VERVIEW OF THE OPERATIONS OF
....L-__''__-----.'
AREA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONS IN GEORGIA: 1985
t
GJ &;
Georgia Department of Community Affairs Jim Higdon, Commissioner
6> Government Information Division
40 Marietta Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303
September, 1985
Received
JAN 31 1986
DOCUMENTS UGA LIBRA IES
T.ble of Contents
Section
Introduction .
1
Administrative Overview
2
Regional Picture
4
Sources of Funding for Are. Planning and Deve-
lopment Commissions
4
Local Funding Sources
5
State Funding Sources
6
Federal Funding Sources
6
APDC Work Program and Capabilities. 8
Technical Assistance Capabilities
8
Studies or Plans of Local Governments
8
Other APDC Programs and Services 10
Programs for the Elderly'
10
Job Training Parternship Act Programs
10
Business Loan Programs
11
Historic Preservation Programs
11
Transportation Planning and Coordination
12
Other Programs of the APDCs
13
Computer Use in Georgia's APDCs
14
Appendix A: Forecast Revenues: FY 1986
17
Appendix B: Description of Computer Services. 18
Received
JAN 31 1986
DOCUME TS UG L1BRAR'ES
List of T~bl And GrAphs
Table
1. Number of Persons Employed by APDC 2
2. Per Capita Dues, APDCs 5
3. Technical Assistance to Local Governments 8
4. Studies or Plans of Local Governments
9
5. Programs for the Elderly.
10
6. Activities Associated with Job Training
Partnership Act
11
7. Business Loan Programs..
11
8. Historic Preservation Programs . 12
9. Transportation Planning and Coordination . 12
10. Other Programs of the APDCs . . 13
11. Summary of Computer Systems and Uses 15
!3r aph
1. Composition of APDC Boards: FY 1986
2
2. Forecast Funding Sources: FY 1986
4
3. Forecast Local Revenues: FY 1986
5
4. Forecast State Revenues: FY 1986 .
6
5. Forecast Federal Revenues: FY 1986
7
INTRODUCTION The eighteen Area Planning and Development Commissions (APDCs) in Georgia were organized in the early 1960's to assist local governments in the state. This report, based upon survey data collected in the summer of 1985 on behalf of the Governor's Advisory Committee on Area Planning and Development by the Georgia Mountains APDC, provides an overview of the operations, and in effect, . the capabilities of the Area Planning and Development Commissions. In addition to the programs and services provided by the Area Planning and Development Commissions, the survey also examined the sources of revenue that the Area Planning and Development Commissions utilized and the staff with which they provided their services. Most importantly, however, the survey examined the programs and services that were provided; A major section of the survey, and this report, examined the data processing or computer capabilities that each Area Planning and Development Commission utilizes. This report will examine each of these areas in turn. First taking a cursory look at the administrative make up of the Area Planning and Development Commissions and their sources of funds. The report will then examine each program area as identified in the survey instrument.
1
CHAPTER 1: ADMINISTRATIVE OVERVIEW
Fifteen of the eighteen 1 Area Planning and Development Com-
missions responded to the survey, a response rate of 831., an ex-
cellent response for any survey.
The APDC's reported boards
varying in size from 13 persons to 35 persons. The average size
board was composed of 28 persons: 19 of whom were elected
officials, either mayors, councilmen or county commissioners; 4
were minority non-elected members, and the balance were non-
publicly elected officials. Graph 1 provides a graphic presenta-
tion of this data.
Graph 1: Composttton of APDC Boards:
I'Y 1 Sllll!
Non-elected (17.11:&)
Overall, 651. of the boards members were elected officials, 171. were minority members, and the remainder, 181., were nonelected members.
The fifteen APDC's employeed a total of 407 full-time individuals. Eighty-seven of these persons held clerical positions and 320 held professional positions. The survey did not measure how the professional positions were used, however. Nor was the assignment of positions by program or responsibility explored. The following table provides information for each APDC on the number of full-time persons employed.
1 Those APDCs not responding were the Heart of Georgia~ Lower Chattahoochee, and Oconee APDCs.
2
Table 1: Number of Persons Employed by APDC
APDC Altamaha Ga Southern ARC CSRA Coosa Valley Chattahoochee-Flint Coastal Georgia Mountains McIntosh Trai 1 Middle Georgia Middle Flint North .Georgi a Northeast Georgia South Georgia Southeast Georgia Southwest Georgia
Total 18 80 16 35 14 35 38 12 18 18 28 24 41 16 14
Professional 14 60 12 29 10 28
34 9
14 15 23 18 32 12 10
Clerical 4
20 4 6 4
7 4 3 4
3
5 6 9 4 4
...::.
Regional Picture
The Area- Planning and Development Commissions serve their
member local governments on a regional basis. The number of the
counties and municipalities served varies from APDC to APDC. The
number of counties served by the fifteen responding to the survey
ranges from a low of five in the Chattahoochee-Flint APDC to a
high of 14 in the Southwest Georgia APDC.
The Middle Georgia
APDC serves thirteen- municipalites while the Atlanta Regional
Commission serves fifty-one municipal governments. It should be
noted that not all counties and municipalities in each region
choose to be a member of the APDC.
The population served by the APDC's also varies greatly. The counties in the Atlanta Regional Commission contained an estimated population in 1984 of 2.04 million persons. The middle Flint APDC region, however, could claim only 97,000 in 1984.
Sources of Funding for Area Planning and Development Commi ion.
Funding sources for APDC's can be divided into four basic
types: state, local, and federal, as well as a general other
category.
Graph 2 shows a breakdown on the expected source of
funds for APDC's in 1985. For the 15 APDC's responding to the
survey, local funds amounted to $5.3 million or 13.81.; state,
$29.4 million or 75.51.; federal, $3.9 million or 10.91.; and
other,$265,OOO or less than 11.. Overall, the 15 APDC's reported
expected revenues of $38.9 million in FY 1986.
Graph 2: Forecast Fundlng Sources:
I'V 1 "a::l
Federal (1 o.,,~)
Local (13~)
State (7::1.:5~)
4
Local FundinQ Source.
Local funding sources for Area Planning and Development Commissions are derived from three areas: local dues, collected on a per capita basis from member jurisdictions; contracts; and a broad "other" category which constitutes the majority of the expected local funding for FY 1986 as Graph 2 shows. Dues amount to almost 13.6'l. of all expected funds. Contracts amount to 1'l. of expected funds. The large other category can be traced in large part to the Atlanta Regional Commission which reported expected revenues of $2.4 million in "in-kind" services.
Graph 3: Forecast Local Revenues:
I'Y , eae
Other (~o.,~)
Contract. (" .O~)
A closer look should be taken of the local dues structure. Amounts reported ranged from $0.25 per capita to $0.80 per capita.
Table 2: Per Capita Dues, Area Planning and Development Com-
missions
APDC
Per Capita Dues
Altamaha Ga. Southern
$0.45
ARC
0.30
CSRA
0.30
Coosa Valley
0.50
Chattahoochee-Flint
0.30
Coastal
0.50
Georgia Mountains
0.60
McIntosh Trail
0.25
Middle Georgia
0.35
Middle Flint
0.45
North Georgia
0.65
Northeast Georgia
0.40
South Georgia
0.73
Southeast Georgia
0.80
Southwest Georgia
0.60
The average per capita dues reported by the fifteen APDCs
responding to the survey was $0.48.
The median reported was
$0.45.
St.te Funding Sources
As was noted, state funds will account for 751. of the expected funds for APDCs in FY 1986. The majority of the state funds, 411. or almost half, as is shown in Graph 3, will originate from the Department of Labor for contracts for the Job Training Partnership Program. Department of Human Resource contracts for the Area Aging Programs will provide 16.21. of expected funds, other state funds will provide 151. of total forecast APDC funds. Department' of Community Affairs money will provide 101. of expected state funding for APDCs.
Graph 4: Forecast State Revenues:
FV 1 IiIIUS
OTHER (20.0~)
DCA (' ..... 2~)
OHR (2'.~~)
DOL ( .... ,.o~)
Federal Funding Sources
Federal funds are expected to contribute about 101. of total
APDC funding in the coming fiscal year. Funds from the Economic
Development Administration are expected to amount to 21. of
federal funding; and Appalachian Regional Commission funds, less
than 11.. The majority of Federal funds, however, are expected to
come in the form of "other" funds, alS the following graph shows.
These "other" federal funds, however, will not be realized by all
APDCs.
The Atlanta Regional Commission will receive $627,000
from the Urban Mass Transit Administration, Coastal APDC will
receive $193,000 for a Title V program, Georgia Mountains will
receive $1.2 million for aging programs and North Georgia will
receive $200,000 from the Applachian Regional Commission for a
housing rehabilitation program in the City of Canton.
6
Graph 5: Forecast Federal Revenues:
I"Y , suss
Other (1I.3:S)
The table in Appendix A summarizes the expected funding for the fifteen Area Planning and Development Commissions.
7
Chapter 2: APDC Work Program and Capabilitie.
Technical Assistance Capabilities
One of the purposes of APDCs was to provide assistance to
local governments in those areas that required special skills or
abilities that the local government might not possess. The APDCs
fulfill this task by providing technical assistance to the local
government and by producing spe~ial studies and reports.
The
following table provides data on a selected list of technical as-
sistance projects that the fifteen APDCs are able to provide.
Table 3: Technical Assistance to Local Governments
Type of Assistance
Number Providing
Industrial development support Budget and finance Solid waste management Water and sewer management Financial packaging Planning and zoning Personnel management Law enforcement Tax assessment Community betterment programs Community services planning Codes and ordinances Housing Data processing
************** ( 14)
************ ( 12)
************** (14)
************** (14 )
************* ( 13)
************* ( 13)
************* (13)
*********
( 8)
********
( 8)
************* (13 )
************** ( 14)
************* ( 13)
**********
( 10)
******
( 6)
All but one of the APDCs are able to provide technical assis-
tance in the areas of industrial development, solid waste
management, water and sewer management and community services
planning.
Just over half are able to provide support in the
areas of law enforcement and tax assessment and less than half
are able to provide support in the area of data processing.
Studies or Plans of Local Governments
In addition to technical assistance services, APDCs also perform other services for member local governments. One of the most important is the development of special studies and reports. The ability of individual APDCs to perform the various types of studies that might be needed by a local government could vary greatly. The following table depicts the types of studies that the fifteen APDCs are able to provide.
8
Table 4: Studies or Plans of Local Governments
Type of Studies or Plans
Number Providing
Population studies Economic base studies Existing land use studies Future land use studies Local transportation studies Zoning ordinances Subdivision regulations Mobile home ordinances
Soil erosion & sedimemtation
Environmental protection studies Manpower studies Personnel management plans
************** ( 14)
************** (14)
************ (12 )
************ ( 12)
************ ( 12)
************ ( 12)
************ (12 )
************ ( 12)
*********
( 9)
*********
( 9)
********
( 8)
************ ( 12)
These studies and plans represent only those that are provided by a majority of the APDCs. Individual APDCs are able to provide additional assistance with administrative space studies, annexation studies, feasibility studies, and industrial site selection.
9
Chapter 3: Other APDC Progra and Service.
Programs for the Elderly
Utilizing DHR aging funds, the APDCs have become very active in providing services to senior citizens. Table 5 provides data on the types of programs being provided and the numbers of APDCs providing the services.
Table 5: Programs for the Elderly
Type of Program
Number Providing
Nutrition sites
************** (14)
Meals for the homebound
************** (14)
Transportation
************** (14)
Civil legal services
************** (14)
Coordination nursing home ombudsman************** (14)
Retired senior volunteer project *****
( 5)
Senior employment programs
***********
(11)
Home health services
**********
(10)
Community care act coordination
************** (14)
Operation of senior centers
************* (13)
Technical assistance
************** (14)
Homemaker services
****
( 4)
Telephone reassurance
***
( 3)
Information and referral
**
( 2)
It should be noted that one APDC did not respond to this question on the survey.
Job Training Partnership Act Programs
As an earlier section of this report revealed, APDCs receive a substantial portion, 311., of their total funding from the Department of Labor"s Job Training Partnership Program. Data from the survey also shows that ten of the APDCs serve as the administrative agency for programs under the JTPA program. The JTPA program activities of these APDCs are summarized in the following table.
10
Table 6. Activities Associated with Job Training Partnership Act
Type of Activities
Number Providing
Title II-A Full-Year Employment Title II-B Summer Youth Program Vietnam Veterans Employment Senior Employment Programs Dislocated Worker OJT Training Older Worker Program Try-Out Training
********** ********* ** **** ********
* * *
( 10) ( 9)
( 2)
( 4)
( 8) (1) (1)
(1)
The primary programs that are provided are the Title II programs, full-year employment and summer youth employment, provided by 10 APDCs and 9 APDCs respectively. and the dislocated worker program, which is provided by 8 APDCs. Four APDCs provide senior employment programs and 2 provide employment programs for Vietnam veterans.
Business Loan Programs
To a certain extent APDCs are also becoming involved in economic development programs. Table 7 summarizes the activities of those APDCs which are involved in business loan activities.
Table 7: Business Loan Programs
Type of Programs
Number Providing
SBA 503 Program SBA 502 Program Revolving loan program Loan packaging assistance Working capital agreement
*********** ******** ****
* *
( 11)
( 8)
( 4) (1) ( 1)
Area Planning and Development Commissions are primarily involved in Small Business Administration programs. Eleven of the fifteen APDCs are involved with the SBA 503 program and eight are involved in the SBA 502 program. Other activities of this type that APDCs are involved in include the revolving loan program, 4 APDCs; loan packagi ng assi stance, 1 APDC; and wodd ng capi tal agreement, 1 APDC.
Historic Preservation Programs
Area Planning and Development Commissions receive funding from the Department of Natural Resources for historic preservation programs as an earlier section of this report showed. The varied activities that the APDCs are involved in are summarized in the following table.
11
Table 8: Historic Preservation Programs
Type of Programs
Development of nominations Coordination of investment credit
tax program Technical assistance local groups Downtown revitalization programs Education programs Environmental review assistance Grantsmanship Information dissemination Planning assistance Resource surveys Site surveys
Number PrOViding
-------------------
**********
( 10)
********
( 8)
*********** ** **** ** *** ** ** ** **
( 11> ( 2)
( 4)
( 2) ( 3)
( 2)
( 2)
( 2)
( 2)
The primary activities that the APDCs are involved in are the development of National Register nominations, 10 APDCs, and technical assistance to local groups, 11; and coordination of the investment tax credit program, 8 APDCs. As the table shows, the other historic preservation activities that the APDCs are involved in are varied. In addition to those identified in the table, other individual APDCs are involved in ordinance assistance, zoning assistance and fund raising.
Transportation Planning and Coordination
Area Planning and Development Commissions receive a small percentage of their total funding from the the Georgia Department of Transportation for transportation projects. The uses of these funds are summarized in Table 9.
Table 9: Transportation Planning and Coordination
Type of Assistance
Number Providing
DOT contracts
Planning contract
***************(15)
Rural transportation contract ********* Metropolitan planning organization **
( 9) ( 2)
designation
Each of the fifteen APDCs that responded to the survey are involved with the DOT planning contracts. Nine of the APDCs are involved with the rural transportation or Rideshare contracts. Only two are designated as a metropolitan planning organization for purposes of transportation planning. Individual APDCs are involved in air quality planning as it relates to transportation,
airport system planning, rail abandonment assistance, research studies, traffic engineering, transit impact monitoring, and urban area plan coordination.
Other Programs ~ th~ APDCs
The uniqueness of the APDCs is emphasized by the category of "other" programs that they are providing to their member governments.
Table 10: Other Programs
Type of Program
Number Providing
Areawide tourism development
*******
7)
Administration of Georgia Land
**
2)
Sales Act Review Program
Adminsitration of Metropolitan
**
2)
River Protection Act
Development imapct review
**
2)
Legislative staff support
**
2)
River and lake management planning **
2)
assistance
In addition to those services or programs identified in the preceeding table, individual APDCs also provide the following list of services:
~ervice
Administrative services Census depository Development impact review (2) Land use mamaqement policy planning Legislation drafting Legislation tracking Legislative staff support for General
Assembly members (2) Market stLldi es Printing cooperative Public seminars and workshops Regional enterprise development program River and lake management planning
assistance (2) Water resources management (2)
13
Chapter 4: Computer U in Georgi.. APDCs
Summary of Systems and Uses
As in many organizations, the uses of computers in Georgia"s
APDCs has increasingly become of more importance in the past few
years.
APDCs are not only using their computer systems for in-
ternal use, keeping track of their administrative structure and
assisting in analytical uses, they are also using the systems to
assist their member governments in their daily activities.
Each of the fifteen APDCs utilizes at least one computer sys-
tem to some extent according to the descriptions submitted in
response to the survey. Seven have at least two systems, and six
have at least three systems. Of the fifteen with one system, one
APDC has a mainframe system, four have mini-computer systems,
nine have micro computer systems, and one utilizes a Department
of Labor (DOL) terminal. Three of these systems are dedicated
systems, used for only one purpose. Of the seven with a second
system, one utilizes a mini-computer, and the rest, six, use a
micro computer system. Five of these seven systems are dedi-
cated systems.
The six with a third system report four micro
systems and two DOL terminal systems. Two of these systems are
dedicated systems.
Seven of the APDCs use their computer systems to perform
their payroll work. Eleven do their accounting work on the com-
puter systems.
Other internal uses include data base man-
agement, transportation modeling, word processing, spread sheet
work, and typesetting. Three of the APDCs use their systems to
provide payroll services to their member local governments. One
APDC performs accounting services for its local governments on
one of their systems. Examples of other computer services per-
formed for member governments include voter registration, jury
lists, utility billing, law enforcement recordkeeping, vehicle
tag accounting, and vehicle cost reports.
Appendi>: B provides specific information on the type of computer systems utilized by each APDC.
14
Taole II: SUI ary of COlputer Systels and Uses
La.put@r Syst@1 NUMb@r I
Type of D@dicated
---- Int@rnal Use ----
---- External Use ----
APDC
Systel Systel Payroll Accounting Other Payroll Accounting Other
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~I ta aha Ga. Southern Terl, DOL
i'
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Aile
l1ain
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
'j
CSRA
Hicro
N
y
y
y
N
N
N
Coosa Va II ey
l1icro
N
N
y
N
N
N
N
Chattahoochee-Flint
Hicro
N
N
Y
Y
N
Ii
H
Coastal
Hiero
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
G@orgla l10untains
Iii ni
N
Y
Y
i'
N
N
N
l1c1ntosh Trail I1lddl@ Gl!orgia
l1iero
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Iii cro
N
Y
Y
y
N
N
N
l1iddl@ Flint
Hicro
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
North Gl!orgla
Hini
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
y
North@ast Georgia
Mini
N
Y
Y
y
N
N
H
South G@or~la
Mini
N
Y
Y
N
Y
y
Y
Southeast Georgia
l1icro
i'
N
N
Y
N
N
H
South_est Georgia
Micro
N
N
N
Y
Ii
k
'j
Co.putl!r System NUMber 2
Type of Deaicated
APDC
System Systetl
Alt. dha Ga. Southern
None
"IiC
l1ini
i'
C3R';
Micro
N
(oo~a Valley
Hi ero
Y
Chattahoochee-Flint
None
Co~stal
None
Geor~~a Mountains
"iero
y
~cIntosr, Trall
None
III ddl e GeorgIa
None
:1ld,He ~lint
None
~()rth Georgi a
"iero
'~r ,heast 6eorg I a
MIcro
30ut Georgia
Hiero
Soutneast Georgia
None
South~l!~t Georgia
None
---- Internal Use ---Payroll Accounting Other
N
N
y
N
N
N
N
y"
N
N
y
N N
N N
"y
N
N
---- External Use ---Payroll Accounting Other
N
N
N
101
tl
Y
N
N
N
101
N
N
N
H
N
N
Table II: Cant.
o.~~ter Svstel NUlber 3
Type of Dedicated
---- Internal Use ----
---- External Use ----
APOC
Systel Systel Payroll Accounting Other Payroll Accounting Other
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alta,aha Ga. Southern
None
ARC
Micro
'(
N
N
y
N
N
N
CSRA
Micro
N
N
N
V
Ii
N
N
Coos~ VallH
None
C~attahoQchee-Flint
None
Coast~l
Georgia Mountains
None ler., DOL
N
N
y
N
N
Ii
PIc Intos~ lrai I
None
Middle Georgia
None
lIiddle Flint
None
Nort~ Georgia
Micro
N
N
N
i'
N
N
N
Northeast Georgia
left, DOL
N
N
N
V
N
N
Ii
50uth Georgia
"icro
Ii
N
'(
Y
N
Ii
N
Southeast Georgia
None
Southwest 6eorgla
None
APPENDIX A: FORECAST REVENUES: FY 1986
Amount
Percentage
Category
($)
of Total
----------------------~--------------------------------------
Total local
5,292~555
13.61.
Dues
2~059,345
5.31.
Contracts from local governments
583,273
1. 51.
Other
2,649,937
6.81.
Total state DCA contract DOT planning contracts DOT rldeshare contract DNR preservation planning contract
DHR aginq program DOL JTPA contracts
Other
29!,395!,273
4~172,750
142,000
740~375 110~000 6,312~540 12~043~908 5,873~700
75.51. 10.71.
0.41. 1. 91. 0.31. 16.21. 30.91. 15.11.
Total federal Economic Development Administration Applachian Regional Commission Other federal
3,967,965 748,099 319,001
2~900,865
10.21. 1. 91. 0.81. 7.51.
Total other funds
265~206
0.71.
Total Forecast Funds
38~920~999
100.01.
l!
Appendix B: Description of Computer Systems
Alta.aha Georgia Southern: Syste I: DOL State "IS-Syste., ter~inals IBH .odel 3276, 12 keyboards IB~ 3270, printer IBH 3287.
tIanta ~eQlonal Co ission: Sy~te. 1: OED PDP 11/34A, two 26 Megabyte RR07 disk drives tied to IBH 3031 Hainframe. Syste.2: DEC NPS 211 with 5 VT100 terlinals, 2 letter quality printers. Syste. 3: IB" PC\XT
Central Savannah River Area: Syste 1: DEC Rainbow 100 with hard disk (4l! Syste.2: Radio Shack TRS-SO Hodel II, Systfl 3: IBH PC\AT.
Coosa Valle~: Svstel I: IB" PC\AT, Syste. 2: IBH PC\XT.
(~attahoochee-Flint:
Syste. 1: IBH Oisplaywriter syste. with IBH 5216 letter quality printer.
Co~stal:
Syste. I: RadiO Shack Hodel II.
6eo~gla "ountains: Syste. I: Wang 2iOO HVP BOHB, 4 worK stations, band and latrix printers.
c1ntosh Tr~l1: 5~ste, I: Televldeo TSBO 2H With 64~ RAM ana 1 hard disk drive With 9.8HB and 1 floppy disk drive.
Idljle Flint: Svste. I: 18" PC\XT.
'hdjle Georgia: Syste. 1: Altos 9B6.
'lorth GeOrlll a: Systel I: IBH Systel 34, CFU 15340). Printer (5225) With 4 ter'lnals (5251) 128K.
Northeast Georgia: S stel I: Basicl4, 410, 9bK le.ory. 42 liB fixed diSk, 5 ter.inals, 3 printers, Siste 2: IBH PC\XT, 10"B fl~ed DiSk, I floppy diSk, color graphics printer. caiar printer, ~ystfl ~: Ib" VOT 32]1) (21.
oult. ueorola: SvStfl I: IBH Syste!l 38, 5vstel 2: IBII PC\IT, 5ystel 3: lSI! PC.
18
Appendix B (Cont.) Southeast Georgia:
Svste I: 18ft PC\IT. Sout west Georgia:
Svste- 1: COlpugraphic 8204.
19