Solid Waste & Recycling Collection 2010 Solid Waste Management Update
Waste Collection
Local governments have an array of options to choose from when providing for waste collection services. A significant minority of local governments continue to provide the service themselves, and many partner with the private sector to manage the waste
Private/Public Partnerships for Residential Waste Collection
FY 2008 - 2010
2008
2009
2010
City County City County City County
Private collection does not exist 199
58
181
60
174
59
Issue permit or license Local ordinance
69
41
68
37
65
30
279
95
272
90
267
89
Franchise agreement
150
42
141
40
134
41
Governments contract
275
64
263
64
259
61
generated within their communities Open competition no local
151
74
153
72
136
79
by using permits, ordinances,
government oversight
franchise agreements, and/or
contracts. Permits and ordinances governing the collection of solid waste are typically the least restrictive tools local
governments use to manage solid waste collection in their community. Collection ordinances typically establish general
standards by which a private sector service provider must operate. Franchise agreements, either exclusive or open,
generally establish a minimum level of services that must be provided by all service providers and usually stipulate the
specific operating standards. A contract between a local government and private waste service provider provides the
greatest degree of management control over the waste stream, with the local government setting forth specific
performance measures and standards to be met by both parties.
The types of residential solid waste collection services range from "green box" or Dumpster drop-off service to curbside or backdoor pick-up. One trend DCA has been tracking for several years is the use of unstaffed Dumpsters. They are often placed in unsupervised areas, usually in rural communities, for trash collection and frequently become dumping grounds for everything from household trash to disabled vehicles, tires, and animal carcasses. They can become an eyesore in a community and attract waste from neighboring jurisdictions. In 1994, 74 cities and 99 counties reported using them for residential waste collection. In FY 2010, just 16 cities and 22 counties reported using green boxes. This steady decline is direct evidence of improving waste management in the state.
Residential Collection Methods FY 2008 - 2010
No. of local governments responding to Solid Waste Management Survey Solid Waste Service Providers Local governments providing/arranging for residential waste collection Provided by public sector Provided by private sector Types of Residential Programs
2008
671
513 435 217
2009
653
489 427 208
2010
615
468 411 194
Curbside/Backdoor - City - County Staffed Drop-off
373
355
337
45
37
40
City
43
41
39
County
78
87
81
Unstaffed Drop-off - City - County
23
16
19
14
14
13
Dumpsters - City - County Recycling Service Providers Local governments making residential recycling services available Provided by public sector Provided by private sector Provided by non-profit organization
23
21
16
28
22
22
405
385
395
318
317
297
104
117
117
109
92
110
C - 1
Solid Waste & Recycling Collection 2009 Update
Recyclables Collection
During FY 2010, 406 local governments reported they provided or arranged for residential recycling services in their communities. As can be seen in the Residential Recycling Services Providers table, the strong tradition of public, private, and non-profit partnerships used to provide recycling services throughout Georgia continues, however it appears that the public sector maybe taking a stronger role in providing collection services.
The number of local governments whose residents have access to recycling services dropped off after making steady gains through the 2000s. The recycling industry is not immune from the economic recession, and commodity prices dropped in the fall of 2008 as global demand slumped. Some local governments, having grown accustomed to the revenue their recycling programs brought, cut collections. Since the public sector recovery will likely lag behind the private sector, Georgia will once again see our strong end-use markets clamoring for more material from a supply chain disrupted at the local level. Already in FY 2010 some of those programs have been restored, as evidenced by the Number of Jurisdictions Colleting Residential Materials for Recycling graph.
Nationally and regionally, market prices for recycled materials have risen steadily. Over the past year we have seen a stabilization of the price for recycled materials. This price stabilization along with local residents demand has prompted local governments to add recycling services and to increase the number of materials they accept in their program.
This report does not address the scale of the individual local recycling operations, which would be difficult to quantify. Rather, it focuses upon the level of recycling services being offered throughout the state. Since 1992, newspaper has been reported as the residential recyclable material most widely collected in Georgia, followed by aluminum cans. During FY 2010, the most popular commodities recycled from residences were newspaper (305 jurisdictions reporting collection); aluminum (314); and PET (# 1 plastic, 249.) It should be noted that there was a decrease in the number of jurisdictions collecting these materials. We will continue to monitor this decrease.
The tables on page C-4 tally the number of local governments collecting commercial and residential materials for recycling.
Recyclables Processing
In FY 2010 137 local governments reported processing residential
Processing of Residential Recyclables
recyclables as source separated
FY 2008 - 2010
materials, or reported that they
2008
2009
2010
collect source-separated materials from their customers. Source-
Source-separated
City County City County City County
74
71
74
71
65
52
separated means the materials are
Commingled
78
21
78
21
96
35
separated before being collected,
Both
23
20
23
20
26
18
typically by the consumer. For example, a homeowner may have to place glass, plastic and metal in separate containers
before collection. Commingled collection means the consumer places all the material in one container and the material is
sorted after collection, often by paid staff, inmates or probationers. The chart above labeled `Processing of Residential
Recyclables' reflects Georgia's shift toward single-stream processing. While source-separated processing fell from 169
local governments in 2007 to 137 in 2010, single-stream processing rose from 44 to 141 local governments.
Georgia continues to have adequate collection and processing capacity for recyclable material; the demand for more material remains constant.
C - 2
Solid Waste & Recycling Collection 2010 Solid Waste Management Update
Transfer Stations
With fewer, more regional-sized landfills in the state and a wide array of solid waste collection programs, solid waste transfer stations continue to be a popular method of streamlining solid waste collection services. Transfer stations are especially effective when collection routes are farther than 50 miles from a landfill. Combining several conventional rear-loader garbage truck loads into a single tractortrailer for the trip to the landfill saves fuel costs, vehicle wear and tear, and means fewer trucks can service more customers. Only 70 counties reported that they or their contractors used transfer stations for the collection or disposal of residential waste in FY 2005. By FY 2010, 84 counties and 105 cities or their contractors were using transfer stations to manage residential waste.
Yard Trimmings
Use of Solid Waste
Transfer Stations
FY 2007 - 2010
City
County
2007
157
77
2008
106
82
2009
108
84
2010
105
84
Georgia banned yard trimmings from lined Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) landfills in 1996, as part of an effort to extend landfill disposal capacity. Effective September 1st 1996, each city, county and solid waste management authority was required to impose restrictions on yard trimmings generated in or disposed within their jurisdiction. The restrictions required that yard trimmings:
Not be placed in or mixed with municipal solid waste;
Be sorted and stored for collection to facilitate composting or other handling;
To the maximum extent feasible be sorted, stockpiled or chipped for composting or used as a mulch or for other beneficial purposes; and
Be banned from disposal at MSW disposal
Yard Trimmings Management
FY 2007 - 2009
2008
2009
2010
City County City County City County
Promote Home
28
21
28
21
24
22
Composting and
Beneficial Reuse
Provide for collection 304
45
304
45
298
45
and disposal
Collection
Not available Your government
203
98
193
100
184
83
254
36
252
30
251
35
Another government
4
0
6
0
4
0
Solid Waste
1
1
0
2
3
2
Authority
Private vendor via
8
0
8
0
6
0
individual
subscription
Private vendor via
35
5
35
6
30
7
government contract
Collection Options
Staffed drop-off facilities
12
31
14
27
13
31
Unstaffed drop-off
10
3
6
2
1
2
facilities
Curbside collection
295
17
297
12
291
16
Accepted at
15
24
11
12
9
20
landfill/transfer
station
Processing Methods
Composting
9
1
10
1
6
0
Solid waste landfill
40
1
35
2
29
1
Inert landfill
63
16
64
11
62
13
Grind/chip into
99
12
91
14
98
14
mulch
Burning Other
21
0
25
0
23
0
10
1
6
1
9
4
Give away
73
0
72
0
69
0
Sell
2
0
5
0
4
0
Used by local
7
0
4
0
5
0
government
Becomes property of 15
0
15
17
24
0
private contractor
C - 4
Solid Waste & Recycling Collection 2009 Update
facilities having liners and leachate collection systems.
The number of local governments providing for the collection and disposal of yard trimmings increased from 291 in FY 2006 to 343 in FY 2010. The number providing the service themselves has increased from 253 in FY 2006 to 286 in FY 2010. The type of collection service options ranged from accepting yard trimmings at solid waste management facilities like a solid waste transfer station to curbside collection programs.
Annually, DCA surveys local governments to determine how they collect, process and use yard trimmings generated within their communities. During FY 2010, 26 cities and 29 counties reported actively promoting waste minimization practices such as home composting or beneficial reuse of yard trimmings. During FY 2010, 298 cities and 45 counties reported collecting yard trimmings for diversion from MSW landfills. It is not surprising, given lot sizes and population densities, that cities lead the way in providing yard trimmings collection services. Most local governments also reported that they provided the collection services with just a few indicating they contracted with a private vendor to collect yard trimmings. In many areas, especially urban and suburban communities, the visible result of the yard trimmings ban has been the presence of large paper bags of leaves and grass at curbsides. Collection of yard trimmings in paper bags enables them to be ground into a mulch or feedstock for composting. The majority of local governments who reported collecting yard trimmings either ground or shredded the collected material for use as mulch, however 75 local governments reported disposing the collected materials into an inert landfill. Twenty-five cities report burning yard trimmings. Composting and chip into mulch were also reported as common processing methods.
Number of Jurisdictions Collecting
Commercial Materials for Recycling
by Type
FY 2007 - 2010
2007 2008 2009 2010
Automobile components
tires
47
31
24
22
auto batteries
13
26
23
25
motor oil
14
24
24
25
Metals aluminum
187
74
83
80
scrap metal
94
49
52
49
Paper
newspaper
252
69
83
81
magazines
67
48
75
78
corrugated cardboard
174
83
88
96
phone books
71
60
69
72
C - 4
Solid Waste & Recycling Collection 2009 Update
Yard trimmings, when processed properly, have numerous beneficial uses in a community. The use of compost and mulch is extremely beneficial for slowing storm-water runoff and retaining moisture around plants. Many local governments use processed yard trimmings as mulch for their landscaping and civil engineering applications or report offering the processed yard trimmings to their citizens for residential landscaping.
Number of Jurisdictions Collecting
Residential Materials for Recycling
by Type
FY 2007 - 2010
2007 2008 2009 2010
Automobile components
tires
127
224
108
112
auto batteries
88
167
81
76
antifreeze
24
78
23
32
motor oil
100
187
79
88
oil filters
25
75
29
24
Metals
aluminum
463
448
310
314
steel cans
228
289
160
154
scrap metal aerosol cans
204
294
173
184
35
101
39
41
Paper
newspaper
507
492
307
305
magazines
381
430
266
271
corrugated cardboard
386
431
254
251
phone books
324
415
233
242
paper board
105
293
148
173
junk mail
198
175
195
Misc.
#1 plastic
363
378
244
249
#2 plastic
324
348
214
208
other plastic
72
238
99
110
glass
311
361
199
202
white goods
222
324
192
213
Christmas trees
254
363
206
213
C&D materials
45
0
37
43
agricultural chemical containers
8
37
12
13
electronics
102
221
119
123
Household Hazardous Waste
paint
27
93
44
39
cleaning products
0
44
17
19
pesticides
4
19
8
11
C - 5