. OODRT PROCEDURE IK_OEOHCHA
Official Project No.
VU \
WORKS PROGRESS ADiaKISTHATION PROJECT
l_ .. _-
EL.;. - -
Spanaored By ; STATE DEPAHTMEKT OP PUBLIC WELFARE CP GECROIA
COKSULTINO 001O-ITTEE
Lawrence a. Caap John o. Humphries, Sr.
Ben T. W&tklci
Ed.*ard Alllson Terry, BS, US Statewide Project Supervisor
Kllllaa Tiylor Thuman, Legal Advleor
1937
LIDRARY
TATE S3LLEBE
33 EltMW ST. 9. B*-
APPRECIATION
No endeavor Involving great amount of toll can be success fully accomplished by one or even a few Individuals. Team work of the highest type among Individual workers and cooperation with supervisory personnel must be present before desired ends are gained* For the completion of this survey, more than two hundred persons labored diligently* Gathering the basIc data from the numerous courthouses scattered all over the State re quired painstaking and patient effort from the workers, and the direct? on of local assignments called for Ingenuity and unfailing energy on the part of the field supervisors and their assistants. A constant vigil against errors was the lot of those charged with editing the schedules, while the tabu lation and assembly of the material gathered was an exhaustive undertaking and made long and tedious hours a necessity for completion* Those upon whom fell the task of general super vision of the work take this opportunity to express a deep appreciation not only for the excellent work that was the rule among all of those connected with the project, but nora par ticularly for the fine spirit that was manifested by all of those whose-combined efforts have made this report possible*
G* As
/<?27
FosEwoao
Sach of the one hundred and fifty-nine county governments of Georgia Is charged separately with the duty of combattlng law lessness and maintaining criminal records, and each county has Tlrtually adopted Ita own methods. Coaron knowledge and previous criminal studies reveal that the methods, procedure, and records of the law enforcement offices In many of these counties can be adopted to narked advantage by the other counties. Uniformity of records alone would create a tremendous benefit In coordinating and utilizing these data. Systematic exchange of pertinent Infcreation would expedite and reduce the cost of apprehending tha criminal. Public officials, crlmlnologlBts, axd osier experts in government administration have long deplored the absence of re liable and sufficient Information concerning crises and crimi nals. These deficiencies are, Indeed, aggravated by such lack of uniformity and uoh multiplicity of county Jurisdiction.
The Federal Government, through the Works Progress Adminis tration, has undertaken many practical surveys which have given needful employment to many types of non-manual workers. Many of these workers were familiar with court records and procedures; In fact, many had had legal training. With the crying need today for remedies to relieve an appalling crlae situation, and with a similar need existing In the unemployment problem, It was thought relief for both could be effected by conducting a survey of this nature.
This survey was planned to enable the authorities to deal more Intelligently with Georgias criminal question. It contains fmota and figures of definite value In directing public attention to conditions which require more Intensive study or Immediate rectification.
United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia
Former Attorney General of Georgia Superior Court Atlanta circuit
Chief ot Police of llacon Former President Peace Officers
Association of Georgia
157970
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE ... KECHAXIC3 .
............ ............
CHAPTER I
CRIMINAL LAY AMD CRDCLSAL CODRT3 ....... SubstantlTe L* of crlB* ........ Viewpoints of criminal Procedure ...... The Routine or Criminal Procedure ......
CHAPTER II
UW ENFORCMENT .......... Tha Sorelgna Paaoa ......... The Conservation of the Paaea .......
CHAPTER III PEOPLE BEFORE THE COURTS ........
CHAPTER IV
BAIL BONDS ...........
Statutory and Constitutional ProTlalona .....
TJPaa of Ball Bond*
........
Ball Bond Practices
........
professional Bondsaen
........
ABOunt of Ball Bonds
.........
Forfeiture Practices
........
Advsntagss Tested In the Defendant ......
CHAPTER 7
CASE3 BEFORE CITY CODRTS ........
CHAPTER I
CASES BEFORE SDPERIOH COI1RT3 ........
CHAPTER Til
CHIMES AJID SEKTEMCES .........
Povers of the Conrt ......... JUsdeossjior Sentences ......... probation and Suspension Sentences ...... RecldlTls* ........... Baunsa Law ...........
CHAPTER VIII THE APPELLATE COURTS ......... NUBber of Cases ..........
CHAPTER II
PROCEDURE AFTER SENTENCE
........
The Role of the Prison Coanleslon ......
Disposition or Prisoners ........
CHAPTER X
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GEORGIA CCCHT 5*3701 .....
BT John D. Ruaphrles t Sr., Judge Superior Court Atlanta circuit
Under the Trustees .....:...
under the ling ..........
Independence of the Croen ........
The Constitution of 1777
.......
The constitution of 1759
.......
The Constitution of 1798
.......
The Constitution of 1861
.......
The Constitution of lg&5
........
The Constitution of looa
.......
The Constitution of 1877
.......
Conclusion ...........
CHAPTER Jd EXPENSES OF THE SX3TEV .........
CONCLU3IKO STATmEW ............
APPENDIX A . APPENDIX S . . APPENDIX 0 . APPENDIX D . APPENDIX K . . APPENDIX T . APPENDIX 3 . APPENDIX H . .
............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
Page .lx f II
.1 1
.} .4 .9 .9
10 .15 .29 .29 -JO .30
31 -32 .32 .33 -35 .51
5
.63 65
.71 73
?* 75
.76 .79 .79 -S3 .25 .S5 .So .25
B9 .89 .9 .92 .92 ,92 .93 .9* .97 - 13
.107 .109 .133 .137 . 1*3. .155 . lfi . 175
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE I TABLE II TABLE III TABLE IT TABLE T TABLE TI TABLI Til TABLI Till TABLI IX TABLt X TABLI XI TABU XII TABLE XIII TABU XtT TABU XT TABLE XTI TABU XVII TABU XVIII TABU XIX TABU XX TABU XXI TABLE XXII TABU XXIII TABU XXXT TABU XXT TABU XXTI TABU XXTII TABU XXTIII TABU XXtX TABU XXX TABU XXXI TABU TTTTI TABU XXXIII TABU XXXXT TABU XXXT TABLE XXXTX TABU XXXTII TABLI infill TABU XXXIX
louth Ca* Admitted to the Georgia Penitentiary.
Page 15
relona Between agee 21 and 25 Admitted to the Georgia Penitentiary . 15
Race and Sex of Thoae Aconaed of Crime - By Crimea and Crime Type*
IS
Race and sex of Tho*e Aooueed of Crime* - By Age Group*
22
Talu* of property Returned for Taxation to Ball Bond Obligation*
Jl
Ball Bond A*a***ment* In Georgia Countle* ......
Size of Bond* Required In an Urban Georgia County .
mlodopaanor Caae* - By leer In Ihloh Docketed .
Tlolatlone Prohibition Lev and Simple Laraenole* .
37
Dlapoeltlon of Ca*e* - city Court* . . .
T*
Period Beteun Docketing and Trial of Caiee - City Courta .
*o
Caaea Hot Triad - Cltj Courta .
..
M.
Conc.tlone and Aoqulttala - City Courta . .
42
Pleae of Guilty and lot Guilty - City Courte .
4*
ConTlotlone and Acquittal* on Pleae of lot Guilty - City Courta.
5
Trial Procedure In Caie* there Plea* of lot Guilty I*r* Entered.
*
ConTlotlona and Acquittal* on Jury Trial* - City Court*
Conriotlona and Acquittal* on Ion Jury Trial* - City Court*
*9
Dl*po*ltlon of Caaee - Superior Conrte ....... 52
Caiee lot Tried - Superior Courte ........ 5*
Plea* of Guilty and lot Guilty - Superior Court* .
58
Conrlotlon* and Aoqulttale - Superior Courta...... 60
Period Betaeen Docketing and Trial - Superior Courta .
2
Sentence* for ConTlotlona of Aatault and Battery .
66
Total ConTlotlone In Relation to Different Type Sentence* - By Crime* 67
Total ConTlotlone In Relation to Different Type Sentence* - By Type . 68
fine and Alternative rlne-Detentlou Seatenoea .
6
Detention Sentence*
.......... 6t
Alternative Pine-Detention Sentence* . . . .
.
69
fine and Detention Sentence* ......... TO
Probation Sentenoee In Relation to the Total Sentence* Impa**d .
72
Reololvlet* In Relation to the Total Caee* RaTleved .
73
Reloene Granted ........... 80
Pardon* - Percent of Minimum fcatenae sernd .
81
Pardon* - By Crime*........... 81
coamtttatloa* - Percent of m-i Sentence Served. .
81
Pardon* - Commutation* - Parole* - By "- Sentence Impoied. .
82
Parole* - By Percent of "-< sentence Served .
82
Pardon* - Commutation* - Parole* - Life Xmprlaonment Caaee
83
Tl
LIST OP APPENDIX TABLES
TABU 1 TABU 2 TABU 3 UBSZ * TABUS TABLE TABU 7 TABU 8 TABLX 3 TABLK 10 TABU 11 TABLX 12 TABLI 13 TABLX U TABLX 15 TABLI 16 TABLX 17 TABLK U TABLI 19 TABU 20 TABLI 21 TABLI ZZ TABU 23 TABLX 24 TABU 25 TABU 2 TABU 27
TABU 28
TABU 2$ TABLX 3O TABU 3V TABU 32 TABU 33
TABU 3*
ralaai Aaaittad to tat Oaorcla raaltaatlarr ....... 109
raraoai Jallad - Sr Crlm* at aalob Aoouat ....... 11O
Month 17 Booth Tarlatloaa of >araaM Jallat ....... 112
AIM or. raraona Aoeaaao. of CriaM ......... 113
Ball Boaaa.Baqniraa In raloay ud Mladaaaaaor GUM ..... IB
TTPM of Ball BOBU Aooaptod la fultoa Coontj, aaorcte .... 133
Ball Bud AaMaaaaat la aa Orbaa (Morel* Coaatr ...... 13*
Ball load AMUaaaata la flaorrla CoaatlM ....... 135
Bool rort.ltr la an Drtoa Qoorgla Covatj ....... 135
CollMtloai of Ball Boat rorfcltsru . ....... 13*
naal jaaMBM oa Bmll Bond tarfoltarM ....... 13S
MtaUoa LUt of MlsoallaBMM MlilaMiaiirl ....... 137
tlHiainnr CUM - nr zur la abloh i>tt^l ...... 13*
1i1in<ir CUM - Br OoBtj la fclok 9ou*lM. ...... 1*O
rrloi Bctma Poottlo( aaA Trlml of CUM ....... 1*2
IlaaaBMaor aad rclaay CUM - Bj IMT la aalaa Ooautol . . . .1*3
MlilHMinnT aad lUaar CUM - Bj Count* la Moh DookttM ....!*
Prlwl BotiMu Dotfketlnc aa* Trial of CUM ....... 150
CUM Bot Trl* ............ 152
MotaaoM for liflMunnr CUM ......... 15*
HatnoM for floar CUM .......... Ifi
Criminal CUM Bafon taa Court of AppMla of 0*orgla ..... 1C}
Criminal CUM amfan th< Sapru. Coart of OMrcla ..... 1?O
COBOUM froa Blah SUM MI* CurKd to to* Appllt coarta
. 170
DUpoiltiaaVf CUM Bifar* th. Court of APPM! of Orcrtla ... 171
rl.po.tlon of Crlalnml CUM Bafora tb lu|iraa Court of 0rjl . . 171
TarlM Btpi) llln of CaaM aad Rwlr Wapoaal - Th Ooart of .
Aspaala or OMTCla ............ 172
rarlM Bataaau rillag of CUM and Tbalr glapoul - Taa aagnuj
Coart of oaorda ............ 17*
Ranaata to ta* Bopraaa Court tor mta or Canlararl ..... 173
Halation of CUM Bararaad to CUM APVMlaa . . . . . . 173
BalMaM onaMtt ............ 175
rardooa - ooaaotatlou - TarolM - By Inlaaa BaataaM lapMad ... 175
Balaaua araatad rrlaooan naaar Ufa lain <Maat gautaauM la taa
OMrla raaltaatlarj ........... 17*
nu>i af xaoaoaa - ralaay OMM la tba oaorcla raaltaatlaty
. 17*
LIST OF CHARTS. MAPS. AND EXHIBITS
MAP I CHART I EXHIBIT I EXHIBIT II CHART II CHART III CHART IT MAP II HAP III MAP IT
Countlee studied .
......... I
Age of Peraona Admitted to Georgia Penitentiary ..... 17
Month by- Month Tarlatlone of Peraona Jailed ...... 14
Agea of Paraona Accuaed of crlaee ........ 20
Bonda for Felony and Mladeaeanor Caaaa ....... 31
Typaa of Ball Bonda Accepted in Fulton County, Georgia 1926-1935 . . 32
Tjpea or Ball Bonda Accepted In Fulton County, Georgia - 1935 . . 33
Countlee In Ihlch the city Courta wre studied ..... 37
Caaea Rereraad to Caaa Appealed ........ 78
Circulta of the Superior Court of Georgia ...... 84
EXHIBIT I EXHIBIT 2 EXHIBIT 3 EXHIBIT fc EXHIBIT 5
EXHIBIT 6 EXHIBIT 7
Jail locket Bohedulea . ......... 107
Schedulea In Trial Courta
......... 107
Schedule* In Appellate Courta ......... 108
aohedule Uaed for prlaon CoaaUaalon Caaea ...... 106
Superior Court Circulta In vhloh the Judgea Recalre Sal&rlea Paid
oy the County ... ......... 15*
Typical RecidlTlat Caaea . ......... 155
Procedure Uaed la flt&0rliv Data fro* prlaon Coanlaaion .... 176
PREFACE
The State Department of Public Welfare Is charged with th duty of collecting, compiling, and publishing statistics and Information regarding the delinquent, dependent, and defective olasssa. Mo factfinding expedition .regarding delinquent classes oould b* complete without some information regarding the operation of tn* criminal court In which thaee persons are triad.
With the aid of fund* from the American Institute of Criminal La*, tha State Department of Public Welfare In 192* made a atudy of cases coming bafora tha Superior and City Courts of five representa tive count lee of Oaorgla. raw atudlaa of thle type had than been at tempted and tha technique developed, mas utlllxad by urraya in other tatea. The etudy ooTarad a total of 12*052 oases brought bafora tha oourta during tha yaara 1916 and 1921. Pull credit for Its success Is given to Boyos H. Wens and Hugh N. Fuller, who wars connected aitb. tha Depertaent in 1924-.
A sore ztezulT* oriaiaal court stud/ saia Akds by Hcgh H. Fuller In 1928, when 89,671 oases appearing before six of tha larger orLalnal courts during tha tan-year period 1916-1925 were surrajad. Such ques tions aa amount of court business, frequency of certain crlus, tiaa of disposition, certainty of punishment, and type of sentenoa lapoeed were given particular attention.
The two studies mentioned above wars aade for tha purpose of asslating the officers of the court, the Judge particularly, in under standing the work of the court and soBethlng about the persons ooaing before It. It Is regretted Chat court records do not inolud* sure- of tha case histories of defendants. This fact naturally limits tha scope of any court study.
Seeing tha need for a continuation of original Court research In Georgia, tha Department appealed to tha Works Frograss Administration of Georgia to approve a project which would Include a survey of a rep resentative group of counties of Georgia. Through tha close coopera tion of tha Works Progress Administration, such * project was under taken In tha fall of 1935. Thle survey covered 25^.32* oases from tha trial courts of fifty-seven representative counties.
With every section of tha State Included In the Surrey of Crimi nal Court Procedure In Georgia, valuable Information regarding tha re lationship of orlm* to geographical areas has been discovered- This survey, utilizing as It has the pioneer work of th* State Department of Public Welfare In former studls*, undoubtedly will furnish a re port of criminal court business which will be invaluable to court of ficials, students of criminology, social worjtere, and tha Interested publlo.
Tha Stata Department of Public Welfare, as Sponsor of th* proj ect, wlahee to thank tha Works Progress Administration for the time and funds expended In thle endeavor.
Atlanta, Georgia February 1, 1957
^W**** Director, State Daj Publlo Welfare
COUNTIES IN WHICH THE SURVEY OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCEDURE OPERATED
MAP Ho. I
MECHANICS OF THE SURVEY
This survey, designed to determine how fine the Dills of the Oeorgla court system grind, sifted and graded the grist of the several courts. The sample se lected for study contains slightly more than one-third of the counties of the State, and a trifle more than one-half Its population. The period covered la representative of 00orgla*s current court and criminal problems, since It covers the decade closing December 31, 1935. This ten-year period should reflect com pletely the problems existent not only today, but also those In the days ot nu merous builness failures.
The court system of Oeorgla Is built around the county as a basis unit. Practically all types of counties found within the State were represented In the group chosen- A complete list of these counties Is shown on the map on the op posite page.
This survey was planned a* a definite part of the Works Progress Adminis tration program In Georgia, with a view of utilizing the talents of large num bers of people then upon relief rolls. Many of these Individuals had had expe rience In and about the courthouses of the state, and were relatively familiar with court procedure and court records. Over 25O persons were employed at vari ous time* on this survey. Close supervision was given these people at all times. and they found few difficulties In securing the desired data.
when preliminary reconnaissance was made for this survey. It was discovered that the complete records of a criminal caee had to be gathered from several sources. Records of arrests are kept In the office of the sheriffs; records of trial are kept In the office of the olerk of the court; records after sentence are kept by tbe Prison Commission; and records of appeals are kept In the appellate courts. The records of several offices must be searched before tbe com plete record of any Individual case can bs compiled. It was soon discovered that, except In a few localities. It would be Impossible to trace on a single schedule the history of a case from the arrest to final disposition. Therefore, It was decided to divide tbe data gathering Into four distinct parts; part one to cover the Information regarding the arrest, bonding, or Jailing of the ac cused; part two to oover the progress of the criminal case before the trial court; part three to cover the progress before the appellate courts; part four to cover the records of the Prison Comaleelon.
Each sheriff In the State of Georgia Is required by statute to keep a Jail docket. This Jail docket Is supposed to contain a record of the age, sex, and color of the person arrested, the crlae charged, the date and process of commit ment, and the date and process of release. In Fulton County, It was possible to place upon the same schedule Information concerning tbe amount of the bond deBanded of persons arrested and the Information from the sheriffs Jail docket. Many sheriffs have record books designed to receive the full Information called for In the Code, but In many cases the value of such Information was not compre hended, and often the sheriff saw fit to keep only a partial record of the per sons sent to Jail. It was found to be unusual for the sheriff to keep a record of all persons arrested. Generally the sheriff kept In his Jail docket such In formation as he deemed germane to the cage, which, In some counties, consisted only of the name of the accused, his age, and the crljse with which charged. In other counties, the race was considered of equal Importance, and only In a very few counties was an accurate record kept of the process of commitment and re lease. (See Appendix A, Exhibit 1, for schedule- used.)
Usually, the record of the trial courts was more nearly complete than that In the sheriffs office. However, this was not always the case, since Incomplete records were found In more than one county. In one county, for Instance, no ef fort was made by the clerk to Index his court dockets. In the trial courts, It Is customary to docket each case on a criminal or bench docket. For the Superior Court, this record should be completed by the Judge.
In gathering the data as desired from the trial courts, the workers usually started with the criminal docket and secured therefrom a record of the begin nlng of the case and thence traced the case through the minute docket, a dayby-day record of the events before the court, to Its conclusion within that court. In many counties It was necessary at times to complete a schedule by re ferring to the original papere (warrants. Indictments, accusations). This was possible In practically every county studied. One difficulty encountered In the completion of the schedules In the trial courts was the practice of many solici tors of using blanket Instead of specific charges. In ons city court, more than ninety percent of the persons before the court were charged with the blanket charge "misdemeanor."
Different schedules were designed for the superior and city courts, due to certain general differences In the procedure of these two courts. Where county courts Instead of city courts ware studied, the same schedule was ussd for both
courts ilnce the procedures within then are quite similar, (coplee of the sched ules used In the trial court* Hill be found In Appendix A, Exhibit 2.)
The data for the appellate courts were relatively easy to secure since the records of both the -Court of Appeal* and the Supreme Court are quite a Imllar and have been kept during the period of the study by the same group of officials. In this particular schedule, effort was made to determine the type of cases se curing appeals and the time of disposition of theee appeal*. (See Appendix A, Exhibit J, for schedule used.)
The Prison Commission of Georgia was exceptionally cooperative In aiding the surrey crew to gather the desired Information from their records. A record or the race and sex of convicted felons was secured, along with a record of the escapes, tine served, and the type of releases granted by the prison commission. (See Appendix A, Exhibit 4, for schedule used.)
This survey has consumed a period of twelve nonths. Uore than a month was taken up In making the necessary preliminary reconnaissance so that the workers could secure the desired Information with a minimum of difficulty. Approximately three months were spent in gathering the data. The remainder of the time was spent In assembling and tabulating the findings.
In each count; where the survey operated, a most cordial reception was ten dered the workers by court officials. Where unforeseen minor difficulties were discovered, clerks and sheriffs spent time and thought in aiding the workers to overcome those difficulties. If a duplicate set of records was kept, the sheriff made It possible for two groups of workers to function simultaneously. In most of the counties a special room was set aside in the county courthouse for the workers so that they would not be Impeded by having to work in a general office.
State-wide Project Supervisor
Legal Advisor
Chapter I
CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINAL COURTS
SUBSTANTIVE LAX OF CRIME: Before going Into a rather than against Its good order.
study of the various aspects of crlne. It la
The next division has been called crimes
proper to set out the definition of crime as against the person, or crimes of violence, and
given by the Code of Qeorgla: "A crlne or mis Includes all homicides, as well as the crises of
demeanor shall consist In a violation of a pub rape, mayhem, false Imprisonment, stabbing, kid
lic law, in the commission of which there shall napping, and all criminal assaults. There are
be a union or Joint operation of act and Inten three degrees of homicide In the State: Murder,
tion or criminal negligence. To paraphrase the manslaughter, and Justifiable homicide. Murder
Code, a crime might be said to be the commission Is defined as the unlawful killing of a human
of any act which has been declared by law to be being with aallce aforethought." It is punish
against the good and well-being of society, able by death except In those eases where the
coupled with an Intention to do a wrong In that Jury reoooaenda mercy.** Manslaughter la the un
act* ^ SSiince the beginnings of civilized society,
lawful killing of a human being without nallce, and may be voluntary or Involuntary.1* Voluntary
crimes have been catalogued In two classifica manslaughter Is a homicide committed while the
tions: One of gravity and the other of type. offender Is In a state of excitement or passion,
Offenses are divided according to gravity Into thus differing froa the deliberation which Is a
felonies and misdemeanors. As defined by the part of the crime of nuirder, and Is punished by
,Cbde: "The term felony means an offense, for confinement In the penitentiary by not less than
which the offender, on conviction, shall be lia one nor longer than 20 years:" Involuntary man
ble to be punished by death or Imprisonment In slaughter Is the frilling of a human being while
the penitentiary, and not otherwise. Every other In the performance of an unlawful act or a law
crlae Is a misdemeanor. " nl An Illustration of the ful act which might produce death In an unlawful
difference In grade IB the difference between manner - such as without that due regard for hu
assault and battery and assault with Intent to man life which Is expected of every ordinary
murder. Assault and battery Is a lesser act of man - and Is punished when In the commission of
violence upon the person of another, and being an unlawful act by confinement In the penitenti
less grave, Is a misdemeanor. On the other ary for not leaa than one nor longer than three
hand, assault with Intent to murder Is an of- years, and when In the comlsslon of a lawful
fenae of extreme gravity, and Is a felony.
act, as for a misdemeanor.171 Justifiable homicide
Each sovereignty makes Its om classifica la the killing of a nnnsn being In selT defense,
tion of types of crimes. In Georgia offensea defense of habitation, et cetera; and also In-.
against the State and people constitute the eludes killing by command of law, such as an ex
first division according to type, and consist ecution In purauance of proper order. :M
of treason. Insurrection, and attempts to Incite
Rape Is also a crime against the person.
Insurrection. The distinguishing mark of these While one of the elenents of rape Is an offense
crimes Is the fact that they are aimed at the
destruction of the sovereignty of the state
1" Sue. 26-301 Os. Cod of 1933. pNSec. 26-101 Hid.
U1 S.C1. 26-1001:26-1002 IMd.
> Soc. 36-1005 Ibid.
IS> Sac. 26-1006 Ibid. V. Sfcm. 26-1007;26-100S ibid. 17 Sc. 26-1009:26-1010 ibid. 10! SK. 26-1011 Ibid.
- 1-
against public morality, still the naln feature are bribery and conspiracy against the state or
of the crime la the carnal knowledge of a female county, rescuing and harboring criminals, and
without nor consent ana against her will. This many other related crimes.
elenant of force properly brings It within the
Cloaely connected to the above are those of-
category of orlaee of violence."
fenaea against the publlo peace, auch aa carry-
3ffenaea against habitation an! othar build Ing weapons without a permit, dueling, rioting,
ings font the next grouping of crimes In mob violence, and other disturbances of the pub
Oeorgla, and Include arson and other burnings, llo peace and tranqulllty.
destruction of property with explosives, and
Another large classification are thoae
burglary. The crime last mentioned consists In crimes whloh are against publlo morality and de
the breaking and entering of a dwelling or place cency, publlo safety, and the general policy of
at business containing articles or value, with the governnent In a civilized society. Under
the Intent to commit a felony or larceny there the heading of crimes against public morality
in. Since an essential element In burglary le the breaking and entering. It belongs to thla
are bigamy, Incest, eodomy, beastiallty, adul tery and fornication, seduction, and prostitu
group of crimes, even though burglary often In tion. Hone of these crlmea entail the element
volves the taking of property. m However, that group of crimes which la re
of force found In rape. Under the heading of public policy are found
lated to property la a large one, and embraces the offensea of gambling, gaming, lottery, using
all larcenies, embezzlements, criminal trespass, and other miscellaneous crlmea of the same na
obscene language, exhibiting obaceno plcturea, and violations of the regulations protecting mi
ture. Robbery also falls within thla category. The distinction between robbery and larceny Is thf element of force that enters Into mbbery and not Into larceny.0 This element might seem to cause robbery to fall more properly within tho classification of crimes of violence, but whon It Is remembered that the taking of prop erty la the gist of the offense, this classifi cation becomes logical.
No classification of crime would be complete without that group which la against publlo Jus tice and the functions of the government. Here are found the orlmes of perjury, subornation of perjury, and false swearing. The difference betreen perjury and false swearing lies In the fact that perjury must be committed In the pro cess of a Judicial procedure, while false swearIng la the falae representation of fact under oath outside of Judicial procedure."1 Here also
nors, as well as violations of the laws protect ing divine services and the sanctity of the Sab bath Day. Strangely enough, vagrancy also falls within thla group, because It Is against the publlo policy of the State to have vagrants within Its limits. Forgery, counterfeiting, and unlawful currency fall within a classification to themselves. Then, there Is that group of miscellaneous crimes which Includes cheating and swindling, malicious mischief, cruelty to anlmala, and related Crimea.
The foregoing are the major classifications of crimes. In addition, many acts have been made offensea because those acte Interfere with the proper conduct of the various departments of the state or the exercise of Ita police powere. Within this group are violations of tax lawa, violations of the laws regulating Intoxicating liquors, and numerous other aota.
a Sc. 26-1301 ibid. 01 Sc. 26-2401 Ibid. CI Sc. 25-2501 J26-2601;;26-2606 Ibid. ft) SKI. 26-4001 ;26-4003;26-40O4 IMd.
. An attempt to commit any crime falls within
the same classification aa the crime.
- 2-
Offendera, aa wall as offenaea, have been
claaslfled In Georgia. Principals in crime are t/ent of the Individual and society aa a whole. of two degrees: The principal In the first de V VIEWPOINT!} nr npTUTfur. raocEBURE: The admini
gree ia the actual perpetrator of tho crloe; stration of any law which requires the active
whereas, the principal In the second degree Is direction of a state agency Is beset by many
one who stand! 19, aids and abets the crime. difficulties, and administration of criminal law
Further, there may be an accessory before the Is no exception. Aa one reads through facts and
fact, as one who aids In the planning of a figures relating to criminal law and criminals ,
crime; and. an accessory after the fact, aa one it must be remembered that In dealing with these
who, after full knowledge that a crlne has been natters, tbe human equation oust be taken into committed, conceals It and harbors the criminal,r?t consideration, and that circumstance may Justify
la the philosophy of criminal law, there Is a condition that, viewed fron a standpoint of
a third classification which dlTldee crimes Into pure efficiency, night appear to be unjustlfltwo groups - those which are mala In _s_a and able. //
those which are aala prohlblta. The former la
In every criminal law and In every statute
comprise! of those urines which are Inherently affecting criminal procedure, allowance must be
wrong, such as aurder, burglary, theft, rape, made for and due weight given to three forces:
et cetera; while the second group Is comprised First, the state aa a social body In Its sover
of those acts which have been made offenses In eign responsibility for the welfare of l*s peo
the Interest of the progress of the state ana ple ae a whole; second, the constitutional and
civilization. In the former class the element natural rights of all members of society as In
of Intent la never presumed, but oust be proved; dividuals; and third, the practical experiences
while In the second, an Intent sufficient to of the machinery set up by the state for the ad
auataln the crime Is presumed froa the commit- ministration of It a criminal laws, viz- , the
ting of the overt act. With this statement. It court aystea. Sometimes all factors will work
Is easy to harmonize the old saying that Igno together and a given law will do Justice to g*T
rance of the law la no excuse.*
three, but In other Instances, the Interest of
In the early development of the fabric of two or more may be adverse.
society, offenses were punished for a retribu
The very nature of a state makes Its atti
tion and compensation to tbe Individual who waa tude floaewhat different froa that of an Individ
harmed. With the progress of civilization, a ual In that It Is responsible for the well-be
wider view has been taken and punishment of ing of Its citizens as a whole, and It must con
crime has no element of vengeance, but the en sider the ultimate effect of a regulation aa to
tire theory of punishment Is based oa an expec Its beneflclent effect on the body politic,
tation that tbe punishment will be a deterrent for the Individual Involved and for other per sons. Such la the main consideration of the
rather than upon each individual application. Thle oay mean that In some Instances a hardship may be worked on a single person or a 9^*11
judge In passing a sentence, but he Ift also con cerned with the surrounding circumstances, the
group, but If the general effect on Its people Is one of protection against an existing or-
offenders background and character, and other threatened evil and an Incentive to the progress
things which make the punishment for a crime a humane thing designed for the eventual better-
of society as a unit, then the viewpoint of the state is satisfied.
Pi Sec. 26-501 Ibid. to 3c. 26-602;26-KH Ibid.
Much could be said witb regard to the rights of the individual In any given case. The indl-
Tldual rlghti and liberties of the American peo each separate force given Its proper weight be
ple hire been beld aaored above all elae In our fore any orlmlnal law may be said to be a good
government. While It la true that criminal laws one, whether It be substantive law. In defining
are Intended for the beet Interest of tbe many, what la criminal, or adjective law. In setting
It le equally true that any la* which denies to ^/up a procedure or administration.
any Individual his personal rights which are In- \\ THE ROUTINE OP CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: The_Ji^lolal
herer-t in our form of government le unfair and system of this State for orlmlnal Jurisdiction
unjutt to not only one Individual but to the Is coBppse.d. of- *>**i typi* QT . courte^__Y_lm_.,
bole people, because society, as an aggregate, oojtfts of Inquiry, trial cour^s^ and appellate
Is composed of Individuals, and a destruction of courts.. Courts of Inquiry aca__o.oaposad of anj_
the personal liberty of one la a blow alined at pecson. baying the powers of Justice of ths
the ^oundat] an of a democratic government. This Peace, and are called Into being from time to
does not mean that the state ebould not have the time to determine probable guilt of suspects.
right to curb any unwarranted license of an In
The trial courts consist of the Superior
dividual, but any regulation which does not re Court and various olty and county courts. Orig
tain for the Individual all those natural and inal Jurisdiction 111 the .trial of all criminal
constitutional liberties which have been found, matters Is given to ths Superior Court. ID or
by the test of time, to be for the beat Interest der to lighten the load of the Superior Court In
of all the people. Is the rankest dsspotlsm. By counties having larger populations, city or
c. ccnslderatlon of those factors may the view county courts have been created and given Juris
point of the Individual be preserved.
diction to try mlademeanqr_ oaaaa.
The. last Interest which must bs considered
For the correction of errors committed In
In nny given criminal legislation la the practi the trial courts, an appeal lies to ths Court of
cability of enforcement. In other words, the Appeals and to ths 3uprss Court. The supreme
question oust be answered, "Will the situation Court has retained appellate Jurisdiction In all
to be created by the practical administration of oasss .qf__convlotlons. of a. capital offense, while
the law be consistent with the best functioning the Court of Appeal* lua frffa given appellate
of the stated machinery as a whole, granting Jurisdiction In other orlmlnal matters."
that It has met with the two requirements re
Following the commission of a orin^ an
ferred to above? A regulation may >>e perfectly arrest Is mftde__ which Is ths first physical hap
sound In theory but unsound In practice, be pening In the progress of a orljolnal oass. _In
cause the good It may accomplish may be Insig the normal courea of events, an arrest is pre-
nificant In comparison to ths great amount of cedad by the laausAjML. of a criminal warrant by
Investigation required of tbe solicitor In pre a judge of the upaxlor_aourjt, county court.
paring and carrying forward a prosecution. Justice of the peace, or similar Judicial -offl-
Likewise, tbe Indirect harm It may do to appar oer.(a_A_neo.nasar tp purmant to tbs Issuance
ently unrelated Interests of the people, Bay ot_a warrant Is the sworn allegation, by any
render it Impractical to carry out. Again, while peraon that a crime has been committed byji par
small good In one direction may be accomplished. ticular Individual.01 The warrant la than served
It may cluttsr up tba works of ths court with .>!?.- sheriff or constable," and the person named.
litigation to such an/extent that the whole sys tem may be disrupts/.
Thus oust all/These requirements ba mst and
UVfKi. 2-3005:3-300} laid. B> Sma. 37-102 Ibid. 131 SKI. 27-103;27-10t Ibid.
W SKI. 27-105:27-209 Ibid.
therein Is.arrested by that officer and car-Tied before a committing magistrate.
An arrest may alao be made by a private citizen without a warrant when an offenee la committed In hie presence, or when felony hag been committed and It come* to hi* Immediate knowledge and the felon 18 attempting to escape"? When thla ocoura. It le the duty of the arreatIng citizen to Immediately turn "the person he has arrested over to the nearest offloer author ised to Issue warrants.
The case then progresses to a commitment hearing?1 The person named In the warrant may waive commitment and have the case carried di rectly to a trial court; but In the event he does not waive commitment, he la carried before a committing magistrate who will Inquire Into the circumstances and evidence touching the matter as soon ae la practicable. The rule of decision In a magistrates court Is the rule of probable suspicion In other words, if, after having hoard the evidence, the committing magla-
trata_ feel_t;hai| them la r.ann.KI pyinnrtf of
suspicion, .that, the pfs^n before-him has^oom-. mltted the orlme_oha*ge4; or-another crime, it IB his duty to bind the peraon go charged over to a court having jurisdiction of -the offense.
Following the coranltment hearing or it* waiver, a peraon charged with crime can be re leased from Jail .by tendering ball The amount of thla ball la assessed by any Judicial officer and approved by the sheriff?" Ball fpr_ capital felony caeca la a natter of discretion on the part of the Judge of the,Superior.Court.00
Jhen the offense Is a misdemeanor, the de fendant may ba charged by the prosecuting of ficer of the court on an accusation without la-
dletment by the grand Jury. It. the offense charged Is a felony, the peraon mo., charged is bound over to the grand Jury for.cnnaldaratlon aJJLta next meeting? If the grand Jry__flnde Insufficient evidence fop trial. It returns a
no bill* and the defendant la discharged. Two no bills for* a permanent bar to further prosecution for that offenee. When sufficient evidence for trial la present, a B true bill of indictment* - the formal charge of the state against the accused - IB returned to the Su perior Court.
While the normal method of bringing B case before the grand Jury la by way of a warrant and commitment, the grand Jury IB authorized to re turn a presentment on Its own Initiative which charges a defendant with having committed a crime?5 Such a presentment by the grand Jury has the same force and le treated aa an indictment?
When * trua_blll 1* returned by the grand Jury, the caee Is lanedlately docketed by the clerk of the court?7 In city courts, when the accusation la signed by the prosecuting offIoer7 the case Is placed on the docket.
Th onunty In which a ease is tried - th venue of a case - Is determined br the place where the crime mm commltted^"_If-._ Tor aay_rason, the defendant. fe.elB_that. It. Is Impossible for him to_obtaln a fair trial In that county, he may make .a ~""nn fT I "Kfg* " -xenue, which motion la heard by the court and decision made on the basis of Aiidfiace mrueufceaS?" JLf the motion Is granted, the ease la transfsrred to another county and proceeds from there; If the motion la denied, the case proceed* In-the oountr wfaare It originated?" This motion can be made _ln .open court after an Indictment naa-been
W'Sei:. 37-308 Ibid.
SI Sec. 27-311 Ibid; 109 Oa. SIS. 531. P) SBC. 27-212 da. Coda 1933W Sac. 37-401 Ibid. B> 3ec>. 37-419:27-430 Ibid. til Sec,. 27-208:27-210 ibid.
^ Sac. Z7-407 lila. [)fc Sac.. 27-407;37-408 Ibid.
W Sec. 37-418 Ibid. WSac. 27-901 Ibid.
Tfi) Sac. 37-901 Hid.
W 134 da. 30; p. U? ieti. 1936.
PS Sc. 27-4O7 Oa, Cod* 1933.
HI Sa. 27-702 Ibid. ta SM. 59-304 IMd. W SKI. Z7-703 Ibid; 73 3m- 205. (> SK>. 34-2714 Om. Cod* 1933. IJI 63 Da. 168 (3).
. 27-1101 0. Cote 1933. . Z7-1301 Ibid. t lee.. Z7-1201-.27-.12Qa Ibid.
- 5-
returned, and It only on* of large group of ajotlons which may be made on proper grounds.
If tbe defendant, exoept on accused of a oapltsl offense, fools that his trial 1* being unreaionably delayed, he may file a formal demand for trial."" Tale demand IB entered on the minutes of the oourt, and the defendant must be tried at the term during union the demand IB filed, or at the next auooeedlng term, proTlded there are Jurors Impanelled qualified to try the oaea at both terns." If he 1 not tried at cither ten, he la automatically acquitted and suet be releaaed from Jail, or discharged If on bond."
% If the defendant feel* that there Is some Irregularity In the Indletnent Itself, whloh maken the Indictment rold, he may file a form of pleading known as a demurrer.* A demurer, In effect, etatee that, admitting all the allgationa of the Indictment to be true, no orime la charged against the defendant9 This pleading li heard by the oourt and decided according to the law of the ease.4 The oourt may sustain or over rule a demurrer. In the former event, another Indi.ctnent may be obtained where tbe defect la one of form; but If the defect IB fatal. It enda thin prosecution. When the oourt over-rulee a demurrer, the ease proceed! to trial. 4 The defendant may make a motion "to quash* an indictment, which. If granted, enda the pros ecution. There re other apeoial pleae and BOtlcna which Bay be made, auoh aa the "plea of former Jeopardy whloh allege! that tbe defend ant hae been tried before for the aame offame" Thnae motions are usually made before tbe ar raignment, whloh eonalete-ln calling the defend ant before the bar and demanding how he ahall plead. Hie plea IB entered on the minute* aa
either guilty" or not guilty.*"1 Aaaumlng in a particular- oase that John Doe
has been arrested on a warrant, arraigned, and had any motions which ha may have filed over ruled, his oase IB now ready for trial. If his jtlea^ae been guilty*, then he 1 called before the judge who listens to a statement of all the circumstances of the case and^gives_the. prisoner the sentence that seems beet In his discretion, within the limits provided by statute. m
Where the plea has been not gujl.trL the procedure In the/Superior Court la slightly .dif ferent from that, of the city, oourt, . since in many., of the latter, exoept when the defendant makes a demand for a jury trial, the oase IB tried before the judge, whereas in the Superior Court, the defendant IB given a jury trial un less he expressly _walves It, Announcement by the state of Its readiness to proceed IB usually the Initial action in the trial of a oase In the Superior Court. Thia step Is followed by a simliar announcement on the part of the defendant.Qg1 After the jury is selected by the combined ef forts of the defendant, the solicitor general, and the oourt, the state opens the prosecution by the Introduction of evidence.02* - At the close of the evidence for the state, the defendant naj make a motion for a directed verdict," if the oourt feels that the state has produced no evidence which conld be considered by a Jury toward the conviction of the defend ant, the court may direct tbe Jury to return a verdict of not guilty* and the trial Is ended there."" If, on the other hand, the oourt sees fit to over-rule such a motion, the defendant proceeds to introduoe hie evidence. After the 1 evidence Is in, arguments are presented by the defendant and by the atate. The oourt then ia-
11 J. 37-1101 ibid. to Ibid. Ct Ibid.
HI ten. 27-1601 Ibll. S Ha. 1pp. S3? (Z). 1 Oa. 36. SK. 2-106 Da. Code 1933; 153 Oa. 119. (1).
ol JM. 27-14O4.-27-140S Oa. Coif 1933. 5) Sus. 27-2503:27-1401 Ibid. fSbSK. 37-1902 Ibid. -m Ibid.
VBfci. S9-809.-S9-70S Ikli. to 11 Da. tff. 15; 19. M Ibid.
- 6-
f atruote the Jury.01 The jury retiree and makes
1 up Its verdict which it later presents In open J court? In the event the Terdlot IB "not guilty1 ,
I the defendant la thereby acquitted forever on / that charge" and the ottae la ended, since the V^atate ha.* no right to appeal?1
If the Terdlot la guilty", the JurT_haa. / coaeirtain prerogatives regarding the sentence
whloh vary with the grade of the orlBe. In a capital oaee, the Jury My return a verdict of guilty with * reoooBendatlon for meroy. In whloh event the reo-oimundatlon la mandatory upon the court, and the court auat aentenoe the defendant
to life Imprisonment? The jury la authorized to fix the sentence for the defendant within the
I llolts prescribed by statute for felonies of I less than capital grade" or It nay In certain / oasee recommend that the defendant receive a
I nlsdeneanor sentence? This latter reconmendatlon la not mandatory upon the court and may be disregarded if the court eees fit" The Jury
\ will simply return a Terdlot of guilty In misde meanor oases.**
that John Doe hae been convicted by
a Jury and feels that an error of law haa been nade and that he should not have been convicted, he may appeal the ease to the appellate courts.
The first step In this direction IB usually the
filing of a motion for a new trial" at which time John Doe may. In cases not capital, tender
a bond In an amount fixed by the court to stay execution of the courts sentence. If the bond Is accepted, he will be released from jail pend ing the outcome of his appeal.1*
a motion for a new trial la given a hearing by the Judge." On the hearing. If the Judge
<M S*o. 81-1101 He,. Cola 1933; 5 0. *tl. (2). m S*e. 27-2301 fe. Col* 1933. >P> 38 Da. 187. Jt*> SK*. 2-108;7O-201 da. Cod, 1933. IW 3*o. 27-2302 Ibid. W SM. 27-2502 Ibid. 01 Sea. 27-2501 Ibid. >) Ibid. \jm SM. 27-2301 Ibid. oa SKI. 2-3005:3-3009 Ibid. _tu Sea. 70-301 Ibid: 131 Oa. 475. (1). J<n> Sec. 6-1006 da. Cod* 1933. 03>SM*. 70-301:70-303 Ibid.
feels that there are sufficient grounds, he may grant the defendant a new trial and the case beglne again with tiie arraignment. In the event the motion for a new trial la over-ruled, the defendant nay file a bill of exceptions" alleg ing certain ground* of error that he feels have been made In over-ruling his motion for a new trial?" This bill of exceptions, together with a brief of the evidence and other fornal pleading required by law, are transmitted to the appel late court. Here the case Is then considered and either affined or reversed, depending upon the view that court may take as to whether or not an error has been committed In the lower court.0 If the ease la affirmed by the appellate court, the defendant le re-sentenced and starts serving his sentence under the supervision of the Prison CosmUsslon?"
In casea where the lower court la reversed, the type of error dftterslr.es whether the defend ant la acquitted and released or the case re manded for a new trial?1 The lower court Is re versed and the defendant freed In those caeea where the error raade was directly responsible for the conviction. If, on the other hand, It may have been possible for the defendant to have been convicted, even had the error not been made, the case Is remanded to the lower court for a new trial.""
In the city and other courts, having. Juris diction of misdemeanor caeca, the prosecuting officers are authorized by law to sign an ac cusation without carrying the defendant before the grand__Jury? During the. trial of a case la. the city court, the same motions^ _*_ ce_tera._ar open to a defendant as nave been Heretofore set out In the Superior Court. The great bulk of the business before the city oourt Is tried by a
<ws*o. 70-101 ibid.
Oil SM. 6-901 Ibid. M Ibid.
anSM. 6-1001 ibid.
SM*. 2-3005:2-3009 Ibid. S*o>. 27-2901:27-2505:6-1801 Ibll.
70-102 Ibid; 61 Oa. 529. ,<zuSM. 6-1610 Oa. Cod* 1933. taa Oa. IBS (2); 119 0*. 120 (2).
Judge without a Jury, but If tha defendant wlabea to have a Jury trial, he nay demand ona and.the court gust provide a Juzy_.<" Jn tha_a.T*B.t of A conviction.... lajLCity oourt,- the -defendant aay_ appeal to tha Superior . Court on a writ of cerfciorarl1^ or for.. _aace. -triad-. ia~cit^jCQ]U^i9 wheie proTlelon for jueh appeal la mada, ha nay
take hie oaaa en a bill of axoaptlona to tha Court of Appeal!. If, on tha. appeal to tha 8uparlor Court, tha decision of the city court la affirmed, tha defendant may than go to tha Court of Appeals on bill of exceptions, where the oaaa la treated la exactly tha aajia manner aa baa been heratofora daaorlbad for tha Superior
"' S.3. 2-4S01 0*. Col* 1933. SfS. 19-303 Itrld.
_,---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- / oDJW S. 2-3009 Itli.
Chapter I
LAW ENFORCEMENT
THE SOVEREIGNS PEACE: After * crime has been a_Hll_famlly
"P"" h1 efr *"d lnm--
committed, the court does not enter into the of the klng'e peace In preference to Thp
picture until an arrest hae been made. So es loT-q'fi p..,----OE--the-- peaeej ot--tbe_lndlvjl4ual
sential IB the am of the court charged with
capturing violators of the law that the courts
In the time of the later Saxon kings, there
are never completely satisfactory when this de had appeared In each region, shire, or county, a
partment falle to function properly. This dls- sheriff who was given full authority to execute
cuaalon of the law enforcement system of Georgia the orders of the klr.g. He was Bore than merely
present* both the historical background and the the local officer of the king, with authority to
relationship of the aysteo to the courts.
collect the kings rent and feudal dues; he was
Developing society haa subjected criminal given complete authority to keep the kings for
law and Its enforcement to great changes. The est Inviolate, and to see that great and small
ancient codlfIcatlone of these laws show that lived up to their feudal obligations to the
.the. _crlmlnal committed hie crlmo against persona king. The sheriff, by the time of King Henry
rather than against the atate, and the serious- the Second, ssems to have systematically dis
neas of the crime depended upon the social ranlt placed the earls and dukes In their functions as
Qf the person wronged^ It_was not until the local officers. Henry the Seconds Immediate
beginnings of the aedleval- times-th*t *-wrong successors used this officer to greater advan
doer committed an offenee agalnat-. tn* jn^erftlgiv tage, Increased Ms powers, and made him an In
or atate rather than agalnat th* indi^^n..!. dividual feared and hated by the local barons
With the development of faudmli^Pt-^tha.J
less powerful than he. No doubt the aggressive
^a person had certain set rights regarding f Ight- use of the sheriffs powers by the king was one
llig^ thefts, disturbances In hlb house or on his of the grievances which caused that memorable
property, was firmly fixed In the mlnde of the assembly at Runnymede, which secured the Great
people. These rights, wera - loosely termed *the peace"..and dinttiT-hinft pumanin eaoe_ waa.a oauae^for legal action. In the cage of persons
Charter from King John. Edward III defined _th*
and at the y*._*lr*
*T.i-rr pojtara* . Ttea where
of rank, their peace was co-extensive with their by the abuses of the t
could be
lordahlp. The eoyerelgn..a.-peaca-was-/ therefore, curbed. It^waa under this great law giver that
the most Important In the realm.
the efflceof_jthe Juatleg of the Peace was es
With the development of royal highways, for tablished?" When originally established, this
ests, and other conveniences for the use of the office seems to have been an extension of some
country at large, offensee committed In the vi earlier plan which was not wholly Incorporated
cinity of any of these became an offense against Into royal writ.
the kings peace. The early Plantagenet kings
Another officer, who, as a conservator of
consolidated the realm more thoroughly _than_jt
_had been In the past, _and the vigorous members
p. 192. Tol. I, Vev American Xdltlon, Baevea Hlatory of Inellah Lav from the Tina of the Bojaana to the Bal^ of Elizabeth*. by f. JTlnlaaon lao... X. Murphr. Philardalphla. 1880.
<" p. 45, Tol. I, 2nd Edition. "The Hlitory of tngllili low. Pollock aad Ifeltlaad, Caabridc* University Presii CaBbrUca. 1911.
Q> p. 251. Tol. II. 'Conatltutioul Hl.torj of W111U. Stab. HcVllUa * Co.. London. 1875.
14) p. 2. Cap. II. Tol. II. IS Idnid III: 'The Statntee at
Larce*. Dauby Plckerlng. Joaaph Bentham. Cubridga. 1762.
-9-
tin peace. aided la bringing the kings peaoe Into gr.ral u. was the Coroner. This officer bad powfrr to arrest the gherlff and In the time of King John seeme to nave taken unto himself In addition the functions of a prosecuting attor ney. The Great Charter took thle latter funotlon from Ma.1" In soae states, by statute, the coroner remains a ooneerrator of the peace. In aeorgla, however. the general peace officer functions. jie_eierelea arlee from his powers at common law, or from his oommon law and statutory rights to replace the aherlff when that officer
their duties wen detailed.0 At that time the name was changed to Justice of the Peace. Each, part of the shire bad one Justice of the peaoe who was the chief criminal officer of that area, and who usually attempted the pursuit and cap ture of local criminals. Beggars, vagrants, tramps, and other persons not firmly bound to the community, were usually arrested by them. Jailed, punished, or sent to other communities.
This officer has continued as a conservator of the peace. Even though under tbe law he is authorized to appoint the necessary officers to handle any local disturbance of the peace which
Ono deterrent to the growth of the Idea of the kings or sovereigns peace was the custom of *pluces of refuge. (zj As the kings court sys tem caice Into more general use and criminals were protected from violence, the places of refuge* were no longer necessary and were abol ished. When Georgia was colonized, early sett lers Incorporated the Ideas at thf-tlngt pc Into the life of_thelr new hone. Crime today Is an offense against th sovereign e peaoe or the
may arise, this particular function Is rarely exerclesd. Justices of the peace often are so laden with the functions of a civil court that the conservation of the peace Is neglected, and other officers are more accessible and better equipped to act than they.
Concurrently with this office, there grew up a tfygtajB of city government. The municipal charter* were framed so as to regulate many trade details which called for a slightly
states peaoe. I^z_^,9nfnrnf**n* Aa_ .the. main
tenance at
ftttr
THE CONSERVATION OF THE PEACE: The development
different type of law enforcement office than was necessary for the rural districts. The present day municipal system of police had Its
of ths Idea that the state was wronged by origi birth In these times; and from Its birth to the
nal actions was accompanied, by the growth of the states machinery for the preservation and the
present, there are In every city two systems of polios officers - one maintained by th county
conservation of tbe peace. By the reign of ling Edward III* the need for a local person to be,
and the other by the city. LA* ENFORCEUEMT IN OEORKLA: Some o. the, count
present to aid the sheriff In carrying out his duties and to curtail the; abuses of the sher iff *n powers was apparent, and persons were ordalnod to fill this need. They were called Conservators of the Peaoe. It was not until
ies have seen fit to more or less combine these units, but nowhere in the State is law en forcement carried on as a tingle unit connected dlreotly with the State and tbe Nation. Each county baa Its sheriff; each town has Its mar
the latter part of King Edwards reign that shal or chief of police, and In 0ooe counties
(Up. 41. Chip ZTII, A Dtct of tb Iacli.il 5ttut.. of fora 1= th 3tt of loorela , Illllu SefcliT. J. lltxwe-l. Fhllalelphla, 1826.
fzj p. 69 "alnteh of Znclivh Lmffti Rlmtacy* , *ni*igA mod Kontacoi, 8. p. PotUBo Ioa, lev Tork, 1915; p. 313 C*> Z, 9 Idnrd II. Tol. I. The Statute* at Largo, Duby Plcktrlic. JoMph lonthaa, 1762.
IS p. 303, Cap. TI. Tol. Til. Ibid. W p. 419 Cap. in. Ibid. a) If.. 391,-T-ol-. -I. -4t-h I-dl-tt-oD, BUciaton..
K. Colloy. CmllMfhfM Co. CUu<o, 1899.
county police force independent of the sheriffs office has been established. Many of our law enforcement problem* can be traced directly to this decentralization and meager coordination.
U p. 419. 14 Xdmid III. Tol. 1, 'Ih> St*tnt at Large'. Dully Flckerlnc, Jonfph tmtlum, Cutrldto, 1762.
- 10 -
The law endorsement regime la the several oatlon with these Individuals since they live In
counties and IB the oltls within Jtht_pountlee remote Motions of the county and can be
! rarely exactly the earns. ana is dependants-la. reached only by aall or messenger. In some
of oountlee there is not a telephone In either the
authority. aa wall aa atatutory regulations. In courthouse or Jail, and neither the sheriff nor
each county of the State there le a sheriff his deputies can be reached by telephone. When
elected for a four-Tear tr by the people of such a condition exists, it is inpos&lbla for
the county. This officer Is a conservator of adequate connections to be maintained with law
the peaoe, and under the authority of this title enforcement agenclee of adjoining countlea.
ha* the power to do whatever Is neoeeaary to
If the county contains an incorporated town,
maintain the peaoe.2 He has, however, hut little It Is likely that the town will have a marshal.
greater authority as a law enforcement official This officer may or nay not have had .experience
than does any citizen, except that he la charged in >i**'Hrig law enforcement problema. is long as
with the execution process of the superior the marshal haa no assistants, It is likely that
Court?1 Be Is authorized to appoint such dep- be will cooperate with the sheriff, but It Is
ntlea a* he needs to aid hl In the business of also likely that It will be a difficult matter
his office!" Aa exeoutlv* officer of the Supe to looate him la an emergency. In a small town,
rior Court, a vast number of his duties are In nowise connected with his duties ae a law ea~
the marshal enforces city ordinances and the laws of ths state as a part-time activity, since
foroement official, and the fees for these are It Is usual for the town to require hla to per
muoh greater than those for n-iynoig orlmlnal form a wide variety of duties. With the townZa
matters i51 for many duties of law enforcement Increase in alxa., thejiarehal^a. pfflcjt_losee
there are no fees attached. TOT Instance, the Ita law enforoeaent functions and_a_chieT. of
sheriff may spend seversl days In the solution police *>._gV**n "^Mrge of law enforcement wi>rg.
of a orlmlnal case, only to be entitled, under
The chief of police generally haa better
the law, to the fee for muting an arrest."
facilities than the marshal, and la given suon
The sheriffs Jurisdiction Is oounty-wlde, equipment as Bay be neceesary to acco:sp3.1ah his
hut as an officer of a etate court, he haa au task. Oftsn, however, the town ( e finances are
thority to serve warrants anywhere within the Inadequate to give the chief as large a force ae
bounds of the State? Usually the sheriff when he may need. The police chief- usually is ac
elected to office has had little experlenoe with cessible and maintains satisfactory telephonic
the advanced methods of law enforcement and the facilities, but he still haa only casual con
duties expected of him In enforcing the law. Re nection with other law enforcement agencies.
elects his deputies from among the citizens of
Law enforcement probleas attendant upon pop
the county, and often their experience In hand ulation Inoreaaee are no* _alwaye_accoapanledhy
ling law enforcement problems le as meager as additional machinery to care for these. Often
his. In the smaller oountlss the pay for theee little effort ie made to better the connections
deputies must come from the sheriffs pocket. between the sheriff'a office and that of the
Frequently It le difficult to maintain oosmjinl- chief of police. Due to the press of civil mat
(1) Seo. 34-2801 O*. Coif 1933.
K19*e>. 26-4901 ;26-M01 t Mqpl. Ibid. O)SC1. 24-2801 at MfOl; 27-301 t Mflil, Ibid. <4>SC. 34-2811 Ibid. l Se. 24-2823 Ibid. I" ill*.
"> 3c. 27-209 Ibli.
ters in the euperlor court, the sheriff may leave much of his law enforcement work undone. In that case, the bulk of the county Is not ade quately policed, and when this happens, the peo-
11 -
pla of the county nay make provision for IJLW en In ROM or Cedartown, the robber would havw ee-
forcement in the rural regions by the formation oaped Into alsTtr A similar situation would
of a county polloa force." Often tBe oounty exist if the route to Tennessee war* chosen.
police are placed under the auperrlalon of the Suppose, further, a route leading toward the
governing body of the oounty, but In oe ootra- southern part of the State were chosen. The
tlea, t.hla force baa bean placed under the di situation la not very different aven though the
rection of the aberlff and the oounty polio* be- distance la longer and there are more counties
eow deputy aherirfa, differing from the other and cities to paaa through. Unless ha wma tan-
deputlea only In that they are paid salaries and glad In the traffic of Atlanta,, It la likely
are provided with the neoeaaary equipment to that the escape would be made good, and It would
patrol a given area.
rest with eoae deteotlve force to nake Identifi
When the town beglna to develop Into a me cation at a later day.
tropolitan area, It la quite likely that Its po
Deteotlvea In Oeorgla are handicapped alnoa
lice force will develop ofaaraeterlatloa peculiar only the larger oltlea of the State Maintain
to auah an area. Usually within thaaa places, fingerprint Identification bureaus, and thaaa
the police system la composed of two major sub have little connection with eaoh other. If
divisions: the uniformed group and the de there ware a state-wide bureau, It la probable
tective bureau. The former conalsta of the pre that a suspects complete Identification would
cinct patrolaen, the radio, the motorcycle, and be on file, and It would be possible to give
the traffic offloara, while the detective bureau definite Information regarding his habits and
IB anslgned Investigation and under-covar work. his family, aa wall as auch physical character
Host of the larger ayateaa nalntaln an Iden istics ae ha night posssss. Suoh a atate bureau
tification bureau whose duty it la to photograph would be available for the uaa of all law an-
and fingerprint all auapecta. Coplea of theae foroeoent officers, and not only those charged
are aent to the Federal Bureau of Investigation with enforcing the law In specific places.
which acta aa a clearing-house for auch In-
The original In Oaorgla possesses another
foroatlon.
advantage In that there .la no state-wide ay step
Sometimes members of the olty polloa force of law enforcement - each county and each olty
are assigned to aid in-. handling situations 1ft * (iftWntn i"i" - and connections between the
srliiliig outside the bounds of the olty. Some severaX.unl.ta are difficult to aeoure and naln-
counties use tne facilities of Identification taln. Thla difficulty could be eliminated by aa
developed within the city, but auch oooparatlon active state-wide body. Under such a ayetem, It
aa may be between these foroea la not a nattier would be possible for the office In Cartara-
of law but rather a natter between the heads of vllle, after the perpetration of the robbery
sueh_foroea. Presume that a bank robbery ha* nentlonad above, to be In communication with
been perpetrated In Carteravilla, Georgia. The offloera In all parts of the state and have an
or..mlnal baa three broad avenuea of eaoape. Re adequate net thrown around the criminal before
nan only a short ride Into o>im- and the he had tine to go Into hM^ngr
fo?oea that will atop auoh a ride would be the
. ......
toTO police and sheriffs foroea In the border the. .advantage of- facing offloara not _ .always
counties. It le likely that oefore ooaplete trained to handle^ specific situations. More
organization could be affeoted between the foroe than one officer Jn__florgta In .tine paat has.
C Sc. 23-1401 Oa. Coda 1933.
uaad^hla Initiative and. ability, in capturing - 12 -
but all tag oftan tha aocuaed la allowed to aaeapa became tha offloar ha* not bean tutored In thoaa Bethoda found Boat aatlafaotorjr. No prorlalon axlata for * etate-wlde tralnlng aonool for law anforoanant offloara, but auch aethoda, prooaduraa, and davloaa ar* usually garnered fro* eiperlanca at a oot to
tha general public. With a. abort and laaaoura tenure of offla*, faw offlcara wlah to taka auca training at their own axpenaa. Suoh la tha altuatlon ltB ragard to organization for law enroroeaant. The picture la not coaplete, nowaw*rf without aoae undaratandlng of tna peraona wltn whoa tha law anforcaaant offloara deal.
-15-
Chapter IE
PEOPLE BEFOBE THE COURTS
Important In the analysis of any crlalnal comfort. In quest of auch desirable things,
court situation .are the people who oome before home and fara are often left even before these
the courts. Huch coBswnt has been made regard- young people have harvested the full educational
Ing the changing types of these people In beneflte of the local Inatltutlona*
Georgia. When considering those before the courts, the vast socio-economic changes o.f the past two generations cannot be Ignored, espec ially those changes which broaden horizons by
TABLK II*
FELONS BETWEEN AOES 21 ADD 25 ADMITTED TO THE GEORGIA PEHITENTIARX
By Agea of Admissions January 1. 1928 - December SI, 1SS5
the granting or leisure time and Increased Mo bility. Now, large numbsrs of people are peren-
TABLE !
YOUTH CASES ADMITTED TO THE GEORGIA PENITENTIARY
By Agea of Admissions January 1, 1926 - December 31, 19SS
Age of
Admis2s1ion
22
8
25
TOTAL
Total Cases
1170 1207
1061
779
5080
Hales White NSRTO
355 785 3*9 830 318 710 298 53* 262 500
1582 3359
Fentie 1RUte NBRTO
1 nu *
1 16
15 12*
Age of Admission
12
! Whltie Negro
T
5
2
20
91
Females White NBRTO
-1
11
Source t Records of the Prison Commission Likewise, the city youth, whose hone has be
come crowded or unsatisfactory and whose working effort brings snail monetary reward, tempts for tune. When the small compensation offered farm
II
19
20
TOTAL"
5031
427
381
1*58 3*18
T
"!
?3
tenant youths and under-privileged city youths is considered, it Is no wonder that poorly planned and financed adventure often leads these
*Source: Records of the Prison Commission
boys and girls Into the courts, or that age
nineteen becomes the age at which penitentiary
nlal migrants.. So mobile haa the _ atlon_ber admissions are the greatest In Georgia.
come that crime which was onoe local In .charao-
During the period January 1, 1926 until
tAr_haa_broken_lta_ bounds and loosed Itself upon Seoeaber 31, 1935, 17,336 cases ware admitted to
the entire country. This nobility has lessened the Georgia penitentiary, and 5,031 cases, or
_the_ effectiveness of community censure which at 29 percent, were youths under age of twenty-one.
one time exercised a great force on_those bound Table I shows ages of admission for these cases.
by ties of kinship or ownership to lven re Under the law, Juveniles may be sentenced to the
gion.
penitentiary when. In the eyes of the court, the
A large part of Georgia derives Its income youth was fully able to have a criminal Intent
from agricultural pursuits. There was a time and knew what he was doing.11
when Georgia youth looked forward to farm op
While 29 percent were under the age of
erations aa a vocation, but such ventures In re twenty-one, 29.3 percent, or 5.0SO cases, were
cent years have been unprofitable for the most between the ages of twenty-one and twenty-five.
part, and the youth from the rural regions has Table II lists admissions to the Georgia Peni
dreamed of occupations less arduous and promis tentiary for persons between these ages*
ing a greater reward In money, leisure time, and M See. 26-301 0. Cod* 1933.
15 -
sgs* g8s-38 s s all* 83 a, i ssgsa-gssrg"?"" s 1<D
SSSSK88S8 3* S S88RS8 8* S ssdssssggsssgsSSS 8 sfS
* ** w**S0'5-n| 'n3**>*5 3N* O K^ww*>03O*
- n3 US E l.ps ?5S "!|s 8S-rtss
HJH
-a" S
$39 S
I
fil4t NU rtr* *ApnMrOiiD-iOA<Vpr<tf4CD V N A D iOOiotO nnMQiO o nA fwfi (A01^-(r71inW 1-1 Bt-ocr*
10 O<OCd
ssW?K s sss ssssSaSys s'sa s as'zilg sis'ss'g'j'is ssis
-
r<
r*
9V o o-
IH* H*
OoQoQooCQoOS co so Qoo5cooB56QoSo?5ocoQoQocoJSooQoQo5o2 so 006002 cococofofforococooqc
riHHHMH t-l rf ri i-l i-t iH M d >~l H i-l H d tH i-l ri iH H M H iHHri H H H H i-l H H i-l H
QssfiQaCsQs&ssfiQsCs afifst
> t' w g?
j aovi ae-^ooittf4r>ip $09 < voHeto
T T -- -. .. .- O " 5 t tO ) t" H t- * O Qt> "^ ft <* fi <* 5 3 rt E H W rt t- ft (D^ C^<* A M n H H W ^i 0^ *^ O C^n O ^
* a gi
S- t ! i 3
lA
s s JT
Hii
i i
3
oS
i3
si i liai
Tba decrease In the number of persona adultted to the penitentiary continues In the ages after age twenty-fire. The downward curve, bowever, baglna to flatten out after age thirtyone. Eren though the number of admissions for
race, and sex of individuals detained on crime charges was determined far 150,359 cases from tbe Jail dockets in twenty-seven counties. For these, the age trend. Is quite similar to that of persona sentenced to the penitentiary, out
FELONS ADMITTED TO THE GEOB&IA STATE PENITENTIARY
by Aees JANUARY 1.1926 THROU&H DeerMBER. 31.1935
AOO
200
40
50
70
AGE IN YEARS
SOURCt: ftECOUDS Cf THI VftlSOM COMMISSION OF
CHAD.T No. I
each age Is not so great for the ages after Tarles with each crime type and^ for each crime
thirty, there were persona adnltted after age within the type. Since the .sheriff .a. Jil_dock-
eighty and one man was admitted after age nine et Is often completed by estimation rather than
ty-eight. Chart I IB an age curve of those ad exactness, all conclusions based on these data
nltted to the penitentiary.
must be considered tentative and subject to
^Persons sent to tbe $enltent.lary are those change In the light of more accurate Information
whose guilt of a felonious crime has been prov- than was obtainable from the records used. Table
ed, and constitute _only_ a small portion of those IT lists the number of cases In each of eight
bSPXS_.the._courts. Pue_ta__the fact that com- age groups.
plete raeorda of jii-r-<-t are kept ln_ only rare
These figures add farther weight to the co-a-Lij
ease* and that many__sherlffe do not keep _rao- elusion that crime Is a youth problsm. Crime, V
ord. of the age* of those..Jailed, it was impos^l- however, lsan_aggregata term and must be broken
hie ^o_a_s_ajBnA)le.. a complete, picture of parjons into types and Individual crimes before it can
coming before th n/"">* - However, the age, be fully analysed or its full effect upon the
- 17 -
EXHlfctT 1
MONTH BY MONTH VAQ1AT1ON OF PERSONS JAILED bv Guwe OF WHICH ACCUSED
TWEWE Coo NT its OF Geon.&iA
JANUAUY I. 1926. TMQOOfiH DECEMBEft 31.1935
FROM MIL DOCKETS OP THE COUHT1M
RECAPITULATION
Uiaottt
SwOOTIMftM
SIMPLE LARCEHV LARCENY AFTCO. TRUST
CUCATIN& AHO
EXH1MT I
MONTH BY MONTH VARIATION OF PERSONS JAILED
mmm.iin.immmi
ASSAULT vrrm IHTCNT TO
ADULTERY AND fbnmcvnoH
ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO MUOW.B
iiiiiiniiiii
J FUAUJ JX3OND
socio-economic life of a locality comprehended. Some prime types and some Individual <-Mm. thrive only under certain conditions, whereas others seem to be less """^"g**"* np^n *ha
of the law was not recognized aa criminal, and few or no cases were brought. On the other hand. In many counties, over 25 percent of the cases were charges of this classification. Hany crlaes
sociological and economic factors, and__reat largely on ^rtmimi^itry t.^^nr^t. habits. Such seems
seen .to._tifnm HTtlf K nn relation to any of tha above features or any other factors, but appear
the case with violations of the prohibition In all communities more or less spontaneously.
laws. In some counties this type of Infraction l!uraer_and_rape, as far as Qeorgla Is concerned.
- 19 -
EXHIBIT I AGES OF PERSONS ACCUSED OF CRIME
DY PER CENTS JANUABY I. 1926. THUOU&H DcccMbtft 31. 1935
fROM JAIL DOCKETS or 27 G-COBAIA. COUNTIES
IMU"b 21 31 3fc 41 Ovtt
*7
50
, 40 --------I ( z S 30
c atumu.
u ?UICIM --
: 20
O.
IO
O 50
H 40
2
/ j
\
^ NS,
c 1 1 1 INtWH. tlUMUt (TH INTIMr-
0 UURDIft
S 30 1 ?0
10
! \ \ L-* ^^
0
\
5O
o
4O
FO
*T AHOTUER
S 30 -
\ u ra /
fi: h7
-^
V\
50
i* hlTC
K*I #1
40
feuNKt NH
a 20
?0
<s O
O 50
'10
N/
S
\
T
\| "^
001 1U 1
i 30
u 20
\f
\ IO O _^
^
\ S" N,
SO
1.., t
4O
^OCCNT) rtH3M-
ttDSC j
- *> x J 2O
i 10
\f
Is
1
\ - Vi
O
UNMfl 31 atii 4i Qv
Aoe Gnour
[Ml* 21 tt 31 3* 41 Ort*
CiunX.NCMCITt
Ml QD ia
/
\ss
/
\/\
c
HOCT1N6AT -
AMOTHIR
(_
I N \ -"
__
^/
(UHMU.AM 1AT
-- SlUPLE
>
A5SAUC
I
^ _ --
rf A ----
~l--
^
N.
i *uten
v KtA sic
\ ^
/^ / \
StfMUM1
'-j ,\| \
/
v
*1
N
UKCKVC
LlvtflCC
s
- / ^ ^<______
\\
WMIW, ?i it, 3 at 4i Ova
TOTAL
UNOU* 71 W 31 3ft 41 0*U
| } r TT '
i_ VCXUNTAOV ,
1 <,
A <s\
c* IN MlUHJT Sr UB Nft
\^~
/ k Nr"S
i,1,..,
DckDU -
/ 1 I
\
1^
L n* a
Ho U N
,( \ /
\^ ^. 1!! UKZNV
/^\ \
/
\, /
LAEtCtMT
-LWCIKY W1ER-
-
1HU51
f^ ^s
V
/
^ J\
teunv a 75 a st 44 Ot
UHBUK 21 76 3) 34 41 Ottt
:TT1 1
1KVOLUHTADV
* MiHtUUOHTt i
-1rr / \ N su > - C ,.JJ - fcSSAULT Ct ~ 5*ntv
/ r^ \y
ft s o>.
~
\ ~ Auto WILE DIM
-t \
^
x\ N
1ILJL Htuoout
(\ 1\ tV
f
\ - .
LAB Vrr
wor-
Air o
tL >\
^
V
t Kl IT
Lutctuva One um
I\
1\
V f
N
>
UNDO it 71 x 31 4| QIW
UH 14 11 1* 5* *l OVtK
~nnr 5O
Ol HH.
LILT
r
30'
yf\ \^
TOr\
/
> V, S IO O
c.l.L a 50
i CATINO
AO -.
t>s / \\
30 ff
10 O
so
I XTUMUMCCS
40
f IM.IC reici
1^ v S
30 S
n ?O ;
j
IO
y \k O
5O
- OTMtR
40
30 3
\ 10 R
| i/
IO s "X 0
50
i^
-
Un
UlICCm ran* . 40
He Otl
30?
\^
-i-zo n;
10
\ S^ O
50
LAKUI
IARCCM
4O
3O -o 20 5
f\>-
r*
10 3
1 1E / Xk^\
Ummw ?i * M 4i Ovw
o
AGE Gtoyp
Aot OKOUP
Aoe GROUP - 20 -
Aoe Gfcoup
Ac* GROUP
AGES OP PERSONS ACCUSED OF CRIME
&Y Pea CENTS JANUARY I.1Q76. TMUOUGU DeceM5ea 31. 1937
FROM JAIL DOCKETS of 11 GEORGU COUNTIES
EXHIBIT! fco-ro) AGES OF PEHSONS ACCUSED Of CRIME
BY Pea CENTS JANUARY I. (926 THR.OUQH DCCCMBEO. 31. 1935 fnoM JAIL DOCKETS of T7 GEOHGIA COUNTIES
toe GROUP
JMCM * II 1* 51 3* tl OvtK
TOTS 30 X 4045
AGE GROUP
UUMl 71 T6 31 S6 V Ovtt
TO 75 5O 35 4O 41
TOTAL AGE firnoui
TO 75 30 33 4O 43
Aee GQOUP
TOTS 3O4 40 4*
AGE GROUP * Ifr II 7* 31 3* 41 OvtA
703 30 35 40 46
Uren * 71 76 31 3* 41 Ove%
707S3O334O*
Ade GROUP
UNDCK 16 71 76 31 34 41 Ovra
7O753O354O43
Aoe &QOUP
UulHR l& 11 76 31 3d 41 OWL
TO SO >3 4O 45
AGE &ROUP
UHK 16 71 It 31 36 41 Ovn
70 75 SO 33 4O 46
Aae GROUP
UHtXn 16 71 76 M 36 41 OvIR
TO W 3O W 43
AG &ROUP
appear_.to be_ o/ this type. In addition, the seaecna seen to have some effect on .nearly all J;jCBes_jQf_crJJLes. Exhibit I shows the percentage of certain crimes charged each month. Consecu-
concealed weapons., auto theft, burglary, and robbery. nn ^-hft ntfher nnnd, nome crimes,_such ajj_stabblng and adultery and fornication, seem to be charged against some_Sjpejj_o;t_women more
Age Srou Under 1"S 16 - 20 31 - 25 2t - "50 ?i- 35 }b - to 4-1 - 50 Over 50
TABLE IV
RACE AND SEX OF THOSE ACCUSED OF CRIME AS SHOWN BY JAIL DOCKETS OF 27 GEORGIA COUMTIES
By Age Groups January 1, 1986 - Pecenber 51, 1935
__Tqtal Casea _Numb.er/ Percent
*p.e Femal26e~
13,102 8.7
5.0
1132.1~0"3
13, 7, 183
583 1,|72 1,030
100.0
59,2 5,164
. Negro ... Male Female 1,003 HA17^690 3!^9t
1a2,,256377 2)575
5,901
71,8lO
tlvc caees from the sheriffs Jail docket In readily than against -aone- *yp of men. Table
twelve counties for a ten-year period constitute III Hats the several crime types studied, and
the basic data for these charts.
shows the percentage^committed by male and fe
In._aSdltlon to a seasonal dlffecenca-balveen male for the white and Negro races.
the several crimes, there Is also a difference
Dj.ffere.nJL_racea and different s.exee seem to
In the percentage coomltted by women and.jnen_ol" react toward the several crimes In slightly dif
both races. There are crimes which, by definl- ferent..ages. Exhibit II shows the age curve for
tlon, can be coomitted only by men, such aa males and females of both races for each of the
rape, and seduction; and other crimes, which, by listed crimes. Some crimes are committed more
their very nature, are more likely to be commit often by youths under twenty than others. Crimes
ted, by men than by women. In addition., __there In whlon__youtha under.. twenty are preponderate
are crimes which appeal to men _ to a larger ex arajisaaulXwith^lntent to murder, operating an
tent than to woaen. as. for ejample. carrying automobile while intoxicated, -buigliry, Inrceny
22 -
of automoblla or bicycle, other lareenle.8j_..e- tions for all peoples of the State. Changes of
ductlon, bastardy, rioting, and the blanket this nature would give the youth greater chances
charge felony."
to enter fields of endeavor other than crlae.
There seeas little doubt that any successful Tbera are, however, In the court system many
attempt to O!TO the arias problem In Georgia_ features which could be Improved and whioh, un
must fIret produce conditions In which the youth der improvement, mtgit hare a marked effect on
of the State find a eatlsfaetory exlstenae. the types of people coning before the courts.
This cannot be done by any group of lavs which In the following chapters, features of court
Is primarily regulatory, but must be an attempt procedure are detailed In the order In which
to make more satisfactory eoclo-eoonomlo condi they are met by the defendant.
EXHIBIT I l AGES OF PERSONS ACCUSED OF CMME
bv PEH CENTS JANUARY 1.1926 THROUGH DECEMBER 31. 1935 FnoM JAIL DOCKETS or 27 BEOKOI* COUNTIES
A s ft GROUP
A o e &ROJ p
UNHR * 7t Tit 51 36 41 Ovu UNOU-* ?i ? M 3* ' Ovtn
WHITE MALE AGB
-T----wauoumiM.Tuuii.-jI H----Ir-l; -'cBwiin
- 23 -
EXHIBIT It (court* AGES OF PERSONS ACCUSED OF CHIME
BY PER CENTS JANUARY i. i9?6. THROUGH DECEMBER 31. 1935 faoM JAIL DOCKETS OF 27 <SEoaeiAOoutnits
WHITE MALE
ACrE CrROUP it 16 ^l 36 *> On*
41 OVCK
2025 30 3S *0 A&E GROUP
WO, It l\ It. it 36 j CVCH W IS W 39 *0
t & e 6ROUP
UO It K % 3! 34 41 OvCR
ID so as 49
ACrC &ROU P
10 IS 30 35 40 49 A&C GrftOUP
IMMKIC V U. 51 5* * &ft
tD 15 30 35 40 4S A&E <&ROUP
Pea Ce NT
Pin. CCNT
Pea. CtHi
8 O>
* Oi 0>
_
pj
W
^ U1
O O O OO O O O O O
I
ms O
m
I-,* 1 "
& i? 6 S
a CCWT
PER CINT
OOOOOOOOO 1
TO 3S 3O 3 4O 45
COLORED MALE (Coxi*)
Ae GROUP CK i& 7) 7* 31 34 4i OVER
TOTS SO 4O 45
fcoe GQOUP
* 7J T* 3* ** Ovut
Aet GBOUP
AGE GOOUP
UNDU 16 71 ?e 31 3* 41 QvtK
35 SO tt *O 45
oe Gaoup
EXHIBIT! AGES OF PERSONS ACCUSED OF CRIME
BY PER CENTS JANUARY I. 1926.THROUGH DECEMBER 31. 1P3S FROM JAIL DOCKETS OF 27 GEOR&IA COUNUIS
Ae GROUP
lb Tl Tfc 31 34 4* Ort*
TO 75 3035 40*5
UMe* Ifc 71 74 H 3fc 44 Ovm 7073 9035 4045
WHITE FEMALE Aft 6 GHOUP
7075SOM40 41
A OC. GftOUP
*-CE GO.OUP
UNOHUU74.3I 34.4) OVCT. U*MK * 7J Tfc 31 3* 44 Dm
TOTS 3039 40*1
30 7&303S 40 5
t, . 71 7i 31 at *l Ovca wi..~n4
7075 30 35 40 '
AOE GROUP
Uno.. 71 It W Sfc 41 CNtH. l*~-w--- T.4S
10T5 iO404
Aoe GROUP
Uuu Ife 71 Tfe M 3* 41 Out*. lfc-. v .i..43
TO 75 3O *O
Aae GROUP
U*l *4 Oi 7* 31 36 41 OtR (4, ,..,,_,..*
TO 75 *O *S
Aec G-aoup
JutxB. * 7J 7*. 31 IA_ WH
7O7S3O35
AGE G-ft
- 27-
Chapter N SAIL BONDS
STATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS: After a person has been arrested or bound over to a trial court, he may be released from Jail pend ing his trial by glTlng approved ball to the proper officer.11 Ball may be defined as that se curity given upon which the accused Is delivered "to another or others who becomes entitled to his custody, and responsible for his appearance when and where agreed In fulfillment of the pur pose of the arrest.* Under euch a plan, the ac cused Is not punished before conviction and his attendance upon court at the proper time and place Is assuredP1 As a protection against arbi trary requirements, provision la made In the Constitutions of the State and Nation that "ex cessive ball shall not be required.**
Under the Georgia law, the Judicial officer before whom the case Is brought for preliminary hearing sets the amount of ths ball, except In capital and occasionally In misdemeanor cases. Two factors deteralne what that amount shall bei The likelihood of the accused Baking an appear ance at his trial, and ths crime of which the person le accused!4 The weight of this latter factor Is so great that capital cases are ballable only before a Judge of the Superior Court, and the granting of ball In such cases Is a
matter of sound discretion.* While In many states the size of ball bonds required for each specific crime Is set by statute, no provision of thle type exists In the Georgia law.
The sheriff, ae executive officer of the court, passes on the ball bond tendered by an accused, and Is left to his own discretion In
Ul Sac. 27-418 da. Code 1933. (Z] p. 197, Vol. I, > Criminal Lay Procedure. J. P.
BLihop. I. . Stophoni Co., 1886. 13) 32 G. App. 339 (1). (41 Amendment to the Constitution of 0. 3.. Pr. DC;
Se. 1, Art. I, Constitution of Oeozgla. (51 Sec.. 27-801:37-901 Oa. Cod* 1933. (*! 6 Corpus Juris. IT) Sec. 27-901 Oa. Cod* 1933.
determining the sufficiency of ball bond suretles,nslnce there are no regulations In the Code which list their qualifications. If the accused feele that the amount Is excessive or that the sheriff erred In refusing to accept the tendered ball, he may apply for a writ of habeas corpus the remedy open to all persons detained without proper authority."
In becoming surety on a ball bond, a person places at the disposal of the state a monetary guarantee for the appearance of the defendant at the trial. At any time before trial the surety has the privilege of releasing hlaself froa this obligation by delivering the accused Into the custody of the sheriff and requesting that he be released from hie obligation1."* Any one of the several sureties on the same bond has this priv ilege. If the accused personally appears at his trial, the obligation beoomes null and void; but If he does not appear, the State moves for the forfeiture of the bond by Issuing a writ of sclre faclae - a demand for the sureties and defendant to appear In court and show cause why a Judgment In the amount of the bond should not be entered against them.1" After the defendant at ball falls to appear at his trial and the term has explred/a>the court alone has the power of releasing a surety, although upon the trial of the sclre facias or at any time before that date, If the sureties produce the body of the accused or show sufficient legal cause why he did not appear, they may escape liability by paying all coats which have accrued. After the Issuance of the writ of sclre facias, ths case becomes a civil suit between the State and the
( Sc. 27-903 3- Code 1933. 0 117 Bs, 305. 10 Sac. 27-90* Oa. Code 1933. in) Sect. 27-905:27-906 Ibid. (01 Sec. 27-9CH Ibid. 18) 112 0. 648.
sureties,"and If Judgaent la entered, the state may collect thla forfeiture In the Banner that other Judgments are collected. TYPES OF BAIL BONDS: The accused, on being faced with the alternative of going to Jail or being released on ball, often finds the latter preju diced by the amount ot tttf bond and acceptabili ty of sureties. Re may give hie own reeognlzanoe, a cash bond, a surety company bond, or a bond signed by one or more Individuals, which ever 18 sufficient security In the eyes of the official! accepting the ball?1 Where ha gives his own recognizance, the accused becomes Ms own ball and guarantees that he will appear for trial by pledging hie property In the aaount of assessed ball. Such a bond can-be forfeited and Judgment rendered against the accused In the same mauier as for other bonds.*1
He nay also become his own ball by placing on deposit with the* officer the aaount of the bond In cash. Thla type of bond Is an advantage to the state In that when final Judgment la ren dered, It is Immediately collectible. Qenerally, th<3 officer assessing ball names the amount without specifying toe type of bond acceptable. When this Is done, friends of the accused often elgn hie bond as suretlee. In such cases, eaoh becomes Individually subject to the conditions of thla ball bond, and, therefore, liable for the payment of Its face amount. The sad experi ence of many persona whose estates have been wrecked by defendants Jumping ball have caused pertont not thoroughly familiar with the workIngs or the court to be hesitant about becoming auretlos. In cities. It Is often difficult for an accused to find friends willing to go his ball, and this fact has given rise In those areas to a specific type of bondsman who makes profession of becoming surety and who la given
i) the naie "professional bondsman. This Indlvld-
ual sells hla services for a fee, and his activ ities are regulated In part by statute and In part by the ordinances of the city In which he operates. BAIL BOND PRACTICES: In some states the entire procedure of ball bonds la completely codified and the practice Is uniform. In Georgia, how ever. It varies from county to county and from Judicial officer to Judicial officer. All ball bonds In one urban county were handled by the solicitor who kept them In his office and dis tributed then to the sureties after the accused >M Bade his appearance1 at trial. In a large number of counties, the sheriff kept all ball bonds In his office, but made no record of then. It waa a general practice, however, for the snerlff to have a bond docket In which he en tered the amount of the bond, the conditions thereto, and the auretlee.
In theory It la expected that no person will be allowed to become surety for another unless ha possesses property equal In amount to the full face of the bond In addition to such legal exenptlona as he may claim.6 A practice current In some urban counties requires a description of the property owned by the surety. In one county a bond attorney Is employed to check the quali fication statements of the sureties, but often he Is not given the opportunity to pass on the bond until after the accused has been released. The practice In another county Is for the surety to file a qualification statement with a de scription of his real property, In addition to which he mist have an affidavit from the tax re ceiver to the effect that this property has been returned for taxation. The valuation, as fixed by the tax officer, mat be greater than the aknunt of the assessed ball bond. Thla elimi nates the danger of the bondsman signing a single bond of greater site than a conservative
(II Ste. 27-906 On. Co4 1933. (II 6 Corpui JurU p. 1074,3c. 37;. (3) Socu. 27-90U27-902 0. Cod IV
(! 3.C. 27-905 Ibid. til 5c. 27-502 Ibid.
I" Boyol statute! 868j p. 405, 3rd Edition, "The Dutiei of Sheriff*. Coronw! and Constable!*, John C. Croolcer, Bank! t Brol., How Tori, 1690, p. 89, Chip. Ill, 2nd Edition, 'Handbook of Crjjulaal IW, Ita. L. Clark, Jr., West Publiihiag Co., St. Paul, 'Jinn., 1902] 6 Corpui JurU 90S (49).
- y> -
ralue of his real property. Many other eountlea many times the value of their taxable holdings.
require a surety to file an affidavit with the
In the rural counties, even those adjacent
bond citing that he Is owner of property In that to the metropolitan areas, the professional
county to the amount of said bond above all bondsman does not operate. Hece.it years have
debts and liabilities, but only In rare eases la such an affidavit Investigated.
In a rural county Just prior to a recent term of court, the docket was found to contain thirty-six criminal cases. No defendant was In
BAIL BONDS REQUIRED IN FELONY AND
PtHCtHT
MISDEMEANOR CASES In A RURAL GEOR&IA COUNTY BY AMOUNT OF BONDS IN PEH CENTS
JAMUWl. W26-OKSM63I.
IOO
Jail and more than one-third of then had been
allowed to give their own recognizances. Chart
II shows the jlze of bonds required for felony
and misdemeanor cases for this county during the
period,1926-1935.
PROFESSIONAL BONDSMEN: The professional bonds
man Is an urban phenomsnon, and Is usually will
ing to provide ball for anyone. In order to
moderate the activities of professional sure
ties, regulatory statutes have been passed by
the Qeneral Assembly"and sometimes ordinances by city authorities; but, for some reason, all such regulations seem difficult of enforcement, and
MISDEMEANORS
AMOUNT OF POND: ioi.oo-aooaoZ22 muxi-Soo.oo
even so simple a requirement as the annual reg istration of such persons Is not always carried out.
Concent has been made about the connections of professional bondsmen with the so-called
CHART No H
shown a marked Increase, however, In the use of this type or surety In the move urban counties. For 1935 In Fulton County, 77-5 percent of the
criminal element." Even more cement has been made regarding their actual criminal records. Three of the four largest operators In one coun ty were found to have police histories.
Slnoe the ball bond Is Insurance for the state against the non-appearance of the accused at his trial, If the surety does not own suffi cient property to_ cover the face amount of the bond. It la uncollectible and the Insurance val ueless. Activities of professional bondsmen
TABLE V
VALUE OP PROPERTY BETTJRNED FOR TAXATION TO BAIL BOND OBLIGATIONS
9 Professional Bondsnen In Georgia
19SS
Bondsman
A B C D E
aF
H
I
Value of Property Total Sail Bond
Returned for Taxation Obligations
t i8to0o0
* 2J.OOO 21,000
1,800
IH.,600
6,030
29,000
15,030 4,500 5.250
1:625 352,,250000
3,950
3.925
were studied with reference to the amount of ball bonds they had assumed In the year 1935 * compared to the property they had returned for taxation. The results Indicate that such per sons are often obligated at one time In amounts
Source: Bond dockets and tax digests of 3 Georgia countlea
ball bond sureties were professional bondsnen, as compared to 50.8 percent In 1926. (See Ap pendix C, Table 6, ror annual comparisons.)
The types of ball bonds accepted In Fulton Coun
I" Sac. 27-501 et qul s. Co4 1933.
ty are shown In Charts III and IV. 31-
AMOUNT OF BAIL BONDS: Since a prlnary purpose The size of ball bonds accepted In these three
of ball la the Insurance of the accuseds at tendance upon hie trial. If this purpose IB ac
counties Is shown In percents In Table VT. (For table In numbers, see Appendix C, Table 8.)
complished, the anount of the ball bond and the
The gravity of the offense Is expected to
type of the sureties are matters of little moaent. On the other hand, If the attendance of the accused le not accomplished. It follows that the procedure or regulations affecting ball bonds are faulty. In some states the amount of bond required Is of sufficient Importance to be set by statute for each crime, but no statutory provision as to anount governs the assessment of ball In Georgia. This has caused some officers to require bonds of several sizes for the same crimes. Hecently In a rural county, for the
TABLE VI*
BAIL BOHC ASSBSSMEHTS I GEORGIA COUNTIES In Percenti
January 1, 1986 - December SI, 19Z5
In Percents
31ze
Total
100 or Lass 40.4-
101-200
2.5
230011--350000
1121..50
501-1,000
9.0
51,,000011--51,00,00000 2..Ta
Dver $10,000 .1
TOTAL
100.0
Urban County
*2. * 23-8 10.8 10.9 9-5 2.1
.2 .1
100.0
Ru-Urban Rural
County County
17-6
S.I
76.1
Vl
3: 0121 6
7.8
J-9
.-1 -
100.0 100 :o
TYPES OF BAIL BONDS ACCEPTED IN FULTON COUNTY. GEORGIA JANUARY 1.1976 -DECEMBER 31.1935
(FROM BOND DOCKET OF FULTON COUNTY)
Sources Bond dockets of 3 counties.
have due weight In the assessment of ball, but from the study of 74,892 oaaea from the bond docket of an urban county, little relationship
of this type appears to exist. For assault and
battery, for Instance, the amount of assessed
ball varied from $100 to over $10,000, and for
murder, from $100 to $10,000. Table VII lists
the amount of ball required for the several
crimes.
FORFEITURE PRACTICES: When the court announces
Its readiness to try a case and the accused does
not appear at the bar, It Is customary for the
SOND SIGNED tv:
DEFENDANT-FRIENDS AS SURETIES
13.733
DEFENDANT- Crtnt RECOGNIZANCE
ztoi
DEFENDANT-PROF. BONDSMAN AS SURETY 29,302
DEFENDANT-SURETY GO. AsSuiETY
76
CASH DEPOSITED WITH SHERIFF IN LIEU OF BOND 1039
TOTAL
*&7*s
CHART NOB.
court to have this particular defendant called by the sheriff. This is an old historic proced ure and consists In the sheriffs calling the defendants name In a loud voice, and citing the fact that he must appear In court or hla bond will be forfeited. If he does not appear by the
jrlce of assault and battery, a bond of $1,000 its demanded; yet In many counties bonds for HOC for this offense are frequently accepted. The requirement of $1,000 seems a bit unusual
end of the term, a spire facias will be Issued to the principal and the sureties requiring them to be In court and show cause why the bond should not be forfeited. These papers are often
since a study of three counties In which the In- Issued on the last day of the courts sitting, forriatlon was available for the period 1926 to and the record of this proceeding le usually In
1935 revealed that approximately 18 percent of the minute docket of the court. ^
the bonds set were for amounts above $500, and
At the next term, the sureties are expected
two and six-tenths of one percent above $1,OOO. ( 3c. 27-905 G. Cod. 1933.
32 -
to present themselves with their reasons why the cases. In recent years there seems to have been
bond should not be forfeited. If the suretlee greater effort toward the collection cf such
have brought the accused Into court, the Judge bonds In this particular county, since the num
must set aside this writ upon the payment of the bers remaining outstanding are much smaller than
costs by the accused or Ms sureties. If the In previous years. (Appendix C, Table 11, lists
defendant la not brought Into court, and there the bond forfeitures not set aside In which no
Is no legal causa why he cannot be, Judgment final prosecution has been made.I
will be rendered against the principal and the sureties for the anount of the bond. This step does not close the criminal prosecution and at any future date, the defendant may be haled be
TYPES OF BAIL BONDS ACCEPTED IN FULTON COUNTY. GEORGIA
1935
(FROM BOND DOCKET OF FULTON COUNTY)
fore the court for trial on the criminal Issue
of which he Is accused.111 The liabilities of the
sureties are satisfied upon the payment of the
Judgment.
The collection of this Judgment may be a
lengthy process. According to a statement of a
court official In one of the urban counties,
there had been no bond forfeitures collected In
over fifteen years. Several clerks of the court
Indicated that collection of bond forfeitures was unsatisfactory In their counties.
Where court officials are on fees, forfeit ures are paid Into the Insolvent fund of the county and disbursed to the several officials.
BOND SIGNED BY:
DEFENDANT-fRltNW AS SURETIES
DEFENDANT- ON* RECOGNIZANCE DEFENDANT-PROE BONDSMAN SURETY
69O
195 3.9O4
CASH DEPosrrED wrru SHERIFF INUEOOF DONB *s
Where they are on salary,t4* forfeitures are paid to the clerk who deposits then In the general fund of the county to be disbursed by the countys governing board." If Judgment on bonds are not paid voluntarily. It Is a duty of the executive arm of the court to force payment.
In a InrRe urban county, during the period between 1936 and 1935, there were 7,1-21 defend ants who failed to appear at court and whose sureties were called to answer why these ball bonds should not be forfeited. These bond for feitures were set aside In 5,^61 cases. Of the remaining 1,960, WS were paid after Judgment had been rendered against the principal and sureties. No final Judgment was taKen In ISO
CHART No. I?
ADVANTAGES VESTia) IN THE DEFENDANT: The pro cedure followed, regarding bail bond forfeiture In Georgia has provided & distinct means for the abatement of trial. A defendant at ball, not wishing to be tried at a specific term, zay fall to appear until a later tera. In such a case, even though his bond was ordered forfeited at the term of court at which he did not appear, this step amounts to little, since it will be set aside by his appearance at court and paysent of the accrued costs. Often It is In the Inter est of the defendant to delay his trial for a. period, and the delay for a single term is often sufficient for the evidence against hlai to waste
. ' Sec. 27-904 Ibid. JDSec. 27-903 ill Id. W? Oa. Apri. 86, ?L* 3n. App. 450. WUec. 27-3902 Hid.
(5)ibid.
itself. The solicitor, because of such un warranted continuance . *.? sc. :e~ -le* forced to request a nol pros.
35-
When forfeitures are not collected, It IB evident that the ball bond doea not completely fill Itg purpose. If the failure of the defend ant to appear at hie trial Is due to the fact that the bond was too small, then perhaps a cor rective measure In the form of a statute provldlr.g for uniform bonds for each crime might be a solution. On the other hand. If the forfeit ure procedure never reaches the place where the surety or the defendant pays the face of the bond, It is to be expected that tha defendant In collusion with his sureties will have no hesi
tancy In skipping ball. If the sureties were always forced to pay the face of the bond on the failure of the defendant to appear at court at the proper tlae. It la lliely that there would never be collusion between the defendant and his surety In an effort to avoid trial. It seems from records In the several counties studied that the sureties and the principals on bonds feel that bond Is a relatively Insignificant thing to be used for the hindrance of the opera tion of the law rather than as a protection of a constitutional right.
TABLE VI>
SIZE OP BOUTS REQUIRED IS AH DREAM GEORGIA COUirTY By Crtonem
January 1, 1926 - Deceribor 31, 1915
CEESS
Total Under Cases $50
Adultery and Fornication
646
5
Assault
571
Assault and Battery
3,779
--
Centring Deadly Weapons
2,502
1
Cheating and Swindling
3.373
1
Disturbing Divine worship
41
.
Drunkenness
1,984
5
Gambling
4,639
32
Larcsny, slnple
v*ni-.*3TiiTig Lewd House
1.088
-
109
-
lisdemeanor, miscellaneous 5,165
68
Operating Auto While Drunlc 3,480
1
'Public Indecency
124
-
Receiving Stolen Goods
540
5
Stabbing
1,011
-
Vagrancy
1.717
Violating of Geav Lew
49
-
Violation of Motor Veh. Lair 1,258
30
Violation of Prohibition Law 24 ,2B2
7
tif Seating
1,010
-
Arson
33
Assault with Intent to Murder 1.953
Asstiult with Intent to Rape
159
-
Boartiality
34
-
Blguny
Burglary
EmbBMleaent Felony, miscellaneous Forgery
Kidnapping
Larceny Larceny of Autonobile
Manslaughter
Kurder
49
^
J.738
1
72
_
1.145
-
S38
-
64
_
7,815
13
1.97S
160
M
21
*
Perjury
Bai.e Robbery Seduction
147
1
28
-
1,518
ffi.
-
GRIJU TOTAV CASES
74.892
170
Source i Bond docket of the urban county.
tso
J201 $301 $401 $501 $601 $801 $1001 $5001
100
200 300 400 500 600 800 1000 5000 10000
308
198
69
38
1
-
23
4
-
164
219 128
5 45
1
7
4
1,194
730 520 23 250
5
4
42
4
--
1.028
918 395 IS 129
4
3
8
1
1,823
677 379 47 273 13 20
94 44
2
20
IS
_
1
5
_
_
__
_
1,446
358
91
8 70
_
S
1
-
_
2,894
901 424
9 278
7
3
72 19
-
315
327 179
1 180
1
1
70 14
-
44
32
14
2 11
1
1
3
1
-
2,778
937 440 42 532
6 17 273 71
1
1,575 1.149 514 30 182
4
_
23
]
1
42
33
23
16
_
1
5
4
-
160
98
88
5 124
2
S
40 13
-
316
379 224
3 78
1
-
6
4
-
1,142
349
88
8 119
_
..
12
2
_
45
4
-
_
-
-
_
-
-
723
27? Ill
9 86
2
1
21
3
_
11,692 7.319 2,590 182 1 979 47 35 385 45
1
375
319 211
5 87
-
2
8
3
-
Felonies
1
1
_
2
_
_
21
7
_
42
129 254 26 738
S 32 528 182
17
2
5
9
2 27
7
2
57 39
9
-
-
1
2
-
-
8 22
3
3
3
8
15
2
_
15 3
_
37
132
72
7 400 41 28 1,733 249
26
2
3
4
17
2
11 22
4
80
113 131
4 308 17 12 3C4 149
25
21
27
54 19 l-;9
-
3 174 71
20
5
1
6
13
1
--
21 17
_
3.162 2.04S 961 58 1.026 44 SO 364 86
6
48
52
46
S 178
1
5 1,477 161
5
4
6
14
2 42
S
2
53 32
2
1
1
1
4
-
-
3 10
1
7
e
23
3 31
2
1
39 31
3
1
1
2
4
10
9
1
16
33
43
1 213
4
6 664 496
57
2
1
5
1 28
4
6
26 15
1
51,S17 17,793. 8.124 519 7 R77 228
Over $10000
-
1 2 -
-
_ _ _ -
1 _ -
^ 2 -
w 2 7 2 -
-- _ ,, .. -
^ w _ -
ChapterY CASES 5EFORE CITY COURTS
In order that Misdemeanor casea Bay be practice In any court other than their own.
brought to trial with minimum delay, the general Other functions are usually performed as ex-of-
Assembly designed three typee of special courts flclo duties by superior court officers (for de
for their disposition. The oust prevalent type tails see acts of Georgia General Assembly).
now In operation, "constitutional olty courts",
The misdemeanor courts* of the counties In
are established by legislative enactment under which the Superior Court was studied constitute
that provision of the Constitution which grants the sample upon which the figures In this chap
the General Assenbly authority to create oourti ter are based. (Hap II snows the relative loca
of Halted Jurisdiction similar to the ones tion of these courts within the State.) Sched
functioning In Atlanta and Savannah at the time ules were gathered from the casea as they ap
of the Constitutions adoption."1 The sscond Bost peared on the docket so that they constitute
usual type, the "grand Jury city court", la es cross section of the charges brou^it In tha
tablished upon the recommendation of the grand area. The number of cases, together with the
Jury of the county In which the court la locat year In which brought, is Hated In Table VIII.
ed .R1 At one time the moat papular type of Infe Due to the fact that some courts were In opera
rior court with misdemeanor Jurisdiction was the tion only a part of the period, the city court
"county court", but now only a few of these casea of those counties oust he studied along
courts remain In operation. They were establish with those of the Superior Court In order that
ed sometimes by legislative enactment and aoae- the complete history of any particular crime
tlmes upon recommendation of the grand jury In may be reviewed.
accordance with a general law. While grand Jury
The depression aas been accused of fathering
city courts and county courts are established a great crlae wave, but such does not appear to
under a general law granting the grand Jury have been true when the cases cooing before the
power to act, the General Assembly reserves for city courts are considered. If only the casea
Itself the power to abolish courts once they brought In those courts which operated the full
have been established. Since each court Is es decade are considered, there baa been onlj a
tablished for an Individual county, effort has relatively small cV.ar.ge In the nuaber of casea
been made by those responsible to make It fit brought. On the other hand, there are aone aark-
the conditions therein. Such steps are often ed variations In certain Individual crimes, some
reflected In the specifications regarding the of which Increased in nuabera and others which
several court officials.
decreased. Table IX lists the nuaber of viola-
Usually the Judge oust be over twenty-five tiona of the prohibition law and of simple
years of age, with at least three years experi larceny by yeara In which docketed. (For other
ence In the practice of law. In most Instances, crimes, see Appendix T>, Table 1J.)
he Is a>salaried officer, and Is prohibited from
The olty and county courts were dealgned for
practicing In any state court. The solicitors the hanrtl1ng of all misdemeanor offenaes, but In
generally must have had two or more years In the
practice of law, are fee paid officers, and nay
Ul Sec.. 2-2901:2-3X5 3a. Cod* 1933. ID p. 96. Acts of 1890-S1, p. 107. Acts of 1892. m p. 288. AcU of 1S71-72.
* AUTHOR'S HCTBi Since both city and county courts have tlie sana erjjdjwl jurisdiction, for t&0 purposes of *>** report, no allefcjil ** "ade to separate the cues codsg before the aanral types of court, and tha term "city court* will Bean all inferior courts vlth risdeneanor Ju risdiction*
- 35 -
certain counties and for the State as a whole, those charges directly related to the posses It seems that a larger part of their ork la de sion, sale, or transportation of liquor, and not voted to cases Involving about ten crlrnea.* Ap- to any crlna growing out of Its use.) The eom-
TAB1E VIII*
CtOTTTV
Pulton
AppHnfi**" Saeon*"* Bibb BrantlJy****
Total
60.233 811 406
9,618 329
1926
6 ,115
136 -
999 -
CASES By Year In Tfhich Docketed 29 City Courts of Goorgil January 1, 1926 - December 31. 1935
1927
1928
Year in unieh Docketed
1929
1930
1931
1932
4.915 140 _
920 78
5.197
134 22
1,075 177
5,452
92 51 1,179 74
5,731
132 25
1,075 -
6,443
177
U 946
-
6,877 -
11 900
-
1933
6.375 -
174 854
-
1934
6,499
80 882
-
1935
6.629 -
32 788
-
Bulloe'.! Burke
Carroll
Chatham Cbattooga *
2.871
342
241
319
261
226
332
227
255
300
368
1,450
127
129
262
177
189
ITS
146
110
77
61
2.925
299
206
268
299
316
273
237
339
338
350
8,453
786
860
869
636
740
746
93S 1,0*7
846
79S
420
86
42
173
119
-
-
-
-
-
-
Clarice Clay*"**
Coffee CoiretB DeKalb
1,871
227
249
192
231
217
236
46
34
1,807
101
179
201
244
167
3,770
383
429
365
366
S77
7,638
647
70Z
902 1,202
7ZS
Dodfe ** Bought rty Floyd
Glynn
JeakilJl
Liberty Lcn*nd<*8 ** Uedison Keriwither * llitohcill
2,853
530
_
113
447
344
3.006 3,479
342 221
338 SJ7
330 390
365
tie
315 398
2,106
179
332
Z69
250
257
1,549
152
191
210
180
177
69
95
sa
62
79
67
3,826
400
45
476
440
522
1,065
136
79
188
152
112
1,071
139
139
104
185
188
1.906
143
121
207
204
245
Muscccee X'clctosh ***
Richmond * Troup
8,830 418
5,550 2,385
833
843
-
-
877 1.287
252
249
7SZ
978
915
-
_
-
852 1,108 1,389
364
297
292
TOTAL
141,056 14.547 13,611 14,452 15,718 . 15,184
'3i1y Court Doclceta 1926-1935.
3ata available: Impossible to conplcte nork nithin rivon tine liMta. Hecorts for 1527 not available.
**** 'lourt not in operation during full period.
189 18 86
285 700
539 402 375 251 163
66 680
83 136 263
859 52 S7
194
14,478
148 22 108 335 563
88 S16 245 181
80
40 596
7Z 85 218
938 77
162
13.624
149 23
212 390 548
245 236 357 124 133
55 167
68 96 186
950 131
174
13.398
1S7 4O 111 430 689
286 225 343
92 130
12 _
109 -
147
961 88
208
13,030
132 53 98
420 829
261 137 399 171 133
35
66 _
172
822 70
193
13,014
proxlnately jo percent, or kS ,691 oases, of the blned total of these and of simple larceny
total cases Socketed were violations of the prohlbltlon law. (Thla classification Includes only
ohaPgiss - second In point of numbers - constltutes 4-6 percent of all cases brought. If SODS
* J.UTliCR< rCTE* In attempting an analysis of these cater. It tec nee apparent that many solicitor* had used different names for crimes which were identical or nearly so* Some solicitors gave the nans of "sixpl* larceny* to all types of larceny cases which -were brought before their court;s. In a few courts* different accusation! or indict-- n.entn were brouglrt for each phase of the violation of the prohibition law, while in other courts, the charge "Tiolation of prohibition law" oorered all of its phases. In order to tabulate and organize all data gathering, it beCBIEQ necessary to group all charges which ware apparently B&ilarj with the result that 62 classifications werw reacaed* Of those, the classification Sdadeueanor" in cludes only those cases for which th* exact crime charge could not be ascertained from the court records* On the other hand, the classification "jrisoellaneous al0de*kanor* bacludes all those oases which are not closely allied to any of the classifications, and of which less than ten cases were charged for all counties. (Appendix D, Table 12, lists these charges.)
expedient could bo discovered which would reduce these two crimes, progress would be made toward the elimination of almost one half the caaes docketed in the city courts of that area under consideration. When those charged with assault and battery, carrying deadly weapons, operating an automobile while Intoxicated, public drunken ness and vagrancy are added to simple larceny and violations of prohibition law, theee seven ofTenses account for 100,198 cases, or about 71 percent, of all oaae docketed. Table X llsta
- 36-
tho totals of the several crimes studied. (Sea
Appendix B, Table 14, for a detailed llet of
orlmea by counties.) TABLE EC
VIOLATIONS PROHIBITION LAW AND SIMPLE LABCENIES
19 City Courts In Georgia January 1, 1986 - December si, 1955
violations of the Slnple Year In Which Prohibition Lav Larcenr
Docketed Number Percent number Percent
1926 1927 1928 1929
1930 1951
1952 1939 1954
1955
4,537 3,995 *,S58 4,696 5,912 4,807 3,806
3,165 2,908 2,435
11.9 10.B 11.9 12.5 10.8 11.0 10.0
8.3 7.6 6.3
1,479 1,5*7 1,660 1,658 2,119 2,185 2,558
8,421 8,830 2,390
7.4 7.7 6.8 8.1 10.5 10.6 12.7
12.0 11.0 U.8
38,817
100.0 20,285 1OO.O
*3ource: Dockets of 19 city courts
difference In assault and assault ana bat tery, yet the latter Is t^led much more often than the former. Stabbing, a type of the latter crime, reaches trial In 72 percent of Its cases, nils assault and battery reached trial little aore than one-half the time, and assault eaae before the court In only 4-2 percent of Its cases.
GEORGIA COUNTIES !N WHICH CASES FROM MISDEMEWO* COURTS WERE STUDIED
Not only was violation of prohibition lav
the largest Item In the combined group, but It
was the largest category of crlae In all Indi
vidual counties studied, except two. ID one of
these, simple larceny ranked first, with viola
tion of prohibition law second; while In the
other, violation of the motor vehicle law ranked
first, with simple laroeny second. No larceny
crises were charged In one county where the most
prevalent offenaes were violation of the prohi
bition law and assault and battery. For another
county, adultery and fornication formed the
second largest group. In five counties, simple
larceny was moved from second to third place by
On the other band, a close examination
public drunkenness, but the Importance of the reveals that there la soae relationship In the
variations between the several counties dwin percentage of cases reaching trial within the
dles whsn totals for the Stats are considered.
several crlae groups. For example, those common
Of the 1111,056 oases docketed, 73 percent ly considered nuisance- crimes are consistently
were tried before January 1, 1936. (For the low In ratios of eases to trial. Within this
purpose of this study, the designation "case to type are disturbing divine worship, s1nt* *"g
trial will be applied to any case In which a a lewd bouse, malicious mischief, and the IDte.
plea of guilty was entered or in which a convlo- Sex offanaes, on the other hand, show a higher
tlon or acquittal resulted.) This percentage of than average proportion coming before the
cases to trial la an average, and, a such, pre courts. The saae Is true of those dlsordsrly
sents only the background of a picture In which oonduct crime* of public drunkenness, public In-
the Individual crimes are the detail. Fro* the decency and vagrancy, and the related vices of
standpoint of human experience, there Is little gambling and lottery. Table X also shows that -37
iias tsm
!
3s
ff r
I?
m
s
1 ti *;u*.f-i !H& *q?i*i i?.f*l(i
III 11 I'I -2i ?gi 4 p> & <
< llrilli
1 pE |!
11 l j1 ?i:e.5 iI^fs s 3* I
I i*ir !i & i ^t
i
r*
R
&
3 ! 88 8p |8 888 888 8I 88
ab bbbbb bbbbb bbbbb bbbbb obobb bbbbb bbbbb bobbo bbbob ooooo
ob boboo
'Mh?*.
asss
sasat; asss
H^ SaiSs Ssssh sisl
s ggsss sagsa a^sas sssss; sssss sss$a sssss sasas sasss ssase sssss sssss
O
t
MMMMO
O<au-4(n
tt**
CO O U> I-
*
tflH*-1
**
O9C4OM
*
OB b* tl> tn *4
<O J CO to -J
-4C4(nMO
*
M CA en U
M*-4*<n
*
*OOffl*-
W^WOlQ
5 sa S388SS sasaa assas ^sass sssse ssasa ssasa ssass sas* assss aassss assssa
OlCnO
*
(O (O -^ -J O
O M N 01 CA
(4tnOM<O
Ul 03 O U
O^^OOO
N*4l->CnM
*
H<a>toCOU
*
U-lCnCaO
4>U)Cn-4
MOtUOCA
OtOONCD
*
CD * Cfl N
those crimes which are coerclrs In their nature such that there Is no way by which a definite
come to trial In relatively few cases. ('Coer date for trial say be set, the Judge may remove
cive' charges are those In which the main object a case from the active to the dead docket where
of the prosecutor la to force performance of It remains until a motion of the Judge aakea It
Borne act with which the situation Involved la active again. Of the 38,010 cases which were
related.) Bartering without license, cheating docketed but not tried In the period under
and swindling, removal and sale of mortgaged study, 18,919, or approximately 50 percent of
property, trespass, et cetera, are within this them, were pending or had been placed upon the
category. Abandonment and bastardy also belong dead docket (see Table XII). Such cases, even
to this list, and are below the average bat are though not technically complete, In a vast ma
nearer to It than those listed above. It may be jority of Instances, will never be revived and
said also that the more serious misdemeanors are for the purpose of this report, can be consid
gsnerally tried more often than those less ered aa ended. Since only a small proportion of
serious.
cases reaching trial do so after having remain
Trial as a definite disposition la not ed on the docket longer than or.e year, It ap
reached by all cases within the same tine pears logical to conclude that only a relatively
limits. In theory, the court for handling mis
small number of the pending and dead docket
demeanor casee la In almost constant session and cases brought prior to the year 1935 will ever
a oa.se can be tried as soon aa the proper papers be tried. Of the g.Wl pending casea, 7,963 had
are drawn and the defendant has had a reasonable been on the active docket more than one year.
time, for tb preparation of his case. Sometimes When the total cases on the dead docket are
also the State needs tins In which to perfect added to these, a total of 17,421 la reached,,
Its evidence and continuances must be had. It Is which. In the light of the above deductions,
not expected, however, that Interminable delays will likely never be tried. In other words, for
will be found In the city court. Table XI shows 12*3 percent of the total casea brought In the
that If a case la to ba tried, It will be city court, It la probable that pending or dead
brought before the city court In 93 percent of docketing Is a final disposition. While the
the time within one year after It la docketed. court can order these casea to trial at any
In fact, more than 4-7 percent of the cases are time, actually It la not done, and the defendant
tried within thirty days after being brought. has a virtual acquittal.
Contrasting with, the speed with which these
. case In which the court grants a nol pros
cases are handled Is the fate of cases docketed Is likewise a virtual acquittal since the charge
but not tried.
can be revived only by the bringing of a new
There are many good and valid reasona why caae. This action must be accomplished before
some oases are not brought to trial at the first the statute of limitations has barred It, and In
term of court after they are docketed. Equally Georgia this la two years after formal knowledge
sound are the practices In some courts of of the charge Is taken IT the court.* The court
periodically clearing the docket of all cases In records Indicate that revivals of action after a
which trial la tha unlikely disposition. Once a nol proa are extremely rare, and It la likely
case Is brought. It Is pending until It Is tried, dismissed, nol pressed, or tha defendant released upon his demand for trial. In Georgia, If the delays attendant upon court action are
JtOTBCR'S SCTEi The atetiite at lirftotiom in Hisderea-
nor eases 1* ton yemrs after the offanstt and the offenler becoae known* If the iadlctaent ! nol pressed for a forllty a nnr indictment iy tn found within ii north*
thereafter) bat this contiijgenoy arises so seldon that no effort la hero nade to offset may alight effect it xdht
haTO OIL tiie figura shown*
- 39
Abandonnent Adultery !Jid Ts+alztttlon Aaeault
Assault and Battery iy or Sodoay
Bartering without Li.ceeanaasea
Baetardy
breaking,
ind Staaltng
Bribery,
grada
Carrying Deadly Weaplonas
Carrying an Lottery Cheating ind SwindliAn*g Cruelty t3 Children and Defacing Public Proplaerty Disturbing Divine Wroarshhlipp
Escaping Failure to ray Occuj>ational la* Tiring Wood* Galling Hit and Run DrlTing
Illegal Arrests
Larceny, ilmple Larceny Aftr Trust Libel
; Lswd Houlasae
Ualicioui ttiscoaaf
Uayhws, roisdeaeanor gnraudlae jfiieBeanar, blanket: charga llisdaaeanor, miscell.aanneaouas
Obscene Language
Obstruct ing Legal Pr:ocaeasas
Operating Aut? whilei Drunk
Opermtia^ Slot
ina with SLuga
Peeping Tom
in without Llcanaa
Pablla Drunkenness Public lidecency aecoivioj Stolen Ooo>dd*a
Tobaccoa 1 Ppoparty
Assistinj * Officerr
Rioting
Selling Mortv-^d Propearty
Shooting at Oc
! Dwalling
Stabbing
Trespass
Usiag Auto wit) Using Hcree wi Usury
>raar ( a Conaaat Oraar'a Coaaant
School Law Haaltb Rulaa Violation of Electiomn Lawvas Violation of Oeae Laiwas r Raculatlana
Violation of Labor L-aws Violation of Motor CZaarrrriar Lawa ViolatiM of Motor Vrahhiiicla Lawa Violation of ProhibLitt!loan Lawa Violation of the Sab>bbaathb
Viol*tl3D of TAaber Lawww* Wife Baiting
TABLE XI*
PH.IOD BTTWSJI DOCKXTDia AHD TRIAL CT CASES By CTI.MS
2<? Citj Court* of Georgia January 1, 1926 - Deoaattier 31, 1935
Total
1,848 2,020
69
4,360
16
57 659 372 13 5,158
2,100 2,319
139 33 346
501 111 15 3,555
58
32 17,833
722
5 170
559 16
fil
67 155
11 6,033
7* 3* 34
5.807 174 277 699 137
32 116
62 39 1,802
225 351 16 12 4.043
s
8 897
36
17 29 3,130 33.784 41
t 800
. nans--
Laa*
1
2
3
0
9
Than
to
to
to
to
to
1
2
3
6
9 _ 12
1,331 163 148 137
31
9
478 695 154 601
41
21
31
7
10
14
4
-
2,177 530 601 788 143
52
4
3
5
2
-
-
16
4
13
23
.
.
421 264
2
59 21
93 36
23 4
9
6
2
1
1
a
2,781 531 743 8O8O8O 106
36
664 735 330 329
25
7
1,312 198 252 407
77
29
14 15 31
4
1
11 175
9
21
2 54
4 71
13
7
386
38
27
24
11
3
25
40
11
1
9
23
1
2
-6
-
1,448 529 649 T25
89
52
18
10
14
12
4
20
2
2
3
2
--
11,360 1.583 1.878 2,146 252 109
484 3
58 1
58-
96 1
12 -
4 -
75 28 28 31
6
2
330
59
70
79
9
4
12
1
3
a.
-
-
532
53
59 256
21
4367
3 25
9 22
14 46
2 6
-3 3
5
1
3
1
1
m
2,311 1,053 1,094 1,235 206
76
30
8
21
15
-
21
2
4
6
-
17
5
3
8
1
-
2,212 105
838 1,291 1,156
22
19
25
1541
55
144
40
27
46
15
3
302 137
99 129
14
11
73
11
14
20
11
4
14
5
8
4
_
_
35
14
41
9
.
31
6
10
9
4
2
18
3
8
6
2
1,215 171 167 197
25
13
127
19
42
202
45
46
48
6
_
12
2
1
1
-
a.
4 1853
3
2
-
a.
2,891
164 737
32
5
11
1
1
--
8
6
4
4
1
1
2
a.
_
41331
103 6
85 200
5
11
29
8 1
7
2
3
4
_
,,
20
3
1
3
1
951 465 541 1.003
98
47
12,617 5.054 6,450 7,241 1.352 554
15 13
7
5
4
,,
_
2
_
^
490
96
84
76
14
4
103,046
doekata of 29 city oourt*
' Tin* of Trial not aacertaiaable
48,878 JL3i7o7 15,426 19.164 2,872 1,136
12 18 to to 0ar *
18
24 24 H.A.
12
36
8
12 2
69
1
a>
3
19 -
14 14
1
-
22 1
.
.1
.
2
2
1
_
1
a*
16
11 at
12
a.
34
6
1i
2
15
9 7 13
1
,,
3
1
1
1
82
1
3
2
-3
-- -
19
11 -
-7
26 -
,,
.m
_
68 21 223 193
3
14
2
*
--
-
-
--
-
4 -
.
2
--
-i
3
1 - 53
-
2
*
-
-6
1
_
_.
,,
23
8-
10 -
17
-
-1
-
-
--
-
33
11
2
8 -
49
1 -
-1 312
4 1
.
__
1
3
-
11
a.
1
1_
3
12
3
1
.1
2
v
---
_
---
a.
6 2 5 16
- -- -
.
_
9
1
6
25
-
-
.
_
,,
1
_
1
-
10
28
213 122 86
1
--
95
_
2
i--
-- -
--
33
506 250 432 617
TABLE HI*
OASES HOT TRUE By Crlm
29 City Court* of Georgia January 1, 1926 - Dacn&er XI,
CRBI
Abandonment
Adultery and Fornication Aaeault Assault tad Battery Attempted Boastiellty or Sodony
Bartering without License Bastardy Breaking, Entering and Stealing Bribery* adadeneanor grade
Carrying Deadly Veapona
Total 1,006
690 93 3.169
5
8* 272
76 7
1.772
Transferred to Other Courts 6 8 3 12 -
. -- 3 4
DisKissed
10 5 4
24 -
. 1 3 _ 9
Kol Pressed
343 335
57 1.980
2
34 112 23
2 899
Carrying on Lottery
476
1
Cheating and Swindling
2,110
4
Cruelty to Children and Aninala
106
--
DefeAing Public Property
16
--
Disturbing Divine Worship
197
1
m
15
11
1,283
71
--
11
1
133
Escaping Failure to Pay Occupational Tax Firing Hoods Gambling 3it and Run Driving
Illegal Arrests Larceny* sbnple Larceny After Truct Libel Hdntainlng Lewd House
48
2
133
~
22
1,087
5
IS
-
18
_
4.973
56
433
6
10
--
172
1
3
14
5
94
19
1
532
-
8
_
a
70
2,703
4
235
_
7
-
El
litficious Zliachief l*yhen, nisdeneaaor grade ^iaJeaoaaor* blostot charge Uisderaoonor, miscellaneous Using Obsoeao Language
SOS
_
3
_
2.424
39
44
2
133
2
Obstructive Legal Process
19
_
Operating Auto while Drunk
1.105
3
Operating Slot l^chine with Slugs
40
--
Pooping Tom
13
--
Practicing Profession Without License
21
-
2
171
_
1
96
1,185
1
25
-
60
1
9
4U.
1
a
--
8
-
7
Public DrunVMnr-ess Public Indecency Receiving Stolen Coeds Receiving Cnstanped Tobaccos Removal of liortgsged Property
1,620
3
55
175
238
--
137
-
7
925
1
17
~
33
12
128
3
SO
Resisting an Officer Rioting Soiling yortgagod Property Shooting at Occupied Dwelling Stabbing
38
_
134
--
66
~
19
683
6
_
24
v
83
1
47
11
4
424
Trespass
191
_
Using Auto without Owner 's Consent
124
2
Using Horse without Owner's Consent
4
--
Usury
Vagrancy
149
v
1,434
7
Violation of Corsson School Lev Violation of County Health Rules Violation of Election Laws Violation of Gaae Laws
Violation of Highway Regulations
10
_
9
18
~
510
_
24
-
2
133
--
64
4
_
84
2
336
_
4
5
_
1
14
330
-
12
Violation of Labor Laws Violation of uotor Carrier Laws Violation of Motor Vehicle Laws Violation of Prohibition Laws
Violation of the Sabbath
114
_
43
1.323
5
8,907
30
21
-
Violation of Ttabor Law Tlifo Boating TOTAL
18
.
642
1
38.010
212
1
10
_
27
11
706
34
3.638
-
11
_
11
-
303
374 _18,40S
Sourcet Minute dockets of 29 city courts.
Released Cn Deaand for Trial
1 5 2 5 -
-- -- ~ 6
4 1 1 -- -
. 1 4 ~
. 8 1 -- -
. _ 9 1 1
_ 4 -- -- -
9 _ -- -
_ 1 1 1
3 -- -- _ ~
_ -- u 7 -
. _ 1 22 -
_ 1 1OO
Dead Docket
432 197
6 S43
2
20 102
24 2
490
289 451
18 --
20
8 23
165
6
7 1.063
105 1 84
S3 2 61
10 45
2 249
5 4 5
222 28 K ED 17
9 13 15
2 170
34 32
58 963
6 4 1 80 8
1 11 270 2,260
7
3 286 9,458
Pending 214 140 21 SOS 1
30 57 23
3 364
167 330
16 S
37
21 10
3 330
4
3 1,073
82 2 36
49 _
1,034 5
30
7 40S
29 1 9
45< 9
33 18 27
5 32
2 6 78
19 26
6 126
_ 16 79 4
102 5
330 2,923
3
4 51 9,41
TABLE XIII*
COHVICTIOIIS AHD ACQUITTALS By Crises
29 City Court* of Georgia January 1, 1936 . December II, 1935
CRIMES Abandonment Adultery uid Fornication Assault Assault and Battery Attempt^ Beutialltr or Sodouy
TOTAL !(5Kr Percent
1,848 100.0 2,020 100.0
69 100.0 4,360 100.0
IS 100.0
COHVICTEQ
Hisnbsr Percent
1,703
92.2
1.924
95.2
39
56.5
2,519
66.9
11
68.7
Baroerl:ig without License Bastard^ Breaking, Entering and Stealing Bribery* rdBdomeaaor grade Carrying Deadly Weapons
57 659 372
13
5.158
100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
100.0
52 586 329
11
4,677
91.2 88.9 8B.4
84.6 90.7
Carrying on Lottery Cheating and Swindling Cruelty to Children and Anljnals Defacing Public Property
Disturbing DiTine Worship
2,100 2.319
139
33 346
100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
loo.o
1,959 1,981
73 29
281
93.3 85.4 52.5
87.9 81.3
Escaping Failure to Fay Occupational Tax Firing floods Canbllng
Hit and Run Driving
501 111 IS 3.5S5
58
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
485 98 9
3.316 52
96. S 88.3 60.0 93.3 89.7
Illegal Arrests Larceny, slople Laroenj- After Tract Libel
Maintaining I,swd Bouse
32 17.633
722 5
170
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
18 1S.749
587 4
135
56.2 88.3
81.3 80.0 79.4
Malicious Jlisehlef
559
Mayhem, alfldeaeeuor grade
16
Ulsdemuanor, blanket ohaxge
981
Hisdenuanor, miscellaneous
67
Obscenn language
155
Obstructing Legal Proeess Operating Auto while Drunk
Operating Slot !laehlne with Slugs
Peeping Tom
Practicing Profession without License
11 8,033
74
34 34
Public Drunkenness Public Indecency Seeelvlng Stolen Goods
Receiving Unstamped Tobaccos
Reaorml of Mortgaged Property
5.807 174 277
699 137
Resisting an Officer Rioting Selling Mortgaged Property Shooting t Occupied Dwelling Stabbing
n3e2
62 39 1,802
Trespass
Using Auto without Owner's Consent
Using Horse without Cwnor*s Consent Usury Vagrercy
225 351
16 12 4,043
Violation of Comon School Law
13
Violation of County Health Rules
18
Violation of Election LMTS
8
Violation of Gam Lmws
897
Violation of Highway Regulations
36
Violation of Labor Iws Violation of Motor Carrier Lews Violation of Motor Vehicle Laws
Violation of Prohibition Laws Violation of the Sabbath
17 29
3.130 33,784
41
Violation of Tinier Law
6
Tlljfe Beating
800
TOTAL
103.046
* Sourcej Minute dook*t of 29 oity court
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0
loo.o
100.0
loo.o
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
loo.o
100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0
loo.o
100.0 loo.o
100.0 100.0
loo.o
446 13 761 53
112
7 5.693
62 28 28
5,526 160 209 639 92
24 80 38 25 1.450
165 291
15 10 3.850
9 14
7 684
29
9 23 2.831 30,795 38
4 694
91,941
79.3 81.3 77.6 79.1 72.3
63.6 94.4 83.8 82,4 82.4
95.2 91.9 75.5 91.4 67.2
75.0 69.0 61.3 64.1 80.5
73.3 82.9 93.3 83.3 95.2
69.2 77.8 87.5 76.3 80.3
52.9 79.3 90.4 91.2 92.7
66.7 86.7
89.2
ACQUITTED
Number Percent
145
7.8
96
4.8
30 43.5
1.441
33.1
5 31.3
5
8.6
73
11.1
43
11.6
2
15.4
481
9.3
141 318
6.7
I4.S
66 47.5
4 12.1
65 13.3
16
3.2
13
11.7
6
40.0
839
6.7
6 10.3
14 2,084
135 1 35
43.8 11.7 18.7 20.0 20.6
113 3
220
14 43
20.2 18.7 22.4 20.9 27.7
4 36.4
340
5.6
12
16.2
6 17.0
6 17.6
281
4.8
14
3.1
68 24.5
60
8.5
45 32.3
8
25.0
36 31.0
24 38.7
14 35.9
552 19.5
60 26.7
60 17.1
1
6.2
2 16.7
193
4.3
4 30.3
4
22.2
1 12.5
213 23.7
7 19.4
8 6 299
2,?89 3
47.1 20.7 9.S
8.3 7.3
2 33.3 106 13.3
11,105 10.8-
that for practically all of the 18,1(05 nol pres sed oases, no further action was ever taken.
Similar in effect to a nol pros Is a dis missal of a case, in that upon motion of the prosecutor and upon payment of the coat, the court orders the charges dropped. Revival can be effected In the vane way as in a nol pros. The proportion of oases so handled Is relatively small and Important only in showing why certain types of oases were not brought to trial. Almost one third of the dismissed cases were for simple larceny and cheating and swindling, crimes in which a restitution of property can often be forced. Other crimes of a coercive nature make up a large portion of the remainder.
When dismissed and nol pressed cases are added to those on the dead docket and to the ones which have been pending more than one year, a total of 36,200 Is reached. In other words, a virtual acquittal la given 27.1 percent of the total city court cases. No doubt it la unwar ranted to say that such cases should not have been brought, and probably ample grounds existed for the docketing of a large proportion of them. Nevertheless, the court records were cumbered with untrlable casea, the officials burdened with non-productive labor, and the defendants suffered in not having their names cleared by being granted actual acquittals. This is like wise true in respect to the 100 cases where the defendants were released upon demand for trial. For these, however, the acquittal Is complete, since after being released in this manner, the oharge cannot, under any circumstances, be re vived against the defendant.")
The effectiveness of the court as an Insti tution is Judged not by the number of casea brought, but by the later disposition of auoa cases. Many solicitors find it good practice to oharge the defendant In aeparate oases with the full category of offenses likely committed at the same time as the ffense upon Which the ar'" Sc. 27-1901 Ca. Cod* 1933.
rest was made. Tor Instance, a man charged with carrying a concealed weapon la often charged with carrying a platol without license. A con viction on the former charge la desired, and if aacured, the other charge may be nol proased or left pending. Also, it is current practice In some courts for accusations to be brought before a defendant has been arrested ar.d many such casea remain pending until they are no longer triable. Clearing the docket of non-triable cases is not a regular procedure in all courts. No doubt such practices as thoss mentioned above account in a large measure for the fact that only 73- percent of the crlalnal eases brought In the city court are tried.
Of the 103,0^6 casea brought to trial, con victions resulted la 91,9M, or S9.2 percent. In other worda, If the prosecuting officer felt that the evidence in the case was sufficient for the case to proceed to trial, the chancea of be ing able to secure a conviction were approxi mately nine to one. This figure la an average, and, as shown by Table XIII, Individual crines differ greatly from It. For aany of thea, how ever, the ratio of convictions to acquittals follows a similar pattern to the ratio of case* tried to other dispositions. To Illustrate: The percentage of casea to trial for carrying on a lottery (see Table X) la 81.5 (a percentage above the average), and convictions for this of fend* resulted In 93.3 percent of cases brought to trial. Conversely, assault and battery, with a lower than average percentage of case* to trial, shows a lower ratio of convictions.
When a defendant is called before the bar to answer the formal charge of the court, his guilt can be determined either by his own declaration or by proof In the form of evidence submitted by the state. In the former case, he convicts him self by entering a plea of guilty and such ac tion la in effect a consent Judgment with the defendant waiving his rights to the formal pro cedures of trial. Aa shown by Table XIV, 68-5
TABLE JCIV*
PLEAS OF GUILT* AND MOT OULTI
By Crime. 29 City Court! at Georgia January 1, 1926 - December 31, 1935
CRIUS Abandonne.'it Adultory -Hid Fornication Assault Assault and Battery Attempted Boastiality or Sodony
Bai-berifig without License Bastardy Breaking, Entering and Stealing Bribery^ misdCDeanor firade Carrying Deadly Weapons
Carrying on Lottery Cheating and Swindling Cruelty to Children and Antaals Defocizig Public Property Diaturbirg Dirine Vforchip
TOTAL
Hunior Percent
1.848
100.0
2,020
100.0
9
100.0
4.360
100.0
16
100.0
57 6S9 372
13 5,158
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
loo.o
2.100
2.319 139 33 346
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
GUILTY
Humber Percent
1.345
72.8
1.738
86.0
19
27.5
1,333
30.6
5
51.5
sr
462
162 4
3,594
47.4
70.1
4S.S 30.8 69.7
1.550 1,500
S3 25 214
73.8 64.7 23.7 75.8 61.9
Escaping Failure to Pay Occupational Tax Firing TToods Goflbling Kit and !Xm Driving
Illegal Arrests Larceny, sirrle Larceny ifter Truirl . Libel L'aijrtaiiujig Lewd House
501 111
15 3,555
58
32 17.833
722 5
170
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
loo.o
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
422 35 2
2,915 35
11 10.492
350 1
7S
84.2 76.6 13.3 82.0 60.3
34.4 58.6 48.5 20,0 44.1
!'alicioU3 "ischief 1 ayhen, (.-.iiideTneanor Grade liadeneaaor, blanket charge I-'isdccicasor, r.iscollanoous Obscene Language
S59
100.0
IS
100.0
981
100.0
67
100.0
155
100.0
291
E2.1
3
18.7
653
66.6
39
58.2
67
43.2
Obstructing Legal Process Operating Auto while Drunk Operating Slot LlnchiBO with Slugs Pooping ~OM Practicing Profession without License
l"ublic IrunVcnness rublic Indecency licceivirg Stolen Coo<Is Receiviig Unstamped Tobaccos Rojr.oval of I'ort^agcd Property
11 6.033
74 34 34
5.807 174 277 699 137
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
4 4,577
51 13 IS
S.099 101 111 554 61
36.4 75.9 68.9 38.2 44.1
87.8 58.0 40.1 79.3 44.5
Heeistiig en officer Rioting Colling yortcacod Froporty Shootinc at Occupied Dwelling Stabbinc
Trospasn Using Aiito without Owner's Consent Using itorso without Owner's Consent Usmry Vagrancy
Violation of Conoon School Lor Violation of County health Rules Violation of Election Lena Violation of Cane Laws Violation of Highway Peculations
32 116
62 39 1,802
225 351
16 13 4.043
13 18
3 897
36
100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
100.0
100,0 100.0 100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
12 GS 24 17 619
111 212
IS
e
3,323
6 11
4 602
23
37.6 47.4 38.7 43.6 34.3
49.3 60.4 93.7 50.0 82.2
46.2 61.1 50.0 67.1 63.9
Violation of Labor Laws Violation of Xotor carrier Laws Violation of T'otor Vehicle Larrs Violation of Prohibition Lara
Violation of the Sabbath
17 29 3,130 33,784 11
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
4
10 2,391 24,656
24
23.S 34.5 76.4 7S.O 58.5
Violation of Tinbcr Laws Tare Beating
TOTAL
6 800
103,046
100.0 100.0
100.0
2 380
70.545
33.3 47.6
68.5
*Sourc: tzinute doctots of 29 city courts*
EOT GDJLTY
Kumber 503 282 50
3,027 11
Percent 27.2 14.0 72.5 69.4 63.7
30 197
210 9
1,564
2.6 29.9 56.5 69.2 30.3
550
26.2
819
35.3
106
76.3
8
24.2
132
38.1
79
15.8
26
23.4
13
86.7
640
18.0
23
39.7
21 7,341
372 4
95
65.6 41.2
51.5 80.0 55.9
268
47.9
13
81.3
328
33.4
23
41.8
83
56.8
7 1.456
23 21 19
63.6 24.1
31.1 61.8 55.9
708
12.2
73
42.0
166
59.9
145
20.7
76
S5.5
20 61 38 22
1.183
62.5 52.6 61.3 56.4 65.7
114
50.7
139
39.6
1
6.3
6
50.0
720
17.8
7
53.8
7
38.9
4
50.0
295
32.9
11
36.1
13 19 739
9.128 17
76.5 65.5 23.6 27.0 41.5
4 420
32,501
66.7 52.5
31.5
TABLE XT*
COCTICTIOBS ASD ACQDITTALS OS PlEaS OF SOI GDHIT By Crime*
29 City Courts of Georgia January 1. 1926 - December 31, 1935
CHIOS
Abandonment Adultery and Fornication Assault Assault and Battery Attempted Beastiality or Sodas?
Barbering without Lloensa Bastardy Breaking. Entering and Stealing Bribery, misdemeanor grade Carrying Deadly weapons
Carrying on Lottery Cheating and Swindling Cruelty to Children and Animals Defacing Public Property Disturbing Divine Worship
Total lumber Percent
503 282 SO 3,027
11
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
30 197 210
9 1.564
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
550 100.0 819 100.0 106 100.0
8 100.0 132 1OO.O
Convictions Sunber Percent
358 186
20 1,586
6
71.2 66.0 40.0 52.4 54.5
25 124 167
7 1,083
83.3 62.9 79, j 77.8 69.2
409 74.4 481 S8.7
40 37.7 4 50.0 67 50.8
Escaping Failure to Pay Occupational Tax Firing Woods Gambling Kit and Run Driving
79 100.0 26 100.0 13 100.0 640 100.0 23 100.0
63 79.7 13 50.0
7 53.8 401 62.7 '
17 73.9
Illegal Arrests Larceny, simple Larceny After Trust Libel Maintaining Lewd House
21 7.341
372 4
95
100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0
7 5,257
237
3 60
33.3 71.8 63.7 75.0 63.2
Ballcious laschlef L'ayhesi, misdemeanor grade Uisdomeanor, blanket charge I'lsdemeanor, miscellaneous Obscene Language
Obstructing Legal Process Operating Auto while Drunk Operating Slot Machine with Slugs Peeping Tom Practicing Profession without License
Public Drunkenness Public Indecency Receiving Stolen Goods Receiving Unstaaped Tobaccos KeEoval of Mortgaged Property
Resisting an Officer Motlne Selling Mortgaged Property Shooting at Occupied Dwelling Stabbing
Trespass Using Auto without Owner's Consent Using Horse without 'Owner's Consent usury Vagrancy
Violation of Conaon School Law Violation of County Health Rules Violation of Election Laws Violation of Gens Laws Violation of Highway Regulations
Violation of Labor Laws Violation of Motor Carrier Laws Violation of Motor Vehicle Lavs Violation of Prohibition Laws Violation of the Sabbath
Violation of Timber Laws rife 3eatlng
268 13
328 28 88
7 1.458
23 21 19
708 73
166 145
76
20 61 38 22 1.183
114 139
1 6 720
7 7 4 296 Z3
13 19 739 9.128 17
4 420
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
100.0 100.0 1 00.0 100.0
100.0 100.0
loo.o
100.0 100.0
100.0
loo.o
100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0
155 10
108 14 45
3 1.116
11 15 13
427 59 98 85 31
12 25 14 8 831
54 79 _ 4 527
3 3 3 82
e
5 13 440 6,139 14
2 314
S7.8 76.9 32.9 50.0 51.1
42.9 78.6 47.8 71.4 63.4
60.3 83.8 59.0 5S.6 40.8
0.0 41.0 36.8 36.4 70.2
47.4 56.8
.. 66.7 73.2
42.9 42.9 75.0 27.8 46.2
38.5 68.4 59.5 67.3 32.4
50.0 74.3
TOTAL
32,501 100.0
21,396 65.3
Source* Minute dockets of 29 city oourti
Acquittals Sunber Percent
145 96 SO
1.441 5
5 7S 43
2 481
141 338
66 4 65
28.8 34.0 0.0 47.8 45.5
16.7 37.1 20.6 22.2 30.8
25.6 41.3 62.3 50.0 49.2
16
20.3
13
50.0
46.2
239
37.3
6
26.1
14 2,094
135
1 35
66.7 28.4 36.3 25.0 36.B
113
42,2
S
ZJ.l
220
67.1
14
50.0
43
46.9
4
57.1
340
23.4
12
52.2
6
2S.6
8
31.6
281
39.7
14
19.2
68
41.0
60
41.4
45
59.2
8
40.0
36
59.0
24
63.2
14
63.6
352
23.8
60
32.6
60
43.2
1 100.0
2
33.3
1S3
26.8
4
57.1
4
57.1
1
2S.O
213
72.2
7
S3.S
8 6 299 2,989
3
61.5 31.6 40.5 32.7 17.S
2
50.0
106
25.2
11.105
34.2
TABLE ITI*
TRIAL PROCSBCBE IN CASES WHERE PLEAS OF HOT (UILTX
29 City Courts of Georgia J--an--u--a--ry--T1*ot1a9l 2P6le-asDeocie'--m--be--r--3--1--, --1935
ACSbaCnEdSo_aD__ai_it_________________________ Adultery nnd Fornication Assault
Assault and Battery Attempted Beaetiallty or Sodooy
Hot Oullty Entered
Nunber Percent
503
100.0
282
100.0
SO
100.0
3,027
100.0
11
100.0
Cas<us Triad Dei1,
Tfithout a Jury
Hunbor Percent
301
59.9-
192
68.1
27
54.0
1,920
63.4
4
36.4
Barbering without License Bastardy Breaking. Entering aad Stealing Bribery, alsdaawuor grada Carrying Deadly Weapons
30 197 210
9 1,564
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
25 73 173
5
1.132
83.3 37.0
82.4 55.5 72.4
Carrying on Lottery Cheating and Swindling Cruelty to Children and Animal*
Defacing Public Property Disturbing Divine Worship
550
100.0
819
100.0
106
100.0
8
100.0
132
100.0
481
87.5
444
54.2
35
33.0
1
12.5
35
26.5
Escaping Failure to Pay Occupational Tax Firing Woods Gambling Hit and Hub Driving
79
100.0
28
100.0
IS
100.0
640
100.0
23
100.0
64
81.0
15
57.7
3
23.0
432
67.5
19
82.6
Illegal Arrests Larceny, simple Larceny After Trust libel Maintaining Lewd House
21 7.341
372
4 96
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
IS 5.462
263 1
56
71.4 74.1 70.7 25.0
50.9
Malicious KlscMef Mayhem, niideneenor grade
Iisdm*enor, blanket charge
Misdemeanor, miscellaneous Obsoeaa Language
268
100.0
13
100.0
328
100.0
28
100.0
88
100.0
189
70.5
10
77.0
74
22.5
16
57.1
41
46.6
Obstructing Legal Process
Operatixg Auto while Drunk Operating slot Machine with Slug* Peeping Ton Practicing Profession without License
1 1,456
23 21
19
100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0
3 1,082
3 11 7
42.9 74.3
34.8 52.4 36.3
Publio Drunkenness Public Lndeoenoy Receiving Stolen Goods Receiving unstamped Tobacco* Removal of Mortgaged Property
Se*istljuj an Officer Rioting Selling Mortgaged Property Shooting at Occupied Dwelling Stabbing
708 73
168 145
78
20 61
22 1.183
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
413
58.3
53
72.6
110
66.2
101
69.3
28
36.8
16
80.0
7
11.5
11
29.0
11
60.0
916
77.4
Trespaai
Using A'jto without Owners Consent Using Horse without Owner's Consent Usury Vagranoy
114
100.0
139
100.0
1
100.0
6
100.0
720
100.0
62
54.4
105
75.5
~
--
1
16.7
638
83.8
Violation of Contnon Sohool Law Violation of County Health Rules Violation of Election Laws Violation of Came Laws Violation of Highway Regulations
Violation of Labor Laws Violation of Motor Carrier Laws Violation of Motor Vehicle Lava Violation of Prohibition Laws Violation of the Sabbath Violation of Timber Laws Wife Bnating
7 7 4 295 13
13 19 739 9.128 17. 4 420
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0
100.0 100.0
4 1 2 5 7
1 13 462 6,547 7 2 338
67.1 14.3 50.0 22.0 53.8
7.7 68.4 62.5 71.7 41.2 50.0 80.5
TOTAL
32,501
100.0
22,540
69.4
Souroftj Ulntta docket* of 29 city court-,*.
With ft Jury
Iftmber Percent
202
40.1
90
31.9
23
46.0
1.107
36.6
7
63.5
5
16.7
124
63.0
37
17.6
4
44.5
432
27.6
69
12.5
375
45.9
71
67.0
7
87.5
97
73.5
IS
19.0
11
42.3
10
77.0
203
32.5
4
17.4
6 1.879
109 3
39
28.6 25.6 29.3 75.0
41.1
79
29.5
3
23.0
254
77.4
12
42.9
47
53.4
4
57.1
374
25.7
15
65.2
10
47.5
12
63.2
205
41.7
20
27.4
56
33.3
44
30.7
48
63.2
4
20.0
54
83.5
27
71.0
11
50.0
267
22.6
52
45.6
34
24.5
1
100.0
5
83.3
82
11.4
3
42.9
6
85.7
2
50.0
230
78.0
e
46.2
12
6 277 2.581
10 2
82
92.3 31.5 37.5 28.3 53.8 50.0
19.5
9,961
30.6
- 46 -
percent of the cases tried received such Judg ments. Since an acquittal under thla plea la Impossible, a comparison of the total convic tions with thoee convicted In this manner la en lightening. For the city court, 76.7 percent of the convlctlona were obtained by voluntary action on the part of the defendant.
It la not expected, however, that a person would willingly give up hla liberty and place himself under the constraints of sentence with out aome hope of beneflttlng by thla action. Exactly the form of such boons would depend largely upon the status of the Individual. Cases are on record of derelicts who. In search of a warm comfortable place to spend the winter sea son, purposely were caught In the commission of crime. On the other hand, for business reaaona, some people would like charges against them com pleted as soon as possible and make every effort to secure a fine that can be paid and the case forgotten. Often cases like the above are han dled by a Judge In chambers without the formal ity of a public hearing. The real grist of theae courts, therefore, la the 32,501 casea In which pleaa of not guilty were entered, and Ita real efficiency Is determined by the disposition made thereof.
Fleas of guilty may be Induced by a prepon derance of evidence gathered by the law en forcement department with regard to which the Judicial officials may give little or no assist ance. On pleas of not guilty, hamfrtr, ouch depends on the solicitor's Judgment of the caae before It goea to trial and his conduct of the case during trial. It Is his duty to attempt to secure a conviction when It appears that a crime has been committed and there Is convincing evi dence against the person charged; but it la likewise hie duty to prevent those cases In which he feels that there la Insufficient evi dence to convict from coming before the court. Thla action Is, from the standpoint of the State, a saving of time and money, and from that
of the Individual, avoidance of persecution. Table XV, where convictions on plea of not guilty are shown, merits consideration froa the standpoint of court efficiency.
A major purpose In the establishment of a court of misdemeanor Jurisdiction Is to secure a more rapid disposal of cases than Is practicable under the cumbersome procedure necessary In a court of general Jurisdiction. As a step In this direction, usually Inferior courts provide Jury trlale only on the request of the defendant. The Judge, therefore, having saved the tlae spent gtrlklng a Jury, and using a modified procedure, la able to dispose of more cases than could be handled In like time by the superior court, llany defendants, however, do not wish to. dispense with their right to a trial by a Jury. In fact, 30.6 percent of those entering a plea of not guilty were given Jury trlala (see Table XVI).
The question then naturally arises as to whether or not there Is any advantage to the de fendant In a Jury trial, and, If ao, of what na ture. Proa the flgurea In Table XVH, It appeara that convictions result In only W.7 per cent of the cases In uhlch the Jury pronounces the verdict and this figure Is smaller by 30.5 percent than where the trial la had without a Jury. (See Table Will for convictions ar.d acqulttala on non-Jury trlala.) In other worda, the defendant has a much better chance of ac quittal If he demanda a Jury. Thla low percent age of convictions does not apply to all crimes alike, and no doubt skilled defense attorneys have long known thoee offenses In which a Jury trial weighs the acalea of Justice to the advan tage of their cllenta.
when the figures In Tables XVII and XVIII are cooparea oy crlaee, It la readily seen that any Jury trlala react advantageously for the defendant. Thla la apparently true of those offenses of an assault nature, with the excep tion of shooting at an occupied dwelling and simple assault, when only those eaaea tried be-
TABI XVII*
COXVXCTIOIS AND ACQUITTALS Oil JUKY TRIALS (Cases TFhore Defendants Plead Hot Guilty)
By Crimes January 1 1926 - December 31, 1955
JURY TRIALS
CRT3S__________________ ____ __----M--u~nb2e5rT Percent
Abandoaaent
1OO.O
Adultery ani Fornicatior-
90 100.0
Assault
23 100.0
Assault and Battery
1.107 110.0
Attempted Eeastiolity or Sodomy
7 100.0
COBVICTIOKS
Number Percent
98
48.5
44
48.9
10
43.5
378
34.0
3
42.9
Harboring without License Bastardy Breaking, Entering and Stealing Bribery, misdemeanor grade Carrying Deadly Weapons
5 100.0 124 100.0
37 100.0
4 100.0 432 100.0
5
60.0
63
55.6
23
2.2
3
75.0
195
45.1
Carrying on Lottery Cheating and Swindling Cruelty to Children or Animals Defacing Public Property Disturbing Divine Worship
9 100.0 57S 100.0
71 100.0 7 100.0 97 100.0
45
3.2
162
43.2
25
36.6
4
57.1
S3
54.6
Escaping Failure to Pay Occupational Tax Firing WooJs
CanMiag !iit and Run Driving
15 100.0 11 100.0 10 100.0 208 100.0
4 100.0
9
60.0
4
36.4
4
40.0
79
38.0
2
50.0
Illegal Arrests Larceny, simple
L&rcony after Trust libel VAintftinirg Lewd Bouso
6 1.879
109 3
J9
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
3
50.0
913
48.6
40
S6.7
3
100.0
24
61.5
Malicious yisohlef
Liyhosi, n3 sdmeiuior grade r^sdaaeanor, blanket charge
Kisdeneanor, miscellaneous Obscono language
79 100.0 S 100.0
254 100.0 12 100.0 47 100.0
22
27.3
2
66.7
84
33.1
4
31.3
20
42.6
Obstructing Legal Process
Opcri^rinc Auto while Erunlc Operating slot ifccuinc with Slugs Peeping Ton Practicing Profession without License
4 100.0 174 100.0
IS 100.0 10 100.0 12 100.0
1
25.0
189
50.5
3
20.0
8
80.0
7
58.3
Public Drokennoss Public Indecency Receiving stolen Goods P.ecoiving Unstamped Tobaccos Removal of Mortgaged Property
295 100.0 20 100.0 56 100.0 44 100.0 48 100.0
132
44.7
13
5.0
74
60.7
6
13.6
18
37.5
Resisting an Officer Rioting Soiling Mortgaged Property Shooting at Occupied Dwelling Stabbing
4 100.0 54 100.0 27 100.0 11 100.0 267 100.0
2
50.0
25
46.3
10
37.0
4
36.4
132
49.4
Trespass
52
Using Auto without Owner* 3 Consent
S4
Using Horse without Owner's Consent
1
Usury
5
Vagrancy
82
Violation of Con&on School Law
3
Violation of County Health Rules
6
Violation of Election Lairs
2
Violation of Game Lews
230
Violation of Highway Regulations
8
Violation of Labor Lam
Violation of L'otor Carrier Laws Violation of Uotor vehicle Laws Violation of Prohibition Laws Violation of the Sabbath
12 G
277 2.5B1
10
Violation of Tijnber Lftws
2
ife Beating
82
TOTAL
9,961
Sources I^imite dockets of 29 city court*.
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0
21 12
3 87
1 2 1 43 3
5 118 1,2579
2 SI
4.458
40.4 35.3
_ 60.0 45.1
33.3 33.3 50.0 18.7 50.0
41.7 _
42.6 48.7 90.0
100.0 S7.8
44.7
- 48 -
ACQUITTALS
----------B--a--n1n0er4-
Percent 51.5
46
51.1
13
56.5
729
66.0
4
57.1
2
40.0
55
44.4
14
37.8
1
25.0
237
54.9
24
34.3
213
56.8
45
3.4
3
42.9
44
45.4
ft
40.0
7
3.6
S
60.0
129 es.o
2
50.0
3
SO.O
968
51.4
69
63.3
a.
15
38.S
57
72.2
1
33.3
170
66.9
8
66.7
27
57.4
3
75.0
185
49.5
12
80.0
2
20.0
5
41.7
1M
5S.3
7
35.0
22
39.3
33
8S.4
30
2.5
2
SO.O
29
53.7
17
3.0
7
63.8
135
50.8
31
59.6
22
64.7
1
100.0
2
40.O
45
54.9
2
66.7
4
66.7
1
SO.O
187
81.3
3
50.0
7 6 159 1,324 1
_ 51
5B.3 100.0
57.4 S1.3 10.0
-- 2.2
5,503
55.3
TABLE XVIII*
coimcxirars ACT ACCSIWALS en i;cu-jraY TRIALS
(Cuo> raoro the Defendants Flood Not Guilty] By CrineB
January 1, 1S26 - Deceriber 81, 1935
cnnss
Kon-Oury Trials :.Mn2>or Percent
Cor.victions
Hunber Percart
Abandonnent Adultery and Fornication Assault Astault and Battery Atteiaptcd Beostiality or Sodony
301 192
27 1.920
*
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
260 142
10 1,208
3
86.1 74.0 37.0 62.9 75.0
Harboring without License Bastardy Brealdjng, Entering and Stealing Bribery, aisdcnoanor grade Carrying Deadly Weapons
25 73 173 5 1.132
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
22
.8.0
SS
75.3
144
S3.2
4
80.0
888
78.4
Carrying on Lottery Cheating and Swindling Cruelty to Children or Aninals Defacing Public Property Disturbing Divino Ttforsliip
4G1 100.0 444 100.0
35 100.0 1 100.0
35 100.0
364
75.7
319
71.8
14
'id.O
~
14
40.O
Escaping Failure to Pay Occupational ?ax ririac "floods Garibling TTit and Run Driving
64 100.0 IS 100.O
3 100.O 432 100.0
19 100.0
54
34.4
9
6O.O
3 100.0
322
74.5
15
78.9
Illegal Arrests Larceny, simple Larceny after Trust Libel * 'jjjitoiaing Lend Houso
Kolicious Mischief **ayhe=L fitisdeoaanor grade lixstloaoorior, blanket charge t/iisdenoanor, riiscellaneous Obscene Language
IS 5,462
255 1
56
10E 10 74 16 41
100.0 100.0. 100.0 100.0 100.0
loo.o
100.0 100.0
loo.o
100.0
4 4,344
197
w
36
133 3
24 10 '' 25
26.7 79.5 74.9
_ 64.3
70.4 80.0 32.4 62.5 61.0
Obsrv.- 4i :rc T.c-al PTOCOBS ,
Ope ratine Auto lAilc Drunk Cr.orbtine Slot I^ciiino with 31u^3 Pooping Ton Practicing Profession without Licence
3 1,082
1
11 V
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
2
66.7
927
85.7
8 100.0
7
63.6
6
85.7
Public Drunkenness Public Indoconcy HecolTing Stolon Goods ."tacoiTing Unstamped Tobaccos D.onaral of yort^agod rrofflrty
S-T-i r:tirg an Cfficcr p ioting Soiling :.ort0-cd Property Shooting at Occupied Dwolling Stubbing
41.1 100.0 S3 100.0
110 100.0 101 100.0
23 100.0
10 100.0 7 100.0
11 100.0 11 100.0 916 100.0
295
71.4
46
86.3
64
58.2
79
78.2
IS
4C.4
10
62.5
_
4
3G.4
4
36.4
699
76.3
Trespass Using Auto without Owner 1 3 Consent 'Jsiag Horsy wi'thout Ounor's Consent Dsury Vagrancy
62 100.0
10S 100.0
_
1 100.0
638 100.0
33
53.2
67
63.3
1 100.0
490
76.3
Violation Common School Lav Violation County Health Rulea Violation of Election Laws Violation of Gama Laws Violation o* Highway Reflations
4 100.0
1 100.0
2 100.0
65 100.0
7 100.0
2
50.0
1 100.0
2 100.0
39 60.O
3
42.9
Violation of Labor LOOT Violation of Voter Carrior Lavs Violation of ^otor Vehicle Lrs Violation of Prohibition HBTJ violation of the Sftbtath
Violation of Tiribor I^rrs ~i~Te Boatinr
TOTAL
1 IS 462 6.547
7
2 338 22.540
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0
loo.o
^ IS 322 4.882
5
_ 283 1C.S38
_ 100.0
69.7 74.8 71.4
_ 83.7 75.2
doctcts of 29 city courts*
Accu3.'-tl rcrcert
41
13.6
SO
2G.O
17
63.0
712
37.1
1
25.0
J
12.C
18
24.7
29 i6.e
1
20.0
244
21.6
117
24,2
125
23.2
21
60.0
1 100.0
21
60.0
10
15.6
e
<o.o -
no 25.5
4
21.1
11
3,228 66 1 20
73.3 20.5
2sa
100.0
35.7
56
29.6
2
20.0
50
67.5
6
37.5
16
39.0
1
33.3
155
14.S
_
_
4
36.4
1
14.3
118
26.6
7
13.2
56
41.3
22
21.3
15
53.S
6
37.5
7 100.0
7
63.6
7
53.5
217
23.7
29
48.3
38
36.2
_
_
148
23.2
2
50.0
_
_
_
_
26 so.o
4
57.1
1 _ 140 1,665 2
2 55 5,602
100.3 _
30.3
25.-:
23.6
loo.i-
16.3 24.8
fore the Jury ara considered. It appear* that the percentage of aoqulttala for theee two erlmee la about tha same ai those for wife beatIng, stabbing, and assault and battery. This would lead to tha oonoluslon that while there la eoma consistency In tha Jury vardlote for a limited type of crimes, tha resulte reaohed whan triad before a Judge without a Jury ara widely divergent.
On tha other hand, Jurlee do not seam to> grant acquittals In other types of crimes- In the aame degrua of regularity aa In those Mentioned above. The offeneea which ara grouped In tha Coda aa ajalnot public morality show wide varlatlone. Acquittals In chargea of violation of the Sabbath ara rare whan tried before a Jury. Conversely, gambling charges result in a large percentage of acquittals, while lottery chargea ahow a percentage of convictions almost twice that of gambling.
Turning to the treatment of tha same type of offenaea tried before a Judge but without a Jury, In is found that exactly tha opposite re sults occur. It la unusual for the ratio of convlotlona to acquittals for crimes la this group to be greatly at variance from tha average on such trials and these exoeptlone are found In those offenaea for which there ara few cases. Exclusive of public Indecency charges, convic tion of the crimes of thla type range between
65 and 75 percent.
From an analysis of tha two tables, a broad general conclusion may be drawn that defendants tried before a Jury are acquitted In a larger percentage of oases than where tried before a Judge without a Jury, but the variations within crime typee and as between given offanaea are so great as to Indicate that the resulta reached are more likely the outooaa of coincidence than the working of a pattern.
In considering the aoqulttala raeultlng from Jury trials. It la well to take Into account the email percentage of oaaea In which auch proced ures are demanded. Contrasting with these la the fact that nine-tenths of the work of tha city court la handled by the Judge without tha aid of a Jury and that oonvlotlona result In approxi mately oJt percent of these oases. It should be borne In mind, however, that voluntary admlaelona of guilt make up a large percentage of these oonvlctlons.
Such admissions cannot be Ignored In esti mating the value of the court performance. Of the total 114-1,056 oases, pleas of guilty ac counted for 50 percent out of the 65 percent which resulted In convictions. In the light of the foregoing discussion. It might he aald that the eventual dlaposltlona of tha remaining onethird of tha oasea studied was an actual or virtual acquittal.
- 50 -
Chapter H CASES BEFORE SUPERIOR COURTS
Courts for the handling of mladenteanor caaea
are usually found only In the more populoua
counties. In the other araa, all casea are
brought In the Superior Court, the oourt of gen*
era! Jurladlotlon and the major trial court
undar the Georgia ayste. This tribunal funotlona through Judicial unit In each countyw,i
and mat alt for the trial of caaea at leaat
twice a year and aa many other tinea aa are neo-
eaeary.01 The regular teraa are Bet by law and
speolal terma by the presiding Judge of the clr-
oult.(U Due to the praaa of bualneaa, the oourt
alta alaoat oontlnuoualy In the nora populoua
counties, while the few oaaea brought In some of
the snail eountlea make two abort terma ade
quate.
For the handling of criminal bualneaa, the
Superior Court haa tha following officers: a
Judge, elected from the circuit; a solicitor
general, elaotad from the sane terrltory;**a
olerk, and a aherlff, elected from the county; a
grand Jury of eighteen to twenty-three men'" and
a petit Jury panel of twenty-four or more man,
selected from tha qualified cltlzena of th
county;'" one or more bailiffs, appointed by the
herlff or Judge^and a reporter, appointed by
tha Judge. The Judge presides oTer and la re
sponsible for tha functioning of thla court.
Tha olerk la tha custodian of the oourt records, and la admlnlatratlon officer,(iMblle tha sheriff
la custodian of the prisoners, and executive of-
(14)
fleer; and tha
bailiffs
are
assistants of the
M See. 24-2615 0*. Cod* 1933. <U*M. 34-2501 ibid. ">M. 24-3009 ibid. ISM. 31-2609 IMd. U)S*e. 24-2601 Hid. <aS*o. 24-2901 Ibid.
mfcei. 34-2801:24-2701 Ibid. tS*o. 59-203 ibid, (4SM.. S9-70?;59-801 Ibid. Idlwi. 34-3351 Ibid. nM. 24-3101 Ibid ($0. 34-2616 Ibid, a fee. 34-3714 Ibid. Mate. 24-2813 Ibid.
aherlff.' The solicitor general represents the tate and handles the state'a case before tha oourt ;*the reporter makea a record of all the evidence In felony caaea1. The petit Jury la the Judge of the law and tha faeta^whlle the grand Jury Inqulrea Into each caae brought before It or originated by It aa to whether or not a crime haa bean committed. When thla question la an swered affirmatively, this body then deternlnea If there la sufficient evidence to Indicate the parties Implicated In the crime. It, as a part of the court, eliminates those casea which are not triable and leavea upon the court docket only those caaes In which there Is evidence aufflelent for trial. The criminal oases regaining form the grist which the court must grind, and usually there la a well-filled docket, cf the 93,2fiS cases docketed In the Superior Court In the counties studied, 55,5*8 bad bean brought to trial by Decanter 51, 1855. (See Appendix E, Table 17, for cases by counties.) Table XIX llata the several crimes studied, along with tha percentage of each reaching trial. An Intareetlng aide--light on the work of thla court la tha similarity of tha disposal pattern with that In the misdemeanor courts.
In the city court, the solicitor brings the formal accuaatlon of the atate against the aoouaed, while In the Superior Court this work la dona by the grand Jury. Perhapa at aome time in Ita early hlatory, thla body functioned Inde pendently of tha prosecutor's office and without aselstanee brought such Indictments a a It deemed In the beat Intereat of the atate. Today, It leans heavily upon tha solicitor general and haa often been accused of being a rubber stamp for
(B I*c. 24-3351 Ibid. twice. 34-2908 Ibid. (nlfcc. 27-2401 Ibid. WlMS. 3-201:27-2301 Ibid. WS.C. 27-701 Ibid.
- 51-
TABLE rDC*
DISPOSUZOH OP CASES By Crimea
57 Superior Courts of Georgia ** January 1, 1926 - Deoentor 51, 1935
V
CRBES
Abandonment
Adultery and Fornication Assault
Assault and Battery
Attempted Beaatlallty or Sodomy
Bastardy Blaoknail and Extortion Breaking, Entering and Stealing
Carrying Deadly weapons Carrying on Lottery
Cheating and Swindling Cock Pightii^ Cruelty to Children and Anlmala Disturbing Divine worship Defamation of Virtuous Female
Escape
Failure to :>ay Occupational Tax
Firing IToodj
Gambling
Hit and Run Driving
Interfering with Laborers Killlae ?ar Anlnals Libel Larceny, claple Larceny, attempted
Larceny After Trust
Ualpnxoticf by Public
>iiicioua iischief
officer
Kaiirbaininf; Lend House
)flalxrcaijiin Opium Joint
Uaykeu, misdemeanor
Misdemeanor, blanket charge.
l^isdemeonor, miscellaneous
Obstructing Legal Process
Operating Auto while Drunk
Operating Slot liachine with Slugs Peddling without License Peeping Tom Performance of Peace Officer'a Duty, illegally
PoUrting fistol at Another
Practicing Profession without LicensePublic Drudcenness Public Incecency Receiving Stolen Goods Receiving Unstamped Tobaccos
Kenovol o Uortgaged Property
Resisting an officer
Rioting
Selling 15?rtcaged Property
Shooting at Occupied Duelling
Stabbing
Trespass
Using Auto without Owner's Consent
Using Obncene Language
Usury
^
Vagrancy
Violation of Conaon School Law Violation of Election Lawa Violation of Professional Bondsmen1 a Act
Violation of Came Law
Total
KWber Percent
1,388 568 1S9
1.&B9 48
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
151 95
247 3,779 1,005
2,922 74 97
542 21
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
296 347
23
2,089 36
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
21 11 17 6,439 80
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
88
100.0
8
100.0
294
100.0
285
100.0
21
100.0
IS 2,471
101 12
1,828
"272
12 21 39 S73
100.0 100.0100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
ioo;o
38 S.307
37 627 214
- 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
159
100.0
14
100.0
369
100.0
US
100.0
34
100.0
389
100.0
164
100.0
147
100 .O
766
100.0
129
100.0
1,006 39 71 15 513
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Cases to Trial
Sumber Percent
429
30.9
297
52.6
S7
51.$
818
43.2
32
66.7
62 41 148 2,129 SOI
41.1 43.2 59.9 56 .S 30.0
1,187 21 40
267 6
214 60 3 948 10
40.6 28.4 41.2 49.3 28.6
72 .S 17.3 13.0 45.4 28.6
S S S 3,995 49
42.9 45.S 17.6 62.0 61.2
53
60.2
2
25.0
152
51.7
156
55.1
13
61.9
6 863
48 4
1,267
46.2 34.9 47.5 33.3 69.3
109
40.1
2
16.7
IB
71.4
28
71.8
257
44.9
11 2,162
16 335
43
28.9 65.4 43.2 . . 53.4 20.1
49
30.2
11
78,6
122
33.1
36
31.0
40
47.6
220
6.6
58
35.4
118
80.S
263
34.9
-
-
7S4
75.0
21
53.8
21
29.6
6
40.0
234
45.6
Other Dispositions number Percent
959 269
92 1,075
16
69.1 47.5 48.7 56.8 33.S
89 54 99
1,650 704
58.9 56.8 40.1 43.7 70.0
1.7S5 5S 57
275 15
59.4 71.8 58.8 50.7 71.4
82 287
20 1,141
25
27.7 82.7 87.0 54.6 71.4
12 6
14 2,444
31
57.1 54.5 82.4 38.0 38.8
35
39.8
6
75.0
142
48.S
127
44.9
8
38.1
7 1,608
53 8
561
53.8 65.1 52.5 66.7 30.7
163
59.9
10
83.3
6
28.8
11
26*2
316
55.1
27 1,145
21 292 171
71.1 34.6 56.8 46.6 79.9
111
69.8
3
21.4
247
6.9
80
69.0
44
52.4
169
43.4
106
64.6
29
19.7
503
68.7
129 100.0
252
25.0
18
46.2
50
70.4
9
60.0
279
54.4
CRIIES
Violation of Highway Regulations Violation of Itotor Vehicle Law Violation of Prohibition LamViolation of Security License Law Violation of the Sabbath
Violation of Timber Lav Wife Beating
Total Hisdeneonors
Table m - Disposition of Cases (Cctt'i)
Total Kunber Percent
36 1,175 11,021
83 44
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
11
100.0
194 100.0
Cases to 'trial. ^rirdser ? srcent
18 730
7,023 12 16
50.0
62 J. 63.7 Z4.5 36.4
4
36.4
86
44.3
49,175
100.0
26,552
54.0
Felonies
Assault with Intent to Jftirder Assault irith Intent to Raps Assault nith Intent to Hob Arson SiESiy
Breaking and Ottering Vehicle Bribery Burglary Destroying House with Explosives Embenlawmt
Enbrocery Felony, blanlret charge Forgery Incest Involuntary Manslaughter
Kidnapping Laroeny frost Building Larceny from Person Larceny of Automobile Larceny of Farm Animals
Larceny Larcery After Trust Uayhen liarmfaeturing Liquor Miscellaneous Felony
L-urder Obtaining !S>ney Under False Pretense Perjury Personating Another Poisoning Hell
Possessing Counterfeit Type Possessing Burglary Tools Rape Receiving Stolen Goods Robbery
Seduction Shooting at Another Sodoxy and Beattiality Violation of Banking Regulations Voluntary ItoslauEhtcr
ITrockirjfj Trains
Total Felonies
GRM1H TOTAL
6.130 428 290 310 135
SS7 81
11,638 12 365
15 341 2,399
28 268
187 2,743
118 4.363
57*
63 1,448
4 2,309
73
2,901 9* 286 10 18
5 82 511 29 3,816
SOS 7*9 137 219 34
17
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
44,093 100.0
93,268
100.0
* Sources uinute dockets of 57 Superior Courts. ** For a county breakdown by crimes, soe Appendix E Taile 17.
- 53 -
3,791 280 1S2 144 75
347 36
8.718 5
131
4 ISO 1.526
17 16*
57 1,919
65 3.243
356
48 492
1 1,450
24
2,073 48 90 8 6
* 63 335 12 2,515
74 458
81 4 22
8
61.8 S5.4 66.2 46.5 56.4
62.3 44.4 74.9 il.7 35.9
26.7 44.0 63.6 60.7 61.2
30.5 70.0 55.1 74 .3 52.0
76.2 34.0 25.0 S2.8 32.9
71 .S 51.1 31.5 80.0 33.3
80.0 76.8 65.6 41.4 65 .9
34.0 61.1 39.1 1.8 64.7
47.1
29,036 65.9
35,588 59.6
^thcr_risposi ~cl
18 MS
3.9SB 71 28
so.r
37.9 36.T-
35.?
63.6
7 108
5635..6"
22,623 *s.;i
2,339 148 98 166 58
210 15 2.S20 7 254
11 133"21
11 1C4
130 S24 53 1.12C
-ir
15
3 S5C 49
S2s8e
liO 2
12
1 19 176 17 1.301
234 291
56 215 12
9
38.2 34.f 33. S 53.?
;;.i!
3".-'
so.,-, 25.:
oxll
73.!
;=.:
3C.-1
33.:
69.? $S4C'3.O25." 38.: D3.' ^"5'.0\ 37.2
2-.c
i6."
.-9.? S:.-
20.:
25.2 3-t."
3ss8*.C1*-
75.,-. 33.? -10.9 98.2 So .3
52.9
15,057 34.1
37,680 10.4
CRIMES
UBUS*
CASES HOT THE? By Crises
57 Superior Courts in Georgia January 1, 1926 - December 31. 1935
msdeaeanors
Transferred to
1161
Total
Other Court* DiawAased Pressed
Beleased On DsaHnd Deed Tor Tril Docket Pending
Abandonee!* Adultery ud ?oraioatloa
Assault Assault and 3attery Attempted Beietiality or Sodomy
959
337
Zen
63
92
8
1.073
282
18
3
BUotaeil sol Extortion Brisking, Entering and stealing Carrying Deadly Weapons Carrying on Lottrjr
89
25
M
99
34
183
TO*
SJS
Chesting and Swindling Cock Flghtlrg Crualty to Children sad Animals Disturbing Ilvine Worship Defamation cf Virtuous Tiejill
Escape Failure to ray Occupational Tax Firing Woodii Gambling Bit and Son BriTing
1.JM
200
5S
27
5T
1
27>
ao
U
8
n
6
M7
7S
20
3
1,141
194
26
4
Interfering with Laborers Killing of :*ra Animals Libel Laraany, siicpl* Larceny, atuaptad
12
S
1
14
2
2,444
304
31
7
Larceny Artsr Trust Ualpnotios by Publlo officer
llalicicus lllsohief Uaintaininc Lend Houe Uaintttinine Opium Joint
38
142
U
127
40
SCaybsn, mlsdenaanor Uisdflne&nor, blanket charge Misdemeanor* Diaoellaneous Obstructinf Legal Process Operating Jjuto iifaile Drunk
T
1
i.eoe
3S8
ss
7
8
S61
Operating lot Ikohine with Slugs
1S3
Peddling without Licensa
10
Peoplne Ion
6
Ferfornucn of Peace offleer 'a Duty, illegally 11
Pointing Pistol At Another
S16
69
Practicing Profession without UaenM Public Drunkenness
Public Indnoenoy BeoeiTing Stolen Goods HeoeiTlng lastaBped Tobaocos
Z1
19
lj!4S
213
21
5
292
10
in
2
Henoral of Mortgaged Property Desisting an Officer
Selling Mortgaged Property Shooting at Occupied Deelling
111
10
3
1
247
37
80
6
44
14
Stabbing Trespass
Cslng Autc without Oner'* Consent Using Obscene Language
Usury
169
50
106
11
29
1O
603
199
129
125
Vagrancy
252
40
Violation of Ccanon School Law
18
1
Violation of Election Law
50
17
Violation of Professional Bondmen* s Act
9
Violation of Gens Law
279
31
17
123
10
103
38
44
381
2
4
7
30
1
IB
4
33
4B
79
It
30
tt
451
1
27
10
94
1
4
17
9
97
1
11
IT
394
10
7
^
1
2
92
969
3
7
14 S 77
37
1
3
66
463
19
4
233
1
' 68
7
2
2
1
1
16
129
3
1
449
2
2
S
107
15S
53
93 29 12
9
48
7
S3
4
a
30
153
1
14
94
6
29
1
8
10
140
3
104
375
3
5
85
2
38
14
49
SOS
2
6
18
34
28
2
41
796
1
26
4
119
934
19
7
4
9
1
10
80
2
10
10
94
S
20
512
11
5
3
2
7
18
214
849
14
12 1 43 48
2
66
646
1
24
4
28
163
1
92
3
2
3
6
11
90
1
1
60
386
.3
9
31
139
1
IS
34 2
111 38 16
55 29
7 114
2
10
93
11
4
2
82
CRIMES
Violation of Highway Regulations Violation of Jfctor Vehicle Lew Violation of Prohibition Law Violation of Security License Law
Violation of the Sabbath Violation of Tinber Law Wife Beating
Total IttadaaeaTiora
Table XX - Caaea tat tried (Contd)
Trenaferrad to
Toi On De.rn.-id Dead
Other Court* Dismissed Proaaed For Trial Doclret Pendlrc
18 445 S..998
71
28 7
106
22,623
S 65 754
4.755
0
162
1S7
1,785
IS
17 3
43
7,951
1
-i
1
SO
1ST
21
226 1,0*5
5
46
3
S
27
1.159 7.82C
Aasault with intent to Harder
Aaaealt ulth Intent to Rap*
Aseault with Intent to Rob Arson Blgey
2,339 143 98 166 58
Breaking and Entering Vehicle
Bribery
Burglary
-
Destroying House with ErploilTes
BwbezilejDKit
2IO 45
2,920 7
234
&2>racery
11
Felony, olantat charge
191
forgery
873
Incest
11
Involuntary Uanslaughtar
104
Kidnapping Larceny from Building Larceny fron Feraon
Larceny of Automobile
Larceny of Pant Aninala
130 824
53 1.120
218
Laroeny
15
Larceny After Trust
956
Hayha.
3
Vanufaoturing Llouor
859
KUoallaneoiu Felony
49
leirder
823
Ovtalnios Honey under PalM Fretenee
46
Perjury
196
Feraonating ^"fft>>*i
2
Pollonlng Hell
12
PoMeaalng Counterfeit Typ* Poeieasing Burglary Toola Eape
Reoeiring Stolen Gooda Eobbery
1 19 176
IT 1,301
Seduction
234
Shooting at Another
291
Sodosy and Beaitiality
56
Violation of Benlring Bagulationa
21S
Voluntary llanelaughter
12
Ireoklng Train*
9
Total Feloniea
15,057
GEAHD TOTAL
37.630
* Souret Minute docket* of 57 Superior Court*
40 4 4 1 -
2 1 133
3
_ 20 10
7
-- 127
9 35
5
-- 48
1 22 4
18 7 -
. 1 7 1 13
3 8 1 139 1
-
673
5.428
36 7 2 5 S
3 -- 79
6
_ 1 16 2 4
4 36
1 19 13
3 22 S3 2
43 5 -
. 1 5 * 17
11 S 16 -
-
400
1,219
764 62 28 80 18
33 18 906
62
6 77 274 4 SB
39 219
20 253
60
3 294
1 371
18
157 13 49 -- 9
. 4
7a5
347
93 133 23 36
3
3
4,599
12.560
27
294 1,178
2
13
60
--
16
ts
7
IS
fiO
-
7
30
4
29
139
~
*
26
13
470 1.31S
7
2
40
121
_
_
5
3
IS
77
4
OS
47S
1 2
_
1
4 54
2
19
66
3
74
305
1
2
20
5
35
723
1
S7
104
2
3
4
6
66
520
_
_
1
9
71
353
-
4
21
1
63
546
-
9
24
6
9
129
-
--
2
-
-
3
_
_
1
1
--
12
~
IS
76
_
8
8
no
806
_
26
101
2
18
125
6
26
~
M
24
-
1
7
-
-
6
112
1605
7.66E
221 2.7S4 15.488
-55 -
Ms offloo. The grand Jury, under the Georgia law, nan powers adequate for It to fulfill the utmost expectatlone of the cltizsnryj" and when It data not lire up to them, such failures may be attributed largely to Its leadership. While It la the duty of this body to keep as many nontriable cases from the docket as possible, prob ably Ite failure to thoroughly sift the evidence Is responsible In part for the fact that approx imately "to percent of the Indictments were not tried. T?ie disposition of all such cases IB shown in Table XX.
For V.19 city court, only small percentage of the cases not tried were transferred to other courts. In fact, little reason existed for transforms, except for those cases which In volved minors. On the other hand, the Superior Court, with Its general Jurisdiction, had all types of cases brought before Its grand Juries, and where proper evidence was presented, an In dictment was returned. Often, then, the Supe rior Court Judge, Instead of trying misdemeanor and Juvenile casea, saw fit to place them under the Jurisdiction of the courts especially de signed fcr thea. Also, while In the city court a change of venue Is a very rare occurrence, It Is not sc rare In the Superior Court, and such cases ade. to the volume of those sent to other courts.
For the purpose of thla study, cases trans ferred to other courts were assumed to be com pleted. Under such an assumption, they are not then a port of the grist of the Superior.Court, and can be eliminated from further considera tion. When this Is done, the total cases not tried Is 32,352, or J6.S percent, of the 87,6*3 casea under consideration (casea docketed minus cases transferred). Upon an application, then, of the reasoning employed In the preceding chap ter In regard to dismissed, nol pressed, and pending cases, approximately one-third of the cases brought In the Superior Court result In
virtual acquittals. Due to the more serious nature of felony
crlir.es,"It Is to be expected that they are tried In greater ratios than mlsdeaeanore. "hen the cases transferred to other courts are eliminat ed, the expectation Is shown to be fulfilled by 66.9 percent of the felonies, and only 59>& per cent of the misdemeanors reaching trial. The procedure of the city and county courts was de signed especially for the rapid disposal of mi nor crimes, while that In the Superior Court has changed little from the cumbersome routine used In early colonial times. Since felony cases, by their very nature, are more Important, from the standpoint of disposal, than misdemeanors. It la In the Interest of the state that these lesser crimes be tried In the courts designed for their trial where such courts are operating. Transferrala to these courts are not always made, however, and In many counties, the Superior Court attempts the trial of large percentages of misdemeanor casea. Thla practice perhaps ac counts In part for the recent change In the law, and allows the solicitor general to Initiate charges on accusation In misdemeanor cases aa Is done In the city court.'21 This change la ao re cent that Its effect on the oases studied la negligible.
Nevertheless, In tha Superior Court, as In the city court, a defendant may waive hla rights to a full examination of the case by the court upon entering a plea of guilty. The Judge, In cases of this kind, makes such Inquiry Into the case aa he deems necasaary and sentencea tha de fendant according to the law of the particular crime Involved. Pleas or guilty were entered In 73.8 percent of the misdemeanors and 55.6 per-
AUTHOR'S I.'OJEi For the purposes of this chapter and for the remainder of those in this report, all tables and com putations were made on the baaia of the crime charged, and not on the basis of the crime for which sentence was passed. In other words, if a. person charged with rape in the indictment was convicted and sentenced for assault and battery, the figures throughout this report show this case under rape.
"I Sec. 59-201 et sequi. iiid.
TOP. 196, Acts of 1935
56-
cent of tne felonies tried In the Superior small portion of time Is oonsuved by the Judge
Court. The numbers of pleas of guilty In one of In handling a case If tbe defendant pleads guil
the more serious felonies no doubt causes vender ty. On the other hand, If the defendant pleads
o'n the port of the average Individual, and jet, not guilty. It Is necessary for a suitable Jury
pleaa of guilty were entered In 17*8 percent of to be Impanelled and the case proceeds before
the murder charges coming to trial In the period It. A large portion of the time In the Superior
under discussion. This, however, does not tell Court is consumed by the assembling, choosing,
the complete story, since often a defendant and qualifying of Jurors. Nevertheless, 35*7
charged with a heinous crime may find It advis percent of the total cases tried In the Superior
able after a conference with the solicitor gen Court were tried before a Jury. Of these, con
eral to plead guilty to an offense not so grave victions resulted In 53. \ percent of misdemeanor
as the one with which he Is charged, and will cases and 65.2 percent of the felony cases.
ingly receive the maximum sentence for the less This difference Is maybe due to the fact that
er offensa. Contrasting with the solicitor who solicitors general spend greater effort In tte
has made a bargain la that prosecuting officer preparation of felony cases and In the selec
whose case Is so well prepared and whose evi tions of Juries for them. As shown by Table
dence Is so complete that the defendant prefers XXII, percentages of convictions vary between
to rest upon the mercy of the court rather than the several crimes. These differences are prob
face an enraged Jury, even though the punishment ably due to the fact that because of their very
meted out by the Judge might be electrocution. naturj, evidence In some types of cases Is more
There are among the cases studied, several In eaelly obtained and presented than In others.
which the defendants were given the ">Tinm pun Arson ai I embezzlement are two crises In which
ishment allowed by law under pleae of guilty. evidence must be gathered by a costly and labo
Table XXI lists the cases tried according to the rious process, and which, after being gathered,
~j' plea entered.
does not lend Itself to a clear presentation to
The charge of murder Is not the only one In a Jury.
which pleas of guilty are entered In surprising
Tbe percentage of convictions before a Jury
ratios. Hape, robbery, burglary, and arson - for misdemeanor cases Is slightly higher In tne
all heinous crlnefl - show such percentages of Superior Court than In the city court, but not
pleas of guilty. On the other hand, among the so muc-h higher as to lead one to believe that
misdemeanor cases, there are points of similar the Jury of the Superior Court Is 30 aach more
ity, aa well as points of difference, In the effective than In the Inferior courts. Taken as
plea pattern to that In the city court. Taken a whole, almost 39 percent of the cases tried
all In all, however, there Is so much difference before a Jury are acquittals. When to these are
between the ratios of the several crimes that It added those virtual acquittals due to nol pros,
Is probable that a definite pattern does not ex dismissal, and pending dispositions. It Is found
ist between crimes of all types and crimes sup that convictions occur In the Superior Court In
posedly similar In character, and that pleas of only 5*.5 percent of the cases docketed there.
guilty are made more on the basis of the evi
This fact Indicates clearly that a large
dence known by the defendant to be In the hands portion of the labor of our law er-forcexer.t and
of the state rather than upon any specific qual court departments Is non-productive, ar.d changes
ity Inherent In the crime or crime type.
of some type are necessary If the desired pur
/ Even In cases of serious felonies, only a poses are to be served by thea. Ko one Ir.dlvld-
57 -
TABliXH*
FLEfcS OP GCILTT *K> ICT GUILTY - BT CRIMES 57 Sop*rlor Court* in Gorgi*,
January 1, 1928 - D*orib*r 51, 1930
QT)|
Adultery and Pornioation Aaeenlt Assault and Battery Attevpted Baaatiallty or Sodoqy
Total
Guilty
Mot Guilty
------ns~~ --------429--------PeIrBcOenTt--------------X--ta5fe0e*r------Fe--ro7eKzz3t------
Nimber --P--er5c5e3nTt
297
100.0
97
100.0
816
100.0
32
100.0
204
8.7
38
39.2
368
45.1
22
68.8
93
31.3
59
eo.a
449
54.9
10
31.2
Bastardy Blaoknall end fotortion Breeding. Entering end Stealing Carrying Deadly weepona
Carrying on Lottery
62 41 148
2,129
301
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
23 25 83 1.45S 281
S7.1 6.1 62.8 68.3 93.4
39
62.9
18
43.9
55
37.2
674
31.7
20
6.8
Cheating and Swindling Cook Fighting Cruelty to Children end Anlvals Disturbing lirine Warship Defamation cf Virtuoue FeMele
1.187 21 40 287
6
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
890
7E.O
9
42.9
12
30.0
ITS
E4.8
1
16.7
297
25.0
12
S7J.
28
70.0
94
36.2
S
83.3.
aoepe Fa aura to Fay Occupational Tax Firing Woodi Gambling Hit and Bun Brirlng
Interfering with Labors Killing 7am Anlnela Libel Larceny, elitile Larceny, attempted
2t4o1
S 948 10
9 5 3 3.99S 49
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
176 64 2
82e7
--i
2,641 27
81.8 90.0 SE.7 87.2 SO.O
77.8 *
66.1 5E.1
38 6 1
121 4
2 S 3 1,364 22
18.2 10.0 33.3 12.B 40.0
22.2 100.0 100.0 33.9 44.9
Laroeny Aftiir Trust Ilalpraotica by Public officer Malicious ttiaobief Maintaining Lead Houee Maintaining Opium Joint
Maybe* Klcianaenor., blanket charge ICLadeMeenor., laoelleneoua Obstructing Legal Process Operating X'lto vhile Drunk
Operating Slot Ilaoblna -alth Slut." Peddling wi'&hout License Peeping Ton
Ferforaance of Feaoa Officer's Doty, illegal!y
Pointing Pistol at Another
Practicing Profession without License Fublio Dnmkexmeas Publio Indeoency Receiving Stolen Goods Receiving Unstamped Tobaoeoe
Heaorel of Mortgaged Property Kealsting an Officer Riotlnj Selling llortgeged Property Shooting at oooupied Deviling
Stabbing Trespass Using Auto without Oanerra Consent Using Obaocne Language Vagrancy
Violation cf CoBnon School Lav Violation of Election Lev Violation of Profeaaional Bonisnaa's Act Violation of Gave Lav Violation of Blgbvay Regulations
Violation of Motor Vehicle Lev notation of Prohibition Lav Violation of Security License Lev Violation of the Sabbath Violation of Tlnber Lav WIT. Beetfcig
lotel. inerteveeraira
S3 2 162 168 J.3
e
883 48
4 1,267
109 2 16
28
267
11 2,1*2
16 396
43
48 11 122 36 4O
220 68
iis
263 764
21 21 fl 254 18
730 7,023
12 16 4 86 26.662
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.O 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
33 1
98 136
8
3 -22 31
4 1,047
98 Z 8
18 1O4
6 1.869
13 185
36
17 8 51
13 19
89 40 86 148 704
10 15
1 174
10
595 S.579
S IS
2 58 19.592
62.3 50.0 64.5 87.2 61.5
SO.O 72.1 64.6 100.0 82.6
89.9 100.0
S3 .3 64.3 40.5
S4.5 86.4 81.3 65.2 81.4
3S.4 72.7 41.8 38.1 47.5
4O.5 69.0 72.9 E5.1 93.4
47.6 71.4 16.7 74.4 E5.8
81.5 79.4 41.6 93.8 SO.O 67.4 73.8
20 1
4 20
5
3 241
17 220
11 7 10 163
5 29S
3 ISO
8
31 3 71 2S
21
131 18 32
118 50
11 6 6
60
a
135 1,444
7 1 2 28 6.960
37.7 50.0 35.S 12.8 38.5
50.0 27.9 35.1
17.4
10J.
46.7 35.7 59.5
45.5 11.5 18.7 44.8 18.6
4.6 27.3 58.2 63.9 52.S
59.5 31.0 27.1 44.9 6.8
S2.4 28.6 85.3 26.6 44.4
16.5 20.6 58.4
6.2 50.0 32.6 26.2
tUOX m - Pleu of Ouilty ami Dot Guilty (Cont'd)
canes
Assaalt with Intent to Ifcrder Assault with Intent to Bapa Assault with Intent to BOD Araon Bigamy
Total Itatoer
3.791 280 192 144 7B
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.O 100.0
Breaking and Entering Vehicle
Bribery
Burglary Destroying Bouse with Explosives Bxtaeiileavnt
347
M 8.718
5 131
100.0 100.O 100.0 100.0 100.0
Xaibruery Pelotty. blenket oharge
Porgery Inoest Involuntary Manslaughter
4 ISO 1.528 17 164
100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Kidnapping tanany from Building Laroeny from Person Lemony of Automobile Laroany of Perm Anlaala
57 1.919
65
3.243 356
100.0
100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0
Laroeny Laroeny After Trust Istyham
M*nufeotnrlng Liquor Miscellaneous Felony
48 492
1 1.460
24
100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0
Murder Obtaining Honey under Palae Pretense Perjury Personating Another
Poisoning Well
2.073 48 90
8
6
100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
Postesslng Counterfeit Type Possessing Burglary Tools Heps Booelving stolen Goods
Robbery
4 63
335 12 2.515
100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
Seduction Shooting at Another Sodomy and Beaitiallty Violation of Banking Reguletlans Voluntary Vanelaughtor
74
100.O
458
100.0
81
100.3
4
100.0
22
100.0
wrecking Traina
8
100.0
Total Felonies
29.036
100.0
GKAaD TOIAL
55.588
100.0
* Souroet Ittnnte dooketa of 57 Superior Courts
Felonies Quilt}1
SUnOer }percent
1,323
34.9
77
27.5
89
46.4
31
21.5
48
61 .J
261
75.2
12
33.3
5.685
65.2
3
60.0
68
51.9
2
SO.O
90
60.0
1.251
82.0
9
52.9
42
25.6
16
28U
1.S57
70.7
28
43.1
2.398
73.9
189
53 J.
23
54.2
279
56.7
1
100.0
893
61.5
13
54.2
370
17.8
31
64.4
41
45.6
5
62.5
3
50.0
1
25.0
35
55.6
68
20.3
3
25.0
1.135
45.1
23
31J.
186
40.6
59
72.8
_
4
18.2
5
62.S
16.158
55.6
35.750
64.3
Sot Ooilty }taber Percent
2,468
65.1
203
72.5
103
53.6
113
78^
29
S8.7
86
24.3
24
66.7
3.033
34.8
2
40.0
63
-JSU
2
50.0
60
40.0
275
18.0
8
47J.
122
74.4
41
71.9
562
29.3
37
56.9
845
26.1
167
46.9
22
45.8
213
43.3
--
--
557
38.4
11
45.3
l^OS
32.2
17
35.4
49
54.4
3
37.5
3
50.0
3
75.0
28
44.4
267
79.7
9
75.0
1,330
54.9
51
68.9
272
S3 .4
22
27.2
4
100.0
13
31.3
3
37.5
12,878
44.4
19,838
35.7
ual nor one part of the court can be blanea for beat. It Is not to be expected - Indeed, It la this fact. It naj be that the law enforcement not desirable fron a standpoint of public pol~ department &aa not aaae*bled all the witnesses Icy, that all cases docketed will result In con or that oourt of Inquiry hare allowed frlrllous victions. 9one allowance oust be made for Hunan ehargeB to be bound over to the trial oourtg. errors In Judgment on the part of those charged Then, naybe the grand Jury hae brought Indict- with the rarloue phase* of law enforcement anQ nenta In oas.es where the eTldence waa faulty and court routine. The fact, howenr, that so rela Insufficient, perhaps the solicitor general has tively few convictions result from the cases failed to prepare the case properly, or aayba docketed Is Incontrovertible evidence that eith the petit Jury has not done its duty. Eren er a great portion of the effort of state agen when all departaenti are functioning at their cies Is directed toward abortive attempts tc
- 59
UBU mi*
COXTCCTIOB UD ACQUITTALS
(Cases nun Pleas of lot Onilty Were Em orod) 57 Superior Court* in Georgia
January l, 1926 - Doombor 31., 1--9J5 JH
CHIMBS
Adnlterjr and Fcraioatlon Assault Assault and Battery Attawpted Besstiallty or Sodowy
Total
Hmnber Faroent
125
10O.O
93
100.0
59
100.0
448
100.0
10
100.0
m^u^ttt
79
63 .2
48
51.6
23
39.0
212
47.3
8
80.0
Bastardy Blaokxsdl and Iktortlon
Breaking, Entering and Stealing
Carrying Deadly Weapons
Carrying on Lottery
39
100.0
18
100.0
65
100.0
674
100.0
20
100.0
22
56.4
a
44.4
34
61.8
408
60.5
6
30.0
Cheating and Swindling Cook Fightlnc Cruelty to Children and Anlaela Disturbing Div-ine Worship Defamation of Virtuous Fnale
297
100.0
12
100.0
21
100.0
M 100.0
S 100.0
160
53.9
12 100.0
13
46.4
43
45.7
-
Esespa Fsllure to Pay Occupational Tax
Firing Woods (tabling
Hit and Run BrlTing
39 100.0
6 100.0
1 100.0
121
100.0
4 100.0
221
56.4 16.7
-
52
43.0
2
50.0
Interfering with Laborers lining Fan Aataala Libel Larceny, SJJB^I
Larceny, attanpted
2 5
3 1.564
22
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
1
50.0
1
33.3
787
58.1
14
63.6
Tarceny'After TVust
dapraotlce by Public officers kaliolous liiecbief Maintaining Lewd House
KalntainliM; Opium Joint
20 100.0
1 100.0
54 100.0
20 100.0
5 100.0
10
50.0
-
27 so.o
14
70.0
4
80.0
Ilayhen Jlisdeneanor, blanket charge Hisdeoeanor, niscellaneous
Operating Auto while Drunk Operating Slot Kachine with Slugs
3 100.0 241 100.0
17 100.0 -
220 100.0
11 100.0
1
33.3
130
54.0
35.3
US
52.7
8
72.7
Peeping TOD Performance of Peace Officer's LXity, illegally
Pointing Pistol at Another Practicing Profession without License Public Drunlceraess
7 100.0
10 100.0 153 100.0
S 100.0 293 100.0
3
43.0
4
40.0
66
45.1
3
60.0
126
43.0
Public Xndeoercy Receiving Stolen Goods
Receiving Unstamped Tobaccos
Renoval of Mortgaged Property
Resisting sn Officer
3 100.0 150 100.0
8 100.0 31 100.0
3 100.0
1
33.3
88
58.7
4
50.0
12
38.7
1
33.3
Rioting Selling l!ortgied Property Shooting at Occupied Dwelling
Stabbing Trespass
71 100.0 23 100.0 21 100.0
131 100.0
18 loo.o
41
67.7
10
45.S
12
57.1
83
63.4
8
33.3
Using Auto without Owner 1 s Consent Using obscene Language Vagrancy
Violation of Comaon School Law Violation of Election Laws
32 100.0 118 100.0
50 100.0
11 100.0
6 100.0
14
43.8
61
51.7
29
58.0
4
36.4
2
33.3
Violation of Professional BondsDen'a Act Violation of Game Lair
Violation of Highway Regulations
Violation of Motor Vehicle LawViolation of ?rohibition Law
5 60 8
135 1,444
100.0 100.0 100.0 100. O 100.0
2
40.0
24
40.0
_
66
48.9
765
63.0
Violation of .Security License Law
Violation of -the Sabbath
Violation of Timber Law Wife Beating
Total I'AeSeneanors
7
1 2 28
6,960
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
5 1 _
IS 3,720
71.4 100.0
.
55.6 53.4
- 60 -
Acquittals
Jfuober percent
46 36.8
45 48.4
36
61.0
236
52.7
2 20.0
17 43.C 10 5S.6
21 58.2
266 39.5
14 70.0
137 46.1
>
IS 55.6 51 54.3
5 100.0
17 43.8
5 83.3 1 100.0 69 57.0
2 50.0
1 50.0
S 100.0 2 6.7 567 41.9
8 36.4
10 50.0
1 100.0
27
50.0
6 30.0
1 20.0
2 66.7
111 46.0
11 4.7
104 47.3 3 27.3
4 57.0 6 60.0
87 56.9 2 40.0
167 57.0
2 66.7 62 41.3 4 50.0
19 1.3
2 6.7
30 42.3 IS . 56.5
9 42.9
48 36.6 12 .7
IB 56.2 57 48.3 21 42.0
7 3.6
4 .7
3 60.0 36 60.0
8 100.0
69 51.1' 679 47.0
2
2 13 3,240
28.6 _
100.0 46.4 46.6
TABLE XXII - ComrtctlOBa and Acqui^tnla (Cont'd)
CRIBS Assault with Intent to Birder Assault with Intent to BapsAssault with Intent to Bob Arson
Breaking and Entering Vehicle Bribery Burglary Destroying House with Bcplosives aibesilenent
Total
Hunber Percent
2,468
100.0
203 100.0
103 100.0
US 100.0
29 100.0
86 24 3.033 2 63
loo.o
100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
Qnbrtccry Felory, blanket charge
Forgery Inoost Involuntary Manslaughter
2 100.0
60 100.0 275 100.0
8 100.0 122 100.0
Xidnajplxg
Larcony frou Building Larceny from Person Larceny of Automobile Larcony of Faro Anfccals
41 100.0 562 100.O
37 100.0 845 100.0 167 100.0
Larceny Larceny Alter Trust
Z&sufcciurlxr Liouor lascellanoous Felony Uurdor
22 213 557
11 1,703
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.O
Obtaining Voney under False Pretense Perjury
personating Another
Poisoning Well Possessing Counterfeit Typo
17
100.0
49 100.0
3 100.0
3 100.0
3 100.0
Possessing Burglary Tools Rape
Receiving stolen Goods Robbery Seduction
28 267
9 1,380
51
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Shooting a* Another
Sodory and Seastiality Violation of Sei&iag Peculations Voluntary' uAnsltUG****1" Crocking Trains
272 100.0 22 100.0 4 100.0 18 100.0 3 100.0
Total Felonies
12,878
100.0
GRSSD TOTAL
19.333 100.0
*Sourcoi Minuto dockets of 57 Superior Courts*
Conviction*
;:unber Percent
1.564
65.4
125
61.6
62
60.2
45
39.8
19
65.5
'1ft8?
2,093 1 28
72.1 75.0 69.2 50.0
44.4
2 100.0
36
50.0
179
SS.l
6
75.0
81
66.4
19
46.3
334
59.4
17
4S.9
576
66.2
89
53.3
15 94 372 6 1.199
68.2
44.1 66.8 54.5 70.4
13
76.5
33
67.3
3 100.0
--
--
2
66.7
20
71.4
156
58.4
3
33.3
917
66.4
S3
64.7
141
51.8
13
72.7
1
25.0
5
27.8
3 100.0
8,393
65.2 '
12,113
61.1
Acquittals Ifjnber I'ercert
904 35.5 78 33.4 41 39.3 68 60.2 10 34.5
24 27.= 6 25.0
935 30.8 1 50.0
35 55.6
0
24 40.0
96
34.9
2 23.0
41 33.6
22 53.7 228 40.6
20 54.1 269 31.8
73 46.7
7
31.8
119 55.9
IBS 33.2
5 45.5
504 29.6
4 23.5 16 S2.7
-
3 100.0
1 33.;
8 28.6 in 41.6
6 66.7 463 33.6 IS 35.3
131 43.2
6 27.3
3
7S.O
13 72.2
m
--
4,435 7,725
34.8 38.9
punlah Individuals for Crimea which were never while others have taken It froa the political
committed, or InnunerablQ crXmee are committed arena so that local interference no longer la-
for which the perpetrator is never punished. pedea its activity. With but few exceptions, the
Neither premise can ba Justified by any stretch Georgia solicitor general enjoya meagre facili
of plausible theory.
ties to aid hill In gathering evidence, has no
In order to remedy this sort of situation, assistants other than those; paid froa his own
some states have seen fit to equip the prosecut pocket, and la often hampered by having to re
ing attorney's office with funds and personnel quest reelectloa at the hands of those whoa he
adequate to gather the necessary .evidence in has recently prosecuted. How much effect such
criminal cases. Other places have woven this facts have had on the effectiveness of the court
office closely in a state department of Justice was not determined by the survey. Nevertheless,
so as to give tho office greater efficiency, the preceding tables Indicate clearly that con-
. 61
PERIOD BROOBES DOCHSTUiO AMD Will Ey Crinea
57 Superior Courts in Georgia January 1, 1926 - Daceobar 31, 1935
cunss
Total
Abandoncer-t
423
Adultery tnd Fornication
291
Assault
97
Asssult aid Battery
816
Attempted Eenstiality or Sodony
32
Bastardy Blaclmall ana Ertortlon BreaVlTiE. Sobering and Stealing Carrying Deadly Weapons Carrying on Lottery
63 41 148
2,129 301
Cheating usd Swindling Cool righting Cruelty to Children and .finicals Disturbing; Divine Worship Defection of virtuoua ?eaale
1.187 21 40
267 6
Escape
214.
Failure to Pay Occupational Tax
60
Firiag Ifooda
3
Gambling
948
Hit and Run Driving
10
Interfering with Laborers Killing Fum Anlaols Libol Laroeny, .-jlaple Larceny, irttenpted
9
S 3 3.995 49
Laroony A-"tor Trust
S3
Malpractice by Public officer
2
Ualicious Mischief
152
Maintaining Lnd House
1SS
Maintaining opium Joint
13
Mayhem
Viadeneanor, blaalcet charge
ttiadenaanar, miscellaneous Obstructing Legal Process Operatise Auto while Drunt
6 363
48 4
1.267
Operetiag Slot Machine ith Slugs
109
Peddling -ilthmit License
2
Peeping T.J
IS
Perfornanse of Fence Officer's Duty, illeally 28
Pointing ,?lstol at Another
257
Praotlcln,; Profession nithout Lioensi Public Drunkenness Public Inieeency Receiving Stolen Goods Receiving TTnstanped Tobaccos
11
2,162 16
335 43
Removal of Ubrtgaged Property
48
ResistiJlg an Officer
11
Hiotlng
122
Selling Mortgaged Property
36
Shooting at Occupied Deviling
40
Stabbing
220
Trespass
58
Using Auto *!.thout Oner's Consent
118
Using Obseeno Language
263
Vagrancy
754
Violation of Comon School Lav
21
Violation of Election Lavs
21
Violation of Professional Bondsen' Act
6
Violation, of Gsae Lev
234
Violation of Highway Regulation*
18
Violation of uotor Vehiola Lav violation of Prohibition Law
730 7,033
Leos
than 1
L'OKTOS
1
2
S
69
12
to
to
to
to to to
2
3
S
9 12 18
138
68
55
96
38 18 12
111
29
41
78
IS 13
2
47
5
6
27
71
..
249
71
57
320
55 ia 15
7
5
11
7
-i I
18
S
S
24
73
,,
13
6
9
6
34
.
66
25
16
37
21
1
657
318
260
678
104 37 32
153
67
34
38
41
-
447
217
118
274
59 30 10
14
4
_
3
_.
_
15
1
.
18
3_
2
71
15
15
113
16 5 13
2
-
-
4
--
-
77
19
22
83
34
4
25
2
4
24
3_
2
1
_
_
1
__
1
270
112
102
367
63 21
3
6
2
1
1
--
3
1 1.164
SS
_
2
4
_.
.
,,
_
5
__
_
_
.
2_
_
308
573 1.5b4
210 63 55
1
8
14
1
11
1
5
31
2_
1
.
1
1
._
_
49
11
21
49
10 _ 11
117
7
16
9
5_
2
2
3
4
4
-
2 234
20 _
408 '
_
_
4
46
66
334
3
2
9
_
1
3
93
188
448
..
.
50 20 24
5_
1
_
SB 23 22
36
30
6
29
32
.
_
1
1
_
_
4
1
1
9
--_
,,
12
4
5
4
11
_
78
32
14
99
17 5
4
4
_
1
3
_.
1
620
136
295
801
141 S3 60
1
2
2
5
1
S
137
42
34
89
21 8
2
12
1
5
17
51
10
8
3
17
43
2
1
_
2
8
_
1
27
14
19
44
51
7
6
1
3
19
22
1
13
7
4
11
2
2
71
15
9
94
22 2
6
14
2
7
29
12
4
2
13
31
4
1
79
22
18
101
22 5
5
297
150
93
197
10 1
2
13
_
1
S
1
1
12
1 2
1 1
S
1
1_
1
2_
68
11
a 119
18 6
6
12
1
l
2
I
221 1.946
69
84
272
31 12
8
62S
881 2.68S
482 20S 135
- 62 -
18
to Over
24
24
<
10
3
5
_
4
6
2S
-
-
_
2
.
,.
.
.
a
37
2
2
5
27
_
.
.
1
5
IS
-
-
,,
2
_
..
,,
4
6
-
-
.
.
_
,,
_
,,
11
57
_
2
_
_
_
1
_
_
-
-
.
.
4
35
_
3
_
7
20
1
2
_
_
_
_
_
1
4
G
1
1
12
44
1
1
2
.
1
M
1
_
5
1
1
1
_
1
..
3
^
3
4
7
4
--
--
--
_
--
8
1
4
31
43
123
Table mil - Period Between Docketing and Trial (Ccct'd)
CRIMES
Violation of Security Lioenaa Lav Violation of the Sabbath Violation of Timber Lav life Beating
Total lUsdeBoanors
Total
12 16
4 88
28,552
Less Than
1
1 3 1 27
8,199
XOXTHS
1
2
3
69
12
18
to
to
to
to to to
to
2
3
6
9 12 IS
24
3
..
Z
_
4_
_
3
1
7
_
1_
..
_
-
3
_
_.
.
9
14
30
2
-1
1
2.530 3.170 9,453 1.523 578 463
130
C^cr 24
2 1 . 2
506
Felonies
assault *th Intent to Birder Asaeult vita Intent to Hape Assault with Intent to Rob Arson Bigeay
3.791 280 192
144 75
1.060 77 87 45
21
503
S94 1.1H2 205 94 S3
17
53
48
42
94
8
6
2
3
39
28
28
5
31
__
1
11 9
17 10
as
13 14 1
6
32
__ -
3 1
Breaking and Entering Vehicle Bribery
Burglary Destroying House vlth EiplosiTSS
QabeulaBjeBt
Itobraeery Felony, blanket charge Forgery
Incest Involuntary Manslaughter
347
148
37
58
94
3
34
_
_
36
10
6
5
7
4
31
-
_
8.718
3.613
1.124 1.451 2.150 1S7 57 51
11
74
5
-
3
1
1
--
--
-
-
131
23
13
26
42
14
43
1
5
4 ISO
1.526 17
164
1
2
1
_
_
__
^
_
33
1
4
97
8
14
1
1
661
209
242
322
49
6 11
7
19
9
_
4
3
_
1_
*
_
21
34
36
44
15
54
-
5
Kidnapping Laroaay from Building
Larceny from Person
Leroeny of Autoaubile Larceny of Para Aniamls
57 1.919
5 3,243
356
IS ESS 27 1.926 118
7
S
20
2
1_
211
387
587
40 22 13
10
11
13
2
-~
480
348
332
SI 42 12
20
31
140
20 10 5
,,
_
5
23
-
2
5
17
-
12
Larceny Larceny after Trnet Ismufacturing of liquor Uayhaa
Kisoallaneoua Felony
41)
25
1
9
11
2
__
--
_
493
128
81
61
118
40 SO 20
7
9
397
53
157
497 129 31 64
26
36
1
1
24
1
8
2
13
1
-1
-
-
llurder Obtaining Uoney Under Talae Fretanae
Perjury
Personating innithur Poisoning Well
2.073 48
90
a
6
484
284
284
204 102 50 13
10
37
15
.
11
20
1
__
_
1
25
14
19
23
4
4_
1
-
1
S
_
3
1
._
_
_
-
1
-
3
1
-1
-
-
Possessing Counterfeit Type
Possessing Burglary Tools
Rape
Receiving Stolen Goods
Robbery
4 63 335
12
2.513
2 14 112
2 1.060
_
.
1
.
._
13
21
IS
2
_~
48
59
92
14
3Z
1
3
5
-
1~
532
379
457
30 22 14
_
1
_
~
6
1
_
~
1
20
Seduction Shooting at Another
Sodooy and BeestiaUty
Violation of Banking Regulations Voluntary llsnalauchter
74
IS
11
3
29
4
4S
2
3
458
175
83
59
89
24 11 6
2
3
81
28
21
17
15
1
1_
_
.
4
_
2
2
.
__
.
22
4
3
5
5
3
2-
-
-
Wrecking Trains
8
S
2
-
1
-
--
-
-
fetal Felonies
29,038
11.014
3,922 4.396 7.428 1,021 494 SIS
104
5*1
GRUID TOTAL
55,588
19.213
6.452 7,564 1S.881 2.544 1.072 779
234
847
Sources Ujatte dooketa of 57 Superior Courta*
Tlatlons) both on pls of guilty sad not guilty had some relationship to tho litely TsJlability of rl4*noa and oonBunlty reaction to certain orines. This IB further brought out by the preTalenoe of some types of oasea In certain
counties. (3ee Appendix E, Table 17.) For In stance, In a mountain county, there era no vio lations of the prohibition law docketed, vnlli In COM South Oeorgla counties, cruelty to ani mals vms an Important misdemeanor. 63-
The .cllcltor general oaa but do hit best, and If the Jury doea not oonvlot, no doubt eosai other part of the oourt 10 opt functioning prop erly. The Juries of Oeorgla are composed of Oeorgla citizens, and no effort was made on this survey to attempt any analyals of thla phase of court procedure. Suffice it to say that whan twelve good men and true hare returned a verdict of not guilty, adequate evidence for oonTlotion waa not praaantad.
The problem remains that approximately onehalf the oaaaa docketed In the Superior Court resulted In convictions. Soaa have auggeetad that Innumerable delays and continuances account in part for thla low percentage of conviction*. No doubt, the fact that often cases are not tri able whan flrat dookatad haa eone bearing oa thla problem. In thoae counties whara the 3upa/rlor Court meet* only onca In alx months, thla la Bora Important than In thoaa oountlaa whara tue court's sessions are more frequent. Despite the faot "hat the Superior Court does not alt aa often aa the olty oourt, it haa a record of re latively :-apld caae disposal. In faot, of tnoaa oases whloh are to be tried, approximately 97 paroant ore tried within 12 montha after being brought and over a third are triad withla JO daya aftor being dookatad. For oaea In the
oltj oourt., a larger percentage la triad Imnedlataly upon being brought, but when the longer procedure of the Superior Court la taken Into consideration, Ite reoord for rapidity of oaae
disposal la ouch better than generally supposed. The eaaea tried In each of several perloda are aaowa In Table XXIII.
If the apeed with which a orlme Is tried IB a arlterla of Ita aerlouaneea In the eyes of the people, perhape there are rerlslona wbloh should ba Biade regarding treatment of thoae ooiivlcted of certain orloea. Chargee of maintenance of a lewd bouse were dealt with faster than any other orlna. Of the felonies, larceny of an automo bile want to trial In almost 60 percent of the oaaes within a month after being brought, while the capital offensea of murder, rape, and arson often seen to have been delayed at leaat one term before trial. This Is In contrast with the procedure In a slater atate where the lw pro vides for the convening of speolel venire* ao that such oasoa oan be given aa rapid a trial as la consistent with publlo policy. In further contrast la the fact that of the 546 pending murder oases (aea Table XX) on the dooketa of the oourt* studied, SS6 had bean there prior to the year, 1932.
The oountlea aeleoted for study by thla sur vey are typical Georgia oountlea, and there la no doubt but tnat the Superior Court In the re naming counties of the State haa the sane prob lems ae those discovered and presented In tble chapter. Each of these problems le probably en twined with othera not ao apparent and the solu tion to ona and all cannot ba accomplished by an attack upon a single phase of oourt procedure.
Chapter 31
CRIMES AND SENTENCES
POWERS OF THE COUHT; The trial of a case In the within limits provided by llaaww..VT If, upon the
superior and city courts la completed when a trial of the case, the facts and evidence are
verdict le rendered, and the defendant la la- such that the jury considers the crime to be of
medlately released from custody , If It is In his minor Importance only. It may recoaaerd that the
favor. If, on the other hand, the verdict has defendant be giver, a misdemeanor sentence!" This
\ 'been "guilty" or a "plea or guilty" made, the does not serve as a mandate to the court, and
offender Is called before the bar to receive the the trial Judge may disregard It entirely and
formal award of the court's judgment - the pen aentence the defendant for a felony. Conversely,
alty provided by law for the criminal act of If the Jury does not recommend that the offenee
which he was convicted.1' Vide limits are allowed be punished as a misdemeanor, the Judge may Im
In such matters, with a maximum and a minimum pose such a sentence. This method of sentence
aentence provided for each felony, and the pun reduction la applicable to all felonies other
ishment for a misdemeanor being a fine not to than those specifically excepted.*- Again, the
exceed (1,000, Imprisonment not to exceed six Jury may find the defendant Innoc**"1"' of the
months, work on the chain gang not to exceed crime charged but guilty of a lesser crime, the
twelve months, or a combination of any or all of elements of which are covered In the Indictment,
these.121 It Is generally accepted that this lat in which case the accused receives the sentence
itude of discretion Is given In order that the provided for the lesser crime. For Instance,
following factors may be taken Into consider the defendant may be indicted for seduction and
ation: The circumstances surrounding the ac be found guilty of adultery and fornication? The
cused at the time the act was committed; the former is a felony and draws a penitentiary
potential Injury within the specific act; the sentence, while the latter Is a misdemeanor.
environment and Intellect of the accused, his
~~ After the Pjy""'"^fftt.en^--o__ajilsdemeanor
previous criminal record. If any, and the pos- sentence, the accused may be placed on proba
slblllty of his reforming and becoming a good tion, or the aentence or a part or It may be
citizen.0* Hla ability to pay a fine, the finan suspended."' These privileges are granted only
cial situation of the county, the capacity of after a careful investigation has been made to
Its Jails, the personal feelings of the Judge, determine If It would be feasible to allow the
and public sentiment In the community, are not offender to serve his sentence outside the Jail
proper considerations In fixing the penalty.
or chain gang.
In determining the sentence of the accused,
A alsdexeanor is a crime
the Judge, In felony cases. Is assisted by the of leaser Importance and, therefore, carries a
Jury when one Is sitting. This arm of the court can recommend mercy In a capital case and this recommendation must be followed^ For felonies punishable by terms shorter than life imprison ment, It sets the maximum and minimum sentence
AOTBCR'S XOIEs The following felonies cannot be reduced ti, crises of nlsScnecnor grade by the nethod oited mtant Tretton, insurrection, nurder, manslaughter, nssftult with intent to rape, rape, sodor&- focticide, ryten, burair* railroad bridges, treto wrecking, destroying, injuring cr obstructing railroads, seduction, arson, false s-- '-aw
ard subornation of perjury or false snaring.'"
tllSfiC. 27-3505 et cccjui; Ga. Codt 1931(3 Seca. 27-3SC2 ; 27-25uS Ga. Code 19SJ. ill SO at 434. WSncs. 26-1005;2?-2302 Ga. Cod* 1933.
15) Sec, 27-u=OS K>i. la Sec. 27-ICC1 ibid. 01 54 Ga. ?89. (S S3.27-S702j 27-2706 Ga, Code 1955.
l" Sec. 27-2501 Ibid.
- 65-
Detention or Fin*
$10 or 15 daya $10 or 1 o-3th
$10 or 2 months
$10 or S wratfc*
$10 or 4 months $10 or 6 sunths $10 or 10 aooths $10 or 12 nonths
$25 or 15 daya $26 or 1 Bonth $25 or 2 montha $25 or 3 jaonths $25 or 4 Berths $25 or 6 Bontha
$25 or 6 months $25 or 7 Bonths $25 or 8 nonths $25 or 9 acntha $26 or 12 Ecnths
$50 or 1 ncnth $50 or 2 Bcntha $50 or 3 months $50 or 4 mcnths $50 or 5 mrntha $50 or 6 mc<ntha $50 or 7 zvixxtha $50 or 8 months $50 or 9 months $50 or 12 mc.rthB $50 or 18 months
$75 or 1 month $75 or 2 jaonths $75 or 3 aionths $75 or 4 montha $75 or 5 souths $75 or 6 months $75 or 8 months $75 cr 9 months $75 or 10 montha $75 or 12 nonths
$100 or 1 month $100 or ' 2 months
$1QO or 3 monbha $100 or 4 montha $100 or 5 montha
$100 or 6 montha
$1CO or 8 montha $100 or 9 months $100 or 10 montha $100 or 12 montha
3200 or 3 200 or 4 $200 or 5 $200 or 6 $200 or 8 $200 or 9 $200 or 10 $200 or 12
ziontha montha months Bontha months months months months
$300 or 6 $300 or 8 $300 or 9 $300 or 10 $300 or 12
montha months months months aionths
$400 or 8 months $500 or 6 nonths $500 or 10 months $1000 or 6 nontha $1000 or 11 nonths
Sub Total
TABU mr
SEKTEHCES FOR COS7ICTICH3 OF ASSAULT ADD BAIIERT S7 Superior ead 29 city Court* la Georgia. January 1, 1926 - December 31, 1935
Blabar of Cftsaa City Court Superior Court
8
_
1
1
1
1
12
6
1
2
7
1
2
_
1
-
4
_
59
2
67
4
379
14
38
. 16
4
49
13
1
4
_
3
_
9
8
26
3
32
3
104
45
116
19
14
8
209
53
1
4
3
5
2
21
18
1
3
1
_
2
_
9
4
8
4
2
,,
51
14
8
6
4
1
1
1
10
9
2
_
6
--
16
1
9
_
2
1
38
11
15
5
3
4
_
20
10
Pine Only |10 Fine $25 Fin* $60 Flue $7E Fine $100 Fine
Sub Total
City Court Superior Court
1
1
2
_
4
5
1
.
1
3
9
9
Svtentlon and Fiji*
410 and 6 months
2
4
110 ud 12 months
1
1
$26 anil IS days
1
_
$25 and 1 north
1
_
425 and 2 months
4
_
$25 and S north
24
2
125 and 4 month.
5
_
$25 and 6 month!
26
2
$25 and 8 monbha
1
2
$25 and 12 nonths
23
9
$50 and 3 months
7
1
$50 and 4 months
12
1
$50 and E months
23
IS
$50 and 8 nontha
2
4
$50 and 9 months
S
_
$50 and 12 months
14
15
J7S and 1 month
1
_
$75 and 4 montha
1
1
$75 and 6 montha
8
7
$75 and 8 months
1
_
$75 and 9 months
1
_
$75 and 12 nontha
4
4
$100 and 4 montha
1
_
$100 and 5 months
1
_
$100 and 6 Booth*
I
1
$100 and 8 nontha
3
2
$100 and 10 nontha
1
_
$100 and 12 norths
11
6
$200 and 6 montha
1
1
$200 and 8 nontha
2
2
200 end 12 nonths
2
2
$1000 and 12 montha
1
2
Sub Total
201
82
2
1
3
2
----
10
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
14
a
6
2
1
1
--
1
_
7
&
1
2
--
1
--
1
--
1
1
1.460
516
Detention Only
i:o Fine 15 days
9
_
Ea fin* 1 month
32
1
Do Fin* 2 nontha
27
4
llo Fixe 3 montha
227
8
No Fine 4 months
95
4
No Fine 5 months
5
3
No Fina 6 nontha
417
32
o Fin* 7 months
4
No Fina 8 montha
42
4
No Fina 9 nonths
16
1
So Pine 10 nonths
25
2
Ho Fin* 12 montha
356
101
HosuFbinTe r1f8nn--on--tha--
6
11
1.459
171
GRAM) TOTAL
2,919
580
* Sourcej tflnute dockets, Superior und City Courts
relatival? light sentence set by the Judge In the dlaoretlon granted him under the law.1 In the city and superior courts, thirty Crimea *ara studied ae to the different sentences Imposed, and little uniformity of penaltlea was discover*
Sentencea for other misdemeanors varied as wldelj as did those for assault and battery. For some orlaes there Has a different sentence Imposed for every 4.6 casea. Table XXV llsta the ratio of different sentences Inposed to the
TABIXXOT*
CRJKES
TOTAL COmCTIOHS IS HOJTIOH TO TEE EDTESEST T^PE SECTEHCIS By Crimes
30 lUadeneanon In 29 City Gouts In Georgia January 1. 1926 - Docariber SI, 1935
Total Caaes Studied
number of Different Santenoes Imposed
O^JySl'tnmilfe
1.T03
54
Adultery aod Pornloation
1.93*
80
Assault and Battery
2.919
118
Sartaroy
86
S7
Breaking and Ottering Building
329
45
Carrying Deadly \Teopona
Carrying on Lottery Cheating nd swindling Disturbljig Divine Worship Eacaplng
4.677
126
1,959
65
1.9B1
1O5
281
47
485
59
Sanbling
3. SIS
84
Larceny, siqple
1S.749
154
Larceny Alter Trust
S87
70
Lewinets or Publio Indooeney
160
34
!Aijitalnin Lewd Housa
135
33
l^licious riachiof
446
SB
T.*i3danttanor
'61
74
Qpantlng Auto nhile Dnnik
S.693
121
^ibllc Drunlcannass
5,526
110
Ke0iTlne Stolon Goods
209
48
Receiving; Un&tar.ped Tobaccos
939
44
Stabbing
1.450
88
Trespass
165
38
Using Auto vithout Omor ( 8 Consent
291
63
Using Obscene Language
112
29
Vacrency
3.850
69
Violation of Gone Law
684
48
Violation of rotor Yohiclo Law
2. en
103
Violation of Prohibition Law
30,795
143
Tlife Certlnp
694
55
Sourcot Itinute dockets of the City Courts.
&atio of Sentences to Cases
31.5 24.1 24.7 1S.3
7.3
37.1 30.1 18.9
&.0 12.4
39.5 117.B
8.4 4.7 3.5
8.0 10.3 47.0 50.2 4.4
14.S 16.S
4.3 4.S 3.3
55.8 14.3 27.5 215.3 12.*
ed among them. The sentences Imposed for aban city court cases studied.
donment, for example, varied from a $10 fine or
V When setting the punishment for a misdemean
15 days In Jail to 12 month* at hard labor on or, the Judge may require that the offender pay
the chain gang and 6 months In Jail. Likewise, a fine or serve a detention sentence (jail or
persona convicted of disturbing divine worship hard labor), or pay a fine and serve a detention
were given sentences ae small as 1 month In Jail or fines of $10, or aa sreat as 12 months In
sentencte^.*) Table XXVI shows the types of mlsdemeanor sentences Imposed by the superior and
Jail. For 3,l|-9 convictions of assault and bat city courta for the crlmea studied.
tery, a misdemeanor of minor Import, 118 vari
There Is little relationship between the
ations In sentences were made. The full extent several courts In the types of sentence Imposed,
of these, as well aa the nunber of cases receiv either In total or for Individual crlaea. Some
ing such sentences, la detailed In Table XXIV.
Judge* lean toward the detention sentence*,
67-
vhloh Inolufie hard labor on the chain gang, a vail aa confinement la tn* county Jail, and other* appear to prafar Imposing a fine, while
tence In Georgia. A man may be given a |10 fin* or a detention lentenoe of 15 day*, or he may receive a eentenoe of 12 montha at hard labor
a conblnatlon fine with detention la a frequent
praetloa. When thla last named praotloe ocTABLZ XXVI*
TOTAL CONVICTIONS IN RELATION
TO THE DIFFERENT TYPE SENTENCES
By Type* 30 Hlsdemeanore In 57 Superior and 29 City Courta In Oeorgla
January 1, 1926 - December 31, 1935
Superior court, CltT Court
Type of Caao
Number Percent Number Percent
Fine Only
532 a.*
301
Fine or Detention 11,576 51.7
Tine and Detention 3,093 13.8
Detention Only
7,193 32.1
TOTAL
22,394 100.0 90,937 100.0
a Source> Minute dockets of the courts.
eura, often A detention sentence will be *uapanded upon the payment of the fine or the of fender allowed to serve the detention sentence on probation.
TABLE XXVII*
FINE AND ALTERNATIVE PINE-DETENTION SENTENCES
By Fine Imposed 30 Uladamaanora In 57 Superior and 29 City Courta In Oeorgla January 1, 1926 - December 31, 1935
and 6 montha In Jail along with an alternative entenoe of a $10 fine. Table XXIX U.ts the alternative sentences Imposed for the Crimea atudled by amount of fine and length of deten tion or hard labor.
TABLE xxvm*
DETENTION SENTENCES
By Length of Detention 30 Misdemeanor* In 57 Superior and 29 City Courta In Georgia January 1, 1926 - December 31, 1935
Suoerlor Court Citj Court Sentence by months Number Percent Number Percent
15 daya
1 month
S montha 3 montha 4 montha
t montha month* 7 month* 8 montha 9 month* 10 month* 12 month* IS month*
^_ 99 1.* 126 1.7 500 7-0 242 3.lt. U4 .6 1,163 16-2 36 .5 160 2.2 99 1.* W 1.2 4,101 57.0
539 7-*
208 -7 2,l9 7-7
il:I "4., 90
2,701 8.6 195 D
8,07 25-7
"I KQIL
P19s1
<l
1.0 2.5
9,654 30. J
119
TOTAL
7,193 loo.o 31.435 100.0
Source z Minute docketa of the courts.
Superior Court city Court Amount of Fine Number Percent Number Percent
The value of convict labor Is 5<V per day In eome places. If this were true for Georgia ae a
ilO or Less
4.6
Jll - 25
2.165 17-9 20, 5
126 - 50 ,51 - 75
61,,216625 s'.l
176 - 100
977
101 - 200
691
11230011 -- t3o0o0
182
48
:401 - 500
:501 - 800 ;oi - 1,000
3 11
.1
6.0 whole, where the $10 fines were assessed, those given the longer sentences were far more valu able to the county from the standpoint of labor than thoae given shorter aantenoe*. It la pos* alble that the lack of fixed, relatlonahlp be tween fine and detention has worked an unneces
TOTAL _
12.108 100.0 48,812 100.0
Source: illoute dockets of the court*.
sary hardship on prisoners. Mot cn&j la there no fixed relatlonahlp between the amount of fine
and the length of detention, but there alo
There la a aet relatlonahlp between the amount of -*lne and the alternative Jail term In one states. In other words, the defendant 1* given a. choice of paying the fine or working out his fine at a specific rate per day on the coun
seems to be little regularity In the amount of the flna eentenoe Imposed. Thla la well brought out by the wide variation In the amount of the fine and the length of detention, a* shown for any particular crime. Fifty-one and seven-tenth*
ty road* Dr other public work*. Little or no relatlonahlp appear* to axlat between the amount of the flna and It* alternative detention sen
percent of the superior court cases carrying fine or alternative fine-detention sentence had the fine set at 150. In the city court, J25
68 -
was the more prevalent (mount. Table XXVII lists the lumber oT cases receiving fines for the various amounta. It seezs strange when on considers the amount of the costs, that these fines are often so small, |>artlcularly when the sentences rarely carry requirements that the de fendant pay the cost In addition to the fine.
Bade to differentiate between sentences carrying hard labor and those carrying confinement. The policy of the court In Imposing hard labor on the chfilr. gar.g, labor on the State Farai, or conflneaent In the county Jail *aa determines by the physical fitness of the defendant to io hard labor, and also by the custom current in that
7ABLE XSDC
AJTEEKASIVE FiM%D;;T.~:7in; SSJTE.CES
1'ttE
TOTAL
> 10 > 25 t 50 1 75
3 100 t 200 1 300 * 400 t 500 .'. 600 t 000 $1000
2,670 20,1 16,270
3.151
3,654 1,?44
454 112 ICO
6 37 87
TWAL 48.S11
rencoc
J 10 t 25 S 50 t 75 * 100 t 200 t 300 S 400 t 500
5 800 M.OOO
534 2,096 6,936 1,305
958 679 181 40 40
6 11
PiECEIiT
s.e
42.1 33.6
6.5 7.? 2.6
.9 .2 .4 _ .1 .2
100.0
4.6 1S.1 51.2
9.f 8.1 6.0 1.6
.4 .3
.1 .1
00 liademenjjors in 57 Superior ani 29 City Court* in 5ooria January 1. 1926 - Doconbcr SI. 1935
lluriner of Ca=ez
cmt cciJOT
IS 1 i Days Ko. ro.
3
4
S
Eo. !. Mo.
87
Bo. >,o.
8
9 10
Vo. 1:0. Vo.
458 1,280 188
401 143
3
270
_
1 16
8
124 4,701 1.448 10,362 1,204 00 1.864 19
S5 59 34
9C4 1,118 3,071 4,679 431 5.026 42 169 109 64
74
77
116 144
12
12
S
10
_
-
1
-
-
_
-
-
210 S81 34 1,434 40 354 158 77
484 251 77 1,044
a 566 76 103
as si 17
313 11 178
9 161
S3
30
3
3
_
2
_
_
.
_
_
7
-
104
13 78 1 10 9
_i . _ _ -
26 42
3
1 93
_
_
_ 10
1
_
_
_
_
_
-
-
S02 7.163 2.905 14,646 6.756 655 10,160 : 1.SSS 562 465
1.2 14.7 6.2
30.1 13.9 1.4
21.0 .2 z.e 1.2 1.0
supcaciLccms:
36
46
327
58
2
38
_
.56
88 128
665 204 19
681
1
12
3 24
27 142 1.685 910 ES2 1.9S7 29 124 56 21
-
-
1
31
66 22
470 32
81 41 40
2
25
7
7
232 13
41 18 33
1
S
2
_
65
3
33 28
9
-
1
1
1
-
18
-
5
3
3
.
_
-
&
-
-
1
--
1
-
-
1
1
-
4
-
-
-
-
...
.
.
-
-
-
.
1
-
.
-
3
-
-
~
-
TOTAL 11.576 J-ERCC.T
100.0
155 319 2.745 1.248 302 3.S07 78 298 134 136
1.3 2.7
23.7 10.8 2.6 3O.2 .V 2.6 1.2 1.2
* Source i JJjaito doclW,8 of City and Superior Courts.
11 12 18
IVx Lo. to.
.
97 2
- 451
11 579 IS
_ 309 3
42 725 11
21 373 1
_ 195 2
..
Z
_
78
_
4
.
27
-
71
74 4,911 32 .2 5.0 .1
_ 10
6
_ 241 30
_ 645 68
_ 314
7
_ 533 27
_ 437 36
- 135 14
- 36
4
- 33
1
.
5
- 10
_ 2.461 193 21.2 1.8
Detention sentences imposed vary as widely county tor the utilization of convict labor.
as flnea. In the Superior Court "twelve months" Some counties In recent years have found It ex
la the detention given In a oajorlty of cases. pedient to utilize the services of the State
This sentence ms also usual In the city court, Farm In the car of misdemeanor convicts rather
although *alx months* as given almost aa often than attempt the aalntenanco of a county chain
as "twelve?"]Table XXXVIII lists the number of gang.
cases receiving a detention sentence In the city >*>. It Is the privilege of the court when It
and superior courts together with the length of I deems It to be for the beet Interest of the
detention Imposed.
f State to combine floe and detention Into one
For the purpose of this study, no effort *aa Isantenoe. The combinations made by the Superior
69-
and City Courts for misdemeanor cases present a strange pattern. Fines of $10 were attached to sentences up to twelTe months at hard labor and Ix months in Jail: Since a 110 fine Is usually Insufficient to pay all the accrued oosti In misdemeanor caeee, one wonders what good purpOBe
than a misdemeanor and carries a heavier penal ty. Crimes of this class have several grades and each has a punishment set by statute according to Its serlousnees In the Judgment of the Gen eral Assembly.) A few of them carry the utmost penalty which can be exacted under the Constltu-
riKK
1 10 j 25 I SO * 76
4* 210000
t SCO
t 500
nm as DirntnoH SBITBICIS
3y Amount of Piae and Length of Detention SO lUidvnanora In 57 Superior and 29 City Courts
Total
183 1.941 3.539
645 2.499 1,'J3T0O8
125
F*rc.nk
1.7 18.1 5S.1 6.0 23.4 12.2
S.8 .1
1.2
IB
1
Bays Mo.
3
19
4
41
e
1
s
-
-
C1TT COTgg
2 Ho. Ho. Ut>. Ho.
8 9 10 Mo. *>. Ito. *>. Ko.
12 18 Ko. Ho.
17 32 22
39
2 ss
48 364 141
638
se
2
19
128 22
e
280 5 9
12 3
1.9iSnO
1 1S
20 60
26
568 13
S US 11
3 991
159 4
8 260 2
1 678
262 1.348 9
19
1
158
8
9 ITS
938
4
2
4 11
350 S
-
1
--
1-
-
1
- 122
Tom
PUtUltft
10,690
8 100.0 .1
1 69 122 572 460 16 3.126 15 978 85 460 4.728 33 .6 1.1 5.4 4.S .2 29.2 .2 9.1 .8 4.5 44.2 .?
* 10 * 25 t 50 * 75
t 100 t 200
t 300 t 400
t 500
166 377 1.196
438 497 262
72 27
33
SOTERIQg COURT
5.4
,,
12
4
9
., .
8_
1^
12.4
_
_
7 50 11 --
88 --
32
38.4
5
4 73 40 15 300 1 95 29
14.1
16.0
_
8.4
2.4
_
7
4_
95 1 33 3
2
_
5
3_
77 4
59
_
1
_
12
11
_
10
2
_
2
_ ,1 1
S.
1
1.0 1.0
-
-
--
_
-
-
1
--
3_
3
-
w
-1
.2
$1000
TOIiL PERCEEI
3.093
100 .C
--
19 .6
18 .6
145 4.7
82 2.0
18
.e
583 18.8
6 .2
148 48 4.8 l.S
Scurce: Ulnut* dook0t* of th City asd Superior Courta.
1 107 24
188 53
2 569 63
S 274 16
4 314 74
1 140 94
18
,.
13 11
-
23 5
13 1.690 _H .t S4.6 11.2
can be served by the attachment of euch a small tlon of the State and Nation, while others oarry
fine to ajch a long detention sentence. Table only relatively abort detention sentences to be
XXX lists the number of misdemeanor cases In eerved In the penitentiary. At one time It was
the city mi superior courts receiving fines and thought that nearly all crimes were sufficiently
detention sentences by amount of flae and the heinous to be worthy of deatb, and the early
length of detention. Almost one-half of these Georgia colonists could recite a long list for
cases In tbe city court and more than one-half which thla penalty was exacted. This haa now
of then In the Superior Court received detention been changed and only seven crimes (treason,
sentences of twelve months or longer, regardless Insurrection, murder, foetlclde, rape, araon,
of the aiount of fine attached to the sentence.
and castration) may oarry this heavy penalty.
FELON! SENTENCES: from the standpoint of wrong Conviction after such a charge does not always
done, a felony la a much more serious ofrente mean that the maximum sentence will be Imposed,
70 -
since the statutes allow for several punishment
degrees fop each cMme an* for the court to be merciful In Its actions. As a result, John Doe,
for some, penitentiary sentences were received in over 75 percent of the cases. The exemplary effect of the swift, surs ari vljorous punish
charged with murder, might be convicted of that ment of criminals is supposed to be a crlne de
charge and sentenced to electrocution, or he may terrent. If this is trje, it is lliely that the
be found guilty of Involuntary manslaughter and effect is mlnlnlisd for Seorgla by the great
receive a sentence of a siall fine. This variety variety of punishments laposed for the same
of treatment which each felony may receive ac crlae. Another theory regarding the penalties
counts for the fact that of ?lf,504- felony con exacted for Infractions of the law is that a
victions studied, 1,022 of then carried i&lsde- person found guilty owes a debt to society and
neanor sentences. (See Appendix F, Table 21, for pays It by Incarceration or the payment of &
the punishment called for In felony convic fine. If this be true, then the inconsistencies
tions.)
in the treatment given those convicted of the
To many people, murder la the most grievous same and various crises operate to nullify the
1 of all crimes, and under the law, after convic efficacy of that theory. Prior to the passage
tion on such a charge, sentences of life im of the present law allowing the punishment for
prisonment or electrocution are given. When the felonies to be set by the Jury, the Judge of the
evidence Indicates that the defendant did not Superior Court set the punishment for each case
commit the crime charged, the Jury may find hia according to the law affecting it."' The punlsh-
gullty of a lesser crlmeTjand this seems to have merits set under this system veiled irldely for
been done in a large percentage of the cases each crime, and the change in the law was ex-
where the Indictment was for murder, since out pected to curb this tendency. Evidently, the
of 1569 convictions, only about one-half of then Jury In the exercise of Its present prerogatives
received sentences of life Imprisonment or elec~ is not able to bring about the desired unifora-
trocutlon. For people in the South, rape car- ity of punlshner.t.
rles most of the horrors of murder, and the su- gfr-PROBATIOH AKP Sl'SPEKSION_ SS:TEKCE3: For many
preme penalty Is usually thought too light for a years no provision was made in the l&w for the
person so convicted. Under the law, however, the Judge to suspend the sentence of an accused. A
punishment varies fron that of a misdemeanor to recent ennctcer.t of the General Assembly gives
electrocution, and all typea of Intermediate the Judge this privilege in sledeaear.or cases or
sentences were represented in the charges stud- felony cases In which a mlsdeaeanor sentence Is
led, with the death penalty called for in only given. <f"ln suspending a sentence, toe court does
seven eases out of 22*. Considering the large not hold an Indefinite threat over the head of
number of murder and rape charges and the small the offender. At the end of the sentence
percentage of sentences indicating the commis period, both the sentence and the threat coce to
sion of these crimes, it nay be worthy of note an end autoaa
' +*t--conduct of the de-
that the fee allowed for the prosecution of a fendant has be 'Od. On the other hand, If
capital offense Is $50, whereas that for other the offender la arrested on another charge, sus
felonies Is *25.
pension nay be revoked, but even In such cases,
Punishment for other felonies varied almost at the end of 12 months from the date set for
as widely as for the two crimes discussed. In the beginning of the suspended sentence, the of-
one of them the percentage receiving misdemean or sentences was"75 percent. On the other hand,
Mp. 3S7. Act. of 1919. KSoci. 1062;1063 Sot* 1910. P. C. casec. 23-2701 Oa. Cod* 1933.
- 71-
TAfliJi mi*
PROBATION A;IE SUSPEHSIOK SENTENCES IH HELAIION TO THE Tt. AL SEHTEKCES IMPOSED City and Superior Court* of 57 Georgia Cc'intie* January 1, 1S26 - Decenber 31, 1935
County
City Courts
Misdenaanor Caaas
Se. o'teKcoa
Probated and Suapendod
Total
Suuiber
Paroent
Superior Courta
Uisdenaanor Caaei
Santencaj
Probated and Suapaoded
Total
Hunber
Porcant
Palony Caaat GlTon Uitdmeanor
Sentence*
Probated arid Suapepded
Total
Bunker Percent
Appllng Atfcinaon
Bacon
Banlca Baler
366
54
14.8
88
42
47.7
16
7
43.8
*#
_
131
30
22.$
31
9
29.0
121
53
43.8
38
12
31.6
34
9
26.5
*
_
~
45
1
2.2
28
2
7.*
**
-
-
221
77
34.8
80
39
48.8
Ben Bill
**
_
_
994
419
Berrten
.
403
128
Bibb
4,860
1,195
24.8
264
43
Brantley
221
50
22.6
149
39
BulXoch
1.449
178
11.9
372
118
42.2
179
31.8
98
15.1
346
26.2
37
31.7
203
83
46.4
20
20.4
87
25.1
2
5.4
39
19.2
Burfca
1,232
402
S2.8
36
20
55.6
139
69
49.6
CalllOUn.
*
_
~
Z65
90
34.0
69
6
8.7
Cwaden.
*
_
.
99
34
34.3
31
8
25.8
enroll
1,686
329
19.5
30
_
64
12
18.8
Chatham
5,582
5S1
6.S
70
14
20.0
352
20
5.7
Cbafctooga
217
45
18.2
859
167
Clarice
Clay Clinch
1.092
255
23.4
212
23
lie
**
'__
H
119
11
.
143
26
Cobb
**
-
-
3.871
SOI
26.3
105
10.8
76
11.8
15
18.2
38
7.9
230
44
41.9
25
32.9
2
13.3
5
13.2
34
14.8
Coffee Coneta Crisp Demon DeKall,
825
78
9.5
52
5
2,268
77
3.4
44
_
*
~
_
1,270
337
**
--
197
5,469
1,173
21.4
137
44
9.S
46
9
19.0
_
122
4
3.3
26.5
208
58
28.2
_
31
..
_
32.1
295
223
75.6
Dodge Doughorty Schola
Floyd Pulton
1.611 1,648
**
2,299 45,452
201 125
~
516 7,342
12.5 7.6
22.4 16.2
75 253
5 1.238 3,182
14 86
_
499 1,241
18.7 31.0
w
40.3 39.0
141 368
3 287 4,563
26 70 _
92 2,074
19.9 19.O
32.1 45.5
Gilmer
**
_
_
244
61
25.0
103
37
35.9
Slyna
1,175
214
18.2
66
18
24.2
128
31
24.2
Groone
*
_
381
91
23.9
109
28
25.7
Baborsham
#
636
^
172
Heard
**
-
-
ISO
14
7.8
64
3
14.1
Houston
*
_
..
592
61
Jeff Da-riJ
**
_
_
223
101
Jeniins
914
61
6.7
163
12
liberty
209
_
v
27
2
I/nmdos
1,435
299
20.3
130
33
10.3
160
45.3
43
7.4
111
7.4
40
25.4
62
21
13.1
15
34.9
16
14.4
2
5.0
27
32.9
yelntosh
142
15
10.6
131
6
Kadison
755
45
6.0
10
4
i:criwther
535
222
41.5
73
6
Mitcholl
1,110
167
15.0
150
48
Itiscocoo
5,763
825
14.3
1,474
721
4.6
16
3
18.8
40.0
25
8.2
66
15
22.7
32.0
es
11
17,5
48.9
845
268
31.7
Peach
i
*
_
_
603
76
Randolph
*
_
_
688
337
Ricte-.iMd
1,943
785
40.8 *
41
3"
Teliarerro
*
_
_
131
ia
Taylor
**
-
-
276
51
Tsirair
_
_
465
lie
lift
**
~
_
425
43
Troup
1,414
85
6.0
60
2
TJpson
**
~
--
680
19
Hare
*
-
-
65
11
Hneelar
THUMB
*
_
**
-
_
388
87
-
323
85
12.6
78
18
23.1
19.0
116
34
29.3
36.8
681
321
17.1
9.9
20
5
25.0
IB .5
71
14
19.7
31.4
105
10.1
S5
3.3
175
2.8
122
16.9
117
21
20.0
11 '
11.8
20
11.4
6
4.9
24
20.5
22.4
54
25.9
148
11
20.4
46
31.1
TOTAL
91,941
15,149
16.5 23,312
5,888
25.3
12.042 * 4,094
Sovrce: Minute docketi. Superior and City Courta. *!:o city oourt in operation. city court not studied. 6 felonies involving 20 cases included in thia table are not Included in figuroa on paga 71.
34.0
fender has completed that sentence. In practice, laposa maximum penalties for offenders whose
the difference between placing the offender on previous record* Indicate that they have not
probation and giving bin a suspended sentence taken advantage of opportunities to reform.
consletB In the fact that a person on probation It la expected, when a verdict of guilty has
must report at state! intervals to the probation been received or a plea of guilty made, that the
officer of the court In which he was sentenced. In Georgia, probation officere hold their commission through special appointment by the Judge of the court, and may or may not be full-tlma officers, skilled or experienced In the task befor* them. In some courts, It is customary to appoint the sheriff as probation officer, and this busy official, unless he has specially ap pointed deputies In his office, finds probation
TABLE XXXII*
RECIDIVIST CASES
In Five Georgia Counties January 1, 1926 - December 31, 1975
Total Casesi County Reviewed
Clarxe
732
Crisp
Floyd 6.US
5:53 Jenklna
Troop
TOTAL 13,501
Total Hecldlvlst Case*
Number
Percent
107 170
1*.6 31.6 13-0
^1
6.1
IT. 5
1,852
13-7
caeca Just another duty on a long list of some Source! Dockets of the City and Superior Courts
times very pressing ones. Some of the larger counties have a separate department for the care of probation cases, and It Is likely that proba tion In such counties means considerably more, both In the welfare of the county and in the life of the individual under such care, than It does in those counties where there are only cas ual officers. Table XXXI lists the probation and suspension sentences granted by the city and superior courts studied.
feThe value of probation and suspended sen tences to the body politic Is meaetired In the reform and good citizenship of farmer offenders. To the individual the value consists In a new lease on life and a chance to rebuild bis respect In the community In which he lives, 'in some counties probation and suspended sentences have been revoked at frequent Intervals by tho court authorities, while In other counties. It la rare that such action Is taken. Often, how ever, no record Is made by the court of Its ac tions in such matters, and the complete value of suspension and probation to society and to Its Individual citizens could not be ascertained. agI?IGIVTSH: In contrast to the action of the Gctii-t In suspending the -sentences or placing the offender on probation, the courts of Georgia may
* ATOHOH'S SOTE. radar tho In, impended nd probated cases ara iattfcical
solicitor-general will Inform the court of the offender's criminal history. This task, if car ried out In minute detail, would entail more satisfactory criminal records than are now pro vided the solicitor-general. In order for him Co keep a complete record of each criminal, it would be necessary to have an index file giving full details of pertinent circumstances, connected with each criminal's life. This would allow the solicitor-general to present the court with fair and accurate Information regarding the offender's life. At the present tlae, the sola record which most solicitors have is the minute docket of the superior court, often this record contains such a paucity of detail that any recommendation which sight be made is likely to be biased and not entirely correct. Ituch crit icism has been raised regarding light sentences, probation and suspension, as well as the privi lege of the cMef executive In pardoning and paroling persons, sentenced to the state peni tentiary. The answer to such criticism rests partially in the number of recidivists before the courts. Spot studies were made In five counties with a view toward determining the per sons constantly before the superior and city courts. It ii likely that the Information gathered on these Is not entirely accurate, but
73 -
it serve* a* an Indicator of thi* phase of th court' bufiness. Table XXXII lliti the eanple cured from each count;, along with the per centage of realdlvlem Indicated by the aample.
If tha aantanca given serves as a deterrent for further crime, tha percentage of recidivism In the court should be very email. On tha other hand, large percentage* of recidivism Indicate that tha court and other attendant featurea of government are likely not solving tha crlna problems ox* the locality. In theory, the indi vidual starts hla orlilnal career by doing petty things of OL questionable nature and gradually growa Into a hardened orlBlnel. Thla theory explodea of It* own weight when the criminal blatorlee of the recldlvleta uncovered by thla study are shown. Uany of them started their oareera before the courts wltb orlmee of major Im portance and ended their careers with such nui sance crimes a* cheating and swindling and lmpie larceny. On the other hand, there are crim inals whose careers rlee to a great peak and and their daya serving long terns In the atata peni tentiary. (See Appendix r for typical caaee.) BAUkXS LAf: Some years ago New York State at tempted to aolve Ita problem of recidivism by passing the Bauoes Law, which, among other things, required tha Judge to sentence four-time felony offender* to life Imprisonment. The theory behind this act Is that the man ao con victed docs not receive punishment but that so ciety reculvea protection. Theoretically, the man who has bean convicted two or three time* and aerved hla sentence and then resumes a crim inal career cannot learn bla legaon and IB In curable and non-reformable. In the eyes of some, ha 1* anti-social, a habitual criminal, and a menace to society, and should be segregated for the good of society and for Ma own good as well. Thj law operated as follows:
1. After arrest upon a felony charge, the fingerprint a of the accused were compared with those on record. If be
waa fonad to have a criminal record, this fact waa submitted to the trial Judge before ball waa allowed. If a previous conviction upon a felony charge wae shown, ball waa allowed only after the case bad been reviewed by an appel late court. 2. One committing robbery faced from 1$ years to life Imprisonment Instead of two year* minimum and 2O years maximum, }. For burglary In the first degree, the sentence was Increased from ID to 15 years; for seoond degree, to 10 to 15 years, and for third degree, from five to ten years* 4. Persona convicted of crime were no longer allowed to be released after serving little more than half their sen tence, but Bust serve at least fivesixths of their ter. 5. If a person armed with a pistol, or other deadly weapon, committed a felony, punishment In addition to that for the orlma was added as follow*: For the first offense, from five to ten years; for the seoond, from 10 to 15 years; for the third, from 15 to 25 years; and for the fourth, life Imprisonment. Such per sons were considered potential murderers and were denied the privileges of proba tion and suspension of sentence. 6. If a man were convicted of four fel onies, he was sentenced to prison for life* Thla waa mandatory, and required confinement for the prisoner's natural life. Whether or not this particular law was aver given an adequate social teat Is problematical. It has remained on the statute books for some time, but has been changed by recent legislation In that State eo that Ita provisions are not now so harsh as they were originally. Social minded Individual* have heralded the law both a* a boon and a* a curse - which It Is, Is yet to be proved. There are, however, some advantages In the provision* which demand that the second, third, and fourth tine offender be given more stringent punishment than for a first offense. The provision on Georgia atatute books allowing the previous criminal record of an Individual to be considered by the court In passing sentence is In part a type of Bauaes Law. Before, how ever, the courts can make adequate use of the existing provisions, the record system must be designed ao that tha court will have accurate Information on which to sentence the prisoner at the bar.
- 7*-
Chapter HE
THE APPELLATE COURTS
hen a defendant has been sentenced and la
dissatisfied with the proceedings of ";he trial
court, he may nave them reviewed by a court of
competent Jurisdiction. In Georgia, provision
la made for a direct appeal to the Supreme Court
In casea of conviction of capital felony; for
review by the Court of Appeals la other cases;
and for oertlorurl to tse superior courts for
casea arising In Inferior tribunals!" The Supreme
Court, as the capstone of the State's judicial
system, has final review on Jurisdictions! ques
tions and Its decisions are binding on all other
courts.01
It gained Ita present status by the Consti
tution of 1S77 and subsequent amendments there
to,'" which were the last of a aeries of changes
which had taken place since the establishment of
the court In ISM^.'^ A supreme court waa not a
part of the original Judiciary, because those
who framed the first Georgia Constitution felt
that such a court would enshackle the State with
CM
the dilatory procedure then current la England.
As need for an appellate court developed, a con
vention of superior court Judges, first by law,
and then by consentTM acted as a tribunal for
the correction of errors, "hen the Supreme
Court was finally established, an effort waa
made to curb dilatory procedure by the constitu
tional requirement that unlesa a decision was
rendered on a oaae within a specified time, the
findings of the lower court were automatically
affirmed.'"
In order to keep pace with an ever Increaa-
m Sec,. 2r300S 2-5205 Ga. Coda 1933. raSao. 2-3009 ibid. O Seo. 2. Art. VI, Conatitution at 1877. (, P* 15. Acta of ISSSj p. 24. lets at 1916. is p. 18, Aota of 1845. tti "History or the stMiitant of the SupraM Court of
Oaorgia," by Joaeph R. Uiar. 24 Georgia Br Asaooiatlon Heporta, 85 - 1907. (fl p. BOB, "Dleoit of the Lan of Georgia," Earbury t Crajrfort, 1802. (f p. 47, "Journal of tha Houae of RepretantatiToa,* 1815. CJSo. 2-3006 Ga. Code 1933.
Ing volume of business, the number of Justices
were Increased from tiae to tine. 3y the turn
of the century, however, It became evident that this method of clearing a crowded docket would
not be a permanent reiely, ana the Court of Ap
peals, created by constitutional amendment In 1906, was thought to be the simplest zeans of
keeping pace with the multiplying appeals. Both the supreme Court and the Court of Ap
peals have sir elected Judges,"01 each receiving
the same salary,"" referred to as "Justices* la
the Supreme Court and "Judges* In the Court of
Appeals.'131 The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Is selected by the people,"51 and the correspond
ing officer In the Court of Appeals by aeabera of the court."*1 It Is Interesting to note that,
unlllce the highest tribunal of many states, the
Supreme Court of Georgia does cot make rules for all the courts In the State,'15'but each court
- Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, Superior Court - xakes Its own rules."*'Also, la Oeorgla,
each of the two high courts regulates the admis
sion of attorneys to Ita bar.;n)
The Supreme Court has the power In the exer
cise of Its appellate Jurisdiction to hear and
determine all cases that may properly coae be
fore It, and to grant Judgments of affirmance or reversal or any other order or direction; The
criminal Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court Is
defined In the Constitution as being *a court alone for the trial and correction of errors ...
i> In all cases of conviction of a capital felony." Writs of error are allowed froa Superior Court
*Saea. 2-3008| 2-3009 ibid) p. 56, Acts of 1306. (in Sac. 2-4001 Ga. Coda 1913. (aSaoa. 2-SOOli 2-3009 ibid. (fflSao. 2-3008 itid. (KIScoa. 2-3009! 24-3501 ibid. (B)15 Corpus Juris S04. (ie Supri Court, See. 24-3901 > Court of Appeals: See*. 24-
3901i2-30O9i Superior Court, Sac. 24-JS28 Ga. Coda 1933. (n)Saoa. 24-3601: 24-4501 !Md. (Sao. 24-3901 ibid. (*Sao. 2-3005 ibid.
- 75 -
and "constitutional* city courts on oases in volving a constitutional question.' The Court of Appeals has appellate criminal Jurisdiction "in all cases in which such Jurisdiction has not been conferred by the Constitution upon tho Su preme Court." In the event a case 18 erroneous ly filed In one appellate court when Jurisdic tion thereof la In the other. It Is transferred automatically. (3) NUUBEH OP CASES: Two thousand nine hundred ten criminal caes were appealed to these courts during the period under study, 85 psroent of which were carried to the Court of Appeals. The number annually appealed was relatively con stant, averaging U4 per year for the Supreme Court and 2M-7 for the Court of Appeals. Prior to 193S, In the Court of Appeals, the aTerage was about 260 cases per year, but for that and the two succeeding years, the average dropped to 206, although there was not a similar fluctu ation In tfce Supreme Court. Over 90 percent of the cases appealed to the Supreme Court were on the charges of aurder and raps. The records of the trial courts show that there was little varlatlon In the number of t'lese crlnes charged annually, md that the depression seemed to have had little or no effect on such crlns. On the other hand, the effect of the depression In gen eral apparently accounts for the smaller number of cases coming before the Court of Appeals. Convictions In which the sentence of life Im prisonment or the death penalty have been Im posed are nlmoet always appealed; whereas, when times are hard, often minor penalties for lesser crimes will be accepted as less costly from a financial standpoint than the expenses Incident upon an appeal.
During the period under study, U-36 cases, encompassing 21 different crimes, were appealed to th Suprene Court. Of this number, jlH were murder cases, 57 cases of rape, and 19 were mis-
CD Ibid.
JSc. 2-3003 Ibid. B>Sic. 2-3005 ibid.
demeanor oases appealed upon constitutional questions. Four oases were brought In whloh the charge was only "misdemeanor" or "felony."
The docket of the Court of Appeals carried a much greater percentage of such blanket charges. In this court, the four largest groups of crimes were violations of the prohibition law, larcen ies, homicides, and assaults, respectively* Felonies predominated In these, with the excep tion of violations of the prohibition law where possession of Intoxicating liquors accounts fop & percent of such charges. The number of mis cellaneous crimes not Included In the above groups varied from year to year both as to num ber and type, but Included, as a total, 96 x crimes, 22 vice crlnes, and "A cases Involving the police power of the State to pass regulatory measures for the several professions.
There were five counties from which no case* were carried to either appellate oourt In the period under study. From seven counties no criminal cases were appealed to the Court of Ap peals, and from V-3, no such case* were sent to the Supreme Court. One case each was sent from eight counties to appellate courts (see Appendix O, Table 2U-). As Is to be expected, a larger number of cases was appealed from Fulton County than from any other. The eleven counties from which the greatest number of appeals reached thv appellate courts are listed below, together with the number of appeals from each of these coun ties, and the Superior Court Circuits In whloh the counties are located:
County Fulton Laurens Bibb Floyd Wllkes Whltfleld Chatham Walker Miller Chattooga Carroll
Circuit Atlanta Dublin llacon Borne Toontbs Cherokee Eastern Rome Pataula Rome Coweta
Number of Case*
a7? ik
DISPOSITION OF CASES: Of ths "1.36 cases appealsd to the Supreme Court, the Judgment of the lower courts was affirmed In 325, or 75 percent, and
-76-
the Judgment was reversed In 90 ease*. One out was withdrawn and ilx were dismissed for mot of prosecution.
In tha Court of Appeal*, larger proportion* of cases mra withdrawn and dismissed for want of prosecution. These war* yz (1*3 paroant) and 228 (9.2 paroant) respectively. Tha judg ment of tha lowar court wa* affirmed in 6? per cent of tha aaiai appealed to tha Court of Ap peal* and wa* reversed In 5.9 paroant. In 315 (12.7 percent) caaea, tha Court of Appeal* re versed tha decision of tha lowar court and sent tha oaaaa back for a new trial, than only tha cases actually decided ara considered, tha per centages of afflmatlon are 83.3 percent and 78.3 percent respectively for the Supreme Court and tha Court of Appeal**
No crime seem* to haTe been reversed or re manded more readily than any other. On the other hand, cases carrying the blanket charge of felony or misdemeanor ara withdrawn or dllmlssed for want of prosecution approximately five and one-half time* a* readily as ara other crime
charges. Fifty-four percent of the cases dock eted o*rrylng the** blanket charge* wer* either dl*ml**ad for want of prosecution or withdrawn.
In 2*7 cases where Judgment wa* rendered In tha Court of Appeal*, the defendant applied to the Supreme Court for a writ of certlorarl. Such an action 1* a request to a higher court to review the Judgment of the lower court"' and 1* granted when the higher court finds evidence In the petition that the other may have erred. In only seven case* did the Supreme Court * fit to review the actions of the Court of Appeals.
Much ha* been eald about the delay* In ap pellate procedure, but In the Supreme Court and Court of Appeale In Oeorgla, 29 percent and 73.1 percent re*p*otlv*ly are handled In three month* after tha bill* of exception* are filed. By the end of six month*, $6.2 percent and 9*.l percent reepectlrely were disposed of. It 1* an excep tion for any case to remain before these court* for twelve month* or longer.
01
- 77-
RELATION OF CASES REVERSED TO CASES APPEALED
tff JUDICIAL DlSTQICTS OF THE SUFCQIOa COURT
COURT OF APPEALS A.HO SUJOEME COURT STA.TB OF GEORGIA
JANUARY 1.1<6 - DtcEMttsIL 1935 Ptn CENTS ronO.OTHROUGH 124 11 | || Pen CENTS FROM 125 THDOUQH IT. I Peo CENTS FIOM ni THBOUSH 718 Pta CENTS fnon'a.9 THROUOH 765 PER CENTS FQOM% wo Ovta
- 7 -
Chapter K PROCEDURE AFTER SENTENCE
THE ROLE OF THE PRISON COUKSSIOU: When a de an arrangement whereby any Individual who pre
fendant has received a felony sentence, he ia sented satisfactory means of so doing could
delivered Into the custody of the sheriff. It lease from the State such convicts as he de
then becomes the duty of the clerk of the court sired. The leased prisoners were fed, clothed,
In which the case was tried to notify the Prison and housed by the lessee and labored for hia.
Commission of such conviction and that the conTlct IB being held subject to Its Inatructlonsw.
This practice had been In vogue since IS?1*-, ard seems to have been designed as a substitute for
Bpon the order of this body, the sheriff deliv the state penitentiary. The Governor leased the
ers prisoners In his custody to the designated convicts, and the head keeper of the per-ltenti-
Institutions. They may be turned over to any ary was charged with seeing that all of them
county on the request of Its prcper officer and lived and worked under humar.e conditions.
put to work on the roads, bridges, and other
Today, administrative control and supervis
public works, or sent to the state penitentiary. ion over all persons under sentence Is exercised
On the other hand, persons receiving misdemeanor by the Prison Coicmlsslon. This supervision Is
sentences are registered with the Prison Commis retained even though the convict casp may be op
sion, but are worked on the chain gang of the erated by a county, city, or the State Hih*ay
county of conviction, unless tliat county does Department. The Commission makes all rules and
not maintain a convict camp, In which case dis regulations regarding proper management, living
position Is made of them under the sane regula tions aa govern the placement of felony con
conditions, disciplinary measures, ar.d sacltatlon for all convict establishments.03) It also
victs .'* The Commission may farm out prisoners to the State Highway Department for irork on the
distributes prisoners among the several fame, camps, and Institutions,fi*i and regulates the work
highways, and when the needs of the counties and they can do within the llnlta set by law. Some
of the State Highway Department have been met, Commissioner is required to make a thorough In
It may hire the remaining convicts to municipal spection of each convict camp and prison at
ities at one hundred dollars per year. Such la least once every six months, and the Cozmlaelon,
bor, however, may never be used In competition as a whole, la required to make a report to each
with free labor.1"
session of the General Assembly showing its ac
The Prison Commission of Georgia, created by wn
the General Assembly In 1897, heralded a new era
tivities and expenditures since the preceding 809slon. At this time It aay make recommenda
In penal management In this state, and set In tions for new legislation that it deems beet for
motion machinery for the -elimination of many the betterment of the prison system."*'
abuses then existent In the handling of prison
In addition to the administrative duties of
ers. Among these was the convict lease system, the Commission, it must Investigate all applica
( Sec. 77-339 0. Cod* 1933. HI 3.=. 77-325 Ibid.
13) Ibid. W Sc. 77-339 ibl*. (5) Stc. 77-2O1 Ibid. (6) Sc. 77-336 Ibid. (7) See. 77-326 11)14. (8) 5.C. 77-330 Ibid. C9) Sec. 77-331 Ibid. (10) p. 71, Act. or 1897.
tions for executive clemency and make such rec-
endatlons to the Governor as it sees fit in
00 p. 26, Act* of 1874. U2)p. 40. Acts of 1S76. W>S0. 77-31! 0. Co Jo 1913. MSfc. 77-325 ibid. (ISSoc. 77-316 Ibid. SC. 77-340 ibid.
79 -
each case. It mates rules tor tha parole of the had died, some had served their allotted sen
prisoners, allowing them, with the consent of tences, and some bad been given pardons and pa
the Governor, to serve their lentencea beyond roles. The percentage of each type of release
the confine! of the penitentiary; remaining, la listed In Table XXXIII.
however, wlttln the legal custody of the CoumlB-
Adverse comment has been made from time ton
lon and subject at any tine to be returned to time regarding deaths of oonvlots In the prison
prison by Its order. When a person has aerved institutions of the south. In Georgia, the
twelve months of hie parole In a satisfactory death rate for felony convicts In the State Pen
manner and Me hletory before the perpetration itentiary Is lower than that of the adult popu
of the crime., along with his prison record, lation throughout the State. No effort waa made
shall warran'; consideration, the Commission, If on this survey to Inquire Into the cause of
It feels tBa" he will become an upright, honest death among convicts.
citizen, may, upon Its own notion, recommend to
Contracting with the number of prisoners who
the Governor that such prisoner be pardoned and served the minimum sentences given them are
his rights of citizenship restored to him. Such those granted pardons, commutations, and pa
TABU: XXXIH* RELEASES GRANTED GEORGIA PENITENTIARY CASES
January 1, 1926 - December }1, 1955
rolee. Such methods of release are expressions of executive clemency exercised In this State, sometimes by the Governor upon his own Initia
Heleaee Granted Through: Completion of Sentence Pardon Sentence Commuted Parole Death of prisoner Total Released Cases Not Released Total Cases Admitted
Number f_Cfl tf*fl
2,055 286
5.tT7aS7sO7
9.3U 8,023
17,336
Percent of AdJSlf*&lPnfl
11.9
'f!c:*? . 15*36..146.
100.0
tive, and sometimes upon the recommendations of the Prison Commission. Cases were studied only as to the percentage of the sentence served, and no effort was made to Inquire Into the merits of any case or to the reason why special treatment was afforded It.
Source: Records of the Prison Commission.
In recent years, governors In general have
reconcer.datlons, however, are not mandatory upon the Governor."' DISPOSITION OF PRISONERS: A thorough study of the prison aystem of Georgia was not Included In the scope 01" this survey, and effort was made to Include only such Information afl Is related to the court system. Facts regarding the final dis position of persons under sentence and data con cerning the length of confinement In relation to the sentences Imposed were considered pertinent.
been accused of opening the gates to the penal Institutions and allowing hardened criminals of all types to be loosed upon society. Large num bers have been freed In Georgia before the ex piration of their sentence, but only 286 felony cases entering the penitentiary during the de cade 1926-1935 received the full pardon before the end of that period. A pardon releases the prisoner from custody and forgives him complete ly of his crime!3' Table XXXV lists the crimes
In the decade January 1, 1926 through Decem ber 31, 1935, 17,336 cases* In which felony sen tences were Imposed were admitted to the peni tentiary system. Prior to the end of the peri od, more than 53 percent of them had been grant ed some form of release - some, of the prisoners
I" Sec. 77-T01 ioiQ. f!1 Sees. 2-Z12j27-2701 ibid.
AUTHOR'S NCTEi For tho purpose of this study, only caecc in nhich felony sentences Tiero icpooed are included, since tho records of convicts given misdemeanor enteocea arc kept in the chain gang camps, aod data from such place: could be gathered only at a prohibit!-** cost. Cases re* ferred to in this chapter represent a smaller mitiber of persons, since often an individual was sentenced for more than one charge, and no effort nas node to correlate the actual persons involved to tho nunber of cases. (See Ap pendix B. EiMbit 6, for details hon data for this chapter was gathered.)
CM Sec. 27-2701 ibid.
- go -
In which pardons were granted In th period must be served before release Is effected. Com
studied.
mutations were aada In a much wider variety of
Ons would ezpeot, In the absence of extra
ordinary clrcunstanoee, that a conTleted person
would Bens at least the minimum tine aet In his
sentence. Such, however, does not seen to hare
been the case. In faot, more than 2O percent of
those granted pardons served less than 11 per
cent of their sentences. The Prison Commission
has on record cases which were pardoned before
they were turned over to Its custody. There are
other cases, however, where persons who, after
serving their complete sentences, desiring to
again enjoy full rights of citizenship, request
TABLE XXXIV*
PARDOHS - PEaOEST MINtKOlI SENTENCE SERVED Felony Cases** Admitted to Oeorgla Penitentiary
January 1, 192fi - December 31, 1935
Percent of Sentence Served
Cases Number Percent
10 and Under 11-20 21-30 31-W W.-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100 Over 100 TOTAL
52
20.2
19
7-*
9-0
11
9-3.
12.4
%
8.6
8
ll'l'
7
a-7
257
100.0
TABIS XXXV*
PARDONS - BY CRIMES ?elony Cases** Admitted to Georgia Penitentiary
January 1, 19SS - December 51, 1935
CRIME
Number of Pardon*
Aiding Escape
5
Assault with Intent to Murder
13
Assault with Intent to Rape
4
Assault with Intent to Hob
1
Arson
3
Bigamy
3
Burglary
43
Bnbezzlenent
12
Felony
8
Forgery
15
False Swearing
2
Involuntary Manslaughter
19
Kidnapping
Larceny After Trust
^
Larceny from Bouee
2
Larceny of Auto
19
Larceny of Baled Cotton
2
Larceny, simple
6
Manufacturing Liquor
6
Mob Violence
2
Murder
31
Perjury
2
Rape
8
Riot
3
Robbery
*5
Seduction
5
Shooting at Another
2
Voluntary Manslaughter
15
Violation of Banklr.g Regulations 1
TOTAL
286
Source: Records of .the Prison Commission. *Includes life imprisonment and electrocution sentences.
crimes than were pardons, and, as shown by Table
*Source: Records of the Prison Commission. *Casea where life Imprisonment or electrocution waa the sentence not Included* Pardons granted at the completion of the sentence not Included.
XXXVI, often only a ssall percentage of the mln*
loum sentence waa served. M3LS XXXVI*
and receive pardons. These, however, are not shown In this chapter. In order to place 'a yard stick as to the place within the sentence most persons receive pardons, the 257 pardons granted to persona not under life sentence were studied as to the percentage of the minimum sentence they actually served. The results of these com putations are shown In Table XXXIV.
The effect of a commut&tlon of sentence Is similar to a pardon In that upon such a release, the prisoner 1 free from further legal re
COMMUTATI01E - PEECEST MINIMUM SEXTS.'OE SERVED
Felony Cascs Admitted to Georgia Penitentiary January 1, 1926 - December 81, 1935
Percent of Sentence Served
Cases Number Percent
10 and Under 11-20 21-30 31-W <1-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 SI-90 91-100 Over 100
121
16.0
KO
8
1C*
J:i
9-3 13-7
67
8.9
6.0
11
8.0
42
5-5
89
11-7
25
3-3
TOTAL
758
100.0
* Records of the Prison Commission See footnote Table XXXIV.
straints. There la a difference between the
DlffeMng from the procedure under a pardon
two, however. In that a commutation of sentence or a commutation, a person placed on parole re-
la a shortening of the sentence and a part of It f" 46 Corpui Jurit 1137.
81 -
mains under -;he supervision of the Prlaon Commlstion, and while freed from confinement, is till (abject to its regulations and maj be re-
granted such releaeeg are returned to custody; but paroles still continue to be granted In large numbers and for all types of orlmea.
TABLE UIVII*
__ ... J . CCaWJIATJOIS - PAROLES Percent )Bjiia.Sentence Served - By Minium Sentence mpoied
Floi7 CMe* AdB&ted to Georgia. Tvmitantiar];
January 1, 1926 - Deoeabor 31, 1935
Sentence Total In Teen Cases 0-10
1
2,212 101
2
2,128 112
3
863 SO
*
MB 27
S 8 7
4Ma n
57 2 8
8 9
67
T
2 1
10
U!> 10
11
2_
12
' 211 1
IS
1
It
32
IS
41 4
18
1--
17
1
IS
j
19
5
20
42 19
Jl-ZO
17 21 24 8 9 3 3 2
14
4 --
7 1 S 3 7
21-30
' 16 48 26 24 29 6 8 S 1 20 _
S --
1 14
1 3 1 13
Itaabar of Caaea Percent of Sentence Served
31-40
22 40 41 32 31
4 11
S 1 28 1 1 _ _
8 _ 2 3
41-50
68 7S 61 28 S3
a
10 7 1
22
3
8 _ -
51-60
48 9S 48 24 28
7 6 < 1 10 1 t I
1 -
61-70
31 74 41 13 28 1 3 2 1 10 -- 4 _ --
m
V
_
-
71-00
40 93 26 18 204 24 23 24 1 24 --
1 _ _ _ -
TOW. 6,8(4 357
128
221
228
341
278
208
478
v SourcAi ztocords of th Frisob Comniavlon* * Caas iriiare life liqirisoniMnt or flloctrocution M tha sentence not Inoludad. * For all aenteaoe* in tbiB colunn, the maximal aentence m evoked*
81-00
26 SI S62 155 IS 5
1 2 _ 3 -- . -- _ --
B
A
-
820
0-ror 91-100 _ 10Q_
1,634
2C1
1,408
111
70
66
27
18
38
16
2
.
6
.
2
.
.
_
_
_
_
.
_
.
.
_
.
.
a>
-
-
3,177
432
turned to the penitentiary upon Its order. 3uoh While pardons and commutations of sentence are
order ur- oa laaued upon any Tlolatlon of tea oftan granted shortly after eonrletlon, paroles,
provlalons of the parole or after arrest upon as shown by Table XXXVIII, seam to be secured
TABtB XXXVIH*
more often after a greater part of the sentence
PiROLES - PEROEOT jnHIWUI SENTEKCB SERVED Felony Casnao* Admitted to Georgia Penitentiary
January 1, 1926 - December si. 193S
Percent of Ssntencs Served
Caaas Number Farcaat
10 and Under 11-20 31^0 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100 Over 100
18^
3-3
7
1.2
213035
\A
187
U
UO3
7-1
763
3.0to5o2
5J*Q 7.1
TOTAL
5,6*9
100.0
* Source I Records of the Prison Coimlnslon. * Se footnote Table XXXIV. ______________
another charge, the reports of th Prison Com
has been served. If th figures shown In Tables XXXIV, XXXVI
and XXXVIII are combined and shown in relation to the minimum sentence Imposed, it appears that the percentage of sentence likely to be served decreases In reverse ratio to the length of the sentence Imposed. In other words, 83.4 percent of those vith sentences of one year serve over 90 percent of it in confinement,'while only 11.0 percent of those with fivs year sentences serve the saas percentage of their aentence, and only 9.2 percent of those with sentences longer than ten years serve more than $0 percent of their
mission to the General Aaaenbl/ sho* that for each blennlUB more than yo percent of those
sentence. Table XXXVII lists the percentt served of each length sentence imposed.
82 -
Tor those prisoners sentenced to Ufa Im prising proportion of those who had only one
prisonment, the record la not greatly different year to serve effected not one escape, but sev
from that for convicts with shorter tenu. eral. (Sae Appendix B for complete statistics
Oader tbe law, persons sentenced to life imprls- on sscapes.) Events such as thess lead to the
ozunent are not eligible to parole until after they have served three year* of the sentence. On the other hand, pardone and commutations can be laaued at any time after sentence has been Imposed. Likewise, a confutation can be Issued to shorten a sentana* and shortly thereafter a
TABLE XXXIX*
PARDONS - COmHDTATIOHS - PAROLES
By Months Served Convicts Dnder Life Sentence Admitted to
Oeorgla Penitentiary _____January 1, 1926 - December 31, 1935____
Total
MCoonntfhlnsenIennt
ROerlaenatseeds
ConauPardons tatlons
Paroles
parole be granted. Table XXXIX lists the par dons, paroles, and commutations granted prison ers under life sentences, along with the number of months serrad by them.
Perhaps more publicity Is attendant upon pardons, paroles, and commutations for murder than for any other crime. This crime, under the Georgia law, unlike most others, Is peculiar In that only two sentences may be Imposed upon a defendant convicted of such a charge. These two punishments are life Imprisonment and electrocu
3 mos. or Less 3 - 6 mos
-
I
2
7 - 9 i 10-12 mos 13-15 mos 16-18 mo
19-2* mo 25-30 mo
aa
IJ
1 1 3
111
5
I
2
1 _ 1 -
31-36 mo
C
\
2
2
37- mo 49-60 mo 61-72 mo 73-8* mos
IS
238
5 1
2 1
2*
l1i7
85-96 mos
26
Over 9 OS.
12
-4
_ 1
22 11
TOTAL
179
29
19
131
Source: Records of the Prison Commission.
tion. Of the 1,137 felony oases admitted to the belief that It Is not only through parole, com
penitentiary and sentenced to life Imprisonment, mutation, and pardon that hardened criminals are
1,121* were for murder. The records of the Stats turned loose upon society. The means In the
Penitentiary at Milledgevllle show that during hands of the Prison Commission for effecting re
the period studied, thsra wera 123 convicted capture ars the local law enforcenent 3epart-
murderers electrocuted. In other words, for the msnts, and It Is likely that those officers are
State as a whols, during the decade January 1, no better equipped to handle th capture of es
1926 through December 3!, 1935, there were 1,2*7 capes than they are to capture euspects. Taken
convicted murderers received by the penitentiary all In all, ths proportion of release from the
system. Of these, 9-8 percent were electrocuted; penitentiary aystsm Is greater than Is supposed
4-.0 percent died from natural causes; 895 wera by the average Individual.
still serving sentence on December 31, 1935, and
Perhaps ths most Important result to be
179. or 11)-.2 percent, had been released upon found In ths foregoing considerations la the
pardon, commutation of sentence, or parole.
fact that, if convicts under life ssntencs are
la any prison system, there are always Indi excluded, *6 percent of the felons admitted to
viduals who can devise ways and means for secur the penitentiary during the period studlod and
ing an Illegal release. Of the 17,336 oases in released during that same period served lass
carcerated la the stats penitentiary, escapes than 90 percent of the minimum term to which
were accomplished In ^,078, and 56.5 percent they had been sentenced. Reviewing conditions
ware recaptured during the period under consid found In the superior and olty courts. It will
eration. Of those who escaped, more than one- bs remembered that for those counties studlsd,
half had effected more than one aacape. A aur- convictions resulted In 59.7 percent of the
- 83
caea doctetei. If It be aa&ufied that this ratio holds good tor the State, and that the percent, age or misdemeanor convicts ho Berne a full tern la comparable to thnt found, for felony con victs, then the unecpable conclusion la that, for all caeet docketed In the trial courts or this State, only a relatively scall percentage
were convicted and served their nlnlnnrn sen tence. If the reason that this 414 not occur In the remaining cases Is the supposition that such, a course would ha-re bssn unjust, what an appalling wast* of tlze, money, and effort was that expended in the handling of these other cases.
COURT CIRCUITS
? AlBANY 5 &UAH7A 4 A7UHTIC 5 AUOUSTA
6 blue Bio
1 bttUNSKICK.
MAP Ho-ffi
Chapter X
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GEORGIA COURT SYSTEM
JOHN D. HUMPHRIES Judge of the Superior Court. Atlanta Circuit
From hia day-to-day contact with the courts,
In pursuance of that authority the trustees,
one may be prone to accept the la* and the courts as an immutable thing, remaining fixed and constant In a world forever changing. Such, however. Is not the case, and like all other hu man Institutions, the courts of Georgia nave de veloped with the advancement of science and civilization In a nanner similar to the edu cational Inetltutlons of the State, Its In dustrial evolution and other functions of the State and Its people. Ae with other things In life, a proper perspective on the court system can only be gained by a knowledge of Its history and background. UNDER THE TRUSTEES: By Charter of ling George II of England, the country between the Savannah and Altamaha, and from the head springs of those rivers due west to the Pacific, was, on June 9, 1732, erected Into the Province of Georgia. For twenty-one years It was placed under the guard ianship of a corporation "In trust for the poor. 1 The purpose of the patrons was expressed In the seal of the corporation, which bad on one side a group of silk worms at work, with the words *non slbl, sed allla* -- not for them selves but for others. All executive and legis lative powers were for twenty-one yeare given exclusively to the trustees or their common council; and they ware expressly authorized to erect and constitute Judicatures and court* of record to hear and determine "all nanner of crimes, offenaes, pleas, processes, plaints, actions, matters, causes, and things whatsoever, arising or happening within the said province of Georgia, or between persona of Georgia, whether the same be civil or criminal, and wnetoer the said crimes be capital or not capital, and whether eald pleas be real, personal, or mixed; and for awarding and making out executions."
before sailing from England, erected on Novem ber 2, 1732 , 'court of Judicature', styled Town Court', bestowing upon it judicial power and authority commensurate with those exercised In England by the Courts of King's Bench, Camion Pleas and Exchequer. On Novenber 17, 1732* James Edward Oglathorpe and 130 persons sailed from Qravesend, Englar-d, on the ship 'Anne' for the new colony, and on February 12, 1733, they land. ed at Xamacraw Bluff on the Savannah River, where the City of Savannah now stands. On the way over, stops were aade at Charleston and Beaufort. From the latter place, Qeceral Oglethorpe made a trip to Savannah in advance of the landing. Thus was projected the first set tlement of the new colony.
Under the charter, the Colony was to be gov erned by the laws of the realm of England and such as might be enacted by the Council of the Province. There were no lawyers among the aettlera, and It does not appear that any were wanted. Therefore, its Judges, three In number and called 'Bailiffs', were layaen, unlearned In the law, and little qualified to preside over a court of small Jurisdiction, much less one whose authority was practically unllnlted and from whose decisions there was no appeal. Compl&lnta of the moat serious kind were soon made.
When Tradertoa was settled in 173. a sim ilar court was established there. Its Judges were lees qualified than those at Savannah; soaw were not able to write. 'The power wae too great for th irresponsible hand* that wielded it," said . B. Stevene, In Ms history of I Oeorgl*, page 223- 'They were charged with set- I ting aside the law* of England, Hiking false! Imprisonment*, wrongfully discharging grand }u-l rlee, threatening petit Juries, blasphemy, lr-|
-65-
reverence, drunkenness, obstructing the course of law, and other equally grave and helnoue offenses."
Realizing that the bailiff's magistracy was a failure, the trustees. In 17lH, divided the province Intc two counties, one called Savannah and the other Frederics, with a president and four associates for each, who constituted the civil and judicial tribunals of their respective counties. In 17^3, before appointment had been made for Frijderlca, that territory was placed under the officers of Savannah, and the magis trates at Frjderlca were made subordinate to the superior authority at Savannah .^ That plan work ed better, b-it still there were many complaints. There were no courts of chancery or of admiralty In the province, but before the charter of the trustees was surrendered, the assembly petition ed for a court of chancery, and a movement was started for the establishment of a court of admiralty. UNDER THE KINO: The trustees surrendered their trust to tht King on April 23, 1752, and on June 23, they cased to exist as a body. Early In July the Lord Justices, the King being absent In Hanover, with the advice of the Privy Coun cil, continued all officers In the province In their respuctive offices until another fora of government should be established. In the mean time "the government of the province was admin istered according to the plan Inaugurated by the trustees, by a president and four assistants, who received their Instructions from and made report to the Lord Justices and the Lord Com missioners of Trade and Plantations." 01
On llarch 5, 1751, the Lord Commissioners of Trade and Plantations submitted a plan for the establishment of a civil government In the prov ince, which received the approval of the Crown and became the governmental policy of the provInce , That plan provided, for- the appointment (D pp. 225-225, Vol. I, "A History of Georgia',
Bacon Stevens, Appleton publishing Co., Hnr Tori, 1847. <3>p. 172, ibid. 0>p. 462, Vol. II, "History of Gsori-liv", Chsrles Coleock
Jones* Jr., Bughfcon Publishing Co. boston, Ifafta.* 1863.
of m governor, with power to call an assenbly to pass laws, trant lands and do all other thing* necessary and proper for the government of the province.'*1 On November g, 1751, the Oovernor brought to the attention of the Board, composed of himself and members of the Council, the royal Instructions regarding the erection of courts; and the matter was referred to the Attorney Gen eral, recently arrived In the Colony, for In vestigation and report to the Board, with reoommendatlons. ts
In the meantime, on November 27, 175l> the Board established a Court of Oyer and Temlner to be held twice yearly. The Judges appointed were Noble Jones and William Spencer, Esq., "who took the State oaths and subscribed the test re quired by law, and likewise took an oath for the due execution of their office of Judge." The establishing of the other courts and officers was postponed for future consideration.^'
On December 12, 1751*. the Attorney General made his report to the Board, recommending the establishment of courts for the speedy adminis tration of Justice, as follows:
1. A Oeneral Court, to be held every three months before two or more persons to be appointed as Judges, with Juris diction to try "all actions, real, per sonal and mlxt", exceeding 40 shillings In value; and all criminal matters, with like power and authority as ued and exercised by the respective courts of King's Bench, Common Pleas and Exchequer In England. The right of appeal to the Governor and Council was given In causes exceeding 300 pounds In amount; and. to his llajesty In Council In matters ex ceeding 500 pounds In amount, and In criminal cases where the fine Imposed was as much as 00 pounds. 2. A Court of Chancery, for matters In equity, to be held before the Oovernor as Chancellor after each seselon of the Qeneral Court. 3. A Court of Oyer and Termlner, to be held twloe yearly by two members of the Council, commissioned by the Oovernor for that purpose, or Judges of the Oeneral Court, for the trial of persons oharged with ooulttlng crimes after the sessions of the General Court. 1. A Court of .Admiralty, for maritime matters, to be held before the Oovernor as Vice Admiral, or 'before whomsoever
H) pp. 460-466. ibid. a>p. 591. Vol. I. "A Birtory of Georjla'. William Baoon
Stevnns, Appleton Publishing Co., Bw York, 1847. (U p. 40, Vol. VII, Colonial Record*.
hs bll depute or surrogate for this purpose.* Right of appeal was given to the High Court at Admiralty of Great Brltlan.
5. A Special Commission Of
Tarmlner, Issued by the Governor whan necessary, directed to tho Juatloaa of tha district or dlTlalon whara tha offenae wag committed, for tha trial of slaves charged with oapltal offanees, without a Jury. On oonTlotlon tha com missioners wara to award execution, and fix tha value of tha slave, to ba paid to tha ownar by tha General Assembly, as an encouragement to the people to discover tha vlllanlee of their slaves.* 6. Inferior oourta, to b* thereafter eatabllahail a* might ba thought rsqulalte and necessary, to try B"e.ll causes, for tha ease and convenience of Inhabltanta of the proTlnoe redding at too great a distance froa Savannah. On tha aana date the report of the Attorney Oeneral waa eubmitted, the Board resolved: That tha respective courts of Justice antloned In the aforesaid report ba constituted as occasion may require, conformable to the said report. That a court of record be Immediately constituted by the nans and etyle of the General Court, to ba holden yearly at Savannah within this, province, on the saoond Tuesday In January, the second Tuesday In April, the aeoond Tuesday In July and the aaoond Tuesday la October. That the said General Court have Juris diction and cognisance of all actions, 'real, personal and mlxt, ' ezoeedlng the value of 4O shillings, except where the title to a freehold ooaea In question; and also have cognisance of all original matter*, with tha like power and author ity as used and exerolsed by the re spective courts of King's Bench, Com mon Pleas and Exchequer In England. That his Excellency, tha Governor, will grant a commission to Noble Jones and Jonathan Bryan, Esq., to be Judges to hold tha said court, which commission Is ordered to be entered In this day's min utes. 1 On December 13, 1754-, tha Board took Into consideration what further regulations might be
Court, a Court of Over and Termlner, a Court of Admiralty, a Commission of Oyer and Termlner to try slaves, and Justices courts.
In November 1755, the Governor and Council ordered that the Judges of tha General Court hold oourta of Oyer and Termlner and General Gaol delivery each second Tuesday In December and the second Tuesday In June yearly.* An act of February 21, 1756, provided funds "to defray tha expenses of the courts of Oyer and Ter mlner.*'0 An act of December 13, 1756 regulated the drawing of Jurors for the courts of Oyer and Ternlner and the General Course.TM
On March 19, 1762, a special commission of Oyer and Ternlner was Issued to Judges of the Oeneral Court and othera to try two Spaniards oharged with murder.^ Other commissioners were added March 26, l?62.w
An aot of April 24, 176o,lS reciting that ooets In the General Courts often exceeded the debt sued for, gave Justice courts Jurisdiction In olvll causes not exceeding eight pounds; to ba tried by two Justices and three Jurora, If tbe amount Involved did not exceed 40 shillings, and by two Justices and twelve Jurors, if the amount involved were above 40 shillings and did not exceed eight pounds. By act of March 4, 176s, an appeal to the General Court was allowed If tha Judgment were for more than 40 shillings. These courts came to be known as courts of con science, because of the rule of decision, which was aoaordlng to conscience and equity. In acts
neoeasarjr in regard to courts, and Resolved: That a commission be issued appointing the Justices of the peace within the province, with power for any two of them and three freeholders to be Judges in causes not exceeding the value of 40 shillings starling.* This was a departure from the role In Eng
land, where Justloe courts had no olvll juris diction.
On page 391, Stevens' History of Georgia, Vol. 1, It is stated that agreeable to the rec ommendation of the Attorney General, on December 12, 1754, the Council established a Oeneral
of March 12, 1774, and August 5, 17S2?' they are referred to as Courts of Conscience.
Referring to the expense to ship masters, supercargoes, and other transient persons having causes against Aeronauts and traders, due to de lays incident to trlala in the usual course, an
(Up. 504. Tol. Hill. Col. See. (zip. 144. loia, CMp. 659. Tol. Tin, Col. Bee.
(UP. en. n>ii.
Op. 77, Georgia Colonial l*m. (Op. 149. Ibid. CD pp. SI, 169. Tol. HX-II, Col. EM.
- 87-
act of April 7, 1/63, authorized and directed the Chief Justice of the Qeneral Court, or In hie absence, another justice, on application, to call a special or extraordinary court to try such causes within seven days. An act of March 6, 1766,'" extended the time for trial, In the discretion cf the justice, to not more than twenty daya, due to the distance from Savannah of som defendants. These special courts were known aa "Courts Merchants."
An act of April 7, 176') gave the General Court authority to partition lands, which was amended by net of Uarch 27, 1767, so as to In sure quicker results than was afforded under the English rule of practice. An act of February 29, 1761;, regulated the practice before the Ordina ry. An act of April 11, 176S,tU authorized the Justices of the peace of a parish, or any three of then) and seven free holders, to try slaves* Cn convlctlcn, the defendant was executed by the Constable, for which he received a fe of three shillings.
An act of April 11, 1768,' prescribed the qualifications of grand Jurors as men owning 500 acres of liind In fee simple, fee tallle, or for life, or lii commlaelon of the peace; but they were not exempt from petit Jury service. The grand Jury, Inherited from England, became an Important Institution In the administration of the criminal lava of the province. It had no civil authority. The oath taken by Its members was. as follows:
Xou thai! diligently Inquire and true presentments make of all such articles, natters and things as shall come to your own knowledge touching this preeent service. The King's Council, your fel lows and your own, you shall keep se cret; you shall present no person for hatred or nallce; neither aball you leave any one unpresented for favor, or affection, for love or gain, or any hopes thereof; but In all things you shall present the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, to the (Dp. 162. G*. col. Lam. (tip. 342. ibid. (3) p. 169, ibid. (Op. 375, ibid. IMp. 209. ibid. Wp. 117. ibid. CBp. 442, Ibid.
best of your knowledge; so help you God." ITlth the words, 'State's Counsel 0 , qualified by the provision "unless called upon to give evidence thereof In soae court of law In this State", substituted for the words "King's Coun cil", that oath Is substantially the oath taken by grand Jurors today. The courts as thus estab lished under the royal rule constituted the Judicial system inherited from England, and for a tine continued In effect by the newly declared republic. INDEPENDENCE OP THE CROWN: On July 6, 1775, th Provincial Congress of Georgia adopted a resolu tion providing that the province Join "with all other provinces In America now net by delegates In Continental Congress* In Philadelphia, and providing, also, for the appointment of a com mittee "whose duty It shall be to sea that the resolutions of the Continental Congress and the Provincial Congress b duly observed, and that every person who shall act In opposition thereto have his name transmitted to the Continental Congress, and that his mlsdaftde be published In every American paper.'" On December 1, 1775, the courts of the prov ince were taken under supervision of the Council of Safety, and a connlttea of fifteen was ap pointed ae a Court of Appeals, to sit In Savannah quarterly, and to hear and determine between the parties, and to sanction or prohibit processes, according to the circumstances of the case f The constitution of the courts of Inferior Jurisdiction was left unchanged. On April 15, 1776, the Provincial Congress proclaimed a temporary constitution for Georgia, which provided that all law, common and statute, and acts of the Assembly, formerly ac knowledged to be of force In the province ana not inconsistent with the government proclaimed, ba of full forc0 and effect In the province un til otherwise ordered; and that a Chief Justice n p. 192. Vol. II. "History of Caorgll," nipra. (t p. 207. Ibid.
and tiro assistant Judges of the court of sslone, or Oyer and Termlner, be appoints! by bal lot to serve during the pleasure of tha Congrepj, tha former rules of procedure to con tinue. <">
of ths law, as well as of fact; but If any had any doubts aa to the law they coujwd apply to the benoh, who eaoh 'In. rotation* gave his opinion. The Court of Conscience was continued aa there tofore practiced with Jurisdiction of caueea
THE CONSTITUTION OF iTH- The pasting of Georgia from a Colony of the British Crown to statehood
not aoountlng to acre than tea pousda. The leg islature was authorized to provide for a regis
brought little Immediate change In Ita lawa and judicial procedure. In pursuance of a recommen dation of the General Congress at Philadelphia,
ter of probates In each county for proving wills and granting letters of administration. No per son was permitted to plead In the courts of law
Independence of the British crown having been of tha State unless authorized to do so by the
declared on July U-, 1776, a convention of the people assembled In October 1776 at Savannah and proclaimed a Constitution for the State en
House of Assembly 1 but tola provision was *aoX Intended to exclude any person from that Inher ent privilege of every freeaan - the liberty to
February 5, 1777' That Constitution established a court, to be called the Superior Court, aad to meet twice yearly for each county In the State,
plead his own cause.* ?he grand Jury was to be composed of not less than eighteen xen, but twelve were authorized to find a bill. Their
namely: Chatham, Efflnghaa, Burke, Richmond, qualifications were defined by Act of llarch 1,
Yllkes, Liberty, Glynn, and uaaden.
T.788, as follows: "all persons returned to serve
All causes of what nature soever were to be aa grand Jurora at the said auperlor court a*"n
tried in the Superior Court,* except aa In the every one of them have and be seized of not lees
Constitution otherwise provided; which court consisted of a Chief Justice and three or more
than 250 acres of land, In their our. right. In fee simple, fee tallle.or for life of themselves
of the Justices residing In the county. In case or some other person, or shall be In commission
of the absence of the Chief Justice, the senior of the peace.*
Justice of the bench was to act as Chief Jua- THE CONSTITUTION OF 17S9: Tie Constitution of
tlce. Justices were made assistants to the Chief May 6, 17S9, provided for a superior court for
Justice of the Superior Court by Act of llarch 1, each county, to be held twice yearly, In which
177S,'z'to carry out tha provisions of the Consti "shall be tried aad brought to final decision
tution of 1777. An Act of February 13, 17S, all cauaea, civil and criminal, except such as
Increased the number of assistant Justices of may be subject to a Federal Court, and such as
each county to four. The Jury was Bade Judges may 6y law be referred to Inferior Jurisdic
tions.* The General Assembly was authorized to
* ACTHCR'S SlOIEl The TOrd *Supro=" in paragraph H, as printed in ITatkin'B Digest, p* 13, IB evidently a typographical error, notiri-thstandiiie it appears, also, in laurbury and Crntford's Divert, pace 11, unless used la the sonse of superior* The Barglne! Indue in Wa.tt3n.'a Divert il "Superior Court Jurisdiction.' Paragraph XXXVI creates the Superior Court, v&ich was iHtented to tain tli* place of the Court of Oyer and Ten&ner referred to in the temporary constitution proclejaed ty ttia Fro-- vlncial Conere" on April 15, IT?*"* In the Constitution aa printed in Volume I, p. 293, of "Revolutionary Renorda of Georgia," the word 'Superior' appeara with MrclMl
index u folloirat "Orcanitatlcn and Jurisdiction 01" toe
superior court."
'point out the node of correcting errors and appeals, which shall extend aa far as to empower the Judges to direct a new trial by a Jury within the county where the action originated, which shall be final.* Courts of Merchant were continued aa previously existing, "subject to such regulations aa the Qeneral Assembly aay di rect.* All causes were to be tried In the county
in op. 274-276, Vol I. Revolutionary Records. Ill p. 219, "JL Difien of the Im of Georgia*, Kobert
George watkins, H. AittLn, Philadelphia, 180O.
where the defendant or one of then resided, exospt oases of real estate, which were to be-
- 9 -
tried where the land lay.
An Act of February 9, 1797, Bade It the duty
of the superior court judge to report the trial
of every capital case, "which shall 00 published
In one of ths public gazettes, within sixty days
after such trial shall have taken place.*
Referring to ths constitutional provision
authorizing the creation of Inferior courts, an
Act of December 2J, 17*9, created common-la*
courts, to be called Inferior County Courts, to
be held In ach county twice yearly. If the
case was for mora than 5 pounds, an appeal lay
to the Superior Court; If for more than 5
pounds, thi> case Bight be removed to the Super
ior Court. An Act of February 9, 1797, gave this
court concurrent Jurisdiction with the Superior
Court In all civil cacaa except land cases, with
the right of appeal to the Superior Court. An
act of December 17, 1792, authorized the Inferi
or eourtt to provide for the poor, bind out or
phans and levy a tax. An Act of February 21,
1796, gavo the court Jurisdiction of court
houses, Jells, and the care of the poor, with
the authority to levy taxes to pay Jailors' fees
and expenses of caring for prisoners.
An Act of February 10, 1797, gave Justice
courts civil Jurisdiction of oauaes not Involv
ing more than thirty dollars, 'provided that no
justice at the Inferior court, or clerk, sheriff
or attorney, being a justice of the peace, ahall
try any wtrrant or give Judgment thereon In any
civil cane whatsoever.' An appeal lay to a jury
of five In the Justice Court.
THE CONSTITUTION OF 179: The Constitution of
Mar JO, 1798, vested the Judicial powers of the
State In . superior court, and In such Inferior
jurisdictions as might be established by the
legislature. The Superior Court was given ex
clusive and final Jurisdiction of all criminal
easess, which ware to be tried in the counties
<1p. 396, * (tip. 636. Ibid.
of th Lam of Georgia*, upra.
B>p. *S7. Hid.
(tip. 595, ibid.
Wj>. 638. luld.
where the crimes were committed; of all casos respecting titles to land; of appellate juris diction by certlorarl of all Inferior Judlcatorlea, as well aa of errors In the Superior Court; of appellate Jurisdiction In such other oases as might be provided by law; and authority *to Issus writs of mandamus, prohibition, aclra facias, and all other writs which may be neces sary for carrying their powers fully Into ef fect.* In cases of application for new trials or correction of errors, the Judges were re quired to enter their opinions on the minutes of the court. An Act of February 16, 1799,M gave the Superior Court equity Jurisdiction.
Divorces were formerly granted by the legis lature, but under this Constitution they could not be granted by the legislature 'until the parties shall have had a fair trial before the Superior Court, and a verdict shall have been obtained authorizing a divorce upon legal prin ciples. And In such cases, two -thirds of each branch of the legislature may pasa acts of di vorce accordingly." On Deceaber 22, 18^9, the Constitution was amended to allow divorces by the Superior Court' on two concurrent verdicts of Juries.
The Inferior Courts were given Jurisdiction of "all other civil cases', but the legislature might, by two-thirds vote of each branch, 'give concurrent Jurisdiction to the superior courts." The powers of a court of ordinary were vested In the Inferior Courts, with the fight of appeal to the Superior Court, and any one or more of then could grant temporary lettere of administration until the next meeting of said court.* The Clerk could Issue marriage licenses. An Act of February 16, 1799V* made Inferior Courts courts of record, and regulated proceedings therein for the probate of wills and the adalnlstratlon of estates of deceased persons.
Amendments to the Cbnatltutlon In 1812 and
10 p. 70S. Hid. (71 p. 691, Ujid.
1819 vested concurrent Jurisdiction In the Supe rior and Inferior Courts of all civil cases ex cept those Involving titles to land, and nade the Judgea of the Inferior Courts elective by the people. An Act of Deceiver 20, 1823, pro hibited Inferior Court Judges, less than a ma jority, from discharging or admitting prisoners to ball. Acts of 1S*3 and 184-7 vested concur rent Jurisdiction In the Superior and Inferior Courts to grant charters to churches and other eleemosynary Institutions, and. to business and manufacturing concerns.
An amendment to the Constitution on December 5, 1S51, provided that "the powers of a court of ordinary or register of probates shall be vested in an ordinary for each county, from whose de cisions there may be an appeal to the Superior Court, under such restrictions and regulations as may be, or may have been, prescribed by law.*
An Act of February 16, ITS?'" provided for an annual convention of the superior court Judges, at the seat of government on the second Monday in January, for the purpose of passing rules for the courts, and 'for determining on such polnta as may be reserved for argument, and which may require an uniform decision, and to give their opinions on all constitutional questions which nay be referred to them by the executive depart ment.'
That Act constituted a statutory form of appeal to the Judges of the State in convention aseaabled, on "such points as may be reserved for argument*; but it was repealed by an Act of December 5, 1801, and "all points reserved for argument and now awaiting a decision at the seat of government* were directed to be *sent back to the respective counties from whence they have been sent, and there decided by the presiding Judge.
In his preface to a volume of decision* rendered In the superior courts of the Eastern District, published in 182^. referring to the ""ibid.
requirement that superior court judges enter upon the Minutes of the court their opinions la applloatlone for new trial and the correction of errors, Judge Thomas D. p. charlton said:
Decisions, therefore, upon questions of the first Importance are left to float upon the memories of the gentlemen of the bar, whose recollections can be of no authority; and hence the conflicting adjudications, which are thus represent ed of the different Judges of this dis trict, and I presuae of the other dis tricts. It Is not surprising, therefore, that such scanty materials should be found for a volume of reports, or that thle effort of mine should be the 'coup d'easal. 1 In our equity practice, *e have the same difficulties to contend with. The Judge of the superior courts (the highest tribunal of the State) is also chancellor." A proposed amendment to the Constitution, confirmed December 22, 1835? provided for a su preme court for the correction of errors, to consist of three Judges to be elected by tost legislature for such terms as might be pre scribed by la*. However, for ten years the leg islature refused to carry that amendment Into effect and provide for the organization of a su preme court. In the meantime, other volumes of superior court decisions were published. In the preface to a volume of these decisions published la 1838 by Judge Robert V. Charlton, son of Judge Thomas U. P. Charlton, referring to the authority of a superior court Judge, the publisher said: This legal Hercules Is the ultima apes of the desponding suitor--the ne plus ultra of the zealous lawyer. His flat is conclusive. There exists no tribunal that can correct his errors or change his decrees. "The Constitution, does not require him to assign written reasons for his judg ments, save on motions for nev trial, but the practice in our circuit (par ticularly of late years! has been to give written opinions In all matters to which deliberate Investigation has been bestowed. The Constitution of the State (as amended a few year* ago} declares that there shall he a 'supreme court for the correction of errore', but the legisla ture of Georgia ha* hitherto disregarded the solemn mandate, and refused to or ganize such a tribunal.* On December 10, 1B45J" the legislature put
(Dp. 49, Act* of 1835. Wj>. IS, Jeta of IMS.
Into affect the oontltutlonl anenojwnt of De cember 22, 1SJ5, and provided for the organiza tion of the Supreme Court, with three Judges to be elected at that session of the General Assem bly, and commissioned by the Governor within twenty days after eleotlon. THE CONSTITUTION OT 1861: Tho Constitution of 1861 provided that the Judicial power* of thle State ahall bo vested In a supreme court for the correction of errors In law and equity from the superior. Inferior, ordinary and Justices courts, and In such other courts aa hare Dean, or nay be, established by law." Tft Supreme Court consisted of three judges, to be appointed by the Governor, with the adrlce and consent of two.thirds of the Senate, for such terns aa might be prescribed by law, "removable by the Governor en the address of two-thirds of each branch of the General Assembly, or by Impeach ment and conviction thereon."
Judges of the Superior Court were appointed In til* daiaa Banner aa Judges of tt> Supreme Court from the circuits they were to serve, for terms of four yeare. That court bad exclusive Jurisdiction of divorce cases (total divorces to be granted only on two concurrent verdicts of Juries); of criminal cases, except as relates to persons cf color, and minor offenses by free white persons; of cases respecting titles to land, to be tried In the county where the land lies; and of equity cases. It had appellate jurisdiction of such oases as might be provided by law; power to correct errors In Inferior JuAlcatorlts by writs of certlorarl; to grant new trials In the superior oourt; to Issus writs of mandamus, prohibition, sclre facias: and all other writs necessary to carry Its powers Into effect.
The Superior and Inferior Courts were given concurrent Jurisdiction la all other civil causes, each to sit twice yearly in each county. The Justices of the Inferior courts and justices of the poace were elected by the people.
The powers of a oourt of ordinary and probats were vested In an ordinary for eacn county, elected by the people for terms of four years. The right of appeal from this court lay to the Superior Court. THE CONSTITUTION Of 1865: The Judicial system under the Constitution of 1665 was substantially the same aa under the Constitution of 1861. The Supreme Court Judges ware elected by the General Assembly for such tsrma of years - not less than six - aa should be preacrlbed by law, for the correction of errors of law and equity from the Superior Courts, and from the cl;y courts of Savannah and Augusta, and such other like courts as might be thereafter established In other cit ies. There were two terns of the oourt yearly, and all caaes were required to be disposed of at the first or second term.
The judge* of the Superior Courts were mode elective by the people, for terms of four years, vacancies to be filled as provided "by the laws of force prior to January 1, 1861," The Jurlsdlotlonal provision In the Constitution of ISfil relating to persons of color was omitted. There were no substantial changes In the Constitution and jurisdiction of the other courts. THE CONSTITUTION OP 1S6S: The Constitution of 1868 vested the judicial powers of the state "in a supreme court, superior courts, courts of or dinary. Justices of the peace, commissioned no taries public, and such other courts* as had been or might be established by law. Judges of the Supreme Court were appointed by the Govern or, with the consent of the Senate, for terms of twelve years. Their jurisdiction was the sane as prescribed under the Constitution of 1865. Judges of the Superior Court were ap pointed in the same manner as supreme court Judges, for terms of eight years. Their Juris diction was substantially the same aa under the previous constitution. The General Assembly was authorized to merge the common law and equity Jurisdiction In the same court. Inferior courts
98 -
war* abolished, their business to be transferred to such tribunals as the legislature should direct. Justices courts were continued, with Jurisdiction in civil oases not exceeding one hundred dollars. If the amount Involved were more than fifty dollars, an appeal ley to the Superior Court.
Until otherwise provided, a district oourt was established for each senatorial district to sit In each county of the district not leas than once a month with authority to try criminal cases less than capital on written accusation founded on affidavit without a Jury, unless de manded by the defendant when the jury should consist of seven; and with such oivil Juris diction as alght be conferred upon It by the General Assembly. Or Aot of October 28, 18701 district courts were established and their Jurisdiction defined; but that Act was repealed over the Qovernor's veto by Act of December 7, 187lf THE CONSTITUTION OF 1877: The Constitution of 1877 continued the Judicial system of the State substantially as it had existed under the Con stitution of 1868. The terns of supreme oourt justices (so-called under this Constitution) wera reduced to six years, and those of superior court Judges to four years. The provision for district courts was omitted. The General Assem bly was authorized to confer upon the courts of common law the powers previously exercised by courts of equity, which was done by the uniform procedure act of October Z, 1SS7?' That had not been done under the authority of the Consti tution of 1868. Total divorces required two verdicts of Juries at different tens of the oourt.
The legislature of 1887*'and ot 199}',^ pro posed amendments to the Constitution Increasing the number of Justices of the Supre&e Court from.
three to five. The proposal of 1SS7 failed of
ratification.'
In his resignation of the office ot Chief
Justice, tendered to the Governor October 13,
189^, Chief Justice Logan E. Blecfcley declared
that the bueinesa of the Supreae Court **<\ be
come too heavy to be adequately handled sad dis
posed of by three Justices, and added: 'The fact
has also been twice recognized $y toe General
Assembly, and a constitutional amendment to in
crease the number from three to five has been
twice proposed and submitted to the people for
ratification,* h3 'have twice rejected the
amendment by a decisive vote against it.*
On December 16, 1895, the Qeneral Assembly
proposed an amendment to the Constitution in
creasing the number of supreme court Justices
from three to six, the Justices to be elected by
the people. The Act of proposal directed that
those voting for the amendment should have
printed on their ballots the words, 'For Supreae
Court Amendment*; ajv\ those voting against It,
the words, "Against Supreme Court Amendment.'
A* thus submitted the proposed amendment was
ratified by the people at the general election
of October 7, 1895. An Act of December 17,
1856,
provided
tor
the
reorganization
of
the
Su
preme Court In accordance with that amendment.
By amendment to the Constitution, proposed
In lS97i"and ratified at the general election of
October 5, 189S, Judges of the Superior Court
were to be elected by the people.
On July 31, 1906,w the General Assembly pro
posed an amendment to the Constitution creating
ADIBCR'S JIOTBj A note to Section 2-1001, Code of 1935, am a pnqiblat in the Ststft Library dealing ^.tb Constitutional JLaandaants, state that there is Do record of the submission of the propose! of 1893 to the people* Sut the report a? a Bouse Coamitteo of 1894, dealing with another proposal of the saao kiad, saldt *As this question has only recently been so.ted.tted to the people
it is deemed advisable sot to imidlxtely resubait the
S*B question*" i
( P. !Z, Act. of 1870. <r. 68, Acts of 1671-72. a t>. 64, let. of 1887.
tUp. 25. ibid. (fWp. 17, lots of 1893.
(a p. 12, Acts ol' 1B96. (t) p. 16, Acts of 1897. l p. 2*. Acts of 1906. M PP. 375-376, Hsuse Journals. 18M.
the Court of Appeals, with three judges. The proposal was :?atlflad at the general election of Ootober 3, 1906, and Its first Judges were eleoted November 6, 1906. The amendment defined the class of oasee appealable to the Supreme Court and to the Court of Appeals and author ized the Court of Appeals to certify question* of law to the Supreme Court for instructions, which instructions when given are binding on the Court of Appeals. An amendment of August 19, 1916, Increased the number of Judge from three to six.
In 1912TM the General Assembly proposed an amendment to the Constitution authorising the abolition of justices' courts In certain cities, which was ratified at the general election of October 2, 1912. That provision has been broad ened by subsequent amendments ratified on No vember T>, 191"V, Noveaber 6, 1918, November 6, 1928, and November S, 1932.
By virtue of those amendments to the Consti tution, municipal courts have been established In Atlanta, Augusta, Columbus, Hacon, and Savannah, with five judges of the Municipal Court of Atlanta (Fulton Division), and one for the Municipal Court of Atlanta (OeXalb Di vision) ; tbJ?ee judges for the Municipal Court of Savannah; and one Judge each for the Municipal Courte of Macon r Augusta, and Columbus. These courts are not of uniform Jurisdiction. CONCLUSION: The slople Judicial system with which the Colony of Oaorgla was projected In 1773 has developed In two hundred year* Into the State's present broad and complicated system.
For the correction of errors, the State has the Supremo Court with six Justices, and the Court of Appeals with six Judges sitting in two divisions. There are 181 published volumes of Supreae Court decisions, and 51 volumes of Court of Appeals deolelone, and each set la increas ing at the rate of about two yearly.
There are 39 superior court Judgee in the
"p. SO, Acts of 1912.
State presiding over the superior courts of Its 159 counties; and there are 64 olty court judges, presiding over as many olty courts, with Jurisdiction of various amounts and with dif ferent rules of practice.
An Act of January 19, 1*72TM subsequently amended, provides for the creation of county courts upon ths recommendation of the grand Jury, eicept in Walton County and those counties having a olty court or county court then ex isting. These courts have common law Jurisdic tion of oases of contract and tort, where the principal SUB claimed does -not exceed five hun dred dollars, and of misdemeanors. Where the principal SUB claimed exceed* fifty dollars, the right of appeal to the Superior Court exists. There are a number of these courts In the State.
There is a Court of Ordinary in each county of the State exercising Jurisdiction of estates of deceased persons, minors and lunatics, with other statutory authority.
In each militia district of the State there IB a Justice's court and a Notary Public, *xofflolo Justice's court; the justices of toe peace being eleoted by the people of their re spective districts; and the Notaries Public, ex- offlolo jUBtloss of the peaoe, being appointed by the Judgee of the superior courts on nomi nation of the grand Jury.
Other statutory courts have been established with varied Jurisdiction for the trial of civil and misdemeanor oases. The Criminal Court of rulton County is a type of these courts. It trie* misdemeanor oasee only, and Is assisted by the Judges of the Municipal Court of Atlanta. Other oourts of the kind have both civil and criminal Jurisdiction.
A radical departure from the former method of handling certain classes of personal injury cases may be found in the Act of August 17, 1920, known as the Oeorgla Workmen's Compensa tion Act. That Aot was benevolent in purpose,
Wp. 288, ict> of 1871-72
- 9*-
and not only created a special oourt for the easy and speedy adjudication of personal Injury cases by employees agalnet employers, but bad as Its purpose tha establishment of a more human itarian rule of decision In such cases. Under It the amounts recoverable In some cases may not be as large as night otherwise have been pos sible, yet recovery may be had under circum stances which would not have been possible under the general law.
For 175 years no legislative policy was In augurated In Georgia looking toward the rehabil itation of the character of persons charged with crime. Such cases were not viewed as social problems, to be dealt with aa such. Persona convicted of crime were regarded as a menace to society, to be punished for their crimes, that they themselves, as well as others by their ex ample, might be deterred from committing crimes In the future. Hence, long terms of punish ment - longer than are now deemed necessary were the rule.
On September k, 1906,'" the legislature es(U p. 1107, Acts of 1908.
tabllshad children's courts as branches or the supsrlop courts* But on August 14-, 1915" the supreme oourt held that Act to be unconstitu tional. Subsequently, the legislature passed the Acts of August 16, 191;, and of August 19, 1916, which provided for Juvenile courts In each county of the State, with Jurisdiction over de linquent children under sixteen years of age.
Juvenile Courts have been established under these Acts, the larger counties having salaried Judges and paid probation officers. Thoa courts are doing the aost constructive work of any In the State. That of Fulton Jounty alone handles 200 eases monthly.
In 1913, ISO ysars after the founding of the Colony, the, legislature provided for the pro bation of adult offendersTM In pursuance of that Act, the larger oountles have established adult probation offices, with salaried officers; and In the smaller counties the courts are probating offenders to the care of Individuals who are willing to assume that obligation without pay.
ml Ca 822. Urn -n IfeCord. tup. 112. Aetm at 191%.
- 95 -
Chapter 31 EXPENSE OF THE GEORGIA COURT SYSTEM
Among the moat pertinent questions raised by mads by law. For Inferior courts, the number Is
a tax payer regarding any function of government relatively small, but for Superior Court opera
are the efficiency of Its operation and the cost tions, to the above named essential officers,
to him. Preceding ohapters have detailed the there must be added bailiffs, grand Jurors,
operation of the criminal courte, and ID this petit Jurors, and a reporter, as well as wit
chapter, effort will be made to disease Tital nesses for the State, and usually, tales Jurors.
features affecting the coet of the preeent sys It Is quits likely, therefore, at any session of
tem. The criminal courts of Georgia' are main the Superior Court, that more than fifty persons
tained by revenues fron the State treasury, from will have to bs paid for services therein, and
county treasuries, and from direct fees and as* often this number will be greatly augmented for
ssesed oosts paid by those convicted In the the trial of an Important case.
courts. Although effort has been1 made to reward
The only trial court officers which univer
each official In proportion to the value of ser sally receive salaries from the state treasury
vice which he renders, there Is a wide variation are Judges and solicitors general of the Superi
throughout the State In the amounts paid for or Court.'0 In the county and city courts, the
similar service. Some officers are paid sal local governments pay such officers as are oa
aries by the State, others receive payment from the county, and the large majority receive re
ealaryP while, for the Court of Appeals and Suprams Court, all costs are borne by the Stateu,)
muneration on a fee basis. Duo to the fact that and courts of Inquiry are supported by fees
no compilation of these costs Is made annually, alone.'" Provision Is nade In the Code for Supe
and that so few counties handle the expenditures rior court Judges to receive $5,000 froa the
for the Judicial system In the same manner, It State, but In some of the larger counties, this
Is Impossible to determine with any dagree of salary Is supplemented by an additional amount
accuracy the actual oosts of the oourta to the froa the county treasury (ses Appendix , Exhib
people of Georgia. The purpose of this chapter it 5)* The result Is that not even Judges of
Is, therefore, to give an epitome of some of the the Superior Court receive uniform remuneration.
Items of expenditure for which direct provision
There la an even wider variation among the
Is Bade In the Code, and from which It may be Judges of the Inferior courts where the range
possible to estimate the coet of a specific Is from $600 to 19,000? It Is true that aeager
court In a given locality, rather than an at- emoluments are paid In the smaller counties,
tvmpt to arrive at the actual cost of orlaa to while full tlie Judges In the populous counties
the State.
receive salaries somewhat commensurate with that
For the operation of each criminal court of of ths Judges of the Superior Court, but such
trial grade, It Is necessary to have a Judge, a does not account In full for the salary differ
prosecutor, a clerk, and an executive officer. encea. Some salaries wers set by the General
These four constitute the irreducible <r>i"^ Assembly and some by the governing bodies of the
but only rarely can trial court function with several counties, and no effort has been made to
suoh a skeleton staff. When court Is opened, usually all officials call for suoh assistant! as may be neaessary and for which provision 1*
to SK*. 3-*001;3t-2606;a*-390t 3fu Cod* 1933. (71 SM Vvlou Act* Crmtlne Cltjr Courts. IS Sc. 2*-i005;E4-3503 Dm. Cod* 19.13.
jo sc. a*-i6oi ibid.
(51 Se TariOM _ct Creating City Oowti.
- 97 -
establish uniformity. Th came practices exist In regard to the
prosecuting officers In the city, county, and superior courts, even though in the latter court an annual ee.lary of 4250 Is proTldad froa the State treasury!" This amount Is supplemented by fees paid by the State If It becomes necessary for a case1 to be litigated In the appellate oourts."' Solicitors In the city court are paid either from the county treasuries or on a fee basis. When this latter is the case, the sane fees are paid them as are proTlded by law for the solicitor general (prosecutor of the Superi or Court);31 In many circuits, It has bean found adTleable to place that officer on salary and have the fees otherwise due bin paid Into the county treasury, but even then, the salaries hare not been uniform. It Is customary where a change from fees to salaries has been Bade that each county of the circuit contribute a prede termined amount to the salary of the solicitor general, but that amount has not always been In proportion to the time and services rendered the several counties of the circuit. The number of those on salary has bean Increased until now alBoat one-half of them are paid by this method.
Fees for this office vary with the duty per formed. For every prosecution of a capital offense, a solicitor general Is entitled to a fee of 150.00; for tbe prosecution of any other fel ony or of the charge of gaining, to the point of trial or to a plea of guilty, ha may receive a fee of (25.00. An exception to this la made In the case of an Indictment for 'assault with In tent to murder1 and conviction of "assault and. battery* o_- "simple assault*, in which case the fee is $5.00. An equal fee Is allowed for the prosecution of all other cases to trial or to plea of guilty. In addition, the solicitor gen eral may collect 85-00 for each Indictment or presentment made by the grand Jury, eren though 01 See Yarlout Actt Creating City Courts.
( Soc. 34-J90S Iblo. (SI Set Yaricxu Actt Creating City Courtt.
the oaee may be later nol pressed, which event entitles him to a fee of twenty-five cents.*"
The difference in the fee allowed for a fel ony charge and a misdemeanor charge has given rise to a criticism that some solicitors have attempted to obtain felony Indictments regard less of the gravity of the offenae Involved. The special treatment given by the legislature to charges of "assault with Intent to murder1 , which are reduced upon trial to misdemeanor crlmea, may have been adopted to curb such prac tices If they aver existed. In the counties studied, there were 6,130 charges of assault with Intent to aur<ter. In which 3,791 came to trial. Convictions of the crime charged result ed in 1,065 oases, and conviction of 'assault and battery* or of a misdemeanor resulted In 1,822 oases. The percentage given misdemeanor punishment Is such greater than the average for all crimes ai shown by Appendix F, Table 21 (table of felony punlahaentaO .
Most of the olerks of the Superior Court are compensated by fees, but a few receive salaries
(w which vary froa (2,UOO to $9,000 per year. As In the oaae of the solicitor general, when the clerk la paid a salary, fees which would other wise aoorue to him are paid into the general fund* of the countyju The feea to which a clerk Is entitled in a criminal case total $6.00 for each caae brought to trial, to plea of guilty, or to settlement; (3.00 for each case in which a nol proa is entered; and fifteen cents per hun dred words of transcribed evidence;1 In counties having a population of less than 50,000, the olerk 1 entitled to 5-OO for each day'a at tendance, at court.'" except In the large city
counties, the olerks of the Superior Court are usually ex-offlolo clerks of the city or county oourts, but where the two officers are separated and the olerk of the Superior Court receives a
( Sec. 24-2904 Ibid. (3) See Various Acts Relating to County officers* < ibid. (I)SM. 84-2727 0*. Code 1933. <8>*0. 34-2238 Ibid,
alary, *b* corresponding officer at the Inferi or court la generally paid a oogmenaurate sal ary. The fees in the Inferior courts are the Base as In the Superior Court for the clerk, as well ae for the solicitor .t"
Except In the larger counties, the sheriff la usually a fee paid officer, with one or two
exceptions, he serves all the trial courts of his county, and when on salary, the double duty Is taken Into consideration. Due to the dif ference In law enforcement problems within the several larger counties, no uniformity of sal aries exists for the sheriff or bis Holer-depu ties. The fees, however, are uniform throughout the State, and In criminal cases are: 5"
Renoving prisoner tben habeas corpus is sought for his release. ................. $1.25 '
Renewing prisoner Under hcbefts corpus* ivften no mileage is paid ................. 2.iX>
Personal services rendered out of the county on authorised official business* per day. . . .... 3.50
Attending person tafcan b;' -msrrant to judge's chaaber for each tir.c. .............. 1.2S
Conducting prisoner before Judge or court to and Iron jail. .................. 1.25
Executing and returning a bench warrant ....... 3.00 Apprehending a person suspected, if cojrittc<?
or hold to bnil ...".-............ 3.00 Each porsona not exceeding two, who may be on*-
ployed to guard a prisoner to and from Jail, per day ..................... 1.50 Summoning each -itness ............... .50 Taking bonds in criminal case::. ........... 2.00 acecuting a crtcinal ........".I... I .! 10.00 SSeeuting a warrant of cscano ............ 1*99 Services in every criicinal case before ft jud^o or A jud<;o and jury ................. 2.00
In addition to his duties as executive of ficer of the court, the sheriff Is generally jailor of his county.19 In this office, he re ceives a turnkey fee of sixty cents for admis sion, release, or conducting a prisoner before the court, as well as monies for feeding prison ers, which are set by the governing body of the county and paid froa Its general fund.^
Attached to each Superior Court 1 a report er, who, for counties where the court Is In con stant session. Is paid a salary,19 and for the other counties, receives feea from the county treasury upon order of the Judge of the court.
For ths trial courts, Juries are provided and serve such times as called for by lie Judge. In the city court, the muter of Jurors necessa ry to constitute a trial panel varies with the specific court and may be as few as five or as great as twelve."1 The trial panel In tna- super ior Court varies with the type of cases, *W5 Jur ors being allowed for felony cases, and only 3k for misdemeanors. If, for any reason, the nuaber of Jurors on the trial panel Is reduced be low the necessary size, the Judge may order the sheriff to supplement the par-el by tales Jurors. These ara summoned for a special case, ar.d serve through an emergency. Each Juror is paid a per dlea for service he readers which aay consist of either merely reporting ready for duty or IE hearing numerous cases.
In the city court, except for soie of the larger centers, a Jury Is not convened until after one has been demanded In the trial of a case, while In the Superior Court, both the trial Jury and the grand Jury report at the cpenlng of the session. The trial Jury will like ly renaln until court Is dismissed, and for the courts constantly In session, it zeans that a Jury panel Is always resdy.' The grand Jury, consisting of from IS to 2J members, may com plete Its business after a day or two and re cess, or It may continue In session Bare or l constantly.'"' Records In rural counties Indicated many grand Juries were excused after serving only two days of a session. It Is customary to have a bailiff to serve each Jury. In the rural counties, this officer receives the Base per diem as the Jurors, which Is either $2.00 or t3.00, as determined by the governing body of t..he count^y. on
It Is customary In this State that witnesses residing In the county where the court J held shall not be paid, but remuneration Is provided
"> Set Trlou icta Oraati.-^ City Court*.
Sec- 24-2823 On. Cod 1933. Msec. 77-10.1 ibid. (4) Sec. 24-2823 ibid. >Se Various Acts Creating City Courts.
. 24-310* Oa. Cod* 1932.
n See 7arlou> lets Creating City Courts. B> Sees. 59-801:53-708 Qa. Coda 19C3. Sec. 59-204 ibid. o>Sec. 59-202 Ibid. (">Sre. 24-3202 Ibid.
- 99 -
for those residing elsewhere. A small mileage allowance no-; exceeding four cents per mile to and from their homes to court Is granted, In ad dition to tile maximum per diem of $2.001" The courts have Inherent authority to grant fees to expert witnesses where such testimony is neces sary for adequate presentation of the case for the State.
Payment for witnesses, Jurors, court report ers, and sums for feeding prisoners, come from the general fund of the county and all other fees are theoretically assessed upon the defend ant. If he la convictedTM If the defendant la acquitted, or a sentence given which does not Include the cost, the fees are classed as Insol vent and car. be collected from the Insolvent fund of the countyTM Where costs are assessed as part of the sentence, the defendant Is supposed to pay them to the clerk of the court who dis burses the monies to the officers entitled to them. Where a fine Is assessed. It Is also col lected by the clerk and Is placed In the Insol vent fundjf which accumulates, In theory, from the excess of fines and forfeitures over fees vhloh encumber It. Actually, payment of coste in State courts la relatively rare and most costs beoomi Insolvent. Due to this. It not In frequently occurs that the amount of the Insol vent fund Is Insufficient to pay all the fees which are due the various court officers. When this happens, the fund Is disbursed In the same ratio as the fees of each offloer bear to the total owing.
The foregoing makes It evident that aacer* talnment of the total costs of operating courts or the coat of an average case Is a virtual Im possibility. This cost varies from county to county to such a degree that it is doubtful If a true figure can ever be reached for the system now In practice In this State. It is possible,
.0 Sec*. 38-1902:38-1905 Ibid. & tat*: 27-2301 1M4. 13) Sue, 27-2903 ibid. (>Sec. 27-2902 Ibid.
however, to a certain extent, to determine the
minimum ooat of a felony or a misdemeanor case
by the use of the amount of fees allowed the
several officials for various steps of the pros
ecution of the case for whloh a jury Is not la-
panelled. For example, the first steps In a
criminal case are the Issuing of a warrant, the
arrest, and the aommltaent hearing. If as many
as three witnesses have been examined, the fees
due the Juatloe of the peace are t3-75 and to
the constable *2.00, caking a total of 15.7!;"
If the case Is a misdemeanor charge and is bound
over to a city court where all officers are on
fees, ths following sums will bs due to the sev
eral officials for the service Indicated:'"
Tne Solicitor. Drawing the peculation ...... 35.00 Carrying the cue to trial or to plea of guilty .......... 5.00
Tha Clarlc of tha Court* Writing up a cue brought to trial or plot ot guilty 6*00
Tha Sheriff t Conducting tha prisoner bafora court 1*25 Suzmonlng threea vitnaasas ..... 1.50 Sarrioaa baforo the judge. ..... 2.00 !* Jailor i Tumksy fee ...... 1.20
Total before tna court. .............. 21.9S Court of inquiiy Costa. ............. S.75
GRUJE TOTAL . . $27.70
Bad the case been tried Is the Superior
Court, the cost would have been the same, ex
cept that the accused would have probably given
ball for which the sheriff would have been en
titled to an additional $2.00 fee.m Had the case
been a felony, the cost In the Superior Court
would have been Increased, due to a difference
In the solicitor's fee, to ft9.70 for an ordi
nary felony and (74.70 for a capital felony."
It must bs remembered that these figures are
ths absolute minimum and do not Include the cost
to the county for services of the grand Jury In
returning the Indictment, if the oaae were in
the Superior Court; nor the oost of the petit
jury If the case were tried before one. Neither
does it Include the cost of the state's witness,
nor the proportionate salary of the Judge and
per dlea of bailiffs, the cost to the State for
the Oeneral Assembly In legislating
(e) Anti So. 24-820 ibUU~ " ~~~
to Auto.
IT) So. 24-2823 ibid.
(jmta.
criminal
- 100 -
lam, nor any of the Indlreot expenses of % criminal ease auoh maintenance of the Jail and feeding the prisoners, the proportionate nalntananoe oot of the court house and other buildings connected therewith, depreciation on such property, and miscellaneous expenses such a* booke, dockets, papers, forms, et cetera. There la absolutely no way of apportioning the cost of these Items to an Ir.dlTldual caae; nor la there any workable method whereby eren the total of such expenditures can be estimated.
For the year 1935, one of the larger eountlee of the State paid from the county treasury 198,813.57 for the tangible charges easily aacertalnable for the criminal dlTlelon of Ita city and Superior Courts. The figure Included cost of the following officers, and no other:
the solicitor, clerk, sheriff, county police. Juries, witnesses, city court Judge, and the feed of prisoners; and represents a total cost of 1.20 for every man, woman, and child In that county. This figure nay or may not be a fair sample for the State, but If It be taken a* such, than, for the State of Georgia In 1935, nearly three and a half million dollars was spent for those tangible Items of the cost of the criminal courts of trial grade. If It were possible to obtain and aid to this figure the Indirect coats heretofore mentioned, plus the coat of the criminal side of the appellate court, and the crime detection axd law enforceaent agencies, exposition would be naie of the toll taken by crime which would be profoundly startling.
- 101 -
CONCLUDING STATEMENT
the Surrey of Criminal Court Procedure In Osorgla was de signed to study the oases passing through the court system of tba Stats. Thai* who Instigated and conducted the urrej felt that reooBMDdatlona and auggeetlona for Improreaent of the orlBlnal ooorts and their procedure aa not vlthln the oope of the stud;. Reform* Bay be needed, or it may be that any defeats vhloa exlet are Inherent In the undertaking of a state to deal with crime and, therefore, can not be elimi nated, it Is felt, however, that the findings of this surrey will furnish material to the proper authorities by i*lah they oan Judge whether the workings of the saehlnery hare taen successful, upon this declelon rests the question of whether or not there Is need for reTlalon of the courts' structure.
.103-
APPENDIXES
APPENDIX A
Qchibit 1 ^Schedule used far infomation from tbo alierirf'a office)
County.
Kite Comitted_ letta ela*ed_ Charge______ Mlled B)f____ Mlted Bjr___
. Stite T_
_3xt Val.> O Pa-na-leO ?.-A. O _________, frootm on which cnKilittd_ ___________PTOCB on which roloaaad_ ________________________Tims in IB;
r>M: KblteQ
BlMk O >: -- O
BcUblt 2 (Sohedulai used for information fn t!.tri*l oourta)
Superior Court - Sch*aul 2
vitb_
for
Fl.* f Qullty O
** Guilty O &*______
of Vmn To
DiBpoitlonj
Dootait O
oll PTOseijui Q
ProbtiOtt SorofcadQ
. Attcraay
yardict;
O
ProoRtionQ
Sui^enB
holentod on Dteand for ?ril Q
Susponsloa
?.BpreBitc*d
i**y O 'J
Tle b*twi docketing ud tril _______ County Wortwr________________ Dta_
_T3zie bo^nreon plea and sentoaca _ ____ -4itor_____________
Cnunfcy caae vuvbar ,
murt State va
Ctty Court - Schedule 2a
t'ontA
Vaar
Attorntfy O
}7ot Repreaontod O
Plea.= COUty Q lot Ouilty Q
"ate , ,
Tried Byt J>id O
Jury O
Tatf
Diapoaittonj
Defendant*
Cocvleted Q
Acquitted O
Uimiaeed Q
Caae, conplirtodO Appealed Q Pending Q Suapenaion Q Releaaad upon IM>and for Trial O
ProbationO Bead DoototO U-a Proaoqui O
Date
fiantanae
Tat*
___,lca
Tlaa between dockatlr^ and dlapnaal
county Vorkar
Data
Editor
!*.
- 107-
Charge--_--------------------------.
Date Bill of Eiceptiona Piled.
Dispoaitioni Affiraed Q
Certiorarl O
Date
Schedule Filled rjj______
Edited Bit____________
perersed O
County--
, Date of Decision.
Remanded for Km Trial
Appellate Court* - Schedule 3
Eihitit 4
Prison Commission Schedule 4
Raoordt *ui Disposition ot Felony Sentence*
Color Sex
Eaoape Recapture
HUM
1! H " 1> ^ r.te Date
Crime
County of Conviction
Sentence
Kin.
Mcc.
Date T?oelTd Discharged Pardoned
DISPOSITIOK Comitei Parollwl Died
(Date) I&sw
Other
- 108 -
APPENDIX 6
FKLOHS fnrmrpn ro TEE CEOfftIA By Aces of Aibsivsian 1. 1S26 - DeoBbor SI, 19S5
Age.
11 12 IS
14 15 16
17 18 19
20 21 22
23 24 25
26 27 28
29 SO 31
32 33 34
35 38 37
38 39 40
41 42 43
44 45 46
47 48 49
Totl
1 8 14
59 131 445
834 1.069 1.291
1.181 1.170 1.207
1.061 863 779
723 617 633
507 475 291
352 307 269
S60 196 182
232 240 221
99 138 118
72 127 70
74 74 86
lkl Ihite Kej
1
--
5
2 12
5 50 20 99 91 339
237 573
294 754 427 822
38i 784
3S5 785 349 830
318 71O 298 534 202 500
230 471 208 391
233 385
178 314 166 294 133 152
105 240 119 174 133 132
110 237 79 109 84 93
13 132 96 139 67 147
47 52 81 57 46 68
30 42 42 80 34 35
40 34
28 44 S3 52
ramie* mte Nogro
_
--
^
1
-
-
--
4
1 11
2 13
3 21 17
9 33
1 35
3 27 2 28
4 29
5 26 1 16
3 19 2 IS 1 14
5 10
3 14
i
4
_ 3
n7
1
3
5
8
3
5
3
2
1
6
2
3
2
5
_
^
_
_
1
1
_
_
2
3
1
-
--
_
1
1
-
1
Sourcei fiaeorda of the Frlaoa f>-TM~ft_irtF* em
Total
50
92
51
45
52
85
53
54
53
55
52
56
52
57
39
58
28
59
26
60
40
61
24
23
63
26
64
IS
65
22
68
9
67
8
69
11
70
7
71
3
72
4
73
74 75 78
77 78 79
31 82
64 85 66 98
TOTAL
17,336
39 0 2O 25
30 55
23
45
19 34
19 33
25 27
12
26
12
14
8
18
20
20
10
14
15
3
11 14
4 11
9 IS
7
2
4
2
6
2
6
5
2
5
2
1
1
3
5.767 11,095
31 393
- 109 -
7HUOB J1IUSD By Cvimtm or WhloB Aeeaead1
9 oeorgle. Coimtlea Jamiarj 1, 1*26 - Dn_tr 51, 1055
CRIVIftAL HOUCID13 Murder Involuntary manslaughter Voluntary :lanslaugbter
Total li 394 2! 077
209 112
CfUmHAL A99AULT9 Assault with Intent to larder Shooting at Another Stabbing mayhem Assault anl Battery wife Beating Pointing Pistol at Another Assault, simple
13,154 4,414
879 2,040
23 4,957 1,302
322
CIRRTISO BEADIT lEAPOIS
4,403
OPERATID3 AUTC KRILZ DRtTWI
6,443
DISTUSBA1ICZ3 CF HJBLIC PKACt Vagrancy Eobolng Malicious Klscblef Other Disturbances
12,683 6,140
ilsai
513 916
ROBBBtr
2,866
BBROLAHY
8,273
LARCZKIKS Larceny o: Automobile Larceny from House Laroeny from Person Larceny or Live stock Eabuilannt Larceny After Trust Larceny of Chickens Larceny of Bicycle Larceny, simple Larceny of Cotton Other Larcenies Attempt larceny Cheating and Swindling Defraudlig Board Bill Passing lorthless Checks Larceny Irom Automobile
F:RGERY
32,273 3,820 6.730 311 497 115 2,191 415 137 4,225 92 7,755 132
156
741ia?
1,142
SCK-S3MORT Baatardy Abandonment
4,146 1,340 C.B06
SEX CRIKES Rape Aassult itlth Intent to Rape Seduction Adultery and Fornication Public Indecency Sodomy ead 3eatlallty Incest Operating Lewd House
.,505
44G 293 2,550 233 163
10 216
GJUBLIVJ Lottery Other Types of Gambling
6, CM 5,038
VIOLATION HCTOB VEHICLE LA*
2,665
VIOLATIC FtOBIBITIOH LAW Posaaeslng Liquor Selling Liquor Manufacturing Liquor Other Violations
43,739 5,242 40? 854 36,241
XIS3ELLAHZOUS CRIMES
28,641
Arson
197
Bigamy
166
Bribery
36
Perjury
253
Rioting
166
Felony
4,394
Isdsmeiinor, sCsoellexeous
1,446
mledemeiinor, blanket ebsrg*
20,618
Obtaining Honey under False Pretense 133
Escaping
569
Palse Okth
85
Kidnapping
226
Blackmail and Xnortlon
33
Cruelty to Children end Anlmele
70
Violation of Oam* Lav
249
TOTAL
176.111
t Soureti J*ll dookt* of the countl".
Baker Bibb
19 149 59
19
49
~
14
3
113 921 314
72 234 114
73 18
2 816
19
19 297
86
1 62 59
3 37 10
2 23
11 876 119
4 274 21
31 31
700 142
13a1i
192
154
_
73
" 139
50
56 767 133
1SS 2,160 686
197 22
I 59 23
13
20 23 93
-
7 49
2a
47 59
12 351 93
1
19
111
230
_
7
7 182 129
1
10
10
2
37
6
-
7
53
43
, 132
34
20
3
112 31
9 205
5 47
7
38 13
3
21
31
1 49 59
-
45
9 2
2
-
9
1
13 169 132
13 189 132
3 148
SB
54
388
42
3 93
3
2 45
4
33
5 1,694 212
424 1,354 554
17
19
2
4
9
11
18 24
13 38
8 275
2 134 28
584 713 414
1 21
6
4
87
10
3
4
13
13
--
a
6 t
4 7
907 9.585 2,807
Can-oil Chattoote
a 184 1 3
8 154 1 3
-
17 13
-
*
38 1,234
8
7
30 389 3 5
2 23
_ 403
-
_
11
4 323
2
7
_ _
2 .
131
1
-
4-
- 690 14 -
- 249 3 .
9 390 19
9
S> 70 14
121 2 3
64
.
22
3
_
~ 113
~
TM
71 962 13 17
37 2,180 22 12
3 322 11 2
8 434
1
_
37
36
--
8
2 139
-- -
;
3 97
7
11_
634 85
1 504
7
11
-
21
2 ,
6 10 1
--
1-
5 103 1 2 43 37 13 _
6 48 31 1ft ~
1 39 2 z
2 33
1
724
22
3
47
-
S
-
-
16
-
-
4 113 7 ,,
1
3 115
7
I
- 158
1
-
60 509 29
-
39
10
2
4
19
10 15
_
499
-
750 379 148 79
3
4
-
2
2
12
13 12
8
47 11 3 as
2 93 38
639 11 81 70S
_
2 189
1
--
_ -
3 9 31
3
_ 7
-;_
1,O41 7 t7UO 293 856
Clarice
69. 31
3 2
Covetm 49 40 1 4
Crisp 23 22 1
151
271 227
56
82 42
6
30
16
44
9
51
71 143
7
20
9
8
12
7
7
12 20
38
7S 79
56 123 19
289 338 130
149
13
43a
24 105 8
19
18 20
7 13
124
140
91
42 597 577
40
33 25
103
57
4
4
4
2
IS
7
1
2
22
7 34
7
34
8
66 155 63
17
4
169
136 343
54
62 28
13
15 26
6
12
4
14 112 64 48
14 5 6
12 2 5 31 31 47 341 312 19 7 3 1,764 1
15 11
88 14
47
14
41
90 30
18
4
12
4
1
3
57
17
2
_
-
2
104 60
104
60
33
9
589 341
13 262
3
23
30 49
516
2
282 2
544a
_ 27 353 42 1,313
4 7 1 7
1 9
3 592
_
12
_
12 22
u8
228 478
2
0
6
9
1
3
2
1
4
2 799 2 164
DeXalb Dodne
72
42
51
40
14
7
2
629
176
121
71
43
3
63
5
1
189
62
79
27
33
3
96
3
207
42
759
16
1,024 337
302
24
7
6
28
4
128
18
153
7
491
113
934
467
210
8
142
6
2
17
68
2
55
2
52
7
11
72
4
14
276
346
2
1
42
17
1
27
7
10
31
19
237
69
73
159
59
63
' 34
13
36
7
9
10
1,166
23
36
16
.
1
1
7
494
6O
190
304
60
372
3
1,494
509
1,1' 5819
423
71
141
6
113
7
1,849
599
9
3
14
1
11
12
17
285
19
81
14
1,390
489
3
2
33
29
2
3
3
7
2
4
34
2
10 O40
BStoSsscJsSlassasiii la
e s,s
---- -3 ,,
S,E S .gS
1 1 l-l Ml SCDHWKM> U 1 HO *5.lS*j3P5
M
(g ik
--
u
M
OtH I * I M I 8C-4W I Hot* NIIIW 0 v3 I 3 IIHIUI**!** III C lMl^t(4->a2lMti*lSHUc3
,,,KSS g S
I K I I I I W I I C4^ to f Hill WW I f t I HU I * t Co II**
* *
*
lllllllSSlllHI I I I I I I III I I I I **! UCD 3 I IIIMINIMItllltUHCB 8 I I Sw t M ( | IIIHIUflU ll tato
\&U IIIIMHOOHMltlo OWtoSS 8 M I W IllnUIII* Itl H K'll*l3lOI | HIAIl-'UC C * * I I H3 l
t4
i-ru
H
f-1 ^
: f:
4fiuioto*>)t**'iiciui-> CDHH > ji-4 IIIICDO**^> V i<i *J loolSiCi**oi-'S*i-''*ot*t''3 S t* SC i wHwS S
1 1 1 1 1 MKtStIO 1 1 1 1 {2
C* I I I I t I t I t I I HH I HlCt IIHI<4*VCDH I td *
gy
flflK>*IM4 !*>> W ICDltWtMIMIIMII
& 6> * i Ki ^fo ft & -SS^KCSS 5 ^ MCP8iS"3i2
H C Ml HWI I I I *
TtBLX 3
KHTB w VONTM VARIATION OF
By Crlmi of hlch AecuMd 12 Count ! of O.orgU 1, 1426 - t>cE*er 51, 1935
Total
February
"1
July
September Rowber
April
June
August
October December
Adultery and Fornication
Amber
970
Percent 100.0
55 83 68
79
79
80 89 113 116
86
67
53
8.6 7.0 8.1 8.1 8.2 9.3 11.9 12.0 8.9 7.0 S.4
Aaaault J>d Battery
Huafcer Percent
3,763
253
218
277
300
317
356
393
403
366
340
277
264
Aaeault vith Ir.tent to Murder Xujsber 3,140 218 210 238 246 253 273 259 337 310 307 236 251
Percent 100.0
6.7 7.6 7.8 8.1 8.8 8.2
Assault vlth I?ttent to Rape
Muefaer Percent
100.0
27 9.2
16 5.5
18 6.1
io3.e1
23 8.5
14 34 40 4.8 11.6 13.7
22 7.5
19 6.3
23 7.8
24 8.2
Beatardy
lumber
1,203 110
85 111
90 104 109 123 103
86 103 103
74
Percent 1OO.O 9.1 7.0 9.2 7.3 8.7 9.0 10.2 8.6 7.1 8.6 8.8 6.2
Burglary
a.r lumber
Percent
5,310 583 100.O 11.0
449
e43.j0
441
386
30
379
499
342 6.4
453 8.9
458 8.6
9.0
Carrying Concealed ffeapona
Humbar
i6o!o
244
173
303 8.2
21O 8.5
191 7.7
173 7.0
253 9.4
196 7.9
183 7.4
193 8.0
223 247 9.C 10.0
Cheating and Selndllng
Muster Percent
3,752 1OO.O
239
278
330
238
336
343
377 8.3 10.1
323 8.7
33O B.8
v2.8e7
301 8.0
Forgery
Wuaber
821
73
73 55 79
63 62
67
60
83
72
65
Percent 100.0 8.3 8.9 8.9 6.8 9.6 7.7 7.6 8.2 7.3 10.1 8.7 7.P
OaKbllng
Nunfcer Percent
3,049 100.0
280 9.2
s1.7a7
318 10.4
285 9.3
230
254 8.3
240 7.9
213 7.3
250 8.2
230 314 7.5 10.?
256 fl.4
Larceny, alap'_e
Xuefcer 3,504 316 311 334 260 260 236 306 277 232 285 286 401
Percent
8.1 8.2 11.5
Larceny of Automobile
2,910 287 241 251 233 227 208 237 247 279 218 238 S4
Percent 1CO.O 9.9 8.3 8.6
3.2 3.4
J*ceny of fvm AoJbttala
Wunfcer
211 Si 13 30 13
Percent 100.0 11.2
7
It
13
14
13
21
29
6.5 7.0 9.8
Larceny rroa 'fcuae
Nunber 5,973 516 416 522 497 443 496 469 528 4D1 492 45S 61S Percent IOO.O 8.7 7,0 8.7 8.3 7.4 8.3 7.9 8.? 8.2 8.2 7.6 10.9
Larceny After Trust
Ximber
1,827 US 130 132 167 146 154 148 159 164 141 184 144
Percent 100.0 8.6 7.1 7.2 9.2 8.0 8.4 8.1 8.7 9.0 7.7 10.1 7.?
Manufacturing Llguor Murder Operating Auto while Drunk
Percent
497
52
100.0 10.5
40 8.0
43 8.7
32 6.4
37 7.5
30 6.0
35 7.0
46
50
60
9.3 1C.1 12.1
40 8.0
32 6.4
Percent
1,481 100.0
131 3.8
121 8.2
113 8.0
91 6.1
121 150 8.2 10.1
118 8.0
132 8.9
187 8,6
135 9.1
120 8.1
117 7.9
Percent
4,986 100.0
363
320
389
381
401
382
447
481
485
477
449 9.0
425 3.5
Public Drunkfinneal Rape
tluiber Percent Ruifcer
Robbery seduetlon Shooting at Aootaer Stabbing vagrancy
Hurber Percent
Percent Jtofcer Parcant
Parcant Munber
violation of Prohibition Law Hunfcer Percent
Jfa SeatSna
Percent
TOTAL
XuEbar Percent
Souroa! Jail dookata of tna countlai.
4,321
363
1,959 100.0
185 100.0
681 100.0 1,283 IOO.O 3,220 100.0 33,286 IOO.O 1,265 100.0 92,742 100.0
271
34
117 6.0
16 8.6 S3 7.7 78 6.1 243 7.3 2,692 8.1 74 5.8 7,506 8.2
293
27
129 6.6 U 7.0 40 5.9 73 6.1
2e7.40
2,514 7.6 71 5.6
6,789 7.3
330
22
194 9.9
16 8.6
64 0.3 122 9.3 300 9.3 2,901 3.7 102 8.1 7,93 8.6
329
29
191 9.7
IS 6.5 54 7.9 101 7.8 244
2,886 8.7 102 8.1
7,652 8.2
356 8.2
36
162 8.3 17 9.2 SS 8.0 110 8.3 271 8.4 2,765 3.3 110 8.7 7,524 8.2
403 8.3
32
140 7.2
10 5.4 68 9.9 107 8.3 346 10.8 2,599 7.8 114 9.4 7,553 8.2
402 9.3
26
167 8.5
17 9.2
64 9.3 148 11.3 297 9.2 2,845 8.5 143 11.3 fl. 007 8.7
445 10.3
32
137 7.0
19 10.!
46 6.7
912.e4
279 8.7 2,923 8.R 134 10.6 8,383 9.0
386 8.9
46
167 8.3 17 9.2
61 8.9 123 9.S 254 7.9 2,956 8.9 123 9.7 8,017 8.5
367 8.3
42
159 8.1
10 5.4 60 8.3 114 3.9 246
3.030 9.1 104 8.2
8,104 8.7
373 8,7
16
1S7 8.0 17 9.2 64 9.3 91 7.1 2S7 7.4 2,620 7,9
88 7.0 7,518
366 3.5 21 5.8 239 12.2 21 11.4
57 8.3 92 7.1 233 7.2 2,573 7.7
95 7.5 7,753
!!
g^
E.H
fe fe6 S 8S S
o a H e; N o.
rt H
rt rt
rt H e w e^ o cc
as s 8 K _s " a
a s s a s "' *
a g a >'
!!
0 H
"iI0Bi
1
8
<
9
S! a riJH otw ^}iO inttO fJti^0O oa wi
i
O
&"
*6
i y1 SH* s
.1 t 8,9
rto
- -i JHf
1 a asaa3s s Mt-HiOei rf
' nHH
o rJ ft
1 sasasa
*
-,
O
saasa aN
tfi o o n o
O
" 55 si s a ' "
i I S S g 8 S g ' S
.,
H
"1
5 r"15f> JM S^ SS>u SnS(O '7'
1 s ? 7 ? ? T , "J
N 01 rl H M
35 E A a M M o S S
25
ri a P 8 s a a s g
1
s838 R988 .
3 i 1 1 1 1 1 (. 3 &SSS nnH | S
TABU 4 (Confd)
PiOT II
CRIXIBAL ASSAULTS
1. TOTAL
Total
T* ^<f l ------rg&i
it------
F-l* mica *-!
Huribtr Parcant unbar Hla Oroup llubar Fa--la Group
Under 16
92
2.1
16 - 20 2, 51V
19.7
846 18.1 33.8
3O 16.9 2.O
21 - 23 3,104
S6.7
1,373
26-30 2,581
18.7
31 - 35 1,378
12.4
36-40 1,362
10.7
41-30
933
7.5
964 20.6 40.3
488 10.4 30.9
355 11.9 40.8
322
6.9 34.4
31
17.3 2.1
41
13.9 2.6
35 18.6 4.0
25
8.3 2.7
Ovar 50
484
TOT.'.!. 12,753
3.8 100.0
96 2.1 19.8 4,672 100.0 36.7
295 100.0 2.3
*] Huar
ii
*AC.
Jni
* gro *.
Oroup Nunfcar Pala Group
49
.8 S3. 5
IS
1.0 16.3
1,458 3.0 57.7
169 11.4
6.7
375 23.3 11.0
1,111
779 02.4 49.4
270 18.2 17.1
534 8.3 38.2
218 14.7 16.0
456 7.2 48.8
341
9.4 7O.3
132
8.0 14.1
47
3.-!
9.7
6,303 100.0 49.4 1,481 100.O 11.6
Total SuMwr Pareant
UoxSar 16
26
.9
16-20 1.086 31.0
21 - 25
MS 17.9
26 - 30
610 18.4
31-95
3.7 10.6
36-40
273
8.3
41 - SO
280
8.4
oar 50
136
4.7
TOTAL
0,313 100.O
ASSHCLT IITH IHTHIT TO OTRDEH
h t*
rftSfri-*-A8T-
risftil Aa
KuBbar la Group Hinbcr Fanala Group
4
.4
15.4
2
4.3 7.7
MS 26.9 28.6
16 34.0 1.6
211 19.4
35.3
14 29.8 2.4
200 13.4
39.7
5
10.8
.9
93
8.5
96.8
9
19.1 2.6
128 11.8
95
8.7
46.5 35.9
1
2.2
.4
-
-
-
64
1,088 100.0 32.8
47 100.0 1.4
Na Q>0
*S5 * *
* Nagro * AS*
Hunbar
Croup Hunibar Femla r.roap
17
.9 65.4
3
.3 11.3
638 36.7 64.1
39 13.2 S.7
234 14.2 42.7
116 30.0 19.4
327 18.2 33.6
78 20.2 12.8
182 10.2 52.4
3 16.3 18.2
111 6.2 4O.4
35
9.0 12.7
153 9.1 58.?
22
3.7 7.9
81
4.3 51.9
11
2.8 7.1
1,793 100.O } 34.1
387 100.O 11.7
Tota.
iljtinr Pareant
Padar 16
7
1.0
16 - 10
147
91.4
21-28
210
30.6
26-30
78
11.4
31-53
92
13.4
36-40
61
8.9
41-50
60
8.7
Orar SO
32
4.6
TOTAL
687
100.0
Vhl tt
-rwnr *Ag
naton 1U1. Group
Xu*br
~%raWMaitaa
1 *AS.
Group
4 3.1 57.1
-
--
29 22.3 19.7
8 53.3 5.5
33 26.9 16.7
3 20.O 1.4
10 7.8 12.8
2
13.3 2.6
23
3 3.8 8.2
20 15.4 13.3
2 1.5 6.: 130 100.0 ia.9
1
6.7 1.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
15 100.0 2.2
* z:s Hai XACa
* CW> % 6
Nunbr
Group Hunbar ?atMla iroup
1
.2 14.3
2
3.2 23.6
94 19.6 63.9
16
25.4 10.0
133 32.0 72.9
19
30.? 9.0
54 11.3 69.2
12
19.0 13.4
59 12.3 64.1
7
11.1 7.6
51 10.4 83.6
4
6.3 6.6
38
7.9 3.4
2
3.2 3.3
29
6.1 90.6
1
1.6 3.1
479 100.0 69.7
65 130.0 9.2
Total Xmbtr Fwetnt
Under U
13
.7
16 - 20
323
17 .
21 - 23
478
20.3
26 - 30
320
17.7
31 - 3
O
16.6
M - 40
107
10.0
41-60
133
7.4
Over SO
45
2.S
TOTAt
l,bQ3
100.0
D, STABBIMQ
------prlgfe] Whl A *Ag. Xu>D<r H.I. Group JtaKxr
3 1.6 23.1
-
^ V.ft2t Kami* -
*45J -
18 9.9 3.6
1
8.3
.3
52 28.6 11.0
2
18.7
.4
60 33.0 18.8
4 53.3 1.2
43 24.7 13.1
1
8.3
.3
2 1.1 1.0
4
33.4 2.0
2 1.1 1.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
182 100.0 10.1
12 100.0
.7
Mar
* 5 1 . "T . Jro5*
tsvmj*
* IOTO * 8
!br
Rtnbr Fewl Group
8
.7 61.3
2
.4 15.4
272 24.0 84.5
31
6.6 9.6
329 29.0 69. 3
92 19.3 19.3
174 13.4 54.4
82 17.3 23.6
155 13.7 51.9
98 20.5 32.8
105 9.3 53.3
86 18.2 43.7
59 5.2 44.7
71 14.9 53.8
31
2.7 68.9
14
2.9 31.1
1,133 100.O 62.8
476 100.0 26.4
TABU 4 (Conl'4) PAST II . Crlnl-ul Aiuult CCont'd)
Tel il ftnftxr Percent
Oaar 16
-
-
1820 "
7
36.8
21 - 25
7
38.S
26-30
SI-SB
3
19.8
1
0.3
36- *J 41 - SO Over 50
1
5.3
-
-
-
-
TOTAL
19 100.0
hit*
* vut* * AS*
ijlttlt* * Ag.
XMter ! Croup *utor | PMl* Group
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
-
*
-
-
-
-
-
1 100.0 53.3
-
-
-
.
..
.
.
.
-
--
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
1 100.0 5.3
-
-
X Jfcgro % Age 9ubr 1U. Group
-
-j -
4 36.4 57.1
Aadw
, 3
36 Negro ?<m
42.9
I Agft 3r=p 42.9
4 34.4 57.1
s 42.9 42.9
1
9.1 33.3 (
1 14.2 33.4
1
9.1 100.0
-
-
1
9.0 10O.O
-
-
-
-
-
.
-
-
-
11 100.0 ' 37.9 |
7 100.0 36.3
P. ASSAULT ASD BATTB.Y
Dndr 16 16 So
__. Tot.! mb*r Percent
35
8
783
17.7
--------------1 llbiU taber !
10
.5
452 Z1.9
Unite
*Age
T*58-7 *Ag.
aroup HoBtier ?e*le 3roup
28.6
-
--
57.7
23 11.* 2.9
21- 28 1366
30.8
759 M.4 55.1
47 22.9 3.4
26-30
801
18.1
357 17.3 44.6
37 18.1 4.6
31-38
406
11.2
173
8.3 S5.S
28 13.7 5.6
36 - 4O
426
9.6
160
7.T 37.5
46 22.4 10.6
41-80
315
7.1
131
6.3 4U
24
11.7 7.6-
Owr SO
08
4.7
30
1.4 14.6
-
-
-
TOTAL
4.428 1OO.O 2,067 100.0 46.7
205 100.0 4.6
^ara
' % Hagro ' % Agft i
% Xegro % *C* '
Thatovf Hal* Group 1nabr ?Mla ^rsop i
17
1.0 43.6
3
L.B 22.3 '
263 1 15.5 i 33.6 i
45
9.3 5.9
447 1 26.3 32.7 ' 12O 26.3 3.3
342
20.2 42.7 j
65
14.S 8.1 .
208 12^ 41.9 i 85 18.6 17^
141
8.3 33.0 1 79 17.3 13.9 \
125
7.4 39.7 , 3S
7.7 11^ 1
156
9.1 f' 75.7 1 20 4.3 9.7 |
1.609 100.0 ; 38.4 | 457 100.0 10.3 |
Tot il Roriber
Under 16
-
-
16 - to
67
4.8
21 - 89
365
26.2
26-30
318
22.9
31-38
234
16.8
36-40
303
21.9
41 - SO
98
7.0
Orr So
S
.4
TOTAL
1.392 100.0
-u^er 7
165 215 135 250
74 846
Whl E*
! Oroap
-
-
.8 10.4
19.5 43.:
8.4 67.6
16.0 S7.7
29.6 82.0
8.7 75.5
-
-
100.0 <0,8
MLiS *.r
E Age Iroup
-
--
_
.-
-
--
,,<
--
-
--
.
..
-
--
-
--
-
--
t legro f Age
% legro f Age
Vneber Ale ' 3xw Vtariber PeMle Group
60 11.0 89.
_
200 36.6 54.8
!
103 18.9 32.4
-
-i
99 18.1 42.3
-
-
55 10.1 18.0
-
-
24
4.4 i 24.3
-
-
S:
.9 100.0
-
-
546 100.0 39^
-
-i -
Totel umber Percent
Under 16
3
.4
16- SO
US
13.3
81-28
281
34.1
26 - JO
173
21.2
31-38
95
11.3
38-40
83
10.3
41-80
43
8.3
0>er SO
32
3.9
TOTAL
8M 100.0
fc----r 23 99 75 13 10 -
t2t
H. rozwrim TISTOL AT
t* U e
-
(hit*
Qroup *.
-
-
<nlt. -
HAS.
Oroup -
10.4 20.3
1 11.1 .9
44.6 36.*
3 33.4 1.1
33.7 42.9
1 11.1 .6
.8 13.8
1 11.1 1.1
4.8 11.3
2 22J 2.3
-
-
- -
1 11.1 2.3
-
-
-
100.0 26.9
9 100.0 1.1
*-zs? *Age " Qroup naeoer > Pe>*l* Group
3
.6 100.0
-
-
79 14.8 70.5
14.3 8.1
164 30.8 58.4
ee 16.9 50^
15 24.2 5.3 U 17. 8.2
6S 12J! 68.4
14 j 22.6 14.7 '
63
11.4 71.8
12 I 19.3 i 14.1 '
41
7.7 95.4
1
1.5 E.3
3>
6.0 100.0
'-
-
S33 100.0 64.8
62 100.0 7.5
*ii*
w * c* e* M OOOGOM
w <TI -j -a -J * 9
S S S S 5" v I
Ell
M * Ot
H-
. M to t4 < O> (0 01
g 2 s 2 j2 4 B
,. ? g 5 S S M
^ 9i W *J O u^>O
-S S
UUU 4
" S i! i , t S
G? S65 i c Sj i
L
53aS '. S. 4, V i !. ,
111?JS
t M H 0 -3
111111
3 <, 8 t 5 u Wf
1 I i I a> ot i)
I 1 1 1 tn i* <ri ff
Q) -4 (0 H M I 1 N 2j S) |
' 1*
i
S
"" Z " " "w VH~V^""~|
* i i i : i I [
I
iIiII f|
iS S S 8 S S 8 .-h ~- -- -- -
01 '-3 '(0 W I-
3S i
!, S K S B K .*gl
1 I * tt H lit*
P1
? ???
O| I I * OB Jo t* D I <
Pi a ?.
01 I U I -Jot I
tfj I I O I * O> I I [
"""*"" I"
rt
,.8j . .- ? S S S S ;.
O - H M o, 10 ^ H >
LW.-s s S s i s ,
?P i u JB> B5 Sto SJJ f
o -a U Se M i
,'S
:Ji ?.-
8aissS8 .
. s sa s8?
HO* ^H I
rM ,<4 fCJ ?(0 sM> ?M ?
(0 M W M t* <J O I
K
. 1 S JS .8 S * I
II S K 0
I I I UWV I I I I I 9*M I I
g^H H
8S68 tP8 ,
S * S S 3 fe S
W W H J* I O *0 I
2 Si z c 3! 2 E,
rtr r I
p BM " t* o t O H
I
is
rf
9 *?
c* u c*
!i
c* p S t* ^
I ra *d (B O U -4 N
ss s s C, C, K j,
I M H M * tfi
f . P P F S"
W W 0,
Jl
!_? K S iS 8
rr
EWHMMM*UI
r?Prr
oaooDwtfu
, 8 ZSSBS ,
? ? r ?? ."
> * n * * w i
1 gsssaagg i
s
''i ,_,)- N> W t->
3 S S s i S s it, s"
s * K S S3 B B IS
0 I s Iff a M CB * *> M
f o>
R g R^SoB *
I ,, u s 8 a P E3!
O
jS TM
g832tS
1*
s
1 8 a s i B ss .
SI
O
Is tt K K S o -i -a u i J. to '-J -a t> >
g
I
>i i
* o *
^ 5S P3"1
O
s
I SJJ1U ?.! W Mc 5> {o. Bt- B B' KV>
SJ S S B p S S j
f
,, p g g B K -i
(3 M O W H H 1
li! p fpMry U H.fM rH
0 i t. H U ' * ' 1
? F ." ? ." .* f
o *, M S 0 * * H 1
TABLE 4 (Cor,t*aj
r
C:0(J3 WECJIJEP
White
____T.o.te]------------ Ifcnber ] Percent
--------1* Whit* Number Kel.
* Age Group
* Kilt. * Age
Number
Oroup
Under 16
8
1.9
1
.5 12.3
-
.15 - 20
94
21.8
"21 - 23
133
35.8
13
6.9 16.0
82
37.7 32.9
4
23.3 4.2
6
35.3 3.9
26 - SO
a - 35
97
22.1
61
14.1
63
29.9 67.0
50
23.0 82.0
2
11.8 2.1
-
-
-
36 - 40
12
2.9
2
1.0 16.7
3
29.4 41.7
41-50
yvr SO W. -A---L--(
5
1.2
-
432 - lob.o
2
1.0 40.0
-
' ----217- --15675-
30.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
17 100.0 4.0
V. arc-
* Negro Kunber H.Ee
---- . ----, r.
7
4.6
Oroup 87.5
; K.CTO * ge F*ml. Group
-
-
-
71
47.3 75.5
4
8.3 4.3
SO
33.3 39.3
17
35.4 11.0
19
12.7 19.0
11
22.9 11.3
3
2.1 4.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
16.6 13.1
3
10.3 41.6
3
6.3 60.0
-
-
-
150 100.0 34.7
48 100.0 11.1
Total Hu*toer Percent
Under 16
3
.4
16 - 20
53
7.7
21 - 23
263
38.4
26-30
138
23.0
f. OTHtB DISTURBASCES
Whit*
* AS'.-
* Unit*
* whit* f Age
ltatr Ible Oroup Inriler F*l* Croup
2
.5 66.7
-
-
-
23
5.7 44.0
2
3.8 4.0
172
42.3 63.4
17
32.6 6.3
103
23.4 66.2
9
17.3 3.7
Kenro
* i.gro^ i!Ag.
Tegro TTge1 '
*ufcw K*l* Oroup *uber Fernl. Group
1
.3 33.3
-
-
-
23
12.S 16.0
3
12.4 6.0
63 30.9 23.9
11
45.8 4.2
41 20.1 23.9
3
20.8 3.,
36-40 41-30
TOTAL
39
3.7
18
2.7
635
100.0
3
1.2 12.S
2
.3 11.1
405 100.0 39.2
12
23.2 30.9
2
3.9 11.1
,
32 100.0 7.6
22
10.9 36.4
14
6.9 77.8
2O4 100.0 29.7
-
.
-
24 loo.o 3.5 j
Tottl 'JnWb*r r*re*Dt
DnC0r 16
33
1.3
16 - 20
648
26.K
21 - 5
75S
so.e
26 - 30
403
1C.5
31-13
229
9.4
36 - 40
207
9.5
41 - 0
134
5.5
Ovr SO
*S
1.3
,_ TOTAL
2,440
100.0
PAST VI
ROB5EFY
Wh t.
i % mut* f AS.
jrwhitTl *Ag.
KmBber < Hl Group Hubr Faa*l* Group
j----------------^----------SSEP?---------- .,.^_,_
% Hagro * AE
. Secro | j) At-. i
Xu*r
Group ] Hunbar ; "'rale Crouf |
221 1 244 1 170 |
75 50 50 ' 7' 82B }
26.7 29.5 20.5
9.1 6.0 6.0
.9 100.0
34.1
3
32.4
13
42.2
2
32.8 ;
6
24.2 :
2
37,3
-
21.2
8
-- - .. -- -
33.9
<!
19.5 1.3
31.7 1.7
4.9
.5
14.6 2.6
4.9 1.0 -
19.3 24.2 100.0 | 1.7
400 464 215 136 146
70 12 1,459
27,5 61.7 31.8 61.6 14.7 53.3
9.3 ' 39.4 1O.O 70.3
4.8 52.3 .e 1 96.4 ;
100.0 | 59.6
f19 \
32 | 16 12 {
9| [
14 . 6j
112 |
: i 17.0 ' 2.f
28.3 , 4.! 14.3 4.0 10,7 3.2 9.0 j 4.3
! 12.5 \ 10.4
3.4 ' 18.7 100.0 1 4.6
1
;___^T^t*!____
1--
Whit.
-ncffiw-i f Ag.
Nunfeor | Percent Himtor ' Kl* Group
Vn3*e 16 j 283
3.4
31
1.3 10.9
16-20 [ 2,966
36.1
893
38.6 30.1
21-23 , 2,230
27.?
MS
28.0 ' 29.1
26-30 1,219
14.9
304
21.8 41.3
31-33
616
7.5
137
3.9 | 22.2
36 - 4O
343
.
75
3.2 21.7
41 - 50
433
3.3
23
1.1 3.7
0<*r SO 1 113
1.4
2
.1 l.B
TOTAL
8,207
100.0
2,315 100.0 28.2
PxnT VII
BURGLARY
[
.
sriSSn iTVhlt* * Age 1
r>nl* Croup ' ftafcer
J AS.
f ro * Age
1U1. Group Huabw F.*le ' Group
3 .s 1.1
249
4.4 98.0
.
IS
32.8
.3
2O37
36.1 68.7
21
1O.6
.7
17
36.9
.7
1494
26.3 67.0
71
33.7 3.2
8
17.4
.7
630
11,6 33.8
51
25.6 4.2
1
2.2
.2
439
7.8 71.5
39
19.6 6.3
1
2.2
.5
-
-
-
257
4.3 74.
4O6
7.2 93.4
12
6.O 3.5
4
2.0
.9
1
2.2
.9
109
1.9 6.4
1
.3
40 1OO.O
.6
3,647 100.O OB.8
199 100.0 1 2.4
TA&CJE 4 (Ctmt'C)
LJJtCBIZfiS A. TOTAL
Bader IS 16 - 20
Tolel Amber 1 Percent
558
l.B
6,498
23.3
SI - 25 7,200
25.3
30 - 30 4,836
17.8
SI - 35
36-40
3,285 2,501
11.7 0.2
. 50 1,825
6.6
Or.r 90 TOML
1,055 27,850
3.8 100.0
White
Keoro
mo. * White * *>
S Whit* 1 % kff
HuMber
Group Hotter Fel* j Group
* Negro % IE*
* Negro L Ace
ffiMber : Kale 3ro".p Jlaaber ?esale Sro"p
191
1.8 55.5
10
1.6 l. ,,
283
2.O S2.6
54
.3 10.0
2,492
25.4 58.4
104
16.3 1.6 f 5,626
2S.S 55.8
277
12.0 4.2
5.014
98.5 41.9
156
31.3 1.9 '; 3,390 i 23.8 ,' 47.1 '
660
28.5 9.1
2,087
19.1 41.5
105
16.1 2.1
2,390
16.8 48.9
566
1S.S 7.3
1.384 950
W.O 8.7
42.4 56.3
100
15.6 3.1
1,442
10.1 44.1
ice
17.1 4.5
1,194
8.4 46.7
539
14.6 10.4
528
14.2 12.7
401
3.8 22.1
74
11.6 4.1
1,165
3.2 : 65.9
1S1
7.8 i.t
190 10,832
1.9 100.0
18.0 38.2
3
.4
.3
752
5.2 ' 71.3 ;
110
4.i< 10.4
639 100.0 2.3 1 14,242 , 100.0 , 51.2 ' 2,317 , 10O.O &.5
TtGra-aEbe.fr9'*1Percent
Under 16
85
2.9
16 - 20
920
31.9
21-25
820
28.4
26-30
594
13.6
31-35
2SB
7.9
56-40
232
8.0
41-50
187
6.3
0er 50
22
.8
TOTAL
2,888
100.0
B. IMOXI OF AUTO
White
% White
X white fte*
WoBber Wale Group ftnfcer Female Group
66
3.9 77.6
-
-
-
632
37.8 68.7
22
47.8 2.3
425
23.4 51.8
13
S9.5 1*6
2 IS
12.9 54.6
5
11.4 1.3
110
6.6 48.2
2
4.5
.9
100
6.0 45.1
121
7.2 64.7
3
6.8 1.3
--
-
3
.2 13.9
.
1,672 100.0 57.9
44 100.0 1.5
rro
> Bmgro ' ! Age mber ale Group
19
1.6 . 22.4
266
23.0 : 28.9
377
S2. ' 46.0
170
14.7 43.1
112
9.7 49.1
128
11.1 53.2
65
3.6 34.ft
39
1.7 86.4
1,136 100.0 j 40.0
.^Negro ! % Age
1
6.2
.1
5 31.4 .t
4
25,0 1.0
4
25.0 1.?
1
6.2
.4
1
6-?
..*
16 ' 1CO.O^ .f
Total Ifcniiber Percent
Under 16
79
1.5
16 - 20 1,722
S7.4
21 - 25 1,357
21.7
26-50 31-55
1,172 726
18.7 11,6
36-40
551
8.8
41-50
445
T.I
Over 5O
211
5.4
TOTAL
6,261
100.0
Whit*
% White * Age
* White
unbar ale Group Hotter
Group
450
37.4 26.1
2.5
64
3.7
300
24.9 22.1
27
17.* 2.0
397
16.4 16.8
24
15.7 2.1
103
8.6 14.2
7
4.6 1.0
100
8.3 18.2
11 ,
7.2 2.0
44
3.7 9.9
16
10.5 3.6
-
-
-
2
, 1.0
1.205 100.0 19.2
1SS 100.0 j 2.4
Hecro
XoBber
grc ' % Age
el* Oroop. Timber Feaale or-or.p
41 i
1.1 51.9
27
2.6 34.2
1,082 1 28.0 8C.9
126 12^ 7.3
722 ' 18.6 &5.S
5O8 ' 29.? 22.7
803
20.7 68.5
148 14.3 12*6
473
12.3 65.4
141
U.6 19.4
336
7.9 55.5
134
13.0 24^
298 1
7.7 67.3
S5
9.2 19^
144
3.7 68.2
65
6^ 30.8
3.S71 j 100.0^ 61.9 j 1,034 100.C M.S
Total ViDKber Percent
Under 18
5
1.8
16 - 2O
61
21,6
21 - 23
96
34.0
26-30
56
19.9
31-35 36 - 40
38
13.5
12
4.3
41-50
3.2
Orar SO
5
1.7
TOTAL
289
100.0
9. LIMBEC HOinmOeT
Iclta
THtT *. Koefcer Malje Croup
1
1.1 2O.O
S Whit* | % Ag* Meter ?F..Ot ' Croop
4.8 20.0
50
55.0 49.2
26
28.5 -27.1.
4
19.0 6.6
6
28.6 6.3
20
22.0 35.7
13
14.3 34.2
-
-
-
1
1.1 11.1
-
-
-
6
28.6 10.7
'
19.0 ' 10.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
91 100.0 32.3
21 100.0 7.4
Henro
% negro 1 AE
% Nf Cro f Ae
Kurtier Vale ' 3roup ui**r ' "e^il* 3roup
3
2.? 60.0
20
15.S 32.l>
7
17.9 11.4
48
36.6 50.0
16
41.1 16.6
21
16.O 57.5
9
23.1 16.1
14
10.7 36.?
12
9.2 ZOO.O
8
6.1 88.9
5
5.8 100.0
7
17.9 2t-.-
.
-
-.
131 100.0 | 46.5
39 : 100.0 ] 13.8 J
H . <j o r; . i
* *
n
i i o o i- n i ic
1
s s' a*
s
i ittncnH i 10
.1 ] *l s i i i s 8 i
if; a". g". sX o. c-. t-. a".g.
*
i '8SSSSSSS
I 1 11 I I In
I! *f 1 1 1 O 1 1 1 1 o
li lIs |i I 1 1 t ! 1 '-- 1 1 1 rl t 1 1 t rt
j i 55
Hi
o a) H r- (r i i IK
8siis
i
j ^0
..". '. *. .
SB! " 8 8 S S
8
h' ""~FF^~8~ v "'~3
ss 1 s e s a * - COOrflCT*r4CDO -.
a* "S-SSJSSSJ
^SSSSSSS! JS ' ' 6 S Is38B85g [_,,
a as
''
)
* a s; s a nsa
>''
PC*
s
' ,,* * ' ' a
rtrt-^0jo
m w
W
f i-f
O>
g
* <~ li
S5
<H en rt c- i
ooooo i
^gS S g
leirtHrirtt t
S g S 15
fa
otiOi-tincovi-i'O
tf>av<ONi-<Ot|O
H H rl H H rt
.O
OvciCDtfinOM
gS KSSS SS
fe *" 3 s s a' s '
S56SS3
S8S
~3R
sa
.
'j ; > j
B 5) * * r-t *
fletiHiotjW'ftojO
C4<-IC')'^<^')Q"
r rt N rl M
g
i1 . ". n. *. ' ' '
Hgj
tj rt H
Ii ::')P&-i''!i o. . <j . Hill
o ,i
J * !!' 2 3 3
N en I I i
lAWlOCOMIflOe-t-i
ClOrlrtHHiOiO 1
3 B H H
0
!I-i s. s. a -i -si Ha. ^-^1 ij.i
IH1'*h>,' Oi Ct4-OW t<V oU>S r<tD KftiOa i3at
UJ;... . ; 'A
OiOrttVClHHcB
i
-78SS8S8S
1
I
I
I
I I I I.
ssa&
^|S 1". s8 s?s?"s. "H. "". -5. !.
;:3Si3SS883 !
, S 8888S88
_.
mfcr ' * Percent
Undar 13
t
3.7
16 - 30
60
3S.O
21 - 25
38
35.8
SO - SO
4
3.T
31-35
1
.9
56 - <0
1
.9
41 - SO
-
-
Over 50
-
-
TOTAL
109
100.0
TAElE 4 (Cont'd)
PART vm - j>rcnii (
j. i^RCTay or BICYCIZ
hljt.
f Whit* Jiige
jt mlt* * *
Vobr al Oroup *TMu.r Fewl* Groop
1
4.3 25.0
.
-
10
43.3 1.7
.
.
10
43.3 28.8
-
.
-
2
8.7 30.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
'-
-
-
-
-
23 1OO.O 21.1
-
-
-
taiier ;
3 50 29
2 1 1 86
25
<.
argup
3.3 73.0
M.I 8S.S
SS.7 "
2.3 so.o
1.2 100.0
3*2 ' 100.0
--
--
100.0 78.9
% *en> * Jig*
Nntar Fml araap
.
"
"
.
.
-.
-
~-
-1
_
-;
-
-
- -;
Xartoer
Under 16
63
16 - 20
521
21 - 25
1268
26-30
553
31-33
39?
36-40
393
41-50
150
oer 50
190
TOTri
3,537
Percent 1.9
14.7 35.9 15.6 11.2 11.2
4.2 3.4 1OO.O
Whl :
f Whit* Age
3
.3 4.8
Umber , ?*w*J* Group
-;
-
80
7.3 15.4
2
7.1
.4
421
41.2 53.2
200
19.5 S6.S
6
21.4
.5
4
14.3
.7
205 113 |
-
2O.O 11.2
-
51.6 29.1
-
6
1.6 1.5
8
28.7 2.0
2
7.1 1.3
-
-
1,024 100.0 29.O
28 100.0
.8
131----------/~3* '<--------'
t XefO-o ' Age fc* Hele Sroup Jtaeber cliS 5roT '
31
2.3 81.0
9
3.4 14.2
41ft
13.7 ' 79.8
23 : 8.8 4.4
783
33.2 61.7
58 | 22.2 4.6 <
3O7
13.9 55.5
42 1 15.0 7.6 '
138
6.2 34.8
48 j 1K.3 12.1 1
206
9.4 52.7
64 ! 24.4 16^Z ;
130
5.8 ' 86.7
18 i 8.9 12.0 I
ISO
8.6 100.0
2,223 | 1OO.O 62.8
-] *; !
262 | 100.0 ; 7.4 ,
L. 07H3.UMK.M
Lj
tot 1-
X.n)r Percent
VnAer 16- 263
3>.9
------1 1
Whttft
rfwhlt 1 % Age
ir>ait*~~rjTAg*~ -
Hen-o ySegro ' I Age i
Uele croup number FeOTle oroup Bnber Mel* aroiip Hoafc*r
93
5.3 1 35.9
t
7.0 2,3
14
3.3 55.0
1
16 - 20 ; 2,195
32.2
680
37.6 31.0
2
2.4
.1
1,406
33.7 64.0
107
21 - 25 1,470
21.6
350
19.3 23.9
20
23.6 1.4 878
21.1 59.7
pp
26 - 30 31-35 38 - 40
1,202 553 393
17.6 8.1 3,
366
20.9 30.4
152
S.4 27.4
73
4.2 19.1
19
22.3 1,6
17 eo.o 3.1
a
9.4 2.0
697
15.7 58.0
120
2f.7
6.9 51.7
99
216
5.2 55.0
94
41-50
492
7.3
40
.2 | 8.1
12
14.1 2.4
385
9.2 78.S
55
Over 50
848
3.6
4 TOTAL | 6,314 r 100.0
51
2.8 21.1
1,809 ' 100.0 I 26.6
1
1.2
.4
153
3.7 64.0
35
85 100.0 1.2
4,170 100.0 61.3
750
?*>!* Croup 2.4 &.
14.3 4.9 ' 29.7 15.1 15.9 10.0 13^ 17.5 12.5 23.9
7.3 11.2 4.7 14.5 100.0 li.0
"1 "
1 ' Ifmmbcr | Percent
OM.r 16
2
1.4
IB - 20
37
23.0
21 - 25
41
27.7
26-30
28
18.9
31-33
16
10.8
36 - 40
11
7.4
41-50
7
4.7
Over SO
6
4.1
TOTAL
148
100.0
Whit.
--------r]HbSt5~i ^ J^,
; % WBlte ' % As*
A*A*r Mele Cronp BOBber 1 ?BB*1 Orottp
2
3.2 100.0
-
19
30.7 51.4
-
--
23
37.1 56.1
-
13
24.2 53.6
1 100.0 3.5
1
1.6 6.3
-
-
2
3.2 18.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
62 100.0 4i.e
-
-
--
-
--
1 .100.0
.7
IU1.
*TM
P.-l.
f negro- % Ag*
$ Vegro * Age
Hnvber el* Oroop Viafcer FaKl* Sroup
-
-, ,
-
-
-
17
20.7 ! 43,9
1
3SJ 2.7
17
20.7 41.3 >
1
33.3 2.4
12
14.6 42.
-
-
14
17.1 87.5
1
33.4 6^
9
11.0 81.S
-
-
-
7
8.6 100.0
6
7.3 100.0 !
OS 130.0 53.4 {
-
-
-
3 100.0 , 2.O
M 1 iroMMr rr.nt
OBdU> 61
6
.1
TAILS 4 (Cont'a) PART VIII - UmnUi (Cont'd)
i. CHur:m AK> tan/vat
-rfe&n*IiVIt.
^Ur
Qroup mbr
4
.1 30.0
-
FMftl*
flUfe Fl
<A. OroTip
21 - IB
n- 30
31-14
1,T 679 M
41-30
:oa
17^ 1T.B 17.6
7.9
69
31.0 M.t
H>
1.T TT.1
476
U. If.t
160
6.7 M.e
89
lt.5 3.6
15
10.0 3.7
M
26.3 .l
17.8 13.9
TOTAL
3,1*1
100.0
3,808 100.0 72.2
236 100.0 5:1
V*.ln
rrSisn *AK.
Group
1
.1 20.0
> HTO * A8. Group
US to.8 14.7 113 14.6 14.7
138
17. 20.7
8
1S.O
.8
18 si.: 2.3
U
20.0 2.2
93
U.I 30.7
a
10.7 2.6
772 loo.o 19.9
73 100.0 1-9 .
Total *DM5r rarent
Bnd.r 16
-
-
U - 20
ia
12.3
n - 20
30
34.7
H - SO
62
34.1
a-M
u
0.0
M - 40
i
4.3
41 - SO
t
1.4
Ov*r 80
-
-
TOTAL
144
100.0
o. cmuvDim MAUD BILL
hit.
f thlM * As
% Mbit* < A,.
Mr Hal. Oroup *r FwU Oroup
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
9.0 55.4
-
-
-
96
91.4 72.0
30
41.1 >6.2
10
- 74.*
a
4.B M.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
83.3 10.0
-
--
-
--
1 16.7 11.1
-
--
-
--
ill 100.0 77.1
6 100.0 L **
MEro
'^^ *A.
% H.gro *AB
JhntMr
Oroup Hunb.r Fnl> Growp
-
-
-
-
-
-
a
40.0 44.4
-
-
i
8
23.0 10.0
4 57.1 e.o
i
3.0 1.9
1
14.S 1.9
3
10.0 18.4
1
14.3 7.7
2
10.0 It.2
2
10.0 100.0
-
--
1
14.3 11.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
20 100.O 13.9
7 1OO.O 4.8
Total feaW Paroant
Under 16
-
-
16 - 20
-
-
21 - 26
lit
29.5
26-30
121
32.7
31-33
92
24.3
36-40
28
7.4
41 - 50
14
3.7
Orr 50
a
e.t
TOUL
379
100.0
T. PAS3IW KORTBUS3 CHJCI3
Unit.
rriSfc-] <A.
!Mr Ihl. Oroup -b.r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
? Whit* P14
-
-
*A. Oronp
-
-
1C*
34.0 91.0
5
29.4 4.3
110
36.7 88.7
4
23.3 3.2
7
2>.0 81.5
2
11.8 2.S
13
4.3 46.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
23.5 14.3
2
11.8 14.3
-
-
-
3OO 100.0 79.2
17 100.0 4.3
Mtnfc*r -
3
* sro K.1. 8.6
Nilro
*AC.
Group -
4.5
Inbir
-
afiSSS- * *c Fml Group
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
13
22.3 14.1
2
60.0 2.2
11
19.0 39.3
10
17.5 71.4
9
13.3 100.0
-
-
-
2 so.o 14.3
-
--
38 100.0 15.3
4 100.0 1.0
Total *J*br Frat
UUr 16
8
1.4
U - <0
127
M.I
n - st
147
16.7
M - 30 31-31
9t
16.1
as
14.6
36-40
66
11.5
41-30
M
6.0
CM.r 60
13
2.6
TOTAL
872
10O.O
. uncnr won AUTO
rffitri if Ihlt*
-snSS-i
Ubp
u
<A.Oroup Ikdtwr T*mOm Oroup
3
1.4 7.6
-
-
-
37
17.1 29.1
H 6.6 rr.4
2
40.0 1.6
2
40.0 1.4
S7
17.1 40.t
-
-
-
41
19.0 49.4
-
-
-
36
16.t BB.O
8
3.7 23.3
-
-
-
1 to.o 1.5
-
--
-
--
216 100.0 37.8
5 100.0
.9
tetf
*, *
* gro <A.
utr
droop tabr F~il. Opoop
8
1.4 62.6
-
-
-
88 16.4 69.3
-
-
-
90 16.9 61.t
.
-
.
64 18.6 68.7
1
23.0 1.1
41 11.8 49.4
1
23.0 1.2
2B
8.1 42.6
U
7.8 74.6
2
50.0 3.0
-
-
-
IB
4.3 100.0
-
-
-
347 100.0 60.6
4 100.0
.7
Tolel nTMur Percent
Under It
14
1.8
16 - 20
sa
6.8
21-23
aa
26.7
26-30
221
27.8
31-33
128
15.8
38-40
76
9.8
41 - SO
48
5.8
Oer SO
48
6.0
TOTAL
795 100.0
TABU 4 (Cont'd)
fAin a Fcatcnor
>nlt
|
* Volte % AS*
sss: M ! Oroup
- r - 4
.9 28.8
ihMMr -
Oroup ' KuEiber 10
-
-
-
7 22.6 13.3
43,
U 25.8 54.2
10 32.3 4.7
67
149 33.3 67.4
11 M.3 3.0
SO
76 17.2 60.3
2
6.3 1.6
42
SO 11.2 65.8
1
3.1 1.3
25.
25
S. 54.3
-
-
-
21 1
26
3.8 54.2
-
-
-
22.
445 100.O 38.0
31 100.O 3.9
280 [
Miro
'' ~
Nel Group Rubber Feaele jrmp
3.6 71.4
-
-
-
13.4 82.7
2
5.1 3.3
23.9 31.8
20 51.? 9.5
17.9 22.6
11 28.2 5.0
15.0 33.3 8.9 32.9
6 15.5 4.3
-
-
-
7.5 4S.7
-
-
7.8 45.8
-
-
1OO.O 33^ , 39 : 1OO.O 4.9
FAST* HOH-SCTPORT A. tOTU.
rfcH- -Hrfl
--------------rnjit. ttff
jrwii[>rAi."
Itarixr
oronp ' ~br ?n>l Group
Undr 16
8
.3
1
.1 12.5
-
--
18-20
648
20.2
102 10.0 W.7
-
--
21 - 29 1,010
51.4
290 28.4 28.7
-
--
86-30
638
19.8
31-38
37
11.7
232 22.7 58.4
let 1B.Z 44.1
3 75.0 .5 1 95.0 .3
36 - 40
257
8.0
107
10.3 41.8
-
-
-
41-50
205
8.3
99
9.7 a.a
-
-
-
oir SO
78
2.3
25
2.4 33.3
-
-
-
TOTAL
3,215 1OO.O . i.oea 100.O 51.8
4 100.0
.1
} Mgro * Ago
% Nero K Ar
Nuaber i H*l Grass VmdMr Feml 3r:iqp
7
.3 87.S
-
-
-
544 25*0 84.0
2 25.0 .3
713 32.9 ' 71.1
2 25.0 .2
401* 18.4 62.8
2 25.0 ' .3
208
9.5 55.3
1 12.5 .3
149,
6.8 ' 68.0
1 12.5 .4
1O4
4.S 51.2
-
-
SO'
2.J 68.7
-
-
-
2,181i 100.0 67.9 ,
8 100.0 .2
3. BASTARD!
------------__.-----TA--5HTJa--t.------------rS,,_S__---i ------(------------_^------stoo
_. . _ .
Totl_____
% Whtt*
X As*
* s"> * AS
t :.rsro ( .'.>.
ua3r | prcat u*.r fcl Qroup Sob*r Painle Group )ha45.p Kl Opcup Boaber ^^rl -Imp
Under 16
7
.5
-
- -,
7
.7 1OO.O
-
-
-
16 - 20
484
36.1
70 25.0 14.S |
414 J9.1 S5.5
-
-
21-25 1 474
55.4
11-5
40.4 | 23.8 1
- . 561 54.1 76.2
-
-
-
CS - J3
165
12.3
42 15.0 25.5 |
323 11.5 74.5
-
-
-
51 - 55 , 110
8.3
30 i 10.7 27.3 '
--
SO
".S 72.7
-
-
36 - 40
!9
2.9
8
S.9 I 20.5
31
2.3 7Q.5
-
-
-
41-50
47
3.S
16
5.7 34.0
Ovr 50 14 1.1 1] i ; .s( 7.1 1
31
S.o 66.0
-
-
-
-1
13
1.2 92.9
-
-|
TOTAL
1,540_) 100.0 j 280 j 100.0 1 20.9 |
- | 1,060 100.0 79,1
-
-
Tottl
----
wut.
1
FeacJ.*
Kiaftw Percent
Itaii* Group | Umber ?emlj 1 Group
Ken\> % negro * Age
Under 18
1
.1 -
1
.1 100.0
"
TM
~
-
16 - 20
164
8.7
32
4.3 19.3
-'
-1 -
130 10.6 79.3
2
21 - 23
536
28.6
177 23.9 33.0 1
-!
-
-
357 31.11 66.6
2
26 - 30
473
23.2
31 - 33
268
14.2
36-40
218
11.6
41-50
156
8.3
Orer SO
61
3.3
190 23.6 40.2 )
136 18.3 51.1
99 13.3 43.4
83 11.2 53.2
24
3.3 39.3
3 75.0 .6 i
1 25.0 .4
-! -
278 24.8 58.8
123 U.4 48.1
ua io.s M.I
73
6.5 46.3
37
3.4 6O.7
2
J5.0
1 1J.5
i
TOTAL
1,873 100.0
742 100.0 39.6
4 1 . 100.0 .2 1.121 100.0 59.8 .
3
Total Nuramr ' Percent
Under 16
2.7
16-20
731
24.O
21 - 25 1.C35
31.8
26 - 3O
512
15.7
31 - IS
370
11.4
36 - 40
233
7.1
41-50
118
3.6
Over 50
:,22
3.7
1 < nil, I t Age Nunber . Kftl* ; Croup
31
1.9 33.2
473
28.6 60.4
607
56.6 58.5
201
16.7 60.8
113
8.9 40.0
71
4.3 30.5
24
1.5 1 20.3
43
TABLE * (CoatM)
PART
sn CRIIBS
t. TOTAL
MS"
Kuaber
Group
5
1.4 3.7
84
23.5 10.9
95
26.8 9.4
41
11.6 8.2
41
11.3 11.1
51
14.1 21.9
02
8.8 27.1
Hen-0
*J2j" % Age
t Segro TAgT-
Xuifc..-
Group ffaator
Group
52
20
21.2 25.9
22
7.6 2.8
249
26.4 25.3
91
31.4 9.8
154
14.1 26.2
1S1 u.e 5E.4
81
8.4 54.7
76
28.2 14.8
60
21.0 16.9
30
1O.4 12.9
58
5.5
70
7.3 57.4
3.9
. ,_ ~ " - ' -
hit.
Total Xunfter Percent
njMp- * Age
* Unite * Age
Kuafcer
Oronp Itafcer
Oroup
Vnder 16
14
3.1
5
0.3 35.7
,
_
16 - 20
119
26.0
56
26.2 47.1
.
.
,,
21 - 25
136
29.8
72
35.6 63.0
_
.
26 - 3O
94
11.8
26
12.1 48.1
-
-
-
SI - 55
57
12.4
23
11.7 43.9
-
-
-
96 - 40
3
7.2
IS
7.0 45.5
-
-
-
41 . SO
20
4.4
9
2.4 25.0
-
-
-
Over SO
24
5.3
10
4.7 41.7
-
-
-
TOTAL
457
100.0
211 loo.o 46.9
-
-
-
theater
He era
Male
FenMle
* >e<ro * Age
* Negro
Group NUHber
% Age Croup
t
3.7 64.?
_
_
m
65
29.9 52.9
.
.
_
64
26.3 47.0
_
_
_
28
11.6 51.9
-
-
-
52
U.I 96.1
-
-
.
18
7.4 54.5
-
-
-
13
8.2 75.0
-
-
-
14
3.8 58.3
-
-
-
243 100.0 53.1
-
-
-
Ur.aer 16
16 - SO
Cl - 25
cr. - 3o
.'1 - J5
*6 - 40
41 - M
>er 60
35
T^T.'.L i 364
3.3 18.J 34.7 20.5 7.4
C. ASSAULT 1TM INTENT TO SAFE
Wv
" FBM*T
' VMie I Jt Age
*A
liber Male ! Oroup -t>er Fenale Oro'jp
3
1.4J 23.1
-
-
-
41
19.4 56.9
-
-
-
SB
46.5 71.6
1
50.0
.7
50
23.7 61.7
1
SO.O 1.2
10
4.7 34.3
-
-
-
:
-
-
-
-
--
9
4.3 25.7 1
-j
211 ' 10O.O 53.6 1
2 1 100.0 . -f
*5eS Nrmber
10
5.5
31
17.1
38
21.0
j
=0
16.6
10.3
\
14
7.7
U
>.>.
26
14.4
181 100.0
He*TM
* Age flrr-up Nunber
76.9
-
43.1
-
27.7
-
37.1
-
65.3
-
100.0
-
100.0
-
74.3
-
45.9
-
* Kegro
-
* Age Group
-
JnJor 16 14 - 30 21 . n 26 - 30 31 - 59 36 - 40 11 - M Over 50 TOTAL
..... . .
Totl Kumlwr ' Percent
2
.7
1M>
S9.2
69
24.8
27
9.7
34
12.2
26
9.4
7
2.5
4
1.5
278
100.0
1
ttiuAer 1
79 35 19 25 20
5 180
fe>llt
.6 43.9 19.4
8.3 13.9 11.1
2.8 -
1OO.O
" t.
* Age Group
50.0
Kopber -
72.5
-
50.7
-
65.5
-
73.5
-
76.9
-
71.4
-
-
-
64.7
-
Tt mat* Feme . -
J AS Croup
. . . -
--------------------=TT,------------!*cro
'fcfr Kunbar
* Ae
% Negro * AO
Oroup XiaOer Fom.1. Oroup
1
1.0 5O.O
-
.
.
30
50.5 27. n
-
-
-
M
34.7 49.3
-
-
-
12
12.5 44.9
-
-
-
0
9.2 26.9
-
-
-
6
.o 23.1
-
-
2
2.0 28.6
-
-
4
4.O 100.0
-
-
-
93 100.0 33.5
-
-
-
* O O> t 5i ^
apssa " 1'PS8 si' 3 a' s s! 3 s s II
* a a 9 s a <n * *JO*'2
* ss
a a s rf
nI1 ~iS
Cr)? w? O rt rt
> o O *) rt i
,' n
,2
o'
' *
<=' r? w
jj n
o a t* *
"ssa
s338s ' a
>' s a a a" " ";||
_____.. . ...... J_-j
8 s 3 s S s s ij
si ' ' ' '
4> rt pj p- o t- f
t? M? W t^ O <ft
-i i "i ~ ~ 1
O8> OH 5J S* OS QS r-
U'3 33533
IJ
rl rt rl
Ii
!
gMnn
ji *' B a a I rl t- J tsT
i&^i '"!.*. . . "5 . *|j SZS88S8
! If1 I
-. --
'('h-i at-nn
iI
*'
rt rt rl H
|i 8, 8, 8i 8i Si 8, S;. iia ssssss^le
M OJ 1
1
f
I
.ft
1 O OO 1 1 1 I
O O W f. fj
*-j o<6 Kw ow o^> t"
I*
*5
u) HI t- ^i r- o> i >n
A;M i
J
a
s
a
J
a
a
i
H ot o t-
mr
1
, 01 rt .** aH
. <J ~ Cj
J8d
I .
t I
1
1 * 0) H ft 1
J
\\ts
m " 2 2 2 2 1 S 3jj!
81' s a a' 3 "' a* : ,_, ft rt ^ t- H rt rt-Oj
*!.,-. .1 _t
in
S W * C5 80 M'
fcl rf
rt .) .
I I I I I I t :<
j
J;73SSSS? P.
*f * i
a " s * I.sjJ
- ffan * *
1 . n ". 5 ". "J ' s s s ss J
* s a s' s " I O O O O i
1 SSSS * '
-' a i s' O O O O 1 1
1 > '
, 0. .,,,. W
SSSS *
-ii --
} S
TABLX 4 (Cont'd) PART XI - S Crime (Cont'd)
Vain 16 16 - 20
21 - 23 26-30 31-38 36 - 40 41 - SO Ovar 50 TOTAL
Suribar Parcaat
-
-
1
14.3
.
.
1
14.3
1
14.3
1
14.3
-
-
3
42.9
7 | 100.0
TART XII
OAKBLINO
A. TOTAZ,
___ Total tfurfacr "Percent
Itedar 16
13
*2
/HSI~: .'^L!.:. ; /*&
J-------- ~ - % white \% A(je
. > white
~* Jfrniber Kale 1 Group number , Penale
-
--
-i
< A8e Group
-
16 - 20 1, 090
18.7
230
23.4 21.1
9 | 11.9
.3
21 - S3 1,870
32.0
374
38.0 2O. 0
17
21.8
.9
26 * 30
029
15.9
20O
20.4 21.3
12
13.4 1.3
31 - 55
707
12.1
94
9. 13.3
13
16.6 1.8
36-40
60$
10.4
75
7.6 12.4
25
32.1 4.1
41-50 t 3&3
6.1
10
1.0 2.8
2
2.6
.6
Owr 50
266
TOTAL j 5.. B5S
4.0
_
100.0 ""flea" 100.0 ' i.T
-
-
78 100.0 1.3
Hmber U
789 1,371
633 513 409 302 260 4,290
...
^Faneie _" ~ ri Nesro 'f Aje 1 Male Group | Munber Poaele Group
.3 10O.O
-
18.4 72.4
62
12.3 5.7
32.0 73.3 14.7 68.1
108
22.3 5.3
84
17.4 9.1
12.0 72.6
87
18.0 12.3
9.5 67. 5
96
19.3 15.9
7.0 85.6
39
8.0 11.0
6.1 97.0
8
1.7 3.0
100.0 73.5
484 100.0 | 8.3
"Kill"
_ E. LOTTQiy
White
Total __ __
f Whl'te
~~
~ Nuihfr '~Prcent tfunbr
Group
r% White"
Undr 26
1
.1
-
-
_ : r:.--.":--...
Map
- __. 'f Seero" Sf'Age
1
Qr<rip Dumber .1 100,0
Group
16 - 20
495
19.2
105
335
18.5 67.7
52
13.4 10.5
21 - 25
785
30.5
1*5
46.2 19.3
8
17.4 l.O
533
29.5 7.9
89
23.0 11.3
2*5 - 3O
443
Z7.2 |
73
22.4 16.9 i
7
13.2 1.6
299 . 16.5 67.5
61
16.0 14.0
SI - 33
303
11.7 ,
-
9
19.6 3.0
223
12.5 74.3
69
17.9 2J.7
36 - 40
284
11.0
-
17
37.0 6.0
192
10.6 67.6
75
19.4 26.4
41-50
152
.1.9
-
2
4.3 1.3
113
6.5 77.6
32
8.3 21.1
Ovar SO
113
4.4 .
-
..
.
105
5.8 92.9
8
2.1 7.1
TOTAL
2,576
100.0 j 333 100. O 13.6 [
46 T 1OO.O 1.9
1,803 ' 100.0 70.2
367
"Tlumber 1 Percent
Under 16
12
16 - 20
595
.4 18.3
21 - 25 1,085
33.3
26 - 30
436
14.8
31 - 55
404
12.4
36-40
321
9.8
41-50
201
6.2
Orer 50
155
4.6
TOTAL
3,259
100.0
C. OTHHl TYPES OF
M*er
HellO
% White
wh: te .
Group Hunbar
.
-
-
-
125
19.3 21.0
6
219
33.8 20.2
9
123
19.3 23.7
5
94
14.5 23.3
4
75 . 11.6 23.4
8
10
1.5 3.0
-
-
-
-
648 | 100.0 19.9
32
>.hlte TAS. -
Group Butter
-
-
12
18.7 1.0
454
28.?
.8
8.18
15.6 1.0
334
12.5 1.0
288
25.0 2.5
217
184
-
-
1SS
100.0 1.0
2,482
Utal '
Male Group 1 Niwber
.5 100.0
-
18.3 76.3
10
33.7 77.2
19
13.5 68.8
22
11.6 71.3
18
8.7 67.6
21
7.5 91.5
7
6.2 100.0
-
100.0 76.1
97
Jt :;egro [* Age
--
10.S 1.7 19.6 1.8 22.6 4.3 1R.6 4.4 21.7 6.5
47.S -J 100.0
lot Kl M>V hreait
Unlir 16
27
1.2
16-20
40C
17.3
21 - 23
833
36.0
28-30
370
16.0
31-35
319
13.8
36-40
239
10.3
TABLX 4 (CotitM)
PART XIII
TIOU.TIOI MOTOR VSH3CI* U>
A. TOTAL
t
mTMtr
TTnfinri Jl*.-' !
Itatar
rtBfri itv Fml Oroup
21
1.6 77.8
-
-
-
218
16.8 M.2
3 13.6 .a
467
36.1 S5.9
6 27.3 .7
203
15.6 34.9
5
22.7 1.3
189
14.3 38.9
3
1S.6 1.0
144
11.1 60^
4
18.3 1.7
"*l
* S.ETO * If
* p-o 11 *
naibn- Hl* Orcmp OBber Fwaal* Sroup
6
.6 | 22.2
-
172
17.7 | 12.3
9
34.6 2,2
359
36.9 j 43.0
154 15. e 41.6
3 , 11.5
.4
8
30.8 S.2
121
12.5 38rf
6
23.1 1.9
91
9.4 38.0
-
Over 5O TOIJJ.
23 2,319
1.0 100.O
5 1,299
.4 20.0 1OO.O 56.0
.
.
22 100.0
.9
20
2.2 ' 80.0
972 100.0 ' 41.9
26 100.0 1.2
PART XIV
VIOLATION OF TROBIBITZOl LAWS
A. TOTAL
I
ITTM*"! >wnl
[ Undr U
198
.5
------rG%]
VMt
1--------niisEJ-]
% tgf
% *8*
NuBtMT 1U1 Group ItartMr , ?ml Oronp
152 |
1.2 78.7
-;
H*p-ft
f <> TT*C. f * SS5~r Je.
Kiabu> ibl* Croup Hmdbr TtaKle ordcp
SI
^ 15.7 ,
is
^7.6
1* - 20 21-29
3,1KB
6,86
13.2 18.O
2,857 1,442
22.1 50.8 11.2 21.5
153 1 10.3 2.7 268 > 18.1 4.0
2.271 | 3,548 !
13.8 40.1 >348 21.6 53.1 '. 1,428
5.6 6^ 22.7 21.4
28-30
1 si - sa
9,222 4.462
2.9 12.0
4,498 1,20
34.7 48.7 9.8 28.4
171
11.6 1.9
3,472 ! 21.2 37.6 1,087
17..1 11.8
245
1.S 5^
1,306 1 11.0 b 40.5 1,143
1IU2 25.6
36-40 3,909
10.5 : 1,171
9.1 30.0
319
81.6 &Jt
1.S81 > 7.8 3B.8 1,132
13.0 29.O
41-50 4,889
12.7 i 1,358 1 10.5 20.0
223 : 15.1 4.8
2,376
14.5 50.7^.
729
11.6 15.3
Cvi> 50 2,308
.2
133 1 1.4 7.9
100
0.8 1 4.3
1,621
9.9 70.3
404
6.4 17.5
TOTiL
37,004
100.0 { 12,923 | 100.0 34.9 1,479 J 100.0 \ 4.0 k 13,405 [ 100.0 44." 6,236 100.0 16.9
B . ?OSS!SS!31i OP UVIOR
rSl! **- -------------*=
Wh t*____
'~Wu26rT"~otToPl ircVnt--'
Kadr
* ! Itol*
*ig. Croup
!fanfcr
?&! ' Group
..-_- . .! lUil
,T"I- ------
'* J.ero < *s
\ Krgro f Ag
tabcr ^(l* Group Hmgbkr "ul* Sroup
Undtr 1&
7
.2
1
.4 10O.O
16 - 20 '
624 ; 13.6
263 ; 11.6 42.5
4
2.7
.7
32S
13.0 32.1
30
3.3 4.7
21 - 23 26-30
1,441 I 834
31.3 18.1
763 ' I
440 |
33.6 33.1 19.3 52.8
38
25.6 S.I
31
20.8 3.7
633
29.3 37.0
303
16.9 36.6
105
29.2 7^
58
16^ 6.9
31-15
351 1 18.5
533
23.3 62.9
3S
21.8 3.8
221
12.S 26.0
S
17.6 7.3
36-40
808 | 11.0
190 ,
8.3 37.4
23.3 7.6
201
U.I 39.
79
22.0 1S.5
41 - 50
220 '
4.3
75 . 3.S 34.1
4.0 3.7
113
9.4 31.3
24
6.7 10.9
Orr 50 i
113
2.3
10 |
.4 8.8
1O3
3.7 91.2
1 TOTAL
4.S98 [ 100.0
2.280 j 100.0 49.<
149 100.0 3.2 j 1,810 100.0 ' 39.4
359 ^ 100.0 7.8
Taul
tater Ttrcettt
Dndr 16
-
-
16 - 20
30
8.6
21-25
106
29.9
26-39
85
24.2
31-35
48
13.7
36-40
29
41 - 50
33
10.0
Ora to
19
8.3
TOUXr
Ml
1OO.O
taMT -
23 68 6t 27
3 4 * 191
H Oroup
.-
12.1 76.7 33.6 64.7 32.5 . 14.1 34.2 2.6
11.4 1.0 M.S 100.0 54.4
0. 3JLI2 07 LIQHCR
Mrixr
-
^5Si .
**"
-
1
10.0 3.3
9
20.0 1.9
2
20.0 9.4
1
10.O 2.1
2
20.0
2
20.0 3.7
-
-
-
10 100.0 2.9
r< i0
RX>-
-
-
6
4.8
34
23.6
HMTB
Group ' VoriMr FViakl* Group
-
-.
-,
20.O 32.4
":
"1<
11 5,9 1.0
2D
13.0 f 23.3
1
S.9 UB
IS
13.3 37.3
2
U.8 4rf
16
12.0
c
22
16.6 62.9
6
35J 20.7
7 . 41-t 20.0
17
I2.B | SB.3
-
133 100.0 37.9
17 100.0 , 4.8 i
- 1ST-
I--.Vnavc 16 16 - 20 SI - 23 26-30 51-55 36-40 41 - 50 Onr SO TOTAL
TABU 4 (Cont'd) P4RT XIV - Violation Ipohlbltlon lan (Cont'd)
D. UKUFACTURIMO LIQ.OOR
1---------------- tt----------*"-' I.
ilP_.r_c_.n_t__]
*-Ae I felt.
< nit. 1-----------------------
IU1. Group
Oronp
2
.3
2
.5 100.0
-
-
-
94
7.7
51
13.3 94.3
1
14.3 1.9
169
24.2
107
27.9 65.3
1
14.3
.6
136
19.5
86
22.4 63.2
2
28.6 1.5
131
18.7
76
19.8 58.0
1
14.3
.8
108
15.5
52
7.4
47
6.7
51
13.3 47.2
-
-
-
11
2.8 23.4
3
8.3 1.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
699
100.0
384 100.0 | 55.0
7 100.0 1.0
** 2 59 46 31 64 61 36
299
Ite rro
Group
-
-
.7 3.6 19.7 54.9
13.4 33.8
17.0 38.9
18.1 50.0 17.1 98.1
12.0 76.6
100.0 41.8
Kmb.r %ES Oroap
-
-
-
-
-
-
.2
22.2 1.2
2
22.2 1.3
5
33.4 2.J
1
11.1
.9
1
11.1 1.9
-
-
-
9 100.0 1.2
hcrf* Pre*nt
Under 16
189
6
16 - 20 4,921
15.6
SI - =5 4,971
15.8
26 - 30 8.167
26.
31 - 31 3.452
10.9
56-40 3.258
10.4
41-50 4,579
15.9
or 50 2,129 .
6.9
TOTAL
51.446 1 100.O
Tot 1 tKMMtr F.rent
UBUr U
382
1.5
16 - 20 4,685
19.0
21 - 25 S.9i!7
15.9
26 - 30 1.279
17.3
SI - 33 3,638
14.8
34 - 40 41 - 50
Ii.308 3,152
9.4
w.a
or 50 3,201
9.5
TOTAL
24,662
100.0
mi: U r*- hii. *A.
-rSSS-i **1.
Mr Jtal. Oronp ~b.r F^Bl* Oroap
150
1.5 79.4
-
-
-
2,518
23.0 51.1
147
U.2 3.0
502
5.0 10.1
227
17.3 4.6
3,904
58.8 47.8
136
10.4 1.6
650
6.3 18.4
2H
16.1 6.1
925
9.2 28.4
277
21.1 8.9
1,279
12.7 29.2
213
16.4 4.9
160
1.5 7.5
100
7.5 4.7
10,068 100.0 32.0 1.313 100.0 4.2
**1TO
^ar V*>M>
<*s.
*.Sro *AC.
Oronp (urixr ?! Oroap
24
.2 12.6
15
.3 8.0
1,938
13.7 3B.4
318
3.4 6.5
2,922
20.6 58.7 1,520
22.4 26.6
3,101 1,516
21.9 38.0 10.7 44.2
1,025 1,075
17.4 12.6
ie.2 51.3
1,010
7.1 31.0 1,046
17.7 32.1
2.188
15.4 50.0
697
11.0 13.9
1,465
10.4 68.8
404
6.8 19.0
14.164 100.0 46.0 6.901 100.0 18.8
tan CT nscnunora CRIMS
lta*r
A. TOTAL
>;
*f risfei K.1. Oroap Jhmttr r*mhli*
*A. Group
11B
1.1 50.9
4
.4 1.1
2,144
20.0 43.8
82
B.5 1.8
1.138
10.6 28.8
324
33.6 8.3
1,720
16.1 40.2
18S
19.0 4.3
1,580
12.9 57.9
170
17.7 4.7
813
7.6 33.3
170
17.7 7.4
1,626
15.2 51.6
29
5.0
.9
1,772
16.3 77.3
1
.1
.1
10,7O7 100.0 43.4
963 100.0
3.9
y*i *"l 0
*E5 **<
<AE.
H^r
Qronp IMMr ma* oroap
248
*^ 64.9
IS
.7 3.1
2,370
21.2 50.3
89
4.8 1.9
1,018
18.1 51.4
453
24.7 11.5
2.0U
18.6 48.2
313
17.1 7.3
1,644 9SS
14.8 46^
e. 41.5
444
24.S 12.2
363
19.9 13.8
1,554
12.1 43.0
143
7.8 4.3
104
4.5 22.0
14
.8
.6
11,169 100.0 46.3 1,833 100.0 7.4
Undr 16 U - 20
--- -
Tot1 mmor r.ro.ni
5
2.4
13
7.3
|----------------------------WBTEi----------------------------11----------------------------KSi----------------------------1
*>!
ITihit*
f-SeT
F.--1. < WSlt. t Ag.
l\dr *! Oroop tatiw mi Oronp
ru *.
_*r.i. *A8.
tab
Group taOn PMl Group
1
1.2 eo.o
-
-
-
4
B.I 80.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
U
16.5 100.0
-
-
-
21-23
69
38.8
46
37.5 66.7
X
23.0 1.4
14
17.7 20.3
8
53.3 11.6
26-30 31-53
39
21.9
13
7.3
23
28.8 59.0
3
3.8 .o
2
30.0 5.1
1
23.0 7.7
11
13.9 28.2
9
11.4 69.3
9
20.0 7.7
-
.
-
56-40
15
7,
6
7.3 46.2
_
.
7
8.9 55.8
m
_
_
41-59
8
4.3
-
-
-
-
-
d
10.1 100.0
-
-
Ovr 5O TOTAL
18 I 10.1
1
1.2 8.0
86 ' 100.0 44.0
.
_
_
4" ioo:t> 2~.Z~
15
16.4 72.2
78 100.0 44.4
4
26.7 22.2
13 100.0
t
I at r- n q . JJg
I1
\\ "3
,
,
,nHHH
s! B si
,
O
-!
4
jI , .J , 0 P 8 8 J! J $
,(. i
if1 a 8 a a J a
s
u
Hi
i
s a a H * 9! |
ujo. 1 3 3 5 S ' ' ' 2
1 i 1 O ? O "O 1 1 1
a R 8 a*
I
r1
1 W n M rl
|
|
1 tt
s
i 1 ". t '. <t ' S S S 8 8 5?
A
ris
1
i (- O rt O 5 rl rt **
1o
! sass* 8
I
i
<D O O t * >
I o **5 0 3 c? n
ig 3S8 a
*
*gS88S88 a
?! 1 1 tf 1 1 0 1 1
8
3
i i t- i i n i t 6
IB S
R
| SI
itntoote>f> 8 8 8* 8 ri
JJ
r ' 1 ' 11 ' I I
3
1
H
1
H*
1
S H K>
If i i i i i i r i 1
M.fi
i
|N i i i i i i i i t
o
1i i i i i i t i 1
'III 1 1 1 3 1 0
Jie3l S33S332 I
,..-.--. 3 1
i { an n sq n n sq
j
41
'1
H
S 8S88S8S i i i i i i ^g
' '^33S32
I i -H n ift n K n o
1
i _j OOJI2**J tt
SSn^wKSF 4 AO
J " a a' a" a d 1
rt
a rt rt a -
I
Jf 1 2 3 S S 5 ' ' S
1 O 10 t- tj 10 1 * O
1
K'
1 rt * W H i I ^
1
8*
O t- *H "1 H O 1 Of-
a s i fc s s a s
ata ' a B a 8* rf ' ^
i rt as8S oin g j^ ^nnsssj
c3**WrtS ^j
c
-j
1 ' J!i ' ' H * i-
>? 3 i -i <J ". ' '5 3aasa i
, W H ,J 1 10
ill 9 85 S - *
g
1 VMHH
',S! * rt t- O O O
1 *
I 19
s2 I R* s s ;5 J t?
Hi "*3"".5"5' " 8 8 ft ^ ' * g
M
ggi'S
1
!! 1 1 *S * ' ' ' ' *
CJ f> tt
N
i n* i i ' i
""1n"1" - 8 8
g
1 i-I P* i-t 1 1 1 10
6 ns " rI <J Cj 0 0
i.S 6SSfl88S|3
IS". 1; ; ". *. ">. 3
V gjj t-t' e~ c" H 5
I *8S <1<1 ""'1 S
"r"to i tw s ra'to"jfjoeoo|
J
S S e-ssaa o>wrf
sI 8,8 ,8 ..8.S.Sg 6 .a IssssKsse
MBZ (COBt'c) PART XT - Uicellueoui Crta (ContM)
0. FELOXT
hfcs.fl'percent
Dnder 16
77
2.?
16 - 20 1,970
30.4
21 - 25
7S7
21.5
26-30
77
21.7
31-33
SJ*
9.5
36 - 40
2;i
6.7
41-50
lf>0
4.9
Orer 50
123
3.9
TOTAL
3.9.14
100.0
Whit*
tola % Kbit*
Age
Peule X white * Ag*
JIUBber lUle Group KuBber Full* Group
8
.9 10.
571
56.3 53.4
316
20.1 41.7
282 17.9 36.8
-
-
-
20 42.6 i.s 9 10.1 i.:
12.8
.8
US
7.8 33.7
3
10.6 1.5
129
8.0 53.2
U4
7.3 71.3
6
12.8 2.1
-
-
-
43
2.7 39.0
1
2.1
.8
1,978 100.0 44.
47 100.0 1.3
Ihnber 60
ele
'SlfT
3.6
Segro
% A?o Qroup
77.9
Munber 9
Fenele % Hearo
Fenele
4.2
* Ate Group --. =
11.7
461
27.3 43.1
13
8.4 1.7
370
21.9 48.9
62
28.9 8.2
433
23.6 36.4
46
21.4 6.0
176
10.3 62.2
42
19.5 12.6
83
5.0 36.2
19
8.8 8.1
34
2.O 1.2
12
S.6 7.S
72
4.3 59.3
7
3.3 5.7
1,690 100.O 48.0
215 100.0 6.1
Muber
Under 16
6
16 - 20
30
21 - OS
170
26 - 30
158
31 - S3
139
36 - 40
60
41 . 50
27
0*r 30
9
TOTAL
.599
Percent 1.0 5.0 28.4 26.4 23.2 10.O 4.3 1.5
100.0
P. JCSCFTXAMEOUS MISDBOUUIORS
h: (
White f Age ffuabar H>1< Group
3
.8 50.0
Ifimtxr
JE Whit* Frale-
G5 rAougp
-
-
-
If
9.1 40.0
1
5.9 3.3
116
30.4 68.2
7
41.2 4.1
111
29.1 70.3
101
2.4 78.7
S 29.4 3.2
1
3.9
.7
30
1,9 50.0
9
8.3 33.9
-
-
-
362 100.0 W.8
3
17.6 9.0
-
-
-
-
I
-
17 100.O j 2.8
Tie rpo
*S % AB
% Negro * AC"
lhafcer
Group Mipber F00l Oroup
3
2.1 50.0
-
-
-
17
11.6 36.7
-
-
-
39
24.0 20.6
12
82.2 7.1
29
19.9 18.3
13
24. 1 8.2
25
17.1 18.0
12
22.2 8.6
16
11.0 26.7
11 . 20.4 18.3
12
8.2 44.9
6
11.1 22.2
9
6.1 100.0
-
-
-
146 100.0 24.4
54 100.0 9.0
Under 16 16 - 20 21 - 85
ae - so
31-35 36 - 40 41 - SO Over 50 TOTAL
Tot 1 Mwber Percent
278
1.5
3,410
18.2
2,354
12.S
J.019
16.0
2,912
19.5
1,881
10.0
2,877
15.3
2.064
11.0
100.0
------------CT:----------1 ------------------B^I------------V--h 1--U----------------------PM^.--------------------
NeeP------------P=m------------
% ttilt Tige nber Hele 0*-oup
Jt White * Age Hudier Fenele Group
* Negro *A0. ---------- J-Hesro- f- Age umb.r "efT Oroup Hnaber FeeBle firoiip
100
1.3 36.0
4
.3 1.4
171
2.0 61.3
3
.2 1.1
l.'W
19.0 43.9
55
6.6 l.ff
1,78
20.8 52.7
61
<.? 1.8
293
3.8 12.5
283
34.2 12.0
1,441
16.6 61.2
333 23.2 14.:
1,15.
14.7 38.3
150
18.1 3.0
1,484
17.1 49.?
225
15.6 7.9
1,024
13.0 33.2
150
18.1 5.2
1,362
15.7 46.7
376
26.1 12.9
601
7.6 31.8
159
19.2 8.4
803
9.3 42.6
.124
22.5 17.S
1.4V5
18.8 51.3
27
3.3
.9
1,257
14.4 43.7
118
8.2 4.1
1,712
21.8 83.0
1 7,asr 100.0 41.8
-,
-
328 ' 100.0 4.4
332
4.1 17.0
-
-
-
8.S6S 100.0 <.! 1,442 100.O 7.7
Totel Rubber 1 Percent
Znder 16
16 - 20
6
3.7
21 - 23
38
36.2
ze - 30
SS
23.8
31-36
17
16.2
36-40
8
7.6
41-50
2
1.9
Orr 50
9
8.6
TOTAL
105 100.0
H. OBTADIIHn OOOD3 OR HONCT OH FALSE FRJ-TENEB
White
**'
barter
Group Number
Fepea* Group
23 56.1 60.5
a 22.0 36.0
7
17.0 41.2
1 50.0 2.6 1 50.0 4.0
2 4.9 22 .a
41 100.0 39.0
2 100.0 1.9
Neffro
T^jro % Age
u*.r
Croup Nuriber
-
6 11.3 100.0
12 22.7 31.6
2
12
49.0
8 15.1 47.0
2
6 11.3 73.0
2
2
3.8 100.0
7
77.8
53 100.0 . 30.5 .
9
PelSJ
22.8 5.2 33.4 12.0
22.; 11.8
22.2 73.0
lOQ.Oj
IUI> 4 (Coot'4)
rim a - inceiineon CM*e (Cont'a)
Total Rnwber Percent
Coder 16-
4
1.1
i -fco
40
10.8
21 - 25
we
47.7
26 - 30
63
22.3
51-3*
29
7.9
36-10
20
5.4
41-50
7
1.9
Orer 50
10
2.7
TOTAL L_ 569
100.0
HBtro
Mala
?amT*
Mala
FqlB
f white I ; Aee 1
* White A 1
* agro f,a
i Negro *^
Huafcer Male 1 Group 1 Wuafcer faimla Grotip fl Suabar Male Group Suatoei- Fe-le .Troup
1
.6 25.0
-
-
3
1.9 ' 75.0
-
-
&
2.9 12.5
-
-
-
32 1 19.6 30.0
3
13.7 7.5
117
64.8 66.5
4
44.4 2.3
47
28.8 26.7
a
J6.< 4.S
55
20.0 42.2
3
33.4 3.6
38
2S.3 45.8
7
31.8 B.4
10
5.7 54.5
5
2.9 25.0
-
-
-
2
22.2 6.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
15 ! 9.2 51.7
14 |
8.6 VO.O
6
3.7 85.7
2
.l 6.9
1
4.5 5.0
1
4.5 14.3
3
1.1 20.0
-
-
-
9
4.9 80.O
~
-
175 100.0 ,47.4
9 100.0 2.4
163 100.0_j 44.^
22 100.0 6.O
Total Hmbei* Percent
tfndar 16
-
-
16 - 20
2 2.e
si - as
24
J0.8
26-30
20
25.6
51-55
22
28.2
36 - 40
2
2.1
41-50
5
6.4
Orer SO
5
3.8
TOT1H
78
100.0
ftuniber 15
16 19 '-
50
X PAL&3 O1TH
ale
white
Male -
White
i kef
croup *u=br
-
-
Pemle X White
-Onlo
-
* Asa Group
-
-
-
-
-
-
3O.O 2.5
2
50.0 8.5
32.0 80.0
1
25.0 5.0
58.0 86.4
-
-
1
25.0 4.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
103.0 M.I
4 100.0 5.1
Hunter
Kajft
* Negro Male
-
Macro
% t^f Group S'.si'ber
-
-
Jer-MZe
% Seero ?e:-*le
.
* Ace Orsup
1
9.* 100.0
-
-
-
4
19.1 1B.7
5 100.0 12.5
5
14.5 1S.O
-
-
2
9.5 . 9.1
-
-
2 ', 9.5 1OO.O
-
-
-
s ' as." loo.o
-
-
S
14.-J 100.0
-
-
SI 100.0 . 26.9 ,
S 100.0 5.9
Dn-'.er 18 16-30 21 - 35 26 - 30 31 - S3 36 - 40 41 - fiO Ov*tr SO TOTAL
Total
- j-hoib-ar rercenc -
12
5.7
90
42.5
56
17.0
37
17.5
IS
7.0
IS
7.O
7
3.3
212
100.0
whit*
wala
Faale
X White % Asa
f white * Age
XumKer le Group 3uafcr Farnl* Croop
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
5.3 58.3
-
-
-
60
47.2 66.7
17
13.4 47.S
23
18.1 62.?
10
1.9 66.6
S
23.8 3.6
a
38.1 22.2
s
23.9 13.3
i
4.8 6.7
10
7.9 6,7
2
9.3 13,3
127 100.0 59.9
-
-
hd21 100.0
Httro
tU\e
% Mtgro 11 *c ;
Hoaber 1 J-kl Group 1-hadanr
-
~i ~
"
s
9.6 41.7
-
* CT*1* i:gro
F-FI-MLZ.*
TM -
[ * *c ' 3raup
~1
24
462 26.7 .
1
3.3 1.0
9
17.3 25.0
2
16.' 5.<
5 >'
8.8 13.5
4
55.4 1O.S
3
5.8 ' 20.0 1
1
9.3 6.7 !
-
- .' -
5
25.0 20.1 |
A
11.5 i 85.7
1
0.3 14.3 '
52 100.0 . 24.5
12 1M.O . 5.7
Total Sumoer Pareant
Under 16
-
-
16-20
2
6.3
21 - 25
15
46.9
28 - V>
5
15.6
31-35
4
12.5
56-40
2
6.3
41-50
3
9.3
uvar 50
1
3.1
TOTAIi
39
100.0
. BUCEUIL Mr !
Hhlta
Kuafcep 2
f hita a.la -
7.4
* *a
Group -
100.0
aolta I % Age tuAar Tanala ' Croup
-
-
-
-
14
51.9 93.3
1
S50 .O
3
11.1 00.0
3
11.1 75.0
2
7.4 100.0
2
7.4. 66.7
1
3.7 100.0
2 | 50.0 40.0
1
25.0 | 25.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
27 100.0 84.4
4. 100.0 12.5
wenro
t Macro * Aea 1
t mgro I Aee
Ifuabar aala Group Xivoer r.l ^oup
-;
-
-
-
-;
--
-'
.-
-;
.-
-
-,
--
1 1OO.O ' 35.3
-
-
-
1 1OO.O [ 3.1 /
-
-
-
-. . ". 1 . .
51
S 8 "> 8- S 8 a
o
1 '
| o'
ft N
I
n
S
N
*
1
H
.
1
1
1
nN
s H Cl r4 M
a
;l s 3 s a s i 8 s s
! 3?
PJ rt
-t i-|
i-< rf
ISS3
<
m
fig
III
S6
i
1se
2T
B
s
1
t H e- rt t-i )ci rt ffl
'I
5! 3 i i * i *> i t i
S*
... 1 1 f 1 *> 1 1 1 0
"lVe"i-
S8
-i
'
t, 1
'5
\
^
,
1%WAiJgte1HGaroleup
1W t H I | |
, - > t; 0 1 J
S3SSS s
--
3 T~~ , , ~o V S8S5
w ------ .._.
I
_ ------|
a
*
0
? H SS 8 3 S* 3 * * 8
i
i
r
3~o g g 8 o 0 o
i
i! 1 ' ' ' ' H ?!
. . _-
H 1 M 05 O)
1 rt 1
I3
1 1 OOO 1 O | 1 o rf-rf s s I
i
I fi H rt
1 rf 1
f*
a
>
n (o n o
''I
S (cf*i Q* H* Oto 4rt H3 Ac-
533533 s
?|j
p 1 j *r> S 0** i
(
I
*l ( 1 1 1 1 1 1
3
j.j o 1 1 O I 1 1 1 1
i!s! Vs.""
S |
rr 1 1 H 1 t f 1 < H
>
1
"1
1
S R S' S S* E 8 S
1 I l t- * n H * w ci * g 3 8 3 * J
A
|
1 .....__.
r
3. 1
_,....,.,,. H g
oj
8i
,
o'
_. . . .. .] "SSSBSS"
I "'if
i-l
"!
s - 8g V 8S88
^ssssssi ii':
_ __
. -- ._
A .^.
APPENDIX C
TABLE 5
BAIL BONDS REQUIRED IX FELON! AND MISDEMEANOR CASES By Amount of Bond
In a Rural Qeorgla County January 1, 1926 - December 31. 1935
Amount of Bond
, Total--,.- _.
Number Percent
Bond S10O or Less
Bond 4101 - *200
Bond Bond
S201 S301
--
{i3s0o0o
Bond $501 - fl.OOO
35
329
76.1
13
4.2
54
7.9
16
5.7
TOTAL
432 1OO.O
Source: Bon docket of the County.
HlmAmmm.rtorm
Number Percent
26
6.3
318 83.0
17
4.4
12
3.2
1O
2.8
383 1OO.O
^1an1*t
Bomber Percent
9
18.4
11
22.4
1
2.0
22
44.9
6
12.3
49 100.0
TABLE 6 TYPES OP BAIL BONDS ACCEPTED IS FDLTOH COUNTS CEOS01A
January 1, 1926 - December 31, 1955
Years
Bond Signed
By Defendant
With No Other
Total
Sureties
Bond Signed By Defendant With No Other
Sureties
Bond Signed by Defendant and
Professional Caah Deposited Bondman as with Sheriff In
Sureties Lieu of Bond
Bond Signed By Defendant and Surety Company
as Sureties
1926 Nusber 5,557
2,184
275
2,828
317
9
Percent 100.0
58.4
4.9
50.8
5.7
.2
1927 lumber 4,287
1,425
160
2,509
160
3
Percent 100.0
35.4
3.3
58.9
3.3
.1
19S8 Number 4,247
1,446
135
2,558
126
2
Percent 100.0
34.O
3.2
59.8
3.9
.1
1929 Nuafcer 4,273
1,331
204
2,640
99
4
Percent 100.0
31.1
4.8
61.7
2.S
.1
1830 Nunber 4,187
1.SS6
191
2,517
1O9
34
Percent 1OO.O
51.9
4.6
60.1
2.6
.8
1S31 Vunber 4,540
1,392
218
2,359
80
Percent 100.0
50.7
4.8
62.5
1.8
1.e1
1952 Kunber 4,355
1,233
233
2,828
48
15
Percent 100.0
28.3
5.4
64.8
1.1
.3
1953 number 4,520
1.039
294
2,942
45
-
Percent 100.0
24.1
6.3
68.1
1.0
1954 Number 4,968
1,007
196
3,753
12
-
Percent 100.0
20.3
3.9
75.6
.2
1935 Nunfcer 5,034
890
195
3,904
4S
Percent 100. O
17.7
3.9
77.5
.9
_
TOTAL Nuafcer 45,743
15,233
2.1O1
29,292
1,059
78
1OO.O
28.9
4.6
64.0
2 -^
.2
Source: Bond docket of Fulton County.
-133-
BAIL BOW!) ASSCSSKEJITS 11 All ORBAI OEOROIA COtJaTT By Crlava
January 1, 1926 - Deoewfcar 31, 1935
CRIMES
Accoesory to tne Crlwa> Adultery and Farcleetlon Aaaault Aaaanlt and Battery Bleofceall Carrying Conaealf4 Weepone Carrying Pletol iltbout Llcenee Cheating and swindling Eacape Defrauding Board Bill Dlapoelng of Mortgaged Property Sfeturblng Public Woraalp Druttaanneea Oawillng Larceny, elBple Maintaining Dieorderly Houae Maintaining Caetjllng Device Mallcloua Mllebl'f Kledeawaoor, aiaiellaneoua Operate Antowoblle Intoxicated raaa aorthleae Cheoka Public Indecency Receiving Stolen Oooda Reokleae Drlvlne Soliciting for Iroatltntlon Stabbing Treapaaalng Vagrancy Violation of Qe Lav Violation of Motor Vehicle Law violation of Problbltlon Law Violation of Ta:: Lav Ife Beating TOTAL OLStEtEAHORS
Under Total
$101 to to 100 200
t301 <401 v501 V601 ,801 elOOl (3001
to
to
to
to
to to to
to' Over
300 400 800 600 800 1000 5000 10000 100OU
62 646 871 2,779
20
12
9 11
-
19
1
8
2
-
-
3 308 198 69
38
1
23
4
164 219
3 48
1
7
4
. 1,194 730 528
-
1
4
4
23 230
8
~5
4 49
4
4 2
"
1
2,050 452
3,291 31 12
773 770 365 10 114
4
2
6
1
2
253 148 30
3 15
1
t
1 1,812
-
2 6
658 7 3
36a3
1
43 289
2
-3
19 -
19 1 -
7B -8
40 -
2 -
-
38 41 1,984 1,952 1,088
. .
14
13
15
5
3 1,446 358 91
31 1,748 94 19
315 327 179
2
1
a1ii
8 70 41 380
. 1
.
..
.
w
8
1
9
9
1 70 14
_ -- -
.
m
-
90 2,687
40 25 U 1 1,146 807 409
2a
3 237
1 7
1
2
1
3 63 10
-
-
283
152 1 28
11
1
4,452
67 2,297 789 389 39 495
6 16 264 69
1
___
3,480
1 1,575 1,149 514
30 182
4
- 23
1
1
-
I
_
2
5
3
.
a
_
3
_
__
124
42 33
16
1
3
4
540
5 160 98 88
8 124
2
3 40 15
we-
ea>
801
10 870 128 38
6 47
1
4
IB
4
7
1
~
6
~
TM
1
"
~
*
1,011 64
1,717
379 224
;
38 1,142
17 34*
ae
1
2
6 119
^
13
8
-
1
49
45
4
754
20 453 144 73
3 39
2
- 17
3
-
-
24,2ze5a4
1,010
7 11,698 7,319 2,590 181 1,971
47
33 370
41
1
,,
1 263 IS
1
373 519 211
4 3 87
-
2
8
3
-
-
86,340 138 28,064 15.234 6,490 390 4,474 98 98 1,078 233
5
4
Und.r Total 50
F1XQH113
fso noi
to to 1OO 2QO
*201 to
300
301 |401
to
to
-400------600_
601 801 $1001 J5OD1
to to
to
to OTvr
800 1000 5000 10000 tlOOOO
araon Aiaault with X:itnt to Hordr Aault -1th latant to Rap* Attaint Felony Fautlallty
Break and Enter Railroad Car Bribery Burglary Embezzlement Felony, mleoallaneoua Purgerj Kidnapping Larceny Larceny of jtalowjobll* Xanalanghter laybeai Harder Perjury Rape Riot Robbery Seduction Snooting at Aaotber TOTAL 72X011X3 PRA1D TOTAL____________________ Sources Bond dootot of the oounty*
1,453 159 399 34
.49 40 26 2.588 72
49> 83B
4 7,815 2,878
180 28 3 21 147
SB 16
1
2
21
7
18
341
22 487 178
17
2
27
2 57 39
9
68
208
3
8
92
IB
1
2
6
22
3
11
2
1
33 124
81
2
3
1
13
3
-
M
29
9
S
369
41
88 1,687 220
17
11
22
7
11
21
27
-
3
1
13 3,162 2,043
48
52
14
3 201 122
24
19 149
3 174
71
20
L3
1
21
17
58 1.026
44
50 364
86
8 178
1
S 1,477 161
a6
4
6
III
1
1
174
42
a l
3
2
53
33
I "l
a
4
i
31
i 3.
3
'11
41
9
-
13 SS 43
2U
28
24
741 130
198
10
l
1
8 664 496
37
13
4
18 3.433 2,559 1,634 129 3,2O3 133
8.521 1,605 160
31,817 17,793 8.3ft 81 7.677 ZZa 248 6,899 1,838
TABLE 80 BAH. BOND ASSESSMENTS IS GEORGIA COUHTISS
January 1, 1986 - December SI, 1935
Amount of Bond
Total Number Percent
Urban Count? Number Percent
$100 or Leas
32,702
40.4
31,687
$101 - $800
19,834
24.5 17,793
$201 - tZOO
1O.082
12.5
8,124
$301 - $500
8,936
11.0
8,196
$501 - $1,000
$1,001 - $s,ooo
7,28O 1,887
9.0
7,072
2.3
1,838
$5,001 - $10,000
169
.2
165
Over $10,000
17
.1
17
TOTAL
80,907
100.O
74,892
Source: Bond dockets of three countlee.
48.3 23.8 1O.B 10.9
9.5 2.4
.2 .1
loo.o
Ru-Urban CoUDtT Number Percent
980 1,712 1,940
706 192
49 4 .
5,583
17.6 3O.7 34.7 12.6
3.4 .9 .1 -
100.0
'ha-al Countr Number Percent
35
8.1
329
76.1
18
4.2
34
7.9
16
3.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
432
100.0
TABLE 9* BOND FORFEITURES IH AH DRBAH GEORGIA COUNT*
January 1, 1926 - December 31, 1935
Year
_Bond Forfeitures Dumber Percent
Set Aside Number Percent
1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935
1,143 887 784 739 663 735 592 564 607 707
1OO.O 100.O 100.0 100.0 10O.O 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
1OO.O
991
86.7
679
76.6
624
79.6
538
72.8
456
68.8
498
67.8
427
72.1
597
70.4
524
86.3
327
46.3
TOTAL
7,421
100.0
5,461
73.6
Source: Minute docketa of the City and Superior Courts of th county.
Not Set Aside Number Percent
152
13.?
208
23.4
160
20.4
201
27.2
807
31.2
237
32.2
165
27.9
167
29.6
83
13.7
380
53.7
1,960
26.4
- 135 -
TABLE 10 COLLECTIONS OF BAIL BOND FORFEITURES
In an Urban County of Georgia January 1, 1926 - December 31, 1935
Year
Bond Forfeitures
Not Set Aside
Number
Percent
Number Bond Forfeitures Not Sat Aside In which Collection was Hade After Judgment Bad Been Rendered
Number Percent
1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935
152
100.0
208
100.0
160
100.0
201
100.0
207
10O.O
237
100.0
165
100.0
167
100.0
83
10O.O
380
100.0
94
61.8
194
93.3
157
98.1
170
84.6
118
57.0
171
72.2
130
78.8
112
67.1
10
12.0
358
94.2
TOTAL
1,960
100.0
1.514
77.2
^Source: Minute dockets of the City and Superior Courts of the county.
Nunber Bond Forfeitures Hot Set Aside In which No Collection was Hade After Judjqnent Had Been Rendered
Number Percent
58
38.2
14
.6.7
3
1.9
31
15.4
89
43.0
66
27.8
35
21.2
55
32.9
73
88.0
22
5.8
446
22.8
TABLE 11 FINAL JUDGMENTS ON BAIL BOND FORFEITURES
In an Urban County of Georgia January 1, T926 - December 31, 1935
Year
Bond Forfeitures
Not Set Aside
Number
Percent
Bond Forfeitures Not Set Aside
In Which Final Judg
In Which no Final
ment Was Rendered
Judgment Was
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
1926 1927 MSB 1929 1930 1931 1938 1933 1934 1935
152
100.0
2O8
100.O
160
100.0
201
1CO.O
207
100.0
237
100.0
165
10O.O
T67
100.0
83
1OO.O
380
100.0
132
86.8
194
93.3
129
80.6
187
93.0
203
98.1
229
96.6
ISO
S0.9
161
96.4
79
95.2
376
98.9
TOTAL
1,960
100.0
1,840
93.9
osource: Minute dockets of the City and Superior Courts of the count*
20
13.2
14
6.7
31
19.4
14
7.0
4
1.9
8
3.4
IS
9.1
6
3.6
4
4.8
4
1.1
6.1 120
- 136-
APPENDIX D
TASLS 12
DETAIL OF CLASS XPICATIOJf MISCELLAHEOUS Incloded In Table 1*, Pcgtm 140 - 141
CHIMES
MJMBHt OP CASES
Abortion
3
Accessory Before the Pact
3
Barratry
3
Slactaall
3
Burning Fences
1
Concealing Death of Bastard Child
2
Conaplraoy
3
2nt Icing Sornnta Away
4
Extortion
Z
Forging Lttra
7
Glrlng Liquor to Minora
4
BarborSi^ Absconding Child
2
Xllgal Certification of Chvctai
1
I llfl;.l Purchaae of Cotton S<J
9
InToluntary Hanalaughtar
8
aklng Fal 3 AfridaTlt by Contractor
3
Maintaining Opium Joint
9
?wralCtlng Xarrlag* Certlflcat* Illegally
1
Perailttlng Minors to RoU Tanplna
3
?o*aaaslngf MmVlng, or Handing Burglar^ Toola
2
Polsonlag Stream
8
Socurlng Produce fro Realty
1
Selling Obaeena Pictures
1
Sending or Delivering Threatening Letter*
7
Taking Oysters from Bed out of Season
Using Illegal Trade Mark*
7
Violation of Bulk Sales Act
3
Violation of Insurance Regulation*
4
- 137 -
CHIMES AbandonBant Mullary ana Tornlt atlon
Aaaault
Aaaault and Sattaru AttaBpted Baaatlallty or Sodomy Barbarlng Without Llcanaa Ba.tardy BraaJrtng, Entering, and Stalling Brlbary. niac'a.Maror grada Carrying Daadly Wcapoaa
Chaatlng and S-lnC.llng Crualty to ChllOrnn and Aniaala Daraelng Public PLoparty Trtaturblng T>Vlna Horahlp Zacaplog Pallura to Fay Occupational Tax Firing wooda Hauling Bit and Run Driving
mji tmtt*
Larcany, alBBla tarcany Af tar Twiit tlb.l Maintaining ILa-d Bouaa Sallclous Mlachlaf MayhaB, BladaBaanor grada MlaoaBaanora, blaatot enarga Klsdaaaanora, atiacallanaoua Obacana Languaga
Obatruotlug Lagiil Proea.a
Oparatlns Auto iihlla Drunk Onaratlng Slot ibcblna alto Sluga Paaplng TOM
lumber Parcant
HUBbar Parcant
KuBbar Pareant
BuBbar Parcant
BuBbar Parcant
BuBbar Pare ant
Bujabar Pare ant
jruBbar Pareant
Bunbar Pareant
Buabar Pal-cant
Niabar
Kinabar Parca&t
Numbar Pareant
HuBbar Pareant
ItxtBbar Farcant
Pareant
KuBbar Pareant
HuBbar Pareant
KuBbar Pareant
KoBber Pareant
NuBbaiPareant
BuBbar Parcaat
Humbar Pareant
HUBbar Pareant
KuBbar Pareant
Hnmbar Pareant
IfnBbar Pareant
Parca&t
HuBbar Pareant
Busbar Parcaot
Kumbar Pareant
MunbaF Pareant
KuBbav Pareant
KuBbap Parcaat
TABLE 13
HSmaBWto CASES T*->r In a-blcb Doeket-id City Court* of C'etrgia ~ . 1926 - Dacetnber 31* 1B3S
Total
2,674 1CO.O
s.ses
100.0
ua
100.0
e10,0v*n0
21
141 100.0
909 100.0
388 100.0
18 100.0
e,2W 10O.O
2.949
1926 149 5.0 554
15.7 13
9.4 530 7.6
2
.
37 4.1 12 3.0
4 22.2
716 11.3
3
1927 133 5.0 935 9.8 14 10.1 573 8.2 1
49 S.4 23 5.3
-
574 9.2
1
1928 229 8.6 352 13.6
16 11.7
652 9.4
2
52 3.7
18 4.5
1 5.6 613 9.9
2
1929 246 9.2 580 22.4
10 7.S 688 9.9
2
7Z 7.9
14 3.3
5 27.7
656 10.6
13
1930
269 10.1
2t 10.2
9 6.9
716 10.3
-
.
80 8.8
40 10.1
3 16.7
633 1O.2
14
1931 407
15.2 211 8.1 11 8.0
679 9.7
4 19.1
84 9.2 41 10.4
2 11.1 629 10.1
11
1932
281 10.3
147 6.7
15 10.9
740 10.6
-
18
110 13.1
re
18.2
2 11.1
600 9.7
22
W33
309 11.5
162 6.2
30 21.8
823 11.8
7 33.3
34 24.1
139 13.3
74 18.7
I
639 10.6
631
U34
348 13.0
MS 5.3
10 7.2
801 11.5
3 14.3
31 22.0
100 11.0
61 15.4
1 5.6
623 10.0
954
1933 SC3 11.3 125 4.8
10 7.2
768 11.0
-
38 41.1
177 19.3
41 10.4
-
511 8.2 893
3,71 100.0
202 10O.O
M 100.0
442 100.0
452 100.0
239 100.0
24 100.0
4,375 100.0
76 1OO.O
45 100.0
20,22S 100.O
9SS 100.0
10 100.0
297 100.0
774
19 100*0
1lo,1o8.o8
100 100.0
24J 100.0
ZS 100.0
o,9sa
100.0
70 100.0
44 100.0
500 10.5
23 11.4
1 2.9
56 12.7
36 8.0
19 7.9
I
1,109 25.S
-
409 11.0
S3 11.4
6 16.7
60 13.4
46 10.2
10 4.2
3 12.9
328 12.1
:
375 10.1
13 7.4
I
41 9.3
45 9.9
36 15.1
3 12.3
463 10.0
:
341 448 9.2 12.0
24
16
11.9 7.9
4 11.1
2.81'
24
11
5.4 3.8
53
66
11.7 14.9
88
12
36.8 5.0
3
1
12.5 4.2
551 12.6
a
10.5
312 7.1
e
10.5
463 12.4
24 11.9
2 3.3
&O 11.3
51 11.3
27 11.3
2 8.3
255 S.8
6 7.9
454 3 ' tV
22 10.9
-
4O 9.1
33 7.3
16 6.7
4 16.7
257 5.9
3 6.6
317 259 8.3 6.9
13
26
6.4 12.9
4
10
11.1 27.8
6V
47
11.5 10.6
32
48
7.1 10.6
ft
13
3.8 5.4
5
2
20.8' 8.3
263 313 6.9 1.2
1
13
9.2 19.8
267 7.2
16 7.9
a
22.2 M
12.7 42
9.7 9
3.1}
1 4.2 322 7.4
27 35.5
15.6
1,479 7.3
116 12.2
20.1
1,547 7.6
103 11.0
13.5
1,660 8.3
119
13.3
1,638 0.1
89
11.1
2,119 10.S
111
6.7
2,183 10. f
aa
11.1
2,558 12.7
90
2.2
2,421 12.0
72
4.4
2,230 11.0
88 9.2
2.2
2,390 11. a
77 8.1
10.0
5
-
30.0
3
1
30.0 1O.O
41
3S
26
33
37
24
38
IS
13
30
13.8 11.8 8.7 11.8 12.4 8.1 12.8 4.4 6.1 10.1
61
40
50
50
73
81 120 114
96
89
6.5 9.4 10.5 15.9 14.7 12.4 11.4
5.3
140 11.8
7 7.0
13.8 112
a
8.0
3.3 20.9
113
97
2
1
2
5.3 5.3 15.8 10.3 5.3 10.5
78 101
82
W 147 259
5.0 12.4 21*6
16
7
8
14
7.0 9.0 10.0 16.0 16.0 7.0 6.0 14.0
11
15
30
18
23
21
36
37
25
27
4.3 6.2 12.3 7.4 9.5 8.7 14. Q 15.2 10.3 11.1
4
2
3
1
7
4
1
1
1
4
14.3 7.1 10.6 3.6 25.0 14.3 3.6 3.9 3.6 14.3
413 6.0
577 8.3
538 7.7
665 9.6
547 7.
809 11.6
798 11.3
860 12.4
io75.a1
99. 14.2
6
2
7.9 2.7
3
9
2
5
9
13
26
I 4.0 12.0 2.7 6.7 12.0 17.3 34.7
2
9
4
4
4.S 20.4 9.1 9.1
5 _ 11.4
3
7
6.9 15.J
4
6
9.1 13.6
:HIES
r ubllc Dru.-.lnr.e!is Public Indecency Receiving Stolen Goods Receiving Unateaped Tobacco* Removal of Mortgaged Property Resisting an officer Rioting Selling Mortgaged Property Shooting at Occupied Dwelling Stabbing Treapeaa "sing jiuto without Owner's Consent I'alng .Vorse without Owner's Conaent Usury Vagrancy Violation of Comon School Law Violation of County ilealth Regulations
violation of oaae Laws Violation or Highway Regulation* Violation of Labor Leva violation of Motor Carrier Lews violation of voter Vehicle Lava violation of Prohibition Lav '. iolatlcn of the Sabbath '. lolatlon of Tlafcer awa V.Ife Beating 'ttAKD TOTAL ^Source: rocket* of 10 city court.,.
- Kl*dwae*Jior C*as (
Total 1926 1927 1329 1929 1S30 1951 1952 1935 1S54 13SS
Hunber
46
Percent 100.3
4
5
8.7 10.9
3 6.3
2 4.5
2
10
4.3 21.7
1 2.2
e.74
8 17.4
7 13.2
Nuatber Percent
Kuwber
8,751 100.0
211
477 7.1
5S5 8.4
s66.a4
795 11.8
659 9.5
585 8.7
544 8.1
;i9 651 1313
9.2 12.J 1S.1
ia
is
16
25
15
14
56
27
C.5 16.8 12.6
a1.99
34 15.9
Snwtoer
293
44
59
4O
45
45
1
1
1
44
55
Percent 100.0 15.0 13.3 15.7 15.4 15.4
.3
.5
.5 15.0 11.5
Huabftr
840
Percent 100.0
53 5.9
54 4.O
238 28.3
a1o7.74
184 21.9
95 11.3
43 5,2
24 2.9
12 1.4
S .4
winter Percent
VuwMr Percent
21S 100.0
64 100.0
18
28
52
33
29
24
IB
20
7
5
8.3 13.S 15.1 15.6 15.7 11.3 7.5 9.4 5.3 2.4
6
3
-
e 12
a
6
6
5
14
21.2
uafcer
160
18
12
30
19
54
5
10
10
3
14
Percent 100.0 11.3 7.3 13.8 11.9 21.5 3.1 6. 6.2 5.0 8.7
wmeber Percent
NuHber Percent
Itusfcer Percent
100.0
100.0
2,407
1OO-O
11 11.3
2
4.1
194 S.1
9 9.7
a
18.5!
ISO 6.7
7
15
18
7.5 16.1 19.4
4
4
5
8.2 8.2 10.2
a2O.3O
209 9.7
221 9.2
5.4 15.1 6.4 3.2 5.4
4
5
2
5
12
8.2 6.1 4.1 1D.2 24.5
m 220 295 545 22
9.1 12.5 14.5 12.1 11.2
Xuabar
554
percent 100.0
20 6.0
26 7.8
20
34
6.0 10.1
31 9.5
55 9.9
n.39
47 14.1
50
54
9.0 16.2
wuafter
442
Percent 100.0
36
30
51
38
46
41
47
44
51
53
3.1 11.3 7.0 8.6 10.4 9.5 10.6 10.0 11.3 15.2
uafcer
16
Percent 10O*O
ss.o4
ia.73
5 18.7
1
2
6.3 12.5
-
-
1
2
6.3 J2.S
-
Muster
ICO
Percent 100.0
47
1O
7
36
5
- 29.3 6.5 4.4 22.5 5.1
1
2
48
4
.6 1.3 50.0 2.5
Ituwber 4.027 513
517 458 379 653 588 563 555 588 550
Percent 100.0 10.4 10.5 8.9 7.7 15.4 11.9 1.1.4 10.6 7.9 7.1
Hunger
19
5
Percent 100.0 26.3
4
2
5
21.1 10.3 26.3
:
1 : 5.J
-
: lo.f2
Xuafcer
24
Percent loo.o 20.9
1 4.2 4.2 4.2 12.5 20.8 8.3 12.3 8.3 4.2
Jluster
IB
Percent 100.0
1
1
0.3 6.3
6
8
50.0
Kuwker 1.079 121
159 106 101 122 139
75 lit
92
93
Percent 100.0 11.2 12.9 9.8 9.4 11.5 11.0 7.0 10.7 7.6 9.1
Number
52
4
13
1
12
7
4
Percent 100.0 7.7 25.0 l. 25.0 15.3 7.7
3
4
4
I 5.8 7.7 7.7
Sunbar
150
8
Percent 100.0 6.2
Number
6
Percent 100.O
I
1
2
3
3
-
3 110
"
.8 1.5 2.3 2.3
2.5 34.6
~
-
11 I 16.7
6
52
16
9.1 48.5 24.2
~
1
1.5
Sunber 0,929 462
425 595 419 438 590 444 225 266 445
Percent 100.0 11.8 10.8 10.1 10.7 11.7 9.9 11.2 5.7 6.8 11.5
ii.o !hn*er
Percent
58lo.2o1.7o
4,537 11.9
5 S9S to.3
4i.5i5.98
4.696 12.3
5,912 10.9
4,207
5,306 10.O
5,163 8.3
2,008 7.6
2,435 6.3
Ittneber
52
10
Percent 100.0 19.2
7
5
7
3
1
0
9
*
15.3 9.6 13.5 5.8 1.9 11.5 17.3 7.7
Susfcer
22
2
Parcant 100.0 9.1
Ruster 1,389 88
Percent 1OO.O 6.3
2
2
9.1 9.1
-
1
4
I 4.3 18.2
10
1
I 45.3 4.3
107 112 124 125 158 159 158 195 165 7.7 8.1 8.9 8.9 11.4 11.4 11.4 14.0 11.9
ftunber 125,152 12.379 Percent 100.0 9.9
11,380 9.1
12,401 9.9
13,156 1O.5
12,550 12,829 10.O 10.3
12.745 ic.2
12,562 10.0
12,552 10.0
12l,5e9.18
- 139 -
I.ISDEKEUIOR CASES - BI COOTTY HI UHICH DOCK2TED 29 City Ctwrts of Goorcia
January 1. 1926 - Decenbor 31, 1935 .
CREJS Abandonment Adultery *nd Fornication Assault Assault and Battery Attempted Beartiality or Sodony
Barbaria^ withe nt License Bastardy Breaking, Entering and Stealing Bribery, misderieanor grade Carryiic Deadly Weapon*
Total
3,354 2.710
162 7,729
21
Fulton
1,725 666 29
2,871 10
141
931 443
20 $.930
38 657
251 13
2,431
Carrying on Lottery Cheating and Swindling Cruelty to Children and Animals Defacing, Public Property Disturbing DiTljae Worship
2.S76 4.429
245 49 543
2,300 1,494
37 _
77
Escspirg Failure to pay Occupational Tax Pirij^ Woods
Gertollng Eat axd Run Driving
549 244 37
4.642 76
97
61 1
1,868 42
Illegal Arrests Larceny, aiwpla Larceny After Trust Libol ifciirtaliiing Land House-
bo 22. SOS
1.1=5 15
342
26 8.159
431
3 180
Ilallcious Uischief li,yhan> clsdeEeanor grade lisdeneanor, llanlret charge lUsdanoanor, xiscellaneous Obscene Lancu*ce
864
377
19
4
3,405
28
111
34
293
128
Obstructing Legal Process Operating Auto while Drunk Operating Slot T^achine with Slugs
Peeping Tea Practicing Prof* without Lioensft
30 7.138
114
47 55
4 3.424
SO 7
21
Bacon
Aoolinic
7 10
10
7
2
3
40 40
-
-
Brantlty
Burns
Chothen
Clarke
Bibt
Dulloe h
Carrol:1 ctittoora
108
2
SI 2
48 31 15
43
105
3
50 1
37 28 9
14
2
6Z
7
S1
S
839
9 222 54 158 729 13
99
5
-
--
-
1
-
-
.
M S7
.
_
.
17 _
3
2
4 12
--
12
12
33 3
10
1 21
-
12
S
44 ~
7
__
-
--.
1
1_
22
19 558
10
141 83
123 1,037 17
52
--
.S
47 11 164
11
1 26
5
_S
14
9 17
_
_
1 294 92
2
30 1
2
11
6
75 15
_
1
1
2
50 402 2 133
14 22 1
5
19
_
_
45
S1
4
1
_ 55
.
1 27
8 182 3
4
1
1 75
-
21
6 28 _
2
7
__
1
_
_
3_
_
20 10 385
IS 125
156 164 19
42
-
-1
-
1-
-
1-
-
2
,,
2
.
.^
1
6_
1
122
37 2.375
38 420 376
486 2.696 18
344
1 133
-
6 12
6 158 *
28
_
.
1
-
_
_
3_
1
1 22
-
--
11
41
-
5
3
_ 116
Z
14 10
31
43
1
4
-1
"
_
11
_
39 18 4
42 300 9
_ 21 44
3
2
_2
9 11 15
i
14 31
2
14
..
18
19
T_ 1
_
2 10
_
.1
5
2
--
1
5
8 628
8
73
6
114 395 14
77
_
_3
-
1_
20 .
_
13
-
1_
3 10 1
3
-
--
-
12
3
5-
-
Public Drunlceunesa Public Indecency Receiving Stolen Goods Receiving Uns^ar^od Tobaccos
Senoiral of Kortgcged Property
7.427 229 452 937 274
2,132 118
224 412
47
Resisting an Officer
Rlcting Selling lijrtga^ed Property Shooting at Occupied Dwelling Stabbing
70
250 128 SB
2 .461
32 8 14
20 1,000
Trespass Use Auto without Ormor'a Consent Use Horse without Cimor'a. Consent Usury Vagrancy
416 475
20 160 5.477
56 103
-
126 3.290
Violation of Cannon School Lairs Violation of County Health Rules Violation of Election Lam Violation of Cane Lam Violation of Highway Regulations
Violation of Labor Laws Violation of LUjtor Carrier Laws Violation of Itotor Vehicle Laws Violation of Prohibition Law Violation ot Sabbath
Violation of Tinber Laws Wife Beating
23
9
27
9
26
9
1.407
144
SO
12
131 72
4,453 42,691
62
_
9 1.525 22.4S5
16
24
5
1.442
874
TOIAL
141,056 60.233
34 44 154
48 178 8 460 21 73
90
1 18
_
__
S 28 ^
2
_
_ 32
-
1 16
3
35
2
10
2
_ 93
7 10
4 100 2
S
a
12
"
20 19
13 14 1
15
i
19
8 3e
1
16
27
4
7 365
2
58
----
12
----
27
--
72
3 13 3
1
__
5
3_
1
4
31
9
17 563
-
16
10
4 40
_
1 56
_
1
_
,, 21
5
2 3S9
2
25 16
S 10
_
4
8
_
-
4 IS
5 46 S
20
36 93 2
6
2
_
_
_--
_
27 83 3 10Z
1
--
--
,,
7
_
1
--_
_
n
_
2
3
_
2
_,,
1
,,
_
2
_
3
_
48 45 87
13
56 73
45 138 6
16
-1
-
1
-
7
1
-- _
_--
78 S
,, _
4
3
33
m
_
32 _
1
8
4 246
14
88
9
58 134 IS
153
295
85 2,144
70 514 536
802 692 133
496
1
2
-
61
Z 12
3
--
3
--
,,
_
2
1
--2
_
4
4 118
5
42
6
42 37 1
7
an 406 9.618 329 2.871 1.450 2.925 fl 458 420 1 871
* Sourcei MLnute dockets of 29 ailty courltJ.
- 140 -
"| w>S i w g * 3 83 HNW 3 ' ' 3 '
t rt
rH
W
rt
flfi
cortNNi
CclCOlO
%?>
0^0,gl
4>c4Otiu> M o o i e-
rt tO
O
N
IrHt-lg
-gO,, 3
icjiino rtOrH HH.
| c- to i
aSTa s ,,,,;,, ;s
<
PNNritO
IM l 13
j
V>
<3 l
>) is
t-
3~3
Hi 8
rl
1j
* 0rt H 1
Illlcn
Idlil
llfll
drl^
' S S ' :"
Ml^ll
rt"
*-*
l fJcJHKP 1 <n
rt 1 (0 rt 1 |
M(OH^ri^l
Ol 1 t- W rt
IttO ^ HlN trH-ll|iO
1 rt rt 1 ^i (O rt
U>:ii| rt
,
8
rt
J^
rt
S rt<H
rt
^
1 CJ <0 1 M
b-OlDO)0
H 1 Ul 1 N
IO(0|IN
^* IIIAI
"Bg- "S |
"" s?r '"
gM s- -- 3?
it5oj uiHl
1< 1 1 1
r5trHjcneoeo
tO I rt rt 0>
tmt-rt(O?t* o^ lno
ICANrtN OUlln
IIINaH
IIIC4H
""sS*
n
NINOIN "S
<s
w
ICO
<
M
^
IO N III Mt- 1 rt iO CJ
1 CO I N rt ^>
CO rt rt W * trt
1 1 1 M 01 ItOrtrtCO
t-U)|ICIf) rt 1 1 Q
N
HrtlC4 rH N rt 1 1 CJ rH
rt
1 lg>JJ
aW g"
l
g
gn
H
rtrt
"
S
1 1-1 o en H i o to
rj rt
g
rt
W
in as- s
B rt
N
J
rH
| rt^^S 1
"R
ro *t- t*j (o <*?> t
fr
X W t- t* f 1
^> rt
S
TOlrt^ltDl
S 1010
S
Pj ar
Qrt(0/Hin
rH
rt
< WW| 5S "S* 11 rt >gj'
i t- m i *toNo > H rt (ooitte-n n
NlMlcl
rt
*
iHrMinHli) S
lOrHNCOl *"
llrtMNlO
1 5 M (O *
rtNy<Ml
.4
JOrt
N
CO
,,a-3 s,..a S,,0S
PrHU>rH
rtHrtS
IrtMlct *
(OrtOI 1
rt * (O t <H rt
OIMCniO M
| rt rt rt tD
*3 * ' I*4
* ' ' ft W rH
rt rt rt H 0>N W
* 1 t- f 1
W
rt
rt O> 1 * 1 O M
* < Cl N tDrtrt <*>
rt tO tO 1 O
OT M 1 1 U)
rt'OrttO
tO
| rt rt lO (O tO
85" S-|" "8'-' |<S m """'S a nl 'S " rt S*
U1 rt
tO
O)
N
NtOrHrtMrtV)
rtO)
IrtOi^i tolunt* lininlrt tortintom iiitco rt to l l o l * l tn 10
(ON
CllOrtn)
<Ortr-I
lONtOV
*P
tIMtol
rt w
llgg,
1 1 M eo 1
M rt O rt 01 r* <" W 1Q
rt i tn CD Y J< 0> CO "5*
|co en
S
,. g
l co 01
to
1 rt
to
rt
Q
S
rt
it1* to
rt
uS
CO
'S 1(-J
|*2 ri S
3
V)
rt
rt
4*
s
CH
0)C4^H|
1 *O * 1 N
Oi (O C H O
NlOtTll
<.*
f)
i-t
to
Ul
M
i-l tO
O
S
rt W
rt
CO
rt
1-1 ' S o M rt O
c3 S f
5frt
tn
K
! N 1 r-C O 1
llrHliH
IrHiHIN
IrtlMI
irtiri rt i N rt i
t^iii t-iii!
iiii m irtiii
iiiirt 1 1 CO<-t |
1 rt
O
g
iH I MM
'2" ' ' t- i-itoiin NIIC^I
<f |
u>
iniii nlltot* MIIIM
n *
l 11 C4
rtW I 1 W *
IH * 1 t 1
* k> I N 1 N
tD CD 1 fj 1
> I I N M ( t* 1 CO W t 1 Ift 1
1 {''".t- to n t- t o to i i i/> 1
* 10 <0 1 | >M
OOJ nn
1 rj rj 1 1 1 1 rt
1 ** 1 1 .N i n
| <D O | CM ** ' *
INIOll iMl*l|U) I I I i
i I i M t I I t> I
I NC4 I fv <-i
I I Qtt* nN
* I I IH
lllrHI
| I IV | |H
I 40 I I I
I CD I 0*
V(0 I I^H
,|IO| H
|ln<04l|Ci W
I 1 I tj III.H I I i mtj i^naiiio
i
*
*
C4
IO H rt
23'33 : *+ *H n <n l to
* t> I (A O I MO OJ
ilttn
>
n
t^*0 *<^O
ft in ^ to
1<01OH t^k^ I I 0
t-toto.H(4iH
*
IIINI
n
I t <-jO I I CO
n*
H
ss
* H t- O C4 t*flH in
asaas
"aass
H I r-IO H
71 353
OMlMtOU) ntooto|4
N N i--J N
O> * * tc * *o eo * HiHrHr*lH
iAP)ia*O> N * 10 o H 17 jH iH (H
t- t- t> C ce 10 10 *0 a H iH Kl r
ass -s ass-^'a tO ojOt^ ^
to t- .d
1010 O I HJ S3" H
10 CO O <4J M
^* cj
NOt^etN
o CO 01 w *o
lannoiH
( w w oj
r. *I<JF^ M i j
S 8li
3 gftl '
.t *.*.". (4M CO
O tO i-t -t * i-t k> 0 I
*"35S$5s t- t- N IO O
(0 N *< r^
o tOtn * to
i
(OkMNtOH) tO(O4<otO t^niOiOt* t**<9>OnlO
3
O C-OlCftO
'ajss
'ow r- o
88SSJ
sW'VsJsIOiCeOsO -H-r^-O'-c
o^
I
00.00.0.
88888
oo.o. 888
OOQ OOO
sasiss a 0.00.0.0. 0.0.00.0. O OO O O
!
888- 8
50.0.0. o.o.o.o.o o.o.o.o.o. o.o.ejo.o, o.o.o.oo. o. o. o o. o. o. o.
ilr lh|
5 111 I
" S'
M 3a*e8-ieH. H
**")<D * *M4n *r-oi t- oicv*04 we w 1" rtrt i i 01 wig* i i o* a KM t- 0100 tf> cioit i~ioi<,j(-\ HIT, H*I i i NIO Oio t^C-i HrtyiA ** i i r)t-a> IIMMI
nt ' rt
'
t*
*" * rt *K.o Jl *
tJ
/ a? ^ * i/ f?
i/S *
**
' rt * ri * n(3i *
*
tt ' *
rtfttwjffi. *OI^H to>r,oji> HI-IUJO, g
H^J H 'S
^ !
H K *' 5
"3S2
i4HV> r^tSM2- rtr^tt**a- o-oi*;5
ai "is 1? s a
"? 88a.'
t- I I V!tf iwflt-MC- >l^Oj IM Bci i t UlOHrt 0} iJ* nJ-l" OtVjMtl)i I I 9 ft V< trt>At|IOCv rilO>O<Cnb> * tOtf>ll H WlCtA jOoi, j * rj | I
a";
I riHtO M HKi
10 8 *"
ri
* *
**
S
S^S
S
lrttO*OJlOrJ(c-
H
$j ,- a j s s s- Sd j 3^ ^ J ten tOiAwto i(jo aiAii iit-d tfnii Oumn iiota
a
~<JO
HK-l .| H
..-. -.^...^ H<0 <o 10 01
; ^
-Q,-i --j--'i ~iW"i -. **|| ''S*; ffl t;c* S^a** IINff)
H)(O({ <o 10 ift 01
Wrt 0 rt (0 1ft
rt
rtO fi
e-rtO
O rj
M ft 5lO
Ort
"fl W
Ot rt
tj rttO H
J2 01
rtOl
* rt
o>
flortt-
CO t- rtflo (a
J>
srt*a.?*a. S'.STa ""iaai a*K.1-", sKOia"r.t sN81! 11 a9is"s. "".ST s*s.""H; sM*t.."^a TMo."3! nsszso", aa^asi ^aIBaI s*. 11 "389M"a! 3sT 1 ^aa^sai r"j>rt":
iH
5111
9
M
*J
d
N il
**
<
<
<
1
?
i* s
S* I
I 'a. o, 11
vS i*
j? 2 S
M
s? -ss
Ia
f!i i3s a; 5 ?5 I t.
I I s6 -s *S 3I
& & & s I T;
V
hO
J
s 1a ^
ii
I i!
S.
16 - "If Ipmnnor fcnfl Pelony Cane* {Con*.'>
! erfi*rwa:v^ . fublle Ini.'acency
.''J-er'fl :'iiy. Illegally Vusiber Percent Percent Number Nuibcr rercer.t
Numtvr Ferment,
ToLftl 3S
If-0.0 527
lOU.'J
568 100.0
1926
2.6 58
11.0
1
283 11.3
1
53 9.7
1927
1?.4 60
11.4
1
SOI 11.7
2
84 14.8
1928
7.9 44
8.3 2
268 10.3
78 12.7
1929
10.6 51
3 IM 10.1
46 8.1
1930 13.2
53
19 2'.4
67 ll.f
1931 1
2.6 54
2 180 7.2
35 6.?
10JS 10.3
2 166
42 7.4
1933_ -sas4_ loss
6
15.8 15.8 2.6
:o.Se7 10.1
44 3.3
3
1
310 276 340 8.4 11.1 13.6
a
36
64
67
6.3 11.2 11.8
Fi'rjval of "crtfa.-ed ' roj-ertj
F!,nlr. s Selling Vort."r.-cJ : ro-Tty
Stabfclr^ Trespass
Percent Hunber Fercent
Number Percent Viunber Fercent
Percent ::u-ber
Number
Huacer percent
100.0 153
100.0
10 100.0
354 100.0
103 100.0
84
334
145 100.0
.5 21 13.7
1 10.0
78 22.0
24 23.?
5
25
18 12.4
34.3 14
9.2
1 10.0
SI 14.4
14 13.6
13
27
13 9.0
21.6 9
5.9
1 10.0
19 5.4
8 ~5
27
8 5.5
28.4
so.c
10.0
9 P. 7
33 22 15.2
1.? 19
l.'.t
32 9.0
a
7.8
36 21 14.3
2.5 IS
6.5
2 20.0
29 8.2
11 10.7
35
7 4.8
1.0 16
10. *
1 10.0
31 3.8
16 15.5
24
11 7.6
3.4 11
7.2
1 10.0
42 11.8
2 1.9
56
19 13.1
6 3.9
1 10.0
24 6.8
4 3.8
10.7
44
14 9.7
12 7.S
1 10.0
21 5.9
1 6.8
21 24.8
27
IS 8.9
Using ^bacons t>anuage Usury Vlol-.t^i. c.' 'ontx'n School Law Violation of Professional Bonrisstan'a Act
Percent 100.1} 12.9 12.9 8.3 19.0 21.2 2.3 6.1 8.3 4.9 4.3
Number
733
66
80
81
93
98
79
68
58
56
56
Percent 100.0 9.0 10.9 11.0 12.' W.3 10.7 9.3 7.0 7.6 7.6
Number
129
29
38
1
1
60
Percent 100.0
- 22.9 29.4
.8
46.5
Number
803 224 189 135
47
31
49
34
28
54
17
Fercent 100.0 87.7 23.4 16.7 5.3 3.8 6.1 4.2 3.5 6.7 2.1
Number
39
3
7
3
7
1
3
10
9
Number
71
2
6
Percent 100.0 2.3 3.5
14
23
1
32.4 1.4
2
16
7
22.3 9.9
number Percent
13 100.0
1
2
3
3
6.7 13.3 20.0 20.O
3 20.0
2
1
13.3 6.7
Percent 100.0 6.6 23.1 10.3 12.4 12.0 6.5 10.3 5.0 5.3 8.2
Violation "" "CIST vehicle Law
Violation J . 'sift:.-':: '.'.m Violation : .-.-c'li-lrv :.: ^r-i Law
Percent 100.0 85.7 22.8 14.2 2.9 5.7 8.6 S.7 8.6 2.9 2.9
Number
759
96 127
69 109
83
80
56
43
41
59
Percent 100.0 12.6 16.7 8.6 14.4 10.9 10.3 7.4 5.7 5.4 7.8
Suaber Percent Kumber Percent
9,06f 1,323 1.119
100.0 14.6 lZ.3
83
11
10
100.0 13.3 12.0
964 1,060
10.6
10
12
12.0 14.3
10.1
836 9.2
16 19.1
676 734
7.S 8.1
3
16
2.4 19.3
733 707
8.1 7.8
4
2
4.8 2.4
Violation of Timber Laws wire Beatlnj Total Mlsdflmeansrs
11 Percent 100.0 7.1
Nunber Percent 100.0
Number Percent
179
25
100.0 14.0
number
-J4_25,37s9-
9,559 13.1
14.3
18 10.1 4,896 11.6
9.3 1
9.1
17
4,162 9.3
16.7
20 11.8 4,430 10.6
11.9a
18.2
20 11.2
4,062 9.6
4.8 9
18.2
15 8.4
3,934 9.3
2.4
20 11.2 3,533
8.3
14.3
12 6.x 3,616 8.5
3 45.4
26 14.3
4,034 9.5
19.0 1
9.1
6 3.3
,087 9.7
Assault wl'iil Int<*at to Rape
Assault wl'ih Intent to Koto Arson
SI gamy preaklnf and intrrlna Vehicle
ES
Percent Number Percent
Number Percent Hmber Percent
number Percent Number Percent
100.0 403
100.0
283 130.0
281 100.0
125 100.0
586 100.0
6.5 41
10.2
24 3.5 20 7.1
19 15.S
34 6.3
10.6 33
8.2
21 7.4 23 8.2
10 8.0
28 5.3
8.9 56
13.6
16 5.7
29 10.3
13 10.4
41 7.0
9.8 39
14.6
28
36 12.8
9 7.2
24 4.6
9.8 52
12.9
30 JO.S
41 14.6
14 U.3
32 6.1
8.9 36
8.9
37 13.1
34 18.1
20 16.0
48
10.4 33
8.2
41 14.3
22 7.8
19 15.2
109 20.7
10.7 30
7.3
27 9.5
26 9.3
6 4.3
53 10.1
11.8 33
8.7
24 8.3 23 8.9
6 4.8
59 11.8
10.9 29
7.S
39 12.3
89 8.9
9
18.6
TABU 16 - XJa*icor 033 Felon) Ctaee (Cont'C)
Bribery Burglary Destroying House with Explosives Eatoeizleawnt Eabracerj Felony, DlanJcat charge Forgery Inceat TnToluntary Manslaughter Kidnapping Larceny froa Building Larceny from Terson Larceny of AutcnaoMl* Larceny of Far* Aalnal*
Larceny After Tnwt fcayhem Jtanufecture Liquor Miscellaneous Felony Kurdar Obtaining Money under False Pretense l>erjurj Personating Another Poisoning Wall Possessing Counterfeit Type PoaaMslng Burglary Tool* Rape
Robbery Seduction Shooting at Another Sodomy and Beaatlallty Violation cf Banking Regulation* Voluntary Manslaughter Wrecking Train* Total Polonle* ORAHD TOTAL Source: Docket! of the Superior Court**
Hurter Percent Percent Number Number Percent dumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Knmber
Total 75
100.0 10.639
1OO.O 12
317 100.0
IS 100.0
SOS 100.0 2,055 100.0
27
1926 1927
4
3
5.3 4.0
66S 749
6.5 7.0
58 12.0
9 2.9 206 10.1
2
47 14.9
3 20.0
32 10.4 288 14.1
3
1928 879 8.3
53 16.7
13 6.2 224 10.5
2
1329 2
2.7 923 3.6
52 16.1
1 6.7
46 14.9 220 10.8
4
1930 58
77.3 1,254
22.8
39 22.3
6 40.0
49 24.9 271 15.3
2932 5
6.7 2.145
10.9 1
27 8.5
2 13.3
14 4.5 229 10.8
4
1932 1
1.3 1,393
15.1 5
21 6.6
18 5.3 168 S.S
1933 1,293
12.2
12 3.8 38 22.4
lao
S.3 2
1??-
^
11 3.5
3 20.0
30 9.7 12* 5.6
3
1..SS 2
2.7
iST?
8 13 5.7
56 15.3
7.7 1
Number Number Percent Suaber Percent Somber Percent Number Percent Nuaber Percent
254 280 100.O 2,542 10O.O 111 100.0 4.150 100.0 554 100.O
17 23 12.8 288 11.3 13 16.2 355 3.6 15 2.7
13 20 11.1 295 ll.B 23 20.7 357 8.9 39 7.0
24
IB 10.0
311 12.2
IS 23.6 394 9.4
49 8.9
23
21 11.7
293 11.5
4 3.C 315 7.6
67 22.1
20
20 11.1
215 3.9
8 7.2 522 22.6
56 20.2
25
13 7.2
207 8.1
14 12.6
519 12.5
92 16.8
20 4
2.2 244 9.6
11 9.9 428 10.3 78 14.1
17 28 13.6 220 8.7 8
11.3 13
23 64 25 9 23.9 4.4 201 267 7.9 13.5
46 3.6 5.4 411
40 75
7.? 13.:
Percent Somber Percent Number Suinbar Percent number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent number Xumber
100.0 1,285 100.0
2 2,049 100.0
63 100.0 2,740 10O.O
88 100.0
268 100.0
10 100.0
13 100.0
4 32
2.4 256 20.0
317 15.5
15 22.1 244 C.9 10.2
40 14.9
4 40.0
4 1
17.1 229 9.2
319 25.9
3 4.4 2SE 20.4 24 27.3 30 11.2
1 10.0
1 7.7
3
27.1 1M 12.2
255 22.4
2O 14.7 221 7.7
7 8.0 38 14.2
1 10.0
-
19.5 175 13.9
263 12.3
25 22.1 274 20.0
9 10.2
13 4.9
3 30.0
2 15.4
a
7.3 105 3.2
208 10.2
3 4.4 304 11.1
7 8.0 22 3.2
1 7.7
IS
7.3 77 8.0
1ST 7.7
4 5.9 239 3.7
9 10.1
21 4.0
25.4 5
7.3 133 3.0
1 213
241 8.3 35 13.1
1 7.7
7
4.9 10.3
1 147 7.2
4 5.9 299 10.9
5 5.7
IS
1
170..-0*1
f
22.2 4.9 67 94 S.2 7.3 91 "4 4.4 3.6 63 3.=! 11.7 330 122
12.0 11.5 7 12
S.3 12.3 41 _23 15.S
2
22
Sumber Percent Percent number Number
487 54 49 100.0 11.1 9.4
100.0 7,4 11.1
3,626 147 241
277
32
29
41 35 45 3.4 17.5 9.2 7,4 7.4 18.6 220 305 359 30 17 30
34 24 62 49 47 7.0 4.9 22.7 70.1 9.7 3.7 11.1 25.9 486 378 554 S2G
2e 24 29 41 23
lumber
44 SO 53 84 30 84 95 72 S7 72
Percent 100.0 6.2 8.4 8.9 11.8 21.S 21.3 9.2 20.1 12.2 10.1
Number
15 19 21 22 IB 14 10 25
52
Siateer Percent Number Percent Huaber Percent number Percent Homber
21fi 10O.O
38 100.0
151 68.9
2 6.3
50 22.8
7 21.9
2
9
4
.9 4.1 2.8
3
4
3
12.3 9.3
3
1.5
9
43
22.5 S.4
16 100.O
8
3
37.5 28.7
3 31.3
"2.52
40,604 100.0
82,983 100.O
3,595 3.9
'^
3,837 9.4
8,733
3,701 9.1
7,863 9.3
3,947 9.7
3,427 10.2
4,44< 10.9 8,508 20.3
4.109 10.2 3,063 9.7
4,321 10.6 7.854 9.5
4.416 10.9 8,032 9.7
4 ioS 4. 032
10.1 3.234 3,169
9.3 9.3
-1.5-
1 ' 'S '1 ?8> ilrt-t8 i ot i 11- i ciiivi iinii riQfHin i i i i M i ooetnn i aiiii o<o
i ao> i i i
IN I I I I I I I I I I I t I H | I t I I I I I f I I II
rtfttr-l N I I H-* (0 I t* 04 I OC4Ni-< I
< V
rt
o*
r(
|i-t*l O
I I Kin I
I Hi-tHO I I it | HrHlOt C* I (4 I C4 W W rt I * H I * IQCOlH
Ol
C4
H
W
0
IV
-ICOI * I I 10 I ft I I I I I I I I t I I I |ll|| IN I I t- IIIHO I CJH I I ll*|| I I I tt I IIIIM IH4JII Ml |
9!
w* J
aas H HiHi c, n(., ai,*i ..- --a" 'g
HOtlOl OIIQI* t-OjO rlltfll lg|H I v rt i I P i jp* ii
ojt- i OIOQI t*iti nAioi iii0 iioii ic*nt<D OIIH^ nriic^ii coiiint j-iaocto i j i i mto HHin i o
S
r*
*"
3
H
Mttini CIIIMH oictn i i i H i 11131 it**i lacini iiiico 10111 i *H t nniii iiii cgir4 IN
0 I I V I H
I H I * I 0) I CHC4 I *H|f|
<0V)r4
H
I * I Q Hlfll JO
t QiHNO IH|A tMICII AlllH rinrtMl I I I R MiAp- I M
WH
rl
rl ft
W
rtf-
|i-I
^S^S* ni *5' J| i *>rf i e^ i PJ I iiH|t-i i i i i i ic-iiri itiin lt-ii iiiOHH miitoi 1111-* ''J 11 rtn
^(nOll t I *0 t Qllttl I I I I I I I I O I | I Kl^i t l|rll * I I I I I J9C4 In IIHiOGt * I > I IH|I* I WC* I ( I M
MMIOI lOllOI |)MH ft t I C- I Hrl rtrtrlM
I t In I H
llt|
ICti-tHtt rlllin W
I D-Hrt I MlOHH MHIt-l
10
c*
"^
I H I I (0 I t- I rt 2
I|
j6IDat-n<Di4N rt* HOuT>'Orfiiru'-liCoE*j f- i *tr-iH o oV>Ht- i 3n 0dio ri t'fonrn-r<oi*n$o ftH vi njaHH oNi<^c- *IHii - ocuco*in tI--eINoaH)oNHo ^n i aF na* AM t9oc>tooHi} Htno i *H<-IH 2-HtI*2eE-"* '3K
H
M
nrt M
assgs
! ia,.j i* i
? S3 . s2 S si .S Is
fi >-*. SB
- II
Mr4*1
O
*J
-,
3
5
*aJ h j5i
vi
V* j: ~t
.
K
M
O
*)*>
O
U
D OBb*< *-*
n
O
O,
,li-|
r
*
kt
**
**5 c^ o g vt, 2c o
i,
O
* 3
t;
^
t-1 C
>HRn
-<" DiridC * 1C ^**
O ( <-l
Rl-l O
S^
wuC^f
cSS toss's t,
Uji^J ? o F 7*7 KA *-
+^J
-3J
^3
& H
b
JB3
ti i
^[-1TSl
M*t 6, i+nj ?t, p
H * 5 C -P U ri ti I,
,M ^
a*)
D. b3
wc 1^-1
5 S
^.fr*.t"p?M K bfcc !Kd?
&c>feoaaun o o**jU^5*
1 IH TiA
Or^PUU 5 &rl fl (J
*jR*jfite*IipE-*^j1 ^^wM?SPP ^ ..'"!-!**
AQV<Pk TM
^T^"?tu=v"if?f I?ffi*3^^
KT.-'iT: 1:: T?TJT?TJ Qs
jj
.,.. .. ,,S.K t 1 1 H 1 U * HA Illll
H W 1 1 1 CD Ol 1 1 O 1
1 1 M1 1
1 0* 1 1 1
1 OIH 1 1
1 *M t K nC.H.
1 l M*
s HI ii OM i 1 1 Cl 1 1
X II
1 1 U1 1
H1 1 1 1
1
HH
g
U 1 OMH
HH 1 1 (O
1 OI 1 *
iiiii 1 1 1 1 H 1 MHO 1
Ol 1 1 1 1
*
M
1*110 1 W OIH -j i i i 5 g.8,
Illll K1 H1 O 1 WO" 1 1
I O1 1 1
1*111
,3, .
.O...H 1 -J ( 1 W
. . . ,8 M 1 1 1 S
i .M i i .Bn
M
18 lui tot;
S Ml
II -l&H
,3. . .
BS
,.^K
S II HI S-3 1
1 1 1 1H
Illll
1 1 1 U 1 01 1 1 1 1 O 1 H<& 1
H^ i i H 1 10 1 1 1 1 <4 1 HM 1 01 1 1 O
1 CKHtO*
Ml Ol
O1
11 *M 1 , . ..
88
HI <O>*M
. . .8
.BESS
..*... I*.., O*
V
,,. 3HP.
,.B,.
,B Hii g -4 -)M
Old 1 0>0>
H S .I to i ^Snoiu
3 U 1 HI HM 1
.....
,.,,H Illll
1 HI El * 1 1 1 1 01 1 1 tf 1
Illll
,s. ..
Illll
SS.K 1 C 1 1 *
1 S 1 <OH
5 II
1 1 M1 1
1 1 Ht 1
..., H 1 1 1 H 1 OIHOI 1 M 1 1 1 1
1 1 H1 1
1 1 H1 1
1 H1 1 1
1 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 tO 1 *H 1 1
1 M1 H1
i Hi
4. ..
SM
HI <0*H ,.0,S,
O*
.,,,
,BB 1 M 1 1 CO (0 1 CD 1 1 TMl HC* ,.S,. ...8.
Kii.S i^, S,,.. 3,-.,
1 COO. 1 K
f->o>ei H
1W1 1 1 1S1 1 1
,3,B. .8. ,3 HCOOI CDU ,^M
,8,,, 1 1 1 1 * 1 OH 1
HO 1 &H
1
W
5i& ,BB.. .8.B. J 1 l-> 1 H
B.nS, 111)1 1 HHH t X> 1 1 1 1
.,S.M .Si I I HCl 1 1 0 1 HH 1 *
I ,,
S H.
j. II "s -01 s ,,
, . SK.
1.^1
Illll
VI 8* 1
..?..,
ll 1 1 1 IO 1 1 1 ? Illll
S,,.B
01 1 1 HH
1 CO 1 1 1
Illll
,,,. 1 . 10 | |
1 1 1 1 11*11 i S-aloo1 H*3M 1 M
1 CONMH 1 HC* 1 1
, . . I 1 1 1 CDH
.K.S,
1 O 1 1
1 H 1 1 1 Illll Bng, u
1 1 HCD 1 0> 1 1 1 1
0> I 1 01 1
Si,*, 1 1 1y1
ss
3HHH |
*, ,'i.
Illll
HCD 1 1 1
Illll
i !u i i i
1 1 1 1 H 1 O1 1 1
i toSmw oi i i
1 HO 1 1 .SKI,
1 Cft 1 1 1 1 * 1 1
..,.,5 1 H 1 1 S
Illll
1 1 1 1H
H&HWCD .5n,3
.,., ,B,,S
1 ft 1 1 1 H1 M
1 Ol 1 1 1 1 (So* 0>* ,8..H
,S,.
,8H
1 N 1 1 tO
,3o%3 .8.B.
3 ,i
'i
Ml H
,,. C4
0
, .. V> 1 1 1 1
I M 1 (O 1 M 1 N 1 1
1^1*1 H 1 1 1 1 V 1 H0> I
B
II 3o> 1
..is,.
11.0. ,,,,
.uK.c.3
IJC.UN
1 W0> 1 Ol
,*,,.
- u ,Sn
H,,8,
O1 1 1 1
H
M
I->H 1 1 tD
S, .g. S. u g,
1 H 1 1 H i o*> i i i
1 MIO 1 1
1 1 1 1 CD 1 QiU 1 1
... IH
1 HOI 1 1
.2i .H
i S i oi5
1 *H 1
to
1 UN 1 M
i8<..
H
iKK.i
1 CO 1 Hi HVbtH* 1 Si 1 H
S H*M OUH
HI
i ,.
1 I S.I -a i i i H
.,h. 5 1 1 H*
1 010 1 1
---- S
,,...,
i i *i -a
Ol 1 M& 1
.....
Si i i i
s, 1 1.
Si 1 1 1
1}
s Hi
0> 1 H 1
01 1 W 1
<..!;,
s
M
1 HU 1 1 ... .
I OJ P I i
1 1U
( M ( 1 y *-> * i * -i
i S i i * 1 MM 1 H nHh-.S
1 HI AO
,|, C . 1 49 1 10
C*CP f com
I <aM i i
. M*OI H owH
.K. , , 1 1 M 1 0>
1 9>HGDH
s HI
Ml V 1
CDI 1 1 I
s
1 I 1 NH I Illll
1 -3HHU Illll
H
H
1 HH| 9 Illll
1 h> 1 HH Illll H. .,
..... 1 H 1 H 1
..s.
Illll ... .
1 1 H 1 * 1 CD 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 N 1 01 I W 1 H1 1 1
1 1 t 1 V i -a i i -3 ,S.,. ,B.
o
1
1 1 101 H Illll
1 1 1 1 * 1 Ml 1 1 H 1-41
Illll H 1 1 1
1 H1 1 1
1 JI 1 1
1 10 1 IP 1
1 1 1 1 H 1*111
1 *l HH
H. ..3. K. , ..,
v i i 5 1 .. .i 1 M 1 1 1 1 1 1 01 Ml 1 * 1
11*11
Illll 1 1 1 1 W 1 OHH 1
1 UMMOI
S
1
u
1 1 OH 1
1 1 1 HH 1 M 1 1 * Illll
* i i i i Illll HI 1 1 1
11*11
i 1 1 Illll
9 HI A f
'1
S
II *Sw I
1 1 08 1 "*
SO 1
<e i i i H
Illll
1 M1 M1
H
W
.,B,C HG.. 1 Ol 1 **
... .US ,.B 1 tOOl 1 0 ...S.
H 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 t* 1
S u . .8 H0, .,,,. *l 1001
Illll i S i i i 1*111 1 H 1 1 3 .C. . 1 StOW*
.2, ,, UOIN'HU
M
..P.I UK* 1 H-J
.8.l
M
3
.8i u ,BB 1 iS.ro Mm 1 1 H 1 5 1 0>0i 1 HH 1 S
,,, ,,,&, I
S. .. . .3..g ,dX HH 1 HM lEKHi 1 H 1 1 0> *C* 1 H 1
HinS,
i I cm i I
(0 K)H 1 1 1
.En..
1 VH 1 1
I
. .*v ss v i. i 6 1 i i i
11*to11
Illll
1 H1 1 1
Illll
N1 1 1 1
i i i i p i i i i t .>! I
1 1 1 1*
H" 1 1 H
I MI
n
b .,
HI gi
H,3,
i i i fii H 1 1 1 10 1 * 1 (UK HI 1 f N
-* 1 1 1 H 1 Pi H 1
1 Hi 1 H 1 HI Si
-3 1 1 1 1 CDHItU 1
iWn *l 1 f H
.s... Illll t 111 1 N * 3 1 * M
,3,, u .,,-,.
,.. 1 1 * 1 H 1 HI 1 1 t* (Dti 1 W
nS i i H .K...
O t
~
,,&,,,
',,,,
1 MMM f
> MiBa, -g
it
V1 1 1C
1 1 1 1H 1 1 1 Q1
H| 1 1 1
*,,2, g. s,
1 1 H1 1 11*11
1 El 1 1 1
1 NH 1 1
,3,1. 1 H* 1 H
V
H
1 -JH*W
1 8 1 1 H igl Id 1 N 1 1 $
HI N 1 Htn i *ca
.,
,,.H,
1 1 1 14
0
.,3,.
M .N. I M
1 1 1 1 H .,.,,, 'IM ,* 1 * 1 MM
.S,i, inSioi
Hoi. If
s
1
1 1 OIH 1
1 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 H Illll
1 M1 1 1 H1 1 1 1
i i i.
11111
1 CD 1 1 1
Illll
1 * 1 1 W 1 OlOt 1 1
1 HHH 1
HI HI 8 CD 1
,8,.. ,B,,B 1 -J 1 (4 t
1 1 1 1 H i MH i
VM t 1 t HI I*H 1 1 Ml 1
H 1 01 1 1
1 OH 1 K
9
H1 1 1U
t 1 * 1 1 1 U* 1 M HOIt 1 1
1 (DH> *
1 * 1 tic*
? 3
-a3- s
7 . CUM erogght (Cont'i)
FlLOtriES Assault with Intent to Murder Aisiult with intent to Rap*
Breaking and Entering Vehicle Burglary
Total 310
6.1JO
153 557 11,638
Felony, blanket charge Forgery Involuntary Manslaughter Kidnapping Larceny of Automobile Larceny frost Building Larceny of Fara Anlnals
Larceny After Trust Manufacturing Liquor Miscellaneous Felony Kurder Obtaining Money under False Pretense Perjury Pirsonatlng Another Poisoning Well Possessing Burglary Tools Possessing Counterfeit Type HuoelYlng Stolen Goods Ribbery Ssductlon Saootlng at Another Sofloaj and Beast la lltjr Voluntary Manslaughter
tracking Trains 1OTAL FELONIES GRAND TOTAL Source! Dockets of tbe Superior Courts,
2.i
. 268
4.31S667);
2.743 574 118
1.448 73
2.901 10 18 82 29
3,816
. 17
93,268
>llnff
Bacon
Pulton
Atklzuon B*ker
1,837
3*
6
52'
?0 37 25
1
1t - -
202 *
6-
27 3J 53 to
150 3 3 l -
'"1?1
4 IX
5
I
ii
1*8 10 1 2 6
80 1
--_
*i7
S 2 20 45
i? 54 i 2 10 16 20
35 TM ll l
11*
1 11i
2
10 *
2 10
2
-2
-
-
-
3 2 ,, 17
320
s1
1
H -
1 3
1
1
*
17,321 178 1*4 147 185
26,209 699 499 S29 782
pn
Boxrlcn BrantlM Burkt
C*MLn
Ben Hill Bibb
Bullooh CalbDiw
Cbttoo.
1 32 S9
5 -1
13
26 119
12
21 2 29
11
1
,
2
10
11 110
17
22 25 32
20 2*1 6 22 1 .1
- *3 31 7*1 1 22 13 20 111 2 1
1
i! 5? ^S
16 22
25 1}I &
3-
-
20
21 135 16?
71
:13 5?1 3^
7
3
-
ij
13 18 "I 3 32
1
17 s2
6-0 26
11 1
5 53
2
2 9 _
iI
ii
19 1
11 1
Jo
w-
86 7
1222
2 9 3 7
77 1018 121 139
5618
1
9
3 2
8 11 2 3
11 _ 4
4
12
6
42
11 1
.
*
_
3
8 10
3i
47 10
1
l
52
B a 27 13
-128 1
1 46 70 26 21 23
2
7- 2
3
{
68
2
1
222
-
2
1
2
1
5
7
10 13 160 3 12 7
7 1
8 16 231
2 2 26
7
4
5 2
J
! 1i!
4 1
2 1 10 ,5 -
1 * 10
2
2
5
4
1
us 629 138 471 230 1,091
495 221 139 28X 2.555 352 5*1
578 1,4*4 578 730 466 422 2.7*21.578 933
CUT
Clinch
Cobb
cofr
ctlap
COMta
IMfellb Dawion
D<augfiany noja
DJ.
Eehol*
Olynn OllM r
Hnbershae 3r#ane Heard
4* i? 12,- 15
1 -
3 -
81 2
*
56 2
4 3
3
2 15 4
3 10
1
7 3
i? 12! 11 6 10
8 168 28 80
-
- 5 5*
-5- -
2
2 33 1
j
-l*
5*
19
-
4
- 18
-
7
1
8 18 153 J 100 U8 IS 412 78 325
7 284 41 114 $8 10*
3*
-
3
-
-
-
3
6 1 9 1 14 1 2 3 1
-
4 .' zi S i *
9 22 231
1
48
IZ 6
11
9
86
2 27 2 10
1
-
1
-
-
3
2 -
12
3
2
1
3
-
1 2
1
-
. 2
.1 1 22
_ 1
1
1
1 *_ 21
. 1
5
2 20
20
20 11
10 12 6 119
2 139 15 *0 - 10
11 10 111 5*
_
7
_
_
4
1
172 12 40
8 1
10
29 57
_ 26
_ 4
i i? ^
_
_
2
10
I
10 67
1 1 12 - 95
_? 17
* 27
_
_
1 ? 103
2_ 59 5* 152
si
2
1
1 13 25
2
68 30 22 ~~
7 52 27 3
19-~
8 75 ~
7 29 li TS
- - 23
15 1
--
9
4- 1
2
5
30
3 22 14
1 12
2 21 109
60 ; 7? 7 29 2 4
1
2 8
;
,7
8 12 -
I
2 ~
6 2
I 20 3
?2 ?1 2 3
- 12 21
I
1
-J
1
!
1
-1
-
2
. 2 1
1
65 16? 627 322 3*1 521 1*2 1,187 331 mt 32 1 i?v> ?M 1*0 217 543 21*
30* 6V) 6.033 599 408 2,2*9 597 1.5*6 5T* l,i*72 97 3 ,*31 82* 667 9171 ffsy 661
Hmwton Jnkln LowU 1lelntoiih
TtTlor
TlTt
J*ff Davl* Llbtrtr JtaOlROii
M>rliithw ItuoovM KutAolDti TmilAT*
ill 37 1 1 1 22
'! i i 2
19
1
% 39
li
2 a 1 17
52
DP400
21 'f
n**lwr u>* 3 10 58
251
1-1 - 23
1
30
12
3
67
99 20 65 19 219 16
1 - 1 - 12 3
9 7* SO 7<>9 108 9* 737 11 *6 *7 * 206 'I 55 3* 92
2 * 5 16 1 2 39 - * 1 3 8
215
i
I 1?
4
2
1
i2 ^ J 27
i!
11 z 3! 1
*
2
99
21
22
26 S
18 63
3
2
2
1
1 2
1 -
2 1
i 17 53 J -5
2 8 270
-a
1 -
8 2a U 3? 16
31
- - -
3
1
2
7 1 1
22
2
6
* 11
10
l
7
3 ? 2
*
11
* 20
23
10
1*
2?
2
U
7 21
17 1
11
I
19
3i
25
73
120 2? 128
11
1
29
17 27 17
1
?
5 72
33
31
25 109
1
If
1
10
6 22 25 2 5
3 5
1 50
"
" "
1
J LI
15 2 65
3 10 - *'
5 7
1 8 1 l* - 12 15 129 10
15
7 15
2 1* 1
-
3
I
2
3
5 1*
-51
2
1
1
1
47 5
i! 5 12 1 6 3
13
13 2 8
11 I
l
2
2
1
5
*2 10 31
I
6 3
1 8
2
2
3
1
r?6 388 135 305 170 581 10* 1*1 26* 20* 2.208 **9 338 2.376 1** 205 286 218
*27 35' 151 302
1,388 722 65* 333 991 153 523 391 622 5.762 1,.611 l.*37 2.601 *66 759 1.269 932 93? 1.6*1 5*0 965 920
UBIX 18*
PSR1UD BECTEUi DOOBETDIO AHD TRIAL JP CASEf By CriBBS
57 Superior Court* of Georgia. January 1. 1926 - Decsaiber 31, 1935
J[ASS Total :than 1
ADanoonaent Adultery and Fornication
AMsult Assault and Battery
Attenpted BeastLality or So&iay
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
52.2 37.4 48.5 30.5 21.9
Bastardy BlacVmai.! and EAortion
Breaking, Eliteruig and Stealing Carrying Deadly ffoapons Carrying on Lottery
100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
25.8 11.7 44.6
50.9 50.3
Cheating and Swindling
Cock Fighting Cruelty to Chiliron and Anirials Disturbing Divine Worship Defamation of Virtuous Female
100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0
37.7 6.7
S7.5 26.6 33.3
Escape ?ai3ure to pay Occupational Tax
Firing Woods Gasoline Hit ard Sun Driving
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
36.0 41.7 33.3 28.5 60.0
Interfering with Laborer*
".illlng Para Azlnals Ubol Larceny, simple Larcenyt attested
100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
100.0
33.3
33.3 29.2 S1.1
Larceny After Inist
Malpractice by Public Officer Malicious Mischief Maintaining Lrd Houae
Maintaining Opium Joint
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
20.3 _
32.2 7S.O
IS .4
VayheD* misdemtiano'" Misdemeanor, blenlmt charge Misdonaanor, miscellaneous Obstructing Legal Process Operating Auto while Drunk
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
33.3 27.1 41.6
32.2
Operating Slot Machine with Sluga pedaling without License poeping tarn
Perform Peaco officer's Duty, illegally Pointing Pistol at Another
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
31.4
26.6 42.8 29.6
Practicing Proression without Licenso
Public Drunkenness Public Indocensy
Receiving Stolan Goods Receiving unstamped Tobaccos
100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0
36.3
28.6 6.3
40.9 27.9
Removal of Mortgaged Property Resisting an officer Rioting Selling Mortgaged Property Shooting at Occupied Dwelling
Stabbing
Trespass Using Auto without Owner's Consent Using Obscene Language Vagrancy
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.O
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
20.8 9.1
22.1
le.s
32.5
32.3 24.1 54.2 30.0 39.4
Violation of Conaon School Law
Violation of Election Lew
100.0 61.3
loo.o 57.0
Violation of ITofessional Bondsnen's Art 100.0
_
Violation of tone Law
100.0 24.8
Violation of Highway Regulations
100.0 66.6
1-2
13.5 9.8 5.2 8.7 15.6
S.I 14.6 16.9 14.9 22.3
18.3 19.0 2.S
5.6 -
8.9 3.3
_ 11.3 20.0
-
_ 7.7 2.0
1.9 _
7.2 4.4 23.0
_ 5.3 16.6
7.3
31.4
6.8 14.2 12.S
_ 6.2 12.5 12.5 2.3
16.7
11.5 2.8 17.5
6.8 3.4 1.7 8.4 19.9
_ 4.3 33.3 4.7 5.3
2-3
12.8 13.8 6.2
7.1 34.4
a.i
22.0 10.7 12.2 11.3
9.9 --
5.6 -
lofs
6.7 _
10.3 10.0
22.2
,, 14.3 16.3
9.5 50.0 13.8 10.3 30.3
_ 7.7 4.2 25.0
Oe sto
50.0 6.3
17.9 5.4
9.1 13.6 12.5 10.1 11.6
6.3 18.2 15.6 8.2 10.0
4.1 12.1 10.9
6.3 12.3
4.3 4.3 16.7 3.4 5.6
1!<>nths 3-6 6-9
22.4 8.9
26.3 5.1
27.8 7.2
39.2 6.7
21.9
-
38.7 14.6 25.0 31.8 12.3
23.1 14.3 4S.O 42.3 66.7
11.3 7.S 1.4 4.9 1.4
5.0 -
7.5 6.0
-
33.8 1.1
40.0 5.0
33.3
-
38.7 6.7
10.0
-
44.5
-
38.3 28.6
66.7
5.3 -
5d.S 50.0 32.3
5.3 30.3
6.7 44.b 18.8 75.0
3.7 --
6.6 3.2
-
. 5.8 10.4
25.2 50.0 60.2 14.3 33.5
27.3 37.1 31.2 26.6 39.3
35.4 54.5 36.1 52.3 27.5
42.7 50.0 26.3 38.4 26.1
23.8 23.3 16.7 50.3 11.0
3.S 6.6
_ 6.S 6.3 6.3 11.7
8.2 -
4.0 5.9 5.0
10.0 1.7 3.4 8.4 1.3
4.8 4.3 33.3 7.7 5.6
9-12 12-13 18-24
4.2 2.8
.9
4.4
.7 1.0
1.1
--
--
2.3 1.8
.7
3.1 3.1
-
4.8
_
_
9.8
-
.7
.7
1.7 1.5
.4
.3
-
.7
2.5
.8
.4
--
-
_ S.O
-
1.9
4.9
L.I
-
-
-
1.9 1.9
.
- 3.3
33.4
_
2.2
.3
.<!
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
_
_
1.6 1.4
.3
2.0
-
-
_ 1.9
_
--
-
- 7.2
-
-- 1.3
-
-
-
-
_
_
_
2.3 ?.B
.5
-- 2.1
-
.8
urer 24
2.3 1.5 4.0 3.0
-
3.2 -
1.7 .6
2.3 -
2.5 6.0
-
.3 .5 -
-
_ 1.4
-
3.7 .7 -
_ 4.0 6.3
1.3
_
-
--
3.6
1.9 1.6
_ 9.1
2.5 2.8
-- 21.2
2.4
.6
2.3
-
6.3 4.2
-
?.l
.8 5.7
5.6 2.8
-
5.0
.9 2.7
3.4
-
.9
1.9
1.9
.2
.3
_ 4.3
_
4.8
_
_
2.3 2.3
-
-
-
-- 3.6
1.6 2.3
9.1
9.1
.6 2.1
--
_
.3
.3
- 4.6
2.1 -- 9.1 4.2
2.8 2.8 - 2.5
.5
_
5.3
-- 2.6
1.5 2.7
-
.5
_
_
-
_
-
-
_
3.4
5.6
- 150 -
i
?
ifl w 1 (
1 r|
a
5
c B.Jtt 1 1 ^ HN 8
^ 1 1
IN
<C <0
N
. .
r- q u> n w *
M H * t-
33'"3J. "i S
1*..'? '3
"-ss a
s'ls'a a'fi
. o... .. !
oUVLohftlacolra oPLrcMmbritlor. oSLaioafunrilaty 5othbbfoth oLefv
I I I I l"5 '" 23'" '
I fj Irt I I
at i m t <n o m in I
H
(4 H N
N
ILO 10, I ^V Ir^ 1*^
N
H
*
|(0|| t-Wl III |
H
ftl *
I * | *J III |
IUJNCJ fljljt-lrj
:Hm* n
|t^>#0 M | W
inn HI-I He!
IHIHI *#IW4|II
to u <v #
flAfJA 11 VV2**1 *
eo MNH o!
|CO^O Oti^rjlt- int4lr^ UJO-Jwje CJ^ 10}^ fll f1*"J ** l *? Ci l *'J **>!* I
M 01 ro rjN o ion <n IONKNIO * ra eo * N ! y to M* H in u? H n
385S S3838 9?
;rj *;<n.ttO,tt Q;uj<5 <JCJBS*; (O ,
[ H rt IrlH
WQUQ^l H H H ft H
"fN'RnW N HNM
* Q O CO rt H H
tOt Hr
-'-''?'" s"a'8 HHas" a w'a a''a'sa*
8a'"a
Nt^ i o o o wcjeo wo * ^ r^o I
gi8 88888 88888 88888 88888 88g88 88888 |||g'i 8
sss b jJf&Jn1 ra
353
TABLE 19*
CASES HOT THUD By Crtnui
57 Superior Courta In Gaorgla, January 1 1926 ~ Daemnber Zi, 1935
Misdemeanors
CRXUE3
Total
Abandonment Adultery and Fornication
Assault Assault and Battery Attenpted Beastiallty or Sodoiy
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Bastardy Blackmail and Sctortion Breaking, Entering and Stealing
Carrying Deadly Weapons Carrying on Lottery
100.0 100.0
100.0
100.0 100.0
Cheating and Swindling
Cod Figlitlng Cruelty to Children and Animals Disturbing Divine Worship Defanation of Virtuous Female
100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0
Escape Failure to Pay Occupational Tax Firing Woods Garbling Hit and Run DrJ-Tlug
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Interfering with Laborers
Killing of ?am Animals
Libel
Larconyj sliiplo
Larceny, attainted
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Larcony Aftor Trust Malpractice by Public Officer Hallo lous lyisa'nief Maintaining Lend House IZaintaijiing Opium Joint
100.0 100.0
100.O 100.0 100.0
l!ayhera^ ndsdcmeanor iiisdensanor. blanket charge Misdemeanor, nascollaneons Obstructing Legal Process Operating Autc while Drunk
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Oporatlng Slot Uachlne wU h Slug* Peddling wlthc ut License
Peeping Ton Perfornance of Peace Oiflcor's Duty, illegally Pointing Pistol At Another
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Practicing Profession without License
Public Drunkenness Public Indecency Receiving Stolen Goods Receiving Uns-;oaped Tobaccos
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0
Renoval of Mortgaged Property Besisting an Officer Rioting Selling Mortgaged Property Shooting at Occupied Dwelling
Stabbing Trespass
Using Auto without Owner's Consent
Using Obscene Language Usury
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
loo.o
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Vagrancy Violation of Cannon School Lav
Violation of Election Lav Violation of Professional Bondsnan Act Violation of Gone Law
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Traaaferrad to
Obhor Conrta Dlodiaad
35.1 23.4
8.7 26.3 18.7
28.1 --
34.3 11.1
90.2
11.5
51.0 28.0 29.1 53.3
0.1 26.2 10.0 17.0 16.0
_ 16.7 14.3 12.4 22.6
2.8 _
7.8 31.5
-
1.8 3.7
4.1 12.5
7.9 1.9 4.1 3.0 1.7
1.6 ~
1.8 3.6 6.7
7.3 3.1 5.0 1.5
-
_ _ 7.1 3.S 9.7
8.6 _
5.6 _ -
14.3 22.2 13.2
_
17.4
14.3 4.1
_ _
7.3
1.2 ~ *
21.8
70.4 18.6 23.8 3.4 1.2
.6 _ 33.3 9.1 5.1
_ 4.5 9.5 1.0
-
9.0 33.3 15.0
7,5 31.7
29.8 10.4 34.5 39.5 96.S
4.5
2.0 3.8 4.8
5.3 6.8 13.8 6.0
-
15.9 5.6
34.0
11.1
5.6 _
11.1 3.8
- 152 -
Sol Proa
Ralaaaad
Dead
For Trial Docket Fending
12.8
.3
3,0.9 39.1
38.3
1.1
1.9 31.6
34.8
2.2
13.0 41.3
55.5
1.3
4.6 28.2
25.0
-
12.5 31.3
33.7 35.1 33.3 35.1 4.3
_
W.I
20.2
-
63.0
_ 28.3
.1
2.E
48.2
-
.1
3.7
26.0
M
47.4 34.2 26.7
.2
6.8 53.9
-
35.8 13.2
"
7.0
15.8
.4
3.6 29.1
-
- 13.3
20.7
_
12.2 53.7
33.8
.6
3.S 32.8
55.0
5.0
w.
25.0
34.5
.4
1.8 44.8
40.0
-
- 44.0
S3 .3 33.3 14.3 39.8 22.8
_
14.3 .7 -
,, 41.7 _ 50.0 _ 50.0
8.8 34.7 - 45.1
40.0 83.3
54.2 29.1
-
_
14.3 34.3
M
. 16.7
2.1 30.3
__
1.6 37.8
-
- 100.0
42.8
.
28.8
.8
35.9
3.7
50.0
_
41.5
.2
_ 28.6 4.1 40.2
1.9 45.3 _ 50.0
4.5 29.1
40.5 70.0 33.4 9.1 40.8
.6
a__
56.S 30.0
33.3
_
27.3
54.5
.3
3.5 28.5
18.5
3.7
3.7
3.7
39.2
.5
5.2 32.0
9.5
14.3 42.9
36.7
.7
10.8 47.6
89.4
-
.6
8.8
47.8
1.8
_
37.7
.4
36.2
_
27.3
-
5.3 30.6 _ 66.7
_ 44.9
5.0 47.5 - 36.4
28.4
1.2
50.0
.9
27.8
--
30.4
.2
.8
-
3.0 32.S
4.7 27.4
24.1
1.2 22.7
.8
1.6
37.3
.3
4.0 36.9
33.3
_ 61.1
SS.O
_
_
8.0
66.7
H
_ 22.2
50.2
.3
5.4 29.4
if '!" tt O " *" '
1 I" (- I"* >!
at
H R N G.
M H **J *^
o H o g
< o M Mt
m asTS- jffJss?sK?
M M.
<
P PJ H-
Isr
8 8888,8 88888 88888 88888 88888 88888 88888 88888
b o oo b o bbbbb bbbbb bbbbb bbbbb bbbbb bbbbb bbbbb
a&HroM 4^]QQOaU
M en ilk tn b WO I
M N o> I I 0> I M N
I
I * I -J -3 C4|CaO*l
IIOllN Mtflttb O -J V f- CO M CD tfl |
0 I ^4 I *> f* O b ^ W
a asesa SJSBJS a ass ?a?s 3K3ss sassy; g ass assss
c b-)H%*j c>Mmbi OIOMO tiMcawb oiro^job oi**ww> wibb% b?*Vw^o
M
HW
I-i l-i H H
|J*M1-J
I I I I -o I en I I */ I I I b I t-< lOIOit* tn V to * *" tobvio>| tultntw | N | V M
M * ( ~J
iicncncn
000)
MM
M
O)O O) --? W O> *
NMivb to o w *a en
M M OOl
b I % I
MMHMMH -J n U M-JOICOI*
MI^IOD M w M w o*
Bijaa K83*sg RHSSCS sssifcg M^y^ft SB&SS ^sjss
b M MW b b b ?*t*b cot* W ^J tj o% li co to^tuwtn b M JoT* ^a N b w *
?& M &.&&
igs I'ggs
! ^^ ^% 2& s ^Sf3fP3P-a
i
J |_i |_t
!88
) bb
|J JJ M (-1
8888
bbbb
(A (ft f*
MMU
O:?-.3_ M CO.*M.
SfeS
sg
(Oil
I U> N I
GO I I .o r-j co tn
K- 3
R&
M O) W M N O * Oi O W
EXHIBIT 5
CIRCUITS OP THE SOTERIOH COURT IN WHICH JTOOES RECEIVE COMPENSATION FROM THE COOT4TIES IH ADDITION TO THAI PAID BY THE STATE OP GEORGIA.
3IRCTIT
CODHTT
AMOOOT PAH) BY COUNTY
AUTHORIZATION,
Atlanta Augusta Cbattahoochee Western
Mac on Rons Stone Mountain Eastern Southwestern
Fulton Richmond Musoogee Clarice Bibb Floy* Pulton Chatham Suvter
: 4,000 2,000 S.OOO 1,000
: 1.000 1,OOO 1,000 5,000
1,000
P. 316, Acts of 1935 P. 24, Acts of 1922 P- 70, Acts of 1925 P- 20, Acts of 1920 P. 20, Acts of 1920 P. 20, Acts of 1920 P. 20, Acts of 1920 P. 111, Acts of 1927 P' 80 Acts of 1920
Circuits as listed In So. 24-2501 Sa. Coda 1933.
TABLE 17
DETAIL OF CLASSIFICATION MISCELLANEOUS MISDEMEANORS Included In Table 17, Pages 146 - HI
CHIME
NUMBER OF CASES
Abortion
Accessory After the Fact
85
Barratry
2
Chaining White and Negro Convicts1 together
1
Concealing Death of Bastard Child
9
Failure to Report Election Expenses
2
Failure to Keep Life Savers at Resort
5
False Imprisonment
11
Filing False Tax Returns
1
Forcible Entry
2
Illegal Disposal of Animal Carcass
1
Illegal Purchase of Cotton Seed
9
Making False Affidavit by Contractor
2
Making False Surrey
5
Making Obscene Drawings
5
Operating Billiard ROOD without License
3
Publishing Name of Assaulted Female
1
Selling Obscene Pictures
S
Violation or Health Regulations
4
Violation of Bulk Sales Act
1
Violation of Motor Comon Carrier Act
2
Violation of Regulations Regarding Measures
2
TOTAL
101
TABLE 17b
DETAIL OF CLASSIFICATION MISCELLANEOUS FELONIES Included In Table 17, Pages 146 - 147
CRIME
NUMBHt OF CASES
Accessory Before the Fact
36
Coapoundlng Felony
10
Sending or Delivering Threatening Letters
23
Destroying Railroad Bridge
2
Harboring Convicts
1
Illegal Traffic In Human Bodies
1
TOTAL
73
Caae A 8 C D
1 F
a
B I J
I
L H I 0 p
APPENDIX F
EXHIBIT 6 TYPICAL RECIDIVIST CASES
Date of Charg*
2-1-20 11-9-20 3-8-24 7-28-23
11*4-26 10-4-35
4-11-17 5-31-17 S-B-20 1-14-29
3-5-14 8-10-1* 12-3-18 11-U-Ct 4-14-23 8-10-10 11-7-89
10-9-23 1-19-32 R-27-S4
11-14-25 4-21- 28 7-28-31 1-2S-32
7-1-01 2-1-0* 2-1-34 11-5-07 2-13-32 11-2-14 8-1O-15 6-2-17
aB--43--1nT
3-4-18
3-10-lw 9-10-19 0-6-19 4-6-21 6-2-22
1S-10-2I U-10-M 4-1-26
8-14-20 1-16-32
9-17-20 ll-U-30
3-15-07
12-2-16 9-10-18 12-1-22 10-24-23 9-S-2S 6-2O-90
9-19-29 3-12-30 12-8-33 9-1-3* 12-S-39 12-2-15
3-16-20 6-14-30
8-8-Z1 8-10-28
ll-U-3*
U-9-2S 1-19-9*
2-27-29 1-2-93
4-140 l-2S-*7 1-2S-S7 6-U-28 3-8-33
Sentenced for
Carrying Concealed Weapons Assault aud Battery Shooting at Another order
Stabbing Aaaavlt with Intent to Harder
Siwfle Larceny Burglary ^ Robbery Receiving Stolen floods
Carrying Concealed Weapon* Aaunlt with Int.nt to Harder Gawbllag Aaaanlt and Battery Profane Language
Aaaanlt with Intent to larder
Shooting at Anothsr Aaaanlt with Intent to Iferdar Vagrancy
Poaaesalng Liquor Possessing Liquor Selling Liquor warder
Laroeny Assault with Intent to llnrdar Laroeny frcai the House
aroeay of Hog Robbery violation Prohibition Law
Oaaalllw Oeabll^B OaafcllJwa' Violation Prolilbltioa Law JajraaeT
OtBRUlnC OfafplH^f
Violation Prohibition Lav Violation Prohibition Law Violation Prohibition Law Unitary (8 east*)
KtaOSP*
AaaKaTt with latent to M*crd*r Violation Prohibition Law
A>*mt with intent to terd*r murder
Gambling
Vialatloa Prohibition Imm Oaavllai Violation Prohibition Lav 31j.pl* Larceny Violation Prohibition La Violation Prohibition I* Larceny
Violation Prohibition I*>* Rap* Violation Prohlbtlloo Law Assault and Battery Pointing Pl.tol ftt Another Violation Prohibition LM
>ird*F Oanbllng
SlJw.pl* I+rena Violation Prohibition Xw Laroany Aatianli wltt Intent to nrd..r
SU*pl Laro Rap*
Aa*anlt with Xnt*mt to lhirdr I^reanj-
Slx.pl* I*ro*nr Operating AntoBobll* XntoxleattA violation Prohibition Lav violation Prohibition Law Aavanlt with intent to Itordar
Sent ease*
450.00 flna or 3 aonth* on chain gang 12 Bnth oa chain gang Cue dismissed Slectrocutloa
12 nontb on chain gang 3 Tears on chain gang
.$25.00 fln or 3 aonUi* on chala *n3 2 years Is State P*nltent lary 7 years In State ?aalt>ntlar7 12 nonthJ cm chain gang
6 no&teba on chain gang And iTC.OO fin* *1Q,OO fin* or 6 aontSv en ct>..ln e-oig 6 uontha on oh" gang
12 wonthn on chain gang to 1 year* in State Penitentiary
1 to 4 years In Statt Penitentiary 2 years State Penitentiary Case sol pross*e
12 aontnn on cjmln gang 12 aontha on chain gang 3 months on chain gang Life imprisonment
$150.00 fin* or 12 months en chain ***
10 acntha on chala gaag $100.0O fine or 12 months on chain gang 2 years In Stat* Panltentlary acquitted $25*00 fin* or 3 souths on chain gang Acquitted $25.OO fine or S months on chain gang lol pro*tt*A 6 aontha on g>i.ain gu*0 Hoi prosHftd Hoi pro**l Sol 'arosaed $40.OO fin* or 2 _ months =n chala gang; $S5*OO fine or i'aonth* on chain gang Hoi ~3ro8S*d $12S..OO fla* or 12 months on ahaln gang 12 months on chain gang afl 6 month In jail 12 Month* on chain gang for each case 12 month* on chain gang
5 years In Stata Penitentiary 8 months on chain gang
$150.00 f ! or 5 aonthi ca si* la ^ang Llfa laprUoranent
$35.00 fin* or 6 *onths on chain gang 12 months on chain gang $35.00 rina or 6 aoatb* on chain gang 12 months on chain gang $50.00 fls* or 5 months on chfcln 5*114 S3S.OO fin* or 3 aontba on chain gang $20O.OO f like or 12 aoat-h* on chain gang $65.00 fls* or 6 month* on chain gang
$66.OO fin* or 4 aont&a on chain gtag 2 yeara in State Penitentiary $150*00 fiae or 12 aoaths on chain gsag Case nol proased $75.00 fin* and 4 months on chain gang 12 months on chain gang
1O 7ars In Stat* Penitentiary $25.OO fin* or 6 months on chain gang
$4O.OO fin* or 4 month* on chain gang C2OO.OO fin* or 12 month* chaSa gang $40.00 fine or 6 mntb* on chain gang 2 y**rs in Stat* Penitentiary
$2S.OO fin* or 6 months on chain gang 1O years In Stat* Penitentiary
2 years In Stat* Penitentiary 4 months on chain gang
$60.00 fla* or 4 month* on chain gang ilCO.OO fin* or 4 mont-n* on chain gang $00.00 fin* or 8 months on chain gang 12 months on chain gang $100.00 fin* and 12 months on chain gang
Sourcei limit, dockets, Superior and City Courts. - 155-
GRAXD TOTAL
Fins or D^t*ntlo $10 or 1$ daj* 10 or 1 Btmth 10 or 2 month* 510 or ") aonth* 810 or 5 month*
10 or S acnttu 10 or 9 onth 10 or 10 sooth*
*25 or 15 day* J25 or 1 aonth* (2$ or 2 onth 125 or J ttuith* 25 or 4 onth* |25 or 5 montt* 25 or b Bonth* 25 or 7 month* 25 or 8 aonth* t25 or 9 month* 125 of 10 nor.th* 25 or 12 BonthB $25 or IB Month* $50 or 1 nonth J5D or 2 monthi 550 or * aonth* 550 or u aonths t50 ~ 5 aonth* 15^ r ^ aonth*
}50 or 7 nonth* 50 or C aonth* 50 or 9 nth* 150 or 10 nonthj t?0 or 11 aontb* $50 or 12 month* t^O or 18 aonth* t75 or 1 aonth 875 ox- 2 oonth* 175 or 3 aor.thj 75 or U aonthi 175 r 5 fflo-thi 575 ? Ko.itha J75 or 7 aonth* S75 or 8 aonthB 175 or 9 aonthi l^ or 10 sonth* 375 or 12 aonthn 575 or 18 sonthn 4130 or 1 aonth S10.1 or 2 monthn tlO^ or T aonth j J100 or & aonthj 5100 or 5 aonth i HOC or 6 aonthi SiOC or 7 aonths SIO: or S aDnth J1CJ or 9 aonths (103 or 10 aonth* I1CO or 11 Month* f 100 or 12 aonth* S100 or 18 xonth* 1200 or 3 monli 1200 or 2 aontU 2CO or 2 ontfj 1200 or 4 o.-.tU $200 or 5 oniti 9200 or 6 aonth* 1200 or 7 months
or 8
J200 or 11 Bon'hi tZOO or 12 aonEb* $200 or 16 B0.-,;t3
Adultery Jh
8r*A, Enter Carry D**d- Carrrln^ on Cheat *M
_ TOTAL __ Ab*n4o.nerrt Fomlcttltt_.
srf - in--' 2sr i. Ciel.tojis Supze1r,i8o1r4
. 1,
C ..
3363 I,1?24C
3 252
. BulWlng . . ,lj Weonft. Lottrj 3*1 naif. . _
_,...,, C, __86,.1.1_; fi._ . 9
C 05S0
1
1
1
1
i
56
1
IS
;
18 2
1 1
3
2
Z 8
1
1
92 3
263
it 37
-
-
i 16
i
- - - - 11 - 3 - 1 2
1
-
96
. 10
_
-
6
-.-
It
3
-
-
1
1
I*. 6*2
''!!
91
1
*1
2
2
3
1
11
12
20
4
651 188
1 1
2 256 11
7 2
1
19
2
1
6681
1
3
1
18
290 31
19
28
1
11 11
3
2
1
"J 30 1 19 41 20
1
12
1
2
11
1
1
2
*?3
4
2 12 1
i
l
i
3
2
12 33 10
3 11 2
11? 1
2
2^967 1,6*0
2
70 12
?
12
24*
1
1
1
79
2
1
1
1
2
1
1 1?
2
I
3 22 S39
5
eO 81
28
20
17 H
U.617 41
1,9* 1??
2
15
2
3
608
36 31
56
1
21
1
~
1
"
~
1 ~
22
" 10
'
~
~
\
2 1 1
558
327
1
4
It in
-
1
3 18 .3 52
1 11 13
9
2of
'3!
''So 3U6
it
1 27
62
1 -
-
t 3
; -
1 -
; -
1 1
; -
ia
3 26 -
; 13 -9
5 1
1
1
~
2
3
2
~
~
1
i J 78
: 88
~ 21 - 16
5
1
1 |
;
-
1
10
-
1 1
20
7
6
67 22
2 1
-3
10 i!
*D3 5*2
75
1,0'JD
3
12
51
15 '??
160 359
24
I
_ -
,, -
S 2
1 -
. 1
_ -
-
_ *8
-
2
_
11
42 -
ii
2
i -
221
H
2 -
_
;
7 1
_ 2
6 1
_ -
_ 1
2
_ 52 26 21
1 ; 10
2
I
6 17 10
12
-
1 5
1
5i?
6
2 1
5
2
3
J
2! 1 12 1Q1
"
3 lit 16
i
1
1
2
1
:
1
;
1
;
1
;
2 It 2
i
;
j
1 1
:
236 8
1 1 ~
-
_ -
;
_ -
-
_ 1
2 1
_ -
_ -
-
_ ~
- 11 ^ ~~
6 6 ~
*
.
; 11
-_
it 1
3
I
4. ~
469
7
4 1
7
1
6
1
1
~
6 12 2
3
l
3 16
-156-
31ft. DlT. J81 210 4
SENTENCES FOR UISDQtEAXCR CASES By Crimea
57 Superior and 29 City Courts of OtorglA January 1, 1926 - aaceaber 31, 1935
Lrcenj
][.nrceny
Tubllo
Oaabl lr.| Olrolel ^ .irt.r Truit Indecency
UalntAlnlng Hftllclou* Ld Mout* Mltoblef
IHc&ir*. oper. Auto rubljo (Hlic. ) ?.bll Orunlt Crunkaniiess
oooa. 3to. Stolen Heo. Unatup
Tobacco^ sttibolng
D AulCo */o UBS Obie. Trii. Omer. Cori. T<nging VAATUC7
Tlo. Gu> Vlo. Kotar Tio. rroh.
Vrt. L
wir
Tl------
-Si loo A----35-- T5G--WT- 125----r6T-- 753-5
,1,' "5", 520-17955--TfiS-- 273--835--3n755o~T72--IW-TSS--391 -
!.5U 735 6* Ws 2,3l ' ool '30.795 6.5** s* 73
*
3
-
1
19 61
61 96
IS
1
1 1
;
5
:
1
i
1
I
0
3 32 11
-
-
1
-
-
i
6
2 2 2
39 -
12
2 21
1
1
11
1
112
1 116 i l
26
2 126 140
1
15
'-
'I : -
!
3
-
2--
6 1
111 350
78 33
IS 2 31 1 2
i 1?10 1 2
81
1 13
1 67
1
6
1
1
12
2
3 kl
2
6
1
25
J S3
17 19
*3
6
2
-
-
1 1
4* 7 1 4 18
: I
9 1
3
: :;
1 1*
;
2* 512
19
290
5 181 16
:' ,04*
39 706 10 158
8
3* 3
A 20
112
4
; -
1 *
3
-
: i
-
-1
1
*
1
-
1
4
9
10
1
I
l
:1 6
11
3
6 1 136 11
1 1
i
64 5
i
4 10
44 28
26 7 1
19 293
11 1,069 7 110
8
2 53
it
2
1
1
78 10 39 23 - 12 3 99 10 67 1 2 2 51
: : : :6
1* - 29 3
2
2!
6
1
5
2
~
_ _ 26
1
13
2
1
-
3
2
1*1
1
76
29 90 9
1*7 3f 190
16
'1*1 14
i1a2
6 5
"1
52
1 26
_
1 3 2
1
9 18
2
7
1
20
"5
4 I? 37
1 2
:i
; 1
'.'.-.-
2
1 1
1 25
;
5
1
8
12
-
*! 5 44 20
17
1
.
1
1-1 : : :
S 2
IS 1
8 ii 1
2
332 I ! 1
11
2
3 1* nl 65 7
3
13
33
1 1
3
11
3 2
116 1
24
2
lit
j
4
24
61
2
22 69 12
2 16* 216
aj 1
216 24
i2
2
8 2
2
:
-
3 -
1;3
13-1 2 116
10
2 10*
1 39
*
1
2 6 6
J? i19 4 101
7* 59 *0
28?
9
15
*0 472
ll
1
-
- 15 12
53
--1
3 *
1
1,6 13
13 1
1
i
10
5
9 21 3 12J ll
1 *
i:j
7-16
--
1
1
i
3 7
1
6
Ti I J
2 12
if
22
IS S
6
3 26
53 6
2
i 1 28 u3?
1 n!
9* 35 1
3
21*
11
s 33
3
1
I 7
10
3
2 10 3*
\
96 2 2
1
-
2
-
1
S 11
50
-
2
-
7
13 14
1-6
2
1
I
2
7
17
2*1 31
J
I
1
2
2
2
1
1 3 27
2 2
1
!: 2
11
5
:
12 1
1
1
17
1
1
1
1
1
2
11 3
2
5
4
1 1
2
7
20
1
2 44
7
2
11 2
9 272 60 11
1 75 if 7
I
2
-
-
1 -
5 1
'-
1 5 *6
1*
3
1
2 15
90 42 30
1
5
*
5
4 3
3 -
8 * - 38
21
9 3
2-
2
11-
11-
*
122
-
-
1
1 3 1
3 -
1 1
5
1 1
2
25 13
-
-
2
1
i20
616 lit
6
J
1
1 2
2
3
2
1
1
2 19
21
3
i
12
5
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
*
8
8 11
3
-
5l
1
9
5
1-
-
2-1
0
2
-
-
J
1
1 2
"211
1
1
1
2
1
1
2 41
1
2-2
1 2 1
; l
2
4 1
;
J
5
2 1
12
2
-_
1
I
5i1*6 33
I
1
11
u
2 9
4 i
~ 1 :
~ -
-
-
1 1 1-1
2
-
4
311
1
~
1
3 18
:
-
1 * 75 2
2 1 33 2 1
3 1
1
1
5 1
1
!i^ i
6
2 1
1-1
-
-
1
1
2
7
2-1
2
1
1-1
1
S
J2
2 33 9
J10 1 5
J
1 15 2
1
2
2
28
1? 139
73
1 2
-
-
11.-
3 11 16 22 25
s 12
2
7
1-9
1
. 1-1
1-1
5
-
-
. 1
- 17
2
"1 s
4
1
j
13
2
,
.
6
1
1
3
l
2 1
1
2 7
;
2 1
-
2
1
1
-
1
1
1
-- 3
1
-
-
2
2
1
1
S1
8
;
2
1
1
1
41
5
1
2
2
^
7
4
1
17
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
-
-
1
2
1
1 2
;
;
1
1
1
4
-1
2
3
i
--
1
I
1 -
-
5
1
9
2
51
2 1
;
1
3
-
-
2
* 51 60
-
-
2
5
2
-
1
2
1 12
16
2
t
1
2
-
1 3 7 5- -
1> 3 1
20 - 3*ntncB* for HlideMaaor CMC* (Cont'd)
OHMS' TOTAL
_.- . Clt* 3u .rlor. C
3
c
3
C . 3,
SiS"^
KSiS"
SSo"0"
SSi;
mto Public
ltox. ?rujikenr.eB
ftpf or Pt*ntion toontial 300 or 1-Bonth 300 or 2 Mohth* 300 or 3 Month* 300 or ft month* 300 or 5 Month* 300 or 6 Month* 300 or 7 Month* 300 or 8 Month* JOO or 9 Month* 300 or 1C Month*
{3X) or 12 Month* 3 or 18 Month*
|4 or 3 Month* MOO or fc Month* MOO or 6 Month* 1*00 or S Month* |4OO or 9 Month*
OO or 12 Month* 00 or 18 Month* f 00 or 1 Month t'.QO or ^ Month* koo or 6 Month* koo or 10 Month* ftoo or 12 Month* t^OO or 18 Month*
IGOQ or 6 Month* llSOO or S Month* (liOO or 12 Month*
$,SOO or 6 Month* iSOO or S Month* 1500 or 12 Month* UOOO or >>> Munth* [1000 or 6 Month* [10OO or 12 aoath*
ib5
ii . .. .. .. .. .. . : : 2 : : ; : : : : : : : : i i : : : :
-----
7
3.
..<-..--.
*-----
------
a
L6
1
-
-
1
-
-
6l32*l----9-a-----
-
-
l
-
-
i*S
1i
H
i. ---.... -.-51-1--
--11--1--.----9-----
i
......
-----1. ....
--!-----
188
127
1
1
3
-
a >
2
it -
1
-
1
-65a-3---23l622---.
2
------
3
2
3
z
4
93
6 ......
-I . 1 . - . - .- .- .-
----2-------------
2
-.-!---. ---.-1------
...
1
2
1
1 7!
i : : i : : : : : i : : : J : : : : : : ; i : : : : : ------ 11 - 1 -
rl
3J
-
1
1
-
3
3
1-3171.. --i-ai---- 1 - - - - 1 6
*i i
!
_._
2 2 ----- 1------1. ----------- .-.-11.
10
1-
-
27
5-- l-11
2 - ...
_ - - . ,,
I
1 ------
70
99-1-5-
-----2-------*-----
.----2--.--1---2---
-
1 -1192---.
2-511-2-
1
... 2
-
-
-H
-
.
.
.10 and 1 Month 1:10 and Z Month* 1 10 and 3 Months (.10 and 4 month* ftlO and 6 Month* ItlO and 3 Math* ilO and 10 Month* IlO and 12 Month* |10 and 18 Month*
and 15 day* and 1 Month and 2 Month* and 3 Month* and 4 Month* 425 and 6 Month* 25 and 8 Month* |25 ana 9 Month* 25 and 10 aonth* 25 and 12 Month* 25 and 18 Month*
and 1 Month and aonth* and 3 Month* and 4 Month* and 5 Month* 50 and 6 Month* KO and 7 MODtb* 50 and 8 aonth* 50 and 9 Month* J50 and 10 Month* 150 and Z2 Month* $50 and 18 Month*
!75 and 15 4*7* 75 1 "onth 7S and 1 Month* 175 and 1* i^nth*
li
12 ...
H - - - --
22
31
1
-----
2
"S i f i ; : :
i--ai-i--ji5---
--
I
I
-
I
I
-I^
1
13
i
20
------
1
_ 12
::!::
Z
i
1 3 2* 10
10
j : 1 \ ::
13
-
-
3 --
:
-----_--2-*-----
--2---1-1---.'.
.12-1---
3 2- -1 ll 2 ll 3 -- - 1 -- -1 -- -- -3 ---2 15 7 1 55 0 S '3 1 - - 1- -
-
-
1 2
-
1 1
-2 -- 1
1
1
12 i
612
19
60
2 - - Z I-
Z
26
S? I ! f ; : :
-2ol31k3t2:i---H67963---
3-
-
-
5 ....... 13 ...
..
:
!
2
!
:
*
:
3 237 - 5S
I ir!
I 7
39
5111
10
1a4
268 12
72 - - I 1 -
8 i : - : :
t
:
--1 -- |
1-1--------12--1--
J r<
1 13 2 -
-
-
-
- 10 29 tj
1
-
j
-
2
1i
1
-
- 2 27
2
*-
-
2 2*
I
1
922
2S7
-
-
S
9-
1
5-*33*3'-Je53r-769ltl96---
2-
i
S
2 1S6 16 2* 26
u|
9
8 -1 i : : : : i : i 1 ::" S :: i i :::'!! 2 ! i :: -
1
61
2
-
-
1
2
1
977
55t>U3
-2
*1
i3
-- -1
1 12 27 ^7
5 9 l> 17 3
3
-
-
6 33 it* no
i.
2
2V
2
1
5 200 f 3?
^
1
2
2
22
7 --.- -
<l
----l--.--.13..
--
- - 13 -
-
8o. Stolen Ro. Unitaap
0 Auto w/o Di Obco.
Tlo. HAM Tlo. Motor Tlo. Proh.
Qlo0ocjj"i____B____c_TTobobaaccccoo* afttaabbbolmy Tr%p!)**a OoWpM?** COM. LL*arnyguage TagraBO| I**m ^ Th. I*M __!
_
!JQJ9L_ JAgQ. i^og?^9- L3^ 1 .*rtO f17L82"^ f1l6. ^ 46 _^2a99^1^_^110*001^1^ 113.22 ZQ6 ?,gyir 7?^ _6S MS "a.m. 661 "y).^95 &Jjtj^^fc~
31
?:
5S
7
125 3
_-
...
...
1
2
-
-
.:
:
!
:
:
:
;
:
:
-
~ **- la -
15
6 6 2112
111
J
.121---.-112-182217
.1.
......
2..
.5!
2-
1
1
-
-
1-.-
3-227-2
1 1 5 110 111 3
132 1^
51
512--
1&52S121
211
12* 7 13 1
--------1-1-1---...----...---..1.
33-21--2--2----**
---1---1-21-1--10-
.i-la...
2*213-
15 1} s -
5-71--1213-U2-20$ !.}
ZllillilliZIIIII 6*
J i I 6 3 - 6 5 2 3 1 15 H9 1J li 3
HUND TOTAL F'Of in* Bt**r>tlon faantid) t75 "d 6 BBotb* t?5 and 7 Bontb* (75 and S Bonr.h* 175 and 9 Booth* 175 and 10 BOiith* 175 nd 12 month* 175 na M Booth*
100 and 1 Kith 100 and Z MOiath* 100 and J aorta* 100 and * BO ath* 100 and 6 Month* 100 *ad 7 BOatb* 100 and 8 Booth* 100 and 9 Month* 100 and 10 aonth* 100 and 12 Moth* 100 and IS 10 nth*
1200 and 2 at nth* 1200 and 3 Bcnth* t200 and * Month* 1200 and 5 Booth* (200 and 6 BO nth* 1200 and S annto* 1200 and 9 Bonth* [200 aad 10 woth* 200 and 12 month* teOO and IS uonth*
UOO and 2 Bjnth. [360 and 4 Bantb* tJOO and 5 Bantb* 13OO and S Booth* (300 and 7 aonta* tWO and S *ooth* boo and 12 month* l300 and IS Booth*
IfcOO and 6 nonth* SHOO and 12 Booth* [4OO and IS Booth*
P and 3 nonth* and 6 iwnth* and 9 itonth* and 12 Bonth* and IS Booth*
1600 and 12 BOnth* boo and 12 Booth* 11000 and 12 Month* 11000 and 1ft Month*
TOTA1
AJultI7
68,018 21,514 1,703 383 1 92* 252 5ifa
BTMk. Cntr Carrr Dtad-Ctrrylne oa cheat cca 5 329 127 ,677 1,8?3 i,9"59 287 1,981 1,050
I6l
8
158
1- -
10 7 60
:::I05
1
2 I : 270 -
1
---7
8 ".
\
I
8 16*
,1 '- I 76-1
-
1
2
- 11
7 31
12-
673 I : \ .
15 1 31 - 2 -
261
: : : 4 308 - 1 3 i -
l 105 669
r
1
2
155
10
6 9
-
... i
1
1
1li
2 2 26 529
3
2
1--
4 11
: : : : : : : *6 - 1
18 - -
I
8
2-1
i il = :
- 2-
122
^
?i: - 1 2
.-
-2
1
I1O fin* 425 Pin* 150 fin* llOO Fin* 3OO MM
Jail or Chnlnganc ft*nt*no*
2 Btnth* i Bonth*
aooth* Banth* 7 Bonth* Bontb* 9 Booth* 10 Bonth* 12 Booth* IS onth*
31251 ii : * - -
U
- 15 1
i ! 4 9
1
1
12
71
SI
10 1-1 -
- - - - 1 1 1-1
i J:I
2
2',loJ
122 1
1H i
i
S 1 221 0--71020
ta - i
i e1j 1-2 M6i
201
1 1 i 49*8 *3 2*
I 12 I 196 21 8 2-10 8
82 7 2
H.OOO 1,5HJ 2* 528 21 O.
98
| 500
ll 10> i 329 93-2
29
8
2 73 25 2 21 3 18 21 -63 - 10 *
SO - 5*nt*nc* for
C*tv* (Cont'd)
TDHlv-.t..MBP IT.
Larctn?
^C* l"------B------S--
(Simple)
=S-3-
larceny Publlo Maintaining Mallclou. Hl.d.zeanor. Opr. Auto PubZlo
Ufa. 3toln Rco. tfnfltaap
CM Allto w/o IT0 Obo
Ylo. 0*>* Tlo. Motor
After Trust Ina.ctncj Uwd Houte Ulchlef (1U.O.)
Ihll. Into.orunker.r.<!t Ooo4.
TOO.CCO. St.bblns Tr.<^.i. Owner, con., uuwu.it. Vvtrmoci
L.W.
T.h. Uw
-? ' ? --'- ' -S- -*=- A-- A -5. A.,.. ~C--------3^ 'TT ------3-- CHC3C3C8C9CflC3C3C5
-^ a Vlo. rrolu ntm, L
30~,79f"^3*>"
73
1
1-
7
11 i7 -1 : :
7J:::
12 13 7 3 2 2 1
51-.--1--1--6 -
-----
1
1
2
-
3 ...
-.--.------.-1
-
16 1
16 i 12 5 I : * - 2 1 - - 9 15
-
H
2
-
-
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
2 11
*
3
-
2
...... 1
. 1 .....
1
..--------1---
- : 1 ... - - 2 1 12 2 - - 1 - - 2 - - - \ j 13 3 1 - 2
2-----------2
3 ----------- 1
2
\ \* : : : i 'S >! : : 1 10
-
-
* 12
: -1-.---------1
17 6 * t
2
--...--------1
-
-
2
i
-
-
-
-
2 3 ...
2
2
7
* 9 ' * : : : : i 1 : : 1 Z 3 32 - 1 - i - : I i :::!:::::: i i
3 : : : : 1 : __...- i -------
... 1 2
-
-
I f : i : Z i 1-2
-
.1.
-------
-.-2
.
... 1
~
I
1
1
2
1
2
....
-
1
-
.
-
-
-
-
1
.
.
-
-
1
1
-
-
-
1
-
1
-
1
-------.....1
-
3
: : I:2:
2
i!!i
1 6 I
li
=
=
=:
i
;
M
i1 6 8 12
:
1|
J
5
I
62
1 1
a
-
3
:
.
:
3
i
-
--------2--112* -l-2-*3-198J
111-..
...81
i .....
38 53 1
1*9
2 11
1 IS
56 j 1
617
1
2*2 j 30
1 16
1 1 1*6 9 2 1
i1
^
z 21
1
11
15 1
2 12
8
2 11* 16
5
*I
if 6
10
3~ si* 1 .
2 1 * 3
18
1 12
1
18
83 55
19 13
8} 59
15 2?
J
1 -i
15 1D5
6?
297
28 ** 57
10*
1
J
-
1
1 28
1
7
2 16
it? 31:' 2
1A* - 11 7 1
\
3*11
13 1
2* 12 *9 35 13 *2
1,2*1 ** 19 4*
13*
I1
1 - 10 2 96 6
2 162 10
1
22
2 - 9 - 16 2 22
: I : 8 : 8 t 205 18 *0?
10|
8 13*
si * 33 17
6 20
10
31
1 13 13 50 3 7*
222-5-
32 397 7? 18
7
2
- 1 1 i5 .2 32 i*
7 20 1 6 6 * 5 5 12 1
1 * 360 **3 3i* *it1> 11-5 12350
18-6173 31* 109 38 126 * 5 9 -H -
-2]
-
*
1
7
-
-
-632 28 13
179
-28
-1-1-1- 2J *1S122
5 62
* 20
5 12
1 15
8 J17 21 *J
2 165
-3817-12-*15*21lS63S
-9-1--- 13 -61--* 1 155 9 1* - 2J 7 - 16 365 2J 9 1 99
-912--211157---2 2*---S122lil--}
-*6---ll
- 26 1 -
3 1*3 21 25 5 3* *6 23 *1 53j 57 19
-3 1 3
5 10
si
'i26
J i20 s7
a-a I 2 96 1* 3 ^3
i.^7 4 6 277 22
8..W.
Grand Total Fine or Datmrlica $10 or 1 nonth
$10 or 12 montha $10 or 18 month*
$25 or 3 montha $25 or 4 nontha
25 or 9 Bontha $25 or 12 month!
$50 or 2 moatha $50 or 3 montha $50 or 4 nontha $50 or 5 nontha $50 or 6 Bontha $50 or 7 montha $50 or 8 months $50 or 9 nonbha $50 or 10 noatha $50 or 12 BontLa $50 or 18 montha $75 or 4 nontha $75 or 5 noatha $75 or 6 notttho $75 or 8 Bontha $75 or 9 Bontha $76 or 10 nontlia $75 or 12 noxttlia
$100 or 3 noataa
$100 or S nontfu $100 or 3 nontha $100 or 10 nontha $100 or 12 Bantha $100 or IB Booth. $200 or 6 nontha $200 or 8 Bantha $200 or 10 northa $200 or 12 Boiiha
$300 or 6 nontha
S300 or 12 nontha $300 or 18 month*
TABUS 21*
SEHTEKCES FOR FELOHJf CASES By Crlaaa
57 Superior Court* of Georgia January 1, 1926 - DMonbor XL. 19S8
1s s
p
Total
S*$ *s$i
4>
*>
Bureadking
&xtring Vehiolt BigMT
|
Burglary
1
!
I ,.
24.504 2,887 202 151
76
65 323
30 7,783
96 126 1.4IO IS
S
1
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
--
14
2
-
-
-
3
1
--
--
--
1^
40 11
11
S
S
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
44
6
1
2
1
...
-
1
1
46
7.2-
1
2
2
1 _
3-
9
70 11
94 17
2
-
1
1
-
-
2
10
1-4
13
1-10
22
g
...
4
215 60
2
1
-
1
1
41
4
1
-
-
-
24
4
4
13
S
2
12 1
14
1
-
-
-
4
241 64
1
2
7
1 37
23
4
2
2
1 10 1
11
8
1
*
3
2
-
-
-
1
136 26
1
1
2 21
-
-
22
7
14
3
-
-
-
10
1
-
213 S3
1
-
-
-
9
1
...
6 4
-
1
41
-
1
-
-
1
1-
-
1
9
... -
123 35
3
14
S
1
34 11
345 89
1
1
16
1
1
1
1
6
3
1
1
SO
1
4 IS 1
11
3
2
1
16
41-.
IS
3
27
3
2
-
8
1 1
S-
304 82
t
1
4
1
39
S
3 11
1-2
--
1
17
8
...
-
1
-
1
1
-
121 41
2
.
3
B
.
- 162-
- 12
3
S
2
-
-
2
_
frl ?
|
li^ronwny
fLraxo-caony
is a & i I ' Suildlnc Ili
Perion
?f -5
15 as SS 3 =
U3 sl
ll
11
.J * -4 &.
a is 1 3.g
123 35 41 371 1 ,691 45 :1.974 278 1,,25a
19 1,569 44
t Hi i
1
In ll A
74 :0 224 2,032 iO 3:7
:s
"~
""
-
--
-
6
-
2
-
_
1
-
_
-
-
-
1
1 -
2a 2 i-l 3 11
2
4
1
-
-
-
C
1
-
-
-
-
2
13
-
-
1
-
-
1
-
-
2
-
ai
2
-
_
-
1s
_
.
2
-
-
-
--
1 11
2 a 20
-
-
6
1
0
8
.
.
2
-
2
3
2
1-1
1
-
I
-
--
-
-
1
.
4
6 25
__s
-
.
.
...
_
4
32
1
8
1
-
-
4
3
2 10
-
-
--
-
. 11
1
1
...
2-1
.
1
3
2
""
~
...
--
-
-
1
6 29
9
5 60
1
2
2
-
2
-
1
2
2
8
_
2
-
-
-
-
-
...
-
-
-
4 20
1
--
1
--
5
1
2
2 37
_
_
2
_
.
1
-
1
-
1
...
4
-
3
.
--
--
.
...
--
...
.
-
l
--
-
--
--
-
2
.
4
1 35
_
_
3
-
-
'*
2 73
-
-
1
-
-
1
_
4
214
-
.
-
-
-
--
-
-
2 -
r :
--
6
1 27
--
--
3
-
-
-
-
3-1
--
-
-
-
2
2
...
6 --
-
-
--
3
-
-
1
1
--
_
4
5
i
11
8 80
-
-
-
12-
1
1
1
--
1
8
3 1C
2
--
--
--
2
-
-
1
-
-
_
!
.
1
-
1
3
3
...
...
-
.
_
.
2
2
-
-
11-
_
2
3
.
-
-
-
_
-
4-1
5 26
1
?
S 86
-
4
-
-
3
10 1
8
.
-
-
-
-
3
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
--
-
-
-
1
.
1
1
_
1
_
.
-
--
...
1
-
1
-
11-
2
4
1
6
1 31
1
-
-
i.
-
-
-
1
...
42-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-163-
Tmbla 21 - SflBtanoe* for Polony C" (Cont'd)
Grand Total Fina or Detention (Cont'dl J400 or 12 month.
J500 or 12 nontss
**
ii ** is : v 5
5 <S
1iI 1
43>
? 3 * *
9 Total
*
Si
SSl
:
i*t
ll
atfafs Is I3
24,504 2 .887 202 151 78 65 323 SO 7,783
IS
3
.....
1
1
1
44 16
....
1
2
3 fr fr * aI *. a$ fil
96 126 1,430
IS
11
223-
11000 or 12 mouths F1A0 and Detention |10 and 12 months
8 1 3 ...... 2
11
3
-
.....
1
-
1
J2S and 6 month* }25 and 8 montlis $35 and 12 aiczr&a
$25 aad 18 months
{50 and 3 aontjs $50 and 4 ttontas
$50 and months $50 and 7 months $50 and 8 months 50 and 10 morthb $50 and 12 norths
50 and 18 norths
17
6
4
1
34
7
12
10
4
10
2
.....
1
1
.....
6
.....
4
1
.....
1
.....
1
....
55 25
1
.....
8
1
1
11
2
.....
1
10
5
...1.2
274 42
3
3
-
2
2
- 52
2
S 25
48
2
2
1
-
-
8
4
$75 and 4 monUis
2
1
.....
1
....
$75 and 9 mon-ais
175 and 10 moathi $75 and 12 norths $75 and 18 Booths
1100 and 6 noabhs $100 and 8 nonths
$100 and 12 nontho $100 and 18 BonthB
9200 and 6 months
JEOO and 12 nonthl SOO and 18 north*
$300 and 6 months $300 and 8 months $300 and 12 uonths $3OO and 18 ionthi
Z
.2
_
.....
1
2
1
.....
1
S4 26
1
2
-
.
1
1
4
1
-
S
-
15
1
-.-1.3
2
39
8
-
1
1
-
-
4
S
7
2
.....
2
191 46
3
1
-
2
1
- 28
12
1
9
1
-
-
2
>
-
-
-
1
-
6
3
.....
1
.
120 31
1
S
-
-
1
-
8
5
.
7
23
6
.-12.'
4
3
1
....
1
.
5
2
....
1
.
50 12
1
...
2
2
9
1
4
1
IHII IHIII ICdlll Illll Illll Illll CDllll Illl Illll f 1 f 1 1 Illll Illll Illll Illll Illll Illll Illlt
lltll UIMII
Illll
IO)IO) CDllll
1 I-1 *. N 1
Illl Illll HHIII II|H| | | | H | Illll Illll Illll Illll tllll
)- w 1 1 * u> 1 I j M o 1 1 H 1 1 can I ** 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 tn J2 | H 1 | Illll M 1 M 1 1 Illll
Illl
IHIII
| f* | 1 |
I I I HI
Illll
Illll * 1 1 1 1
IHIII ^ W ^- | 1
ll'lll
J-K HH- MM | M | racollol H h* M | H 0> 1 1* 1
1
Illl
Illll
1 H- | 1 1
Illll
Illll
i
1 H I l-> 01 Oi H 1- | MllHM V>|H||
Illll
Illll
||tOIH
till
Illll
Illll
1 I 1 H1
Illll
Illll M | | 1 1
Illll M 1 1 1 1
Illll
Illl
Illll
Illll
Illlt
Illll
Illll
Illll
Illll
Illll
Illll
Illl
Illll
Illll
Illll
Illll
Illll Illll
Illll
Illll
Illll
Illll
Illll
Illfl
Illl
Illll
IHIII
Illll
Illll
Illll 0 1 1 1 H Illll
Illll
Illll
Illl
1 C*H< | )
f HI I H>- 1 * I W 1
I 1 1 H|
Illll MHHIH 1 1 H 1 I
1 1 H1 1
Illll
Illll Illll Illll
8 Involuntary
Illl
Illll
Mitt f-'tl-'ll Illl H 1 1 1 HIlll Illll
Illl
IIIIM
Illl M 1 1 1 h-
IHII UlliKtn
Illl Illll Illl Illll Illl Illll Illl Hill!
en
ft Loroony
au Larceny Aftor Trust
I Larceny from Building
a Larceny froa Peroon o Lsro*ny of
Autonobila
Lroeny of 3 i-
8 Liquor
Kiccollwiocue
lelony
b
Ol
to
Murdor
Obt, Uonoy under Koleo Protonso
s Prjury
s Burglary Tools
Rape
Hill
1 1 N1 1
Illl
Illll
Illl
Illll
Robbory
s Seduction
tjhootin^ at Another
a LoautitliW
Tails 21 - 3antno for Tflany CMaa (Cont'd)
Fla and IlatanUen (Cont'd^ |500 and 12 auEtha 1600 ami 12 Bortha
J800 and 7 aootlu J800 aod 12 Bonbha 11000 and 12 xatha 11000 and U oontha
Total
S3 1 1 * * 3
MM Only tlO FIDO 2S Fin. 460 Fioo 475 Fino
4200 fine 4300 m
7
1
-
-
1
-
11
21
3
1
1
-
-
4 1
;
;
2 1
11 3
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
10
1
Datagtion OnlT
Jail or Cbalagang Santanoai
1 aonth
157
3
1
1
23
47
124
3
1
3
1
14
8
2
3 auntha
171
7
1
1
4
1
; 36
1
10
-
4 monUu
95
3
2
1
11
23
5 anntba
25
1
1
8
6 nontha 8 nontha
701 49
i94
6
174
1
8 45
1
22
1
4
196 22
2
1
1
2
-n
1 16
2
9 nozxbha
159 23
2
6
36
1
4
10 aonthfl
169 16
_
_
7
M
59
1
8
_
12 month.
5,744 609 60 34
5 19 84
4 1.956
13
48 469
2
18 nontlul
691
45
2
-
-
3
9
- 20S
7
1
54
-
Padtentlary 3agtenoea 1 yaar 2 yaara
3 yaara
4 yaara 5 yaara
6 yeara 7 yaara 8 yaara 9 yaara 10 yaara
2,428 154
27
4 10
1 S7
V 1.028
8
2 19
2
2,839 374
10
47
18
15
55
1 1.192
23
19 149
2
1,613 127
5
3
3
2 36
747
2
7 159
1
942
46
4 18
5
2
11
_ 204
8
1 142
_
1,187 129
10
219 25
1
193 28
1
1
1
6
1
14
_
1
-- 553
90
~
68
1 1
4 13
6
1
8
2 -- --
138 23
_
1
1
44
_
47
7
_
_
_
_
_
30
1
_
~
454
52
7
4
-
-
-
~ 175
-
1
3
-
11 yaara 12 yaara 13 yaara 14 yaara 15 yaara 16 yaara 17 yaara 18 yaara 19 yaara 20 yaan
13
_
..
--
_
_
.
_
4
.
_
M
3E9 84
1
5
2
88
_ 40
1
10
1
_
_
1
_
V
21 123
4
e
_ ~ -
_ 5 -
_ _ -
w
-1
_ _ -
_ _ -
_
3
_
49
-
2
M
V
1
-
1
-
92
2
4
,,
.
--
,,
_
67
^
--
3
.
39
Z
_
19
~
V
29S 12
9
2
TM
--
m
~
87
"
1
6
--
Elaetrooirtloa
83
Ufa
715
2
2
3
Othr PlaroaltlcBa
Industrial School Trailing School Buaao Ayaldn K.a.
147
3
21
7
77
3
173
5
_
V
81
M
w
2
0
1
M
1
M
340 57
7
1
2
1
-
-
59
1
2 16
-
TOTAL
24.504 2.887 2O2 111
76
65 323
30 7.783
98 126 1.430
15
* Souroei ttaita dookata of th eotirca.
. 166 -
K
en lil|
M
Illl
^ > i w i
(OMtOfJ VJ W|^o
% Mill
to
to
-j * ro M
* H *t*
N ^j l-i "> -4111 H
fo O S* i I |
> IIIH*
ta
M <OM</ICn
^ HIIH
*
Illl
W Illl M
CiM
M
M -gllM
tn
CM U -J Ulll
* MWItllH-lltOlM
|| ililiC4lltl l l I l | l to l * l
||
Illlllllll
1 1 M | | ti>Nf*f> 1
ro^to|||i|t->MIH
ii Mitiiiiiui *- i i i M-4&>S8 H I-J
Ol
I-1
tOC4-jO
II
llMlllllll-4 NMIH^OJOJiRWO
||
Illlllllll
1 1 1 1 1 H | fOtnfO
tOMllHMttrOMIIf
to lit co 0) if
||
M 1 * 1 1 H | 1 * h*
I f I MMO* 61 * O N
||
IllllllltOl
l_i ^ H COlHHf-JV><0*40
|| iiiiiiiiroi t- i | i | i w * 8 S
Ht>M.B.M
MolifobtitOHWcnlM
M
61
M
IMIIIII
Illllll
Illllll
,.,,H,,
Illllll
11
Illlllllll
IIIIIIIIWN
(O-4M
M
M
C90} Wfl^*|OWMWM
t^MMHCDro-OcnM t*WCPNI-O>03HCI>M
Mi-Ill Illllll -4MW||H|Nh*HH
||
Illllll.
I
IIIIIIMMCOH
1 K 1 1 M | M 1 1 HM 1
II
tlllllllll
|lillHO>too><4
itofl-MMllMCfltl
||
Illlllllll
Illlllllll
i-J
M
H
to M
1 1 1 I 1 1 0> 1 1 1 1 1 I^VIHI|N|M|N|
||
MH
( (-* I-*
HMOoMHO*OiNq>
-j*W-JOitl6M i^yiO>CnO)O>WCDO)-J
H
og
M ro
||
Illllllllt
M M Ol 1 1 | 1 t- H 0 * 0) I-*
w2jHMOH-M|IW|N
1 1 1 1 1 l-> 1 Hllllll Illllll Illllll Illllll Illllll
IIIIH1I
t S 1 1 M 1 1 | MK | 1
Illllll
IIIIIM
Involuntary
Illi-'tl
Laroeqy
Larceny aftor Trurt
IIIIII
,,,,,,
lilili
Lor o <ray from Building
Larceny from Periou
Laroony of Automobile
Larceny of Farm
u Liquor
IIMflf
rolony
IIIIII IIIIII
Murder
Obt* lloney undei False protene
IIIIII Perjury
IIIIII IIIIII
Toolo Rapo
Robbury
Soduotion
IIIIII 1 1 M1 1 1
Anotlier Sodoaty and
APPENDIX G
TABLE 22* CRJXIBAL CASKS BEFORE TBX C6CTT OP APPEALS OP GBORSIA
January 1, 19B:yeeC-rlmTMtmCM.Stxr 31, 1915
Vmmrm
CRWIHAL HOMICIDES Harder IriToluntary Xanalaogbter Voluntary KansZ*aglit*r
2a48s
23 1
28 4
22 2
24 3
26 3
27 4
24 1
24 2
2ft 3
28 2
3 218
1 21
24
20
2 19
23
23
25
1 21
19
I 25
CRIMINAL ASSAULTS Assault Assault and Battery ABaanlt with Intent to Hn-der Pointing Platol at Another
Shooting at Another Stabbing Wife Beating
CARRYING DEADU WEAPONS
OPERATING AUTO WHILE OHUKt
225
a
27 S
28
e
51 ft
22 -
22 -
22 -
10
16
20
27 2
49 US
7
u
IS 3
17
11
1e2
8
8
3 9 1
8
3
8
14
32
3
a
7
2
2
3
1
e
3
4
10 3
1 1
-
3 -
2 -
-
1 1
-
-
1 -
1 1
4
6
-
4
6
9
2
-
Z
6
23
2
DISTURBING- PUBLIC PEACB
Druiueennejj Halle loxii Mischief Vagrancy Other Disturbance*
SO
10
9
S3
5
4
1
2
2
8
1
1
1
2
3
0
3
10
S
1 3
1
3 1
1
-
1
1
-
SOBBERY BURGLARY
90
1
6
2
5
3
11
13
12
3
IS
ISO
13
a
9
13
8
14
13
15
U.
21
URC.Z.ZSS Attested Lurceny Cheating and SvlnOllttg Embe=xlere<*nt
551
36
29
33
46
0
46
29
33
9
30
2
1
a.
_
_
a.
_
_
1
63
5
S
6
13
9
11
4
2
4
4
50
1
5
-
3
2
1
3
4
-
1
Larceny After Truot larceny from House Larceny fros. Person Larceny of Auto
Larceny of Cotton Larceny of Livestock Lnrctny, alnple ?t?-sr I-areenlea
28 2B
3
4 4 1
4 2
1 2 2
2-a
2 3 -
1 4 -
2 3 -
3 2
3
1
50
5
2
10
2
&
3
3
_
_
2
1
2
63 72 14
-a
4 2
1
9 2
10
7
9
2
1
5 A 2
5 6 -
*T
3 11
1
3
>CFoax
NON-SUP: ORT
Abandonment Pa 3 tardy
19
3
2
1
1
3
6
1
-
-
2
40
3
2
2
4.
6
5
3
5
4
6
24
16
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
1
SEX CrllXES
Adultery anfl Fornication Jlaa*ult *Ith Intent to 3.tjpe Incest Maintaining Lewd Houae
96
9
12
7
S
1?
S
9
16
8
6
IS
2
3
1
2
3
a.
4
a.
28
2
2
4
e>
6
2
3
6
2
1
a1
1 3
-
-
1
3
-
-
1
-
FuMlc Indecency Rap* Seduction
Soeony
CAME LI S3 lottery Other Types of Cantllng
3
_
1
1
_
_
_
_
1
_
8
1
1
1
S
2
28
5
1
1
4
2
3
3
4
5
5
-
-
-
1
-
1
2
1
22 12 10
_
,, -
2 2
2 _ 2
1 1
2 1 1
3 1 2
_ _ -
3
4
3
4
-
5
e3
VZOLATIOK IROHIBITIQN LA
Manufacturing Liquor Posses a Ing Liquor Selling Liquor Other violation*
734
126
1C5
92
83
69
74
50
42
52
41
174
29
2ft
24
2A
13
S2
12
12
Z
471
66
57
47
45
28
27
42
37
48
9
7
4
6
5
5
9
2
1
1
41
12
1
VIOLATIOH OP UOTQR VEHICLE LAW
27
4
2
5
1
1
3
4
2
S
MSCPLLAKEOU3 CRIMES Arson
Briber) Slaclcntll and Extortion Cruelty to Children and Anlaula
Escaping "alae Oath Feiony, alscellaneou* Felony Kidnapping
500
32
36
34
S3
30
57
38
51
33
66
35
10 0 6
:1 i
:B
3
2
1 1
4 1
~
2 2 S
~
4 4 -
4 1
1
1
ei
8 1
~
13 2
20 Z
-
. 3
1 -
1
1 -^
9.
2 2
2 1
S 1
4 2
11
2
2
Klsderoeanor, ralscellanenu* Xladeneanor Perjury Rlctlng Violation of Gaoo La*
TOTAL
68
7
4
S
13
178
17
12
20
22
11 4
11
1 -
a-1
1 1
2 1 2
5
IS
10
5
3
4
9
7
14
15
13
49
2
..
2
1
a.
_
_
a.
>
a*
1
4
-
~
5
"
1>.474
201
ST7
232
9
250
270
205
38
20*
2C3
Source: Dockets of tfce Court of Appeal*
- 159 - '
CRIMES
Armoa Attpt to Inclt* I MUTT action Bribery Burglary Eabatsl.rn.mt
Escaping fro* ?nl.tentlary F2oay, blank*!; oharg* Larceny of AutooMl* Larceny from HOBBO iblprftctlc* la Public Offie*
HlidvManor,, bluU;t charge Murder Participating In Illegal Future* Po*elng Liquor Practicing FrafM.ilon without Llcenio
Rap* Violation of 3eeir?lty Llcenie U* Violation of Banking Regulation* Violation of OMM lav Violation of Motor Vehicle Law
Voluntary Xanelaugbter
TABLE 23* CFIKIMAL CASES BEFORE THE SUPRBUK COURT OP GEORGIA
January 1, 1026 - Decnber 31, 1955
Yara 192& 1829
10SO
9 541
1
1051
1932
Docket* of Hie Snpraat Court.
COUSTIES ?RO)I WHICH CASES HERE CARRIED TO THE APPELLATE COURTS January 1, 1926 - J>cenxbr 31, 1935
County
Total Appeala Court
County
Appllng Bacon 3akftr Baldwin Banks Barrow Bartow Ban 3111 Barrlsn Bibb
35
32
3
Pannln
22
21
1
7
7
-
Floyd *
4
4
Poreyth
7
2
S
franklin
a
7
1
Fulton
18
13
3
Gllr
34
31
3
Dlascock
30
28
2
Clynn
107
90
17
Gordon
Blecklay 3rantlay Brooks Bryan Bulloch
3 3
2 8
1
Grady Greeae
3
2
1
Owlnnatt
2
2
RaberahaB
It
24
2
Hall
Burks Butts Calhoun CaMden Csndler
9
7
2
Hancock
12
6
6
Haralson
3
2
1
Harris
4
2
Hsrt
14
11
3
Heara
Carroll
43
Catooaa
16
Cbarlton
S
Chatham
63
Chattahooehss
1
Chattoogs.
43
Cbarokaa
9
Clsits
22
Clay
6
Clayton
14
Cllnob
e
Cobb
23
Coffaa
14
"olciultt Jolusfcla
3e0
Cook
is
CoweU Crawford Criep
i12ta
Bade
3
Dawson
3
Decatur
32
Dablb
27
Dodge
19
Dooly
11
DouRherty
7
Douglaa
23
Early
13
Eftlngham
12
Elbert
6
42
1
nsnry
16
Houston
3
2
Irwln
SO 1
13 -
Jackson Jasper
36
9
Jeff Dails
8
1
Jaf fraon
19
3
Janklna
4
2
Johnaon
11
3
Jonea
S
1
Lanler
20
3
Laurana
12
2
Lee
24
6
Liberty
4
1
Lincoln
13
.
Long
10
2
Lowndes
7
1
Luwpldn
IS 3
1
IfcBuffls
-
clntosb.
3
_
Kacon
27
5
Vadlaon
23
4
!farlon
14
1
Herlwether
10
1
Killer
6
1
Xltchall
19
6
Honroe
11
4
Montgoary
8e
4
Morgan
-
Hurray
Evans
20
17
3
Muaeoge*
Kewton
* Soure*' Do;ket of the Supreme Court *ad Court of Appeal*,
Total
a4
100
6a
470 5
10 10 29
11 4
30 S
24
4 32
4 1 9
8 11
3 17
4
10 7
17 18 13
1 130
4 11
S
19 17
1 11 14
14 16
2 16 52
3 8 7 12 SO
18 11
Court of Appeals
4 S 94
a6
334 4 7 7
27
9 4 23
21
4 30
1 1 7
6 8 1 13 4
10 3
13
11
1 120
4 9 5
16 12
11 11
14 16
X 12 43
a
7 S 9 17
13 7
Suprea* Court
^ 3 6
-
es 1
3 3 2
2
3
3
^ 2 3
2
2 3
8
_ 2 2 3 2
_ 10
2 -
3 S
3
_
;
4 4
1 1 Z 3 3
5 4
County Co ones Oglethorps Pauldlng Peacb Plckena Pierce Pike Polk PulasU Putnaa Rabun Randolph P.lchmond Rockdale Schlfly Screvea Semlnole Spaldlng Stewart Stephana Sumter Talbot Tallafarro Tattnall Taylor TelfalJTarrall Thonas lift
Towns Trautlen Troup Turner Twlgg* Union Opson Xalker iralton ware ffarren WAshlAgtoi. Vayna nabster Hhaeler White Khltfleld irilcoz wllkee "llkln.cn Worth TOTAL
Court of Supreme Total Appeals Court
9
7
2
8
6
2
19
13
1
5
3
2
4
1
3
27
SI
6
8
S
3
26
23
3
19
12
3
24
3
1
1
_
17
14
3
21
11
5
5
4
4
16
13
,
7
7
^
1a5
12 6
(i 2
19
16
3
1
1
19
13
37
3t
2
2
9
a
11
8
11
9
1
1
16
13
2
_
9
8
'l
32
2
2
3
2
S
9
57
53
9
S
IS
12
u
10
13
14
19
IS
4
4
2
1
4
3
70
63
11
9
76
73
4
3
16
12
3,910_ T.474
_ 1 1
1 3 2
1
Z 1 4 1
1
4 4 3
3 4 4
1
1 7 2 3 1 4
<
TABLB 25*
DISPOSITIOH OP CASES BEPCRE TEE COCRT C* 1PJEALS C? GECSGI1 By Crlne Typ*
Jmy 1, 1926 - Deoenfcer 31, 1935
Reversed wad Tr*nTrrd t-o Supremo Court
Criminal Boadeides
248
179
7
IS
11
Crfcdnal Ausulti
225
160
12
21
3
Carrying Deadly Weapons
39
27
3
3
_
Operating Auto *llo Drunk
23
19
1
1
Disturbing Fnbllo Peace
SO
31
4
3
-
6
12
18
4
_
25
2
_
4
1
1
-
-
12
Hobbery Burglary Lareanoles
Forgery Son-Support
80
61
1
5
ISO
74
9
13
351
221
34
19
19
16
1
1
40
31
1
3
_
5
1
10
3
6
1
.
1
1
.
8
.
23
_
SB
_
.
-
3
Skx Crimes
96
67
5
8
Gambling
22
IS
1
1
Violation Prohibition Lav
7X4
543
35
39
Violation liotor Law
27
IS
4
1
Ittsoellaneous Ciixias
200
120
12
6
_
2
..
3
7
9
..
_
1
24
fi
8
_
2
*
101
_
7
-
XI
Idademssiur. blanket charge
173
73
12
84
Felony* blanket charge
12
1
3
5
3 1
4 "
"_
2 2
TOTAL
2.474
1,659
1+5
228
32
77
18
315
* Sourcei Dooket* of the Court of Appeals,
TABLE 26*
D1SPOSITICH C? CKCCSAL CASES BEFORE THE SDSRQE OTKT CF GKSGIA 8y Criaes
January 1, 1926 - Decobber 31. 1935
Disnimaed
Withdrawn
Iracm Atteopt to incite Insurrection Bribery Burglary aibezzleEttzifc
Escape from Penitentiary Felony, blanket charge Larceny of Autoxohile Larceny fron House Kal;racttce in Public Office
1
1
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1\
2
1
1
Xitdemoanor. blanket charee
3
2
_
_
1
_
lauder
341
254
73
2
12
Participating In Ulegal Futures
1
_
1
a.
a.
Possessing Liquor
2
2
--
e.
--
Practicing Profession ulthout Lleensa
3
3
-
-
-
-
Bap. Violation of Security License *4or Violation of BanttnE Sngulatlona Violation of Gea LeaViolation of Motor Vehicle Lav
57
39
13
3
_
2
2
2
_
*
v
--
4
3
1
_
.
*
2
2'
_
_
a*
1
1
-
-
-
-
Voluntary Vanslanghter
4
3
1
-
-
*
TOTAL
438
325
SO
t
1
14
> Soonxi Doofartj of toe Suprtm* Court.
-171-
TABLE 27*
PERIOD BETWEEN PILDIG OP CASES AIJD THEIR DISPOSAL The Court of Appeals of Georgia.
January la 1920 Doccisber 31, 1935
Crimes
CrJxdnol Honieic.es Cri2d&l Assaults Carrying Deadly Weapons
Under
Over
a Total 1 EC. 1 2 3 4 5 fi 7
9 10 11 12 12
248
32 3 72 62 36 11 4 9 8 4 _ 1 1 _
225
17 11 73 63 32 3 9 4 1 2 3 1 1 _
39
1 -- 15 14 6 _ 3 _ _ .. _ _ . _
Disturbing Public Peace
50
1 1 19 14 3 3 1 1
1 1 ---
Robbery Burglary
Larcenies Forgery Non-Support
80
4 11 22 14 10 8 6 1 2 ,, _ -- 2 --
130
6 4 42 41 17 8 S 2 1 3 ] _ . _
351 19
11 11 132 92 45 24 2 1 74 21
8 ..
3 11 _ ..
'23
2 ..
3 _
,,
1 --
40
1 2 1C 7 7 3 1 - 1 1 1 - - -
Sex Crimea
96
7 10 37 23 8 2 3 1 - 3 1 1 - -
Violation of Prohibition Lnr
734
24 17 278 240 102 33 9 7 10 7 5 1 - 1
liiscellanoous Crimes
390
87 21 91 87 51 19 12 2 6 7 4 1 2 -
TOTAL
2,474 197 103 827 682 331 123 66 36 42 33 18 8 6 2
Source) Dockets of the Court of Appeals.
TABLE 28*
Crir.es
PLHIOD BETCE3I FILIEG OP CASES AliD THEIR DISPOSAL ?ho Suprcno Court of Georgia
January 1, 1926 - December 31, 1935 Kontns
Under
Total 1 no* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 n
Over 9 10 11 12 12
Arson
Bribery Burglary
1
1
5
3 - -2
1
1
1
Escape froti Foritcrrtinry
1
"deny, tlcntet charge
1
Larceny of Autcnobile
2
Lr.rcony fron Reuse
1
^nlprpctico in Public Office
2
--
--1 1
Hisdecujacorj blorict charge
3
Tairder
341
Participating in Illegal Futures
1
Possessing Liquor
2
practicing Profossion itithout License
3
-1-
1
1
- 13 47 42 29 30 32 27 30 26 30 14 12 9
1
1
1
1
1
Hape Violation of Security License Law Violation of SiinUns Reflations Violation of Cm* Larr Violation of Uotor Vehicle Low
57
128 7 7 4 3 5 7 2 3 3 5
2
1
1
4
1
111
--
2
1
--
1
1
Voluntary l!azuCaugntor
4
3
----
.
1
TOTAL
436
1 17 58 50 40 41 38 33 45 30 37 19 17 10
Sourcj DocloDts of the Suprcne Court
- 172-
TABLE 2S REQUESTS TO THE SUPRBEB COURT FOR RITS OF CSSTIORABI
By Yeara January 1, 1926 - December SI, 1935
TEARS
1926 1927 1028 1829 1930
Total
24
37 22 26 2O
Granted
,,
3 _ -
Denied
13 IS
7 17
9
Abandoned
11
19 15
9 11
1931
44
2
17
25
1952
20
1
6
13
1933
22
1
8
13
1934
2O
5
15
193S
12
-
1
11
TOTAL
247
7
98
142
Sonrcai Dockets of th Court of Appeals.
TABLE 30" RELATION OP CASES REVERSED TO CASES APPEALED
By Judicial Districts of tha Superior Court Court of Appeals and Supreme Court of Georgia
January 1, 1926 - Eecember 31, 1935
District
Cases Appealed
Cases Reversed
Number
Percent
Alapaha
SO
Albany
63
Atlanta
470
Atlantic
92
Augusta
57
15
3O.O
13
20.6
36
7.7
16
17.4
6
10.5
Blue Ridge
51
Brunswick
80
Cnattahoocb.ee
28
Cherokee
156
Cordele
72
9
17.6
14
17.5
6
21.4
41
26.3
14
19.4
Coweta
116
12
10.3
Dunlin
150
32
21.3
Eastern Flint
63 28
12a
18.O 28.6
Griffin
36
7
19.4
Kacon
131
Middle
75
Northeastern
62
Northern
39
Oemlgee
69
31
16a
--.3 12.9
6
15.4
20
29.O
Oconee
60
Ogeechee
61
Pataula.
108
Piedmont
62
ROBS
2O2
S
8.3
19
31.1
17
15.7
17
27.4
55
27.2
Southern
61
Southwestern
34
Stons MountaJJ?
57
Tallapoosa
102
Tlfton
21
12
19.7
8
23.5
13
22.8
20
19.6
2
9.5
Toomba
123
Way cross
91
Western
4O
33
26.8
21
23.1
6
15.0
TOTAL
2.91O
55O
18.9
8ourciDoefcets of the Suprene Court ana Court of Appeal*. - 173 -
APPENDIX H
TABLE 31*
RELEASES GRABTED By >H^<**n Sentence laposed Felony Cues Admitted to the Georgia Penitentiary January 1, 1926 - December 31, 1935
|;1ivl!iwi &erft-nn?V in Year
Total Admitted
Not Seleued
1
4.251
1,192
2
4.621
1,654
3
2,303
1,021
4
1,090
599
5
1.717
1,033
6
183
111
7
250
161
a
21S
150
9
26
17
10
781
585
11
12
3
12
96
72
13
10
8
14
16
12
15
217
156
16
7
6
17
6
4
13
49
33
19
35
27
20
314
261
Lite
1.137
903
TOTAL
17,336
8,023
* Sourcei Records of the Prison Comission.
Completion of Sentence
798 753 232 96 148
5 4 4 2 11
2 1 1
. _ _ -
-
2,055
ParJoa
70 S3 33 15 22
5 S 1 1 7
. 1 -- _ 4
_ 1 6
29
286
Coma* tKtion
263 2*2
95 67 53
8 9 3 2 16
_ 4 2 6
_ 2
19
777
Parole
1.S79 1,803
860 287 427
49 67 53 4 116
2 16 1
1 34
1 2 3 5 34
131
5,780
Death
51 86 57 26 46
i B 4 40
. 2 1
16
_
2 11
50
415
TABLE 52*
EARECXS, cacCTCMS, PAECLES Per-cert oi* ^inixam Serttncft Served Felory Cases A&ritted to tho Georgia Perxitertifcry Jteuaiy 1, 1S26 - Decec&cr 31, 2935
v^mim Sentence in Years
2
5
6 7 S
10
11
12 13 14 15
16 17 13 19 20
Cases
100.0 100.0 100.0
ico.o
100.0
100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0
-- 100.0 100.0
100.0
ico.o
100.0 100.0 100.0
0-10
4.6 5.3 2.9 7.3 7.5
3.2 10.1 J.5 14.3
7.2
,, 4.8
S6.7
9.1
,, _ _ 45.2
11-20
.7 1.0 2.3 1.6 1.8
4.3 3.3 3.5
_ 10.7
. 19.0
-- 15.9
100.0 -
62.5 50.0 16.7
21-30
.7 2.2 2.5 6.5 5.9
9.7 10.1
3.8 14.3 14.3
_ 23.8
-- 33.3 32.4
_ 50.0 37.5 16.7 30.9
31-40
1.0 1.9 4.0 8.7 6.3
6.5 13.9 8.8 14.3 18.6
50.0 4.8
13.2
_ 35.3 7.2
41-50
3.0 .1.5 6.0 6.8 10.9
12.9 12.7 12.3 14.3 15.7
_ 14.3
13.2
. -
51-60
2.1 4.4 4.S 6.5 S.7
11.3 7.6 10.6 14.3
7.2
50.0 9.5 6.2
50.0
-
61-70
1.4 3.5 4.0 3.5 5.7
l.S 3.8 3.5 14.3 7.2
_ 19.0
-
-- -
TOTAL
100.0
5.4
1.9
3.3
3.4
5.1
4.1
3.1
* Sources Secoris of tto Prison Conalcsion. * In this colurm the nwcinua sentence tna evolced.
- 175 -
71-80
1.8 4.4 2.6 4.9 -il.S
33.7 29.2 42 .0 14.2 17.1
4.8 -
-- -
7.2
e:-so
**
PI-100
"1.* 00
1.2 2.4
S8.7 41.9
3.1
?3*5 5.2
6.9 7.X 7.8
10.0 5.2 7.5 4.9 3.4
5.1 3.2
-
1.2 7.6
-
3.5 3.5
-
-
-
-
2.0
~
.
-
-
-
"
"
-
~
"
-
-
TM
-
~
*
.
-
-
-
*
*
-
~
"
-
~
"
-
"
"
12.3 ''l. 6.5
TABLE 33
BXLEtSES GRUTSD - PRISONERS UlUSt LIFE HCPRISCHDOT SENTENCES in the Oeorgll Penitentiary
January 1, 1926 - Deoenber 31, 1935
Tl Serred
0-3 lie. 4-6 7-9
10-12 13-15 16-18 19-24 25-30 31-36 37-48 49-60 61-72 73-84 85-96 Onr 96
Total 6 8 4 S S 7 8 9 8
!7 30 32
a
27 13
TOTAL
229
Source] Records of the Prison Cocsnission.
Panlon
-- 1 1 S S
1 1
5 S S 2 4 -
29
Conutation* 5 1 -- 1 1 1 2 4 2 2 1 M
M
1
19
Parole -- 2 _
1 -- 1 _ _ 2 24 17 25 26 22 11
151
------------D--i--ed3
5 S 1 4 2 3 4 3 6 10 1 3 1 1
50
TABLE 34*
HUUBER OF ESCAPES - BT UHIHJU SB8TESCE DIPOSED Felony Cue* in the Georgia penitentlaxy Jnuary 1, 1926 - Deoeabor 31, 1935
jSitfnuB Sentence
Total Cues
In Trj
Effecting Eioape
ftunbar of E3CK70S Effected bv Each Cue
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
S
1 2
3
4 S 6 7
8 9
10
11 12 13
14 15 16 17
18
19 20 Life Sentence
TOTAL
684 97S 588 323 551 GO 76 64 11 258
34 4
4
61
1
1 16 10 102
250
4,078
469
147
49
694
192
48
398
132
40
226
S3
S3
387
108
32
45
11
2
51
19
6
42
13
5
a
1
2
172
66
15
5
-
-
17
6
7
3
1
4
--
-
34
21
4
1
-
_
--
1
--
11
3
-
8
1
1
56
23
4
17S
51
IS
2 .80S
349
254
11
6
2
--
_
21
a
12
_
(.
8
8
4
<
16
3
2
16
7
1
_
_
1
1
_
.
.
--
-
_
~
*
1
2
_
1
,,
-
.
_
.
3
1
1
.
_
--
-
-
3
1
_
_
e>
*
----
_
_
.
1
_
1
_
,,
__
.
.
i
_
_
.
.
1
1
.
.
_
_
,,
.
.
3
13
.
_
3
4 89
--si1---- 2
23
--i----i
Soureot Records of the Prison Conmlssion.-
EXHIBIT 7 TTben tho Survoy of Crininal Court Procedure TTM first the ccnploto record of all felony convicts sent frcn cnrery planned it ma contemplatd that only data concerning county in Georgia* This could bo accomplished vith oao felony prisoners ocmvicted in tha trial courts of tha worker in the desired time linit, and was therefore chosen countioa studied would be gathered. To aoconplich this it in preference to tb ohor By this method SQUIB data was wu found that nany houra would have to be spent in secured on all felony convicts *0nt to the Georgia PealrchlBg out the recorda of the individual coaricta* tentiary uuring tha period January 1# 1926 to Docentor Siaco only one worlcor could be placed at this task it 31, 1935, rather than a greater amount of data on each appeared to be an almost interminable assignment. On tha case sent from a aoaller area* The schedule uaod was a reother hand by TM*^< -j^ a copy of the personnel record as plica of the docket on which personnel data was recorded kept by the prison Commission it would be possible to got and the survoy worker neda an exact copy of these dockets*
3 466
- 176-