Audit report, Non-Emergency Transportation Program, Loving Hart's, Atlanta, Georgia, Medicaid provider no. 00577343A, for the year ended June 30, 1994 [June 30, 1994]

!::{fl
Ag oo, tv:4-
R-I U, IC/'13-q,./-
STATE OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AUDITS
254 WASHINGTON STREET ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30334

AUDIT REPORT NON-EMERGENCY TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
LOVING HART'S ATLANTA, GEORGIA MEDICAID PROVIDER NUMBER 00577343A FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1994
Report Prepared By: State oJGeorgia
Department ofAudits and Accounts Medicaid and Local Govemment Audits Division
254 Washington Stree~ S. W, Suite 322 Atlanta, Georgia 30334-8400 (404) 656-2006 Michael A. Plant, Director

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I

AUDIT OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY . . . . . . . 1

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
Sample Results ..... . Procedure Codes .... . Vehicle Standards ... . Insurance Coverage ........... . Number of Vehicles ..... . PSC Requirements ...... . Drivers' Requirements ...... . Business License Requirements Usual and Customary Charges ........... . Change of Address ......... .

.2 .. ....... 3
.. .. 4 .. ..... 4
.. ....... 5 .. 5
. ................ 6 ...................... 6
.. 7 .. 7

CLAUDE L VICKERS
STATE AUDITOR

DEPARTMENT OF AUDITS
MEDICAID AND LoCAL GOVERNMENT AUDITS
254 Washington Street, S.W., Suite 322 Atlanta, Georgia 30334-8400
Telephone (404) 656-2006 Facshnile (404) 656-7535
October 16, 1995

MICHAELA. PLANT
DIRECTOR

Members of the Board of Medical Assistance, and The Honorable Marge Smith, Commissioner Department ofMedical Assistance 2 Peachtree Street, N.W., Suite 27-100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This report provides the results of our audit ofLoving Hart's, provider number 00577343A,

a participant in the Medicaid Non-Emergency Transportation Program for the period July 1, 1993,

through June 30, 1994. This audit was conducted in accordance with the terms of the December 1,

1994, agreement between the Georgia Department of Medical Assistance and the Georgia

Department ofAudits and Accounts.

This report is intended to be used solely in connection with the administration of the Georgia

Department of Medical Assistance Non-Emergency Transportation Program and is not to be used

or relied upon for any other purpose.

.,~:;~

CLV/by

Claude L. Vickers State Auditor

1994 Audit Report: Loving Hart's
AUDIT OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY
The purpose of this audit was to determine whether Loving Hart's, an enrolled provider in the Georgia Medicaid Non-Emergency Transportation (NET) Program, maintained adequate documentation to support claims paid by the Georgia Department of Medical Assistance (DMA) for non-emergency transportation services from July 1, 1993 through June 30, 1994; and to determine whether Loving Hart's complied with the DMA policies and procedures for the NET Program in effect during that period. The specific objectives ofthis audit were to determine if the NET provider:
maintained sufficient documentation to adequately support claims paid by the DMA; utilized correct procedure codes when billing the DMA for services; complied with Appendix G, "Minimum Vehicle Standards for Non-Emergency
Transportation Program" contained in the DMA P & P; maintained all state required insurance coverage on transportation vehicles; used the same number ofvehicles to transport recipients as the number of vehicles on file with
theDMA; complied with Public Service Commission requirements for vehicles used to transport
recipients; complied with applicable requirements for NET drivers; complied with applicable business license requirements; billed Medicaid its usual and customary charges; and notified the DMA of changes in address due to a move or a change in ownership.
To accomplish these objectives, we developed a statistically valid attribute sampling plan to test a sample of the provider's Medicaid Trip Sheet and Medical Certification for Non-Emergency Transportation (DMA 408) forms to determine if the DMA 408 forms provided sufficient documentary evidence to support claims filed by the provider and paid by the DMA. We also interviewed provider personnel, inspected vehicles used to transport Medicaid recipients, and examined other records and documentation in order to determine if the provider complied with provisions of the DMA Policies and Procedures Manual.

1994 Audit Report: Loving Hart's

2

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
SAMPLE RESULTS
The DMA requires that non-emergency transportation providers maintain such records as are necessary to fully disclose the extent of services provided. These records must contain a completed DMA 408 form for each trip. Except for recipients receiving mental health, chemotherapy, radiation services, or dialysis, a signed medical certification must also be obtained for each trip.
A data file containing all ofthe provider's paid claims for the audit period was obtained from EDS. Based on the total number of records in this data file, a statistically valid sample size was computed, and a corresponding number of paid claims were randomly selected as our sample. For each claim listed in the sample, we attempted to locate and examine the provider's documentation (DMA 408 form) for that claim.
The provider received payments totaling $60,438.07 for claims filed with a service date within the 1994 state fiscal year. The statistically valid sample ofDMA 408 forms represented claims of $16,127.78, or 26.68% of dollars paid. As a result of this audit, it was determined that none ofthe claims included in the sample were sufficiently documented to support payment of the claims. Based on these results, we conclude with 95% certainty that the total population of paid claims includes $60,438.07, plus or minus $3,021.90 (5%), in paid claims that are not sufficiently documented to support payment ofthe claims. We recommend that the DMA seek to recover $57,416.17 from the provider, which is the lower end of the range of the statistically determined amount of insufficiently documented claims in the population.
The following is a list ofthe types of errors identified in the sample. In accordance with DMA instructions, any one of these errors causes the claim to be insufficiently documented. Each claim included in the amount ofinsufficiently documented claims in the above paragraph contained one or more ofthe following types of errors:
No DMA 408 form was provided to document the service Date oftransportation service was missing

1994 Audit Report: Loving Hart's

3

Date oftransportation service did not match claim data Date oftransportation service did not match medical certification date Provider's name was missing Provider's Medicaid number was missing Provider's Medicaid number did not match claim data Recipient's Medicaid number was missing Recipient's Medicaid number did not match claim data
Escort's name was missing Reason for escort was missing or not allowable
Place of pickup was missing or inappropriate Destination was missing or unallowable
Odometer readings were missing Number of miles billed exceeded the number of miles documented
Waiting time was not documented Reason for non-emergency ambulance was missing Reason for medical transportation was missing or unallowable Type transportation used was unallowable DMA 408 form was not signed DMA 408 form was signed by an inappropriate person Incorrect NET procedure code was used

PROCEDURE CODES DMA policies and procedures specify that providers must use the appropriate code as outlined
in Appendix D of the DMA Policies & Procedures Manual when billing for services. Our audit included a review of the NET procedure code associated with each claim in the
sample. We compared the procedure code billed for each claim to the provider's documentation in order to determine ifthe appropriate code was used. The use of incorrect procedure codes was noted

1994 Audit Report: Loving Hart's

4

during the audit. These errors were included in the sample errors identified in the previous section and were also included in determining the total amount of insufficiently documented claims.

VEHICLE STANDARDS As a condition ofparticipation in the NET program, providers must comply with requirements
specified in Appendix G, Minimum Vehicle Standards for the Non-Emergency Transportation Program ofthe DMA Policies and Procedures manual. Appendix G requires that all vehicles used by the provider to transport Medicaid recipients contain a basic first aid kit, a class B chemical type fire extinguisher (extinguisher must have a visible gauge or annual inspection tag and be mounted in a bracket within the driver's reach), seat belts for all passengers, valid proof of vehicle insurance, and no hazardous debris or unsecured items. In addition to these requirements, vehicles used as wheelchair vans or non-emergency ambulances must also have some reasonable means of securing the wheelchair(s) or stretcher(s).
All ofthe provider's three vehicles were inspected in order to determine whether the provider complied with Appendix G. Based on our inspection, we determined that:
one of the vehicles contained no first aid kit; two of the vehicles contained no fire extinguishers; two of the vehicles contained no proofofinsurance; two ofthe vehicles contained hazardous debris or unsecured items; and the vehicle used as a wheelchair van had no reasonable means to secure a wheelchair.

INSURANCE COVERAGE As a condition ofparticipation in the NET program, providers must maintain all state-required
insurance coverage. The Georgia Public Service Commission requires minimum liability coverage as follows: $100,000 bodily injury each person, $300,000 bodily injury each accident, and $50,000 property damage each accident.

1994 Audit Report: Loving Hart's

5

Our audit included a review of the provider's insurance coverage to determine whether required coverage was maintained on all vehicles for the entire audit period; and to determine if required coverage was provided for all current vehicles. Based on our audit, we determined that the appropriate insurance coverage was maintained for each vehicle for the entire audit period, and that the current vehicles are adequately insured. However, according to information obtained from the Georgia Public Service Commission, none of the vehicles were insured during the period February 16, 1995 through April 2, 1995.

NUMBER OF VEHICLES
Vehicle identification numbers (VIN) from each vehicle were compared to information provided by the DMA to determine if both the total number ofvehicfes operated and the VIN for each vehicle agreed with DMA records. Based on our audit, we determined that two of the provider's three vehicles are not registered with the DMA. The only vehicle registered with the DMA is registered as a minibus, wheelchair van, and non-emergency ambulance. The vehicles we inspected included two minibuses and one combination minibus/wheelchair van.

PSC REQUIREMENTS
DMA Policies and Procedures require that NET providers maintain current licenses, permits, or certifications as required by all levels of government in Georgia for operation of a vehicle. The State of Georgia requires that intrastate motor carriers apply to the Public Service Commission (PSC) for the issuance of a vehicle registration and identification stamp and cab card (Form G). A current, original Form G, with registration and identification stamp affixed, must be maintained in each vehicle.
As part ofour audit, we determined whether each vehicle operated by the provider contained a valid PSC cab card. We found that two of the vehicles operated by the provider contained no current PSC cab cards.

1994 Audit Report: Lovin7Hart's

6

DRIVERS' REQUIREMENTS
DMA Policies and Procedures provide that each NET driver must possess a valid Georgia driver's license, receive a pre-employment health screening and physical examination by a physician within six weeks ofinitial employment, and receive an annual health review if driving responsibilities account for 40% or more of that driver's work time. In addition, any driver who operates a wheelchair van or minibus that is designed to carry sixteen or more persons including the driver is required to possess a class C driver's license. For any driver hired after August 1, 1988, the provider must document that a driving record was obtained for that driver prior to employment.
A list of the provider's NET drivers was prepared from information obtained from the provider. A total ofthree drivers were identified from the beginning of the audit period through the date ofthe audit. For each driver identified, we determined whether the provider complied with tbe driver's requirements stated in the previous paragraph.
As a result of our audit, we determined that none ofthe drivers had received the required preemployment physical examination, and two of the drivers had not received required annual health reviews. Furthermore, the provider was unable to document that one of the drivers possessed a valid Georgia driver's license when hired, or that the driving records for any of the drivers had been obtained prior to employment.
Although the provider filed claims for non-emergency stretcher trips, no employees had received first aid or CPR training.

BUSINESS LICENSE REQUIREMENTS As a condition ofparticipation in the NET program, providers must maintain current licenses
as required by all levels of government. Many local governments in Georgia require that businesses pay an annual fee in order to obtain a business license.
As part of our audit, we determined whether the provider complied with local business license requirements during the period under audit and through the date of this audit report. We examined all business licenses to determine if the provider was properly licensed during the periods reviewed,

1994 Audit Report: Loving Hart's

7

and to determine if the business address agreed with the provider's address on file with the DMA. As a result of our audit, we determined that the provider complied with all business license
requirements.

USUAL AND CUSTOMARY CHARGES
DMA Policies and Procedures stipulate that a provider's submitted charges to the DMA must not exceed the provider's usual and customary charge to private paying passengers.
As part of our audit, we attempted to review the provider's transportation charges for both Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients in order to determine whether Medicaid patients were charged more than other patients for the same services. However, the provider was unable to provide documentation for private pay transportation. Therefore, we were unable to determine if the provider complied with this requirement.

CHANGE OFADDRESS
Instructions for completing the Provider Data Form for the Georgia Medical Assistance Program stipulate that if any ofthe information on the form changes, the provider should submit those changes to the Provider Enrollment Unit in writing.
As part of our audit, we determined if the provider had a change of address due to a move or a change in ownership, and if so, whether the provider properly notified the DMA of this change.
As a result of our audit, we determined that the provider had a change of address and did not properly notify the DMA of this change. The provider's current address is: Loving Hart's 3480 Greenbriar Parkway Suite 226 Atlanta, GA 30331