Biennial Report
Lavinia Luca Georgia Disability Services Ombudsman and Olmstead Coordinator
Mission Statement: The mission of the Office of the Disability Services Ombudsman (ODSO) is to promote the safety, well-being, and rights of individuals with disabilities and to coordinate state compliance with the 1999 US Supreme Court Olmstead decision (O.C.G.A. 37-2-35).
Office Location:
7 Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive 4th Floor, Suite 443 Atlanta, GA 30334
Toll Free: 1-(866)-424-7577 Phone: (404) 656-4261
Website: www.dso.georgia.gov Email: odso@georgia.gov
Biennial Report Objective: Georgia law stipulates that the biennial report should document the types of complaints and problems reported by consumers and others on their behalf and include recommendations concerning needed policy, regulatory, and legislative changes (O.C.G.A. 37-2-35).
FY 2014 - FY 2015 BIENNIAL REPORT
Table of Contents
Message from the Ombudsman and Olmstead Coordinator ___________________________ 1 Responsibilities of the Office of Disability Services Ombudsman______________________ 3 Intake Overview ____________________________________________________________ 4
Intake Categories__________________________________________________________ 5 FY 2014: Intake by Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities (DBHDD) Service Regions ___________________________ 6 FY 2015: Intake by Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities (DBHDD) Service Regions ___________________________ 6 Disability Populations ______________________________________________________ 7 Complaints Received ________________________________________________________ 8 Complaint Issues __________________________________________________________ 9 Complaint Outcomes______________________________________________________ 10 Assistance and Information Requests ___________________________________________ 11 Most Frequent Issues: Assistance and Information Requests _______________________ 12 Medical Review Group (MRG) _______________________________________________ 13 MRG Meetings _________________________________________________________ 144 Medical Review Statistics __________________________________________________ 14 Policy, Regulatory, and Legislative Changes _____________________________________ 15 Recommendations for Change ______________________________________________ 15 Changes Implemented During the Biennium ___________________________________ 16 DBHDD Map of Service Regions ____________________________________________ 18 Appendix B Medical Review Group Legislation_________________________________ 19 Appendix C Acronyms_____________________________________________________ 21
Message from the Ombudsman and Olmstead Coordinator
To Governor Nathan Deal, the General Assembly, Commissioners, and the general public:
It is my honor to serve as Ombudsman and Olmstead Coordinator, a position I assumed on December 1, 2015. The Office of Disability Services Ombudsman (ODSO) combines the roles of Ombudsman and Olmstead Coordinator and fully embraces the mission of promoting the safety, rights, and well-being of individuals with disabilities in Georgia. This office responds to complaints and requests for assistance and information while also working to support community integration and consumer choice in accordance with the U.S. Supreme Court's 1999 Olmstead decision.
The enclosed report provides an account of the work accomplished by ODSO and the Medical Review Group, as well as a list of policy, regulatory, and legislative changes during fiscal years 2014 and 2015. Within this biennium, the ODSO saw a 2.8 percent increase in the total cases opened compared to the previous biennium, while seeing a 37 percent decrease in the total number of issues raised by complainants. The majority of inquiries received were from or on behalf of individuals living with a mental illness.
Of note, since the submission of the previous report in 2013, ODSO has been monitoring efforts by the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities (DBHDD) to expand community-based capacity and transition individuals from institutional settings into the community. In 2013 and 2015 respectively, the department closed Southwestern State Hospital and the James B. Craig Nursing Center. This work to support community integration aligns with ODSO's priorities.
1
ODSO seeks to partner with federal, state, and local agencies and stakeholders to improve service delivery for all disability populations in Georgia. We reaffirm our commitment to listening to the disability community and the general public to identify issues and determine effective solutions. Thank you for your interest and support of the work of the Office of Disability Services Ombudsman. Sincerely,
Lavinia Luca Ombudsman and Olmstead Coordinator Governor's Office of Disability Services Ombudsman
2
Responsibilities of the Office of Disability Services Ombudsman1
Establishes priorities, policies and procedures for receiving, investigating, referring, and attempting to resolve complaints made by or on behalf of consumers concerning any act, omission to act, practice, policy, or procedure of provider of services that may adversely affect the safety, well-being, and rights of consumers and any policies and procedures necessary to implement the provisions of this article;
Investigates and make reports and recommendations to the department and other appropriate agencies concerning any act or failure to act by any provider of services with respect to the safety, well-being, and rights of consumers and is authorized to: (a) Prioritize investigations, reporting, and recommendations based on the seriousness and pervasiveness of the alleged act or failure to act; and (b) Refer to the services' provider those complaints deemed appropriate for resolution by the services' provider;
Establishes a uniform state-wide complaint process;
Collects and records data relating to complaints and findings with regard to services' providers and analyze such data in order to identify adverse effects upon the safety, well-being, and rights of consumers;
Promotes the interests of consumers before governmental agencies and seek administrative and other remedies to protect the safety, well-being, and rights of consumers by: (a) Analyzing, commenting on, and monitoring the development and implementation of federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and other governmental policies and actions that pertain to the safety, well-being, and rights of consumers; and (b) Recommending any changes in such laws, regulations, policies, and actions as the ombudsman determines to be appropriate;
Makes a biennial written report documenting the types of complaints and problems reported by consumers and others on their behalf and include recommendations concerning needed policy, regulatory, and legislative changes. The biennial report shall be submitted to the Governor, the General Assembly, the commissioner, and other appropriate agencies and organizations and made available to the public. The ombudsman shall not be required to distribute copies of the biennial report to the members of the General Assembly but shall notify the members of the availability of the report in the manner which he or she deems to be most effective and efficient. The report shall not identify any consumer by name or by implication without the express written consent of the consumer, or if applicable the parent of a minor consumer, the guardian of the consumer, or the health care agent of the consumer if the agent is so authorized to make such a decision and the consumer is unable to do so; and
Reports suspected criminal activity, abuse, neglect, exploitation, abandonment, or violation of professional code.
Coordinates and leads the medical reviews of all deaths in state hospitals and state operated community residential services.
Coordinates state compliance with the 1999 US Supreme Court Olmstead decision.
1 O.C.G.A. 37-2-35
3
Intake Overview
The Office of Disability Services
Ombudsman (ODSO) responds to
complaints as well as requests for assistance and information as it
FY 2014 - FY 2015 Intake Categories
relates to the safety, well-being
and rights of individuals with
22%
disabilities in Georgia. During the 57%
2014 and 2015 fiscal years,
ODSO opened 754 cases and
responded to 821 issues. The
issues responded to range from
complaints of abuse and neglect
to requests for assistance or
21%
information regarding disability
benefits. From fiscal year 2014 to fiscal year 2015, there was a decrease of 33% in the number of issues responded to by the
Complaints Assistance Requests Information Requests
ODSO.
Figure 1
Top 10 Most Frequent Issues Across all Intake Categories
Benefits Legal Other Abuse and Neglect Housing Discharge Client Rights Treatment Issue ADA Accommodations Medication Subtotal (10 most frequent issues) Total (of all issues responded to)
Figure 3
FY 2014 and 2015
252 76 71 64 62 36 35 32 27 23 678 821
FY 2014 FY 2015
491
330
236228
135
120
45
57
Figure 2
Percentage
31.0% 9.3% 8.6% 7.8% 7.6% 4.4% 4.3% 3.9% 3.3% 2.8% 83% of total 100%
4
Intake Categories
Information Requests
Assistance Requests
Complaints
Calls to the Office of Disability Services Ombudsman (ODSO) often concern how to determine benefit eligibility or how to apply for a benefit. In most instances, these inquiries can be resolved by providing a telephone number or point of contact. ODSO staff routinely verify that the contact information is valid before providing it to a caller. ODSO staff continuously update the office's resource listing and points of contact to support individuals with disabilities.
Requests for assistance are more involved than requests for information and often require extensive work by ODSO staff. ODSO cannot provide legal, financial, or medical advice. ODSO staff will provide contact information for these technical services. If a caller has difficulty obtaining a benefit or service, ODSO staff can facilitate the connection to the agency responsible for the benefit, service, or support. These calls are not transferred to other helping agencies until ODSO has worked to resolve the request in the office and has provided the caller with a workable solution.
Complaints are regarded as more serious and normally require an investigation to determine if the complaint is substantiated or not. Although ODSO often works with state agencies to resolve complaints, ODSO is an independent office that is legislatively required to determine the facts in an investigation and take appropriate action to correct the situation and to prevent a future reoccurrence. ODSO makes its final determinations independent of any provider or state agency. Any call concerning the safety, well-being, and rights of an individual with disability is considered a priority.
5
FY 2014: Intake by Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities (DBHDD) Service Regions2
FY 2014 Intake by DBHDD Regions N = 491 Issues
Unknown/Other 1 13
89
Region 6 19 8 19
Region 5 12 14 11
Region 4 5 7 6
Region 3
75
47
Region 2 14 9 14
Region 1 9 22
32
0
50
100
Figure 4
Complaints Assistance Requests
65
150
200
Information Requests
FY 2015: Intake by Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities (DBHDD) Service Regions3
FY 2015 Intake by DBHDD Regions N = 330 Issues
Unknown/Other 0 21
155
Region 6 10 3 11
Region 5 5 3 5
Region 4 015
Region 3 20 22
34
Region 2 8 5 5
Region 1 22 13
0
50
100
Figure 5
Complaints Assistance Requests
150
200
Information Requests
2 Map of DBHDD service regions can be found in Appendix A 3 Map of DBHDD service regions can be found in Appendix A
6
Disability Populations
The Office of Disability Services Ombudsman (ODSO) serves all individuals with disabilities, their families, and those who provide support and advocacy. The table below lists the disability populations served during fiscal years 2014 and 2015 - highlighting the highest intake category for each (Figure 4). Mental illness disabilities accounted for the majority (40 percent) of the ODSO's total intake during the biennium. This includes complaints reported by individuals with a disability or on their behalf, as well as requests for assistance and information. This information is useful in outreach planning, policy formulation, legislative recommendations, and Olmstead planning.
Total Disability Population Served
Mental Illness Physical Disability None/Not Determined/Not Available Intellectual and Developmental Disability Co-Mental Illness and Addictive Disease Co-Mental Illness and Intellectual and Developmental Disability Co-Occurring (Other) Brain Injury-Mental Illness Addictive Disease Total Cases by Disability Type
Figure 6
FY 2014
189 147 44 34 15
9
6 2 1 447
FY 2015
114
62 81 41
1
Total Cases
303
Highest Intake Category based on disability type
Request for Information
209
Request for Information
125
Request for Information
75
Request for Information
18
Request for Information
2
11 Request for Information & Complaints
1
7
Request for Assistance
3
5
Request for Information & Assistance
0
1
Request for Assistance
305
754
7
Complaints Received
To emphasize the availability of ombudsman services, the Office of Disability Services Ombudsman (ODSO) has established a state-wide complaint process, distributed posters about the complaint process, and provided contact information for ODSO. The Ombudsman discusses the complaint process with individuals with disabilities, providers and state agencies during visits to the community, meetings, conferences, and any other public forum.
During the intake of complaints, ODSO gathers and evaluates initial information from the complainant to determine how to proceed in the investigation. This is primarily done through a phone intake process. Sixtytwo percent of cases involving issues of complaint are initiated directly by individuals with disabilities and the other thirty-eight percent are initiated by relatives, agency personnel, and other advocates.
O.C.G.A. 37-2-39
The ombudsman shall prepare and distribute to each services provider in the state a written notice describing the procedure to follow in making a complaint, including the address and telephone number of the office and the ombudsman. The administrator or person in charge of such services provider shall give the written notice required by this Code section to each consumer who receives disability services from such services provider and the consumers guardian, parent of a minor consumer, or health care agent, if any, upon first providing such disability services. The administrator or person in charge of such services provider shall also post such written notice in conspicuous public places in the facility, premises, or property in which disability services are provided in accordance with procedures provided by the ombudsman and shall give such notice to any consumer and his or her guardian, parent of a minor consumer, or health care agent, if any, who
During the complaint investigation process, ODSO looks for and analyzes the facts of each complaint issue. This is done while also maintaining impartiality as well as necessary confidentiality. All available sources of information are considered, including: applicable laws, rules, regulations, policies and or procedures, important documentation, and phone interviews. The range of issues investigated and an overview of the complaint outcomes during fiscal years 2014 and 2015, follow.
8
Complaint Issues
The percentage of complaint cases
decreased by 68% from FY 2014 to FY 2015.
The percentage of complaint issues
decreased by 66% from FY 2014 to FY 2015.
For reporting purposes, the number of complaint cases equals to the number of complainants. Therefore, ODSO not only tracks how many individuals report problems (complaint cases/complainants), but also the various problems that are reported by complainants (complaint issues).
160 140 120 100
80 60 40 20
0 Complaint
Cases Complaint
Issues
Figure 7
FY 2014 112 135
FY 2015 36 45
70 60 57
Issues of Complaints FY 2014 and FY 2015
50
40
30
20
18 17 14
10
10 9 8 7 6 6 6 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1
0
Figure 8
9
Complaint Outcomes
The investigation process involves communicating with state agency points of contact, and in some instances, private service providers who are not contracted with a state agency. Nonjurisdictional cases involving services not provided by or contracted through a state agency may rely more on the process of informal mediation to assist with resolving the problem(s).
Complaints are substantiated if information received during the investigation supports the allegations presented. If the investigation does not support the allegations, the complaint is unsubstantiated. If ODSO staff is unable to obtain information to make a substantiated/unsubstantiated determination, the complaint is reported as inconclusive. As reflected in Figure 9, the majority of complaints investigated during fiscal years 2014 and 2015 were unsubstantiated. However, an unsubstantiated outcome does not mean that there are no presenting issues that need attention and does not discourage the ODSO from working with the reporter beyond the investigation to determine alternative actions to work towards resolution and to determine what can be done to address the situation. It is not uncommon for a complaint case, regardless of the determination, to include substantive assistance in facilitating communication between key parties and coordinating resources with the goal of addressing identified needs of the individual with disability.
As a result of the complaint process, ODSO staff routinely investigates and make reports and recommendations to the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities (DBHDD). However, not all complaints are related to DBHDD services. In fiscal year 2014, thirty-nine percent of complaints were unrelated to services provided by DBHDD or DBHDD contracted providers, and in fiscal year 2015, twenty-two percent were unrelated (Figure 10).
FY 2014 and 2015 Complaint Outcomes Substantiated Unsubstantiated Inconclusive Referred to another agency Pending (still open)
Figure 9
Percentage of Complaints
14.0% 67.2% 1.1% 4.4% 3.3%
Figure 10
Cases Involving Complaint Issues
State Hospitals
DBHDD Providers
Other
Total
FY 2014 38%
23% 39% 100%
FY 2015 64%
14% 22% 100%
10
Assistance and Information Requests
Most citizens do not contact the Office of Disability Services Ombudsman (ODSO) to make a complaint about an agency or services' provider.4 Instead, they contact ODSO because they are having a problem and they need help or information so that it can be resolved. They are often frustrated by what they perceive as bureaucratic obstacles or by their lack of understanding or knowledge of a process or available resources. Therefore, ODSO intake staff spend a significant amount of effort coaching individuals; researching policies, procedures, regulations, and resources on their behalf; and facilitating communication between individuals and other agencies. Below are examples of the various ways that ODSO helped address 641 issues during the 2014 and 2015 fiscal years that stemmed from assistance and information requests:
Provided individuals with relevant phone numbers, websites, and resource information relevant to issues of their concern;
Served as a liaison between a mother and a regional office of DBHDD to facilitate mother's understanding of the next steps of completing a Medicaid waiver application for her adult child with a MH and IDD diagnosis;
Communicated patient's medical concerns to state hospital, resulting in patient receiving a precautionary medical examination;
Contacted involved agency on behalf of individual with disability after their attempts to get a response to inquiry was unsuccessful;
Contacted involved agencies or other involved individuals to facilitate the resolution of misunderstandings or miscommunications about a policy, process or action taken;
Coordinated actions between different agencies and levels of government to assist individuals and providers in need of information, assistance, and support; and
Researched problems and made sure involved parties develop a shared understanding of the facts, issues, and possible solutions.
4 During the FY 2014-2015 biennium, only twenty percent (20%) of intake cases involved one or more issues of complaint, whereas, eighty percent (80%) of cases involved issues of information and/or assistance requests only.
11
Most Frequent Issues: Assistance and Information Requests
Benefits
Top 5 Most Frequent Assistance Request Issues
Legal
Discharge
Housing
Other
Subtotal (5 most frequent assistance request issues) Total (of all issues assistance requests)
FY 2014 and 2015
35 23 19 10 18 105 177
Percentage
19.7% 12.9% 10.7% 5.6% 10.2% 59% of total 100%
Benefits
Top 5 Most Frequent Information Request Issues
Legal
Housing
Other
ADA Accommodation
Subtotal (5 most frequent information request issues) Total (of all information requests issues)
FY 2014 and 2015
214 50 48 46 18 376 464
Percentage
46.1% 10.7% 10.3% 9.9% 3.9% 81% of total 100%
12
Medical Review Group (MRG)
The Governor appoints a Medical Review Group (MRG) to review all deaths of individuals with disabilities in state hospitals or state operated community residential services. The MRG consists of the ombudsman, who serves as the chairman, and four board certified physicians, one of whom must be a psychiatrist. Supported by O.C.G.A. 37-2-455, the medical review group makes four determinations as to whether:
1) the death was the result of natural causes or may have resulted from other than natural causes;
2) the death requires further investigation or review; 3) to make confidential recommendations to the ombudsman, the department, the division,
the state hospitals, and state operated community residential services regarding consumer treatment and care, policies, and procedures, which may assist in the prevention of deaths; and 4) to report to the appropriate law enforcement agency any suspected criminal activity or suspected abuse and shall report any suspected violation of any professional code of conduct to the appropriate licensing board.
5 The legislation that supports the Medical Review Group can be found in Appendix B.
13
MRG Meetings
The MRG convened three times in FY 14 and two times in FY 15 to review the deaths that met the legislative guidelines. The MRG conducted 51 total reviews during the biennium, of which 43 were initial reviews. Due to the vacancy of the Ombudsman during January 1, 2015 November 30, 2015, the MRG did not meet in the 2015 calendar year.
Medical Review Statistics
Medical Review Dates
September 27, 2013 December 13, 2013 May 2, 2014 September 4, 2014 December 4, 2014 TOTAL
Figure 13
FY 2014 and FY 2015 Medical Reviews
New death cases reviewed
Cases w/follow up from previous meeting(s)
Cases Closed
Cases reviewed that are still pending
12
5
16
1
6
2
7
0
7
0
7
0
10
0
9
1
8
1
9
0
43
8
48
2
Total cases reviewed
17 8 7 10 9 51
14
Policy, Regulatory, and Legislative Changes
The biennial report is required by Georgia law to include any recommendations concerning policy, regulatory, and legislative changes.
Recommendations for Change
1) Quality of Personal Care Homes. ODSO continues to receive frequent calls about substandard living conditions and care in personal care homes. Multiple state agencies are involved in funding and providing services in these homes. Safe, healthy housing is a critical resource that we must provide individuals with disabilities. The At-Risk Adult Working Group lead by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) continues to facilitate ways to break down barriers to combat the abuse, neglect and exploitation of older adults and adults with disabilities. We must continue supporting these efforts to improve maintenance, funding, and management accountability of personal care homes.
2) Community Integration Not Always Understood and Achieved. The U.S. Supreme Court's 1999 Olmstead decision is a clear response to the question about the importance of living a life of independence in a community setting. People transitioning from state institutions should live in community settings where they live and work with people who do not have a disability. Our communities should not further institutionalize and isolate people with disabilities. Community integration should mean a person with a disability can live in their own home, enjoy family and friends and obtain meaningful work if possible. We must continue to educate our communities and insist on true integration for people with disabilities living in our communities.
15
Changes Implemented During the Biennium
1) At-Risk Adults Mobile Tool. The Georgia Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation (GANE) mobile application was developed through the collaboration of the Georgia Department of Human Services Division of Aging Services, the Georgia Chapter of the Alzheimer's Association and the Georgia Bureau of Investigation. GANE is a resource to help law enforcement and social workers make critical decisions about older adults and adults with disabilities in vulnerable situations. The GANE app provides information on laws, makes it easier to report a missing adult and provides guidance on evaluating whether an adult may have been abused, neglected or exploited.
2) Supported Housing Assessment Tool. Access to housing is an essential part of the recovery process and community integration. In 2015, the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities (DBHDD) developed the Supported Housing Needs and Choice Evaluation tool to be administered to individuals meeting the ADA Settlement criteria. This tool informs community-based adult mental health service providers of an individual's housing preferences and needs, within the appropriate available housing options across the state, as well as the level of support needed to remain in the housing the individual have chosen.
3) State Hospital Closures. ODSO has been collaborating with DBHDD to transition individuals from institutional settings into the community and expand communitybased capacity. In 2013 and 2015 respectively, the department closed Southwestern State Hospital and the James B. Craig Nursing Center. As a result of these hospital closures, the number of individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities that have transitioned into the community since the ADA Agreement is 505 as of December 2015. During this biennium, the department continued its efforts to expand community based services and in regions of the state that experienced hospital closures added a number of services such as: behavioral health crisis centers, crisis respite apartments, assertive community treatment teams, case managers, and a PATH team (Projects for Assistance in Transition from Homelessness program).
4) Chest Pain Protocol. State hospitals provide basic medical care but are not equipped with the diagnostic equipment needed to fully assess many major medical signs or symptoms. Therefore, DBHDD has guidelines to assist clinicians with early recognition of impending medical emergencies and to know when a rapid transport to a medical facility is warranted. Based on recommendations from the Medical Review Group, DBHDD made revisions to the Chest Pain protocol providing additional guidance to clinicians on procedures to
16
appropriately assess and determine when to initiate emergency transfer for individuals experiencing chest or abdominal pain. 5) DBHDD Mortality Review Report. In 2015, DBHDD published its first annual mortality report on adults who died while receiving waiver-funded intellectual and developmental disability Medicaid waiver services from DBHDD and its contracted providers. The purpose of the report is to identify trends and indicators that will help direct training and education efforts to assist the department and service providers with improving the quality and efficiency of services rendered.
17
Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities Map of Service Regions
18
Appendix B Medical Review Group Legislation
O.C.G.A. 37-2-45. Medical review group to review the deaths of consumers
a) The Governor shall appoint a medical review group to conduct medical reviews of all deaths of consumers in state hospitals or state operated community residential services, which shall serve at the pleasure of the Governor. The medical review group shall consist of the ombudsman and four board certified physicians, one of whom shall be a psychiatrist. Three members of the medical review group shall constitute a quorum. The ombudsman shall serve as the chairperson and shall appoint a vice chairperson.
b) The physician members of the medical review group shall receive such compensation, if any, as may be fixed by the Governor. Such physician members shall be reimbursed for expenses incurred by them in performance of their duties such as transportation, lodging, and subsistence, at the same rate as members of the General Assembly.
c) The medical review group:
1) Shall be a review organization and shall conduct reviews of deaths of consumers in state hospitals and state operated community residential services as peer reviews pursuant to Article 6 of Chapter 7 of Title 31;
2) Shall review, within 60 days of notice of the death, all deaths of consumers:
A. Occurring on site of a state hospital or state operated community residential services providing services under this title;
B. In the company of staff of a state hospital or state operated community residential services providing services under this title; or
C. Occurring within two weeks following the consumer's discharge from a state hospital or state operated community residential services;
3) Shall have access to all clinical records of the consumer, all investigations conducted by the department, state hospitals, or state operated community residential services regarding the death, and all reviews of the death, including peer reviews;
4) May interview staff of the state hospitals and state operated community residential services, and other persons involved in the events immediately preceding and involving the death;
19
5) Shall determine whether the death was the result of natural causes or may have resulted from other than natural causes;
6) Shall determine whether the death requires further investigation or review; 7) May make confidential recommendations to the ombudsman, the department, the
division, the state hospitals, and state operated community residential services regarding consumer treatment and care, policies, and procedures, which may assist in the prevention of deaths; and 8) Shall report to the appropriate law enforcement agency any suspected criminal activity or suspected abuse and shall report any suspected violation of any professional code of conduct to the appropriate licensing board. d) All peer review records submitted to or produced or created by the medical review group and the findings and recommendations of the medical review group, except for the quarterly reports, shall remain confidential and shall not be considered public records under Article 4 of Chapter 18 of Title 50.
20
Appendix C Acronyms
BHCC CIT CMS CSH DAS/FSIU DBHDD DCA DCH DCH/HCF DHS DNR/DNI DOJ ECRH FY GBI GRHA GRHS HUD ME MOU MRG ODSO OPC NOW/COMP NWGRH PCH SAMHSA SWOT SWSH WCGRH
Behavioral Health Coordinating Council Crisis Intervention Training US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Central State Hospital Division of Aging Services, Forensic Special Investigations Unit Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities Department of Community Affairs Department of Community Health Department of Community Health, Healthcare Facility Regulation Department of Human Services Do Not Resuscitate/Do Not Intubate Department of Justice East Central Regional Hospital Fiscal Year Georgia Bureau of Investigations Georgia Regional Hospital at Atlanta Georgia Regional Hospital at Savannah U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Medical Examiner Memorandum of Understanding Medical Review Group Office of the Disability Services Ombudsman Olmstead Planning Committee New Options Waiver/Comprehensive Supports Waiver Northwest Georgia Regional Hospital Personal Care Home Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Strengths/Weaknesses/Opportunities/Threats Analysis Southwestern State Hospital West Central Georgia Regional Hospital
21