends

COUNTY

- - - -

-

Appling

- -
~ o t aplregnancies -

- - -- -

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

1998
58 691 83.9

1999
-- -
57 690 82.6

2000
79 688 114.8

2001
. .
5 1
678 75.2

2002
u4.3

2003
55 - i41 85.8

2004
45 614 73.3

2005
45 602 74.8

2006
- 55-----595 92.4

2007
.-
56
604 92.7

--2008
J
5 .6

Atkinson
BHCO~

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

- --

-

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

36

46

42

30

45

23

303

31 5

313

272

270

269

118.8 146.0

134.2 110.3 166.7

85.5

. .- . ...,

37- -

34

43

3 1

25

20

383

377

372

348

-78

323

96.6

90.2

115.6

89.1

.2

61.9

3 1 274 113.1
33 303 108.9

28 274 102.2
-
24 308 77.9

28 274 102.2
-
36
295 122.0

27 293 92.2
42 297 141.1

27 308 87.7
42 --19
5.3

Baker

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

~alawi'n

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

12 165 72.7
1321,822 72.4

8

11

166

158

48.2

69.6

=-

=--

144

124

1,862 1,878

77.3

66.0

12 163 73.6

10 157 63.7

106 - - 89

1,726 1,683

61.4

52.9

4 157
*
1231,722 71.4

5

3

163

166

30.7

*

-
140 1,771
79.1

113 1,920
58.9

9 164 54.9
133 2,087 63.7

11

1

147

146

74.8

*

-

-- -

1 10

--4 -

2,05!

38

53.4

.I

Banks
-- - - E. .-- -
Barrow

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

- - - . - -- -

.-

-

Total pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

3 1 454 68.3
--
123 1,359 90.5

43

35

38

3 1

462

470

460

450

93.1

74.5

82.6

68.9

-

- -- -

-

123

138

137

134

1,403 1,432 1,503 1,581

87.7

96.4

91.2

84.8

39 453 86.1
115 1,673 68.7

40 452 88.5
130 1,775 73.2

31 474 65.4
142' 1,815 78.2

36

36

37

489

508

518

73.6

70.9

71.4

.. . - - .. - -

125

146

i4

1,935 2,09'

74

64.6

69.6

70.8

Bartow
.----
Ben Hill

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

- -- - - - -
Total pregnancies

--- -

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

262 2,288 114.5
-
82 681 120.4

297 2,352 126.3
-
8 1 680 119.1

253 2,396 105.6
----
660 104.5

254 2,517 100.9
75648 115.

226 2,648 85.3
6- 8

235 2,761 85.1
55349 $4.7

248 2,884 86.0

250 2,859 87.4

-

-

72

634

113.6

80 667 119.9

258 2,900 89.0
--78
E7A

271 2,932 92.4
73

236 2,961 79.7
-.
69 19 3.3

Berrien

-

Bibb

-

Total Pregnancies

65

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

544

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

119.5

- -

-

-=- -- -

Total pregnancies

-.
539 -

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

6,323

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

85.2

44 543 81 .O
- 487
6,272 77.6

47 540 87.0
... -.530 6,223 85.2

44

49

535

541

82.2

90.6

. - - ---- - . . -

490

478

6,096 6,079

80.4

78.6

42 555 75.7
46 1 6,274 73.5

53 542 97.8
459 6,355 72.2

63 594 106.1
474 6,464 73.3

54 590 91.5
467.. 6,473 72.1

54 588 91.8
- 4436,463 68.5

584 89
504 6485 77.7

COUNTY

- TEENAGE PREGNANCY PREVENTION GEORGIA DECLINING PREGNANCY
Rates for 15 - 19 Years Old
1998 thru 2008 Trends
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Bleckley

Total Pregnancies

52

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

516

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

100.8

. .

-.-

- - - - - - - -- -

- - -. - .

- - -- -

Brantley

Total Pregnancies

2 1

male Population (age 15 to 19)

507

te of Pregnancies per 1,000

41.4

4 1

40

33

522

51 8

491

78.5 77.2 67.2

- -. .

. --

36

3 1

1-5

523

59.3

26 485 53.6
4 1

2 7

25

485

51 7

55.7 48.4

- .-

- 33

44 -

558

78.9

21 553 38.0
'26 557 46.7

25 572 43.7

35 627 55.8

32 7 14 44.8

-.-. -..- -

- 3 r - 47

30

8

.8

Brooks

Total Pregnancies

47

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

620

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

75.8

-- - ---

- . - - -- - - - - - .- -

Bryan

Total ~ Z G a n c i e s

73" - -

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

891

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

88.7

52 623 83.5
--
75 921 81.4

56 620 90.3
-
63 928 67.9

54

35

41

60 1

583

560

89.9 60.0 73.2

- 56 - - -*"45 - - 6 7 -

978

,067 1,079

57.3

12.2 62.1

39 563 69.3
' 47 1,114 42.2

49

48

556

547

88.1 87.8

-.

-

53

39

1,152 1,129

46.0 34.5

56 550 101.8
.
53 1,085 48.8

4 7 54 1 86.9
-
62 1099 56.4

Bulloch Burke- -

Total Pregnancies
Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

175 3,683 47.5

184 3,728 49.4

170 3,745 45.4

--

-

~ o t aPlregnancies -

- - -- .-. -

- -

-. - .-

.- .- - -. -

108

124

125

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

926

945

942

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

116.6 131.2 132.7

178 2,988 59.6

173 2,698 64.1

- --

-

115

93

965

91 1

119.2 102.1

146 2,710 53.9
- ..
97 91 8 105.7

183 2,990 61.2
- .. .
78 889 87.7

156 3,710 42.0
-
105 853 123.1

203 4,265 47.6

189 4,236 44.6

173 4,335 39.9

. .
89 822
108.3

--.- - .

82

a-
3

833

19

98.4 105.1

Butts

- - - - -

-

Calhoun

Total Pregnancies

53

7 1

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

594

612

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

89.2 116.0

-
~ o t a m r engancies -

- - - -

. --- .

25

20

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

21 4

214

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

1 16.8 93.5

65 625 104.0
-
18 207 87.0

78 638 122.3
29198 146.5

6 1 656 93.0
18 195 92.3

59 658 89.7
19 187 101.6

57 670 85.1
28 183 153.0

57 692 82.4
-
11 1 84 59.8

63 694 90.8
20 167 119.8

5 1

6 0

668

680

76.3 88.2

- - ---

19

9

159

149

119.5 60.4

Camden

Total Pregnancies
Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-- - - -
Candler

- -
Total Pregnancies
Female Population (age 15 to 19)
Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

106 1,628 65.1

96 1,607 59.7

-43-- - 29

31 0

294

138.7 98.6

100 1,624 61.6
-
31 289 107.3

119 1,685 70.6
32285 112.:

106 1,765 60.1

112 1,771 63.2

85 1,847 46.0

88 1,877 46.9

103 1,856 55.5

125 1,890 66.1

124 1,839 67.4

Carroll

Total Pregnancies
Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

291 3,772 77.1

30 1 3,833 78.5

284 3,902 72.8

290 3,788 76.6

285 3,803 74.9

255 3,857 66.1

255 3,909 65.2

246 4,151 59.3

282 4,053 69.6

299 4,339 68.9

294 4,436 66.3

COUNTY
- --
Catoosa

- TEENAGE PREGNANCY PREVENTION GEORGIA DECLINING PREGNANCY

Rates for 15 - 19 Years Old
1998 thru 2008 Trends

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

-.

-

~ o t apl regnanciesp

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

- --

-

124

115

1,635 1,660

75.8

69.3

-
1-67 -
1,682
63.6

.
111 I,71i 64.8

.
I I 0 -83
.7

-100 1,838 54.4

. -
109 1,932 56.4

-
98 2,069 47.4

137' 2,125 64.5

2007

2008

135 2,13: 63.3

137 19
I

Charlton Chatham '

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000
- -
Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

34 393 86.5
768 8,111 94.7

3 1 396 78.3
.
757 8,107 93.4

32 391 81.8
. --
685 8,074 84.8

25 402 62.2
- =
725 7,71'
94

24

402

59.7

-- - -

.-

CC5

11

.2

21 423 49.6
630 7,988 78.9

25 448 55.8
678 8,198 82.7

12 431 27.8
670 8,574 78.1

24 433 55.4
- .-

22 390 56.4
18 4: .3

29 387 74.9
- --
I 56 .2

Chattahoochee Total Pregnancies

26

40

35

30

35

23

24

15

12

12

14

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

390

392

40 1

438

502

601

551

531

552

466

530

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

66.7

102.0

87.3

68.5

69.7

38.3

43.6

28.2

21.7

25.8

26.4

--- -.- --- - - - - - .- -

- .- -

. ..

--

- -

- ---.

-

--

-.

Chattooga

Total Pregnancies

94

70

82

88

53

82

46

59

67

82

3

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

752

746

740

729

724

749

746

739

700

700

7

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

125.0

93.8

110.8 120.7

73.2

109.5

61.7

79.8

95.7

117.',

cz , .6

Cherokee
-.-=
Clarke

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-- - -

- --

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

264 3,972 66.5
233 5,961 39.1

281 4,160 67.5
260 6,004 43.3

285 4,278 66.6
249 6,026 41.3

262 4,607 56.9

249 4,991 49.9

249 5,015 49.7

- 207
4,8 ^' 42

225 5,323 42.3
223 A ,427
10.4

260 5,736 45.3
216 4,705 45.9

254 6,091 41.7
208 5,807 35.8

306 6,355 48.2
248
"'A

285 6,538 43.6
2396,45! 37.0

~/3 6,721 40.6
--
219 ""34
.3

Clay Clayton

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-

--

--

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

18 132 136.4
- 7-67 ==
7,960 96.4

24

14

18

131

133

125

183.2 105.3

144

- --- ---

- .-

774

790

785'-

8,166 8,338 8,66!

94.8

94.7

90.E

15

8

126

122

119.0

65.6

. -- -. "0 78
.8

....75 1 9,145
82.1

7

14

125

118

56.0

118.6

798 9,430 84.6

. -
873 9,856
88.6

5 115 43.5
a5- - -
10,135 83.4

8

8

119

108

67.2

74.1

. -- - . ..

886

^?O

10,38

i83

85.3

.9

Clinch ~obb

Total Pregnancies

20

26

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

281

273

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

71.2

95.2

-
Totawregnancies

-. - - -
1,1461,50

Female Population (age 15 to 19) 17,590 18,163

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

65.2

63.3

3 1

36

26

264

250

244

117.4

144

106.6

-1,165

-

.
1,101

.---

ITI~O

18,742 19,857 20,468

62.2

55.4

55.7

29 244 118.9
1035 20,426
50.7

25

23

246

263

101.6

87.5

1,131 - 1,032

20,640 21,127

54.8

48.8

21

33

2 1

263

245

233

79.8

134.7 90.1

- - .-.-
1,116 1,164'

21,690 21,926

51.5

53.1

--'lo63 21974 48.4

COUNTY

--

=

-. .

Coffee

,--A-
Colquitt

.-- - -

- TEENAGE PREGNANCY PREVENTION GEORGIA DECLINING PREGNANCY
Rates for 15 - 19 Years Old
1998 thru 2008 Trends

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-- - -- - . +.- .*.

-- - .- ---

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Columbia

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

- - --. -

- -- . . - . - - --

Cook

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Coweta

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

crawford- -

-

. -

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Crisp

-- - -

---

Dade

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-

.-- -

- . ..

- -

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Dawson
-
Decatur

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-

- - - - -- -

-- -

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Dekalb

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

COUNTY Dodge

- TEENAGE PREGNANCY PREVENTION GEORGIA DECLINING PREGNANCY
Rates for 15 - 19 Years Old
1998 thru 2008 Trends

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

- - - .

- --

-

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

- -45
655
68.7

-.
46 647
71.I

- .-. --
59 639
92.3

- - - - . .- --. - .-

57

58

56

618

- 5

606

92.2

.3

92.4

43610 70.5

-

-

5 1

646

78.9

55 -
635
86.6

2007
6 1 659 92.6

Dooly Dougherty

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000
-
Total pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

50 433 115.5
4024,318 93.1

60 438 137.0
42 1 4,261 98.8

59 429 137.5
365 ' 4,212 86.7

53 41 2 128.6
364 4,022 90.5

54 41 2 131.1
- -
3 98 .7

35 366 95.6
345 3,873 89.1

30 344 87.2
320 3,889 82.3

37 344 107.6
348 3,996 87.1

34 351 96.9

37 347 106.6

. . ..

.. -

Douglas ,__
~ar&

Total Pregnancies

237

FemalePopulation(age15to19)

3,169

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

74.8

_

-- -

Total Pregnancies

60

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

484

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

124.0

232 3,217 72.1
47 476 98.7

249 3,245 76.7
28472 59.3

236

216

- 3,310
71.3

3,404 63.5

4 2 - - - 47

486

487

86.4

96.5

229 3,548 64.5
44 488 90.2

239 3,752 63.7
42 477 88.1

219 4,016 54.5
31 454 68.3

264 4,299 61.4

282 4,542 62.1

-- -

-

36

33 -

452

440

79.6

75.0

Echols
- --= --
Eftinghamf

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-- -- - - - - *.

.- - --

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

3 121
.- .- 106 1,351 78.5

3

10

12

9

130

156

164

146

64.1

73.2

61.6

- - . - -.. - - - .-

90

'I08

1,415 1,448

63.6

74.6

-- .

- - - --...

90

165

1.52F "'68

15 142 105.6
.
81 1.631
,9.7

15 138 108.7
.
1041,634 63.6

12 132 90.9
85 1,676 50.7

8 124 64.5

23 130 176.9

-

87"--

- -
9 1

1,692

^"'

51.4

Elbert Emanuel

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-

%

-

--

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

56

57

702

714

79.8

79.8

- .-.- - - - - - -

93

100

983

1,000

94.6

100.0

5 1 718 71 .O
-92 1,006 91.5

42 742 56.6

-

-

87 '

983

88.5

57 749 76.1
85374 37.3

4 1 749 54.7
92 977 94.2

53 699 75.8
86 929 92.6

40 691 57.9
83 814 102.0

6 1 662 92.1
78 800 97.5

50 660 75.8
105 -
749 140.:

Evans Fannin

Total Pregnancies

35

37

45

37

36

45

50

45

36

52

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

395

40 1

41 8

406

41 8

431

406

391

397

403

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

88.6

92.3

107.7

91.I 86.1

104.4 123.2 115.1

90.7

129.0

-

- --

Total Pregnancies

-

- -

- --

50

46

42

5 1

36

36

40

45

46-

46

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

535

54 1

543

574

597

61 1

638

600

582

555

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

93.5

85.0

77.3

88.9

60.3

58.9

62.7

75.0

79.0

82.9

COUNTY Fayette

- TEENAGE PREGNANCY PREVENTION GEORGIA DECLINING PREGNANCY
Rates for 15 - 19 Years Old
1998 thru 2008 Trends

-

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-- - -

-. .- -. . .- . -

Tntal Pregnancies -

- . . -. - - -

male Population (age 15 to 19)

te of Pregnancies per 1,000

Forsyth -. Franklin

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

.

.

>

. --

- . .-

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Fulton Gilmer

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

2,712 26,639 101.8

- . - -- - -

-- - - --

- -

Total pregnancies

79-

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

633

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

124.8

2,719 26,902 101.1
6 1 673 90.6

Glascock
- -
Glvnn

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

- - -- -

- -

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate o f Pregnancies per 1,000

6 86 69.8
206 2,348 87.7

4 88 *
207- '-
2,371 87.3

Gordon Grady

--

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

159 1,417 112.2

- - - -

- -- - - - - -

Total Pregnancies

6 1

Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

878 69.5

160 1,450 110.3
-
74 892 83.0

Greene

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

57 545 104.6

48 561 85.6

COUNTY

- TEENAGE PREGNANCY PREVENTION GEORGIA DECLINING PREGNANCY

Rates for 15 - 19 Years Old
1998 thru 2008 Trends

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

- ,- - --- - - - - - .-. . .- ... - --

Gwinnett

Total Pregnancies

-- -.

4

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-

-- - -

-

943

980

17,335 18,249

54.4

53.7

- .. - . .
1062

7 it3

18,887 20,398

56.2

56.9

- .-. - . 1222 21,335 57.3

. -.
1265 22,081
57.3

1327 23,009
57.7

... -. - 1408 1547

23,996 24,896

58.7

62.1

Habersham
H- -

Total Pregnancies FemalePopulation(age15to19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000
~ s a r ~ r e g n a n c i e sFemale Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

95 1,079 88.0
407 4,361 93.3

114 1,112 102.5
-
439 4,521 97.1

124 1,128 109.9
.- --

94 1,138 82.6
. .-

99 1,160 85.3

99 1,173 84.4

. .-- - t49 ,014 19.5

101 1,218 82.9
430 5,083 84.6

87 1,272 68.4
445 5,233 85.0

85 1,224 69.4
434 5,354 81 .I

Hancock ---Haralson

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000
- .-. - - Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Harris
. -
Hart

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000
- - - - - -.- . .- Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Heard H---.

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000
-
Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Houston

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Irwin

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

COUNTY
--
Jackson
---- ----
Jasper

- TEENAGE PREGNANCY PREVENTION GEORGIA DECLINING PREGNANCY
Rates for 15 - 19 Years Old
1998 thru 2008 Trends

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

--- - . . - -. - --Total Pregnancies

- - - - --

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Jeff Davis - -Jefferson

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

- - .- .

- -

Total Pregnancies

- - --

Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Jenkins Johnson '-

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000
. .
Total pregnancies ' ' - Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Jones --Lamar

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

---

--

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Lanier

- - .- -

- -

Laurens

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

.- -

-

--

iota1 Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Lee

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

COUNTY

- TEENAGE PREGNANCY PREVENTION GEORGIA DECLINING PREGNANCY

Rates for 15 - 19 Years Old
1998 thru 2008 Trends

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Liberty

- -
Total pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

238 2,231 106.7

235 2,284 102.9

268 2,292 116.9

247 2,17! 113.(

221 09 1.0

Lincoln

Total Pregnancies

15

17

20

18

18

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

272

273

268

286

287

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

55.1

62.3

74.6

62.9

62.7

Long- -

Total pregnancies

37

3 I

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

450

464

Rate o f Pregnancies per 1,000

82.2

66.8

Lowndes

- - --.-

-T

Lumpkin

Total Pregnancies

233

272

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

3,836 3,840

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

60.7

70.8

----
Total Pregnahcies

-- --

62

49

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

1,033 1,084

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

60.0

45.2

229 3,819 60.0

237 3,598 65.9

21 7 3,580 60.6

. -. . .
651,107 58.7

. .
411,077 38.1

.-..-
36 1, I15 32.3

Macon
-- -
Madison

Total Pregnancies

54

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

54 1

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

99.8

.. - -

~otai~re~nancie;

77

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

803

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

95.9

55 529 104.0
- -7 I 825 86.1

64

44

530

52 1

120.8

84.5

-70 - 58

835

848

83.8

68.4

42 499 84.2
' 74 870 85.1

Marion

Total Pregnancies

22

3 1

22

28

20

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

235

234

244

250

258

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

93.6

132.5

90.2

112

77.5

- - -

-

-

- -

-

- --

-

-

- - - -

McDuffie

~ o t aPlregnancies

86

95

82

79

'2

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

784

782

779

817

8

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

109.7 121.5 105.3

96.7

.O

Mclntosh
-- -. I -. .- --
Meriwether

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-- --- -- .

-

Total Pregnancies -- --

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

40

30

339

334

118.0

89.8

- -. - -

- -

86

98

83 1

814

103.5 120.4

40

30

34

338

350

335

118.3

85.7

101.5

- - - - - - - -- - - -

80

85

79

803

802

792

99.6

106

99.7

198 2,140 92.5
19 289 65.7
252 3,563 70.7
-.
38 1,I65 32.6
50 498 100.4
58 875 66.3
21 255 82.4
7682 1 92.6
21 32 1 65.4
68 810 84.0

210 2,326 90.3
20 299 66.9

193 2,255 85.6
11 294 37.4

189
3ACK
18
296 60.8

246 3,614 68.1
47 1,241 37.9

235 3,809 61.7
- .-
53 1,243 42.6

268 4,060 66.0
. .-
45 1,293 34.8

38

35

478

488

79.5

71.7

67 -- - 67

891

909

75.2

73.7

4 1 504 81.3
. --
-6-4-

30 256 117.2
77 806 95.5

26 256 101.6
90 826 109.0

21 272 77.2
-
77 818 94.1

25

23

34

342

390

41 8

73.1

59.0

81.3

65 -

65

69

850

846

829

76.5

76.8

83.2

COUNTY

- TEENAGE PREGNANCY PREVENTION GEORGIA DECLINING PREGNANCY
Rates for 15 - 19 Years Old
1998 thru 2008 Trends

Miller

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

- - . - - -. - . - . - - - . - ..

- - - . -

. .

-

Mitchell

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Monroe Montgomerj

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-- -

.-- -

-

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Morgan - - -Murray

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

- -

- - - - -.-

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Muscogee

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000
Total pregnancies
male Population (age 15 to 19) te of Pregnancies per 1,000

Oconee bglethorpe

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000
- -Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Paulding

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

- TEENAGE PREGNANCY PREVENTION GEORGIA DECLINING PREGNANCY
Rates for 15 - 19 Years Old
1998 thru 2008 Trends

COUNTY

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

- -

-

--

.---

Peach

Total Pregnancies

-.

- -

-- -

100

89

89

- 94

8 1

76

58

66

79

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

1,036 1,028 1,017

993

QQ5

978

966

1018

970

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

96.5

86.6

87.5

94.7

.2

77.7

60.0

64.8

81.4

Pickens
- 7 erce

Total Pregnancies

51

68

63

64

52

57

55

46

68

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

637

680

725

733

749

788

81 3

820

832

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

80.1

100.0

86.9

87.3

69.4

72.3

67.7

56.1

81.7

Total pregnancies

-

-

-

54

54

54

5 1

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

561

554

556

568

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

96.3

97.5

97.1

89.8

44

59

54

44 -

i72

575

536

505

6.9

102.6 100.7

87.1

Pike
- . - .- . -.
Polk

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

.. .. .-.

-

Total Pregnanse-s

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

33 435 75.9
-
I3 8 1,314 105.0

31 449 69.0
- - -
156 1,325 117.7

30

3 1

36

455

464

503

65.9

66.8

71.6

- -

-- - --

154

146

1,334 1,328

115.4 109.C

- -
60 1,294
445.9

25 533 46.9

-

.

134

1,281

104.6

30 567 52.9
123 1,313 93.7

30 560 53.6
-
120 1,283 93.5

25 574 43.6
--112 1,287 87.0

Pulaski
-=J~utrhs

Total Pregnancies

31

25

24

30

26

18

15

22

18

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

327

325

32 1

299

31 2

31 3

302

324

335

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

94.8

76.9

74.8

100.3

83.3

57.5

49.7

67.9

53.7

--

---

Total Pregnancies

-

65

66

63

49

31

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

61 1

634

622

651

t.-n

51

53

65

54

ecc

635

606

#?-a

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

106.4

104.1 101.3

75.3

83.5

107.3

2007

2008

- -

66

69

1027

I5

64.3

3

73 842 86.7
-.
54 524 103.'

5 1 842 60.6
.
> 7 .4

25 556 45.0
148 1,246 118.8

33 549 60.1
- -
143 1257 113.8

30

16

328

331

91.5

48.3

--

41

41-

547

'-5

75.0

.I

Quitman
---- ---
Rabun

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-- -- -
Total Pregnancies

. - ..

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

9 93 96.8
* -. 24 409 58.7

8

10

3

88

89

85

90.9

112.4

*

. .--- - * 27 412 65.5

33 428 77.1

- '29-
436
66.5

10 85 117.6

--

--

34

479

71.O

11 81 135.8
35 489 71.6

8 81 98.8
36 483 74.5

11 81 135.8
3 1 477 65.0

8

8

4

86

86

8 3

93.0

93.0

- *

. .

- - . . .. - --

- -. .- - -

23-

36

29

468

49 1

483

49.1

73.3

60

Randolph -- -.- --.Richmond

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

4 1 374 109.6

-

- .- . -

-- - - - --

Total Pregnancies

744

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

7,500

35 378 92.6
748

27 380 71. I
" 7m-.

34 357 95.2
-75-o - -

7,488 7,491 7,227

21 32 1 65.4
.. .684 7,174

17 351 48.4
.
7047,175

19 329 57.8 708
7,240

22

30

26

29

34 1

348

332

324

64.5

86.2

78.3

89.5

706.- - - .- .. - - - --

- -

618

- - .- - - .

740

629

7,286 7,344 7,295 7265

COUNTY
-

- TEENAGE PREGNANCY PREVENTION GEORGIA DECLINING PREGNANCY

Rates for 15 - 19 Years Old
1998 thru 2008 Trends

--
~ a & o f w e g n a n i e sper1300

1998

1999

--

-

99.2

99.-9

2000 98.8

2001 - 1W.t

2002
--
.3

2003 98.1

2004 9z8

2005 84.8

2006 96.7" -

Rockdale

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-- - - - - .- -

. - --

-

Schley

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

157 2,629 59.7
-
18 129 139.5

187 2,644 70.7
-- 13 125
104.0

176 2,666 66.0
IF
124 96.8

182 2,789 65.3

-

--

7

135

51.9

181 2,878 62.9
-
2 2 .9

187 2,921 64.0
14 127 110.2

161 2,976 54.1
9 141 63.8

194 3,046 63.7
14 151 92.7

191 3,095 61.7
16 141 70.9

Screven Seminole

Total Pregnancies

62

44

39

43

40

54

45

3 1

56

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

547

546

544

540

547

579

623

666

647

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

1 13.3

80.6

71.7

79.6

73.1

93.3

72.2

46.5

86.6

-- -
Total Pregnancies

-

31

32

40

. .

22-

23

31

17

31

22-

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

347

342

339

328

334

322

319

316

323

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

106.6

93.6

118.0

67.1

68.9

96.3

53.3

98.1

68.1

Spalding
-
Siep%eis -'

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

271 2,085 130.0

. . . .- . -

. -

~ o t aPl regnancies

---

Female Pop

age 15to 19)

Rate of Pre!

per 1,000

--

-

65

918

70.8

243 2,080 116.8

223 2,073 107.6

---- -
73

61- -

nrl r

915

66.7

238 2,029 117.3
75 878 85.4

194 1,999 97.0
57 15 .7

230 2,009 114.5
58 838 69.2

212 2,047 103.6
44 832 52.9

192 2,033 94.4
60 896 67.0

197 2,078 94.8
5 1 914

Stewart + ,~ u m t e r-IT-

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

- - . -

.-.. - - ..

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

17 165 103.0
137 1,368 100.1

25

10

160

155

156.2

64.5

143 1,356 105.5

-
100 1,345
74.3

11 I62 67.9
134 1,28! 104.:

19 150 126.7

12 144 83.3

11 145 75.9

14 157 89.2

13 146 89.0

Talbot
-------
Taliaferro

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000
--
Total pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate o f Pregnancies per 1,000

20

20

27

25

229

22 1

215

200

87.3

90.5

125.6

125

-

5

6

3

4

65

62

62

66

76.9

96.8

*

*

21

13

15

13

191

180

205

219

109.9

72.2

73.2

59.4

6

2

11

4

63

65

69

60

95.2

159.4

19 217 87.6
5 53 94.3

Tattnall

Total Pregnancies

92

73

66

68

67

76

72

64

68

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

653

659

652

669

673

672

694

682

660

COUNTY

-- -

--

Taylor-

- TEENAGE PREGNANCY PREVENTION GEORGIA DECLINING PREGNANCY
Rates for 15 - 19 Years Old
1998 thru 2008 Trends

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

140.9 110.8

- - - ... - -- - ---

-. - -

-- - -- --- .. -

~ o t aPl regnancies

35

32

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

322

31 3

Rate o f Pregnancies per 1,000

108.7 102.2

101.2
- .- -.-
29 306 94.8

101.6 99.6
.- -- - - ---. > ... 9 18 .9

113.1
- 15318 47.2

103.7
2 1 326 64.4

93.8
19 292 65.1

103.0
16308 51.9

Telfair

- -

Tc

--

. .

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-

. - -

- - -

-

- --

~otaf~regnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

35 381 91.9
60 443 135.4

29 371 78.2
-.
5 I
445 114.6

52 373 139.4
-.
50 439 113.9

24 353 68
--
57 420 135.7

33 353 93.5
36 397 90.7

30 332 90.4
-.
80.1

36 31 7 113.6
38 379 100.3

33 31 7 104.1
3 1 375 82.7

38 31 9 119.1
48 376 127.7

Thomas
Tifi---

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

--, --

- -

-

- Total pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate o f Pregnancies per 1,000

168 1,601 104.9
158 1,531 103.2

141 1,589 88.7
lb2 1,520 93.4

145 1,591 91 .I
-
141 1,512 93.3

128 1,615 79.3

92 1,639 56.1

- -

118

115

1,43P 1 A23

82

.8

123 1,629 75.5
105 1,440 72.9

123 1,610 76.4
116 1,462 79.3

106 1,543 68.7
154 1,538 100.1

106 1,519 69.8
126 1,558 80.9

Toombs
- -- -
Towns

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

- -
Total-Pregnancies

- -

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

98 989 99.1
13
350 37.1

113 985 114.7
-
I 7
355 47.9

118 981 120.3
11 365 30.1

103 1005 102.5

99 1,010 98.0

-

I c

2

13

.5

89 998 89.2
5 383 13.1

82 999 82.1
14 387 36.2

97 1000 97.0
14375 37.3

104 999 104.1
9 338 26.6

Treutlen

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

- -
TIroup

- -
Total Pregnancies
Female Population (age 15 to 19)
Rate o f Pregnancies per 1,000

20 258 77.5
2342,142 109.2

29

25

257

258

112.8 96.9

241 - 20-7 2,132 2,130 113.0 97.2

23

19

231

227

99.6 83.7

- -.

217

194

2,177 2,205

99.7 88.0

22 21 4 102.8
183 2,208 82.9

10 206 48.5
193 2,236 86.3

15 206 72.8

9 199 45.2

204-- 18i 2,244 2,279 90.9 79.4

Turner
--
Twiggs

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-

-

Total Pregnancies -

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

29

36

50

42

37

31

33

393

399

394

391

380

380

370

73.8 90.2 126.9 107.4 97.4 81.6 89.2

-

30 - 40

3 1

33

26

23

27

40 1

41 1

41 6

420

407

407

399

28 363 77.1
35 357

30 347 86.5
. -
3 1 330

COUNTY

. -
Rate -of-g

- TEENAGE PREGNANCY PREVENTION GEORGIA DECLINING PREGNANCY
R a t e s for 15 - 19 Y e a r s Old
1998thru 2008 Trends
E n i s per 7 ,U00

Union
. - - - - . -., .
Upson

Total Pregnancies
Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

--

- - ..

-

Total pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Walker walsri-

Total Pregnancies
Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000
- - - . -- . . . - .. - -
Totai Pregnancies
Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Ware

Total Pregnancies
Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000
-
Total Pregnancies
Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Washington
- -.-
Wayiie

Total Pregnancies
Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

- -

-

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

Webster

Total Pregnancies
Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

- ---
Wheeler

- - -

-

- --

Total pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

White

Total Pregnancies

COUNTY
-
whitfield Wilcox
--
~Kkes Wilkinson Worth

- TEENAGE PREGNANCY PREVENTION GEORGIA DECLINING PREGNANCY
Rates for 15 - 19 Years Old
1998 thru 2008 Trends

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

-A -

- - - -- -- - - -

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

600 93.3
-- 319 2,771 115.1

612

634

83.3

77.3

- -- - . -

345

336-

2,794 2,820

123.5 119.1

644

689

60.6

79.8

-. -

362

314

2,811 2,850

128.8 110.2

715 72.7
309 2,844 108.6

744 57.8
315 2,853 110.4

754 65.0
309 2,844 108.6

768 54.7
3122,887 108.1

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

--

--

Total Pregnancies

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

Rate o f Pregnancies per 1,000

29 263 110.3

20 265 75.5

45- - 42 -

399

398

112.8 105.5

14

35

261

265

53.6

132.1

2.g-. -- -3 1

396

376

73.2

82.4

15 257 58.4
.-.
19 775
.7

24 269 89.2
28 367 76.3

16 251 63.7
35 347 100.9

19 246 77.2
28 327 85.6

25 225 111. I
2% -
9.13

Total Pregnancies

36

36

3 1

38

25

35

21

3 1

25

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

422

422

422

42 1

389

382

370

356

348

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

85.3

85.3

73.5

90.3

64.3

91.6

56.8

87.1

71.8

.- -

- --

.

.- -

- -

- -

= --

. .-

Total Pregnancies

75

76

71-

6 I

~3

59

65

52

A 3'

Female Population (age 15 to 19)

908

899

17

828

835

896

Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

82.6

84.5

.3

71.3

77.8

58.0

Georgia

Total Pregnancies Female Population (age 15 to 19) Rate of Pregnancies per 1,000

23,780 279,228
85.2

23,985 283,808
84.5

23,298 286,463
81.3

22,586 287,916
78.4

21,437 292,120
73.4

21,040 296,639
70.9

21,098 303,451
69.5

21,058 314,220
67.0

22,083 326,722
67.6

These are projections based on a linear regression model using 1995-2007 data (DCHIDPHIEPIIOHIP)(11.4.09)

J. Sanctions Applied to TANF Recipients

TANF SANCTIONS
State Fiscal Year 2010

K. The Number of Legal Immigrants Receiving TANF Benefits by Category of
Immigration Status

LEGAL IMMIGRANTS RECEIVING TANF BY IMMIGRATION STATUS
State Fiscal Year 2010

Counl

LEGAL IMMIGRANTS RECEIVING TANF BY IMMIGRATION STATUS
State Fiscal Year 2010
Alien

LUMPKIN MACON MADISON MARION MCDUFFIE MCINTOSH MERIWETHER MILLER

0 - 0 - 1 -0 - 0 - 0

0

0

- 0 0

0

0

0

- o - 0

0

0

0

0

1
0 0
o
- 0 0

58

LEGAL IMMIGRANTS RECEIVING TANF BY IMMIGRATION STATUS
State Fiscal Year 2010

LEGAL IMMIGRANTS RECEIVING TANF BY IMMIGRATION STATUS
State Fiscal Year 2010
Source: State TANFIO
60

L. Number of Families No Longer Eligible Because of Time Limits

NUMBER OF FAMILIES NO LONGER ELIGIBLE BECAUSE OF TIME LIMITS .
As of January 1,2001 thru June 30,2010

Number
of

FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION ON JOB RETENTION AND EARNINGS
Adult Recipients Exited from July 2007 thru June 2008
rnployedI at Exit otal

FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION ON JOB RETENTION AND EARNINGS
Adult Recipients Exited from July 2007 thru June 2008
vers Uumber

FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION ON JOB RETENTION AND EARNINGS
Adult Recipients Exited from July 2007 thru June 2008
mployedI at Exit lumber

L
WORTH
State Totals

11

8

1 63.6% $3,304 ] $23,125

1 7,553 1 4,325 1 57.3% 1 4,137 1 54.8% 1 $2,608 1$10,789,295

64

N. An Evaluation of the Effect of Code Section 49-4-186 On the Number of Births to TANF
Recipients

FAMILY CAP CASES AND CHILDREN
State Fiscal Year 2010

FAMILY CAP CASES AND CHILDREN
State Fiscal Year 2010

FAMILY CAP CASES AND CHILDREN
State Fiscal Year 2010

of June 2010

FAMILY CAP CASES AND CHILDREN
State Fiscal Year 2010

TANF Percent of Family cap Total

of June 2010 Caseload of June 3n4n

SFYIO

SFYI 0

of June 2010 Recipients

TREUTLEN

FAMILY CAP CASES AND CHILDREN
State Fiscal Year 2010