ASOURCE BOOK
of data concerning
TEACHERS AND TEACHER , EDUCATION IN GEORGIA
~
1959
A SOURCE BOOK OF DATA CONCERNING TE.t\CHERS AND TEltCHER EDUCATION IN GEORGIA
Prepared Under The Direction of
THE TASK FORCE ON TEACHER EDUCATION of
THE gEORGIA NUCLEAR ADVISORY CO~n1ISSION
By
James E. Greene, Sr. (Editor), Joseph C. Bledsoe George B. Miller, Jr., George L. Newsome, Jr. Bernice Cooper, Albert J. Kingston, Harren G. Findley
R. Travis Osborne, and Mary Ellen Perkins
1959
ROSTER OF MENBERS: THE TASK FORCE ON TEACHER EDUCATION
EX OFFICIO MEMBERS
Mr. Frank H. Neeley, Chairman, Georgi!;). Nuclear Ad1risory Commri<8s:ion, and Chairman of' the BOax'd, Rich's, At1a.r'J.t~, Georgia.
Dr. William M. Suttles, Chairman, Committee on Manpower and Education of the Georgia Nuclear Advisory Commission and Dean of Students, Georgia State College of Business Administration, Atlanta, Georgia.
Mr. A. L. Feldman, Chairman, Governor's Conference on Education, and President of the Puritan Chemical Company, Atlanta, Georgia.
Dr. Doak S. Campbell, Coordinator of Task Force Studies, and President Emeritus, Florida State University, Ta1la~assee, Florida.
MEMBERS
Mr. R. F. Adamson, Executive Vice-President, The Citizens & Southern National Bank, Atlanta, Georgia.
Miss Marjorie Crouch, Critic Teacher, Georgia Teachers College Demons~ration School, Statesboro, Georgia.
Dr. 1ATarren G. Findley, Assistant Superintendent for Pupil Personnel Services, Atlanta Board of Education, Atlanta, Georgia.
Mr. Edgar J. Forio, Vice-President, The Coca Cola Company, Atlanta, Georgia.
Dr. James E. Greene, Sr., Chairman, Task Force on Teacher Education, and Chairman, Di'lision of Graduate Studies in Education, College of Education, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
Mr. E. C. Hammond, Secretary, Georgia Power Company, Atlanta, Georgia.
Dr. Robert E. Lee, President, Georgia Association of Colleges, and President, Georgia State College for Women, Milledgeville, Georgia.
Miss Mary Ellen Perkins, Coordinator for Teacher-Education, Georgia Department of Education, Atlanta, Georgia.
Dr. Lloyd B. Raisty, Vice-President, Federal Reserve Bank, Atlanta, Georgia.
Mr. W. L. Robinson, President, Fulton County Board of Education and President, Georgia School Boards Association, College Park, Georgia.
Mr. W. A. Thompson, Vice President for Personnel, Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company, Atlanta, Georgia.
Dr. Judson C. Ward, Jr., Vice-President and Dean of Faculties, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION
The present volume is one of two mimeographed reports prepared by the Task Force on Teacher Education of the Georgia Nuclear Advisory Commission. This volume consists of a series of 97 tables presenting the basic statistical data upon which the descriptive and evaluative comments contained in the companion volumel are mainly based. Both volumes have been organized with reference to a common outline of major topics and related sub-topics. AlthOUGh either volume may be used independently of the other, both volumes were planned, organized and reproduced on the assumption that the tjlPical reader would wish to make joint and related use of each of them. Consequently, the authors of the companion volumel have made numerous cross references to the tabular materials in the present volume.
In some instances it may be possible that a particular reader of this volume may not have or may not w'ish to have access to the companion volume. In either case, it would be the ~dsh of the Editor that such a reader would examine and appraise the tabular material contained in this volume in the light of background information concerning the purpose and scope of the total studY and the conditions under which it was conducted. Such a statement was prepared as the Editor's Introduction to the companion volume, Teachers and Teacher Education in GeorGia. Beoause of its presumed interest and pertInence to the reader-or-the present volluue, this statement is reproduced herein as Appendix A, page 122, ff.
Although the statistical data presented in this source book obviously lack definitivenes and finality, it is believed that they will have much interest and value to all agencies and persons concerned with the improvement of teaching and teacher education in Georgia.
James E. Greene, Sr., Chairman
Task Force on Teacher Education
1 Teachers and Teacher Education in Georgia
TOPICS AND ACCOMPANYING TABLES
A SOURCE BOOKI
for OF DATA CONCERNING TEACHERS AND
TEACHER EDUCATION
IN
GEORGIA
TOPICS
AND
U~ES
~~
I. THE GENERAL STATUS OF PUBLIC EDUCATION IN GEORGIA A. The Role of the Public Schools2
B. Extent of the Enterprise: Persoilllel, Capital Outlay, Operating Expenses, Etc. 2
C. Comparisons of Georgia with Selected States and the Nation
Table I-C-l: Selected Indices of Ability, Burden, Effort, and Achievement of Several Selected States in Education 1
Table I-C-2: Selected Indices of Ability, Burden, Effort, and Achievement of Several Selected States in Education EJ..'Pressed as a Ratio of the Respective Indioes of the Cortttnontal United States. 2
Table I-C-3
Average Annual Salaries of Teachers, Average Effective Buying Income of Consumer Spending Units, and Average vJeelcly Earnings of 11anufacturing Employees for Selected States, in Comparison with National Averages 3
Table I-c-h
Specific Hininum Requii,'ements for Elementary and High School Certificates for Selected
States 4
II. SELECTED CHAW.CTERISTICS OF THE HORK FORCE
A. Certification Status
Table II-A-l : Percentage of Hhite PulJJ..ic School Teachers of Georgia in Each of Six Certification
Categories for Selected School Years from
1938 to January 1959 5
I This Source-Book is designed to accompany and supplement a companion volume entitled Teachers and Teacher Edlwation in Georsia. The order of presentation oflnaterfa:ls in---S-o'tll"voIUllieS'11illconformto the topics and subtopics listed herein. The nomenclature of tl1e tables conforms to the topics and sub-topics here sho~m.
2 These topics will be discussed in tlle companion volume. There are no tabular data in the present volume related to these topics.
i
TOPICS
AND
TABLES
PAGE
Table II-A-2 Percentage of Negro Public School Teachers of Georgia in Each of Six Certification Categories for Selected School Years from 1938 to JanuaFJ 1959 6
Table II-A-3 The Number of Georgia ~n1ite Teachers within Each of Six Certification Categories for Selected School Years Expressed as a Percentage of the Teachers Holding Given Types of Certificates During the School Year 1950. 7
Table II-A-4 The Number of Georgia Negro Teachers i'Jithin Each of Six Certification Categories for Selected School Years Rxpressed as a Percentage of the Teachers Holding Given Types of Certificates During the School Year 1950. 8
Table II-A-5 The Level of Certification of Teachers in Georgia Public Schools as of Janua~J 1959: It~ Population Groups. 9
Table II-A-6
The Hean Nmnber of Years of College Training of Public School Personnel in 159 County School Systems of Georgia as of January, 1959: :8'"J Hace and Sex . , 10
Table II-A-7 Table II-A-S
The 1'rean Number of Years of College Training of Public School Personnel in 39 City Systems as of January 1959: By Race and Sex " . 17
The Extent to ~fuich Public School Teachers of Georgia as of flay, 1957 1rIe:;."e Certified in the Hajor Teaching Field: By Population Groups. . 19
Table II-A-9 : The Level of Certification of Superintendents of County and Independent School Systems in Georgia: April, 1958. 20
B. Teaching Aptitude and Student Achievement.
Table II-B-l : Standardized Scores Earned on the National Teacher ExarIination by PrimarJ, Upper ElementaFj", and Secor:da...ry Teachers in the Public Schools of Atlanta, Georgia: By nace. " 21
ii
TOPICS AND TABLES
PAGE
Table II-B-2 Standardized Scores in Certain Indicated Teaching Field Options of the National Teacher Examinations Earned by TJhite and Negro Teachers in the Public Schools of Atlantaj Georgia, as Compared with National Samples. 22
Table II-B-3 Standardized Scores Earned on the National Teacher EXR'1lination By Teachers in A Large Public School System in Georgia: By Race 23
Table II-B-4 Grade Placement Scores on Standardized Tests in Arithmetic and Reading Earned by Students in the Fourth, Sixth, and Eighth Grades of the Public Schools of Atlanta, Georgia:
By Race. 24
Table II-B-5 Standardized Scores Earned on the Essential High School Content Battery by Tuelfth Grade Students in the ~~blic Schools of Atlanta, Georgia: By Race. 25
Table II-B-6 Grade Placement Scores on Standardized Tests in Aritl~etic and Reading Earned by Students in the Sixth, Eighth, and Tenth Grades of a Large Public School System in Georgia: By
Race 26
C. Years of Experience
Table 11-0-1 : The Number of Years of Teaching Experience of All Teachers in Georgia Public Schools
as of January, 1959: Itr Level of Certification 27
Table 11-0-2 The Humber of Years of Teaching Experience of lilllite Teachers in Georgia Public Schools as of January, 1959: By Level of Certification 28
Table I1-C-3 The Number of Years of ~I'eaching Experience of Negro Teachers in Georgia Public Schools
as of January, 1959: By Level of Certification 29
Table II-C-4 The Years of Self-Reported Teaching Experience
of Personnel in All Public School Systems of Georgia as of May 1957: ~J Race and Sex 30
Tabllie 11-C-5 The Years of Self-Reported Teaching Experience of Personnel in County School Systems of Georgia as of Nay, 1957: By Race and Sex 31
iii
TOPICS AND
~~S
~~
Table I1-C-,6 :' The Years 'Jf Self-Reported Teaching Experience
of Personnel in Independent School Systems of Georgia as of May, 1957: ~J Race and Sex 32
Table II-C-7
The Number of Years of Service of Public School Employees in the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia as of June 30, 1957: ~J Sex 33
D. Age
Table I1-D-l The Age Distribution of Persons Employed in All Public Systems of Georgia During January 1959: ~- Race and Sex 34
Table 1I-D-2 The Age Distribution of Persons Employed in County School Systems of Georgia During January, 1959: By P..ace and Sex 35
Table II-D-3 The Age Distribution of Persons Employed in Independent School Systems of Georgia During JanuarJ, 1959: By Race and Sex 36
Table II-D-4 The Age Distribution of Personnel Employed in 159 County School Systems of Georgia During January, 1959: ~T Race 37
Ta1;):he II-D-5 The Age Distribution of Personnel Eraployed in 39 City School Systems of Georgia During JanuaFJ, 1959: By Race 44
Table I1-D-6 The Age Distribution of Public School Employees in the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia as of June 30, 1957: By Sex 46
Table I1-D-7 The Age Distribution of Georgia Public School Personnel as of February, 195h: By Race and Sex 47
E. Narital Status
Table II-E-l : T;1e Marital Status of Personnel in Georgia Public Schools as of May, 1957: By Population Groups. 48
F. , Relative Stability of the "\rJm:ok Force
Table II-F-l : The Distri1)l.l.tion of Georgia Public School Personnel ::;mployed as of M2.y 1957 According to Teaching Status During the School Year 1955-56: BJ Population Groups 49
iv
TOPICS
AND
TABLES
PAGE
Table II-F-2 : The Age Distribution of Persons Entering
. . the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia
During 1958: ~. Race and Sex
50
Table II-F-3 The Age Distribution of Persons Withdraiiing From the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia During 1958: B.f Race and Sex. 51
Table II-F-h : The Years of Service of Persons l'Jithdralung from the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia During 1958: B.f Race and Sex. 52
Table II-F-5 : The Number, Percentage, and Mean Ages of Men and Fomen Principals of Selected Georgia Public Schools within Each of Several Mobility Categories for the Nine-Year Period
from 1947 through 1956 53
Table II-F-6 : The Numbers and Percentages of "Stablefl and flI1obile l ' Principals 'tuthin Five Rural-Urban Residence Categories 54
G. Teaching Duties and Level of Instruction
Table II-G-l : The Distribution of Georgia Public School Personnel According to Level of Instruction as of May, 1957: By Population Groups 55
Table II-G-2
Teaching Duties of Georgia Elementary Teachers in May 1957. By Race and Sex According to Number and Per Cent of Classes Reported for Each Grade or Combination of Grades 56
Table II-G-3 : Teaching Duties of Georgia ~~ite and Negro Elementary Teachers in May 1957 According to Number and Per Cent of Pupils Reported in Each Grade or Combination of Grades. 57
Table II-G-4
Number and Per Cent of Pupils and Periods in Each of Several Broad Subject Pields Reported as Teaching Duties in May 1957 By Georgia High ScJ.lOol Teachers 58
Table II-G-5 : Teaching Duties Reported in May 1957 &J Georgia High School Teachers: By Subject Areas. 59
Table II-G-6 : Number and Per Cent of Classes By Race and Sex iiJithin Each of Several Activity Categories j.n Georgia 'VJhi te and Negro High Schools as Reported by Teachers in May, 1957 60
v
TOPICS
AND
TABLES
PAGE
Table II-G-7 : Number and Per Cent of Pupils and Periods by Race in Each of Several Activity Categories in Georgia Tfuite and Negro High Schools as Reported by Teachers in May, 1957. 61
H. Compensation
Table II-H-l The Salary Status of School Personnel in All School Systems as Reported to the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia for January, 1959: By Race and Sex. 62
Table II-H-2 The Salary Status of School Personnel in
County School Systems as Reported to the
. . Teacher Retirement System of Georgia for
January, 1959: Itr Race and Sex.
63
Table II-H-3 The Salary Status of School Personnel in Independent School Systems as Reported to the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia for JanuarJr, 1959: By Race and Sex. 64
Table II-H-4 The Hean Honthly SalarJ of Public School Employees in 158 County School Systems of Georgia as of January, 1959: ErJ Race and Sex. 65
Table II-H-5
The Mean ~'1onthly Salar;;r of Public School
Employees in 38 City School Systems of Georgia
as of Janua~!, 1959: By Race and Sex. 72
Table II-H-6 The Nean Honthly Sala.--y of Public School Employees in the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia, According to Age as of June 30, 1957: By Sex. 74
Table II-H-7 : The Nean r1onthl:r Salary of Public School Employees in the Teacher Hetirement System of Georgia Acco~ding to Years of Service as of June 30, 1957: Dy Sex. 75
III. PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION PROGRANS
A. Number of Trainees in Undergraduate Training Programs
Table III-A-l : The Number of Graduates of Eighteen ~~ite Colleges in Georgia Prepared for Teaching Positioi1s During the Decade 1949-58: B'lJ Level of Prospective Certification 76
vi
TOPICS AND TABLES
PAGE
Table III-A-2 : The Number of Graduates of Eight Negro Colleges in Georgia Prepared for Teaching Positions During the Decade 1949-1958: By Level of Prospective Certification 77
Table III-A-3 : The Total Number of Prospective Teachers of Both Races Trained in Georgia Colleges During the Decade 1949-1958, According to Teaching Field: By Sex. 78
Table III-A-4 The Number of Prospective ~fuite Teachers Trained in Georgia Colleges During the Decade 1949-1958, According to Teaching Field: By Sex 79
Table III-A-5 The Number of Prospective Negro Teachers
Trained in Georgia Colleges During the
. . Decade 1949-1958, According to Teaching
Field: By Sex
80
Table III-A-6 Projected Esti~ate of the Nur.lber of Teachers to be Trained in Georgia Colleges for the Years 1960 and 1965 81
B. Curriculum and Staff
Table III-B-l : Curriculum Patterns for Teacher Education Programs in Georgia White Colleges: Expressed in Quarter Hours 82
Table III-B-2 Curriculum Patterns for Teacher Education Programs in Georgia Negro Colleges: Expressed in Quarter Hours 83
Table III-B-3 SQ~m~ of Professional Course Credit Requirements in Tea~her Education Programs of 114
Institutions of Higher Education 84
Table III-B-4
Number of Qum'ter Hours Required and Actually Taken in Prof6ssional Courses in Georgia Colleges as Reported by THenty Institutions with Teacher Education Programs 85
Table III-B-5 : The Qualifications of Full Time Faculty lJIembers Engaged in Teacher Training in T1'ITenty Institutions Hith Teacher Education Programs Based on IIighest Degree Held: By Race and
Sex . . 86
vii
TOPICS AND
~4BLES
PAGE
C. Operational Policies and Procedures
Table III-C-l : The Incidence of Self-Reported Recruitment Practices of Twenty Georgia Colleges liLth Teacher Education Programs 87
Table III-C-2
The Incidence of Self-Reported Admission Policies of THenty Georgia Colleges I'dth Teacher Education Programs 88
D. Opinions Concerning Teacher Education Progralnsl
IV. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRAINEES
A. Bachelors Graduates of the University of Georgia: 1958
Table IV-A-l : The Place of Residence of 1958 Baccalaureate Graduates of the University of Georgia. 89
Table IV-A-2 Percentages of the 1958 Bachelors Graduates of the University of Georgia by Categories of Father Occupations and School of Registration 90
Table IV-A-3 : Nunilier of Years Between High School and Baccalaureate Graduations for the 1958 Bachelors Graduates of the University of
Georgia 91
Table IV-A-4 High School Averages of the 1958 Bachelors Graduates of the University of Georgia. 92
Table IV-A-5 : The Number of Carnegie Units Earned in High School b~r the 1958 Baccalaureate Graciuates of the University of Georgia: ~ Selected
Subject Fields and Total. 93
Table IV-A-6 : American Council on Education Psychological Examination Scores Achieved by the 1958 B~cbelDr$GraduatJes of the University of
Georgia 94
Table IV-A-7 Algebra and Reading Comprehension Scores Achieved by the 1953 Bachelors Graduates of the University of Georgia 95
1 These topics will be discussed in the companion volume. There are no tabular data in the present volu..me related to these topics.
viii
TOPICS AND TABLES
PAGE
Table IV-A-8 : Age at Time of Baccalaureate Graduation of the 1958 Bachelors Graduates Of' the
University of Georgia 96
Table IV-A-9 : The Percentages of 1958 University of Georgia Baccalaureate Graduates Classified by College of 11ajor Registration Transferring Given Numbers of Quarter Hours of Credit 97
Table rJ"-A-lO: Number of Quarter Hours Credit Earned at the University of Georgia by the 1958 Bachelors Graduates of the University of Georgia. 98
Table IV-A-ll: Marks Assigned in Designated College Courses by the 1958 Baccalaureate Graduates of the University of Georgia: By Sex. 99
Table IV-A-12: Actual Undergraduate Average ~1ark Achieved by the 1958 Bachelors Graduates of the University of Georgia: All College Subjects 100
Table IV-A-l): Number of Quarter Hours Credit, Mean Number of Quarter Hours Credit, and Mean Grade in Teaching Field Achieved by the 1958 Bachelor of Science in Education Graduates of the University of Georgia. 101
Table IV-A-14: Average Grade in Teaching Field Compared to Averace Grade in Education Courses Achieved by the 1958 Bachelor of Science in Education Graduates of the University of Georgia 102
B. Masters Graduates of the University of Georgia: 1958
Table IV-B-l : Mean Scores on Graduate Record Examinations and Certain Age Factors for Sub-Groups of the 1958 Masters Degree Graduates of the University of Georgia. 103
Table IV-B-2
Mean Scores on Certain Factors Related to the Graduate and Undergraduate Programs for Sub-Groups of the 1958 Nasters Degree Graduates of the University of Georgia. 104
Table IV-B-3 : Mean Scores on Graduate Record Examination Tests anc. Certa.in Age Factors of the 1958 Master of Education Graduates of the University of Georgia 105
ix
TOPICS
AND
TABLES
PAGE
Table IV-B-4 : Mean Scores on Certain Factors Related to the Graduate and Undergraduate Programs of the 1958 llaster of Education Graduates of the University of Georgia 106
Table IV-B-5 : Nl.unber and Per Cent 'v'Jithin Each of Several Sub-Groups of the 1958 Masters Degree Graduates of the University of Georgia Classified by Number of Years Since Undergraduate Degree was Conferred 107
Table IV-B-6 : Number and Per Cent "Ii'!ithin Each of Several Sub-Groups of the 1958 Masters Degree Graduates of the University of Georgia Classified by Institution Conferring Bachelors Degree 108
Table IV-B-7
Number and Per Cent l'Jithin Each of Several Sub-Groups of 1958 Masters Degree Graduates of the University of Georgia Classified by ~JPe of Undergraduate Degree Received. 109
Table IV-B-8 : Number and Per Cent Within Each of Several Sub-Groups of the 1958 Masters Degree Graduates of the University of Georgia Classified by Field of Undergraduate Major. 110
C. Supplementary Studies of the Distribution of Marks Assigned to University of Georgia Students
Table IV-C-l : The Distribution of Marks in Junior Division
Courses in 43 Areas of Instruction: The
University of Georgia: Fall Quarter, 1955.. 111
Table IV-C-2 : The Distribution of Marks in Senior Division Courses in 54 Areas of Instruction: The University of Georgia: Fall Quarter, 1955. 113
Table IV-C-3 : The Dj_stribution of Undergraduate Marks in the Schools and Colleges of the University of Georgia: Fall Quarter, 1955. 115
Table Iv-c-4
Mean Standard Scores for Grades and Intelligence for Lower Division Students Enrolled in Courses for the Fall Quarter 1951 in Each of the Schools and Colleges of the University of
Georgia. 116
x
TOPICS
AND
TABLES
PAGE
Table IV-C-5 : Mean Standard Scores for Grades and
Intelligence for Upper Division Students
Enrolled in Courses for the Fall Quarter 1951 in Each of the Schools and Colleges of the University of Georgia. 117
D. Selected Comparisons of Education Majors Versus Non-Education
Majors in Certain Georgia Colleges Having Teacher Education Programs
Table IV-D-l : A Comparison of Teacher Trainees with Other Students on various Indices Based on the Opinions of Respondents from Fifteen 1f1Jhite and Five Negro Teacher Education Colleges
of Georgia. 118
Table IV-D-2 : A Comparison of the Status of the 1958 Education and IJon-Education Graciuates of Certain ~Vhite and Negro Teacher Education Colleges of Georgia with Respect to Scholastic Aptitude, High School Average Mark, and Age at Graduation 119
Table IV-D-3 : Number and Median Grade-Point Averages of the 1958 Education and Non-Education Graduates of Twelve 1{nite Teacher Education
Colleges of Georgia 120
Table IV-D-4 Number and Median Grade-Point Averages of the 1958 Education and Non-Education Graduates of Five Negro Teacher Education
Colleges of Georgia 121
xi
-1-
TABLE I-o-1
SELECTED INDICES OF ABILITY, BURDEN, EFFORr, AND ACHIEVEMENT OF SEVERAL SELECTED STATES IN EDUCATION&.
State
Ability Index No. 1$
Dollars
Ability Index
NOdi 2$$
Dollars
Burden Index
No. 1#
er ent
Burden Effort Index Index
No. 2## No. 1 Pupils Dollars
Ach5.eve- AchieveEffort ment ment
Index Index Index
No. 2 No. 1* No. 2** Per Cent ears Per Cen
U. S.
$10,049 $1,140 18.2 429 $300
2.57
Alabama
5,177 764 23.3 563
184
2.81
California 12,337 1,356 17.7 385
344
2.79 11.6
Florida
8,034 1,344 19.8 410
247
2.49
34.2
Georgia
5,534 928
540
205
3.01
35.1
New York
15,097 1,212
339
462
2.57 9.6 15.9
North Carolina
5,495 911
543
181
7.9 39.5
South
4,660 741 23.9 615
192
Carolina
Tennessee
5,969 875 21.5 495
168
8.4
1iisconsin 10,963 1,176 15.8 436
330
8.9
&Abstracted from Tables 1-8, "The States and Education," Washington: N.E.A. Re-
search Bulletin, Vol. 36, No. 1, Febru~ 1958, PP. 24-29.
$ Ability Index No.1: Personal income payments per pupil enrolled in public
schools, 1956-57.
~Abi1ity Index No.2: Per-capita retail sales, 1956.
# Burden Index No.1: Per cent of total population enrolled in public Schools.
# Burden Index No.2: Number of school-age Children (5..17) per 1,000 adults aged
21..64, 1955.
Effort Index No.1: Estimated expenditures per pupil in A.D.A., 1956-57.
~ Effort Index No.2: Current expenditures for public education from state and
*
local sources as a per cent of personal Achievement Index No.1: Hedian school
income payments, 1956-57. year completed by persons
25
years
of
*
age and older, 1950. Achievement Index No.2:
Per cent of selective service recruits disqualified by
the~MBnt.aJ.Xest, 1956.
- 2 ..
TABLE I ..C-2
SELECTED DIDICES OF ABILITY, BURDEN, EFFORT, AND ACHIEVEMENT OF SEVERAL SELECTED STATES IN EDUCATION EXPRESSED AS A RATIO OF THE RESPECTIVE IN-
DICES OF THE CONTnJENTAL UNITED STATES&.
State
Ability Index
No. 1$ Dollars
U. S.
Alabama California Florida Georgia New York North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee i1Tisconsin
100.0 122.8
79.9
59.4 109.1
Burden Index No. 1# er Cent
Burden Effort Index Index
No. 2## No.1
Pupils Dol ars
Effort
~dex
No. 2 Per Cent
Achieve-Achievement ment Index Index
WOe 1* No. 2** Years Per Cen
100.0 67.0
81.4 106.3
79.9
100.0 100.0 128.0 131.2 97.3 89.7 108.8 9S.6 124.7 125.9 81.9 79.0 126.9 126.6
100.0 61.3
114.7 82.3 68.3
154~0
60.3
100.0 100.0 100.0 109.3 84.9 232.6 108.6 124.7 121.2 96.9 103.2 195.4
100.0 103.2 90.9 108.2 84.9 225.7
65.0
64.0 125.3 81.7 235.4
118.1 115.4 86.8 101.6
56.0 110.0
95.7 100.0
90.3 152.0 95.7 26.3
& Abstracted from Tables 1-8, liThe States and Education," Washington: N.E.A. Re-
search Bulletin, Vol. 36, No.1, February 1958, pp. 24-29.
-
$ Ability Index No.1: Personal income payments per pupil enrolled in public
schools, 1956-57.
$$ Ability Index No.2: Per..capita retail sales, 1956.
# Burden Index No, 1: Per cent of total population enrolled in public schools.
## Burden Index No.2: Number of school-age children (5-17) per 1,000 adults aged
21-64, 1955.
.
.
Effort Index No.1: Estimated expenditures per pupil in A.D.A., 1956-57.
Effort Index No.2: Current expenditures for public education from state and
*
local sources as a per cent of personal income payments, 1956-57. Achievement Index No.1: :Hedian school year completed by persons 25 years of
**
age and older, 1950. Achievement Index No.2:
Per cent of selective service recruits disqualified
by -the Mental Test, 1956.
-3TABLE r-o-3 AVERAGE ANNUAL SALARIES OF TEACHERS, AVERAGE EFFEOl'IVE BUYING INCOME OF CONSUMER
SPENDING mms, AND AVERAGE WEEKLY EARNINGS OF MANUFAGrURING _LOYEES
FOR SELEGrED STATES, IN COMPARISON WITH NATIONAL AVERAGES*
e r ;
State
Continental u. S.
Estimated average salary for teachers 1955-5A6moaunndt 1956-57.
195MB 125M?
$4,135 100.0
$4,330 100.0
Inaome per ConsUI!ler Spending Unit, 1955**
Amount
$4,785 100.0
Average week.1;y earnings of production workers in manufacturing
industries, 1955**
MJrom
-
$76.52
100.0
Alabama
3,175 76.8
3,450 79.7
3,450 72.1
60.34 78.8
California
5,100 J.a3e3
5,250
121.2
5,170 lOB.O
85.24 1ll.4
Florida
4,130 99.9
4,192 96.8
4,022 84.1
58.10 75.9
Georgia
3,250 78.6
3,400 78.5
3,672 76.7
54.00 70.6
New York
5,300 128.2
5,700 131.6
5,546 115.9
75.17 98.2
North Carolina
3,381 81.8
3,400 78.5
3,677 76.8
51.46 67.2
South Carolina
3,100 75.0
3,250 75.1
3,508 73.3
53.30 69.6
Termessee
3,200 77.4
3,350 77.4
3,738 78.1
60.64 79.2
Wisconsin
4,051 98.0
4,300 99.3
4,764 99.6
80.61 105.,3
:
* Abstracted from Table 16, "Economic Status of Teachers in 1956-57", Special
~, Researoh Division.. National Education Association, February 1957, pp.23-24.
** The top figure is the amount; the bottom figure is an index of the U.S.
average. (U. S. 100%).
4 - !"" TABLE r-G-4
SPECIFIC MINIMUM REQlJIREMEIIlTS FOR ELEMENTARY AND HIGH SCHOOL CERrIFICATES FOR SELECTED STATES*
State
Elementary
High School
Alabama
30
3
24
3
California
24
8
22
6
Florida
20
6
20
6
Georgia
18
6
18
6
New Yerk
36
12
18
2
North Carolina 18
3
18
3
South Carolina 21
6
18
6
Tennessee
24
4
24
4
Wisconsin
26
8
18
5
Mean" All States 24
6
19
5
Range
5-40
0-12
12-27
0-10
Nmnber States
Requiring less 10
21
than Georgia
11
24
* So~ce: ! Manual on Certification Reguirements !2!: School Personnel ~ ~ Um.ted States" ~9~ Edition.
# Thirty-seven states including all those named herein require Bachelorfs degree
for regular Elementary Certificate.
#HAJJ.. states require BachelorJs degree, four states (including Galii'ornia
and New York) require Masterfs degree for the regular High School Certificate.
-5-
TABLE II-A-1
PERCENTAGE OF WHITE PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS OF GEORGIA IN EACH OF SIX CERTIFICATION CATEGORIES FOR SELECTED SCHOOL YEARS FROM 1938 TO JANUARY, 1959.*
T,ype of Certificate
Year
5
4
3 '2
1
0 Total Mear/!
1938* 1942
3.0 39.0 12.7 32.0 10.0 3.2 . 100.0 2.83
4.9 41.$ 15.1 28.2 3.3 0.9 100.0 3.20
19h6
1.5 39.6 13.2 24.5 7.0 8.2 100.0 2.91
1950
8.7 41.9 16.6 21.1 3.2 2.1 100.0 3.31
"
1951
10.1 50.1 17.1 18.9 1.9 1.3 100.0 3.44
1952
11.9 54.4 11.6 14.1 0.8 1.2 100.0 3.59
1953
13.6 57.7 15.9 10.9 0.8 1.1 100.0 3.69
1954
15.0 60.1 1.4.3 8.9 0.5 1.2 100.0 3.16
1955
15.3 62.5 12,.7 7.9 0.4 1.3 100.0 3.81
1956
16.1 63.2 11.9 7.1 0,6 1.0 100...0 3.84
1957
16.8 63.6 11.1 6.8 0.6 1.1 100.0 3.86
1958
17.2 64.4 10.7 6.3 0.3 1.1 100.0 3.88
Jan. 1959 18.4 63.9
9.9 5.4
( 2..4 )$ 100.0 3.98 No Data
* The table is interpreted as follows: In the school year 1937-38, 3.0 per
cent of the teachers held five-year certificates; 39.0 per cent held fouryear cert:1ficatesJ 12.7 per cent had three-year; 32.0, two year; 10.0 per cent, one-year, and 3.2 per cent held a county license only or no c'ollege training.
H Mean number of years of college training,
$ In January, 1959, no data were available on 2.4 per cent of the teachers.
- 6-
TABLE II-A-2
PERCENTAGE OF NEGRO PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS OF GEORGIA IN EACH OF SIX CERTIFICATION CATEGORIES FOR SELECTED SCHOOL YEARS FROM 1938 TO JANUARY, 1959.*
Type of Certificate
Year
5
4
3
2
1
0 Total Mearfl
1938
0.4 15.0
3.5 16.1 14.4 50.6 100.0 1.19
1942
0.8 24.3
9.2 31.2 17.2 17.3 100.0 2.09
1946
1.5 25.2 12.2 24.4 9.3 27.4 100.0 2.03
1950
3.4 53.5 17.5 17.3 5.8 2.5 100.0 3.24
1951
4.3 61.0 17.3 14.5 2.1 0.8 100.0 3.48
1952
5.9 66.3 16.8 9.8 0.6 0.6 100.0 3.65
1953
6.7 70.4 15.4 6.7 0.4 0.4 100.0 3.75
1954
8.1 73.8 12.9 4.5 0.3 0.4 100.0 3.84
1955
8.8 77.5 10.2 3.1 0.1 0.3 100.0 3.91
1956
10.6 78.7
8.2 2.1 0.1 0.3 100.0 3.97
1957
1l.9 80.0
6.2 1.6 0.1 0.2 100.0 4.02
1958
13.6 79.5
Jan. 1959 14.6 78.4
5.5 1.1 0.0 0.3 100.0 4.05
4.4 1.0
( 1.6 )$ 100.0 4.08 No Data
* The table is interpreted as follows: In the school year 1937-38~ 0.4 per
cent of the teachers held five-year certificates; 15.0 per cent had fouryear certificates; 3.5 per cent, three-year; 16.1 per cent had two-year; 14.4 per cent~ one-year certificates; and 50.6 per cent held a county license only or no college training.
# Mean number of years of college training.
S In January 1959~ no data were available on 1.6 per cent of the teachers.
... 7 ...
E NUMBER OF GEORGIA WHITE TFACHERS \rJITHIN EACH OF SIX CERT:tF!OATION CATEGORIES
R SELECTED SCHOOL YEARS EXPRESSED AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TF..:ACHERS HOLDING GIVEN
TYPES OF CERTIFICATES DURING THE SCHOOL YEAR 1950.*
tt'"" ! '.
;."
f
:
) t'.
J
"., r t .- ,
1938 lL942 1946 L950 L951 1952 L953 L954 L955 L956 L957
~958
fan. 1959
46~3
79.h
100.0 120.0
150~7
179.'1 203.2 214.6 232.2 250.5
4
81.5
16.2
100.0 109.3 125.2
138~2
147.9 158.8 165_0 171.9
3 68.8 75.0
73.2
100.0 106.7 116.9 109.6
101~9
93.4 89.7 86_9 86_3
84~'5
2
132.4 106.8 104.0 100.0
90.2 71.6 57.9
48~4
44.4
41.1 40.7 38.5 35 41 1
1
o
202.7
100.0 100.0
66.3
27.1 65.7
27.5 62.5
19.1
10~4
15.1 74.2
23.1 61.3
25.8
68.'9
11..8 73.9
No Data$
Total
117.8 121.6 124.8 129.4 133.2
141.5
~ The several index numbers are to be interpreted as followsl The number of
white teachers holding five-year certificates during the school year 1938 (September 1937-June 1938) was 30.8 per cent of the number holding fiveyear certificates in 1950. Stated differently, for each 100 teachers holding five-year certificates in 1950, there were 30.8 teachers holding five-year certificates in 1958.
In January,. 1959, no data were available on 2.4 per cent of the teachers,
pre.sumably falling in these two certificate categorieG.:
-8-
TABLE II-A-4
THE NUMBER OF GEORGIA NEGRO TEACHEHS UITRIN EACH OF sn CERTIFICATION CATEGORIES
FOR SELECTED SCHOOL EArlS EXPRESSED AS A PERCENTAGE JF THE 1'Ei'.CHERS HOLDING GIVEN TYPES OF CERTIFICATES DURING THE SCHOOL YEiiR 1950. -:~
Year
1938 1942 1946 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 Jan. 1959
5
9.0~~
21.0 44.0 100.0 130.9 194.2 226.7 2800 2 313.2 393.08 458.8 534.2 600.4
4
21.2 41.4 47.0 100.0 11.5.0 135.9 149.5 160.4 172.8 184.3
192 c7
19.500
202~1
Type of Certificate
3
2
15.3
70.2
48.2 164.1
69.4 140.4
100.0 100.0
99.8
84 .5
1,)6.2
62.2
1)0.4
44.1
35.8
30.2
,;9.6
21.3
~8.6
14(19
L5 .5
12.0
L1 .5
6.3
;~.2
7.8
1
0
186.1 1,,512.0
266.8 619.0
1.57.6 1,,078.7
100.0 100.0
35.5
33.7
11.3
27.7
8.0
18.5
5.4
17.9
2.3
13.6
2.6
14.7
1,,2
8.7
0.7
13.0
,,-
No Data':'
Total 75.8 91.1 99.7 100.0 100.9 110.0 113.7
11~.2
119.2 12.5.1 128.8 131.3 137.9
*
The several index numbers are to be interpreted as follows: The number of Negro teachers holding five ..year certificates during the school year 1938
(S~ptember 1937-June 1938) was 9~0 per cent of the number holding five-year
certificates in 1950. Stated differentl)~" for each 100 teachers holding
fiveoyear certificates in 1950" there were 9.0 teachers holding five-year
certificates in 1938.
,l: \;1
In January, 1959, no data were available on 1.6 per cent of the teachers"
presumably falling in these two certificate categories.
TABLE II~-5
* THE LEVEL OF CERTIFICATIO~ OF TEACHERS IN GEORGIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS AS OF JANUARY, 1959: BY POPULATION GROUPS
population Groups
2 Years
'Doo %
3 Years
NOll %
@
Certification Level
4 Years
5 Years
No. % No. %
No Data
No. %
Total
Noo % Mean@
County Systems
White Males
68
White Females
1091
White Total
1159
Negro Males
7
Negro Females
79
Negro Total
86
Total (County Systems) 1245
1~7 118 3GO 2150 5400 1428 3509 214 5~4
3978 100.0 403
7.5 1952 1304 965L. 66 0 0 1666 6.2 2070 11.1 11804 63.6 3094
11')4 16.6
242
h56
1.. 7 2.5
14605 100.0 30 8 18583 100QO 309
.4 23 104 1204 7400 346 210 3 48 2.9 1628 100.0 4.2
1.3 403 6.7 4787 79~0 670 11 0 1 113 1.9 6052 100.0 40 0
1.1 426 5.5 5991 78.1 1016 13.2 161 2.1 7680 100.0 4~1
4.7 2496 905 17795 67.9 4110 1506 617 20 3 26263 1000 0 40 0
City Systems
White Hales
1
White Females
97
White Total Negro Males
-98
Negro Females
15
Negro Total
15
Total (City Systems) 113
.1
4
.4 428 46 0 4 462 50.2
27 2.9
2.5 223 5.8 2692 6907 757 19.6 94 20 4
-2.0
227 1
4.7 3120 65.3 1219 .2 346 68 0 2 :113
25.5 28 0 1
121 18
2.5 3.5
.8 19 1.1 :1133 79.2 299 16.5 43 2.4
.6 20 .9 1779 76.8 442 19.1 61 2.6
1.6 247 3.5 4899 68.9 1661 23.4 182 2~6
922 100.0 4G5
3863 100cO 3~9 '0 4735 100lioO 4~2 I
508 100.,0 433 1809 100.0 40 1
2317 100.0 40 2 7102 100.0 4.2
State (i.e~, COllilty & City)
White ~a1es
69
White Females
1188
White Total
1257
Negro Males
7
Negro Females
94
Negro Total
101
Total (State)
1358
1.4 122 2.5 2578 52.6 1890 38~6 241 4.9 4900 1001)0 4.4 6.4 2175 110 8 12346 66..9 2423 13.1 336 10 8 l8468 100.0 3.9 504 2297 9.8 :11924 63.8 4313 18~5 577 2.5 23368 100.0 4.0
.3 24 10 1 1550 72.6 489 22.9 66 3.1 2136 1000 0 40 2 1.2 422 5.4 6220 79.1 969 12.3 156 2.0 7861 100.0 4e l 10 0 446 405 7770 77,,7 1458 14.6 222 202 9997 1000 0 40 1 4e1 2743 8.2 22694 68",0 5771 17.3 799 2.4 33365 loo~O 400
@
The Certification Level refers to the number of years of college training. The nNo Data" cases were excluded in the calculation of means o
* The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the
Georgia Department of Education (Courtesy of the State Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Claude Purcell, and members of the staff of the Department).
:aBLE II-A.-6
.. TIm MEAN NUMBER OF YEARS OF COLLEGE TRAINING OF PUBLIC SCHOOL PERSONNEL IN 159 COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEMS OF GEORGIA
AS OF JANUARY.. 1959: BY RACE AND SEX"
County School System
1'100MaleMearf~
Whtte Female No. Mean
Total No. Mean
Male No. Mea-ri
Negro Female
No. Hean
Total No. Mean
Total No. Mean
Appling 30 Ih2
Atkinson 14 4.4
Bacon
15 11.3
Baker
7
t~.3
Baldwin 19 4.5
79 3.9 109 4.0
8 3.9 28 3u8 36 30 8 145 40 0
43 3:J7 57 3.9
4 4.5 15 4.1 19 4.2 76 4.0
64 3.7 79 3.8
3 4.0 10 4.2 13 4.2 92 309
19 3..6 26 3~8
7 4.0 27 4.0 34 4.0 60 3.9
79 40 2 98 4.3 17 4.1 58 4e O 75 4.0 173 4,,2
Banks
11 11.4
39 3.9 50 4.0
Barrow
13 4.5
49 3.8 62 3.9
Bartow
44 L~ .2 112 3.4 156 3.7
Ben Hill 6 4.3
28 3.6 34 3.7
Berrien 24 3.8
82 3.5 106 3.6
1 4.0
2 3.5
3 3.7 53 40 0
4 4.0 12 4.0 16 4.0 78 3.9
4 4.3 18 3.9 22 4.0 178 307
4 4.0 13 4.1 17 4.1 51 3,,8
5 4.2 14 4.0 19 4.1 125 3.7
Bibb
103
Bleckley 5
Brantley 21
Brooks
1S:
Bryan
10
4.3 4.2 Loa 403 L.5
629 22
49 50 33
4.0 732 3.5 21 305 70 3.3 65 3.8 43
4.0 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.9
-88
1
10 6
-4.2 312 11
4.0
6
4.2 41
4.5 22
4.0 4BO
4.0 11
4.2
7
4.0 51
4.1 28
4.1 1,212 4.0 38 4.1 77 4Gll n6 4.2 71
4.0 3.1 3.7 3.8
4.0
$>
~
Bulloch Burke Butts Calhoun Camden
28 16 10 8 19
LI.4 11.4 4.3 403 4.3
ll~
66 34 30 36
4.2 143 3,8 82 3.9 44 3.7 38 3.8 55
4.2
3.9 4.0 3.8 4.0
17 24 12 14 12
4.1 71
4ct 2
95
3.9 24
4.1 34
4.1 37
3.9 88 4.0 119 40 0 36 4.0 48
4,,0 49
4.0 231
4.0 201
4~0
80
4.0 86
4.0 104
4.1
4.0 4.0 3.9 4.0
Candler
6
Carroll 51
Catoosa 40
Charlton 13
Chatham 124
407 4.2 3.8 4113 4.3
39 122 121 32 662
4.0 45 4~1 3.7 173 3.8 305 161 3.7 3.5 45 3.8 3.9 786 4.0
4 4.2 19 4.1 23
11 4.4 32 3.7 43
1 3.0
2
3QO
3
7 4.0 13 4.1 20
72 4.3 385 4.2 457
40 1 68 3.9 216 3.0 164 4.1 65 4.2 1,243
4.1 3.8
3.7 3.9 4.1
..
County School System
11ale No. Hean;i
"VJhite Female No. I1ean
TABLE II-A-6 (CONTINUED )
--
Total No. I'lean
Hale No. Nean
Negro Female No. liean
Total No. Mean
Total No. Mean
- Chattahoochee -
6 2.7
6 2.7
2 L.o
5 3.4
7 3.6 13 3.2
Chattooga 22
Cherokee 1~7
Clarke
21
Clay
3
LI.O 4.1 lJ,.4 4.7
88 127 187
17
3.3 110 3.5 171., 1.,.3 208 3.6 20
3.5 3.7 4.Lr 3.8
6 2 20
9
4.3 11.0 4.3 4.1
13 10
78 19
4.0 Lf .2 h.2 309
19 12 98 28
4.1 129 4.2 186 LI.2 306 4.0 1.18
3.6 3.7
1'.3. 3.9
Clayton 77
Clinch
13
Cobb
156
Coffee
35
Colquitt 1.,3
4.4 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2
223 33 1.199 134 134
3.7 280 3.3 46 3.8 655 3.8 173 3.4 177
3.8 3.5 3.9 3.9 3.6
9 4.2 4 4.0 5 4.2 13 LI.2 9 4.0
34 16 23 1.,1
53
4.1 h.l 4.0 4.0 4.1
LJ
20 28 54 62
4.1 323
1.1.1
66
4.0 683
4.0 227
4.1 239
3.8 3.7 3.9 3.9 3.7
~
Columbia 9 4.0
Cook
13 4.5
Coweta
19 4.2
CravJford 4 4.5
Crisp
24 4.4
64 60 66 22
78
3.7 73 3.8 73 3.6 85 4.0 26 3.8 102
3.7 3.9 3.7 4.0 4.0
7 5 22
9 10
3.7 4.2
4.3 4.3 4.3
43 26
54 21 56
3.. 6
3.9 4.1 4.0 1.,. 0
So
31
76 30 66
3.6 123 1.1.0 104 4.1 161 4.1 56 4.1 168
3.7 3.9
3.9 4.1 4.0
I
Dade
18
Dawson
6
Decatur 30
DeKalb 220
Dodge
22
4.0 4.2 1.1.]:
4.5 4.2
51 31 114 892 87
3.2 69 3.6 37 3.7 til4 4.1 1112 3.9 109
3.4
3.7 3.8 4.2 4.0
1
-
18 29 8
-4.0
4.2
4.3 4.4
-2 4-.0
- - 3 4.0 72 37
85 4.1 103 4.1 247
87 4.1 116 4.1 1228
38 4.0 46 4.1 155
3.4
3.7 3.9 4.2 4.0
Doo1y
14
Dougherty 38
Douglas 20
Early
1~
Echols
6
4.2 4.5 4.1:
4.3 4.3
47 273 80 53 12
3.8 61 4.0 311 3.5 100 3.9 64 3.3 18
3.9 4.1
3.7 4.0 3.6
16 32 7 20 1
4.3 So
4.3 160
4.1 19
4.2 48
3.0
4
4.0 66
4.2 192
4.0 26
4.0 68
J.8
5
4.0 127 4.2 503 4.0 126 4.1 132 3.6 23
4.0 4.1 3.. 8
4.1 3.6
TABLE II-A-6 (CONTINUED)
County SchObl System
l'1a1e No. Nean#
White Female No. 11ean
Total No. Mean
Effingham 14 14
50 3.4 61.r 3.6
Elbert
20 4.2
93 3.8 113 3.9
Emanuel 25 1.1.2
95 3.9 120 3.9
Evans
11 1.1.4
33 4.0 44 l.l
Fannin
38 4.1 100 3.5 138 3.6
Fayette
7 4.3
44 3.7 51 3.8
Floyd
57 4.4 197 3.7 254 3.9
Forsyth 22 1.1..0
73 3.3 95 3.5
F'ranklin 18 It.4
82 4.0 100 4.0
Fulton 170 4.4 722 4.0 892 4.1
Gilmer
22 4.4
61 3.4 83 3.7
Glascock 3 4.3
16 3.9 19 4.0
Glynn
49 11.4 195 4.0 244 4.1
Gordon
28 Lt.3
71 3.2 99 3.5
Grady
20 Li.3
90 3.7 110 3.8
Greene
10 4.4
43 3.9 53 4.0
Gwinnett 83 11.2 194 3.6 277 3.8
Habersham 34 J .3 106 4.1 140 4.1
Hall
59 1, .2 180 3.9 239 h.o
Hancock
3 4.3
28 1.1.2 31 4.2
Haralson 22
LI.O
Hakis
12 LI.4
P.art
26 1,.0
Heard
10 Lt.L
Henry
23 It.3
53 3.5 75 3.6 32 3.3 L!1 3.6 68 3.8 94 3.8 3LI 4.3 44 4.3 57 3.8 80 3.9
Male No. l-lean
Negro Female No. Mean
Total No. Mean
- Total
~
No. Mean
5 4.4 35 3.9 40 h.o 10L, 3.8
19 t!.l 48 3.7 $7 3.8 180 3.9
14 Lt.l
7- -1_1.3
44 19 1
3.9 ir.O
ti.O
58 26 1
3.9 178 Lt.l 70 4.0 139
3.9
Lt.1
3~6
3 LI.3 22 3.8 25 3.9 76 3.8
- - - - - 2
3-.5
21
4.0
23
4.0 277 95
3.9 3.5
8 35
4.1 13 4.2 110
3.8 21 4.2 145
4.0 121 4.2 1037
4.0
4.1
--
3 4.3
--
6 il.O
-
9
-
h.l
83 28
~
3.7
4.0
- - - - 14
4.3
81
4.1
-
-95 4.1 339 99
li.l
3.5
13 4.3 51 l:.l 64 L.l 114 3.9
15 4.1 49 4.0 64 4.0 117 1.1.0
8 4.1 19 3.9 27 LI.O 304 3.8
3 4.3
7 4.0 10 4.1 150 4.1
1 4.0 15 4.2 16 I, .2 255 LI.o
14 4.1 56 3.9 70 il.O 101 4.1
4 16
4.0 4.2
12
).1-5
3.8 3.9
16 61
3.9 93. L.o 105
3.7 3.8
8 4.1 22 3.8 30 3.9 124 3.8
6
11.2
12
l,.l
18
L,.l
62
L,.2
15 4.3 ;2 4.2 67 1,.2 147 4.0
TABLE II-A-6 (CONTINUED)
.tl
County School System
Male No. Mean
Houston 58 4.3
Irwin
17 4.2
Jackson 13 4$5
Jasper
5 4.4
Jeff Davis 16 4.2
Jef:ferson 16 4.3
Jenkins
6 4.7
Johnson
9 4.4
Jones
6 4.0
Lamar
4 4.5
Lanier
8 4.6
Laurens 26 4.3
Lee
8 4.4
Liberty 11 4.4
Lincoln
5 4.4
Long
9 4.2
Lowndes 28 4.0
Lumpkin 14 4.3
Macon
6 4.3
Madison 15 4.3
Marion
5 4.6
McDuffie 12 4.4
McIntosh 6 4.2
Meriwether 21 4.4
Miller
10 4.5
White Female No. Mean
Total No. Mean
173 3.7 231 3.9 45 3e7 62 3.8 74 3.5 87 3.7 22 3.9 27 4.0 59 3.7 75 3.8 69 3.9 85 4.0 37 3.9 43 4.0 39 3.8 48 3.9 27 4.0 33 4.0 31 3.9 35 3.9 26 3.7 34 3.9 100 3419 126 4.0 22 3.6 30 3.8 40 3.8 51 3.9 27 3.9 32 4.0 23 3.6 32 3.8 92 3.8 120 30 8 47 3.8 61 3.9 45 4.1 51 4.1 65 3.8 80 3.9 24 3.5 29 3.7 53 4.1 65 4.1 21 3.7 27 3.8 68 3.8 89 3.9 47 4.1 57 4.1
Male No. Mean
15 4.1 9 4.2 7 3.9 6 4.3 4 4.3 24 4.2 14 4.2 4 403 6 4.2 8 4.4 5 4.0 8 4.3 8 4el 14 40;.1 8 3.9 4 4.3
- - 9 4.2
15 4.1 6 4.0 5 3.8 10 4.1 9 402 17 4.2 '1 4.1
Negro Female Noo Mean
60 40 0 28 40 1 14 3.9 27 3.9 15 4.0 63 3.9 38 3(>8 20 3.8 35 4.0 33 3.8 11 3.8 62 3.9 32 3.9 48 3.9 21 3.8
13 4.1 45 3Cl9 1 400 63 4.0 21 4.0 28 4.0 32 3.9 34 4.1 67 4.0 19 4.1
Total
Total
No. Mean No. Mean
75 4.0 306 3.9 37 4.1 99 3.9 21 3.9 108 3.7 33 4.0 60 400 19 4.1 94 3.9
87 4.0 172 4.0
52 3.9 95 3.9
24 41
3.8 4.0
72 74
3.9 400
41 4.0 76 4..0 t;
16 70
3.9 50
o 4lt 196
3.9 40 0
40 4..0 70 3.9
62 4.0 113 4.0
29 3.8 61 3.9
17 4.1 49 3~9
54 4.0 174 3e~
1 4.0 62 3.9
78
40 0 129
4~o
27 4.0 107 3.9
33 3.9 62 3.e
42 3.9 107 4.0
43 84 26
4.1 70 4.0 173 4.1 83
40 0 3.9 4.1
TABLE II-A-6 (CONTINUED)
, L1iiI6IW '
county School Systems
!
Male . No. }lean
Mitchell 12 4.7
Monroe
7 4,,)
Montgomery 7 4.9
Morgan
9 4.8
MuI'ray
23 3.9
Muscogee ll.!,9 4.5
Newton
24 4.3
Oconee
10 4.0
Oglethorpe 5 4.4
Paulding 25 4.0
PMch
11 4.2
picksns 15 4\)3
Pierce
28 4,,1
Pike
5 4.2
Polk
28 4.2
Pulaski
1 4.0
Putnam
6 4.8
Quitman
2 )00
Rabun
24 4.4
Randolph 7 4.6
Richmond 99 h.4
Rockdale 12 4.3
Schley
4 4..3
Screven 14 4.4
Seminole 7 4.3
White Female
f
No~ Mean
~--,._-
-
- Tota!
No. Mean
f
t
Male No. Mean
Negro Female No. Mean
Total No. Mean
Total No. Mean
55 38
3.8 4.2
67 45
4.0 4.2
14 10
4.2 4.1
49 37
4.0 40 0
63 47
4.1 130 4.0 92
40 0 401
27
44
65
3.8 3.9 3.1
34 53 88
4.0 4.1 3.3
4 12
4.0
-4.3
22 37 1
3.8 3.9 4.0
26 49 1
3.8 60 4.0 102 4.0 89
3.9 4.1 3.3
669 88
4.1 818 3.8 ill
4.2 3.9
59 14
4.3 226 4.,1 41
4.2 285 3.8 55
4.2 1,103 3.9 167
4.2 309
39 37 72
3.7 3.9 3.6
49 42 97
3.9 4.0 3.7
5
11
3-
40 0 4.0 4.3
9 25 13
4al 4.0 3.7
14 36 16
41)1 63 4.0 78 3.8 ll3
3.9 I
40 0 31)7
~
I
45 57 61 37 101
4.1 56 3.4 72 3.6 89 3.8 42 3.5 129
4.1 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.6
8 2 7 11 7
4.8 4.0 4.1 4.4 4.3
58 5 17 26 26
4.1 3.6 3.7 4.0 3.7
66 7 24 37 33
4.2 122 3et7 79 3,,8 113 4.1 79 3.8 162
4.2 3.6 307 4.0 3.6
26 32 10 53
29
3.9 4.0 3.9 4.1
4.0
27 38 12
77 36
3.9 4.2 4.1 4.2
4.1
4 4.3 13 3.9
- - 4 3.8
11 4.5
21 32
12
1
53
4.0 4.0 3.8 4.0
3.9
25 45 16 1
64
4.1 52 4.0 83 3.8 28 4.0 78
4.1 100
4.0 4.1 3.9 4.2
4.1.
497 42 13 59 35
4.0 596 3.5 54 3.7 17 3.9 73 3.9 42
4.1 3.7 3.8 4.0 4.0
66 6 2 14 8
4.3 249 4.3 16 4.0 20 4.1 71 4.1 24
4.1 315
4.1 22
4.0 22
4.0 85
4~0
32
4.1 911 4.2 76 4.0 39 4.0 131
4.1 74
40 1 3.8 3.9
4~6
4.Q
!
TABLE II-A-6 (CONTINUED)
County School Systems
Male No. Mean
White Female No. Mean
Total No. Mean
Male Noo Mean
Negro
Female No. Mean
Total No. Mean
Total No. Mean
Spalding 30
Stephens 25
Stewart
6
Sumter
1
Talbot
7
L.4 4.4 4.3 4g4
4.4
178 65 22 38 18
3.9 208 4.0 90 3.5 28 3.8 45 3.7 25
4.0 40 1 3.7 3.9 3.9
13 1 14 8 7
4.5 3.0 4.5 403 4.1
71 4 41
55 42
4.1 3.5 4.0 4.0 40 0
84
5 55 63 49
4.2 292 3.4 95 4.0 83 4.0 108 4.0 74
4.1 4.1 3.9 4.0 4.0
Taliaferro 3 4.3
Tattnal 23 4.3
Taylor
10 4.4
Telfair 13 4.2
Terrell 10 4.6
Thomas
25 4.2
Tift
25 4.3
Toombs
14 4.4
Towns
19 4.3
Treut1en 6 4.3
12 80 35 68 36
75 123 60 30 32
3.9 15 3.8 103 3.8 45 3.9 81 3.9 46
3.7 100 3.7 148 3.7 74 3.6 49 4.1 38
4.0 3.9 3.9 4.0 4.1
4 11 9 11
11
3.8 4.2 4.3 4.1 4.1
15 32
30 33 63
4.1 4.1 4.2 3.9 3.9
19 43 39 44 74
4.0 34 4.1 146 4.2 84 4.0 125 4.0 120
4.0 4.0 400 4.0 4.0
3.8 3.8 3.8
3.9 4.1
10 h.3 10 4g 2
- - 6 4.2
5 4.2
55 4'-1
48 4.0
- - 17 4.0
12 4.2
65. 4~1 165' 3.9 58 4.0 206 3.9
- - 23 4.0 97 3.8 49 3.9 17 4.2 55 4.1.
~
Troup Turner Twiggs Union Upson
23 4.7 13 4.5 4 4.3
14 4.1
23 4.5
97 42 32 52 49
4.0 120 3.7 55 3.4 36 3.7 66 3.6 72
4.2 3.9 3.5 3.8 3.9
19 4.3 8 4.1
- - 10 4.1
14 4.1
36 4.1 18 4.1
- - 37 3.5
49 4.0
55 4.2 175 26 4.1 81
- - 47 4.0 83 66 63 4.0 135
4.2
4.0 3.8 3.8 3.9
Walker
65
Walton
12
Ware
26
Warren
5
Washington 12
4.2 4.5 4.3 4.2 4.5
218 71 85 22 70
3.4 283 3.8 83 3.4 III 3.7 27 4.0 82
3.6 3.9 3.6 3.8 4.1
7 4.1
- - 12 3.8
10 4.1 23 4.0
19 46 10
29 69
3.8 3.9 4.2
4.0 4.0
26 58 10 39 92
3.9 309 3.9 141 4.2 121 4.0 66 4.0 174
3.6 3.9 3.6
3.9 4.0
TABLE II-A-6 (CONTINUED)
County
School Systems
Male No. Mean
White
Female No. Mean
Total No. Mean
Hale Noo I1ean
Negro Female Noo Nean
Total No. Mean
Total No. Mean
Jvayne
29
4.3
lll.~
3.7 lL3
3.8
Webster
5
4~0
11 3.4 16. 3.e6
Wheeler 11 4.3
28 3.6 39 30 8
White
18 4.2
47
308
65
3.9
Whitfield 72 40 0 130 3.5 202 3.7
9 4.1 27 4.0 36 4.0 179 3.8
2 4.5 lL 4.0 16 4.1 32 3.9
5
1..
4.4
-4.0
..15 1
3.9
..40 0
20 L,.l 65
- .. 2 4.0 67 202
3.9 3.9 307
Wilcox
13 1.1.3
Wilkes
8 4.0
Wilkinson 6 4.5
Worth
26 4.1
47
44
38
3.7 3.8
4.1
60 52
44
3.9 3.8 4.2
8 9 10
3.9 4.1
4.5
18
51 30
4.0 3.8 3.8
26 60 40
4.0 86 3.9 112 4.0 84
3.9 3.9 4.1
~,
72 3.5 98 3.6 12 4.3 60 40 0 72 4e o 170 36 8
Total 3,764
4.3 lL,363
3.8 18,127
3.9 1,580
4.2 5,939
4.1 7,519
4.1 25,646
4~0
* The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the
Georgia State Department of Education (Courtesy of the State Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Claude Purcell, and members of the staff of the Department.)
# In all of the calculations involving mean number of years of c::>11ege training, Ilno datall cases (i.e., persons
for whom the amount of training is unknown) were excluded.
TABLE II-A-7
THE HEAN NUMBER OF YEARS OF COLLEGE TRAINING OF PUBLIC SCHOOL PERSONNEL IN 39 CITY SYSTENS AS OF JANUARY, 1959: BY RACE AND SEX-:l-.
City School Systems
AmericuS Atlanta Barnesville Bremen Buford
Calhoun Carrollton Cartersville Cedartown Chickamauga
Cochran Commerce Dalton Decatur Dublin
Fitzgerald Gainesville Hawkinsville Hogansville Jefferson
LaGrange Marietta Monroe Jvloultrie Newnan
Male No. Meaii#
\~nlte
Female No. Hean
12
4.6 46
4.1
354
4.5 1724
4.2
17
4.4 22
4.1
7
4.6 17
3.9
5
5.0 19
3.9
Total No. Mean
'5-84'.2
2078
4.3
39
L:.2
24
4.1
24 4.1
13 12
4.5 31
4.5 53
4.0 44
4.0 65
4.1 4.1
14
4.4 53
3.8 67
3.9
22
4.4 60
3.8 82
4.0
4
h.3 19
3.8 23
3.9
11
4.3 27
3.8 38
3.9
16
4.3 33
4.0 49
4.1
26
4.6 92
3.8 118
3.9
20
4.5 117
4.2 131
L(.2
11 4.7 64 4.1 75 4.2
13
4.5 47
4.1 60
4.2
24 4.5 99 4.1 123 4.2
6 4.7 14 4.1 20 4.3
10 4.4 28 3.9 38 4.0
4 5.0 13 3.9 17 4.2
18
4.4 119
4.0 137
4.1
25 4.5 142 4.0 167 4.0
9 4.4 28 4.0 31 4.1
23
4.4 66
3.8 89
3.9
20 4.5 69 4.2 89 4.3
Male No. Hean
8 4.5
290
4.3
2
5.0
2
4.5
Negro Female No. Mean
35 4.1 1043 4.2
7
4.0
Total
No o ?Iean
43 4.2 1333 4.2
2
5-.0
9
4.1
4 4.3 7 4.0 11 4.1 9 4.2 24 4.1 33 4.2 4 4.3 20 4.1 24 4.1 4 4.3 12 4.3 16 4.3
4 h.3 10 3.9 14 4.0 1 4.0 5 4.0 6 4.0 2 4.5 15 4.1 17 4.2 7 4.1 25 4.1 32 4.1 7 4.3 30 4.2 3C1 4.2
5 4.4 22 4.1 27 4.1
6 4.3 40 4.0 46 4.0
1
5.0 10
4.2 11
4.3
5 4.2 12 4.2 17 4.2
13 4.2 52 4.1 65 4.2
13
4.2 24
4.1
--
37
4.1
9
4.2 11
4.2 20
4.2
5 4.6 23 4.0 28 4.1
Total No. }1ean
101 4.2
3411 4.3
41 4.2
24 4.1 33 4.1
55 4.1 98 4.1
91 4.0
98 23
43..90 ~
I
52 3.9
55 4.1 135 3.9 l~& 4.2 112 4.2
87
4~2
169 4.1
31 4.3
55 4.1
17 4.2.
202 4.1 204 4.0 37 4.1 109 4.0
117 4.3
TABLE II-A-7 (CONTINUED)
City School Systems
loJhite
Male
Female
lTo. Mea nil No. Mean
Total No. Mean
Male No. Mean
Negro Female
No. Mean
Total No. Mean
Total No. !'1ean
Pelham
114
14.3 29
14..0 143
14.1 6
14.2 22
h.o 28
L.o 71
Quitman
7
L.h 25
14.0 32
14.1 8
14.1 19
14.1 27
14.1 59
Rome Tallapoosa
Tallulah Falls
31 5 14
14.5 135 14.4 15 4.3 6
3.9 166 3.8 20 14.3 10
---- 14.0 13
14.0 4.3
1--4--.2 -3---7
1--4--.1 -5---0
----14.1 216 20 10
Thomaston Thomasville
Toccoa Trion Valdosta
26 17
14.7 76 1.r.2 73
4.1 102 3.9 90
14.2 --
14.0 11
-- --
4.2 1.r7
-- --
4.3 58
-- 102
L'.3 148
15 9 25
4.4 43 4.9 30 4.6 128
4.2 58
L.o 39
4.0 153
-- 4.2 5
14.2 4.1 14
--1.(.2 16 2 4.1 83
4.1 21 4.0 2 4.1 97
14.1 79
h.o 4a.
4.1 250
Vidalia VJaycross Viest Point 1tJinder
6 20 7
4.8 39 4.6 112 4.3 18
3.9 45 4.1 132 3.9 25
4.0 7 4.1 10 4.0 6
4.1 15 4.6 66 4.2 15
4.1 22 4.2 76 3.8 21
4.1 67 14.3 208 3.. 9 46
13
4.5 38
4.0 51
4.1 9 4.1 17
4.1 26
4.1 77
Total
- R~5
-4.5 3769
4.1 4664
4.2 490
4.3 1766
4.1 2256
49 2 6920
{I- The basic rat1 data on l'Jhich the present calculations are based 'lt1ere made available from official records of the
Georgia State Dep&rtment of Education (Courtesy of the State Superintendent oi Schools, Dr. Claude Purcell, and members of the staff of the Department).
14.1 14.1 14.0 4.0 4.3
14.2 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.1
, 4.0
4.2 Ic-o' 4.0 I 4.1
44 2
./1 If
In all of the calculations involving mean number of years of college training, "no data" cases (i.e., persons
for whom the amount of training was unknown) were excluded.
TABLE II-A..8
THE EXTENT TO WHICH PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS OF GEORGIA AS OF MAY, 195Z, WERE CERTIFIED IN THE MAJOR TEACHING FIELD:
BY POPULATION GROUPS W
population Groups
County Systems White Males White Females White Total Negro Males Negro Females Negro Total Total (County Systems)
City Systems White Males White Females White Total Negro Males Negro Females Negro Total Total (City Systems)
Certified in
Major Field
No o
%
2936 12331 15267
1348
5537 6885 22152
88.5 91.1 90,,6
90.5 94.7 93.8 91.6
663
3405 4068
363 1515 1878
5946
910 2 92.2 92.0
9le9 95.0
94.4 92,.8
Not Certified@ in
Major Field
No o
%
383 1201
1584 142 312
454 2038
110 5 80 9
9.4 905 5.3 6.2 8.4
64
8.8
288
7.8
352
8.0
32
8.1
79
5.0
III
5.6
463
7.2
Total
No.
-%
3319 13532 16851 1490
5849 7339 24190
727 3693 4420 395 1594 1989 6409
100.0
lOO~O
100.0
1001:\0
100GO
100,)0
100.0
-
lOO~O
J-I
100.0. '0
1000 0
I
100,,0
100.0
100ttO 100_0
State (i.e., City &County)
White Males White Females White Total Negro Males Negro Females Negro Total Total (State)
3599 15736
19335 1711 7052 8763 28098
89.0
91~4
90.9 90.8
9407
93.9 91.8
447 1489 1936
174 391 565 2501
11.0 8.6
9.1 902 5.3 6.1 8.2
4046 17225 21271
1885
7443 9328 30599
100,,0
100.0
100~
100\\0
100.0
100~G
100.c
* The basic raw da'ta on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the
Georgia Department of Education (Courtesy of the State Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Claude Purcell, and members of the staff of 'the Department.)
@ More than one-half of the teaching load was in a field or fields in which the teacher was 'hot 6ertifip.d"'.
- 20 -
TABLE II-A-9 THE LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION OF SUPERINTENDENTS OF COUNTY*#
AND INDEPElIJDENT SCHOOL SYSTEMS IN GEORGIA: APRIt, U158
Level of Certification
Su - 5 T -5
T -4 E -4 C -3 C -2
Permit Total
Number
25 78 72 4
7
5 8 199
Per Cent
12.6 39.2 36.2 2.0 3.5 2.5 4.0 100.0
~~ Superintendents in most of the county systems are eleeted by popular ballot.
# The basic data were obtained from official records of the Georgia
Department of Education. The present data do not permit direct
comparisons of the relative levels of certification of superintend-
:ents of county systems versus superintendents of independent sy-
stems.
-
TABLE II-B-1
STANDARDIZED SCORES EARNED ON THE NATIONAL TEi.CHER EXilHINATION BY PR1MJi.RY" UPPER ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY TEi.\.CHERS IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF ATLi\.NTA, GEORGIA.: BY Rl\.CE*
Test Categories of the
Racial Primary
Upper Elem. Secondary
Total
Nat 11. Sample
National Teacher Examination Group No. Med. Q.D. No. Med. ~.D. No. Med. Q.D. No. Med. Q.D. No. Med. Q.D.
Professional Information
White 707 54 Negro 364 46
7 505 68 7 503 60
6 256 48 6 261 49
8 1715 57 7 881 47
~ 6608 59
8
English Expression
White 707 54 Negro 364 46
7 505 57 7 503 59 10 1715 56 7 256 49 7 261 50 7 881 48
~ 6608 59
8
Social Studies" Literature and Fine Arts
White 707 52
Negro 364 44
7 505. 56 7 503 59
8 256 46 6 261 49
8 1715 56 6 881 1+6
~ 6608 58
8
.~
Science-Mathematics
White 707 54 . Negro 361+ 45
6 505 59 7 503 63 6 256 46 6 261 52
8 1715 58 8 881 46
~ 6608 59
8
Non-Verbal Reasoning Weighted Common Examination
lrJhite 707 50 9 505 53 8 503 56 9 1715 53
Negro 364 43 8 256 1+5 8 261 49 8 881 45
6608 61 7
Hhite 707 536 62 505 568 58 503 602 68 1715 562 64 Negro 364 451 42 256 472 56 261 501 63 881 469 56 6608 597
70
* The ~at~ on iitlanta teache~s were ab~tracted.from Learning ~ Teaching in ~ Atlanta Public Schools" 1955-56:
Stat1st1cal Report, Educat10nal Test1ng Serv1ce" Princeton, New Jersey.
--
TABLE II-B-2
ETl1JIDARDIZED SCORES IN CERTAIN INDICATED TEACHING FIELD OPTIONS OF THE NATIONAL TEACHER EXA14INATIONS EARNED BY tillITE AND NEGRO TEACHERS IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF
ATLANTA, GEORGIA, AS COMPARED WITH NATIONAL SAMPLES{}
Teaching Field Options of the National Teacher Examination
Early Cldldhood Education Education in the Elementary School
Atlanta Whites No. Median Q.D.
707
60
7
505
60
6
Atlanta Negr oes
No. Median Q.D:
National Samples
No. Median Q.D.
364
52
7
705
63
7
256
51
6 1,950
62
8
High School Options English Frenoh Spanish Social Studies Biology and Gen. Science Physical and Gen. Science Iv1a thema t ics Industrial Arts Business Education Physical Education
140
56
8
12
63 11
12
60
6
98
59
6
58
61
6
,4
46
5
-12 49.. .9.
56
46
4
36
51
9
-8.4.1
621
58 60 60 61
8 8 8
7
201
62
8
rroo
17
60
6
80
56
6
26
51
5
50
61
5
60
59
5
9 55 4
39
48
7
18
40
4
29
48
6
38
54
5
85
62
7
353
57
9
88
59
8
408
61
8
302
60
8
* The data on Atlanta teachers were abstracted from Learning and Teaching in the Atlanta Public Schools: Statistical Report, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey. - - --
TABLE 11-13-3
STANDARDIZED SCO"1ES EAR1\lED ON THE NATIONAL TEACHER EXAMINA.TION BY TEACHERS IN A LA.T:(GE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM IN GEORGIA: BY RACE*
Test Cate~ories of the National Teacher Examination
White
Mean
S.D.
Negro
Mean
S.D.
Professional Information English Expression Social Studies, Literature, and Fine Arts Science and Mathematics Non-verbal Reasoning Weighted Common Examination
56.23 55.08 55.56 56.95 52.33 557.33
9.44 9.74 9.63 9.56 9.52 81.11
46.99 44.96 45.01 45.56 43.19 4,57.39
7.76
7.84 I\)
6.91 w
8.44 9.78 65.23
* This school system prefers to remain anonymous, but has given permission for the data to be used anonymously.
The present computations were made by James E. Greene. The tests were administered and scored by the Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey.
TABLE II-B-4
GRADE PLACEMENT SCORES ON STANDARDIZED TESTS# IN ARITHMETIC AND READING EARNED BY STUDENTS IN THE FOURl'H, SIXTH, AND EIGHTH GRADES OF THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA: BY RACE*
Grades
Grade Point of School
IVhite
-
Negro
Tested Testing SUbject
Number
Median
QD
Number
~Iedian
QD
Fourth
4.4 Arithmetic
4290
4.5
0.7
1998
2.8
0.9
4.4 Reading
4687
4.0
1.1
2297
2.2
0.8
Sixth
6.4 Arithmetic
3663
6.3
0.9
1996
4.1
0.8
6.4 Reading
3984
6.0
1.8
2173
3.3
0.8
Eighth
8.4 Arithmetic
3961
6.9"
1.0
1754
5.3 "
0.7
8.1 Reading
4033
7.4
1.6
1786
4.7
0.7
I
tU
+:-
I
*Abstracted from data presented in Learning and Teaching in the Atlanta Public Schools, 1955-56; statistical
RilPort, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, Nel'IT Jersey.~his "testing program was carried out under t e professional direction of Dr. 1rJarren G. Findley).
#The standardized tests used in the school subject fields were:
(1) For grades .four and six, arithmetic and reading sub-tests of the Stanford Achievement Battery (2) For grade eight, arithmetic and reading sub-tests of Iowa Every-Pupil Battery.
"The norms for this arithmetic test have proved severe in many situations besides here.
TABLE II-B-5
STANDARDIZED SCORES EARNED ON THE ESSE1TIAL HIGH SCHOOL CONTENT BATTERY BY TWELFTH GRADE STUDENTS IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF ATLANTA, GIDRGIA: BY RACE*
School Subject
White Number Median Q.D. Number
Negro
National Samples
Heman Q.D. Number Median
Q.D.
Social Studies 2017
English
2017
f.'Iathematics
2104
Science
2105
116
10
120
10
118
11
123
10
712
99
8 10,000
123
712
88
12 10,000
118
731
95
8 10,000
115
731
101
10 10,000
118
9
11
5
I IV
VI.
I
10
-"-
"Abstracted from data presented in Learning and Teaching in the Atlanta Public Schools, 1955-1956: Statistical RC.E..o.rt, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, Nevi Jersey.--rThis testing program was carried out under the professional direction of Dr. Warren G. Findley).
TABLE II-B-6
GRADE PLACEMENT SCORES ON STA11DARDIZED TESTS@ IN ARITHNETIC AND READING EARNED BY STUDENTS-l~ IN THE
SIXTH, EIGHTH AND TENTH GRADES OF A LARGE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM!! IN GEORGIA: BY RACE$
Grades
'1'.,.~ted
Grade Point of Testing
School Subject
Sixth
6.8
Reading
855
5.86
1.11+
462
Arithmetic 870
6.15
0.68
464
4.15
1.05
4.79
0.82
Eighth
8.8
Reading
857
7.94
1.30
470
Arithmetic
851
8.03
1.27
491
6.00
1.10
6.25
0.96
Tenth
10.6
Reading
882
s.80
1.80
489
6.63
1.31
I
I\)
0-
Arithmetic
888
10.33
2.37
484
6.37
1.09
I
_
- ----~--
-............-~
--r=:==e==;:=x
=======
@California Achievement Test Battery.
*With only a few exceptions, the test data shovl.n for the sixth, eighth and tenth grades are based on the
same individual students tested respectively in April, 1954, April, 1956 and February, 1958. That is,
.-- ~d~ta are .longitudinal rather than cross-sectional in character.
#This school system prefers to remain anonymous.
$This study was conducted by Dr. R. Travis Osborne, Director, University of Georgia Guidance Center.
TABLE II-c-1 THE NUMBER OF YEARS OF TEACHING EXPERIENCE OF ALL TEACHERS IN GEORGIA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS AS OF JANUARY, 1959: BY LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION.*
=
Years of Experience
5 Years No. %
4 Years
No. l
- Level of Certification
3 Years
2 Years
No.
(.}
la
No. %
13+ Years 12
II
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
1
0
Tota~
3,1263g 280 389 373 202 162 158 147 103 220
44
77 220
5,771
5h.18 4.9 6.7 6S 3.5 2.8 2.7 2.5 1.8 3.8
.8 1.3 3.8
100.0
8,~7382 695
1,008 1,084
917 965 962 1,030 1,149 1,501 1,301 1,408 1,630
22,760
3~..37 3.1
4.4
4.8 4.0 4.2 4.2 4.5 5.1 6.6 5.7 6.2 7.2
100.0
1
Per Cent with less than
6 years of experience
14.0
35.3
Per Cent with 6 through
12 yeus of experience
31.2
27 .0
Per Cent with 13 or more
years of experience
54.8
37.7
1,5a~
55.8 3.0
93 3.4
117 4.2
118 4.3
73 2.7
79 2.9
95 3.5
80 2.9
73 2.6
144 5.2
94 3.4
63 2.3
105 3.8
2,756 100.0
20.2 24.0 55.8
5~~ 4i.66
30 2.2 54 4.0 55 4.1 30 2.2 33 2.4 39 2.9 47 3.5 34 2S 100 7.4 88 6.5 105 7.7 128 9.4 1,355 100.0
37.0
19.4
43.6
b
No Data
No. %
Total
- No. - ,
g5
7..68 13,~2792 412..~
4 .6 1,102 3.3
7 1.0 1,515 4.7
10 1.4 1,640 4.9
3 .4 1,225 3.7
10 1.4 1,249 3.7 12 1.7 1,266 3.8
l\:)
10 1.4 1,314 3.9 22 3.0 1,381 4.1
-J
41 5.7 2,006 6.0
45 6.2 1,572 4.7
76 lOS 1,729 5.2
422 58.3 2,505 7.6
723 100.0 33,365 100.0
85.1
31.5
7.3
26.7
7.6
41.8
* The calculations are based on data made available by the Georgia Department of Education (Courtesy of
Mr. J. J. Medlin).
TABLE II-c-2 THE NUN3ER OF YEfeRS OF TEACHING EXPERIEl\CE OF hIHITE TEACHE.:1S IN GEORGIA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS AS OF' JANUARY, 1959: BY LEVEL OF CERTIJ.I'ICATION. 1~
Years of Experience
5 Years
No.
el /0
4 Years
No.
%
Levels of Certification
3 Years No.
g
2 Years
No.
o! /0
No Data
No.
%
Total
NO.
%
13 + Years
12 11 10
9 8
7 6
5 4 3 2 1 0
2,383 55.3 5,958 39.8 1,245 54.0
163 3.8 336 2.2
70 3.0
203 4.7 437 2.9
77 3.3
280 6.5 615 4.1 103 4.5
279 6.5 662 4.4 103 4.5
I5h 3.6 564 3.8
61 2.6
114 2.6 609 4.1
71 3.1
117 2.7 604 4.0
82 3.6
100 2.3 613 4.1
75 3.3
74 1.7 7h1 4.9
66 2.9
198 4.6 920 6.1 125 5.4
36
.8 833 5.6
(38 3.8
48 1.1 941 6.3
54 2.3
164 3.8 1,157 7.7
86 3.7
516 41.0 20 1.6
29 2.3 52 4.1 53 [,.2 30 2.4
31 2.5 38 3.0 46 3.7 33 2.6
98 7.8
84 6.7 103 8.2
125 9.9
55 11.0 10,157 43.5
6 1.2 595 2.5
4
.8 750 3.2
7 1.4 1,057 4.5
10 2.0 1,107 4.7
3
.6 812 3.5
10 2.0 835 3.6
12 2.4 853 3.7
10 2.0 844 3.6 ~
22 41
4.4 936 8.2 1,382
4.0 I 5.9
45 9.0 1,086 4.6
70 l!r.O 1,216 5.2
206 Lrl.0 1,738 7.5
Total
4,313 100.0 14,990 100.0 2,306 100.0 1,258 100.0 501 lOO.G 23,368 100.0
Per Cent with less than
6 years of experience
14.3
34. 7
21.4
38.9
78.6
30.8
Per Cent with 6 through
12 years of experience
30.h
25.5
24.6
20.1
lo.h
25.7
Per Cent with 13 or more
years of experience
55.3
39.8
54.0
41.0
11.0
43.5
* The calculations are based on data made available by the Georgia Del~rtment of Education (Courtesy of
Mr. J. J. Medlin).
TABLE II-o-3 THE NUMBER OF YEARS OF TEACHING EXPERIENCE OF NEGRO TEACHERS IN GEORGIA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS AS OF JANUARY, 1959: BY LEVEL OF CERl'IFlCATIoN*.
Years of Experience
13+ Years 12
11
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
Total
5 Years
4 Years
No. % No. %
777 53.3 73 5.0 77 5.3 109 7S 94 6S 48 3.3 48 3.3 41 2.8 47 3.2 29 2.0 22 IS 8S 29 2.0 56 3.8 1,458 100.0
2,620 33.7 196 2S 258 3.3 393 5.1 422 5.4 353 4S 356 4.6 358 4.6 417 5.4 408 5.3 581 7S 468 6.0 467 6.0 473 6.1
7,770 100.0
Levels of Certification
3 Years
2 Years
No. % No. %
294 65.3 13 2.9 16 3.6 14 3.1 15 3.3 12 2.7 8 1.8 13 2.9 5 1.1 7 1.6 19 4.2 6 1.3 9 2.0 19 4.2
450 100.0
74 76.2 2 2.1 1 1.0 2 2.1
-2 2-.1
2 2.1 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 2 2.1 4 4.1 2 2.1 3 3.1
97 100.0
No Data
Total
No. % No. %
---.-..
... ...
-.--..
-
--...
.--..
-... ----
3,765 284 352 518
533 413 414 413 470
445 624 486
37.7 2.8 '
3S 5.2 5.3 4.1
4.1
4.1 4.7 !)1
4S
6.3 4.9
6 2.7 513 5.1
216 97.3 79~ 7.7
222 100.0 9,997 100.0
Per Cent with less than
6 years of experience
13.0
36.3
14.4
13.4
100.0
33.2
Per Cent with 6 through
12 years of experience
33.7
30.0
20.3
10.4
...
29.1
Per Cent with 13 or more
years of experience
53.3
33.7
65.3
76.2
-
37.7
* The calculations are based on data made available by the Georgia Department of Education (Courtesy of
Mr. J. J. Medlin).
TABLE n..c-4
THE YEARS OF SELF.REPORTED TEACHlm EXPERIENCE OF PERSONNEL IN ALL PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEMS
OF GEORGIA AS OF MAY, 1957: BY RACE AND SEX*
Experience Categories
Lo+ yrs,
White Males No. %
49 1,2
White Females No. %
360 2.1
White Total
No, %
409 1.9
Negro Males No o %
--
Negro Females
- - No. %
)0 - 39 yrs. 238 5.9 1,,830 10,8 2,068 9.9 36 2,0 553 1.6
20 - 29 yrs. ,48 13,7 3,,413 20,1 3,961 18.9 206 11.6 1,360 18,7
10 - 19 yrs. 947 23.6 4,732 27.9 5,679 27.1 413 23.2 1,989 27.4
5 - 9 yrs, 1,193 o - 4 yrs. 1,,039
29.7 2,894 17.1 4,087 19.5 653 36,6 1,595 21.9 25.9 3,740 22.0 4,779 22.7 473 26,6 1,777 24.4
Total
4,014 100,0 16,969 100,0 20,983 100,0 1,181 100.0 7,274 100.0
.,'-'l,
-.
..
..
Median
9.1
13.9
12.9
8,0
11.3
25th Percentile 4.8
,.9
5.6
4.5
5,1
75th Percentile 18,2
24,0
23.0
13.9
20.7
Quartile Dev. 6.7
9.1
8.7
4.7
7,8
Negro Total
No, %
Total
NOt
%
409 .1.4
589 6.5 2,~S7 8.8
1,566 17.3 5,527 18.4
2,402 26.6 8,081 26.9
2,248 24.8 6,335 21,1 ~
2,250 24.8 7,029 23.4
9,055 100.0 30,038 100.0 ... " ... . ~
10.1
12,Q
5.0
,.~
19.5
22.()
7.3
8.3
* The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the
Georgia State Department of Education.
TABLE II-c-5
THE YEARS OF SELF-REPORTED TEACHING EXPERIENCE OF PERSONNEL IN COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEMS OF GEORGIA AS OF MAY, 1957: BY RACE AND SEX*
Experience categories
40+ yrs.
White Males White Females White Total
No. % No. % No. %
46 1.4 265 2.0 311 1.9
Negro Males Negro Females Negro Total
No o % NOe % No. %
----- -
Total
Noo %
311 1.3
30 - 39 yrs.
195 5.9 1,356 10.2 1,551 9.4 29 2.1 436 7'06 465 6.5 2,016 8.5
20 - 29 yrs.
449 13.6 2,722 20.5 3,171 19.1 154 li.O 1,,143 20.0 J.,291 18~ 4,468 18~a
10 - 19 yrs. 5 - 9 yrs.
o - 4 yrs.
801 24.3 3,878 29.2 4,679 28.1 346 24.8 1,621 28.3 1,967 27.6 973 29.5 2,337 17.6 3,310 200 0 511 36.5 1,225 21.4 1,736 2lh4 835 25.3 2,724 20.5 3,359 21t~ 357 25.6 1,302 22.7 1,659 23.3
6,,646 28.1
.f)
5,046 21e3 ~ 5,218 22.0 I
Total
3,299 100.0 13,282 100.0 16,581 1000 0 1,397 100.0 5,727 100.0 7,124 100.0 23,705 100.0
I
Median
9.2
11+.1
13.0
8.4
11.6
10.8
12.4
25th Percentile
4.9
6.3
5.9
4.9
5.6
5.4
5.7
75th Percentile 18.3
23.8
22.8
15.2
200 6
19.9
21.9
Quartile Dey~
.-........eIl-_ _,
6e7
8.8
8.5
5.2
7.5
7.3
8.1
* The basic raw] data on WL::'C~l the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the Georgia Stat~ DepBr~~ent of Education.
TABLE II-c-6
THE YEARS OF SELF-REPORTED TEACHING EXPERIENCE OF PERSOm.TEL IN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL SYSTEMS OF GEORGIA AS OF MAY, 1957: BY RACE AND SEX~l-
Experience Categories
40+ years
White Males
No. %
3
.4
White Females
No o
%
95
2.6
White Total
Noo
'---01
;0
98
2.2
Negro Males
No. %
--
30 - 39 yrs. 43 6.0 474
12.9 517 11.7 7 1.8
20 29 yrs. 99 13.8 691
18.7 790 17.9 52 13.5
10 - 19 yrs, 146 20.4 854
23.2 1,,000 22.7 67 17.4
5 - 9 yrs. 220
o - 4 yrs. 204
30.8 557 28.6 1..016
15.1 777 27.5 1,,220
17.7 142 37.1 27.8 116 30.2
Total
715 100.0 3,687 100QO 4,,402 1000 0 384 1000 0
Negro Females Negro Total
l'J'oo % Noo %
-- --
Total
NO e
%
98 1.5
117 7.6 124 6.4 641 10.1
217 14.0 269 13.9 1,059 16.7
368 23.8 370 23.9 475 30.7
435 22.5 1,435 22.1
I
512 26.5 1,,289 20.4 ~
591 300 7 1,811 28~6
1,547 1009 0 1,,931 100GO 6,333 100.0
Median
8.5
13.2
12.0
7.8
900
8.7
10"
25th Percentile 4.4
405
4.5
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.4
75th Percentile 17.7
24.9
23.9
14.5
18.6
17.9
22.0
Quartile Dev. 6.7
10.2
9.7
5.2
7.3
22.0
8.8
* -- The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the
Georgia State Department of Education.
TABLE II-D-1 THE AGE DISTRffiUTION OF PERSONS EHPLOYED IN ALL PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTENS OF GEORGIA DURING JANUARY, 1959: BY RACE AND SEX*
Age Groups
White Kales
No. %
White Females
NOll %
White Total
No. %'
Negro Males Negro Females Negro Total
No.
% No.
<IiJ)!
NO Q
%
Total No. "%
Over 58 48 .. 57 38 .. 47 28 .. 37 18 - 27 Under 18 Total
209 4.6 1,442 8.5 1,651 7.6 40
620 13.5 4,336 25.5 4,956 22.9 195
922 20.1 4,990 29.3 5,912 27.4 440
1,,682 36.7 2,917 17.1 4,599 21.3 868
1,151 25.1 3,338 19.6 4,489 20.8 503
- ..
4 .. 4 - ..
4,584 100,0 17,027 100.0 21,611 100,0 2,,046
2.0 254
9.5 950
21.5 1,869
42.4 2,343
24.6 1,828
-1
100.0 7,245
3.5 13.1
25.8
32.4
25.2
-
100,0
294 3.2 1,945 6.3
1,145 12.3 6,101 19,.7
2,309 24.9 8,221 26.6
, 3,211 34.5 7,810 25.3
2,331 1
25.1
..
6,820 5
22~1
-
,w
,f::'"
9,291 10000 30,902 100.0
Median
34.8
42.5
25th Percentile 28.0
31.1
75th Percentile 44.6
51.5
Quartile Dev.
8.3
10.2
40.9
34.0
3507
30.0
28.1
27.9
50.4
41.7
44.8
10~2
6.8
8a 5
35,2
39.0
28.0
2911 2
44.2
48 iS
8.1
9.7
* The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the Georgia State Department of Education.
TABLE II-D-2 THE AGE DISTRIBUTIJN OF PERSONS ENPLOYED IN CCUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEHS OF GEORGIA. DURING JANUARY, 1959: BY RACE JU\lI) SEX*
White Males White Females
Age Groups Noo %
No!)
%
Over 58
112 4~6 1,153 8~5
Wpite Total
NO e
%
1,325 1.1
N~~ro Males N~gro Females
No.
%
NO e
%
32
2.0
211 3~9
Negro Total
No o
%
249 3.5
Total
No. %
1,514 6.5
48 - 57 38 - 41 28 - 31
490 13.2 3,413 25.2 3,903 22.1 139 8.9 769 13.7 908 12.1 4,811 1907. 136 19.8 4,065 300 2 4,801 21.8 354 22 5 5 1,486 26.6 1,840 25.1 6,641 2702
1,331 36.1 2,309 17 e l 3,646 21 0 2 651 41.9 1,769 310 6 2,426 33.8 6,072 2409
18 - 27 Under 18 Total
974 26.3 2,515 19.0 3,549 20.6 388 24.1 1,352 24.2 1,740 24.3 5,289 21.7
~)
--
3-
3-
-
-
1
-
1-
4 - \('
3,709 100.0 13,518 100.0 17,227 10000 1,570 100.0 5,594 100.0 7,164 100.0 24,391 1000 0
Median
34.6
25th Percentile 27~5
15th Percentile 44.4
Quartile Dev. 8.5
42 0 6 31.5 510 5 10.0
40.9 30.1 50.4 10~2
34.0 28~1 41 01
6.8
36.2 28.3 45.2
8.5
35.6
39.3
28 0 2
29.3
44 ft6
48.6
8.2
9.7
* The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the Georgia State Department of Education.
TABLE 11-D-3
THE AGE DISTRIBmcION OF PfillSONS "E!JIPLOXED IN INDEPENDENT5CHOQ7i SIS1EMS 01" ClE)Ro'Lt Dtffi-JiNGJANt1AAX,.. 19591 BY "RACE MID SEX*
White Males White Females White Total
Age Groups No. % No. % No. %
Negro Males
No. %
Negro Females
No. %
Negro Total
No. %
Total
NOt
%
Over 58 48 - 57 38 - 47 28 - 37 18 - 27 Under 18 Total
37 4.2 289 8.2 326 7.4
130 14.9 923 26.4 1,053 24.1
186 210 3 925 26.5 1,111 25.4
345 39.4 608 17.3 953 21.7
177 20.2
.. ..
763 21.7
- 1
940 21.4
1 ..
875 100.0 3,,509 100,0 4,384 100.0
8 1.7 37 2.2 45 2.1 371 5.7
56 11.8 181 11.0 237 11.1 1,290 19.8
86 18.1 383 23.2 469 22.0 1,580 2403
, 211 44.2 574 34.8 785 37.0 1,738 26.7
.. .. .. .. - '" 115 24.2 476 28.8 591 27.8 1,531 23.5 VJ
1
476 1000 0 1,651 100.0 2,127 1009 0 6,511 1000 0
Median
35.6
42.1
40.7
33.8
34.1
34 e o
37.9
25th Percentile 29.2
29.9
29.6
28.2
26.7
27 ..0
28.6
75th Percentile 45.2
51.6
50.7
41.6
42.9
42.7
48.3
Quartile Dev. 8.0
10.9
10.6
6.7
8.1
7.9
9.9
* The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the
Georgia State Department of Education.
County School Systems
Appling Atldnson Bacon Baker Baldwin
Banks Barrow Bartow Ben Hill Berrien
Bibb Bleck1ey Brantley Brooks Bryan
Bulloch Burke Butts Calhoun Camden
TABLE II-D-4
THE AGE DISTRIBUTION OF PERSONNEL EMPLOYED IN 159 CO~TY SCHOOL SYS'l'EMS OF GEORGLI\. DURING JANUARY J 1959: BY RACE
White
No o
Med.
Ql
Q3
QD
104
40.8
30.0 48.0 9.0
56
37 0 1
31.0 46.0 7.5
75
37.8
30.3 46.3 8.0
25
37e3
28.4 45.2 8.4
93
44.2
15'.7 52.1 8.2
41
43 0 8
37.h 50.7 6.7
59
42.3
31.1 51.5 10.2
150
4403
32.6 53.4 10.4
32
41.3
32.4 50.5 9.1
100
38.7
30.1 47.3 8.6
118
42.4
31.4 51.4 10.0
23
37.3
29.1 49.8 10.4
65
37.6
26.1 47.3 10.6
63
45.9
36.4 53.8 8.7
41
40.8
32.8 51e4 9.3
138
43.4
33.2 51.6 9.2
81
43.5
35.5 51.4 8.0
44
45.8
39.7 53.4 6.9
33
39.7
28.3 53 0 2 12.5
52
40.0
28.0 51.9 12.0
Negro
No.
Med.
Ql
Q3
35
36.5
27.7 47.1
17
31~.3
25.1 41.9
11
33.0
29.1 39.9
34
36.6
25.7 3$.9
71
38.7
29.0 46.4
3
33.0
25.5 50.5
16
30 05
23.1 41..3
21
3505
26.8 4704
17
32.2
25.1 40.5
17
30.5
24.1 31.6
366
36.2
28.6 45.4
10
32.3
28.7 35.8
6
500 5
35.5 54.3
50
38 0 0
30.2 47.6
26
36.0
29.5 45.5
83
35 0 8
26.0 44.0
112
31.1
24.7 40.1
34
31.6
2405 41.8
48
29.5
23.5 39.7
44
35.7
29.2 44.4
QD
9.7 8.4
3.9 7.1 8.1
12.5
8.8 10.3
f
w
-.l
7.7 I
6.8
8.4 3.6
9.4 8.7 8.0
9.0
8.7
8.7 8.1 7.6
TABLE II-D-4 (CONTINUED)
County School Systems
Candler Carroll Catoosa Charlton Chatham Chattahoochee Chattooga Cherokee Clarke Clay Clayton Clinch Cobb Coffee Colquitt Columbia Cook Coweta Crawford Crisp Dade Dawson Decatur DeKalb Dodge
No.
44 16.5 1.54 41 746
5 102 166 198 18
262 45 633 158 169
10 71 82 23 91
70 33 133 1,075 104
Med.
43.0 42.4 40.3 36.6 37.4
53.0 38.8 39.6 39.7 40.5
38.7 40.3 39.1 38.9 39.3
40.4 44.6 42.6 41.6 41.9
34.3 42.5
~2.0
36.0 42.1
White
Ql
3.5.8 31.2 31.2 27.3 2.5.7
40.5 28.6 30.0 29.2 33.0
27.8 27.4 28.0 30.6 30.1
29.7 38.3 33.6 33.9 33.3
25.0 30" 32.5 25.1 32.2
Q3
QD
49 .5 .50.9 49.4 49.5 47.3
61.8 49.8 48.2 47.9 46.1
.53.8 41.8 48.9 48.2 42.0
49.3 .53.9 50.9 50.1 49.1
44.8 51.1 49.4 47.2 49.9
6.9 9.9 9.1 11.1 11.2
10.7 10.6
9.1 9.4 6.6
13.0 10.2 10.5 8.8
5.1
9.8 7.8
6.7
8.1 7.9
9.9 10.3
8.5 11.1 8.9
Negro
No.
Med.
Ql
Q3
QD
19
38.7
27.5 4.5.5
9.0
42
3.5.4
30.8 44.4
6.8
3 20
40.5 32.0
3.5.5 44.3
4.4
26.3 37.0
.5.4
428
34.5
28.0 43.2 ' 7.6
6
38.0
33.0 60.5 13.3
19
31.6
24.8 38.8
7.0
12
93
26.6 LtO.7
22.3 34.7 31.9 48.4
, 6.2
8.3
29
32.4
24.6 41.1
8.3 wco
42 19 27
.51
37.3 29.7 38.4 28.3
29.8 43.9 23.9 34.9 29.1 Li3.6 23.1 3.5.0
1.1
5.5 7.3 6.0
.59
36.2
30.3 4.5.9
1.8
47 30 68
29 6.5
36.9
28 .5 47.3
9.4
34.4
27.4 45.0
8.8
37.6
29.8 44.7
7.5
31.6 40.3
24.0 42.6
9.3
30.5 46.1
7.8
3 0 94
-25.5
38.8
-21.8
31.4
-30.5
4.5.2
-4.4
6.9
111
43
35.2
28.4 44.5
8.2
33.9
27.0 48.4 10.7
County School Systems
Dooly Dougherty Douglas Early Echols Effingham Elbert Emanuel Evans Fannin
Fayette Floyd Forsyth Franklin Fulton
Gilmer Glascock Glynn Gordon Grady
Greene Gwinnett Habersham Hall Hancock
TABLE II-D-4 (CONTlj,\lUED)
_W.._hi-te-
No.
Med.
Ql
Q3
QD
57
43.0
36.3 49(!3 6.5
298
38.0
26.6 47.8 10.6
93
42.4
30.7 52.4 10.9
59
43.9
36.8 57.8 10.5
14
41.3
29.7 53.0 147
62
1~l(l8
32.6 48.4 7.9
105
47.8
39.4 54.8 7.7
112
42.1
33.4 49.1 7.9
42
3905
30.3 47.6 8.7
131
41.5
31.4 50.7 9.7
45
48.4
39.0 57.0 9.0
229
39 .. 5
27.7 49.5 11.4
88
41,,6
33.3 47.7 7.2
92
44.7
38.3 52.8 7.3
845
40.6
30.3 48.9 9.3
78
45.0
37.6 52.8 7.6
18
35.8
30.8 43.0 6.1
236
32.8
2L~,,3
4404 10.1
100
43 e 8
31.9 53.0 10.6
103
41.2
30.6 50.4 9.9
51
44.3
33.6 53.2 9.8
255
42.6
31.4 52,,7 10.7
130
41.8
32.4 49.0 8.3
215
40.8
29.3 50.6 10.7
29
45.7
39.1 53.3 ~.l
Hego
No.
Med.
Ql
Q3
QD
62
34.1
27.1 42.3
7.6
170
38.0
31.5 46.2
7.4
26
35.1
26.1 4300
8.5
67
33.2
27.9 39.0 5.6
4
28.0
23.0 38.0
7.5
36
36'12
30.9 45.5
7.3
61
36.6
30.3 44.5
7.1
53
37.1
30.1 47.8
8.9
25
35.3
30.5 43.5
6.5
1
33.0
30.5 35.5
2.5 I
U>
24
46.9
40.2 54.3
7.1 \,()
21 0 17
-40.1
32.1
-28.6
28.2
-47.6
36.0
-9.5 I
3.9
140
38.7
31.5 45.1
7.2
a
8
91 0 64
-
28.0
- - -
23.0 38.0
7.5
-37Cl5
33.0
- - 29.3 47.7
24.7 42.7
-9.2
9.0
59
34.9
27.8 43.9
8.1
27
40.1
27.6 45.1
9.1
9
14
62
30.5
23.6 41.8
9.1
43.1
38.7 49.3
5.3
34.8
28.6 42.7
1.1
County School Systems
Haralson Harris Hart Heard Henry
Houston Irwin Jackson Jasper Jeff' Davis
Jefferson Jenkins Johnson Jones Lamar
Lanier Laurens Lee Liberty Lincoln
Long Lowndes Lumpkin Macon Hadison
TABLE II-D-4 (CONTINUED)
White
No.
Med.
Ql
Q3
QD
71
40.5
31.4 50.5
9.6
40
48.0
33.7 54.7 10.5
91
43.0
34.6 51.6
8.5
43
39.9
32.1 48.3
8.1
75
45.2
33.5 54.8 10.7
221
38.8
28.2 48.4 10.1
61
39.6
29.5 49.5 10.0
85
36.9
24.9 51.5 13.3
23
41.6
33.4 52.2
9.4
73
38.9
28.2 45.4
8.6
85
44.6
37.4 52.7
7.7
39
41.5
29.3 49.4 10.1
45
42.6
33.3 50.9
8.8
32
45.7
39.5 53.6
7.1
35
44.4
33.8 56.9 11.6
33
4165
33.8 47.8
7&0
106
44.4
35,,9 52.7
8.4
28
46.9
39.1 54.7
'l~8
51
32.4
25.1 42.1
8.5
28
46.8
38.0 56.6
9.3
30
39.0
26.3 46.5 10.1
108
35.6
27.3 45.0
8.9
57
43.0
33.2 53.2 10.0
51
45.5
38.4 53.1
7.4
78
42.2
33.0 50.5
8.8
Negro
No.
l'1ed.
Ql
03
QD
16
35.5
26.0 50.5
12.3
61
33.0
27.5 39.1
5.8
30
34.4
27.4 42.4
7.5
18
30.0
23 ..6 39.7
8.1
65
40.1
31.6 49.7
9.1
71
36.1
26.5 44.8
9.2
35
30.5
23.8 400 1
8.2
18
34.3
28.6 43.0
7.2
32
33.0
24.2 42.6
9.2 !=-
17
32.4
26.5 37.7
5.6 ~
82
34.8
26.5 45.4
9.5
49
38.8
32.0 45.2
6.6
21
39 0 0
28.5 50.3
10.9
38
32.6
24.8 42.4
8.8
39
36.6
27.8 44.4
8.3
15
29.7
23.4 42.2
9.4
65
43.0
34.5 52.5
9.0
39
32.5
24.5 42.7
9.1
58
38.0
28.9 45.6
8.4
28
31.3
25.0 37.2
6.1
17
39.0
26.3 46.5 10.1
52
44.5
36.5 51.7
7.6
1
53.0
50.5 55.5
73
33.0
29.7 44.9
7.6
27
38.7
31.8 48.4
8.3
County School Systems
Marion McDuffie McIntosh Meriwether Miller
Mitchell Monroe Montgomery Morgan Murray
Muscogee Newton Oconee Oglethorpe Paulding
Peach Pickens Pierce Pike Polk
Pulaski Putnam Quitman
Rabun
Randolph
TABLE II-D-4 (CONTINUED)
White
No.
Med.
Ql
Q3
QD
29
44.8
39.6 50.8
5.6
66
39.7
30.9 49.2
9.2
26
48.9
40.1 54.8
1.4
83
39.2
31.7 49.3
8.8
56
39.8
32.2 48.0
7.9
63
44.4
35.5 52.9
8.7
44
45.7
37.0 56.9 10.0
32
45.8
36.9 54.7
8.9
51
43.6
35.1 54.3
9.6
80
41.9
32.7 49.4
8.4
785
40.9
27.3 51.6 12.2
107
44.0
34.7 51.1
8.2
44
45.0
31.3 52.7 10.7
39
48.4
33.4 55.3 11.0
90
43.9
33.9 53.6
9.9
56
40.2
26.8 51.3 12.3
58
42.7
31.8 51.0
9.6
82
41.9
32.5 50.1
8.8
37
51.2
42.6 56.7
7.1
96
40.8
30.3 50.5 10.1
25
43.9
38.2 50.9
6.4
36
!~5.0
35.5 53.0
8.8
12
43.0
38,0 48.0
)~O
73
38.9
29,6 49.0
9.7
34
40.0
32.1 48.8
8.4
Negro
No.
f1ed.
Q1
Q3
QD
31
34.5
28.6 44.5
8.0
41
34.6
28.2 43.3
7.6
40
38.0
25.7 47.1
10.7
75
34.6
26.9 42.3
7.7
24
36.3
26.6 45.1
9.3
57
37.0
30.7 46.0
7.7
45
36.2
28.2 46.8
9.3
26
38.0
27.3 46.1
9.4
44 1
33.4 23.0
25.3
i!!"-
--42.5
--8.6 !If
272
36.3
28.8 45.8
8.5
51
31.8
24.1 44.6
10.3
12
35.5
28.0 48.0 10.0
33
39.5
29.6 47.8
9.1
14
40.5
34,,3 44.9
5.3
63
39.3
32.2 47.1
7.5
5
29.7
24.3 33.8
4.8
22
38.0
30.1 44.1
7.0
34
34.0
28.3 41.1
6.4
30
35.8
27.4 45.7
9.2
24
34.2
29.5 40.0
5.3
45
31.7
24.6 40.2
7.8
16
38.0
31.3 36.0
2_4
1
43.0
61
41.8
35.0 47.2
6.1
County School Systems
Richmond Rockdale Schley Screven Seminole Spalding Stephens Stewart Sumter Talbot Taliaferro Tattna11 Taylor Telfair Terrell Thomas Tift Toombs Towns Treut1en Troup Turner Twiggs Union Upson
TABLE II..D-4 (CONTINUED)
White
No.
Med.
Ql
Q3
QD
587
42.2
29.6 51.8 li.l
52
41.3
26.7 51.3 12.3
15
36.1
31.4 49.3
9.0
70
39.0
30.3 47.3
8.5
38
43.0
34.9 50.3
1.7
198
43.1
29.2 52.7 11.8
85
43.4
32.5 51.8
9.7
27
46.8
32.6 53.7 10.6
43
44.3
33.4 52.5
9.6
24
42.0
30.0 51.8 10.9
12
42.0
34.7 48.0
6.7
97
40.8
29.3 47.9
9.3
42
44.0
36.1 52.1
8.0
79
40.2
31.7 46.8
7.6
43
42.1
34.1 49.4
7.7
100
40.1
29.3 51.5 li.l
138
43.1
34.3 51.4
8.6
71
41.0
29.2 51.2 li.O
43
39.0
31.8 46.2
7.2
35
43.9
35.2 51.3
8.1
108 52 34 65 72
44.5 44.4 38.0
33.2 52.9
9.9
34.5 54.0
9.8
29.5 47.4
9.0
38.3
31.2 47.9
8.4
44.3
32.3 53.5 10.6
~ro
No.
Med.
Ql
Q3
QD
300
35.3
27.9 44.0
8.1
22
35.3
30.3 42.2
6.0
20
36.0
31.0 44.0
6.5
78
37.3
30.0 44.5 1.3
29
31.1
24.0 40.5
8.3
78
36.0
28.2 44.9
8.4
5
43.0
38.8 47.2
4.2
51
36.7
30.0 44.0
7.0
57
36.3
29.1 45.7
6~3
48
32.1
25.1 40.0
7.5 A-
19
33.0
24.8 41.8
N
8.5
43
33.8
28.4 41.2
6.4
37
35.7
29.5 45.2
7~~)
41
33.0
25.9 41.4
7.8
69
38.7
27.6 46.9
9.7
60
37.5
29.6 46.8
8.6
56
35.5
28.5 43.6
7.6
23
30.5
23.8 40.5
8.4
0
15
37.0
29.5 43.4
7.0
52 26 46 0
59
29.9
23.9 36.1
6.1
33.5
27.3 40.1
6.4
--34.9
32.7
2-6-.2 4-2-.7
25.0 44.6
--8.3
9.8
TABLE II-D-4 (CONTINUED)
County School Systems
Walker Walton Hare Warren "VJashington Hayne Webster Wheeler White Whitfield Wilcox Wilkes Wilkinson Worth
White
No.
Med.
Ql
Q3
QD
280
41.4
29.9 51.6 10.9
72
44.2
33.5 52.4
9.5
104
40.4
31.3 48.5
8.6
27
46.6
34.8 51.6
8.4
80
40.1
31.6 50.8
9.6
135
36.3
28.4 46.8
9.2
16
40.7
28.f" 48.0 10.0
38
39.0
30.9 48.5
8.8
66
36.7
26.3 46.5 10.1
191
39.7
29.1 50.1 10.5
62
41.8
33.7 48.4
7.4
49
47.0
38.8 53.7
7.5
41
39.3
30.7 47.8
8.6
93
41.4
31.1 50.3
9.6
Negro
No.
Med.
~l
Q3
QD
21
39.9
30.5 46.4
8.0
56
29.3
23.4 38.0
7.3
7
41.8
35.5 46.1
5.3
39
27.8
22.9 38.5
7.8
90
35.3
30.2 43.3
6.6
35 15 20
31.5
24.7 38.4
6.9
36.8
27.4 46.1
9.4 !:-
35.8
30.2 42.3
6.1
\..v
t
2
38.0
33.0 43.0
5.0
0
26
36.2
30.3 47.0
8.4
54
35.6
30.2 L4.3
7.1
40
36.0
26.3 44.7
9.2
70
35.9
28.6 L4.0
7.7
* The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the
Georgia state Department of Education (Courtesy of the State Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Claude Purcell, and members of the Staff of the Department.)
City School Systems Americus Atlanta Barnesville Bremen Buford Calhoun Carrollton Cartersville Cedartown Chickamauga Cochran Commerce Dalton Decatur Dublin Fitzgerald Gainesville Hawkinsville Hogansville Jefferson LaGrange Marietta Monroe Moultrie Newnan
TABLE II-D-5
THE AGE DISTRIBUTION OF PERSONNEL EMPLOYED IN 39 CITY SCHOOL SYSTEMS OF GECRGIA*
DURING JANUARY, 1959: BY RACE
No.
56 1,948
24 21 21
41 63 57 10 22
35 47 117 131 68
58 112 19 32 17 124 159 35 85 85
White
Med.
Ql
Q3
QD
42.4
32.6 51.3
9.4
38.9
27.1 50.4 11.1
43.8
35.5 51.5
8.0
41.8
26.8 51.4 12.3
41.3
39.8 54.8
7.5
39.3
28.3 47.8
9.8
39.9
26.8
L~8.9
11.1
42.7
33.9 50.6
8.4
40.2
30.5 50.2
9.9
41.3
27.2 53.0 12.9
36.3
26.8 48.3 10.8
38.5
27.0 49.3 11.2
3903
31.7 50.4
904
44.1
32 0 4 52.5 10.1
45.0
35.9 52.8
8.5
44.3
34.8 53.3
~~3
41.3
29.8 47 e 8
9~0
41.0
27.0 50.5 11.3
35.5
26.0 49.3 li.7
52.5
48.3 56.8
4.3
47.4
36.9 55.4
9.3
40.4
29.1 50.3 10.6
35.9 40.7
25.3 49.8 12.3
32.2 47.6
7.7
37.0
28.9 48.4
9.8
No.
38 1,267
2 0 9
U
31 23' 17 0
12 6 16 28 36
24 44 10 17 0
61 35 0 19 21
Med.
38.9 33.6
-53eO
46.3
27.2 314)2 33.0
-39.3
43.0 31.3 32.0 40.5
34.U
33.0 360 5 43.0
-30.5
36.0
-29.7
30.1 29.9
Negro
Ql
Q3
29.5 47.6 27.0 41.6
- - 50.5 55.5
38.8 52.4
22~6
40.5
25.1 36.8
26.2 44.3
- - 32.6 49.9
31.3 53.0 2505 36.3 2407 41e 3 33.0 49.3 28.0 42.4
24.7 41.8 28.0 44.0 350 0 49.1
- - 24.1 37.6
30.3 45.0
- - 23.5 40.1
23.9 36.9 23.8 36.4
QP
9.1 7.3
-2.5
6.8
9.0 5.9 9.1
-8.7 , ~ ~
904 5.4 8.3 8.2 7.2
8.6 8.0 7.4 6.8
7.4
-8.3
6.5 6.3
TABIE II-D-5 (CONTINUED)
City
School
Systems
No.
Pelham
42
Quitman
31
Rome
158
Tallapoosa
20
Tallulah Falls
10
Thomaston
99
Thomasville
84
Toccoa
52
Trion
39
Valdosta
144
Vidalia
44-
Waycross
128
West Point
24
Winder
46
Med.
41e5 42 0 1 41,2 43.0 44.7
40.5 44.5
41~3
42 0 5 42.6
39.8 42.6 43.0 33.8
White
Ql
31.6 34.8 32.0 31.3 35.5
33.7 35.. 9 32 fl 7 33.6 32.2
30.5 32.8 32.3 25.2
Q3
47.7 49.8 49.4 52.0 55.5
46.4 55.5 510 0 52 e 3 51.6
49.8 51.1 53.0 46.1
QD
8.1 7115 8.7 10.4 10.0
6.4 9.8 9.2 9.4 9.7
9.7 9.2 10.4 10.5
-Negro
No.
Med.
Ql
Q3
QD
28
30.2
23.8 38.0
7.1
26
32.4
25.2 41.8
7.8
47 0 0
0 56
--37.6
-
36.7
- .. 28.6 47.4
--
27.3 45.5
9.4
- ,.j::""
- \J1.
9.1
19
32.1
27.5 36.4
4.5
2
38.0
33.0 53.0 10.0
92
34.8
29.0 44.7
7.9
20
30.5
23.6 43.0
9.7
65
38.7
28.2 46.1
9.0
21
30.8
24.6 36.6
6.0
24
33.0
24.0 43.0
9.5
* The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the
Georgia Department of Education (Courtesy of the State Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Claude Purcell, and members of the staff of the Department.)
TABLE II...n-6
THE AGE DISTRIBUTION OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ENPLOY~ES TIlT TIlli TEi. CIER RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF GEORGIA AS OF JUNE 30, 1957: BY SEX*.
Age Groups Above 70 Yrs. 65-69 Years 60-64 Years 55-59 Years 50-54 Years L~5-49 Years 40-44 Years 35-39 Years
Males
No.
%
25
.3
120
1.5
253
3.2
400
5.1
629
8.0
758
9.6
950
12.0
1277
16.2
Females
No.
%
177
.7
610
2.6
1012
4.2
1623
6.8
2703
11.3
3620
15.1
3058
12.8
2745
11.5
Total
No.
%
202
.6
730
2.3
1265
4.0
2023
6.4
3332
10.5
,
Lt378
13.7
.j::""
()'\
4008
12.5
I
4022
12.6
30-34 Years
1724
21.8
2593
10.8
4317
13.6
25-29 Years
1346
17.1
3493
14.6
4839
15.2
20-24 Years
Under 20 Yrs. Total
412
5.2
1
.0
7895
100.0
2258
59 23951
9.4 .2
100.0
2670 60
31846
8.4
.2 100.0
Median
36.8
41.4
40.0
25th Percentile
30.6
30.4
30.5
75th Percentile
46.4
50.3
49.6
Quartile Deviation
7.9
10.0
9.6
~~The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official recora-S-or the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia (Courtesy of Messrs. Pittman and Skipper.)
TABLE II-D-7 THE AGE DISTRIBUTION OF GEORGIA PUBLIC SCHOOL T)ERSONNEL AS OF FEBRUARY, 1954: BY RACE AND SEX-:l-..
Age Groups
wnne
I'fegro
Male
Female
Total
r-1ale
Female
Total
No.
% No.
% No.
% No.
% No.
%
No.
cl p
Total
Male Female
Total
No. % No. % No. %
Above 70 65-59 60-6}.j
9 .3 44 1.3 75 2.2
48 .3 270 2.0 618 4.4
57 .3 314 1.8 693 4.0
1 .1
15 1.0
14 1.0
18 .3 69 1.1 135 2.2
19.3 84 1.1 149 1.9
10 .2
59 1.2 89 1.8
66 .3
339 1.7 753 3.8
76 -.3
398 1.6
842 3..4
55-59
128 3.8 908 6.6 1036 6.0 33 2.3 223 3.6 256 3.3 161 3.4 1131 5..6 1292 5.2
50-54 45-49 40-44
215 6.4 1497 10.8 1712 10.0 57 4.. 0 378 6.0 435 5.7 272 5.7 1875 9.3 21.47 8.6
321 9.6 2306 16.7 2627 15.3
120 8.3
636 10.2
756 9.8
4hl 9.2 29',[2 14.7 3383 ll.6
4+:-
432 12.9 2103 15.2 2535 14.8 176 1~2 886 14.2 1062 13.8 608 12.7 2989 11.9 3597 1}~5 """"
35-39
447 13.3 1615 11.7 2062 12.0 244 17.0 954 15.3 1198 15.6 691 14.4 2569 12.8 3260 13.1
30-34
711 21.2 1170 8.4 1881 10.9 376 26.1 977 15.6 1353 17.6 1087 22.1 2147 10..7 3234 13.0
25-29
854 25.h 1618 11.7 2lr72 14.4 361 25.1 1,JS8 21.7 1719 22.4 1215 25..3 2976 11r.8 1-1191 16.8
20-24
121 3.6 1683 12.2 1804 10.5 42 2.9 610 9.8 652 8.5 163 3,4 2293 11.4 2456 9.9
Under 20
1.0 4.0 5.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.Q 5.Q 6 ,Q
Total
3358 100.0 13840 100.017198 1000 3439100.0 6245 100.0 7684 100.0 4797 100..020085 100.0 24882 100..0
Median
33.9
41.2
39.8
32.8
34.9
34.5
33.7
39..1
37.9
25th Percentile 28.3
29.7
29.1
28.6
27.4
27.. 7
28.3
28.6
28.4
75th Percentile Quartile Dev.
473..3,
498..7,
48.0 9.5
40.6 6,0
43.4 8.0
42.9 7.6
42.7 7.2
47.6 9.5
46..6 9.)
TABLE II-E-1 THE MARITAL STATUS OF PERSONNEL IN GEORGIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS AS OF MAY, 1957: BY POPULATION GROUPS*
Population Groups
.Married
No.
%
County Systems
White l"1ales
2709
81.2
White Females
9132
66.8
\.Jhite Total
11841
69.7
Negro Hales
1106
76.8
Negro Females
3686
62.2
Negro Total
4792
65.0
Total (County Systems)16633
68.2
Single
No.
%
567
17.0
2971
21. 7
3538
20.8
280
19.4
1418
23.9
1698
23.0
5236
21.5
NOvJ;i-dowed %
21
.6
1160
8.5
1181
6.9
18
1.2
428
7.2
446 6.1
1621
6.1
Divorced
No.
%
Total
No
%
39
1.2
3336 100.0
410
3.0 13673 100.0
449
2.6 17009 100.0
38
2.6
1442 100.0
395
6.7
5921 100.0
433
5,,9
1369 100.0
882
3.6 24318 100.0
City Systems
White Males
594
82.1
110
15.3
5
.7
White Females
2063
56.4 1253
34.2
218
5.9
wbite Total
2651
60.6 1363
:311.1
223
5.1
Negro Males
295
14.5
79
19.9
9
2.3
Negro Females
948
61.0
430
27.6
52
3.3
Negro Total
1243
63.7
509
26.1
61
3.1
Total (City Systems) 3900
61.5 1872
29.6
284
4.5
9 130
1.3 3.5
718 3664
100.0 100.0
-'g;
139
3.2
4382 100.0 I
13
3.3
396 1000 0
126
8.1
1556 100.0
139
7.1
1952 100.0
278
4.4
6334 100.0
State (i.e., County & City)
White Males White Females White Total Negro Males Negro Females Negro Total
Total (State)
3303
81.5
677
16.7
26
.6
48
1.2
4054 100.0
11195
64.6 422h
24.4 1378
7.9
540
3.1 17337 100.0
14498
67.8 4901
22.9 1404
6.6
588
2.7 21391 100.0
1401 4634 6035 20533
76.2
359
61.9 1848
64.8 2201
66.9 7108
19.5
27
24.7
480
23.7
507
23.1 1911
1.5 6.4
5.4 6.2
51 521
572 1160
2.8
1838 100.0
7.0
7483 100.0
6.1
9321 100.0
3.8 30712 100.0
*
The
basic
raw
data
on
which
the
present
calculations
are
based
were
made
available
from
official
:
records
of
the Georgia Department 0: Education (Courtesy 0: the State Superintendent 0: Schools, Dr. Claude Purcell, and
members of the staf: 0: the Department).
TABLE II-F-l
THE DISTRIBUTION OF GEORGIA PUBLIC SCHOOL PERSONNEL EHPLOYED AS OF MAY, 1957 ACCORDING TO TEACHING STATUS DURING THE SCHOOL YEAR 1955-56: BY POPULATION GROUPS*.
Population Groups
Taught
in Same
System
No.
el
/0
Taught
in Other
Georgia System
No.
%
Taught
Out of
Georgia
No.
%
Did
Not
Teach
No.
%
Total
No.
~
/0
County Systems White Males White Females White Total Negro Males Negro Females Negro Total Total (C01mty Systems)
City Systems White 1-1ales White Females 'VIlhite Total Negro Males Negro Females Negro Total Total (City Systems)
2369 10484 12853 1098 .5000 6098 18951
550 2868 3418 313 1277 1590 5008
72.5 78.6 77.3 77.8 85.0 83.7 79.2
77.5 78.9 78.8 80 0 9 83.8 83.1 800 1
364 11.1
859
6.4
1223
7.4
125
8.9
344
5.9
469
6.4
1692
7.1
52
7.3
206
5.7
258
5.9
27
7.0
87
5.7
114 6.0
372
5.9
101
3.1
374
2.8
475
2.9
39
2.8
129
2.2
168
2.3
643
2.7
34
4.8
133
3.7
167
3.8
11
20 8
32
2.1
43 210
2.3
3.4
435 13.3
1630 12.2
2065 12.4
148 10.5
407
6.9
555
7.6
2620 11.0
74 10.4
425 li.?
499 U.5
36
9.3
128
8.4
164 8.6
663 10.6
3269 13347 16616 1410 5880
7290 23906
710 3632 4342 387 1524 1911 6253
,100.0
100.0
100.0
1000 0
- . 100.0
100.0 100.0
~'
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
State (i.e., County and City)
White Males
2919 73.3
416 10.5
135 3.4
509 12.8
3979 100.0
White Females
13352 78.6
1065
6.3
507
3.0
2055 12.1 16979 100.0
'h'hite Total
16271 77.6
1481
7.1
642
3.1
2564 12.2
20958 100.Q
Negro Males Negro Females
1411 78.5 6277 84.8
152
8.5
431
5,,8
50
2.8
161 2.2
184 10.2
535
7.2
1797 100.0 7404 100.0
Negro Total
7688 83.6
583
6.3
2li
2.3
719
7.8
9201 100.6
*Total (State)
23959 79.5
2064
6.8
853
2.8
3283 10.9
30159 100.0
The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the Georgia,
Department of Education (Courtesy of the State Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Claude Purcell, and members of the staff
of the Department.)
TABLE II-F-2 THE AGE DISTRIBUTION OF PERSONS ENTERING THE TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF GEORGIA DURING 1958: BY RACE AND SEX
-
Age Groups
White Males White Females White Total Negro Males Negro Females
No. ~
'NO. % No. ~
NO: % No. %
Above 60 yrs. 12 1.1 42 1.7 54 1.5 1 .4 4 .7
55-59 years
21 1.9 46 1.9 67 1.9
-
4
.7
.. .. 50-54 years 26 2.5 109 4.5 135 3.8
4 .7
Negro Total
No. %
5 .6
4 .5
4 .5
No Data
No. %
.. -
1 .9
3 2.9
Total No. $
59 1.3
72 1.6
142 3.2
45-49 years 36 3.4 153 6.3 189 5.4 4 1.5 10 1.8 14 1.1 1 6.7 210 4.1
40-44 years 51 5.4 193 1.9 250 7.2 11 4.2 21 3.1 32 3.8 9 8.6 291 6.6
35-39 years 105 9.9 208 8.5 313 9.0 24 9.1 35 6.2 59 1.0
6 $.7 318
8.5
30-34 years 25-29 years
148 14.0 250 10.3 398 11.4 41 15.5 53 9.3 94 11.3
351 33.2 375 15.4 726 20.8 102 3&,6 no 19.3 212 25.5
9 8.6 27 25.7
501 965
11.3 21.8
'B
20-24 years 298 23...2 1013 41.6 1311 37.5 81 30.7 323 56.8 404 48.5 43 40.9 1758 39.7
- .. Under 20 yrs. 4 .4 47 1.9 51 1.5
- 5 .8 5 .6 ..
56 1.3
Total
1058 100..0 2436 100.0 3494 100.0 264100,.0 569 100.0 833 100.0 105 100.0 4432 10-0.0
Median Age
28.2
27.1
27.7
27.5
24.4
25.2
26.8
27.1
25th Percentile 24.4
22.8
23.2
24.1
22.2
22.5
23.1
23.0
75th Percentile 34.8
38.4
37.2
31.9
29.5
30.2
34.9
35.6
Quartile Dev.
5.2
1.8
7.0
-=
3.9
3.7
3.-9
5.9
6.3
*The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the
Teacher Retirement System of Georgia (Courtesy of Messrs. Pittman and Skipper).
TABLE II-F..3
THE AGE DISTRIBUTION OF PERSONS WITHDRAWING FROM THE TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF GEORGIA DURING 1958: BY RACE AND SEX*
Age Groups Above 60 Yrs. 55-59 Years
White Males No. %
7 1.5
14 3.1
tVhite Females No. %
24 1.8
18 1.3
white Total No. %
31 1.7
32 1.8
Negro Males No. %
2 1.6
--
Negro Females No. %
3 1.0
3 1.0
Negro Total
No . %
5 1.1
3 .7
~ean
TOTAL
Years of
No. % Service
37 1.6
5.4
36 1.6
5.3
50-54 Years
9 2.0 72 5.3 81 4.5 1 .8 1 .3 2 .5 83 3.7
4.6
45-49 Years
25 5.5 58 4.3 83 4.6 3 2.4 21 6.7 24 5.5 107 4.7
6.9
40-44 Years
46 10.0 102 7.5 148 8.2 17 13.6 22 7.0 39 8.9 187 8.3
5.8
,
35-39 Years
59 12.9 no 8.1 169 9.3 23 18.4 39 12.4 62 14.1 232 10.3
5.4
,\.J.1...
30-34 Years
98 21.4 201 14.8 299 16.5 35 28.0 71 22.5 106 24.1 407 18.0
5.0
25-29 Years 142 31.0 362 26.7 504 27.7 30 24.0 107 33.9 137 31.0 644 28.4
3.3
20-24 Years
57 12.4 398 29.3 455 25.0 14 11.2 48 15.2 62 14.1 517 22.8
2,2
- - Under 20 Yrs. 1 .2 12 .9 13 .7
--
- - 13 .6
1.6
Total
458 100.0 1357 100.0 1815 100.0 125 100.9_3]$_190.0 440 100.0 2263 100.0
4.0
Median
31.5
28.7
29.4
32.6
30.2
31.0
29.7
25th Percentile 27.0
24.1
24.8
27.9
26.4
26.8
25.3
75th Percentile 38.9
37.1
38.2
38.2
36.3
37.0
37.5
6.0
6.5
6.7
5.2
5.0
5.1
6.1
ic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the
Retirement System of Georgia (Courtesy of Messrs. Pittman and Skipper).
'. "
TABLE II-F-4 THE YEARS OF SERVICE OF PERSONS WITHDRAWING FROH THE TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF GEORGIA DURING 1958: BY RACE AND SE.x*
White Males
Median
Less 1.0- 2.0- 3.0- 4.0- 5.0- 6.0- 7.0- 8.0- 9.0- More
years
than 1.9 2.9 3.9 4.9 5.9 6.9 7.9 8.9 9.9 Than
Total of ser-
l"yr. yrs. y'rs yrs. yrs. yrs. yrs. yr!!... yrs. yrs. 10 yrs.
vice
No~- 51
153 105
41
21
18
10
10
11
9 29
458
2.2
% 11.1 33.4 22.-9 9.0 4.6 3.9 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.0 6.3 100.0
l-Mte Females
.,No. 1~,"~
/0 11.1
509 251 141 37.4 18.5 10.4
89
6~6
49 3.6
34 2.5
32 2.4
27 2.0
17 1.3
57 4.2
1357 100.0
2.1
White Total
No. 202
% 11.1
662 356 182 36.5 19.6 10.0
110 6.1
67 3.7
44 2.4
42 2.3
38 2.1
26 1.4
86 4.8
Negro l1a1es
No. 3
% 2.4
31 24 18 24.8 19.2 14.4
7 5'.6
12 9.6
7 5.6
6 4.8
2 1.6
4 3.2
11 9.8
Negro Females No. 7
55 52 41 24 22
7 23 16 18 50
% 2.2 17.5 16.5 13.0 7.6 1.0 2.2 7.3 5.1 5.7 15.-9
1815 100.0
125 100.0
31$ 100.0
2.1
3.3 ,
\J1.
I\)
4.1 I
Negro Total
No. 10
86 76 59 31 34 14 29 18 22 61
440
3.8
% 2.3 19.5 11.3 13.4 7.0 7.7 3.2 6.6 4.1 5.0 13.9 100.0
- Unidentified as No. - to Race and Sex .%
6
1
75.0 12.5
--
--
--
--
--
--
-1
a
- 12.5 100.0
1.0
Total
No. 212 754 433 241 141 101 58 71 56 48 148
226.3
2.4
.% 9.4 33,,4 19.1 10.6 6.2 4..5 2.6 3.1 2.5 2.1 6.5 100.0
Mean Age of
;
Withdrawees Age of Youngest
- 28.3 29.7 31.0 32.9 32.9 33.6 38.0 35.5 36.1 36.4 41.1
32.0
Withdrav1ee
17
18 20 21 22 23 25 25 27 27 29
17
Age of Oldest
.Wifhdrawee
67
69 72 71 69 70 70 60 63 16 76
76
*
The
basic
raw
data
on
which
the
present
calculations
are
based
were
made
;
available
,
from
official
records
of
the
Teacher Retirement System of Georgia (Courtesy of Messrs. Pittman and Skipper).
- 53>";
TABLE u-F-5
THE NUMBER, PERCENTAGE, AND MEAN AGES OF MEN AND WOMEN PRINCIPAlS*OF SELECTED
** GEORGIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS WITHIN EACH OF SEVERAL MOBILITY CATEGORIES
FOR THE NINE-YEAR PERIOD FROM 1947 THROUGH 1956..
Mobility Category Same Pos!tion Five or More Years
Same Position Two to Four Years
First Year Principals
Two Positions (Moved Once)
Three Positions (Mo'fed Twice)
Four or More Positions (Moved Three or More Times)
Total
Male
No.
150
(% of Total) 27.1
Mean Age
46.3
No.
135
(% of Total) 24.4
Mean Age
40.0
No.
46
(% of Total) 8.3
Mean Age
39.0
No.
105
(% of Total) 19.0
Mean Age
43.8
No.
86
(% of Total) 15.6
Mean Age
45.9
No.
(% of Total)
Mean Age
No. (% of Total) Mean Age
31 5.6 47.7
553 100.0 43.7
'~e 84
69.4 55.0
13 10.8 49.5
8 6.6 40.6 16 13.2 47.0 None
None
121 100.0 52.4
Total
234
34.7
49.0
148 22.0 40.6
54 8.0 39.2
121 18.0 44.1
86 12.8 45.9
31 4.6 47.7 674 100.0 45.3
* The subject group of 674 principals included all principals of white schools
having ten or more teachers in 1~55-56.
**Abstracted from "A Study of Mobility among Georgia Principals from 1947 through
1956," by Joseph C. Bledsoe, Educational Administration and Su:eervision,
VoJ.. Jl2,.. ~..8~ .December, 1956, p. L49=45'6.
-
'""
TABLE II-F-6
NUMBER AND PERCENTAGES OF "STABLE" AND "NOBILE" PRINCIPALS WITHIN ?IVE RURAL-URBAN RESIDENCE CATEGORIES**'
Mobility Categor.1
80..100 60..79
Per Cent Urban 40..59 2Q...39 0..19
Total
tJStable" group*(Five or more years in same po.. sition)
Number
101
29
14
47
43
234
Per Cent
43.1
12.4
6.0 20.1 18.4
100.0
"Mobile Ijroup*(Two or
more positions in nine years)
Number
32
13
24
81
88
238
Per Cent
13.4
S.5
10.1 34.0 37.0
100.0
F
* These two groups comprise 472 of the 674 principals in the subject group.
The remaining 202 principals were in a somewhat intermediate status, for example, beginning principals and those holding the same position less than five years.
** Abstracted from "A Study of Mobility among Georgia Principals from 1947
through 1956,"by Joseph C. Bledsoe, Educational Administration aad SURer",:
.. vision, Vo~. L.2, No.8, December.. )$56, p. 449..I:i~6
TABLE II-G-l
THE ISTRIBUTION 01" GEORGIA PUBLIC SCHOOL PEitSONNEL ACCOHDnJ~ TO LEVEL 01" INSTRUCTION AS 01" MAY, 1957: BY
D
POPULATION GROUPS".
population Groups
County Systems lrJhite Males White Females White Total Negro Males Negro Females Negro Total Total (County Systems)
bity Systems "liAhite Males vlhite Females \rJhite Total Negro Hales Negro Females Negro Total Total (City Systems)
State (i.e. County & City)
1'Jhite Males White Females l"1hite Total Negro Males Negro Females Negro Total Total (State)
Elementary
No.
%
915
30.9
9791
7LI.8
10706
66.7
513
41.2
4395
79.2
4908
72.2
15614
68.3
91
14.0
2617
73.0
2708
63.9
97
28.4
1119
76.3
1216
67.2
3924
64.9
1006
27.8
12408
74.4
13414
66.1
610
38.4
5514
78.6
6124
71.2
19538
67.6
Jr. H. S.
No.
%
310
10.5
686
5.2
996
6.2
109
8.8
272
4.9
381
5.6
1377
6.0
52
8.0
135
3.8
187
4.4
11
3.2
30
2.0
41
2.3
228
3.8
362
10.0
821
4.9
1183
5.8
120
7.6
302
4.3
422
4.9
1605
5.6
Sr. H. S.
No.
%
1736
58.6
2618
20.0
21354
27.1
623
50.0
884
15.9
1507
22.2
5861
25.6
509
78.0
832
23.0
1341
31.7
233
68.4
318
21.7
551
30.5
1892
31.3
2245
62.2
3450
20.7
5695
28.1
856
54.0
1202
17.1
2058
23.9
7753
26.8
Total
No.
%
2961 13095 16056 1245
5551 6796 22852
652 3584 4236 341 1467 1808 6044
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
..
100.0 ~
100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
3613 16679
20292
1586 7018 8604 28896
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
~Co The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the
Georgia Department of Education ( Courtesy of the State Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Glaude Purcell, and mem-
bers of the staff of the Department).
i
I
j
TABLE II-G-2
TEACHING
DUTIES
OF
GEORGIA ELEMENTARY TEACHERS IN MAY 1957 BY RACE AND SEX OF CLASSES REPORTED FOR EACH GRADE OR COMBINATION OF
AGCRCAODREDS.n*JG
TO
Nill1BER
AND
PER
CENT
Grade
or, Grades
'61 while
Men
Total
white Women
No. of Classes Reported by
%of
Negro %0
Negro
Total
Men
Total Women
%0 AU %Oi
Total Teachers Total
Kindergarten First Second
7
0.6
40
0.3
9
0.7
1,906
14.5
12
1.0
1,682
12.8
6
1.0
24
.4
17
O~
5
0.8
958
16.2 2~878
13.8
6
1.0
843
14.2 2,543 12.2
Third
3
0.2
1,692
12.9
6
1.0
798
13.4 2,499 12.0
Fourth
23
1.9
1,707
13.0
11
1.8
728
12.3 2,469 11.8
Fifth
51.
4.2
1,496
11.4
55
9.0
626
10.5 2,228 10.7
Sixth Seventh
Eighth
135
11.1
1,434
11.0
120
19.7
512
329
27.l.
1,051
8.0
191
31.2
374
383
31.6
693
5.3
88
14.4
171
Ninth**
9
0.7
3
0.0
3
0.5
4
Combinations of
Two Grades
194
16.0
1,156
8.8
70
11.4
482
Combinations of Three Grades
28
2.3
143
1.1.
27
4.4
166
Combinations of Four
or More Grades
30
2.5
J24
0.9
24
3-.9
248
8.6 2,201 6.3 1,945
2.9 1,335
.1
19
8.1 1,902
2.8
364
4.2
426
10.5
9.3 \.J1.
6.4 '"
0.1. 9.1 1.7
2.0
Total
1,213 100.0
13,127
100.0
612 100.0 5,934
* Source of Data: Questionnaire submitted to all teachers in Georgia, May 1957.
. 100.0 20,886 100.0 ?
** Most ninth-grade students are classified as high-sOl)ool students. A small percentaO'e of students in the ninth-grade are taught in the prevailing manner of elementary c1as~es, i.e., one teacher per gr:de.
I
- 57 -
TABLE II-G-3
TEACHING DUTIES OF GEORGIA WHITE AND NEGRO ELEHENTARY 'l'EACfillRS IN lo1AY 1957
ACCORDING TO NUMBER AND PER CENT OF PUPILS REPORTED IN EACH GRADE OR COMBINtI.TION OF GRADES*
Grade
or Grades
Number of White Pupils
Taught
% of Total
Number of Negro Pupils
Taught
%
of
Total
Kindergarten First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth Seventh Eighth
949
0.2
61,153
12.2
.56,964
11.4
58,255
11.7
60 J 546
12.1
53,198
10.6
46,708
9.3
53,213
10.6
54,279
10.9
787
0.3
35 J 852
15.1
30,,107
12.7
29 J 123
12.2
27,,340
U.S
24,590
10.3
23,202
9.7
21,,156
8.9
10,890
-4.6
Ninth**
379
0.1
192
0.1
Combinations
of Two Grades
44 J 573
8.9
19,854
8.2
Combinations
of Three Grades
5,122
1.0
6,537
2.7
Combinations of
Four or More Grades
4,826
1.0
8,767
3.7
Total
500 J 165
100.0
238,,397
100.0
c
* Source of Data: Questionnaire submitted to all teachers in GeorgiaJ May 1957.
**Most ninth-grade students are classified as high school students. A small percentage, however" are taught in the manner which generally prevails in elementary grades, i.e., one teacher per grade.
TABLE II-G-4
NUMBER AND PER CENT OF PUPILS AND PERIODS IN EACH OF SEVERAL BROAD SUBJECT FIELDS REPORTED AS TEACHING DUTIES IN MAY, 19.57, BY GEORGIA HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS.*
High
School Subject
Number Pupils
White
%of Number %of Number
Total Periods Total Pupils
Negro
%of Number
Total Periods
tf,of.
Total
Art
Business and Co~nercial English and Language Arts Foreign Languages Health and PhYsical Education
6,6.51
.571 2.5.5 188,630
1.5,856 96,428
Homemaking (Home, Family Living, etc.> Industrial Arts and Vocational Education
Mathematics**'
Music Natural Sciences
34,6.58
13,961 1061 385 32,278
77,282
Social Sciences Trades and Industrial Education
(includes Distributive Ed.)
Vocational Agriculture
120,403
6,314 22,1.59
0.7 1,.51.5 6.4 13,175 21.3 39,619 1.8 3,6.58 10.8 23,588
3.9 9,350 1.6 3,735 11.9 231426 3.6 .5,874 8.7 14,177
13.5 22,979
0.7 2,012 2.5 7,278
0.8 5,.527 6.7 9,783 20.3 70,786 1.9 3,817 12.0 39,732
4.8 19149.5 1.9 6,787 11.9 40,756 3.0 19,820 7.2 36,019
11.7 54,207
1.0 4,1.52 3.7 8,910
1.6
835
2.8 2,404
20.1 13,610
1.1
829
11.3 9,120
.5.5 4,849 1.9 11 699 11.6 11,5.58 .5.6 2,481 10.2 6,5.54
1.5.4 9,671
1.2 1,.566 2.5 2,678
1.1
3.2 17.9
1.1 12.0
6.4
2.2
I
1.5:12 \rl.
3.3 8.6
CD
I
12.7
2.1 3.5
Study Hall
Miscellaneous (Counseling, Supervision, etc.)
96,472 10.8 14,58.5
7.4 25,639
7.3 4,025
5.;3
16,47.5
1.8 11,280
.5.7 6,771
1.9 4,09.5
.5.4
Total
891,207 100.0 196,251 100.0 3.52,201 100.0 75,974 100.0
* These data were made available by courtesy of the Georgia Department of Education.
**Data for mathematics pupils and periods are approximate, based en a comparable survey in September, 1957~
- 59 TABLE II-G-5
TEACHING DUTIES REPORTED IN MAY 1957 BY GEfGIA HIGH
SCIll::m, TEACHERS: BY SUBJE<m ARRAS
High School Subject
Number of Teacners
White
Male
--Eema13
Negro
.;!ale-: Eeiiiaiil
No. % No. % No. % No.. %
.Tot~
No. %
Art
41 0.4 128 0.9 35 0.8 99 1.7 303 0.9
Industrial Arts and
Vocational Education 420 4.3
Music
372 3.8
12 0.1 177 343 2.4 208
3.9 4 0.1 613 1.9
4.6 no 3.6 1133 3.3
Mathematics~*'
1181 12.1 1072 7.4 717 15.8 447 7.7 3417 9.9
Business
386 4.0 1452 10.0 100 2.2 282 4.9 2220 6.4
English and Language Arts
841 8.6 )601 24.7 341 7.6 l441 24.7 6224 18.2
Foreign Language
76 0.8 466 3.2 29 0.6 97 1.7 668 2.0
Health and Physical 1423 14.6 1450 9.9 646 14.2 706 12.2 4225 12.2
Education
Science
858 8.8 779 5.3 521 lIS 325 5.6 2483 7.3
Social Studies
1114 11.4 1466 10.0 609 13.4 737 12.7 3926 11.4
Vocational Agri. culture
Home Economics
.u84 12.2 112 0.8 411 83 0.9 1158 1.9 52
9.0 46 0.8 1753 5.1 1.1 624 10.8 1917 4.7
Trades and Industrial
Education
104 1.1
63 0.4 73 1.6 59 1.0 299 0.9
Study Hall
836 8.6 1750 12.0 274 6.0 480 8.3 3340 9.6
Miscellaneous
819 8.4 726 5.0 351 7.7 243 4.2 2139 6.2
, Q9YPse1ing, Supervision)
-
Total
9738 100.0 14~~8 ]00.0 4544 100.0 5800 100.0 34660 100.0
#Number of teachers by race and sex in broad subject matter areas with per cent
each subject area is of total. These data were made available by courtesy of the Georgia Department of Education.
*Data. O' ma'tbem.Qt.ic5 teachers are estimated on the basie of a survey in September, Lc57.
- 60 -
TABLE II-G-6
NUMBER AND PER CENT OF CLASSES BY RACE AND SEX WITHIN EACH OF SEVERAL ACTIVITY CATEGORIES IN GEORGIA WHITE AND NEGRO HIGH SCHOOLS AS REPORTED BY TEACHERS IN MAY, 1957*
Activity Athletics
Number and Per Cent of Classes
1'fuite
Negro
Male -
NO:- f,
Female
Male
Female
I{.Q., , % ;,0:- % % No~
274 35.6 22 2.1 59 14.8 18 2.6
Total
-- % NOil
373 12.8
Character Building
21 2.7 87 8.2 58 14.5 88 12.6 254 8.1
(Y.M.C.A.,Bqy Scouts)
Literar,r - Dramatic 55 7.2 211 19.9 33 8.2 152 21.8 451 15.4 (Paper, Annual, Debating)
Music
35 4.6 14 1.3 21 5.3 34 4.9 104 3.6
Scholastic (Beta,Nat 1l Honor,etc.) 16 2.1 43 4.1 20 5.0 18 2.6 91 3.3
Vocational (F.F.A.,F.H.A.,F.T.A.) 48 6.2 76 7.2 27 6.7 61 8.8 212 7.2
Student Government
l6 2.1 31 2.9 20 5.0 20 2.9 87 3.0
Other
295 38.3 564 53.3 160 40.0 303 43.4 1322 45.2
In-Service Teacher Period
9 1.2 11 1.0 2 0.5 3 0.4 25 0.8
Total
769 100.0 1059 100.0 400 100.0 691 100.0 2925 100.0
*Source of Data: Questionnaire submitted to all teachers in Georgia, May 1951.
- 61-
TABLE TI-G-7
NUMBER AND PER CENT OF PUPILS AND PERIODS BY RACE IN EACH OF SEVERAL ACTIVITY CATEGORIES IN GEORGIA WHITE AND NEGRO HIGH SCHOOLS AS REPORI'ED BY TEACHERS IN MAY,1957*
Activity Athletics
Pupils and Peri~ds
white
Negro
. Pupils
N8
,
,NPo~erio"dIs
Pupils
Periods
No. % No. %
9050 17.2 1550 20.4 2017 6.1 317 7.7
Character Building (Y.M.C.A., Bqy Scouts)
3949 7.5 224 3.0 4713 14.3 :t48 8.4
Literary - Dramatic (Paper, Annual, Debating) 5237 9.9 985 13.0 4570 13.9 529 12.8
Music
2583 4.9 372 4.9 2570 7.8 222 5.4
Scholastic (Beta,Nat t 1. Honor, etc.) 1878 3.6 111 1.5 1053 3.2
74 1.8
Vocational (F.F.A.,F.H.A.,F.T.A.)
4961 9.4 279 3.7 4595 14.0 163 3.9
Student Government
1279 2.4 144 1.9 964 2.9 132 3.2
other
23649 44.9 3887 51.2 12373 37.7 2339 56.5
In-Service Teacher Period
91 .2 33 .4 48 ~1 14 .3
Total
52677 100.0 7,85 100.0 32903 100.0 4138 100.0
*Source of Data: Questionnaire submitted to all teachers in Georgia, May, 1957.
TABLE II-H-l
THE SALARY STATUS OF SCHOOL PERSONNEL IN ALL SCHOOL SYSTEMS AS REPORTED T? THZ TEACHER RETIREHENT SYSTEN OF GEORG IA FOR JANUARY, 1959: BY RACE AND SEX;!-.
Salary Intervals
White Males
No.
01
I"
More than $1,000 12
.3
900-999
4
.1
800-899
11
.2
700-799
59 1.3
600-699
215 4.8
500-599
475 10.7
400-499
1,019 22.9
White Females
No.
'"jJ
--
--
1-
2-
White Total
No. %
12
.1
4-
12
.1
61
.3
28
.2 243 1.2
92
.6 567 2.9
872 5.7 1,891 9.5
Negro Males
No. %
--
--
1
.1
1
.1
Negro Females
No.
d
I"
--
--
--
--
10
.6
3
.1
106 6.1 22
.4
244 14.1 278 4.4
Negro Total
No.
d
/"
--
--
1-
1-
TOTAL
No.
dI:)
12
.1
4
13
.1
62
.2
13
.2 256
.9
I
128
1.6 695
2.5 rCoi'
522
6.5 2,43.3
8.7
300-399
1,524 34.3 5,445 35.4 6,969 35.1 458 26.4 1,558 24.9 2,016 25.2 8,985 32.3
200-299
960 21.5 7,964 51.8 8,924 45.0 878 50.6 4,214 67.3 5,092 63.8 14,016 50.3
100-199
124 2.8 880 5.7 1,004 5.1 20 1.2 144 2.3 164 2.1 1,168 4.2
Less than 100
50 1.1 91
.6 lId
.7 14
.8 35 .6 49
.6 190
.7
Total
4,!453 100.0 15,375 100.0 19,828 100.0 1,732 100.0 6,254 100.0 7,986 100.0 27,A1LI 100.0
Median
25th Percentile 75th Percentile Quartile Dev.
$371 297 466
85
$ 283 234 347 57
$ 297 242 368
63
$294 244
384 70
$269 232 318
43
$273 234
333 50
$ 289
239 360 61
~~ The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia (Courtesy of Messrs. Pittman and Skipper).
TABLE II-H..2
THE SALARY STAWS JF SCHOOL PEl1S0NNEL IN COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEIIS AS iIC?ORTED TO THE TE..i\.CHER RETIREHENT SYSTEM OF GEORGIA FOR J_LLNUARY 1959: BY RACE AID SBX'~.
Salary Intervals More than $1,000 900-999 800-899 700-799 600-699 500-599 400-499
White IvIa les
No. %
11
.3
2
.1
8
.2
LI7 1.2
1rJhite Females
No.
pd!
- ..
--
--
2-
White Total
No. %
11
.1
2-
8-
h9
.3
187 4.8 25
.2 212 1.2
410 10.5 81
.6 491 2.8
876 22.5 798 6.0 1,674 9.7
Negro Hales
No. %
- ..
--
1
.1
1
.1
10
.7
88 5.6
222 14.6
Negro Females
No. %
--.. --
2-
22
.4
270 4.9
Negro Total
No.
H
/"
--
--
1-
1-
TOTAL
No. %
11
.1
2
9
50
.2
12
.2 224
.9
I
110
1.6 601
2.5
0' \.oJ
492
7.0 2,166
9.0
300-399
1,303 33.3 4,355 32.6 5,658 32.8 396 26.0 1,304 23.5 1,700 2L~.1 7,358 30.0
200-299
891 22.9 7,172 53.5 8,063 h6.7 776 51.1 3,766 68.1 4,51.~2 64.3 12,605 52.0
100-199
119 3.1 852 6.1J 971 5.6 17 1.1 140 2.5 157 2.2 1,128 1.1.6
Less Than 100
1.14 1.1 87
.7 131
.8 11
.7 34
.6 45
.6 176
.7
Total
3,898 100.0 13,372 100.0 17,270 100.0
l1edian
25th Percentile 75th Percentile Quartile Deviation
$368 290 464
87
$ 279 233
343
55
$292 239 366
64
1,522 100.0
$295 244 384 70
5,538 100.0
$268 231 315 42
7,060 100.0 24,330 100.0
$ 272 233 331
49
$285
237 358 61
-~ The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the Teaoher Retirement System of Georgia (Courtesy of Messrs. Pittman and Skipper).
TABLE II-H-3
THE
SALARY
STATUS OF SCHOOL PERSONNEL IN INDEPENDENT
RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF GEOIDIA FOR JANUARY,
SCHOOL SYSTEMS AS
1959: BY RACE AND
RSEEX?~O~.RTED
TO
THE
TEACHER
salary Intervals More than $1,000 900-999 800-899 100-799 600-699 500-599 Loo-499
White Males No. ~
1
.2
2
.4
'White Females
No. I
- ..
--
3 .5 1 .1
12 2.2 .. ..
28 5.0
J
.1
65 11.7 11
.5
lLJ 25.8 74 3.7
WhIte Total No. %
1-
2
.1
4
.2
12
.5
31 1.2
76 3.0
217 8S
Negro Males Negro Fema)Oes
No. ?t
No.
"/0
- - - ..
-- --
- - ..
.. ... - -
- .. 1 .1
18 8.6 .. ..
22 lOS
8 1.1
Negro Tota1- -TOTAL
No. % No. %
.. - 1
- ..
2
.1
.. .. 4 .1
- -
12
.3
1
.1 32
.9
&
18 1.9 94 2.7 ~
30 3.2 247 7.1
300-399
221 39.8 1,090 54.4 1,311 $1.2 62 29.5 254 35.5 316 34.1 1,627 46.8
200-299
69 12.4 792 39.6 861 33.6 102 48.6 448 62.6 550 59.5 1,411 40.5
100-199
5
.9 28 1.4 33 1.3
3 1.4
4
.6
7
.8 40 1.1
Less than 100
6 1.1
4
.2 10
.4
3 1.4
1
.1
4
.4 lL
.4
Total
555 100.0 2,003 100.0 2,558 100.0 210 100.0 716 100.0 926 100.0 3,484 100.0
Median
$388
$315
$328
$296
$278
$281
$326
25th Percentile
326
258
268
24$
238
239
257
75th Percentile
480
Quartile Dev.
77
361
52
376 54
379 67
332 47
341
Sl
370 57
* The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from otficial records of the
Teacher Retirement System of Georgia (Courtesy of Messrs. Pittman and Skipper).
TABLE II-H-4 THE MEAN MONTHLY SALARY@ OF PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES IN 158# C~UNTY SCHOOL SYSm1S
CF GECRGIA AS OF JANUARY" 1959: BY RACE AND SEX
County School Systems
Appling Atkinson Bacon Baker Ba1dwin Banks Barrow !artow Ben Hill Berrien Bibb B1eck1ey Brantley Brooks Bryan
S11lloch Burke
Butts Calhoun Oamden
White
Negro
System Mal.e
Female
Total.
Male
Female
Total
No. No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean
Total No. Mean
1 30 2 16 3 18 48 5 13
6 12 7 10 8 48 97 10 30
11 106 12 6 13 20
14 18 15 11
16 28 17 13 18 10 19 8 20 17
398@ 78 259 36 378 57 398 16 454 73
393 41 429 37 335 100 442 28 338 83
4n 626 372 24 358 45 362 47 400 31
415 99 428 65 405 36 440 31 338 42
289 108 319 14 273 52 269 3 277 75 301 2 280 24 319 7 304 86 327 16 279 53 304 1 269 47 303 0 263 1.48 286 4 270 35 304 3 263 113 283 4 335 732 346 73 259 30 282 0 287 65 309 1 254 65 284 7 266 42 301 5 298 127 323 16 285 78 308 25 283 46 309 12 281 39 314 15 287 59 302 12
314 20 362 15 273 8 )05 27 319 56
296 3 00
317 18 309 13 306 16
338 313 0 11
421 3 358 40 319 21
305 67 318 92 289 23 302 33 319 39
269 34 291 18 285 10 280 34 287 72
292 4
00 283 22 281 16 270 20 334 386 285 11.1
312 4
284 47 296 26 279 83 289 117 284 35 286 48
295 51
287 142
303
70
282
85
285
58
294 158
293
57
0
47
289 170
286
51
277 133
334 1,118
285 41
339
69
295 112
301 68
285 210
295 195
286
81
291 B7
301 no
311 278 299 299 312
303 ~
303 Vl. 286 I 298 282
342 283 311 289 301
3013 300 299 301 302
TABLE II-H-4 (CONTINUED)
County School Systems
White
System Male
Female
Total
Male
No. No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean
Negro
Female No. Mean
Total No. Mean
Total No. Mean
Candler Carroll
Catoosa Charlton
Chatham
21 7 22 53 23 48 24 JA 158 78
468 35 339 119 327 121 434 28 340 283
298 42 279 172 264 169 322 42 310 361
326 5 333 21 286 26 295 68 314
297 9 334 32 270 41 284 213 294
282 1 265
2 235
3 245 172 2~1
359 7 296 12 286 19 290 61 338
316 24 323 137 321 161 321 522 318
Chattahoochee 25 3
Chattooga
26 26
Cherokee
27 48
Clarke
28 24
Clay
29 4
323 5
323 86 353 128 441 181 474 14
246 8 259 112 278 176 313 205 2)4 18
275 2 313 274 5 344 299 2 290 328 20 330 303 10 307
7 304 15 273 10 302 79 318 19 284
9 306 17 291
, 20 293 132 277
12 300 188 299
99 321 304 326 29 292 47 296
,~
0-
Clayton Clinch
Cobb Coff'ee
Colquitt
30 59
31 14
32 157 33 42 34 28
370 227 348 33 383 507 361 127 387 109
227 286 251 47 313 664 288 169 257 137
296 9 347 280 4 319 329 6 383 306 13 300 283 7 280
39 300 16 282 22 325 42 280 44 305
48 309 334 298 20 289 67 283 28 329 692 329 55 285 224 301 51 296 188 287
Columbia Cook Coweta Crawford Crisp
Dade Dawson Decatur DeKalb Dodge
35 11
36 14
37 21 38 6 39 24
40 24 41 6 42 30 43 24S 44 25
415 67 403 59 380 70 473 23 387 78 387 53 382 31 413 112 ~3J3 1,024 392 78
258 78 277 73 279 91 269 29 298 102 232 77 283 37 279 142 331 1,269 292 103
280 7 300 301 5 347 302 22 324 312 9 330 319 11 334
249 1 254
299 0
0
307 18 337
328 27 391
316 10 332
42 259 26 283 55 294 21 279 53 305
49 265 127 274 31 294 104 299 77 303 168 302 30 294 59 303 64 310 166 316
2 0 82
254 0
302
3 0 100
254 0
309
80 37 242
249 299
308
92 32
327 281
119 42
342 1,388 293 145
329 309
TABLE II-H-4 (CONTINUED )
County School Systems
Dooly Dougherty Douglas Early Echols
Effingham Elbert Emanuel Evans Fannin
Fayette Floyd Forsyth Franklin Gilmer
Glascock Glynn Gordon Grady Greene
Gwinnett Habersham Hall Hancock Haralson
White
Syst8Jll Ma1e
Female
Total
Male
No. No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean
Negro Female No. Mean
.-nTotal~
No. Mean
Total No. Mean
45 16 46 49 47 20 48 15 49 7 50 17 51 27 52 29 53 12 54 42
55 9 56 59 57 27 58 23 59 24 60 4 61 51 62 28 63 24 64 11
65 88 66 39 67 62 68 5 69 21
435 44 435 289 445 83 401 59 416 13 365 50 387 98 402 90 406 34 339 101 400 39 408 198 340 71 373 79 348 64 378 16 413 292 328 74 394 87 470 43 351 190 336 108 356 182 531 27 330 47
288 60 319 338 356 103 290 74 270 20
255 67 275 125 285 119 283 46 257 143
285 48 311 257 252 98 289 102 256 88
286 20 314 253 251 102 272 111
286 54
280 278 295 147 290 244 302 32 253 68
326 16 321 51 286 67 294 127 309
336 31 334 158 298 189 304 527 325
365 8 373 18 366 26 368 129 366
313 21 312 48 287 69 294 143 304
321 1 275
5 228
6 236 26 301
283 6 358 300 24 295 314 12 331 315 7 324 281 0 0
306 3 365
333 1 250
276 0
0
308 9 318
281 0 0
34 283 45 276 43 284 20 279 1 296
22 282 15 329 00 12 279 00
40 294 107 287
69 282 194 294
55 294 174 308
'" 27 290 73 306 I
1 296 144 281 -3
I
25 292 73 301
16 324 273 332
0
0 98 276
21 296 123 306
0
0 88 281
305 2 293 334 13 373 272 0 0 298 13 323 323 15 315 303 8 319 306 3 335 306 1 298
338 14 312
277 :3 362
6 292
80 330
0
0
53 279
52 279
18 292 8 261 1 240 56 281 13 270
8 292 28 301
93 336 346 335
0
0 102 272
66 287 177 294
67 287 121 303
26 11 2
300 281 269
304 158 246
303 304 306
70 16
287 287
102 84
303 279
TABLE TI-H-4 (CONTINUED)
County
SCbool System
White
System Male
Female
Total
Male
No. No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean
Negro Female No. Mean
Total
Total
No. Mean No. Mean
Harris Hart Heard Henry Houston
Irwin Jackson Jasper Jeff Davis Jefferson
Jenkins Johnson Jones Lamar Lanier
Laurens Lee Liberty Lincoln Long
Lowndes Lumpkin Macon Madison Marion
70 13 71 27 72 12 73 24 74 62 75 19 76 16 77 7 78 17 79 16 80 7 81 12 82 7 83 5 84 8 85 28 86 9 87 13 88 7 89 11
90 29 91 13 92 8 93 16 94 6
323 35 345 71 385 33 372 59 386 174 406 46 396 71 422 20 389 67 353 68 457 38 389 37 433 35 431 22 404 26 382 76 412 23 344 44 422 26 348 20 363 76 356 46 418 43 388 64 505 23
252 48 279 98 303 45 282 83 280 236 275 65 262 87 288 27 263 84 288 84 283 45 288 49 280 42 267 27 283 34 286 104 294 32 293 57 290 33 256 31 258 105 282 59 296 51 275 80 290 29
271 14 319
297 7 327 325 6 318 308 17 267 308 14 307 313 13 310 287 6 306 323 7 328 289 4 359 300 23 313 310 13 332 313 4 379 305 6 335 297 7 340 311 5 306 312 7 405 327 8 322 305 14 285 318 8 323 289 4 378 287 8 386 298 0 0 315 13 339 298 8 300 334 6 301
45 275 23 273 12 285 50 302 61 296 25 280 17 267 25 274 15 287 63 276 33 272 20 280 33 282 34 279 11 275 59 288 32 272 52 280 23 266 12 286 41 290 00 61 290 18 296 27 287
59 285 107 279 30 285 128 294 18 295 63 316 67 293 150 301 75 298 311 306
38 291 103 .305 23 277 110 285
32 286 '59 303
19 302 103 291 86 286 170 293 ~
46 289
I
91 299
24 296 73 307
39 290 81 298
41 289 68 292
16 285 50 303
66 300 170 307 40 282 72 302 66 281 123 292 31 280 64 300 16 309 47 296
49 305 00
154 59
293 298
74 298 125 30,
26 297 106 296
33 290 62 311
TABLE II-H-4 (CONTnWED)
County School Systems
WMte
System No.
Male No. Mean
Female No. Mean
Total No. Mean
Male No. Mean
Negro Female No. Mean
Total
Total
No. Mean No. Mean
McDuffie Hclntosh Meriwether Miller Mitchell
Monroe Montgomery Morgan Murray Muscogee
Newton OConee Oglethorpe Paulding Peach
Pickens Pierce
Pike
Polk Pulaski
Putnam Quitman Rabun Randolph Ricbnond
95 14 96 6 97 20 98 11 99 13
100 8 101 8 102 10 103 29 104 153
105 29 106 13 107 9 106 31 109 12
110 17 ill 27 112 7 113 25
114 2
115 9
116 3 117 27 118 10
119 120
422 .54 394 23 411 72 435 46 460 59 430 37 489 27 433 40 350 61 415 712 368 88 404 40 341 38 327 67 404 48
411 56
352 62 420 35 387 94 511 27 433 31 371 11 361 53 431 36
L44 Sh8
287 68 265 29 280 92 297 57 294 72 318 45 294 35 280 50 251 90 330 86) 282 117 264 53 279 47 271 98 314 60 265 73 268 89 291 42 295 ll9 275 29 287 40 287 14 293 80 280 46 375 668
315 10 306 292 9 339 303 17 341 324 7 333 324 15 332
32 279 36 268 66 284 18 288 49 287
42 285 110 304 45 282 74 266 83 296 175 300 25 300 82 317 64 297 136 311
338 10 309 39 312 49 311 94 324
338 4 3.54 23 278 27 290 62 317
310 11 353 283 0 0
41 263 1 253
52
1
282 102 296 253 . 91 283
()\.
345 61 360 232 334 293 340 1,158 344 ~
303 16 297 43 265 59 274 176 293
298 5 304
9 301 14 302 67 299
291 11 270 26 290 37 284 84 288
289 3 324 12 280 15 289 113 289
332 5 330 49 289 54 293 11h 314
299 2 276 294 6 336 313 11 324 314 7 314 292 4 ,364
5 274 17 274 26 284 22 297 21 281
7 275 80 297 23 290 112 293 37 296 79 305 29 301 148 311 25 294 54 293
320 13 285 305 4 311
32 284 10 281
45 284
11+ 289
85 301 28 297
318 0
0
1 296
1 296 51 318
313
387
13 17
354 396
54 263
294 384
67 340
306 113 387 1,008
309 387
TABLE II-fI...4 (CONTINUED)
County School Systems
Rockdale Schley Screven Seminole Spalding
Stephens Stewart Sumter Talbot Taliaferro
Tattna11 Ta;y'lor Teliair Terrell Thomas
Tift Toombs Towns Treutlen Troup
Turner Twiggs Union Upson Walker
- ,- White
System Male No. No. Mean
'NOF;emGJ.Me ean
Total Noo Nean
Male Noo Mean
120 14
121 4 122 13 123 9 124 31
125 27 126 8 127 9 128 9 129 3
130 26 131 11
132 14
133 13 134 29
135 27 136 15 137 22 138 7 139 24
140 17 141 6 142 16 143 20 144 69
380 44
406 14 377 60 464 35 414 179
365 69 414 22 447 39 402 18 489 9
31~5 79 32 38 369 67 384 36 358 78
425 133 355 61 329 25 421 28 446 76
453 43 407 35 370 53 390 41 337 225
261 58 282 18 295 73 292 4!~ 298 210
285 96 273 30 275 48 286 27 258 12
280 105 281 49 286 81 289 49 269 107
280 160 274 76 253 47 302 35 289 100
276 60 259 41 268 69 264 61 242 294
290 7 350 310 2 364 310 13 319 327 9 288 316 16 354
308 1 250 311 13 335 308 8 347 325 5 353 316 6 324
296 11 308 306 6 391 305 11 301 314 13 286 293 11 31+3
304 9 365
290 9 301
289 0
0
326 5 348
327 20 307
326 8 317
281 10 314
292 0
0
305 10 281
265 7 310
Negro
Female ~ --Total~
Total
No. l1ean No. Mean No. Mean
17 289 19 283 70 291 23 286 67 300
4 21+8 39 287 54 283
44 282 14 287
32 294 31 295 31 280 63 283 54 286
44 281
15 266
0
0
12 294
35 285
20 292
36 287
0
0
29 288
18 271
24 307 82 295 21 290 39 299 83 296 156 303 32 286 76 310 83 311 293 315
5 248 101 305
52
62
299 291
82
no
303
27'8
49 290 20 298
76
302
-.3
0
32 305.
43 297 ::.48 296 37 311 86 308 42 286 123 299 76 283 125 295 65 295 172 294
53 296 213 302
24 279 100 287
0
0 47 289
17 310 52 321
55 293 IS5 315
28 299 88 317
46 293 87 287
0
0 69 292
~~ 39 286 100
25 282 319
,
\
TABLE II-H-4 (CONTINUED)
County School Systems
System Male No. No. Mean
White Female NOe Mean
Total No. Mean
Male No., Mean
Negro Female No., Mean
Total --
Total
No. Mean No. Mean
Walton Ware
. 145
146
1,. 5.,.
~;
377 $8 390 87
279 73
252 114
300 13 283 285 0 0
47 0
Warren
147 8 368 22 283 30 305 9 286 30
Washington 148 1$ 433 68 291 8.3 317 24 331 69
Wayne
149 35 376 1ll 275 146 299 9 339 26
Webster
1$0 6 288 II 257 17 268 3 325 17
Wheeler
1$1 12 366 31 269 43 296 $ 364 14
White
152 21 349 47 285 68 305 1 303
1
Whitfield 153 96 292 134 268 230 278 0
0
0
Wilcox
154 18 383 48 270 66 301 8 311 20
Wilkes
155 II 417 47 275 58 302 II 329 52
Wilkinson 156 10 450 37 302 47 333 9 352 34
Worth
157 27 343 75 270 102 290 12 335 59
Total'""~"- '---3;8~8 .~~ 4d6-n;i72~ 2961"&270 . . 317 i;.5'~(- 342" -J;'S38"
268 60 272 133 287
0
0
0 114 285
269 39 273 69 287
294 93 304 176 310
282 .35 297 181 299
272 20 280 37 274
287 19 307 62 299
265
2 284 70 304
0 270
0 28
0 282
230 94
278 I 295 -:J
1-1
280 63 288 121 295 I 267 43 284 90 310 288 71 296 173 292
311 - 7,,060-- 3'22 ~4,.330 -- -319-
@ As reported to the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia. The individual salaries reported include supplementary income from the local school system (if any) as well as income from State funds. The mean (average) salaries are
rounded oft to the nearest dollar.
Includes all public school employees of County systems affiliated with the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia
as of January, 1959.
# Fulton County has an independent teacher retirement system.
* The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia (Courtesy of Messrs. Pittman and Skipper).
TABLE II-HoaS
THE MEAN MONTHLY SALARY@ OF PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES IN 38# CITY SCHOOL SYSTEMS OF GFDRGIA AS OF JANUARY 19,9: BY RACE AND SEX*
City School 9lstems
Americus
Barnesville Bremen Buford calhoun
System No.
201 203 24$ 204 205
Males No. Mean
10 441 20 366 8 4$, 6 310 17 374
WHTIE
It'emales No. Mean
49 294
28 323
24 321
21 31
~~
--Total
No. Mean
$9 319 48 341 32 3$4 27 318 48 325
NEGRO
Males
Females Totai
No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean
-- -- -- -- 8
0 0
33--6--
31
--
28-1- 3--9--
297
4 233 1 291 11 270
5 218 9 309 14 298
TOTAL No. Mean
98
310
48
341
32
3,4
38
304
62
319
Carrollton
201 11 414 54 294 65 314
Cartersville 208 17 413 59 306 76 330
8 4
3323~
25 18
290 33 306 22
301 98 309 98
310 325
- -- -- -- -- -- cedartown
Chickamauga
209 21 403 62 311 83 337 210 6 324 19 213 2$ 285
5 383 12 322 11 340 100 25
338 265
I
Cochran
243 12 346 26 284 38 304 5 335 9 289 14 305 52
J04
~
Commerce Dalton Decatur
212 14 401 33 303 47 332
214 27 431 81 314 114 343
215 22 422 123 351 145 362
- -- 1 374 5 309 6 320 SJ 16 296 16 296 130 8 340 26 364 34 359 179
331
337 362
Dublin
217 10 429 64 314 14 330 8 303 31 295 39 291 113
)18
Fitzgerald
219 13 445 45 321 ,8 349 7 327 24 281 31 296 89
330
Gainesville Hawkinsville Hogansville Jefferson LaGrange
220 200
222 211 223
24 437 100 342 124 361
12 306 15 218 21 290
10 408 29 294 39 323 3 663 14 286 17 353 16 455 122 309 138 326
7 1
5-
14
402 407
31-9-
330
42 10
1-3-
49
316 49 301 11
28-8- 1-8-
306 63
329 173
31l 38
29-7-
57 17
311 201
352 296
31S 353 322
Marietta Monroe Moultrie
Newnan
Pelham
22, 226 227 228
229
27 43, 144 336 111 352
9 401 43 272 52 294 40 313 98 298 138 320 20 433 68 ,325 88 350 13 383 30 292 43 320
1--3
12 4 6
35-6-
330 354 343
2-4-
19
24
22
--314 3-7-
286 31 289 28 296 28
--329 2~ $2 303 169 298 116
306 n
.348
29k 317 337
314
TABLE II-H-5 (CONTINUED)
ciG'
School
Systems
WHii'E
NEGRO
System
Males
Females
fiili1
MaIes Females Total
TOTAL
No. No. Mean No. Mean No. Meana No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean
QRomudi;r
-- -- 230 7 449 25 301 32 333
221 4 518
4 518
Tallapoosa
2)2 6 338 11 213 23 290
Tallulah Falls 231 6 295 10 256 16 271
---7--- 30.--.7--..
---2---0
2---8---6 ---2--7-
----291 59
4
--
23 16
314 518 290
271
Thomaston
233 27 414 81 324 108 346 6 316 20 265 26 277 134
279
Thomasville Toccoa Trion
234 17
236 IS
237 8
432 391 455
78 291 43 302 30 332
95 321 58 325 38 358
11
--6
325
29-5-
41
16
2
303 58 288 22 330 2
307 153 294 80 330 40
316 317 356
Valdosta
241 25 416 121 290 152 311 15 343 81 288 96 297 248
305
Vidalia
246 5 470 37 286 42 308 8 300 15 288 2) 292 65
302
Waycross
238 29 386 llh 298 143 316 16 288 65 297 81 295 224
308
1.vest Point
239 6 424 18 291 24 324 7 298 19 264 26 273 50
298
Winder
240 12 410 35 295 47 324 9 308 15 283 24 298 71
314
~ w
!R:iM
55'1 ; = W: ! :?,QQl .}1Q 2228 m 2J.p. 326 716 297 9~6 304 3484
324
As reported to the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia. The individual salaries reported include supplementary income from the local school system (if any) as well as income from State funds. The mean (average) salaries are rounded off to the nearest dollar.
#Atlanta has an independent teacher retirement system. Rome has only t&ken representation in the State Teacher Retirement S,ystem.
Inc1udes all public school employees in independent school systems affiliated with the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia as of Janua.r.Y'J 1959.
*The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the Teacher Retirement Systems of Georgia. (Courtesy of Messrs. Pittman and Skipper).
TABLE II-H-6
THE MEAN MONTHLY SALAR,Y@ OF PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES# IN THE TEACHER REl'IREMENT SYSTEM OF GEORGIA, ACCORDING TO AGE AS OF JUNE 30, 1957: BY SEX.*
Age Groups
-
Above 70 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29
20~24
Under 20 Total
No. 25 120 253 400 629 758 950 1277 1724 1346 412
1 7895
JMales Mean Mon'th!y Salary: $326 371 417 483 455 433 431 399 349 292 245 196 $378
Females
Mean MonthlY
No.
Salarr
177
$251
610
276
1012
278
1623
280
2703
278
3620
274
3058
270
2745
266
2593
257
3493
240
2258
223
59 23951
193 $262
No. 202 730
1265 2023 3332 4378 4008 4022 4317 4839 2670
60 31846
TotaJ. Plean Monthiy SalarY
$261
292
306
320
312
.302
I
~
308
308
294
255
244
-193
$291
@As reported to the Teacher Retirement System Of Georgia. The individual salaries reported include supplementary income from the local school system (if any) as well as income from State funds. The mean (average) salaries are rounded off to the nearest dollar.
#Includes all public school employees affiliated with the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia as of June, 1251.
*The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia (Courtesy of Messrs. Pittman and Skipper).
TABLE II-H-?
THE MEAN HONTHLY SALARY@ OF PUBLIC SCHOOL EHPLOYEES11 IN THE TEACHER RETIREHENT SYSTEM OF GEORGIA. ACCORDING TO YEARS OF SERVICE AS OF JUNE 30, 1957: BY SEX~~.
Years of Service
Above 50 Yrs. 45-49 Years 40-44 Years 35-39 Years 30-34 Years 25-29 Years 20-24 Years 15-19 Years 10-14 Years 5-9 Years 0-4 Years
Total
Males
Mean l10nthly
No.
Salary
'1
~~263
11
342
43
368
98
559
224
479
333
449
416
469
446
454
574
447
2268
383
3481
324
7895
:;)378
No.
"$;?9
117 276 640 1188 1568 1835 1413 2103 5286 9496 23951
Females l1ean Monthly Salary
~~28!
294 286 290 296 286 284 289 279 267 235
~:i262
No.
~"30
128 319 738 1412 1901 2251 1859 2677 7554 12977 31846
Total Mean Honthly Sala!'y
$281
298
297
326
325
-.J
\il
314
318
329
315
302
25~
r->291
@As reported to the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia. The individual salaries reported include supplementary in-
come from the local school system (if a~) as well as income from State funds. The mean (average) salaries are rounded off to the nearest dollar.
*# Includes all public school employees affiliated with the Teacher Retirement System of Georgia as of June 30, 1957. The basic raw data on which the present calculations are based were made available from official records of t he Tea-
cher Retirement System of Georgia (Courtesy of Messrs. Pittman and Skipper).
TABLE III...A-l THE NUMBER Of GHiDUATES OF EIGHTEEN vJHI'i'E COLLEGES IN GEORGIA P:REPARcJ) FOR T.::.ACHING ?OSITIONS DURING THE DECADE
1949-58: BY LEVEL OF PROSPECTIVE C;RTIFICATI')N~}.
Name of College
No. of Yearsi1//
Elementary
High School
Total No. Per Cent
Covered in Total Yearly Per Cent Total YearlY Per Cent at Both of
Present Report Number Average of Total Number Average of Total Levals Grand Total
Agnes Scott
Berry
Drenau
Emory G. S.
C.
w.
Ga. State C. of Bus. Ad.
G. T. C. LaGrange Mercer North Georgia
10
148 14.8
3.0 116 11.6
2.0
26Li
10 5 10
126 12.6
28
5.6
77
7.7
2.5 .6
-Lr73
-47.3
1.5 193 19.3
-8.1
599 28
3.3
270
10
1021 102.1
20~4
882
b8.2
15.2 1903
1
3
3.0
.1
3
3.0
.1
6
10
1056 105.6
21.1 1355 135.5
23.3 2411
9
47
5.2
.9
89
9.9
1.5
136
10 6
278 27.8
42
7.0
- - 5.6 246 24.6
.8
-h.2
524 h2
2.4
5.5 .3 2.5 17.6
.1
22.3 1.3
4.8
-.J 0-
.4
Oglethorpe Piedmont Shorter Tift U. of Ga.
4
1)~9
37.3
3.0
20
5.0
.3
169
1.6
8
317 39.6
6.3 106 13.3
1.8
423
3.9
lO
28
2.8
.6
78
7.8
1.3
106
1.0
).:)
9h
9.4
1.9 160 16.0
2.8
254
2.3
10
1067 106.7
21.3 2012 201.2
34.6 3079
28.5
Valdosta Wesleyan Hest Georgia
Total
4
108 27.0
2.2
11
4.3
.3
125
5 10
47
9.4
368 36.8
.9 6.4
- 6-6
13.2
-1.1
113 368
-
5004 500~4 100.0 5816 581.6 100.0 10820
1.2 1.0 3.4
100.0
* The present calculations are based on original dpta submitted by the individual colleges to the Division of Certi-
fication, Georgia State Department of Education, (Courtesy of Mr. J. J. Medlin).
I
# Only 10 of the 18 colleges submitted a report for each of the years 1949 through 1953.
TABJ.J:; III>A~2
THE NUMBER. OF GRADUATES OF EIGHT NEGRO COLLEGES IN G~D:lGIA PREPARED FOR TEll-CEING
POSITIONS DURING THT:: DECADE 1949-1958: BY LEVEL OF ?ROSPECTIVE CERTIFIC.ATION-:l-.
Name of College Albany State Clark Fort Valley State Morehouse Morris BrOlvn Paine Savannah State Spelman
Total
No. of Years/I
Elementary
High 3chool
Covered in
Total Yearly Per Cent Total Yearly Per Cent
Present Report Number Average of Total Number Average of 'fatal
10
1320 132.0
35.6 100 10.0
2.9
10
243 2Lr.3
6.6 563 56.3
16.5
10
816 81.6
22.0
8t~6
84.6
24.8
8
-- --
--
429 53.6
12.6
9
192 21.3
5.2 289 32.1
8.5
10
104 10.4
2.8 230 23.0
6.8
10
857 85.7
23.2 807 80.7
23.7
7
-----_.....
--
169 24.1
4.6 141 20.1
4.2
3701
100.0 3h05
100.0
Total No. Per Cent
at Both
of
Levels Grand Total
1420
20.0
806
11.3
1662
23.4
429
6.0
481 334 1664
6.8
--J
4.7
-.J
I
23.4
310
4.4
7106
100.0
* The present calculations are based on original data submitted by the individual colleges to the Division of
Certification, Georgia Department of Certification (Courtesy of Mr. J. J. Medlin).
# Only 5 of the 8 colleges submitted a report for each of the years 1949 through 19580
- 78 -
TABLE III-A-3
THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS OF BOTH RACES TRAINED IN GEORGIA COLLEGES DURING THE DECADE 1949-1958, ACCORDING TO TEACHING FIELD: BY SEX*
Prospective Teaching Field
Hale
No.
%
Female
No.
%
Total
No.
%
%of
Grand Total(
Elementary
General~
490
Special Ed.
3
TotaJ#
493
Secondary
Agriculture
514
Commerce
263
Ehg1ish
242
For. Languages 20
Home Econ.
4
Industrial Arts 385
Math
192
Gen. Science 274
Biology
109
Chemistry
36
Physics
7
Social Studies 935
Distrib. Ed.
20
Others (Misc.) Tota1#
53 3,054
Combined$
Art
15
Library Sci.
1
Music
123
Phys. Ed.
577
TotaJ#
716
Grand TotaJ# 4,263
99.4 7,514
.6
25
100.0 7,539
16.8 8.6
7.9 .7 .1
12.6 6.3 9.0
3.6 1.2
.2 30.6
.7 1.7 100.0
99 639 802 123 1,293
252 159 93
27 18 859 21 41 4,426
2.1
91
.1
42
17.2 243
80.6 225
100.0 601
25.3@ 12,566
99.7 8,004
.3
28
100.0 8,032
2.2 14.4 18.1
2.9 29.2
5.7 3.6 2.1
.6 .4 19.4 .5 .9 100.0
613 902 1,044
143 1,297
385
444
433 202
63 25 1,794 41
94 7,480
15.2 7.0 40.4
37.4 100.0
106 43 366 802 1,317
74.7@ 16,829
99.6 .4
100.0
8.2 12.1 14.0 1.9 17.4 5.1 5..9
5.8 2.7
.8 .3 24.0
.5
1.3 100.0
8.0 3.3 27.8 60.9 100.0
lOO.O@
47.6 .2
47.8
3.6 5.4 6.2
.8 7.7 2.3 2.6 2.6 1.2
.4
.1 10.7
.2 .6 44.4
.6 .3 2.1 4.8 7.8
100.0@
* The present calculations are based on original data submitted by the individual colleges to the Division of Certification, Georgia Department of Education (Courtesy of Mr. J. J. Medlin). The present table disregards the race of the trainee.
@The percentages shown in the last column are based on the Grand Total of all sub-groups.
A distinction is made between elementary teachers having "regular" duties and those with duties in IIspecial education" (i.e., retarded, physica~ handicapped, etc.).
# Due to failures by certain institutions to make reports for certain years, the
totals shown probably "underestimate" the actual numbers by about 10%.
$ Persons in these fields sometimes function at the elementary level, sometimes at the secondary level and occasionally at both levels.
- 79 TABLE 1II-.\-4 THE NUMBER OF PROSPECTIVE WHITE TEACHeRS TRAINED IN GEORGIA COLLEGES DURING THE DECADE 1949-l958~ ACCOnnn\lG TO TEACHING FIELD: BY SEX*
Prospective Teaching Field
Male
No.
%
Female
NOe
~
Total
No.
%
%01" GraM Total@
ElementarJ
General 190
Specia~ Ed.
2
Total
192
Secondary
Agriculture
355
Commerce
146
English
174
For. Languages 16
Home Econ.
0
Indstr1. Arts 291
Math
82
Gen. Science 161
Biology
16
Chemistry
8
Physics
6
Social Studies 523
Distrib. Ed.
20
others# (Misc.) 24
Total
11 822
Combined$
Art
14
Library Sci.
1
Music
73
PhYSld.
488
Total
576
Grand Tota1#
2~590
99.0 1.0 100.0
4~198
23
4~221
19.5 8.0
9.5 .9 0 16.0
4.5 8.8
.9 .4 .3 28.8 1.1
1.3 100.0
59 350 556
74 934
0
131 86
44 13 16
404 21
38 2,726
2.4
81
.2
41
12.7 170
84.7 197
100.0 489
25.8@ 7,436
99.5
.5 100.0
41 388
25
4~413
99.4 .6
100.0
2.2 12.8 20.4
2.7 34.2 0
4.8 3.2 1.6
.5
.6
14.8 .8
1.4 100.0
414
496
730 90
934 291 213
247 60 21 22
927 41 62
4,548
9.1 10.9 16.1
2.0 20.4
6.4
4.7
5.4 1.3
.5 .5 20.4
.9 1.4 100.0
16.6
95
8.4
42
34.7 243 40.3 685
100.0 1,065
74.2@ 10~026@
8.9
3.9 22.8
64.4 100.0
43.8 .2
44.0
4.1 5.0
7~3
.9 9.3 2.9 2.1 2.5
.6 .2 .2 9.3 .4
.6
45.4
1.0 .4
2.4 6.8 10.6
tOO.o@
* The present calculations are based on original data submitted by the
individual colleges to the Division of Certification, Georgia State Department of Education (Courtesy of Mr. J. J. Medlin).
@ The percentages Shown in the last column are based on the Grand Total 01" all sub-groups.
A distinction is made between elementary teachers having ttregular" duties and those with duties in "special education" (i.e., retarded" p-hysically handioappedl etc.).
IJ Due to failU1'es .by.eertam inStoitutions to make iFeporte orce1"tJe1n i1~$~
the totals shown probably "underestimate" the actual numbers by about 10%.
$ Persons in these fields somet:imes function at the elementary level" sometimes
at the secondary level and occasionally at both levels.
- 80 ...
TABLE III..A.-5
THE NUl-18ER OF PROSPECTIVE NEGRO TEACHERS '!RAINED IN GEORGIA COLLEGES DURING THE DECADE 1949-1958, ACCORDING TO TEACHING FIELD: BY SEX*
E1ementar~
Generaf9= Special Ed.
TotaJil
Male
No.
%
300
1 301
Secondary
Agriculture
159 12.9
Cormnerce English
117
9.5
68 5.5
For. Languages 4
.3
Home Econ.
4
.3
Indstrl. Arts
94
7.6
Math
110
8.9
Gen. Science ill
9.2
Biology
93
7.6
Chemistry
28
2.3
Physics
1
.1
- Social Studies 412
Distrib. Ed.
-33.4
Others (Misc.) 29
TotaJ#
1,232
Combined$
Art Library Sci. Music
-1
50
-
Phys. Ed.
89
Tota1#
140
Grand Tota1# 1,673
Female
Nco
~
Total
3,616
3
3,,619
40
2.4 199
6.8
289 17.0 406 13.8
246 14.5 314 10.7
-49
359
121
2.9
-21.1
7.1
53
363
94
231
1.8
12.4 3.2 7.9
73 4.3 186 6.3
49
2.9 142
4.9
14
.8
42
1.4
2
.1
3
.1
- - - - 455 26.7 867 29.6
3
.2
32
1,700 100.0 2,,932
10
8.9
11
1
.9
1
73 658 2 123
28 25.0 117
112 100.0 252
75.4@ 6,803@ 100.0
%of
Grand Total@
-
-
1.8 1.7 3.7 100.0@
* The present calculations are based on original data submitted by the
individual colleges to the Division of Certification, Georgia State Department of Education (Courtesy of Mr. J. J. Medlin).
@ The percentages shown in the last column are based on the Grand Total of all sub-groups.
A distinction is made between elementary teachers having nregularlt duties and those with duties in "special education" (i.e., retarded, physically handicapped, etc.).
# Due to failures by certain institutions to make reports for certain
years the totals shown probably "tmderestimate" the actual numbers by
about 10%.
$ Persons in these fields sometimes function at the elementary level, sometimes at the secondary le'ITe1 and occasionally a't bn'th levp-l~_
-81.-
TABLE III-A-6
PROJECTED ESTD1ATE OF THE NUMBER OF TEACHERS TO BE i,RAlNED
m GEORGIA COLLEGES FOR THE YEARS 1960 AND 1965
June & August" June & Augu$t, .126.!.. June & August, 196$
Institution
1959
Estimated% change Estimated %change
No. Graduate No. Grad. from 1959 No. Grad. from 1959
White
#1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
U
12 13
]1
15
total White
Negro
#1 2 3 4 5
Total Negro
Grand Total
280 28 35 29 143 50 6 26 59 75 40 31 50 46 290
1,188
123 140 80 10 75 428
1,,616
300 18 35 30 140 45 40 40 74 100 60 40 65 50 300 1,337
120 150 65
15
80 430 1,,767
7.1 -35.7
0.0
- 3.4 2.1 - 10.0 566.7
53.8 25.4 33.3 50.0 29.0 30.0 8.7 3.4
12.5
300 9 40
40 )30 65 125
140
-150
45 120 65 350
1,579@
- 2.4 7.1 - 18.8
50.0 6.7
0.5
9.3
130 175 80
0 90 475 2,054
7.1 -60.7 14.3 37.9 9.1 30.0
-1,983.3 137.3 -100.0 45.2 140.0 4~3 20.7
40.l '
5~7
25.0
O~O
-100.0 20.0
11.0
32.rJI#
* The data presented in this table are based upon returns of a questionnaire sent to aU Georgia 'OoUeges having a program of teacher education.
@
Two institutions did not make an estimate for 1965. This figure represents 13 institutions. II For those thirteen institutions which gave estimates for 1965. fp Fer eighteen institutions which gave estimates for 1965.
!HI Z'~ .i.ghteen institutions which gave estimates for 1965.
TABLE Ill-B-l
CURRICULUM PATTERNS FOR TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS IN GEORGL\ WHITE COLLEGES:* EXPRESSED IN QUARTER HOURS
Col- Gen. leges Ed.
1. 75105
2. 85 3. 63 4. 755. 1,5055-
95 6. #62-
82 7. 75 8. 75-
87 9. 80 10. 95 11. 120 12. 95 13. 93
14. 75
15. 65n5
16. 80 17. 97
-18. 100
Pro. Ed.
30 36 35 30 30 35 40 32 35 35 39 35 30 35 3540 40 32 40
Elem.
30 30 32 30 30 45 45 30 30 45 30 40 36 30 40 34 40 40
Secondary - Academic
Eng. For. Math Sci. Soc.
Lang.
St.
45
58 67 45
50
-72
50
- 75
45 57
.. 75 - 75
55 58 67 55
- 55
45 70 65
50 40
30 ..
45 45
50 70 50 35 60 45 45 54 45
40.. 30
- 36
- 30
- 32 36
60 30 40 40
30 ..
-36 36..
- - 45.. 70.. 50 64 24 35 55 40
..30 42 32 65 60 40 L~o 40 35 70 25
- - - 36 40 45
Secondary - Vocational
Ag. Bus. Dist. Home Ind.
Ed. Ed. Ec. Arts
- - - .. ..
..-..
64.. -
.. 98
.. 70
--
..
57
..
-57..
- ..
.. 65
.-.
-.. -70
....
-8-.-0.
750-8-.--.
....
.....-....
60
- -85 70
.--.-..
50 82
-..-.. --
45
-.-. ...... ...... ..-.. ......
Special@
Art Mus. Phy. --Speech
Ed. Cor.
.. .. .. -
- - ..
..
..
85
58-..
.. #m ..
-.-.
-
- # 98 70
- .... 80 65 82
- ---- .---. .--...
- -40 90 ..
.- co
. f\)
.-........
88 91 77
65
- - .. .. ..
63.. 90- 40.. ..
*The data presented in this table were made available from the official records of the Georgia State Department of
Education (courtesy Mary Ellen Perkins, Coordinator of Teacher Education).
@Special fields such as art, music, etc. are taught at both the elementary and secondary levels, and students completing
programs in these fields are certified for both levels of teaching in these subjects.
# In highly specialized fields such as music, more courses are required in the special field and fewer courses in general
education. This is due j~' ;,'T'~ to the dema:--1C'::! of the speci?l field and in part to the fact that music courses are not
often required as a matics are inclu.ded
part in g
:.;i 68;:~8::'al educat';'oH:- whereas academic eneral education and as teachinO' fields
~
s
u
bj
e
c
ts
such as English"
social
studies ,
and mathe-
TABLE III-B-2
* CURRICULUM PATTERNS FOR TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRJ~IS IN GEORGIA NEGRO CJLLEGES: EXPRESSED IN QUARTER HOURS
Secondary - Academic
Secondary - Vocational
Special@
Colleges
Gen. Ed.
Pro. Ed.
Elem.
Eng. For. Math Sci. Soc.
Lang.
St.
Ag. Bus. Home Ind. Ed. Ec. Arts
Art Mus. PfiY.
'Edo
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
8.
105 35 30
98 32 30
100 35 35
105 32 36
95
36
30
104 32 32
106 36 40
94
32
30
-
45 54 45 45 60 30 36
--
40
..
40
55
40 54
--30 40 36 45 40 36
60 60 68 55 54 60 68 45
-
45 50 36 36 63 35 33
- ....
70 80
81
- - - - - - - ....90 74 84 81
- - - 70 80
-.------.
-.. 80 60
-- -- --
83--
54 66
-70
75
--72
co
U)
-65
--
*The data presented in this table were made available from the official records of the Georgia State Department of
Education (courtesy Mary Ellen PerkinsI Coordinator of Teacher Education).
@ Special fields such as art" music" etc. are taught at both the elementary and secondary levels and students completing programs in these fields are certified for both levels of teaching in these subjects.
TABLE m-a-3
SUMMAR!' OF PRCFESSIONAL COURSE CREDIT REQtJIR1iJ.mm'S IN TEAQiER
EDUCATION PROGRAMS OF l.l4 DlSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.*'
(1)
Type of Institution
Teachers College, Public
Liberal Arts College, Public
Liberal Arts College, Private
University, Public University, Private
(2)
(3)
Profess. Credits
Number of
as %of
Institutions Total Credits
(4)
Range of
Column 3
(5)
.RaI1ge of Middle 60%
of Column 3
(6)
Practice Teaching
as %of Total Profess. Credits
(7)
Range of
Column 6
17
20
JS - 32
18 - 20
.34
17 - 48
U
16
13 - 26
16 - 20
29
12 - 47
12
19
13 - 25
17 - 23
26
20 - 35
29
18
14 - 27
16 - 20
29
17 - 45 .(rX::-l
11
21
14 - 33
19 - 23
24
17 - 35
Subtotal
110
19
13 - 33
16 - 21
29
12 - 48
Five-Year Programs
Public
1
17
24
Public
1
20
38
Private
1
15
23
Private
1
17
25
- ---- - - - - *'Source: Morris L. Cogan, "Professional Requirements in Programs for the Preparation of High School Teachers,"
.J...o...u~r-na-l of Teach...e...r. Education, LX: No.3 (September, 1958), p. 273
TABLE III-B-4
:2
No. of
Colleges Reporting
NUMBER OF QUARTER HOURS REQUIRED AND ACTUALLY TA~N IN PROFESSIONAL COURSES IN GEORGIA COLLEGES AS REPORTED BY 'l'JENTY INSTITUTIONS WITH TEACHER EDUCATION PROORAMS*
Programs
of Study
Range in No. of Quarter
Hours Required in
Professional Courses
Low
High
Mean
Range in No. of Quarter
Hours Taken in
Professional Courses
Low
High.
Mean
2
Agriculture
38
40
39.0
38
40
39.0
2
Public School Art
35
35
35.0
35
35
35.0
17
E1em. School
16
Sec. School
26
45
35.7
20
40
32.5
26
50
37.6
20
40
32.5
5
Home Economics
30
6
Public School Music
30
1
Exceptional Child
35
40
34.0
54
37.7
35
35.0
30
40
34.0
30
54
37.7
co
\J1
35
35
I
35.0
4
Health &. Phy. Ed.
30
40
35.3
30
40
35.3
3
Industrial Arts
35
40
37.0
35
40
37.0
2
Teacher - Librarian
35
40
37.5
35
40
37.5
6
Business Education
30
40
33.5
30
40
33.5
1
Distributive Ed.
40
40
40.0
40
40
40.0
2
Trade & Industrial Ed. 36
40
38.0
36
40
38.0
1
Jr. High School
40
40
40.0
I
40
40
40.0
'* The data presented in this table are based upon returns of a questionnaire sent to all Georgia Colleges
haVing a program of teacher education.
TABLE III-13-5
THE QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FULL TM FACULTY MEMBER ENGAGED IN TEACHER TRAINING IN 'lWENTY INSTITUTIONS WITH TEACHER EDUCAIION
PROGRAMS BASED ON HIGHEST DEGREE HELD: BY RACE AND SEX.
Doctors Degree
No.
%
Masters De~ee
No.
%
Bachelors De'lee No.
Total
No.
%
White
Male
77
57.5
56
41.8
1
0.7
134
100.0
Female
19
26.4
49
68.1
4
5.6
72
100.0
Total
96
46.6
105
51.0
5
2.4
206
100.0
,
Negro
Male
J2
28.6
28
66.7
2
4.8
Female
2
12.5
13
81.3
1
6.3
Total
14
24.1
41
70.7
3
5.2
CD
42
100.0
16
100.0
0-
58
100.0
Total
Male
89
50.6
84
42.7
3
1.7
176
100.0
Female
21
23.9
62
70.5
5
5.7
88
100.0
Total
110
41.7
146
55.3
8
3.0
264
100.0
* The data presented in this table are based upon returns of a questionnaire sent to all Georgia oolleges having a progNm of teacher education.
-87-
TABLE III-o.l
* THE INCIDENCE OF SELF-REPORTED RECRUTIHENT PRACTICES oF TWENTY GEORGIA COLLEGES WITH TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS
Recruitment Practices:
~te con1es No.
College Day Programs in High School
13
86.7
College Sponsored Visits 10 of High School Students to Campus
66.7
Planned Personal Contacts and Visits
9
60.0
Distribution of
13
86.7
Brochures, Catalogs, etc.
No Response
1
6.7
Total No. of
15
Institutions
Recruitment Practices in Teacher Education vSe,Recruitment Practicesin Other Departments.
No Different for Teacher 1h
93.3
Education Students and
Other Students
Different for Teacher
1
BduettArm; :S'hU~S'-'and other Students
No Response
--
Total
15
6.7
--
lOO.O
NeFo Collerl! No ..
5
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
0 -5 --
5
100.0
-- --
-- .-
5 'moo.o
Total COlleteS No.
18
90.0
15
75.0
70.0
18
90.0
1 20
_.5.0
19
95.0
1
5.0
--
20
100.0
4 The data presented in this table are based upon returns of a questionnaire sent to all Georgia Colleges having a program of teacher education.
# The d::l'ferences specified were more active recruitment of student leaders,
and, in one case, aid from the State Department of Education.
-88TABLE 1I1-C-2 THE INCIDENCE OF SELF-REPORTED ADMISSION POLICIES OF TWENTY GmRGIA COLLEGES WITH TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS*
Criteria for Admission Aptitude Tests
r : : ! White Colle~es Negro ColleteS Total Colleges
No.
No. :
0 :: : no.
10 66.7
3
60.0
13 65.0
Achievement Tests
8 53.3
2 40.0 10 50.0
College Marks Earned in Freshman
and Sophomore Courses
13 86.7
4
80.0
17 85.0
Personal Interviews
11 73.3
3 60.0 14 70.0
High School Record
9 60.0
2
40.0
11 55.0
Recommendations of Principal and/or Counselor
7 46.7
No Response
Total
15
1
20.0
-
5
8 40.0 20
Entrance Requ1rements in Teacher Education vs. Entrance Requirements in Oilier Departments
No Different for Teacher
Education Students and Other
students
9 60.0
4
60.0
13 65.0
Different for Teacher Education Stu,nts and Other Student
No response
Total
6 40.0 15 100.0
1
20.0
5 100.0
1 35.0
-
20 100.0
*The data presented in this table are based upon returns of a questionnaire sent to all Georgia Colleges hav:ing a program of teacher education,
'The differences specified in all seven cases indicated comparatively higher
standards for teacher education admission. For example, specific grades earned
in freshman and sophomore courses (c, C+ or better), junior standing,
personal interview, special requirements in spoken and written English, etc.
TABLE IV-A-l THE PLACE OF RESIDENCE* OF 1958 BACC'ALAUREATE GRADUATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA.
School or College
City of Atlanta@ Atlanta Met. Area
lever 100,000
Georgia Cities 25j~ 5,,000100&000 25,000
Less than 5,000
Total Georgia Resident
Out-
ofState
Foreign
No Tota1#
Info.
Arts and Sciences 1.3.3
7.2
(N 263)
Education (N. 282)
9.2
7.4
Journalism
= (N 61)
18..0
3.3
Business Admin. 9.6
.3.6
(N 280)
Home Economics
6.8
3.4
(N : 59)
Agriculture (N :; 148)
0..7
2.0
Pharmacy (N :; 69)
2.9
1.4
= Forestry (N :57)
7.0
3.5
8.7
18.6
12.5
'BS~6
86.1 12.7
4.3
16.7 17.0 .35.8
90.4 8.9
4.9
14.7 18..1 24.6
83.6 14.8
4.3
21.4 14.6 33,.9
81.4 12.2
1.7
15.3 22.0 45.8
9S.0 S.o
0.7
2.7 13.5 32.1
71.7 24.9
1.4
11..6 14.5 57.9
89,.7 8.9
.3.3
5.3 19.3 38.5
79.0 21.0
0.4 0.8 100.0
-- 0.7
100.0
-- 1.6
100.0
0.4
--
100.0
co
'0
-- --
100.0
-- 3.4
100.0
-- 1.4
100.0
-- -- 100.0
.In' (students
9.0
4.9
4.6
15.5 15.3 .36.5
85.8 13.1
0.9 0.2 100.0
* The place of residence is determined at the time of first entrance at the University of Georgia.
@ Fulton, DeKalb, Cobb Counties (other than City of Atlanta)
# All numerical entries shown in this table are expressed as a per cent rounded off to one decimal place.
of the per cents in each row is adjusted statistically to equal 100 per cent.
The sum.
TABLE IV-A-2
PERCENTAGES OF THE 1956 BACHELORS GRADUATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEDRGIA BY CATEGORIES OF FATHER OCCUPATIONS AND SCHOOL OF REGISTRATION*
School or College
Occupafi6n Categor:i:ffB$-
12
j 456
7 8 9 10 IT
12
Total
Arts and Sciences
4.6 3.1 8.4 13.0 16.4 4.2 6.9 1.9 10.3 6.1 3.4 21.7 100.0
Education
5.3 2.8 8.9 16.0 6.4 5.3 11.0 3.5 4.6 20.9 3.2 12.1 100.0
Journalism
9.7 3.2 6.4 16.3 12.9 6.4 3.2 9.7 6.4 11.3 1.6 12.9 100.0
Business Administration 6.4 1.4 4.3 21.0 ll.l 4.3 1.9 2.9 7.5 11.1 1.4 20.1 100.0
Home Economics Agriculture Pharmacy Forestry
- 5.1 3.4 6.8 13.6 8S 3.4 20.2 8S 6.8 5.1
18.6 100.0
- 2.7 2.0 4.1 4.7 2.1
36.4 8.8 4.1 8.8 1.4 24.3
100.0
I '0
0
lS IS 10.1 10.1 7.2 IS 11.6 5.8 2.9 14.5 5.8 21S 100.0
I
- - 3.5
1.8 5.3 lOS
26.2 8.8 5.3 8.8 1.8 28.0 100.0
All students
5.0 2.3 6.6 14.2 9.8 3.1 13.3 4.6 6.6 ll.8 2.4 19.7 100.0
*Occupation of father at time of entrance of student to the University.
$1 - Medical doctor" dentist" minister" lawyer.
7 - Farmer
2 - Teacher or educational vocation.
8 - Poultryman, lumberman, county agent,
3 - Military, engineer, pharmacist, other professional
other agricultural vocation.
4 - Owns own business (merchant, contractor, service station, etc). 9 - Sales (insurance, etc.).
5 - Clerical, other white collar.
10 - Deceased.
6 - Managerial, etc., in "big business."
11 - Retired.
12 - Laborer, transportation employeeJ all
other.
TABLE IV...A-3
NUMBER OF YEARS BETVJEEN HIGH SCHOOL AND BA.CCAIJl.UREATE GRADUATIONS FOR THE
1958 BACHELORS GRADUATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
School or College
Arts and Sciences Education Journalism Business Administration Home Economics Agriculture Pharmacy Forestry
All Students
Males
Mean
S.D.
Range
N
Females
Mean
S.D.
Range
N
5.6
2.2
9.6
1.B
6.3
2.5
6.2
3.0
--
6.8
3.3
6.7
3.6
6.3
2.4
3-12
114 4.5
1.6
4-43
102
B.l
9.5
4-14
29 4.4
1.5
2-26
249 4.1
1.0
-
- 4.1
3.5
3-26
l44 5.0
1.4
424
60 9.8
5.7
4-13
- 56
-
3-14
81
3-46 118
3-11
33 ,
3- 6
28
ts
I
4-24
57
4- 6
2
4-17
5
-
"'"
6.6
4.0
2-43
alb 6.2
6.9
3-46
390
TABLE IV..A-4
HIGH SCHOOL AVERAGES OF THE 1958 BACHELORS GRADUATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
School or College
Male
Mean
S.D.
N
Mean
Arts and Sciences Education Journalism Business Administration Home Economics Agriculture Pharmacy Forestry
86.2
6.7
90
87.7
80.0
7.3
31
87.9
79.5
6.8
17
88.6
81.7
7.1
U8
87.4
..
--
90.1
84.0
6.1
39
..
83.4
6.8
27
85.5
82.7
5.9
16
..
All Students
83.1
7.1
338*
88.1
* High School averages were not available for all of the 1958 Bachelor Graduates.
Female S.D.
6.0 5.2 6.1 6.3 5.1
..
2.9
..
5.6
N
57 68
17
16
21
'is
.. I
4
..
183*
TABLE IV-A-5
THE NUMBER OF CARNEGIE UNITS EARNED IN HIGH SCHOOL BY THE 1958 BACCALAUREATE GRADUATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: BY SELECTED SUBJECT FIELDS AND TOTAL
School or College
Male
For.
Total
Sci. Math Lang. Voc. Units
Female For. N Sci. Math Lang. Voc.
Arts and Sciences
2.7 3.2 1.7 1.1 16.7 170 2.0 2.9 2.6 1.5
Education
2.5 2.8 0.8 1.3 16.5 90 1.9 2.7 2.0 2.2
Journalism
2.4 2.8 1.4 0.8 16,3 27 1.8 2,8 2.6 1.6
Business Administration 2.4 3.1 1.0 1.3 16.5 235 1.9 2.6 1,8 2.2
Home Ec anomies
- - - - - - 2.1 2.5 1.1 3.3
Agriculture
2.3 2.8 0.5 2.7 16.9 117 2.5 3.5 2.0 1.0
Pharmacy Forestry
2.8 3.0 0.7 1.8 16.5 58 1.4 3.0 2.2 2.6
2.3
2.8 0.5 2.1 16.5 52
-
-
-
-
All Students
2.5 3.0 1.0 1,6 16.6 749 1.9 2.7 2.0 2.2
Total Units N
17.0 87
, 17.1 169
, 16.9 32 ~
16.9 28
17.1 57
17.0 2
16.2 5
- ..
17.0 380
TABLE IV-A-6
AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION PSYCHOLOGICAL EJWUNATION SCORES* ACHIEVED BY THE 1958
BACHELORS GRADUATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
School or College
Male
"va-
"QII
liT"
Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. N
Female
"V"
UQIl
'IT"
Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean Sen. N
Arts and Sciences
61.5 16.3 45.2 9.6 109.4 20.9 74 63.1 18.7 40.5 9.1 106.6 21.9 33
Education Journalism
51.S 13.8 38.6 11.4 90.1 22.5 23 58.3 12.4 38.6 9.2 96.8 18.8 58
62.1 10.3 39.1 9.8 101.2 14.4 10 62.4 12.5 39.9 5.3 102.3 13.7 12
,
Business Administration 57.8 14.6 40.4 9.4 98.1 20.9 86
Home Economics
- - .. - - .' .'
Agriculture
$6.5 15.2 40.0 9.0 95.9 Se.a 27
Pharmacy
Sl.7 17.6 38.6 11.4 95.3 24.7 20
Forestry
57.6 11.7 40.2 5.7 97.8 12.2 17
58.3 16.0 38.9 10.2 97.2 24.2 13
56.6 1S.9 37.3 9.7 93.9 22.9 16
..
- - - 34.0
- - ..
..
31.0
.. ..
..-
65.0
..
-
1
~
;
All Students
57.8 1S.3 41.3 9.9 100.1 15.3 257 59.5 15.1 39.0 9.0 99.2 20.7 133
'* Three separate scores (Verbal, Quantitative and Total) are obtained from the American Council on Education Ps,ycho1ogical Examination.
TABLE IV-A-7
ALGEBRA AND READING COMPREHENSION SCORES ACHIEVED BY THE 1958 BACHELORS GRADUATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
School or
- College
Arts and Sciences
Algebra
Reading
Males
Females
Males
Females
Mean S.D.
N Mean S.D. N Mean S.D. N Mean S.D.
N
29.18 7.9S 75 28.75 8.30 33 160.50 24.14 72 171.50 24.41 33
Education
20.91 7.06 23 25.94 7.72 57 138.20 23.72 23 146.40 34.97 56
Journalism
24.20 9.01 10 23.66 10.40 12 155.00 27.27 10 157.50 28.75 12
Business Admin. Home Economics Agricu1ture
- .. 25.67 1l.64
24.62 8.20
86 26.76 7.51 13 151.10 20.61 85 136.90 28.42 13
-
27
23.25 9.96
--
- 16
-
- 139.30 40.24
- - 151.10 27.92 26
-
16
\0 \J\
Pharmacy Forestry
25.80 7.36 24.47 6.62
- 20 30.00
- 12
-
1 137.00 39.53 20 130.00
- - 351.70 17.49 17
-
1
.-
All Students
25.97 9.49 258* 26.22 8.45 132* 151.50 25.61 253* 151.80 33.95 131*
* The discrepancy between the total number of students is due to the fact that c'n1 one score is available on a few students.
TABLE IV-A-8
AGE* AT Tll'1E OF BACCALAUREATE GRADUATION OF THE 1958 BACHELORS GRADUATES
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
School or College
Males
Mean
S.D.
Range
N
Females
Mean
S.D.
Range
N
Arts and Sciences
23.0 2.2
20-30
175
21.6 1.7
20-32
87
Education
21.2
8.1
21..65
103
25.4
9.6
20-63
119
Journalism
23.8
2.6
21-31
29
21.5
1.3
20-21
33
Business Administration
23.9
3.3
Home Economics
--
20-44
252
-0
21.2
1.0
22.5
4.7
18-23 20-46
28 S8
"8-
Agriculture
24.2
3.4
20-44
146
22.5
2.2
21-24
2
Pharmacy Forestry
24.1
3.7
24.1
2.7
20-42 21-31
64 56
28.4
-
-5.0
22-35
-
S 0
All Students
24.2
4.2
20-65
825
23.6
7.1
18-63
392
*Age was determined by the age of the student as of June 1" 1958.
TABLE IV-A-9
THE PERCENTAGES OF 1958 UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA BACCALAUREA'rE GRADUATES CLASSIFIED BY COLLEGE
OF MAJOR REGISTRATION TRANSFERRING* GIVEN NUMBERS OF QUARTER HOURS OF CREDIT
School or College
None
Fresh. (5-35 Hrs.)
Soph.
Junior
(40-15 brs.) (8<1-130 brs.)
Senior (over 130 brs.)
No
Info. Total II
Arts and Sciences
52.0
1.6
15.5
23.5
(N ; 264)
Education (N 282)
39.1
5.0
18.1
33.0
Journalism (N ;; 60)
45.0
6.1
10.0
36.1
Business Administration 44.9
14.3
18.9
19.6
(N : 280)
Home Economics
40.7
(N : 59)
13.6
45.1
= Agriculture (N 148)
29.8
2.7
13.5
50.0
Pharmacy (N 68)
45.6
13.2
29.3
8.8
1.1
0.3 100.0
3.5
0.1 100.0
1.6
...
100.0 ~
-oJ
2.3
100.0
-
100.0
4.0
- 100.0
3.1
100.0
Forestry
(N =57)
33.3
10.5
35.1
19.3
1.8
100.0
All (NStu: d1e,n2t1s6)
~l.~.8
8.0
18.0
28.7
2r I.
.4IIl
0.1
100.0
* Credit transferred from other colleges upon initial entrance to the University.
# All numerical entries shown in this table are expressed as a per cent rounded off to one decimal place. The Sl.Jl
of the per cents in each row is adjusted statistically to equal 100 per cent.
TABLE IV-A-I0
NUMBER OF QUARTER HOURS CREDIT EARNED AT THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA BY
THE 1958 BACHELORS GRADUATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA.
SChool or College
Males
Mean
S.D.
N
Females
Mean
S.D.
N
Arts and Sciences
161.6
49.5
173
157.4
41.4
87
Education
137.5
57.1
103
135.9
47.7
176
Journalism
150.2
47.4
29
Business Administration 161.5
45.7
252
Home Economics
--
145.0
45.4
33
154.8
38.4
28
143.2
43.0
58
'0 CD
Agriculture
145.8
53.0
143
163.0
32.5
2
Pharmacy Forestry
191.7
38.7
64
178.0
43.3
57
184.2
33.4
5
-- -
All Students
158.9
50.7
821
144.7
45.5
389
TABL:G :r;J'c/.-<n
School or College
Arts and Sciences Education
IWUfS*A8SIGNED IN DESIGNATED COLLEGE COURSES BY THE 1958 BACCALAUREATE GRADUATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: BY SEX
-
Eng. 101 N
Eng. 102 N
Math 100 N
H.B.
1
N
H.B.
2
N
80S.
4
N
Pol. 1
~.-
Males 8101 Females 77.9
168
86
79 G8
76 e 4
160
85
80.9 80.8
155 78.0 81 82.5
148 79.8 70 83.1
1h4 82.3 69 78.5
14 77.9 14 78.1
Hales 85.4 Females 81.1
94 84.7 93 85.8
94 80.2 158 82.2
71 83.6 132 84.3
72 82.9 151 83.7
70 85.6 149 78.8
35 82.6 116 79.3
Journalism Males 83.7 28 83.7 27 86.7 Females 77.2 28 77.7 31 81.2
19 90.3 17 82.8
20 88.0 30 83.0
18 83.5 27 77.0
10 81.9 5 75.7
Business Admin.
Home Economics
Males 86.4 243 85.3 238 85.3 Females 80.1 28 81.8 28 80.7
- - - - - Males
Females 81.5 55 80.1 57 77.5
225 86.7 28 85.9
--
19 81.2
94 87.0 19 87.0
--
53 81.2
61 80.2 5 81.1
--
19 77.7
133 82.3 13 80.4
--
15 77.9
- Agriculture Males 85~0 140 85 g 1 139 8304 135 84.0
Females 800 5 2 98,0 1 88.0
1
- - 15 84.8
-14 79.8 83.0
11 80.7 1 78.0
Pharmacy
Males 85.6 61 84.3 60 85.5 Females 81.8 4 80.5 4 81.0
57 81.3 5 87.0
62 82.5 5 82.0
58 82.5 5 98.0
19 79.3 1 81.0
- - - - - - - - - - - - Forestry
,Males 88.0 57 88.1 56 87.2 Females
55 85.8
9 84.7
-6 83.6
8 82.4
N
168 84
92 159
27 33
243 ,
27
- '0 \0 I
45
130 1
55 5
-50
All Students Males 84.1 791 81.1..8 773 84.3 717 82.4 420 82.7 371 82.2 230 80.9 765 Fema 1es 80eO 373 79.0 364 81.3 283 83.4 328 83.3 274 79.0 161 78.6 354
~ost of these m~rks were assigned at the University of Georgia, but a small number of marks were assigned in comparable courses in other colleges.
-100TABLE IV-A-12 ACTUAL UNDERGRADUATE AVERAGE*MARK ACHIEVED BY THE 1958 BACHELORS GRADUATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEDRGIA: ALL COLLEGE SUBJECTS
Sohool or College
Maie
Bean S.D. N
Arts and Seiences
81.9 6.8 174
Education
80.7 7.1 103
Journalism
80.7 6.6 29
Business Administration 71.7 6.5 252
Home Economics
Agriculture
79.7 6.1 1&6
Pharmacy
77.9 5.3 64
Forestry
79.5 4.8 56
All Students
79.5 6.6 824
Female Mean S.D. N
83.1 5.9
87
83.5 5.6 175
85.7 4.7
33
81..1 5.8
28
82.8 4.7
58
79.5
2
77.8 6.5
5
83.2 5.6 388
*Does not include grades at other colleges..
'IJ~~:..~~~l'~; . '~ .. ; :~3
NUMBER OF QUARTER HOURS CREDIT, MEAN NUMBER OF QUARTER HOURS CREDIT, AND MEAN GRADE IN TEACHING FIELD ACHIEVED BY THE 1958 BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN EDUCATION GRADUATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GIDRGIA
Quarter Hours
100 and over
Seconda~ E1ementa~ Voc. Ed. Music &Art Ed. Spec. Ed.
M F -,:r I"
MFM F
MF
-- - - - - 1 3 - -
Indust. Arts Phy. Ed. Total
M
F
11
F --M
F
----1 3
90 - 99
-- - - - 1 2 2 - - - - - - 2 5
80 - 89
-- - - - - 2 3 - - - - - - 2 1
70 - 79
-1 - - - - 1 - - 1 1 - 3 - 5 2
60 - 69
- - - 3 -
6
1
3
--5 2
14 1 20 15
50 - 59
- - - - 11 3
29
2
9
-
2
6
8
2 27 45
40 - 49
- - - - 29 16
1 50
---
2
1
- 33 66
I
f-J 0 f-J
30 - 39
10 3 3 34 - - - - - 1 - - - - 13 38
I
No Info.
-2 - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - 4
~feail-No.
Quarter
Hours Credit Mean Grade in Teaching Field
43.4 44.3 84.5
33.8 43.3 84.7
53.3 58.8 84.5
90.0 94.4 83.8
- 58.2 . ~4_.1 -
82.3
82.5
60.8 56.7 51.5 48.1
83.9
84.4
- 102 -
TABLE IV-A-14
AVERAGE GRADE IN TEACHING FIELD COMPARED TO AVERAGE GRADE
IN EDUCATION COURSES ACHIEVED BY THE 19S8 BACHELOR
OF SCIENCE IN EDUCATION GRADUATES OF THE UNIVERSITY
OF GECRGTA
Major Field
General Secondary
(N 78)
Elementary (N 121)
Vocational (Bus. Ed.)
(N 16)
Art, Music Ed.
(N e 14)
Special Ed.
(N III 9)
Industrial Arts (N 11)
Physical Education
(N 29)
Teaching Field
Mean
S.D.
84.5 s.o
84.7
84.5 83.8
82.3
82.5
83.9
s.n. Education Courses Difference in
Mean
Means
87.1
2.4
87.7
4.8
81.5
3.9
All Fields
84.4
4.5
"',
TABLE IV-B-l
MEAN SCORES ON GRADUATE RECORD EXAMmATIONS AND CERrAlli AGE FAcrORS FOR SUBGROUPS
OF THE 1958 MASTERS DEGREE GRADUATES OF THE UNIVERS:rI'Y OF GEORGIA*
GRE TEST Q Score V Score Social Science Humanities Natl. Science GRE Average NISCELLANEOUS Age at ORE Years in completing master requirements Age at baccalaureate Years between AB-GRE
* Ed~cation
Male(46 Female(51)
other Professional
MA and MS
Male(19) .. ~le(8) Male(LI5FemaJ.e(12)
All Degrees
~:I.(lQ6J_femaJ.f!(71)
474
387
479
454
531
466
495
408
399
388
427
459
461
592
426
430
386
382
421
443
447
5ho
415
415
377
418
397
506
437
571
403
453
f
447
402
427
461
437
487
477
422
wb
417
395
436
458
485
521
446
424
30.6
36.5
25.8
31.0
25.0
27.0
27.5
34.3
3.0
3.7
1.9
3.0
2.0
2.8
2.4
3.5
25.2
28.0
23.7
22.1
23.6
24.5
24.3
26.7
5.7
8.9
2.3
9.8
1.8
2.6
3.5
7.9
*The number of persons within each subgroup is indicated in parentheses.
TABLE IV-I3-2-
MEAN SCORES ON CERrAlN FACTORS RELATED TO THE GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS FOR SUBGROUPS OF THE 1958 MASTERS DEGREE GRADUATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
Education
Other Professional
MA and MS
All Degrees
Male(46)* .FEl!YljJJ.~JS11 ~e(1~L~e~e(8J _Male(411 Fe!JlB.1~(12)uMa1e(106) Female(51)
GRADUATE MARRS
Average Mark in Graduate 1-fajor
90.8
92.0
92.4
92.3
92.1
92.9
91.6
92.2
No. qt. hra. in Graduate Major Average Mark in Graduate Minor(s) No. qt. brs. in Graduate Minor(s) Graduate Average All Subjects No. qt. bra. All Subjects Average Mark Transfer Credit No. qt. hrse Transfer Credit UNDERGRADUATE MARKS
36.4
38.7
51.5
35.6
43.0
90.0
90.8
90.7
94.0
87.2
22.5
19.8
6.8
15.6
5.1
90.5
91.6
92.0
92.4
91.5
58.9
58.5
58.3
51.3
48.2
88.0
87.2
-
88.0
0.8
1.3
1.3
0.2
45.3
41.7
39 .5
91.3
89.5
91.2
.br=-
3.3
13.0
16.5 i
92.8
91.2
91.9
48.7
54.6
56.0
-
88.0
87.2
--
0.4
1.1
Average Professional Courses 84.0
85.2
87.9
98.1
87.7
92.4
86.1
86.8
Average All Undergraduate
Courses
81.4
84.4
85.4
81.B
84.9
89.1
83.4
85.5
*The number of persons within each subgroup is indicated in parent,heses.
Ii
TABLE IV-B-3
MEAN SCORES ON GRADUATE RECORD EXAMINATION TESTS AND CERTAIN AGE FACTORS OF THE 1958 MASTER OF EDUCATION GRADUATES OF THE UNIVEHSITY OF GEORGIA
Basis of Comparison GRE TESTS
Gener-a- l " s~ econda~
~e{2JL: .l"'male (12) Male:=< 1m }'emai:e(
1 ean
Nean
lVIean
Mean
Q score
410
380
504
430
472
V score
400
379
447
442
393
Social Science
355
380
459
406
358
Humanities
340
415
414
526
364
Nat1. Science
445
389
467
424
449
GRE Average
390
389
458
446
408
AGE FAC'rORS
Age at GRE
35.5
39.0
31.6
31.8
27.4
Years in completing
master requirements 4.0
3.6
2.8
4.2
3.1
Age at
Baccalaureate
34.0
31.5
25.4
20.8
24.0
Years between
AB-GRE
1.5
7.7
6.2
11.2
3.8
~!-
The number of persons within each subgroup is indicated in parentheses.
Non-T-eaching
Malej[l:tl Femaljlllil
11ean
IvIean
405
465
365
415
369
356
402
373
359
405
362
394
,
421
435
393
b
\J1.
408
400
374
I
32.5
34 .. 4
38.7
3.6
2.9
3.7
22.8
25.6
30.6
10.1
9.3
8.6
-
TABLE IV-B-4
MEAN SCORES ON CERTAIN FACTORS RELATED TO THE GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE PROGRMfIS OF THE 1958
MASTER OF BDUCATION GRADUATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
- -_....-~-;;;;:;;;;;:=
Elementary
General Secondary Special Secondary
Non-Teaching
!lale(2)* :!'eiialeTI21 !(aj.eIiO) Fem81e(5) -M:a1e(20) Fema1e(lJI Ma:ieT13) iema~le""'"-!(14""!""~
Mean _ I1..ean _._. Me.aJl._. __ . 1"i'e'an
Me.an
Mean.
Mean
Mean
GRADUATE MARKS
Average Mark in
Graduate Najor
90.5
91.0
91.6
91.6
90.7
92.5
90.5
91.9
No. Qt. Hrs. in
Graduate Major
37.5
40.3
33.0
36.0
35.0
35.8
41.2
40.4
Average Nark in
Graduate Minor(s) 90.0
90.6
90.0
90.4
89.9
91.2
89.5
90.7
No. Qt. Hrs. in
8:
Graduate Minor(s) 22.5
17.9
31.0
24.0
22.0
23.5
16.9
17.5
I
Graduate Average
All Subjects
90.0
91.5
91.0
91.0
90.5
92.0
90.2
91.4
No. Qt. Hrs.
All Subjects
60.0
58.2
64.0
60.0
57.0
Average Hark
Transfer Credit None
88.0
90.0
None
87.3
No. Qt. Hrs.
Transfer Credit None
1.1
1.0
None
1.3
UNDERGRADUATE lVIARKS
Average Professional
Courses
86.0
85.6
86.3
85.4
84.2
Average All Under-
graduate Courses 82.0
85.1
85.1
85.4
82.1
~e number of persons within each subgroup is indicated in ~arentheses.
59.3
~8.1
57.9
83.0
None
88.0
0.8
None
1.8
85.5
80.9
84.2
83.3
77.4
84.0
=
TABLE IV-B-5
NUMBER AND PER OONT WITHIN EACH OF SEVERAL SUBGROUPS OF THE 1958 MASTERS DEGREE GRADUATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA CLASSIFIED BY NUMBER OF YEARS SINCE UNDERGRADUATE DEGREE WAS CONFERRED
N:unber of Years
Ed. Major
S~nce Under-
Ua1e Female
graduate Degree -
t'lTas Conferred iMO.:;;
-
No.
%
1 - 3 Years
10 21.7 5 9.8
Other Prof.
Male
I.~o. %
Female
No. 't
10 52.6 3 37.5
]ff.A and .MS
I1ale No. %
Female
No.
cl
19
27 65.9 6 50.0
Total
Male
No.
'" lq
Female ,No. '1.
Grand Total
47 44.h 14 19.7 61
4 - 8 Years
23 50.0 19 37.2 8 42.1 1 12.5 11 26.8 5 L~l. 7 42 39.7 25 35.2 67
9 -13 Years
6 13.0 8 15.7 1 5.3 1 12.5 3 7.3
10 9.4
9 12.7 19
14-18 Years 19-23 Years 24-28 Years
1 2.2 10 19.6
3 6.5 5 9.8
2 4.4 2 3.9
2 25.0
1 0.9 10 lh.l 11
1 8.3 3 2.8
8 11.3
II
~o
-.J
I
2 1.9
2 2.8
4
29-33 Years
1 2.2 1 2.0
34 - Over Years --
-... 1 2.0
1 12.5
1 0.9
2 2.8
3
1 1.4
1
Total
46 100.0 51 100.0 19 100.0
Mean Number of
Years Since
Bachelors
8
12
4
Graduation
8 100.0 12
41 100.0 12 100.0 106 100.0 71 100.0 177
------------
4
5
6
10
8
TABLE IV-a-6
NUMBER AND PER CENT WITHIN EACH OF SEVERAL SUBGROUPS OF THE 1958 MA.STERS DEGREE GRADUATES CF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA CLASSIFIED BY INSTITUTION CONFERRING BACHELORS DEGREE
Baccalaureate Institution
Education Major
Male
Female
No. % No. %
'University of
Georgia
24
G.S.C.W.
-
Georgia Teachers
College
2
Georgia State
- College of B.A. 2
LaGrange College
North Ga. College
3
Mercer
1
Berry
4
Oglethorpe
1
Piedmont
4
Emory Shorter Brenau New England
-1-
States Colleges 1
Middle Atlantic
Colleges
1
Southern States
other than Ga. North Central States Northwestern States Foreign Universities
--1
1
and Colleges
52.1 17 33.3
- 10 19.6
4.3 2 3.9
-4.3 2 3.9 1 2.0 6.5 2 3.9
2.2 1 2.0
- - 8.7 1 2.0
2.2
8.7 4 7.8 2.2
- - 1 2.0 -- 1 2.0
- 2.2
-
- 2.2
-
-- - - 2.2 7 13.6 1 2.0 2.2 1 2.0
Other Prof.
Male
Female
No. % No. %
10 52.6 4 50.0
-- --
-- --
1 5.3
-1------- -------5-.3
--- -
-- 1 12.5
-1-----
12.5
----
-- --
-- --
- -- - - 2 10.5
-
5 ~.3
- - 2 25.0 --
MA and MS
Male
Female
No. % No. %
29 70.8 7 58.4
- - --
- - --
-
1-
-
-2.4
---
---
---1 2--
2.4
---4-.9
--1---- ------8.3
--
-
-
--
--
4 9.8 2 16.7
- - - - 1 2.4 1 8.3 1 8.3 3 7.3
Total
Male
Female Grand
No. % No. %Total
63 59.5 28 39.5 91
- - 10 14.2 10
2 1.9 2 2.8 4
3 2.8 2 1.9 3 2.8 2 1.9 4 3.8 1 0.9 4 3.8
3-- --2.8
1 0.9
1 0.9
2 2.8 5
2 2.8 4
2 2.8 5
2 2.8
- -2 2.8
- - 4 5.6
4 6 1 8
:3
l:>
co I
1 1.4 1
1 1.4 1
-- - 1
-1
7 6.7
- - 1 0.9
9 8.5
11 15.5 18 2 2.8 ) 1 1.4 1 1 1.4 10
Total
46 100.0 51 100.0 19 100.0 8 100.0 41 100.0 12 100.0 106 100.0 71 100.0 177
TABLE IV-B-7
NUMBER AND PER CENT vJITHIN EACH OF SEVERAL SUBGROUPS OF 1958 IiASTJ:RS DEGREE GRADUATES OF THE In-JIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
CLASSIFIED BY TYPE OF UNDERGRADUATE DEGREE RECEIVED
Undergraduate Degree
Ed. Najo:r-
NoM. ale;,",'
t'e~
No.
(~ /0
_.-otner
Male
Prot. --_ Female-
._
_
-lVIale
1J1A
and MS
Female"
NO. % No. % NO:% No. %
Total
Male
No.
-a /0
Female--- Grand
No. % Total
AB
3 6.5 14 27.4 2 10.5 1 12.5 8 19.5 9
BFA
1
- 2.2
- 1 5.3 2 25.0 _. - -
BS
- - 12 26.1 7 13.7 1 5.3
12 29.3 2
BSA
- 10 21.7 .- ,- - - -
17 41.5 -
BSF
- . ,- .- 3 15.8 . - - - -
- - - - BS Ed or AB Ed 17 37.0 24 47.1
_.
.- 1
BBA
- 2 4.3 1 2.0 9 47.3
- 2 4.9 -
BSHE
- - 5 9.8 - - .5 62.5 _. ,- -
75.0 13 12.2 24 33.8
- 2 1.9 2 2.8
16.7 25 23.6
- 27 25.6
- 3 2.8
9 12.7
---
8.3 17 16.0 25 35.2
- 13 12.3 1 1.4
- .- .
.- 10 14.1
37
4'
34 27
3I
~
42
0 '0
I
14
10
BS Pharm.
- - - - - - - - 1 2.4 - - .. 1 0.9 - 1
Degree from Foreign Institution
other Total
- - 1 2.2
3 15.8
- - - -
.- -
46 100.0 51 100.0 19 100.0
- - 1 2.4 -
- -- - -
8 100.0 41 100.0 12
- 4 3.8 - - 4 - 1 0.9 - - 1
100.0 106 100.0 71 100.0 177
~ARI.E IV-B-8
NUMBER AND PER CENT WITHIN SACH OF SEVERAL SUBGROUPS )F THE 1958 MASTERS DEGREE GRADUATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA CLASSIFIED BY FI~LD OF UNDERGR.I.DUiiTE 11AJOR.
Undergraduate
Major Field
Education Major
other Prof.
MA and MS
Total
Male
Female Male Female Male Female
Male Female Grand
No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Total
Agriculture
- - - - - 6 13.1
18 43.9 3 25.0 24 22.7 3 4.2 27
Biological Sciences
- - - - - - 1 2.2
4 9.8 2 16.7 5 4.7 2 2.8 7
Physical Sciences
- .. - - - 2 4.3 1 2.0
- 8 19.5
10 9.4 1 1.4 11
Forestry
-
Pharmacy
..
Business Administration 4
- - - - .. ...
3 15.8 - - .. -
- 3 2.8
3
- - - .. .. - - ..
- - - 1 2.4
1 0.9
1
- - - - - 8.7
- 13 68.4
2 4.9
19 18.0
'. 19
Education Home Economics Social Sciences Fine Arts
Language &Literature
Journalism Religion Other
24
-
3
2
2
-
-
2
52.2 34 66.6
1
- - -- -- - - - 5 9.8
4
- - - 6.6 3 5.9
4.3 1 2.0 2 10.5 3
- - - 4.3 6 11.7 1 5.3
.. - - -- -- --- - - - - - - - - 1 2.0
- - - - - - .. - - - 4.3
..
12.5
50.0
-6
37.5
.. 1
1
-
.. 1 8.3 24 22.6 36 50.7
- ..
- 9 12.7
14.7 3 25.0 9 8.5 6 8.5
-
4 3.8 4 5.6
2.4 3 25.0 4 3.8 9 12.7
2.4
.. 1 0.9
.. 1 1.4
-
2 1.9
60 9
15 8 13 1 1
2
0t,::
Total
----.: 46 100.0 51 100.0 l' 100.0 8 100.0 41 100.0 12 100.0 106 100.0 71 100.0 177
-... ..
TABLE IV-C-l THE DISTRIBUTION OF HARKS IN JUNIOR DIVISION COURSES IN 43 AREAS )F INSTRUCTION: THE UNIVERSITY CF GEJRGIA
FALL QUARTER, 1955~l-
Rank Hea~)
1 87.7
2 86.9
3 85.3
4 85.1
5.5 84.5
5.5 84.5
7 84.3
8 83.0
9 82.8
10 81.8
11 81.7
12 81.2
14 80.9
14 80.9
14 80.9
16 80.1
17 79.8
18 78.0
19 77.9
20 77.1
21 76.2
22 76.0
~243
74.8 74.7
25 74.6
26 74.5
27 74.4
28 74.1
29 74.0
Area of Instruction
Horticulture Physical Education Home Economicsff Music Forestry# Landscape Arch. Journalism# Drama Nursing Poultry Husbandry Pharmacy# Agrl. Econ. Agrl. Engin. Art Dairy Husbandry Education Speech Industrial Arts Agronomy French Spanish Sociology Economics Archeology Business Psychology Political Science German
Physics
No. of Students
15 46 212 148 108 57 89 20 49 38 91 78 131 264 25 86 168 67 100 251 181 176
444
33 682 439 528 61
180
Percentage Distribution
ABC
D E&F
33.3 32.6 21.2 39.8 34.3 26.3 27.0 20.0 16.3 15.8 31.8 17.9 20.6
16.3 8.0
11.6 12.5 10.4 150 0 23.1 22.1 10.8
7.2 15.2 13.8 10.5 9.8
6.6
10.6
60.0 60.9 63.7 32.4 39.7 43.8 47.2 40.0 44.9 42.1 36.3 38.5 43.6
34.1 60.0 29.1 33.3 28.4 29.0 27.1 24.3 31.2
23.4 27.3 20.2 20.7 26.9
31.1
21.7
6.7 4.3 13.2 19.6 20.4
2~.1
22.5 40.0 38.8 36.8 180 7 37.2 22.1
43.5 24.0 58.1 45.3 52.2 34.0 26.7 27.1 . 33.6
47.8 30.2 37.9 39.7 34.3
41.0
38.2
1.4 6.8 1.9 1.8 1.1 5.3 4.4 3.8 8.4
5.3 4.0 8.3 4.5 19.0 11?0~.70 15.9
13.5 12.1 17.4 21.2 18.4
6.6
18.9
2.2
.5 1.4 3.7 2.2 8.8 2.6 5.3
.3 4.0 1.2
.6 4.5 3.0 13.1 13.8 8.5
8.1 15.2 10.7 7.9 10.6
14.7
10.6
Total
1?0.0 100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
t.
h:
l
100.0
100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
~} The basic raw data used consists of the grade reports of individual instructors for the Fall Quarter, 1$ 5 _
the most recent date for which pertinent punch card data are available. The present calculations were made by James E~ Greene, Chairman, Division of Graduate Studies, College of Education.
The rank positions are ranged in the order of decreasing magnitude of the average mark in each of the
indicated areas of instruction.
~p In computing the average (i.e., mean) marks, the several letter grades were given numerical weights as
follows: A, 95; B, 85: C, 75; D, 65: E and F, 43 (Compare with practi~es of the University Registrar).
i~ Registrar records do not indicate sub-areas of instruction in this administrative unit.
TABLE IV-G-2 THE DISTRIBUTION OF MARKS IN SENIOR DIVISION COURSES IN 54 AREAS OF INSTRUCTION: THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA,
FALL QUARTER, 1955~!-
Rarik
I
2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11.5 11.5 13
14
15 16 17 18.5 18.5 20 21 22 23 24.5 24.5 26 27 28.5 28.5 30 31 32.5
Mean$
90.5 90.0 88.7 87.8 87.5 87.2 87.1 86.8 86.4 86.3 85.5 85.5 85.3 85.1 84.9 84.8 84.7 84.6 84.6 84.5 84.0 84.0 83.8 83.6 83.6 83.5 83.3 83.0 83.0 82.8 82.7 82.5
Area of Instruction
No. of Students
French
11
Horticulture
24
Vet. Med. & Surge
370
Political Science
32
Vet. Hygiene
120
Geology
14
r1usic
351
Speech
49
Religion
7
Greek
8
Library Education
19
Poultry Husbandry
20
Dairy Husbandry
30
Education
600
Spanish
15
J ourna1ismj
259
Vet. Medicine
32
Agronomy
38
English
114
Vet. Path. :: Parasite 115
Industrial Arts
39
Latin
22
Agr1. Econ.
43
Art
126
Vet. Physio1. ~ Pharmac. 275
Home Eco~omics
335
Forestry
301
Archeology
5
Drama
20
Sociology
102
Food Teohno1ogy
47
Physical Education
126
A
63.6 50.0
44.3 43.8
37.5 42.9 46.8 ho.8
14.3 25.0 21.1 25.0 43.4 20.2 40.0 34.4 21.9 19.3 23.9
17.4 25.6 27.3 20.9 19.8 24.6 21.5 17.3 20.0
25.0
14.7 10.6
13.5
Percentage-Distributions
B
27.3 50.0 48.6 40.6 50.0
42.9 34.2 38.8
8S.7
62.5 63.9 55.0 30.0 61.1 40.0 40.2 62.4 61.4 44.8 60.0
41.0 50.0 46.5 51.6 43.5 48.0 52.5 40.0
30.0 52.9
59.6 52.3
C
D E&,-F Total
-9.1
--
-- 100.0 100.0
6.8 15.6 12.5
--.3
7.1 7.1
----
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
14.8
-18.4
12.5 15.8 20.0 20.0 18.2
13.3
3.1 2.0
----
3.3
-5
1--.1
.---
l(jO.O
10().0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
-3.3 100.0 100.0
6.7 100.0
I
E
..
22.0
6.3 1h.8
1.9 9.4 4.5
1.5 100.0
- 100.0
- 100.0
21.9 22.6
30.8 18.2
32.6 23.8 25.0 26.9
3-.5
-2.6
-
4.8 6.9
3.3
--.9 100.0 100.0
100.0 4.5 100.0
100.0
- 100.0
-- 100.0
.3 100.0
27.2 40.0
45.0 30.4
25.5 30.2
--2.3
1.0
4.3 4.0
--.7 100.0 100.0
100.0
--1.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
TABLE IV-C-2 (CONTINUED)
Rank
32.5 34 35 )6 37 39 39 39 41 42 43 44 45 46 47.5 47.5 49
So
51 52 53 54
Mean<<1t:l'
82.5 82.2 81.7 81.5 81.4 81.3 81,3 81.3 80.6 80.3 79.3 78.6 78.5 78.1 77.9 77.9 77.8 77.1 76.2 76.0 75.8 75.1
82.1
Area of Instruction
No, of Students
Psychology
59
Entomology
29
Business
922
Agrl. Engin.
Ih6
Botany
36
Animal Husbandry
77
Classics
70
Landscape Archit.
60
Philosophy
62
Geography
74
Vet. An;H' & Histol.
124
Pharmac
401
Fine Arts
90
Zoology
94
Bacteriology
71
Ecopomics
501
Law
368
Physics
44
History
138
Mathematics
60
Chemistry
36
Plant Pathology
76
Total: Senior Division 7,523
A
25.4 17.2 22.5 22,6
5.6 20,8 20.0 21.8 17.7 12,2
3.2 12.7 14,4 13.8 lif.l 12.4 11.1 18.2 13,0 25.0 Ih.o
3.9
21.8
Percentage Distributi~ns
B
C
D
FM'
33.9 41.4
30,5 41.4
-10,2
--
35.5
33.3
6.4
2.3
36.3
29.4
9,6
55.5
36.1
2.8
-2.1
40.2
28.6
6.5
3.9
hl.4
22.9 14.3
1,4
38.3 46.8
28.3 27.4
-8.3
37.8
40.5
9.5
41.2
50.8
4.8
3.3
--8.1
37.9
33.9 10.0
5.5
31.1
42,2
6.7
5.6
38.3
22.3 21.3
4.3
33.8
25.4 23.9
2.8
30.3
43.9
7.8
5.6
31.6
42.1 10.6
4.6
34.0
18,2 20.5
9.1
33.4
29.7 13.0
10.9
21.7
28.3
8.3
16.7
30.4
30.9 13.0
11.7
23.7
50.0 18.5
3.9
41.9
27.8
5.9
2.6
TotijI
100.0
100,0
100.0
100,0
100,0
100.0
100.0
100,0
100.0
100,0
100,0
100,0
100,0
100.0
100,0
100.0
100,0
~
100.0
100.0
100,0
100.0
100.0
100.0
82.4
Senior Division Courses
in Professional Schools 5,519
21.0
43.4
28.6
5.1
1.9
100.0
* The basic raw data used consist of the grade reports of individual instructors for the Fall Quarter, 1955-the most recent date for which pertinent punch card data are available. The present calculations were made by James E. Greene, Chairman, Division of Graduate Studies, College of Education.
The rank positions are ranged in the order of decreasing magnitude of the average mark in each of the indicated
areas of instruction.
$ In computing the average (i.e., mean) marks, the several letter grades were given numerical weights as follows: A, 95; B, 85; C, 75J D, 65; E and F, 43 (Compare with practices of the University Registrar).
# Registrar records do not indicate sub-areas of instruction in this prIm; rd.strative unit.
TABLE IV...o-3 THE DISTRIBt1l'ION OF UNDERGRADUATE MARKS IN THE SCHOOlS AND COLLEGES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: FALL QUARrER, 1.955*.
Div.
Sr. Jr.
Sr. Jr.
Sr. Jr.
Sr. J.r.
Sr. Jr.
Sr. Jr.
Sr. Jr.-
Sr.
Sr. Jr.
Sr. Sr. Jr. Sr. Jr.
#*
0
Mean&>
62.0 60.4 81.3 73.1
80.4 74.7 84.7 80.9
8.3.3 84.5
8.3.5 85.3
84.8 84.3
77.8
78.6 81.7
School or College
No. of Students A
Percentage Distribution
B c D E&F
Agriculture Arts and Sciences
61.1
20.6 42.3 27.7 7.4 2.0
486
17S 39.7 29.8 9.7 3.0
2004
24.0 37.7 25.7 8.1 4.5
7215 11.9 23.8 30.6 18.6 15.1
Business Administration 1423 1126
Education
784
199
18.9 33.7 31.1 6.9 3.4 11.2 21S 41.8 15.9 9.6
19.4 58.8 20.7 1.1
-
16.1 36.2 43.7 IS 2.5
Forestry
.301
17.3 52.5 27.2 2.3
.1
108
.34.3 .39.7 20.4 1.9 3.7
Home Economics
3.35
21.5 48.0 26.9 3.3
.3
212
21..2 63.7 13.2 1.4
.5
Journalism
259
34.4 40.2 22.0 1.9 1.5
89
27.0 47.2 22.5 1.1 2.2
LaW'@
368 11.1 31.6 42.1 10.6 4.6
Pharmacy
401 12.7 91 31.8
10 7 29.7 7 23 21. 9526 13.0 5519 21.0 2311 16.4
33.9 10.0 5.5 18.7 4.4 8.8
- 2.8
.9 2. 16.6 13.0 5.1 1.9 mo.3 6.2
Total
100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0
moo.o
100.0
100.0
- - - -----_.~
~
- -~
Div. Ratio#
55.7
44.3
22.0 78.0 $.8 44.2 79.8
20.2 & 73.6
26.4 I 61.2 38.8
11h4 25.6 100.0*-
81.5 18.5
100.0
55.9
7o.~
29.5
- 116 -
TABLE IV-c-4
MEAN STANDARD SCOP,ES FOR GRimES AND INTSLLIGENCE FOR LOHER DIVISION
STUDENTS ENROLLED IN COURSES FOR THE FALL QUARTER 1951 IN
* EACH OF THE SCHOJLS AND C1LLEGES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGLA.
School or College
No. of Students
@Biological Science
475
@Social Sciences
572
@Physical Sciences
673
@Language and Literature 711
Business Administration 369
Agriculture
242
Forestry
31
Pharmacy
22
Journalism
30
Education
108
~ine Arts
166
Home Economics
82
ARTS AND SCIENCES
2,597
PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS
884
Grades$
47.0 47.9 48.9 50.1 51.0 51.3 52.6 52.8 54.0 56.5 56.7 57.9 49.2 52.6
Intelligence
49.3 51.0 50.5 51.5 50.6 45.6 45G4 51.7 54.9 48.1 50.4 47.6 50.5 48.6
Mean Difference
2.3# 3.1#
l.r!
1.4# (.4) (5.7)# (7.2)# (1.1) .9 (8.4l (6.3)# (10.3)# 1.3# (4.0)#
*The data in this table are adapted by permission from an article by Van Cleve
Morris" .;.C_oll=..;e~.ge. ~ University, January, 1954, PP. 273-284.
oivisions of the College of Arts and Sciences.
The difference between the mean intelligence score and the mean grade score. Those without brackets are differences noted where grades are lower than would be expected on the basis of intelligence; those with brackets are differences in which grades are higher than would be expected on the basis of intelligence.
- $These standard scores should be interpreted as deviations from the respective
mean standard score for all University students (i.e., :SO).
#Significant at .01 level.
-117 .. TABLE IV-c-5
MEAN STAIIJDARD SCOHES FOR GRn.DES ,dID INTELLIGEITCE FOR UPPER DIVISION
STUDENTS ENRiiLLED IN COURSES FOl( THE FALL QUARTER 1951 :rn
EACH OF THE SCT-IOJLS !dlID CJLLj;::G=~S OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA~~
School or College
No(\ of Students
-
Grades$
Intelligence
. .!~
Mean Differenca
@Physical Sciences
76
42.8
50,,4
7.6#
Law
55
45.7
56.7
11.if
aiological Science
66
47 .. 9
49.6
li/7
Business Administration 402
48.6
48 0 8
.2
@Social Sciences
127
49.1
56.0
6.1
Agriculture
178
50.0
4504
(4.6l
Pharmacy
120
50.3
48 0 8
(1.5)
:Language and Literature 90
50.7
55.3
4.6#
Education
276
50,.8
49 .. 7
(1.1)
Forestry
86
50.8
53.7
2.9
Journalism
98
50.9
52 ..6
1.7
@Pine Arts
184
52.0
50.2
(1.8)
Home Economics
67
54.0
45.3
(8.7l
Veterinary Medicine
78
55\,0
50.3
(4.7)#
ARTS AND SCIENCES
543
49,,3
52,,9
3.6#
PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS 1,360
50 0 2
48~lJ
(l.8l
=
~
*The data in this table are adapted by permission from an article by Van Cleve
Morris, College ~ University, Januarr, 1954, ppo 273-284.
@Divisions of the College of Arts and Sciences o
The difference between the mean intelligence score and the mean grade score.
Those Hithout brackets are differences noted where grades are lower than would
be expected on the basis of intelligence; those with brackets are differences
in which grades are hicher then w:)'Jld be expected on the basis of im.teiUig~,
$ These standard scores should be interpreted as deviations from the respective
- mean standard score for all University students (i"e", 56) ~
# Significant at....-..o1. level.
TABLE IV-D-l
Item
A OOMPARISON OF TEACHER TRAINEES WITH OTHER STUDENTS ON VARIOUS INDICES BASED ON THE OPINIONS OF RESPONDENTS FROM FIFTEEN WHITE AND FIVE NEGRO TEACHER EDUCATION COLLIDES OF GEORGIA
White More About Less No Often the Same Often Response
Total
More Often
- - - - -- liegro~~~-
~
About
Less
No
the Same Often _~sponse Total
1. Teacher trainees have need for financial assistance
- 13.3 73.4
2. Teacher trainees receive financial assistance 6.7 73.3 6.7
- 13.3 100.0
- 13.3 100.0
- 80.0
- 80.0
20.0 100.0 20.0 100.0
3. teacher trainees are placed on academic
probati-6n
- 53.3 46.7
- - 100.0
80.0 20.0
-
4. Teacher trainees fail courses
- 53.3 46.7
- -
100.0
80.0 20.0
-
5.. Teacher trainees attain
leadership roles and honors
26.7 60.0
-
13.3 100.0 60.0 20.0
20.0
-
100.0
~co
100.0 I
100.0
6. General quality of teacher
trainees is (compared
to other students)
20.0 73.3 6.7
-
- 100.0
100.0
-
7. General quality of teacher
trainees is (compared
to previous teacher trainees)
- 53.3 46.7
-
100.0 20.0 80.0
-
t
-
100.0
-
100.0
':'AB1E IV-D-2
A COMPARISON OF THE STATUS OF THE 1958 EDUCATION AND NON-EDUCATION GRADUATES OF CEllTAIN WHITE AND NEGRO TEACHER EDUCATION COLLEGES OF GEORGIA WITH RESPECT TO SCHOLASTIC APTrrUDE, HIGH S(''HOOL AVERAGE MARK AND AGE AT
GRADUATION*
Bases of Comparisons
Ho. of Colleges with
}~dian for Education
Graduates Higher than
for Non-Education
Graduates
vJhite
Negro
No. of Colleges with
Median for Education
Graduates Lower than
for Non-Education
Graduates
lVhite
Negro
~of Colleges with
No Difference
between Education
and Non-Education
Graduates
1Vhite
Ne~ro
No.or-Colleges for which Data are not Available
~
White
Negro
Scholastic
Aptitude
4
0
5
0
AveraGe High
School Nark
3
3
1
1
0
0
3
5
4
0
4
1
Age at
Graduation
8
2
0
1
_.
I
2
0
2
2
~
'0
I
~~Source of data: Confidential questionnaire from college officials. Of the 18 white colleges, two reported no
graduates in education, three failed to respond, and one (The University of Georgia) reports data in greater detail in another part of this report (see pages 89-102). Of the eight Negro colleges, three failed ~o respond.
-120-
TABLE DJ-D-3
NUNBER AND HEr:lIAN GRADE-POINT AVEHAGES OF THE 1958 EDUCATION AND NON-EDUCATION GRADUATES OF TVlELVE ~mITE TEACHER-EDUCATION COUEGES OF GEORGIA-l,~
Institution Number
.
Number of Number of Education Non-Ed. Graduates Graduates
.---.....'---_.,.-_.
Per::lent H'.add.an
Median
Educ. is Grado-Peint Grade-Point
of Total Average: Average:
Education$ Hon-Ed.$
1. (June) (August)
164
8
95.3
2.60
2.55
85
1
98.8
2.60
3.00
2. (June)
32
124
25.8
2.67
2.65
3. (June)
32
39
45.1
3.00
3.00
4. (June) (August)
5. (June)
84
17
83.2
2.65
2.85
70
3
95.9
2.50
3.00
41
13
75.9
t?
#
6. (June)
26
82
24.1
2.76
2.70
7. (June)
19
44
30.2
2.70
2.86
8. (June) (August)
16
170
8.6
2.70
2.60
5
35
12.5
2.70
2.20
9. (June)
52
38
57.8
2.70
2.63
10. (June)
23
20
53.5
2.79
2.71
ll. (June) (August)
27
49
35.5
2.40
2.50
17
14
54.8
2.10
2.20
12. (June)
38
38
50.0
3.00
2.50
Total number Mean@
731
718 - 50.4
61
60
2.67
2.61
*Source of data: Confidential questionnaire from college officials. Of the 18 colleges, two reported no teacher-education graduates in 1958, three failed to respond, and one is the University of Georgia, on which much detailed information is reported elsewhere in the report (see pages 89-102).
$The grade-point averages reported herein were transformed to the modal pattern reported which corresponds to a scale as follows: "A" D 4.00; "B" = 3.00;
"G" = 2.00; "D" .,. 1.00.
#rnrormation reported in a form which could not be used.
@
The mean for grade-point medians is an "unweighted mean"; that is, each median was treated as a unit without regard to the number of graduates of the institution.
-121-
TABLE IV-D-4
NUMBER AND MEDIAN GRADE-POINT AVERAGES OF THE 1958 EDUCATION AND NON-EDUCATION GRADUATES OF FIVE NEGRO TEACHER-EDUCATION COLLEGES OF GEORGIA~:-
Institution Number
1. (June) (August)
2. (June)
3. (June)
(August)
4. (June)
(August)
5. (June)
(August)
---- .
Number of Education Graduates
82 21
- - - - - Number of Per C_e.-n... t Nedian
~fedian
Non-Edit Education
- Graduates is of . Total
Grade-Point Grade-Point Average: Average: Education$ Non-Ed ,,$
5
1
9.0/ 54..3),J
2.50 2.70
2.L~9
2.68
123
45
73.2
2'".50
2.80
61
14
81.3
2.58
2.41
54
5
91.5
2.46
2.92
14
66
17.5
J(
ii-
II
2
22
8.3
If/
Jl 7f
50
41
54.9
2.83
2.50
8
12
40.0
2.50
2.50
Total Mean@
415
211
66.3
83
42
2.58
2.61
-~
Source of data: Confidential questionnaire from college officials. Of the eight Negro colleges, three failed to respond.
$The grade-point averages reported herein were transformed to the follo1f.Lng
scale: "All = 4.00; "B" - 3.00; "c" - 2.00; "D" - 1.00.
#Information reported in a form which could not be used.
The mean for grade-point medians is an "unweighted mean"; that is, each median was treated as a unit without regard to the number of graduates of the institution.
- 122 -
APPENDIX A
. EDITOR'S n~TRODUCTION TO: TEACHERS AND TEACHER EDUCATION IN GEORGIA~~ ---~
*The companion volume to: A Source Book of Data Concerning Teachers and
Teacher Education ~ Georgi"a::--- - - -
-
EDITOR'S ThlTRODUCTION
The present volume is one of tHO mimeographed reports prepared by the Task Force on Teacher Education of the Committee on Nanpower and Education of the Georgia Nuclear Commission. The companion volumel consists of a series of 97 tables presenting the basic statistical data upon ~Jhich the descriptive and evaluative co~~ents contained in the present volume are mainly based. Both volumes have been organized with reference to a common outline of major topics and related sub-topics. Although either volume may be used independently of the other, both volumes were plarilled, organized and reproduced on the assumption that the typical reader would wish to make joint and related use of each of them. Consequently, the authors of the present volume have made numerous cross references to the tabular materials in the Source Book.
The scope and content of these two companion volumes should be viewed by the reader in relationship to (1) the special task or mission assigned to the Task Force on Teacher Education and (2) the special conditions and ciroumstances uhich contributed to or interf'ered vJith effective attainment of' this mission.
The special mission of the present Task Force was that of analyzing the present status of teachers and teacher education in Georgia and making recommendations concerning such types of future social action as might seem appropriate. Operationally considered, this mission may be thought of as involving the f'ollovdng types of Task Force activities: (1) a determination of the kinds and amounts of data needed to serve as the basis of' a factually accurate and pertinent description of present status and probable future needs; (2) attempting to locate potentially available sources of data of the type and amount considered desirable for the present purposes; (3) the statistical processing of available
data considered to be pertinent; (4) a critical consideration of the implications of the data; (5) the preparation of the tvJO volumes described
above.
The f'irst meeting of the membership of the Task Force was held in Atlanta,
Georgia on December 9, 1959. A tentative agenda of Task Force activities
was discussed and approved. It was recognized that, due to bUdgetary and other considerations, the activities of the Task Force must inevitably be of limited scope and must be completed d1.:ring the f'iscal year ending
June 30, 1959. The Chairman of' the Task Force (i.e., the present Editor)
was authorized to attempt to secure such cooperation and assistance as could be made available in the implementation of the agenda and 't"Jas directed to submit a progress report as early as possible. This progress report was made at a second meeting of the Task Force membership in Atlanta,
Georgia on April 9, 1959. At this second meeting, the Task Force Chair-
man (with the assistance of a corps of part-time professional staf'f' associates whose services to the Task Force had been donated by the Dean of the College of' Education of the University of Georgia) was directed to prepare f'or prospective publication, subject to appropriate approval, the two volumes brief'ly described above.
1 A Source ~ of ~ Concerning ~chers ~d Teacher ~ducation in Georgia.
In presenting these companion volumes for prospective use by agencies and persons concerned with the improvement of teaching and teacher education in Georgia, it is expressly recognized that the basic data 1uth which th~ deal have important limitations as respects completeness of coverage of sub-topics and sub-populations, obvious and immediate pertinenc~ to the problems at hand, and in some instances factual accuracy and objectivity. Under the conditions obtairing for the present study (i.e., limited bUdgetary and staff resources; limited availability of complete, pertinen\j, and current basic source data; limited time schedule within Nhich the present Task Force activities had to be completed), it is believed that most of the limitations of the data presented in the present study were mainly unavoidable. Hopefully, many of these limitations could be avoided in future studies of this type by maki.r:g appropriate adlninistrative and bUdgeta-~ provisions for a program of continuous research concerning taxsupported educational enterprises.
The allocation of at least a small portion of the total budGet for public education to support a 5".1stematic and continuous program of research activities directed toward the improvement of tax-supported educational enterprises would appear to have many practical and theoretical justifi~ cations. A very hi;::;h proportion of the tax dollar in Georgia is expended for educational purposes. Judicious and efficient expenditures of these funds logically presuppose that policy decisions will have been based on the availability and use of comprehensive and current data pertinent to such policy decisions. Generally considered, such data in desirable quanti"0Y and of desirable quality have not in the past usually been available for use in the determination of sound policy decisions concerning many facets of enterprises in public education. 11any business concerns have found it to be expedient to allocate funds for research activities related directly or indirectly to improvements in the efficiency of the business enterprise. As the largest and most expensive enterprise of the state of Georgia, public education might well be the focus of long-term and comprehensive research emphasis supported by public funds.
The outline of major topics and related sub-topics which has served as a basis for the organization and presentation of materials contained in the two present companion volumes was developed on the basis of both logical and practical considerations. Logically, the assigned mission of the Task Force on Teacher Education appeared to require that consideration be given to each of the four major topics concerning vrhich tabular data have been presented and analyzed:
I. The General Status of Public Education in Georgia II. Characteristics of the Hork Force III. Professional Preparation Programs IV. Characteristics of Trainees
Practically, the inclusion or exclusion of data pertinently related to a particular major topic was detennined by such considerations as the follmdng: (1) availability or non-availability of basic source data; (2) the availability of bUdgetary and staff resources for data processing and
interpretation; (3) limitations imposed by the necessity of completing
the project before the close of the fiscal year 1956-1959.
The purposes and scope of the present project, and conditions under which plans for its implementation had to be developed, were such as to require the collaboration of many agencies and persons. Basic source data pertinently related to the purposes and scope of the project had to be procured from many sources. Data found to be available had to be processed and interpreted. Funds and staff resources had to be made available. In each instance, the collaboration of persons other than members of the Task Force was mandatory. Accordingly, it is most appropriate that grateful aCkn01'iledgement be made for these contributions to the present study.
To Dr. Doak S. Campbell, Coordinator of Task Forces, much appreciation is expressed for his IDaJI'J valuable services in helping make administrative and budgetarJ provisions requisite to the attainment of the objectives of the Task Force; in providing counsel concerning general and specific phases of Task Force activities; and in providing encouragement and stimulation to the Editor and members of the professional staff.
For furnishing or facilitating access to basic source data, grateful ackn01vledgement is made to the follovr.i.ng:
1. Dr. Claude Purcell, State Superintendent of Schools, and the
fol101dng members of his staff: Nr. Hal l,r. Clements, ~h~. J. H.
Cammon, I1rs. Bernice McCullar, 11r. John J. Medlin, Jr. E. P. Morgan, }liss I1ary Ellen Perkins, Mr. R. D. Pulliam, Dr. H. S. Shearouse, and Dr. Allen C. Smith. 2. Mr. G. E. Pittman, Executive Secretary, Teacher Retirement System of Georgia and members of his staff; particularly, 11r. C. H. Skipper.
3. The President (or delegated representative) of the several white
and Negro senior colleges of Georgia furnishing questionnaire data concerning teacher training programs and teacher trainees.
4. Officials of the University of Georgia -- particularly the
following: President O. C. Aderhold; f1r. Walter N. Danner, Registrar; Dr. George H. Boyd, Dean of the Graduate School; Dr. R. Travis Osborne, Director, University Guidance Center.
5. Dr. Ira Jarrell, Superintendent of Schools, Atlanta, Georgia. 6. Dr. Paul Hest, Superintendent of Schools, Fulton County, Georgia. 7. Dr. 'Harren G. Findley, Assistant Superintendent of Schools for
Pupil Personnel Services, Atlanta, Georgia. 8. Dr. Van Cleve 11orris, Rutgers University, Nen Brunsvdck, New Jersey.
For invaluable assistance in the l.B.M. processing of punch card data of several types, much credit is due to:
1. Mr. E. P. Horgan and assistants, Georgia Department of Education. These services were furnished gratis.
2. }~. C. H. Skipper and assistants, Teacher Retirement System of Georgia. These services were furnished gratis.
3. Dr. J. L. Carmon, statistician, and Mr. James C. Fortson,
assistant statistician, Department of Experimental Statistics, Georgia Experiment Station, The University of Georgia. These services ,;-rere financed by special funds made available by President O. C. Aderhold to process the data concerning bachelors and masters graduates of the University of Georgia, 1958. See Tables IV-A-l through IV-A-14 and IV-B-l through IV-B-8.
To members of the statistical and stenographic staff, grateful acknowledgement is made for assistance in data processing, the preparation of tabular and textual materials and other related services. The members of the statistical staff 1-Jere: 1-1rs. Sheila Bailey, IvIr. Joseph A. Booker, Miss Francina Couey, :tvIrs. Grace J. Eubanks, ~1rs. Frances Gotesky, Mrs. Hazel D. Simpson and I'1iss 1'lartha June !'latts. The members of the stenographic staff were: }1rs. Jan N. Armstrong, Mrs. Linda F. Farmer, Miss ~'lary Patterson, Mrs. Leitha Smitb, and H':rs. Helen 1iJilson.
To his perso.nal secretary, r-1rs. Jan N. ArmstronG, the Editor is especially indebted for the highly efficient performance of a i'lide variety of secretarial and managerial duties related to the program of research activities and the preparation of the present manuscripts.
With due respect to the value of all other contributions to the present study by non-members of the Task Force, the services of the professional staff deserve special and outstanding recognition. Due to the cooperation of President O. C. Aderhold and Dean John A. Dotson, the fol101dng members of the faculty of the College of Education of the University of Georgia were released from regular duties during one or two quarters for "parttime" participation as members of the professional staff of the present study: Dr. Joseph C. Bledsoe, Dr. Bernice Cooper, Dr. Albert J. Kingston, Dr. George B. Miller, and Dr. George L. Newsome, Jr. Under the general direction of the Chairman of the Task Force, these persons have contributed to: (1) the planning of the general and specific research objectives of the stUdy, (2) the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data; and (3) the preparation of the two manuscripts which report the results of the study. Specific citations of responsibility and credit for particular individual contributions are made in footnote references in each volume. Except for the contributions by the professional staff, the study could not have been completed.
Since each member of the professional staff ivorked in the role of a "team member" as Hell as in the role of an "individual contributor" with specific assigned responsibilities, it is not feasible to give a fully accurate descriptive account of the varied contributions of each staff member to the study as a whole. The order in which the authors are listed by name on the title page is meant to reflect the proportinate amount of time (in decreasing order) 11hich each author contributed to the entire project. The specific footnote citations of credit and responsibility for the authorship of a particular section of the manuscript enable the reader to identify the individual staff member primarily responsible for the analyses and interpretations of data made in that particular section. That is, although each contributor had access to comments and criticisms from other members of the professional staff and from the Editor,
the final responsibilit:y- in matters of data interpretation, format and style rested vJith the individual contributor.
It should also be mentioned that tl,-JO members of the Tasle Force have made significant research contributions to the present studJ'. r1iss }1arJ Ellen Perkins collected and analyzed the data concerning curriculum patterns for teacher education programs in white and Negro colleges of Georgia. See Tables IV-B-l and III-B-2. Dr. ~\Tarren G. Findley collected and analyzed the data on teaching aptitude and student achievement in the public schoms of Atlanta, Georgia. See Tables II-B-l, II-B-2, II-B-4, and II-B-5.
The Editor lJould be Grnssly remiss in his duties if the present acknowledgements did not pay special tribute to the interest and concern shown in the present study by the entire membership of the Task Force. By deliberate intent, this membership I"las comprised of individuals held in the highest esteem by their peers in industry, conunerce, and education. It was felt that only such a group, broadly representative of the diverse interests and concerns of the citizens of Georgia in matters related to teaching and teacher education, could best determine what types of studies should be undertaken and appraise the major implications of the findings. Although the majority of these members could not, by virtue of their respective responsibilities, assume an active research role in the present study, each has Given generously of his time in serving in advisoFy and evaluative capacities.
The reader ..Jill properly anticipate that a manuscript produced under the present circumstances (i.e., basic data derived from va~ing sources, involving varying time periods and var;}rj.nG base populations, analyzed and interpreted by different professional staff members 'Jho had to Hork somewhat independently of each other) may well lack desirable (1) completeness in factual coverage, (2) exact consistency in data presentation and interpretation and (3) agreeffient in format and style. For such imperfections of these types as the present stUdy may contain, no apology is considered
necess~.
In consideration of the purposes of the study and the conditions under which it was executed, the calculation and reporting of measures of the statistical reliability of findinGS was held to be neither ne~essarJ nor feasible. In most instances, the reader interested in computing such measures "Jill have available in the tables the data requisite to such calculations.
Although the present study makes no claims of definitiveness or finality, it is believed that the factual and interpretative data contained in the present volumes will have verJ great interest and value to all agencies and persons concerned vJith the improvement of teaching and teacher education in Georgia. "t"Jhatever limitations the present study may have, it may be said to have the virtue of presenting more nearly complete, accurate and recent data concerning teaching a~d teacher education in Georgia than have ever been available previously. For these reasons, and in view of the strategic role of public education in a democratic society, the present findings and reconunendations are respectfully commended to the attention of the Governor, the General Assembly, Boards of Edti.cation, school officials, members of the teaching profession, and the general public.
James E. Greene, Sr., Chairman Task Force on Teacher Education