Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Drug and System Improvement Formula Grant Program, annual report for the period of July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997 [1997]

STATE OF GEORGIA
EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE
DRUG AND SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT FORMULA GRANT PROGRAM
ANNUAL REPORT
For the Period of July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997

A. TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1

INTRODUCTION

3

Report Purpose

3

TheDCSIGffmt

3

OVERVIEW OF PROGRAMS AS THEY LINK TO

PROGRAM PRIORITIES ARTICULATED IN THE STATE STRATEGY

3

Law Enforcement

3

Prosecution

4

Courts

4

Corrections

5

Prevention, Education, md Treatment

5

Juvenile Justice

5

Criminal Justice Records Improvement (COO)

6

SUMMARY OF PROGRAM COORDINATION EFFORTS AND ACTIVITIES

6

EVALUATION PLAN AND ACTIVITIES

8

SUMMARY OF PROGRAMS, PERFORMANCE MEASURES,

EVALUATION METHODS AND EVALUATION RESULTS

10

SECTION 1: DRUG ABUSE EDUCATION

10

Section 1.1 Drug Abuse Resistmce Education (DARE)

10

Section 1.2 School Resource Officer (SRO)

14

Section 1.3 State DARE Officer Training (DOT)

17

SECTION 2: MULTI JURISDICTIONAL TASK FORCES

18

Section 2.1 Local Multi Jurisdictional Task Forces

19

Section 2.2 State Drug Task Force

26

Section 2.3 Fugitive Squads

29

Section 2.4 Drug Enforcement Training

SECTION 3: DOMESTIC CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES TASK FORCE

(INDOOR GROWTH)

33

SECTION 4: COURT DELAY REDUCTION

36

SECTION 5: MODEL JAILS

36

Section 5.1 Model Jails

37

Section 5.2 Jail Assistmce

38

SECTION 6: OFFENDER TREATMENT PROGRAMS

39

Section 6.1 Adult Offender Treatment

40

Section 6.2 Juvenile Offender Treatment

43

Section 6.3 Adolescent Substance Abuse Program

45

Section 6.4 Alternative to Incarceration for Female Offenders

46

SECTION 7: VICTIM: ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS

46

SECTION 8: PURPOSE AREA #15A

48

Section 8.1 Forensic Service Upgrade

48

Section 8.2 Sexually Violent Offender Registry

49

SECTION 9: PURPOSE AREA #15B

51

Section 9.1 Statewide Narcotics Information and Intelligence Exchange

51

Section 9.2 Criminal Justice Records Improvement (COO)

52

Section 9.3 Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS)

53

SECTION 10: PURPOSE AREA #16

54

Section 10.1 Excess Property Program

54

Section 10.2 Gemini Project--Prosecution

56

SECTION 11: PURPOSE AREA #20

57

SECTION 12: nUl TASK FORCE

58

SECTION 13: CORRECTIONAL RESOURCE UPGRADE

60

APPENDICES

B. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The State of Georgia is unique when it comes to drug and violent crime problems. The State has a combination of several large urban populations, with surrounding counties of a rural nature. This combination brings many challenges to developing and administering a Statewide strategy which will focus on the varied problems of the different regions ofthe State.

In 1996 the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council (Council) acting as the administering agency for this purpose, has worked with State agencies, local governments, and non-profit organizations to combat the drug and violent crime problem faced in each community throughout the State. As referenced in our 1996 multi-year strategy, we have linked various governments and agencies in cooperative unions to better address the multitude ofproblems. Over the past year, cooperation from these communities has produced results in many areas with the help ofthe Edward Byrne Memorial Drug Control and System Improvement (DCSI) Grant Program and other Federal and non-Federal funding sources.

Planning efforts for this program, as required by BJA, are reviewed by the Council's Crime Control and System Improvement Advisory Committee (CCSIAC), which serves as part ofthe State's Drug and Violent Crime Control Policy Board. These planning efforts have been furthered in part by the Georgia Statistical Analysis Center (SAC). The SAC has been responsible for research in the past year that has provided needed planning information. Current research projects are focusing on a comparison of selected local multi jurisdictional task forces.

These planning efforts focused primarily on the following seven areas of the Criminal Justice System which have had a great impact in improving Georgia's ability to combat drugs and violent crime in the past year.

1.

Law Enforcement;

2.

Prosecution;

3.

Courts;

4.

Corrections;

5.

Juvenile Justice System;

6.

Prevention, Education, and Treatment; and,

7.

Criminal Justice Records Improvement.

Specific goals have been identified and funding allocations have been established based on the program areas that are considered to have the highest priority. Georgia received approximately $12.8 million from the 1996 DCSI award to the State, and funded projects in 10 ofthe 26 eligible purpose areas.

These included cooperative projects such as multi jurisdictional drug task forces, fugitive squads, Drug Abuse Resistance Education programs, alternative incarceration programs, rehabilitative treatment for adults and juveniles with substance abuse problems, and automation of courts and court related agencies. The combined effort ofthese projects together had the following results for the State as a whole:

1



9,068 arrests, primarily drug-related, $3,857,550 in seizures, and $1,509,491 was

received in forfeited assets from local multi jurisdictional projects.



Various law enforcement inquiries resulted in over 3,000 identifications of

criminals while utilizing the Statewide Narcotics Information and Intelligence

Exchange Program.



Over 1,200 fugitives were arrested by the two regional multi jurisdictional fugitive

squads in conjunction with local law enforcement.



Over 22,000 children received the DARE curriculum.



Over 1,700 adults and 4,200 juveniles were referred and or received substance

abuse treatment.



Eight additional Courts (for a total of38) are capable of transmitting automated

dispositions electronically.



More than 170 courts and law enforcement agencies were evaluated by the audit

team (COO) which cleared over 15,000 delinquent dispositions.

These results are encouraging and indicate how the Byrne strategy is instrumental in bringing communities and agencies together to fight similar problems across the State. DCSI funds contribute greatly to this effort as they offer the additional incentive needed to forge such cooperation, and concentrated effort on the complex and varied problem of drugs and violent crime.
New evaluation initiatives were completed in the areas ofDARE, SRO, and Multi jurisdictional task forces, while staff efforts continue to develop more standard evaluation tools for the remaining program areas. In addition a transition to an automated Grants Management Information System (GMIS) was completed and implemented in July of 1997. This system will greatly enhance staff capabilities in the upcoming year and allow for the generation of more detailed financial status reports. The Council continues to look ahead in 1997 to add a component to electronically reconcile subgrantee payment information to our financial State agency, the Office ofPlanning and Budget.

2

C. INT'RODUCTION

Report Purpose
The pwpose ofthis annual report is to provide information to the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) on Drug Control and System Improvement (DCSI) program expenditures and project performance. The DCSI program is designed to increase the effectiveness and enhance the capabilities of state and local criminal justice practitioners in their efforts to control drugs and crime.
The DeSI Grant
The DCSI grant is administered by the Governor's Criminal Justice Coordinating Council. Subgrantees are awarded funds on a yearly competitive grant application process in conjunction with areas determined in the previous year's statewide strategy.
Overview of Programs as they link to program priorities articulated in the State strategy
The 1996 Multi-year Statewide Drug and Violent Crime Control Strategy described and prioritized areas of greatest need. These needs were divided into seven categories. They included law enforcement; prosecution; courts; corrections; juvenile justice system; prevention, education, and treatment; and criminal justice records improvement. Specific types of projects falling under these categories were identified through a year long dialogue with criminal justice practitioners and through the annual application process.
Law Enforcement
The statewide strategy identified metropolitan and rural areas alike as having intensifying needs in fighting drug related and violent crime. Additionally we indicated that one ofthe greatest problems for rural areas is a lack ofboth monetary resources and trained personnel. In order to address these areas, over 31 related grants were awarded, representing over halfthe 1996 funding, which provided resources to local, regional and statewide task forces. One ofthe most unique projects, is the State Drug Task Force. It provided assistance to local law enforcement where local and/or multi jurisdictional task forces were unavailable. This coverage, combined with the local multi jurisdictional task forces, allowed Georgia to provide resources to every region ofthe State whether rural or urban.
Local law enforcement agencies identified a need for continued training in drug enforcement. Therefore, the Georgia Public Safety Training Center's Program for this initiative was continued throughout this funding cycle. This provided training for approximately 2,000 law enforcement officers across the State.
In an effort to provide local law enforcement agencies and task forces equipment and supplies to adequately combat drug and violent crime, the Georgia Emergency Management Agency (GEMA), has continued the State's Excess Property Program. This program provides military surplus items which would otherwise be unavailable or cause a drain on financial resources. Examples of items
3

range from vehicles to clothing items such as utility uniforms used by special operations teams.
Forensic services is always a changing environment with new technologies and therefore it was determined that resources be allocated to the centrally located State agency (Georgia Bureau of Investigation) responsible for this area of expertise for studies of improved lab productivity and new site projects for local urinanalysis testing equipment.
Additionally, the strategy recognized victim services as a high priority area in the State of Georgia. To expand the services available, model law enforcement projects were continued in the Cities of Atlanta and Albany to better address the needs of domestic violence victims. In addition a new area ofvictim services, tertiary victims, was selected for judicial awareness.
Prosecution
A problem area prosecutors identified was a backlog of drug cases in local judicial circuits. To address this problem, the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), continued automation of judicial circuits throughout the state by providing software and training to courts and district attorneys' offices. Grant funding provided software licenses that AOC anticipates will provide a uniform system and process between the district attorneys and the courts. This software (persons Manager) works in conjunction with software being implemented in the court system through the Criminal Justice Records Improvement Plan. In this grant cycle activities were restricted to the initial implementation ofthe program in two judicial circuits. This will enable the district attorney to obtain information about defendants more efficiently and should begin to reduce the backlog of drug cases.
A second initiative in this area is the continuation of The Gemini project in Savannah (Chatham County) which concentrates on drug related and homicide cases. It allowed the employment of a special investigator who works exclusively on these cases in that judicial circuit. Chatham County had the ninth highest rate ofindex crimes among 159 Georgia counties in 1993, which initially led to the funding ofthis project.
Victim Witness Assistance programs in District Attorneys' offices were also seen as a priority in the
1995 strategy and one project was funded. Because of the ability of the Council to coordinate with the Victims of Crime Act grant program and the STOP Violence Against Women grant program which it also administers, many victim witness assistance programs are funded through those two programs. In addition, a 5% add-on fine was established by the Georgia Legislature. This additional source ofrevenue, although not exclusively designated for judicial circuits, also has been a factor in the number of projects which were funded through DCSI.
Courts
Drug Courts were identified in the strategy as an area ofneed in the Courts system. Three drug court and court delay reduction projects were funded in 1996. These projects were each unique and focused upon two different purpose areas. These projects allow offenders who qualify (usually first
4

time substance abuse offenders) to participate in a drug education/rehabilitation program. Depending on the program they are either referred to treatment and/or actually provided services as a part of participation in the project. Offenders are given waivers or reductions in their sentences ifthey retain a drug free lifestyle. Other court related projects are included in the Criminal Justice Records Improvement topic area.
Corrections
Prior to and during the application process it became apparent that there was an interest in developing several model jail projects around the state. These projects are aimed at determining the needs of the jail population and whether inmates will qualify for and benefit from drug treatment, educational programs and life skills classes. As these programs progress, they plan to lessen inmate recidivism through rehabilitative projects that address the identified needs.
There were two model jail projects continued along with a statewide technical assistance project through the Georgia Sheriffs' Association. The Association combined its previous project efforts of LEADS with the addition ofJail Assistance. In this manner, local county jails were given assistance in jail management practices as well as given opportunities to join the statewide database that links participating agencies jail populations for central searches. The individual model jail projects continued their efforts at inmate education, treatment, and conflict resolution.
Other corrections related projects designated in the strategy are in the categories of Prevention, Education, and Treatment.
Prevention, Education, and Treatment
The statewide strategy prioritizes the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) related prevention programs and offender treatment as the second and third most important funding areas after multijurisdictional task forces. The second largest percentage of funding in the 1996 Byrne grant was allocated for prevention programs. There were 64 DARE and School Resource Officer (SRO) projects funded in 1996. The associated DARE certification and SRO training for these programs was provided by the Georgia Public Safety Training Center.
Adult offender treatment projects included combined efforts by the Georgia Department of Corrections and the State Board ofPardons and Paroles. These programs focused on identifying and providing treatment for inmates and/or parolees with substance abuse problems.
Juvenile Justice
In the area ofjuvenile justice, adolescent substance abuse programs (ASAP) were identified as an area of need. In addition to the three ASAP programs funded in 1996, one juvenile offender treatment project was awarded. Awards were made to further the objectives of existing projects addressing this
5

area of need in the state. Other issues in the juvenile justice system are addressed by the State's Children and Youth Coordinating Council, which is the State administrative agency for federal funds received from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP).
Criminal Justice Records Improvement (CJRI)
The 1996 strategy describes five goals in the area of Criminal Justice Records Improvement (COO). They include: updating criminal histories with final dispositions for all felony arrests; full automation of all criminal history and fingerprint records; increased frequency and quality of criminal history reporting to the Federal Bureau ofInvestigation (FBI); extension ofthe improvement of state criminal record systems and the sharing of all records described above as required to implement the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) for checking the eligibility of potential firearms purchasers under the Brady provisions; and extension ofthe improvement of state record systems and the sharing ofall records described in the above goals with the U.S. Attorney General as required to implement the Child Protection Act. These goals are inclusive of many funding sources including multiple Federal, State, and local sources. The annual report focuses primarily on the Byrne funded projects (such as court automation, local live scans, and GBI felony disposition efforts) while the multi-year strategy and the subsequent update that was developed and accepted by the Bureau of Justice Assistance in 1996 is all inclusive.
SUMMARY OF PROGRAM COORDINATION EFFORTS AND ACTIVITIES
CJCC plays an important coordinating role within the State's criminal justice system. Its membership is representative of many state and local criminal justice agencies and other relevant groups. In addition to the administration ofthe Byrne program, Council activities include: commencing periodic statewide meetings including the Annual Victims Assistance Conference, operating the State Victim Assistance and Compensation Office, and administering the Federal Victims of Crime Act and Violence Against Women Act Grant Programs.
The Council also has input into the criminal justice system by its membership on many committees and task forces. The Director of the Council serves as a member ofthe Governor's Task Force on Correctional Institutions and Populations which meets as needed to discuss legislative initiatives. The Director also serves as a member ofthe DARE Board, the Governor's Strike Force Against Drug and Violent Crime and serves on the Advisory Council to the Georgia Commission for Automation in the Courts.
The funding priorities set forth in the 1996 multi year strategy were made in conjunction with the goals described in the National Drug Control Strategy which is demonstrated by the focus in 1996 on programs such as DARE and adolescent and adult substance abuse treatment programs.
Coordination and planning for the 1996 statewide strategy included efforts to obtain input from diverse sources within the State's criminal justice system. These efforts included advertised public hearings which allow for input into the funding priorities. In this manner a dialogue can be
6

established between various levels ofgovernment and community organizations to detennine what programs are most desired and effective. Some programs such as DARE require additional coordination as there are multiple funding sources available. The sources include the Byrne Grant, and the Drug Free Schools Act which is separated into two different grant programs in Georgia. One part is administered by the Department ofHuman Resources and one part is administered by the Department ofEducation. In an attempt to learn more about the prevention and education programs that exist in Georgia, the Statistical Analysis Center sent out questionnaires to the 180 School Superintendents to detennine if their districts offer
DAREISRO programs or other drug prevention programs. The results of that survey have not been
compiled yet but should be especially helpful in preparing the 1997 Statewide Strategy Update. Final coordination efforts are accomplished through the Council itself The Council's Crime Control and System Improvement (CCSI) Advisory Committee is comprised of representatives from various levels ofgovernment and private citizenry. CCSI provides input during the planning process and has final approval over the recommended funding priorities. The 1996 Work plan (Attachment A) is the actual blueprint of strategy funding.
7

D. EVALUATIONPLAN AND
ACTIVITIES

In an effort to gather as much data as feasible to detennine whether projects are effectively utilizing Federal funds, the Council monitored subgrantees quantitatively through financial evaluation and qualitatively through programmatic and performance evaluation. It is hoped that this initiative enabled the Council to better assess future funding needs and requests while at the same time holding subgrant recipients accountable for their use of public funds. The following part explains these efforts in greater detail.
The Council's evaluation plan consists mainly of financial and site monitoring by staff members who also review quarterly report data submitted by each project. Staff members monitor each project by requiring extensive documentation of services provided as well as conducting random site visits. In addition, individual projects are visited upon request for technical assistance.
In the past year, staff members visited 6 of the 28 task forces and performed both financial and programmatic evaluations. The most interesting ofwhich a site visit to East Metro Drug Task Force. This innovative task force demonstrated a high tech surveillance van that has audio and video surveillance capabilities. The van as well as many other unique equipment items were all purchased with drug seizure funds that the task force had earned over the last couple of years. The interesting part though was not the van but the task force's use of several different agencies to accomplish a surveillance mission on a mid level drug distributor. The task force utilized its van in conjunction with a National Guard helicopter which was equipped with night vision and a FLIR. This advanced equipment allowed the officers to track the suspects 24 hours a day. However they did not have quite enough staff for that so they combined with another local task force in a neighboring county where the offender was also doing business. The last resource utilized was borrowed from a more urban Sheriff's Office. The resource was a wire tapping device known as a slave which allowed surveillance ofthe offender's cellular phone. The combination ofall ofthese resources culminated later in the year with a significant number of suspects arrested, and a large seizure amount including several real estate properties which were connected to the investigation.
Five other task forces were evaluated but not in such a lengthy manner. These evaluations consisted of either a one day site visit with mainly financial monitoring and limited programmatic evaluations. Activities included touring facilities and viewing demonstrations ofvehicles and equipment. Staff members also timed their visits to enable them to attend and answer questions at the Task Force Control Board meetings. A joint purpose ofthe site visits was to provide technical assistance to the Task Forces for legal problems and budget difficulties. The five task forces included the Piedmont Northern MANS, the Ocmulgee Drug Task Force, the Appalachian Drug Task Force, the West Georgia Drug Task Force, and the Tallapoosa Judicial Circuit Drug Task Force. Quarterly reports were submitted by all Task Forces and are reviewed by staff members as they are sent in. Summary data from all the quarterly reports is included later in this report. This data was captured on a newly developed format which came as a result ofmultiple meetings of several task force commanders, who volunteered their input and time.
Twelve of the twenty-eight local multi jurisdictional drug task forces have Georgia Bureau of
8

Investigation (GBI) Assistant Special Agent in Charge (ASAC) as commanders. These task forces receive additional evaluation and oversight from each GBI Regional Drug Enforcement Office (RDEO). These evaluations are conducted routinely to assure the ASACs are conforming to GBI's rules and regulations in their operational activities. This oversight provides added assurance that these task forces are run efficiently and effectively. In addition to this, the Council employed an outside contractor who will be visiting non-GBI task forces in the future. The contractor is currently developing an audit program for his site visits with the aid of GBI supervisory personnel. For other programs such as DARE, staff are able to evaluate projects both financially and programmatically by reviewing quarterly reports, reimbursement documentation, public input, and by providing technical assistance to DARE projects at their request. Many of the projects use the quarterly reports to bring to light innovative and unique elements oftheir projects. The State projects are constantly being evaluated by Council staffin a number of ways. Many of the State agency subgrantees have a representative on the Council and attend periodic Council meetings. Also, many ofthe State agency project staff are members of other criminal justice related task forces and committees that Council representatives attend. This interaction allows for a less formal way of evaluating the projects by sharing information. They too are required to submit quarterly reports which are reviewed to determine the progress ofthe project.
9

E.

SUMMARY

OF PROGRAMS,

PERFORMANCE MEASURES,

EVALUATION METHODS, AND

EVALUATION RESULTS

SECTION 1: DRUG ABUSE RESISTANCE EDUCATION-PURPOSE AREA #1
During the 1996 grant cycle, the Council funded 61 projects and allocated $1,050,635.06 to this purpose area, as summarized in the table below.

PROJECT TYPE

TOTAL NUMBER OF TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROJECTS FUNDED FUNDS AWARDED

Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE)

47

$687,954.21

School Resource Officer (SRO)

9

$140,398.77

DAREISRO (Combination)

4

$107,015.52

DARE Training & Certification (State-implemented)

1

$115,266.56

TOTALS

61

$1,050,635.06

Please note that Attachment 1 under Appendix A presents maps identifying locations ofDARE and/or SRO projectsfunded throughout the State.
These projects were funded in order to assist law enforcement agencies, in conjunction with educators and school administrators, with their efforts to deter youth in Georgia from using drugs, alcohol and/or tobacco, and from becoming negatively involved with the criminal justice system.
Section 1.1: Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE)
Drug Abuse Resistance Education is a comprehensive educational program designed to prevent substance abuse and violence by educating children about the threats and consequences associated with such activities. l
The objectives, associated with achieving the primary goal [i.e., prevent substance abuse and violence through education] of this program, are virtually the same regardless of which curriculum (e.g., elementary school, middle school, high school, etc.) is being taught. These are,
~ To provide the skills for recognizing and resisting social pressures to experiment with tobacco, alcohol, and drugs;
To help enhance self-esteem;

lDavid L. Carter, Michigan State University, "Community Policing and DARE: A Practitioner's Perspective," Bureau of Justice Bulletin: Community Policing Series, June 1995.
10

~ To teach positive alternatives to substance use;
~ To develop skills in risk assessment and decision making; and,
~ To build interpersonal and communication skills.
In order to fulfill these objectives, DARE utilizes several curriculums to activate implementation of the program. The impetus behind the development of these curriculums, which are designed for specific age groups, is to influence the socialization process in young people's lives. During the 1996 grant cycle, the Council provided funds for the instruction of the following DARE program curriculums:
-> Elementary School curriculum (17 lessons taught over a 17-week period targeting 5th and/or 6th grade students);
Junior HighlMiddle School curriculum (10 lessons taught over a 10-day period targeting 7th grade students); and,
Senior High School curriculum (10 sessions, six sessions taught by the DARE Officer and the other sessions are taught by the classroom teacher, covering a period of 10 to 11 days targeting high school students).
Due to the amount of projects funded under this purpose area, the Council intensified its programmatic monitoring efforts by redesigning its evaluation component for these types of projects. Specifically, a component [i.e., goals, objectives, activities, and performance measures] was developed for each curriculum utilizing a "common" activity report. The data collected on this activity report is based upon the culmination or graduation of students from each of these curriculums. This new report corrected and eliminated one deficiency (double counting) identified with the previous activity report. Please note that copies of the aforementioned evaluation components, activity report, and other related documents are prOVided in Attachments 2 through 6 under AppendiX A.
In order to collect and disseminate the data obtained from the activity reports, a spreadsheet (see Attachment 7 under Appendix A) was designed and formatted according to the information requested in the report itself
After evaluating the data collected from the Culmination Activity Reports, as well as the anecdotal data requested in the evaluation components, the Council was able to cite the following accomplishments and results:
17,325 of the 17,455 (99.26%) of the students participating in the Elementary School curriculum successfully completed the course and graduated.
11

5,364 of the 5,476 (97.95%) of the students participating in the Junior High/Middle School curriculum successfuIly completed the course and graduated.

@ Only 204 of the 329 (62.01%) of the students participating in the Senior High School curriculum successfuIly completed the course and graduated. After discussing this low success rate with the DARE Officer instructing this curriculum, the Council learned that theparticu/Ql' high school being targeted has a consistently high "dropout" rate. Also, the DARE Officer stated that most ofthe students failing to graduatefrom this curriculum demonstrated an apathetic attitude to the course material and subsequentlyfailed to complete assignedprojects.

A graph comparing the mnnber ofstudents participating to the number ofstudents graduating, for each curriculum, has been presented in Attachment 8 under Appendix A..

In order to successfuIly graduate from the DARE program, students are required to prepare and submit an essay describing what they have learned from the program. After reviewing the essays submitted by each project, the Council selected five of these essays (see Attachment 9 under ApPendix A) for presentation in this Report.

What do students learn from the DARE program? One student stated, ''We also learned in D.A.R.E. (sic) that you don't have to look to (sic) hard to find drugs in middle school. Recently, a 13 year old girl took a poIl of how many kids used ritaIin as a drug, and found out the majority did Ritalin the drug prescribed to kids with Attention deficit disorder to calm them down. Now it is being used as a drug in most schools. Besides making kids high, it gives them the feeling of bugs crawling under their skin. Who would want to have the feeling of bugs crawling under their skin?"

What does DARE mean to students? One student responded as foIlows:

D is for death and dying brought on by drugs.

A is for action.

R is for the responsibility that we need to take for our future.

E is for encouragement.

As part of the evaluation component for each curriculum being taught, the DARE Officer was required to coIlect statements (see Attachment 10 under Appendix A) from each ofthe teachers as to the effect the program had on the students. The Council would like to present the foIlowing

excerpts from selected statements:

*

''The presence ofan officer in the school has a positive effect. The students are exposed

to a law enforcement officer in a natural and supportive environment and learn to see the

12

officer as a friend rather than a person who arrives when tragedy occurs. The DARE officer is an excellent role model. In our situation, the officer this year was male. He was definitely a positive role model for the young males in my class, many ofwhich have no male role model in the home."

*

"An important part ofthis program is the presence of a positive role model. Many of our

students see the police as a threat but DARE has shown them that the police department

is there for them. Our DARE program has always shown them that the police department

is there for them. Our DARE officer has always been supportive and encouraging and

helped to build self-esteem in our students."

*

''Possibly the greatest testimony to our DARE program came last school year. I had a

student who was worried that her Mom and Dad smoked cigarettes. Deputy Morgan

talked with her almost every week to get an update and to encourage her in her effort to

make her home smoke-free. It took most ofthe time of the program to convince them,

but at DARE graduation she told me that her Mom and Dad were going to quit smoking.

At last years open house Mom and Dad came with the student to report that they had quit

smoking over the summer."

*

"The students in my classroom and in Austell Elementary all come from different

situations. All of these students have different needs. Some of them need more

confidence in themselves; others, someone to look up to. The Dare (sic) Program helped

touch many of these students and their needs. Especially the ones moving on to a

different environment such as middle school. It gave them the tools to build on their

abilities and make better students of themselves."

Many ofthe DARE programs, funded by the Council, initiate other methods to get across the drugfree message to students. One exemplary approach cited by the Council was the distribution of a DARE newsletter (see Attachment 11 under Appendix A) by one ofthe programs. Please note the number of supporters from the local community. Community support is essential to the successful implementation of any DARE program, as evidenced by the donation of a DARE satellite office by Wal-Mart (see copy o/newspaper article in Attachment 12 under Appendix A) to a local DARE program.

Currently, there are no programs available for instruction in Georgia Schools which have drawn the amount of research and the approval for funding availability as the DARE program has. Feedback received informally from law enforcement, judicial officials, educators, parents, and children who have been exposed to the DARE program is that the program presents positive reinforcement for the children to discourage substance abuse, and provides a positive interaction between law enforcement and the targeted youth. Positive reinforcement from an authority figure such as a teacher, or a law enforcement officer teaching DARE, is believed to be of significant value in directing that child towards socially desirable behavior, and away from potentially self-destructive influences.

13

Section 1.2:

School Resource Officer

A School Resource Officer (SRO) program is a community policing approach practiced in a school environment. The exclusive focus on the physical and social territory ofthe school is an important aspect of the SRO concept. Unlike the police officer who responds to school problems as a result ofa 911 call by the principal, the SRO regards the school as his or her community. The officer knows its physical design and layout and is aware of who belongs on campus and who does not. School Resource Officers are required to wear both a uniform and a weapon while on duty to reinforce their role as actual police officers in the school. The SRO is the center of many school events and extracurricular activities while serving as a classroom resource to teachers.2

Two additional effects come from SRO coverage at the schools: (1) violence prevention; and, (2) savings within the criminal justice system. The savings to the criminal justice system occurs when cases end as petitions. When SROs bring juveniles to court, the quality of cases increases so that judges dismiss fewer cases. Before SRO presence in schools, juvenile cases that made it to court were often dismissed because the quality of evidence was not acceptable. The municipality incurred court costs with no tangible benefit for the community or the juveniles involved. Moreover, as one judge stated, such dismissals gave the involved juveniles the message that they could ''beat the system." It became a badge of honor for youngsters to go to court, have their cases dismissed, and return to school to brag about the adventure. With officers schooled in juvenile issues, the quality of evidence is such that case dismissal is less likely to occur.2

To summarize, the SRO basically fulfills three principle roles. One, the SRO is first of all a peace officer with the mission of keeping order on campus with legal authority to arrest ifrequired. Two, the SRO is a resource to teachers in the area oflaw enforcement. And third, the SRO is sometimes called upon to play the role of counselor.

The primary goal ofthe School Resource Officer program is to maintain and improve the safety of the learning environment in the schools through the reduction and prevention of school-related violence. Accomplishing this goal entails the following:
o Providing students, teachers, and school officials with a resource that serves as a visible
proactive deterrent to crime with the capabilities to react to violent crime and related activities;
o Providing students with a positive role model while giving new meaning to the term
"professional law' enforcement officer"; and,

2Justice Research and Statistics Association, The Forum, A ReSJ)onse to Youth Violence: The North Carolina School Resource Officer Program, Volume 13, No.3, September, 1995.
14

o Encouraging cooperation between youth and law enforcement, educators, business
owners, and parents.
Some ofthe activities necessary to implement the SRO program include, but are not limited to, the following:
Monitoring school areas. Attending student assemblies, extracurricular activities, etc. Establishing a network ofexisting community agencies to "catch" children who otherwise
will fail due to diminished capacity of their families to provide adequate socialization. Assist with school fund raisers, campus crime prevention activities, community drives, and
so forth. Conduct classroom instruction. Teacher orientation, parent education, and commuirity presentations.
In an effort to remain consistent with the evaluation efforts established for the DARE program, the Council also established an evaluation component for the SRO program. Modifying an activity report currently being utilized by a subgrantee, the Council developed goals, objectives, activities, and performance indicators to correspond with the report as well as the mission and elements of the program itself. This evaluation component was designed anticipating a substantial increase in the number of projects to be awarded funds in the future. The evaluation component, instructions for completing the Quarterly Activity Report, and the Quarterly Activity Report itself, are provided in Attachments 13 through 15 under Appendix A.
In order to collect and disseminate the data obtained from the Quarterly Activity Reports, a spreadsheet (see Attachment 16 under Appendix A) was designed and formatted according the data elements on the Report itself.
During the 1996 grant cycle, School Resource Officer programs produced such results as listed below.
1. Responded to a total of2,607 (1,839 from another agency and 768 were initiated by the SRO) complaints.
2. Effected a total of 505 arrests (117 for felonies and 388 for misdemeanors) as presented in the graph below.
15

SRO ARRESTS BY TYPE

mrrrJ. .' '.

;

"

.

.

. ' .

. '.,

','.

.

==~- - - - ' -

o 20 4J 00 80 100 120

#OF ARRESTS

MOA

Misdemeanor Other Arrests

FaA

= Felony Other Arrests

MVA

Misdemeanor Violent Arrests

FVA

Felony Violent Arrests

MWA = Misdemeanor Weapons Arrests

MOA JUVENILES .MOA ADULTS
FOA JUVENILES .FOAADULTS
MVA JUVENILES OMVA ADULTS
FVA JUVENILES .FVAADULTS
o MWA JUVENILES
.MWAADULTS

3. Issued a total of 414 traffic and/or parking warnings and/or citations. 4. Issued a total of 302 tresspass warnings and/or citations. 5. Provided 860 instances of assistance to law enforcement and other agencies. 6. Recovered approximately 65 percent of the reported stolen and/or lost property.

16

7. Transcended the role of the typical law enforcement officer by providing assistance to victims

through conferences as designated by the pie chart below.

Another

notable

Victim Assistance Conferences

accomplishment by one of the SRO programs was

seen in the reduction of

SUICIDE INIE RVE NTION
12%

01HER 7%

truancy rates. Truancy not only hinders a student's academic performance, but also truant juveniles are the

most likely to commit

STALKING 9%

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
42%

certain other crimes while

not in school. The

Norcross

Police

Department's

SRO

program concentrated

considerable effort in

SEXUAL ASSAULT
16%

CHILD ABUSE
14%

reducing truancy. This was accomplished by meeting individually with habitual truants and their families, determining the problems

and educating the student

and his/her family on

truancy laws. When appropriate, referrals are made to mental health counselors, school counselors,

social workers and juvenile court. The police department is prepared and has taken the appropriate

legal action in cases where the parents are declining to cooperate with the program and failing to send

their children to school. Additionally, the police department has solicited the cooperation oflocal

businesses and apartment managers in reporting truants. The police department respond~ to all

truancy complaints in a timely manner and detains any juveniles found loitering in the area during

school hours without a valid reason.

Section 1.3: State DARE Officer Training (DOT)

State DARE Officer training is offered and conducted through a collaborative effort between the Georgia Department ofEducation and the Georgia Bureau ofInvestigation (GBI). The GBI's DARE training program offers an initial certification course for the Elementary and Junior High School DARE curriculums at the Georgia Public Safety Training Center in Forsyth, Georgia. The goal of this unit is the prevention of substance abuse in Georgia's youth. In order to obtain this lofty goal the unit has the objectives of providing training, certification, and technical assistance to Georgia's law enforcement officers implementing the DARE curriculums at the elementary and junior high school grade levels. The unit of six GBI agents provides in-service training at the Georgia DARE Officers' Association Conference each year which allows each officer to maintain his/her certification

17

to teach DARE cuniculum. The Unit is the primary evaluation effort in Georgia oflaw enforcement efforts as they relate to the implementation and continuation of the DARE curriculums.

During the 1996 funding cycle, the GBI DARE training unit,



received 101 applications to attend DOT.



accepted 96 candidates for DOT.



provided 1,426 hours ofinstruction.



graduated 71 candidates from the training program.

In addition to the above classes, one Middle School/Junior High training session was conducted in June of 1997 that graduated fifteen (15) officers. This curriculum took approximately 91 hours of instruction time.

The monitoring aspect ofthis project had instructors visit 114 DARE certified officers in the field to review and evaluate the officer's classroom proficiency. These reports are provided to the Council and are an invaluable resource and tool in funding considerations. Overall the project is successful in the coordination and education oflaw enforcement to reduce substance abuse among young people. Also, the project demonstrates a successful collaboration between the law enforcement and educational communities by providing trained certified instructors to implement these curriculums.

SECTION 2: MULTIJURISDICTIONAL TASK FORCES-PURPOSE AREA #2
Today it is virtually impossible for a single agency, much less a single investigator or prosecutor, to successfully combat organized criminal activity.
To meet these challenges, law enforcement had to become more innovative and resourceful in combating crimes, criminals, and criminal activity. Multijurisdictional task forces have emerged as one of the most effective modem law enforcement tools; in part because task forces can not only transcend agency differences in organization, orientation, policies, size, constituency, and even personalities, but also resource and jurisdictional constraints. The emergence of task forces is also due in part because task forces have proven just as adaptable to multi agency street enforcement activities as they have to the multijurisdictional investigation of the most complex criminal organizations.3
Task forces facilitate the pooling of expertise and other resources so that the individual strengths of the member agencies become collective, task force strengths. Few innovations in the history oflaw

3Institute for Intergovernmental Research, Training for Multijurisdictional Narcotics Task Force Commanders, supported by grant number 92-DD-CX-KO14, awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office ofJustice Programs, U. S. Department ofJustice, 1993.
18

enforcement offer the versatility of task forces. Regardless of the scope or setting, one common theme emerges: the joining together to overcome obstacles to a successful enforcement effort.3
To assist State and local law enforcement agencies with their fight against drugs and violent crime, the Council provided $7,161,163.08 to these agencies to fund projects, as designated in the table below.

PROJECT TYPE

TOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS FUNDED

Multijurisdictional Drug Task Forces

(Locally-implemented)

29

State Drug Task Force (State-implemented)

1

Fugitive Squads (State-implemented)

2

Drug Enforcement Training (State-implemented)

1

Totals

33

TOTAL AMOUNT OF FUNDS ALLOCATED
$6,147,253.42 $483,594.21 $317,997.50 $212,317.95
$7,161,163.08

Section 2.1: Locally-implemented Multijurisdictional Task Forces
Basically, two types ofdrug task forces have evolved over the last few years in the State of Georgia. The first type is characterized by a combination oflaw enforcement resources to perform street level narcotics enforcement on a cit)wide, countywide, or regional basis. These drug task forces are often unique in that the participating agencies agree to a single chain of command and, dependent upon 10ca1laws and customs, agree to provide the requisite personnel and other resources. Often, too, the support for these drug task forces is derived from a pro rata formula or may be obtained from drug task force seizures and forfeitures. These drug task forces are activity response oriented, and, essentially, their purpose is to perform the enforcement function of the individual members on a collective or joint basis. Of course, the pooling ofresources and expertise and the ability to operate in a larger geographic territory can yield new enforcement capabilities and, therefore, opportunities not available to a single agency.
The other type of drug task force that has evolved is investigations oriented, allowing members to conduct related street enforcement activities separately. Both types more often than not involve local,
19

State, and Federal agencies as participants, as well as prosecutors.
There is a degree of similarity between these two types in terms of their motivation to form drug task forces as well as influences on their organizations and performance. There are differences, too: the former are by necessity more response oriented, while the latter tend to be more formal in their planning and strategies, the casework consumes more time and resources, and with more emphasis on targeting criminal organizations as well as the criminals involved.
Ofthe 29 drug task forces (a map indicating the location and coverage area ofthese taskforces is presented in Attachment 1 under Appendix B) funded under this purpose area, some are of the first type---focusing on street-level narcotics enforcement---and a few are of the second type---focusing on the mid- to upper.;.level violators/distributors, with the majority ofthese drug task forces operating as a hybrid while combining elements from each type. The mission [i.e., what the drug task force is supposed to do] generally determines how the drug task force is organized and subsequently developed.
Due to the diverse nature and composition of the 29 drug task forces, the Council approached the development ofthe evaluation component for these specialized units from a generic perspective. A careful review of each of the proposals submitted under the 1996 Grant Program revealed a consistent and dominant theme throughout.
The primary goal of these drug task forces is to promote a coordinated drug enforcement effort throughout the area served and to encourage maximum cooperation between all law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies within the jurisdiction.
The objectives to be satisfied while in pursuit of attaining this goal were as follows:
.. To address the multi-faceted drug problem on the varied fronts of three tiers [i.e., major violators/drug distributors, mid-level violators/drug distributors, and street level violators/drug distributors] through investigation, prosecution and conviction ofthese violators/distributors;
.. Recovery of criminal assets derived from illegal drug activities;
.. Reduction of fractional and duplicitous investigations and prosecutions; and,
.. To encourage and increase the participation of citizens in preventing drug and violent crime in their communities and in supporting local drug education.
The first phase in initiating a case is the receipt ofinformation by drug task force personnel. It is at this point that they learn that a particular individual or group of individuals is involved in illicit drug activity. This type of information may be received from various sources such as another law enforcement agency, from different components within the drug task force, and from calls through
20

an anonymous (800) tip line or anonymous tips received from concerned citizenry. For example, one drug task force received an anonymous tip resulting in the seizure of 1,300 marijuana plants in a South Georgia county. Another drug task force received approximately 345 tips, throughout the year, resulting in 37 felony arrests with sizable seizures of crack cocaine, marijuana, and methamphetamine.
This information may also be received from cooperating individuals also known as informants. These cooperating individuals are a cornerstone to drug law enforcement. Under this label are included all those persons who contribute information as a result of personal contact by an agent. It includes defendants who cooperate for consideration at time of sentencing, the "good citizen" source of information who responds helpfully to questioning, and the victim of a crime who provides investigative leads.
After the initial receipt of information and a tentative evaluation is made of the information and its source, the agent must make an effort, independent ofthe initial source, to verify or corroborate the information. This is done through one or a combination ofthree primary methods. The first method is surveillance. By closely monitoring the activities of the suspected individual, an attempt to verify the information is made. Drug taskforces conducted 4,658 acts ofsurveillance throughout the grant period. The second is the development of an informant who will be able to corroborate the information on the suspected activity. The development and subsequent utilization ofinformants is a key ingredient to a successful investigation ofthe cases initiated by drug taskforces funded throughout the State. The third method is the use of a number of sources ofinformation within and outside the agency. An invaluable resource for drug task forces throughout the State is the Statewide Narcotics Information and Intelligence Exchange. This project is partially funded by the Council and is discussed later in the report.
Drug cases must be planned thoroughly. The success or failure of a drug investigation often hinges upon small procedural details that should be considered during the initial planning of the case. The target ofthe investigation will determine the appropriate level ofinvestigative response. For instance, the magnitude ofdrug violations being committed by the suspect under investigation is an important planning element. Is the individual an addict? Is he/she a street dealer? Is he/she the source of supply? Can he/she be used to reach others in an organization? The type ofinvestigation that will be utilized against the suspect will in large part be determined by the answers to the preceding questions. Arrest strategy will similarly be affected by the status ofthe target ofthe investigation. Case planning and development necessitates the employment or assignment of qualified and experienced personnel. To ensure that each drug taskforce has trained personnel, the Council providesfunds to the Georgia Public Safety Training Centerfor drug enforcement training. This project is discussed later in the report.
Thorough case preparation requires close cooperation between the drug task force and the prosecutor. Each drug taskforce funded by the Council is required to have the district attorney from the respective circuit(s) covered sit on the Control Board ofthe taskforce. Staffresources permitting, some district attorneys have assigned a prosecutor to serve as a liaison between the drug
21

task force and the prosecutorial function. By working together, the prosecutor and the task force avoid wasting time on cases where charges are dropped due to insufficient evidence or other legal weaknesses.
The amount ofgrant funds invested in these locally-implemented projects was substantial. Therefore, the Council placed the bulk ofits evaluation and monitoring resources in this particular area. These efforts began with a careful review ofeach Request for Proposal (RFP) to determine common goals, objectives, activities and performance measures. Utilizing these RFPs and previous progress reports developed by the Bureau ofJustice Assistance, the Council was able to develop a viable evaluation component that systemically embraced the drug enforcement efforts proposed by these multijurisdictional projects. Careful attention was given to the plausible linkage of project activities with objectives, and performance indicators with project activities. In order to collect and disseminate data for these projects, the Council developed a Quarterly Activity Report that captures statistical as well as anecdotal information for presentation purposes. A copy of the evaluation component, activity report and related instructions, are presented in Attachments 2 through 4 under AppendixB.
In order to compile the statistical data from the Quarterly Activity Reports, the Council developed a program utilizing a spreadsheet application that summarized this data on a quarterly as well as a summary basis. The summary spreadsheet is presented in Attachment 5 under Appendix B.
The implementation of this new evaluation component, the enhanced monitoring efforts, as well as a detailed financial review resulted in the Council having to disqualify the data received from two of its locally-implemented drug task forces. The first ofthese task forces was discovered to be operating not as a multijurisdictional project [ie., concentrated, coordinated drug enforcement effort addressing a particular region of the State] but rather as several individual narcotics units. The data collected by the implementing agency did not reflect the results of task force operations. Also, some of the data collection methods were not producing accurate reliable information. Thus, the Council felt it would be inappropriate to include any ofthe data provided by this subgrantee. After the grant period, the Council called a mandatory meeting with all participating agencies to discuss both the financial as well as the programmatic problems prohibiting continued funding of this project. In order to enforce compliance with established requirements, the Council presented a report of its findings to the Control Board, which included several conditions that had to be met for future funding considerations. One ofthese conditions was a complete overhaul ofthe task force's data collection methods to include accurate data, reflective ofall participating agencies, complying with the Council's reporting requirements. The second of these projects was discovered to not have a qualified commander in charge of the drug task force. This was discovered by a careful review of the performance reports, which reflected numerous felony charges being reported as misdemeanors and vice versa. After this situation was discovered, the Council sent a directive to the drug task force advising them of funding suspension until a qualified commander was employed or assigned to provide adequate leadership to the task force. This action resulted in the task force complying with the Council's request by securing the services of an experienced commander. Both of these projects will be monitored closely in the upcoming grant year.
22

The daily operations ofthese locally-implemented drug task forces effected numerous positive results. Some of these results have been presented below. 1. A total of 11,547 cases were initiated during the grant cycle. As indicated by the pie chart
below, 69 percent of these cases involved crack cocaine and marijuana---two of the most prevalent drugs encountered by these drug task forces.
23

2. Initiation of these cases resulted in a total of 11,282 chatges being filed. As reflected in the graph to the right, 64 perc~nt of these charges were for possession and possession with the
intent to distribute. Again, the major drugs associated with these charges were crack cocaine
and marijuana. Additionally, categorizing these charges by crime classification revealed that 68 percent ofthe charges were felonies, with 89 percent ofthe charges being non-violent and, of course, drug-related.
1lI~
a.L1l\IA"OCNM\N..FACIUt
o SALE
1SI~W1HMENT' .~ER'iE 1iI~
.OTJ-R

3. Utilizing both covert and overt tactics, drug task forces effected the arrests of 9,068 offenders during the grant period. As presented in the graph below, 79 percent of these offenders were adult males and 17 percent were adult females, with the remaining 4 percent comprised of juvenile offenders. Perhaps an alarming statistic is the amount (47%) of offenders with no previous criminal history at the time of the arrest.

MJTF TOTAL ARRESTS

8000
6000
4000 2000
o
ADU.T (Male)

ADU.T (Fermle)

JWENLES

24

4. As indicated in Attachment 6 under Appendix B, these drug task forces seized a considerable amount of illegal narcotics during the grant cycle, as highlighted by the following:



Over 68 pounds (combined grams, ounces, pounds, and kilos) of powder

cocaine was seized with an associated dollar value in excess of$2 million.



Approximately 260 pounds (combined "rocks" and ounces) of crack cocaine

was seized with an associated dollar value of over $900,000.



Over 25,000 pounds of marijuana (commercial grade and sensemilla) was

confiscated with a dollar value approaching $38 million.



Approximately 22 pounds (combined grams, ounces, and pounds) of

methamphetamine was seized with an associated dollar value in excess of

$500,000.

To help put this area in perspective, the Council has presented a map (see Attachment 7 under Appendix B) ofdrug prevalence, based upon drug seizures reported by the drug task forces, to indicate which drug(s) the task forces encounter in their respective jurisdictions.

The Council focused, for presentation purposes, on the five most prevalent drugs [i.e., cocaine, crack cocaine, marijuana, heroin, and methamphetamine] found in the State. However, some drug task forces noted sizable seizures of other drugs, such as:

o The Richmond County Drug Task Force, in coordination with the Fort
Gordon Drug Suppression Unit, confiscated over 1500 dosage units of LSD during the grant period. This was the largest seizure of this drug in the metropolitan Augusta area.

o The West Georgia Drug Task Force, based in the City of Carrollton (Carroll
County), seized 7,350 tablets of prescription drugs with an associated dollar value of$8,000, during the second quarter ofthe grant year.

o The Tallapoosa Judicial Circuit Drug Task Force, based in Haralson County,
seized 3,700 doses of the designer drug "Ecstasy" with an associated dollar value of$37,000.

5. Many of the drug task forces funded by the Council rely heavily upon the seizure and subsequent forfeiture of assets to help meet the match requirements of the Byrne Grant Program. With an increased emphasis upon recovering these assets derived from illegal drug activities, drug task forces reported a total of2,613 seizures during the 1996 grant period. The associated dollar value ofthese seizures was in excess of$3.8 million. At the end of the

25

grant cycle, a total ofl,108 ofthese seizures had resulted in forfeiture actions, with over $1.5 million in forfeitures. Ofthis $1.5 million, approximately 89 percent was distributed back to the projects to satisfy match requirements and to enhance the project's effectiveness.
Over the past few years, drug task forces have found it necessary to inform as well as educate the citizenry about the drug problem facing their respective communities. Some notable examples of these efforts are as follows:
* Many of the drug task forces gave presentations to civic organizations, schools, churches, and other community agencies and/or organizations.
Agents from the Richmond County Drug Task Force gave a familiarization presentation to grand jury members each session. This presentation included drug distribution techniques, familiarization and identification of narcotics, video presentation, and solicitation ofinformation from the citizens in attendance.
The East Metro Drug Enforcement Team, based in the City of Covington (Newton County), made annual contributions to three local DARE programs.
Several of the drug task forces made presentations to nursing homes, hospitals, and apartment complexes advising them on issues related to drug identification, familiarization, and prevention techniques.
It is imperative that the drug task forces work closely with local governmental officials, local businesses as well as community members to ensure an efficient and effective operation. Only with the support ofthese participants can a drug task force reach its fullest potential.
Section 2.2: State Dmg Task Force
Quite often, the successful investigation of violent crimes requires the undercover penetration of street-level narcotics dealers and users. If the narcotics organization is successfully infiltrated, the results will often bring information concerning various crimes as well as the apprehension of drug dealers.
A target-specific undercover drug investigation is an effective tool in eliminating local narcotics traffickers, as well as gaining valuable information about local crimes. By utilizing a target-specific approach, maximum use of investigative man-hours can be achieved.
To assist the State in effecting these undercover operations, the Council provided $483,594.21 to the Georgia Bureau ofInvestigation (GBI) to implement a State Drug Task Force (SDTF). This SDTF primarily offered undercover operatives and surveillance units to law enforcement agencies throughout the State experiencing narcotics-related and violent crime problems. Many crimes such as murder, aggravated assault, armed robbery, and rape occur as the direct result of the sale,
26

distribution, and use ofillegal narcotics. The perpetrators of violent crimes are often drug users or dealers who are indigenous to their communities.
By utilizing the GBI's Regional Offices (see Attachment 8 under Appendix B for a map identifying the location ofthese offices) and the Regional Drug Enforcement Offices (located in Gainesville (Hall County), Macon (Bibb County), and Savannah (Chatham County, a clear cut flow ofinformation with local agencies exists. All requests for assistance were routed through these offices, thus eliminating any confusion concerning who to contact regarding the initiation of an investigation. A designee from these offices acts as the contact person and directs the focus of the investigation.
Once the request for an investigation was forwarded to the Task Force, the Special Agent in Charge and the Assistant Special Agent in Charge coordinated, with the RegionallDrug Office, the initiation ofthe investigation.
A standard narcotics investigation consisted oftwo (2) narcotics agents and either one or two (lor 2) Georgia State Troopers being dispatched to the requested area. The undercover narcotics agents then would make drug purchases while being "covered" by the troopers and the GBI RegionallDrug Office representative. Once the targeted narcotics violators were arrested, the SDTF team moved on to the next area which had requested the SDTF's assistance. The SDTF was also available to help in violent crime cases where an undercover operative was needed.
All cases and confidential informant files are documented and maintained in the GBI RegionallDrug Office that initiated the investigation.
Due to the Olympic games being held in Atlanta during the summer of 1996, and the Paralympics following shortly thereafter, the SDTF did not really become fully operational until January 1, 1997. The latter part of 1996 was utilized to adequately train undercover agents and bring the staffup to its full complement.
In order to effectively monitor and evaluate the progress of this project, the SDTF provided the Council with monthly updates broken down by the services provided to the GBI RegionallDrug Office (refer to Attachment 8 under Appendix B) requesting assistance.
During the time frame ofJanuary 1, 1997, through June 30, 1997, the SDTF made 368 cases resulting in $104,772 ofdrugs being seized, with 94 percent ofthe drugs being methamphetamine and crack cocaine. Listed below is a summarization ofthe assistance given to each GBI RegionallDrug Office requesting the services ofthe State Drug Task Force.
Region 1
The SDTF assisted with a short-term narcotics investigation resulting in the purchase of $420 of methamphetamine. An arrest was pending upon the conclusion of this investigation. Also, the SDTF provided assistance with a wire tap investigation in this region.
27

Region 2
The SDTF worked very closely with the West Georgia Drug Task Force on several operations during the grant period. Specifically, the SDTF made over 70 cases resulting in 35 arrests with 30 arrests pending the conclusions ofongoing investigations. The cases initiated resulted in the seizure of over $10,000 of crack cocaine being seized and/or taken off the street. One undercover operation deserves some additional elaboration, specifically,
> An SDTF Agent orchestrated a buy-bust operation resulting in two arrests, the
seizure ofa vehicle, and nine ounces of crack cocaine. Based upon local intelligence, the individuals arrested were considered to be two of the major suppliers of crack cocaine in that area.
Region 4
The SDTF provided invaluable assistance in a Federal narcotics investigation involving a major crack cocaine dealer by making several undercover buys from two ofthe main violators being targeted in this investigation. At the end ofthe grant period, no arrests had been made and the investigation was ongomg.
Region 6
Towards the end of the grant cycle, SDTF Agents began gathering intelligence and information for several undercover investigations to commence in July 1997.
Region 7
A total of 83 undercover buys were made during the course of ongoing investigations. Drugs amounting to over $70,000 have been seized during these investigations, with 96 percent ofthe drugs being either methamphetamine or crack cocaine. These investigations were anticipated to be concluded sometime in July 1997.
Region 8
SDTF Agents made 22 undercover buys while taking $1,600 of crack cocaine offthe streets. At the end ofthe grant period, investigations were ongoing with arrests forthcoming.
Region 9
SDTF Agents worked extensively on several street-level investigations by making 79 undercover buys and seizing approximately $4,000 ofpowder and crack cocaine. These investigations were still active at the end of the grant year with arrests forthcoming.
28

Region 15
Since the inception of the investigation in this region, SDTF Agents have made a total of 140 undercover buys while seizing over $11,000 in drugs, with 85 percent of the drugs being crack cocaine. The investigation was still ongoing at the end ofthe grant cycle with numerous offenders to be arrested in the future.
Also, the SDTF commenced an investigation with the Albany-Dougherty Drug Unit (partially funded by the Council) and the Drug Enforcement Administration on several major violators in Dougherty County. This investigation began towards the end ofthe grant cycle.
Savannah Regional Drug Enforcement Office (RDEO)
During May 1997, the SDTF, in conjunction with the RDEO and the East Central Drug Task Force, initiated investigations in Emanuel and Jenkins counties targeting street-level dealers. At the end of the grant term, a total of 9 cases had been made with a small amount of crack cocaine being taken off the street. These investigations were, of course, still ongoing at June 30, 1997.
The demand for assistance from the SDTF continually increased as the project approached the end ofthe grant cycle. By coordinating the investigations through the GBI's RegionaVDrug Offices, the efficiency and effectiveness of this Unit has been optimized. This project not only serves as an invaluable resource to local law enforcement agencies not participating in a drug task force, but also as an integral complement to the drug task forces funded by the Council.
Section 2.3: Fugitive Squads
At the beginning ofthe 1996 grant period, the Georgia Crime Information Center's records reported approximately 28,000 individuals were wanted in the State of Georgia for crimes ofviolence, drug offenses, and other serious violations of State law. The majority ofthese individuals are recidivists with previous felon convictions and have a history ofdrug abuse or illicit drug sales. To assist the State in apprehending these violators, the Council awarded funds to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation for the continued operation oftwo fugitive squads (see Attachment 9 under Appendix Bfor a map indicating the counties participating in these squads) covering the metropolitan Atlanta and middle Georgia areas.
The primary goal of these squads is the apprehension of violent career criminals and escapees. By combining the resources ofthe participating Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies into a multijurisdictional task force, their investigative actions are coordinated into a concerted effort, thereby increasing their effectiveness in the fugitive apprehension effort.
The objectives ofthese squads are:
To establish and enhance multijurisdictional investigations that are conducted;
29

To reduce the number of violent criminal offenders residing in the participating jurisdictions;

To reduce the amount of violent crime confronting the citizenry of the affected communities; and,

To improve the citizenry's perception that a coordinated effort is being made to locate and arrest violent criminal offenders.

A concerted effort was made by the agencies participating in these squads to execute outstanding felony warrants and to locate and apprehend escapees. Warrants were submitted to the squads primarily by law enforcement agencies in the coverage areas; however, many Federal and out of State warrants were submitted to the squads for execution. The squad members, working with other agencies in the coverage areas, often concentrated the squads' efforts to a specific geographic area to effect the execution ofa large number offelony warrants during a limited period of time. Criminal cases were documented, outlining investigative actions, circumstances of arrest, and the offenders biographical data. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation's case management system for the documentation and retention ofthe case files was utilized by the squads.

To adequately monitor and evaluate the progress ofthese projects, both fugitive squads were required to submit quarterly updates to the Council for review. The projects were required to report statistical as well as anecdotal data regarding the operational aspects of these specialized units.

During the 1996 grant year, the fugitive squads apprehended and/or arrested a total of 1,216 offenders/violators. The crimes and/or violations initiating the apprehension of these offenders/violators were as follows:

319 (26%) ofthe offenders arrested were the result of assistance rendered cases.

301 (25%) of the offenders arrested were for parole/probation violations.



177 (15%) ofthe offenders arrested were for theft/robbery violations.

133 (11 %) ofthe offenders arrested were for drug violations.

87 (7%) of the offenders arrested were wanted for the crime of murder.

60 (5%) of the offenders arrested were for forgery/fraud violations.

52 (4%) ofthe offenders arrested were for their failure to appear in court and a bench warrant was issued.

50 (4%) of the offenders arrested were for assault & battery violations.

30

37 (3%) of the offenders arrested had escaped from either a Federal or State correctional facility.
Listed below are some noteworthy examples to demonstrate the effectiveness as well as the impact that these squads have on the communities throughout the coverage areas.
o On October 16, 1996, an Investigator from the New York Department of Correctional
Services requested the assistance of the Metro Fugitive Squad (MFS) in locating and apprehending an escaped felon serving a nine-year sentence for armed robbery.
The request was forwarded to an Investigator assigned to MFS for investigation, location, and subsequent arrest ofthis offender. The offender was located at his residence in Atlanta by MFS Investigators and subsequently transported to the Fulton County Jail for extradition to New York.
On November 25, 1996, a citizen contacted a MFS Investigator regarding the whereabouts ofan escaped fugitive on the run since 1987. This violator was wanted by the Cobb County Sheriff's Office for aggravated robbery, aggravated assault, and aggravated sodomy. The Investigator had an analyst, assigned to MFS, process the information searching for a possible address on the violator in Mobile, Alabama. After confirming the address to be valid, the Investigator contacted the FBI's Mobile Violent Crimes Task Force regarding the information obtained on the violator.
On December 4, the Investigator was advised that the violator was in custody in Mobile. The Investigator notified the Cobb County Sheriffs Office ofthe arrest so extradition proceedings could begin.
On October 15, 1996, an offender escaped from a work detail at the Coweta County Correctional Institution. During the initial investigation, MFS Investigators determined that the offender was in the company ofhis girlfriend. Further investigation revealed that when the offender was in Atlanta, he frequented "The Bluff." The Bluffis the intersection ofNorth Avenue and Griffin Street. Interviews conducted in the area revealed that the offender had, in fact, been in the area.
On February 26, 1997, an MFS Investigator received information that the offender was in Gary, Indiana. The Investigator contacted the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) for assistance with the case. The fugitive was located, but lost in a foot chase. The USMS discovered that the fugitive was using an alias (the name ofhis girlfriend's ex-husband).
On May 9, 1997, an MFS Investigator received information that the offender was in Memphis, Tennessee. The Investigator again contacted the USMS in Memphis for their assistance. Information gathered from prior interviews revealed that the fugitive preferred to stay in a nationally-recognized discount motel chain (Motel 6). The last time that the
31

fugitive had been in Memphis, he stayed at the Motel 6 on Elvis Presley Boulevard. The offender was located at the motel and transported to the Shelby County Jail awaiting extradition.
The very nature and composition ofthese squads, which necessitates that Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies work together, only serves to foster cooperation and coordination. Thus, leading to efficient and effective investigations that ultimately progress to the successful apprehension and incarceration of violent criminals.
Section 2.4: Drug Enforcement Training
The Georgia Public Safety Training Center, through the Georgia Police Academy Division, provides Drug Enforcement, Community Oriented Police, and School Resource Officer training for requesting agencies/communities. During the presentation of these programs the Training Center seeks the support and resources available from Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, judicial officers,and treatment professionals. These agencies and their respective resources are utilized to better meet the training needs in the State of Georgia. Advanced programs are tailored to meet the particular needs ofthe requesting agency and ifnecessary will be taken to that agency's location.
The goal of this training program is to provide the highest caliber of advanced professional community and drug-related training to agencies charged with an operational response to drug and violent crime at the lowest possible cost to all law enforcement agencies in Georgia. To assist the Training Center in fullilling its mission, the Council provided this agency with $212,317.95 in Federal funds during the 1996 grant cycle.
Training is made available to municipal, county, and State officers. Although local officers generally make up approximately 93 percent of the students attending courses at the Training Center, application provisions allow the course coordinators to give preference to drug task force members. Several of the courses are offered at the Training Center because of the need for specialized equipment such as forensic labs, computers, and a mock village. Those courses that do not require special facilities are made available as off-site training courses which are determined by the agency requesting the training. The sites selected receive specific Community Oriented Police, advanced tactical street drug enforcement techniques, culture awareness, civil liability, and Spanish language training. The actual off-site programs are designed to meet the needs ofthe specific agencies and communities requesting the programs. All training programs presented are either Georgia POST (Peace Officer Standards and Training) certified or must receive such certification prior to their presentation.
In order to monitor and evaluate the project's progress, the subgrantee was required to provide the Council with quarterly reports utilizing such performance indicators as:
<D The number ofcourses available at the Training Center and at off-site locations. The
32

Training Center provided a total of135 courses to prospective applicants during the 1996 grant year.
The number of students attending these training sessions. A total of3,629 students attended these training courses throughout the grant cycle.
@ The number of students successfully completing these courses. A total of 3,560 students successfully completed the 135 training sessions offered throughout the 1996 grant term. This equates to a graduation percentage in excess of98 percent.
@) The cost per student. During the 1996 grant cycle, the Training Center was able to offer 135 courses, at the Training Center itselfand at off-site locations, at a cost of$8.44 per student.
The data cited above was compiled utilizing a spreadsheet application and is presented in Attachment 10 under Appendix B.
The impact ofthis project can be measured by the number of agencies that share and utilize these training resources. Specifically, the Georgia Police Academy, the Georgia Public Safety Training Center, the network of regional training academies, drug task forces, State and local (county and municipal) law enforcement agencies, other criminal justice agencies, and Federal agencies that provide either guest instructors or students.
SECTION 3: DOMESTIC CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES TASK FORCE (INDOOR GROWTH)---PURPOSE AREA #3
Marijuana is not the same drug it was 20 years ago. illegal growers use special fertilizers, plant hormones, and steroids, carbon dioxide and advanced horticulture techniques to make the plants produce the highest grade---sinsemilla---the unfertilized flowering top of the female plant that contains the highest THC [i.e., tetrahydrocannabinol, the chemical which causes the psychoactive effects desired by the abuser] content. During the 1970s, the average THC content was 1.5 percent. Today, the average THC content ranges from 8 to 20 percent and can be as high as 30 percent in marijuana grown indoors.
The success of the State's, through the Governor's Task Force on Drug Eradication (GTFt, eradication efforts during the outdoor marijuana growing season (May through October) and the demand for a product with a higher narcotic value (higher THC concentration) has forced many cultivators to move indoors.
4GTF is comprised of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, the Georgia State Patrol, the Georgia Department of Transportation, the Georgia National Guard, and the Drug Enforcement Administration.
33

By moving to a sophisticated indoor grow, an ideal grow environment can be simulated to produce a superior grade of marijuana. Attachment 1 to Appendix C presents the setup ofa typical indoor grow. Control of lighting, temperature, and other factors by the grower cause the marijuana to be much more potent and dangerous than it was in the 1970s. In order to address this problem, the Council awarded $345,284.38 to the Georgia Department of Public Safety to implement an Indoor Cannabis Unit.
The main goal ofthis project was to eradicate marijuana being illegally cultivated indoors in Georgia by coordinating its efforts with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Georgia Bureau ofInvestigation (GBI). The project focused on major growers as opposed to those whom may grow plants only for personal use. For example, the task force would investigate a purchase of 10 grow lights before investigating a purchase of I grow light.
The approaches directed at addressing the problem were as follows:
3 Enhance multi-agency investigations of indoor grows in Georgia through continued participation in the task force;
Enhance cooperation with local law enforcement agencies regarding indoor grow investigations by providing direct assistance and training;
3 Increase the number of indoor grows discovered in Georgia;
3 Increase the number ofindoor grown marijuana plants eradicated in Georgia; and,
3 Increase the number of weapons seized at indoor grows.
Marijuana can be grown indoors by employing one of two methods. The first method utilizes a process known as hydroponics, which simply means that the marijuana root system is sustained by vitamin and mineral fortified water with various supporting mediums, such as lava rock or rockwool. The second method uses the traditional process of rooting the plants in dirt. Both of these methods must rely on a means of artificial sunlight, usually accomplished with halogen or halide lights which generate heat as well as the needed light.
Investigations on indoor marijuana are usually initiated after receiving information that a cultivator has an operation. After receiving information, an investigator will attempt to verify the identity of the alleged grower by utilizing such resources as the intelligence databases of the GBI or DEA. Utility records are often subpoenaed in order to indicate the owner ofthe property in question and also monitor power consumption. The equipment utilized to generate artificial light and heat will consume large quantities of electricity. The consumption is noted when compared to houses of similar size and construction. Another method used by an investigator is to seize and search discarded trash from the residence in an attempt to locate material which will identify persons occupying the residence.
34

This trash often contains undesirable stems or leaves from the marijuana operation.

The final method used by investigators involves the use of a thermal imager (FLIR) mounted on a helicopter. A thermal imager detects heat sources when focused on a target. When focused on a building housing a marijuana operation, the thermal imager will detect the heat generated by the high intensity lighting systems. Using the FLIR, the investigator can also compare the generated heat escaping from the building in question with other buildings in the area experiencing normal heat loss. In order to promote a successful operation, a portion of the funds awarded was used to refurbish a helicopter and purchase a FLIR.

To determine the impact ofthe project's activities, the Subgrantee provided quarterly reports on the following performance indicators:



Case investigation activity (the Unit initiated 21 investigations during the grant

year);

Number ofcharges filed categorized by crime classification (the Unitfiled 10felony charges during the grantperiod);



Number ofarrests categorized by crime classification (the Unit made 7felony arrests

during the grant cycle);



Arrest data classified by race and offender status (a// 7 ofthe felony arrests were

white males with repeat offender status);

Amount ofmarijuana seized (the Unit seized 144pounds ofmarijuana-142 plants and 2 pounds ofprocessed marijuana); and,

Number and amount of seizures and forfeitures (the Unit hadfour seizures-1 for real property and 4 weapons-during the grantperiod).

The Council is currently working with this Indoor Cannabis Unit to make the drug task forces aware of this project's existence, and to enhance the coordinated drug enforcement effort throughout the State.

35

SECTION 4: COURT DELAY REDUCTION-PURPOSE AREA #10
To participate in a collaborative effort between Georgia's Administrative Office ofthe Courts (AOC) and the Supreme Court's Committee on Substance Abuse and the Courts, the Council provided $81,122.70 to AOC for a project administered through contractual services. The contract, with the Metropolitan Atlanta Council on Alcohol and Drugs (MACAD), expanded a local metropolitan database to a Statewide Computerized resource of over 600 agencies. This accomplished the project's goal ofproviding a statewide database resource to applicable users that would enable them to carry out program objectives of diversion, alternative sentencing, and probation programs. The central objective of the goal was availability of the resource and a training component that would make users more aware of resources in their area. The project accomplished this goal through the use ofan Internet platform for the database. The Internet accessibility to MACAD's newly expanded Statewide database was the key for judiciary involvement. The judiciary in Georgia all have Internet access through Georgia's internal computerized network known as Georgia Online or the "GO Network". This accessibility coupled with a training effort by MACAD personnel at various statewide conferences and training sessions will make treatment resources and their services more available than ever before. In addition, the format created allows for an easy matching to the criteria of the offender needing services, and was designed with input from the judiciary itself.
The project accomplished the following during the grant year:
The database known as the Substance Abuse Internet Referral System (SAIR) became available on-line during 1997.
The SAIR was demonstrated at more than 20 locations to a total of 577 people between February and July of 1997.
The database was featured in a national drug newsletter (see Attachment 1 under Appendix D) to inform the nation about the misconceptions of treatment center availability.
The actual utilization of the database can not be determined at this point in time as the publicity and training on the system did not start until February and still continues to date. However, the main MACAD Internet site has had over 88,000 hits since 6/13/96, so the awareness ofthe resource has been effective. This is an important development in the State and one which Georgia proudly demonstrated to the South Branch Chief-SLAD, on her site visit just prior to the finalization ofthis report.
SECTION 5: MODEL JAILS---PURPOSE AREA #11
The Council provided funds under this purpose area to implement two types of projects. The first type was for the provision ofadditional services to improve local correctional facilities. For this type
36

ofproject, the Council allocated a total of $117,916.70 to fund two locally-implemented Model Jail programs. The other type of project funded under this purpose area was a subgrant ($88,899.35) awarded to the Georgia Sheriffs' Association to initiate model protocols and/or a training curriculum for the improvement ofjail standards throughout the State of Georgia.
Section 5.1: Model Jails
The purpose ofthese types ofprojects was to provide additional services for inmates and correctional officers to improve the overall quality of the local correctional system. These projects offered GED classes, self-improvement classes [ie., Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), etc.], classes on the prevention of pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, and training on living a productive life outside of pnson.
These projects had a positive impact on correctional officers and inmates alike. Both groups were provided training on conflict resolution. By increasing the mediation skills of both inmates and officers, these projects positively affected jail conditions.
The primary goal of these projects was to reduce the recidivism rates for violent and substance abusing individuals entering the criminal justice system. Correlated objectives for these projects varied but generally addressed the following: .
o Test all offenders for use of controlled substances and alcohol. o Administer a risk/needs assessment to evaluate the inmate's likelihood to recidivate. o Provide a complete and flexible continuum of intervention programs to treat and
educate offenders that are incarcerated or placed on probation/parole.
o Initiate a new array of sanctioning options (intermediate sanctions) for the judiciary
allowing judges to respond to both the criminal behavior and the underlying addiction.
To effectively monitor the progress of these two projects, each subgrantee was required to submit quarterly updates to the Council. From these quarterly updates, the Council would like to cite the following accomplishments:
o Over 175 deputies received at least 20 hours of training.
DOver 500 inmates (male and female) received some sort of training to help them overcome their risk to recidivate.
The deputies attending these trainings were amazed at the difference it made in their approach to the job. One Sergeant commented, "This training has changed the way I do my job. I handle things differently and get a lot more cooperation."
Positive outcomes were not only achieved by the deputies' training, but also by the inmates receiving classes to reduce and/or successfully mediate conflicts. Often the zones that were considered the worst on the floor would be the most cooperative after attending the classes. The self-management
37

skills the inmates learned from the training can make a positive impact on the life choices they make once they are released from prison. Although reduction in recidivism is the main objective of these projects, it is not the only positive outcome. Many inmates that attend GED classes go on to further their education once released. Others attend AA classes and attain sobriety that continues after released from prison. These projects offer inmates the resources to obtain the skills necessary to make a fresh start at becoming productive members of society after their release.
Section 5.2: Jail Assistance
Georgia law requires the Sheriff (or a Sheriff-designated jail administrator) to operate the jail which serves each ofGeorgia's 159 counties. The localjails in the State of Georgia have no model protocol or established training curriculum, from a State resource, for jail personnel on how to administer a jail at a local government level. Each jail in the State is unique due to the varying demographics of each region. This lack ofprotocol and current guidelines or standards has caused several problems for jails throughout the State. Jail personnel are often not familiar with the liability imposed upon them by their duties and facilities. The overcrowding and lack ofprocedures and training to deal with such problems in the State has increased this liability tremendously, causing many local jails to incur law suits, and in some cases, jails have been closed due to conditions of confinement deemed unconstitutional.
To assist with correcting this problem, the Council provided the Georgia Sheriffs' Association with a subgrant to fund two technical advisors to perform on-site evaluations of jails, focusing on developing a set of Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and training programs to address the many administrative, security, and staffing issues present in Georgia's jails. A significant improvement resulting from the development of these SOPs and training programs is the increased level of knowledge and skills achieved by the personnel staffing these local jails.
The accomplishments of the Jail Assistance project exceeded the expectations of the subgrantee/implementing agency (Georgia Sheriffs' Association) and the grantor agency (Criminal Justice Coordinating Council). The demand for the proposed services also seriously exceeded the perceived need, and the time available for the two staff assigned to the project.
Administrative Accomplishments:
In addition to hiring staff, empaneling a Jails and Prisons committee, and completing a first draft revising Georgia Jail Standards, the project staff are developing a draft "Jail Standards Facility Self Audit Manual" to assist jurisdictions in conducting reviews of their facilities.
Technical Assistance Accomplishments:
During the first ten months of project operations, 44 County Jails received completed on-site technical assistance providing or developing:
38

q> 2S-"days of Jail Officer Training in 8 locations. q> 9-"Administrative or Management Procedures. q> 11-"Jail Staffing Analyses. q> 7-"Jail Policy and Procedure Manuals. q> 6-"Jail Security Audits. q> 1-"Jail Management Audit. q> 2-"Jail Facility Audits. q> S-"New Jail Needs Assessments. q> l-"New Jail- Planning. q> 1-"New Jail- Standards Evaluation. - 3-..Existing Jail Needs Assessments. q> 3-"Assistance with Court Order Compliance. q> 2-"Transition Plans to open new facility. q> 4-..Bonding Policy and Procedures. q> 1-"12-hour shift deploYment policy. q> l-"Salary Study. q> l-"Medical Protocol. q> 24-"Miscellaneous Research projects not requiring on-site visit nor formal report.
The staffproducing these reports have practical experience, enhanced by training from the National Institute of Corrections (NIC), in the administration of Jails and Sheriff's Offices. Strong reliance on models and planning processes promulgated by the NIC are evident in the work products reviewed to date.
The demand as well as the feedback received from Sheriffs and Jail Administrators learning ofthis valuable technical assistance has been overwhelming and positive.
Based on the initial demand and the response from the local Sheriffs using this service, the Jail Assistance Project wi11likely develop into one of the most significant, in terms of the long-term potential for improving the corrections system, in the history of the Byrne Grant Program in Georgia.
Providing a manual ofJail Standards is obviously a positive step, but providing a team of competent professionals to provide on-site audits and assistance in implementing the standards is innovative, and far more likely to result in local implementation of the standards developed.
SECTION 6: OFFENDER TREATMENT PROGRAMS--PURPOSE AREA #13
Research conducted in the last several years suggests that many offenders commit crimes in order to obtain drugs or the means to purchase drugs. Surveys ofFederal and State correctional populations indicate that large numbers of offenders have lengthy histories of drug involvement and/or had been using controlled substances at the time oftheir arrests. Given these circumstances, it has been widely acknowledged by officials in the criminal justice and related social services fields that criminal
39

sanctions alone, even those involving incarceration, are unlikely to have significant or prolonged effects on either the behavior or the drug use of drug-dependent offenders. Prison recidivism
statistics, for the State of Georgia, document that drug-dependent offenders are more than twice as likely than are non-substance abusing offenders to continue their criminal behavior upon release from correctional custody because they are likely to resume or continue their involvement with drugs on the street.5 These considerations prompted the Council to fund proposals under this purpose area because of the rehabilitative potential of the projects and their primary focus on ending offenders' dependencies on drugs. The breakdown ofprojects funded under this purpose area is summarized as follows:

1 State-implemented project (Adult Offender Treatment)

$343,961.97

1 State-implemented project (Juvenile Offender Treatment)

205,311.56

1 Locally-implemented project (Alternative to Incarceration)

69,265.91

1 Locally-implemented projects (Adolescent Substance Abuse)

140.156.44

Q Projects funded at the amount of ----------------------------------> $758.695.88

Section 6.1: Adult Offender Treatment

Substance abuse is the predominate reason why people become involved with the criminal justice system. Records from the State Board of Pardons and Paroles document that a total of 40 percent of the parolee population is serving a sentence for a drug crime.

Since 1990, the City of Atlanta, along with 20 other metropolitan areas, has participated in the National Institute ofJustice's Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) project. Every three months, over a 10 day period arrestees in the Atlanta City Jail are interviewed anonymously regarding their drug use and asked to provide a urine sample for testing. Over 90 percent of those interviewed agree to submit a sample and over 60 percent ofmales and 70 percent of females tested positive for some illicit drug.

Although 40 percent ofoffenders entering prison do so as a direct result of drug offenses, many more drug addicted offenders are serving time for offenses committed to support their drug habits. The DUF project provides convincing support for this argument: a significant number of the arrestees who tested positive for drugs were charged with property and violent crimes.

Parolees who continue to use drugs are more likely to commit additional crimes, and those who do not learn the skills necessary for successful community living are likely to see crime as the only viable solution to solving problems. To help fulfill its mission,6 the State Board of Pardons and Paroles utilized Byrne funding provided during the 1996 grant cycle to continue, as well as enhance, its

SSubstance Abuse and Georgia's Offender Population, Office ofEvaluation and Statistics, Georgia Department of Corrections, November, 1989.
6The State Board of Pardons and Parole's mission is to protect citizens and help parolees reach self-sufficiency.
40

Parolee Drug Testing, Treatment and Rational Thinking Skills Training Program.
The desired results ofthis project were to:
o Reduce drug use among the parolee population; o Improve parolees' problem solving skills and attitudes toward authority; and, o Reduce the rate of recidivism among parolees.
The specific approaches to achieving the desired results for this project were as follows:
> IdentifY parolees, through a newly established policy and an adequately funded drug
testing program, who are using drugs;
Monitor contracted drug treatment providers to ensure that parolees receive appropriate and high-quality services;
> Identify parolees who cannot become drug free in the community; > Facilitate the transition of parolees who graduate from prison-based treatment
programs;
Train and certify up to 25 agency staffas cognitive skills coaches and certify one staff member as a cognitive skills trainer;
> Expand the cognitive skills training program for parolees; and,
> Gather data on drug tested parolees, offenders who complete prison treatment
programs, and parolees who enter cognitive skills training to evaluate the effectiveness of these program components.
One of the operational elements of this project was to expand an existing random drug testing program to determine which parolees were in need oftreatment. Parolees who tested positive were referred to a community treatment provider for a substance abuse assessment. Data was collected on each drug test, on each offender in prison treatment and on offenders who were referred to community treatment programs.
Another operational element ofthe project was to employ three Senior Human Service Providers that assessed the treatment services, assisted parole officers in deciding how to respond to parolee drug use, and assisted parolees in the transition process from prison based to community-based treatment programs.
41

Regarding the cognitive skills program (final operational element of this project), research on offenders and their propensity for repeated criminal acts has produced impressive results.
Monitored aftercare, structured drug testing and ongoing parole supervision provide assurances that offenders who complete in-prison drug treatment have the best chance of becoming successfully reintegrated into their communities.
Results ofthis project during this funding cycle included:
o Staffdeveloped a drug testing policy for parolees, and commenced testing.
o Parole officers, assisted by grant funded program assistants, conducted 30,398 test
occurrences, including 63,292 drug tests resulting in 8,741 (13.8%) positive drug tests.
Among other positive sanctions resulting from the drug testing of parolees, a number of inmates were .determined to need intensive prison-based substance abuse treatment at either the Homerville State Prison or the Whitworth Detention Center. As a result of this project:
>- 155 parolees were admitted to intensive, prison based SA treatment programs,
-105 ofthose parolees successfully completed prison based treatment program. -14 parolees withdrew from the program for various reasons, of those, only 3
withdrawals were disciplinary or based on drug use. -36 parolees remain actively involved in the program, currently. -262 urinalyses were performed during the program, with only 6 positives.
25 parole officers were trained to provide cognitive skills coaching for parolees, and to identifY parolees needing cognitive skills training. The number needing these classes surpassed the availability of staff to conduct classes, so each district parole office selected a pilot group of 20-30 of the most problematic parolees under their supervision to attend the initial classes. A total of 149 parolees are currently enrolled in the cognitive skills training in 16 district parole offices.
A very critical function of the three grant funded program assistants is to monitor the delivery of aftercare pursuant to a $1 million contract the State Board ofPardons and Paroles established with the local service providers established through the Federal HHS block grant funding for SA treatment. These staff completed programmatic audits of the 29 contract aftercare providers in 51 parole offices statewide, then consulted with involved parole chiefs and program managers to address communications and case management issues. In one area, the program assistant assisted in conducting substance abuse evaluations of inmates where the contract provider was falling behind due to the number of referrals received. Those contract treatment providers audited reported:
42

>- 1,773 Parolees referred for substance abuse evaluation. >- 1,088 SA evaluations completed. >- 841 Parolees diagnosed as needing SA treatment.
Grant funding provided research and evaluation technical assistance to the State Board of Pardons and Paroles through the Morehouse Research Institute (MRI). 1bis assistance is ongoing, and will develop more fully as the program expands to additional parole districts.
Section 6.2: Juvenile Offender Treatment
The correlation between youth substance abuse and juvenile delinquency has been well documented. "The more serious the youth's involvement in drug use, the more serious is his or her involvement in delinquency, and vice versa. This correlation is observed across age, gender, and ethnic groupS."7
In Georgia, 70,000 to 80,000 youths admit to using alcohol or drugs at least three (3) times a week. In the past two (2) years, drug and alcohol offenses committed by youth rose over 200 percent. The most frequently occurring substance use disorder was marijuana dependence and the second most common diagnosis was alcohol dependence.
The Department ofChildren and Youth Services (DCYS)8 is responsible for addressing the needs of juvenile offenders with alcohol and other drug (AOD) problems. When youth are committed to DCYS with AOD problems, they interact with several Divisions within DCYS. The Division of Detention Services houses AOD youth in Regional Youth Detention Centers (RYDC) while awaiting placement at the Youth Development Campuses (Division of Campus Operations) where AOD treatment programs are being implemented. A Court Service Worker ofthe Community Programs Division manages these youth cases upon release. The Office of Programs Development and Evaluation cover all divisional lines to address programmatic issues ofthe department such as health, education, quality assurance, and prevention programs.
In an effort to help the State address the dramatic increase in drug and alcohol offenses for juvenile offenders, the Council allocated funds for one State-implemented project enabling DCYS to expand their service capacity to reach youth awaiting AOD services.
The goals ofthis project (Drug Abuse Rehabilitation (DAR) Program) are to reduce AOD abuse and the number ofrepeated offenses including drug and violent crime among substance abusing juvenile offenders. The long range goal ofthis project was to reduce recidivism in this higher risk population.
7Research Summary, Office ofJuvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office ofJustice Programs, Department ofJustice, 1994.
8Effective July 1, 1997, the Department of Children and Youth Services changed its name to the Department of Juvenile Justice.
43

The specific approaches in pursuit of attaining these goals were as follows:

1. The provision ofdaily drug treatment services to a minimum of 40 youth, residing in an ADD cottage, at a selected YDC.

2. Establish an ADD treatment cottage at a selected facility serving a minimum of 24 youth.

3. Continuation of assisting youth in redirecting their lives through exposure to a variety of therapeutic activities such as life skills building and conflict resolution.

4. Replicate DAR at two YDC facilities (one male and one female) prepared to receive the model.

Drug Abuse Rehabilitation is an institutional ADD abuse treatment program designed for juvenile offenders with ADD abuse problems. The model is based on the cognitive behavioral approach in which offenders are exposed to intensive therapeutic activities and are required to work on individualized goals and objectives.

The DAR program is designed to follow youth for a one year period after leaving the institution. On the DAR continuum of care, youth are provided comprehensive treatment that is individualized. Treatment begins from the time the youth enters the RYDC (initial intake assessment of ADD use) until he/she reaches the YDC. At the YDC leve~ youth are exposed to a highly structured
environment (the DAR program) that is goal oriented. While participating in this program, youth are
prepared for Aftercare by receiving individualized treatment. During Aftercare, youth are guided
through a process oflearning how to survive outside without the use ofdrugs.

In order to monitor and evaluate the progress of this project, the subgrantee was required to submit
quarterly updates. After reviewing these quarterly updates, the Council noted the following accomplishments:

*

Dfthe 42 youths admitted to the program during the 1996 grant cycle, 38 (90%)

successfully completed Aftercare. Data reflects that 10 percent of those who

completed treatment, but did not complete Aftercare, recidivated within an average

of five to six months during the Aftercare period (1 year). Also, these youth

attributed their relapse to the re-occurrence of criminal involvement. However, none

of the recidivates reported regression of alcohol and other drug abuse.

Data from the Aftercare reports, indicate that approximately 45 percent of the youths successfully completing the Aftercare component were employed full-time and approximately 30 percent were employed in part-time jobs while enrolled in public schools.

44

A review of responses supported by case records, interviews with students and staff, pre/post tests and observations, indicate that:
* 100 percent ofthe residents interviewed feel that what they have learned, as a result of their exposure to the DAR, will keep them from returning to alcohol and other drug abuse.
* Some changes have occurred with respect to participants' attitudes and behaviors about alcohol and other drug abuse.
Based upon the conclusion ofthis project, the Department was able to determine the foundation for establishing an effective alcohol and drug abuse residential treatment program. Much of what was learned about the DAR model can be transferred to other Departmental alcohol and drug abuse treatment programs.
Section 6.3: Adolescent Substance Abuse Program
Drugs and alcohol are a part of the everyday life of youth, creating problems for them at home, at schooL and in the community. The use ofdrugs is now occurring in elementary schools and increases in middle and high schools, particularly in response to peer pressure.
The future implications of youth experimenting with and using drugs are staggering. The problem of adolescent substance abuse is well documented and publicized, however, it often goes unrecognized by professionals who look beyond the initial problems brought to their attention. Ifthe drug problem is not recognized and treated in the juvenile offender, the pattern of abuse becomes habitual, and leads to more severe problems, including the potential for lifelong abuse or addiction.
In 1996, three local program were provided Federal funds for adolescent substance abuse treatment. Results varied among jurisdictions, but all produced favorable outcomes.
Approximately 4,215 juveniles were referred to the three courts. Ofthose, 519 were determined to be substance abuse related, and of those, 493 were referred to the adolescent substance abuse treatment program (ASAP).
In the Walton County program during 1996, of the 114 juveniles referred to ASAP, 96 completed the program for an 84 percent completion rate. Ofthose completing the program only three (3) have reoffended in the current year.
In the Bartow County program, approximately 900 juveniles have been referred to the program since its inception, and ofthose, 70 percent have had no additional complaints filed with the courts during that three year period. On the average, 75 families receive counseling or education to assist with adolescent substance abuse from this program each month, and it is the only program available in Bartow County.
45

In Douglas County during 1996, 108 out of 504 cases brought before the court involved substance abuse. Of those cases, 79 were screened for the ASAP program and 66 were accepted.
Section 6.4: Alternative to Incarceration for Female Offenders
This program is a collaborative effort by several organizations to provide a meaningful program for female offenders with children who are sentenced to a treatment program The program funding provides the court, through an intermediary to the treatment program, with updates on each offender and their progress and whether or not they are maintaining the conditions of their sentence. The goal ofthe project is to end the female offender's physical dependence, while allowing her to care for her children and maintain a normal home life and to reduce recidivism rates of female offenders overall. The project has established several objectives to accomplish this goal. These include:
o To end the female offender's physical dependence; o To provide the female offender with life skills and training; o To provide services to the offender which allow the completion of the alternative
sentence program.
The activities to accomplish these objectives focus on problems with traditional treatment programs such as lack ofchild care, transportation, and an aftercare component that provides skills training for future employment. The grant program funding provides transportation, child care services, and skills training to facilitate compliance with the treatment program offered by the contractor. The contractor, known as Mothers Making a Change, is unique in its approach as it focuses on helping pregnant women who are attempting to break the drug habit so they will not have a negative effect on their unborn child. During the first year of project implementation, the 1996 grant year, the program has had 59 out of61 births through their program be born drug-free. The evaluation efforts ofthe program are not available yet as the program was not staffed until November of 1996.
SECTION 7: VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS--PURPOSE AREA #14
Victim Assistance Programs have seen a dramatic increase in public awareness over the past two years since the Crime Victims' Bill ofRights was enacted into Georgia State law. In conjunction with this new awareness there has been an increase in funding from the Federal level through the Victims ofCrime Act (VOCA) Victim Assistance Grant Program, the STOP Violence Against Women Grant Program, and the COPS Domestic Violence Grant Program. These Grant Programs have greatly increased the level of resources available to victim service providers throughout the State and the Nation. The Council, as administering agency in the State for two ofthe aforementioned programs, works to coordinate the efforts ofall ofthese funding sources to provide the maximum benefit to the citizens of Georgia.
There were three projects funded under this purpose area during the 1996 grant cycle which utilized a total of$328,596.85 in Federal funds awarded. Two ofthe three projects funded in this area were
46

implemented by law enforcement agencies and provided model examples for other agencies to duplicate throughout the State with the assistance of either a Federal grant and/or local support. Please refer to Attachment 1 under Appendix E for selected letters of appreciation for technical assistance provided.
The Domestic Violence Crisis Response Team (CRT) in Albany, that was initiated in the 1995 grant cycle, had continued success in eliminating domestic violence homicides in their community by providing a specialized team ofofficers to respond to all domestic violence calls in the city. The goal ofthe program was to reduce the escalation ofdomestic violence incidents in the community, and to more specifically stop domestic violence homicides. The objectives ofthe project were to provide increased law enforcement and victim service support to the community by creating a specialized team oflaw enforcement officers specifically to address domestic violence calls. Law enforcement officers in the Police Department received and utilized revised forms for on-scene reporting of victims, witnesses, and family information. The CRT unit provided follow-up letters and service to families where domestic violence occurred utilizing this initial information. In addition the unit coordinates with local service agencies such as the Department ofFamily and Children Services and nonprofit groups such as Liberty House, a domestic violence shelter.
This project has experienced great successes in their community. There were no domestic violence homicides in 1996, where there had been at least two for six years straight, and an average of four deaths per year over the six year period from 1990-1995. This specialization and follow-up with victims and witnesses ofdomestic violence provided assistance in 685 cases through March of 1997, when the City picked up the costs of the project through local resources. The project demonstrated that collaboration with service agencies, local agencies such as the District Attorney, Department of Family and Children Services, and the School system is an effective way to decrease violence in the home. In addition to the success ofthe project locally, the Domestic Violence team has made several demonstrations and provided sample materials and protocols to many local law enforcement and victim service agencies throughout the State for implementation of additional domestic violence teams.
The City ofAtlanta started a model project in one ofits zones in 1995. The project was implemented in the 1996 grant year after considerable time and effort was spent developing the implementation of the project and choosing a subcontractor. The goal of the program was to reduce multiple calls to residences for domestic violence. The project differs from the previously mentioned CRT team in that it subcontracts out the responsibilities such as follow-up calls, counseling efforts and coordination to a local service agency. The objectives ofthe project are to respond to domestic violence situations with services such as crisis intervention, follow-up counseling, and follow-up contacts to each victim. The service agency responds to the domestic violence situations in the zone in two ways. First, by providing social workers to ride along with officers to address victim needs and provide crisis intervention, while taking information for follow-up contact. The second way the agency addresses the problem of domestic violence is follow-up letters from the information captured by the officer when a ride-along worker was not available. These activities, such as ride-alongs, follow-up contacts, referrals to service agencies, and counseling services act well to decrease repeated instances of
47

domestic violence in the same family unit. In addition it coordinates officers with counseling services for all domestic violence calls. At the conclusion of the project the City was proposing make the program effective in all its police zones.
The third project active in this area was the Baldwin County Victim Assistance Program which serves the Ocmulgee Judicial Circuit. The project addressed the needs oftertiary victims in the 1996 grant period by creating an awareness program in the circuit which will allow for the debriefing ofjuries and courtroom personnel in highly charged trials that involve a murder and a possible death sentence for convicted offenders. This area of the criminal justice system was identified in the Ocmulgee Judicial Circuit after 17 murder trials in the last five (5) years, and 28 murders within the circuit in the last year. This is extremely difficult on circuits with a small population base, thus, resulting in a limited number ofjurors to choose from Ocmulgee is Georgia's largest judicial circuit in land mass but ranks much lower in population by comparison.
WIthin the last year the project has developed a brochure for distribution to jurors and criminal justice personnel to make them aware of the problems associated with murder trials and the counseling services available for debriefing in the Victim Assistance Program which has licensed counselors with a specialization in assisting survivors ofhomicide. To further increase awareness of the problem the project hosted a symposium of national leaders in the area ofjury debriefing.
SECTION 8: PURPOSE AREA #15A
Section 8.1: Forensic Services Upgrade (1 project at $481,460.16)
The Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI), Division of Forensic Services (DOFS) provides comprehensive analytical services to any requesting law enforcement agency free of charge. Annually, over 80,000 service requests are received. DOFS analyzes all human biological samples collected in cases such as Dill alcohoL drugs, and medical examiner autopsies obtained by state and local officials in Georgia, in addition to providing a drug-testing service necessary to support enforcement ofthe controlled substance laws in Georgia. Continued growth in the caseload has slowed the turn-around time on the laboratory tests beyond the lab's goal of30 days.
The goals and objectives of this project for the 1996 funding cycle included:
o Continued enhancement ofthe GBI-DOFS Toxicology Service through continuance
ofthe Gwinnett County site, and implementation of one additional site using the new concept for urine drug testing.
o Enhancing staffin the evidence receiving/documentation function at the Toxicology
and SerologylDNA lab sections.
48

o Using a hired consultant to develop a plan to reengineer the lab to address the
turnaround time ofthe three areas [i.e., drug testing, toxicology, and serology/DNA] which comprise 80 percent ofthe lab's services.
Major accomplishments within the 1996 funding cycle included the following:
o ADx drug testing equipment was purchased and installed in an additional pilot drug
testing site at the Decatur, Georgia, Municipal Police Department. Originally this equipment was to be installed and operated at a another site, but that site could not sustain the operation due to insufficient local resources.
o The existing pilot site, established at Gwinnett County, continues to increase case
load. Operations were at a low level during the first quarter of this grant year, but increased as surrounding local law enforcement agencies became accustomed to using the new site. Plans were made to train additional officers from another local agency to expedite testing, and to offset a decrease of available staff within the host agency.
o Additional grant funded equipment and personnel enhanced the Branch Laboratory
Toxicology programs and the overall operations ofthe toxicology section by reducing the number of overdue cases in the lab (cases over 30 days old). A statistical review of toxicology operations for the first six months, indicated a 90 percent reduction in overdue lab cases resulting from personnel and enhancements funded through this grant.
o DOFS completed its reengineering project in the third quarter of the grant year. The
project resulted in some concrete recommendations which, after implementation, will provide significant improvement in both scientist productivity as well as case turnaround time. This reengineering provided the mandatory plans which were then translated into a specific funding request which will be presented to the next session of the Georgia Legislature to facilitate these long term goals.
Section 8.2: Sexually Violent Offender Registry (3 projects at $452,587)
The Georgia Crime Information Center (acIC) successfully implemented a Sexually Violent Offender Registry containing over 600 offenders. This registry is kept updated by local sheriffs who are respoIlSlble for registering and reporting the changes in address of offenders in their jurisdiction. The registry was initially established through Byrne funding, but funding has subsequently been provided by the General Assembly to maintain it in future years.
The Department of Human Resources (DHR) is responsible for the review of all offenders through the establishment of its review board which administers tests and other measures to determine offenders who meet the definition of the law and should be included in the registry. Byrne dollars also funded the establishment ofthis board, however the General Assembly has subsequently provided
49

funds for its continued operation.
The Georgia Sheriffs' Association and the Sheriffs of Georgia are the third group which has made the registry a reality in a short period of time. The Sheriffs' Association, in conjunction with each County Sheriff, has worked to provide an automated registration process for the twenty-eight Georgia Sheriffs who did not have this capability. At the end of 1996 funding cycle, 18 of the Sheriffs had implemented an automated reporting system in their jail facility. The Sheriffs' Association will attempt to automate the remaining jurisdictions utilizing 1995 Byrne funds which were recently extended for this purpose.
GCIC Terminal Project
The Georgia Sheriffs' Association (GSA) was awarded a GCIC Terminal grant by the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council (CJCC) after GSA informed the Council that of 159 counties in Georgia, only 121 had GCIC terminals available in the Sheriff's Office. The Sheriff's Office includes the primary jail and booking facility in each county, since by virtue of the Office held, Georgia law requires that the Sheriff serve as the County Jailer.
The lack of the GCIC terminal places 38 of the primary law enforcement and detention facilities, primarily in rural jurisdictions, in jeopardy in any of several ways, all of which involve the lack of timely communication regarding criminal activity, criminal records, and criminal apprehensions.
1. Inability to timely receive national or statewide lookouts for fugitives or stolen property broadcast over the National (NCIC) or Georgia Crime Information Center (GCIC) network.
2. Inability to timely enter wanted notices or warrants to the GCIC and NCIC systems, or to enter inquiries for suspected wanted persons or wanted vehicles as offenders are arrested and booked into the County Jail on other charges.
3. Inability to provide timely report of changes regarding offenders required to register under Georgia's Sexual Violent Offender Registry, by which Sheriffs confirm information including offender residence, changes of address, employment status, and other pertinent data.
4. Inability to inquire for wanted persons or stolen vehicle information when deputies stop an offender on the road.
Without a GCIC terminal, functions one through three are accomplished by dispatching a deputy to the nearest available county which has a operational terminal; item number four is accomplished by telephoning the State Patrol or an adjacent county for assistance with the wanted inquiry, a time lag which greatly increases danger for the officer involved confronting the suspected wanted person(s) or vehicles, typically in a rural area.
Goals:
50

The primary goal of this project was to provide on-site GCIC terminal availability in at least 90 percent ofthe Georgia Sheriffs Offices within one year. A secondary goal was to provide terminal availability to 100 percent of the Sheriffs within two years.
Accomplishments:
The GSA has provided the liaison and used this grant funding to provide terminals to 27 of the Sherifl"s Offices formerly devoid of the technology, thus 148 of 159 Sheriffs (93%) statewide now have the GCIC computer capability. GSA continues efforts to resolve problems prohibiting terminal installation with the remaining 11 Sheriffs.
It should be noted that all of the above agencies have worked to implement the registry in a short period oftime and because of their efforts Georgia was recently commended by the U.S. Attorney General for being one of the first States to comply with the Federal Statute. Please refer to Attachment 1 under Appendix Ffor a copy of this letter.
SECTION 9: PURPOSE AREA #15B
Section 9.1: Statewide Narcotics Information and Intelligence Exchange (1 project at $105,620.04)
The Georgia Bureau ofInvestigation's Intelligence Unit operates the Statewide Narcotics Information and Intelligence Exchange (SNIIE).
This projects provides the mechanism for exchange of confidential information regarding individuals and organizations which have been identified as, or which have the potential to be, major drug violators. The goal of the exchange is to provide participating members this information by access to a consolidated database in order to identify and target major violators statewide.
Major drug traffickers utilize not only the metropolitan Atlanta area, but also a number of areas within Georgia as a transshipment point for contraband. Where major drug traffickers or major shipments of illegal drugs are involved, time is a crucial element in the sharing of information necessary for law enforcement agencies to collaborate in the interdiction effort. The SNUE program greatly assists in achieving that goal.
Programmatic changes in the procedure for submissions to the database during 1996 included the elimination of submissions on persons or organizations involved in local and/or lower level narcotics which were not multijurisdictional in scope. This change lowered the overall number of submissions, but still resulted in a substantial number of submissions regarding middle- to high-level drug violator submissions. In the 1996 DCSI funding cycle, 6,270 submissions to the program were made by Byrne funded agencies.
51

Absent this program there would be no mechanism for the exchange of intelligence information on narcotics trafficking through a consolidated database.
Section 9.2: Criminal Justice Records Improvement (CJRI)---3 Projects at $938,949.05
In 1996 the State of Georgia had its multi-year COO plan approved to assist with improving the accuracy and completeness of Georgia's Criminal Justice records. There were two primary agencies with various initiatives to accomplish the goal ofautomating Georgia's Criminal Justice records. The 96 funding cycle utilized 5 percent set-aside funds in conjunction with the National Criminal History Improvement Program (NClllP) to work towards this primary goal of automating Georgia's criminal records to a seamless system from arrest to correctional status of inmates.
The Georgia Crime Information Center (GCIC) is charged with the responsibility of entering data collected from various criminal justice agencies into its database, while providing technical assistance to different agencies as they automate their own local record and submission system. There has been significant activity in this area for GCIC in the last year. Specifically the Center has:
Eliminated a 300,000 backlog ofunprocessed criminal fingerprint cards that represent one year's criminal arrests.
Audited 179 local sites including law enforcement and judicial agencies to ensure that all qualified arrestees are fingerprinted, records submitted to GCIC, and correct rules followed for access and dissemination of criminal history data.
Upgraded the Georgia AFIS to accept local fingerprints from remote live scan devices from local jail booking agencies with this automated capability.
Reduced a backlog of270,000 disposition reports through an outsourcing contract.
Increased local agencies dispositions through audit efforts, specifically 15,298 delinquent dispositions were collected and processed in comparison to 3,985 the preVIOUS year.
In conjunction with GCIC, the Georgia Courts Automation Commission (GCAC) has led the continuing effort to automate the submission ofdispositions electronically in both the Superior Courts and District Attorney's Offices. The goal of GCAC is to automate the court systems of the State of Georgia. The objectives are to initiate a compatible electronic reporting system in each Court agency that is capable of electronic reporting to GCIC, while providing access to current criminal justice information to key officials such as prosecutors, judges, and law enforcement. The agency has accomplished the following within the last year:
38 counties in Georgia now have the automated court disposition capability.
52

Two judicial circuits are implementing an automated case management system which is capable of electronically submitting changes to arrest disposition data which will decrease the percentage of arrests dispositions that are not matched to final dispositions due to dropped charges and pleas.
The start of an automation project to completely automate one county from the
arresting agency to the prosecutor to the final dispositional reporting to GCIC from the Superior Court clerk.
The progress, ofthe above mentioned agencies, is more fully described in Georgia's COO Plan Status report (submitted May 20, 1997) which was recently approved for the continuation of all of the above mentioned initiatives into the 1997 funding cycle.
Section 9.3: Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS)---l project at $53,477.25
One cooperative grant was given to a rural region of southwest Georgia in the Criminal Justice Records Improvement area. This grant serves to coordinate several local law enforcement agencies through the use of a remote AFIS at the lead agency's, Dougherty County Sheriff's Office, headquarters in Albany.
Program Goals and Objectives:
To provide the regional capability to identify individuals associated with criminal offenses through live-scan electronic fingerprint imaging and an automated fingerprint identification system (AFIS) to law enforcement agencies in southwest Georgia.
Program Description:
The project involved coordinated use ofFederal, State, and local funds. Equipment was funded by a grant from the Governor, while maintenance and line fees were funded through the Byrne grant. A latent fingerprint examiner and one clerk are assigned to the project, funded locally.
The technology allows numerous State and Federal law enforcement agencies serving the predominately rural SW Georgia region to have latent fingerprints recorded at the scene of a crime entered at the AFIS remote site in Dougherty County, and compared electronically to the existing State Fingerprint File Database maintained at the Georgia Crime Information Center (GCIC) in Atlanta.
While the host agency, Dougherty County Sheriff's Office is located in a 90 percent urban county, the 21 counties in the Southwest Georgia region which regularly utilize the AFIS services range from 44 to 100 percent rural, and the population thereof includes some of the lowest average per capita incomes among all counties in Georgia.
53

In addition, the AFIS services are utilized by the Federal Bureau ofInvestigation, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, U.S. Postal Service, United States Secret Service, and the Military Investigative Units operating at the Marine Corp Logistics Base in Albany.
Costs
The host agency received a grant from the Governor's Office to fund the system, which currently is estimated to range from $100,000 to $112,000 to purchase and install. Annual maintenance and operating costs of$16,000 were paid from the Byrne Grant. The host agency, Dougherty County Sheriff's Office, is providing personnel from their budget to operate the system, and will assume total cost of maintenance, etc., in 1998.
Evaluation
Since inception in August 1995, a total of404 ''hits'' (criminal identifications) have resulted from this system.
For Example:
In June of 1996, a rash ofbank robberies, in the SW Ga. counties of Thomas, Dougherty, and Crisp, using suspected explosive devices and demand notes were solved by chemically processing a demand note used in a Thomas County robbery, yielding latent fingerprints which were searched through the database, resulting in identification and arrest of two individuals, and clearance of three bank robberies.
Other Benefits
The success of the AFIS has caused several rural agencies to reevaluate their crime scene investigations and implement new methods oftraining and criminal case preparation, particularly more detailed crime scene processing by their investigators.
A peripheral benefit of sharing the use ofthis technology has been an enhancement of the cooperative spirit among the rural agencies involved, despite the traditional jurisdictional boundaries, and the sense ofisolation which sometimes occurs in less populated and rural jurisdictions.

SECTION 10:

PURPOSE AREA #16

Section 10.1: Excess Property Program (1 project at $197,600)

1bis program is a cooperative effort between law enforcement and the administering agency, the Georgia Emergency Management Agency (GEMA). The project provides property not normally affordable, to law enforcement agencies for drug enforcement operations. The program is a subset

54

of a larger initiative by the Department of Defense which provides equipment to State designated agencies for distribution to qualifying local agencies.

The project has changed substantially in the last year. It is no longer permissible to provide equipment to correctional facilities due to a U.S. legislative change in the program directives at the Department of Defense that became effective in the last part ofthis past fiscal year. However, the directives expanded its scope in the law enforcement arena, and now allow equipment to be distributed for any law enforcement purpose, and not strictly drug enforcement.

The Excess Property Program's major tasks which require the utilization of funds are:

1. Identifying the need oflo cal agencies; 2. Acquiring the property from the Department of Defense; 3. Transporting the equipment to a central storage and distribution facility; 4. Controlling the property through inventory and safeguard procedures; and, 5. Distributing the property to authorized recipients.

The project reaches local and State agencies in almost every area ofthe State of Georgia. In a recent demonstration ofthe refurbished equipment which was obtained through Excess Property there were exhibits from County Sheriffs' Offices in the North Georgia Mountains all the way down to Thomas County which borders the Florida State line. These exhibits demonstrated the great success and scope ofthe equipment obtained from the program as there were K-9 Vehicles from rural counties in Georgia to helicopters from urban cities such as Atlanta. In addition to these local uses, the Georgia State Patrol demonstrated in video format how a helicopter, obtained from Excess Property, could be utilized with a Forward Looking Infra Red (FLIR) to locate marijuana grown indoors,
missing persons (such as Alzheimer patients and children), and fugitives on the run.

The automation ofthe project has expanded from last year to where all equipment is bar coded for inventory and distribution based on a coding system derived from the Department of Defense. This automation allows the project staff to inventory equipment at any agency in the state for required verification checks for the usage of the equipment.

In other respects the project has maintained its support from the Department of Corrections for the retrieval and inventorying of equipment. Correction officers work in the project to assist GEMA assigned staff. In addition Corrections provides inmate labor to sort and inventory supplies that are obtained.

Overall the program has accomplished the following in the 96 grant year:

. Acquired $13,245,856 in equipment during 177 trips to bases.



Fulfilled 542 of670 (80%) requests for items.



Distributed $13,638,432 in equipment and related items.

55

These statistics are more fully described in Attachment 1 under Appendix G which details each quarters' activity over the past year, including a breakdpwn ofthe different law enforcement agencies served in the State.
The evaluation of the project is evident in most every Sheriff's Office and Police Department in the State who speak ofhow their equipment needs, and law enforcement capabilities, would go unmet ifnot for the operation of the Excess Property Program.
Section 10.2: Gemini Project---Prosecution (1 project at $28,333.09)
The primary purpose of the Gemini Project is to improve the quality of the investigation and prosecution of homicide and street level drug crime. The main objectives of this program are to terminate drug cases as quickly as possible with the appropriate negotiation of guilty pleas so that a local district attorney can focus an even greater intensity on the balance of felony cases deemed inappropriate for plea bargaining.
The project has the following objectives and accompanying activities:
1. Increase communication between the District Attorney and the wide array of law enforcement agencies.
2. Improve the quality of prosecution at the initial arraignment of defendants, the preliminary hearing leve~ and in trial courts.
3. Increase contact with the civilian victims and witnesses of crime before their first court appearance.
4. Expedite the processing of all felony warrants through the criminal justice system 5. Increased in-service training for police. 6. Increased intense prosecutor assisted case investigation. 7. Allow for ongoing case evaluation. 8. Development of protocols for the optimum handling of homicide and drug crime.
Evaluation efforts for this project are limited in 1996 due to staffing lapses during this particular funding cycle. However, the protocol developed formed cooperative arrangements with law enforcement which netted the following narrative results:
The District Attorney's Office now consults with police homicide investigators and their supervisors immediately after the discovery of each killing.
Ongoing, virtually daily, briefings have been conducted by police agencies, particularly the Savannah Police Department, with Assistant District Attorneys (ADA) and Investigators until a suspect has been arrested in each case.
Prosecutors have assisted police with charging decisions, the drafting of search warrants, the issuance ofdocumentary subpoenas for records such as medical records
56

and phone logs and the often critical timing decisions on when these various actions should be taken.



The DA's Gemini (Homicide) Investigator has assisted the police whenever requested

and has also gathered evidence independently which has been immediately shared with

the police.



The ADA initially assigned to each homicide has issued a series of "investigative

requests" to the Gemini investigator. Such requests typically include a request to

gather: 911 calls and transcripts; police computer information about suspects and

incident locations; death certificates and autopsy report data; crime lab data, and

booking and jail information on arrestees.



The District Attorney, through his Victim-Witness Office, has continued to make

immediate contact with families of homicide victims both to provide comfort and to

obtain information on a case.



Preliminary discussions have begun between the Savannah PD, the agency which

investigates more than 80 percent of the homicides in Chatham County, and the

District Attorney to integrate the Gemini investigator into on-scene investigation of

cases.

SECTION 11:

PURPOSE AREA #20---CONDmONAL DISCHARGE PROGRAM AND DRUG COURT (2 Projects at $88,249.72)

These projects allow offenders who qualify (62% of these were first time offenders in the Drug Court's six month analysis) to participate in a drug education rehabilitation program. Offenders are given waivers or reductions in their sentences ifthey retain a drug free lifestyle. Weekly counseling sessions are held and offenders are required to attend. Random drug testing of participants also enables program staffto keep many offenders drug free. The Drug Court project reported they had a 68 percent rate of no recidivism for the first group of38 graduates ofthe program that started in late 1994.

Goals and objectives of the projects include:

1. Creating an effective bridge between the criminal justice system and the treatment
community. 2. Interrupting the cycle of continuous arrests for those with a substance abuse problem. 3. Providing assessment, referral, treatment, and education for substance abusers
enrolled in the program. 4. Encouraging participants enrolled in the program to maintain a substance-free lifestyle
and to modify their behavior through monitoring and drug screening. 5. Reporting progress, success, and failures of participants enrolled in the program to

57

judicial authorities on a timely basis. 6. Reducing substance abuse recidivism rates.

In the 1996 funding cycle the following was accomplished for the two programs combined:



Over 1,100 offenders (over 900 from conditional discharge) participated.



Over 20,000 drug screens were conducted.



110 successful completions of the conditional discharge program.



18 of 161 initial participants graduated the drug court program in November of96.

It should also be noted that the National Treatment Accountability for Safer Communities (TASC) evaluated the Bibb County Drug Court Program in Macon at the lead Judge's request. This work was done under a BJA cooperative agreement and the results were released to the Council for review. It was labeled Technical Assistance Number 96TASC-02. The overall summary of the evaluation was favorable and stated "the consultants observed an excellent drug court that holds much promise for the future".

SECTION 12:

nUl TASK FORCE---PURPOSE AREA #22

During the 1996 grant period, the Council allocated $709,870.66 to implement one project under this purpose area.

The primary goal of this project was to increase the apprehension of motorists driving under the influence (Dill) of alcoho1. A blood alcohol content (BAC) level of 0.1 0 will cause a driver to be charged with Dill. If there is a second Dill conviction within five years of the first conviction, a three year suspension period applies. A third conviction within a five year period constitutes revocation ofthe violator's driver's license and also makes himlher a habitual violator. The project chose to focus its efforts on the metropolitan area because ofthe following reasons:

1. The high volume oftraffic in the metropolitan area at all times of the day;

2. The extremely high number of accidents, injuries, and fatalities related to Dills which occur in the metro area;

3. The high percentage of arrests and alcohol and drug related deaths occurring in the metropolitan area as compared to other parts ofthe State; and,

4. The population increases in surrounding metropolitan counties.

To increase the apprehension of motorists driving under the influence of alcohol, the project sought to fulfill the following objectives:

58

o

Increase the number of Dill arrests through concentration on evening and night

patrols;

o

Increase the number of traffic citations issued for other and, often Dill-related

violations including speeding, lack ofproper use of occupant restraint devices, etc. 9;

o Reduce the number of accidents, injuries, and fatalities associated with Dills;

o Improve the level of safety for driving on Georgia's roads; and,

o Improve information-sharing channels with local law enforcement through joint
operations.

The Subgrantee, the Georgia Department of Public Safety, implemented this project through the Georgia State Patrol (GSP---a division within the Department). When establishing this task force, GSP leadership sought Troopers with Dill training as well as volunteers. The main tactic, to implement the project, utilized by the task force was patrol of metropolitan Atlanta roads during hours when most Dills occur (evenings and nights). To help ensure the successful implementation of this project, each patrol car was outfitted with a keyboard data terminal (KDT)---a mobile computer device capable of operating from a vehicle.

To evaluate this project, the Subgrantee submitted monthly reports providing the following performance indicators:

G) Number of patrols (a total of 1,440 patrols were conducted during the grant period).

(2) Number of Dills (a total of678 DUl arrests were made).

@ Number of"other" arrests made during patrols (a total of4,496 "other" arrests were made).

It:n Speeding citations (a total 2,491 speeding citations were issued).

@

Greater than 80 miles per hour.

(> Between 71-80 miles per hour.

@

Between 55-70 miles per hour.

@

Less than 55 miles per hour.

~any other problems, such as not wearing a seatbelt, speeding, and pedestrian safety, are related to Dill. Not wearing a seatbelt can cause serious injury or death even when a driver has not been drinking. Also, Georgia's seatbelt law is no longer a secondary law. This means that a driver can be given a ticket just for not wearing his/her seatbelt.
59

Seatbelt and child restraint citations (a total of 803 seatbelt and child restraint citations were issued).

@

Arrests.

(> Warnings

Total number of arrests (a total of5,174 arrests were made during the grant cycle).

@ Total number ofasset seizures and forfeitures ($45,397 in assets were seized during the grant term).

The subgrantee was required to submit monthly reports which have been summarized in a spreadsheet application and presented in Attachment 1 under Appendix H.

Some additional benefits from implementation of this project were as follows:

.. Enhanced coordination and cooperation between GSP and local law enforcement agencies as evidenced through periodic joint operations and assistance provided during the booking process and the provision ofjail space.

Coordination of activities between GSP and the Fulton County Police Department through sharing of the Police Department's radio frequency.

Coordination of activities between GSP and Federal (e.g., Drug Enforcement Administration) and State (e.g., Georgia Bureau of Investigation) law enforcement agencies when a traffic stop uncovers illegal drugs.

SECTION 13:

CORRECTIONAL RESOURCE UPGRADE - BYRNE FY 1996

Correctional resources at the State level in Georgia has been in a constant state of upgrade since the early 1990s, in an effort to keep pace with the rapid growth in the inmate population accompanying the increases in drug related and violent crime. Prior to this expansion of the prison system, the public had become disenchanted with the rapidity with which inmates were released from prison, a perception which too often reflected the realities of the system as the State waged a daily battle to control over-crowding in the prison system as the inmate population expanded in the late 1980s. A large part of that increase is believed to have resulted at least partly from the "crack" cocaine epidemic which began during that period.

Admissions to Georgia prisons reached a peak of20,510 inmates in State FY 1990 and have generally declined slightly since that time (17,508 admissions in State fiscal year 1996). However, during this same period, the legislature has enacted laws requiring that a greater percentage of sentences be served by violent offenders. The changes in law were accompanied by a Pardons and Paroles Board policy which grew far more conservative regarding the release of inmates convicted of violent crimes

60

or sex offenses.
The synergy ofthese two factors produced a rapidly expanding inmate population, with violent and sex offenders increasingly serving a greater percentage of their sentences in prison, which is reflected by an inmate population increase from 21 ,584 in State fiscal year 1990, to 34,713 at the end of State FY 1996 (June 30, 1996), a net 60.8 percentage increase of institutional inmates. In addition to the institutional case10ad, the Georgia Corrections system supervised 134,056 inmates on probation, while another 21,560 were under the supervision of the State Board ofPardons and Paroles during this same period.
The correctional upgrade is used as an aggregate match for projects at the State level in Georgia, not only to simplifY the administrative record keeping on State projects, but also to reflect the importance of corrections as a cornerstone of the criminal justice system.
Georgia enhanced the correctional resources in several ways during the Byrne FY 1996 Grant Program, in addition to the long term capital budget expansion. Some of the more innovative expansions included $650,000 budgeted to provide 600 additional electronic monitoring units to expand that program for the Board ofPardons and Paroles, and $1.8 million to provide start-up costs to operate an additional 192 beds in a fast track expansion of the Lee Correctional Institute.
In keeping with the goals ofinnovation in the Byrne Program, an innovative project was selected as the match for 1996. To keep pace with the rapid growth of inmates, Georgia expended $6,000,000 for the planning and design of three new prisons, which will be privately constructed, and operated. Ofthat amount, $2,000,000 was identified as match for the Byrne Program and was expended in the planning and design of a new prison in Charhon County Georgia, which will add 500 beds to the Georgia prison system.
Despite the recent six year trend ofprison admissions declining slightly, the inmate population will continue to increase as violent and sex offenders are required to serve greater percentages oftheir sentence. Georgia laws enacted in 1994 require that offenders convicted of certain specified violent crimes after January 1, 1995 must serve 100 percent of their sentences, with second offenders required to be sentenced to life in prison with no parole (the "two strikes" law.)
These enhanced sentencing laws and policies reflect the public's desire to have a safer society by keeping dangerous offenders in prison the maximum time permissible. The long term effects ofthese changes will require that Georgia closely monitor the prison system and will require continual allocation of resources to upgrade the vital correctional resources.
These changes pose some long term challenges for the prison system as the inmate population is comprised ofa greater portion ofviolent offenders serving more oftheir sentences, in many cases life sentences with no chance for parole, in institutional custody. As this violent population ages, in addition to a greater percentage of higher security cells for the general population, there will be greater need for additional secure medical bed spaces. This changing prison population will also pose
61

some interesting challenges for correctional staff as they manage this more violent prone population. 62

F. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A PURPOSE AREA #1

ATTACHMENT 1 1996 DARE PROJECTS MAP 1996 SRO PROJECTS MAP

Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE)
Counties and/or Cities Implemented
!!:l DARE

School Resource Officer (SRO)
City Implemented
III Alma (Bacon County) III Adel (Cook County) 111 Newnan (Coweta)
oiii Norcross (Gwinnett) Hazlehurst (Jeff Davis)
m1l Millen (Jenkins County)
~ Conyers (Rockdale County) ~ Tifton (Tift County)
School Resource Officer (SRO)
County Implemented
I!Il Clinch lil Coweta
~ Forsyth
oIII Fran klin Turner

ATTACHMENT 2
EVALUATION COMPONENT FOR
ELEMENTARY DARE PROJECTS

EVALUATION COMPONENT FOR
D.A.R.E. PROJECTS TEACHING THE
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CURRICULUM

GOAL:

To prevent substance abuse among school children.

Objective #1:

To provide the skills for recognizing and resisting social pressures to experiment with tobacco, alcohol, and drugs.

Project Activities:

Present Lesson #4 making students aware of influential pressures to experiment with tobacco, alcohol, or drugs.

Present Lesson #5 teaching students resistance techniques to "just say no."

Present Lesson #9 making students aware of influential pressures from the media.

Present Lesson # 14 making students aware of influential pressures regarding gang involvement and the consequences affecting their decision(s).

Objective #2:

To help enhance self-esteem.

Project Activities:

Present Lesson #6 focusing on building students' self-esteem.

Present Lesson #7 educating students on assertiveness.

Present Lesson #17 in a culmination exercise involving students and school administrators, with students being awarded certificates of achievement.

Objective #3:

To teach positive alternatives to substance use.

Project Activities:

Present Lesson #8 educating students on methods ofmanaging stress without taking drugs.

Present Lesson # 11 discussing alternatives to drug abuse.

Present Lesson #12 introducing a high school student as a positive role model.

Objective #4:

To develop skills in risk assessment and decisionmaking.

1

Project Activities:

Present Lesson #1 reviewing common safety practices to protect students from any type of harm.

Present Lesson #2 educating students about the hannfu1 effects drugs have on the body.

Present Lesson #3 focusing on the consequences of using and not using alcohol and marijuana.

Present Lesson #10 making students cognizant of the difference between bad risks and responsible risks, and how to recognize their choices.

Objective #5:

To build interpersonal and communications skills.

Project Activities:

Present Lesson #13 forming a support system by developing positive relationships with many different people.

Present Lesson #15 allowing students to summarize and assess what they have learned.

Present Lesson #16 forming the student's "DARE Pledge" on how they can respond when they are pressured to use drugs and alcohol.

... The performance indicators listed below are to be considered applicable for each of the five objectives presented under this evaluation component.

Performance Indicators:

Number of students taught classified by:



School (Column 1 on the Culmination Activity Report);



Grade (Column 2 on the Culmination Activity Report); and,



Teacher (Column 3 on the Culmination Activity Report).



Number of students taught (Column 4 on the Culmination Activity Report)

versus the number of students graduated (Column 5 on the Culmination

Activity Report) at the end of the term.



Brief summarization prepared by the DARE Officer addressing the

evaluations and assessments completed by each student taught.

2

Brief narrative prepared by the DARE Officer describing any forms of informal interaction between the Officer and the students.



Brief narrative prepared by the DARE Officer describing any presentations

made to the community promoting or providing information about the

program.

Brief narrative prepared by the DARE Officer describing participation (Officer and student) in any enrichment or extracurricular activities.

Brief summarization, prepared by each teacher and/or faculty member involved with the DARE program for that particular term, addressing the impact and/or the effect the DARE curriculum has had on the students.

3

ATTACHMENT 3
EVALUATION COMPONENT FOR
JUNIOR HIGH/MIDDLE SCHOOL DARE PROJECTS

EVALUATION COMPONENT FOR
D.A.R.E. PROJECTS TEACHING THE
JUNIOR HIGH/MIDDLE SCHOOL CURRICULUM

GOAL:

To provide additional infonnation and reinforce previously learned skills enabling students to resist pressure and other influences when making personal choices.

Objective #1:

To help students manage their feelings of anger.

Objective #2:

To help students resolve conflicts without causing hann to themselves or others and without resorting to violence or the use of alcohol and drugs.

Project Activities:

Present Lesson #1 regarding mind-altering substances and their effects on the mind and body.

Present Lesson #2 discussing acceptable standards of conduct.

Present Lesson #3 addressing the effects of drug use on the individual and the community.

Present Lesson #4 making students aware of influential pressures and available resistance skills.

Present Lesson #5 identifying ways of forming positive relationships.

Present Lesson #6 exploring conflict resolution.

Present Lesson #7 discussing the effects of vandalism on the community.

Present Lesson #8 making students of aware of influential pressures regarding gang involvement and the consequences affecting their decision(s).

Present Lesson #9 summarizing and strengthening what has been previously learned under the DARE program.

Present Lesson # 10 helping students to respond appropriately under pressure situations.

Peiformance Indicators:

Number of students taught classified by:



School (Column 1 on the Culmination Activity Report);



Grade (Column 2 on the Culmination Activity Report); and,



Teacher (Column 3 on the Culmination Activity Report).

1



Number of students taught (Column 4 on the Culmination Activity Report)

versus the number of students graduated (Column 5 on the Culmination

Activity Report) at the end of the tenn.



Brief narrative prepared by the DARE Officer describing any fonns of

infonnal interaction between the Officer and the students.



Brief narrative prepared by the DARE Officer describing any presentations

made to the community promoting or providing infonnation about the

program.



Brief narrative prepared by the DARE Officer describing participation

(Officer and student) in any enrichment or extracurricular activities.



The DARE Officer should identify any additional perfonnance indicators

(e.g., tests, surveys, essays, etc.) utilized to measure the success of the

program. Also, the Officer should indicate the results of such perfonnance

indicators.

2

ATTACHMENT 4
EVALUATION COMPONENT FOR
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DARE PROJECTS

EVALUATION COMPONENT FOR
D.A.R.E. PROJECTS TEACHING THE
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL CURRICULUM

GOAL:

To reinforce and enhance previously learned material under one or more of the DARE program components---emphasizing the effects of drug abuse on the community and its youth.

Objective #1:

Provide students with information and skills enabling them to act in their own best interest when facing high-risk choices, and to recognize the possible influences that can affect those choices.

Objective #2:

Provide students with skills enabling them to recognize and deal with feelings of anger.

Project Activities:

Introduce the curriculum and pre-:test students to measure their knowledge and understanding of drug abuse.

Officer and teacher present Lesson #1 focusing on the consequences of drug abuse to the individual and the community.

Officer presents Lesson #2 teaching communication skills and ways to assert these skills in various situations.

Officer and teacher present Lesson #3 focusing on applicable laws, rights of an individual, and blood-alcohol levels.

Officer presents Lesson #4 discussing the effects of drug abuse and the media on violent behavior.

Officer and teacher present Lesson #5 identifying positive ways of expressing and managing anger without the use of drugs.

B' Students evaluate the program and a post-test is administered by the teacher.

Performance Indicators:

Number of students taught classified by:



School (Column 1 on the Culmination Activity Report);



Grade (Column 2 on the Culmination Activity Report); and,



Teacher (Column 3 on the Culmination Activity Report).



Number of students taught (Column 4 on the Culmination Activity Report)

versus the number of students graduated (Column 5 on the Culmination

I

Activity Report) at the end of the term.



Brief narrative prepared by the DARE Officer describing any forms of

informal interaction between the Officer and the students.



Briefnarrative prepared by the DARE Officer describing any presentations

made to the community promoting or providing information about the

program.



Brief narrative prepared by the DARE Officer describing participation

(Officer and student) in any enrichment or extracurricular activities.



Officer and teacher should collaborate to provide a briefnarrative describing

the students' progress from the introduction/pre-test phase to post-test phase.

Also, this narrative should summarize the students' evaluation of the

program.

2

ATTACHMENT 5
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING
DRUG ABUSE RESISTANCE EDUCATION
CULMINATION REPORT

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE
CULMINATION ACTIVITY REPORT FOR THE
DRUG ABUSE RESISTANCE EDUCATION
PROGRAM

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE CULMINATION ACTIVITY REPORT
Please note that ifthe DARE Officer is teaching the DARE curriculum to more than one school,
then all requested data should he compiled andpresented on one (1) Culmination Activity Report. However, each respective DARE component [i.e., elementary school curriculum, junior high/middle school curriculum, and the senior high school curriculum] should he reported on a separate Culmination Activity Report.

HEADINGS

Subgrantee: Local unit of government awarded the Subgrant. (See Subgrant Award Docwnent.)

Subgrant #: Number assigned to the Subgrant by CJCC. (See Subgrant Award Docwnent.)

Officer(s):

Name of each DARE Officer teaching a curriculwn under one of the respective DARE components.

Contact:

Name of person responsible for collecting and disseminating the data reported on the Culmination Activity Report.

Phone:

Telephone nwnber where the contact can be reached if questions arise concerning the data reported on the Culmination Activity Report.

BODY OF REPORT

School:

List the name of the school where the DARE curriculwn was taught.

Grade:

List the particular grade level the DARE curriculwn was taught.

Teacher:

Enter the teacher's name for the class of students the DARE curriculwn was presented to.

Number of Students Taught:

Enter the, nwnber of students the DARE curriculwn was presented to.

Number of Students Graduated:

Enter the nwnber of students that successfully completed the DARE curriculum--participating in some form of graduation exercise or similar.

I

Dates of Term:

Indicate the beginning date the curriculum was started as well as the ending date the curriculum was completed---resulting in some form ofgraduation exercise or similar. Please indicate the dates of term for each school listed on the Culmination Activity Report.

SIGNATURES
The Culmination Activity Report must be signed by bGth the Officer(s) and his/her immediate supervisor. These signatures will serve as certification that the data reflected on the Culmination Activity Report is a fair and accurate representation of the duties carried out by the Officer(s) during the time period being reported on.

2

ATTACHMENT 6
DRUG ABUSE RESISTANCE . EDUCATION
CULMINATION REPORT

Subgrantee: Contact/Phone:
SCHOOL

DRUG ABUSE RESISTANCE EDUCATION PROGRAM CULMINATION ACTIVITY REPORT
Subgrant #:
Ofjicer(s):

DCSI-

GRADE

TEACHER

NO. OF STUDENTS NO. OF STUDENTS DATES OF TERM

TAUGHT

GRADUATED

Column I

Column 2

Column 3

Column 4

Column 5

See attachedpagefor instructions to befollowed when completing this report.

OFFICER'S SIGNATURE IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATURE

SIGNATURES:

Column 6

SUBMISSION SCHEDULE FOR THE
CUL:MINATION ACTIVITY REPORT

Period Covered July 1996 thru December 1996 January 1997 thru May 1997

Deadline
Friday, February 28, 1997 *
Monday, June 30, 1997

* PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FIRST CULMINATION ACTIVITY REPORT IS NOT DUE
UNTIL THE END OF FEBRUARY. HOlVEVER, IF YOUR AGENCY HAS ALREADY SUBMITTED A QUARTERLY REPORT IN THE OLD FORi\1AT, IT IS REQUIRED THAT A NEW CULMINATION ACTIVITY REPORT BE SUBMITTED IN THE NEW FORMAT BY THE ABOVE DEADLINE.
FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE CULMINATION ACTIVITY REPORT(S) BY THE ABOVE DEADLINE(S) WILL RESULT IN THE WITHHOLDING OF FEDERAL FUNDS UNTIL COMPLIANCE IS ACHIEVED.

ATTACHMENT 7
1996 SUMMARY REPORT OF
DRUG ABUSE RESISTANCE EDUCATION
CULMINATION REPORTS

996 DCSI GRANT PROGRAM ;UMMARY REPORT ON CULMINATION ACTIVITY REPORTS JRUG ABUSE RESISTANCE EDUCATION PROJECTS

SUBGRANT NUMBER DCSI

SUBGRANTEE

96-30 & 95-30 CITY OF ALMA

TOTALS FOR ALMA

96-31

CITY OF AUSTELL

TOTALS FOR AUSTELL

96-32

BANKS CTY BRD OF COMM

TOTALS FOR BANKS COUNTY

96-33

BARTOW CTY COMM

SCHOOL(S)
BACON CO. ELEM. BACON CO. ELEM. BACON CO. ELEM. BACON CO. ELEM. BACON CO. ELEM. BACON CO. ELEM.
AUSTELL ELEM. AUSTELL ELEM. AUSTELL ELEM. AUSTELL ELEM. AUSTELL ELEM.
BANKS CO MIDDLE BANKS CO MIDDLE BANKS CO MIDDLE BANKS CO. ELEM BANKS CO. ELEM BANKS CO. ELEM BANKS CO. ELEM BANKS CO. ELEM
HAMILTON CROSSING HAMILTON CROSING HAMILTON CROSSING HAMILTON CROSSING ADAIRSVILLE ELEM ADAIRSVILLE ELEM ADAIRSVILLE ELEM ADAIRSVILLE ELEM WHITE ELEM WHITE ELEM WHITE ELEM WHITE ELEM EMERSON ELEM EMERSON ELEM EMERSON ELEM Mlrn'~",ROA~ -'-M

GRADE

TEACHER

5TH SEARS 5TH TAYLOR 5TH DEEN 5TH HART 5TH DUDLEY 5TH BENNETT

5TH MS. MULLET 5TH MR. PELLETIER 5TH MS. THOMPSON 5TH MS. JONES 5TH MS.ODOM

7TH MARTIN 7TH HOWARD 7TH ROGERS 5TH KIMBREY 5TH PEPPERS 5TH HOWARD 5TH HUNNICUTT 5TH HULSEY

5TH BRANTON 5TH C.SMITH 5TH FOUNTAIN 5TH T.SMITH 5TH WHITE 5TH PELFREY 5TH WARREN 5TH JOHNSON 5TH ALEXANDER 5TH PERRY 5TH COLLIER 5TH LUMPKIN 5TH SMITH 5TH THOMPS("" 5TH WADE 5"'" ''000/'

NUMBER OF STUDENTS
TAUGHT
25 26 25 25 25 24
150

NUMBER OF STUDENTS GRADUATED
25 26 25 23 25 23
147

DATES OF TERM
9/96 THRU 5/97 9/96 THRU 5/97 9/96 THRU 5/97 9/96 THRU 5/97 9/96 THRU 5/97 9/96 THRU 5/97

OFFICER
ROBERTS ROBERTS ROBERTS ROBERTS ROBERTS ROBERTS

25

21

1/6197 THRU 6/6/97

DAVID M. GLOVER

23

21

1/6/97 THRU 6/6/97

DAVID M. GLOVER

22

19

1/6/97 THRU 6/6/97

DAVID M. GLOVER

10

10

1/6/97 THRU 6/6/97

DAVID M. GLOVER

12

11

1/6/97 THRU 6/6/97

DAVID M. GLOVER

92

82

58

58

9/9/96 THRU 9/20/96

SAVAGE

60

60

9/23/96 THRU 10/4/96 SAVAGE

14

14

10/4/96 THRU 10/25/96 SAVAGE

27

27

1/96 THRU 5/97

SAVAGE

30

30

1/96 THRU 5/97

SAVAGE

26

26

1/96 THRU 5/97

SAVAGE

27

27

1/96 THRU 5/97

SAVAGE

30

30

1/96 THRU 5/97

SAVAGE

272

272

91

91

8/96 THRU 12/96

MORGAN

8/96 THRU 12/96

MORGAN

8/96 THRU 12/96

MORGAN

8/96 THRU 12/96

MORGAN

117

117

8/96 THRU 12/96

MORGAN

8/96 THRU 12/96

MORGAN

8/96 THRU 12/96

MORGAN

8/96 THRU 12/96

MORGAN

83

83

8/96 THRU 12/96

MORGAN

8/96 THRU 12/96

MORGAN

8/96 THRU 12/96

MORGAN

8/96 THRU 12/96

MORGAN

78

78

8/96 THRU 12/96

MORGAN

8/96 THRU 12/96

MORGAfII

--

8/96 THRU 12/96

MORGA

87

5r- 1/-- -. '~U

W---'\t-l

._-_ _... ..- ---------_..._.....

SUBGRANT

NUMBER

.---- DeSI- --

SUBGRANTEE

TOTALS FOR BARTOW COUNTY

--------------

SCHOOL(S)
KINGSTON ELEM PINE LOG ELEM PINE LOG ELEM TAYLORSVILLE ELEM TAYLORSVILLE ELEM TAYLORSVILLE ELEM TAYLORSVILLE ELEM

GRADE

TEACHER

5TH MCLEAN 5TH LONG 5TH BISHOP 5TH CREEL 5TH HANNAH 5TH CHESTER 5TH JONES

96-34

BLECKLEY CTY COMM

BLECKLEY CO ELEM BLECKLEY CO ELEM BLECKLEY CO ELEM BLECKLEY CO ELEM BLECKLEY CO ELEM BLECKLEY CO ELEM

TOTALS FOR BLECKLEY COUNTY

5TH ROGERS 5TH HOBES 5TH SAWYER 5TH LEE 5TH STEPHENS 5TH BELFLOWER

96-36

CHEROKEE CTY BRD OF COMM

SIXES ELEM SIXES ELEM SIXES ELEM SIXES ELEM CHAPMAN ELEM CHAPMAN ELEM CHAPMAN ELEM CHAPMAN ELEM CHAPMAN ELEM FREE HOME ELEM FREE HOME ELEM BALL GROUND ELEM BALL GROUND ELEM CLAYTON ELEM CLAYTON ELEM L1TILE RIVER L1TILE RIVER L1TILE RIVER L1TILE RIVER JOHNSTON ELEM JOHNSTON ELEM JOHNSTON ELEM JOHNSTON ELEM R.M. MOORE ELEM R.M. MOORE ELEM BASCOMB ELEM BASCOMB ELEM BASCOMB ELEM BASCOMB ELEM BASCOMB ELEM BASCOMB ELEM
Hlr'-''"'--'' Fl)l.~ -, -iV1

6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6T"

HARRIS KEITH TATE BOWES ROACH PATIERSON BARFIELD WEST CAGE GADDIS TIPPENS" NATION HULSEY WHITE CAGLE BELLAMY MITCHELL PELUSI BOLLING PARKER HATHCOCK TIERNAN CARROLL GREEN PARRISH BERKE DEVITI MELTON SMITH CROWE ZAVERTI
-1YAN~

NUMBER OF STUDENTS
TAUGHT
72 68
106

NUMBER OF STUDENTS GRADUATED
72 68
106

702

702

DATES OF TERM
1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97

- - - - - - - OFFICER - MORGAN MORGAN MORGAN MORGAN MORGAN MORGAN MORGAN

22

22

9/96 THRU 2/97

JONES

20

20

9/96 THRU 2/97

JONES

25

25

9/96 THRU 2/97

JONES

21

21

9/96 THRU 2/97

JONES

23

23

9/96 THRU 2/97

JONES

26

26

9/96 THRU 2/97

JONES

137

137

29

29

8/96 THRU 1/97

THOMPSON

30

30

8/96 THRU 1/97

THOMPSON

32

32

8/96 THRU 1/97

THOMPSON

30

30

8/96 THRU 1/97

THOMPSON

28

28

8/96 THRU 1/97

THOMPSON

32

32

8/96 THRU 1/97

THOMPSON

30

30

8/96 THRU 1/97

THOMPSON

28

28

8/96 THRU 1/97

THOMPSON

8

8

8/96 THRU 1/97

THOMPSON

24

24

8/96 THRU 1/97

THOMPSON

23

23

8/96 THRU 1/97

THOMPSON

20

20

8/96 THRU 1/97

THOMPSON

18

18

8/96 THRU 1/97

THOMPSON

24

24

8/96 THRU 1/97

COLLETI

24

24

8/96 THRU 1/97

COLLETI

29

29

8/96 THRU 1/97

COLLETI

28

28

8/96 THRU 1/97

COLLETI

28

28

8/96 THRU 1/97

COLLETI

29

29

8/96 THRU 1/97

COLLETI

23

23

8/96 THRU 1/97

COLLETI

23

23

8/96 THRU 1/97

COLLETI

24

24

8/96 THRU 1/97

COLLETI

24

24

8/96 THRU 1/97

COLLETI

25

25

8/96 THRU 1/97

COLLETI

25

25

8/96 THRU 1/97

COLLETI

27

27

1/97 THRU 6/97

THOMPSON

23

23

1/97 THRU 6/97

THOMPSON

25

25

1/97 THRU 6/97

THOMPSON

27

27

1/97 THRU 6/97

THOMPSON

26

26

1/97 THRU 6/97

THOMPS r

25

25

1/97 THRU 6/97

THOMP~

20

1:--~' '~U 6'--

r"-' )SOI~

------------------ -

SUBGRANT

NUMBER

DCSI

SUBGRANTEE

SCHOOL(S)

HICKORY FLAT ELEM HICKORY FLAT ElEM HICKORY FLAT ELEM CANTON ELEM CANTON ElEM CANTON ElEM BUFFINGTON ELEM BUFFINGTON ElEM BOSTON ELEM BOSTON ElEM BOSTON ELEM BOSTON ElEM BOSTON ELEM ARNOLD Mill ElEM ARNOLD Mill ELEM ARNOLD Mill ElEM ARNOLD Mill ELEM HOllY SPRINGS ElEM HOllY SPRINGS ELEM HOllY SPRINGS ELEM MACEDONIA ELEM MACEDONIA ElEM

TOTALS FOR CHEROKEE COUNTY

96-39

CITY OF CONYERS

MEMORIAL MIDDLE MEMORIAL MIDDLE MEMORIAL MIDDLE MEMORIAL MIDDLE MEMORIAL MIDDLE MEMORIAL MIDDLE MEMORIAL MIDDLE MEMORIAL MIDDLE EDWARDS MIDDLE EDWARDS MIDDLE EDWARDS MIDDLE EDWARDS MIDDLE EDWARDS MIDDLE EDWARDS MIDDLE CONYERS MIDDLE CONYERS MIDDLE CONYERS MIDDLE CONYERS MIDDLE CONYERS MIDDLE CONYERS MIDDLE CONYERS MIDDLE MEMORIAL MIDDLE MEMORIAL MIDDLE MEMORIAL MIDDLE MEMORIAL MIDDLE EDWARDS MIDDLE Er.'"'' "'')s M',~~"-

GRADE

TEACHER

6TH CARTER 6TH CHEEK 6TH HIGHSMITH 6TH KIMMER 6TH BUICE 6TH ROSS 6TH MCCLEllEN 6TH BROOKS 6TH ELLIOTT 6TH GAllOWAY 6TH HllSEN 6TH JONES 6TH KISH 6TH CASTEEL 6TH ELLIOTT 6TH LAMBERT 6TH MCCORMICK 6TH CANTREll 6TH GAY 6TH STANCil 6TH AUCHENPAUGH 6TH WALLACE

7TH COUCH

7TH DOLPHIN

7TH BURROUGHS

7TH WALDEN

7TH SLAUGHTER

7TH MORRIS

7TH DICKERSON

7TH MilLIGAN

7TH RODGERS

7TH YOUNG

7TH PETERS

7TH BURTON

7TH THOMAS

7TH LINDSEY

7TH UPCHURCH

7TH SPARKMAN

7TH QUARLES

7TH PHilLIPS

7TH MARION

7TH YODER

7TH MOORE

7TH EDWARDS

7TH HENLEY

7TH PEARCE

7TH MOUlDEP

7TH EGGEl~

7T "

~',ANNr'-

NUMBER OF STUDENTS
TAUGHT
25 22 24 24 24 24 19 19 26 27 28 28 28 30 30 30 30 28 27 30 18 18
1,370

NUMBER OF STUDENTS GRADUATED
25 22 24 24 24 24 19 19 26 27 28 28 28 30 30 30 30 28 27 30 18 18
1,370

DATES OF TERM
1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97

31

31

9/96 THRU 11/96

32

32

9/96 THRU 11/96

30

30

9/96 THRU 11/96

32

32

9/96THRU 11/96

30

30

11/96 THRU 1/97

29

29

11/96 THRU 1/97

29

29

11/96 THRU 1/97

28

28

11/96 THRU 1/97

26

26

9/96 THRU 11/96

27

27

9/96 THRU 11/96

28

28

9/96 THRU 11/96

28

28

11/96 THRU 1/97

27

27

11/96 THRU 1/97

28

28

11/96 THRU 1/97

27

27

9/96 THRU 11/96

26

26

9/96 THRU 11/96

27

27

9/96 THRU 11/96

27

27

9/96 THRU 11/96

27

27

11/96 THRU 1/97

25

25

11/96 THRU 1/97

26

26

11/96THRU 1/97

30

30

1/97 THRU 3/97

29

29

1/97 THRU 3/97

31

31

1/97 THRU 3/97

28

28

1/97 THRU 3/97

9

9

1/97 THRU 3/97

28

1,-

'~U 3i--

OFFICER
THOMPSON THOMPSON THOMPSON THOMPSON THOMPSON THOMPSON THOMPSON THOMPSON COllETT COllETT COllETT COllETT COllETT COllETT COllETT COllETT COllETT COllETT COllETT COllETT COllETT COllETT
BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES
f"~---':

SUBGRANT NUMBER DCSI-

SUBGRANTEE

TOTALS FOR CONYERS

96-40

CITY OF COVINGTON

TOTALS FOR COVINGTON

96-42

CRISP CTY BRD OF COMM

------

SCHOOL(S)
EDWARDS MIDDLE EDWARDS MIDDLE CONYERS MIDDLE CONYERS MIDDLE CONYERS MIDDLE

GRADE

TEACHER

7TH HINES 7TH DOEFFINGER 7TH KNOWLES 7TH BYLICK 7TH BROWN

FICQUETT ELEM FICQUETT ELEM FICQUETT ELEM FICQUETT ELEM FICQUETT ELEM MANSFIELD ELEM MANSFIELD ELEM PALMERSTONE PALMERSTONE PALMERSTONE PALMERSTONE PALMERSTONE HEARD-MIXON ELEM HEARD-MIXON ELEM HEARD-MIXON ELEM HEARD-MIXON ELEM EASTSIDE TRANS EASTSIDE TRANS COUSINS MIDDLE COUSINS MIDDLE CLEMENTS CLEMENTS CLEMENTS

5TH DODGE 5TH MCCORMICK 5TH BARBER 5TH WOODWARD 5TH THOMAS 5TH THOMASON 5TH GUNN 5TH WILLIAMS 5TH MILLER 5TH WILEY 5TH BRICKELL 5TH WILSON 5TH AIKEN 5TH HALL 5TH HAWKINS 5TH PURVIS 7TH DAVIS 7TH JONES 7TH KAY 7TH MALLARD 7TH MS. ALEXANDER 7TH MR. HOPKINS 7TH MR. RAY

CRISP CO MIDDLE

7TH PHILLIPS

CRISP CO MIDDLE

7TH DOROUGH

CRISP CO MIDDLE

7TH HORNE

AS. CLARK

5TH BRAZIEL

AS. CLARK

5TH BREEDEN

AS. CLARK

5TH CURLEE

A.S.CLARK

5TH DEAN

CRISP ACADEMY

5TH GREEN

SOUTHWESTERN ELEMENTAR 5TH LAGRONE

SOUTHWESTERN ELEM

5TH OLUFADE

SOUTHWESTERN ELEM

5TH HALL

SOUTHWESTERN ELEM

5TH DEXTER

A.S. CLARK

5TH HUNTER

AS. CLARK

5TH BARKER

SOUTHWESTERN ELEM

5TH MENSCH"'-

SOUTHWESTERN ELEM

SO' .-. -- 'ESn

:.EM

5TH BURNET

5T

;LFLC

NUMBER OF STUDENTS
TAUGHT
28 27 25 24 12
861

NUMBER OF STUDENTS GRADUATED
28 27 25 24 12
861

DATES OF TERM
1/97 THRU 3/97 1/97 THRU 3/97 1/97 THRU 3/97 1/97 THRU 3/97 1/97 THRU 3/97

----
- - - - OFFICER
BATES BATES BATES BATES BATES

113
43 100
96
87 128 118 84 88 104 103 1,064

113
43 100
96
86 125 117 84 84 102 103 1,053

8/26/96 THRU 1/14/97
8/28/96 THRU 1/08197 3/30/96 THRU 1/17/97
8/29/96 THRU 1/16/97
9/30/96 THRU 10/14/96 10/15/96 THRU 11/01/96 11/11/96 THRU 11/22/96 12/02/96 THRU 12/13/96
313/97 THRU 3/14/97 4/16/97 THRU 5/2/97 5/15/97 THRU 5/30/97

DOLAN DOLAN DOLAN DOLAN DOLAN DOLAN DOLAN DOLAN DOLAN DOLAN DOLAN DOLAN DOLAN DOLAN DOLAN DOLAN DAILEY DAILEY DAILEY DAILEY DAILEY DAILEY DAILEY

122

122

11/96 THRU 1/97

WIGGINS

120

119

11/96 THRU 1/97

WIGGINS

124

123

11/96 THRU 1/97

WIGGINS

26

26

10/96 THRU 2/97

STRIPLING

29

20

10/96 THRU 2/97

STRIPLING

21

21

10/96 THRU 2/97

STRIPLING

30

30

10/96 THRU 2/97

MOORE

13

13

10/96 THRU 2/97

MOORE

31

31

10/96 THRU 2/97

MOORE

28

28

10/96 THRU 2/97

SLADE

30

30

10/96 THRU 2/97

SLADE

18

18

10/96 THRU 2/97

SLADE

27

27

10/96 THRU 2/97

BRAKE

26

26

10/96 THRU 2/97

BRAKE

27

27

10/96 THRU 2/97

BRAKE

27

27

10/96 THRU 2/97

BRAKF

'28

10

;:W~',

8

1

.._----- -------------

SUBGRANT

NUMBER

DeSI-

SUBGRANTEE

SCHOOL(S)

GRADE

TEACHER

TOTALS FOR CRISP COUNTY

9643

DECATUR CTY BRD OF COMM TOTALS FOR DECATUR COUNTY

WEST BAINBRIDGE ELEM WEST BAINBRIDGE ELEM WEST BAINBRIDGE ELEM POTTER STREET ELEM. POTTER STREET ELEM. UNIDENTIFIED UNIDENTIFIED UNIDENTIFIED UNIDENTIFIED UNIDENTIFIED UNIDENTIFIED UNIDENTIFIED UNIDENTIFIED UNIDENTIFIED

5TH MRS. SMITH 5TH MRS. CROSBY 5TH MRS. COLLINS 5TH MS. BARBER 5TH MRS. SIMMONS 5TH THOMAS 5TH DICKSON 5TH NEW 5TH BROCK 5TH MITCHELL 5TH PIERCE 5TH HENRY 5TH BELL 5TH GREEN

9644 9645

DOUGLAS CTY BRD OF COMM
TOTALS FOR DOUGLAS COUNTY CITY OF DUBLIN

MT. CARMEL ELEM MT. CARMEL ELEM MT. CARMEL ELEM MT. CARMEL ELEM BILL ARP ELEM BILL ARP ELEM BILL ARP ELEM LITHIA SPRINGS LITHIA SPRINGS LITHIA SPRINGS LITHIA SPRINGS DORSETT SHOALS DORSETT SHOALS DORSETT SHOALS DORSETT SHOALS CHAPEL HILL ELEM CHAPEL HILL ELEM CHAPEL HILL ELEM CHAPEL HILL ELEM WINSTON ELEM WINSTON ELEM WINSTON ELEM S. DOUGLAS ELEM. S. DOUGLAS ELEM.
HILLCREST ELEM HILLCREST ELEM HILLCREST ELEM Hil' r.~!=.ST E! I=U

5TH STOOKSBURY 5TH DONALDSON 5TH SOLOMON 5TH TILLER 5TH FESTAG 5TH SLATER 5TH HENDRIX 5TH JONES 5TH MALLORY 5TH HEYER 5TH HARRIS 5TH PARKER 5TH SMITH 5TH SCHILLINGER 5TH PERRINE 5TH SCHAUER 5TH CATES 5TH SKELTON 5TH SMITH 5TH CONNOR 5TH FERGUSON 5TH TAYLOR 5TH MS. ALLEN 5TH MS. CLARKE
5TH WARREN 5TH WILSON 5TH JOHNSC 5T~ f"'lLPEI'"

NUMBER OF STUDENTS
TAUGHT

NUMBER OF STUDENTS GRADUATED

---------- -
DATES OF TERM

OFFICER

727

716

27

23

8/19/96 THRU 1/24/97 WALTON

26

26

8/19/96 THRU 1/24/97 WALTON

25

23

8/19/96 THRU 1/24/97 WALTON

21

21

8/19/96 THRU 1/23/97 WALTON

27

27

8/19/96 THRU 1/23/97 WALTON

27

27

1/21/97 THRU 6/6/97

WALTON

26

26

1/21/97 THRU 6/6/97

WALTON

27

27

1/21/97 THRU 6/6/97

WALTON

24

23

1/20/97 THRU 6/6/97

WALTON

24

24

1/20/97 THRU 6/6/97

WALTON

24

23

1/20/97 THRU 6/6/97

WALTON

14

14

1/22/97 THRU 6/6/97

WALTON

14

14

1/22/97 THRU 6/6/97

WALTON

11

11

1/22/97 THRU 6/6/97

WALTON

317

309

25

25

9/96 THRU 1/97

FOSTER

25

25

9/96 THRU 1/97

FOSTER

24

24

9/96 THRU 1/97

FOSTER

26

26

9/96 THRU 1/97

FOSTER

27

27

9/96 THRU 1/97

FOSTER

28

28

9/96 THRU 1/97

FOSTER

30

30

9/96 THRU 1/97

FOSTER

32

32

9/96 THRU 1/97

LUMPKIN

26

26

9/96 THRU 1/97

LUMPKIN

29

29

9/96 THRU 1/97

LUMPKIN

31

31

9/96 THRU 1/97

LUMPKIN

28

28

9/96 THRU 1/97

LUMPKIN

26

26

9/96 THRU 1/97

LUMPKIN

26

26

9/96 THRU 1/97

LUMPKIN

26

26

9/96 THRU 1/97

LUMPKIN

28

28

2/97 THRU 6/97

FOSTER

30

30

2/97 THRU 6/97

FOSTER

28

28

2/97 THRU 6/97

FOSTER

26

26

2/97 THRU 6/97

FOSTER

26

26

2/97 THRU 6/97

LUMPKIN

28

28

2/97 THRU 6/97

LUMPKIN

31

31

2/97 THRU 6/97

LUMPKIN

29

29

2/97 THRU 6/97

KIRBY

29

29

2/97 THRU 6/97

KIRBY

664

664

124

124

1/97 THRU 5/97

HARRISON

1/97 THRU 5/97

HARRISO~

1/97 THRU 5/97

HARRIS

1/'.<7 TI-l~U 51,,!7

HAf>""~L

------- -------------

SUBGRANT

NUMBER

_- ------- DCSI-
-- -_.. ..

SUBGRANTEE

TOTALS FOR DUBLIN

9646

EVANS CTY BRD OF COMM

TOTALS FOR EVANS COUNTY

9649

FRANKLIN CTY BRD OF COMM

------
SCHOOL(S)
HILLCREST ELEM HILLCREST ELEM MOORE ST. ELEM MOORE ST. ELEM MOORE ST. ELEM MOORE ST. ELEM MOORE ST. ELEM MOORE ST. ELEM TRINITY CHRISTIAN TRINITY CHRISTIAN
CLAXTON MIDDLE CLAXTON MIDDLE CLAXTON MIDDLE CLAXTON MIDDLE CLAXTON MIDDLE CLAXTON MIDDLE PINEWOOD CHRISTIAN PINEWOOD CHRISTIAN
FRANKLIN CO MID FRANKLIN CO MID FRANKLIN CO MID FRANKLIN CO MID FRANKLIN CO MID FRANKLIN CO MID FRANKLIN CO MID FRANKLIN CO MID FRANKLIN CO MID FRANKLIN CO MID FRANKLIN CO MID FRANKLIN CO HIGH FRANKLIN CO HIGH FRANKLIN CO HIGH FRANKLIN CO HIGH FRANKLIN CO HIGH FRANKLIN CO HIGH FRANKLIN CO HIGH FRANKLIN CO HIGH FRANKLIN CO HIGH FRANKLIN CO HIGH FRANKLIN CO HIGH FRANKLIN CO HIGH FRANKLIN CO HIGH LAVONIA ELEM LAVONIA ELEM
LA\I()NI~ ELEk~

--------

GRADE

TEACHER

5TH BEST 5TH GREEN 5TH HUGHES 5TH DREW 5TH MITCHELL 5TH CLARK 5TH HOOD 5TH SENN 5TH HOGAN 5TH GOITLIEB

NUMBER OF STUDENTS
TAUGHT

NUMBER OF STUDENTS GRADUATED

130

130

36

35

290

289

DATES OF TERM
1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97

OFFICER
HARRISON HARRISON HARRISON HARRISON HARRISON HARRISON HARRISON HARRISON CAIN FUQUA

6TH DISMUKE 6TH CLARKSON 6TH GAMBLE 6TH SCARBORO 6TH HIGHT 6TH BEASLEY 6TH TOOTLE 6TH MOBLEY

146

146

9/96 THRU 1/97

DIXON

9/96 THRU 1/97

DIXON

9/96 THRU 1/97

DIXON

9/96 THRU 1/97

DIXON

9/96 THRU 1/97

DIXON

9/96 THRU 1/97

DIXON

32

32

9/96 THRU 1/97

DIXON

9/96 THRU 1197

DIXON

178

178

7TH ROSE (3RD PO)

42

7TH ROSE (2ND PO)

34

7TH ROSE (4TH PO)

40

7TH ROSE (6TH PO)

39

7TH ROSE (7TH PO)

34

7TH STRICKLAND (2ND)

36

7TH STRICKLAND (3RD)

38

7TH STRICKLAND (4TH)

25

7TH STRICKLAND (6TH)

37

7TH STRICKLAND (7TH)

45

7TH WOOTEN (2ND PO)

12

9-12 TURNER (1ST PO)

19

9-12 TURNER (2ND PO)

32

9-12 TURNER (4TH PO)

27

9-12 TURNER (5TH PO)

30

9-12 TURNER (6TH PO)

29

9-12 COILE (1ST PO)

20

9-12 COILE (2ND PO)

26

9-12 COILE (3RD PO)

23

9-12 COILE (5TH PO)

15

9-12 COGGINS (2ND)

28

9-12 COGGINS (6TH)

27

9-12 BYRD (3RD PO)

25

9-12 BYRD (4TH PO)

28

5TH HOLLANr

34

5TH HARRIS'

34

5T'-' r:VANS

""

41

8/22/96 TH RU 11/14/96 SMITH

34

8/22/96 THRU 11/14/96 SMITH

40

8/22/96 THRU 11114/96 SMITH

37

8/22/96 THRU 11/14/96 SMITH

34

8/22196 THRU 11/14/96 SMITH

33

8/23/96 THRU 11/15/96 SMITH

34

8/23/96 THRU 11115/96 SMITH

21

8/23/96 THRU 11/15/96 SMITH

33

8/23/96 THRU 11115/96 SMITH

45

8/23/96 THRU 11115/96 SMITH

12

8/23/96 THRU 11/15/96 SMITH

16

8/26/96 THRU 9/18/96 SMITH

10

8/26/96 THRU 9/18/96 SMITH

22

8/26/96 THRU 9/18/96 SMITH

5

8/26/96 THRU 9/18/96 SMITH

21

8/26/96 THRU 9/18/96 SMITH

9

9/30/96 THRU 12130/96 SMITH

18

9/30/96 THRU 12/30/96 SMITH

12

9/30/96 THRU 12/30/96 SMITH

11

9/30/96 THRU 12/30/96 SMITH

13

9/30/96 THRU 12130/96 SMITH

15

9/30/96 THRU 12/30/96 SMITH

25

10/1/96 THRU 12/30/96 SMITH

27

10/1196 THRU 12/30/96 SMITH

34

1/97 THRU 5/97

SMITH

33

1/97 THRU 5/97

SMITH

, 33

1'- Tl.l~U 51,0,?

$UIT'.4

-_...----- ---..SUBGRANT NUMBER
----- DCSI ---

SUBGRANTEE

TOTALS FOR FRANKLIN COUNTY

SCHOOL(S)
LAVONIA ELEM CARNESVILLE ELEM CARNESVILLE ELEM CARNESVILLE ELEM CARNESVILLE ELEM ROYSTON ELEM ROYSTON ELEM ROYSTON ELEM

96-50

CITY OF GAINESVILLE

TOTALS FOR GAINESVILLE

FAIR STREET LAKEVIEW

96-51

HALL CTY BRD OF COMM

MOUNT VERNON MOUNT VERNON MOUNT VERNON MOUNT VERNON MOUNT VERNON MYERS MYERS MYERS LANIER LANIER LANIER LANIER WAUKA WAUKA WAUKA LYMAN HALL LYMAN HALL L Y M A N HALL LULA LULA MCEVER MCEVER MCEVER TADMORE TADMORE TADMORE NORTH HALL MS NORTH HALL MS NORTH HALL MS NORTH HALL MS EAST HALLMS EAST HALLMS EAST HALLMS EAST HALL MS W' ._-

--------

GRADE

TEACHER

5TH GOSS 5TH GAILEY-(A.M.) 5TH VARNER-(A.M.) 5TH GAILEY-(P.M.) 5TH VARNER-(P.M.) 5TH MCCAULEY 5TH BEATTY 5TH COLE

NUMBER OF STUDENTS
TAUGHT
35 30 34 34 34 33 34 32
1,079

NUMBER OF STUDENTS GRADUATED
34 29 31 30 29 30 34 32
917

DATES OF TERM
1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97 1/97 THRU 5/97

OFFICER
SMITH SMITH SMITH SMITH SMITH SMITH SMITH SMITH

5TH LATIMER

250

5TH BENDING/HENDERS

32

282

250

1/1/97 THRU 6/1/97

BUFFINGTON/LAN

32

1/7/97 THRU 5/6/97

NEWMAN

282

5TH ARMOUR

23

5TH FRANKLIN

23

5TH HEAD

23

5TH NICHOLS

23

5TH WILSON

23

5TH REEVES

27

5TH MARTIN

27

5TH MILLS

26

5TH CLARK

26

5TH DUNANGAN

26

5TH JOHNSON

25

5TH WHELCHEL

26

5TH OLIVER

25

5TH ROBERTS

23

5TH HUSBY

24

5TH MCKAY

25

5TH GUTHERIE

22

5TH SIMS

14

5TH JUSTUS

29

5TH BELLADONNA

29

5TH WEEKS-ALLEN

17

5TH SMITH

23

5TH BORING

20

5TH GREGORY

20

5TH CANUP

24

5TH CASTLEBERRY

24

7TH RUDASEAL

433

7TH JARRARD

7TH HEARTSFIELD

7TH MCCORD

7TH MACLOSKIE

263

7TH CONNER

7TH FRAGA

7TH BONDS

5....

'iOOI'

23

8/96 THRU 1/97

NEWBERN

23

8/96 THRU 1/97

NEWBERN

23

8/96 THRU 1/97

NEWBERN

23

8/96 THRU 1/97

NEWBERN

23

8/96 THRU 1/97

NEWBERN

27

8/96 THRU 1/97

NEWBERN

27

8/96 THRU 1/97

NEWBERN

26

8/96 THRU 1/97

NEWBERN

26

8/96 THRU 1/97

LANE

26

8/96 THRU 1/97

LANE

25

8/96 THRU 1/97

LANE

26

8/96 THRU 1/97

LANE

25

8/96 THRU 1/97

LANE

23

8/96 THRU 1/97

LANE

24

8/96 THRU 1/97

LANE

25

8/96 THRU 1/97

LANE

22

8/96 THRU 1/97

LANE

14

8/96 THRU 1/97

LANE

29

8/96 THRU 1/97

JOY

29

8/96 THRU 1/97

JOY

17

8/96 THRU 1/97

JOY

23

8/96 THRU 1/97

JOY

20

8/96 THRU 1/97

JOY

20

8/96 THRU 1/97

JOY

24

8/96 THRU 1/97

JOY

24

8/96 THRU 1/97

JOY

433

8/96 THRU 1/97

PUCKETT

8/96 THRU 1/97

PUCKETT

8/96 THRU 1/97

PUCKETT

8/96 THRU 1/97

PUCKETT

263

8/96 THRU 1/97

PUCKETT

8/96 THRU 1/97

PUCKETT

8/96 THRU 1/97

PUCKET

8/96 THRU 1/97

PUCKE"1

97

1

FrIU (if

i,

..--------_.-
SUBGRANT
NUMBER
DCSI-

SUBGRANTEE

TOTALS FOR HALL COUNTY

96-53

HENRY CTY BRD OF COMM

SCHOOL(S)
JONES SARDIS CHESNUT MOUNTAIN SPOUT SPRINGS FRIENDSHIP FLOWERY BRANCH OAKWOOD WEST HALL MIDDLE SOUTH HALL MIDDLE
SMITH-BARNES SMITH-BARNES SMITHBARNES SMITH-BARNES SMITH-BARNES SMITH-BARNES SMITH-BARNES SMITH-BARNES MCDONOUGH MCDONOUGH MCDONOUGH MCDONOUGH MCDONOUGH MCDONOUGH PLEASANT GROVE PLEASANT GROVE PLEASANT GROVE PLEASANT GROVE PLEASANT GROVE FAIRVIEW FAIRVIEW FAIRVIEW FAIRVII;W AUSTIN AUSTIN AUSTIN AUSTIN OAKLAND OAKLAND OAKLAND OAKLAND J.B. HENDERSON HAMPTON ELEM. HAMPTON ELEM. HAMPTON ELEM. HAMPTON ELEM. HAMPTON ELEM. PATES CREEK ELEM. PATES CREEK ELEM.
P)l---- -,REEi- _. - t

-----

GRADE

TEACHER

5TH POOLE 5TH MARABLE 5TH DUNCAN 5TH DUDLEY 5TH ROLANDER 5TH GOODSON 5TH BROOKSHIRE 7TH STAPLES 7TH BOND

5TH BELL

5TH BENNETT

5TH DUDLEY

5TH FINDLEY

5TH GEORGE

5TH ENGIGN

5TH JOHNSON

5TH MELTON

5TH RUTLEDGE

5TH KASPER

5TH HIGHTOWER

5TH NELSON

5TH ARNOLD

5TH PONDER

5TH SELPH

5TH BURR

5TH STRONG

5TH NELSON

5TH JOYNER

5TH HERLIHY

5TH HOLCOMB

5TH ADAIR

5TH RUSSELL

5TH CARDER

5TH KATES

5TH HARGROVE

5TH MCMICHAEL

5TH BENJAMIN

5TH MEYERS

5TH DAILEY

5TH KOERNEK

5TH HUTTER/MARTIN

5TH MCNORTON

5TH WILSON

5TH EVANS

5TH PARKER

5TH JOHNSTON

5TH COLLINS

5TH WALKEI

5,

'ICE

NUMBER OF STUDENTS
TAUGHT
49 98 68 108 75 82 102 422 308
2,722

NUMBER OF STUDENTS GRADUATED
49 98 67 108 75 82 102 422 308
2,721

DATES OF TERM
1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 6/97 1/97 THRU 3/97 4/97 THRU 6/97

--------
- ------- OFFICER -LANE LANE KOGOD KOGOD KOGOD JOY JOY PUCKETT PUCKETT

20

20

9/96 THRU 1/24/97

TAVENNER

20

20

9/96 THRU 1/24/97

TAVENNER

20

20

9/96 THRU 1/24/97

TAVENNER

21

21

9/96 THRU 1/24/97

TAVENNER

20

20

9/96 THRU 1/24/97

TAVENNER

20

20

9/96 THRU 1/24/97

TAVENNER

20

20

9/96 THRU 1/24/97

TAVENNER

20

20

9/96 THRU 1/24/97

TAVENNER

23

23

9/96 THRU 1/97

HARPER

23

23

9/96 THRU 1/97

HARPER

25

25

9/96 THRU 1/97

HARPER

23

22

9/96 THRU 1/97

HARPER

23

22

9/96 THRU 1/97

HARPER

24

24

9/96 THRU 1/97

HARPER

22

22

9/96 THRU 1/97

HARPER

21

21

9/96 THRU 1/97

HARPER

23

23

9/96 THRU 1/97

HARPER

22

22

9/96 THRU 1/97

HARPER

22

22

9/96 THRU 1/97

HARPER

27

27

9/96 THRU 1/97

TAMMARO

27

27

9/96 THRU 1/97

TAMMARO

27

27

9/96 THRU 1/97

TAMMARO

27

27

9/96 THRU 1/97

TAMMARO

25

25

9/96 THRU 1/97

TAMMARO

25

25

9/96 THRU 1/97

TAMMARO

25

25

9/96 THRU 1/97

TAMMARO

25

25

9/96 THRU 1/97

TAMMARO

24

24

9/96 THRU 1/97

TAMMARO

24

24

9/96 THRU 1/97

TAMMARO

24

24

9/96 THRU 1/97

TAMMARO

24

24

9/96 THRU 1/97

TAMMARO

48

48

9/96 THRU 1/97

HooD,JR.

22

22

1/97 THRU 6/97

HARPER

19

19

1/97 THRU 6/97

HARPER

20

19

1/97 THRU 6/97

HARPER

26

25

1/97 THRU 6/97

HARPER

24

24

1/97 THRU 6/97

HARPER

22

22

1/97 THRU 6/97

HARPE~

24

24

1/97 THRU 6/97

HARPEl

24

1,

,:U f,/

HR

SUBGRANT NUMBER DCSI-

-------
SUBGRANTEE

TOTALS FOR HENRY COUNTY

----------

SCHOOL(S)
PATES CREEK ELEM. PATES CREEK ELEM. COTTON INDIAN COTTON INDIAN COTTON INDIAN COTTON INDIAN HICKORY FLATS HICKORY FLATS HICKORY FLATS HICKORY FLATS

GRADE

TEACHER

5TH DAVIS 5TH SPICER 5TH HUDGINS 5TH REINER 5TH DIDIER 5TH SIZEMORE 5TH TORENO 5TH WELLDEN 5TH JOLLEY 5TH ROBINSON

96-64

JACKSON CTY BRD OF COMM TOTALS FOR JACKSON COUNTY

EAST JACKSON MIDDLE EAST JACKSON MIDDLE EAST JACKSON MIDDLE EAST JACKSON MIDDLE EAST JACKSON MIDDLE EAST JACKSON MIDDLE WEST JACKSON MIDDLE WEST JACKSON MI WEST JACKSON MIDDLE WEST JACKSON MIDDLE

7TH AKIN 7TH NEAL 7TH PARR 7TH SIMS 7TH DUNN 7TH WHITE 7TH CLARK 7TH CLARK 7TH HOBBS 7TH HOBBS

96-65

CITY OF LAGRANGE

WESTSIDE MAGNET WESTSIDE MAGNET WESTSIDE MAGNET WESTSIDE MAGNET WESTSIDE MAGNET BERTA WEATHERSBEE BERTA WEATHERBEE BERTA WEATHERBEE UNITY ELEM. UNITY ELEM. UNITYELEM. CANNON STREET CANNON STREET CANNON STREET

TOTALS FOR CITY OF LAGRANGE

5TH GIVENS 5TH JOHNSON 5TH MONTGOMERY 5TH CISSEL 5TH BLAKLEY 5TH BUCHANAN 5TH NEIGHBORS 5TH THOMPSON 5TH DOIG 5TH ELLINGTON 5TH WILLIAMS 5TH WILLIS 5TH FREEMAN 5TH BARNETT

96-66

LIBERTY CTY BRD OF COMM

BUTTON GWINETTE BUTTON GWINETTE BUTTON GWINETTE BUTTON GWINETTE FRANK LONG FRANK LONG FR... ,)NG

5TH MORRISON

5TH WILLIAMS

5TH WRIGHT

5TH WALKER

5TH RIVERA

5TH JOHNSC

5T1

)X

NUMBER OF STUDENTS
TAUGHT
24 24 24 24 24 25 27 27 28 30
786

NUMBER OF STUDENTS GRADUATED

DATES OF TERM

24

1/97 THRU 6/97

24

1/97 THRU 6197

24

2/1/97 THRU 5/22/97

24

2/1/97 THRU 5/22/97

24

2/1/97 THRU 5/22/97

25

2/1/97 THRU 5/22/97

27

211/97 THRU 5128197

27

211197 THRU 5128/97

27

211197 THRU 5128197

30

211197 THRU 5128/97

784

------
OFFICER
HARPER HARPER TAVENNER TAVENNER TAVENNER TAVENNER TAVENNER TAVENNER TAVENNER TAVENNER

23

23

3197 THRU 4/97

GRANT

23

22

3197 THRU 4197

GRANT

23

23

4197 THRU 5197

GRANT

22

22

4197 THRU 5/97

GRANT

21

21

4197 THRU 5197

GRANT

21

21

MAY

GRANT

36

33

MAY

GRANT

29

29

MAY

GRANT

24

24

MAY

GRANT

25

25

MAY

GRANT

247

243

20

20

8196 THRU 1197

MORRIS

22

22

8196 THRU 1/97

MORRIS

18

18

8196 THRU 1197

MORRIS

20

20

8196 THRU 1/97

MORRIS

20

20

8196 THRU 1197

MORRIS

22

22

8196 THRU 1197

MORRIS

22

22

8196 THRU 1197

MORRIS

20

20

8196 THRU 1197

MORRIS

22

22

8196 THRU 1197

MORRIS

22

22

8196 THRU 1197

MORRIS

22

22

8/96 THRU 1/97

MORRIS

18

18

8196 THRU 1197

MORRIS

18

18

8196 THRU 1197

MORRIS

18

18

8196 THRU 1197

MORRIS

284

284

28

28

9196 THRU 1197

GOOCHISHAVERS

27

26

9196 THRU 1/97

GOOCH/SHAVERS

28

28

9196 THRU 1197

GOOCHISHAVERS

28

28

9/96 THRU 1197

GOOCHISHAVERS

28

28

9196 THRU 2/97

GOOCHf!'" -'/ERS

28

28

9196 THRU 2197

GOOCH,

ERS

27

9/

U 211

G

I/~II .-"\

SUBGRANT NUMBER DCSI-

-----
SUBGRANTEE

TOTALS FOR PAULDING CTY

96-65

PIERCE CTY BRD OF COMM

TOTALS FOR PIERCE CTY

96-66

POLK CTY BRD OF COMM

...~ . ." "''''t POL v "--"

SCHOOL(S)
NEW GEORGIA ELEM. NEW GEORGIA ELEM. NEW GEORGIA ELEM. W.C.ABNEY W.C.ABNEY W.C.ABNEY W.C.ABNEY HIRAM ELEM. HIRAM ELEM. HIRAM ELEM. MCGARITY ELEM. MCGARITY ELEM. MCGARITY ELEM. MCGARITY ELEM. MCGARITY ELEM.
PATIERSON PATIERSON BLACKSHEAR BLACKSHEAR BLACKSHEAR BLACKSHEAR BLACKSHEAR BLACKSHEAR
WESTSIDE ELEM. WESTSIDE ELEM. WESTSIDE ELEM. CHEROKEE ELEM. CHEROKEE ELEM. EASTSIDE ELEM. EASTSIDE ELEM. EASTSIDE ELEM. EASTSIDE ELEM. GOODYEAR ELEM. GOODYEAR ELEM. GOODYEAR ELEM. GOODYEAR ELEM. CHEROKEE ELEM. CHEROKEE ELEM. CHEROKEE ELEM. WESTSIDE ELEM. WESTSIDE ELEM. WESTSIDE ELEM. WESTSIDE ELEM.

GRADE

TEACHER

5TH REINHOLD 5TH TROUT 5TH KAY 5TH BARTRON 5TH MCKINNEY 5TH CHAMPION 5TH SHIFLETI 5TH GAGLIONE 5TH OLDHAM 5TH MALLOY 5TH TURNER 5TH HARROW 5TH MCCOY 5TH WARREN 5TH ANKRICH

5TH MORGAN 5TH KIRKLAND 5TH HYERS 5TH POLVAOORE 5TH GALLAGHER 5TH DENISON 5TH WATERS 5TH MOORE

5TH BECK 5TH PYLE 5TH HACKNEY 5TH CARR 5TH ROWELL 5TH PASCHAL 5TH HIGHNOTE 5TH THAXTON 5TH GAGE 5TH HITCHOCK 5TH LUMPKIN 5TH STRINGER 5TH PAYNE 5TH MCRAE 5TH MATHEWS 5TH ROWELL 5TH HOLCOMB 5TH THOMAS 5TH RAY 5TH ZUKER

NUMBER OF STUDENTS
TAUGHT
24 23 24 21 24 22 23 25 25 28 23 24 24 21 20
475

NUMBER OF STUDENTS GRADUATED

---_.

DATES OF TERM

OFFICER

24

9/9/96 THRU 1/24/97

GRIFFIN

22

9/9/96 THRU 1/24/97

GRIFFIN

24

9/9/96 THRU 1/24/97

GRIFFIN

21

9/9/96 THRU 1/24/97

MORRIS

24

9/9/96 THRU 1/24/97

MORRIS

22

9/9/96 THRU 1/24/97

MORRIS

23

9/9/96 THRU 1/24/97

MORRIS

24

9/9/96 THRU 1/24/97

MORRIS

25

9/9/96 THRU 1/24/97

MORRIS

28

9/9/96 THRU 1/24/97

MORRIS

23

9/9/96 THRU 1/24/97

MORRIS

24

9/9/96 THRU 1/24/97

MORRIS

24

9/9/96 THRU 1/24/97

MORRIS

21

9/9/96 THRU 1/24/97

MORRIS

18

9/9/96 THRU 1/24/97

MORRIS

471

24

24

9/10/96 THRU 02/28/97 MATTOX

29

29

9/10/96 THRU 02128/97 MATIOX

29

29

9/10/96 THRU 02/28/97 MATTOX

27

27

9/10/96 THRU 02/28/97 MATIOX

32

32

9/10/96 THRU 02/28/97 MATIOX

30

30

9/10/96 THRU 02/28/97 MATIOX

30

30

9/10/96 THRU 02/28/97 MATIOX

35

35

9/10/96 THRU 02/28/97 MATIOX

236

236

26 27 27 27 26 27 27 26 26 27 29 26 28 23 23 24 28 27 24 22
-

26

11/18/96 THRU 5/12/97 CAMPBELL

27

11/18/96 THRU 5/12/97 CAMPBELL

25

11/18/96 THRU 5/12197 CAMPBELL

26

11/19/96 THRU 5/14/97 CAMPBELL

26

11/19/96 THRU 5/15/97 CAMPBELL

25

10/22/96 THRU 3/4/97 CAMPBELL

27

10/22/96 THRU 3/4/97 CAMPBELL

24

10/22/96 THRU 3/4/97 CAMPBELL

26

10/22/96 THRU 3/4/97 CAMPBELL

27

10/23/96 THRU 3/5/97 CAMPBELL

29

10/23/96 THRU 3/5/97 CAMPBELL

26

10/23/96 THRU 3/5/97 CAMPBELL

27

10/23/96 THRU 3/5/97 CAMPBELL

23

10/24/96 THRU 3/6/97 CAMPBELL

23

10/24/96 THRU 3/6/97 CAMPBELL

24

10/24/96 THRU 3/6/97 CAMPBELL

28

10/25/96 THRU 3/7/97 CAMPBELL

26

10/25/96 THRU 3/7/97 CAMPBELL

22

10/25/96 THRU 3/7/97 CAMPBELL

22

10/25/96 THRU 3/7/97 CAMPBF

609

------- -------

SUBGRANT

NUMBER

----- OOSI- --

SUBGRANTEE

- -----
SCHOOL(S)

96-67

RANDOLPH CTY BRD OF COMM TOTALS FOR RANDOLPH CTY

RANDOLPH ELEM. RANDOLPH ELEM. CLAY CO. ELEM. CLAY CO. ELEM. RANDOLPH SOUTHERN CLAY CO. ELEM. CLAY CO. ELEM. RANDOLPH CO. ELEM. RANDOLPH CO. ELEM. CHAIT CO. ELEM. CHAIT CO. ELEM. STEWART CO. ELEM. STEWART CO. ELEM. STEWART CO. ELEM. RANDOLPH SOUTHERN

96-68

CITY OF ROME

MAIN ELEM. MAIN ELEM. WEST CENTRAL WEST CENTRAL SOUTH EAST ELM STREET ELEM. ELM STREET ELEM. ROME MIDDLE SCHOOL ROME MIDDLE SCHOOL ROME MIDDLE SCHOOL ROME MIDDLE SCHOOL ROME MIDDLE SCHOOL ROME MIDDLE SCHOOL ROME MIDDLE SCHOOL ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC WEST END ELEM. WEST END ELEM. WEST END ELEM. ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC N. HEIGHTS ELEM. N. HEIGHTS ELEM. E. CENTRAL ELEM. E. CENTRAL ELEM. E. CENTRAL ELEM. MCHENRY ELEM. MCHENRY ELEM. ALTO PARK ELEM. ALTO PARK ELEM. ALTO PARK ELEM. ALTO PARK ELEM. ANNA K. DAVIE AN.. "DAVI~

GRADE

TEACHER

5TH LAMB 5TH RIGSBY 5TH KIRKLAND 5TH GLAZE 5TH GARLAND 5TH GLAZE 5TH KIRKLAND 5TH RIGSBY 5TH LAMB 5TH TEAT 5TH PAGE 5TH FORTE 5TH AMONONS 5TH WEBB 5TH GARLAND

6TH HOLZENDORF 6TH CONES 6TH HITE 6TH PRICE 6TH UMBRANT 6TH SMITH 6TH CROUCH 8TH JOHNSON 8TH THORNTON, J. 8TH LANGTON 8TH BUNTE 8TH THORNTON, A. 8TH WHITE 8TH ASKEW 8TH LUCCI 6TH DEANGELUS 6TH POLLITZ 6TH GENTRY 6TH RUFFIN 6TH WILSON 6TH KILLEN 6TH MOORE 6TH HILTON 6TH ALLEN 5TH DAVIS 5TH TATE 5TH PLUNKEIT 5TH BLANTON 5TH HALL 5TH GARRISO' 6TH DAVIS 6r '}MSr-

NUMBER OF STUDENTS
TAUGHT

NUMBER OF STUDENTS GRADUATED

DATES OF TERM

----_..- ..-
OFFICER

48

48

9/96 THRU 1/97

59

59

9/96 THRU 1/97

DAWKINS

30

30

9/96 THRU 1/97

DAWKINS

31

31

9/96 THRU 1/97

DAWKINS

20

20

9/96 THRU 1/97

DAWKINS

17

17

9/96 THRU 1/97

DAWKINS

21

21

9/96 THRU 1/97

DAWKINS

60

60

9/96 THRU 1/97

DAWKINS

42

42

9/96 THRU 1/97

DAWKINS

25

25

9/96 THRU 1/97

DAWKINS

25

25

9/96 THRU 1/97

DAWKINS

24

24

9/96 THRU 1/97

DAWKINS

20

20

9/96 THRU 1/97

DAWKINS

20

17

9/96 THRU 1/97

DAWKINS

18

18

9/96 THRU 1/97

DAWKINS

460

457

25

24

9/96 THRU 1/97

LEE

15

15

9/96 THRU 1/97

LEE

25

25

9/96 THRU 1/97

LEE

25

25

9/96 THRU 1/97

LEE

23

23

9/96 THRU 1/97

LEE

23

20

9/96 THRU 1/97

MCKINNEY

20

20

9/96 THRU 1/97

MCKINNEY

53

46

FEB. 1997

MCKINNEY

20

19

FEB. 1997

MCKINNEY

40

35

FEB. 1997

MCKINNEY

55

51

MAR. 1997

MCKINNEY

51

48

MAR. 1997

MCKINNEY

49

41

3/97 THRU 4/97

MCKINNEY

8

7

3/97 THRU 4/97

MCKINNEY

10

9

APR. 1997

MCKINNEY

26

26

1/97 THRU 5/97

WALTERS

26

26

1/97 THRU 5/97

WALTERS

26

26

1/97 THRU 5/97

WALTERS

17

17

1/97 THRU 5/97

FAIREL

17

17

1/97 THRU 5/97

PEARSON

20

18

1/97 THRU 5/97

PEARSON

20

20

1/97 THRU 5/97

LEE

20

19

1/97 THRU 5/97

LEE

20

20

1/97 THRU 5/97

LEE

20

20

1/97 THRU 5/97

LEE

20

20

1/97 THRU 5/97

LEE

20

20

1/97 THRU 5/97

LEE

20

20

1/97 THRU 5/97

LEE

20

20

1/97 THRU 5/97

LEE

10

10

1/97 THRU 5/97

LEE

17

15

1/97 THRU 5/97

LEE

20

1.

~U~

L

-------- -_.._------------- ------------- --- ---

SUBGRANT

NUMBER

DCSI-

SUBGRANTEE

.---------

SCHOOL(S)

GRADE

TEACHER

TOTALS FOR CITY OF ROME

NUMBER OF STUDENTS
TAUGHT

-- ---------- ------

NUMBER OF

STUDENTS

DATES OF

GRADUATED

TERM

OFFICER

781

742

96-69

SCREVEN CTY BRD OF COMM

TOTALS FOR SCREVEN CTY

SCREVEN CO. ELEM. SCREVEN CO. ELEM. SCREVEN CO. ELEM. SCREVEN CO. ELEM. SCREVEN CO. ELEM. SCREVEN CO. ELEM. SCREVEN CO. ELEM. SCREVEN CO. ELEM. SCREVEN CO. ELEM. SCREVEN CO. ELEM.

5TH BUSBY 5TH BUSBY 5TH CANTREL 5TH WYNNE 5TH BLACKBURN 5TH BLACKBURN 5TH OWENS 5TH OWENS 5TH BODDIFORD 5TH BODDIFORD

26

26

9/96 THRU 6/97

MEALOR

27

27

9/96 THRU 6/97

MEALOR

24

24

9/96 THRU 6/97

MEALOR

10

10

9/96 THRU 6/97

MEALOR

28

28

9/96 THRU 6/97

MEALOR

26

26

9/96 THRU 6/97

MEALOR

28

28

3/96 THRU 6/97

MEALOR

27

27

9/96 THRU 6/97

MEALOR

24

24

9/96 THRU 6/97

MEALOR

28

28

9/96 THRU 6/97

MEALOR

248

248

96-71

TATTNALL CTY BRD OF COMM TOTALS FOR TATTNALL CTY

REIDSVILLE ELEM. GLENNVILLE ELEM COLLINS ELEM.

5TH CLARK

85

5TH S. WATERS

125

5TH BURKHALTER/NASH

50

260

85

1/97 THRU 5/97

SHORE

120

9/96 THRU 1/97

SHORE

50

9/96 THRU 1/97

SHORE

255

96-72

TERRELL CTY BRD OF COMM

LEE CO. ELEM. LEE CO. ELEM. LEE CO. ELEM. LEE CO. ELEM. LEE CO. ELEM. LEE CO. ELEM. LEE CO. ELEM. LEE CO. ELEM. TWIN OAKS ELEM. TWIN OAKS ELEM. TWIN OAKS ELEM. TWIN OAKS ELEM. TWIN OAKS ELEM. TWIN OAKS ELEM. TWIN OAKS ELEM. BAKER ELEM. BAKER ELEM. BAKER ELEM. ARLINGTON ELEM. ARLINGTON ELEM. ARLINGTON ELEM. TERRELL ACAD. CARVER ELEM. CARVER ELEM. CARVER ELEM. CARVER ELEM. CARVER ELEM.
CA~ '--'ELE~-

5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5T

MASHBURN ROWELL WINGATE WIGGINS BARLOW BRADLEY OLSEN PARKER BLESSING KNIGHT CHARLES EDWARDS FOLSOM MARSHALL WILKINSON PUGH WOOD THOMAS STUART CHENEY WIMS WALDEN ROBERTS REEVES BOLTON WESTON
DURHA~
'ASH;'

23

23

1/96 THRU 5/97

IVEY

22

22

1/96 THRU 5/97

IVEY

25

25

1/96 THRU 5/97

IVEY

25

25

1/96 THRU 5/97

IVEY

23

23

1/96 THRU 5/97

IVEY

21

21

1/96 THRU 5/97

IVEY

23

23

1/96 THRU 5/97

IVEY

24

24

1/96 THRU 5/97

IVEY

23

23

1/96 THRU 5/97

IVEY

23

23

1/96 THRU 5/97

IVEY

43

43

1/96 THRU 5/97

IVEY

22

22

1/96 THRU 5/97

IVEY

24

24

1/96 THRU 5/97

IVEY

22

22

1/96 THRU 5/97

IVEY

21

21

1/96 THRU 5/97

IVEY

22

22

8/96 THRU 1/97

IVEY

23

23

8/96 THRU 1/97

IVEY

25

25

8/96 THRU 1/97

IVEY

24

24

8/96 THRU 1/97

IVEY

22

22

8/96 THRU 1/97

IVEY

22

22

8/96 THRU 1/97

IVEY

25

25

8/96 THRU 1/97

IVEY

23

23

8/96 THRU 1/97

IVEY

17

17

8/96 THRU 1/97

IVEY

23

23

8/96 THRU 1/97

IVEY

20

20

8/96 THRU 1/97

IVEY

23

23

8/96 THRU 1/97

IVEY

22

a, 'w 1/

r

---------------------------- --------------------

SUBGRANT

NUMBER

DCSI-
--------

SUBGRANTEE

------------ - - SCHOOL(S)

GRADE

TEACHER

CARVER ELEM.

5TH LAKES

TOTALS FOR TERRELL CTY

96-74

TROUP CTY BRD OF COMM

TOTALS FOR TROUP CTY

MOUNTVILLE ELEM. MOUNTVILLE ELEM. MOUNTVILLE ELEM. HILLCREST ELEM. HILLCREST ELEM. HILLCREST ELEM. HILLCREST ELEM. LONG CANE ELEM. LONG CANE ELEM. LONG CANE ELEM. ROSEMONT ELEM. ROSEMONT ELEM. ROSEMONT ELEM.

5TH HURD 5TH COOK 5TH SHEPARD 5TH MCCLUNG 5TH STEVENSON 5TH BREWER 5TH NAMEY 5TH HOWARD 5TH BRYANT 5TH HOLLOWAY 5TH HUMPHRIES 5TH SIVELL 5TH MAULDIN

--------

NUMBER OF

NUMBER OF

STUDENTS

STUDENTS

TAUGHT

GRADUATED

21

21

676

676

DATES OF TERM
8196 THRU 1197

------
OFFIC.ER IVEY

25

25

9120196 THRU 01128197 COTTON

25

25

9120196 THRU 01128197 COTTON

25

25

9120196 THRU 01128197 COTTON

20

20

9111196 THRU 01129197 COTTON

20

20

9111196 THRU 01129197 COTTON

20

20

9111196 THRU 01/29197 COTTON

19

19

9111196 THRU 01129197 COTTON

21

21

9112196 THRU 02106197 COTTON

22

22

9112196 THRU 02106197 COTTON

20

20

9/12196 THRU 02106197 COTTON

24

24

9113196 THRU 01131197 COTTON

21

21

9113196 THRU 01131197 COTTON

22

22

9/13196 THRU 01131197 COTTON

284

284

96-76

UNION CTY COMM

FAILED TO COMPLY

96-77

CITY OF VIENNA

TOTALS FOR VIENNA

UNADILLA UNADILLA FULLINGTON ACAD VIENNA VIENNA VIENNA VIENNA VIENNA VIENNA VIENNA VIENNA

9678

CITY OF VILLA RICA
-" _ 0- 0- CITY -- 'LLA fO-

VILLA RICA MID. VILLA RICA MID. VILLA RICA MID. VILLA RICA MID. VILLA RICA MID. VILLA RICA MID. SAND HILL ELEM. SAND HILL ELEM. SAND HILL ELEM. SAND HILL ELEM.

FAILED TO COMPLY

5TH BRYANT

24

5TH WATKINS

24

5TH BRAXTON

28

5TH CARTER

27

5TH STEWART

21

5TH MURRAY

23

5TH NEWBY

25

5TH CARTER

27

5TH STEWART

21

5TH MURRAY

23

5TH NEWBY

25

268

5TH GASTON

25

5TH CROOK

23

5TH HARRIS

25

5TH BROCK

26

5TH TANT

23

5TH HOLIDAY

24

5TH INGRAM

25

5TH ALLEN

24

5TH GRANTHAM

23

5TH WILSON

25

~

FAILED TO COMPLY

24

9124196 THRU 1116197 BEAUCHAMP

24

9124196 THRU 1116197 BEAUCHAMP

28

9124196 THRU 1/16197 BEAUCHAMP

27

9124196 THRU 1121197 MUSSELWHITE

21

9124196 THRU 1121197 MUSSELWHITE

23

9124196 THRU 1121197 MUSSELWHITE

25

9124196 THRU 1121197 MUSSELWHITE

27

1215196 THRU 3121197 HOLSEY

21

1215196 THRU 3121197 HOLSEY

23

1215196 THRU 3121197 HOLSEY

25

1215196 THRU 3/21197 HOLSEY

268

25 23 25 26 23 24 25 24 23 25
.00-

913196 THRU 1115197 913196 THRU 1115197 913196 THRU 1115197 913196 THRU 1115197 913196 THRU 1115197 913196 THRU 1115197 1128197 THRU 5128197 1128197 THRU 5128197 1128197 THRU 5128197 1128197 THRU 5128197

BELL BELL BELL BELL BELL BELL BELL BELL BELL BELL

SUBGRANT NUMBER DCSI-

SUBGRANTEE

SCHOOL(S)

-------------------------,---

NUMBER OF

NUMBER OF

STUDENTS

STUDENTS

DATES OF

GRADE

TEACHER

TAUGHT

GRADUATED

TERM

OFFICER

96-79

WALKER CTY BRD OF COMM TOTALS FOR WALKER COUNTY

FAIRVIEW ELEM.

5TH ALLEN

FAIRVIEW ELEM.

5TH MILLER

CHICKAMAUGA ELEM.

5TH WILLERTON

CHICKAMAUGA ELEM.

5TH PARHAM

CHICKAMAUGA ELM.

5TH LEE

MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM.

5TH BRITION

MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM.

5TH EAVES

CHATIANOOGAVALLEY ELEM. 5TH GUERRERO

CHATIANOOGA VALLEY ELEM. 5TH GILREATH

CHATIANOOGA VALLEY ELEM. 5TH KILLEN

NAOMI ELEM.

5TH WElL

NAOMI ELEM.

5TH LOWERY

NAOMI ELEM.

5TH BARFIELD

ROSSVILLE MS

7TH MANNING

ROSSVILLE MS

7TH STOKES

ROSSVILLE MS

7TH CULPEPPER

LAYFAYETIE MS

7TH HOLDER

LAYFAYETIE MS

7TH CHAPMAN

LAYFAYETIE MS

7TH BLAYLOCK

LAYFAYETIE MS

7TH HOBBS

GORDON LEE MIDDLE

7TH MS. SHELL

GORDON LEE MIDDLE

7TH MR. SELF

GORDON LEE MIDDLE

7TH MS. SWANSON

CHATIANOOGA VALLEY MIDDL 7TH MR. LANGFORD

CHATIANOOGA VALLEY MIDDL 7TH MS. ADAMS

ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL

7TH MS. LEONARD

96.aO

WALTON CTY BRD OF COMM

TOTALS FOR WALTON CTY

LOGANVILLE ELEM. LOGANVILLE ELEM. LOGANVILLE ELEM. LOGANVILLE ELEM. LOGANVILLE ELEM. LOGANVILLE ELEM. LOGANVILLE ELEM. LOGANVILLE ELEM. LOGANVILLE ELEM.

5TH FORRESTER 5TH BROOKS 5TH JOHNSON 5TH MCKUHEN 5TH PHILLIPS 5TH ELLIOTI 5TH HARRISON 5TH HALLECK 5TH DIGBY

96.a1

WHITE CTY BRD OF COMM

W.C. ELEM. W.C. ELEM.
W.C.ELEM. W.C. ELEM. W.C. ELEM. W.C. ELEM. W.C. ELEM.
wr &:''':M.

5TH VANDIVER 5TH J.THOMAS 5TH WILKERSON 5TH PAGE 5TH YOUNG 5TH WARD 5TH THOMA: 5T," ~'\RTEr

24 26 25 25 25 25 27 27 25 28 27 28 27 108 103 16 17 87 89 90 41 40 36 80 92 7
1,145
26 27 24 25 26 27 25 26 27
233
28 28 29 25 29 25 24

24 26 25 25 25 25 27 27 25 25 27 28 27 105 101 16 17 87 88 89 41 40 36 80 92 0
1,128

8121/96 THRU 12/20/96 8/21/96 THRU 12/20/96
8119/96 THRU 1/7/97 8119/96 THRU 1/7/97 8119/96 THRU 1/7/97 8120/96 THRU 1/9/97 8120/96 THRU 1/9/97 8119/96 THRU 1/23/97 8119/96 THRU 1/23/97 8/19/96 THRU 1/23/97 8121/96 THRU 1/24/97 8/21/96 THRU 1/24/97 8121/96 THRU 1/24/97 9/10/96 THRU 11/19/96 9/9/96 THRU 11/18/96 9/9/96 THRU 10118/96 9/11/96 THRU 10/10/96 9/11/96 THRU 10/10/96 10/23/96 THRU 11/26/96 12/02/96 THRU 12113/96 1/23/97 THRU 4/14/97 1/23/97 THRU 4/14/97 1/23/97 THRU 4/14/97 1/22/97 THRU 4/8/97 1/23/97 THRU 4/9/97 1/30/97 THRU 4110/97

HAMBRICK HAMBRICK HAMBRICK HAMBRICK HAMBRICK HAMBRICK HAMBRICK WARD WARD WARD WARD WARD WARD DEER DEER DEER DEER DEER DEER DEER HAMBRICK HAMBRICK .HAMBRICK HAMBRICK HAMBRICK HAMBRICK

26

9/3/96 THRU 1/22/97

JOHNSON

27

9/3/96 THRU 1/22/97

JOHNSON

24

9/3/96 THRU 1/22/97

JOHNSON

25

9/3/96 THRU 1/22/97

JOHNSON

26

9/3/96 THRU 1/22/97

JOHNSON

27

9/3/96 THRU 1/22/97

JOHNSON

25

9/3/96 THRU 1/22/97

JOHNSON

26

9/3/96 THRU 1/22/97

JOHNSON

27

9/3/96 THRU 1/22/97

JOHNSON

233

28

10/96 THRU 4/97

WILLIAMS

28

10/96 THRU 4/97

WILLIAMS

29

10/96 THRU 4/97

WILLIAMS

24

10/96 THRU 4/97

WILLIAMS

28

10/96 THRU 4/97

WILLIAMS

25

10/96 THRU 4/97

WILLIAM"

24

10/96 THRU 4/97

WILLIAI

21

10- - -. ',RU 4:--

If .... M.... ~

--_.---_..-

_ _ _- _ _-- ... ..... ..

.......

--

--

--

--------_.._------

----

- - - -- _ _ _ - .. .. ... _.. --

SUBGRANT

NUMBER OF

NUMBER OF

NUMBER

STUDENTS

STUDENTS

----DC-S-I-_.-.

SUBGRANTEE

- - - - -_....

SCHOOL(S)

GRADE

TEACHER

TAUGHT

GRADUATED

W.C. ELEM.

5TH LONDON

21

21

TOTALS FOR WHITE CTY

231

228

DATES OF TERM
10/96 THRU 4/97

OFFICER WILLIAMS

96-82

WHITFIELD CTY BRD OF COMM

WESTSIDE ELEM.

5TH TALLEY

25

25

9/96 THRU 12/96

GIBSON

WESTSIDE ELEM.

5TH NOBLE

25

25

9/96 THRU 12/96

GIBSON

WESTSIDE ELEM.

5TH WHITAKER

25

25

9/96 THRU 12/96

GIBSON

WESTSIDE ELEM.

5TH CUNNINGHAM

25

25

9/96 THRU 12/96

GIBSON

TUNNEL HILL ELEM.

5TH HON

75

75

8/96 THRU 4/97

GIBSON

DAWNVILLE aEM.

5TH ESTES

26

25

9/96 THRU 12/96

KING

DAWNVILLE ELEM.

5TH WARE

27

27

9/96 THRU 12/96

KING

DAWNVILLE ELEM.

5TH WARD

22

22

9/96 THRU 12/96

KING

EASTSIDE ELEM.

5TH ADAMS

25

25

9/96 THRU 12/96

KING

EASTSIDE ELEM.

5TH PILCHER

24

24

9/96 THRU 12/96

KING

EASTSIDE ELEM.

5TH RIDLEY

24

24

9/96 THRU 12/96

KING

EASTSIDE ELEM.

5TH PHELPS

24

24

9/96 THRU 12/96

KING

PLEASANT GROVE ELEM.

5TH LORD

24

24

11/96 THRU 4/97

SILVERS

PLEASANT GROVE ELEM.

5TH BROOKER

24

24

11/96 THRU 4/97

SILVERS

PLEASANT GROVE ELEM.

5TH MINTER

24

24

11/96 THRU 4/97

SILVERS

PLEASANT GROVE ELEM.

5TH SPRINGER

23

23

11/96 THRU 4/97

SILVERS

VARNELL ELEM.

5TH CARPENTER

24

24

1/97 THRU 5/97

SILVERS

VARNELL ELEM.

5TH MCGREW

25

25

1/97 THRU 5/97

SILVERS

VARNELL ELEM.

5TH BUCKNER

23

23

1/97 THRU 5/97

SILVERS

VARNELL ELEM.

5TH SCHOEN

23

23

1/97 THRU 5/97

SILVERS

VARNELL ELEM.

5TH PHIPPS

25

25

1/97 THRU 5/97

SILVERS

COHUTIA ELEM.

5TH TEEMS

25

25

9/96 THRU 1/97

SILVERS

COHUTIA ELEM.

5TH BRIDGES

28

28

9/96 THRU 1/97

SILVERS

DUG GAP ELEM.

5TH WAGNON

65

65

1/97 THRU 4/97

GIBSON

VALLEY POINT ELEM.

5TH EARLE

25

25

1/97 THRU 5/97

KING

VALLEY POINT ELEM.

5TH BLACKWOOD

24

24

1/97 THRU 5/97

KING

VALLEY POINT ELEM.

5TH CARLTON

26

26

1/97 THRU 5/97

KING

ANTIOCH ELEM.

5TH TUCK

24

23

1/97 THRU 5/97

KING

ANTIOCH ELEM.

5TH ALLEN. A.

26

26

1/97 THRU 5/97

KING

ANTIOCH ELEM.

5TH ALLEN, C.

25

25

1/97 THRU 5/97

KING

TOTALS FOR WHITFIELD CTY

830

828

96-83

CITY OF WINDER TOTALS FOR CITY OF WINDER

WINDER-BARROW MIDDLE

7TH P.E. STAFF

258

225

1/1/97 - 5/15/97

RUSE

258

225

96-111

HARALSON CTY BRD OF COMM

BUCHANAN ELEM. BUCHANAN ELEM. BUCHANAN ELEM. BUCHANAN ELEM. BUCHANAN ELEM. BUCHANAN ELEM. WEST HARALSON WEST HARALSON Wr::!':T I-I.ARAl !':('\..

5TH WARD 5TH CALHOUN 5TH PONDER 5TH HOLBROOKS 5TH MCDILL 5TH DUBOSE 5TH ROBINSOI\I 5TH COGGlt 5T" LO\CKS

26

26

1/16/97 THRU 5/29/97 BELL

25

25

1/16/97 THRU 5/29/97 BELL

24

24

1/16/97 THRU 5/29/97 BELL

26

26

1/16/97 THRU 5/29/97 BELL

25

25

1/16/97 THRU 5/29/97 BELL

24

24

1/16/97 THRU 5/29/97

BELL

27

27

1/16/97 THRU 5/29/97 BELL

27

27

1/16/97 THRU 5/29/97

BELL

22

1/16,n- ~YRU s,',,,,,n-

pi"""l.

_.. ------- -_..-------------- ---_......._----- ---. ---SUBGRANT

NUMBER
_ -- .. D....C...SI ..._-

SUBGRANTEE

SCHOOL(S)

GRADE

TEACHER

ROBINSON ELEM

5TH MORAWSKY

TOTALS FOR DAWSON COUNTY

95-49

EMANUEL CTY BRD OF COMM TOTALS FOR EMANUEL COUNTY

SWAINSBORO ELEM SWAINSBORO ELEM SWAINSBORO ELEM SWAINSBORO ELEM SWAINSBORO ELEM SWAINSBORO ELEM SWAINSBORO ELEM DAVID EMANUEL SWAINSBORO ELEM SWAINSBORO ELEM SWAINSBORO ELEM SWAINSBORO ELEM SWAINSBORO ELEM ADRIAN SCHOOL EMANUEL CO INST EMANUEL CO INST EMANUEL CO INST EMANUELCOINST

5TH PITTMAN 5TH CONNOR 5TH HOLDER 5TH CLEMENS 5TH BOULINEAN 5TH LAMB 5TH NORDINE 5TH IRVIN 5TH YOUNGBLOOD 5TH ROGERS 5TH FARTHING 5TH BILLUPS 5TH WILLIAMS 5TH NEWMAN 5TH HARPER 5TH MILLS 5TH A. JOHNSON 5TH S. JOHNSON

95-54

GORDONCTYBRDOFCOMM

TOTALS FOR GORDON CTY

W.L. SWAIN ELEM. BELWOOD ELEME. FAIRMOUNT ELEM. MAX V. TOLBERT ELEM.

5TH STEPHENS 5TH CARPENTER 5TH WHITENER 5TH HENRY

95-62

LONG CTY BRD OF COMM

TOTALS FOR LONG CTY

WALKER ELEM. WALKER ELEM. WALKER ELEM. WALKER ELEM. WALKER ELEM.

5TH MURPHY 5TH CAPHTON 5TH DAVIS 5TH FREEMAN 5TH TOMILSON

95-73

CITY OF PELHAM

TOTALS FOR PELHAM

PELHAM ELEM. PELHAM ELEM.

5TH NESMITH 5TH BALLA

95-84

CIT" ')F TOCCOA

TOCCOA ELEM.

TOCCOA ELEM.

TC

ELEI

5TH ARROWC'- ~

5TH GIBSON

5T

\RBE

NUMBER OF

NUMBER OF

STUDENTS

STUDENTS

- - - - - - - TAUGHT

GRADUATED

27

27

DATES OF TERM
11/96 THRU 4/97

186

185

--...- - - - - - - -
OFFICER BOYER

25

25

8/96 THRU 12/96

BOWEN

25

24

8/96 THRU 12/96

BOWEN

25

25

8/96 THRU 12/96

BOWEN

25

25

8/96 THRU 12/96

BOWEN

16

16

8/96 THRU 12/96

BOWEN

19

19

8/96 THRU 12/96

BOWEN

17

17

8/96 THRU 12/96

BOWEN

12

12

8/96 THRU 12/96

BOWEN

18

17

1/97 THRU 5/97

BOWEN

25

25

1/97 THRU 5/97

BOWEN

25

22

1/97 THRU 5/97

BOWEN

24

24

1/97 THRU 5/97

BOWEN

22

22

1/97 THRU 5/97

BOWEN

20

20

1/97 THRU 5/97

BOWEN

24

24

1/97 THRU 5/97

BOWEN

22

22

1/97 THRU 5/97

BOWEN

22

21

1/97 THRU 5/97

BOWEN

24

23

1/97 THRU 5/97

BOWEN

390

383

66

66

9/9/96 THRU 1/16/97

GARIGAN

86

86

9/11/96 THRU 5/19/97 GARIGAN

71

71

1/28/97 THRU 5/22/97 GARIGAN

82

82

1/27/97 THRU 5/26/97 GARIGAN

305

305

31

31

9/24/96 THRU 2/11/97 BARRY

32

32

9/24/96 THRU 2/11/97 BARRY

33

33

9/24/96 THRU 2/11/97 BARRY

33

33

9/24/96 THRU 2111/97 BARRY

32

32

9/24/96 THRU 2/11/97 BARRY

161

161

104

100

10/2196 THRU 3/5/97

COLIMON

22

22

10/3/96 THRU 3/6/97

COLIMON

126

122

22

22

8/96 THRU 1/97

MAYFIE'

22

22

8/96 THRU 1/97

MAYFIE

23

8.1

~U 1/

~

:LlJ

~._----- -----------

SUBGRANT

NUMBER

DCSI-

SUBGRANTEE
-----

TOTALS FOR CITY OF TOCCOA

._--

. _ - - - - - SCHOOL(S)

GRADE

TEACHER

EASTOLLEE ELEM.

5TH DONNAN

EASTOLLEE ELEM.

5TH HALE

EASTOLLEE ELEM.

5TH CUMMINGS

LIBERTY ELEM.

5TH DAMRON

LIBERTY ELEM.

5TH ELROD

LIBERTY ELEM.

5TH WILLIAMS

LIBERTY ELEM.

5TH MILLER

BIGAELEM.

5TH CLARK

BIGAELEM.

5TH LAWSON

BIG A ELEM.

5TH WHITEN

95-93

CITY OF WAYCROSS

TOTALS FOR WAYCROSS

WAWNAELEM. WAWNAELEM. WAWNAELEM.
WAWNA~LEM.
WILLIAMS HEIGHTS ELEM. WILLIAMS HEIGHTS ELEM. WILLIAMS HEIGHTS ELEM.

5TH PAGE 5TH RARER 5TH MCCARTHY 5TH WALKER 5TH POPE 5TH SMITH 5TH BOATRIGHT

NUMBER OF STUDENTS
TAUGHT
30 30 30 21 20 21 21 26 26 28
320

NUMBER OF STUDENTS GRADUATED
30 30 30 21 20 21 21 26 26 28
320

DATES OF TERM
8/96 THRU 1/97 8/96 THRU 1/97 8/96 THRU 1/97 8/96 THRU 1/97 8/96 THRU 1/97 8/96 THRU 1/97 8/96 THRU 1/97 8/96 THRU 1/97 8/96 THRU 1/97 8/96 THRU 1/97

----
OFFICER
MAYFIELD MAYFIELD MAYFIELD MAYFIELD MAYFIELD MAYFIELD MAYFIELD MAYFIELD MAYFIELD MAYFIELD

23

23

8/19/96 THRU 1/3/97

GONZALEZ

24

24

8/19/96 THRU 1/3/97

GONZALEZ

23

21

8/19/96 THRU 1/3/97

GONZALEZ

24

23

8/19/96 THRU 1/3/97

GONZALEZ

19

19

8/19/96 THRU 1/3/97

GONZALEZ

20

20

8/19/96 THRU 1/3/97

GONZALEZ

19

19

8/19/96 THRU 1/3/97

GONZALEZ

152

149

TOTALS FOR ALL SUBGRANTEES PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS GRADUATED

23,260 98.42%

22,893

DARE CURRICULUM ELEMENTARY MIDDLE HIGH

PARTICIPATED 17,455 5,476 329

GRADUATED 17,325 5,364 204

23,260

22,893

GRADUATION RATE 99.26% 97.95% 62.01%

ATTACHMENT 8
DRUG ABUSE RESISTANCE EDUCATION
GRAPH OF PARTICIPATION IN PROGRAM
TO GRADUATION

COMPARISON OF PARTICIPATION AND GRADUATION TOTALS BY DARE CURRICULUM

HIGH
364
MIDDLE
476

GRADUATED PARTICIPATED

ELEMENTARY
o 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 16000 17000 18000
NUMBER OF STUDENTS

ATTACHMENT 9
DARE ESSAYS FROM STUDENTS

- - - - - ----_.... -.- ._-_._-----_.

._-------------

------_Q..""'-~!Jj._d~.s-~'nJ)~O"~~,_5Q..",~ ~h'f we.-5n,v\~-\LO-c:'I'\-\oo~~_'me,,:.'Wf'4 tn-6i xj:h8~e r~}-t'r

------_&>"10 nU~_y-UL't""4.bt.-C~'L-O.f~Q'l"~ _.i\("'~S .~f'" 'oecom;n~-~o~~~dO'"5-w~~\.j)e

._

..- - . - ._.__Lven j~d.:l-.d4Y'l1_.J'}.;n~ .~~.s~"""'''' of.~"'ee..pf'c'r!~"i~t~l'.-.h~~"F~ ~l"'\.s~"""Y'\"J-

\ - - - - - - - - f \ U O e_~Jd."'r.I,tj ~"e.~ .wa--n-'r' _~'-C' v.e,\on.j-" 1T" _yo"" J"0w"t 0,; -8e..~~4--at+ th~'" JlI.~.. "f_o&I#.- yllv ~D..",e.

---------~eTiev~,ero'o,~.,.,.,~.

..

_

------- tJo ~12h\ '1.-00-yOu ~!'!,;,~Y"~er-'1C1"rs~-_wb.en.l'~r"';'tLA-~o.:n~ t-'10oJ __Ct'lOa.~ ,r
yev .--------Ytl.ur,;o.xw\ily, S,~5e_ c.3 n_ ...&a..,.~ .o-~ _..0 J'\e.n~\o.,;._h.b\-.,..Qv ~4.-;_ __h~t I Jl.. ri"",-\

;, ----SO''Y'~ t''''llS~'' _fro" ~_o.c!.tl'Jr .h"use~"Y':!.~.~ ~r:;':~~J-!IJO+iYo " ...Thtio-} ~r ~e.1l.y_..sh<)o_Hn~

_

'0... ------.-"o~--Otl\'f .... +_~i~_yo"'.) '1c l.It"_ft'-W1 jly i1-t~Y1."~G.J2'I~an~-"'\61)...l;.e~So~s'!-eo..Aof~"~~5 ._-

-

t'--;J'!,L~.f~.~_-.~ ,~..::v;;"':.: I RE!U.y-.H'IJ ()- \~-,,~<"o\~-dlr\. ..toa-~_""f'41l-~~ ~e:tV-J _

- - - - - - - _ft'~ ~;~.7..~i> r._~f.,I\.., ~ ~_.)C'~ ,~t1 C ~""'O ou+-htWUl...1c*tJ:~'-ll-;-1-,,:\~~,-~.tl14>-J{"lJj ----

- - - . - - _ .--P~esc.("~e.D+a_~~5_.,.,~j_"'A~~e.,..,.:..;o~~ tJe~ ;..;;J.. ~:sO:f~['___m_~lJ!dhltTL_JO'J"ln,~4S~:~ ,~j _

bGi~~~~~..fL~t'~;~-".,"5~~'~DO'-5, -;;t.,:Je;_m.c.::.Wt::'j~;~.5 -.~n. t-i~-6h:~l!tl'l'1~t_-----

----

G" -'h~e~:r\ bln~ "~Y'..I\.-wY.ir~ _~tir S~\"I\. ~!~__W_'!~~~.1Ah'r:~_}uo..y.uH-~!eeLIJ:'~ . _

.,.,,;...

'-J

-

_ _ _ _ _ _ _- - - ' ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ! o . ci~~~Jl

_

----------

=nt:v~ -~h...~gt-!~e,V"~'f-(JetJf\!=.r-'."U-((.'j,~~~~I4\ 0Y\~ ~~""'~ -----------

_

_

_

_

_

_

_....:"'=.!~.Jo1~.,l:_YQ""-,J>,,,u.

J

i

u

__~

y~

Ib...

115!'.1t::'-.W,l,,'1.1-__().,.Y~

...w

'1:..},_1:lei;,pl:!:1~._,,_~_c:~~ .,)

--------'(~~;.!J~;..'.:ll:.::--1-~rt..-r.e.f;f-~.i.;~i:.~~!_"iL~~n~11-C~.!' ~~8S'------ _... . _

-

..

- B-U'-(~:Wt-.w\1.:LWjJV-~uWO"Y'\~Jj)n'I!..~',,/)'~~_f2_.~~1~- ..f~ .

. _ - - - - - _ . _ .__....__._--------_.... _.._- ._. _._--- -_.. '

/f4t llAREI14'M l{, 11~ ~ A~,.t4 Erft
n~.~~~44~~"~. 'i~k~~"~tk
~ CJ1at ~ ~t4 ~.w~ ~,,;.J ~ ~ d..v: ~ w:.L.
A~~~. Wtdl....uJ.~~~t4~~~d..v:~~. 't.wt
~'i ~ ~, -uuM ~ 4A4 .w:.Ll tt ~ iD k ~ M-J. .wt ~'i La d.A~. &d. ~ ~ 4A4 ~ i1J-w.l,lt.
R. ~ ~ #..t. ~.dA.wt,..uJ. iD ~ ~ ~~. Wt ~ ~ ~ ~
M.J.Wa~~.wUt.wtk. Tk~~~~~~iD
4A4.
E~~~. Al1~~~,~~~CJ1attM~4A4
4-t. ~ ~ ~ iD tt d.t ttM tJ.A.wt ~ tt.w~ ~ ~ ~
Wt ~ ~ I.MJ. ~ ~ ~ ~ DARE ~ .::t *'u J."v~~. Wt ~ ~ iD
e, 1Nj N(J ~ .::t 0f4 MJ, ~ 4A4 ~ ~ .wW .wMJJ.~. (i ~d 4A4 *,Ut
~ J;.J. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M.J. k MIM.~. T~ ~ uJJ. ~ iD 4A4t J1. ~.w~ iD ~ ~ 4A4t ~ ~ U i1~ ~~.
Wt~iUt~~~~~~~~~Wa~, ~~~
M.J. ~ MJ. "lt11.~. Tk ~ ~ iD ~ ~ t-w- ~ iD 1Nj ~ MJ. ~t ~
~. ~4 4f ~ I.MJ. ~ ~''1 .wMlJ.. ~'i 4A4t ~ ~ ~ .::t ~ ~. y~....uJ. ~ ~t ~ d,w" ~ iD ~ ~ ~~. ~'i k ~l

( \

._-- . , , - - - - - _ . _ . ._----_.-.

---:'~~----'-

.

He..tioGj \.Jw.t:t I 'Q.otn~el ~o..t piDpl~.ue. '{,

------*-11 ( .-----.l;~W~t.~O~l.J"y.r:~j ftj . 'Girt hi q ~J ,-( ~~~-"""Cl..,.,..",~,!:-'._,.".:~_.,.-- . _U~P$i.+J Mel if %uj .'1.r:.e......,dor- Q...-fo~ - O~IS:frt;sS, ~.,\ L... ,.;.

:! leo.trnd -+f.ccct ~O$~WriRs~~_S<?~.f+ -t.lJ4..V~ %i r\.~,--

_

"hku:i ------;,i~IO\.c.-dO, r ItD.t. r1id. .J ~-t~

C1.r"" dt'Y.t.c.Lnr \t'nols.

1D4a'iS$~t.t)/B:uS!6r4. ";6 ~ru or- in3-lu~e.. *'~+

-.----__ ' --_-"--O"~_...-qn ~ -to do 'f>oM~,thit'L~,T~e-~ 'ft,rur 56Urc";i .., ~i '~~1 :: ~:;'-~'1 ~~~ ?~=.~,':::::-:tJ ..' -
----~;D;.u~;u:;~:;i:fL ;;0~ =:;.~ m\~ti;,u. ~c_.O_.:=drJ---

._--.""..:..,S/..WO:r0.4.:l:I)\Og_LI l~g,,(ned +bt:t+ ~L-o.roL- -' .Q..i qhr 'WC4:1.S . . ' - - - - -

q"t------ -b s'" !J (i 0 t> dn 1 9~ I SOnu 0-1 YJ, em 0. r~ t..h.D.....t1~:JT--'-,.~n
...... -.------=rfu-~J~Cf,J_Q-~iMJ-n.o~.o..n.f{sJ--~ro~a:J.J o..td uJet-1f, ~

.i
.. .

a.u.!~~::z:-lta..rM.~rn.c.-ft..0f\~ hanL_.bI'<j b .5'tlf-
__ -rt.s.+-.u.rrt..~Qc1 ~fh er;s AWL 10 w._~ ( - e..st-(.ett:L._---a.o.pl~_ _ .__ .__ .

~h;9h se.f.f-~~+.Q..tm .('~~L8ood a..bau.t.~S2/V.esJ P~opl~ _

.. ----- -_ . .- .

-L-__ ._._.

..

_

, I,
. 'K

. --. __ .~.i+h._l~l:Y __.:_ Stir- :-tst~.etf\ cl.~-t_I__.J~rnW_~:-h~Sj~ ..

.. ----.---~QJ)su-tlJ(~~_..C.h.~c~d.LN_n~~LfH ..o-pJ.(--
r '--" .....--.--..----; +""-4_"c.h.o.Dc.LS~~~~$. {l.o.n1..e,--""cl:.---l:#'::L1--.ld.a.+..

:~rq. o.ft ~ . ~9o.t1q;sifl ~. wa-c/dr :t,: J~r~fi~tdlC__

. in .. '.,. --- .. --_.oc...ih~.,_p.top1t- V~ .s~--tuJttb~ml~cla...tL---~_
,'+ l\5J- .b~+f~;ohdu.1at:hd+_,.lL+ .ge+-~ .c.j~,.r

if~rn~.:-+h~fiL:~,,:.~.,dtH-t.r:~t..'.l<.!..'itiS-L-~,':t:.::...Jr:M-8:.sJ-. .-'

;6om-i.:' :SpiQrJ. 'iJw Tu.pl '. $:crrtR .:> I dW t1Oi..t. dttWfI\'"'I ;(

i /.eo r-nrof ..~!)bc~cSh,'6Q\; som'&ro.t. ;'.vse.' $ mQ/4c.'u/.s '

j

~

~

J

l

-----. ! lU$'.(> js ~~ii~..d;p~;o:trn9\ ~/ 1-, I+'fS'" c.a..lill:/ p:..=Q.S~S~t~j):..!I!t.~,

..

~tXi~l~~:'lf;c:4

!

-:7

,_~~_,

~1'XlI-~
--;J

..!.D.J

L.5IL.

:s

(._.~. rn~ tJS:.

~I.~f:J/:-u.s

"

..

e;

:

'

.-.....- '- - .---~~&b!n1!Lf,,~-hi_~'iStA..sj d.ru.'J.:-~,~d:'l.

_. __._. _.. ; () io (-l.rt?.~._;..Ftr.u. "7 :~~t ; . " , r . ; ' ) J. ... : ::.: !

_ --- "
-... ..... ... .. -._~--

__~ f~. . . . . .

~.. .''. r",

,-s:,: i~.'-L

j:.. ...

:. ,

. ~. !,~

, ,j,8t1~t,:~,-.:J~\'~O..:.!~.:..;t1~..;.:::rc..:.:.:..i')=-.:h.~.J_~

~'.::...j ._ _ .. .... _ ..._""--_._'_:'_\_"--::;0:-:'

-:':....-'

UJ.ams:-/=-.--" - ~ _'~ -:.... --:._.::..l_'_' _";,...-.:W. ..:..-L....L-'; I

(
~_
_ __'__
_
_
_

..- . ..... -.-----.--+--+--~~-"=---'--=--_1_1

-----__I___I_-~----'--'_I_---'--------

_._._- .------- - --- _.~--'---
_._--. -' ------_. .

.'

. ~~}.

.'

I.

_._-- _ . _ - - - - ' - ' - ...

--

- - - - - - - _.._ . _ -

._--~._------------------'-_-,- t :'.: .\' .:_--

_._-- _._--_ -- .-- ,.._..

-- ._-~----- --_._~--' _.:.....-._. ..

..~ -.. ---------_... -- __. .- -~_.-

" <9#1 1-26-97

D.A.R.E ESSAY

Hilary Arrington

~.. '"//

I am a D.A.R.E. student.1 think that it is a great idea to

/

a come up with program like D.A.R.E. It is fun,especially

when Officer Cotton teaches itll have learned a lot from him. I have learned how serious drugs can hurt you.~

_ a n t h O f f i c e r Cotton has told

my class about how many people there is out there right

now.He also told us how crazy they end up.No

family,education,and probably no home because their family

has kicked them out.1 certianly do not want that to happen to me.Then there is violence.1 really hate violence.~
611 they do is just go and

beat up innocient people.Violence is not a game.lt is wrong

to beat somebody up just because they have a problem at

school,home,or at work.They will be ,sorry one day when
they wind up killing someone.Then ~iII have more

problems to face. Gangs are wrong.Never get into or near a

gang because if you dO,then they will start getting you into

robbing banks,convenient stores,and etc.Groups are much

better. If you are in a group then you do not have to worry

about getting into trouble,getting into jail,or even

worse.Groups are fun.1 think that everyone should be in a

group or some kind of club that can take up your spare time

instead of just sitting on the couch watching t.v. It is very

important to be drug free because I would like to be a doctor

or a lawyer someday.And in order to be those things you

have to get good grades and stay in school.And I know

some people who did not stay in school and graduate.And

now they wished that they had stayed in school and

graduated and gotten a good career.l kn9~ that I will never

quit school no matter how hard it gets.l-Wrrr try my hardest:7-to o.COIO)P\.t~

_

.

QL,A ~G'Cll~~

Ana.. \.J~'\. \

(te\J -tt-f. "Cr--
to:~ . ,~\. :-':~,'

And. -\:'vIo..t ,

1c;5

a..

p\'-Oi'1-1

.
.

DtAre :
LV he.--\- U0.re. J'I\ c: (HI') 10 Mt:.

i05 +0 I ~ V P (Ilc. / o..re.. j:) 0-

r(zfY\

h~ p ,

kIds bc...(cIYJ~ ~~""M;jlo..l ~\th one. o~ +-he. WU\\c\~

\o.\~<!.s-t e,ob\Q.(Yl<) ~'D,C,",ljS.

''Pttr rpre<:iS '-Ale.. IS On~ o~ ..f.h~ reV-jon)' hocb

t U -r + o.r(!... fc..c..Q.d . w,' Ih

1l.\5'.> I

~ au o..,e. III 0 ne o~

+ht .,C CL\\\ed, S~"~':> ':"5roV.ps- o..nd Q(\e l"tl'd U.s~s

+Q d("Llj~:),J he: or ~h~ pre~5u..,e.s ~Cl->""

cC(Y)~ 0('\ c.... I\~

t-r::J _~. J.....s+- SC~ ~o l ~ AC'd f; nd. D-.(lot-h~r ~,;~nd,

, \ he. r\~ks ot- ~C\.k'0>5 c!cu5s L\re hl)h-
rl~\i+ down t-o Newbern bo,t)le.s., & .\ S 6\nd

bOLjs c.C\.r1 ~e.+- 01'\xecl In w\t-h t-he.. wrc,'j

C io:'::..:cL (And

l""ke LS1) I S ().\~+

k C. \LA.(.

01"

lAr-; S 0'lcke. (y\ IJ ~ j (AnD... The ~e.+ h', '3h C"-0d.

IPrt:~~.U.\~. (1\,\:0 thll\~<; +ho.,.\= Q..'e. dc..~J~IOl-'.~
TU i-h,,:-\, L ve.s o..(\d. be.<:.crt'H:_ dc\.n3~rDus +0

c+-h~1 I.v~s.

\~Ic\S +odG\.j nee.-d +0 f\ C\d j66,5 oJh.r .scheel Cr pc. It \(. \p~~t?.. I ('I s porh. TheA+ \..V~j

+-'h~j wc.nJ~ be vu..+- on +.hl:,.. sl,e.e.\s Icck\J

tOr ~Cl)S +0 be.. in tro\.Ab\e..,

+u.n G-,c~f5" L"-\n 5e...t. to<Je+he r a.nd hC\..v'~ \...\-1 ,lhuu.-\- ~511}J d \\.A.J5 or 0..\ c...~ 1.0.. \ ' . I kncl.....; J{.. J-= Lv,,-S o...skul 1-0 ~c drl..l'''(J:;

wc..J k d -L WCL",I

o.w~j d D..(\ sC\..j () 0." /VI 0::' ~

o~ +hc. pecp\e. t\l~\- do drv..ss ho-..VlL d\c'PP~

ouJ- or ~chocJ

B~J EJ \e.ll S ~o.n~.~ ld, 5 th Sl'C\..de.
M,.:>. t"\ or.jC"f\

ATTACHMENT 10
STATEMENTS FROM TEACHERS

April 25, 1997
To Whom It May Concern:
The DARE program is an excellent program for fifth grade students. The students learn the facts about drugs, alcohol, tobacco, etc. They are well informed by the end ofthe program and are capable of making educated choices when confronted with these substances. They know the legal, physical, and social consequences ofdrug use and abuse.
The students are also made aware ofpeer pressure. Through role play the students not only learn how to deal with peer pressure, they practice so they will be prepared when situations arise.
The presence of an officer in the school has a positive effect. The students are exposed to a law enforcement officer in a natural and supportive environment and learn to see the officer as a friend rather than a person who arrives when tragedy occurs. The DARE officer is an excellent role model. In our situation, the officer this year was male. He was definitely a positive role model for the young males in my class, many ofwhich have no male role model in the home.
I am not sure what the lasting effect ofthe program will be, but I do feel that when a student who has been through the DARE program becomes involved with substance abuse or conflicts with peers, the student goes into that situation well informed. He knows he has choices and he also knows the consequences for those choices. As a teacher and a citizen ofDecatur County, I am very grateful that the students have the opportunity to become so well informed in fifth grade.
Thank you again,
Mary Adams Fifth Grade Teacher Jones- Wheat Elementary School

JUL-31-19'37

BARTOW CO SHERIFF

To Whom It May Concern:
The fifth grade students here at Northside Elementary have benefitted greatly from having the DARE program as part of our curriculum. Our students have been taught about
the different kinds of drugs and the difterent ways so called friends and other
acquaintances will approach them to try drugs. Our students have also been given a
solution, because they have also received instructions ofhow to "just say no." In learning the difterent techniques of saying no, our students show evidence of
using DARE techniques in dealing with other daily life situations in which they must make a decision., take a stand, and do the right thing. The students have been. taught positive self-esteem and the importance of knowing yourself
In my opinion the DARE program has been. an effective and worthwhile program
because the fifth grade is such an impressionable year and a year ofgrowth, responsibility, and maturity. Our students need this awareness when going on to middle school and the challenges that lie ahead of them.
In the three years that I have worked with Officer Griffin., I have found him to be a
very protessiOIlaI, caring, dedicated, and knowledgeable instructor in teaching the DARE program. He truly believes and enjoys what he is teaching to the students. In developing a
rapport with the students, they have come to trust and respect him. The environment that he has created puts them at ease, and they are also open and honest with him. He shares with them and they share with him. Officer Griffin works well with each teacher and involves us in the program. He knows his subject matter thoroughly. I too have learned a
lot from listening to Officer Griffin's lessons. He is a great asset to the DARE program. Sincerely, Sidney Johnson

ATTACHMENT 11
INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO EXTEND THE DRUG-FREE
MESSAGE

D.A.R.E. NEWSLETIER
Vol. 1f Issue 2,3-18-97

So if you walk into one of these business, how about giving your appreciation.
SUPPORTERS:
CASEY'S FOOD STORE, PLAZA VIDEO, FATERNAL ORDER POLICE, D'S TOWELS AND LINEN SERVICE, TACO BELL, WAL-MART, SOUTHEAST AIRGAS, TIP TOP, ROCKLAND REACT-RITE, SMITH-LOCKWOOD DRUGS, ANDY'S FLORAL AND GIFTS, RODDY'S BODY SHOP, THE HOMEPLACE, BASKETSNMORE, ALL-STATE INSURANCE, THAXTON TAX SERVICE, LINDSEY'S ALLEY, YVONNE'S STYLE SHOP, STATHAM TIRE SERVICE, ROCKMART FLORIST, PIZZA DEPOT, ANGELICA TEXTILE SERVICE, MCNABB TIRE.

CONG6RATULATIONSI
To all of Polk County D.A.R.E. graduates. I would like to thank you for all the fantastic essays and great enthuasim during DARE graduation. Also, I would Iik.e to give my appreciation to the 5th grade teachers for helping me in my seventeen week program.
THANKS A BUNCH!

PARENTS:
I would like to give my appreciation to the parents who attended DARE graduation and helped serve refreshments. It did not go unnoticed. I am sorry if I did not get a chance to talk to soine of you before you left graduation, so feel free to visit me at the school at another time. I appreciate the support you gave to the DARE program. If I can be of any help to you please contact me at the Polk County Police Dept. 748-7331.

We would like to also thank the Supporters of the D.A.R.E. program who helped provide prizes and food.

.. That Gov. Zen Miller is trying to get passed a law ahat states juveniles can not get their drivers license until the age of 21. He has a lot of support from the community at large. This bill looks as if it could pass.

DARE BOX QUESTION
" I,

QUESTIONS OF THE WEEK:

POEM OF THE WEEK: By: Vanessa Gibson
Class: Mrs. Holcomb, Westside Elementary
Drugs are for Thugs, and you know it is true cause you got that smart attitude.

"'Name the 4 kinds of Peer Pressure?
"What is the defintion of Consequences?

ooo
DID YOU KNOW:
--rhat it is illegal to purchase any type of tabcco products if you are under the age of seventeen.
... Nicotine is a highly addictive (habit-forming substance found in cigarettes.
.. That Simple Assault occurs when one person attemps to commit a violent injury to another person. This person could spend up to 12 months in jail.

"What is LSD?
Answer: LSD (Lysergic Acid Diethylamide) It is a hallucinogens, which is a drug that affects a persons perceptions, sensations. thinking. self-awareness, and emotions
INFORMATION:
If you have some information to put into the D.A.R.E. Newsletter, than put it in writing and summit it to me. Thanks for your poems and pictures. I need some more pcems and pictures for upcoming issues. So get to writing and drawing. Thanks! See you in the next issue.

ATTACHMENT 12
DEMONSTRATION OF COMMUNITY SUPPORT

Police gethew precinct,
courtesy of Wal-Mart

By S.E. VANDERBOOM
StaffReponer
One of the tenants in the new Wal-Mart/Home Depot shopping center will be the Conyers Police Department. . Conyers police will be setting up an office in Conyers Plaza courtesy ofWal-Mart, according to Conyers Police Chief Tony Lucas. . The giant discount retailer is providing a 20foot by 20-foot space for police in the shopping center, which opened on Wednesday. The police department will pay $1 a year in rent, he. said.
"Wal-Mart gave it to us," Lucas told Conyers City Council member Chris Bowen at a meeting of the public safety committee on Friday.
Besides its low prices, Wal-Mart is known for giving to community causes. The Wal-Mart supercenter in Stockbridge has given police there a similar set-up, Lucas said.
Wal-Mart will pay all costs, excluding telephone service, Lucas said.
The new precinct will replace the one the city closed in Conyers Village shopping center on Ga. 138 south due to operating costs, he said.
The satellite office will house the police department's crime prevention officers - those who teach the Drug Awareness and Resistance Education (DARE.), he said. Police can also

take crime reports from the public at the location, he said.
Lucas told Bowen that the city of Conyers is receiving less this year to fund its D.A.RE. program, which encompasses all of the county's elementary schools, including the new school, as well as some middle and high schools.
The .Criminal Justice Coordinating Council has awarded the city $47,000, down from last year's record award of $69,000, Lucas said. The city dedicates four full-time police officers to its D.ARE. program at a cost of $200,000 a year, he said.
The police chief said all anti-drug agencies were allocated less funding this year as state monies were split among more programs. The East Metro Drug Enforcement Team, which serves Conyers and Rockdale County, also received less funding, he said.
Lucas said he implored U.S. Sen. Paul Coverdell at a recent public meeting in Rockdale County to boost funding so police can continue fighting the war on drugs.
Due to the increased use of drugs, the police department is discussing teaching the D.ARE. curriculum at the third or fourth-grade level, he said. The classes are currently taught at the fifth-seventh grade levels.

ATTACHMENT 13
EVALUATION COMPONENT FOR
SRO PROJECTS

EVALUATION COMPONENT FOR
SCHOOL RESOURCE
OFFICER PROJECTS

GOAL:

To maintain and improve the safety of the learning environment in the school through the reduction and prevention of school violence.

Objective

#1:

Provide students, teachers, and school officials with a resource that:



serves as a visible deterrent to campus crimes, criminal incidents,

and incidents of violent and unruly behavior.

can react to violent crimes and activities; and,

can be a visible, proactive force on the campus.
Project Activities: Q> Monitor hallways, common areas, etc.
S' Check school grounds [i.e., parking lot(s), gymnasium, etc.]. S' Attend student assemblies, extracurricular activities, etc.

Performance Indicators: (1)

Number of assigned complaints received from a law enforcement agency and/or school.

(2) Number of officer initiated complaints.

(3) Number of drug related arrests categorized by crime classification, results of these arrests, and age of the offender.

(4) Number of weapon related arrests categorized by crime classification, results of these arrests, and age of the offender.

(5) Number of violence related arrests categorized by crime classification and age of the offender.

(6) Number of other arrests categorized by crime classification and age of the offender.

(7) Number of total arrests categorized by crime classification and age of the offender.

(8) Number of traffic/parking warnings/citations issued.

(9) Number of trespass warnings/citations issued.

1

(10) Number of instances SRO assisted Patrol/Detective Division, or similar, from a law enforcement agency.

(11) Number of instances SRO assisted other agencies [i.e., non-law enforcement related].

(12) Valued of reported stolen/lost property.

(13) Value of recovered stolen/lost property .

(14) Conflict Resolution/Mediation:

(a) Student conference (walk in). (b) Student conference (call in).

(15) Juvenile Court Process:

(a) Petitioned; and,

Transfer to criminal court.

Placement.



Probation.



Dismissed.

Other.

(b) Nonpetitioned.

Objective #2:
Project Activities:

Provide the student with a visible and positive role model while giving new meaning to the term "professional law enforcement officer. "
Establish a network of existing community agencies to "catch" children who otherwise will fail due to diminished capacity of their families to provide adequate socialization.
Assist with school fund raisers, campus crime prevention activities, community drives (e.g., blood drives, March of Dimes campaign, etc.), and so forth.
Conduct classroom instruction.

2

Performance Indicators: (16) Victim Assistance Conference (between student & SRO):
(a) Domestic violence. (b) Child abuse. (c) Sexual assault. (d) Stalking. (e) Suicide intervention. (f) Other.
Subsequent Referrals: ... Social service agency. ... School agency.. ... Law enforcement. ... Other.
(17) Hours spent on the following:
(a) School fund raisers. (b) Campus crime prevention activities. (c) Community drives.
(18) Hours spent on classroom instruction:
(a) Criminal justice (Law). (b) Safety. (c) Alcohol/drug abuse.

Objective #3:
Project Activities:

Provide a role model who will encourage cooperation between youth and law enforcement, educators, business owners, and parents.
Talk to teachers about the SRO function and duties as well as provide them with information regarding his/her knowledge, capabilities, and resources. (Teacher Orientation.)
Work with school officials to present a program at parent/school organization meetings which explains the SRO Program as well as the duties and responsibilities of the SRO. (parent Education Evenings.)
Promote a positive level of community acceptance, support, and
3

understanding by meeting with groups representing all segments of the community. (Community Presentations.) Performance Indicator: (19) Hours spent on the following:
(a) Teacher orientation. (b) Parent education evenings (PTO/PTA). (c) Community presentations.
4

ATTACHMENT 14
INSTRUCTIONS FOR
COMPLETING THE QAR

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE
QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR THE
SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER PROGRAM

Please note that if the SRO is providing services to more than one school, then all requested
data should be compiled and presented on one (1) Quarterly Activity Report. However, all schools being served should be listed on the Quarterly Activity Report.

HEADINGS

Subgrantee: Local unit of government awarded the Subgrant. (See Subgrant Award Document.)

Subgrant #: Number assigned to the Subgrant by CICCo (See Subgrant Award Document.)

School:

Name ofschool SRO is assigned to.

Quaner Ended:

The date the quarter ended (e.g., 09/30/96).

Contact:

Name of person responsible for collecting and disseminating the data reported on the Quarterly Activity Report.

Phone:

Telephone number where the contact person can be reached if questions arise concerning the data reported on the Quarterly Activity Report.

BODY OF REPORT - ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATION
(1) Enter the number of complaints reported by a law enforcement agency [i.e., Police Department and/or Sheriff's Office] or the school [i.e., principal, faculty, staff, etc.] that the SRO responded to.
(2) Enter the number of complaints initiated by the SRO.
(3) Enter the number of felony and misdemeanor drug related arrests for both adult (A) and juvenile (J) offenders. Also, the SRO is required to indicate the results of these arrests by entering the following data:
Total Amount Seized - enter the amount [i.e., grams, ounces, pounds, etc.] of drugs seized.
Total Dollar Value - enter the dollar value of the drugs seized.
Type of Drug - enter the type of drugs seized by referring to the legend at the end of the Quarterly Activity Report.

1

The Georgia Bureau of Investigation's guidelines (Refer to Memorandum dated July 1,
1996, from Vernon M. Keenan, Deputy Director for Investigations, regarding 1996-97
Standardized Drug Values) will be utilized when collecting the data requested under (3) on page 1.

The following values will be used for drug seizures and purchases:

1. MARIJUANA

A. Sinsemilla

Ounce Pound

$ 200.00 2,000.00

B. Commercial

Ounce Pound

140.00 2,000.00

C. Hashish

Ounce Pound

200.00 3,000.00

D. Cannabis Plants will be valued at one pound per plant.

2

5. LSD

Per Dosage 5-10.00

6. DILAUDID

Per Dosage

50.00

7. BARBITURATE

Per Dosage

3.00

8. STIMULANTS

Per Dosage

3.00

(4) Enter the number of felony and misdemeanor weapon related arrests for both adult (A) and juvenile (J) offenders.

Type of Weapon - enter the type of weapon seized by referring to the legend at the end of the Quarterly Activity Report.

(5) Enter the number of felony and misdemeanor violence related arrests (e.g., battery, assault, terroristic threats, etc.) for both adult (A) and juvenile (J) offenders.

(6) Enter the number of felony and misdemeanor "other" arrests (please specify in an attached narrative) for both adult (A) and juvenile (J) offenders.

(7) Enter the total number of felony and misdemeanor arrests for both (A) and juvenile (J) offenders.

(8) Enter the number of traffic/parking warnings/citations issued by the SRO.

(9) Enter the number of trespass warnings/citations issued by the SRO.

(10) Enter the number of instances the SRO assisted the Patrol/Detective Division, or similar, from a law enforcement agency.

(11) Enter the number of instances the SRO assisted other [Le., non-law enforcement related] agencies.

(12) Enter the value of reported stolen/lost property. The SRO should use fair market value when computing or assigning a value to this property.

(13) Enter the value of recovered stolen/lost property. The SRO should use fair market value when computing or assigning a value to this property.

(14) Enter the number of conflict resolution/mediation conferences accordingly:

(a) Student conferences in which the student "walks in" or initiates a request

3

for assistance.

(b) Student conferences in which the SRO "calls in" or initiates some type of resolution/mediation.

(15) Enter the following information with regard to the Juvenile Court Process.

(a) The number of formally handled cases that appear on the official court calendar in response to the fIling of a petition or other legal instrument requesting the court to adjudicate the youth a delinquent, a status offender, or a dependent child or to transfer the youth to criminal court for processing as an adult---Petitioned. The disposition (i.e., petitioned) or the defInite action taken or treatment plan decided upon or initiated in a particular case should be classifIed into the following categories:

Transfer to Criminal Court [i.e., cases that were sent to a criminal court as the result of a waiver or transfer hearing in the juvenile court].



Placement [i.e., cases in which youth were placed out of the home

in a residential facility for delinquents or status offenders or cases

in which youth were removed from their homes and placed

elsewhere] .

Probation [i.e., cases in which youth were placed on informal/voluntary or formal/court-ordered probation or supervision] .

Dismissed [i.e., cases dismissed, including those warned, counseled, and released, with no further disposition anticipated. Among cases handled informally, some may be dismissed by the juvenile court because the matter is being handled (e.g., petitioned or nonpetitioned) in criminal court].

Other [i.e., miscellaneous dispositions not included above, which may include fmes, restitution, community service, referrals outside the court for services with minimal or no further court involvement anticipated, and dispositions coded as "other" in a jurisdiction's original data].

(b) Enter the number of informally handled cases in which duly authorized court personnel screen for adjustment before the fIling of a formal petition. Such personnel include judges, referees, probation officers, other officers of the court,
4

and/or an agency statutorily designated to conduct petition screening for the juvenile court---Nonpetitioned.

(16) Enter the number of times the SRO provides assistance to a victim (student) through an individual conference addressing the following types of victimization:

(a) Domestic Violence. (b) Child Abuse. (c) Sexual Assault. (d) Stalking. (e) Suicide Intervention. (t) Other (please specify in an attached narrative).

Also, the SRO will need to provide data regarding the results of these conferences. If the victim assistance conference resulted in a subsequent referral, then the SRO should indicate the number of referrals classified accordingly:



Social Service Agency.



School Agency.

Law Enforcement.



Other.

Please note that one conference could result in multiple referrals. Also, the total number of conferences does not necessarily have to correspond with the total number of referrals.

(17) Enter the number of hours spent on the following activities:

(a) School Fund Raisers. (b) Campus Crime Prevention. (c) Community Drives.

(18) Enter the number of hours spent on classroom instruction covering the following subjects:

(a) Criminal Justice (Law). (b) Safety. (c) Alcohol/Drug Abuse.

(19) Enter the number of hours spent on the following:

(a) Teacher Orientation. (b) Parent Education Evenings (PTO/PTA). (c) Community Presentations.

5

Any additional information deemed to be of importance or relevant to the administration or performance of this project should be disclosed in an attached narrative. Also, any data entered in the categories classified as "other" should be disclosed in this narrative. SIGNATURES
The Quarterly Activity Report must be signed by both the SRO and his/her immediate supervisor. These signatures will serve as certification that the data reflected on the Quarterly Activity Report is a fair and accurate representation of the duties carried out by the SRO during the quarter being reported on.
6

ATTACHMENT 15
QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT (QAR)

SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER PROGRAM QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT

Subgrantee: School: ContactlPhone:

ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATION

(1) Assigned Complaints

(2) Officer Initiated Complaints

(3) Drug Related Arrests:

Felony

Misdemeanor

Total Amount Seized Total Dollar Value Type of Drug (see legend) (4) Weapon Related Arrests: Felony

Misdemeanor

Type of Weapon (see legend)

MONTH 1

Subgrant #:

DCSI-

Quarter Ended:

Officer:

MONTH 2

MONTH 3 QTRLYTOTAL

A-------------- -A------------- -A------------- -A-------------

J-

J-

J-

J-

A-------------- -A------------- -A------------- -A-------------

J-

J-

J-

J-

$

$

$

$

A-------------- -A------------- -A------------- -A-------------

J-

J-

J-

J-

A-------------- -A------------- -A------------- -A-- -----------

J-

J-

J-

J-

Page 1

ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATION (5) Violence Related Arrests: Felony

Misdemeanor

. (6) Other Arrests:

Felony

Misdemeanor

(7) Total Arrests:

Felony

Misdemeanor

(8) Traffic/Parking Warnings/Citations (9) Trespass Warnings/Citations (10) Assist Patrol/Detective Division (11) Assist Other Agencies (12) Value of Reported Stolen/Lost Property (13) Value of Recovered Stolen/Lost Property (14) Conflict Resolution/Mediation:
(a) Student Conference (walk in) (b) Student Conference (call in)

MONTH 1
AJAJAJA-
J-
AJAJ-

MONTH 2
A-
J-
AJAJAJAJAJ-

MONTH 3
AJAJAJAJAJAJ-

QTRLYTOTAL
AJA-
J-
AJAJAJAJ-

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

Page>

ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATION (15) Juvenile Court Process:
(a) Petitioned > Transfer to Criminal Court > Placement > Probation > Dismissed > Other
(b) Nonpetitioned (16) Victim Assistance Conference
(between student & SRO): (a) Domestic Violence Conference (b) Child Abuse Conference (c) Sexual Assault Conference (d) Stalking Conference (e) Suicide Intervention (f) Other (specify in narrative)
SUBSEQUENT REFERRALS: > Social Service Agency > School Agency > Law Enforcement > Other (specify in narrative)
(17) Hours spent on the following: (a) School Fund Raisers (b) Campus Crime Prevention Activities (c) Community Drives

Page

ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATION
(18) Hours spent on classroom instruction: (a) Criminal Justice (Law) (b) Safety (c) Alcohol/Drug Abuse
(19) Hours spent on the following: (a) Teacher Orientation (b) Parent Education Evenings (PTO/PTA) (c) Community Presentations

LEGEND FOR TYPE OF DRUG:

Cocaine - C Crack Cocaine - CC Cannabis - CA
[i.e., hashish, marijuana, etc.] Opiates - OP
[i.e., heroin, opium, codeine, etc.] Stimulants - S
[i.e., amphetamines/methamphetamine, etc.]

Depressants - D [i.e., barbiturates, alcohol, etc.]
Hallucinogens - H [i.e., PCP, LSD, etc.]
Prescription - P Counterfeit - CF Other - 0 (specifY in narrative)

SIGNATURES:

OFFICER'S NAME (PRINTED)

OFFICER'S SIGNATURE

IMMEDIA.TE SUPERVISOR'S NAME (pRINTED) IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATURE

Page'

LEGEND FOR TYPE OF WEAPON:
Knife -K Handgun - G Shotgun - SG Rifle - R Other - 0 (specify in narrative)

SUBMISSION SCHEDULE FOR THE
QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT

Period Covered July 1996 thru December 1996 January 1997 thru March 1997 April 1997 thru June 1997

Deadline
Friday, February 28, 1997 *
Wednesday, April 30, 1997 Thursday, July 31, 1997

* PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FIRST TWO QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORTS ARE
NOT DUE UNTIL THE END OF FEBRUARY. HOWEVER, IF YOUR AGENCY HAS ALREADY SUBMITTED A QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT IN THE OLD FORMAT, IT IS REQUIRED THAT A NEW REPORT BE SUBMITTED IN THE NEW FORMAT BY THE ABOVE DEADLINE.
FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT(S) BY THE ABOVE DEADLINE(S) WILL RESULT IN THE WITImOLDING OF FEDERAL FUNDS UNTIL COMPLIANCE IS ACHIEVED.

ATTACHMENT 16
SUMMARY REPORT FOR
SRO PROJECTS

1996 DCSI GRANT PROGRAM SUMMARY REPORT ON QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORTS SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER PROJECTS

SUBGRANT
NUMBER
DeSI-
-- - -
96-29

SUBGRANTEE

--

-

CITYOFADEL

ANNUAL

96-30 & 95-30 CITY OF ALMA

ANNUAL

96-37

CLINCH COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-39

CITY OF CONYERS

ANNUAL

96-41

COWETA COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-48

FORSYTH COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-49

FRANKLIN COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-52

CITY OF HAZLEHURST

ANNUAL

96-59

CITY OF MILLEN

ANNUAL

96-61

CITY OF NEWNAN

ANNUAL

96-62

CITY OF NORCROSS

ANNUAL

96-73

CITY OF TIFTON

ANNUAL

96-75

TURNER CTY BRD OF COMM

fOTAL FOR ALL SUBGRANTEES

ASSIGNED COMPLAINTS
270

DRUG RELATED ARRESTS

DRUG RELATED ARRESTS

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OFFICER
INITIATED

FOR FELONIES

FOR MISDEMEANORS

COMPLAINTS

ADULTS
-

JUVENILES

ADULTS

JUVENILES

102

1

1

1

4

DRUG SEIZURES

AMOUNT SEIZED
-
N/A

DOLLAR VALUE
--
$0.00

42

13

0

0

1

0

N/A

$10.00

0

0

1

2

0

9

N/A

$155.00

52

9

4

0

9

0

N/A

$625.00

814

390

1

2

6

10

N/A

$300.00

50

40

0

2

0

5

N/A

$399.00

64

35

0

0

0

0

N/A

$0.00

37

2

0

0

0

0

N/A

$0.00

0

2

0

0

0

0

N/A

$0.00

35

27

2

0

0

3

N/A

$75.00

197

138

0

7

1

8

N/A

$630.00

288

10

0

0

0

0

N/A

$0.00

FAILED TO COMPLY
I

1,839 I

768

9

14

18

39

0

$2,194.00

J996 DCSI GRANT PROGRAM SUMMARY REPORT ON QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORTS SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER PROJECTS

SUBGRANT NUMBER DeSI
_.
96-29

SUBGRANTEE
.
CITY OF ADEL

ANNUAL

96-30 & 95-30 CITY OF ALMA

ANNUAL

96-37 96-39

CLINCH COUNTY
I
CITY OF CONYERS

ANNUAL ANNUAL

96-41

COWETA COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-48

FORSYTH COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-49

FRANKLIN COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-52

CITY OF HAZLEHURST

ANNUAL

96-59

CITY OF MILLEN

ANNUAL

96-61

CITY OF NEWNAN

ANNUAL

96-62

CITY OF NORCROSS

ANNUAL

96-73

CITY OF TIFTON

ANNUAL

96-75

TURNER CTY BRD OF COMM

OTAL FOR ALL SUBGRANTEES

TYPE OF DRUG
N/A

WEAPON RELATED ARRESTS FOR FELONIES

ADULTS

JUVENILES
-

0

1

WEAPON RELATED ARRESTS FOR MISDEMEANORS

ADULTS

JUVENILES

0

1

TYPE OF WEAPON

VIOLENCE RELATED ARRESTS FOR FELONIES

ADULTS

JUVENILES

N/A

1

10

N/A

2

0

0

0

N/A

0

0

N/A

0

7

0

0

N/A

1

2

N/A

4

0

0

0

N/A

0

0

N/A

5

6

0

1

NlA

1

0

N/A

0

4

0

1

N/A

0

0

N/A

0

0

0

0

N/A

0

0

N/A

0

1

0

0

N/A

1

0

N/A

0

0

0

0

NlA

0

0

N/A

1

0

0

0

NlA

0

0

N/A

0

6

1

4

N/A

2

2

N/A

0

0

0

0

N/A

0

0

FAILED TO COMPLY
I

0

12

24

1

7

0

6

14

1996 DeSI GRANT PROGRAM SUMMARY REPORT ON QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORTS SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER PROJECTS

SUBGRANT

NUMBER

DCSI-
-.

SUBGRANTEE
--

96-29
,

CITYOFADEL

96-30 & 95-30 CITY OF ALMA

ANNUAL ANNUAL

96-37

CLINCH COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-39

CITY OF CONYERS

ANNUAL

96-41

COWETA COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-48

FORSYTH COUNTY

96-49

FRANKLIN COUNTY

ANNUAL ANNUAL

96-52

CITY OF HAZLEHURST

ANNUAL

96-59

CITY OF MILLEN

ANNUAL

96-61

CITY OF NEWNAN

ANNUAL

96-62

CITY OF NORCROSS

ANNUAL

96-73

CITY OF TIFTON

ANNUAL

96-75

TURNER CTY BRD OF COMM

OTAL FOR ALL SUBGRANTEES

VIOLENCE RELATED ARRESTS FOR MISDEMEANORS

ADULTS

JUVENILES

1

14

OTHER ARRESTS

OTHER ARRESTS

TOTAL ARRESTS

._-- - - - - - - FOR FELONIES

FOR MISDEMEANORS
------

FOR FELONIES
-------- -------

ADULTS

JUVENILES

ADULTS

JUVENILES
.

ADULTS
--

JUVENILES
--- -

2

3

16

17

4

15

1

2

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

3

0

22

39

2

14

7

0

11

15

4

18

0

0

5

12

0

0

2

26

12

20

4

0

17

0

6

0

5

0

2

3

12

8

1

2

1

17

0

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

2

2

8

2

2

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

3

3

0

7

17

57

16

9

31

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

FAILED TO COMPLY

431

107

23

24

117

107

41

76

1996 DCSI GRANT PROGRAM SUMMARY REPORT ON aUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORTS SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER PROJECTS

SUBGRANT

NUMBER

DeSI-
.- - -

SUBGRANTEE

96-29

CITY OF ADEL

ANNUAL

96-30 & 95-30 CITY OF ALMA

ANNUAL

96-37

CLINCH COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-39

CITY OF CONYERS

ANNUAL

96-41

COWETA COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-48

FORSYTH COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-49

FRANKLIN COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-52

CITY OF HAZLEHURST

ANNUAL

96-59

CITY OF MILLEN

ANNUAL

96-61

CITY OF NEWNAN

ANNUAL

96-62

CITY OF NORCROSS

ANNUAL

96-73

CITY OF TIFTON

ANNUAL

96-75

TURNER CTY BRD OF COMM

fOTAL FOR ALL SUBGRANTEES

TOTAL ARRESTS FOR MISDEMEANORS

ADULTS 18

JUVENILES
-
36

TRAFFIPARK WARNICITN
71

TRESPASS WARNICITN
63

ASSIST PATROU DETECTIVE DIVISION
167

ASSIST OTHER AGENCIES

VALUE OF REPORTED STOLEN/LOST PROPERTY

VALUE OF RECOVERED STOLEN/LOST PROPERTY

75

$829.00

$679.00

1

2

80

1

15

4

$385.00

$0.00

24

42

30

20

51

2

$1,800.00

$1,200.00

29

0

0

0

15

10

$5,486.00

$4,000.00

19

29

54

13

150

5

$1,767.00

$1,447.00

6

41

0

75

20

0

$5,086.00

$1,500.00

0

0

21

11

4

12

$8.00

$8.00

7

20

0

1

2

0

$5,577.00

$5,176.00

0

2

9

1

0

0

$0.00

$0.00

2

32

107

24

4

20

$630.00

$0.00

28

48

42

93

187

117

$3,770.00

$2,470.00

0

2

0

0

0

0

$185.00

$0.00

FAILED TO COMPLY

134

254

414

302

615

245

$25,523.00

$16,480.00

1996 DCSI GRANT PROGRAM SUMMARY REPORT ON QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORTS SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER PROJECTS

SUBGRANT NUMBER DCSI-
-
96-29

SUBGRANTEE
-
CITY OF ADEL

ANNUAL

96-30 & 95-30 CITY OF ALMA

ANNUAL

96-37

I

I

96-39

CLINCH COUNTY CITY OF CONYERS

96-41

COWETA COUNTY

ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL

96-48

FORSYTH COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-49

FRANKLIN COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-52

CITY OF HAZLEHURST

ANNUAL

96-59

CITY OF MILLEN

ANNUAL

96-61

CITY OF NEWNAN

ANNUAL

96-62

CITY OF NORCROSS

ANNUAL

96-73

CITY OF TIFTON

ANNUAL

96-75

TURNER CTY BRD OF COMM

roTAL FOR ALL SUBGRANTEES

CONFLICT RESOLUTIONIMEDIATION

STUDENT CONFERENCE
(WALK IN)

STUDENT CONFERENCE
(CALL IN)

JUVENILE COURT PROCESS
============== ============== ============== ============== ============== =======1

---------PETITIONED--

I

----- ----- ----- ------
TRANSFER TO

I
==============

CRIMINAL

NON-

COURT

PLACEMENT

PROBATION

DISMISSED

OTHER

PETITIONED

103

113

0

0

0

0

0

0

129

58

2

0

6

2

0

18

39

40

1

3

15

1

47

3

43

34

4

5

26

0

0

0

128

156

15

2

26

0

0

0

101

53

38

6

2

0

0

0

356

43

0

0

1

0

0

0

14

50

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

77

23

0

0

17

0

0

1

229

152

0

0

0

0

0

0

211

214

0

0

0

0

0

1

FAILED TO COMPLY

FAILED TO COMPLY
I

1,432

946

60

16

93

3

49

23

1996 DCSI GRANT PROGRAM SUMMARY REPORT ON QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORTS SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER PROJECTS

SUBGRANT

NUMBER

DeSI-

-0-

--

SUBGRANTEE

96-29

CITYOFADEL

ANNUAL

96-30 & 95-30 CITY OF ALMA

ANNUAL

96-37

CLINCH COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-39

CITY OF CONYERS

96-41

COWETA COUNTY

96-48

FORSYTH COUNTY

96-49

FRANKLIN COUNTY

96-52

CITY OF HAZLEHURST

96-59

CITY OF MILLEN

ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL

96-61

CITY OF NEWNAN

ANNUAL

96-62

CITY OF NORCROSS

ANNUAL

96-73

CITY OF TIFTON

ANNUAL

96-75

TURNER CTY BRD OF COMM

OTAL FOR ALL SUBGRANTEES

SUBSEQUENT REFERRALS

- - - - - - VICTIM ASSISTANCE CONFERENCE
----- -_._--- ------ ------

-------- ---------- - - - - - SOCIAL

DOMESTIC

CHILD

SEXUAL

SUICIDE

SERVICE

SCHOOL

VIOLENCE

ABUSE

ASSAULT
-

STALKING

INTERVENTION
-

OTHER

AGENCY

AGENCY

--

40

3

7

5

0

23

14

29

1

0

2

0

0

0

0

63

1

2

2

0

1

0

3

7

19

2

0

8

0

0

2

0

5

2

3

2

0

1

3

43

41

11

32

12

11

12

13

3

1

24

0

33

7

0

25

35

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

8

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

1

0

25

17

7

4

5

0

24

5

1

0

0

0

1

1

5

0

FAILED TO COMPLY

145

50

57

32

44

25

110

197

1996 DCSI GRANT PROGRAM ,UMMARY REPORT ON QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORTS ,CHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER PROJECTS

SUBGRANT

NUMBER

DCSI-

SUBGRANTEE

- - - --

--

96-29

CITYOFADEL

ANNUAL

96-30 & 95-30 CITY OF ALMA

ANNUAL

96-37

CLINCH COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-39

CITY OF CONYERS

96-41

COWETA COUNTY

96-48

FORSYTH COUNTY

96-49

FRANKLIN COUNTY

ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL

96-52

CITY OF HAZLEHURST

ANNUAL

96-59

CITY OF MILLEN

ANNUAL

96-61

CITY OF NEWNAN

ANNUAL

96-62

CITY OF NORCROSS

ANNUAL

96-73

CITY OF TIFTON

ANNUAL

96-75

TURNER CTY BRD OF COMM

,OTAL FOR ALL SUBGRANTEES

SUBSEQUENT REFERRALS
--------

LAW ENFORCEMENT
24

OTHER
--
0

SCHOOL FUND
RAISERS

HOURS SPENT ON
-------

CAMPUS

CRIME

PREVENTION

COMMUNITY

ACTIVITIES

DRIVES

HOURS SPENT ON CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION IN
---------

CRIMINAL

JUSTICE

ALCOHOUDRUG

(lAW)

SAFETY

ABUSE

6

14

17

7

13

20

10

0

0

0

1

7

9

8

1

0

1

29

0

30

10

30

13

0

14

43

3

23

39

34

16

0

6

10

0

28

10

16

32

0

2

155

2

135

74

156

10

0

70

255

14

235

195

565

0

0

0

198

0

9

0

60

0

0

16

4

0

0

0

14

0

0

17

59

4

19

15

17

17

2

10

75

9

34

87

18

0

0

0

0

0

17

17

16

FAILED TO COMPLY

123

2

141

842

50

544

469

954

1996 DCSI GRANT PROGRAM SUMMARY REPORT ON QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORTS SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER PROJECTS

SUBGRANT NUMBER DCSI-
.96-29

SUBGRANTEE
--
CITYOFADEL

ANNUAL

96-30 & 95-30 CITY OF ALMA

ANNUAL

96-37

CLINCH COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-39

CITY OF CONYERS

ANNUAL

96-41

COWETA COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-48

FORSYTH COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-49

FRANKLIN COUNTY

ANNUAL

96-52

CITY OF HAZLEHURST

ANNUAL

96-59

CITY OF MILLEN

ANNUAL

96-61

CITY OF NEWNAN

ANNUAL

96-62

CITY OF NORCROSS

ANNUAL

96-73

CITY OF TIFTON

ANNUAL

96-75

TURNER CTY BRD OF COM'll1

'-OTAL FOR ALL SUBGRANTEES

HOURS SPENT ON

TEACHER ORIENTATION

EDUCATION

COMMUNITY

EVENINGS PRESENTATIONS

9

2

10

3

2

4

8

0

0

31

3

12

12

0

3

14

33

17

16

42

27

3

0

0

0

0

21

18

4

4

11

16

26

0

0

0

FAILED TO COMPLY

125

102

124

APPENDIXB PURPOSE AREA #2

ATTACHMENT 1
1996 LOCALLY IMPLEMENTED MULTIJURISDICTIONAL DRUG TASK FORCE PROJECTS MAP

CJCC Multl-Jurisdlctional Drug Task Forces
Southeast Georgia DTF 2. Athens-Clarke-Elbert County DTF 3. Richmond County DTF 4. Ocmulgee DTF 5. Altamaha DTF 6. Middle Georgia DTF 7. Oconee Dublin DTF 8. West Georgia DTF 9. Cherokee County M.A.N.S. 10. South Georgia DTF

11. Tri-Cities Narcotics 12. East Metro Drug Enforcement Team 13. Mid-South Narcotics Task Force 14. Flint River Narcotics Task Force 15. East Central Georgia DTF 16. Tri-Circuit DTF 17. Coastal Organized Drug Enforcement TF 18. Northeast Georgia Narcotics Task Force 19. Hall County MAN.S. 20. Tallapoosa Judicial Circuit DTF
DTF = Drug Task Force MAN.S. = Multi-Agency Narcotics Squad

21. Piedmont/Northern MAN.S. 22. Multi-Agency Crack Enforcement DTF 23. Metro DTF 24. Southwest Georgia DTF 25. Rome/Floyd Metro DTF 26. Narcotics Task Force 27. Lookout Mountain Judicial Circuit DTF 28. Appalachian DTF 29. Albany-Dougherty DTF (#29 is 95-14 in Statistical References)

ATTACHMENT 2
EVALUATION COMPONENT FOR
LOCALLY IMPLEMENTED MULTIJURISDICTIONAL TASK
FORCE PROJECTS

....
EVALUATION COMPONENT FOR
LOCALLYIMWLEMENTED MULTIJURISDICTIONAL
TASKFORCE PROJECTS

GOAL:

To promote a coordinated drug enforcement effort throughout the area served and to encourage maximum cooperation between all law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies within the jurisdiction.

Objective #1: To address the multi-faceted drug problem on the varied fronts of three tiers [i.e., major violators/drug distributors, mid-level violators/drug distributors, and street level violators/drug distributors] through investigation, prosecution and conviction of these violators/distributors.

Project Activities: (1) Covert (undercover) operations including but not limited to:



Gathering and documenting intelligence.



Conducting surveillance.



Purchase of illegal drugs through undercover buys.



Utilization of confidential informants to purchase evidence,

information, and services (pIE, PII, PIS).



Multiple arrests ("Takedowns") of targeted offenders.

(2) Overt operations including but not limited to:



Gathering and documenting intelligence.



Conducting surveillance.



Execution of search warrants.



Raids.



Street sweeps throughout the open air drug market.



Utilization of canine services.



Interdict/intercept distributors transporting drugs.



Utilization of road blocks.

(3) Utilize audio/video resources to ensure maximum prosecution and conviction.

(4) Timely submission of complete case file(s) to appropriate prosecutorial official(s).

(5) Consult with prosecutorial official(s) where appropriate or deemed necessary.

Performance Indicators: (1)

Number of activities performed per quarter (See Section 2 of the Quarterly Activity Report):

1



Surveillance.



Intelligence Submissions (GSINs).



Undercover Buys.



Probable Cause Searches.



Consensual Searches.



Search Warrants.



InterdictionIRoadblocks.

(2) Total number of cases per quarter (See Section 3 of the Quarterly Activity Report).

(3) Number of cases initiated by drug type (See Section 3.1 of the Quarterly Activity Report):



Cocaine.



Crack Cocaine.



Cannabis.



Opiates.



Stimulants.



Depressants.



Hallucinogens.



Prescription.



Counterfeit.



Other.

(4) Number of charges filed by type of offense and by drug-related activity (See Section 4 ofthe Quarterly Activity Report):

1. Cocaine. 2. Crack Cocaine. 3. Cannabis. 4. Opiates.
5. Stimulants. 6. Depressants.
7. Hallucinogens.
8. Prescription. 9. Counterfeit. lQ. Other.

a. Trafficking.

b. CultivationlManufacture.

c. Sale.

d. Possession with Intent.

e. Reverse.

f.

Possession.

g. Other.

(5) Number of charges by crime classification (See Section 4.1 of the Quarterly Activity Report):



Felony.

2



Misdemeanor.



Total Charges.

(6) Total number of charges classified by drug and violent offense (See Section 4.2 of the Quarterly Activity Report):



Violent drug charges.



Non-violent drug charges.



Violent non-drug charges.



Non-violent non-drug charges.

(7) Arrest Demographics (See Section 5 of the Quarterly Activity Report):

A. Juvenile (Male/Female).

1.

~te.

2. Black.

3. Hispanic.

4. Native American.

5. Other.

Total Number of Male Juvenile Arrests. Total Number of Female Juvenile Arrests.

B. Adult (Male/Female).

1.

~te.

2. Black.

3. Hispanic.

4. Native American.

5. Other.

Total Number ofMale Adult Arrests. Total Number of Female Adult Arrests.

Note: Total number of arrests classified by age & sex should equal the total number of arrests classified by criminal history.

(8) Ainount and value of drugs seized classified by drug type (See Section 6 of the Quarterly Activity Report):



Cocaine.



Crack Cocaine.

3



Cannabis.



Opiates.



Stimulants.



Depressants.



Hallucinogens.



Prescription.



Counterfeit.



Other.

(9) Number of marijuana plants destroyed during the quarter classified by the following types of marijuana (See Section 6.1 of the Quarterly Activity Report):



Sinsemilla.



Commercial Grade.



Wild (Ditchweed).

(10) Convictions by drug type and drug-related activity (See Section 8 of the Quarterly Activity Report):

1. Cocaine.
2. Crack Cocaine. 3. Cannabis. 4. Opiates.
5. Stimulants.
6. Depressants. 7. Hallucinogens. 8. Prescription. 9. Counterfeit.
10. Other.

a. Trafficking. b. CultivationlManufacture. c. Sale. d. Possession with Intent. e. Reverse. f. Possession. g. Other.

(11) Number of convictions by crime classification (See Section 8.1 of the Quarterly Activity Report):



Felony.



Misdemeanor.



Total convictions.

(12) Total number of convictions classified by drug and violent offense (See Section 8.2 of the Quarterly Activity Report):



Violent drug convictions.



Non-violent drug convictions.

4



Violent non-drug convictions.



Non-violent non-drug convictions.

(13) Sentences of convictions by drug offense and type of sentence (See Section 9 of the Quarterly Activity Report):

1. Cocaine.
2. Crack Cocaine.
3. Cannabis. 4. Opiates.
5. Stimulants. 6. Depressants.
7. Hallucinogens. 8. Prescription. 9. Counterfeit. 10. Other.

a.

Prison.

b. Jail.

c.

Probation.

d. Split Sentence.

e. Boot Camp.

f.

Suspended Sentence.

g. Other.

h. Community Service.

1.

Fines.

(14) Sentences of defendant by offense type (See Section 9.1 of the Quarterly Activity Report):



Non-violent drug offenses.



Drug-related violent offenses.



Non-drug violent offenses.



Non-drug non-violent offenses.

Objective #2: Recovery of criminal assets derived from illegal drug activities.

Project Activity:

Utilize financial investigative techniques including forfeiture actions, tax law enforcement, and so forth.

Performance Indicators: (1)

Number and dollar value of asset seizures (See Section 7 of the Quarterly Activity Report):



Vehicles.



Vessels.



Aircraft.



Currency.



Other Financial Instruments.



Real Property.



Weapons.

5



Other.

(2) Number and dollar value of assetforfeitures (See Section 7 of the Quarterly Activity Report):



Vehicles.



Vessels.



Aircraft.



Currency.



Other Financial Instruments.



Real Property.



Weapons.



Other.

Objective #3: Reduction of fractional and duplicitous investigations and prosecutions.

Project Activities: (1) Establish a representative Control Group/Board that provides oversight and
management to the task force, including such functions as:



Define mission or purpose of task force.



Determine participating jurisdictions.



Develop Interagency Agreement, Operating Policies and Procedures,

allocation of resources, and so forth.



Select quality cases that will impact the service area in the most

productive fashion.

(2) Establish a network facilitating the sharing of intelligence and resources, reflected through productive monthly Control Group/Board meetings.

(3) Establish a central location for the collection and dissemination of information relating to drug distribution and manufacturing activities within the jurisdiction of the member agencies.

Performance Indicators: (l)

In-house reviews of Interagency Agreement (Performed by CJCC).

(2) In-house review of Operating Policies and Procedures (performed by CJCC).

(3) Number of GSINs submitted versus the number of cases initiated during the period (Monitored by the GBI Intelligence Unit and CJCC).

6

(4) Monthly submission ofControl Group/Board minutes to the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council (Monitored and reviewed by CJCC).
(5) Total number of "assistance rendered" cases (already reflected in appropriate sections of the Quarterly Activity Report; no need to report separately).

Objective #4: To encourage and increase the participation of citizens in preventing drug and violent crime in their communities and in supporting local drug education.

Project Activities: (1) Speaking to various civic organizations, church groups, schools, and other
community groups promoting awareness of the drug problem within the service area.

(2) Advertise anonymous (800) tip lines to encourage the public to become involved in eradicating drugs in their respective communities.

(3) Publicize results of task force operations such as number of arrests made, amount and type of drugs seized, and so forth.

(4) Distribute educationaVinformational literature promoting the anti-drug message and making the citizenry aware of the task force existence.

(5)
Performance Indicators: (1)

Conducting periodic School Safety Searches in accordance with task force operating policies and procedures.
Number of community presentations given to:



Schools.



Churches/Religious Organizations.



Civic Groups/Organizations.



Other (please specify).

(2) T,otal number of anonymous (800) tips received.

(3) Total number of anonymous (800) tips resulting in arrests and/or seizures.
(4) Submission of all task force related press releas.es with photographs, if possible.

7

(5) Number of anti-drug related educational and informational brochures distributed and dates of distribution. (Please enclose copies ofall brochures.)
(6) School Safety Searches (name and grade levels of school(s)):
A. Number ofjuvenile arrests:



Felony.



Misdemeanor.

B. Number of adult arrests:



Felony.



Misdemeanor.

C. Drugs seized (amount and dollar value):



Cocaine.



Crack Cocaine.



Cannabis.



Opiates.



Stimulants.



Depressants.



Hallucinogens.



Prescription.



Counterfeit.



Other.

D. Weapons seized:

1. Knife. 2. Handgun. 3. Shotgun. 4. Rifle. 5. Other.

8

ATTACHMENT 3
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE QUARTERLY ACTIVITY
REPORT

INSTRUCTIONS FOR
COMPLETING THE QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT

SECTION 1: HEADINGS

Subgrantee: Local unit of government awarded the Subgrant. (See Subgrant Award Document.)

Subgrant #: Number assigned to the Subgrant by CJCC. (See Subgrant Award Document.)

Project Title: Name of project being implemented by the law enforcement agency on behalf of the Subgrantee. (See Subgrant Award Document.)

Quarter Ended:

Period of time covered by the Quarterly Activity Report (e.g., 09/30/96).

Contact:

Name ofperson responsible for collecting and disseminating the data reported on the Quarterly Activity Report.

Phone:

Telephone number where the contact person can be reached if questions arise concerning the data reported on the Quarterly Activity Report.

SECTION 2: COVERT/OVERT OPERATIONS Indicate the number oftimes each activity was performed during the quarter.

SECTION 3: PROJECT INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY

The purpose of this section is to reflect the number of investigations handled during the reporting period. Except for any active cases which were initiated before the reporting period starting date, all data should reflect only activity during the current reporting period.

Step 1:

Indicate the number of cases in "active" status at the beginning ofthe quarter. A case
is considered "active" if any additional information is required by follow up investigation or ifthe case ifbeing actively investigated or prosecuted by project
staff.

Step 2:

Indicate the number of cases initiated during the quarter. The table in Section 3.1 should be utilized when compiling this data. Please note that the amount entered in the second blank should correspond with the total amount computed in the table.

Step 3:

Add the amount of "active" cases at the beginning of the quarter (Step 1) with the number of cases initiated during the quarter (Step 2) to arrive at the amount of total cases in "active" status for the quarter.

1

Step 4:

Indicate the number of cases that were "closed" during the quarter. A case is "closed" when the entire matter is completed as far as the project's staff involvement is concerned and no further action is required.

Step 5:

Indicate the number of cases that were "dropped" during the quarter. A case is
considered "dropped" if the case is unsolved or every reasonable avenue of
investigation has been pursued and exhausted. No arrests have been made and all active investigation has been terminated. PLEASE NOTE THAT IN SOME JURISDICTIONS AND/OR PROJECTS THE TERM "DROPPED" IS
SYNONYMOUS WITH THE TERM "CLOSED" AND IT WOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED UNUSUAL FOR A ZERO TO BE ENTERED FOR TillS BLANK.

Step 6:

Add the amount of cases that were "closed" during the quarter (Step 4) with the amount of cases that were "dropped" during the quarter (Step 5) to arrive at the amount of cases cleared from "active" status during the quarter.

Step 7:

Subtract the total number of cases cleared during the quarter (Step 6) from the total
number of cases that were in "active" status during the quarter (Step 3) to arrive at the total number of cases considered "pending" at the end of the quarter. A case is
considered "pending" if any additional information is required by follow up investigation or ifthe case is being actively investigated or prosecuted by project
staIf--synonymous with "active." PLEASE NOTE THE AMOUNT ENTERED
HERE SHOULD BE THE SAME AMOUNT ENTERED IN STEP 1 ON THE
SUBSEQUENT QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT.

Section 3.1: Cases Initiated

Indicate the number of cases initiated during the quarter categorized by the following drug types:



Cocaine.



Crack Cocaine.



Cannabis [i.e., hashish, marijuana, etc.].



Opiates [i.e., heroin, opium, codeine, etc.].



Stimulants [i.e., amphetamines/methamphetamine, etc.].



Depressants [i.e., barbiturates, alcohol, etc.]'



Hallucinogens [i.e., PCP, LSD, etc.].



Prescription.



Counterfeit.



Other (please explain).

2

SECTION 4: CHARGES FILED BY TYPE OF OFFENSE AND BY DRUG-RELATED ACTIVITY
This section records data from arrests involving drug charges. For the purposes of this report, "arrest" refers to the fOImal filing of criminal charges by a law enforcement agency against a suspected offender. Please note that each charge should be counted as an individual offense. For
example, ifan individual is arrested andfour charges arefiled, then four separate entries should
be made to the matrix in Section 4. Refer to Section 5 for individuals counted by arrest. Summonses issued or persons held temporarily for investigatory purposes should not be counted, nor should persons picked up on escape or violation warrants (unless new charges are filed).
If a person is arrested and charges for more than one drug offense are filed, then enter each charge according to offense. The following categories of drug-related activity are to be utilized.
. Drug-Related Activity Categories (high to low):



Trafficking.



CultivationlManufacture.



Sale.



Possession with Intent.



Reverse.



Possession.



Other (please explain).

Within each of these categories, the following hierarchy of drug types are to be utilized:



Cocaine.



Crack Cocaine.



Cannabis [i.e., hashish, marijuana, etc.].



Opiates [i.e., heroin, opium, codeine, etc.].



Stimulants [i.e., amphetamines/methamphetamine, etc.].



Depressants [i.e., barbiturates, alcohol, etc.].



Hallucinogens [i.e., PCP, LSD, etc.].



Prescription.



Counterfeit.



Other (please explain).

Section 4.1: Charges by Crime Classification

Take the total number of charges computed in Section 4 and indicate how many charges were classified as felonies and how many charges were classified as misdemeanors. Please note that the total amount ofcharges for this subsection should correspond with the table total in Section 4.
Ifthis is not the case, please explain.

3

Section 4.2: Charges by Drug Offense and by Violent Offense
This matrix provides information on the project's charges filed by drug-related offenses and by violent offenses. Violent offenses consist ofthe FBI's Uniform Crime Reports (VCR) Part I offense categories of murder/nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault.
The drug-related offenses row total should equal the table total in Section 4. If this is not the
case, please explain.

SECTION 5: ARRESTS BY RACEIETHNICITY AND SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS

Data should be entered by race/ethnicity and by sex, age, and criminal history.

Age:



Juvenile: Enter the number of offenders who were under the age of 17 at the time of

arrest.



Adult: Enter the number of offenders who were 17 or older at the time of arrest.

Note: The data entered in this part of the matrix should also be classified by sex.

Criminal History:



1st Time Offender: Enter the number of arrestees who were first time offenders.



Repeat Offender: Enter the number of arrestees who were repeat offenders.



Unknown: Enter the number of arrestees for whom the offender status (first time or

repeat) was unknown at the time the Quarterly Activity Report is prepared.

SECTION 6: AMOUNT AND VALUE OF DRUGS SEIZED
Provide data on the total amount and dollar value of drugs that the project has seized during the quarter (by seizure and/or by purchase). The Georgia Bureau of Investigation's guidelines (See Memorandum dated July 1, 1996, from Vernon M. Keenan, Deputy Director for Investigations, regarding 1996-97 Standardized Drug Values) will be utilized when collecting this data.
The following values will be used for drug seizures and purchases:
1. MARIJUANA
4

A. Sinsemilla

Ounce Pound

$ 200.00 2,000.00

B. Commercial

Ounce Pound

140.00 1,100.00

C. Hashish

Ounce Pound

200.00 3,000.00

D. Cannabis Plants will be valued at one pound per plant.

NOTE:

Marijuana will be identified as Sinsemilla or Commercial.

2. COCAINE

A. Powder Cocaine

Gram Ounce Pound Kilo

$ 100.00 1,100.00
15,000.00 26,000.00

B. "Crack Cocaine" "Rock" Ounce Pound

20-40.00 1,000.00 12,000.00

3. HEROIN

Gram Ounce Pound

150.00 4,000.00 50,000.00

4. METHAMPHETAMINE (Crystal Meth)
Gram Ounce Pound

100.00 1,100.00 15,000.00

5. LSD

Per Dosage

5-10.00

6. DILAUDID

Per Dosage

50.00

7. BARBITURATE

Per Dosage

3.00

8. STIMULANTS

Per Dosage

3.00

Section 6.1: Marijuana Eradication

5

Indicate whether or not any marijuana plants were eradicated during the quarter. If so, indicate the number of plants destroyed per the type of marijuana.

SECTION 7: ASSETS SEIZED AND FORFEITED

Provide data on the quantity and dollar value for both seized and forfeited assets from project arrests and investigations.

Please note that the forfeiture data requested is for assets seized by and forfeited back to the specific project identified for this report. If, for example, a task force reported seizure of $10,000 at an earlier date, and receives only $5,000 back in the current reporting period (with the other $5,000 going to another state or local agency), it is expected that the amount reported under "Forfeiture" would only be the $5,000 that came back to the task force, not the total $10,000.

Asset Seizures, Number:

Enter the number of seizures for the reporting period. For seized currency, provide the number ofincidents where currency was seized.

Asset Seizures, Value:

Enter the estimated dollar value for seizures made during the reporting period.

Asset Foifeitures, Number: Enter the number of asset forfeitures for the reporting period. For forfeited currency, provide the number of incidents where currency was forfeited.

Asset Foifeitures, Value: Enter the dollar value of asset forfeitures for the reporting period.

Section 7.1: Distribution of Forfeiture Proceeds

Indicate the distribution (dollar value) offorfeiture proceeds between the project and other entities. In some jurisdictions, forfeiture proceeds are allocated to general revenue funds, public education, or general departmental budgets rather than going to the project which originated the forfeiture.

SECTION 8: CONVICTIONS BY DRUG OFFENSE AND DRUG-RELATED ACTIVITY
For this report, "convicted persons" refers to those individuals receiving a finding of "guilty," based on jury verdict, a guilty plea, or a nolo contendere plea, for a formal criminal charge filed in a court of original jurisdiction.
Like Section 4 and subsections 4.1 and 4.2, these data refer to project operations and activities, not to the tracking of individual cases. Therefore, the total number of convictions in this report refers to the number of decisions handed down by a court for charges filed by a project for all cases during
6

the reporting period, regardless of when the charges were filed. Please note that the total from the table in Section 4 does not necessarily have to correspond with the table total in this Section.

Refer to Section 4for a definition ofarrest and classification ofcharges.

The following categories of drug-related activity are to be utilized.

Drug-Related Activity Categories (high to low):



Trafficking.



CultivationlManufacture.



Sale.



Possession with Intent.



Reverse.



Possession.



Other (please explain).

Within each of these categories, the following hierarchy of drug types are to be utilized:



Cocaine.



Crack Cocaine.



Cannabis [i.e., hashish, marijuana, etc.].



Opiates [i.e., heroin, opium, codeine, etc.].



Stimulants [i.e., amphetamines/methamphetamine, etc.].



Depressants [i.e., barbiturates, alcohol, etc.].



Hallucinogens [i.e., PCP, LSD, etc.].



Prescription.



Counterfeit.



Other (please explain).

Section 8.1: Convictions by Crime Classification

Take the total number of convictions computed in Section 8 and indicate how many convictions were classified as felonies and how many convictions were classified as misdemeanors. Please note that the total amount ofconvictionsfor this subsection should correspond with the table total in
Section 8. Ifthis is not the case, please explain.
Section 8.2: Convicti,ons by Drug Offense and by Violent Offense

This matrix provides infonnation on the project's convictions by drug-related offenses and by violent offenses. Violent offenses consist ofthe FBI's Unifonn Crime Reports (VCR) Part I offense categories ofmurder/nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault.

7

The drug-related offenses row total should equal the table total in Section 8. If this is not the
case, please explain.

SECTION 9: SENTENCES BY DRUG OFFENSE AND TYPE OF SENTENCE

Provide data on the number of persons sentenced by sentence type and sentence length using the same drug types specified in Sections 4 and 8. Like the arrest data, these data refer to project operations and activities, not to the tracking of individual cases. Therefore, the total number of sentences in this report refers to the number of decisions handed down by a court for all cases during the reporting period, regardless of when the arrest was made.

Nine sentence types are listed:

"Prison" sentences refer to official sentences to State prisons, regardless of whether time is served in local jails because of crowding problems.

"Jail" sentences refer to official sentences to local jails or correctional centers. These are primarily county facilities, though a sentence of thirty days, with time spent in local lockup considered served, would apply.

The other seven categories are self-explanatory.

Sentence length refers to the number ofyears/months for the sentence type handed down by the court (excluding fines, which should be reported in dollar amounts, and community service, which should be reported in hours).

Prison Sentences, Number: Enter the number of prison sentences for the reporting period.

Prison Sentences, Years: Enter the total number of years sentence for each drug type.

Jail Sentences, Number: Enter the number ofjail sentences for the reporting period.

Jail Sentences, Months: Enter the total number of months sentence for each drug type.

Probation Sentences, Number:

Enter the number of probation sentences for the reporting period.

Probation Sentences, Months:

Enter the total number of months sentence for each drug type.

Split Sentence, Number:

Enter the number of sentences for the reporting period that involve a combination of time in jail and time on probation.

8

Boot Camp Sentences, Number:

Enter the number of boot camp sentences for the reporting period.

Suspended Sentences, Number:

Enter the number of suspended sentences for the reporting period.

Other Sentences, Number: Enter the number of sentences for the reporting period that do not fit into any of the other categories.

Community Service Sentences, Number:

Enter the number of community service sentences for the reporting period.

Community Service Sentences, Hours:

Enter the total number of hours for community service sentence for each drug offense type.

Fines Assessed, Number: Enter the number of fines assessed for the reporting period.

Fines Assessed, Dollars: Enter the total dollar amount of fines assessed for each drug type.

Section 9.1: Sentences of Defendant by Offense Type

This matrix provides information on the project's sentences by drug-related offenses and by violent offenses. Violent offenses consist of the FBI's Uniform Crime Reports (VCR) Part I offense categories ofmurder/nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault.

SECTION 10:

EFFORTS TO INCREASE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN THE PREVENTION OF DRUGS AND VIOLENT CRIME IN THE COMMUNITY

Provide data on the Task Force's efforts to increase community participation in the prevention of drugs and violent crime within the communities of the participating jurisdictions. The information provided in this Section should be presented in a written narrative format disclosing what steps the Task Force has taken to involve and educate the community as to the existence, effects, and preventive measures regarding drugs and violent crime. Ifthe Task Force is currently unable to meet any of the Requirements listed, then an explanation should be provided indicating why the Task Force is unable to satisfy the Requirement(s).

SECTION 11:

SIGNATURES

9

Please note that in order to comply with attached Special Condition #14 of the Subgrant Agreement, the Quarterly Activity Report must be signed by both the Task Force Commander as well as the Chairman ofthe Control Board/Group. These signatures serve as certification that the contents of the Report are accurate and complete.
10

ATTACHMENT 4
MULTIJURISDICTIONAL DRUG TASKFORCE QUARTERLY
ACTIVITY REPORT

SECTION 1: HEADINGS Subgraniee: Project Title: Contact:

MULTIJURISDICTIONAL DRUG TASK FORCE QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT

Subgrant #:

DCSI-

Quarter Ended:

Phone #:

SECTION 2: COVERT/OVERT OPERATIONS

ACTIVITIES
Surveillance Intelligence Submissions (GSINs) Undercover Buys Probable Cause Searches Consensual Searches Search Warrants Interdiction/Roadblocks
I TOTAL ACTIVITIES

NUMBER

Page 1

SECTION 3: PROJECT INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY

Step 1: Step 2: Step 3:

Active cases at beginning ofquarter Cases initiated during quarter
Total active cases

Step 4: Step 5: Step 6: Step 7:

Cases closed during quarter Cases dropped during quarter
Total cases cleared during quarter Cases pending at end ofquarter

Section 3.1: Cases Initiated

DRUG TYPE

Cocaine

Crack Cocaine

Cannabis

Opiates

Stimulants

Depressants

Hallucinogens

Prescription

Counterfeit

Other
I

TOTAL CASES

NUMBER

Page 2

SECTION 4: CHARGES FILED BY TYPE OF OFFENSE AND DRUG-RELATED ACTIVITY

DRUGTVPE
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL

TRAFFICKING CULTIVATIONI MANUFACTURE

SALE

POSSESSION WI INTENT

REVERSE

POSSESSION

OTHER TOTAL

Section 4.1: Charges by Crime Classification

Section 4.2: Charges by Drug Offense & by Violent Offense

Felony Misdemeanor TOTAL

Drug Non-Drug
TOTAL CHARGES

VIOLENT NON-VIOLENT TOTAL

Page 3

SECTION 5: ARRESTS BY RACEIETHNICITY AND SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS

JUVENILE

ADULT

RACEIETHNICITY Male Female Male Female

White

Black

Hispanic

Native American Other

SUBTOTALS

TOTALS

(Male + Female)

(Male + Female)

CRIMINAL HISTORY

First Offender

Repeat Offender

Unknown

(First Offender + Repeat Offender + Unknown)

Page 4

SECTION 6: AMOUNT AND VALUE OF DRUGS SEIZED

Section 6.1: Marijuana Eradication

DRUG TYPE
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL

AMOUNT SEIZED

DOLLAR VALUE OF DRUGS
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

Was eradication an element ofthis project?

YES

NO

Ifyes, please complete the following:

Type of Marijuana Destroyed

Number of Plants Destroyed

Sinsemilla Commercial Grade Wild (Ditchweed)

PageS

ASSET TYPE
Vehicles Vessels Aircraft Currency (# of incidents) Other Financial Instruments Real Property Weapons Other
TOTAL

SECTION 7: ASSET SEIZURES AND FORFEITURES

SEIZURES NUMBER
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

VALUE

$

FORFEITURES

NUMBER

VALUE

$

$

$

$

$

$

$ $

$

Section 7.1: Distribution of Forfeiture Proceeds

$ - - - -to project

$

to other entities

Page 6

SECTION 8: CONVICTIONS BY DRUG OFFENSE AND DRUG-RELATED ACTIVITY

DRUG TYPE
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL

TRAFFICKING CULTIVATIONI MANUFACTURE

SALE

POSSESSION WIINTENT

REVERSE

POSSESSION

OTHER TOTAL

Section 8.1: Convictions by Crime Classification

Section 8.2: Convictions by Drug Offense and by Violent Ofense

Felony Misdemeanor TOTAL

Drug Non-Drug
TOTAL CONVICTIONS

VIOLENT NON-VIOLENT TOTAL

Page?

SECTION 9: SENTENCES BY DRUG OFFENSE AND TYPE OF SENTENCE

DRUG TYPE

PRISON

JAIL

PROBATION SPLIT BOOT SUSPENDED OTHER COMMUNITY

SENT. CAMP SENTENCE

SERVICE

FINES

Number /I OfVears Number /I Of Months Number /I Of Months Number Number

Number

Number Number /I of Hours Number $ Amount

Cocaine

Crack Cocaine

Cannabis

Opiates

Stimulants

Depressants

HaIlucinogens

Prescription

Counterfeit

Other

TOTAL

Page ~

Section 9.1: Sentences of Defendant by Offense Type

OFFENSE TYPE

PRISON

JAIL

PROBATION SPLIT BOOT SUSPENDED OTHER COMMUNITY

SENT. CAMP SENTENCE

SERVICE

FINES

No. # Of Years No. # Of Months No. # Of Months No.

No.

No.

No.

No. # of Hours No. S Amount

Non-Violent Drug Offenses

Drug-Related Violent Offenses

Non-Drug Violent Offenses Non-Drug Non-Violent Off.
TOTAL

Page 9

SECTION 10:

EFFORTS TO INCREASE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN THE PREVENTION OF DRUGS AND VIOLENT CRIME IN THE COMMUNITY

Requirement #1
In a written narrative, indicate the number of presentations given to the community as well as the type of organization given the presentation and the subject of the presentation.
Requirement #2
In a written narrative, indicate the number of tips (whether anonymous or not) received as well as the highlights (arrests and/or seizures) of these tips.
Requirement #3
Provide copies of all task force newspaper clippings or articles as well as photographs, if possible.
Requirement #4
In a written narrative, indicate the number of anti-drug educational and/or informational literature distributed as well as the dates of distribution and the audience given the literature. Also, enclose copies of all literature distributed to the community.
Requirement #5
In a written narrative, indicate the number of School Safety Searches (identify name and grade levels ofschool(s)) as well as the results of these searches. Specifically, the narrative should address the following:
1. The number ofjuvenile and/or adult arrests classified by crime type [i.e., felony and misdemeanor] .
2. The amount and dollar value of any drugs seized.
3. The number and type of any weapons seized.
4. Any other information pertinent to the results of these searches.

The Task Force can also include any other type of information relevant to the accomplishments of Task Force operations in this Section.
Page 10

SECTION 11: SIGNATURES
COMMANDER'S NAME (pRINTED) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
COMMANDER'S SIGNATURE
CHAIRMAN OF CONTROL GROUP NAME (pRINTED) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CHAIRMAN OF CONTROL GROUP SIGNATURE
Page 11

ATTACHMENT 5
1996 MULTIJURISDICTIONAL DRUG TASK FORCE PROJECTS
SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORTS

1996 DCSI GRANT PROGRAM SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORTS MULTIJURISDICTIONAL DRUG TASK FORCE PROJECTS TOTAL

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT
SECTION 2: COVERT/OVERT OPERATIONS
Surveillance Intelligence Submissions (GSINs) Undercover bUys Probable Cause Searches Consensual Searches Search Warrants Interdiction/Roadblocks
TOTAL ACTIVITIES (#)
SECTION 3: PROJECT INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY
Active Cases at Beginning of Quarter Cases Initiated During Quarter
TOTAL ACTIVE CASES
Cases Closed During Quarter Cases Dropped During Quarter

1/

1/ Total for All MJTFs

1/
II

1/

1/

4,658

1/

5,275

1/

2,966

1/

2,117

1/

2,098

1/

1,368

1/

684

1/

1/

19,166

1/

1/

1/

1/

1/

- 1/

1/

13,360

1/

11,547

1/

1/

24,907

1/

1/

8,649

934

TOTAL CASES CLEARED DURING QUARTER

9,583

CASES PENDING AT END OF QUARTER

15,324

Section 3.1: Cases Initiated

Cocaine

Crack Cocaine

Cannabis

Opiates

Stimulants

Depressants

Hallucinogens

Prescription

Counterfeit

Other

1/

1/

Total Cases Initiated

1/

1/

-------

1/ -- 1/

987 4,058 3,916
8 492
97 48 167 47 1,727
11,547

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT
SECTION 4: CHARGES FILED BY TYPE OF OFFENSE AND DRUG-RELATED ACTIVITY
TRAFFICKING
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL FOR TRAFFICKING
CULTIVATION/MANUFACTURE
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL FOR CULTIVATION/MANUFACTURE
SALE
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL FOR SALE
POSSESSION W/INTENT
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants

Total for All MJTFs

122

II

1,372

II

276

II

o

II

32

15

9

9

21

34

1,890

287 756
1,049 2
230

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT
Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL FOR POSSESSION W/INTENT
REVERSE
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit other
TOTAL FOR REVERSE
POSSESSION
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL FOR POSSESSION
OTHER
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL FOR OTHER
TOTAL CHARGES FILED

II

II Total for All MJTFs

II

II

4

II

21

19

4

13

2,385

4 23
6 0 1 0 1 3 0 0
38

523 1,121 2,675
3 248
65 25 89
6 132
4,887
/I /I
19 44 41
0 7 61 0 43 1 1,401
1,617
11,282

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT

Total for All MJTFs

Section 4.1: Charges by Crime Classification Felony Misdemeanor Total Charges Filed
Section 4.2: Charges by Drug Offense & by Violent Offense VIOLENT Drug Non-Drug TOTAL NON-VIOLENT Drug Non-Drug TOTAL
Total Charges Filed

7,682 3,600
11,282

/I

260

II

61

/I

321
"/I
I

10,044 917

10,961

11,282

SECTION 5: ARRESTS BY RACElETHNICITY AND SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS
JUVENILE (Male)
White Black Hispanic Native American Other
Totals for Juvenile Males
JUVENILE (Female)
White Black Hispanic Native American Other
Totals for Juvenile Females

118 205
2
o
1
326
35 21
o o o
56

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT
TOTALS FOR JUVENILES
ADULT (Male)
White Black Hispanic Native American Other
Totals for Adult Males
ADULT (Female)
White Black Hispanic Native American Other
Totals for Adult Females
TOTALS FOR ADULTS
CRIMINAL HISTORY (First Offender)
White Black Hispanic Native American Other
Totals for First Offenders
CRIMINAL HISTORY (Repeat Offender)
White Black Hispanic Native American Other
Totals for Repeat Offenders
CRIMINAL HISTORY (Unknown)
White Black Hispanic Native American Other

Total for All MJTFs

382
II

""I""I

2,266 4,787
79

1

""""

20 7,153

749 755
20 0 9
1,533

8,686

1,521 2,697
57 1
25
4,301
1,217 2,408
13 0 3
3,641
434 660
30 0 2

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT Totals for Unknown TOTALS FOR CRIMINAL HISTORY TOTAL ARRESTS

Total for All MJTFs 1,126 9,068 9,068

SECTION 6: AMOUNT AND VALUE OF DRUGS SEIZED

AMOUNT SEIZED

Cocaine

Crack Cocaine

Cannabis

Opiates

Stimulants

Depressants

I

Hallucinogens

/I

Prescription

I

Counterfeit

Other

TOTAL AMOUNT SEIZED

DOLLAR VALUE OF DRUGS

Cocaine

Crack Cocaine

Cannabis

Opiates

Stimulants

Depressants

Hallucinogens

Prescription

/I

Counterfeit (no assigned value)

/I

Other

/I

/I

TOTAL DOLLAR VALUE OF DRUGS SEIZED

/I

/I

/I

Section 6.1: Marijuana Eradication

/I

II

Number of Plants Destroyed

/I

/I

Sinsemilla

/I

Commercial Grade

/I

Wild (Ditchweed)

/I

/I

Total Number of Plants Destroyed

/I

II

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N/A
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
9,443 9,259
0
18,702

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT
SECTION 7: ASSET SEIZURES AND FORFEITURES
SEIZURES (Number)
Vehicles Vessels Aircraft Currency (# of incidents) Other Financial Instruments Real Property Weapons Other
TOTAL NUMBER OF SEIZURES
SEIZURES (Value)
Vehicles Vessels Aircraft Currency (# 'of incidents) Other Financial Instruments Real Property Weapons Other
TOTAL VALUE OF SEIZURES
FORFEITURES (Number)
Vehicles Vessels Aircraft Currency (# of incidents) Other Financial Instruments Real Property Weapons Other
TOTAL NUMBER OF FORFEITURES
FORFEITURES (Value)
Vehicles Vessels Aircraft Currency (# of incidents) Other Financial Instruments Real Property Weapons Other

- II II
- II II
--- II
II I

Total for All MJTFs

261 4 0
753 3
185 688 719
2,613

$1,051,960.00

$25,000.00

$0.00

$1,978,657.28

$1,060.00

$549,799.00

$103,115.00

II

$147,959.30

I"""

$3,857,550.58

153 2 0
556 1
28 135 233

1,108

$309,466.76 $3,170.00 $0.00
$1,004,150.30 $60.00
$125,688.14 $21,150.15 $45,805.79

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT TOTAL VALUE OF FORFEITURES
Section 7.1: Distribution of Forfeiture Proceeds Amount to Project Amount to Other Entities Total Amount Distributed

II II ---II /I
/I

Total for All MJTFs $1,509,491.14

$1,343,277.52 $166,213.13
$1,509,490.65

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT
Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL FOR SALE
POSSESSION WIINTENT
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL FOR POSSESSION W/INTENT
REVERSE
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL FOR REVERSE
POSSESSION
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL FOR POSSESSION
OTHER
Cocaine Crack Cocaine

II II --- II II
1/

Total for All MJTFs
8 10
5

1,039

150

313

414

0

67

6

5

5

II

1

1/

2

1/

1/

963

II

1/

1/

II

67

1/

1

1/

1

"1/

0 0

1/

0

"1/

0 0

1/

0

1/

0

1/

1/

69

1/

""1/

302

I"I

463 1,041

I

5

101

23

9

26

0

42

2,012

4 10

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - II

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT

II

Cannabis

---II II

Opiates

Stimulants

Depressants

Hallucinogens

Prescription

Counterfeit

Other

II

II

TOTAL FOR OTHER

II

II

/I

TOTAL CONVICTIONS

/I

/I

II

Section 8.1: Convictions by Crime

II

Classification

/I

Felony Misdemeanor

---.- - - / I /I II

II

Total Convictions

/I

/I

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - /I

Section 13.2: Convictions by Drug

/I

Offense & by Violent Offense

II

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - /I

VIOLENT

/I

/I

Drug

/I

Non-Drug

/I

/I

TOTAL

/I

/I

NON-VIOLENT

II

/I

Drug

II

Non-Drug

/I

/I

TOTAL

/I

/I

/I

Total Convictions

/I

/I

/I

----- /I

SECTION 9: SENTENCES BY DRUG OFFENSE II

AND TYPE OF SENTENCE

/I

/I

PRISON (Number)

II

/I

Cocaine

/I

Crack Cocaine

II

Cannabis

/I

Opiates

II

Total for All MJTFs 13 1 1 1 2 18 4
256 310
4,610
3,692 1,172 4,864
158 29 187
4,312 174
4,486
4,673
127 735 141
3

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT
Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL NUMBER OF PRISON SENTENCES
PRISON (# of Years)
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL YEARS SENTENCED
JAIL (Number)
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL NUMBER OF JAIL TERMS
JAIL (# of Months)
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL MONTHS SENTENCED
PROBATION (Number)

Total for All MJTFs
87 2 5 10 9 18
1,137

957 5,555
629 22 875 11 11 35 95 120
8,309

20

65

119

1

8

1

1

1

2

24

/I

/I

242

II

II

227

809

795

1

28

12

3

6

72

202

I

II

2,154

/I

II

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL NUMBER OF PROBATIONS GIVEN
PROBATION (# of Months)
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL MONTHS SENTENCED
SPLIT SENTENCES (Number)
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other
TOTAL NUMBER OF SPLIT SENTENCES
BOOT CAMP (Number)
Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit

"" Total for All MJTFs

""I

337

705

1,103

8

162

21

20

39

9

140

2,544

22,898 44,620 32,695
136 9,906
563 1,273 1,512
492 2,461
116,556

126

495

158

1

76

I

3

6

""""

7 0 31

903

16 111
34 0 3 0 1 0 0

II

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT

II

- II

Other

"II

TOTAL NUMBER OF BOOT CAMP SENTENCES

"II

SUSPENDED SENTENCE (Number)

II

Total for All MJTFs
2 167

Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other

"II

8

II

8

26

"""

0 0 0

0

0

0

10

TOTAL NUMBER OF SUSPENDED SENTENCES

52

OTHER (Number)

Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other

46

25

"II

54

II

2

3

"""""

0 0 1 0 16

TOTAL NUMBER OF OTHER SENTENCES

147

COMMUNITY SERVICE (Number)

Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other

51

108

176

0

13

2

"I

2

5

1

21

TOTAL NUMBER OF COMNTY SVC SENTENCES

379

COMMUNITY SERVICE (# of Hours)

Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates

10,761

20,803

I

12,444

II

0

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT

Total for All MJTFs

Stimulants

Depressants

Hallucinogens

Prescription

Counterfeit

/I

Other

/I

II TOTAL # OF HOURS OF COMMUNITY SERVICE /I

/I

FINES (Number)

/I

1,442 136 128 205 500
1,446
47,865

Cocaine Crack Cocaine Cannabis Opiates Stimulants Depressants Hallucinogens Prescription Counterfeit Other

309 870 1,076
4 158
11 16 33 8 150

TOTAL NUMBER OF FINES

2,635

FINES (Amount)

/I

/I

Cocaine

/I

Crack. Cocaine

/I

Cannabi3

/I

Opiates

/I

Stimulants

I

Depressants

Hallucinogens

Prescription

Counterfeit

Other

I

TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINES

/I

/I

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - /I

Section 9.1: Sentences of Defendant

/I

by Offense Type

/I

/I

PRISON (Number)

$1,344,845.00 $3,125,550.50 $1,323,024.50
$4,664.00 $2,273,305.00
$10,480.00 $29,816.00 $52,819.00
$9,500.00 $51,033.00
$8,225,037.00

Non-Violent Drug Offenses Drug-Related Violent Offenses Non-Drug Violent Offenses Non-Drug Non-Violent Offenses

1,081 41 6 6

TOTAL NUMBER OF PRISON SENTENCES

1,134

PRISON (# of Years)

Non-Violent Drug Offenses

7,933

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT

Total for All MJTFs

Non-Drug Violent Offenses

1

Non-Drug Non-Violent Offenses

1

TOTAL NUMBER OF BOOT CAMP SENTENCES

167

SUSPENDED SENTENCE {Numbe0

Non-Violent Drug Offenses

46

Drug-Related Violent Offenses

o

Non-Drug Violent Offenses

o

Non-Drug Non-Violent Offenses

6

TOTAL NUMBER OF SUSPENDED SENTENCES

52

OTHER (Number)

Non-Violent Drug Offenses

144

Drug-Related Violent Offenses

2

Non-Drug Violent Offenses

o

Non-Drug Non-Violent Offenses

10

TOTAL NUMBER OF OTHER SENTENCES

156

COMMUNITY SERVICE (Number)

Non-Violent Drug Offenses

350

Drug-Related Violent Offenses

.9

Non-Drug Violent Offenses

1

Non-Drug Non-Violent Offenses

14

TOTAL NUMBER OF COMNTY SVC SENTENCES I

374

II

COMMUNITY SERVICE (# of Hours)

I

Non-Violent Drug Offenses Drug-Related Violent Offenses Non-Drug Violent Offenses Non-Drug Non-Violent Offenses

TOTAL # OF HOURS OF COMMUNITY SERVICE II

FINES (Number)

""

Non-Violent Drug Offenses

""

Drug-Related Violent Offenses

"

Non-Drug Violent Offenses

II

Non-Drug Non-Violent Offenses

II

II

TOTAL NUMBER OF FINES

II

II

FINES (Amount)

II

---

II

Non-Violent Drug Offenses

II

Drug-Related Violent Offenses

II

Non-Drug Violent Offenses

II

44,827 892 60 886
46,665
2,493 76 9 48
2,626
$8,045,162.50 $165,544.50 $4,912.00

------------11

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT

II

II

Non-Drug Non-Violent Offenses

II

II

TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINES

II

II

Total for All MJTFs
$29,388.00 $8,245,007.00

ATTACHMENT 6
1996 MULTIJURISDICTIONAL DRUG TASK FORCE PROJECTS SUMMARY OF DRUG SEIZURES
AND ASSOCIATED DOLLAR VALUES

SUBGRANT

NUMBER

.==.n..:::lI::

:.:

DCSI-96-01

DRUG TYPE : "'''''=: COCAINE

GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO

TOTAL

AMOUNT
SEIZED
= .. =:a: .. c

FIRST QUARTER

SECOND QUARTER

STl\NDJ\RD VALUE
=="' :::a::

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

OF DRUGS

SBIZED

:a: :.==... '""==="" =

STANDARD

VALUE

= = ..

= ""

'l1lIRD QUl\RTER

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

STl\NDJ\RD

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

VALUE

'""....... .. .. ac.,..==...

9.10

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$910.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$910.00

29.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$2,900.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2,900.00

2.90

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

FOUR'l1l QUl\RTER

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

'""

STl\NDJ\RD
VALUE
a ,..=,.. "'==

TOTAL

TOTAL

$ VALUE

AMOuNT

$ VALUE

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

OF DRUGS

===",:a:.=== ""=,..= "'.::=== =="'===0::==0::=====

$290.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$290.00

16.40 1. 00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$1,640.00 $1,100.00
$0.00 $0.00
$2,740.00

57. olD 1. 00 0.00 0.00

$5,740.00 $1,100.00
$0.00 $0.00
$6,840.00

CRACK
ROCK OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

91.00 1. 00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$2,275.00 $1,000.00
$0.00
$3,275.00

105.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$2,625.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2,625.00

220.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$5,500.00 $0.00 $0.00
$5, 500.00

75.00 1.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$1,875.00 $1,000.00
$0.00
$2,875.00

491.00 2.00 0.00

$12,275.00 $2,000.00 $0.00
$14,275.00

MARIJUANA

SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND

2,466.00

TOTAL

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $2,712,600.00 3,232.83
$2,712,600.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $3,556,113.00
$3,556,113.00

11.00 102.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$1,540.00 $112,200.00
$113,740.00

.1.10 572.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$5,754.00 $629,200.00
$634,954.00

0.00 0.00
52.10 6,372.83

$0.00 $0.00
$7,294.00 $7~ 010,113.00
$7,017,407.00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00 0.00. 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

METH
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

DCSI-96-02

COCAINE

GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO ..... ,.. ==.OC
TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00
:11

$0.00

$100.00

$0.00

6.00

$1,100.00

$0.00

$15,000.00

$0.00

w~

~

,..

$26,000.00 = ""

$0.00

CRACK
ROCK OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

4.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

MARIJUANA

$200.00 ~2. '100.00

$0.00 $0 nn

239. nn

$200.00 $2,00 ..........

$0.00 $6,600.00
$0.00 $0.00
w
$6,600.00

.,.

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00
:. --

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$0.00 $4,000.00
$0.00
$4,000.00

2.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$0.00 $2,000.00
$0.00
$2,000.00

$0.00 $4-- --- 00 P,

$200.00 . ~ - - 1.00

$0.00 $0.

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00
$26,000.00 "",.==.

38.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$200.00
~2.000.

$0.00

0.00

$0.00

6.00

$0.00

0.00

$0.00

0.00

= ""11:1=..=="'.==

$0.00

$0.00

$6,600.00

$0.00

$0.00

~.

~

$6,600.00

$950.00 $0.00 $0.00
$950.00

38.00 6.00 0.00

$950.00 $6,000.00
$0.00
$6,950.00

, $0.00

o. c

$0.00 000.0

FIRST QUARTER

SECOND QUARTER

THIRD QUARTER

SUBGRANT

DRUG

NUMBER

TYPE

....IC._====_ "''''=''"'''''''' ''''=== =

AMOUNT SEIZED ===z:

STANDARD
VALUE
:0:==

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

===.. .."'''''

STANDARD
VALUE
"'.=."' .. :a

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

STANDARD

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

VALUE

.,_lI::I:=""",===a. "'...........

COMMERCIAL

OUNCE POUND
= ====

$140.00 $1,100.00
==_",_:lIa .. _==

$0.00 $0.00
M

$140.00

$1,100.00

=

==""

$0.00 $0.00

$140.00
$1,100.00

TOTAL

$0.00

$478,000.00

FOURTH QUARTER

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

.. "" c

STANDARD VALUE

"'==

$ VALUE OF DRUGS : "".......

TOTAL AMOUNT SEIZED
== .. =""=

==z:==

TOTAL $ VALUE OF DRUGS
""""

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00

9.00

$140.00

$0.00

$1,100.00

$9,900.00

==. ---------------

$9,900.00

= ""

0.00

$0.00

9.00

$9,900.00

=="" --------.------

$487,900.00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

METH
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

DCSI-96-0J

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO
TOTAL

3. 00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

CRACK
ROCK OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

240. 00 10.70

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

9.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

METH
GRAM OUNCE POUND

30.66

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $3,300.00
$0.00 $0.00
$3,300.00

1. 00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $1,100.00
$0.00 $0.00
$1,100.00

2.50

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $37,500.00 $0.00
$37,500.00

58.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$5,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$5,800.00

58.00 4. 00 2.50 0.00

$5,800.00 $4,400.00 $37,500.00
$0.00
$47,700.00

$6,000.00 $10,700.00
$0.00
$16,700.00

262.00 19.80

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$6,550.00 $19,800.00
$0.00
$26,350.00

6#034.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$150,850.00 $0.00 $0.00
$150,850.00

119.00 20.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$2,975.00 $20,000.00
$0.00
$22,975.00

6,655.00 50.50 0.00

$166,375.00 $50,500.00 $0.00
$216,875.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $9,900.00
$9,900.00

25.50

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $28,050.00
$28,050.00

69.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $75,900.00
$75,900.00

130.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $143,000.00
$143,000.00

0.00 0.00
0.00 233.50

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $256,850.00
$256,850.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.50

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$75.00 $0.00 $0.00
$75.00

0.50

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$75.00 $0.00 $0.00
$75.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

1. 00 0.00 0.00

$150.00 $0.00 $0.00
$150.00

$3,066.00 $0.00 $0.00
$3,066.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

22.00

$0.00
_ _ _ _ .. '"'O:: . . . _'"' __ ~ . .

PC''''

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$2,200.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2,200.00

16.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$1,600.00 $0.00 $0.00
$1,600.00

68.66
o. 00 o. 00

$6,866.00 $0.00 $0.00
$6,866.00

FIRST QUARTER

SECOND QUARTER

SUBGRANT
NUMBER
.. oo "' .. ==:..=: "'

DRUG
TYPE
== ::,,:::11

AMOUNT

STANDARD

SEIZED

VALUE

== == "="::11:"" "'..==..,.. = ""

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

STANDARD

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

VALUE

=OO::lI lC:= "'..... ..."'oo"'=== oo ."'.== ..="'

"'

THIRD QUARTER

$ VALUE OP DRUGS
'= ==..... .

AMOUNT
SEIZED
= ",=

STANDARD VALUE =

FOURTH QUARTER

$ VALUE
OF DRUGS
= "' :::.

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD

$ VALUE

VALUE

OF DRUGS

"" II: = _".::Il:.==.",""'"

TOTAL
AMOUNT SEIZED
==."" z== =

== .. =

TOTAL $ VALUE OF DRUGS
zo==='"

DCSI-96 -04

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO
TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15.000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

CRACK
ROCK OUNC,E POUND
TOTAL

132.00 7.80

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12.000.00

$3,300.00 $7,800.00
$0.00
$11,100.00

12.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$300.00 $0.00 $0.00
$300.00

22.00 3.80

$25.00 $1,000.lJu $12,000.00

$550.00 $3,800.00
$0.00
$4.350.00

40.00 1.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$1.000.00 $1,000.00
$0.00
$2.000.00

206.00 .1. .... 60 0.00

$5. 150.00 $12,600.00
$0.00
$17,750.00

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

18.00

$200.00 $2.000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $36,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$36,000.00

5.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$700.00 $0.00
$700.00

1.00

$200.00 $2.000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00

1.00

$2.000.00 3.268.00

$0.00 $0.00

$2,000.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1.100.00

$200.00 $6,536,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$6.536.200.00

1. 00 3.287.00
5.00 0.00

$200.00 $6.574,000.00
$700.00 $0.00
$6.574,900.00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4.000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4.000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

METII
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

2.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00

$200.00 $0.00 $0.00
$200.00

2.00 0.00 0.00

$200.00 $0.00 $0.00
$200.00

DCSI-96-05

COCAINE
GRAM DUNCE POUND
KILO
TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15.000.00 $26,000.00

CRACK
ROCK OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

244.00

$25.00 $1.000.00 $12.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

2.77

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15,000.00 $26.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $41,550.00 $0.00
$41.550.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15.000.00 $26,000.00

$6.100.00 $0.00 $0.00
$6.100.00

215.00

$25.00 $1.000.00 $12,000.00

$5.375.00 $0.00 $0.00
$5,375.00

28.00

$25.00 $1.000.00 $12.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

2.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15.000.00 $26,000.00

$200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$200.00

2.00 0.00 2.77 0.00

$200.00 $0.00
$41,550.00 $0.00
$41,750.00

$700.00 $0.00 $0.00
$700.oli

70.00

$25.00 $1.000.00 $12,000.00

$1.750.00 $0.00 $0.00
$1,750.00

557.00 0.00 0.00

$13,925.00 $0.00 $0.00
$13,925.00

SINS,

SUBGRANT
NUMBER .............. =

DRUG TYPB ,.."';:;;.,

AMOUNr SEIZED
="'

OUNCE

POUND

461.00

COMMERCIAL

OUNCB

POUND

..........,..."". a

TOTAL

FIRST QUARTER

STANDARD VALUE
$200.00 $2,000.00

$ VALUE OF DRUGS
,.. "".... $0.00
$922,000.00

AMOUNr SEIZED
20.00

$140.00

$0.00

$1,100.00
"" ""''''''. ------

$0.00

$922,000.00

1:1

SECOND QUARTER

THIRD QUARTBR

STANDARD

$ VALUE

AMOUNr

VALUE "''''''' '''' =

OF DRUGS

SBIZBD

=.... ....,.

$200.00

$0.00

$2,000.00

$40,000.00

17.00

STANDARD VALUE
$200.00 $2,000.00

$ VALUE OF DRUGS
""......... .
$0.00 $34,000.00

AMOUNr SEIZED
1.00 999.00

$140.00

$1,100.00

=1:1

=*

$0.00 $0.00
$40,000.00

$140.00

$0.00

$1,100.00

$0.00

.;0;............ ---------------

$34,000.00

"' a

FOURTH QUARTBR

STANDARD

VALUE

= ZI

"'....

$200.00

$2,000.00

$ VALUE OF DRUGS
..
$200.00 $1,998,000.00

TOTAL AMOUNr SBIZBD
1. 00 1,497.00

TOTAL $ VALUE OF DRUGS

aa

"',..

$200.00

$2.994,000.00

$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
---------------
$1,998,200.00

0.00 0.00 "'ac =

$0.00 $0.00 --------------$2.994,200.00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCB POUND
.""a===..a=
TOT~

$150.00

$0.00

$4.000.00

$0.00

$50,000.00

$0.00

"""'

""= ---------------

$0.00

;; .. ,..""""=

$150.00

$4,000.00

$50.000.00

"".."" =

--

MBTII
GRAM OUNCB POUND
TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00

$0.00

$4,000.00

$0.00

$50,000.00

$0.00

z -= ---------------

~" .00

$150.00

$0.00

$4.000.00

$0.00

$50,000.00

$0.00

"""" ---------------

$0.00

0.00

$0.00

0.00

$0.00

0.00

$0.00

""= =..=.= = ---------------

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

DCSI-96-07

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCB POUND
KILO
TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

CRACK
ROCK OUNCB POUND
TOTAL

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCB POUND
TOTAL

$150.00 $4.000.00 $50,000.00

MBTII GRAM
. . . . . . . . ""

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.25 76.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$25.00 $83,600.00
$0.00 $0.00
$83,625.00

23.95

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$2,395.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2,395.00

9.50 1.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$950.00 $0.00 $0.00
$26,000.00
$26.950.00

33.70 76.00
0.00 1.00

$3,370.00 $83.600.00
$0.00 $26,000.00
$112,970.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

459.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$11,475.00 $0.00 $0.00
$11,475.00

164.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$4,100.00 $0.00 $0.00
$4,100.00

95.00

$25.00 $1.000.00 $12,000.00

$2,375.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2,375.00

718.00 0.00 0.00

$17.950.00 $0.00 $0.00
$17,950.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00

212.50 166.00

$200.00 $2.000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$29,750.00 $182,600.00
$212,350.00

15.09 73.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$2,111.90 $80,300.00
$82,411.90

1.00
34.22 430.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $2,000.00
$4,190.10 $473,000.00
$479,790.10

0.00 1.00
261.80 669.00

$0.00 $2,000.00
$36.652.00 $735,900.00
$774,552.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
M

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

"'

- .. _ - -------~ - - -

---

Plt-

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

0.00
O. or
0.0

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

FIRST QUARTBR

SECOND QUAATER

suaGRANT

DRUG

AMOUNT

STANDARD

NUMBER

TYPE

SEIZED

VALUE

................. "=="""."""""'''''''''' .= eee e.a..""""e .. "'''

TOTAL

$ VALUE
_ee......O..F....D..R..U..G..S .
$0.00

AMOUNT SEIZED
:E

STANDARD
z"".= VALUE "'= .. "".""

$ VALUE
OF DRUGS
""z... .
$0.00

THIRD QUAATSR

AMOUNT SEIZED
0

STANDARD VALUE

FOURTH QUAATER

$ VALUE OF DRUGS
"".......
$0.00

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD
VALUE
"".=.=

$ VALUE
OF DRUGS
"'... ..
$0.00

TOTAL

AMOUNT

SBIZED

::=

=

TOTAL $ VALUE
OF DRUGS
""== "'.
$0.00

DCSI-96-08

COCAINE:
GRAM OUNes POUND
KILO
TOTAL

2.25

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15, 000.00 $26, 000.00

CRACK
ROCK OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

23.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12, 000.00

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE FOUND
TOTAL

210.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

MSTH
GRAM OUNCB POUND
TOTAL

23.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15, 000. 00

$0.00 $2,475.00
$0.00 $0.00 $2,475.00
$0.00 $23,000.00
$0.00 $23,000.00
$0.00 $420,000.00
$0.00 $0.00 $420,000.00
$0.00 $0 .00 $0.00 $0.00
$2,300.00 $0. 00 $0.00
$2,300.00

18.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

8.25

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

63. 00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50, 000. 00

6.00

$100. 00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$1,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0. 00
$1,800.00

274.00

$100. 00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $301,400.00
$0 .00 $0.00
$301,400.00

2.60

$100. 00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $8,250.00
$0.00
$8,250.00

804.00

$25. 00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$20,100.00 $0.00 $0.00
$20,100.00

16.00 4.20

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$0.00 $126,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$126,000.00

1,106.00

$200. 00 $2, 000. 00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $2,212,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$2,212,000.00

19.00 577.50

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0. 00 $0.00
$0.00

103.00

$150.00 $4, 000.00 $50,000.00

$15,450.00 $0.00 $0.00
$15,450.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$600.00 $0.00 $0.00
$600.00

150.00

$100.00 $1,100. 00 $15,000.00

$15, 000.00 $0.00 $0.00
$15,000.00

4. :l0

$100. 00 $1,100. 00 $15,000. 00

$0.00 $2,860.00
$0.00 $0. 00 $2,860.00
$400.00 $4,200.00
$0.00 $4,600.00
$0.00 $38,000.00
$0.00 $635,250.00 $673,250.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$420.00 $0.00 $0.00
$420.00

18.00 278.85
0.00 0.00

$1,800.00 $306,735.00
$0.00 $0.00
$308,535.00

820.00 35.45 0.00

$20,500.00 $35,450.00
$0.00
$55,950.00

0.00 1,398.00
0.00 577.50

$0.00 $2,796,000.00
$0.00 $635,250.00
$3,431,250.00

103. 00 O. 00 0.00

$15,450.00 $0.00 $0.00
$15,450.00

183.20 0.00 0.00

$18,320.00 $0.00 $0.00
$18,320.00

DCSI-96-09

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCB POUND
KILO
TOTAL

45.19 1. 00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15, 000.00 $26,000.00

CRACK
ROCK OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

4.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$4,519.00 $0.00 $0.00
$26,000.00
$30,519.00

4.33

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$100.00 $0.00 $0.00
$100.00

15.00

$25.00 $1,000. 00 $12,000.00

$0.00 $4,763.00
$0.00 $0.00
$4,763.00

2.25

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000. 00 $26,000.00

$375.00 $0.00 $0.00
$375.00

1.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000. 00

Pi'"

$225.00 $0.00 $0 .00 $0.00
$225.00

3. SO

$100. 00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $1,000.00
$0.00
$1,000.00

9. 00

$25. 00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$350.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$350.00

50.94 4.33 0.00 1. 00

$5, 094.00 $4,763.00
$0.00 $26,000.00
$35,857.00

$225.00 $0.00 $0.00
$225.00

28.00 1. 00 0.00

$700.00 $1,000.00
$0.00
$1,700.00

SUBGRANT NUMBER

DRUG TYPE

AMOUNT SEIZED

FIRST QUARTER
STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE
OF DRUGS

SECOND QUARTER

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

1.25 29.00

$200.00 $2.000.00
$140.00 $1.100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$175.00 $31.900.00
$32.075.00

3.25

$200.00 $2.000.00
$140.00 $1.100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $3.575.00
$3.575.00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4.000.00 $50.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0. 00
$0.00

METa
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

2.80

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00

$280.00 $0.00 $0.00
$280.00

49.80

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15,000.00

$4.980.00 $0.00 $0.00
$4.980.00

THIRD QUARTER

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

FOURTH QUARTER

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

17.25

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $18.975.00
$18.975.00

12.50 42.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$1.750.00 $46.200.00
$47.950.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

3. SO

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $3.850.00
$0.00
$3.850.00

11.25

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15. OOQ. 00

$0.00 $12.375.00
$0.00
$12.375.00

TOTAL AMOUNT SEIZED

TOTAL $ VALUE OF DRUGS

0.00 0.00
13.75 91. SO

$0.00 $0.00
$1.925.00 $100.650.00
$102.575.00

0.00 O. 00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

52.60 14.75
O. 00

$5.260.00 $16.225.00
$0.00
$21.485.00

DCSI-96-10

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO
TOTAL

2.17

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15,000.00 $26.000.00

$217.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$217.00

5.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15.000.00 $26.000.00

$0.00 $S,SOO.OO
$0.00 $0.00
$5.500.00

1.30

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000. 00 $~6, 000.00

$130.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$130.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00 $26.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

3.47 5.00 O. 00 O. 00

$347.00 $5.500.00
$0.00 $0.00
$5.847. 00

CRACK

ROCK

112. 00

$25.00

$2.800.00

OUNCE

3. 00

$1.000.00

$3.000.00

POUND

$12.000.00

$0.00

==="' =

"' .. : ---------------

11:

TOTAL

$5.800.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12.000.00 === ==".."

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ---------------
$0.00

112.00

$~5. 00

$2.800.00

$1, 000.00

$0.00

$12,000.00

$0.00

"' ---------------

$2.800.00

88.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00 "' "' """' .. '"

$2.200.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2.200.00

312. 00 3.00 0.00
.""==="==_=*a..

$7.800.00 $3.000.00
$0.00 _
$10.800.00

MARIJUANA

SINSEMILLA

OUNCE POUND

200. so

COMMERCIAL

OUNCE

POUND
....=== ==

TOTAL

$200.00 $2,000.00

$0.00 $401.000.00

106.00

$200.00 $2,000.00

$0.00 $212.000.00

12.00 18.00

$200.00
$~,OOO.OO

$2,400.00 $36,000.00

8.00 212.00

$140.00

$0.00

$1.100.00

$0.00

,.. "'."".="'. ---------------

$401,000.00

.=z===

$140.00

$0.00

$1,100.00

$0.00

a

======= --------- __

$212,000.00

$140.00 $1,100.00 .,."""'''''.,.''''.,. .,. .,. .,. -.~

$0.00 $0.00

$38.400.00

1:: .,.."' .,.

$200.00 $2.000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00
.,."',..'"

$1,600.00 $424,000.00

20. 00
536. so

$4.000.00 $1,073,000.00

$0.00 $0.00
$425,600.00

0.00 0.00
==="' =======

$0.00

$0.00

~

_

$1,077,000.00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUND
... "'.."'''''==
TOTAL

$150.00

$0.00

$4,000.00

$0.00

$50,000.00

$0.00

"''''='''''''::11:='''''''=.

~

--~---------

$0.00

$150.00
$4,000.00 $50,000.00
;0:= "''''' '''''''''=

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
---------------
$0.00

=="'."'''''''''''=

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50.000.00
'" -----

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00
$4,000.00
$50.000.00
"'.=="""::111; .""..,,~"',. ..= =::;.

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00
0.00
0.00
==>::=.="" .. ===

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
_
$0.00

METH

$100.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00 Paq..

$100.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00

$100.00 $1.100.00

$0.00 $0.00

O. C 0.0l.

$0.00 $0.00

FIRST QUARTER

SECOND QUARTER

THIRD QUARTER

SUBGRANT NUMBER
.",,""1::. I:: ==

DRUG

AMOUNT

TYPE

SEIZED

'" =""a:"""""" a: .. =.."" ., ..== ..= =_=_

POUND

STANDARD VALUE
==== === =.. _=
$15,000.00

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

STJINDARD

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

VALUE

1::.....

.""a: _

II "'.,. .."...==..== ".

$0.00

$15.000.00

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

".""".. .8,...=

$0.00

STANDARD VALUE
$15,000.00

TOTAL

$0.00

$0.00

FOURTH QUARTER

$ VALUE

OF DRUGS

.,......



$0.00

AMOUNT SBIZED

STJINDARD VALUE

$15,000.00

$0.00

$ VALUE OF DRUGS
a .=.... ...=
$0.00
$0.00

TOTAL
AMOUNT SEIZED
=
0.00

TOTAL
$ VALUE
OF DRUGS
== .. '" "'''''''''''.= .
$0.00

$0.00

DCSI-96-11

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO
TOTAL

0.05

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.300.00
$1.300.00

2.11

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

CRACK
ROCK OUNCB POUND
TOTAL

240.00 1.76

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$6.000.00 $1.760.00
$0.00
$7.760.00

160.00 11.98

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

MARIJIJJ\NA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

2.75 62.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$385.00 $68,200.00
$68,585.00

9.00 12.50

$200.00 $2.000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCB POUND
TOTAL

2.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$300.00 $0.00 $0.00
$300.00

3.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

METH

GRAM

OUNCE

2.11

POUND

a

TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 = "'."" --

$0.00 $2.321.00
$0.00
$2,321.00

a.a

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $54,860.00
$54,860.00

3.32

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $86,320.00

4,212.16 4.00

$86,320.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00 $26,000.00

$421,216.00 $0.00
$60,000.00 $0.00
$481,216.00

4,212.16 0.00 4.00 5.48

$421,216.00 $0.00
$60,000.00 $142,480.00
$623,696.00

$4,000.00 $11,980.00
$0.00
$15.980.00

240.00 5.28

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12.000.00

$6,000.00 $5,280.00
$0.00
$11,280.00

425.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$10,625.00 $0.00 $0.00
$10.625.00

1,065.00 19.02 0.00

$26.625.00 $19.020.00
$0.00
$45,645.00

$0.00 $18,000.00
$1,750.00 $0.00
$19,750.00

8.75 233.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$1,225.00 $256.300.00
$257,525.00

12.00 82.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$1,680.00 $90.200.00
$91,880.00

0.00 9.00
36.00 377.00

$0.00 $18,000.00
$5.040.00 $414.700.00
$437,740.00

$450.00 $0.00 $0.00
$450.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

13 .30 3.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$1,995.00 $0.00
$150,000.00
$151,995.00

18.30 0.00 3.00

$2,745.00 $0.00
$150,000.00
$152,745.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

270.90

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$27,090.00 $0.00 $0.00
$27,090.00

5.50 2.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00

270.90

$6.050.00

7.61

.= "'."'.. $30,000.00

2.00
==

$36,050.00

$27.090.00

$8,371.00

$30,000.00

.

_

$65,461. 00

DCSI-96-12

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCB POUND
KILO
TOTAL
CRACK
ROCK OUNCE POUND

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00
$25.00 $1.000.00 $12.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

17.25 0.50

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$1.725.00 $550.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2,275.00

3.08

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$308.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$308.00

58.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26.000.00

$5,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$5.800.00

78.33 0.50 0.00 0.00

$7,833. 00 $550.00 $0.00 $0.00
$8,383.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

358.00 2.67

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$8,950.00 $2.670.00
$0.00

84.00

$11,620.00 .........------.- Pa

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12.000.00

$2,100.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2.100.00

29.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$725.00 $0.00 $0.00
$725.00

471. 00 2.67 0.00

$11.775.00 $2,670.00 $0.00
$14 5.00

SUBGRANT

NUMBER

...."' "'

=

DRUG TYPE =

AMOUNT
SEIZED
=:1:1:= .. "".,.,

MARIJUANA

SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUNO
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUNO

TOTAL

FIRST QUARTER

STANDARD

$ VALUE

VALUE

OF DRUGS

"'"'.. =11:: =..=

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00

SECOND QUARTER

THIRD QUARTER

FOURTH QUARTER

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE ""

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

STANDARD

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

"'

=""....... . OF DRUGS

SEIZED

VALUE

OF DRUGS

"'......... .,.

SEIZED
:a

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS
"".........

1.14 352.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$159.60 $387,200.00
$387,359.60

2.37 60.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$331.80 $66,000.00
$66,331.80

50.39 123.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$7,054.60 $135,300.00
$142,354.60

TOTAL AMOUNT SEIZED

TOTAL

$ VALUE

OF DRUGS

., >1:

""==.

0.00 O. 00
53.90 535.00

$0.00 $0.00
$7,546.00 $588,500.00
$596,046.00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUNO
TOTAL

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

~150. 00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

METH
GRAM OUNCE POUNO
TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

16.72

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$1,672.00 $0.00 $0.00
$1,672.00

21.55

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$2,155.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2,155.00

648.34

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$64,834.00 $0.00 $0.00
$64,834.00

686.61
o. 00
O. 00

$68,661.00 $0.00 $0.00
$68,661. 00

DCSI-96-13

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUNO
KILO
TOTAL

6. 00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

CRACK
ROCK OUNCE POUNO
TOTAL

88. 00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUNO
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUNO
TOTAL

27.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUNO
TOTAL

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$600.00

47.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$2,200.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2,200.00

96.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$5,400.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$5,400.00

0.50

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$4,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$4,700.00

tt. 00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$2,400.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2,400.00

7:l.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$0.00 $1,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$1,000.00

3.61

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$4,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$4,400.00

t5t.OO

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$45,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$45,400.00

$1,800.00 $0.00 $0.00
$1,800.00

380.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$9,500.00 $0.00 $0.00
$9,500.00

$721.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$721.00

18.50

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$3,700.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$3,700.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

551. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00

$55,100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$55,100.00

636.00 0.00 0.00

$15,900.00 $0.00 $0.00
$15,900.00

49.11 0.50
0.00 0.00

$9,821. 00 $1,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$10,821. 00

0.00 0.00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

PaL

SUBGRANT
NUMBER
.... =::c =."'." .. "' .. '" ""

FIRST QUARTER

SECOND QUARTER

DRUG

AMOUNT

TYPE

SEIZED

"'..= '" = :: ..=",,,, = =

STANDARD VALUE
"":c

GRAM

$100.00

OUNCE

$1,100.00

POUND

$15,000.00

.... =c====== -=

==""

TOTAL

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

STANDARD

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

VALUE

"'.....

=

=

"'

$0.00

$100.00

$0.00

$1,100.00

$0.00

$15,000.00



= ==== "'''' ,.. = =. ..

$0. 00

THIRD QUARTER

$ VALUE OF DRUGS
:0::"."'.. ..

AMOUNT SEIZBD

$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
. __

37.00
""

$0.00

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE
OF DRUGS
=.=

$100.00

$3,700.00

$1,100.00

$0.00

$15,000.00

$0.00

---------_.----

$3,700.00

FOURTH QUARTER

AMOUNT

STANDARD

$ VALUE

SEIZED

VALUE
=

OF DRUGS
"" ==..= .,=

$100.00

$0.00

$1,100.00

$0.00

$15,000.00

$0.00

:D.==., ------.--------

$0.00

TOTAL
AMOUNT
SEIZED
"""" =
37. 00 0.00 0.00
,.... ,..==

TOTAL $ VALUE OF DRUGS

:e

,..

$3,700.00

$0.00

$0.00
-------------

$3,700.00

DCSI-96-15

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO
TOTAL

CRACK
ROCK OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCB POUND
TOTAL

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

METH
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00
$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$0.00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00
$0.00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00
$150.00 $<,000.00 $50, 000. 00
$100. 00 $1,100. 00 $15,000.00

$0. 00 $0.00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00
$0. 00 $0. 00 $0.00 $0. 00
$0. 00 $0. 00 $0.00 $0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00
$25.00 $1. 000.00 $12,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00
$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00
$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00
$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

1. 00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$100.00

1. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00

$100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$100.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

115.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$2,875.00 $0. 00 $0.00
$2,875.00

115. 00 0.00 O. 00

$2,875. 00 $0 .00 $0.00
$2,875.00

$200.00 $2, 000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00
$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00
$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.17 2.75

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140 .00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$23.52 $3,025.00
$3,048.52

0.00 0.00
0.17 2.75

$0.00 $0.00
$23.52 $3,025.00
$3,048.52

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

1.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $15,000.00
$15,000.00

O. 00 0.00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0 .00

o. 00
0.00 1. 00

$0.00 $0.00 $15,000.00
$15,000.00

DCSI-96-16

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO
TOTAL

16.15

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000. 00 $26,000.00

$1,615.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$1,615.00

27.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$2,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2,700.00

63.30 71.00
2.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$6,330.00 $78,100.00
$0.00 $52,000.00
$136,430.00

175.35 5.80
2.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

CRACK

ROCK 138.00

$25.00

$3.450.00

"

$1,000. 00 $12, 000.00

$0.00 $0.00

.......................... = ,,"',.. .. ------------_.-

951.00

$25.00
$1,000.00
$12, 000. 00
==

$23,775.00
$0.00
$0.00
---------------

.65.00 10
Peo-

$25.00 $1,000.00
$l~,OOO.OO

$11,625.00 $24,000.00
$0.00

286.00 13. 00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$17,535.00 $6,380.00 $0.00
$5~, 000.00
$75,915.00

281. 80 76.80 0.00 4.00

$28,180.00 $84,480. 00
$0.00 $104,000.00
$216,660.00

$7,150.00 $13,000.00
$0.00

1.840.00 37.0' 0.0

$46,000.00 $37.000. 00
$0 .00

SUBGRANT NUMBER

DRUG TYPE
TOTAL

AMOUNT SEIZED

FIRST QUARTER

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

$3,450.00

SECOND QUARTER

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

$23,775.00

THIRD QUARTER

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS
$35,625.00

FOURTH QUARTER

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE
OF DRUGS

$20,150. 00

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

23.24 677 .50

$200.00 $2,000.00
$1<0.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$3,253.60 $745,250.00
$748,503.60

28.73 24.60

$200.00 $2,000.00
$1<0.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$4,022.20 $27,060.00
$31,082.20

35.00 3.00
0.72 56.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$1<0.00 $1,100.00

$7,000.00 $6,000.00
$100.45 $61,600.00
$74,700.45

37.00
23.60 4.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$1<0.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $74,000.00
$3,304.49 $4,400.00
$81,704.49

HEROI!'
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

METH
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$100.00 $1.100. 00 $15.000. 00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

3. 00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$300.00 $0.00 $0.00
$300.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15, 000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15, 000. 00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

TOTAL AMOUNT SEIZED

TOTAL $ VALUE OF DRUGS
$83,000.00

35.00 40.00
76.29 762.10

$7,000.00 $80,000.00
$10,680.74 $838,310.00
$935,990.74

0.00 0.00 O. 00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

3. 00 0.00 0.00

$300.00 $0.00 $0.00
$300.00

DCSI-96-17

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO
TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

2,268.00

$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$226,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$226,800.00

500.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$50,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$50,000.00

18 .42

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$1,842.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$1,842.00

2,786.42 0.00 O. 00 0.00

$278,642.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$278,642.00

CRACK

ROCK OUNCE POUND
_""""ze"""""_ TOTAL

$25.00

$0.00

$1,000.00

$0.00

$12,000.00

$0.00

"''''''''' --------------_

$0.00

1,81<.00

",

""

$25.00

$45,350.00

600.00

$1,000.00

$0.00

$12,000.00

$0.00

:11:""

""=

--------------- .""

$45,350.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00
= --

$15,000.00 $0.00 $0.00
$15,000.00

1,032.20

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00
""::t:=====c ..

$25,805.10 $0.00 $0.00

$25,805.10

3,446.20 0.00 0.00
"'

$86,155.10 $0.00 $0.00 _
$86,155.10

MARIJUANA

SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND
.==""
TOTAL

c .,,. a

$200.00 $2,000.00

$1<0.00

$1,100.00

"'

""'. - - - - - - -

$0.00 $0.00

321. 00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00

.= .. ,.1:110::=:11'

$200.00 $2,000.00

$0.00 $642,000.00

147. 00

$1<0.00

$0.00

$1,100.00

$0.00

"":l2:;: :a:a - - - - - - - - - - -

$642,000.00

0:.= ""

$200.00 $2,000.00
$1<0.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $294,000.00

99.66 32.00

$200.00 $2,000.00

$0.00 $0.00
$294,000.00

.. =.""

"". c

$140.00 $1,100.00
o:o:o:"" .. "'

$19,932.00 $64,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$83,932.00

99.66 500.00

$19,932.00 $1,000,000.00

0.00 0.00
====.. "'= ..==.

$0.00 $0.00
.. _
$1,019,932.00

HEROIN

GRAM

$150.00

$0.00

OUNCB

$4,000.00

$0.00

POUND

$50,000.00

$0.00

...............a

------------- __

:0:

$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
---------------
$0.00

$150.00

$4,000.00

$50,000.00

"'

-

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

:0:

$150.00

$4,000.00

$50,000.00

:0:

""

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
__ __ __ ""
$0.00

o. 00

0.00

0.00

=2'

__

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
_
$0.00

FIRST QUARTER

SUBGRANT

DRUG

AMOUNT

NUMBER

TYPE

SEIZED

.................="'."".. "'''' ..= _:::.==_:1::1=1:=

METH

STANDARD

VALUE

,..

a ,.,

GRAM OUNCE POUND

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15,000.00

TOTAL

SECOND QUARTER

THIRD QUARTER

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

OF DRUGS

SBIZED

"" =a <::= z.=

"'

STANDARD

$ VALUE

VALUE
"''''

OF DRUGS
===..................

=,..

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15.000.00

FOURTH QUARTER

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

STANDARD

OF DRUGS

SBIZED

VALUE

"" =...

"",.............

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

TOTAL

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

....=.==

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

TOTAL $ VALUE OF DRUGS
===== ==
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

DCSI-96-18

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO
TOTAL

3.75

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15, 000. 00 $26,000.00

CRACK
ROCK OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

1. 00 4.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12.000.00

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCB POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

9.21 110.00

$200.00 $2.000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

HEROIN
GRAM m.mCE POUND
TOTAL

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50.000.00

METH
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

24.30 1.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15,000.00

$375.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$375.00
$25.00 $4.000.00
$0.00 $4,025.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15.000.00 $26,000.00
$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$0.00 $0.00
$1.289.40 $121.000.00
$122,289.40

465.25

$200.00 $2.000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$2.430.00 $1,100.00
$0.00
$3,530.00

22.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $511,775.00 $511,775.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2,200.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2,200.00

5.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

2.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

5.12 5.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$150.00 $", 000.00 $50,000.00

4.02

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$500.00

11.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 ':;;26,000.00

$1,100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$1.100.00

$50.00 $0.00 $0.00
$50.00

188.00

$25.00 $1.000.00 $12,000.00

$4,700.00 $0.00 $0.00
$4,700.00

$0.00 $0.00
$716.73 $5,500.00
$6.216.73

26.63 107.50

$200; 00 $2.000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$3.728.20 $118.250.00
$121,978.20

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.50

$150.00 $4.000.00 $50.000.00

$75.00 $0.00 $0.00
$75.00

$0.00 $4.,422.00
$0.00
$4,422.00

75.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15.000.00

$7,500.00 $0.00 $0.00
$7.500.00

19.75 0.00 0.00 0.00

$1,975.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$1,975.00

191. 00 4.00 0.00

$4.775.00 $4,000.00
$0.00
$8,775.00

0.00 0.00
40.96 687.75

$0.00 $0.00
$5.734.33 $756.525.00
$762,259.33

0.50 0.00 0.00

$75.00 $0.00 $0.00
$75.00

121.30 5.02 0.00

$12,130.00 $5,522.00 $0.00
$17.652.00

DCSI-96-19

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO
TOTAL

19.50

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

CRACK

260.00

$25.00 $1.000.00

$1.950.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$1.950.00

21. 75

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$6.500.00 $0.00

60.00

$25.00 $1,000.00

$2,175.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2,175.00

3.50

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$350.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$350.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$1.500.00 $0.00 Pagt.

$25.00 $1.000.00

$11.200.00 $0.00

38.00

$25.00 $1.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

44.75 0.00 0.00 0.00

$4,475.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$4,475.00

$950.00 $0.00

806.0' 0.0("

$20,150.00 $0.00

SUBGRANT

NUMBER

."'."'

=

FIRST QUARTER

SECOND QUARTER

DRUG TYPE "'''' .. =''' .. ''' POUND

AMOUNT

STANDARD

SEIZED
"' ..,== "'

VALUE ==

$12. 000.00

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

mac,. .. "' .. "''''......... .."' .. = 1:1

$0.00

STANDARD VALUE

"'

""."'

$12,000.00

TOTAL

$6,500.00

$ VALUE
1O;F1.D..R..U..G.S ..
$0.00
$1,500.00

THIRD QUARTER

FOURTH QUARTER

AMOUNT

STANDARD

SEIZED

VALUE

.,............"'..'" ."'

$12, 000.00

$ VALUE OF DRUGS
"'''' '"''....
$0.00

AMOUNT SEIZBD

STANDARD VALUE
$12,000.00

$11,200.00

$ VALUE OF DRUGS
== "'... .=
$0.00
$950.00

TOTAL
AMOUNT SEIZED
,.. "'
0.00

TOTAL $ VALUE OF DRUGS ""==_=a==",_===,,,
$0.00

$20,150.00

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

247.75 344.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$34,685.00 $378,400.00
$413,085.00

28.50 14.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$3,990.00 $15,400.00
$19,390.00

50.25 9.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$7,035.00 $9,900.00
$16,935.00

9.11 142.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$1,275.40 $156,200.00
$157,475.40

0.00 0.00
335.61 509.00

$0.00 $0.00
$46,985.40 $559,900.00
$606,885.40

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

METH
GRAM OUNCB POUND
TOTAL

224.10 4.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$22,410.00 $4,400.00 $0.00
$26,810.00

259.70 12.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$25,970.00 $13,200.00
$0.00
$39,170.00

76.60

$100.00 $1,100.00 $IS, 000.00

$7,660.00 $0.00 $0.00
$7,660.00

86.45

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$8,645.00 $0.00 $0.00
$8,645.00

646.85 16.00 0.00

$64,685.00 $17 f 600.00
$0.00
$82,285.00

DCSI-96~20

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO
TOTAL

1. 00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$100.00

6.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $6,600.00
$0.00 $0.00
$6,600.00

4.75

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $5,225.00
$0.00 $0.00
$5,225.00

0.50

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

CRACK

ROCK

107.00

$25.00

$2,675.00

OUNCE

$1,000.00

$0.00

POUND

$12,000.00

$0.00

.................... ",

",. ---------------

TOTAL

$2,675.00

121.00 0.50
.z

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00
=

$3,025.00 $500.00 $0.00
~
$3,525.00

130.00

$25.00

13.00

$1,000.00

$12,000.00
m

$3,250.00 $13,000.00
$0.00
$16,250.00

24.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00
""

MARIJUANA

SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND

9 .50 513.00

TOTAL

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$1,900.00 $1,026,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$1,027,900.00

128.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $256,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$256,000.00

27.25

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $54,500.00
$0.00 $0.00
$54,500.00

125.50

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE
."

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 PaD".

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0. 0 0

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$50.00

1.50 10.75
0.00 0.00

$150.00 $11,825.00
$0.00 $0.00
$11,975.00

$600.00 $0.00 $0.00
$600.00

382.00

13.50

0.00

.. = .."'="''''

1:1

$9,550.00 $13,500.00
$0.00
_
$23,050.00

$0.00 $251,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$251,000.00

9.50 793.75
0.00 0.00

$1,900.00 $1,587,500.00
$0.00 $0.00
$1,589,400.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
so _00

0.00
0.00
O. or

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

SUBGRANT NUMBER

DRUG TYPE

AMOUNT SEIZED

FIRST QUARTER
STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

SECOND QUARTER

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

THIRD QUARTER

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

FOURTH QUARTER

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

TOTAL AMOUNT SEIZED

TOTAL $ VALUE OF DRUGS

METH
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

21.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$2,100.00 $0. DO $0. DO
$2,100.00

11.75

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $12,925.00
$0.00
$12,925.00

4.25

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $4,675.00
$0.00
$4,675.00

21. 00 16.00
0.00

$2,100.00 $17,600.00
$0.00
$19,700.00

DCSI-96-21

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE, POUND
KILO
TOTAL

CRACK
ROCK OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

METH
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15. 000. 00 $26,000.00
$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

6.00 3.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$600.00 $3,300.00
$0.00 $0.00
$3. 900.00

2.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$200.00

1.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$100.00
~u. ;)0
$0. DO $0.00
$100.00

9.00
3.00
o. 00 o. 00

$900.00 $3,300.00
$0. DO $0.00
$4,200.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

800. 00 2.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$20, 000.00 $2,000.00 $0.00
$22,000.00

286.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12, 000.00

$7,150.00 $0. DO $0.00
$7,150.00

82.00 6.20

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$2,050.00 $6,200.00
$0.00
$8,250.00

1,168.00 8.20 0.00

$29,200.00 $8,200.00 $0.00
$37,400. DO

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00
$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00
$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00

178.00 722.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $356,000.00
$0.00 $794,200.00
$1,150,200.00

106.50

$200.00 $2, 000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $117,150.00
$117,150.00

lIB. 00
319.00 247 .00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $236,000.00
$44,660.00 $271,700.00
$552,360.00

0.00 296.00
319. 00 1,075.50

$0.00 $592,000.00
$44,660.00 $1,183,050.00
$1,819,710.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00 0.00 O. DO

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

12.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $13,200.00
$0.00
$13,200.00

7.00

$100.0,0 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $7,700.00
$0.00
$7,700.00

20.40

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$2,040.00 $0.00 $0. DO
$2,040.00

20.40 19. 00
0.00

$2,040.00 $20,900. DO
$0.00
$22,940.00

DCSI9622

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO
TOTAL

2.20

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$220.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$220.00

3.10

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$310.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$310.00

9.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26, 000. 00

$900.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$900.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

14.30 0.00 0.00 0.00

$1,430.00 $0. DO $0.00 $0.00
$1,430.00

FIRST QUARTER

SUBGRANT NUMBER
......"'.===

DRUG

AMOUNT

TYPE

SEIZED

==::: .."''''==:=:-= ==:g "'=

RO,CK 316.00

OUNCE

POUND

STANDARD
VALUE
=.. ",,====..=:z==
$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$ VALUE OF DRUGS
= "" = ====
$7,900.00
$0.00 $0.00

TOTAL

$7,900.00

SECOND QUARTER

AMOUNT

STANDARD

SEIZED
"'''''''''' "'

VALUE
"""'''''''== =

75.00

$25.00

$1,000.00

$12,000.00

$ VALUE

OF DRUGS

a .. "'

'"

$1,875.00

$0.00

$0.00

$1,875.00

THIRD QUARTER

FOURTH QUARTER

AMOUNT

STANDARD

SEIZED

VALUE

,..

z ,..

116.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

== =..=..==........ .,..""

$2,900.00

699.00

$0.00

$0.00

STANDARD

VALUE

"."'

"'. Il ..=

$25.00

$1,000.00

$12,000.00

$ VALUE

OF DRUGS

z

"''''.

$17,475.00

$0.00

$0.00

TOTAL

TOTAL

AMOUNT

$ VALUE

SEIZED

OF DRUGS

== ,.. ,,=="=""="lC_==".

1,206.00

$30,150.00

0.00

$0.00

0.00

$0.00

$2,900.00

$17,475.00

$30, 150.00

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

5.37 2840.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $10,740.00
$0.00 $312,400.00
$323,140.00

63.96 135.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $127,920.00
$0.00 $148,500.00
$276,420.00

116.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $232,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$232,000.00

9.41 361. 00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$1,882.00 $722,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$723,882.00

9.41 546.33
0.00 419.00

$1,882.00 $1,092,660.00
$0.00 $460,900.00
$1,555,"2.00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

METH
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

1. 00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$100.00 $0.00 $0.00
$100.00

1.00 0.00 0.00

$100.00 $0.00 $0.00
$100.00

DCSI~96-23

COCAINE

GRAM

178.90

OUNCE

POUND

KILO
. . . . == .. "''''

TOTAL

$100.00

$17,890.00

$1,100.00

$0.00

$15,000.00

$0.00

$26,000.00

$0.00

= =====.=. -- - - - - ~ - -------

$17,890.00

1,811.20
=

$100.00

$181,120.00

$1,100.00

$0.00

$15,000.00

$0.00

$26,000.00

$0.00

:." ==

-------- ----. - ~ :::

$181,120.00

18.70
"'

$100.00

$1,870.00

$1,100.00

$0.00

$15,000.00

$0.00

$26,000.00

$0.00

:a: .. " .. "" - - -'~ - - - - - - ~--- _ 11:

$1,870.00

76.00

$100.00

$1,100.00

$15,000.00

$26,000.00

= IC

-

$7,600.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
. --- ----. --
$7,600.00

2,0840.80

$208,480.00

0.00

$0.00

0.00

$0.00

0.00

$0.00

"' .. = .,::""11: - --- - - - - - - - - - --

$208,480.00

CRACK

ROCK 1,106.00

$25.00

$27,650.00

OUNCE

$1,000.00

$0.00

POUND

$12,000.00

$0.00

==.= .. ==..... . ...""....... =........

-~----~-------

TOTAL

$27,650.00

4040. 00

$25.00

$1,100.00

$1,000.00

$0.00

$12,000.00

$0.00

.... "' .... ="' .... :::o."'''' ..... = .... ,z=z --- ----

_

$1,100.00

532.00

$25.00

$13,300.00

$1,000.00

$0.00

$12,000.00

$0.00

""::'""."'''' ---

$13,300.00

253.00

$25.00

$6,325.00

$1,000.00

$0.00

$12,000.00

$0.00

.1l:. . =. Il:= ......===..:0:="".. >1: ..

----~----------

$6,325.00

1,935.00

$408,375.00

0.00

$0.00

O. 00

$0.00

""'=::Z "'''''=== --------------

$48,375.00

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

1".70

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $289,400.00
$0.00 $0.00
$289,400.00

53.20

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $106,400.00
$0.00 $0.00
$106,400.00

7.00 272.70

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $14,000.00
$38,178.00 $0.00
$52,178.00

26.400 1.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $52,800.00
$0.00 $1,100.00
$53,900.00

0.00 231.30
272.70 1.00

$0.00 $462,600.00
$38,178.00 $1,100.00
$501,878.00

HEROIN

4. 00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50.000.00

$600.00 $0.00 $0 (10

$150.00 $4,000.00 c,50,00(\ no

$0. $0.
Pas

$150.00 $4,000.00 oC::- n "''''',00

$0.00 $0.00 $0. r-

$150.00 $4,000.00 "--',000. ( -

$0.00 $0.00

40. or
0.0(,
o

$600.00 $0.00 $0.00

SUBGRANT NUMBER

DRUG TYPE

AMOUNT SBIZED

......""."' ",,,:II,,:"""' ,...,,,,,

""' ..""''""'''''''

.... "'

TOTAL

FIRST QUARTER

SECOND QUARTER

THIRD QUARTER

FOURTH QUARTER

TOTAL

TOTAL

STANDARD

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

VALUE

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

= "' "'... ."'."' .,.., ::a

STANDARD VALUE
"".,

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

AMOUNT SEIZED

"""'. .,.

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

.,..,.."' "'. a"'.a .,.

STANDARD

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

VALUE

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

.,."'= "' ""'

"'.. "'=.,..,.."'

$ VALUE OF DRUGS "''''' ='''.'''=

,..".,.

---------------

"'="" .,.

"' ---_.--------.- .,. ---------------

= .,. "'

---------------

,.

"" ---------------

$600.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$600.00

METa
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

DCSI-96-24

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO
TOTAL

24.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$2,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2.400.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

CRACK
ROCK OUNCE FOUND
TOTAL

80.00

$25.00 $1.000.00 $12.000.00

$2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2,000.00

180. 00

$25.00 $1.000.00 $12,000.00

$4.500.00 $0.00 $0.00
$4,500.00

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

2.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $4,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$4.000.00

0.50

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $1,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$1,000.00

HEROIN

GRAM

$150.00

OUNCE

$4,000.00

POUND .............$.5.0..,0.0.0.."0' 0

TOTAL

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
---------------
$0.00

$150.00

$0.00

$4,000.00

$0.00

$50.000.00

$0.00

""

.,.

----.----------

$0.00

METa
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

9.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$900.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$900.00

7.30

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$730.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$730.00

40.30 0.00 0.00 0.00

$4,030.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$4.030.00

52.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$1,300.00 $0.00 $0.00
$1,300.00

14 .00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$350.00 $0.00 $0.00
$350.00

326. 00 O. 00 0.00

$8.150.00 $0.00 $0.00
$8,150.00

65.38

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$9,153.20 $0.00
$9,153.20

1.99

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$278.60 $0.00
$278.60

0.00 2.50
67 .37 0.00

$0.00 $5,000.00
$9,431.80 $0.00
$14.431.80

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
---------------
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50.000.00

$0.00 $0.00
. $0.00
--------------- ."
$0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
---------------
$0.00

6.20

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$620.00 $0.00 $0.00
$620.00

0.20

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15.000.00

$20.00 $0.00 $0.00
$20.00

6.40 0.00 0.00

$640.00 $0.00 $0.00
$640.00

DCSI-96-25

COCAINE

GRAM

14.00

OUNCE

1. 00

POUND

KILO

.,.

$100.00

$1,400.00

$1,100.00

$1,100.00

$15,000.00

$0.00

$26.000.00

$0.00

1:1 ~-~----

$2,500.00
.............. "".

30.00

$100.00

$1,100.00

$15.000.00

$26,000.00

"'

= .. ~~

.,.

$3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
~

9.00

$100.00

$1,100.00

$15,000. 00

$26,000.00

$900.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$3,000.00
'""...

$900.00
.,,""..=za..

Page

7.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26.000.00

$700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
~

$700.00

ilI .. ""."..""

=.

60.00 1. 00 0.00 0.00
.,,...,,.=

$6,000.00

$1,100.00

$0.00

$0.00

~.

_

$7.100.00
-- - --

FIRST QUARTER

SECOND QUARTER

THIRD QUARTER

SUBGRAN'l'

DRUG

AMOUNT

STANDARD

NUMBER

TYPE

SEIZED

VALUE

"'

== .. =."""" "".=='" "'''' .. ", ",=:11: '" ===

::Z="",""zz z """,,,,, II

CRACK

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

""""."';1;; .. ""==.... .."' =.c

STANDARD VALUE
= ;I: ="' "',.

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

"' c.......

..=== ,..

STANDARD VALUE

ROCK OUNCE POUND

336.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12.000.00

$8,400.00 $0.00 $0.00

128. 00 4.00

$25.00 $1.000.00 $12.000.00

$3,200.00 $4,000.00
$0.00

150.00 2.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

TOTAL

$8.400.00

$7,200.00

$ VALUE
OF DRUGS
"' """'."'...

AMOUNT SEIZED =a",

FOURTH QUARTER

STANDARD VALUE =

$ VALUE
OF DRUGS
"" c =."" =.... c

TOTAL

AMOUNT

SEIZED

"'. ""

""",

TOTAL $ VALUE OF DRUGS
==== "' = ..

$3,750.00 $2,000.00
$0.00
$5,750.00

16.00

$25.00 $1.000.00 $12,000.00

$400.00 $0.00 $0.00
$400.00

630.00 6.00 0.00

$15,750.00 $6,000.00 $0.00
$21,750.00

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL vUNCE poUNil
TOTAL

68.00 93.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$1<0.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $136.000.00
$0.00 $102.300.00
$238.300.00

71.50
12. 00 10.00

$200.00 $2.000.00
$1<0.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $143,000. 00
$1.680.00 $11.000.00
$155,680.00

22.00 1<.00

$200.00 $2, 000.00
$1<0.00 $1,100.00

$4,400.00 $28,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$32,400.00

6.00 294.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$1<0.00 $1,100.00

$1,200.00 $588,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$589,200.00

28.00 447.50
12. 00 103.00

$5,600.00 $895,000.00
$1,680.00 $113.300.00
$1.015,580.00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$150.00 $<.000.00 $50.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4.000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

O. 00 O. 00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

METH
GRAM OUNCE FOUND
TOTAL

56.00 3.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$5.600.00 $3.300.00
$0.00
$8.900.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

18.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$1,800.00 $0.00 $0.00
$1,800.00

21. 00 5.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$2,100.00 $0.00
$75,000.00
$77,100.00

95.00 3.00 5.00

$9,500.00 $3,300.00 $75. 000.00
$87,800.00

DCSI-96-26

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO
TOTAL

31. 00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00 $26.000.00

$3.100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$3,100.00

0.50

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

CRACK
ROCK OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

110.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12.000.00

$2.750.00 $0,00 $0.00
$2,750. 00

459.00

$25.00 $1.000.00 $12.000.00

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

5.00 425.00

$200.00 $2.000.00
$1<0.00 $1.100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$700.00 $467,500.00
$468,200.00

2.50 15.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$1<0.00 $1,100.00

$50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$50.00

3.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$11,475.00 $0.00 $0.00
$11,475.00

610.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$500.00 $30,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$30,500.00

54.25

$200.00 $2,000.00
$1<0.00 $1,100.00

$300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$300.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15, 000. 00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

34 .50 0.00 0.00 0.00

$3,450.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$3,450.00

$15,250.00 $0.00 $0.00
$15,250.00

266.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12, 000.00

$6,650.00 $0.00 $0.00
$6,650.00

1,445.00 0.00 0.00

$36,125.00 $0.00 $0.00
$36,125.00

$0.00 $0.00
$7,595.00 $0.00
$7.595.00

0.25 164.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$1<0.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $0.00
$35.00 $180,400.00
$180,435.00

2.50 15.00
59.50 589.00

$500.00 $30,000.00
$8,330.00 $647,900.00
$686,730.00

$150.00

$0. nn

$150 _00

~150.00

$0. DC

$150. no

f:O 00

DC

$0.00

SUBGRANT NUMBER

FIRST QUARTER

SECOND QUARTER

DRUG TYPE

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

OUNCE POUND
z=="".. ===== TOTAL

$<,000.00

$0. 00

$<,000.00

$50,000.00

$0.00

$50, 000.00

===:a==.""", ------~._-----_ .. ====,.,==*, .. _ .. a==== '"::=.,, .

$0.00

THIRD QUARTER

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

$0.00

$<,000.00

$0.00

$0.00

$50,000.00

$0.00



== "" ---------------

$0.00

$0.00

FOURTH QUARTER

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

TOTAL AMOUNT SEIZED

TOTAL $ VALUE OF DRUGS

$<,000.00

$0.00

0.00

$0.00

$50, 000.00

$0.00

0.00

$0.00

""

"" --------------- = ..",=== ===",= ---------.-----

$0.00

$0.00

METH
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

5.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$500.00 $0.00 $0.00
$500.00

8.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$800.00 $0.00 $0.00
$800.00

7.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15, 000.00

$700.00 $0.00 $0.00
$700.00

1. 00 3.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$100.00 $3,300.00
$0.00
$3, <00.00

21. 00 3.00 0.00

$2,100.00 $3,300.00
$0.00
$5,<00.00

DCSI-96-27

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO
TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000. 00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

8.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

CRACK
ROCK OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

165. 00

$25. 00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$4,125.00 $0.00 $0.00
$<,125.00

165.20

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

926. 00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $1,852,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$1,852,000.00

27.50

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$150.00 $<,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $<, 000.00 $50,000. 00

METH
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

19.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$800.00
$<,130.00 $0.00 $0.00
$<,130.00
$0.00 $55,000.00
$0.00 $p.OO $55,000.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$1,900.00 $0.00 $0.00
$1,900.00

1<.70

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

19. 00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

0.50 36.00

$200.00 $2,000.00
$1<0.00 $1,100.00

$150.00 $<,000.00 $50,000.00

3.50

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$1, <70.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$1, <70.00

0.50

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$50.00

23.20 0.00 0.00 0.00

$2,320 .00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$2,320.00

$<75.00 $0.00 $0.00
$<75.00

0.28

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$0.00 $280. 00
$0.00
$280.00

349.20 0.28 O. 00

$8,730.00 $280.00 $0.00
$9,010.00

$100. 00 $72,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$72,100.00

208.50

$200.00 $2,000.00
$140.00 $1,100.00

$0.00 $<17,000.00
$0.00 $0.00
$<17,000.00

0.50 1,198.aO
0.00 0.00

$100.00 $2,396,000.00
$0. 00 $0.00
$2,396,100.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00 $<,000.00 $50,000.00

$0.00 $0. 00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

$0. 00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$0.00 $3,850.00
$0.00
$3,850.00

56.10

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$5,610.00 $0.00 $0.00
$5,610.00

75.10 3.50 0.00

$7,510.00 $3,850.00
$0. 00
$11,360.00

DCSI-96-28

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
'0

5.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15, 000.00 $26, 000. 00

$500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$500. CC

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0. 00 $0.00
So ,,00 Pa'.

1. 00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
, $100.00

1.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
~1 nn 00

7.00 0.00 0.00 0.0'

$700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
~700. 00

SUBGRANT NUMBER

DRUG TYPE

AMOUNT SBIZED

FIRST QUARTER
STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

SECOND QUARTER

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

THIRD QUARTER

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OP DRUGS

POURTH QUARTER

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD VALUE

$ VALUE OF DRUGS

TOTAL AMOUNT SBIZED

TOTAL $ VALUE OF DRUGS

CRACK
ROCK OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$25. 00 $1,000.00 $12, 000. 00

MARIJUANA
SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

36. 00 302.00

$200. 00 $2,000.00
$140 .00 $1,100. 00

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$150. 00 $4, 000. 00 $50, 000. 00

METH
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

2. 00 2.00

$100.00 $1,100. 00 $15, 000. 00

$0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0 .00
$0. 00 $72,000.00
$0. 00 $332,200.00 $404,200. 00
$0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0 .00
$0. 00 $2,200.00 $30, 000. 00 $32,200.00

$25. 00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

30. 00 78. 00

$200. 00 $2,000.00
$140. 00 $1,100. 00

$150. 00 $4, 000. 00 $50, 000. 00

14. 00

$100. 00 $1,100.00 $15, 000. 00

$0. 00 $0.00 $0. 00 $0 .00
$0.00 $60,000.00
$0. 00 $85,800. 00 $145,800. 00
$0 .00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00
$0. 00 $15,400. 00
$0. 00 $15,400. 00

$25. 00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00

$0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00
$0. 00

$25. 00 $1, 000. 00 $12,000.00

$0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00
$0. 00

15. 00 83. 00
19. 00

$200. 00 $2, 000. 00
$140.00 $1,100. 00

$3,000.00 $166, 000. 00
$0. 00 $20,900. 00
$189,900. 00

100. 00
... 00 253. 00

$200. 00 $2,000.00
$140. 00 $1,100. 00

$0. 00 $200,000.00
$560. 00 $278,300.00
$478,860.00

$150 .00 $4, 000. 00 $50,000.00

$0. 00 $0. 00 $0 .00
$0. 00

$150. 00 $4, 000. 00 $50,000.00

$0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00
$0. 00

24.00 5.00

$100 .00 $1,100.00 $15, 000. 00

$2,400. 00 $5,500. 00
$0. 00
$7,900. 00

132. 00

$100. 00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00

$13,200. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00
$13,200.00

0.00 O. 00 0.00

$0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00
$0. 00

15. 00 249. 00
".00 652.00

$3, 000. 00 $498,000.00
$560.00 $717,200. 00
$1,218,760. 00

O. 00 O. 00 O. 00

$0. 00 $0.00 $0. 00
$0. 00

156. 00 21.00 2.00

$15,600. 00 $23,100.00 $30,000.00
$68,700. 00

DCSI-95-14

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO =
TOTAL

$100. 00 $1,100.00 $15, 000. 00 $26,000.00

$0. 00 $0.00 $0. 00 $0. 00 -----.--------$0. 00

14.00 "'

$100. 00

$0 .00

$1,100.00

$15,400. 00

$15,000.00

$0. 00

$26,000.00

$0.00

".. ---------------

$15,400.00

8.80

$100. 00 $1,100.00 $15,000.00 $26,000.00

$0. 00 $9,680.00
$0. 00 $0.00 ---------------
$9,680. 00

5. 00

$100. 00 $1,100.00

$0. 00 $5,500. 00

$15, 000. 00

$0. 00

$26,000.00

$0. 00

c ---------------

$5,500. 00

0.00 27.80
O. 00

$0. 00 $30,580.00
$0. 00

O. 00

c

----

$0. 00
_

$30,580.00

CRACK
ROCK 504. 00 OUNCE POUND
........... ;a
TOTAL

$25. 00

$12,600.00

$1,000.00

$0. 00

$12, 000. 00

$0. 00

="""" ---------------

$12,600.00

1,400.00

$25. 00
$1,000.00
$12, 000. 00
"'

$35,000.00 $0. 00 $0. 00
$35, 000.00

269. 00

$25. 00
$1,000.00
$12,000.00
-

$6,725.00 $0. 00 $0. 00
.
$6,725.00

227. 00

$25. 00 $1, 000. 00 $12,000.00
===

$5,675. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00
$5,675.00

2,400.00

O. 00

0.00

::I:a:.l:I

==1III

$60,000.00 $0. 00 $0.00 _
$60,000.00

MARIJUANA

SINSEMILLA

OUNCE

$200. 00

$0.00

POUND

$2,000.00

$0. 00

COMMERCIAL

OUNCB

4.30

$140.00

$602. 00

POUND

$1,100.00

$0. 00

......................... ---------------

TOTAL

$602. 00

95.00

$200. 00 $2,000.00

$0. 00 $0. 00

$200. 00 $2,000.00

$0. 00 $0. 00

$200. 00 $2,000.00

$140.00 $1,100.00

$13,300.00 $0. 00
---------------
$13,300.00

216. 00

$140. 00

$30,240.00

$1,100. 00

$0.00

c ---------------

$30,240. 00

0.80

$140. 00

3.00

$1,100. 00

.,.

0:::.

$0. 00 $0. 00
$112. 00 $3,300.00
$3,412.00

O. 00 O. 00
316.10 3. 00

$0 .00 $0. 00
$44,254. 00 $3,300.00
_
$47,554.00

Pa~-

SUBGRANT
NUMBER
.:a:= "''''O:=~

FIRST QUARTER

SECOND QUARTER

DRUG

AMOUNT

STANDARD

TYPE

SBIZED

VALUE

======ce= :0:."'>=""":=""" =="""'S======_

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

OF DRUGS

SEIZED

"""'

"'.. a"" === .. _a

STANDARD

VALUE

= ==

z

GRAM OUNCE POUND
.....",,====
TOTAL

$150.00 $'.000.00 $50.000.00
====_."".._=== _..

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$150.00

$ 000.00

$50.000.00

IIr.

= oz """"

MBTH
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00

$0. QO $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00

THIRD QUARTER

FOURTH QUARTER

$ VALUE OF DRUGS ca""""....

AMOUNT SEIZED

STANDARD

$ VALUE

AMOUNT

VALUE

OF DRUGS

SBIZED

""."" .=.1::=:11:............. -= """"===

STANDARD VALUE

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00



.01:

$0.00

$150.00 $'.000.00 $50.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

'"'

$150.00

$'.000.00

$50.000.00

=a



$ VALUE OF DRUGS
1:: ===

TOTAL AMOUNT SEIZED
==..=

TOTAL $ VALUE OF DRUGS
=."' === ==

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00

$0.00

0.00

$0.00

0.00

$0.00

..=""..=-===0=- ---------------

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15,000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00

TOTAL

COCAINE
GRAM OUNCE POUND
KILO
TOTAL

357.96 6.25 0.00 1. 05

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00 $26.000.00

$35.796.00 $6.875.00 $0.00
$27.300.00

4,287.05 115.83 2.77 2.11

$69.971.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00 $26.000.00

$'28.705.00 $127. "3.00
$41.550.00 $5'.860.00
$652.528.00

715.68 358.55
2.50 5.32

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00 $26.000.00

$71.568.00 $39 '05.00
$37.500.00 $138.320.00

5.112.63 14.40 4.00 3.00

$641.793.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00 $26.000.00

$511.263.00 $15.840.00 $60.000.00 $78.000.00
$665.103.00

10,473.32 495.03 9.27 11.48

$1.0'7.332.00 $5".533.00 $139.050.00 $298.'80.00
$2.029.395.00

CRACK

ROCK OUNCE POUND

4,274.00 51.26 0.00

TOTAL

$25.00 $1.000.00 $12.000.00

$106.850.00 $51.260.00 $0.00

7.879.20 53.20 0.00

$158.110.00

$25.00 $1.000.00 $12.000.00

$196.980.00 $53,200.00 $0.00

11.'59.00 51.08 0.00

$250.180.00

$25.00 $1,000.00 $12.000.00

$286.'75.00 $51.080.00 $0.00

'.624.20 45.68 0.00

$337.555.00

$25.00 $1.000.00 $12.000.00

$115.605.10 $'5.680.00 $0.00
$161.285.10

28,236.40 201. 22 0.00

$705.910.10 $201,220.00
$0.00
$907,130.10

MARIJUANA

SINSEMILLA OUNCE POUND
COMMERCIAL OUNCE POUND

36.50 2,584.57
293.50 4,801.50

TOTAL

$200.00 $2.000.00

$7.300.00

2.50

$5.169.140.00 1.326.16

$140.00 $1.100.00

$41.090.00

395.37

$5.281.650.00 5,228.43

$10.'99.180.00

$200.00 $2.000.00
$140.00 $1.100.00

$500.00 $2,652,320.00
$55.351.80 $5.751.273.00
$8 59 ..... 80

88.11 1,575.25
701.62 749.75

$200.00 $2.000.00
$140.00 $1.100.00

$17.621.00 $3.150.500.00

143.57 5.801.'0

$98.227.08

535.76

$82'.725.00 2.8B9.75

$'.091.073.08

$200.00

$28.71'.00

$2.000.00 $11.602.800.00

$140.00 $1.100.00

$75.005.91 $3.178.725.00

$14.885.2".91

270.68

$5 135.00

11.287.38 $22,574,760.00

1.926.25

$269.67'.79

13.669.43 $15.036.373.00

$37.934.9'2.79

HEROIN
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

6.00 0.00 0.00

$150.00 $4,000.00 $50.000.00

$900.00 $0.00 $0.00
$900.00

3.50 0.00 0.00

$150.00 $'.000.00 $50.000.00

$525.00 $0.00 $0.00
$525.00

103.50 0.00 0.00

$150.00 $'.000.00 $50.000.00

$15.525.00 $0.00 $0.00
$15,525.00

13.80 0.00 3.00

$150.00 $'.000.00 $50,000.00

$2.070.00 $0.00
$150.000.00
$152.070.00

126.80 0.00 3.00

$19.020.00 $0.00
$150.000.00
$169.020.00

MBTH
GRAM OUNCE POUND
TOTAL

365.86 12.11 2.00

$100.00 $1,100.00 $15.000.00

$36.586.00 $13.321.00 $30.000.00
$79.907.00

405.22 38.00 0.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00

$'0.522.00 $41.800.00
$0.00
$82.322.00

633 .25 34.77 0.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00

$63.325.00 $38.2'7.00
$0.00

1,063.69 2'.00 8.00

$101.572.00

$100.00 $1.100.00 $15.000.00

$106.369.00 $26.'00.00
$120.000.00
$252.769.00

2.'68.02 108.88 10.00

$2'6.802.00 $119,768.00 $150.000.00
$516.570.00

ATTACHMENT 7
1996
MULTIJURISDICTIONAL DRUG TASKFORCE PROJECTS
DRUG PREFERENCE MAP

CJCC Multi-Jurisdictional Drug Task Forces
1. Southeast Georgia DTF 2. Athens-Clarke-Elbert County DTF 3. Richmond County DTF 4. Ocmulgee DTF 5. A1tamaha DTF 6. Middle Georgia DTF 7. Oconee Dublin DTF 8. West Georgia DTF 9. Cherokee County MAN.S.
10. South Georgia DTF

Grady Thomas

11. Tri-Cities Narcotics 12. East Metro Drug EnforcementTeam 13. Mid-South Narcotics Task Force 14. Flint River Narcotics Task Force 15. East Central Georgia DTF 16'. Tri-Circuit DTF 17. Coastal Organized Drug Enforcement TF 18. Northeast Georgia Narcotics Task Force 19. Hall County MAN.S. 20. Tallapoosa Judicial Circuit DTF
= DTF Drug Task Force = MAN.S. Multi-Agency Narcotics Squad

21. PiedmonVNorthern MAN.S. 22. MUlti-Agency Crack Enforcement DTF 23. Metro DTF 24. Southwest Georgia DTF 25. Rome/Aoyd Metro DTF 26. Narcotics Task Force 27. Lookout Mountain Judicial Circuit DTF 28. Appalachian DTF 29. Albany-Dougherty DTF (#29 is 95-14 in Statistical References)

Marijuana
o Cocaine Methamphetamine

ATTACHMENT 8
GEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
INVESTIGATIVE DIVISION REGIONAL
OFFICES MAP

Georgia Bureau of Investigation Investigative Division Regional Offices

Regional Offices

'gion 1- Calhoun, Gordon Co. Ga. .gion 2-Thomaston, UI)SOn Co. Ga. Region 3-Americus, Sumter, Co. Ga. Region 4- Douglas, Coffee Co. Ga. Region 5- Statesboro, Bulloch Co. Ga.

Region 6- Milledgeville, Baldwin Co. Ga. Region 7- Thomson, McDuffie Co. Ga. Region 8- Gainesville, Hall Co. Ga. Region 9- ThomasviUe, Thomas Ga. Region 10-C0llYers, Rockdale Co. Ga.

Region 11- Athens, ClarIce Co. Ga. Region 12- Eastman, Dodge Co. Ga. Region 13- Perry, Houston Co. Ga. Region 14- Kingsland, Camden Co. Ga. Region 15- Albany, Dougherty Co. Ga.

ATTACHMENT 9
1996 FUGITIVE SQUADS MAp

CJCC FUGITIVE SQUADS
~ METRO FUGITIVE SQUAD
III MIDDLE GEORGIA FUGITIVE

ATTACHMENT 10
GEORGIA PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING CENTER
SUMMARY REPORT ON QUARTERLY ACTIVITY
REPORTS

1996 DCSI GRANT PROGRAM SUMMARY REPORT ON QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORTS GEORGIA PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING CENTER (GPSTC)

SECTION 1: COURSES AT THE GPSTC

1st Quarter

2nd Quarter

3rd Quarter

July 1 - September 301996 October 1 - December 311996 January 1 - March 311997

Number of Courses Available Number of Students Attending Number of Rejected Applicants Number of Students Successfully Completing Courses Graduation Percenatge

16 322
23 314 97.52%

26 760
60 740 97.37%

18 435
18 419 96.32%

SECTION 2: COURSES AT OFF-SITE LOCATIONS

Number of Courses Available Number of Students Attending Number of Rejected Applicants Number of Studenls Successfully Completing Courses Gradualion Percenatge

9 318
0 317 99.69%

17 309
0 302 97.73%

16 470
0 466 99.15%

SECTION 3: TOTALS

Type/Number of Courses Available Drug Related COP Spanish SFST/DUI Cancelled
Total Courses Available

16

26

17

4

8

11

3

2

4

2

3

1

0

4

1

25

43

34

Tolal Number of Students Attending Total Number of Students Successfully Completing Courses Total Number of Students Cancelling Total Number of Students Who Were No-Shows Graduation Percenatge

640 631
77 18 98.59%

1,069 1,042
135 91
97.47%

905 885
65 59 97.79%

SECTION 4: COSTS OF COURSES

Cost for Outside Instructors Cost per Student Total Contact Hours Cost per Student Contact Hour

$5,762.52 $9.00
11,549 $0.50

$9,866.88 $9.23
19,378 $0.51

$6,070.32 $6.71
17,754 $0.34

4th Quarter April 1 - June 30 1997
20 578
8 565 97.75%
13 437
0 437 100.00%
18 12
0 1 2 33
1,015 1,002
109 86
98.72%
$8,943.75 $8.81
20,850 $0.43

Totals
80 2,095
109 2,038 97.28%
55 1,534
0 1,522 99.22%
77 35
9 7 7 135
3,629 3,560
386 254 98.10%
$30,643.47 $8.44
69,531 $0.44

APPENDIXC PURPOSE AREA #3

ATTACHMENT 1
1996 INDOOR GROW OPERATION EXAMPLE

INDOOR GRO"T OPERATION EOUIPMENT (See diagram)
A. Exhaust FanNent- 'Used to exhaust stale air and control the temperature of the grow room. Ideal temperature for marijuana ranges between 60 and 85 degrees.
B. C02 (Carbon Dioxide Cylinder)- Used to enrich the grow environment with carbon dioxide. Propane heaters may also be used to enrich the C02 content of the grow room.
c. Window Air Conditioners- Used to keep the grow room at the ideal temperature of 60 to 85
degrees.
D. Sun Circle or Solar Track- Used to support grow lights and to move them around the room to provide even lighting.
E. Reflective Light Hood/lOOO Watt High Pressure Sodium Vapor Bulb- On the opposite 'side of the sun circle is a 1000 watt metal halide bulb. Growers differ on their p'rcfercnce of light sources or use combinations of both types.
F. Ballast- A ballast is a transformer. Each grow light must have a ballast to operate.
G. Grow Medium- Grower can use several types. Rock or rock wool to produce plants hydroponically (without soil) or in one of several types of soils.
H. Feeder Reservoir- Used to water and feed the plants with wate~ soluble fertilizer.
1. Light Source for the Clones
J. Oones or Cuttings- Usually located in a separate room referred to as a nursery.

APPENDIXD PURPOSE AREA #10

ATTACHMENT 1
1996 SAIR PROGRAM FEATURED IN NEWSLETTER

_N_ew_s_fo_r_po_li_cy_an_d_p_ro_g_raD_ l d_eCl_'5_i_on_-_m_ak_ers_.

W e ek 1y __IS_S_N_1_04_2_-_13_9_4_

Vol. 9, No. 40 Monday, October 20, 1997

Also This Week
SAl'\1HSA issues recommendations for rural behavioral needs ._...... Page 2
N.Y. providers become growingly suspicious over managed care ...... Page 4
Resource on workplace substance abuse goes online ..................................... Page 6
Telepsychiatry poised for greater role in behavioral care Page 6
Letter: M.D. dispensing of methadone carries risks ................. Page 7

Georgia finds some surprises in inventory of treatment programs

It's time to treat a client. Does your state know where its providers are?
One might be inclined to think that every state has a handle on how many programs it has that offer addiction treatment services, and what their overall treatment capacity is. But the reality is there are few places where either field professionals or the general public can go to retrieve such basic information.

majority oftreatment programs were being underutilized.
"Waiting lists are actually limited to the few well-known public programs," said Scott Dunbar, program coordinatoratthe Metropolitan Atlanta Council on Alcohol & Drugs (MACAO), which spearheaded the creation of the online inventory of treatment programs known as the Substance Abuse Internet Referral System.

Members ofGeorgia' streatment and prevention community made an astonishing discovery after they received a grant from the U.S. Department ofJustice to do a formal inventory ofaddiction treatment services. In a state where people had talked of a lack oftreatment capacity, the vast

Dunbar, who began working with MACAO officials when he was with the Georgia Department of Corrections, told ADA Wthat in the past, the longest list ofGeorgia treatment programs he had ever seen amounted to
(See Inventory, page 5)

(Inventory, from page 1)

MACAD service after having tried project while he developed after-

one of the several addiction "help care programs for graduates ofdrug

lines" in operation across the state. treatment in the DepartmentofCor-

two dozen agencies. The Substance Other users of the service include rections. He constantly discovered

Abuse Internet Referral System friends and relatives of persons with new programs and passed the in-

lists about 700 programs, ranging addiction problems; employers; and formation along to MACAD, where

from for-profit inpatient centers counselors or case workers. System he would eventually go to work.

with huge advertising budgets to hard-to-find nonprofit programs.
"There are many inde-

operators report about 9,000 "hits" on the Internet service over the past six months.

"The majority ofthe resources out there are nonprofit and small," he said. "Andthe majority ofplaces

pendent nonprofits that

are underused, not over-

charge a fair rate, but no one "The majority of the resources out there used."

knows about them," Betty

Hanacek, director of infor-

mation dissemination at

MACAD, told ADAW.

"Theirservice can be as good

as that of the higher-priced

programs."

.

are nonprofit and small. And the majority
ofplaces are underused, not overused. n
Scott Dunbar, Metropolitan Atlanta Council
on Alcohol & Drugs

Hanacek and Dunbar, who are willing to talk to professionals in other states about how they established the system, say the people who need information about treatment programs the most

Professionals and the general public can receive free access to the entire inventoryofGeorgia programs through the MACAD Web page athttp://www.macad.org.Or,

The Department ofJustice grant, which amounted to about $125,000 in the first year and about $93,000 in the present second year, enabled MACAD to establish an Internet da-

usually have the most difficulty expressing their needs. As a result, many programs, especially those without large advertising
budgets, go unnoticed.

for a fee of $30, they can contact tabase that is updated consistently.

So based on their experience,

MACAD to receive a two-volume Project coordinators hope to receive Hanacek and Dunbar believe it is

directory of programs.

a third year of funding for the pro- dangerous for any state to assume

Hanacek said that half of the system's Internet users are persons seeking treatment services for themselves; often, these individu-

gram. Grantfunding goes to MACAD through the state's Supreme Court Committee on Substance Abuse & the Courts.

that it has a shortage of treatment capacity - unless it has all the facts.
Metropolitan Atlanta Council on Alcohol

als have been referred to the

Dunbar became involved in the & Drugs: (404) 351-1800

APPENDIXE PURPOSE AREA #13

ATTACHMENT 1
DEMONSTRATIONS OF INTRA AGENCY
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

Safe Shelter Outreach Program
1108 East Andenon Street Savaonah, Ga.,31404
Fbooe(912) 232-2410
January 14, 1997
Kayren S. Hines Domestic Violence Crisis Response Team Albany Police Department P.O. Box 447 Albany, Ga., 31702-0447
Dear Kayren, I want to take this opportunity to thank you and your staff for the valuable assistance you have provided our new program. As you know, starting a new program is a tremendous challenge - it's both difficult and exciting! However, with your help, the forms and information you have provided, we are getting off the ground and will soon be fully operational. I will send you progress reports as we move along. As soon as we finish ",ith the disk, I'll put it in the mail along with the first one you sent us. Again, thank you for all ofyour help and support.
Sincerely,
Cheryl Branch Program Manager, Safe Shelter Outreach

GARRY T. MOSS DISTRICT ATTORNEY

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
SUPERIOR COURTS OF THE BLUE RIDGE JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
PLEASE REPLY TO:

Victim Witness Assistance Program 90 North Street, Suite 390 Canton, GA 30114 770-479-1488 Fax 770-479-3105
February 17, 1997
Ms. Kayren Hines Domestic Violence Crisis Response Team Albany Police Department P.O. Box 447 Albany, GA 31702-0447
Dear Ms. Hines:
Thank you for your cooperation in providing information to our office regarding your Domestic Violence Crisis Response Team. The information you provided will be most useful to us in drafting our Team Protocol.
For your information, the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council has agreed to fund our project, contingent upon the approval of our Protocol. We are currently taking steps to draft a protocol for all agencies to agree upon for submission to the CJCC.
Again, thank you for your assistance in this matter. If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me at the above number and/or address.
Kim~erIY B. MCC~~
Coordinator

Cherokee and Forsvth Counties

....._ .... ..::;::~::-.,

.--. ... ...-: -~~:

:"M~:~

:~~

.~

_.~

_"'H>I'N .... ~"",..,.

_~

HODAC's VICTIM AsSISTANCE PROGRAM
2762 WATSON BOULEVARD WARNER ROBINS, GEORGIA 31093

March 3, 1997
Ms. Kayren Hines, Crisis Response 1 earn Leader Domestic Violence Crisis Response Team Albany Police Department P.O. Box 447 Albany, GA 31702-0447
Dear Ms. Hines:
I would like to extend my appreciation to you and your program for the information that was provided to me regarding the "cellular phone project" implemented by your program.
The information sent was very helpful and is currently being adapted to be used in our
county (Houston). Your willingness to share the information is again very much appreciated, and will contribute to the success of our cellular phone project. Many thanks for your help.
Sincerely,
lia Brown, Program Director
Victim Assistance Program

PHONE (912) 953-5675 FAX (912) 953-5674

APPENDIXF PURPOSE AREA #15a

ATTACHMENT 1
RECOGNITION FROM THE
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
FOR PROGRESS ON
THE SEXUALLY VIOLENT OFFENDER REGISTRY

<.@ffitr of tqr Attarnc~ ~rnrrnl
masqingtnn. E. <!T. 20.5S0
June 16, 1997

The Honorable Zell Miller Governor of Georgia Atlanta, GA 30334

JUN .1 9 1991

Dear Governor Miller:

I write to thank you for your state's assistance in the important endeavor to link federal and state law enforcement in an effort to protect our children and others from sex offenders.

As you know, one of themost significant provisions in the 1994 Crime Act was the Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act. It promotes the establishment by the states of effective registration systems for convicted child molesters and other sexually violent offenders. Two more recent laws have built upon this registration requirement: "Megan's Law," which requires public disclosure of relevant infonnation about child molesters and sexually violent offenders who are released from prison or placed on probation, and the "P3.!Jl Lychner Sexual Offender Tracking and Identification Act, " which refmes and strengthens the earlier registration requirements.

In June 1996, President Clinton directed me to develop a national sexual predator and child molester registration system -- a computer system that would, for the first time, link together the sex offender registration and notification systems being developed in all 50 States. On February 23, 1997, an important ftrst step occurred toward making that national registration system a reality, when the computers housing the FBI's interim national sex offender registry became operational. The FBI has modifted its existing Flash Program to allow arresting officers and others to identify immediately an individual as a convicted sex offender and indicate where that person is registered. Because that new system is centralized, this information, once it is loaded onto the system, can be retrieved through a single search as opposed to 50 separate inquiries.

will Of course, this new national registry

only be as good as the quality of the

infonnation on sex offenders that it contains. For the system to work, there must be a close ._

partnership between federal agencies, such as the FBI, and state and local law enforcement

agencies. We are already working closely with officials in your state to ensure that accurate and

up-to-date information on the whereabouts of sex offenders is loaded into the system on a timely

basis.

The Honorable Zell Miller Page 2.
Your state -was one of the first to load infonnation on sex offenders into the interim national registry, making the promise of a registration system a reality. We greatly appreciate the efforts made by your staff in loading this infonnation onto the interim system so soon after it became operational. As this project continues, we stand ready to work with you and assist you in this vitally important effort.
Should you have any questions or need further assistance regarding the national sexual predator and child molester registration system, please have your staff contact Venetia Sims of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, who may be reached at (304) 625-2747.
Working together, I know that we can make a difference in preventing sex crimes. I look forward to continuing the close partnership between federal and state law enforcement agencies in pursuing that common goal.
Sincerely,
Janet Reno

APPENDIXG PURPOSE AREA #16

ATTACHMENT 1
SUMMARY OF EXCESS PROPERTY QUARTERLY ACTIVITIES

1996 DCSI GRANT PROGRAM SUMMARY OF MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORTS GEMA - EXCESS PROPERTY

SECTION 1: ACQUISITIONS Trips made by personnel Dollar amount of acquisitions

July - September 1996

October - December 1996

January - March 1997 April - June 1997

48 $3,763,506.52

45 $5,332,371.85

43 $2,256,357.76

41 $1,893,620.03

SECTION 2: REQUESTS/ORDERS
Requests made by law enforcement agencies
Orders distributed
Dollar amount of distributions
SECTION 3: ORDERS RECEIVED BY AGENCY
Sheriff Offices State Agencies Drug Task Forces Police Departments Correctional Institutions Other
Total

171 125 $4,336,288.12
33 7
13 61 10
1 125

130 112 $4,643,993.54
38 8
12 44
8 2 112

181 148 $2,136,405.76

188 157 $2,521,745.35

62

59

6

6

13

14

57

60

6

14

4

4

148

157

SECTION 4: DOLLAR AMOUNT BY AGENCY
Sheriff Offices State Agencies Drug Task Forces Police Departments Correctional Institutions Other
Total

$685,390.80 $1,145,684.29
$137,138.53 $1,575,264.25
$792,292.54 $517.71
$4,336,288.12

$689,840.28 $3,079,155.01
$137,513.60 $704,434.05
$18,847.61 $14,202.99
$4,643,993.54

$986,095.90 $57,846.58
$134,595.93 $730,607.98 $209,454.19
$17,805.18
$2,136,405.76

$741,988.49 $232,095.27 $157,835.94 $1,171,920.79 $178,017.63
$39,887.23
$2,521,745.35

TOTAL
177 $13,245,856.16
670 542 $13,638,432.77
192 27 52
222 38 11
542
$3,103,315.47 $4,514,781.15
$567,084.00 $4,182,227.07 $1,198,611.97
$72,413.11 $13,638,432.77

APPENDIXH PURPOSE AREA #22

ATTACHMENT 1
SUMMARY OF METRO nUl TASK FORCE QUARTERLY ACTIVITIES

-''''''Ro., 19,~~~~'11 GR("~

SL,y"WU"''U'Y OF',I'I'v,'f'

\... IIVI (V REt-UK rs

METRO DUI TASK Fl

SECTION 1: SPEEDING CITATIONS
Greater than 80 mph Between 71 and 80 mph Between 56 and 70 mph Under 55 mph
Total Speeding Citations

September-96

october-96

November-96 December-96

JanUary-97

February-97

March-97

Aprll-97

May-97

June-97

29

61

170

105

137

113

96

109

182

143

52

130

154

104

175

124

105

90

102

75

9

29

56

19

3

14

22

21

18

11

2

10

16

3

1

0

0

0

0

1

92

230

396

231

316

251

223

220

302

230

TOTAL
1,145 1,111
202 33
2,491

SECTION 2: SEATBELT CITATiONS
Arrests Warnings
Total Seatbelt Citations

25

24

40

38

74

125

63

98

165

31

36

37

76

68

112

26

33

12

33

7

267

42

37

14

22

36

501

68

70

26

55

43

768

SECTION 3: CHILD RESTRAINT CITATIONS

Arrests Warnings

4

2

1

5

1

0

5

0

1

1

2

0

17

0

3

0

2

4

2

18

Total Child Restraint Citations

9

3

2

5

3

3

6

2

35

SECTiON 4: ACTNITY DUI Arrests Other Arrests Total Number of Arrests
Officer Patrols Avg. Arrests per Patrol

119

86

81

61

72

40

51

51

63

54

678

367

460

685

428

518

403

401

339

519

376

4,496

486

546

766

489

590

443

452

390

582

430

5,174

152

136

3.20

4.01

163 4.70

133 3.68

147 4.01

132 3.36

149 3.03

139

164

125

2.81

3.55

3.44

1,440 3.59

SECTION 5: SEIZURES (Number)
Vehicles Currency
Total Seizures

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

SECTION 5: SEIZURES (Value)
Vehicles Currency
Total Seizure Value

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$5,700.00 $39,697.00
$45,397.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$0.00 $0.00
$0.00

$5,700.00 $39,697.00
$45,397.00

NOTE: Implementation of project was delayed due to the 1996 Olympic Games.