Solid Waste & Recycling Collection 2008 Solid Waste Management Update
Waste Collection
The primary objective of waste management is to protect the public and environment from potential harm. The traditional
role of government in solid waste management is the creation and enforcement of regulation to ensure the safety of the
public and environment. A historical as well as a futuristic view is necessary to be able to enact and enforce relevant
effective regulation. One way of acquiring a historical and futuristic view is by using a set of metrics that captures and
analyzes the key indicators of a solid waste management program. The Annual Solid Waste Management Survey
Residential Waste and Recyclables
and Full Cost Report provide us with information on some of the key indicators of solid waste management programs throughout the State.
Collection FY 2006 - 2008
2006 2007 2008
This update will focus on the level and type of solid waste collection, processing and, recycling methods available throughout the State. The level and type of solid waste, recycling and yard trimmings collection services provided throughout the state varies greatly depending upon a community's size, density and demographic profile. The data contained in this report is obtained mainly from the
No. of local governments responding
631
643
663
to Solid Waste Management Survey
Solid Waste Service Providers
Local governments
593
640
509
providing/arranging for residential
waste collection
Provided by public sector
335
347
429
Provided by private sector
356
293
214
Annual Solid Waste Management Survey and Full Cost Report. This data is used to acquire an over-all "annual snapshot" of solid waste and recycling activities in the State. Before applying any analysis to this data it should be
Types of Residential Programs Curbside/backdoor
City County
436
448
370
66
71
45
noted that annual response rates vary greatly and may contribute to the variations in trends.
In the table entitled Residential Waste & Recyclables Collection the changing role of local governments as solid waste collection service providers is highlighted. Many local governments are now "providing for" rather than "arranging for" solid waste collection services. One potential trend appears to be the increasing availability of recycling services. In FY 2006 66% of local governments who provided or arranged for residential waste collection for
Staffed Drop-off
City
42
21
43
County
80
57
78
Unstaffed Drop-off
City
40
26
22
County
43
32
14
Dumpsters (Green box)
City
23
20
22
County
25
17
27
Recycling Service Providers
Local governments making residential 395
408
401
recycling services available
their residents, also made recycling services available, in FY 2008 this number increased to 79%.
Provided by public sector Provided by private sector
264
290
315
77
112
104
Local governments can partner with the private sector to
Provided by non-profit organization
80
80
108
manage the waste generated within their communities by
using permits, ordinances, franchise agreements, and/or contracts. Permits and ordinances governing the collection of
solid waste are typically the least restrictive tools local governments use to manage solid waste collection in their
community. Collection ordinances typically establish general standards by which a private sector service provider must
operate. Franchise agreements, either exclusive or open, generally establish a minimum level of services that must be
provided by all service providers
and usually stipulate the specific operating standards. A contract between a local government and private waste service provider provides the greatest degree of management control over the waste stream, with the local government setting forth specific performance measures and standards to be met
Private/Public Partnerships for Residential Waste Collection
FY 2006 - 2008
2006
2007
2008
City County City County City County
Private collection does not exist 181
59
199
58
199
58
Issue permit or license
57
37
68
41
69
41
Local ordinance
267
84
278
95
279
95
Franchise agreement
142
41
149
42
150
42
Governments contract
260
63
274
64
275
64
by both parties.
Open competition -- no local
169
72
151
74
151
74
government oversight
C - 1 Revised July 31, 2009
Solid Waste & Recycling Collection 2008 Update
The number of local governments reporting they use ordinances continues to increase (351 in FY 2006 to 374 in FY 2008). The wording of this question as well as the section of the survey in which the question was asked was changed in FY 2005. We will continue to monitor the trending of this question in the future.
As can be seen in the Residential Waste and Recyclables Collection table (C-1), the types of residential solid waste
collection services range from "green box" or Dumpster drop-off service to curbside or backdoor pick-up. One trend the
Department of Community Affairs has been tracking for several years is the use of Dumpsters. They are often placed in
unsupervised areas, usually in rural communities, for trash collection and frequently become dumping grounds for
everything from household trash to disabled vehicles,
tires, and animal carcasses. They can become an eyesore in a community and attract waste from neighboring jurisdictions. The number of local governments using green boxes for residential waste collection has dwindled. In 1994, 74 cities and 99 counties reported using them for residential waste collection. In FY 2008, just 22 cities and 27 counties
Yard Trimmings Management
FY 2006 - 2008
2006
2007
2008
City County City County City County
Promote home composting and grasscycling
25
25
22
29
28
21
reported using green boxes.
Provide for collection 258
33
326
56
304
45
and disposal
Collection Options
Yard Trimmings Collection
Staffed drop-off facilities
19
28
21
28
12
31
The number of local governments reporting that they
Unstaffed drop-off facilities
9
3
10
3
10
3
provide for the collection and disposal of yard
Curbside collection
294
22
302
21
295
17
trimmings increased from 291 in FY 2006 to 349 in FY 2008. The number of local government reporting
Accepted at
21
32
23
31
15
24
landfill/transfer station
they provide the service has increased from 253 in
FY 2006 to 290 in FY 2008. The type of collection service options ranged from accepting yard trimmings at solid waste
management facilities like a solid waste transfer station to curbside collection programs.
Recyclables Collection
Residential Recycling Service Providers FY 2006 - 2008
During FY 2008, 401 local governments
reported they provided or arranged for
450
residential recycling services in their
400
communities. As can be seen in the
Residential Recycling Services Providers
350
graph, the strong tradition of public, private, 300
and non-profit partnerships used to provide
recycling services throughout Georgia
250
continues, however it appears that the public
sector maybe taking a stronger role in
200
providing collection services.
150
The number of local governments whose
100
residents have access to recycling services
has increased slightly during the last three
50
years. Collection programs for paper, beverage 0
containers and plastics continue to rise. It
appears that cities and counties are expanding
collection programs at about the same rate.
This increase in programs may be linked to the
rise in prices for recyclable commodities. What
is notable is the increase in the number of
Counties who reported collecting other
2006
2007
2008
Governments with recycling services available to residents Provided by public sector Provided by private vendor Provided by non-profit organization
C - 2 Revised July 31, 2009
Solid Waste & Recycling Collection 2008 Update
Household Hazardous Waste.
As shown in the Number of Jurisdictions Collecting Materials for Recycling tables on page C-4, there has been a steady increase in the number of local governments making residential recycling services available in their jurisdictions. Nationally and regionally, market prices for recycled materials have risen steadily. Over the past year we have seen a stabilization of the price for recycled materials. This price stabilization along with local residents demand has prompted local governments to add recycling services and to increase the number of materials they accept in their program. This report does not address the scale of the individual local recycling operations, which would be difficult to quantify. Rather, it focuses upon the level of recycling services being offered throughout the state. Since 1992, newspaper has been reported as the residential recyclable material most widely collected in Georgia, followed by aluminum cans. During FY 2008, the most popular commodities recycled from residences were newspaper (492 jurisdictions reporting collection); aluminum (448); corrugated cardboard (431); magazines (430); and Phone books (415). It should be noted that there was a decrease in the number of jurisdictions collecting these materials. We will continue to monitor this decrease. The tables on page C-4 tally the number of local governments collecting commercial and residential materials for recycling.
Recyclables Processing
In FY 2008 145 local governments reported processing residential recyclables as source separated materials, or reported that they collect source-separated materials from their customers. Source-separated means the materials are separated before being collected, typically by the consumer. For example, a homeowner may have to place glass, plastic and metal in separate containers before collection. Commingled collection means the consumer places all the material in one container and the material is sorted after collection, often by paid staff, inmates or probationers.
Processing of Residential Recyclables
FY 2006 - 2008
2006
2007
2008
City County City County City County
Source-separated
79
97
77
92
74
71
Commingled
46
14
31
13
78
21
Both
6
9
9
8
23
20
C - 3 Revised July 31, 2009
Solid Waste & Recycling Collection 2008 Update
Number of Jurisdictions Collecting
Number of Jurisdictions Collecting
Residential Materials for Recycling by
Commercial Materials for Recycling
Type
by Type
FY 2005 - 2008
FY 2005 - 2008
2005 2006 2007 2008
Automobile components tires auto batteries motor oil Metals aluminum scrap metal Paper newspaper magazines corrugated cardboard white paper phone books other paper Misc. plastic glass
2005 2006 2007 2008
62
54
47
31
44
38
13
26
50
36
14
24
248
196
187
74
106
94
94
49
293
254
252
69
189
84
67
48
202
177
174
83
98
66
66
*
163
71
71
60
92
50
31
35
214
181
162
*
139
57
47
56
Automobile components tires auto batteries antifreeze motor oil oil filters Metals aluminum steel cans scrap metal aerosol cans Paper newspaper magazines corrugated cardboard phone books paper board other paper Misc.
117
142
127
224
89
100
88
167
18
21
24
78
66
95
100
187
18
28
25
75
292
452
463
448
118
226
228
289
124
208
204
294
16
39
35
101
344
509
507
492
269
378
381
430
280
368
386
431
202
322
324
415
111
72
105
293
172
236
253
339
#1 plastic
247
360
363
378
#2 plastic
208
311
324
348
other plastic
52
69
72
238
glass
180
303
311
361
white goods
246
225
222
324
Christmas trees
253
262
254
363
Transfer Stations
With fewer, more regional-sized landfills in the state and a
C&D materials agricultural chemical containers
51
48
45
0
15
10
8
37
wide array of solid waste collection programs, solid waste
electronics
12
transfer stations continue to be a popular method of
Household
streamlining solid waste collection services. Transfer stations
Hazardous Waste
are especially effective when collection routes are farther
paint
42
than 50 miles from a landfill. Combining several conventional cleaning products 0
76
102
221
29
27
93
2
0
44
rear-loader garbage truck loads into a single tractor-trailer for
pesticides
4
4
4
19
the trip to the landfill saves fuel costs, vehicle wear and tear,
other
19
12
6
65
and means fewer trucks can service more customers. Only
70 counties reported that they or their contractors used transfer stations for the collection or disposal of residential waste
in FY 2005. By FY 2008, 82 counties or their contractors were using transfer stations to manage residential waste.
Use of Solid Waste
Transfer Stations
FY 2005 - 2008
City
County
2005
153
70
2006
157
72
2007
157
77
2008
106
82
C - 4 Revised July 31, 2009
Solid Waste & Recycling Collection 2008 Update
Georgia banned yard trimmings from lined Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) landfills in 1996, as part of an effort to extend landfill disposal capacity. Effective September 1st 1996, each city, county and solid waste management authority was required to impose restrictions on yard trimmings generated in or disposed within their jurisdiction. The restrictions required that yard trimmings:
Not be placed in or mixed with municipal solid waste;
Yard Trimmings Management
Be sorted and stored for collection to facilitate composting or other handling;
FY 2006 - 2008
2006
2007
2008
To the maximum extent feasible be sorted, stockpiled or chipped for composting or used as a mulch or for other beneficial purposes; and
Be banned from disposal at MSW disposal facilities having liners and leachate collection systems.
City County City County City County
Promote Home
25
25
22
29
28
21
Composting and
Beneficial Reuse
Provide for collection 258
33
326
56
304
45
and disposal
Collection
Annually, DCA surveys local governments to determine how they collect, process and use yard trimmings generated within their communities. During FY 2008, 28 cities and 21 counties reported actively promoting waste minimization practices such as home composting or beneficial reuse of yard trimmings. During FY 2008, 304 cities and 45 counties reported
Not available
178
96
189
96
203
98
Your government
242
76
245
8
254
36
Another government 17
22
12
9
4
0
Solid Waste
8
11
7
8
1
1
Authority
Private vendor via
11
24
8
17
8
0
individual
subscription
Private vendor via
35
11
36
9
35
5
government contract
collecting yard trimmings for diversion from MSW
Collection Options
landfills. It is not surprising, given lot sizes and
Staffed drop-off
16
32
20
29
12
31
population densities, that cities lead the way in
facilities
providing yard trimmings collection services. Most local
Unstaffed drop-off facilities
10
8
10
3
10
3
governments also reported that they provided the
Curbside collection
240
16
277
22
295
17
collection services with just a few indicating they contracted with a private vendor to collect yard
Accepted at landfill/transfer station
21
44
23
54
15
24
trimmings. In many areas, especially urban and
Other
8
6
suburban communities, the visible result of the yard trimmings ban has been the presence of large paper
Processing Methods
Composting
48
18
35
9
9
1
Solid waste landfill
22
8
42
5
40
1
bags of leaves and grass at curbsides. Collection of
Inert landfill
154
92
104
30
63
16
yard trimmings in paper bags enables them to be ground into a mulch or feedstock for composting. The
Grind/chip into mulch Own a
183
76
158
30
99
12
143
29
144
17
0
0
majority of local governments who reported collecting
chipper/shredder
yard trimmings either ground or shredded the collected
Contract out
31
33
47
21
chipping/shredding
0
0
material for use as mulch, however 79 local
Use another local
18
9
21
3
0
0
governments reported disposing the collected materials government's
into an inert landfill. Composting and chip into mulch were also reported as common processing methods.
chipper/shredder Burning Other
24
4
26
0
21
0
23
6
0
0
10
1
Yard trimmings, when processed properly, have
Beneficial Use
Give away
178
68
159
16
73
0
numerous beneficial uses in a community. The use of
Sell
8
8
11
3
2
0
compost and mulch is extremely beneficial for slowing storm-water runoff and retaining moisture around
Used by local
97
41
48
17
7
0
government
Becomes property of 39
15
39
21
15
0
plants. Many local governments use processed yard
private contractor
trimmings as mulch for their landscaping and civil
engineering applications or report offering the
processed yard trimmings to their citizens for residential landscaping.
C - 5 Revised July 31, 2009