A look into the outlands : the cultural landscape of the Dougherty Plain of Georgia / R. Jeannine Windham, Johannes H. N. Loubser, and Mark T. Swanson

A Look Into the Outlands: The Cultural Landscape of the Dougherty Plain of Georgia
P.I. Numbers: 422220, 422230, and 422235
Report submitted to: Georgia Department of Transportation 3993 Aviation Boulevard
Atlanta, Georgia 30336
Report prepared by: New South Associates 6150 East Ponce de Leon Avenue Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083
J.W. Joseph, PhD, RPA Principal Investigator R. Jeannine Windham, RPA Archaeologist and Co-Author Johannes H. N. Loubser, PhD Archaeologist and Co-Author
Mark T. Swanson, RPA Historian and Co-Author
March 12, 2009 Final Report New South Associates Technical Report #1407
The contents of this publication reflect the views of the author(s), who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the DEPARTMENT or Federal Highway Administration. This publication does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

PREFACE
The Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) proposes to purchase a 1,685-acre parcel in Miller County as a wetland mitigation site to offset wetland impacts attributed to GDOT projects. The Plum Creek Wetland Mitigation Site is geographically located in the Dougherty Plain of Southwest Georgia and as with all wetland mitigation sites associated with federal monies was subjected to a survey and evaluation of impacts to cultural resources in compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act in 1966, as amended. In conjuncture with the archaeological survey report an additional volume was developed that exceeded the scope of a typical survey and evaluation to address questions of regional significance.
A research design was developed to extrapolate the use of landscape by prehistoric and historic peoples as observed within the Plum Creek Wetland Mitigation Site to the entire Dougherty Plain. New South Associates, Inc. undertook the monumental task of synthesizing archaeological site types identified in the Dougherty Plain to address questions of landscape utilization framed by environmental archaeology. The study makes use of the available records in creating a synthesis of landscape utilization in the Dougherty Plain based upon environmental and geographical factors such as elevation zones and drainage catchment density zones. Statistical tests were chosen to answer the research questions about landscape utilization based upon the available quality and vast quantity of archaeological site data. Future research in southwest Georgia will be able to make use of this foundational and expansive look into site distribution and landscape utilization.
GDOT is pleased to publish A Look into the Outlands: The Cultural Landscape of the Dougherty Plain of Georgia as the fifteenth installment in its Occasional Papers in Cultural Resource Management series. It serves as an example of state and federal transportation efforts employed to enhance the future by serving as good stewards of the past.
Sara H. Gale Archaeologist Georgia Department of Transportation

ABSTRACT

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA iii

This research study was prepared as an element of the archaeological survey of the Plum Creek Wetland Mitigation Site and focuses on the Dougherty Plain physiographic province, the lime sink region of southwest Georgia, as a cultural unit. An environmental approach was utilized to explore various environmental variables, including elevation, drainage density, and soil drainage within the study area and relate these environmental factors to prehistoric cultural timeframes and historic site types. Investigation of these environmental and cultural parameters was performed through GIS and statistical analyses. Results revealed cultural trends for both prehistory and history that are discussed within this volume. These results are placed within the context of previously defined cultural frameworks within the southeastern United States, which illustrate how the Dougherty Plain study area compares as a region. Implications of this study provide a broad-spectrum platform for future studies within the region, and specific research questions worthy of more in-depth examination.

iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
New South Associates, Inc. wishes to thank Shawn Patch and Sara Gale, archaeologists at the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT), for their help and competent advice. Eric Duff, Chief Archaeologist with GDOT, is thanked for his support and review of the project. Chuck Crews, wildlife technician for the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, is thanked for sharing some background information on the natural and cultural history of the originally surveyed Plum Creek Wetland Mitigation Site. Dan Elliott from the Lamar Institute willingly shared background information and literature concerning the archaeology of southwest Georgia. We thank John Chamblee from the Anthropology Department at the University of Arizona and Jamie Waggoner from the Anthropology Department at the University of Florida for sharing their pioneering research results from the project area with us. Scot Keith from Southern Research, Inc. also provided useful information on previous archaeological work and ongoing research into the prehistory of the area. Mark Williams and Ellie Haywood from the Georgia Site Files in Athens provided friendly assistance during Jannie Loubser's initial background research. Kevin Harrelson is thanked for his assistance with GIS analysis and graphic presentation. Gratitude is expressed for Mark Swanson's role in providing historical information on the study area. At the New South headquarters in Stone Mountain, David Diener and Jennifer Wilson assisted with report production while Joe Joseph and Yulounda Ralls took care of administrative matters. Finally, Joe Joseph and Julie Coco are thanked for their editorial work. The support of each of these individuals was integral to the project and gratitude is extended to all those involved.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................... iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................... vii
I. INTRODUCTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL APPROACH ....................................................................1 ENVIRONMENTAL APPROACH ....................................................................................................1 RESEARCH QUESTIONS ..............................................................................................................3 RESEARCH VOLUME ORGANIZATION ..........................................................................................5
II. ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH..............................................7 STUDY AREA .............................................................................................................................7 PHYSIOGRAPHY.........................................................................................................................7 Elevation....................................................................................................................................9 GEOLOGY ................................................................................................................................9 HYDROLOGY........................................................................................................................... 12 SOILS .....................................................................................................................................13 BIOTIC COMMUNITY ...............................................................................................................14 TESTING ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES ......................................................................................15
III. THE CULTURAL SETTING AND DATASET ....................................................................................17 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................17 PRE-PALEOINDIAN PERIOD (>11,500 B.P.) ...................................................................................17 PALEOINDIAN PERIOD (11,50010,000 B.P.) ..............................................................................18 ARCHAIC PERIOD (10,0003,000 B.P.) .......................................................................................21 WOODLAND PERIOD (3,0001,000 B.P.) ..................................................................................28 MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD (1,000400 B.P. (1540 A.D.)) ..................................................................33 PROTO-HISTORIC AND HISTORIC INDIAN PERIODS (A.D. 15401815)..........................................35 EURO-AMERICAN HISTORIC PERIOD (1815PRESENT) ..................................................................39 ANTEBELLUM COTTON (1815-1865) ......................................................................................39 AGRICULTURE AND INDUSTRY (1865-1940) ............................................................................41 MODERN ERA.......................................................................................................................41 CULTURAL DATASET OF STUDY AREA ........................................................................................42 SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................................45
IV. THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE: RESULTS OF ANALYSES ............47 NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL TRENDS AND CHERT OUTCROPS ..................................................47 NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL TRENDS AND ELEVATION ZONES .................................................48 NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL TRENDS AND DRAINAGE CATCHMENT DENSITY ZONES ................50 NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL TRENDS AND SOIL DRAINAGE CLASS ...........................................55 HISTORIC CULTURAL TRENDS AND ELEVATION ZONES ...............................................................59 HISTORIC CULTURAL TRENDS AND DRAINAGE CATCHMENT DENSITY..........................................61 HISTORIC CULTURAL TRENDS AND SOIL DRAINAGE CLASS .........................................................64
V. CULTURAL IMPLICATIONS.........................................................................................................69 NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL IMPLICATIONS.............................................................................71 (PRE-) PALEOINDIAN PERIOD...................................................................................................71 ARCHAIC PERIOD ..................................................................................................................72 WOODLAND PERIOD............................................................................................................73 MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ..........................................................................................................74 PROTO-HISTORIC PERIOD ......................................................................................................75

vi
HISTORIC INDIAN PERIOD ......................................................................................................76 HISTORIC CULTURAL IMPLICATIONS ..........................................................................................76
AGRARIAN SITES...................................................................................................................76 CEMETERY SITES ...................................................................................................................77 COMMUNITY/INTERACTION SITES ........................................................................................77 DOMESTIC SITES ..................................................................................................................77 INDUSTRIAL SITES .................................................................................................................77 MISCELLANEOUS SITES .........................................................................................................78 TRANSPORTATION/URBAN/MILITARY ....................................................................................78 CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................................... 78
REFERENCES CITED ......................................................................................................................79
APPENDIX A. SITES WITHIN DOUGHERTY PLAIN STUDY AREA

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA vii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Dougherty Plain Study Area. ............................................................................................2 Figure 2. Physiography of the Dougherty Plain Study Area. ...............................................................8 Figure 3. Geology of the Dougherty Plain Study Area. ....................................................................11 Figure 4. View of All Prehistoric and Historic Resources Recorded Within the Study Area.....................43 Figure 5. Number of Cultural Components in Elevation Zones. .........................................................49 Figure 6. Woodland Sub-period Occupations by Elevation Zone. ...................................................51 Figure 7. Number of Components in Drainage Catchment Density Zone............................................52 Figure 8. Woodland Sub-period Occupations within Drainage Catchment Density Zones. ..................54 Figure 9. Number of Components in Soil Drainage Class. ..............................................................56 Figure 10. Woodland Sub--period Occupations within Soil Drainage Class........................................58 Figure 11. Number of Historic Site Types in Elevation Zones. ............................................................59 Figure 12. Historic Site Types within Elevation Zones .......................................................................60 Figure 13. Number of Historic Site Types in Drainage Catchment Class. .............................................62 Figure 14. Historic Site Types within Drainage Density Class.............................................................63 Figure 15. Number of Historic Site Types in Soil Drainage Class. ......................................................65 Figure 16. Historic Site Types within Soil Drainage Class. ................................................................67
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Physiographic Distribution of Study Area. ..........................................................................7 Table 2. Elevation Zones Represented within the Dougherty Plain. .......................................................9 Table 3. Drainage Catchment Density Represented within the Dougherty Plain Study Area. ...................13 Table 4. Soil Drainage Represented within the Dougherty Plain. .......................................................14 Table 5. Counties Included within the Dougherty Plain Study Area ....................................................42 Table 6. Cultural Resource Occupations within the Dougherty Plain Study Area ..................................44 Table 7. Counties Included within the Dougherty Plain Study Area Having Chert Outcrops ..................48 Table 8. Chi-Square Test for Archaic Sub-periods Within Elevation Zones. ........................................49 Table 9. Chi-Square Test for Woodland Sub-periods within Elevation Zones......................................50 Table 10. Chi-Square Test for Archaic Sub-periods within Drainage Catchment Density.........................52 Table 11. Chi-Square Test for Woodland Sub-periods within Drainage Catchment Density. ...................53 Table 12. Chi-Square Test for Archaic Sub-periods within Tested Soil Drainage Classes........................56 Table 13. Chi-Square Test for Woodland Sub-periods within Tested Soil Drainage Classes. ..................57 Table 14. Chi-Square Test for Historic Site Types within Elevation Zones. ............................................61 Table 15. Chi-Square Test for Historic Site Types within Catchment Density Zones ................................64 Table 16. Chi-Square Test for Historic Site Types within Soil Drainage Class. ......................................66

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 1
I. INTRODUCTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL APPROACH
This research report is an outgrowth of the Georgia Department of Transportation's (GDOT) interest in the establishment of the Plum Creek Wetland Mitigation Site (PCWMS). This wetland mitigation site comprises three tracts in Miller County, located in southwestern Georgia, totaling approximately 1,685 acres. Natural landscapes identified within the survey area consist of wetlands, floodplain, and slope divided among the three tracts that are generally described as inter-riverine uplands. GDOT contracted with New South Associates to perform an archaeological survey of the PCWMS and the results of that survey are discussed in the report Archaeological Survey of the Plum Creek Wetland Mitigation Site, Miller County, Georgia (Windham et al. 2007). The archaeology study observed differential landscape use during prehistory, with specific landforms and resources exploited more heavily than others. This observation led to further research on the interaction of cultures and environmental variables in the Dougherty Plain physiographic province of southwest Georgia (Figure 1), an environmental region that is unique in the state.
The Dougherty Plain of southwest Georgia is a flat to gently rolling karst-like physiographic province that slopes northeast to southwest. It is bordered to the northwest by the Fall Line Hills and to east by the Tifton Uplands (Wharton 1978). It is a unique Coastal Plain region that is distinguished by limestone geology interlaced with extensive subsurface aquifers and surface wetlands characterized by sinks, ponds, and marshes (Jones 2003, Clarke and Zisa 1976).
The aim of this research report is to present cultural trends in landscape utilization observed within the Dougherty Plain study area using existing data through an environmental approach. The research goal of this study is attained through literature review, Georgia Site File research analyzed through a Geographic Information System (GIS), and analysis of human-environmental relationships.
ENVIRONMENTAL APPROACH
In this study, an environmental approach is utilized to explore Native American and Historic cultural resource distributions. This multivariate approach, as developed since the 1970s during the revolution of ecological studies, is based fundamentally in environmental archaeology (i.e. integration of ecology with archaeology) and the premise that there are long-standing associations between humans and the environment (Dincauze 2000). It follows that these relationships will be represented archaeologically and they will potentially differ through time based on the changing dynamics of human ecology. With a defined cultural dataset (such as the identified cultural resources of the Dougherty Plain) and environmental variables (i.e. elevation, hydrology, soils, etc.), one should be able to define frequency of specific variable relationships and statistically test their significance, if an adequate sample size exists. Through these tests, one can define trends seen in the cultural landscape utilization.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 3

Of interest is the integration of the human and environmental variables with recognition that these independent variables are interrelated. Researchers must have, "the awareness that data complexity and interrelated variables invalidate models of linear causation chains" (Dincauze 2000:509). In other words, in an environmental approach, there are no direct cause and effect relationships. It is an approach that calls for the application of models and hypotheses and their elimination thereof based on the evidence if and when possible. Therefore, "[u]ncertainties [in human-environment relationships] do not represent failures; they should not be suppressed in the final reports" (Dincauze 2000:513). O'Conner (1991:1) stated it best as, "Absolute certainty is not an offer."
Within this analytical framework, Native American occupations are analyzed by cultural period while historic occupations are analyzed by site type. Literature review of the region places the Dougherty Plain study area within a cultural context of the Coastal Plain Southeast. Research of the Georgia Site File database resulted in a dataset of 2,112 discovered archaeological sites within the study area that encompasses approximately 13.7 billion square meters. It is important to note that an overall lack of archaeological coverage marks the study area, and as a result, much of the region has not been surveyed and no cultural resources have been recorded. This limited coverage creates an irresolvable bias within our analysis. In short, the archaeologically surveyed area represents a small immeasurable percent of the total study areas. Therefore, identified cultural resources are far fewer and within specific constricted areas (i.e. transportation corridors, park service compartments, specific research areas) within the greater study area of the Dougherty Plain. However, available data does illustrate potential trends that are valuable for the interpretation of landscape utilization within the Dougherty Plain as the constricted survey areas do represent somewhat random placements in regards to environmental variables.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Specific research questions (premises) were developed in review of the relevant literature and environmental variables to guide this study. These include the following:



Potential Pre-Paleoindian sites have been discovered in the interior Coastal Plain similar to

the study area.

o

Is there evidence for these sites in the Dougherty Plain and in what setting(s) are

these sites located?



It is hypothesized that Paleoindian populations were highly mobile foragers in the oak-

hickory-pine Coastal Plain, but may have been somewhat logistically organized in regards

to riparian and lithic resources at least in the boreal forests north of the Fall Line.

o

Within the study area, are Paleoindian sites distributed across the landscape in a

potentially highly mobile and dispersed (using both lowland and upland areas)

settlement pattern reminiscent of foraging patterns of site distribution?

o

Do Paleoindian sites cluster along drainage ways, indicating cultural utilization of

riparian environments, which potentially acted as migration corridors?

o

Are Paleoindian sites tied to chert outcrops, such as observed at the Muckafoonee

site?

4



The Archaic period was a time of increased population and changing group mobility tied,

at least in part, to environmental changes.

o

Are Early Archaic site distributions similar to Late Paleoindian occupations in

regards to settlement strategy?

o

Is a lower population and/or restricted group mobility during the Middle Archaic

reflected by site clustering? Or is there a trend of dispersed site distribution?

o

Are Middle Archaic sites concentrated in specific water related niches, potentially

in response to warmer and drier conditions?

o

During the Late Archaic, are sites dispersed, suggesting high mobility, or

concentrated in specific environmental settings suggesting (semi-) permanent

occupations focused on specific niche(s) such as smaller upland streams?



Increased social complexity and more sedentary occupations in the bottomlands of large

drainage ways is a settlement strategy recognized for the broader Southeast.

o

Is there cultural continuity in regards to settlement strategy for the Late Archaic and

Early Woodland?

o

Is there a trend for dispersed sites on fertile soils, suggestive of small farmsteads?

o

During the Late Woodland, are sites in the bottomlands and/or dispersed along

upper tributaries?



Mound centers and large sites on floodplains characterize the Mississippian period in the

much of the Southeast; however, recent research suggests that the settlement strategy was

more diverse and that traditionally undesirable locations were utilized, including the

Dougherty Plain.

o

During the Early Mississippian, is there a continued settlement pattern from the Late

Woodland sub-period?

o

Is a more dispersed population and a diverse settlement strategy reflected in the

Dougherty Plain?

o

Are increases in population during the Middle and Late Mississippian sub-periods

seen by increased site frequency?

o

Are Mississippian sites located in less desirable locations for agriculture?



Native Americans minimally inhabited the Dougherty Plain during the Proto-historic and

Historic period. It is hypothesized that Native Americans became acculturated with time

and adopted a settlement strategy of small dispersed farmsteads.

o

Does site frequency illustrate a relatively vacant landscape?

o

Does the environmental setting of sites suggest a settlement strategy of dispersed

farmsteads?

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 5



The first Euro-American historic occupations were forts (military) along the rivers, which

were later followed by an increase in population and railroads, tying river ports to the

interior Dougherty Plain. The first settlers focused on agricultural plantations followed by

timbering and turpentine industries after the Civil War.

o

Are Military sites focused in the bottomlands of major drainage ways?

o

Is there a trend in transportation routes suggestive of particular industry or urban

needs?

o

Are Agrarian and Domestic sites concentrated in the floodplain(s)?

o

Do other historic site types show any pattern in environmental variables?

RESEARCH VOLUME ORGANIZATION
Within this report, the relationship of Prehistoric sites and lithic resources is briefly addressed for the study region. In addition, the sites were analyzed by cultural periods and site types as reported by site file information. The environmental approach outlined within this research emphasizes three variables: elevation range data, ordered drainage catchments density area, and soil drainage class that structured the GIS categorization and analysis of site distributions and human-environment trends.
The investigation of cultural trends within the Dougherty Plain is presented within the following chapters. The "Environmental Variables and Methodological Approach" chapter presents a detailed discussion of the study area and the variables utilized for the study of occupations, along with methods of GIS and statistical analysis and specific environmental datasets. The "Cultural Setting and Dataset" chapter provides an overview of known cultural manifestations and trends previously documented within the Coastal Plain of the Southeast and surrounding regions. This chapter serves to provide background information used to formulate the research questions. Additional information defines the cultural dataset of discovered cultural resources within the Dougherty Plain study area and collected from current Georgia Site File information. Analyses of the cultural data using the variables defined by the environmental approach are presented within the "Results of Analyses" chapter. The final chapter of this report, "Cultural Implications", discusses the interpretations of the results in the context of the research questions. All archaeological sites and related cultural and environmental attributes are provided in Appendix A. This information, the GIS illustrations, and digital copy of this research volume are provided on an enclosed CD for future researchers.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 7
II. ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH

STUDY AREA
The Dougherty Plain is a flat to gently rolling karst-like physiographic province that slopes northeast to southwest. It is bordered to the northwest by the Fall Line Hills and to east by the Tifton Uplands (Wharton 1978). This discussion focuses on the Dougherty Plain as a specific study area; however, analyses of the hydrologic units of the region necessarily expanded the geographic scope of the study to encompass total drainage catchment areas discussed within a later section. Therefore, the total study area measures 13,689,439 square kilometers and includes small portions of bordering regions. Table 1 outlines the distribution of area encompassed within this study as represented by physiographic provinces and districts. Figure 2 illustrates this same area.

Table 1. Physiographic Distribution of Study Area.

Physiographic Region Buhrstone/Lime Hills Coastal Plain Red Uplands Dougherty Plain Southeastern Floodplains and Low Terraces Southeastern Plains and Hills Tifton Upland Vidalia Upland Totals

Total Area (sq. meters) 50,168,512.78
1,002,436,543.10 11,016,539,659.70
655,104,031.29
33,318,681.51 720,074,332.15 211,797,833.35 13,689,439,593.87

Percent of Total Area 0.37 7.32
80.47
4.79
0.24 5.26 1.55 100.00

PHYSIOGRAPHY
The Dougherty Plain of southwest Georgia is a unique Coastal Plain region that is distinguished by limestone geology interlaced with extensive subsurface aquifers and surface wetlands (Jones 2003). The porous limestone also favors the formation of sinks, ponds, and marshes (Clarke and Zisa 1976, Clarke 2004). Most of the shallow circular or oval-shaped ponds are likely sinkholes formed within the underlying bedrock. Considering the ubiquity of these hydrological features, the Dougherty Plain is also known as the Lime Sink region of the Coastal Plain province. This region represents the majority of the study area and is the focus of this research.
The lesser-represented physiographic regions (Table 1 and Figure 2) encompass a small percentage of the study area. These regions border the Dougherty Plain or are floodplain settings. All border regions are identified as various Coastal Plain uplands marked by a comparably more dissected topography with higher elevations reaching approximately 600 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). The Southeastern Floodplains and Low Uplands are characterized by sluggish rivers including the Flint and Chattahoochee and associated backwater swamps (Griffith et al. 2001).

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 9

ELEVATION

Elevation was chosen as a study variable as it relates to major ecozones (i.e. upland and bottomland) that were important to Native American settlement, subsistence, and resource procurement patterns. According to regional digital elevation models (DEM), the topography of the study area slopes from 577 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) in the north along the Fall Line Hills to a minimum elevation of 60 feet AMSL around Lake Seminole in the far southwest corner of the Dougherty Plain. For the purposes of this study, the elevation dataset was grouped using natural breaks created within a GIS. This assisted in environmental analyses of Native American and Historic cultural manifestations.

The natural breaks are defined within Table 2, and represent a fairly well distributed spectrum of bottomland to upland elevation zones. The lowest range of elevation from 60-158 feet AMSL represents the bottomlands. This encompasses 22 percent of the study area and includes topographic depressions (wetlands and sinks), and river valleys (large drainages). The lowland zone includes 28 percent of the study area and is characterized by low-lying relatively level floodplains and slightly sloped wetland edges. Elevation within the lowland zone ranges from 158230 feet AMSL. The zones designated as midlands are subdivided into low and high designations that are characterized by rolling hills and associated slope representing a spectrum of elevations. The low midland range from 230-302 feet AMSL and encompasses 24 percent of the study area. The high midland zone is from 302-384 feet AMSL and includes 17 percent of the study area. Uplands represent a much smaller percent of the study area including only nine percent of the total area. The upland zone ranges from 384-577 feet above mean sea level and are characterized by ridges, knolls, and steeper slopes.

Table 2. Elevation Zones Represented within the Dougherty Plain.

Elevation Zone
1. Bottomlands 2. Lowland 3. Low Midlands 4. High Midlands 5. Uplands All

Total Area (sq. meters) 2,962,106,065.82 3,847,538,662.64 3,300,792,043.20 2,355,780,891.02 1,223,221,984.45 13,689,439,647.13

Percent of Total Area
21.64 28.11 24.11 17.21
8.94 100

Minimum Elevation (ft/m)
60/18.47 158/48.63 230/70.16 302/92.93 384/117.55 60/18.47

Maximum Elevation (ft/m)
158/48.63 230/70.16 302/92.93 384/117.55 577/176.01 577/176.01

GEOLOGY
The geologic setting of the Dougherty Plain represents a minor variable investigated in this study. This was performed through comparison of known chert resource locations/areas due to the need for this material prehistorically.
The Georgia Coastal Plain region was formed through sea level fluctuation during the Upper Cretaceous and Cenozoic geologic timeframes (Cooke 1943). The region as a whole has been repeatedly covered by the sea as illustrated by the numerous and distinct strata of seashells and erosion. Therefore, strata of gravels and clays from wave erosion intervals and sandier deposits during inundation were observed; all of which are mingled with calcium carbonate rock such as limestone.

10
Within this large Coastal Plain region is the Dougherty Plain that is underlain by the Eocene aged Ocala limestone that formed in the Cenozoic era (Figure 3). Goad (1979:21) recognized the Ocala limestone as a portion of the Jackson stage deposits of the Eocene. According to Cooke (1943:68), the Ocala limestone, "lies near the surface in a belt... that extends from the Chattahoochee River to Twiggs County. Outcrops of unaltered limestone are the most abundant along the streams and rivers." It should be noted that Cooke (1943) defined, but did not offer an explanation, a larger geographic area for the occurrence of the Ocala Limestone Formation than the Dougherty Plain physiographic province defined by Clarke and Zisa (1976). It is the authors' opinion that the geologic reference may be more consistent with patterns revealed through hydrologic analysis during this study as the karst topography and related hydrologic features are the primary characteristic of the physiographic region. Therefore, it is worth considering the geology of the study area as a whole, although this crosscuts physiographic units to a small extent.
Silicified limestone outcrops within the broad undulating Dougherty Plain between the Flint and Chattahoochee rivers. The friable limestone formations are characterized by white or cream colored pure limestone. Clayey soil deposits mark the northeastern portion of the formation while more sandy deposits characterize the southeastern portion where pure limestone is not exposed.
Of particular interest is the chert that has formed in this region and became exposed at the surface. Cooke (1943:71) stated that, "at many natural exposures... all the lime originally in it [the formation] has been replaced by silica, and the rock at the surface is flint." Silicified limestone outcrops are recorded along Spring Creek, near the original PCWMS, at Colquitt. In addition, great masses of chert are found along Aycock Creek just south of Colquitt and numerous other locations that are outlined by Goad (1979), who compiled an extensive list of outcrops documented geologically.
The Fall Line Hills represent an intermediary geologic unit between the Piedmont and younger coastal deposits that were formed during the Oligocene epoch. The Flint River Formation (formerly known as the Vicksburg Formation (Veatch and Stephenson 1911:307)) overlays the Ocala limestone and the Suwannee Limestone Formation can be found in this region. The Flint River Formation is significant to this discussion due to evidence of cherty outcrops and geographic expanse. On the other hand, the Suwannee limestone is not discussed in detail as Cooke (1943) placed this formation south and east of the study area and stated that the formations had few outcrops within Georgia.
The Flint River Formation can be found in the northeastern and southwestern portions of the study area where it overlies the Ocala Limestone Formation (Cooke 1943). There are breaks or inconsistencies in the Flint River Formation that were caused by either erosion or differential formation. Limestone, sand, and gravel characterize the formation; however, "at most of the outcrops the limy part has been either dissolved out, leaving a crumpled mass of variegated residual clay, sand, and gravel, or completely silicified into chert" (Cooke 1943:78). It is noted that these outcrops occur at sinks that penetrate overlying formations where, "chert lumps of varying sizes and abundance are widely distributed" (Cooke 1943:79). Countless chert outcrops from this formation can be found in the southern portion of study area. An extensive list of these outcrops was provided by Goad (1979) and is exhaustive of the geologic references for the region.

12
In reference to cultural utilization of the study region, three primary geologic features are recognized as culturally significant including the chert outcrops, karst limestone, and alluvial deposits found along lowland drainages. Chert resources were attractive to prehistoric and Proto-historic groups for the production of stone tools. The karst limestone created sinkholes and backwater features that resulted in greater plant and animal diversity for a broad-spectrum subsistence economy. The alluvial deposits were favorable for small and large-scale agriculture throughout all timeframes.
HYDROLOGY
Hydrology was important to Native American and Historic cultural groups for water, transportation/trade, agricultural fields, subsistence, and other means. Therefore, hydrology as measured through drainage catchment was a variable considered in this study as it influenced the location of sites.
The Dougherty Plain generally falls between two major river systems in Georgia, the Chattahoochee and Flint rivers, which form the Apalachicola River system (Figure 1, 2, and 3). The study area necessarily crosses the Chattahoochee River to incorporate related catchment areas. In addition, a portion of the Dougherty Plain is found to the east of the Flint River. Other major drainage ways within the study area include Spring Creek and Chickasawhatchee Creek with numerous other tributaries.
The Chattahoochee River is a large drainage way that flows north to south in the southern Coastal Plain portion of Georgia, while the headwaters are in the northeast portion of the Piedmont. This river is found on the western edge of the Dougherty Plain and creates the state border with Alabama. The Flint River is also a drainage that spans a large portion of central to western Georgia. This drainage represents the eastern edge of the Dougherty Plain physiographic province. These two rivers form lowland borders of the study area, which is best characterized as interriverine uplands. These uplands are marked by scattered tributaries and sinks that feed the Chattahoochee and Flint rivers through the Florida Aquifer artesian system created by carbonate bedrock that underlies the coastal regions of the Southeast.
Of primary interest to the current study is the use of a drainage catchment as a geomorphic unit for analytical purposes (Leopold et al. 1964), as the study area is composed of countless tributaries and related sinks. The associated water features form unique networks of water bodies within catchment basins (drainage catchments) of the study region that may have been spatially exploited by past inhabitants versus specific drainage ways (i.e. river, tributary). The interrelated nature of drainage basins with geology, elevation, relief, and soils is an environmental reality that must be observed during any study of one or all these variables.
During the current study, the drainage catchment as a geomorphic unit was found to be a more accurate portrayal of the true nature of the aquifer system as it encompassed the catchment area versus relying solely on drainage ways for identification. The termination of numerous streams and creeks into sinks and/or wetlands rendered the commonly utilized stream order (Horton 1945) irrelevant in the study area. In addition, the use of stream order is biased by the variable of scale and changes based on what map is used for calculation. However, drainage catchments can be ordered empirically by measure of density and utilized to define the overall water availability in a given location with no interrelationship with map scale.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 13

Designation of drainage catchments was performed using a GIS and based on analysis of 24,000 digital elevation models and the National Hydrology dataset (2005). After computation of individual drainage catchments, the order of a given catchment was defined based on the following formula that computes drainage density:

Drainage Density = L / Ad = Sum of drainage length(s) / Total drainage area

The vast variation in drainage densities across the Dougherty Plain study area was further grouped by five natural breaks for analysis. This data is summarized within Table 3 and illustrates the range in available water within a given catchment area. Drainage catchment density is conversely related to elevation zones. Generally speaking, low-density drainage catchments (Density Order 5) relate to bottomlands (Elevation Zone 1) such that the Flint and Chattahoochee floodplains are designated by the lowest subset and inversely related to the traditionally utilized stream order. However, one must keep in mind that floodplains (normally considered bottomlands) also occur in the upper reaches of drainage catchments that would have a high drainage density. This is particularly true in areas of relatively low relief, such as the study area. It is worth noting that drainage catchments representing the highest flow are represented by lower order and opposite of conventional stream ordering. Therefore, the Chattahoochee and Flint rivers are marked by a basin density order of one while five marks upland tributaries. The percent of the study area covered by a given drainage density order is fairly well distributed with the exception of the most dense catchments. This distribution indicates that the data is not skewed by the larger drainages and analysis of this variable is viable.

Table 3. Drainage Catchment Density Represented within the Dougherty Plain Study Area.

Basin Density Order 1. Highest Density 2. High Density 3.: Medium Density 4. Low Density 5. Lowest Density

Area (sq. meters) 1,588,383,825.21 2,647,605,373.59 3,090,081,458.03 3,209,276,192.84 3,154,092,739.41

Percent of Total 11.60 19.34 22.57 23.44 23.04

Average 0.0015 0.0013 0.0010 0.0007 0.0003

Minimum 0.0014 0.0011 0.0008 0.0005 0.0001

Maximum 0.0018 0.0014 0.0011 0.0008 0.0004

SOILS
A detailed list and discussion of all soil types found within the Dougherty Plain study area is outside the scope of this research due to the complexity of the numerous counties included within the study area. However, specific variables related to the soil drainage and permeability crosscut these biases within individual county soil information. Within this study, soil drainage was used as an environmental variable because Native American (particularly from the Woodland period and forward) and Historic cultural groups often chose these setting for settlement and horticultural/agricultural fields.
Soil drainage class is a dataset available from the Natural Resources Conservation Service (2006a through 2006p). Because there was no soil information available for Webster County, which makes up four percent of the study area, it was not investigated in this study. Soil drainage is a result of numerous interrelated variables including elevation, geology, and hydrology and is defined by how well a particular soil holds water on a defined scale.

14

The "water" designation refers to those soils that are presently or intermittently inundated along floodplains or wetlands, "very poorly drained" soils may retain water (i.e. sinks, ponds), and the classification "excessively drained" refers to soils that filter surface water quickly and do not hold moisture such as in the uplands. These extremes encompass a small percentage of the total study area (Table 4). Well-drained soils are the most highly represented designation totalling 62 percent of the study area. This soil classification encompasses areas that are likely favorable for crop production, large-sized settlements (not likely inundated), pine plantations, road development, and various other long-term cultural manifestations. The skewed area distribution of soil drainage class must be recognized during interpretation of this variable.

Table 4. Soil Drainage Represented within the Dougherty Plain.

Soil Drainage Class Excessively drained Somewhat excessively drained Moderately well drained Well drained Somewhat poorly drained Poorly drained Very poorly drained Water Unavailable (Webster Co.) All

Area (sq. meters) 205,817,021.76 641,642,159.05 865,035,162.47
8,542,669,478.35 510,427,486.71
2,120,364,915.22 20,643,308.31
277,565,129.14 505,274,986.11 13,689,439,647.13

Percent of Total 1.50 4.69 6.32
62.40 3.73
15.49 0.15 2.03 3.69
100.00

BIOTIC COMMUNITY
Before the severe disturbances caused by silviculture, a quilt-work of plant communities accentuated the different landforms in the area. Long-leaf pines and wiregrass occur on the higher-lying areas, dense hardwood forests, including tupelo and water oak, occurred along streambeds, and cypress and gum trees grew within lime sinks. May hawthorn trees, known as mayhaw among inhabitants of the research area, grow within the better-drained loamy sand portions of ponds, swamps, and stream banks. Adjacent to the ponds and wetlands are some big live oaks, most of which have little resistance to fire, but thrive in the disturbance created by irregular flooding (Wharton 1978).
White-tailed deer, varieties of smaller mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians are attracted to the densely vegetated wetland areas. The diversity of plant species encouraged by frequent flooding includes fruit and mast producing species and grasses. Seasonal plants make up a large portion of the herbivore and omnivore diet, and such animals are attracted to these wetlands such areas in the Dougherty Plain, which occur along the large floodplains and at sinks, and other regions of the Eastern Woodlands.
Presently, much of the higher terrain of the study area is in cropland and pasture, with some small areas of mixed forest. Peanuts, pecans, and cotton are common crops grown in the region. Remnant natural forests consist of pines, including long-leaf pine, and hardwoods such as red oaks and hickories (Griffith et al. 2001). Today, much of the wooded portions of the study area are planted in pines of varying ages. The numerous sinks and low lying areas scattered throughout the region are wetter and poorly drained with vegetation consisting of black gum, sweet gum, water

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 15
oak, and a few pines and cypress. It is perhaps not surprising then that many of these tree-covered lime sink ponds and marshes continue to be biological oases in a mostly agricultural landscape (Griffith et al. 2001). Ecologically speaking, these shallow sinkholes are productive hubs, reminiscent of Carolina Bays in the Coastal Pain of the Carolinas and southeastern Georgia.
TESTING ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES
Once GIS analysis of the environmental and cultural variables was performed, frequency distribution described, and a null hypothesis formed, statistical testing was conducted. Statistical testing was utilized for observed frequency variation to determine if results represented random or nonrandom distribution in regards to the variables.
Pearson's chi-squared goodness of fit test was utilized within a statistical package to accomplish this goal. Briefly, this test compares the observed frequency distribution and expected (theoretical) frequency through cross-tabulation (contingency table) of, in this instance, a cultural variable by an environmental variable. The formula for this test is as follows:
Oi = an observed frequency;
Ei = an expected (theoretical) frequency, asserted by the null hypothesis;
n = the number of possible outcomes of each event.
Given a set degrees of freedom ((df= (1 - the number of rows)(1 - the number of columns)), this test calculates probability (p-value). The p-value is used with a standard chi-square table to find the level of significance of the results (df and p-value). A significance level of 0.05 or less is considered high, and shows that observed values are not the result of a random sample but of a noteworthy association in the data. High significance level results in rejection of the null hypothesis and indicates a likely association of the human-environment relationship. Observation of high variance between observed and expected values within the contingency table suggests that the particular association (i.e. Late Woodland-Bottomland Elevation) is outside the realm of normal distribution and significant as a pattern.
The most apparent bias in using the chi-square test is sample size. According to Drennan (1996:197), statisticians differ in the definition of a reliable sample. He defined a middle course approach, which is adopted here as, "no expected values be less than 1 and no more than 20% of the expected values be less than 5" (Drennan 1996:197). If the sample was statistically unreliable, then observed frequency variation and statistical variation are discussed.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 17
III. THE CULTURAL SETTING AND DATASET
INTRODUCTION
The following chapter outlines the Native American (prehistoric) and Historic cultural contexts of Georgia, and more specifically, research pertaining to the Interior Coastal Plain region and Dougherty Plain region of southwestern Georgia. Each prehistoric cultural period is described with specific variables in mind: 1) environmental factors and change; 2) diagnostic tools associated with each period, and 3) cultural shifts and continuities in settlement and landscape utilization. The background research guided development of specific research questions outlined in Chapters 1 and 5.
This discussion is presented chronologically by cultural period with specific historical information following the prehistoric discussion. There is a body of limited prehistoric research about the study area. Recent research provided by Elliott (2004), Chamblee (2004, 2005), and Waggoner (2003) is extensively utilized to discuss specific cultural manifestations in the region between the lower Flint and Chattahoochee Rivers. This recent and ongoing research within the Dougherty Plain physiographic province provides a glimpse of shifts and continuities in settlement location through prehistory.
PRE-PALEOINDIAN PERIOD (>11,500 B.P.)
Prehistoric occupations predating diagnostic Clovis occupations in the Southeast (Pre-Clovis) have been highly debated for decades (see Anderson 2005). The climate during this period was characterized by full glacial Pleistocene conditions, with the Southeast much colder and drier than present. Traditionally, it was thought that no prehistoric peoples occupied the Southeast during this time span. Yet, deeply buried sites along the Atlantic littoral have revealed evidence for these early occupations. These sites include Page-Ladson (8JE591), Topper (38AL23), Cactus Hill (44SX202), Little Salt Spring (8SO18), and Saltville (44SM37) (Anderson 2005). Ongoing research suggests that there was one or more occupation(s) that predated the Paleoindian period in the Southeast. Greater accuracy and variety of absolute dating methods, along with sampling of deeper deposits, have advanced indications of this occupation.
Currently, there is no defined artifact type that is diagnostic of the Pre-Clovis occupation. This ostensible absence of diagnostic artifacts implies that pre-Clovis materials can be easily overlooked. Nonetheless, in the absence of readily recognizable artifacts, other sources of evidence seem to suggest pre-Clovis occupation. For example, the Page-Ladson site, located to the south of the current project area in the Florida panhandle, shows stratified deposits of late Pleistocene and early Holocene animal bones associated with artifacts. Dates of these deposits range from 14,50012,500 years before present (B.P.). Judging from this evidence, the earliest dates for artifacts recovered from Page-Ladson are roughly 1,500 years before the beginning of the Clovis culture (Brown 1994).

18
The Topper site, which also consists of apparently pre-Clovis material, is located in the Coastal Plain of South Carolina, not far below the Fall Line. Both this site and the current study area are located within the interior Coastal Plain region, which was much closer to the Atlantic coastline during the Pleistocene than present. Excavations at the Topper site extended below a Clovis layer, through a red paleosol zone, and exposed white Pleistocene alluvial sands (Pleistocene terrace), which are believed to be the normal pre-Clovis zone for the site. Within this Pleistocene layer, small flakes, some with bend break fractures, were recovered. These items are believed to be pre-Clovis chert processing piles. In one area of the site, six chert artifacts (small blades, end scrapers, and side scrapers) were found around a large boulder that had been used as an anvil. Of considerable interest was the recovery of charcoal from the pre-Clovis layer. There was an area of abundant charcoal in a shallow depression, from which a chert flake was recovered, and this location is believed to represent a hearth. Two radiocarbon samples were submitted, which resulted in dates of 50,300 B.P. and 51,700 B.P. (Goodyear 2005). On-going work at Topper could have great implications for understanding the origin and migration of the humans in the North America continent and for defining the archaeological attributes of pre-Clovis cultures. In reference to the current study area, evidence for a deeply buried, potentially Pre-clovis occupation within the interior Coastal Plain suggests that similar sites may be preserved in similar contexts such as the Dougherty Plain.
PALEOINDIAN PERIOD (11,50010,000 B.P.)
In spite of increasing research on the Paleoindian period, there are few systematically excavated sites in the Southeast that have produced diagnostic Paleoindian artifacts (particularly Clovis types) and even fewer such sites that contain more than surface materials. Therefore, interpretation of the early Georgia inhabitants has been highly debated over the decades. There is consensus that the Paleoindian period is a time of great environmental and cultural change in the Southeast as climate shifts were reflected by cultural change. Anderson (2005) suggested that it now appears likely that at least some people were in the region before the widespread occurrence of Clovis technology. Therefore, what may be represented by Paleoindian tool assemblages is the radiation of a preexisting reproductively viable culture.
Increasing knowledge of climate change during the Late Pleistocene/Early Holocene transition has provided greater comprehension of the related sub-regional cultural developments in the Southeast. During this cultural period, the drier, colder conditions of the Late Pleistocene gave way to the warmer, wetter conditions of the Early Holocene. These climate changes shaped the biotic resource structure and influenced prehistoric group size, technological organization, and mobility patterns (Anderson et al. 1990:5, Anderson and Hanson 1988). Within the Coastal Plain province, a homogeneous forest cover of oak, hickory, and southern pines became dominant during the Paleoindian period and spread northward with time.
The Paleoindian period is characterized by occurrences of fluted and unfluted lanceolate points. The Clovis type, many of which are fashioned from Coastal Plain chert (Ledbetter et al. 1996), represented the Early Paleoindian. The Folsom, Cumberland, Suwannee, Beaver Lake, Simpson, and Quad types mark the Middle Paleoindian sub-period and are often manufactured from Coastal Plain chert. During the Middle Paleoindian sub-period, an increased concentration on specific environmental zones and resources accounted for a greater variety of lithic point types. Dalton bifaces characterize the end of this period from secure contexts in Alabama (Soday 1954). During

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 19
the Late Paleoindian, the extensive re-sharpening of lithic tools such as Dalton bifaces and the use of more localized lithic resources suggest a cultural shift. Researchers have suggested that this shift reflects highly mobile groups favoring a foraging strategy (Ledbetter et al. 1996:284, Anderson 2005). This trend could have been a precursor of a more regional lithic procurement focus as evidenced during subsequent Early Archaic occupation.
A number of fluted bifaces have been found in the Ridge and Valley province of northwestern Georgia (Williams and Stoltman 1965) and along the Oconee River in the central Piedmont of Georgia (O'Steen et al. 1983). Within the Coastal Plain, Ledbetter et al. (1996:281) stated, "...concentration of Early and Middle Paleoindian sites in southwest Georgia, in an area of extensive chert deposits, suggests that the area was more intensively utilized." This is in agreement with the numerous Coastal Plain chert artifacts throughout the state, which are diagnostic of these earlier timeframes.
The Muckafoonee site (9DU37) and the Lee County chert outcrop, a large quarry site located near Albany consisted of Paleoindian and later artifacts indicative of lithic procurement and tool manufacture (Anderson et al. 1990:27-28, Ledbetter et al. 1996). This evidence supports that Paleoindian groups occupied the region despite the paucity of widespread subsurface findings.
Conventional interpretations of the Paleoindian period portrayed the people exclusively as hunters of Pleistocene mega-fauna. Researchers in the Southeast have suggested that high mobility, low population density, and hunting characterized Paleoindian occupations in the region (Anderson and Joseph 1988). Yet, research beginning in the mid to late 1980s indicates that while reliance on mega-fauna may have been common place in the western part of North America, southeastern Indians appear to have relied on a more varied diet including plants and small game (Sassaman et al. 1990; Walker 2000; Hollenbach 2005). Consequently, new interpretations have argued against the traditional view of settlement patterns caused by the nomadic searching and following of large game herds. Recent models suggest a less mobile population that selected choice areas to colonize and expand into sub-regional settlements and that may have been tied to lithic resources. In addition, the widespread occurrence and uniform nature of Paleoindian assemblages (unrelated to regional density), plus the reproductive viability of low-density populations during this time period, indicate that sophisticated information exchange networks must have been in place (Anderson et al. 1990).
According to Anderson et al. (1990), the first Georgia inhabitants of the Early and Middle Paleoindian period preferred the spruce/pine boreal forests found north of the Fall Line as this provided a known resource base utilized during the full-glacial Pleistocene as opposed to the oakhickory-pine forests to the south. The boreal forest environment was suited for a logistical strategy (after Binford 1980) using a highly developed toolkit. Evidence of this landscape utilization includes numerous Paleoindian sites in northern Georgia having similar assemblages (Anderson et al. 1990:11) with significantly less evidence for Paleoindian settlements below the Fall Line. The selection of good quality raw material, often from extra-local sources, for the production of Early Paleoindian tools is circumstantial evidence for a high degree of mobility during this sub-period.
Overall, it appears that Paleoindians within the northern boreal forests adopted a logistical strategy (after Binford 1980), using specialized toolkits. Probable aggregation sites have been identified even among the earliest Paleoindian groups in the southeastern United States (e.g., Anderson

20
1995). It is indeed plausible to assume that the large Paleoindian sites in the Southeast were permanent or semi-permanent base camps from which resources within specific territorial ranges were exploited (possibly 150+ km, Ledbetter et al. 1996). In addition to the few intensively or repeatedly occupied sites, small and low density camps and quarries seem to have been used during the Paleoindian period in the Georgia Piedmont (e.g. Ledbetter 1995), and have been found at most landscape types including levees, terraces, upland boundaries, and in the uplands primarily above the Fall Line (Anderson et al. 1990, Anderson 2005).
The oak-hickory-pine forest environment that was forming in the Coastal Plain region was more suited for a foraging strategy of highly mobile groups using expedient tools (Anderson et al. 1990:5). A foraging strategy may have been more productive given seasonal resources (fruits, masts, and grasses) and associated animal exploitation of the same harvests. Accordingly, the lesser number of Paleoindian sites discovered in the Coastal Plain may be the result of a lower population density using ephemeral camps to a greater extent than long-term base camps as seen north of the Fall Line. This evidence suggests that the region was "geographically peripheral" to major concentrations of Paleoindian populations (Stoltman 1983).
It remains to be determined whether this apparent peripheral occupation is factual, or whether it is an illusion based on the lack of diagnostic Paleoindian artifacts present at sites recorded as "nondiagnostic lithic scatters" or as possible "base camps" that produced no diagnostic artifacts. Further, the lack of discovered sites could be due to the dramatic drop in sea level between 18,000 and 10,000 B.P., after which Paleoindians very likely occupied sites along what was then the shoreline but is now submerged due to the rise in sea level during the Holocene (Smith 1986). Elliott (1989) supported this assertion, as little evidence for intensive Paleoindian occupation has been documented in the Flint River watershed (Anderson et al. 1990). The region of Albany, Georgia, where high-grade chert outcrops occur, showed, "somewhat greater use, although there is little evidence... for intensive occupation during the period" (Anderson et al. 1990:23). Only smaller camps and quarries might have occurred in the interior Coastal Plain before sea level rise. This preference may reflect migratory routes from the Fall Line and northern regions to the coast or potentially between major river drainages such as the Chattahoochee and Flint.
In contrast, more recent research has shown a high Paleoindian frequency in southwest Georgia and could illustrate settlement strategies highly associated with chert resources (see Anderson and Sassaman 1996, Ledbetter et al. 1996). In addition, Elliott (2004) redefined this geographical evidence when he recorded several Paleoindian contexts in southwest Georgia. Communication with local artifact collectors led Elliott to several locations where lanceolate chipped stone tools and fossilized elements of extinct Pleistocene mega-fauna have been found. Findings during Elliott's (2004:17) investigations showed that "Paleoindian hunters may have preferred to make their settlements near non-linear water sources, such as limestone sinks, Carolina bays, and springs." These findings suggest that the lack of Paleoindian sites in the Coastal Plain of Georgia may be due to the lack of intensive investigations, deeply buried deposits, and/or underwater deposits versus a realistic geographical gap. Additionally, Anderson (2005) suggested that Clovis people preferred high quality chert and other knappable raw materials for their toolkits, which typically contained a wide range of well made, highly specialized forms, such as scrapers, gravers, and perforators. This in combination with the plethora of Coastal Plain chert Early and Middle Paleoindian bifaces in the state suggests that further evidence for Paleoindian occupations may be within the vicinity of the study area where high-grade chert, such as that specifically available from the Ocala Limestone and Flint River Formations is found.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 21
By the Early Holocene, climate change resulted in the expansion of the oak, hickory, and southern pine forests north into the Piedmont and Ridge and Valley provinces. This shift favored a foraging strategy in the upper latitudes, as Paleoindians found modern flora and fauna replacing larger extinct species. The Terminal Pleistocene and Early Holocene transition was marked by stabilization of generally warmer climatic conditions. Increased population densities in the Southeast parallel this climate shift. In addition, the growing population density embraced a more diversified subsistence strategy as the biotic community adapted to the warmer conditions and megafauna became extinct.
ARCHAIC PERIOD (10,0003,000 B.P.)
Compared to Paleoindian remains, material dating to the Archaic period is generally better represented within the Georgia Coastal Plain as it is across the Southeast. The Archaic period represents a timeframe of ongoing shifts and expansion from the economic and social patterns of the earlier Paleoindian period. Most researchers believe that the Archaic period marks a pronounced adaptation to climatic stabilization.
The early Holocene shift to a warmer and wetter climate resulted in a change from a sub-boreal vegetation to a more culturally productive deciduous one. Watts (1980), for example, has suggested that the Early Archaic period corresponds with the time that closed-canopy hardwood forests became established in the southeastern United States. These warm and wet weather patterns gave way to drier and warmer conditions during the Mid-Holocene/Hyposithermal Interval (Styles and Klippel 1996). North of the Fall Line, this climate change distinction is supported by the recovery of Early Holocene artifacts from "medium to coarse-grained sediments indicative of vigorous channel activity" (Elliott and Sassaman 1995:15), while later Mid-Holocene artifacts are recovered from finer grained sediments. Unfortunately, the fine distinctions in sediments seen in the Piedmont and Ridge and Valley provinces of the Southeast are not easily recognizable in the sands of the Coastal Plain. However, research indicates that Holocene conditions in the Coastal Plain may have fluctuated from wet to wetter with varying sedimentation rates and water table depth. The cause of these fluctuations is yet to be determined as numerous variables contribute to sedimentation rates, and these variables could be different for various sub-regions.
Jones (2006) has found that Georgia Piedmont sites having Early Archaic lithics show a bias towards biface production instead of an expedient toolkit as observed during the Late Paleoindian. The onset of the Archaic period is characterized by typical Early Archaic period (10,000-8,000 B.P.) notched bifaces such as Palmer, Big Sandy, and Kirk (Ledbetter et al. 1996). Later manifestations of the Archaic include distinctive bifurcate based bifaces of the MacCorkle-St. Albans-LeCroy-Kanawha series.
Although bifurcate based bifaces identified for the Early and early Middle Archaic period have a geographic spread over much of eastern North America, they are rare in Georgia and are limited to the hilly areas above the Fall Line (Chapman 1985). Some archaeologists, such as Fitting (1964), have suggested that the bifurcate "tradition" might provide a horizon marker between the Early and Middle Archaic, especially in areas thought to be associated with oak-hickory forests.

22
Extensive environmental changes and the extinction of the large herbivores caused greater emphasis to be placed on hunting smaller animals, particularly white-tailed deer (Anderson and Hanson 1988). Dietary patterns were expanded to include an even wider variety of mammals and reptiles. Birds, fish, white-tailed deer, and shellfish constituted the bulk of the population's dietary needs. In addition, evidence to the north indicated that nutmeat comprised at least a portion of the Early Archaic diet (Chapman 1985). Plant utilization during the earlier Paleoindian period has been documented (Hollenbach 2005) and undoubtedly was continued into the Archaic timeframe.
Archaeologists continue to argue over the extent and kind of mobility experienced by Early Archaic peoples. The scattered distribution of fairly small Early Archaic campsites suggests that the people were highly mobile, utilizing both uplands and lowlands for resources. Anderson (2005) has suggested that the Early Archaic peoples used most of the landscape, continuing the strategy of land use that began with Dalton during the Late Paleoindian period. This includes the Anderson and Hanson (1988) hypothesis that seasonal movements occurred up and down major river valleys, crossing the Fall Line at least twice a year adjusting the frequency and distance of their movements to seasonal changes in economic and social demands and opportunities (Elliott and Sassaman 1995:138). Also, based on the recovery of extralocal lithic raw materials, Daniel (1994) showed that movement also occurred between major drainages, across inter-riverine upland divides such as the current study area. This theory is supported by the appearance of a variety of notched bifaces across the Southeast at the beginning of this period, suggesting that not only were populations distributed throughout the region by 9,800 B.P., but that regional traditions had already developed (Sassaman et al. 1990).
O'Steen's (1983) work in the Georgia Piedmont suggested that productive shoal habitats could have supported Early Archaic bands for extended periods. Instead of implying seasonal rounds, her research indicated that the occurrence of extra-local raw material at these semi-permanent camps implies long-distance exchange. The predominance of locally available raw material in lithic assemblages from the Piedmont, together with signs of tool re-use and the small amount of non-local lithics, supports O'Steen's notion of local populations with limited territorial ranges occasionally interacting with people from distant regions (Pluckhahn 1993).
A few larger Early Archaic sites along the more prominent creeks could represent periodic aggregation camps, perhaps re-occupied on a seasonal basis. Numerous small sites, containing only a few artifacts, have been found near larger creeks (opposed to small streams) and in the uplands. Anderson and Hanson's (1988) model suggested that highly mobile groups that inhabited the Middle Coastal Plain region left little evidence of sustained occupation. The comparatively low density of sites and high proportions of formal tools of the Early Archaic period resemble a mixed forager and logistic strategy as observed in certain ethnographic instances (e.g., Binford 1980). Recent research (i.e., Elliott 2004, Waggoner 2003) and the recovery of a single Early Archaic diagnostic specimen during the PCWMS survey (Windham et al. 2007) support a scenario of high mobility.
Alternatively, people visiting the shoals from afar on rare occasions could have brought the extralocal materials with them for reasons not directly linked to subsistence strategies. Considering the relative abundance of plant and animal species within and around the rapids and still pools associated with shoals (Shapiro 1990), it is perhaps not surprising that such niche points in resistant bedrock acted as magnets for Archaic peoples. However, apart from the attraction that varied plant

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 23
and animal life around shoals provided to hunters and collectors, Indians across the Americas viewed such places as spiritually significant. North American groups as far apart as the Cherokee (e.g., Mooney 1900) and Nez Perce (e.g., Philip Cash-Cash, personal communication to J. H. N. Loubser 2006) viewed certain rapids as portals between the Upper and Lower worlds. Native Americans would often traveled great distances to obtain favors from the spirit world and to pay homage to particularly powerful spirit beings believed to reside at productive rapids. Artifacts made from extra-local materials left as reciprocal gifts to the spirits over a prolonged period of repeated visits can still be seen at various rapids in the American West (e.g., Loubser 2005). Considering this widespread, and probably ancient, practice, it is indeed possible that extra-local tools found at Early Archaic sites on productive shoals could be physical testimony of long-distance pilgrimages.
Archaeologists have generally accepted the possibility that warmer and drier mid-Holocene conditions, the Hypsithermal period, in part caused subsistence and settlement shifts during the Middle Archaic period (6,000-3,000 B.P.). According to Elliott and Sassaman (1995:15), "Middle Archaic assemblages were found at varying depths in progressively finer sediments indicative of gentler stream flow (and increasing stability)" from the early to Mid-Holocene. This supports the theory of a climatic shift. Research in South Carolina suggests that Carolina Bays in the southeastern United States, and by implication limestone sinks in southwestern Georgia, were some of the few locales that might have contained water throughout the drier Hypsithermal period (Brooks et al. n.d.). This is supported by evidence from the upland Dry Creek drainage within the study area where Fish and Fish (1977) found that Archaic sites (in general) concentrated on upland ponds. However, the average limestone sink may be more prone to dry up than a Carolina Bay due to porous bedrock and subsurface drainage. The micro-regional effects of the Hypsithermal in southwest Georgia are an area in need of further research to decipher smaller scaled differences. Recently, Waggoner (personal communication to R. J. Windham 2007) obtained core samples from the southwest Georgia in order to investigate botanical evidence for past environmental conditions within the study area. These samples did not prove helpful in this regard, as the organic preservation was low. The environmental implications of the Hypsithermal period on the Dougherty Plain are not well understood.
Middle Archaic people focused on locally available resources. People living in the Piedmont focused on locally available quartz, whereas those in the Coastal Plain relied on chert outcrops in the region. Notched, stemmed, and lanceolate bifaces seem to be associated with the upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina (Sassaman et al. 1990). Farther south in the Coastal Plain, Middle Archaic assemblages seem to include expedient flake tools and debitage, crude bifaces, bifacial cores, and relatively few curated tools. During the Middle Archaic, stemmed bifaces replaced earlier notched bifaces, with Morrow Mountain (5,500 - 4,000 B.P.) and Guilford (4,000 - 3,000 B.P.) being the most common in the eastern-lying Savannah River region (Sassaman et al. 1990). Other diagnostic Middle Archaic bifaces include Stanly, Halifax, and Benton.
Middle Archaic lithics from the southeastern Georgia Piedmont show a marked increase in nonbifacial reduction techniques (Jones 2006) suggesting adoption of new technologies. The Middle Archaic sub-period also has increased evidence of bone and ground stone tools, including atlatl weights, axes, and grinding implements (Coe 1964). Abundant Middle Archaic sites in the Georgia Piedmont include a broad range of quartz material types and numerous expedient tools. The substantial proportion of informal flake tools and almost exclusive reliance on local lithic

24
sources within Middle Archaic assemblages is reminiscent of a forager strategy as documented by Binford (1980). Echoing what has been found to be generally the case in the Coastal Plain, Elliott (2004:21) indicated that there is a paucity of known Middle Archaic diagnostic items in the study area, with only a few sites recorded. He suggested that this lack of evidence may be the result, at least in part, of limited knowledge of Middle Archaic hafted bifaces in the sub-region. This is potentially reflected by many broad-bladed stemmed bifaces collected by amateurs, which correspond to Bullen's (1975) Middle to Late Archaic period projectile point types for Florida.
The preference of Middle Archaic people living in the Georgia Piedmont to make their tools from quartz (Caldwell 1951) is lacking in the Coastal Plain with its paucity of naturally occurring quartz. Nonetheless, within the PCWMS (Windham et al. 2007) and surrounding area (Waggoner 2003) some bifaces have a translucent appearance resembling quartz. Quartz Morrow Mountain bifaces occurring in locales with abundant chert in the Piedmont suggests that this was a preferred material (e.g., Pluckhahn 1993). For this and other reasons in the Upper Savannah River valley, Anderson and Joseph (1988) suggested that the high incidence of quartz probably reflects a deliberate cultural choice; the durability and bright appearance of the material might have been appealing to people living during the Middle Archaic. The piezoelectrical property, the ability to emit an internal flash of light when flaked or submitted to any form of pressure or friction, of quartz (Wolfram Research 2004) has been found to be of particular importance in a variety of cultures around the world (e.g., Vitebsky 1995). This includes a number of historic period Southeastern Indian groups (e.g., Adair 1930, Mooney 1900, Swanton 2000). It is unknown if similar specimens within the Coastal Plain have this quality.
The onset of the Middle Archaic period appears to mark a constriction of group mobility range and cultural divergence between the Piedmont and the Coastal Plain. Smaller mobility range is inferred from the occurrence of clusters of sites in a particular region/waterway, as well as cultural barrens between clusters where Middle Archaic sites are uncommon or unknown. Sassaman (1994) ascribes the limited number of Middle Archaic sites in the Coastal Plain to groups that choose to avoid the restricted mobility imposed by limited surface water. Indeed, Braley and Price (1991) suggest that increased aridity in the Coastal Plain may have made the then almost uniformly pinecovered area (Delcourt and Delcourt 1985) less attractive for human habitation. This is supported by large-scale tool production, intensive occupation, and the manufacture of certain tool types not found in the Piedmont. Sassaman et al. (1990) suggested these changes result from decreasing mobility and a less homogeneous resource environment in the Coastal Plain.
There are several models of Middle Archaic Coastal Plain occupation (see Elliott and Sassaman 1995). However, due to the paucity of Middle Archaic sites in the Coastal Plain, no apparent settlement pattern can be discerned in southwestern Georgia to date. Nonetheless, Waggoner (2003) suggested that the few Middle Archaic bands that might have occupied the area probably continued the strategy of high mobility seen in the previous Early Archaic sub-period, as evidenced by dispersed ephemeral sites occurring in varied topographic settings. Basically, Early and Middle Archaic sites probably reflect residential mobility, even if restricted to certain territorial ranges. The expedient lithic technology and lack of formalized tools during the early Middle Archaic period are suggestive of a foraging strategy.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 25
Within certain areas of the Piedmont, Middle Archaic components outnumber those of any other period (Pluckhahn 1993); the reverse is true for the Coastal Plain. For example, Elliott and Sassaman (1995:3) cited Georgia site file information that sites with diagnostic Early Archaic material (n=243) outnumber those with diagnostic Middle Archaic artifacts (n=206). Sassaman (1995) ascribed the limited number of Middle Archaic sites in the Coastal Plain to groups choosing to avoid the restricted mobility that was imposed by limited water points on the landscape. Research in South Carolina suggests that Carolina Bays in the southeastern United States, and by implication limestone sinks in southwestern Georgia, were some of the few points that contained water throughout the drier Hypsithermal period (Brooks et al. n.d.). However, these site file results could reflect other unknown variables or archaeological survey bias.
Scattered across much of the Georgia Piedmont are generally small Middle Archaic sites with fairly homogenous assemblages (Ledbetter 1995) with few examples in southwest Georgia. There are, as yet, hardly any examples of base camps, or aggregation sites in Georgia, with the possible exception of a few sites with abundant lithics (e.g., O'Steen 1983), at places such as Pen Point in the Savannah River valley. In stark contrast to the small-scale and fairly uniform sites in the southeastern United States are the Middle Archaic mound sites west and north of the Appalachian Mountains. These mound complexes are most likely remnants of aggregation sites with suggestive traces of feasting and ritual (Anderson 2004). This difference could be related, at least in part, to the generalized foraging strategy in Georgia (Blanton and Sassaman 1989) which contrasts with the specialized focus on riparian resources in Tennessee (Conaty and Leach 1987).
By roughly 6,000 years B.P., exotic items and mounds start to appear at several Middle Archaic sites in the central Tennessee-upper Tombigbee River valleys (Bense 1987) and the central Mississippi-lower Ohio River valleys (Jefferies 1997). It was roughly during this time that groups abandoned their predominantly residential-mobility strategy in favor of a logistically organized one (Binford 1980). This shift included the appearance of ostensibly smaller home ranges and multiseasonal occupation base camps. The latter part of the Middle Archaic period is marked by settlements close to water sources north and west of the Appalachian Mountains. This pattern was established to procure shellfish and a variety of large game and plant foods (e.g., Brookes 2004). The shallow-water pond burials in Florida that characterized the Early and Middle Archaic subperiods were replaced with burials on dry ground by terminal Middle Archaic and Late Archaic times (e.g., Doran and Dickel 1988). Burials in mounds ranging from Tennessee to Louisiana as well as widespread similarities in certain stone tool types and even mound complex layouts during the terminal Middle Archaic, suggest a certain amount of contact between distant peoples within certain regions, particularly those who lived north and west of the Appalachians (e.g., Clark 2004). The lack of Middle Archaic sites in the interior Coastal Plain of Georgia creates a void in the timeline of the region that cannot be reconciled at present.
Smith (1994) argued that increased sedentism in prime riverine habitats would have resulted in clearing the woods and disturbing the ground in and around settlements thereby causing an increase in the habitats suitable for sun-loving weeds. Some of the seed-carrying weeds, such as the starchy-seeded chenopod and the oily-seeded sumpweed, later became domesticated. Gardner (1997) proposed that although prime riverine habitats supported the largest populations and so received the most anthropogenic disturbance, weedy habitats were very likely also created around smaller sites dispersed throughout the uplands. This may help explain why small upland rockshelters, such as in Arkansas (Fritz 1997), have yielded some of the earliest known cultigens that could date

26
back to terminal Middle Archaic/initial Late Archaic times. Excavated evidence also suggests that people living around 7,000 years ago harvested wild forms of these plants in small quantities. Fragments of domesticated squash gourds have been found from archaeological contexts that date to 7,000 years B.P. though not within the current study area (Smith 1994).
During the terminal Middle Archaic and initial Late Archaic, from approximately 5,400 to 4,600 years ago, there was a general amelioration of global climate, which marked the end of the Hypsithermal. Precipitation and water levels rose over the preceding period (Webb et al. 1993), and flooding increased, as did shifting drainage channels. Compared to the generally drier Hypsithermal, these wetter conditions probably meant that the ponds and creeks within the study area could support increasing numbers of plants and animals. Nonetheless, droughts probably punctuated the generally wetter period; substantial inland dunes in the Georgia Coastal Plain mark intermittent periods of severe drought, occurring every 200 years or so up until 3,000 years ago (Markewich and Markewich 1994).
Climatic conditions of the Late Archaic were probably slightly wetter than those associated with the Middle Archaic; it is during this sub-period that a modern vegetation matrix emerged (Delcourt and Delcourt 1987). For example, "Cambic paleosols correlated with Late Archaic occupation... signifies the onset of uniformly moister conditions conducive to advanced soil development" (Elliott and Sassaman 1995:15) such that the B horizon is of finer sediments having a redder hue (from iron liberation). The onset of the Late Archaic period is also marked by a general increase of site density in the southeastern United States including southwest Georgia. According to Georgia site file information collected by Elliott and Sassaman (1995:3), diagnostic site frequency more than doubled from the Middle Archaic (n=21) to the Late Archaic period (n=53). Therefore, the wetter conditions and emergence of modern vegetation encouraged greater occupation density and/or mobility during the Late Archaic.
Diagnostic lithic bifaces include an assortment of large bifaces with straight, contracting, or expanding stems, as well as smaller stemmed and side-notched types, including characteristic Savannah River Stemmed, Flint Creek, and Wade bifaces (Cambron and Hulse 1975). Smaller bifaces, notably Gypsy and Swannanoa, appear to become more prevalent in the Late and terminal Late Archaic. It also is roughly at this time that grinding tools become more ubiquitous, suggesting increased processing of plants. In southwest Georgia, Elliott (2004) and Waggoner (2003) discovered that the Late Archaic was heavily represented by diagnostic hafted bifaces.
Soapstone vessels (ca. 3600 B.P.) make their initial appearance in the Piedmont towards the latter half of the Late Archaic, while coastal areas did not adopt this technology until some 500 years later (ca. 3100 B.P.) (Sassaman 1997). The appearance of non-local raw materials, such as soapstone, indicates the development of long-distance trade during this sub-period. Elliott (2004:22) states that in regards to soapstone, "Georgian societies were participants in a large trading network whose center of influence was in Mississippi and Louisiana." The terminal Late Archaic sub-period is marked by the appearance of fiber tempered ceramics. The very earliest ceramics in the Southeast are fiber tempered Stallings Island pots on the Georgia and South Carolina border. Slightly later fiber tempered wares include Orange and St. Johns from the Gulf Coast and Wheeler from the Tennessee River valley. Roughly contemporary fiber and sand tempered types include Norwood from the Gulf Coast, while sand tempered Thoms Creek wares come from the South Carolina coast (Sassaman 1993).

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 27
Diagnostic fiber tempered pottery in the eastern Georgia Coastal Plain includes St. Simons wares from Late Archaic sites along the Atlantic coast of Georgia (Milanich 1971). The difference in technology between populations in the Coastal Plain, as contrasted with the Fall Line zone and Piedmont, could be the result of numerous variables such as sociopolitical factors. A differentiation in point types between the two physiographic regions supports this suggestion, as does the development and use of fiber tempered pottery on the Coastal Plain and its delayed introduction in the Piedmont. The widespread use of soapstone in cooking on sites in the Piedmont contrasts sharply with the limited soapstone cooking artifacts recovered from Coastal Plain sites (Sassaman et al. 1990).
However, the appearance of soapstone from quarries in Georgia and Alabama on distant sites in south Florida and Louisiana does indicate long-distance trade and communication. It is conceivable that the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers were convenient arteries through the Coastal Plain for the transport of goods, such as soapstone. Elliott (2004:22) agreed with this scenario adding that, "the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers probably served as a significant transportation artery" during the terminal Late Archaic with little evidence of long-term occupation found, except Piedmont soapstone recovered from some contexts.
Overland routes would also have been followed, most likely trails along upland ridges, similar to those that have been documented in early historic times (e.g., Myer 1928). Collectors in southwest Georgia, in the vicinity of the PCWMS, have found a few soapstone as well as fiber tempered sherds (Waggoner 2003), suggesting that the region occurred on or near a terminal Late Archaic trade route (Elliott 2004). However, no soapstone or fiber tempered artifacts were recovered during the PCWMS survey.
Compared to the Middle Archaic, the Late Archaic period marks a shift to aquatic resources and a more entrenched logistical mobility strategy, at least above the Fall Line. Previously underutilized areas, such as upland rock shelters and ponds, also seem to be used more intensively during the Late Archaic (Sassaman et al. 1990). Overall, archaeologists agree that during the Late Archaic seasonal dispersion into inter-riverine upland areas augmented band aggregation in base camps next-to higher order streams in the bottomlands.
In regards to landscape utilization, Waggoner (2006) proposed that prehistoric peoples of at least the Late Archaic sub-period practiced a form of land-management that exploited biodiversity through burning within the upland pine forests. A higher density of Late Archaic sites in southwest Georgia supports this reconstruction. Late Archaic sites studied by Waggoner (2006) have not been tested through subsurface excavation but collections of a local landowner and surface inspection indicated that these, "upland and interriverine sites [were] located adjacent to Gum Ponds and Cypress Creeks" (Waggoner 2003:2). Waggoner (2003) related this pattern to the welldocumented occupations of Carolina Bays and suggested that Late Archaic peoples of the Interior Coastal Plain Swamps of southwest Georgia diversified their resource base and exploited previously underutilized areas due to territorial restrictions of the Middle Archaic. Further, Waggoner (2003:7) suggested that the dispersed nature of Late Archaic sites does not indicate a lack of occupation, but reflects an "abundance of resources allowing for decreased social dependence and increased mobility [within the region]."

28
The terminal Late Archaic represents a period of cultural innovation and diffusion in the Southeast. The intensive use of resources along major rivers might have eventually resulted in depletion and a shift in settlement locations to smaller, upland streams during the terminal Late Archaic and Early Woodland at least in the Savannah River Valley (Sassaman et al. 1990). This settlement shift and/or diffusion of cultural traits stopped in the vicinity of the Piedmont and the Coastal Plain of southwestern Georgia. This is supported by the lack of fiber-tempered Late Archaic ceramics found in these areas before 3,500 years B.P.
Waggoner (2003) found a similar settlement pattern in Early County near the current project area. The Late Archaic sub-period was heavily represented through formalized stone tools, but the terminal Late Archaic soapstone vessels and fiber-tempered pottery were not well represented. Waggoner (2003) stated that this is indicative of a terminal Late Archaic logistical strategy that was relatively less mobile than the foraging strategies of prior Archaic sub-periods and resulted from a constriction of territorial ranges as evidenced in other parts of the Southeast. Sassaman and Brooks (1988) asserted that Late Archaic populations were concentrated along the Fall Line and in the Central Piedmont, which may have represented discrete cultures or seasonal activities. Further, data along the upper Savannah River indicates greater reliance on a logistical strategy based on riverine settlements. These riverine settings are located along the east and west boundaries of the current study area. The inter-riverine zone may have become decreasingly utilized during the terminal Late Archaic given the cultural trends outlined above. It is feasible that this area of the Georgia Coastal Plain, including the Dougherty Plain, reflects an outback hunting territory between more densely occupied riverine settings.
Also during this period, prominent shell ring sites appeared along the Atlantic Coast of South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida (Russo 1994). It could be that the earlier inland tradition of terminal Middle Archaic mounds finally manifested itself on the Georgia coast during the terminal Late Archaic as a significant cultural shift is seen to the north and south of the study area.
The Late Archaic/Early Woodland transition is marked by increased reliance on a logistical strategy that allowed for more sedentary occupations. This pattern was either prompted and/or promoted by development of horticulture and agriculture of an increasing number of species in many areas of the Southeast. These developments in settlement strategy resulted in the subsequent Woodland period and are characterized by increased cultural complexity at larger more sedentary sites.
WOODLAND PERIOD (3,0001,000 B.P.)
By the Woodland period, the climatic fluctuations evidenced in the earlier cultural periods had stabilized to modern conditions, eventually allowing for greater sedentism. However, a continued reliance on a logistical strategy consisting of aggregation and dispersal camps, coupled with hunting and intensive gathering strategies, characterizes much of the Woodland period. The Late Woodland cultural manifestations best summarized this cultural shift. Steinen (1995:1) summarizes these manifestations as an, "an uneven growth toward complex societies that were encountered by de Soto in 1540."
One feature of the Woodland period is the regionalization of cultures, particularly as expressed by the appearance of multiple ceramic styles. In southwest Georgia, ceramic styles show interaction between multiple geographic regions (Florida Gulf Coast, Georgia Coast, and Georgia Piedmont).

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 29
Evidence of this cultural interaction is seen through a minority of these types and a majority of the local cord marked variety. The cord marked variety is found in assemblages around the Middle Flint River and eastward, indicating that the Chattahoochee and Lower Flint River were closely tied to the Gulf Coast (Steinen 1995). This evidence suggests that the region continued to be an artery of transport and diffusion from the Archaic period.
Terminal Late Archaic/Early Woodland ceramics in southwest Georgia are fiber-tempered and give way to Deptford types early in the Early Woodland with a minority of Cartersville Check Stamped (Steinen 1995) and Dunlap Fabric Impressed found in the Chattahoochee Valley. The sand/grit tempered Deptford specimens show evidence of the following: coiling versus molding of fiber tempered types; simple and check stamped surfaces; conoidal jar shape; tetrapodal supports; and straight or slightly flaring rims (Griffin and Sears 1950). In contrast to the Chattahoochee River, cord marked varieties are more common in the Middle Flint River and Ocmulgee Rivers versus further south and west where the current project area lies.
The stylistic continuity between terminal Late Archaic/Early Woodland fiber-tempered ceramics and initial Early Woodland sand-tempered wares suggests some form of cultural continuity. Moreover, the distinction between Coastal Plain Deptford Check Stamped and Piedmont Cartersville Check Stamped, albeit minor, could designate a continuation of cultural differences between these two physiographic regions, apparent at least since the Middle Archaic. Some earlier Dunlap Fabric Impressed ceramics occur in the Chattahoochee Valley (Steinen 1995), while cord marked vessels are more common along the Middle Flint and Ocmulgee rivers to the northeast of the project area.
A secure lithic tool typology has not been established for the terminal Late Archaic/Early Woodland period in this region; therefore, most temporal associations are based on ceramic evidence. Lithic artifacts representative of the Early Woodland period in the Coastal Plain, such as the Woodland Spike and Swan Lake hafted bifaces, are manufactured from locally variable raw materials, with hafted bifaces being generally small and stemmed. In addition, Coastal Plain sites of this period often contain shell and remnants of bone and antler tools.
Increasing reliance on horticulture, particularly starchy and oily seeded domesticates, appeared as a key parameter for the Woodland period (Fritz 1993). During the Early Woodland, a shift from the coastal shoreline areas to upland riverine settings continued. This shift allowed for a larger and more diversified plant subsistence base than what was available near the coast. Less dependence was placed on shellfish resources, probably reflecting decreasing availability. The diversified subsistence provided through horticulture and upland hunting and gathering encouraged more sedentary base camps in the floodplains for large parts of the year.
Evidence of Middle Woodland occupation in the vicinity of the study area is scant (Pluckhahn 2003, Steinen 1998). The Middle Woodland in the Southeast is characterized by the distinctive Swift Creek culture. The earliest Swift Creek-like Complicated Stamped sherds in the Southeastern United States date to approximately 2,000 years ago, at the Pirate's Bay site in the Florida Panhandle (Thomas and Campbell 1993). In Florida, as well as southwest Georgia, the fairly crude Swift Creek-like sherds co-occur with Deptford and Santa Rosa pottery as they do in southwest Georgia. Fully-fledged Swift Creek ceramics first appeared in southwestern Georgia by 1,850 B.P. (Snow 1998) and are used to define the Middle Woodland in the Chattahoochee and Lower Flint drainages. This ceramic type occurs progressively later in central and northern Georgia (Cantley et al. 1996).

30
Lithic artifact types and much of the fine-tuned serration of ceramic types for the Middle Woodland are derived from excavations conducted at Kolomoki (Pluckhahn 2003) as few other Middle Woodland occupations have been found in the study area. According to Pluckhahn (2003:23), the Bakers Creek, Swan Lake, and Bradford hafted biface types represented the Middle Woodland contexts but showed temporal spans extending into the Early and Late Woodland timeframes.
Intensive plant gathering and hunting dependence, from seasonal and permanent base camps, was common during the middle part of the Woodland period. However, botanical evidence of domesticates and cultigens, suggests an increase in horticultural activities during Middle Woodland times in the greater Southeast. For instance, a large pit feature from 9TP62 on the Middle Chattahoochee River yielded a cucurbit seed and 96 seeds from three starchy-seeded annuals, including goosefoot, knotweed, and maygrass (Cantley and Joseph 1991). Such sites contained large populations, supported in part by food cultivation, preservation, and storage on a grand scale (Sassaman et al. 1990). Indeed, the intensification of cultivation, which later included squash and gourds, is one of the prime characteristics of the Middle Woodland period. This is a reasonable interpretation considering that starchy and oily seeded domesticates that make up the so-called Southeastern Agricultural Complex continued to be grown and consumed throughout much of the region (Johannessen 1993).
However, ubiquitous cultivation may not have been viable within the patchy and resilient environmental setting of the Coastal Plain uplands where anthropogenic disturbance could not be maintained (John Chamblee, personal communication to Jeannine Windham 2006). Sites in the Coastal Plain have yet to present evidence of such cultivation. Nonetheless, Steinen (1998) proposed that at least some of the scattered Woodland sites in the area surrounding the Kolomoki Mounds represent long-term but low-intensity agricultural plots on pockets of fertile soil. This is supported by evidence from Alabama and Georgia. The seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Creeks and Cherokees continued the agricultural practices of their Mississippian predecessors, practicing a labor-intensive, mixed-habitat strategy that combined communal field cultivation in floodplain bottomlands with smaller household gardening on terrace soils, occasionally some distance from their floodplain villages (Waselkov 1997). This is evidenced at the Red Bluff site within the study area (John Chamblee, personal communication to Jeannine Windham 2006).
Kolomoki is a prominent mound site located within an otherwise sparsely populated region of southwest Georgia, halfway between distant concentrations of contemporary Swift Creek sites in Alabama and Georgia (Pluckhahn 2003). It is conceivable that Kolomoki could have been a more permanently occupied version of a so-called "vacant center". Numerous people from distant areas typically occupy vacant centers only during certain times of the year. Some mound sites occupied by early Historic Indians (Swanton 1911) were not primarily residential units, even though a small group of high status religious caretakers and their extended families permanently resided on or close to the mounds. At least once a year, people from outlying settlements would aggregate at the principal town for renewal ceremonies and cleansings in the nearby river (e.g., Adair 1930). This occupational pattern is supported by many principal towns during the Mississippian period, such as Ocmulgee (meaning, "where the water boils up" (Swanton 1946)), Etowah, and Little Egypt. All of these towns occurred near shoals at the transition between geological zones. These were naturally productive locales that could support many people since they occurred on floodplains with nutrient rich alluvial soils immediately below upland settings (e.g ., Hally and Williams 1994).

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 31
Considering the high carrying capacity of such floodplain settings, it is conceivable that vacant centers grew in size and became more permanent depending on the success of religious functionaries to attracted people from surrounding areas. Williams and Brain (1983) identified possible vacant centers that date to the Woodland and Mississippian periods. Almost all of these sites contain mounds, many with burials. The arrangement of mounds around a central plaza is a pattern that can be traced back to the late Middle Archaic mound complexes of the lower Mississippi River valley (e.g., Gibson and Carr 2004). The selection of shoals for aggregation sites is a practice that can be traced back at least to the Early Archaic along the Georgia Fall Line.
The transition between the Middle and Late Woodland periods in Georgia is not very noticeable. During the early Late Woodland, Weeden Island ceramics (plain and zone punctated ware with red surface finish) were present in the Florida Panhandle and southwestern Georgia and were then replaced by Wakulla types during the course of the Late Woodland period (Steinen 1995).
In other regions, Late Woodland hafted bifaces are small and triangular representing the adoption of the bow and arrow. However, this is not the case in southwestern Georgia where the large triangular forms of the Middle Woodland persist into this later timeframe and are found with Late Woodland ceramic types. This evidence tentatively suggests that bow and arrow technology did not diffuse to this area until later (Pluckhahn 2003:27-29).
People continued to rely heavily on hunting, gathering, fishing, and gardening in most regions (e.g., Steinen 1998). The starchy and oily seeded domesticates that encompassed the so-called Southeastern Agricultural Complex continued to be grown and consumed throughout much of the Southeast during the Late Woodland (Johannessen 1993). While the beginnings of slash-and-burn agriculture is evident at this time in dispersed upland settlements, there may not have been a viable strategy in the wetlands of southwest Georgia (John Chamblee, personal communication to Jeannine Windham 2006). However, these developments eventually gave way to corn agriculture, larger villages in floodplains, and a broader sociopolitical hierarchy observed along large drainages (Sassaman et al. 1990).
As during the Late Archaic, small settlements appeared along creeks in the upper reaches of river catchments during the Late Woodland. These settlements contain only a few structures or none at all, and probably represent population expansion or the "filling up" of much of the Southeastern landscape (Smith 1986). This is supported by later evidence for many small, ephemeral Mississippian period sites in Tennessee occurring on soils with marginal agricultural potential (Schroedl 1998). The ethnographic record also has some insightful information concerning small sites in the inter-riverine areas. Pertaining to such sites among the Chickasaw Indians, Beverley (1968:156) reported in 1705 that:
"...when they go a Hunting into the Out-lands, they commonly go out for the whole Season with their Wives and Family: At the Place where they find the most Game they build up a convenient Number of small Cabins, wherein they live during that Season. These Cabins are both begun, and finished in Two or Three Days, and after the Season is over they make no further Account of them."

32
These small camps may have been a part of a Coastal Plain residential mobility pattern documented historically by Bartram. Traveling through Alachua Creek land of northern Florida in the mid-1770s, Bartram witnessed a similar summer-time camp with Indian women and children living in temporary tents while the men were out hunting (extract from Bartram 1791:209 in Waselkov and Braund 1995:56). Meanwhile the main village with more substantial houses was left abandoned near a major wetland, complete with corn-filled cribs. According to Bartram (extract from Bartram 1791:1932 in Waselkov and Braund 1995:54), these Native Americans temporarily abandoned their low-lying main village to avoid mosquitoes and putrid fish in the late summer and fall. Bartram estimated that the dispersed temporary camps were some nine miles away from the abandoned main village; the Indians had to pass through grassy savannah and pine uplands to reach the temporary sites. Considering that such seasonally occupied sites only had temporary tent-like abodes with no significant post-holes, the structures would most likely leave few archaeological traces.
To date, Late Woodland and Mississippian aggregation sites near the PCWMS, such as 9Mi91, 9Mi99, and those documented by Chamblee (2006) and Fish and Fish (1977), all occurred along the bottomlands, and show a growing material expression of ceremonies, as reflected in burial practices. During the Middle and Late Woodland periods, prominent mound sites in the lower Chattahoochee River Valley were indicative of increasing public ceremonialism. Mound sites, such as Mandeville and Kolomoki, typically contained long-distance trade items. The monumental mounds and the associated scarce prestige items are strongly suggestive of the accumulation of prestige by certain sections within Middle and Late Woodland communities (Steinen 1998).
Within the Dougherty Plain of southwest Georgia, Chamblee (2005) and Elliott (2004) found evidence of mound sites. Elliott's findings are based largely on interviews with local artifact collectors and require further field investigations to identify their validity. Chamblee (2004, 2005) conducted research that indicated that Woodland period peoples chose settlement locations in the area that are not within the normally accepted "floodplain" pattern. Overall evidence from Chamblee's (2004:4) survey showed many plain ceramic scatters that were generally small-sized and dispersed, with ceramic evidence accounting for less than two percent of a given site assemblage (including excavated assemblages). Ceramics that could be classified were typically Late Woodland including Wakulla Check Stamped and Weeden Island varieties.
John Chamblee (personal communication to Jeannine Windham 2006) observed numerous Late Woodland Weeden Island ceramics in personal collections from Miller County residents. Most sites that could be attributed to the Woodland period were found concentrated at creek confluences and along small floodplains within the study area (Chamblee 2004:5). On the other hand, a single mound Woodland site, Windmill Plantation previously recorded by Don Smith in 1962, "is located in the exact center of a large concentration of ground-water fed ponds" (Chamblee 2004:6). This site is unusual as it is not surrounded by smaller sites nor is a large site near by. Chamblee (2004:6) stated that, "it is likely that the site was often inaccessible, except by boat." Artifacts from Chamblee's (2004) excavations indicated Early and Middle Woodland occupations at the Windmill Plantation. Evidence included, "check stamped pottery, Deptford Linear Check Stamped, tetrapods, Alligator Bayou Rocker Stamped, Swift Creek Complicated Stamped, Woodland Spikes, triangular bifaces, and Tallahassee points" (Chamblee 2004:7). Late Woodland occupants were reported for Tallassee Plantation, which had Weeden Island ceramics and a small platform mound (John Chamblee, personal communication to Jeannine Windham 2006). In addition, the

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 33
Hayfever, Red Bluff, and Chickasawhatchee Knoll sites have Late Woodland components. These sites are located along the floodplains of the Chickasawhatchee Creek a low and generally wetland area.
Even though the mound center populations in the lower Chattahoochee River valley show signs of decline during the Weeden Island period after A.D. 800, it is conceivable that the stratified Late Woodland societies in the Southeast set the stage for the establishment of more fully fledged Mississippian period chiefdoms. Further advances in agricultural subsistence throughout the Woodland period fed, in many areas of the Southeast, an increasingly hierarchical social system. Increased population density placed greater stress on the natural resources available, and furthered the development of territorial ranges and distinct cultures of greater complexity within a political network.
MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD (1,000400 B.P. (1540 A.D.))
Continued stability of climatic conditions allowed for the development of greater cultural complexity during the Mississippian period across much of the Southeast. Conventionally, this period of significant population growth was defined by the presence of flat-topped mounds, open plazas, permanent occupation, agriculture based subsistence, and new ceramic types. These characteristics marked the expansion of chiefdoms and the broad reach of social, political, and religious cultural manifestations across the Southeast. The extension and enforcement of these cultural norms occurred through a complicated network of villages and mound centers. Mississippian period mound centers are particularly noticeable north of the Fall Line, such as at Etowah in northwestern Georgia and at Tugaloo in northeast Georgia. Accordingly, evidence concerning Mississippian period occupation appeared more fine-tuned for the Piedmont than for the Fall Line or Coastal Plain. However, as discussion of Woodland occupations illustrated, greater diversity in settlement pattern is increasingly evident with greater archaeological coverage. Therefore, the current school of Mississippian thought has archaeologists leaning away from defining the period with mandatory architectural and cultural categories, and toward new levels of cultural development in the "pansoutheastern interaction sphere" (Schnell and Wright 1993).
Previous research shows a lack of defined ceramic typologies in southwest Georgia. This present study utilizes the accepted serration of Coastal Plain ceramics to generalize the area, but acknowledges that this does not adequately reflect sub-regional differences. However, specific knowledge of the ceramic types in the project area is lacking and supports Elliott's (2004:24) assertion that this area was not significantly occupied.
The Wakulla series ceramics represent the Late Woodland and Early Mississippian periods (800900 A.D.). Evidence of shell-tempered specimens, traditional of Mississippian wares in other regions, is seemingly sparse in the early sub-period of southwest Georgia. Rood/Bristol phase ceramics are indicative of the Middle (or Mature) Mississippian Phase in the Middle Lower Chattahoochee valley and south to the Florida Panhandle (Schnell and Wright 1993). Specific to the Lower Chattahoochee/Upper Apalachicola, located to the south of the current project area, the Clayson, Sneads, and Yon phases are characterized by a greater percentage of grit than sand temper pottery. The earlier series predominately have plain and incised surface decorations, while the Yon phase ceramics are complicated stamped and incised/punctuated decorated (Schnell and Wright 1993, Scarry 1980).

34
Except for the middle Flint River valley, available evidence suggests that the Middle Mississippian marked the height of economic centralization, political control, and public ceremonies in the study area. Ledbetter et al. (1996) supported this centralization stating that toward the end of the Middle Mississippian period, a general decline in mound building and elaborate public ceremonies occurred. Conversely, the Late Mississippian period of the region is defined by the Lamar culture that spanned much of the Southeast from 950-1800 A.D., though evidence of these manifestations in the current research area is vague.
Subsistence in Mississippian sites throughout most of Georgia was based on cultivated maize and starchy-seeded cultigens, hunted deer, raccoon, turkey, waterfowl, and harvested fish (e.g., Bense 1994). Research of resource procurement and exploitation has recently been conducted in the study area. In an assessment of the relationship between soils, vegetation, and settlement in the vicinity of the Chickasawatchee Swamp, Chamblee (2005) found that hardwoods correlate with red clays and longleaf pines tend to occur on red sandy clayey loams. Given the close relationship between soil, tree cover, and site location, Chamblee proposed that landscape patches are most are likely the direct or indirect result of anthropogenic fire management. Wagner (2003) noted that frequent burning favor the spread of long-leaf pines and increased biodiversity. Periodic natural fires that occur during dry periods and low water levels were known to regenerate lime sink ponds and promote plant growth (Wharton 1978). Ample evidence also exists that Native Americans purposefully set the woodlands on fire to achieve the same results as natural wild fires. Bartram (1791:151-152 in Waselkov and Braund 1995:49) observed southeastern Indians deliberately setting the country on fire "which happens almost every day throughout the year" even in the wetlands where birds were attracted to "roasted serpents, frogs and lizards". Through routine burning, Native Americans modified their hunting and gathering habitats to maintain high levels of biotic diversity (Waselkov and Braund 1995:241). Habitats would have reverted back to forest except for intentional burning to encourage young and weedy vegetation, including herbaceous plants and small fruit-bearing shrubs (Robertson 1962). Such plants were the favored browse of deer and also had seeds and other edible parts for human consumption.
In southwestern Georgia, platform mounds associated with Mississippian period sites are less common but present nevertheless (e.g., Snow 1998). Generally, these Mississippian sites are smaller and do not represent the traditional view of a stratified society within a chiefdom complex. On the other hand, these southern manifestations may have been less structured, middle range components of the Mississippian network.
As Schnell and Wright (1993:16) stated for southwest Georgia, "there are examples of a relatively "pure" Woodland tradition extending well into the [temporal] Mississippian Period." It is difficult to specifically define the ceramic series associated with this temporal span as present research has focused on associated sites to the north and south of the current project area. Accordingly, there is little evidence of Mississippian manifestations in the project area, with the exception of Chamblee's (2004) findings discussed below. It is worth noting that Elliott (2004:24) and Chamblee (2004) identified two "chiefly societies" within southwestern Georgia from document research. These included the Capachique (possibly located near the study area) (Braley 1995:Figure 2) and the Toa that were encountered by de Soto in 1540. To date, location of these polities remains a debatable topic among historians and archaeologists. Further information concerning these two polities was not found during Elliot's investigation, and this negative evidence suggested to Elliott that "Mississippian settlement was not homogenously distributed across the landscape" (Elliott 2004:24).

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 35
Recently, Chamblee's (2004) research and survey of the Chickasawhatchee Wildlife Management Area resulted in the investigation of several Mississippian sites. Many are small ceramic scatters similar to the small Woodland sites discussed previously and do not represent civic-ceremonial centers. This evidence supports the dispersed nature of settlement in this region. However, Chamblee (2004) also investigated several consolidated Mississippian settlements represented by mounds and/or associated artifacts. Sites investigated by Chamblee (2004) through subsurface testing and document research include Magnolia Plantation (also known as the Three Mound site), Red Bluff, and Hayfever. The Magnolia Plantation investigation revealed Middle through Late Mississippian components. Evidence included Rood, Fort Walton, and Lamar ceramic types (John Chamblee, personal communication to Jeannine Windham 2006). The Magnolia Plantation was located at the confluence of two relatively large channels of the Chickasawhatchee Creek with mounds on either side.
Two sites, Red Bluff and Chickasawahatchee Knoll, were located to the north and south of Magnolia Plantation and represent long-term occupations from the Woodland through the Mississippian periods but lacked man-made architecture. These sites possibly represent the Toa and/or Capachequi polities discussed above (Chamblee 2004). Both sites are located at a confluence of an unnamed drainage and the lower Chickasawhatchee Creek north of its confluence with the Ichawaynochaway Creek. The Hayfever site, which also lacks architecture, is located at the northern headwaters of the Chickasawhatchee Creek. It was occupied during the Middle to Late Mississippian sub-periods, but shows little evidence (one Etowah sherd) of an Early Mississippian occupation.
If the concentrations of non-mound sites in the Chickasawatchee Swamp area are contemporary with the few mound centers in the same area, then the mound centers can be said to fall on the periphery of the settlement concentrations. According to Chamblee (2004), this suggests behavior not explicable in terms of ecological constraints, as intermittently inundated areas would not be advantageous to long-term occupation. Again, as in the case of Kolomoki, there appears to be empty space between sites and mound centers in southwest Georgia suggesting dispersed settlements having surrounding outlands that may have served a political, social, and/or subsistence function. Evidence of outlands (also known as borderlands) in the Dougherty Plain deserves further investigation as greater archaeological survey coverage is attained in the region.
The Mississippian period marks a peak in the prehistoric Southeast both in population and sociopolitical complexity. Hypotheses related to the catalyst(s) for the decline of Mississippian cultures are numerous in the literature. Despite the reason(s), many of the Mississippian cultures encountered during the subsequent Proto-historic period were shadows of what is represented in the archaeological record and accounts from initial European contact.
PROTO-HISTORIC AND HISTORIC INDIAN PERIODS (A.D. 15401815)
The Spanish first began to explore this area a few decades after their discovery of the New World. By the early 1500s, the Spanish were well established in Cuba and in Mexico, and it was from these centers that the first conquistadors made incursions into what is now the American Southeast, known to the Spanish as "La Florida." As early as 1528, the Narvaez expedition visited the heavily populated Apalache area, around what is now Tallahassee. This area was revisited by de Soto in 1539-40. De Soto then marched through the eastern half of the study area on his epic trek

36
through the Southeast. However, he did not visit any of the large Native American settlements along the Chattahoochee River. Another attempt to explore and settle this general area was made by Tristan de Luna y Arellano between 1559 and 1561, also ending in failure. In 1565, the Spanish established a small settlement in St. Augustine located along the upper Atlantic coast of Florida, while the Florida Panhandle and its interior were ignored for a number of decades.
The Indian province of Toa visited by de Soto in the mid-sixteenth century was probably located along the middle Flint River (north of the current study area), an area in which Worth (1988) identified various Late Lamar sites. Capachique, another polity recorded by the de Soto expedition, also was plotted in the vicinity of the current study area (Braley 1995, Elliott 2004). Chamblee (2004) suggested that the Chickasawhatchee Knoll might be the polity of Capachique, based on the geographical description of the site.
Late Lamar sites containing European artifacts dating to the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries have been located in the Pine Barrens of the southeastern Georgia Coastal Plain (Snow 1998). However, little evidence of these sites has been recovered in southwest Georgia. According to Snow (1998), the major Lamar occupation of this area occurred during the late 1500s and early 1600s by Hitchiti people who made what he calls Square Ground ceramics. Sites with square ground motifs often are found near known Indian trails marked on original land lot survey maps of the upper Satilla River drainage (Snow et al. 1990). During this period, Hitchiti- and Muscogeanspeaking Creek groups occupied the lower Piedmont, Fall Line, and Coastal Plain. Hitchiti people probably made Lamar type ceramics; while the Timucuan ceramic inventory was more likely a mixture of St. Johns and Savannah Series wares (Russo 1992) and occurred to the east of the Dougherty Plain. Unfortunately, specific cultural manifestations of the Proto-historic timeframe are not available within the Dougherty Plain as it is thought (Elliott 2004:24) that most Native Americans were incorporated into the Spanish Mission System and that Capachqui collapsed soon after contact.
In the century, following de Soto, Spain concentrated on establishing a presence in northeast Florida and along the Atlantic coast to the north. This led to the settlement of St. Augustine in 1565 and the Juan Pardo expeditions through what is now the Carolinas. It was not until the 1630s, after the English established colonies along the Atlantic and began a slow inexorable push down the coast, that Spanish mission work shifted from the Guale area of coastal Georgia, to the Apalachee area of north Florida, west of St. Augustine. Even though the Spanish largely abandoned the coast of the Florida Panhandle in the late 1500s and early 1600s, a chain of missions was expanded into the interior during this same period. From a base in St. Augustine, Franciscan missionaries established outposts along the Atlantic coast and westward to the Apalache region. By the midseventeenth century, there were at least seven individual missions within the Apalache area, with another 15 or so along the "Mission Path" connecting St. Augustine to the Apalache region (Fretwell 1980:79-81).
By 1675, the Mission Path was extended westward to the junction of the Chattahoochee and Flint rivers, where the last two missions were established: San Carlos and Santa Cruz de Sabacola (Fretwell 1980:80-84). This was beyond the borders of the Spanish province of Apalache, and this new province, located along the Apalachicola/Chattahoochee River, was called "Apalachicoli."

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 37
Spanish missionary efforts in Apalachicoli did not meet with the success encountered in Apalache. The local Creek Indians were centered in the populous communities around the Fall Line of the Chattahoochee River and were not as interested in what the Spanish had to offer (Fretwell 1980:8485). By this time, the new English colony at Charles Town s already began to establish trading routes to the Creek communities, and the Creeks themselves were relatively successful in playing the Spanish and English against each other.
The Spanish made a final push into the Chattahoochee River Valley in the early 1690s, spurred on by the presence of the English, and the new French claim to the Mississippi Valley, established by La Salle in the 1680s. This resulted in a Spanish fort on the west side of the Chattahoochee River near the Fall Line in what is now Russell County, Alabama. It was established to keep an eye on the two main Creek communities of Coweta and Cusseta, but it only lasted two years (Fretwell 1980:98106). Soon, the French made their presence felt with the establishment of Mobile and New Orleans, causing the Spanish to settle nearby Pensacola. By the early 1700s, the French moved inland to Fort Toulouse, where the Coosa and Tallapoosa rivers form the Alabama. Even so, the Creek Confederation was still able to deal with the Spanish, English, and French in such a way as to preserve their independence from all three. By the mid- to late 1600s, Apalachee and Chacota missions in the St. Marks-Tallahassee area were the cornerstones of Spanish power in the Southeast. In addition, three missions were located in or near what is now extreme southwest Georgia, near the confluence of the Flint and Chattahoochee rivers (e.g., Swanton 1922). Evidence of more upland settlements at this time is not documented near the project area. However, the Apalachicola region to the west is considered the home of the Lower Creek (Worth 2000:267), and may have extended into the hinterlands to some degree. This is supported by Elliott (2004:24) who stated that during the Spanish Mission period multiple expeditions were made through southwest Georgia in order to, "establish control over the tribes living on the Chattahoochee River region near the Fall Line [near Columbus]."
The Spanish presence in Apalachacoli was always marginal, but even that largely came to an end in 1704-05, when Governor James Moore and his South Carolina militia and Indian allies attacked Apalache and most of the other north Florida Spanish settlements. Moore devastated the local mission system and it never recovered (Fretwell 1980:117). This put an end to any direct Spanish ties with the upper Chattahoochee River Valley, even though Spain would still control Florida until 1763. It is known that during the early eighteenth century, James Moore came through the area and possibly had contact with Native Americans (Elliott 2004:25) though no evidence of contact is known in the study area.
Europeans arriving in Georgia during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries found various Native American groups that basically represented remnants of earlier Mississippian chiefdoms. This is based on cultural continuities such as Lamar-related artifact assemblages (Worth 2000:266). Many of these groups were recorded as relocating frequently during the time of European incursion and settlement. As stated previously, according to archaeological and historical research, the upland Coastal Plain was largely abandoned byt this time. It is not within the scope of this study to describe the varied groups, settlements, and migrations surrounding the project area. However, the area eventually became home to the Lower Creeks with the towns of Chehaw, located in Lee County, and destroyed by the Georgia militia in 1818, and Chiaha located along the central Chattahoochee River.

38
The establishment of Savannah and the Georgia colony in the 1730s brought the English closer to the upper Coastal Plain, the Piedmont, and the mountains. Meanwhile French encroached onto Creek land from the west. Caught between competing English and French factions, various Creek groups took advantage of this situation to strengthen their own position. Between 1730 and 1760, the Creek Confederation came into its own in the Piedmont region, while the coastal groups joined the Seminoles in northern Florida (Braley 1995:5). However, Braley (1995:5) stated that the region, including the study area, disintegrated shortly after de Soto's passage and remained abandoned for 150 years. Braley's (1995) research is supported by the overall lack of Mississippian and Protohistoric evidence in the study area. During the period of Euro-American encroachment into the interior, the Cherokees and Creeks increasingly adopted Euro-American settlement, technology, and subsistence practices from various traders and agents. For example, nucleated villages with palisades gave way to dispersed farmsteads and Indian farmers increasingly acquired metal farming equipment and domestic animals.
Between 1705 and 1763, the Creek inhabitants of the Chattahoochee Valley would remain largely neutral in the "trade wars" between the French to the west and the English to the east. Over time, the English presence slowly came to overshadow everything else. The colony of Georgia, based in Savannah in 1733, only increased the pressure on the Creek Confederation. After the French lost Canada and Louisiana in 1763 and the Spanish traded Florida, the British gained control of the entire region.
The Creek Confederation entered a pro-British period, largely out of necessity. It became a matter of choice with the outbreak of the American Revolution. Alexander McGillivray, leader of the Creeks until his death in 1793, did not favor the Patriot cause, but was wise enough to stay neutral during the war. After the war ended and the Spanish returned to Florida, he also maintained close ties with the Spanish, and through them, several prominent British merchants (Fretwell 1980:139-141). By this time, it was clear that the most pressing threat to the Creek Confederation would come from the American colonists advancing westward from the Atlantic seaboard.
No other Creek leader after McGillivray was able to do more than delay the inevitable, and the Creek Confederation began to split under the threat of American encroachment. The "Lower Creeks," located along the Flint and Chattahoochee rivers, were either more favorably inclined towards the Americans, or more resigned to the approaching flood. The "Upper Creeks" were more hostile and thus more receptive to the influence of the Spanish and British interests. The beginning of the nineteenth century saw the establishment of the so-called Creek Agency where the Lower Trading Path crossed the Flint River (Fretwell 1980:164). This was located near modern Georgia Highway 128 in Taylor County, just north of the project area. Created by the U.S. government, the Creek Agency was the home of the local agent for Indian Affairs and was designed to serve as a sort of clearinghouse between U.S. interests and those of the Creek Nation. As such, it was not terribly successful, as witnessed by the events of the War of 1812.
The War of 1812 between the United States and Britain was the first to draw the active engagement of the Creek Confederation leading to a virtual civil war between the Upper and Lower Creeks. The Upper Creek massacre of over 500 American settlers at Fort Mims in southern Alabama brought a heavy reaction from the Tennessee militia under Andrew Jackson. In 1814, Jackson defeated the Upper Creek at the battle of Horseshoe Bend. This ended most Creek resistance for the duration of the war. For the first time, the Americans set up permanent forts in the region: Fort Mitchell on the

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 39
Chattahoochee was established as early as 1813, and after Horseshoe Bend, Fort Jackson was set up on the site of the old French Fort Toulouse. It was here that Jackson forced the Creek to cede to the United States a broad strip of land immediately north of Spanish Florida to serve as an American buffer between the Creek and the Spanish (Fretwell 1980:175; Hemperley and Jackson 1993:66). This had a direct impact on the southern half of the study area, which now passed to American control and settlement. The north limit of this strip is still partially preserved as the southern boundary line of Randolph, Terrell, and Lee counties.
This land cession led to the establishment of American forts along the adjacent parts of the Chattahoochee River. Fort Gaines was founded in 1816 in what is now Clay County, about 100 miles south of Ft. Mitchell. That same year saw the establishment of Camp Crawford, later known as Fort Scott. Three years later, Spain ceded Florida to the United States, and the Creeks were left wholly at the mercy of their land-hungry American neighbors (Fretwell 1980:190-196). There were other land cessions, made in 1818 and 1821, that affected the extreme north and east of the study area, especially in those areas east of the Flint River.
Following disruptions caused by the fighting between American and British forces in the late eighteenth century, Cherokees from the Lower Towns in the upper Savannah River valley took refuge in the mountains of far northern Georgia and North Carolina (Bouwman 1992). Farther south, the Creek Confederation ceded the land between the Ocmulgee and the Flint rivers in 1821 (Coulter 1933). At this time, Euro-American settlers already had constructed a fairly extensive system of roads, forts, trading posts, and settlements in the area. By the early 1800s, there were enough traders and settlers to create a substantial proportion of so-called mixed-race Cherokees and Creeks. Soon, prominent Cherokees of "mixed" descent adopted a system of government patterned after the United States Constitution, with the capital at New Echota in northwestern Georgia. Similarly among the Creeks, Indians of "mixed" ancestry attained leadership positions within the Creek Confederation of the late 1700s (Swanton 1928). The Creeks were considered allies of the U.S. government during Andrew Jackson's campaign against the Cherokees, but hostilities between the Creeks and Euro-Americans of southwest Georgia increased over time as is evidenced by the Seminole Wars. These wars and related tensions between Indian groups and the United States lasted from 1817 to 1858.
After much bloodshed throughout the Southeast, Native American leaders reached agreements with the U.S. government that resulted in the movement of their subjects, voluntarily or against their will, to land west of the Mississippi River. The last Cherokees were removed from northwestern Georgia by 1838; whereas the last Creek land cession occurred after a treaty signed in 1827. The Seminole groups reached the same demise and were forced west in 1858.
EURO-AMERICAN HISTORIC PERIOD (1815PRESENT)
ANTEBELLUM COTTON (1815-1865)
After the treaties of the early 1800s, there was soon a demand that all Indian groups be removed from the state of Georgia. As a result of this pressure, William McIntosh, one of the primary leaders of the Lower Creeks, signed over the last of the Creek lands within the bounds of the state of Georgia in 1821, a move that was bitterly opposed by the Upper Creeks in Alabama. They assassinated him later that same year. Even so, the first Creeks began to voluntarily relocate to the

40
newly designated "Indian Territory" west of the Mississippi (Fretwell 1980:205-209; Hemperley and Jackson 1993:67-72). Many more were forced to go. It was not until 1836 that almost all of the Creek in both Georgia and Alabama were relocated to the western territory (Fretwell 1980:244).
The ink was barely dry on these treaties before American settlers began to pour into the southwest corner of the state. Columbus, located at the Fall Line on the Chattahoochee, was established as early as 1828, and was visited by the river's first steamboat that same year. Other settlements quickly followed. Irwinton, later renamed Eufaula, was set up in 1831 on the Alabama side of the river. The first railroads tied the river ports to the local interior by the late 1840s (Fretwell 1980:212220).
The phenomenon that spurred this flush of settlement and transportation development was the spectacular spread of cotton cultivation all across the fertile floodplains of the American South. The invention of the cotton gin in 1793 led to a huge demand for new lands, and this was the economic spur to the spread of the Southern plantation system, based on cotton and a work force of enslaved African Americans. It was a system that was already in practice along the Seaboard South and was ready to be imported whole cloth across the newly opened Indian lands, from Georgia to Mississippi and beyond. The growth of cotton led to the tremendous increase in the population of the river ports, foremost of which were West Point, Columbus, and Eufaula. The population of Columbus had grown to 10,000 by 1850. Not counted among these were another 8,000 slaves, many of who worked in the city's textile plants (Fretwell 1980:250-251).
Just as spectacular, although more dispersed, was the settlement of the entire study area, which was accomplished in just a few short decades. The first counties created in the project area date to 1818 (Early County) and the subsequent 1820s (Randolph, Lee, Dooly, Decatur, and Baker). These large counties were subdivided as the settlement thickened, beginning in the 1830s (Sumter and Macon), and leading to a wave of smaller counties created in the 1850s: Schley, Quitman, Mitchell, Miller, Dougherty, Clay, Calhoun, Webster, Worth, Terrell, and Colquitt (Nesbitt 1896: 400-416). Only a small handful of the counties in the project area were created after this period, and this was done no less than 50 years later: Crisp, Grady, and Turner, in 1905; and Seminole in 1920 (Georgia Historical Society 1981).
Certainly not everybody that lived in the project area was the owner of a plantation, but this was the model for many of those that moved into the area. It was a way of life predicated on cotton and a workforce of enslaved African Americans. This system was particularly strong along the major rivers, namely the Chattahoochee and the Flint. It was so rooted by 1860, that this entire region favored secession from the Union after Lincoln's election (Swanson 2004:8-9). It was this secession movement across the Deep South in the winter of 1860-61 that led directly to the Civil War in 1861.
Ironically, the Civil War almost completely skirted the study area. The major exception was the Confederate prison camp at Andersonville in Macon County, at the north end of the study area. This notorious camp, in operation during the last two years of the war (1864-65), was actually set up in this area because it was so distant from the main theaters of the war.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 41
AGRICULTURE AND INDUSTRY (1865-1940)
The collapse of the Confederacy meant the end of slavery and the plantation way of life that slavery made possible. Cotton still remained the cash crop throughout most of this area, but now much of it was grown by tenant farmers, either African American or poor Euro-Americans. Land degradation caused by years of consecutive cotton cultivation depleted much of the local soils by the turn of the twentieth century. As if this were not enough of a problem, the Mexican boll weevil infestation began to sweep across the Southeast. By the mid 1910s, the weevils had decimated the local cotton crop. This led to experiments with new crops, foremost of which was the peanut, which quickly became popular throughout the area. Worth County has long claimed to be the peanut capital of the world, but most of the other counties in this region also found success with peanut cultivation.
The collapse of the plantation paradigm paved the way for other agricultural and industrial pursuits. Cotton mills thrived around the Fall Line at Columbus. Oil from the reduction of cottonseeds became a popular local industry in the years after 1880. In addition, the resources of the local pine forests were fully exploited during this period. The local long leaf pine was particularly favored for lumber, as well as for its tar and turpentine (Nesbitt 1896:205-208).
Another local development that reached its florescence in the late 1800s and early 1900s was the spread of railroads. Limited to just a few lines before the Civil War, railroads literally crisscrossed the state, by the end of the 1800s. Columbus, with its bridges across the Chattahoochee, certainly became a major rail hub, but so did Albany in Dougherty County (Nesbett 1896:14-15).
Population continued to rise throughout the region during the 1900s. The more agricultural, rural counties had average populations of around 4000-6000 each, while counties with larger towns and cities usually had double that (Nesbitt 1896:411-416). The old plantation system was reflected in the local population; the percentage of African Americans ranged from 30 to 60 percent of the total population. The relatively rural and agricultural trend has dominated lifeways in southwest Georgia in to the present. With the exception of scattered urban areas, the region was characterized by low population density, broad open of croplands, and wetland forests.
MODERN ERA
The general trend toward a diversified agriculture and a nascent industrialization, continued into the modern era. In addition to peanuts, pecan cultivation has proven popular in recent decades, and in many areas cotton has made a comeback. Dooly County, the home of the Georgia State Cotton Museum, has a population that is almost evenly divided between Euro- and African American. The ratio of white to black in the local population ranges from 60/30 in Schley, Worth, Grady, Seminole, and Colquitt counties, to 30/60 in Macon, Clay, Randolph, Terrell, Calhoun, Dougherty, with every combination in between, depending on the county.
In some counties, population levels have increased greatly over what they were a hundred years ago. In other counties, the population is virtually the same as it was on the eve of the Civil War. An example of the former is Dougherty County, which contains Albany, by far the largest city in the study area. The county population, 96,065 (2000 census), is far and away greater than any other in this area. The second largest is Colquitt County, with 42,053, while the third largest is Sumter, with 32,912. Some examples of the latter are Webster County, with a population of only 2,390, Clay County, with 3,357, and Schley with 3,766.

42

Clearly, with a few exceptions like Albany and some larger towns, this region is still largely rural and agricultural, which was observed during survey of the PCWMS. The peanut and pecans were the main crops with pasture intermixed and forming a patchwork of rural landscape utilization.

CULTURAL DATASET OF STUDY AREA
Archaeological sites identified within the study area were researched and compiled through the use of the Georgia State Site Files geo-referenced database (NARHGIS) and include whole and partial portions of 23 counties (Table 5). Sites, presented as point data, within the study area total 2,112 and are affiliated with prehistoric, historic, and unknown cultural designations (Figure 4). Information regarding site size and extent of a given survey or archaeological investigation (polygon data) was not available for this study. This information is currently being compiled at the University of Georgia, and would benefit future researchers when evaluating site size and archaeological coverage of the study area. A full list of all cultural resources included within the study area is provided within Appendix A, which includes information associated with current study variables.

Table 5. Counties Included within the Dougherty Plain Study Area

Baker Calhoun Clay Colquitt Crisp Decatur Dooly Dougherty

Early Grady Houston Lee Macon Miller Mitchell Randolph

Schley Seminole Sumter Terrell Turner Webster Worth

Utilizing a large dataset in this fashion does create certain analytical limitations that are important to recognize. Further, the study area is primarily rural and has, overall, not been subject to many large-scale archaeological surveys. Boundaries of those surveys conducted were not available; therefore, the cultural dataset reflects currently known site distribution with little to no knowledge of surveyed areas with negative cultural findings. Figure 4 provides an overview of recorded cultural resources and archaeological coverage of the study area.

The biases recognized within the cultural dataset include:

o

Dependence on the defined cultural component, site type, and location by previous

researchers.

o

The site location is provided as point versus polygon and does not illustrate the

extent or size of a given site.

44

o

The extent or boundaries of a given survey is not provided; therefore, one only is

aware of the area of existing sites and not survey areas having no site data.

o

A lack of survey data in the majority of the study area limits this study to

assessment of cultural trends for components having sufficient sample size. Due to

the overall paucity of well-distributed data, no predictive modeling is attempted.

Due to the differing resource needs of prehistoric and historic inhabitants as outlined in the previous sections, cultural resources were analyzed differently within this study. Prehistoric, Proto-historic, and Historic Indian occupations are analyzed by cultural timeframe according to environmental variables (elevation zone, drainage catchment, and soil drainage). These are discussed as Native American occupations within the following chapters. On the other hand, non-Indian historic occupations are analyzed by site type in relation to the same environmental variables. Site type is defined within the NARHGIS database; however, for analytical purposes this data was placed within functional categories as defined by Joseph et al. (2004). The historic functional categories are represented by numerous site types including the following: Agrarian sites such as barns or fields; Cemeteries; Community and Interaction sites such as churches and other places of congregation; Domestic sites are typically homesteads; Military sites range from Civil War earthworks to Cold War installations; Transportation sites include roads, trails, railroads, and wharves; Urban sites include courthouses and other public buildings/locations; Industrial sites include mills and gins; and other sites including dumps and push piles fall under Miscellaneous.

Table 6 provides the total number of resources that fall within a given prehistoric sub-period, historic site types, and sites with unknown cultural affiliation. It is noted that many site locations represent multiple cultural components that are outlined within Table 6. This inflates the actual total of occupations included within the study area. In addition, several sites recorded within the site files lacked differentiating description, were grouped as "not applicable," and were eliminated from the study sample. The cultural dataset is utilized in subsequent chapters to investigate trends through time within the study area.

Table 6. Cultural Resource Occupations within the Dougherty Plain Study Area

Sub-Period Native American Early Paleoindian Native American Late Paleoindian Native American General Paleoindian Native American Early Archaic Native American Middle Archaic Native American Late Archaic Native American General Archaic Native American Early Woodland Native American Middle Woodland Native American Late Woodland Native American General Woodland Native American Early Mississippian Native American Middle Mississippian

Count 5 7
19 70 58 220 169 40 103 180 150 10
6

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 45

Table 6. Cultural Resource Occupations within the Dougherty Plain Study Area

Sub-Period Native American Late Mississippian Native American General Mississippian Native American Proto-historic Native American Historic Indian Native American Unknown
Site Type Historic Agrarian Historic Cemetery Historic Community Historic Community/Interaction Historic Domestic Historic Interaction Historic Military Historic Miscellaneous Historic Transportation Historic Urban Historic Unknown
Other Designation Not Applicable

Count 39 65 57 49
959 Count
16 55 10
5 163
1 5 238 15 3 207 Count 5

SUMMARY
Human occupation of the Dougherty Plain dates from the early origins of human presence in the region, the Paleoindian period, through the historic era and into the modern age. From an archaeological perspective, Native American sites are more common than sites from the historic era, totaling 2,206 resources, versus 718 Historic sites. Based on the sites with diagnostic artifacts recorded for the prehistoric era, the region saw its most intensive use during the Archaic era, where 517 sites are recorded. Woodland period sites were slightly less common, at 473, while Mississippian sites exhibited a further decline in intensity of occupation, totaling 120 (a number comparable to the protohistoric and historic Native American occupation, with 106 sites). Historic period sites only marginally outnumber sites from the Archaic era, a frequency distribution that stands in stark contrast to the state in general, which witnessed an exponential increase in the number of Historic sites.
These distributions runs counter to population trends witnessed elsewhere in Georgia, where Native American populations increased following the advent of horticulture during the Woodland period and further expanded with historic settlement economies and population densities. This contrast may be based on environmental factors, and the analysis of site distributions, by environmental variables, is presented in the following chapter with an analysis of the cultural landscape of the Dougherty Plain.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 47
IV. THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE: RESULTS OF ANALYSES
In order to assess the significance and associations between environmental variables and site distributions, by cultural period, a series of statistical analyses were performed. The chi-square test was used to evaluate the associations between the cultural dataset and environmental variables, and to identify specific patterns through an environmental approach. An environmental approach functions on the premise that there is a relationship between the environment (i.e. elevation, hydrology, soils, etc.) and human occupation. This relationship potentially differs through time (i.e. cultural periods) based on the changing dynamics of human ecology. The GIS produced frequency of specific variable relationships can be statistically tested for significance through a chi-square test. Given a reliable sample, the significance level is five percent or lower having a probability (p) of 0.05 or less and confidence level of 95 percent or more. If result of high significance and rejection of the null hypothesis of a given environment-cultural association, then particular instances of higher variation between observed and expected values (within the contingency table) were noted and aid interpretations in the following chapter. If the sample was statistically unreliable, observation of frequency distribution aided tentative interpretations. Through these tests and observed variation, trends in cultural landscape utilization could be defined.
The following sections provide discussion of the results of analyses. GIS generated illustrations are provided within this discussion and digitally on an enclosed CD for more detailed viewing of specific areas. Some Native American sub-periods and historic site types are biased by under representation having frequencies too low for statistical analysis. In addition, later prehistoric timeframes are biased by geography such that sites are overly represented along major drainages particularly the Chattahoochee River. Cultural timeframes that are affected by these biases include the Paleoindian, Mississippian, Proto-historic, and Historic Indian periods. The current study does not attempt to analyze Native American site type due to differential site investigation that creates inherent bias within this subset of the cultural dataset.
The Historic cultural dataset shows trends within the environmental variables analyzed for this study. Similar to the Native American sample, some site types are biased by representation within the study area similar to the Native American sample. Historic site types that are affected by this bias include under representation of Community/Interaction, Interaction, Military, Transportation, and Urban types. This result illustrates the limited habitation of the upland area during the historic timeframes. On the other hand, the Miscellaneous site type is heavily represented within the sample and includes sites of undefined function such as earthworks, rock piles, isolated finds, and push piles.
NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL TRENDS AND CHERT OUTCROPS
The distribution of Native American site data from the limited survey coverage within the study area is not sufficient to perform analysis of identified areas of chert outcrops and sites with lithic assemblages. In addition, county information (Goad 1979) indicates that chert outcrops are

48

widespread within the study area (Table 7), which limits any interpretative differentiation in regards to this variable. Based on literature review and evidence discovered during the PCWMS investigations, it is hypothesized that there is a strong correlation between lithic resources and Native American sites. Unfortunately, this correlation cannot be empirically tested with the current dataset.

Table 7. Counties Included within the Dougherty Plain Study Area Having Chert Outcrops (compiled from Goad 1979)

Baker

Early

Mitchell

Calhoun

Grady

Randolph

Crisp

Houston

Seminole

Decatur

Lee

Sumter

Dooly

Macon

Terrell

Dougherty

Miller

Worth

*Clay, Colquitt, Schley, Turner, and Webster do not have documented chert outcrops.

NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL TRENDS AND ELEVATION ZONES
Elevation zones (i.e. lowlands, uplands, etc.) are defined by a GIS calculated, natural break range representing the spectrum of elevations within the study area. Prehistoric cultural trends observed during analysis of elevation zones represented within the study area shows a distinctive pattern for specific cultural sub-periods (Figure 5). While several cultural periods are biased within the present sample, the Archaic and Woodland timeframes show observable differences and are analyzed in greater depth below.

The small quantity of Paleoindian period sites does not allow for statistical analysis within this study. However, with respect to the Archaic sub-periods, there is a trend of bottom and lowland occupations during the Early and Middle Archaic. The relatively low quantity of occupations during these earlier timeframes is noted in comparison to that observed during the Late Archaic sub-period. The populations of the Late Archaic appear to have integrated higher elevations into the general settlement pattern and are more distributed across the landscape.

In the interest of determining if this observed pattern was a factor of sampling bias, a chi-square test was performed to determine any significant statistical pattern (Table 8). For the purposes of this analysis Elevation Zones 4 and 5 were collapsed as not to skew statistical testing through null values. The following hypotheses were defined following Drennan (1996):
H0: there is no difference in settlement of specific elevation zones during the Archaic subperiods.
H1: there is a difference in settlement of specific elevation zones during the Archaic subperiods

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 49 Figure 5. Number of Cultural Components in Elevation Zones.

The difference between the Archaic sub-periods in respect to elevation zone is not significant ("2 = 7.8641, 0.5 > p > 0.200) and failed to reject the null hypothesis. This result is unsurprising as the calculated expected values are relatively close to those observed within the cultural dataset for this environmental variable. In other words, the results showed that Archaic groups did not significantly deviate from the statistically expected trend.

Table 8. Chi-Square Test for Archaic Sub-periods Within Elevation Zones.

Elevation Zone
1. Bottomland 2. Lowland 3. Low Midland 4&5. High Midland and Uplands All
"2 = 7.8641, df=6, p=0.248

Early Archaic

Middle Archaic

Observed/Expected Value

15.0/16.9

17.0/14.0

25.0/17.1

12.0/14.2

18.0/20.3

14.0/16.8

12.0/15.7

15.0/13.0

70.0

58.0

Late Archaic
52.0/53.1 48.0/53.7 69.0/63.9 45.0/49.3
220.0

50

Due to increased component data through the Woodland timeframe, statistical testing was performed to evaluate the significance of the observed difference within the sample. As was the case with the previous analysis, Elevation Zones 4 and 5 were combined to eliminate any cells having a null value that would skew significance testing of the Woodland sub-periods. The following hypotheses were utilized during chi-squared analysis (Table 9) of the Woodland subperiod data.

H0: there is no difference in settlement of specific elevation zones during the Woodland sub-periods.

H1: there is a difference in settlement of specific elevation zones during the Woodland subperiods

Table 9. Chi-Square Test for Woodland Sub-periods within Elevation Zones.

Elevation Zone

Early Woodland

Middle Woodland

Late Woodland

Observed/Expected Value

1. Bottomland

19.0/21.3

53.0/54.9

100.0/95.9

2. Lowland

7.0/4.0

16.0/10.2

9.0/17.8

3. Low Midland

5.0/9.9

20.0/25.5

*55.0/44.5

4&5. High Midland and Uplands

9.0/4.6

14.0/12.4

16.0/21.7

All

40.0

103.0

180.0

2 = 21.8502, df=6, p= 0.001 *High Variation of Observed and Expected Values

The difference between the Woodland sub-periods in relation to elevation zones is significant (2 = 21.8502, 0.01 > p > 0.001) and depicted in Figure 6. Therefore, these results are not the product of a random sample variation and can be attributed to other nonrandom factors. Review of the observed and expected values further substantiates the rejection of the null hypothesis, as there is a high variation observed during the Late Woodland period within Elevation Zone 3 indicative of a cultural preference for this setting.

NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL TRENDS AND DRAINAGE CATCHMENT DENSITY ZONES
The environmental variable of drainage catchment density zone is complex and described in detail with Chapter II. Briefly, this variable is defined as the total measure of hydrologic density of a drainage catchment (tributaries and drainage) versus a specific drainage way. Drainage catchment density is conversely related to elevation zones. Generally speaking, low-density drainage catchments (Density Order 5) relate to bottomlands (Elevation Zone 1) such that the Flint and Chattahoochee floodplains are designated by the lowest subset and inversely related to the traditionally utilized stream order. However, one must keep in mind that floodplains (normally considered bottomlands) also occur in the upper reaches of drainage catchments that would have a high drainage density. This is particularly true in areas of relatively low relief, such as the study area.

52
Prehistoric cultural trends observed during analysis of drainage catchment densities zones represented within the study area show a distinctive pattern for specific cultural sub-periods (Figure 7). While the Paleoindian and Mississippian timeframes are biased by low sample size, the Archaic and Woodland timeframes show observable frequency differences and are analyzed statistically below. Generalized patterns are observed for later Native American timeframes and follow analysis of the Archaic and Woodland periods.
Figure 7. Number of Components in Drainage Catchment Density Zone.

No inferences can be made in regards to the Paleoindian sub-periods as the sub-sample is inadequate to illustrate variation. Similar to the analysis of elevation zones for the Archaic subperiods, there is an observable difference in the settlement patterns of drainage catchments (Figure 7). In the interest of determining if this observed pattern could be a factor of sampling bias, a chisquare test was performed to determine any significant statistical pattern (Table 10). Hypotheses defined for the purposes of statistical testing include the following:

H0: there is no difference in the settlement pattern of specific drainage catchment density zone during the Archaic sub-periods.

H1: there is a difference in the settlement pattern of specific drainage catchment density zone during the Archaic sub-periods

Table 10. Chi-Square Test for Archaic Sub-periods within Drainage Catchment Density.

Drainage Catchment Density
1. Highest Density (Upland Tributary) 2. High-Medium Density 3. Medium Density

Early Archaic
8.0/6.8 11.0/12.7 16.0/21.7

Middle Archaic Observed/Expected Value
9.0/5.7 11.0/10.5 16.0/18.0

Late Archaic
17.0/21.5 41.0/39.8 76.0/68.3

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 53

Table 10. Chi-Square Test for Archaic Sub-periods within Drainage Catchment Density.

Drainage Catchment Density
4. Low-Medium Density 5. Lowest Density (Bottomland Drainage) All
2 = 8.4719, df=8, p= 0.389

Early Archaic
19.0/13.9 16.0/14.9
70.0

Middle Archaic Observed/Expected Value
10.0/11.5 12.0/12.3
58.0

Late Archaic
40.0/43.6 46.0/46.7
220.0

Results of the chi-square test (2 = 8.4719, 0.5 > p > 0.200) showed no significant difference and failed to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, the observed trends in Archaic settlement patterns of specific catchment density zones cannot be attributed to a nonrandom association of the environmental and cultural variable.

Variation also is observed within the Woodland sub-periods. Overall, there is consistent emphasis on the lowest drainage density catchment zone (large drainages). In addition, during the Late Woodland it appears that site frequency within the medium density zone (Density Zone 3) was emphasized.

A chi-square test was performed to determine if any significant statistical pattern existed within the Woodland sub-periods in regards to the drainage density (Table 11). Hypotheses defined for the purposes of statistical testing include the following:

H0: there is no difference in the settlement pattern of specific drainage catchment density zones during the Woodland sub-periods.

H1: there is a difference in the settlement pattern of specific drainage catchment density zones during the Woodland sub-periods

Table 11. Chi-Square Test for Woodland Sub-periods within Drainage Catchment Density.

Drainage Catchment Density

Early Woodland

Middle Woodland

Late Woodland

Observed/Expected Value

1: Highest Density (Upland Tributary)

4.0/2.0

5.0/5.1

7.0/8.9

2: High-Medium Density

7.0/4.5

16.0/11.5

*13.0/20.1

3: Medium Density

6.0/11.8

25.0/30.3

*64.0/53.0

4: Low-Medium Density

6.0/5.8

14.0/15.0

27.0/26.2

5: Lowest Density (Bottomland Drainage)

17.0/16.0

43.0/41.1

69.0/72.0

All

40.0

103

180.0

2 = 14.6069, df=8, p= 0.067 *Higher Variation of Observed and Expected Values

Results of the chi-square test (2 = 14.6069, 0.05 > p > 0.020) showed significant difference and the null hypothesis can be rejected. Illustration of the Woodland sub-period analysis is provided in Figure 8. Further comparison of the observed and expected values show variation within the Late Woodland sub-period. The observed Late Woodland occupations within medium density drainage catchments are considerably higher than other associations.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 55
Analyses of the later Native American sub-periods are biased by limited sample size and cannot be tested statistically. An observed pattern of dispersal is seen during the overall Mississippian period, while the Late Mississippian sites are more highly represented in low-density zones. Proto-historic occupations are highly represented in drainages of medium to low order indicating a settlement preference for smaller, midland tributaries with far fewer occupations represented in the lowestdensity catchments. During the Historic Indian period, the low-density drainage zones were more heavily utilized within the bottomlands of the study area. This apparent fluctuation in settlement pattern, during the late prehistoric through the Historic Indian timeframe, may reflect shifts in the needs of these peoples that mirror agricultural and defensive measures during European contact and acculturation.
NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL TRENDS AND SOIL DRAINAGE CLASS
Soil drainage class is utilized as an environmental variable as it provides a uniform measure of how well particular soils hold water outside of sometimes subjectively named soil types within a given county. Information regarding soil drainage is important to Native American and agricultural occupations in many regions such that poorly and well drained areas could be utilized for different means. Therefore, the cultural dataset was compared with the soil drainage classes (Figure 9). Note that the "well-drained" designation was excluded from this analysis due the overrepresentation of this type with the natural environment (n=62.4 percent) and the cultural dataset. In addition, sites within the study portion of Webster County (n=4) are excluded, as no soil information is available for that area. This analysis focuses on the remaining soil class designations and counties having soil data available.
Overall, Native American occupations within the study are located on well-drained soils. This being said, the "well-drained" category was not used in this analysis as it would mask any other prehistoric cultural trends in the soil drainage class analysis. Although, several Native American periods are biased within this dataset, there is higher frequency of sites where water and poorly drained soils are located. However, observably slight shifts in this pattern are seen during the Archaic and Woodland sub-periods. Both the Archaic and Woodland sub-periods are investigated further below.
The limited number of Paleoindian period occurrences limits any interpretation within this study. Secondary to well-drained locations, the Archaic sub-periods show high frequency in areas of poorly drained soils within the sample. However, the Middle Archaic sub-period shows greater dispersal of occupations across the soil drainage classes tested. Due to the limited quantity of occupations represented within a given soil drainage class, grouping of categories was necessary to statistically test significance. Combining sub-categories of excessively drained and poorly drained soils was performed for statistical analysis. To determine the validity of this observed pattern within the collapsed dataset, a chi-square significance test was utilized (Table 12) with the following hypotheses:
H0: there is no difference in the settlement pattern of soil drainage class locations during the Archaic sub-periods.
H1: there is a difference in the settlement pattern of soil drainage class locations during the Archaic sub-periods.

56

Table 12. Chi-Square Test for Archaic Sub-periods within Tested Soil Drainage Classes.

Soil drainage Class
Water (Somewhat) Excessively drained Moderately well drained (Somewhat to Very) Poorly Drained All
"2 = 1.1207, df=6, p= 0.981

Early Archaic

Middle Archaic

Observed/Expected Value

3.0/4.1

3.0/3.1

8.0/7.6

6.0/5.7

4.0/2.8

2.0/2.1

9.0/9.5

7.0/7.1

24.0

18.0

Late Archaic
16.0/14.8 27.0/27.7
9.0/10.1 35.0/34.4
87.0

Figure 9. Number of Components in Soil Drainage Class.

Results of the chi-square test ("2 = 1.1207, p > 0.500) showed no significant difference and failed to reject the null hypothesis. Based on the previously defined bias of the chi-square test, it is noted that this environment-cultural association does not represent a reliable sample (33 percent of expected values are below five). Therefore, no chi-squared test is valid for Archaic-soil drainage class association given the present dataset.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 57

Variation also is observed within the Woodland sub-periods based on frequency distributions. During the Early Woodland sub-period, there appears to be greater site frequency on generally poorly drained soils than the subsequent Woodland sub-periods that exploited soils associated with inundation.

A chi-square test was performed to determine if any significant statistical pattern existed within the Woodland sub-periods in regards to settlement patterns in the soil drainage class (Table 13). Grouping of the soil class categories was necessary due to the small sample size. Hypotheses defined for the purposes of statistical testing include the following:

H0: there is no difference in the settlement pattern of soil drainage class locations during the Woodland sub-periods.

H1: there is a difference in the settlement pattern of soil drainage class locations during the Woodland sub-periods

Table 13. Chi-Square Test for Woodland Sub-periods within Tested Soil Drainage Classes.

Soil Drainage Class

Early Woodland

Middle Woodland

Late Woodland

Observed/Expected Value

Water

3.0/9.1

20.0/30.6

*71.0/54.3

(Somewhat) Excessively drained

13.0/5.2

23.0/17.6

*18.0/31.2

Moderately well drained

2.0/2.1

8.0/7.2

12.0/12.7

(Somewhat to Very) Poorly Drained

2.0/3.5

16.0/11.7

18.0/20.8

All

20.0

67.0

119.0

2 = 34.3820, df=6, p= 0.000 *High Variation of Observed and Expected Values

Results of the chi-square test (2 = 34.3820, p < 0.001) showed a highly significant difference and the null hypothesis can be rejected. Therefore, cultural trends observed during the Woodland subperiod are significant and not likely the result of random variation within the sample. Depiction of Woodland sub-period occupations by soil drainage classes is shown in Figure 10. Although most Woodland sites occur on well-drained soils, a significant variation in observed and expected frequencies during the Late Woodland sub-period suggests that sites occurred more than expected on inundated and excessively drained soils.

Observed patterns during later Native American periods lack sufficient sample size for testing. Nonetheless, most sites were contained in well-drained soils. Secondarily, Late Mississippian occupations appear to cluster at locations of water or excessively drained soils. Proto-historic occupations are more prevalent in areas of poorly drained to moderately well-drained soils that are associated with wetlands and floodplains. Historic Indians occupied areas that are associated with water such as river floodplains and wetlands. These results tentatively suggests that these groups, as the Late Woodland peoples before, chose areas adjacent to drainages, wetlands, or sinks that may have supplied additional subsistence resources, as well as water.

Number

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 59
HISTORIC CULTURAL TRENDS AND ELEVATION ZONES
Historic cultural trends observed during analysis of elevation zones represented within the study area show a pattern for specific preferences of habitation/domestic, cemetery, and miscellaneous locations (Figures 11 and 12). Other site types are characterized by dispersal within the elevation zones and may be the result of sampling bias.
Figure 11. Number of Historic Site Types in Elevation Zones.
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10
0
1: Bottomland 2: Lowland 3: Low Midland 4: High Midland 5: Upland
The small quantity of several site types in the area including Community (n=10), Interaction (n=1), Community/Interaction (n=5), Transportation (n=15), and Urban (n=3) reflects the generally rural landscape of the study area. Though the limited number of sites represented within these categories appears to be distributed across elevation zones, this observation is likely biased by the limited sample size.
However, cultural trends were observed for several site types explored within this study. Agrarian, Domestic and Cemetery sites are more prevalent in the midland to lowland elevation zones. In the interest of determining if this observed pattern was a factor of sampling bias, a chi-square test was performed (Table 14). For the purposes of this analysis, several related site types were combined to reduce statistical bias through null values. These groups include Community/Interaction and Transportation/Urban/Military. Hypotheses defined for testing the significance of elevation zones are stated below.

Agrarian Community/ICnotCeemrmamecuttineiortyny
Domestic Int Iernadcutistorny TrMiasncselploarMtinliaettioaorusny
Urban

60

GEORGIA ALABAMA

Study Area
Archaeological Sites
Domestic Agrarian Industry
Community/Interaction Military, Urban, Transportation Cemetery Miscellaneous
Transportation
Roads
Railroads
Elevation Zones(AMSL)
1 18.5 - 48.6 m 2 48.6 - 70.2 m 3 70.2 - 92.9 m 4-5 92.9 - 176.0 m

Figure 12. Historic Site Types Within Elevation Zones
INTERSTATE
75

280
AMERICUS

520

afo o

DAWSON

19

300

82
ALBANY

CORDELE
INTERSTATE
75
82

BLAKELY

19

ALABAMA FLORIDA
SAI/GIS

RIVER OCK

Spring

84 19

BAINBRIDGE

84

84

27
GEORGIA FLORIDA

0

30 km

0

20 mi.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 61

Statistical analysis illustrated that the quantity of limited Historic sites was not sufficient for a reliable sample for the chi-square test. Despite this finding, the results are presented to be consistent with methods utilized for Prehistoric and Proto-historic sites. These results are tentative and serve to outline possible associations between site types and elevation zones that should be better developed through future research.

H0: there is no difference in the settlement pattern of specific elevation zones between historic site types.

H1: there is a difference the in settlement pattern of specific elevation zones between historic site types.

Table 14. Chi-Square Test for Historic Site Types within Elevation Zones.

Elevation Zone

Agrarian

Cemetery

Community/ Interaction

Domestic

Industry

Observed/Expected Values

Miscellaneous Transportation/ Urban/Military

1. Bottomland 2. Lowland

1.0/3.1 8.0/10.5 5.0/3.7 19.0/12.6

5.0/3.1 *21.0/31.1 9.0/5.4 3.0/3.7 *27.0/37.2 10.0/6.4

46.0/45.5 53.0/54.3

*13.0/4.4 6.0/5.2

3. Low Midland
4. High Midland
5. Upland All

5.0/4.7

17.0/16.0 2

2.0/3.1 10.0/10.8

3.0/1.5 16.0

1.0/5.1 55.0

4.0/4.7 50.0/47.5 5.0/8.2 74.0/69.3

3.0/3.1 *42.0/32.1

1.0/1.5 *23.0/15.1

16.0

163.0

4.0/5.5 0/2.6 28.0

44.0/46.8 21.0/22.1
238.0

2.0/6.7
1.0/4.5 1.0/2.1
23.0

2 = 59.1716, df=24, p=0.000

Association of site types of the historic period in respect to elevation zone is highly significant (2 = 59.1716, p < 0.001) and rejects the null hypothesis. The variation in the observed and expected values in relation to all Domestic sites suggests a strongly significant preference for specific elevation zones. This includes a higher than expected site frequency of high midlands and uplands and lower expected frequencies in the lowlands and bottomlands. On the other hand, statistical testing indicates that the preference for low midland to lowland cemeteries may be significant within the study area though not exceedingly outside the realm of expected frequency. The Transportation/Urban/Military site type category is heavily represented in the lowland regions of the study area and supported by high variation in statistical testing. This result is heavily influenced by the quantity of low-lying Transportation sites and urban trade centers focused on river transportation. Other site type frequencies are distributed among all elevation ranges.

HISTORIC CULTURAL TRENDS AND DRAINAGE CATCHMENT DENSITY
Analysis of historic site types and drainage catchment density show a settlement pattern of specific type categories within the study area (Figures 13 and 14). Other site types are characterized by dispersal and likely reflect of sampling bias through under representation.

Number

Agrarian Community/ICnotCeemrmamecuttineiortyny
Domestic Industry Interaction TrMiasncselploarMtinliaettioaorusny Urban

62
Figure 13. Number of Historic Site Types in Drainage Catchment Class.
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10
0
1: Highest 2: High 3: Medium 4: Low 5: Lowest
The rural landscape of the study area is reflected by the paucity of Community, Interaction, Transportation, and Urban site types that bias the current sample. Agrarian sites show a higher incidence in the low-density drainage catchments. Similar to analysis of elevation zone, Domestic sites are more prevalent in the high drainage density zone (upland to midland tributaries). On the other hand, Cemetery sites show a more dispersed pattern of utilization for this variable.
Significance testing was utilized to further investigate the observed patterns (Table 15). Statistical analysis illustrated that the quantity of limited Historic sites was not sufficient for a reliable sample for the chi-square test. Despite this finding, the results are presented to be consistent with methods utilized for Prehistoric and Proto-historic sites. These results are tentative and serve to outline possible associations between site types and elevation zones that should be better developed through future research.
For the purposes of this analysis several related site types were combined to reduce statistical bias through null values. These groups include Community/Interaction and Transportation/Urban/Military. Hypotheses defined for testing significance of settlement pattern observations are stated below.
H0: there is no difference in the settlement pattern of specific catchment density zones between historic site types.
H1: there is a difference in the settlement pattern of specific catchment density zones between historic site types.

64

Table 15. Chi-Square Test for Historic Site Types within Catchment Density Zones

Agrarian

Cemetery

Community/ Interaction

Domestic

Industry

Observed/Expected Values

Miscellaneous Transportation/ Urban/Military

1. Highest Density (Upland Tributary)

0/1.0

5.0/3.6

1.0/1.0 8.0/10.6 1.0/1.8 19.0/15.5

2. High-Medium Density

4.0/4. 0

13.0/13.9

4.0/4.0 *58.0/41.1 3.0/7.1 52.0/60.0

3. Medium Density

3.0/4. 1

11.0/14.2

6.0/4.1 44.0/42.0 4.0/7.2 70.0/61.4

4. Low-Medium Density

8.0/3. 4

15.0/11.6

1.0/3.4 39.0/34.5 8.0/5.9 41.0/50.3

5. Lowest Density (Bottomland Drainage)

1.0/3. 4

11.0/11.7

4.0/3.4 *14.0/34.8 12.0/6.0 56.0/50.8

All

16.0

55.0

16.0

163.0

28.0

238.0

2 = 89.5633, df=24, p=0.00000

* High Variation of Observed and Expected Values

1.0/1.5 2.0/5.8 1.0/5.9 2.0/4.9
*17.0/4.9 23.0

Statistical testing (2 = 89.5633, p < 0.000) of the historic site type and drainage catchment density illustrated that observed trends are not the result of sampling bias. Therefore, the null hypothesis can be rejected and suggest there is an association between settlement pattern and drainage catchment density. High variation between observed and expected values of Domestic and Transportation/Urban/Military sites suggests a significant settlement pattern in regards to catchment density.
There is a higher than expected frequency of Domestic sites in the high-medium density zone with the opposite being the case for the lowest density zone. The Transportation/Urban/Military site type category occurs more frequently in the lowest density zone than expected. Other site types do not show a high variance (possibly related to small sample size) in regards to drainage catchment density suggesting a dispersed pattern of landscape utilization.
The Transportation/Urban/Military site type category is heavily represented within the lowest density catchment zone (larger creeks and rivers) regions of the study area. This result is heavily influenced by the quantity of low-lying Transportation sites as discussed in the previous section. The Miscellaneous site type mirrors the other site types due to the nature of this category.

HISTORIC CULTURAL TRENDS AND SOIL DRAINAGE CLASS
Due to the need for good cropland, the majority of Historic sites are located on well-drained soils totaling 71.9 percent. As this is clearly the most preferred soil class during the historic timeframe, this analysis attempts to identify trends in less desirable soil drainage classes by not including the well-drained category, which would mask other preferences. Figure 15 illustrates a secondary preference for moderately well drained soils for several site types (excluding Webster County sites). However, it is not possible to deduce any trend for site types having limited representation within this sample.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 65 Figure 15. Number of Historic Site Types in Soil Drainage Class.
With the exclusion of well-drained soils, Domestic and Agrarian sites occur frequently in areas of moderately well drained soils. No sites occurred areas of very poorly drained soils. Cemeteries are found on somewhat excessively drained soils with the majority in well-drained areas. Industrial sites do occur on well-drained soils, but appear generally more dispersed. Miscellaneous sites frequently occur on poorly-drained soils. Statistical testing was performed to determine if the historic site sample illustrated significant cultural trends in the subset of soil drainage class (Table 16). Related site types were combined to reduce statistical bias through null values. These groups include Community/Interaction and Transportation/Urban/Military. Hypotheses defined for testing the significance of the observations outlined above are as follows:
H0: there is no difference in the settlement pattern of specific soil drainage classes between historic site types. H1: there is a difference in the settlement pattern of specific soil drainage classes between historic site types.

66

Statistical analysis illustrated that the quantity of limited Historic sites was not sufficient for a reliable sample for the chi-square test. Despite this finding, the results are presented to be consistent with methods utilized for Prehistoric and Proto-historic sites. Results presented are tentative and serve to outline possible associations between site types and soil drainage class. These should be better developed through future research.

Table 16. Chi-Square Test for Historic Site Types within Soil Drainage Class.

Soil Drainage Agrarian Class

Cemetery

Community/ Interaction

Domestic

Industry

Observed/Expected Values

Miscellaneous Transportation/ Urban/Military

Water

0.0/1.2 0.0./2.2

(Somewhat) Excessively Drained

1.0/1.9 *9.0/3.4

Moderately well-drained

5.0/1.3

1.0/2.3

(Somewhat to Very) Poorly Drained

0.0/1.7

1.0/3.1

All

6.0

12.0

2 = 59.6720, df=18, p=0.000002

3.0/1.2 1.0/1.9

2.0/4.8 *7.0/1.4

6.0/3.4 4.0/5.2

12.0/14.1 18.0/21.6

2.0/1.3 10.0/5.0 1.0/3.5 12.0/15.0

0.0/1.7

5.0/6.8 6.0/4.8 *28.0/19.7

6.0

24.0

17.0

70.0

* High Variation of Observed and Expected Values

7.0/3.0 6.0/4.6 0.0/3.1 2.0/4.2
15.0

Statistical testing of the historic site type and soil drainage class illustrated that observed trends are not the result of sampling bias and are illustrated in Figure 16. Therefore, the null hypothesis can be rejected, as there is a difference in settlement/occupation strategy. High variation is observed in relation to Domestic, Cemetery, and Miscellaneous site types. Observed Domestic and Cemetery sites show higher than expected frequency for (somewhat) excessively drained soils. Conversely, Miscellaneous sites show a higher than expected frequency in (somewhat to very) poorly drained soils. Other site types represented do not show high variation between observed and expected values suggesting a dispersed pattern of utilization possible biased by the small sample size.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 69
V. CULTURAL IMPLICATIONS

The aim of this research report is to analyze the cultural landscape within the Dougherty Plain study area within an environmental paradigm. This research plan was implemented through literature review and Georgia State Site File research analyzed through a Geographic Information System (GIS). An environmental approach was utilized to investigate specific research questions in regards to a regional cultural dataset. All site information is provided within Appendix A and digitally with the GIS illustration on a CD accompanying this research volume.

These research questions revolved around concepts of human ecology. Briefly, human ecology is the study of the human relationship(s) with the natural and/or created environment. The environmental approach of this study focuses on the changing dynamics of human ecology through time. The environmental variables of elevation zones, drainage catchment densities, and soil drainage classes were associated with a defined cultural dataset. The cultural dataset encompassed Prehistoric, Proto-historic, and Historic resources discovered within the Dougherty Plain. Native American occupation was investigated by cultural sub-period including the Paleoindian through the Historic Indian periods. Historic site types were grouped by function and analyzed within the same environmental approach.

Research questions defined for this study include the following:

o

Is there evidence for Pre-Paleoindian sites in the Dougherty Plain and what setting

are these sites located?

o

Within the study area, are Paleoindian sites distributed across the landscape in a

potentially highly mobile and dispersed (using low and upland areas) settlement

pattern reminiscent of foraging?

o

Do Paleoindian sites cluster along drainage ways having culturally utilized riparian

environments and potentially acting as migration corridors?

o

Are Paleoindian sites tied to chert outcrops?

o

Are Early Archaic sites similar to Late Paleoindian occupations in regards to

settlement strategy?

o

Is a lower population and/or restricted group mobility during the Middle Archaic

reflected by site clustering? Or is there a trend of dispersed site distribution?

o

Are Middle Archaic sites concentrated in specific water related niches (potentially)

in response to warmer and drier conditions?

70

o

During the Late Archaic, are sites dispersed suggesting high mobility or

concentrated in specific environmental settings suggesting (semi-) permanent

occupations focused on specific niche(s) such as smaller upland streams?

o

Is there cultural continuity in regards to settlement strategy for the Late Archaic and

Early Woodland?

o

Is there a trend for dispersed sites on fertile soils suggestive of small Woodland

farmsteads?

o

During the Late Woodland, are sites in the bottomlands and/or dispersed along

upper tributaries?

o

During the Early Mississippian, is there a continued settlement pattern from the Late

Woodland sub-period?

o

Is a more dispersed Woodland population having a diverse settlement strategy

reflected in the Dougherty Plain?

o

Are increases in population during the Middle and Late Mississippian sub-periods

seen by increased site frequency?

o

Are Mississippian sites located in less desirable locations for agriculture?

o Does Native American site frequencies illustrate a relatively vacant landscape during the Proto-historic and Historic?

o

Does the environmental setting of sites suggest a settlement strategy of dispersed

farmsteads?

o

Are Historic Euro-American Military sites focused in the bottomlands of major

drainage ways?

o

Is there a trend in Historic Euro-American Transportation routes suggestive of

particular industry or urban needs?

o

Are Historic Euro-American Agrarian and Domestic sites concentrated in the

floodplain(s)?

o

Do other Historic site types show any pattern in environmental variables?

Given defined, independent variables, analysis was conducted to investigate human-environment associations. Analysis included frequency distribution and chi-square statistical tests. In some instances, statistical analysis was limited by small sample size, resulting in tentative results and related trends discussed below.

The cultural implications of these analyses are discussed here and reflect upon the defined research questions and literature review. The following discussion summarizes the findings by Native

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 71
American period in relation to the regional cultural context and results of this study in order to deduce potential cultural implications in the Dougherty Plain study area. This is followed by discussion of historic results and the implications of this data within the context of Euro-American and African American settlement and development.
NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL IMPLICATIONS
(PRE-) PALEOINDIAN PERIOD
Potential Pre-Paleoindian sites have been discovered in the interior Coastal Plain similar to the study area. It is hypothesized that Paleoindian populations were highly mobile foragers in the oakhickory-pine Coastal Plain, but may have been somewhat logistically organized in regards to riparian and lithic resources at least in the boreal forests north of the Fall Line. Within the study area, no Pre-Paleoindian sites were recorded.
Paleoindian sites were previously found by collectors along watersheds and drainage divides in the study area (e.g., Elliott 2004). The current analysis of this cultural subset was limited by a small and poorly distributed sample size compared to later timeframes. However, the inter-riverine setting of the study area with outcropping chert is a favorable environmental niche according to previous documentation of Paleoindian findings within other physiographic regions. This suggests that southwest Georgia may have been a favored region during the Paleoindian period (Ledbetter et al. 1996). In fact, a concentration of Early and Middle Paleoindian sites in southwest Georgia is documented (Ledbetter et al. 1996).
Windham (2006) suggested that Late Pleistocene changes in climate may have strongly affected early prehistoric use of the study area and procurement of chert outcrops (e.g., Goad 1979). During the formation of the Coastal Plain, which correlates to the Pleistocene/Early Holocene geologic and Paleoindian/Early Archaic transitions, the Dougherty Plain study area may not have been a viable resource procurement area due to fluctuations in sea level, changing seasonal attributes, and resulting changes in vegetation and fauna.
However, Windham (2006) found evidence for deeply buried deposits at 9MI149 in Miller County, an area of chert outcrops, that potentially are related to this transitional timeframe within an interriverine setting. In addition, Paleoindian sites were found at surface (mostly by collectors) and submerged contexts of southwest Georgia and the Muckafoonee site near Albany (Elliott 2004). These findings suggest some association with lithic resources; although, ephemeral camps may have been more heavily utilized within the oak-hickory-pine forests.
The limited number of sites from the Early and Late sub-periods (n=12) made settlement patterns difficult to empirically test. Observation of site frequency showed that sites were dispersed in the Early and Late Paleoindian. Results of General Paleoindian sites (n=19) (used here due to low subperiod site frequency) suggest that Paleoindian populations preferred low/bottomlands distributed in the upper and lower (not middle) catchment density zones with varying soil drainage.
Considering the study area is located between two major river corridors (the Chattahoochee and Flint) it is likely that the region was incorporated within the scattered pattern of Paleoindian/Early Archaic landscape utilization found in other parts of the Coastal Plain and other physiographic

72
regions. Therefore, the (Pre-)Paleoindian sites likely reflect a survey bias and a scattered settlement strategy during the timeframe that appears to focus on lowland water features of the upper tributaries, as suggested by Elliott (2004:17), and large drainage ways. These water features and lowland elevations would have provided culturally utilized plant species and fauna. In addition, more linear water features may have served as migration corridors where large quarry (and possibly aggregation) sites occurred such as Muckafoonee on the Flint River. The expanse of documented and undocumented chert resources in the region precludes any observations of potential site associations with chert outcrops. However, chert resources are likely a factor as seen in the study area in southwest Georgia, and may be tied to theories regarding quarry and aggregation settlement strategies (see Anderson and Sassaman 1996 for discussion).
ARCHAIC PERIOD
The Archaic period was a time of increased population and changing group mobility tied, at least in part, to environmental changes. Increased population is a hallmark of the Archaic period across the Southeast, and this increase holds true within the Dougherty Plain study area. The changing landscape utilization documented within the PCWMS (Windham et al. 2007) and near Blakely, Georgia (Waggoner 2003) may be a small-scale reflection of larger settlement patterns of specific microenvironments. However, fluctuation in overarching Archaic landscape preference in regards to elevation, drainage density, and soil drainage on the larger scale of the study region proved statistically insignificant. This observation may be the result of the low percentage of archaeological survey coverage in the study area as a whole and the resulting sample size. Observations of frequency distributions are utilized to formulate tentative hypotheses of Archaic settlement strategy. The lack of evidence for landform preference during the Archaic period suggests that populations were utilizing a diversity of microenvironments within the Dougherty Plain study area.
The Early Archaic shows a distinctive spike in site frequency that is often related to cultural adaptation to the warmer and wetter Early Holocene conditions through a wide-ranging and seasonal logistical strategy. Results of this study show a dispersed pattern of Early Archaic occupations (n=70) in the well and poorly drained lowlands of all drainage catchment zones.
This dispersed pattern may mirror the landscape utilization of the previous Paleoindian period and natural population increase. In fact, the Early Archaic site distribution is almost identical to the Paleoindian period with emphasis on lowlands/bottomlands and distributed across all (including middle) catchment density zones and soil drainage classes.
The Middle Archaic sub-period is generally represented by a hiatus in occupational density across the Southeast and is attributed to the dryer conditions of the Hypsithermal (potentially caused by Milankovitch cycles of the Earth's orbit). This pattern is not strongly represented by observed frequencies within this study, as the Middle Archaic dataset (n=58) did not show a considerable decrease in population density compared to the Early Archaic sub-period. The previous research defines greater constriction of group mobility and concentration on upland ponds (sinks).
Observation of Middle Archaic site frequency shows fairly even distribution in association with the environmental variables. Therefore, a dispersed settlement strategy is suggested. This study suggests that despite slightly lower occupation rates during the Middle Archaic, the landscape was broadly utilized (possibly more so than during the Early Archaic), with no significant information suggesting

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 73
restricted environmental ranges at this regional scale. Utilization of all landscape settings with no apparent preference is particularly interesting given previous research of the Hypsithermal and Middle Archaic sub-period in the region. This suggests that the sinks did not "dry up" during this timeframe, which would have forced population to congregate around large rivers having low catchment densities.
Consistent with views of climate stabilization and the Late Archaic, the study area shows a significant increase in Late Archaic occupations (n=220). Observed site frequencies suggest a settlement pattern focused on well and poorly drained soils ranging from midland to bottomland elevations within medium catchment densities. This tentative pattern suggests that Late Archaic populations, though somewhat dispersed across elevation zones, preferred to occupy tributaries and associated water features (i.e. sinks, oxbows) as opposed to the headwaters or large drainage ways. This information shows that smaller streams were more heavily utilized as a Late Archaic niche, and suggests focused (possibly [semi-]permanent) occupations.
Recognizing the limited Archaic period sample size and geographically restricted study region, these results do provide an interesting perspective worthy of attention during future studies. The collective information suggests that the population utilized a diversity of natural settings within a mobile and logistically based strategy. Fine-tuned site-specific research, analysis of site types, and a larger, statistically reliable sample could further illuminate patterns within this generally dispersed Archaic settlement pattern.
WOODLAND PERIOD
Increased social complexity and more sedentary occupations in the bottomlands of large drainage ways is a settlement strategy recognized for the Southeastern Woodland period. In this study, the Woodland period is marked by an apparent abandonment and subsequent revitalization in regional occupation. The drop in Early Woodland occupations within the study area is observed in the cultural dataset and is flanked by higher populations during the Late Archaic and Middle Woodland. Continued population increase is evidenced during the Late Woodland sub-period and shows an adaptation in landscape utilization. Frequency distribution and statistical testing showed significant Woodland period trends in settlement strategy and strong human-environment associations.
The drop in Early Woodland site frequency (n=40) is potentially linked to nascent political organization that emphasized agricultural dependence along large low-drainage density bottomlands. The congregation of populations within this environmental setting, as documented throughout the Southeast, is supported by this study. Significant results suggest that Early Woodland peoples in the Dougherty Plain settled excessively drained bottomlands within low drainage density catchments or, simply speaking, dry areas on large floodplains. Although Late Archaic sites occur in this environmental niche, their frequency is more pronounced for the Early Woodland. Far fewer sites occur in other midland or upland settings refuting the notion that, overall, small-dispersed Early Woodland farmsteads were a preferred settlement strategy. It appears that the initial phases of social nucleation for a regional population resulted in lower site frequency. It is worth noting that upland summer procurement camps/forays would leave minimal diagnostic evidence and also could contribute to the overall paucity of Early Woodland occupations in these settings.

74
Middle Woodland occupations (n=103) are more highly represented within the study area and likely indicate increases in population density. The statistically significant association of Middle Woodland sites with all tested environmental variables suggests a continued pattern of dry (excessively drained) bottomland settlement within low-density catchments. Some researchers suggest that dispersed upland riverine settlements are associated with Kolomoki and other "vacant centers"; however, the current study does not illustrate a strong preference for this elevation zone.
The Late Woodland sub-period diverges from the previous Woodland pattern and is significant to this study. Late Woodland sites (n=180) occur in floodplain environments. In addition, populations also exploited excessively drained low midland elevations (more than previous Woodland subperiods) within medium drainage density. This supports the concept that at least a significant minority of sites, possibly small farmsteads, was dispersed among upper tributaries, but not at the headwaters. Late Woodland sites did not occur less than expected in higher drainage density catchments. Cumulatively, these findings suggest that Late Woodlands people sought to exploit similar settings not exceedingly far removed from the lowlands of large drainage ways.
The Late Woodland pattern revealed during this analysis is consistent with previous research, which found a trend toward upland tributary occupation where "upland" may be relative to the scale of the environment and analysis. This environmental setting is less conducive to agricultural subsistence (smaller floodplain and fertile, alluvial deposits) as practiced during this timeframe and reflects a different utilization of the landscape. It may be that this settlement pattern of fertile pockets reflects a cultural adaptation to a stressed environmental carrying capacity due to increased population and/or social pressures within the study area. In-depth research on various site types may yield further information about the shift in Late Woodland landscape utilization.
MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD
Mound centers and large sites on floodplains characterize the Mississippian period in the much of the Southeast; however, recent research suggests that the settlement strategy was more diverse and present in "traditionally" undesirable locations in, at least, the Dougherty Plain. Within the Dougherty Plain study area, the Mississippian period was marked by few sites (n=120), with a slight increase in site frequency during the Late Mississippian sub-period (n=39). This pattern in site frequencies for the Mississippian period is reminiscent of the findings for Woodland period sites, possibly suggesting greater nucleation. However, the frequencies are much lower, suggesting a decrease in population, possibly in conjunction with social nucleation in other regions. The Mississippian sample was not statistically reliable due to limited quantity. Therefore, observations of frequency distributions and human-environment associations are considered tentative.
A sudden decline and overall lack of occupation suggests that the region did not offer a preferred environmental setting and that socio-political organization was focused elsewhere, at least during the Early and Middle Mississippian. The settlement pattern reflected across the Southeast emphasizes broad well-drained floodplains along large low-density drainages. However, the current study showed greater dispersal of Early and Middle Mississippian sites throughout various elevation and drainage catchment density zones on well-drained and inundated soils. This dispersal and exceedingly low site frequency is more similar to the Paleoindian and Early Archaic timeframes than any later trend.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 75
During the Late Mississippian, site frequency increased in the bottomlands, along all drainage density zones having varying soil drainage. Although the majority of Late Mississippian sites occur in association with the Chattahoochee and Flint rivers, the bottomlands of smaller drainage ways and associated water features also were utilized. Dispersal of Late Mississippian sites suggests a diverse settlement strategy existed. This strategy included areas less desirable for large-scale agriculture, a hallmark of the "traditional" Mississippian settlement. Further, it supports evidence for a continued "pure Woodland" tradition, such as observed for the Late Woodland sub-period, into the Mississippian.
This trend is perplexing and inconclusive but suggests large-scale abandonment of the region. Recent study of Mississippian sites within the Chickasawhatchee Swamp suggests that the small sample may not fully reflect the range of regional settlement pattern(s) during this period as middle range sites have been discovered in environmental setting removed from the floodplains of the large river drainages (Chamblee 2004, 2005, 2006). Greater archaeological coverage may reveal other inter-riverine Mississippian sites that created an adaptive niche.
Future archaeological survey may show a more distinct pattern of relatively small centers and sites that created a web-like interaction sphere in the region. However, the overall lack of Mississippian occupations suggests that the upland study area may have been a part of an outland buffer zone and/or resource procurement area between the Mississippian polities seen along the Chattahoochee and Flint watersheds. Analysis of a future and larger sample could aid interpretation of one or more Mississippian settlement patterns in the study area.
PROTO-HISTORIC PERIOD
The Dougherty Plain was minimally inhabited by Native Americans during the Proto-historic and Historic period. It is hypothesized that Native Americans became acculturated with time and adopted a settlement strategy of small-dispersed farmsteads.
Only a handful of Proto-historic period sites have been recorded within the Dougherty Plain study area (n=57); therefore, the study area appears to have been relatively vacant during this timeframe. This follows Elliott's (2004:24) assertion that most Native Americans were incorporated into the Spanish Mission System located primarily to the south and east in coastal areas. The low frequency of Proto-historic sites did not yield a statistically reliable sample.
In regards to the limited remaining population, observed patterns within this relatively small sample suggest a preference for a specific environmental setting. The setting consisted of (moderately) well and poorly drained low midland elevations within medium to low-density drainage catchment. This human-environment relation potentially suggests that the limited Native American populations may have preferred a settlement strategy focused on upper midland tributaries. These sites were likely small-dispersed farmsteads on fertile pockets similar to the minority trend in the Late Woodland subperiod. Overall, the limited sample suggests that less desirable areas (not bottom/lowland floodplains) were utilized during initial European colonization. The reasons for this settlement strategy trend may be related to or in response to European encroachment.

76
HISTORIC INDIAN PERIOD
Historic Indian sites (n=49) also are few and do not represent a statically reliable sample. The low frequency suggests that the Dougherty Plain study area was not heavily utilized by Historic Indians. Observed site frequency distribution shows a settlement trend of well drained and inundated bottomland elevations along large, low-density drainage catchments that diverge from the Protohistoric observations. This is particularly true of the Chattahoochee River, which is considered Lower Creek territory. A secondary preference for low midland elevations also was observed.
These floodplain settings are considered conducive to large-scale agriculture. Therefore, the overriding trend is for (potentially) large bottomland sites with few sites dispersed in the midlands. A return to a more agriculturally productive setting suggests a cultural shift from the Proto-historic that could be attributed to several factors including acculturation, cooperation, and reorganization of Native Americans with encroaching European settlement. These factors deserve further research attention during future studies of a larger sample size.
HISTORIC CULTURAL IMPLICATIONS
The first Euro-American Historic occupations were forts (military) along the rivers, later followed by increased population and railroads, which tied river ports to the interior Dougherty Plain. The first settlers focused on agricultural plantations followed by timbering and turpentine industries after the Civil War.
Historic sites show specific trends in most physiographic regions. Occupations are typically constructed with transportation in mind and can be found along historic roads, many of which are currently utilized and recorded on related map sources. In addition, archaeological survey is often conducted along these same roads for improvements in transportation. Given that the current cultural dataset relies in large part on archeological survey of roads and most historic sites are along historic roads, analysis may provide a circular argument. To date, survey coverage information is not available and cannot be integrated to fully define this potential bias.
The frequency of Historic sites is low (n=746) creating a small, statistically unreliable sample in which to test. It was found that dividing this sample by site type further compromised the ability to statistically test association with environmental variables. Therefore, historic cultural implications presented are considered tentative and largely based on observation of frequency distribution.
AGRARIAN SITES
The Dougherty Plain study area of southwest Georgia is marked by rural and agrarian lifeways. Sites attributed to the agricultural practices within the cultural dataset were limited in number (n=16) but showed a tentative human-environment trend. Agrarian sites tend to be found in the (moderately) well-drained low and low-midland elevation zones in low-density drainage catchments. This result is unsurprising given the need for good cropland for agricultural functions. However, it is noted that these sites were not typically discovered in lowland areas adjacent to large drainages (lowest density). This observation is likely related to a desire to places structures in locations that were not subject to frequent flooding while employing floodplain locations as agriculture fields.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 77
While relatively few Agrarian sites were recorded in the region, it is likely that many of the domestic occupations (discussed below) were domestic households on farms, but, in the absence of agricultural artifacts, was not recognized as Agrarian sites.
CEMETERY SITES
Historic Cemetery sites (n=55) were numerous within the cultural dataset and show a trend in location. There is a preference for lowland to low-midland elevations within mid to low drainage density zones. The majority of these sites are located on well-drained soils, yet, there is a secondary preference for somewhat excessively drained soils. These findings reflect the function of Cemetery sites such that they may be in association with family, community, or church lands in a variety of locations across the landscape although potentially placed in areas less suitable for construction (i.e. a lowland next to landform where a church was built). Cultural place and association are considered primary determinants for location, while water source and soil drainage would be of limited importance.
COMMUNITY/INTERACTION SITES
This study combined Community and Interaction site types (n=16) due to the related function and limited quantity within the samples. No specific trends emerged through the current analysis in regards to this combined historic category. Instead, the handful of recorded sites is generally dispersed in regards to elevation, drainage catchment density, and soil drainage (with the exception of well-drained soils). No inference can be deduced for this negative data, which likely reflects the small sample size rather than a meaningful pattern.
DOMESTIC SITES
Historic sites having a domestic function were highly represented within the current dataset (n=163) and showed specific trends in habitation location. These sites were heavily represented within the high to low midland elevation and drainage catchment ranges having (moderately) well and excessively drained soils. Specifically, there is a trend for historic Domestic sites to be located in the midlands flanking smaller tributaries, not within floodplains. These results suggest that homesteads were placed in areas that would not flood, offered potable water, and may have been surrounded by good cropland, suggesting that many of these Domestic sites operated in the Agrarian world. Considering the past and present rural nature of the majority of the study area, many of these sites may be tied to large land holdings for agriculture and livestock with the house site constructed on the higher landforms.
Urban areas having historic Domestic sites such as Albany and Cordele are located in relatively higher elevations and drainage catchment densities. These urban areas have been more extensively surveyed due to transportation needs and skew the Domestic site sub-sample. Yet, the association with higher elevation and catchment density may reflect some level of city planning in which inundation (during floods) would be avoided and population growth encouraged.
INDUSTRIAL SITES
Industrial sites within the study area include mills, furnaces, spring boxes, and a variety of other resources related to providing services to a community. The limited number of Industrial sites (n=28) tends to be in lowland, low drainage catchment density areas on well-drained soils, or at water.

78
Considering the need for flowing water for industries such as historic milling and for spring boxes, this functional association with large water drainages is an expected trend for Industrial sites. The locational trend is further supported by the need to transport goods efficiently, which was often by river during historic times. Aided by a larger dataset, research of Industrial site types may yield more detailed information for the environmental associations of different Industrial site types.
MISCELLANEOUS SITES
The Miscellaneous site type category is highly represented (n=238), but diverse in nature. Therefore, only limited implications can be deduced from observation frequency. These sites are scattered across lowland and midland areas having varying catchment densities. There is prevalence for these sites on well-drained soils with a secondary occurrence on poorly drained soils. Considering that many of these sites are dumps, push piles, springs, isolated finds, and rock piles, it follows that these sites would be in less desirable areas that are not suitable for agriculture, infrastructure, or other household/community needs.
TRANSPORTATION/URBAN/MILITARY
Transportation, Urban, and Military sites were combined for statistical study (n=23) as related types as these types are often culturally interrelated such that urban and military centers form in places of good transportation routes and further encourage the growth of both. An overall lack of Urban and Military sites within this dataset reflects the rural landscape that has existed from initial settlement to present within the study area. Observation of the limited sample shows Military sites in low-lying areas of large drainage ways. This supports documentation for bottomland Military sites. Given the low frequency of urban and Military sites (n=8), trends in this historic site category are more representative of Transportation sites. A trend of bottomland and lowest drainage catchment density areas is observed and heavily represented by Transportation sites. These sites may be related to mills and other industries needing river transport (such as cotton) and roads for service. The small sample size and archaeological survey bias likely influence these results.
CONCLUSIONS
This research study of the natural environmental and cultural landscape within the Dougherty Plain illustrates general landscape utilization through prehistory and history with caveat that small sample size, in some instances, hindered empirical testing. Results of waxing and waning occupations indicate that the inter-riverine area was not heavily utilized through most cultural timeframes. Rather, the outland area was sparsely inhabited and shows some divergence from the views of broader Southeastern settlement patterns. Sites including lithic procurement areas, farmsteads, small mounds, and plantations to name a few; in essence, formed a cultural "outland" web across the Dougherty Plain. This analysis indicates that cultural trends in landscape utilization were less structured in an environmental setting that also lacked structure. Specific trends observed for cultural sub-groups in this study should serve as a catalyst, not a conclusion, for more in-depth research in the future.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 79
REFERENCES CITED

Adair, J. 1930

Adair's History of the American Indians. Edited by S. C. Williams. Promontory Press, New York.

Anderson, D. G.

1995

Paleoindian Interaction Networks in the Eastern Woodlands. In Native American Interactions: Multiscalar Analyses and Interpretations in the Eastern Woodlands, edited by M. S. Nassaney and K. E. Sassaman, pp. 3-26. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.

2004

Archaic Mounds and the Archaeology of Southeastern Tribal Societies. In Signs of Power: The Rise of Cultural Complexity in the Southeast, edited by J. L. Gibson and P. J. Carr, pp. 270-299. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

2005

Southeastern Regional Context. Archaeology Program. National Park Service, U. S. Department of the Interior. Electronic document, http://www.cr.nps.gov/archeology/PUBS/NHLEAM/E-Southeast.htm, accessed March 26, 2006.

Anderson, D. G., and G. T. Hanson
1988 Early Archaic Settlement in the Southeastern United States: A Case Study from the Savannah River Basin. American Antiquity 53:262-286.

Anderson, D. G., and J. W. Joseph
1988 Prehistory and History along the Upper Savannah River. Garrow and Associates Technical Report submitted to Interagency Archaeological Services, Atlanta.

Anderson, D. G., R. J. Ledbetter, and L. O' Steen
1990 Paleoindian Period Archaeology of Georgia. University of Georgia Laboratory of Archaeology Series Report No. 28. Athens.

Anderson, D.G. and Kenneth E. Sassaman

1996

Modeling Paleoindian and Early Archaic Settlement in the Southeast: A Historical Perspective. In The Paleoindian and Early Archaic Southeast, edited by David G. Anderson and Kenneth E. Sassaman, pp. 16-28. University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.

Bense, J. A. (editor)
1987 Midden Mound Project. Reports of Investigations No. 6, Office of Cultural and Archaeological Research, University of West Florida, Pensacola.

1994 Archaeology of the Southeastern United States: Paleoindian to World War I. Academic Press, San Diego.

80

Beverley, R. 1968

The History and Present State of Virginia, edited by L. B. Wright. Orginally Published in 1705. Dominian Books, University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville.

Binford, L. R. 1980

Willow Smoke and Dogs' Tails: Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation. American Antiquity 45:4-28.

Blanton, D. B., and K. E. Sassaman

1989

Pattern and Process in the Middle Archaic Period of South Carolina. In Studies in South Carolina Archaeology, edited by A. C. Goodyear and G. T. Hanson, pp.53-72. Anthropological Studies No.9, Occasional Paper of the South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, The University of South Carolina, Columbia.

Bouwman, R. E.
1992 Traveler's Rest and the Tugaloo Crossroads. State of Georgia DNR, Historic Preservation Section, Atlanta.

Braley, C. O. 1995

Historic Indian Period Archaeology of the Georgia Coastal Plain. Georgia Archaeological Research Design Paper No. 10. University of Georgia Laboratory of Archaeology Series Report No. 34. University of Georgia, Athens.

Braley, C. O., and T. J. Price

1991

Cultural Resources Survey of Selected (Fy90) Timber Harvesting Areas, Fort Gordon, Richmond and Columbia Counties, Georgia. Southeastern Archaeological Services Technical Report submitted to the Savannah US Army Corps of Engineers an Division of Forestry and Engineering, Fort Gordon.

Brooks, M.J., B.A. Taylor, and J.A. Grant
n.d. Carolina Bay Geoarchaeology and Holocene Landscape Evolution on the Upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina. Unpublished Manuscript.

Brookes, S. O.

2004

Cultural Complexity in the Middle Archaic of Mississippi. In Signs of Power: The Rise of Cultural Complexity in the Southeast, edited by J. L. Gibson and P. J. Carr, pp. 97-113. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

Brown, R. C. 1994 Florida's First People. Pineapple Press, Sarasota.

Bullen, R. P. 1975 A Guide to the Identification of Florida Projectile Points. Kendall Books, Gainesville.

Caldwell, J. R.
1951 The Discovery of the Old Quartz Culture. Unpublished Paper presented to the Anthropology Club of the University of Georgia, Athens.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 81

Cambron. J. W., and D. Hulse
1975 Handbook of Alabama Archaeology: Part I: Point Types. Archaeology Research Center Association of Alabama, Birmingham.

Cantley, C.E. and J.W. Joseph

1991

Prehistory of the Middle Chattahoochee River Valley; Findings of the 1989-1900 West Point Lake Archaeological Survey and Testing Project. Report submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mobile District. Copies available from New South Associates, Georgia.

Cantley, C.E., L.E. Raymer, J.H.N. Loubser, and M.B. Reed

1996

Phase III Data Recovery at Four Prehistoric Sites in the Horton Creek Reservoir Project Area, Fayette County, Georgia. Submitted to Mallett and Associates. Copies available from New South Associates, Stone Mountain, Georgia.

Chamblee, J. F.

2004

Regional Survey and Intra-site Patterns in the Chickasawhatchee Swamp, Georgia. Unpublished Paper presented at the 61st Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, St. Louis.

2005

Regional and Intra-Site Settlement Patterns in the Chickaswatchee Swamp, Georgia. Unpublished Paper presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Salt Lake City.

2006

Periods, Patches, and Places: A New Look at Eastern Woodlands Settlement Patterns and Mound Building in the Lower Southeast. Unpublished Paper presented at the 63rd Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Little Rock.

Chapman, J. 1985

Archaeology and the Archaic Period in the Southern Ridge-and-Valley Province. In Structure and Process in Southeastern Archaeology, edited by R. S. Dickens and H. T. Ward, pp. 137-153. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

Clark, J. E. 2004

Surrounding the Sacred: Geometry and Design of Early Mound Groups as Meaning and Function. In Signs of Power: The Rise of Cultural Complexity in the Southeast, edited by J. L. Gibson and P. J. Carr, pp. 162-213. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

Clarke, W. Z., Jr. and A. C. Zisa 1976 Physiographic Map of Georgia. U.S. Department of Natural Resources. Atlanta.

Coe, J. L. 1964

The Formative Cultures of the Carolina Piedmont. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 54(5), Philadelphia.

82

Conaty, G. T. and E. K. Leach

1987

Resource Patches and Mobility Strategies: Archaic Responses to Climatic Change. In Man and Mid-Holocene Climatic Optimum, edited by N. A. McKinnon and G. S. L. Stuart. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary.

Cooke, C. Wythe
1943 Geology of the Coastal Plain of Georgia. Geologic Survey Bulletin 941. Department of the Interior. Washington.

Coulter, E. M. 1933 A Short History of Georgia. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

Daniel, I. R. 1994

Hardaway Revisited: Early Archaic Settlement in the Southeast. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Delcourt, H. R. and P. A. Delcourt

1985

Quaternary Palynology and Vegetational History of the Southeastern United States. In Pollen records of the Late Quaternary North American Sediments, edited by V. M. Bryant and R. G. Holloway, pp.1-37. American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation, Washington DC.

1987 Long-term Forest Dynamics of the Temperate Zone: A Case Study of Late Quaternary Forests in Eastern North America. Ecological Studies 63. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Dincauze, Dena F.
2000 Environmental Archaeology Principles and Practice. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Drennan, Robert D. 1996 Statistics for Archeologists: A Commonsense Approach. Plenum Press, New York.

Doran, G. H. and D. N. Dickel
1988 Radiometric Chronology of the Archaic Windover Archaeological Site (8Br246). Florida Anthropologist 41:365-380.

Elliott, D. T. 1989 Manuscript on file, Southeastern Archaeological Services, Inc., Athens, Georgia.

2004 Southwest Georgia Archaeological Survey, 2001-2004. Lamar Institute Publication 60, Box Springs.

Elliott, D. T. and K. E. Sassaman

1995

Archaic Period Archaeology of the Georgia Coastal Plain and Coastal Zone. Georgia Archaeological Research Design Paper No. 11. University of Georgia Laboratory of Archaeology Series Report Number 35, Athens.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 83

Fish, P. R. and S. K. Fish

1977

Prehistoric Settlement in the Dry Creek Watershed: Results of an Archaeological Survey for the USDA Soil Conservation Service in Decatur, Seminole, Miller, and Early Counties, Georgia. University of Georgia Laboratory of Archaeology Series Report 14, Athens.

Fitting, James E.

1964

Some Characteristics of Projectile Point Bases from the Holcombe Site, Macombe County, Michigan. Papers in Michigan Academy of Science, Arts and Letters 49:231-238. (1963 meetings).

Fretwell, Mark E.
1980 This So Remote Frontier: The Chattahoochee Country of Alabama and Georgia. Historic Chattahoochee Commission, Eufaula, Alabama.

Fritz, G. J. 1993

Early and Middle Period Paleoethnobotany. In Foraging and Farming in the Eastern Woodlands, edited by M. Scarry, pp. 39-56. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.

1997

A Three-Thousand-Year-Old Cache of Crop Seeds from Marble Bluff, Arkansas. In People, Plant, and Landscape Studies in Paleoethnobotany, edited by K. J. Gremillion, pp. 42-62. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

Gardner, P. S.

1997

The Ecological Structure and Behavioral Implications of Mast Exploitation Strategies. In People, Plant, and Landscape Studies in Paleoethnobotany, edited by K. J. Gremillion, pp. 161-178. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

Georgia Historical Society 1981 The Counties of the State of Georgia. Georgia Historical Society, Savannah, Georgia.

Gibson, J. L. and P. J. Carr (editors)
2004 Signs of Power: The Rise of Cultural Complexity in the Southeast. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

Goad, S. I. 1979

Chert Resources in Georgia: Archaeological and Geological Perspectives. University of Georgia, Laboratory of Archaeology Series Report 21, Athens.

Goodyear, A. C.
2005 Summary of the Allendale Paleoindian expedition 2003 and 20004 Field Seasons. Legacy 9(1 and 2):4-11.

Griffin, James B. and William H. Sears

1950

Certain Sand-tempered Pottery Types of the Southeast. In Prehistoric Pottery of the Eastern United States, edited by J.B. Griffin. University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology. Ann Arbor.

84

Griffith, G.E., J. M. Omernik, J. Comstock, A. Lawrence, and T. Foster
2001 Ecoregions of Georgia. Corvallis, Oregon, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (map scale 1:1,500,000).

Hally, D. J. and M. Williams
1994 Macon Plateau Site Community Pattern. In Ocmulgee Archaeology, 1936-1986, edited by D. J. Hally, pp. 84-95. University of Georgia Press, Athens.

Hemperley, Marion R., and Edwin L. Jackson
1993 Georgia's Boundaries: The Shaping of a State. Carl Vinson Institute of Government, University of Georgia.

Hollenbach, Kandance

2005

Modeling Resource Procurement of Southeastern Hunter-Gathers: A View from Northwest Alabama. Paper presented at 62nd Annual Meeting of Southeastern Archaeological Conference. Columbia South Carolina

Horton, R. E. 1945

Erosional Developments of Streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geologic Society American Bulletin 56, pp. 275-370.

Jefferies, R. W.
1997 Middle Archaic Bone Pins: Evidence of Mid-Holocene Regional-Scale Social Groups in the Southern Midwest. American Antiquity 62:464-487.

Johannessen, S. J.,
1993 Farmers of the Late Woodland. In Foraging and Farming in the Eastern Woodlands, edited by C. M. Scarry, pp. 39-56. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.

Jones, J. W. 2003

Ecological Research Center at Ichauway. Electronic http://www.jonesctr.org/research/aquatics_research/wetland_research.html, March 27, 2006.

document, accessed

Jones, S. 2006 Quartz Tool Technology in the Northeast Georgia Piedmont. Early Georgia 34(1):27-88.

Joseph, J.W., Theresa M. Hamby, and Catherine S. Long
2004 Historical Archaeology in Georgia. Georgia Archaeological Research Design Paper No. 14. University of Georgia, Athens.

Ledbetter, R. J.
1995 Archaeological Investigations at Mill Branch Sites 9Wr4 and 9Wr11, Warren County, Georgia. Technical Reports No. 3, Interagency Archaeological Services Division, Atlanta.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 85

Ledbetter, R.J., D.G. Anderson, L.D. O'Steen, and D.T. Elliott

1996

Paleoindian and Early Archaic Research in Georgia. In The Paleoindian and Early Archaic Southeast, edited by David G. Anderson and Kenneth E. Sassaman, pp. 270-287. University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.

Leopold, Luna B.; M. Gordon Wolman; John P. Miller 1964 Fluvial Processes in Geomorpohology. Dover Publications, New York.

Loubser, J. H. N.

2005

In Small Cupules Forgotten: Rock Markings, Archaeology, and Ethnography in the Deep South. In Discovering North American Rock Art, edited by L. L. Loendorf, C. Chippendale, and D. S. Whitley, pp. 131-160. The University of Arizona Press, Tuscon.

Markewich, H. W. and W. Markewich

1994

An Overview of Pleistocene and Holocene Inland Dunes in Georgia and the CarolinasMorphology, Distribution, Age, and Paleoclimate. US Geological Survey Bulletin 2069, Washington D.C.

Milanich, J.T. 1971

The Deptford Phase: An Archaeological Reconstruction. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville.

Mooney, J. 1900

Myths of the Cherokees. Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Nineteenth Annual Report, 1897-1898. Part 1, pp. 3-576. US Government Printing Office, Washington DC

Myer, W. E. 1928

Indian Trails of the Southeast. Forty-second Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1924-25. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

National Hydrologic Dataset

2005

National Hydrologic dataset, NHDH0313. Electronic document, ftp://nhdftp.usgs.gov/SubRegions/High/, accessed April 21, 2007. U.S. Geologic Society.

Natural Resources Conservation Service
2006a Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Decatur County, Georgia, ga087. Electronic document, http://websoilsurve.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed April 21, 2007. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.

2006b Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Dougherty County, Georgia, ga095. Electronic document, http://websoilsurve.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed April 21, 2007. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.

86
2006c Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Grady County, Georgia, ga131. Electronic document, http://websoilsurve.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed April 21, 2007. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.
2006d Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Randolph County, Georgia, ga243. Electronic document, http://websoilsurve.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed April 21, 2007. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.
2006e Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Webster County, Georgia, ga307. Electronic document, http://websoilsurve.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed April 21, 2007. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.
2006f Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Worth County, Georgia, ga321. Electronic document, http://websoilsurve.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed April 21, 2007. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.
2006g Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Baker and Mitchell counties, Georgia, ga603. Electronic document, http://websoilsurve.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed April 21, 2007. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.
2006h Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Calhoun and Early counties, Georgia, ga615. Electronic document, http://websoilsurve.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed April 21, 2007. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.
2006i Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Colquitt and Cook counties, Georgia, ga627. Electronic document, http://websoilsurve.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed April 21, 2007. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.
2006j Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Crisp and Turner counties, Georgia, ga631. Electronic document, http://websoilsurve.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed April 21, 2007. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.
2006k Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Dooly and Macon counties, Georgia, ga634. Electronic document, http://websoilsurve.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed April 21, 2007. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.
2006l Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Houston and Peach counties, Georgia, ga640. Electronic document, http://websoilsurve.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed April 21, 2007. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.
2006m Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Lee and Terrell counties, Georgia, ga643. Electronic document, http://websoilsurve.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed April 21, 2007. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.
2006n Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Miller and Seminole counties, Georgia, ga646. Electronic document, http://websoilsurve.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed April 21, 2007. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 87

2006o Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Schley and Sumter counties, Georgia, ga652. Electronic document, http://websoilsurve.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed April 21, 2007. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.

2006p Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Clay and Quitman counties, Georgia, ga658. Electronic document, http://websoilsurve.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed April 21, 2007. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.

Nesbitt, R. T. 1896

Georgia: Her Resources and Possibilities. George W. Harrison, State Printer, Atlanta, Georgia.

O'Conner, T.P.
1991 Science, Evidential Archaeology and the New Scholasticism. Scottish Archaeological Review 8:1-7.

O'Steen, L.D. 1983

Early Archaic Settlement Patterns in the Wallace Reservoir: An Inner Piedmont Perspective. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens.

O'Steen, L. D., R. J. Ledbetter, D. T. Elliott, and W. W. Baker
1983 Paleoindian Sites of the Inner Piedmont of Georgia: Observations of Settlement in the Oconee Watershed. Early Georgia 13:1-63.

Pluckhahn, T. J.
1993 The Evolution of Settlement and Land Use in Jackson and Madison Counties, Georgia. Unpublished MA Thesis, Department of Anthropology, The University of Georgia, Athens.

2003 Kolomoki: Settlement, Ceremony, and Status in the Deep South, AD 350 to 750. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

Robertson, W. B. 1962 Fire and Vegetation in the Everglades. Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Proceedings 1:67-80.

Russo, M.

1992 Chronologies and Cultures of the St. Mary's Region of Northeast Florida and Southeast Georgia. The Florida Anthropologist 45:107-126.

1994 Archaic Mounds in the Southeast. Southeastern Archaeology 3(2):89-109.

Sassaman, K. E.

1993 Early Pottery in the Southeast: Tradition and Innovation in Cooking Technology. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

1994 Production for Exchange in the Mid-Holocene Southeast: A Savannah River Valley Example. Lithic Technology 19:42-51.

88

1995

The Cultural Diversity of Interactions among Mid-Holocene Societies of the American Southeast. In Native American Interactions: Multiscalar Analyses and Interpretations in thee Eastern Woodlands, edited by Michael Nannaney and Kenneth E. Sassaman, pp. 174204. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.

1997 Refining Soapstone Vessel Chronology in the Southeast. Early Georgia 25(1):1-20.

Sassaman, K.E. and M.J. Brooks
1988 Raw Material Procurement and the Reduction of Hunter-gatherer Range in the Savannah River Valley. Southeastern Archaeology 7:79-94.

Sassaman, K. E., M. J. Brooks, G. T. Hanson, and D. G. Anderson.

1990

Native American Prehistory of the Middle Savannah River Valley: A Synthesis of Archaeological Investigations on the Savannah River Site, Aiken and Barnwell Counties, South Carolina. Savannah River Archaeological Research Papers 1, South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of South Carolina, Columbia.

Scarry, J.F. 1980

The Chronology of Fort Walton Development in the Upper Apalachicola Valley, Florida. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 22:38-45.

Schnell, F. T. and N. O. Wright

1993

Mississippian Period Archaeology of the Georgia Coastal Plain. Georgia Archaeological Research Design Papers No. 3. University of Georgia Laboratory of Archaeology Series Report No. 26. University of Georgia, Athens.

Schroedl, G. F.

1998

Mississippian Towns in the Eastern Tennessee Valley. In Mississippian Towns and Sacred Spaces: Searching for and Architectural Grammar, edited by R. B. Lewis and C. Stout, pp. 64-92. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

Shapiro, G. 1990

Bottomlands and Rapids: A Mississippian Adaptive Niche in the Georgia Piedmont. In Lamar Archaeology: Mississippian Chiefdoms in the Deep South, edited by M. Williams and G. Shapiro, pp.147-162. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

Smith, B. D. 1986

The Archaeology of the Southeastern United States; From Dalton to de Soto. Advances in World Archaeology 5:1-91.

1994 The Emergence of Agriculture. Scientific American Library, New York.

Snow, F. 1998

Swift Creek Design Investigations: The Hartford Site. In A World Engraved: Archaeology of the Swift Creek Culture. Edited by M. Williams and D.T. Elliot, pp. 61-98. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 89

Snow, F., Stephenson, Keith, and John E. Worth
1990 Pine Barrens Lamar. In Lamar Archaeology. Edited by M. Williams and G. Shapiro, pp.8293. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

Soday, F. J. 1954

The Quad Site: A Paleoindian Village in Northern Alabama. Tennessee Archaeologist 10 (10):1-20.

Steinen, K. T. 1995

Woodland Period Archaeology of the Georgia Coastal Plain. Georgia Archaeological Research Design Paper No. 12. University of Georgia Laboratory of Archaeology Series Report No. 36. University of Georgia, Athens.

1998

Kolomoki and the Development of Sociopolitical Organization on the Gulf Coast Plain. In A World Engraved: Archaeology of the Swift Creek Culture. Edited by M. Williams and D. T Elliott, pp.181-196. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

Stoltman, James B.

1983

The Evolution of Human Ecosystems in the Eastern United States. In Late Quaternary Environments of the United States, Part 2, The Holocene, edited by H.E. Wright, Jr., pp. 252-268. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

Styles, Bonnie W. and Walter E. Klippel

1996

Mid-Holocene Faunal Exploitation in the Southeastern United States. In Archaeology of the Mid-Holocene Southeast, edited by K.E. Sassaman and D.G. Anderson. University Press of Florida.

Swanton, J. R.
1911 Indian Tribes of the Lower Mississippi Valley and Adjacent Coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin 43, Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C.

1922 Early History of the Creek Indians and their Neighbors. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 73.

1928 Social Organization and Social Usages of the Indians of the Creek Confederacy. 42nd Annual Republication Bureau of American Ethnology, 1924-1925, pp. 23-472.

1946 The Indians of the Southeastern United States. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.

2000 Creek Religion and Medicine. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln

Swanson, Mark
2004 Atlas of the Civil War, Month by Month: Major Battles and Troop Movements. University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia.

90

Thomas, Prentice M., Jr., and L. Janice Campbell

1993

Eglin Air Force Base; Historic Preservation Plan; Technical Synthesis of Cultural Resources Investigations at Eglin; Santa Rosa, Okalooosa and Walton Counties, Florida. New World Research, Inc., Report of Investigations No. 192. Prepared for the National Park Service, Southeast Region, Atlanta. Contract No. CX5000-2-0497.

Veach, Ootto and Lloyd W. Stephenson
1911 Preliminary Report of the Geology of the Coastal Plain of Georgia. Geological Survey of Georgia, Bulletin 26.

Vitebsky, P. 1995 The Shaman. Macmillan, London.

Waggoner, J. C.

2003

Gum Ponds and Cypress Swamps: Late Archaic Use of Upland Interriverine Resources in the Dougherty Plain of Southwest Georgia. Unpublished Paper presented at the 60th Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Charlotte.

2006

From Lithic Scatters to Landscapes: Looking for the Late Archaic Social Complexity in the Interior Coastal Plain. Unpublished Paper presented at the 63rd Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Little Rock.

Wagner, G. E.
2003 Eastern Woodlands Anthropogenic Ecology. In People and Plants in Eastern North America, edited by P. E. Minnis, pp. 126-171. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.

Walker, Renee

2000

Subsistence Strategies at Dust Cave: Changes From the Late Paleoindian through Middle Archaic Occupations. Report Investigations 78. Office of Archaeological Services, Moundville, Alabama.

Waselkov, G. A.

1997

Changing Strategies of Indian Field Location in the Early Historic Southeast. In People, Plant, and Landscape Studies in Paleoethnobotony, edited by K. J. Gremillion, pp. 179194. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

Waselkov, G. A. and K. E. H. Braund (editors) 1995 William Bartram on the Southeastern Indians. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.

Watts, W. A. 1980

The Quaternary Vegetation History of the Southeastern United States. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:387-409.

A LOOK INTO THE OUTLANDS: THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOUGHERTY PLAIN OF GEORGIA 91

Webb, T., P. J. Bartlein, S. P. Harrison, and K. H. Anderson

1993

Vegetation, Lake Levels, and Climate in eastern North America for the Past 18,000 years. In Global Climate Since the Last Glacial Maximum, edited by H. E. Wright, J. E. Kutzbach, T. Webb, W. F. Ruddiman, F. A. Street-Perrott, and P. J. Bartlein, pp. 415-467. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

Wharton, C. H. 1978 The Natural Environments of Georgia. Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Atlanta.

Windham, R. Jeannine
2006 A GIS Approach to the Plum Creek Quarry/Workshop Site Complex. Unpublished Paper presented at the 63rd Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Little Rock.

Windham, R. J., J. H. N. Loubser, and J. Langdale

2007

Archaeological Survey of the Plum Creek Wetland Mitigation Site, Miller County, Georgia. New South Associates Technical Report submitted to the Georgia Department of Transportation, 3993 Aviation Boulevard, Atlanta.

Williams, S. and J. P. Brain

1983

Excavations at the Lake George Site, Yazoo County, Mississippi, 1958-1960. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology 74, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Williams, S. and J. Stoltman

1965

An Outline of Southeastern United States Prehistory with Particular Emphasis on the PaleoIndian Era. In The Quaternary of the United States, edited by H. E. Wright and D. G. Frey, pp. 669-684. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

Wolfram Research
2004 Triboluminescence. Electronic document available at http://scienceworld.wolfram.com. Accessed November 2006.

Worth, J. E. 1988

Mississippian Occupation of the Middle Flint River. Unpublished M. A. Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens.

2000

The Lower Creeks: Origins and Early History. In Indians of the Greater Southeast: Historical Archaeology and Ethnohistory, pp. 265-289, Edited by B. McEwan. University Press Florida.

APPENDIX A. SITES WITHIN DOUGHERTY PLAIN STUDY AREA

Site Sub-Period

Elevation Drainage Class

9CP167 Early Paleo Indian 80.45

Well drained

9CU13 Early Paleo Indian 82.22

Well drained

9ER57 Early Paleo Indian 53.34

Somewhat excessively drained

9MI116 Early Paleo Indian 45.61

Well drained

9MI3 Early Paleo Indian 41.67

Poorly drained

9CP21 Late Paleo Indian 80.50

Well drained

9CY83 Late Paleo Indian 97.93

Well drained

9DU33 Late Paleo Indian 63.75

Well drained

9ER67 Late Paleo Indian 77.39

Moderately well drained

9LE5 Late Paleo Indian 63.97

Well drained

9MI3 Late Paleo Indian 41.67

Poorly drained

9TE46 Late Paleo Indian 94.02

Well drained

9BX124 General Paleo Indian 54.79

Well drained

9BX138 General Paleo Indian 42.67

Excessively drained

9BX68 General Paleo Indian 31.09

9BX73 General Paleo Indian 31.15

Somewhat poorly drained

9CY163 General Paleo Indian 103.19 Well drained

9DU37 General Paleo Indian 56.12

Excessively drained

9DU98 General Paleo Indian 48.61

Somewhat excessively drained

9ER238 General Paleo Indian 58.08

Well drained

9ER247 General Paleo Indian 69.01

Well drained

9ER252 General Paleo Indian 36.61

Well drained

9ER253 General Paleo Indian 53.27

Well drained

9ER255 General Paleo Indian 74.66

Well drained

9LE139 General Paleo Indian 75.96

Well drained

9MI119 General Paleo Indian 66.16

Well drained

9MI121 General Paleo Indian 39.82

Well drained

9MI123 General Paleo Indian 52.57

Well drained

9MI124 General Paleo Indian 47.94

Well drained

9MI91 General Paleo Indian 51.41

Somewhat poorly drained

9ML93 General Paleo Indian 79.18

Well drained

9BX10 Early Archaic

35.73

Excessively drained

9BX100 Early Archaic

34.05

Somewhat excessively drained

9BX115 Early Archaic

47.14

Well drained

9BX123 Early Archaic

37.84

Excessively drained

9BX131 Early Archaic

46.96

Well drained

9BX86 Early Archaic

65.13

Well drained

9CP136 Early Archaic

90.94

Well drained

9CP146 Early Archaic

109.42 Poorly drained

9CP172 Early Archaic

82.13

Well drained

9CP188 Early Archaic

86.88

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Lisbon Formation Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Claiborne Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Neogene Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Neogene Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000911254 0.00117253 0.001471782 6.8762E-05 0.00084478 0.000996178 0.001007474 0.000493239 0.001389486 0.000611689 0.00084478 0.001548109 0.000447204 0.000319793 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.001329975 0.000800569 0.000253543 0.001389486 0.001399507 0.001471782 0.001471782 0.001267191 0.000611689 0.000785911 0.000871104 0.000192057 0.000192057 0.000671497 0.00138868 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000447204 0.000160345 0.000319793 0.000598552 0.000881856 0.000996178 0.001014457 0.000950185

Page 1 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9CP194 Early Archaic 9CP21 Early Archaic 9CP80 Early Archaic 9CU12 Early Archaic 9CY173 Early Archaic 9DR152 Early Archaic 9DR183 Early Archaic 9DR203 Early Archaic 9DR213 Early Archaic 9DR5 Early Archaic 9DR84 Early Archaic 9DU111 Early Archaic 9DU154 Early Archaic 9DU170 Early Archaic 9DU183 Early Archaic 9DU33 Early Archaic 9DU44 Early Archaic 9DU53 Early Archaic 9ER140 Early Archaic 9ER232 Early Archaic 9ER244 Early Archaic 9ER246 Early Archaic 9ER255 Early Archaic 9ER258 Early Archaic 9ER268 Early Archaic 9ER64 Early Archaic 9ER67 Early Archaic 9LE11 Early Archaic 9LE121 Early Archaic 9LE149 Early Archaic 9LE5 Early Archaic 9LE53 Early Archaic 9MI10 Early Archaic 9MI15 Early Archaic 9MI18 Early Archaic 9MI20 Early Archaic 9MI24 Early Archaic 9MI39 Early Archaic 9MI51 Early Archaic 9MI7 Early Archaic 9MI80 Early Archaic

Elevation Drainage Class

81.51

Well drained

80.50

Well drained

71.77

69.99

Well drained

109.67 Well drained

24.33

Moderately well drained

24.25

Excessively drained

29.40

Excessively drained

28.22

Well drained

30.37

Poorly drained

23.49

69.75

Well drained

53.17

Somewhat poorly drained

66.55

Well drained

66.28

Well drained

63.75

Well drained

58.19

Well drained

56.20

Well drained

34.68

Well drained

69.45

Well drained

57.88

Well drained

64.88

Well drained

74.66

Well drained

63.88

Well drained

50.74

Well drained

60.37

Well drained

77.39

Moderately well drained

89.75

Well drained

68.54

Somewhat excessively drained

88.20

Somewhat excessively drained

63.97

Well drained

100.47 Well drained

68.82

Well drained

68.24

Poorly drained

69.33

Moderately well drained

76.10

Poorly drained

65.83

Well drained

52.75

Poorly drained

52.24

Well drained

58.06

Moderately well drained

52.06

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Water Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Water Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Water Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Lisbon Formation Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001014457 0.000996178 0.000950185 0.000522164 0.001329975 0.000110291 0.00040199 0.000248601 0.00040199 0.000248601 0.000286713 0.000686915 0.000253543 0.00068923 0.00068923 0.000493239 0.0005513 0.000253543 0.000589451 0.001007474 0.001231318 0.000794166 0.001267191 0.001579022 0.001471782 0.001007474 0.001389486 0.001141014 0.000861966 0.001299864 0.000611689 0.001288351 0.000785911 0.000676376 0.000785911 0.000676376 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911

Page 2 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9ML183 Early Archaic 9ML89 Early Archaic 9ML90 Early Archaic 9SU146 Early Archaic 9SU159 Early Archaic 9SU181 Early Archaic 9SU208 Early Archaic 9SU214 Early Archaic 9SU53 Early Archaic 9TE30 Early Archaic 9TE34 Early Archaic 9TE38 Early Archaic 9TE42 Early Archaic 9TE50 Early Archaic 9TE51 Early Archaic 9TE53 Early Archaic 9WO11 Early Archaic 9WO12 Early Archaic 9WO23 Early Archaic 9BX100 Middle Archaic 9BX27 Middle Archaic 9BX36 Middle Archaic 9BX45 Middle Archaic 9CP10 Middle Archaic 9CP11 Middle Archaic 9CP166 Middle Archaic 9CP191 Middle Archaic 9CP2 Middle Archaic 9CP24 Middle Archaic 9CU12 Middle Archaic 9CU9 Middle Archaic 9CY110 Middle Archaic 9CY162 Middle Archaic 9CY163 Middle Archaic 9CY173 Middle Archaic 9CY85 Middle Archaic 9CY86 Middle Archaic 9DR213 Middle Archaic 9DR3 Middle Archaic 9DR5 Middle Archaic 9DU142 Middle Archaic

Elevation Drainage Class

42.28

Well drained

44.31

Well drained

47.20

Somewhat poorly drained

100.99 Well drained

101.07 Well drained

114.99 Well drained

88.23

Well drained

103.14 Well drained

71.77

107.50 Somewhat excessively drained

95.44

Well drained

82.18

Well drained

93.91

Well drained

94.22

Well drained

91.33

Poorly drained

92.60

Well drained

105.37 Well drained

76.02

Well drained

71.76

Poorly drained

34.05

Somewhat excessively drained

40.27

Well drained

36.78

36.86

85.73

Well drained

91.19

Well drained

85.19

Excessively drained

73.69

Well drained

94.96

Well drained

86.52

Well drained

69.99

Well drained

63.84

Somewhat excessively drained

65.75

Excessively drained

108.37 Well drained

103.19 Well drained

109.67 Well drained

97.48

Well drained

97.48

Well drained

28.22

Well drained

30.35

Moderately well drained

30.37

Poorly drained

60.80

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000192057 0.00018039 0.00018039 0.001244391 0.001290564 0.001035085 0.00110159 0.001499214 0.00110159 0.000878886 0.000986086 0.001285433 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001644527 0.00136139 0.001101161 0.000319793 0.000160345 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.001014457 0.001014457 0.000911254 0.001014457 0.001014457 0.000996178 0.000522164 0.001454734 0.001344885 0.00139855 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.00040199 0.000994571 0.000248601 0.00111595

Page 3 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9DU159 Middle Archaic 9DU40 Middle Archaic 9DU53 Middle Archaic 9ER116 Middle Archaic 9ER139 Middle Archaic 9ER203 Middle Archaic 9ER58 Middle Archaic 9LE105 Middle Archaic 9LE107 Middle Archaic 9LE11 Middle Archaic 9LE116 Middle Archaic 9LE31 Middle Archaic 9LE52 Middle Archaic 9MA73 Middle Archaic 9MI10 Middle Archaic 9MI18 Middle Archaic 9MI2 Middle Archaic 9MI20 Middle Archaic 9MI24 Middle Archaic 9MI4 Middle Archaic 9MI83 Middle Archaic 9ML179 Middle Archaic 9ML89 Middle Archaic 9ML90 Middle Archaic 9RH56 Middle Archaic 9SE119 Middle Archaic 9SU146 Middle Archaic 9SU159 Middle Archaic 9SU8 Middle Archaic 9TE22 Middle Archaic 9TE42 Middle Archaic 9TE43 Middle Archaic 9TE51 Middle Archaic 9TE53 Middle Archaic 9TE57 Middle Archaic 9WO28 Middle Archaic 9BX10 Late Archaic 9BX100 Late Archaic 9BX101 Late Archaic 9BX102 Late Archaic 9BX103 Late Archaic

Elevation Drainage Class

61.06

Well drained

59.86

Well drained

56.20

Well drained

36.99

Well drained

26.22

Well drained

72.88

Well drained

44.01

91.32

Well drained

91.32

Somewhat excessively drained

89.75

Well drained

72.03

Well drained

66.02

Well drained

69.99

Somewhat poorly drained

102.48 Well drained

68.82

Well drained

69.33

Moderately well drained

41.67

Poorly drained

76.10

Poorly drained

65.83

Well drained

43.58

Well drained

47.78

Well drained

44.90

Well drained

44.31

Well drained

47.20

Somewhat poorly drained

115.47 Well drained

31.28

Well drained

100.99 Well drained

101.07 Well drained

108.59 Somewhat excessively drained

112.83 Very poorly drained

93.91

Well drained

96.56

Well drained

91.33

Poorly drained

92.60

Well drained

93.63

Well drained

79.03

Well drained

35.73

Excessively drained

34.05

Somewhat excessively drained

37.61

Well drained

40.90

Moderately well drained

35.22

Moderately well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Tallahatta Formation Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Lisbon Formation Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Water Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.00111595 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.001615558 0.000589451 0.000598552 0.001471782 0.001299864 0.001299864 0.001141014 0.000611689 0.000289308 0.001548109 0.001163134 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.00084478 0.000676376 0.000785911 0.000881038 0.000970533 0.000212461 0.00018039 0.00018039 0.001329975 0.000589451 0.001244391 0.001290564 0.001035085 0.001071746 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.000643505 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000160345

Page 4 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9BX104 Late Archaic 9BX105 Late Archaic 9BX107 Late Archaic 9BX109 Late Archaic 9BX111 Late Archaic 9BX112 Late Archaic 9BX113 Late Archaic 9BX115 Late Archaic 9BX117 Late Archaic 9BX118 Late Archaic 9BX125 Late Archaic 9BX132 Late Archaic 9BX133 Late Archaic 9BX134 Late Archaic 9BX14 Late Archaic 9BX141 Late Archaic 9BX142 Late Archaic 9BX148 Late Archaic 9BX15 Late Archaic 9BX155 Late Archaic 9BX16 Late Archaic 9BX19 Late Archaic 9BX23 Late Archaic 9BX45 Late Archaic 9BX82 Late Archaic 9BX87 Late Archaic 9CP10 Late Archaic 9CP11 Late Archaic 9CP135 Late Archaic 9CP14 Late Archaic 9CP141 Late Archaic 9CP142 Late Archaic 9CP146 Late Archaic 9CP166 Late Archaic 9CP167 Late Archaic 9CP168 Late Archaic 9CP169 Late Archaic 9CP170 Late Archaic 9CP171 Late Archaic 9CP172 Late Archaic 9CP173 Late Archaic

Elevation Drainage Class

47.42

Well drained

44.27

Well drained

37.12

Well drained

38.04

Somewhat poorly drained

36.91

Somewhat excessively drained

41.04

Somewhat excessively drained

38.31

Somewhat excessively drained

47.14

Well drained

39.26

Poorly drained

35.48

Excessively drained

51.72

Poorly drained

44.82

Well drained

51.10

Somewhat excessively drained

49.27

Poorly drained

47.66

Somewhat excessively drained

39.29

Well drained

49.60

Well drained

45.48

Somewhat excessively drained

42.98

Excessively drained

51.71

Well drained

47.50

Somewhat poorly drained

53.46

Somewhat excessively drained

44.30

Somewhat excessively drained

36.86

38.64

Excessively drained

51.71

Somewhat poorly drained

85.73

Well drained

91.19

Well drained

89.72

Poorly drained

93.76

Well drained

121.43 Well drained

130.11 Well drained

109.42 Poorly drained

85.19

Excessively drained

80.45

Well drained

82.13

Well drained

84.01

Well drained

82.13

Poorly drained

89.52

Well drained

82.13

Well drained

81.22

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Neogene Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone

Page 5 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000447204 0.000447204 0.000447204 0.000447204 0.000319793 0.000701321 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 8.78234E-05 0.000160345 0.000319793 8.78234E-05 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000160345 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.0002194 0.001014457 0.001014457 0.001436739 0.001014457 0.000996178 0.000996178 0.000996178 0.000911254 0.000911254 0.000911254 0.001014457 0.001014457 0.001014457 0.001014457 0.000911254

Site Sub-Period 9CP188 Late Archaic 9CP191 Late Archaic 9CP6 Late Archaic 9CP7 Late Archaic 9CP9 Late Archaic 9CU1 Late Archaic 9CU18 Late Archaic 9CU19 Late Archaic 9CU2 Late Archaic 9CU20 Late Archaic 9CU23 Late Archaic 9CU24 Late Archaic 9CY126 Late Archaic 9CY162 Late Archaic 9CY163 Late Archaic 9CY169 Late Archaic 9CY180 Late Archaic 9CY182 Late Archaic 9CY183 Late Archaic 9CY64 Late Archaic 9DR129 Late Archaic 9DR155 Late Archaic 9DR2 Late Archaic 9DR213 Late Archaic 9DR3 Late Archaic 9DR5 Late Archaic 9DU120 Late Archaic 9DU142 Late Archaic 9DU157 Late Archaic 9DU40 Late Archaic 9DU54 Late Archaic 9DU6 Late Archaic 9DU80 Late Archaic 9DY10 Late Archaic 9DY11 Late Archaic 9DY12 Late Archaic 9DY13 Late Archaic 9DY14 Late Archaic 9DY2 Late Archaic 9DY3 Late Archaic 9DY4 Late Archaic

Elevation Drainage Class

86.88

Well drained

73.69

Well drained

90.08

Well drained

88.70

Well drained

85.68

Well drained

77.40

Well drained

69.44

Well drained

67.72

Well drained

79.06

Well drained

66.98

Well drained

70.03

Well drained

67.91

Well drained

100.75 Well drained

108.37 Well drained

103.19 Well drained

121.04 Well drained

111.47 Well drained

107.90 Poorly drained

118.81 Well drained

103.27 Well drained

24.31

Poorly drained

23.75

Well drained

24.25

Excessively drained

28.22

Well drained

30.35

Moderately well drained

30.37

Poorly drained

64.90

Well drained

60.80

Well drained

53.79

Moderately well drained

59.86

Well drained

57.79

Well drained

52.74

Poorly drained

59.50

Excessively drained

107.84 Well drained

102.89 Well drained

99.33

Well drained

101.54

107.63 Well drained

94.94

Well drained

96.40

Well drained

94.69

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000950185 0.001014457 0.000881856 0.000881856 0.001014457 0.001454734 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001454734 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001329975 0.00139855 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.00139855 0.00139855 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.00040199 0.000110291 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000994571 0.000248601 0.00111595 0.00111595 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000522164 0.000289308 0.001093049 0.001093049 0.001093049 0.001093049 0.001298769 0.001093049 0.001093049 0.001093049

Page 6 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9DY5 Late Archaic 9DY6 Late Archaic 9DY8 Late Archaic 9DY9 Late Archaic 9ER139 Late Archaic 9ER140 Late Archaic 9ER141 Late Archaic 9ER203 Late Archaic 9ER205 Late Archaic 9ER207 Late Archaic 9ER216 Late Archaic 9ER221 Late Archaic 9ER251 Late Archaic 9ER254 Late Archaic 9ER272 Late Archaic 9ER276 Late Archaic 9LE102 Late Archaic 9LE105 Late Archaic 9LE107 Late Archaic 9LE11 Late Archaic 9LE114 Late Archaic 9LE116 Late Archaic 9LE117 Late Archaic 9LE122 Late Archaic 9LE126 Late Archaic 9LE13 Late Archaic 9LE131 Late Archaic 9LE132 Late Archaic 9LE14 Late Archaic 9LE145 Late Archaic 9LE149 Late Archaic 9LE15 Late Archaic 9LE152 Late Archaic 9LE23 Late Archaic 9LE33 Late Archaic 9LE40 Late Archaic 9LE41 Late Archaic 9LE43 Late Archaic 9LE60 Late Archaic 9LE89 Late Archaic 9LE96 Late Archaic

Elevation Drainage Class

99.43

Well drained

89.88

Well drained

97.92

Well drained

111.82 Well drained

26.22

Well drained

34.68

Well drained

30.96

Excessively drained

72.88

Well drained

81.86

Well drained

83.35

Well drained

79.80

Well drained

69.70

Well drained

60.89

Well drained

74.79

Well drained

69.65

Well drained

72.91

Somewhat excessively drained

91.30

Well drained

91.32

Well drained

91.32

Somewhat excessively drained

89.75

Well drained

72.05

Well drained

72.03

Well drained

69.60

Well drained

72.98

Somewhat excessively drained

63.90

Well drained

69.96

Well drained

73.06

Somewhat excessively drained

72.11

Well drained

71.09

Well drained

88.32

Somewhat excessively drained

88.20

Somewhat excessively drained

71.34

Well drained

81.48

Well drained

75.03

Well drained

71.78

71.77

71.77

71.77

94.28

Well drained

69.98

Somewhat excessively drained

90.90

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Water Stream Alluvium Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001093049 0.001093049 0.001093049 0.001093049 0.000589451 0.000589451 0.000589451 0.000598552 0.001007474 0.001231318 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001267191 0.001007474 0.001260413 0.001141014 0.001299864 0.001299864 0.001141014 0.001342568 0.000611689 0.000611689 0.000561599 0.000611689 0.000611689 0.00094367 0.00094367 0.000611689 0.001299864 0.001299864 0.000611689 0.001141014 0.000611689 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000967301 0.001314299 0.001314299

Page 7 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9LE98 Late Archaic 9MA73 Late Archaic 9MI1 Late Archaic 9MI108 Late Archaic 9MI12 Late Archaic 9MI13 Late Archaic 9MI140 Late Archaic 9MI161 Late Archaic 9MI17 Late Archaic 9MI2 Late Archaic 9MI23 Late Archaic 9MI26 Late Archaic 9MI27 Late Archaic 9MI28 Late Archaic 9MI31 Late Archaic 9MI32 Late Archaic 9MI38 Late Archaic 9MI4 Late Archaic 9MI41 Late Archaic 9MI44 Late Archaic 9MI5 Late Archaic 9MI57 Late Archaic 9MI58 Late Archaic 9MI7 Late Archaic 9MI70 Late Archaic 9MI72 Late Archaic 9MI8 Late Archaic 9MI9 Late Archaic 9ML137 Late Archaic 9ML179 Late Archaic 9ML189 Late Archaic 9ML7 Late Archaic 9ML89 Late Archaic 9ML90 Late Archaic 9RH47 Late Archaic 9RH69 Late Archaic 9SE10 Late Archaic 9SE119 Late Archaic 9SE13 Late Archaic 9SE40 Late Archaic 9SE46 Late Archaic

Elevation Drainage Class

91.97

Well drained

102.48 Well drained

55.43

Well drained

45.35

Poorly drained

68.94

Poorly drained

63.94

Well drained

54.77

Well drained

47.41

Moderately well drained

69.33

Moderately well drained

41.67

Poorly drained

61.98

Poorly drained

60.36

Poorly drained

69.09

Poorly drained

59.46

Poorly drained

63.68

Poorly drained

63.87

Well drained

56.17

Poorly drained

43.58

Well drained

53.81

Well drained

59.74

Moderately well drained

58.62

Poorly drained

45.37

Poorly drained

50.82

Well drained

58.06

Moderately well drained

49.52

Well drained

45.96

Moderately well drained

67.27

Well drained

65.96

Well drained

67.56

Poorly drained

44.90

Well drained

45.65

Well drained

55.99

Well drained

44.31

Well drained

47.20

Somewhat poorly drained

132.70 Well drained

127.52 Well drained

23.33

31.28

Well drained

24.22

Somewhat poorly drained

36.31

Well drained

36.53

Well drained

Geologic Description Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Water Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001314299 0.001163134 0.001380187 0.000671497 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000785911 0.00084478 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000881038 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000881038 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000881038 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.001213644 0.000212461 0.000185815 0.000792466 0.00018039 0.00018039 0.000799192 0.000799192 0.00040199 0.000589451 0.000409366 0.00084478 0.00084478

Page 8 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9SE51 Late Archaic 9SE54 Late Archaic 9SE69 Late Archaic 9SE87 Late Archaic 9SU113 Late Archaic 9SU128 Late Archaic 9SU138 Late Archaic 9SU139 Late Archaic 9SU142 Late Archaic 9SU143 Late Archaic 9SU146 Late Archaic 9SU148 Late Archaic 9SU156 Late Archaic 9SU157 Late Archaic 9SU159 Late Archaic 9SU169 Late Archaic 9SU211 Late Archaic 9SU215 Late Archaic 9SU216 Late Archaic 9SU23 Late Archaic 9SU25 Late Archaic 9SU26 Late Archaic 9SU38 Late Archaic 9SU48 Late Archaic 9SU53 Late Archaic 9SU55 Late Archaic 9SU6 Late Archaic 9SU65 Late Archaic 9SU76 Late Archaic 9SU8 Late Archaic 9SU83 Late Archaic 9SU85 Late Archaic 9SU88 Late Archaic 9SU93 Late Archaic 9TE109 Late Archaic 9TE121 Late Archaic 9TE34 Late Archaic 9TE43 Late Archaic 9TE46 Late Archaic 9TE50 Late Archaic 9TE51 Late Archaic

Elevation Drainage Class

39.96

Well drained

36.20

Poorly drained

39.32

Poorly drained

23.39

Somewhat poorly drained

102.19 Well drained

91.35

Poorly drained

107.32 Well drained

106.76 Poorly drained

104.24 Poorly drained

102.77 Poorly drained

100.99 Well drained

100.45 Well drained

96.89

Well drained

96.59

Well drained

101.07 Well drained

100.20 Well drained

90.99

Well drained

92.43

Well drained

93.27

Well drained

94.37

Well drained

95.27

Well drained

105.75 Excessively drained

71.85

71.79

Well drained

71.77

71.77

111.61 Well drained

71.77

71.77

108.59 Somewhat excessively drained

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

90.62

Well drained

103.58 Well drained

95.44

Well drained

96.56

Well drained

94.02

Well drained

94.22

Well drained

91.33

Poorly drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Tuscahoma Sand Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Water Stream Alluvium Water Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Water Water Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.000409366 0.001141014 0.000986086 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001290564 0.001290564 0.001290564 0.001141014 0.000950185 0.001499214 0.001499214 0.001141014 0.001141014 0.001581473 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.001299864 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.001035085 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.001158547 0.000977975 0.000986086 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109

Page 9 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9TE53 Late Archaic 9TE57 Late Archaic 9TE69 Late Archaic 9TE71 Late Archaic 9TE76 Late Archaic 9TE78 Late Archaic 9WO11 Late Archaic 9WO15 Late Archaic 9WO28 Late Archaic 9WO7 Late Archaic 9BX110 General Archaic 9BX119 General Archaic 9BX122 General Archaic 9BX13 General Archaic 9BX132 General Archaic 9BX136 General Archaic 9BX139 General Archaic 9BX14 General Archaic 9BX156 General Archaic 9BX17 General Archaic 9BX18 General Archaic 9BX20 General Archaic 9BX21 General Archaic 9BX22 General Archaic 9BX24 General Archaic 9BX26 General Archaic 9BX28 General Archaic 9BX29 General Archaic 9BX33 General Archaic 9BX35 General Archaic 9BX56 General Archaic 9BX82 General Archaic 9BX83 General Archaic 9CP1 General Archaic 9CP187 General Archaic 9CP3 General Archaic 9CU10 General Archaic 9CU11 General Archaic 9CU9 General Archaic 9CY106 General Archaic 9CY158 General Archaic

Elevation Drainage Class

92.60

Well drained

93.63

Well drained

80.48

Well drained

88.05

Well drained

85.23

Well drained

84.97

Well drained

105.37 Well drained

73.26

Excessively drained

79.03

Well drained

75.11

Well drained

34.51

Excessively drained

36.17

Excessively drained

38.39

Moderately well drained

40.72

Excessively drained

44.82

Well drained

45.70

Well drained

49.70

Well drained

47.66

Somewhat excessively drained

44.61

Well drained

50.75

Somewhat excessively drained

49.93

Somewhat excessively drained

47.01

Poorly drained

48.22

Well drained

41.03

Well drained

41.32

Somewhat excessively drained

42.22

Well drained

57.82

Well drained

45.77

Somewhat excessively drained

48.10

Somewhat excessively drained

39.87

29.20

38.64

Excessively drained

40.60

Excessively drained

85.14

Poorly drained

86.81

Well drained

91.28

Well drained

57.80

Well drained

57.80

Poorly drained

63.84

Somewhat excessively drained

45.31

Excessively drained

121.86 Moderately well drained

Geologic Description Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001644527 0.000967301 0.000643505 0.000967301 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000160345 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 8.78234E-05 0.000160345 0.000319793 0.000160345 0.000447204 0.000160345 0.000192057 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.001014457 0.000950185 0.001014457 0.000646133 0.000646133 0.001454734 0.001344885 0.00139855

Page 10 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9CY161 General Archaic 9CY166 General Archaic 9CY172 General Archaic 9CY174 General Archaic 9CY175 General Archaic 9CY176 General Archaic 9CY178 General Archaic 9CY185 General Archaic 9CY189 General Archaic 9CY91 General Archaic 9DR100 General Archaic 9DR117 General Archaic 9DR127 General Archaic 9DR137 General Archaic 9DR16 General Archaic 9DR163 General Archaic 9DR60 General Archaic 9DR87 General Archaic 9DR92 General Archaic 9DR94 General Archaic 9DR95 General Archaic 9DR96 General Archaic 9DR99 General Archaic 9DU117 General Archaic 9DU119 General Archaic 9DU148 General Archaic 9DU151 General Archaic 9DU153 General Archaic 9DU173 General Archaic 9DU182 General Archaic 9DU37 General Archaic 9DU39 General Archaic 9DU41 General Archaic 9DU63 General Archaic 9DU69 General Archaic 9DU7 General Archaic 9DU70 General Archaic 9DU75 General Archaic 9DU76 General Archaic 9DU9 General Archaic 9DY1 General Archaic

Elevation Drainage Class

108.58 Well drained

121.80 Well drained

124.37 Well drained

96.51

Excessively drained

102.85 Well drained

122.92 Well drained

120.55 Well drained

112.62 Well drained

113.55 Well drained

122.26 Well drained

52.84

Well drained

27.80

Well drained

23.35

Moderately well drained

26.53

Excessively drained

32.07

Excessively drained

24.42

Moderately well drained

35.96

Poorly drained

32.03

Well drained

25.31

Well drained

29.02

Well drained

32.73

Well drained

23.67

55.63

Moderately well drained

56.34

Poorly drained

52.03

56.22

Excessively drained

54.49

Excessively drained

57.10

Somewhat poorly drained

79.50

Well drained

72.72

Well drained

56.12

Excessively drained

50.12

59.14

Well drained

65.75

Somewhat excessively drained

68.44

Poorly drained

54.73

Well drained

68.43

Well drained

67.20

Well drained

67.87

65.75

Somewhat excessively drained

93.39

Well drained

Geologic Description Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Hawthorn Formation Ocala Limestone Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Ocala Limestone Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Hawthorn Formation Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001329975 0.00139855 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.00139855 0.00139855 0.00139855 0.001329975 0.00139855 0.00040199 0.000994571 0.00040199 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.00040199 0.000110291 0.000286713 0.000110291 0.000286713 0.000286713 0.000286713 0.00040199 0.000800569 0.000253543 0.000611689 0.00068923 0.0005513 0.000780615 0.000780615 0.000800569 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000688154 0.000686915 0.000522164 0.000686915 0.000686915 0.000686915 0.000688154 0.001093049

Page 11 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9DY17 General Archaic 9DY19 General Archaic 9DY24 General Archaic 9ER101 General Archaic 9ER102 General Archaic 9ER105 General Archaic 9ER109 General Archaic 9ER110 General Archaic 9ER116 General Archaic 9ER139 General Archaic 9ER146 General Archaic 9ER148 General Archaic 9ER157 General Archaic 9ER160 General Archaic 9ER161 General Archaic 9ER163 General Archaic 9ER165 General Archaic 9ER166 General Archaic 9ER167 General Archaic 9ER168 General Archaic 9ER169 General Archaic 9ER170 General Archaic 9ER175 General Archaic 9ER176 General Archaic 9ER177 General Archaic 9ER225 General Archaic 9ER233 General Archaic 9ER239 General Archaic 9ER243 General Archaic 9ER253 General Archaic 9ER261 General Archaic 9ER262 General Archaic 9ER265 General Archaic 9ER273 General Archaic 9ER51 General Archaic 9ER54 General Archaic 9ER55 General Archaic 9ER56 General Archaic 9ER60 General Archaic 9ER62 General Archaic 9ER65 General Archaic

Elevation Drainage Class

87.18

Well drained

88.79

Well drained

111.84 Well drained

42.60

Well drained

38.11

Well drained

42.37

Excessively drained

39.55

Well drained

37.22

Well drained

36.99

Well drained

26.22

Well drained

41.50

Excessively drained

65.97

Well drained

59.71

Well drained

60.89

Poorly drained

64.03

Well drained

63.93

Moderately well drained

58.76

Well drained

50.60

Well drained

54.11

Well drained

57.89

Well drained

54.59

Well drained

53.58

Well drained

61.70

Well drained

64.80

Well drained

50.47

Well drained

67.95

Well drained

75.91

Well drained

76.88

Poorly drained

63.91

Well drained

53.27

Well drained

94.42

Well drained

70.14

Poorly drained

88.32

Well drained

76.12

Well drained

40.07

56.14

Well drained

43.87

43.59

Well drained

86.05

Well drained

53.10

88.37

Poorly drained

Geologic Description Stream Alluvium Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene Undifferentiated Tallahatta Formation Tallahatta Formation Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Tallahatta Formation Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Lisbon Formation Lisbon Formation Lisbon Formation Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

Page 12 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001442063 0.001538806 0.001163134 0.001572355 0.001487013 0.001572355 0.001615558 0.001615558 0.001615558 0.000589451 0.001615558 0.001007474 0.001389486 0.001231318 0.001389486 0.001007474 0.00104483 0.00104483 0.00104483 0.000752422 0.000870758 0.000870758 0.000752422 0.000752422 0.00104483 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001521256 0.001380187 0.001471782 0.001389486 0.001389486 0.001260413 0.000598552 0.001471782 0.001471782 0.001471782 0.001471782 0.001389486 0.00104483 0.001389486

Site Sub-Period 9ER66 General Archaic 9ER67 General Archaic 9ER68 General Archaic 9ER83 General Archaic 9ER85 General Archaic 9LE10 General Archaic 9LE12 General Archaic 9LE143 General Archaic 9LE144 General Archaic 9LE16 General Archaic 9LE20 General Archaic 9LE24 General Archaic 9LE25 General Archaic 9LE26 General Archaic 9LE27 General Archaic 9LE6 General Archaic 9LE8 General Archaic 9MA53 General Archaic 9MI119 General Archaic 9MI84 General Archaic 9MI98 General Archaic 9ML165 General Archaic 9ML178 General Archaic 9ML57 General Archaic 9ML93 General Archaic 9RH46 General Archaic 9RH55 General Archaic 9RH58 General Archaic 9SE1 General Archaic 9SE102 General Archaic 9SE117 General Archaic 9SE119 General Archaic 9SE131 General Archaic 9SE19 General Archaic 9SE22 General Archaic 9SE77 General Archaic 9SE80 General Archaic 9SU138 General Archaic 9SU140 General Archaic 9SU141 General Archaic 9SU145 General Archaic

Elevation Drainage Class

90.56

Well drained

77.39

Moderately well drained

83.79

Well drained

94.26

Well drained

64.72

Somewhat excessively drained

86.03

Well drained

69.96

Well drained

67.26

Somewhat excessively drained

68.00

Somewhat excessively drained

73.01

Moderately well drained

94.43

Well drained

72.85

Well drained

73.00

Well drained

72.99

Well drained

72.99

Well drained

77.91

Poorly drained

78.23

Poorly drained

123.66 Excessively drained

66.16

Well drained

50.21

Well drained

37.72

Somewhat poorly drained

45.17

Well drained

38.01

Well drained

48.94

Moderately well drained

79.18

Well drained

130.66 Well drained

108.71 Well drained

114.93 Well drained

23.33

27.21

Well drained

24.26

Well drained

31.28

Well drained

33.32

Well drained

51.39

Moderately well drained

23.32

38.19

Well drained

29.24

Well drained

107.32 Well drained

105.66 Excessively drained

102.01 Poorly drained

94.45

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Neogene Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Ocala Limestone Water Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001389486 0.001389486 0.001260413 0.001260413 0.001260413 0.001141014 0.000611689 0.000561599 0.000561599 0.000611689 0.001141014 0.000611689 0.000611689 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.001242365 0.000785911 0.000970533 0.000192057 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000224971 0.00138868 0.000799192 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.000409366 0.000511073 0.000511073 0.000589451 0.000353384 0.000353384 0.00040199 0.000511073 0.000189278 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001141014

Page 13 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9SU158 General Archaic 9SU21 General Archaic 9SU24 General Archaic 9SU98 General Archaic 9TE104 General Archaic 9TE34 General Archaic 9TE4 General Archaic 9TE40 General Archaic 9TE44 General Archaic 9TE47 General Archaic 9TE49 General Archaic 9TE54 General Archaic 9TE55 General Archaic 9TE6 General Archaic 9WO18 General Archaic 9BX10 Early Woodland 9BX100 Early Woodland 9BX102 Early Woodland 9BX104 Early Woodland 9BX107 Early Woodland 9BX110 Early Woodland 9BX112 Early Woodland 9BX114 Early Woodland 9BX115 Early Woodland 9BX118 Early Woodland 9BX123 Early Woodland 9BX126 Early Woodland 9BX155 Early Woodland 9BX19 Early Woodland 9BX26 Early Woodland 9BX9 Early Woodland 9CP6 Early Woodland 9CY126 Early Woodland 9CY85 Early Woodland 9DR2 Early Woodland 9ER119 Early Woodland 9ER139 Early Woodland 9ER157 Early Woodland 9ER194 Early Woodland 9ER240 Early Woodland 9ER57 Early Woodland

Elevation Drainage Class

100.47 Well drained

98.69

Well drained

97.42

Well drained

71.77

88.28

Well drained

95.44

Well drained

127.56 Well drained

94.38

Moderately well drained

91.33

Well drained

94.14

Well drained

92.43

Well drained

94.37

Moderately well drained

92.86

Well drained

99.85

Well drained

69.94

Well drained

35.73

Excessively drained

34.05

Somewhat excessively drained

40.90

Moderately well drained

47.42

Well drained

37.12

Well drained

34.51

Excessively drained

41.04

Somewhat excessively drained

38.22

Excessively drained

47.14

Well drained

35.48

Excessively drained

37.84

Excessively drained

51.73

Well drained

51.71

Well drained

53.46

Somewhat excessively drained

42.22

Well drained

33.99

Excessively drained

90.08

Well drained

100.75 Well drained

97.48

Well drained

24.25

Excessively drained

35.47

Excessively drained

26.22

Well drained

59.71

Well drained

69.51

Somewhat excessively drained

63.77

Well drained

53.34

Somewhat excessively drained

Geologic Description Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Lisbon Formation Ocala Limestone Lisbon Formation

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001290564 0.001399486 0.001141014 0.000950185 0.001548109 0.000986086 0.000878886 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.000977975 0.00094367 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000319793 0.000447204 0.000319793 0.000447204 0.000319793 0.000160345 0.000701321 8.78234E-05 0.000319793 0.000160345 0.000319793 0.000881856 0.001329975 0.001007474 0.00040199 0.00136049 0.000589451 0.001389486 0.00136049 0.001389486 0.001471782

Page 14 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9MI108 Early Woodland 9MI163 Early Woodland 9RH47 Early Woodland 9RH69 Early Woodland 9SE10 Early Woodland 9SU181 Early Woodland 9SU183 Early Woodland 9SU23 Early Woodland 9SU25 Early Woodland 9SU64 Early Woodland 9SU87 Early Woodland 9TE40 Early Woodland 9TE50 Early Woodland 9WO41 Early Woodland 9BX10 Middle Woodland 9BX101 Middle Woodland 9BX102 Middle Woodland 9BX104 Middle Woodland 9BX107 Middle Woodland 9BX108 Middle Woodland 9BX110 Middle Woodland 9BX112 Middle Woodland 9BX114 Middle Woodland 9BX115 Middle Woodland 9BX118 Middle Woodland 9BX119 Middle Woodland 9BX123 Middle Woodland 9BX13 Middle Woodland 9BX14 Middle Woodland 9BX19 Middle Woodland 9BX26 Middle Woodland 9BX27 Middle Woodland 9BX3 Middle Woodland 9BX9 Middle Woodland 9CP167 Middle Woodland 9CP80 Middle Woodland 9CY162 Middle Woodland 9CY163 Middle Woodland 9CY182 Middle Woodland 9DR1 Middle Woodland 9DR13 Middle Woodland

Elevation Drainage Class

45.35

Poorly drained

42.44

Well drained

132.70 Well drained

127.52 Well drained

23.33

114.99 Well drained

76.47

Well drained

94.37

Well drained

95.27

Well drained

71.77

71.77

94.38

Moderately well drained

94.22

Well drained

79.09

Somewhat poorly drained

35.73

Excessively drained

37.61

Well drained

40.90

Moderately well drained

47.42

Well drained

37.12

Well drained

44.52

Somewhat excessively drained

34.51

Excessively drained

41.04

Somewhat excessively drained

38.22

Excessively drained

47.14

Well drained

35.48

Excessively drained

36.17

Excessively drained

37.84

Excessively drained

40.72

Excessively drained

47.66

Somewhat excessively drained

53.46

Somewhat excessively drained

42.22

Well drained

40.27

Well drained

42.58

Somewhat poorly drained

33.99

Excessively drained

80.45

Well drained

71.77

108.37 Well drained

103.19 Well drained

107.90 Poorly drained

24.35

Excessively drained

23.34

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Water

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000671497 0.000718253 0.000799192 0.000799192 0.00040199 0.001035085 0.000950185 0.001141014 0.001141014 0.00110159 0.000950185 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001420181 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000319793 0.000447204 0.000319793 0.000447204 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000548364 0.000319793 0.000911254 0.000950185 0.00139855 0.001329975 0.00139855 9.37041E-05 0.00040199

Page 15 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9DR137 Middle Woodland 9DR143 Middle Woodland 9DR15 Middle Woodland 9DR153 Middle Woodland 9DR154 Middle Woodland 9DR176 Middle Woodland 9DR189 Middle Woodland 9DR2 Middle Woodland 9DR213 Middle Woodland 9DR3 Middle Woodland 9DR69 Middle Woodland 9DR7 Middle Woodland 9DR75 Middle Woodland 9DR8 Middle Woodland 9DR83 Middle Woodland 9DU10 Middle Woodland 9DU103 Middle Woodland 9DU26 Middle Woodland 9DU4 Middle Woodland 9DU6 Middle Woodland 9DU63 Middle Woodland 9DU9 Middle Woodland 9DY15 Middle Woodland 9ER1 Middle Woodland 9ER101 Middle Woodland 9ER103 Middle Woodland 9ER140 Middle Woodland 9ER157 Middle Woodland 9ER163 Middle Woodland 9ER172 Middle Woodland 9ER173 Middle Woodland 9ER177 Middle Woodland 9ER269 Middle Woodland 9ER276 Middle Woodland 9ER69 Middle Woodland 9ER93 Middle Woodland 9LE149 Middle Woodland 9MI12 Middle Woodland 9MI163 Middle Woodland 9MI23 Middle Woodland 9ML93 Middle Woodland

Elevation Drainage Class

26.53

Excessively drained

24.48

Excessively drained

24.89

Well drained

24.00

Poorly drained

24.75

Well drained

23.98

Moderately well drained

23.35

Moderately well drained

24.25

Excessively drained

28.22

Well drained

30.35

Moderately well drained

27.04

Poorly drained

23.33

32.85

Well drained

24.24

33.09

Well drained

46.96

55.56

Poorly drained

53.38

Poorly drained

52.92

Poorly drained

52.74

Poorly drained

65.75

Somewhat excessively drained

65.75

Somewhat excessively drained

78.73

Somewhat poorly drained

95.95

Well drained

42.60

Well drained

44.25

Excessively drained

34.68

Well drained

59.71

Well drained

63.93

Moderately well drained

55.32

Well drained

67.58

Well drained

50.47

Well drained

48.84

Well drained

72.91

Somewhat excessively drained

64.38

Well drained

41.00

Moderately well drained

88.20

Somewhat excessively drained

68.94

Poorly drained

42.44

Well drained

61.98

Poorly drained

79.18

Well drained

Geologic Description Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Water Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Claiborne Undifferentiated Tallahatta Formation Tallahatta Formation Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Neogene Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.00040199 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000994571 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00084478 0.00040199 9.37041E-05 0.000253543 0.000289308 0.0005513 0.000522164 0.000522164 0.000688154 0.000688154 0.001442063 0.001260413 0.001572355 0.001572355 0.000589451 0.001389486 0.001007474 0.000752422 0.001231318 0.00104483 0.001380187 0.001260413 0.001007474 0.001572355 0.001299864 0.000785911 0.000718253 0.000785911 0.00138868

Page 16 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9RH11 Middle Woodland 9RH9 Middle Woodland 9SE10 Middle Woodland 9SE105 Middle Woodland 9SE106 Middle Woodland 9SE14 Middle Woodland 9SE17 Middle Woodland 9SE21 Middle Woodland 9SE24 Middle Woodland 9SE27 Middle Woodland 9SE33 Middle Woodland 9SE4 Middle Woodland 9SE53 Middle Woodland 9SU138 Middle Woodland 9SU140 Middle Woodland 9SU156 Middle Woodland 9SU159 Middle Woodland 9SU192 Middle Woodland 9SU25 Middle Woodland 9SU28 Middle Woodland 9SU51 Middle Woodland 9SU52 Middle Woodland 9SU57 Middle Woodland 9SU62 Middle Woodland 9SU63 Middle Woodland 9SU64 Middle Woodland 9SU73 Middle Woodland 9SU85 Middle Woodland 9SU86 Middle Woodland 9SU87 Middle Woodland 9SU90 Middle Woodland 9TE22 Middle Woodland 9TE34 Middle Woodland 9TE37 Middle Woodland 9TE40 Middle Woodland 9BX10 Late Woodland 9BX100 Late Woodland 9BX101 Late Woodland 9BX115 Late Woodland 9BX14 Late Woodland 9BX26 Late Woodland

Elevation Drainage Class

105.33 Well drained

86.19

Poorly drained

23.33

27.41

Well drained

27.40

Well drained

23.35

27.31

Well drained

23.31

24.19

Somewhat poorly drained

23.32

23.33

23.33

35.56

Poorly drained

107.32 Well drained

105.66 Excessively drained

96.89

Well drained

101.07 Well drained

91.29

Well drained

95.27

Well drained

71.85

73.08

Somewhat excessively drained

76.04

Poorly drained

71.77

Moderately well drained

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

112.83 Very poorly drained

95.44

Well drained

112.95 Well drained

94.38

Moderately well drained

35.73

Excessively drained

34.05

Somewhat excessively drained

37.61

Well drained

47.14

Well drained

47.66

Somewhat excessively drained

42.22

Well drained

Geologic Description Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Water Ocala Limestone Water Water Ocala Limestone Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001092272 0.001092272 0.00040199 0.000511073 0.000353384 0.000511073 0.000511073 0.00040199 0.000409366 0.00040199 0.000409366 0.000286713 0.00084478 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001290564 0.001290564 0.00132299 0.001141014 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.001071746 0.000986086 0.00083219 0.001548109 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000447204 0.000319793 0.000160345

Page 17 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9BX3 Late Woodland 9BX9 Late Woodland 9CY162 Late Woodland 9CY163 Late Woodland 9CY185 Late Woodland 9DR1 Late Woodland 9DR10 Late Woodland 9DR101 Late Woodland 9DR104 Late Woodland 9DR109 Late Woodland 9DR11 Late Woodland 9DR118 Late Woodland 9DR12 Late Woodland 9DR120 Late Woodland 9DR125 Late Woodland 9DR127 Late Woodland 9DR129 Late Woodland 9DR13 Late Woodland 9DR14 Late Woodland 9DR142 Late Woodland 9DR15 Late Woodland 9DR152 Late Woodland 9DR155 Late Woodland 9DR157 Late Woodland 9DR16 Late Woodland 9DR163 Late Woodland 9DR17 Late Woodland 9DR179 Late Woodland 9DR183 Late Woodland 9DR188 Late Woodland 9DR189 Late Woodland 9DR19 Late Woodland 9DR199 Late Woodland 9DR21 Late Woodland 9DR22 Late Woodland 9DR23 Late Woodland 9DR25 Late Woodland 9DR27 Late Woodland 9DR3 Late Woodland 9DR32 Late Woodland 9DR33 Late Woodland

Elevation Drainage Class

42.58

Somewhat poorly drained

33.99

Excessively drained

108.37 Well drained

103.19 Well drained

112.62 Well drained

24.35

Excessively drained

23.34

23.57

23.43

23.41

Excessively drained

24.90

Well drained

27.04

Moderately well drained

23.49

24.25

Moderately well drained

25.19

Moderately well drained

23.35

Moderately well drained

24.31

Poorly drained

23.34

47.05

Somewhat poorly drained

23.99

Excessively drained

24.89

Well drained

24.33

Moderately well drained

23.75

Well drained

24.63

Well drained

32.07

Excessively drained

24.42

Moderately well drained

34.98

Well drained

72.43

Well drained

24.25

Excessively drained

26.79

Well drained

23.35

Moderately well drained

30.48

Well drained

24.03

Poorly drained

31.64

Poorly drained

31.59

Poorly drained

23.33

24.47

Well drained

23.31

30.35

Moderately well drained

23.47

Moderately well drained

23.34

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Water Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Water Miccosukee Formation Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water Miccosukee Formation Water Miccosukee Formation Water Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Water Water Water Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000548364 0.000319793 0.00139855 0.001329975 0.00139855 9.37041E-05 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000110291 0.00040199 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.000161981 0.000110291 0.00040199 0.000110291 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000994571 0.00040199 0.000648216 0.000578895 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000994571 0.00040199 0.00040199

Page 18 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9DR34 Late Woodland 9DR35 Late Woodland 9DR46 Late Woodland 9DR49 Late Woodland 9DR50 Late Woodland 9DR6 Late Woodland 9DR7 Late Woodland 9DR71 Late Woodland 9DR8 Late Woodland 9DR9 Late Woodland 9DR96 Late Woodland 9DU103 Late Woodland 9DU87 Late Woodland 9ER1 Late Woodland 9ER106 Late Woodland 9ER131 Late Woodland 9ER133 Late Woodland 9ER137 Late Woodland 9ER138 Late Woodland 9ER140 Late Woodland 9ER144 Late Woodland 9ER146 Late Woodland 9ER52 Late Woodland 9ER54 Late Woodland 9ER59 Late Woodland 9ER63 Late Woodland 9ER84 Late Woodland 9ER88 Late Woodland 9ER93 Late Woodland 9LE40 Late Woodland 9LE41 Late Woodland 9LE42 Late Woodland 9LE43 Late Woodland 9LE53 Late Woodland 9LE78 Late Woodland 9MI163 Late Woodland 9MI4 Late Woodland 9MI53 Late Woodland 9MI90 Late Woodland 9MI91 Late Woodland 9RH10 Late Woodland

Elevation Drainage Class

23.35

Moderately well drained

23.41

23.34

24.45

Poorly drained

29.20

Well drained

23.35

23.33

23.94

24.24

23.34

23.67

55.56

Poorly drained

53.07

Excessively drained

95.95

Well drained

39.48

Well drained

38.77

Well drained

44.57

Well drained

44.41

Excessively drained

41.43

Well drained

34.68

Well drained

41.03

Excessively drained

41.50

Excessively drained

48.36

56.14

Well drained

75.03

Well drained

54.78

Well drained

85.66

Somewhat excessively drained

38.83

41.00

Moderately well drained

71.77

71.77

72.41

Somewhat excessively drained

71.77

100.47 Well drained

63.79

Well drained

42.44

Well drained

43.58

Well drained

48.65

Moderately well drained

52.23

Well drained

51.41

Somewhat poorly drained

98.31

Well drained

Geologic Description Water Stream Alluvium Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Water Ocala Limestone Water Stream Alluvium Claiborne Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Lisbon Formation Lisbon Formation Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Water Stream Alluvium Water Stream Alluvium Water Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000286713 0.000289308 0.000800569 0.001260413 0.001572355 0.001471782 0.001471782 0.00127936 0.000589451 0.000589451 0.00136049 0.001615558 0.001471782 0.001471782 0.001389486 0.00104483 0.00139855 0.000589451 0.001572355 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.001288351 0.000800569 0.000718253 0.000881038 0.000785911 0.000970533 0.000671497 0.001092272

Page 19 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9RH4 Late Woodland 9RH81 Late Woodland 9RH9 Late Woodland 9RH91 Late Woodland 9SE1 Late Woodland 9SE10 Late Woodland 9SE102 Late Woodland 9SE103 Late Woodland 9SE107 Late Woodland 9SE11 Late Woodland 9SE114 Late Woodland 9SE115 Late Woodland 9SE117 Late Woodland 9SE119 Late Woodland 9SE12 Late Woodland 9SE127 Late Woodland 9SE13 Late Woodland 9SE14 Late Woodland 9SE15 Late Woodland 9SE16 Late Woodland 9SE17 Late Woodland 9SE2 Late Woodland 9SE20 Late Woodland 9SE21 Late Woodland 9SE22 Late Woodland 9SE26 Late Woodland 9SE27 Late Woodland 9SE3 Late Woodland 9SE30 Late Woodland 9SE32 Late Woodland 9SE33 Late Woodland 9SE35 Late Woodland 9SE46 Late Woodland 9SE58 Late Woodland 9SE70 Late Woodland 9SE76 Late Woodland 9SE89 Late Woodland 9SE97 Late Woodland 9SU100 Late Woodland 9SU101 Late Woodland 9SU102 Late Woodland

Elevation Drainage Class

106.15 Well drained

99.53

Excessively drained

86.19

Poorly drained

99.53

Excessively drained

23.33

23.33

27.21

Well drained

26.86

Well drained

29.83

Well drained

23.33

42.19

Well drained

26.79

Well drained

24.26

Well drained

31.28

Well drained

23.33

Somewhat poorly drained

29.24

24.22

Somewhat poorly drained

23.35

24.26

Well drained

27.31

Well drained

27.31

Well drained

23.33

23.32

23.31

23.32

23.54

Somewhat poorly drained

23.32

31.33

Well drained

23.33

24.25

Well drained

23.33

24.26

Well drained

36.53

Well drained

44.60

Well drained

37.98

Well drained

33.62

Well drained

30.94

Well drained

23.52

71.77

71.77

71.77

Geologic Description Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Water Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Water Water Water Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Water Water Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Water Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Water

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001092272 0.00060684 0.001092272 0.00060684 0.000409366 0.00040199 0.000511073 0.000511073 0.000409366 0.000286713 0.000511073 0.000511073 0.000511073 0.000589451 0.000286713 0.000589451 0.000409366 0.000511073 0.000511073 0.000511073 0.000511073 0.000409366 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000409366 0.00040199 0.000409366 0.00040199 0.000511073 0.000409366 0.000511073 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.000511073 0.000409366 0.000409366 0.000353384 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185

Page 20 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9SU103 Late Woodland 9SU138 Late Woodland 9SU159 Late Woodland 9SU181 Late Woodland 9SU25 Late Woodland 9SU28 Late Woodland 9SU30 Late Woodland 9SU37 Late Woodland 9SU38 Late Woodland 9SU42 Late Woodland 9SU43 Late Woodland 9SU44 Late Woodland 9SU46 Late Woodland 9SU48 Late Woodland 9SU49 Late Woodland 9SU50 Late Woodland 9SU51 Late Woodland 9SU52 Late Woodland 9SU53 Late Woodland 9SU55 Late Woodland 9SU56 Late Woodland 9SU58 Late Woodland 9SU6 Late Woodland 9SU60 Late Woodland 9SU61 Late Woodland 9SU63 Late Woodland 9SU67 Late Woodland 9SU69 Late Woodland 9SU71 Late Woodland 9SU72 Late Woodland 9SU73 Late Woodland 9SU76 Late Woodland 9SU77 Late Woodland 9SU78 Late Woodland 9SU79 Late Woodland 9SU80 Late Woodland 9SU81 Late Woodland 9SU82 Late Woodland 9SU83 Late Woodland 9SU84 Late Woodland 9SU85 Late Woodland

Elevation Drainage Class

71.77

107.32 Well drained

101.07 Well drained

114.99 Well drained

95.27

Well drained

71.85

72.91

Poorly drained

71.85

71.85

70.96

Poorly drained

87.22

Well drained

71.34

Well drained

72.54

71.79

Well drained

71.77

Well drained

72.11

Poorly drained

73.08

Somewhat excessively drained

76.04

Poorly drained

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

111.61 Well drained

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

Geologic Description Water Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Stream Alluvium Water Water Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Water Water Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000950185 0.001244391 0.001290564 0.001035085 0.001141014 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.001299864 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185

Page 21 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9SU86 Late Woodland 9SU87 Late Woodland 9SU88 Late Woodland 9SU89 Late Woodland 9SU90 Late Woodland 9SU92 Late Woodland 9SU93 Late Woodland 9SU94 Late Woodland 9TE22 Late Woodland 9TE37 Late Woodland 9BX13 General Woodland 9BX17 General Woodland 9BX24 General Woodland 9BX33 General Woodland 9BX44 General Woodland 9BX45 General Woodland 9BX56 General Woodland 9BX8 General Woodland 9BX85 General Woodland 9CP138 General Woodland 9CP140 General Woodland 9CP146 General Woodland 9CU1 General Woodland 9CU12 General Woodland 9CU2 General Woodland 9CU20 General Woodland 9CU24 General Woodland 9CY161 General Woodland 9CY175 General Woodland 9CY180 General Woodland 9CY64 General Woodland 9DR73 General Woodland 9DR80 General Woodland 9DU118 General Woodland 9DU119 General Woodland 9DU32 General Woodland 9DU33 General Woodland 9DU37 General Woodland 9DU38 General Woodland 9DU45 General Woodland 9DU49 General Woodland

Elevation Drainage Class

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

112.83 Very poorly drained

112.95 Well drained

40.72

Excessively drained

50.75

Somewhat excessively drained

41.32

Somewhat excessively drained

48.10

Somewhat excessively drained

37.22

36.86

29.20

37.79

Excessively drained

48.64

Poorly drained

109.63 Poorly drained

108.72 Poorly drained

109.42 Poorly drained

77.40

Well drained

69.99

Well drained

79.06

Well drained

66.98

Well drained

67.91

Well drained

108.58 Well drained

102.85 Well drained

111.47 Well drained

103.27 Well drained

32.32

Moderately well drained

31.57

Moderately well drained

51.93

Poorly drained

52.03

60.87

Well drained

63.75

Well drained

56.12

Excessively drained

57.48

Well drained

59.93

57.75

Poorly drained

Geologic Description Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Neogene Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.001071746 0.00083219 0.000160345 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000192057 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000218204 0.000996178 0.000996178 0.000996178 0.001454734 0.000522164 0.001454734 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.00139855 0.001329975 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000493239 0.000493239 0.000800569 0.000289308 0.000493239 0.000493239

Page 22 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9DU50 General Woodland 9DU63 General Woodland 9DU69 General Woodland 9DU70 General Woodland 9DU76 General Woodland 9DU78 General Woodland 9DU80 General Woodland 9DY19 General Woodland 9DY2 General Woodland 9ER147 General Woodland 9ER148 General Woodland 9ER149 General Woodland 9ER159 General Woodland 9ER238 General Woodland 9ER245 General Woodland 9ER246 General Woodland 9ER266 General Woodland 9ER268 General Woodland 9LE10 General Woodland 9LE107 General Woodland 9LE132 General Woodland 9LE143 General Woodland 9LE150 General Woodland 9LE154 General Woodland 9LE156 General Woodland 9LE157 General Woodland 9LE2 General Woodland 9LE30 General Woodland 9LE33 General Woodland 9LE34 General Woodland 9LE36 General Woodland 9LE37 General Woodland 9LE39 General Woodland 9LE40 General Woodland 9LE41 General Woodland 9LE42 General Woodland 9LE43 General Woodland 9LE46 General Woodland 9LE8 General Woodland 9LE80 General Woodland 9MA53 General Woodland

Elevation Drainage Class

60.80

Somewhat poorly drained

65.75

Somewhat excessively drained

68.44

Poorly drained

68.43

Well drained

67.87

53.17

Moderately well drained

59.50

Excessively drained

88.79

Well drained

94.94

Well drained

33.99

Well drained

65.97

Well drained

50.46

Well drained

60.89

Well drained

58.08

Well drained

56.58

Well drained

64.88

Well drained

86.13

Well drained

50.74

Well drained

86.03

Well drained

91.32

Somewhat excessively drained

72.11

Well drained

67.26

Somewhat excessively drained

81.32

Somewhat excessively drained

73.20

Well drained

64.29

Well drained

66.47

Well drained

75.16

Well drained

92.23

Well drained

71.78

71.78

71.76

71.76

71.76

71.77

71.77

72.41

Somewhat excessively drained

71.77

71.77

Somewhat excessively drained

78.23

Poorly drained

62.51

Well drained

123.66 Excessively drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Water Water Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Claiborne Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000493239 0.000688154 0.000686915 0.000686915 0.000686915 0.000253543 0.000289308 0.001538806 0.001093049 0.000941979 0.001007474 0.000941979 0.001007474 0.001389486 0.001231318 0.000794166 0.001260413 0.001471782 0.001141014 0.001299864 0.00094367 0.000561599 0.001299864 0.000611689 0.000775896 0.000775896 0.000861966 0.001141014 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.00094367 0.001242365

Page 23 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9MA73 General Woodland 9MI103 General Woodland 9MI119 General Woodland 9MI121 General Woodland 9MI122 General Woodland 9MI2 General Woodland 9MI35 General Woodland 9MI53 General Woodland 9MI54 General Woodland 9MI86 General Woodland 9ML156 General Woodland 9ML164 General Woodland 9ML165 General Woodland 9RH6 General Woodland 9RH60 General Woodland 9RH70 General Woodland 9RH72 General Woodland 9RH74 General Woodland 9RH82 General Woodland 9SE129 General Woodland 9SE131 General Woodland 9SE22 General Woodland 9SE37 General Woodland 9SE39 General Woodland 9SE46 General Woodland 9SE53 General Woodland 9SE60 General Woodland 9SE98 General Woodland 9SU128 General Woodland 9SU138 General Woodland 9SU14 General Woodland 9SU140 General Woodland 9SU143 General Woodland 9SU157 General Woodland 9SU216 General Woodland 9SU25 General Woodland 9SU37 General Woodland 9SU39 General Woodland 9SU41 General Woodland 9SU42 General Woodland 9SU48 General Woodland

Elevation Drainage Class

102.48 Well drained

37.09

Well drained

66.16

Well drained

39.82

Well drained

38.41

Well drained

41.67

Poorly drained

57.33

Poorly drained

48.65

Moderately well drained

48.65

Poorly drained

42.29

Well drained

37.81

Excessively drained

48.59

Well drained

45.17

Well drained

99.78

Well drained

102.10 Well drained

130.21 Well drained

121.06 Well drained

122.52 Well drained

89.53

Somewhat excessively drained

24.45

Somewhat poorly drained

33.32

Well drained

23.32

33.47

Moderately well drained

36.74

Well drained

36.53

Well drained

35.56

Poorly drained

36.40

Poorly drained

25.10

Well drained

91.35

Poorly drained

107.32 Well drained

71.97

Poorly drained

105.66 Excessively drained

102.77 Poorly drained

96.59

Well drained

93.27

Well drained

95.27

Well drained

71.85

71.85

71.83

Poorly drained

70.96

Poorly drained

71.79

Well drained

Geologic Description Eocene Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001163134 0.000871104 0.000785911 0.000871104 0.000871104 0.00084478 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000676376 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.001092272 0.001329975 0.000799192 0.000799192 0.000799192 0.00060684 0.000409366 0.000353384 0.00040199 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.000353384 0.000986086 0.001244391 0.00110159 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001290564 0.001499214 0.001141014 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159

Page 24 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9SU50 General Woodland 9SU51 General Woodland 9SU53 General Woodland 9SU55 General Woodland 9SU56 General Woodland 9SU57 General Woodland 9SU59 General Woodland 9SU61 General Woodland 9SU62 General Woodland 9SU63 General Woodland 9SU64 General Woodland 9SU65 General Woodland 9SU67 General Woodland 9SU69 General Woodland 9SU71 General Woodland 9SU72 General Woodland 9SU73 General Woodland 9SU74 General Woodland 9SU76 General Woodland 9SU83 General Woodland 9SU87 General Woodland 9SU88 General Woodland 9SU96 General Woodland 9TE104 General Woodland 9TE113 General Woodland 9TE115 General Woodland 9TE130 General Woodland 9TE3 General Woodland 9TE33 General Woodland 9TE34 General Woodland 9TE35 General Woodland 9TE37 General Woodland 9TE44 General Woodland 9TE71 General Woodland 9TE84 General Woodland 9WO42 General Woodland 9WO7 General Woodland 9BX101 Early Mississippian 9CP165 Early Mississippian 9DR4 Early Mississippian 9ER1 Early Mississippian

Elevation Drainage Class

72.11

Poorly drained

73.08

Somewhat excessively drained

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

Moderately well drained

71.80

Well drained

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

72.64

Excessively drained

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

88.28

Well drained

79.18

Moderately well drained

99.94

Somewhat excessively drained

97.30

Well drained

137.04 Well drained

85.13

Poorly drained

95.44

Well drained

103.94

112.95 Well drained

91.33

Well drained

88.05

Well drained

91.28

Well drained

82.11

Well drained

75.11

Well drained

37.61

Well drained

83.95

Well drained

25.97

Moderately well drained

95.95

Well drained

Geologic Description Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Tuscahoma Sand Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Claiborne Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.001548109 0.000977975 0.000878886 0.000977975 0.00083219 0.001133451 0.000986086 0.000878886 0.00083219 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001420181 0.000967301 0.000319793 0.001224985 0.000161981 0.001260413

Page 25 of 71

Site Sub-Period

Elevation Drainage Class

9MA73 Early Mississippian 102.48 Well drained

9MI90 Early Mississippian 52.23

Well drained

9MI91 Early Mississippian 51.41

Somewhat poorly drained

9SU174 Early Mississippian 83.95

Well drained

9SU6 Early Mississippian 111.61 Well drained

9SU87 Early Mississippian 71.77

9CY106 Middle Mississippian 45.31

Excessively drained

9ER1 Middle Mississippian 95.95

Well drained

9ER57 Middle Mississippian 53.34

Somewhat excessively drained

9SE102 Middle Mississippian 27.21

Well drained

9SU88 Middle Mississippian 71.77

9TE35 Middle Mississippian 103.94

9BX10 Late Mississippian 35.73

Excessively drained

9BX115 Late Mississippian 47.14

Well drained

9BX9 Late Mississippian 33.99

Excessively drained

9DR137 Late Mississippian 26.53

Excessively drained

9DR46 Late Mississippian 23.34

9DU2 Late Mississippian 72.30

Well drained

9DU7 Late Mississippian 54.73

Well drained

9ER1 Late Mississippian 95.95

Well drained

9ER100 Late Mississippian 41.46

Well drained

9ER105 Late Mississippian 42.37

Excessively drained

9ER107 Late Mississippian 42.40

Well drained

9ER117 Late Mississippian 37.03

Well drained

9ER127 Late Mississippian 32.54

9ER130 Late Mississippian 37.50

Well drained

9ER131 Late Mississippian 38.77

Well drained

9ER137 Late Mississippian 44.41

Excessively drained

9ER140 Late Mississippian 34.68

Well drained

9ER144 Late Mississippian 41.03

Excessively drained

9ER54 Late Mississippian 56.14

Well drained

9ER88 Late Mississippian 38.83

9ER93 Late Mississippian 41.00

Moderately well drained

9LE114 Late Mississippian 72.05

Well drained

9LE2 Late Mississippian 75.16

Well drained

9LE5 Late Mississippian 63.97

Well drained

9SE104 Late Mississippian 24.26

Well drained

9SE106 Late Mississippian 27.40

Well drained

9SE113 Late Mississippian 24.25

Somewhat poorly drained

9SE119 Late Mississippian 31.28

Well drained

9SE124 Late Mississippian 27.25

Well drained

Geologic Description Eocene Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Tuscahoma Sand Claiborne Undifferentiated Lisbon Formation Ocala Limestone Water Claiborne Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Tallahatta Formation Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Tallahatta Formation Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Lisbon Formation Water Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Water Water Water

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001163134 0.000970533 0.000671497 0.001224985 0.001299864 0.000950185 0.001344885 0.001260413 0.001471782 0.000511073 0.000950185 0.000878886 0.000319793 0.000447204 0.000319793 0.000110291 0.00040199 0.001172518 0.000522164 0.001260413 0.001487013 0.001572355 0.001615558 0.001615558 0.00136049 0.001471782 0.001471782 0.00127936 0.000589451 0.00136049 0.001471782 0.000589451 0.001572355 0.001342568 0.000861966 0.000611689 0.000511073 0.000353384 0.000409366 0.000589451 0.000353384

Page 26 of 71

Site Sub-Period

Elevation Drainage Class

9SE126 Late Mississippian 27.88

Well drained

9SE15 Late Mississippian 24.26

Well drained

9SE26 Late Mississippian 23.54

Somewhat poorly drained

9SE27 Late Mississippian 23.32

9SE3 Late Mississippian 31.33

Well drained

9SE98 Late Mississippian 25.10

Well drained

9SU174 Late Mississippian 83.95

Well drained

9SU37 Late Mississippian 71.85

9SU53 Late Mississippian 71.77

9SU87 Late Mississippian 71.77

9BX112 General Mississippian41.04

Somewhat excessively drained

9BX17 General Mississippian50.75

Somewhat excessively drained

9BX4 General Mississippian51.69

Poorly drained

9BX82 General Mississippian38.64

Excessively drained

9BX85 General Mississippian48.64

Poorly drained

9CP165 General Mississippian83.95

Well drained

9CU1 General Mississippian77.40

Well drained

9CU11 General Mississippian57.80

Poorly drained

9CY161 General Mississippian108.58 Well drained

9CY175 General Mississippian102.85 Well drained

9CY64 General Mississippian103.27 Well drained

9DR73 General Mississippian32.32

Moderately well drained

9DR8 General Mississippian24.24

9DR80 General Mississippian31.57

Moderately well drained

9DU108 General Mississippian55.80

Poorly drained

9DU118 General Mississippian51.93

Poorly drained

9DU156 General Mississippian53.17

Poorly drained

9DU32 General Mississippian60.87

Well drained

9DU33 General Mississippian63.75

Well drained

9DU37 General Mississippian56.12

Excessively drained

9DU80 General Mississippian59.50

Excessively drained

9DY2 General Mississippian94.94

Well drained

9ER238 General Mississippian58.08

Well drained

9ER244 General Mississippian57.88

Well drained

9ER257 General Mississippian65.07

Well drained

9ER268 General Mississippian50.74

Well drained

9ER82 General Mississippian45.47

Well drained

9LE122 General Mississippian72.98

Somewhat excessively drained

9LE150 General Mississippian81.32

Somewhat excessively drained

9LE154 General Mississippian73.20

Well drained

9LE156 General Mississippian64.29

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Water Stream Alluvium Water Claiborne Undifferentiated Water Water Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Water Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Lisbon Formation Stream Alluvium Tallahatta Formation Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000353384 0.000511073 0.000409366 0.00040199 0.000409366 0.000353384 0.001224985 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.000950185 0.000447204 0.000319793 0.000522164 0.000319793 0.000218204 0.001224985 0.001454734 0.000646133 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.00084478 0.00040199 0.00084478 0.000289308 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000493239 0.000493239 0.000800569 0.000289308 0.001093049 0.001389486 0.001231318 0.00136049 0.001471782 0.001615558 0.000561599 0.001299864 0.000611689 0.000775896

Page 27 of 71

Site Sub-Period

Elevation Drainage Class

9LE157 General Mississippian66.47

Well drained

9LE5 General Mississippian63.97

Well drained

9LE80 General Mississippian62.51

Well drained

9MI115 General Mississippian42.56

Well drained

9MI121 General Mississippian39.82

Well drained

9MI122 General Mississippian38.41

Well drained

9MI2 General Mississippian41.67

Poorly drained

9MI35 General Mississippian57.33

Poorly drained

9MI53 General Mississippian48.65

Moderately well drained

9MI54 General Mississippian48.65

Poorly drained

9ML164 General Mississippian48.59

Well drained

9RH60 General Mississippian102.10 Well drained

9RH74 General Mississippian122.52 Well drained

9RH82 General Mississippian89.53

Somewhat excessively drained

9SE129 General Mississippian24.45

Somewhat poorly drained

9SE16 General Mississippian27.31

Well drained

9SE37 General Mississippian33.47

Moderately well drained

9SE39 General Mississippian36.74

Well drained

9SE98 General Mississippian25.10

Well drained

9SU138 General Mississippian107.32 Well drained

9SU14 General Mississippian71.97

Poorly drained

9SU143 General Mississippian102.77 Poorly drained

9SU216 General Mississippian93.27

Well drained

9SU25 General Mississippian95.27

Well drained

9SU74 General Mississippian72.64

Excessively drained

9TE115 General Mississippian99.94

Somewhat excessively drained

9TE130 General Mississippian97.30

Well drained

9TE3 General Mississippian137.04 Well drained

9TE34 General Mississippian95.44

Well drained

9TE37 General Mississippian112.95 Well drained

9TE40 General Mississippian94.38

Moderately well drained

9TE44 General Mississippian91.33

Well drained

9WO42 General Mississippian82.11

Well drained

9WO7 General Mississippian75.11

Well drained

9CP180 Protohistoric

94.32

Well drained

9CP181 Protohistoric

91.27

Moderately well drained

9CP185 Protohistoric

91.27

Well drained

9CP192 Protohistoric

79.09

Well drained

9CP193 Protohistoric

76.94

Well drained

9CP195 Protohistoric

83.61

Well drained

9DU165 Protohistoric

61.13

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Claiborne Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000775896 0.000611689 0.00094367 0.000332634 0.000871104 0.000871104 0.00084478 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000160345 0.001329975 0.000799192 0.00060684 0.000409366 0.000511073 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.000353384 0.001244391 0.00110159 0.001244391 0.001499214 0.001141014 0.000950185 0.000878886 0.000977975 0.00083219 0.000986086 0.00083219 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001420181 0.000967301 0.001014457 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.001014457 0.001014457 0.001014457 0.00068923

Page 28 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9DU166 Protohistoric 9DU167 Protohistoric 9DU168 Protohistoric 9DU174 Protohistoric 9DU175 Protohistoric 9DU176 Protohistoric 9DU177 Protohistoric 9DU178 Protohistoric 9DU179 Protohistoric 9DU180 Protohistoric 9DU181 Protohistoric 9DU184 Protohistoric 9DY19 Protohistoric 9GR22 Protohistoric 9MI126 Protohistoric 9MI98 Protohistoric 9MI99 Protohistoric 9ML102 Protohistoric 9ML104 Protohistoric 9ML215 Protohistoric 9ML216 Protohistoric 9ML217 Protohistoric 9ML218 Protohistoric 9ML98 Protohistoric 9RH32 Protohistoric 9RH42 Protohistoric 9RH46 Protohistoric 9RH77 Protohistoric 9RH79 Protohistoric 9RH83 Protohistoric 9SU176 Protohistoric 9SU177 Protohistoric 9SU202 Protohistoric 9SU203 Protohistoric 9TE114 Protohistoric 9TE117 Protohistoric 9TE118 Protohistoric 9TE119 Protohistoric 9TE120 Protohistoric 9TE122 Protohistoric 9TE123 Protohistoric

Elevation Drainage Class

66.19

Well drained

65.36

Well drained

62.36

Well drained

72.77

Moderately well drained

72.99

Poorly drained

72.98

Well drained

73.42

Somewhat poorly drained

74.67

Moderately well drained

74.90

Somewhat poorly drained

76.19

Moderately well drained

73.01

Moderately well drained

66.91

Well drained

88.79

Well drained

51.15

Well drained

53.66

Well drained

37.72

Somewhat poorly drained

52.52

Well drained

40.38

Well drained

52.90

Well drained

73.25

Well drained

71.70

Well drained

71.12

Well drained

71.47

Well drained

43.86

Somewhat excessively drained

134.56 Well drained

148.41 Well drained

130.66 Well drained

118.92 Well drained

130.55 Well drained

105.59 Well drained

73.06

Well drained

78.64

Well drained

123.01 Well drained

109.74 Well drained

86.66

Well drained

115.74 Well drained

117.22 Well drained

117.16 Poorly drained

109.63 Well drained

100.78 Well drained

94.90

Poorly drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Miccosukee Formation Miccosukee Formation Hawthorn Formation Miccosukee Formation Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Water Stream Alluvium Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.00068923 0.00068923 0.00068923 0.000780615 0.000780615 0.00068923 0.001420181 0.001420181 0.001420181 0.001420181 0.000780615 0.00068923 0.001538806 0.000212461 0.000671497 0.000192057 0.000671497 0.000503312 0.000503312 0.000958071 0.000958071 0.000958071 0.000958071 0.000503312 0.001329975 0.000799192 0.000799192 0.000799192 0.00060684 0.000878886 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.001499214 0.001499214 0.000878886 0.000878886 0.000778824 0.000826348 0.000977975 0.000977975 0.000977975

Page 29 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9TE124 Protohistoric 9TE126 Protohistoric 9TE127 Protohistoric 9TE128 Protohistoric 9TE129 Protohistoric 9TE29 Protohistoric 9TE33 Protohistoric 9TE36 Protohistoric 9WO42 Protohistoric 9BX23 Historic Indian 9DR124 Historic Indian 9DR157 Historic Indian 9DR199 Historic Indian 9DR22 Historic Indian 9DR3 Historic Indian 9DR33 Historic Indian 9DR4 Historic Indian 9DR46 Historic Indian 9DR71 Historic Indian 9DR8 Historic Indian 9ER106 Historic Indian 9ER110 Historic Indian 9ER118 Historic Indian 9ER131 Historic Indian 9ER53 Historic Indian 9LE114 Historic Indian 9LE116 Historic Indian 9LE132 Historic Indian 9LE135 Historic Indian 9LE136 Historic Indian 9LE42 Historic Indian 9LE5 Historic Indian 9LE55 Historic Indian 9LE88 Historic Indian 9SE106 Historic Indian 9SE11 Historic Indian 9SE113 Historic Indian 9SE116 Historic Indian 9SE2 Historic Indian 9SE20 Historic Indian 9SE21 Historic Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

96.16

Well drained

92.72

Poorly drained

91.34

Poorly drained

91.76

Poorly drained

92.55

Well drained

121.45 Well drained

85.13

Poorly drained

109.60 Very poorly drained

82.11

Well drained

44.30

Somewhat excessively drained

51.57

Well drained

24.63

Well drained

24.03

Poorly drained

31.59

Poorly drained

30.35

Moderately well drained

23.34

Well drained

25.97

Moderately well drained

23.34

23.94

24.24

39.48

Well drained

37.22

Well drained

44.12

Excessively drained

38.77

Well drained

63.50

Somewhat excessively drained

72.05

Well drained

72.03

Well drained

72.11

Well drained

79.43

Well drained

69.95

Well drained

72.41

Somewhat excessively drained

63.97

Well drained

81.27

Well drained

81.53

Well drained

27.40

Well drained

23.33

24.25

Somewhat poorly drained

24.25

Somewhat poorly drained

23.33

23.32

23.31

Geologic Description Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Claiborne Undifferentiated Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Tallahatta Formation Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Water Water Water Water Water Water

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000977975 0.000977975 0.000977975 0.000977975 0.000977975 0.000986086 0.001133451 0.00083219 0.001420181 0.000160345 0.00040199 0.000161981 0.00040199 0.000578895 0.000994571 0.00040199 0.000161981 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.001572355 0.001615558 0.00136049 0.001471782 0.001471782 0.001342568 0.000611689 0.00094367 0.000861966 0.000861966 0.000950185 0.000611689 0.001342568 0.001548109 0.000353384 0.000286713 0.000409366 0.000409366 0.000409366 0.00040199 0.00040199

Page 30 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9SE24 Historic Indian 9SE26 Historic Indian 9SE27 Historic Indian 9SE29 Historic Indian 9SE3 Historic Indian 9SE77 Historic Indian 9SU159 Historic Indian 9SU52 Historic Indian 9SU6 Historic Indian 9SU84 Historic Indian 9SU85 Historic Indian 9SU86 Historic Indian 9SU87 Historic Indian 9SU93 Historic Indian 9TE111 Historic Indian 9TE82 Historic Indian 9TE83 Historic Indian 9BX10 Unknown Indian 9BX100 Unknown Indian 9BX105 Unknown Indian 9BX107 Unknown Indian 9BX108 Unknown Indian 9BX11 Unknown Indian 9BX110 Unknown Indian 9BX111 Unknown Indian 9BX115 Unknown Indian 9BX116 Unknown Indian 9BX117 Unknown Indian 9BX12 Unknown Indian 9BX121 Unknown Indian 9BX127 Unknown Indian 9BX128 Unknown Indian 9BX143 Unknown Indian 9BX144 Unknown Indian 9BX145 Unknown Indian 9BX154 Unknown Indian 9BX25 Unknown Indian 9BX30 Unknown Indian 9BX31 Unknown Indian 9BX32 Unknown Indian 9BX36 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

24.19

Somewhat poorly drained

23.54

Somewhat poorly drained

23.32

23.33

31.33

Well drained

38.19

Well drained

101.07 Well drained

76.04

Poorly drained

111.61 Well drained

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

91.75

Well drained

82.47

Well drained

91.32

Well drained

35.73

Excessively drained

34.05

Somewhat excessively drained

44.27

Well drained

37.12

Well drained

44.52

Somewhat excessively drained

44.18

Somewhat excessively drained

34.51

Excessively drained

36.91

Somewhat excessively drained

47.14

Well drained

37.09

Somewhat excessively drained

39.26

Poorly drained

48.47

Well drained

38.35

Excessively drained

50.01

Well drained

50.90

Well drained

45.35

Moderately well drained

48.47

Well drained

56.41

Well drained

48.17

Well drained

38.09

Somewhat excessively drained

38.79

Well drained

38.47

Somewhat excessively drained

44.89

Poorly drained

36.78

Geologic Description Water Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Water Water Water Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000409366 0.000409366 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000409366 0.000511073 0.001290564 0.00110159 0.001299864 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.001285433 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000447204 0.000319793 0.000447204 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000447204 0.000319793 0.0002194 0.000192057 0.0002194 0.000447204 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000447204 0.000319793

Page 31 of 71

Site 9BX41 9BX42 9BX43 9BX44 9BX46 9BX48 9BX52 9BX53 9BX54 9BX55 9BX57 9BX58 9BX59 9BX6 9BX60 9BX61 9BX62 9BX63 9BX64 9BX65 9BX66 9BX67 9BX68 9BX69 9BX7 9BX70 9BX71 9BX72 9BX73 9BX74 9BX75 9BX76 9BX77 9BX78 9BX79 9BX8 9BX80 9BX81 9BX88 9BX89 9BX90

Sub-Period Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

36.55

36.89

36.53

Excessively drained

37.22

33.96

34.78

Excessively drained

32.17

30.31

29.33

Moderately well drained

30.55

36.57

36.53

36.66

Somewhat poorly drained

49.38

Well drained

35.86

35.92

Somewhat poorly drained

35.26

34.19

Moderately well drained

34.90

32.65

Moderately well drained

32.20

36.41

Well drained

31.09

30.31

45.09

Well drained

29.44

Excessively drained

29.66

29.53

31.15

Somewhat poorly drained

36.86

Somewhat poorly drained

29.06

27.67

27.81

27.64

28.43

Well drained

37.79

Excessively drained

28.39

27.14

Somewhat poorly drained

51.71

Somewhat poorly drained

51.44

Somewhat poorly drained

42.78

Moderately well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium

Page 32 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 8.78234E-05 8.78234E-05 8.78234E-05 0.000319793 8.78234E-05 8.78234E-05 8.78234E-05 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000319793 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000319793 0.000192057 0.000192057 0.0002194 0.0002194 0.000319793

Site Sub-Period 9BX91 Unknown Indian 9BX92 Unknown Indian 9BX93 Unknown Indian 9BX94 Unknown Indian 9BX95 Unknown Indian 9BX96 Unknown Indian 9BX97 Unknown Indian 9BX98 Unknown Indian 9BX99 Unknown Indian 9CP12 Unknown Indian 9CP13 Unknown Indian 9CP134 Unknown Indian 9CP137 Unknown Indian 9CP139 Unknown Indian 9CP140 Unknown Indian 9CP143 Unknown Indian 9CP144 Unknown Indian 9CP145 Unknown Indian 9CP147 Unknown Indian 9CP148 Unknown Indian 9CP152 Unknown Indian 9CP153 Unknown Indian 9CP158 Unknown Indian 9CP161 Unknown Indian 9CP174 Unknown Indian 9CP177 Unknown Indian 9CP18 Unknown Indian 9CP19 Unknown Indian 9CP196 Unknown Indian 9CP197 Unknown Indian 9CP20 Unknown Indian 9CP22 Unknown Indian 9CP23 Unknown Indian 9CP4 Unknown Indian 9CP5 Unknown Indian 9CP8 Unknown Indian 9CU14 Unknown Indian 9CU16 Unknown Indian 9CU17 Unknown Indian 9CU18 Unknown Indian 9CU19 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

44.06

Moderately well drained

39.09

Moderately well drained

37.79

Somewhat poorly drained

46.47

Well drained

32.78

Excessively drained

33.98

Somewhat excessively drained

36.06

Moderately well drained

45.39

Somewhat excessively drained

46.06

Well drained

94.32

Well drained

94.25

Well drained

89.76

Poorly drained

108.23 Well drained

112.34 Poorly drained

108.72 Poorly drained

130.19 Well drained

125.15 Poorly drained

127.11 Well drained

113.16 Well drained

111.71 Well drained

83.53

Excessively drained

85.19

Excessively drained

92.10

Somewhat poorly drained

90.04

Poorly drained

113.21 Moderately well drained

99.59

Well drained

82.00

Well drained

87.09

Well drained

77.93

Well drained

76.43

Well drained

97.37

Well drained

80.94

Well drained

82.55

Well drained

88.20

Well drained

91.27

Well drained

93.30

Well drained

70.02

Moderately well drained

73.23

Well drained

70.03

Well drained

69.44

Well drained

67.72

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Neogene Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Neogene Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000160345 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000192057 0.000192057 0.000319793 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.001014457 0.001014457 0.000881856 0.000996178 0.000996178 0.000996178 0.000996178 0.000996178 0.000996178 0.000996178 0.000996178 0.000911254 0.000911254 0.001042538 0.001221166 0.001042538 0.001042538 0.000911254 0.001042538 0.001014457 0.001014457 0.001042538 0.000996178 0.000996178 0.001014457 0.000881856 0.000881856 0.001280851 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474

Page 33 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9CU21 Unknown Indian 9CU25 Unknown Indian 9CU26 Unknown Indian 9CU27 Unknown Indian 9CU28 Unknown Indian 9CU29 Unknown Indian 9CU3 Unknown Indian 9CU30 Unknown Indian 9CU31 Unknown Indian 9CU4 Unknown Indian 9CU5 Unknown Indian 9CU7 Unknown Indian 9CY107 Unknown Indian 9CY108 Unknown Indian 9CY109 Unknown Indian 9CY110 Unknown Indian 9CY111 Unknown Indian 9CY112 Unknown Indian 9CY113 Unknown Indian 9CY125 Unknown Indian 9CY157 Unknown Indian 9CY159 Unknown Indian 9CY160 Unknown Indian 9CY164 Unknown Indian 9CY168 Unknown Indian 9CY170 Unknown Indian 9CY171 Unknown Indian 9CY177 Unknown Indian 9CY181 Unknown Indian 9CY184 Unknown Indian 9CY186 Unknown Indian 9CY187 Unknown Indian 9CY190 Unknown Indian 9CY191 Unknown Indian 9CY192 Unknown Indian 9CY193 Unknown Indian 9CY64 Unknown Indian 9CY87 Unknown Indian 9CY88 Unknown Indian 9CY89 Unknown Indian 9CY90 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

70.03

Well drained

78.46

Well drained

73.08

Well drained

60.85

Poorly drained

63.90

Well drained

70.07

Well drained

66.98

69.18

Poorly drained

60.82

Well drained

57.79

Poorly drained

81.20

Well drained

73.07

Well drained

69.68

Excessively drained

67.64

Excessively drained

67.03

Excessively drained

65.75

Excessively drained

64.87

Excessively drained

53.96

Excessively drained

51.15

Excessively drained

118.42 Well drained

123.50 Well drained

109.74 Well drained

121.86 Poorly drained

115.76 Well drained

124.46 Well drained

120.00 Well drained

109.60 Well drained

115.42 Well drained

118.84 Well drained

106.21 Well drained

103.43 Poorly drained

124.34 Well drained

106.90 Well drained

113.25 Well drained

103.51 Well drained

111.13 Well drained

103.27 Well drained

119.45 Well drained

121.46 Well drained

127.90 Well drained

122.81 Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Tuscahoma Sand Tuscahoma Sand Tuscahoma Sand Tuscahoma Sand Tuscahoma Sand Tuscahoma Sand Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001454734 0.000646133 0.00104294 0.001007474 0.00104294 0.000522164 0.000522164 0.001454734 0.00117253 0.001344885 0.001344885 0.001344885 0.001344885 0.001344885 0.001344885 0.001344885 0.00139855 0.00139855 0.001329975 0.00139855 0.00139855 0.001645307 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.00139855 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.00139855 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.00139855 0.00139855

Page 34 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9DR102 Unknown Indian 9DR103 Unknown Indian 9DR105 Unknown Indian 9DR106 Unknown Indian 9DR107 Unknown Indian 9DR108 Unknown Indian 9DR110 Unknown Indian 9DR111 Unknown Indian 9DR112 Unknown Indian 9DR113 Unknown Indian 9DR114 Unknown Indian 9DR115 Unknown Indian 9DR119 Unknown Indian 9DR121 Unknown Indian 9DR122 Unknown Indian 9DR123 Unknown Indian 9DR126 Unknown Indian 9DR131 Unknown Indian 9DR132 Unknown Indian 9DR133 Unknown Indian 9DR134 Unknown Indian 9DR136 Unknown Indian 9DR138 Unknown Indian 9DR139 Unknown Indian 9DR140 Unknown Indian 9DR141 Unknown Indian 9DR144 Unknown Indian 9DR145 Unknown Indian 9DR146 Unknown Indian 9DR147 Unknown Indian 9DR148 Unknown Indian 9DR149 Unknown Indian 9DR150 Unknown Indian 9DR151 Unknown Indian 9DR156 Unknown Indian 9DR158 Unknown Indian 9DR159 Unknown Indian 9DR160 Unknown Indian 9DR161 Unknown Indian 9DR162 Unknown Indian 9DR164 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

24.07

Moderately well drained

24.25

Well drained

28.17

Well drained

24.08

Excessively drained

23.49

Excessively drained

23.63

Excessively drained

25.05

Moderately well drained

33.58

Well drained

33.40

23.47

Moderately well drained

40.14

Well drained

24.45

Moderately well drained

32.01

Well drained

28.15

Moderately well drained

28.68

Well drained

24.24

Excessively drained

23.34

23.44

24.79

Moderately well drained

30.21

Well drained

28.66

Well drained

33.71

Well drained

33.71

Well drained

30.19

Excessively drained

30.55

Excessively drained

30.33

Excessively drained

25.38

Excessively drained

27.66

Excessively drained

27.89

Excessively drained

25.38

Excessively drained

26.08

Excessively drained

27.80

Excessively drained

25.45

Excessively drained

24.60

Poorly drained

24.99

Well drained

24.20

Well drained

25.94

Moderately well drained

24.77

Moderately well drained

23.34

Moderately well drained

24.07

Moderately well drained

23.34

Moderately well drained

Geologic Description Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Water Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Water Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Water Stream Alluvium Hawthorn Formation Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Stream Alluvium Water Water Stream Alluvium Water Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water

Page 35 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000161981 0.00040199 0.000161981 0.000161981 0.000161981 0.000161981 0.000994571 0.000994571 0.000994571 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.000110291 9.37041E-05 0.000161981 0.00040199 0.000161981 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199

Site Sub-Period 9DR165 Unknown Indian 9DR166 Unknown Indian 9DR167 Unknown Indian 9DR168 Unknown Indian 9DR169 Unknown Indian 9DR170 Unknown Indian 9DR171 Unknown Indian 9DR172 Unknown Indian 9DR173 Unknown Indian 9DR175 Unknown Indian 9DR177 Unknown Indian 9DR178 Unknown Indian 9DR180 Unknown Indian 9DR181 Unknown Indian 9DR182 Unknown Indian 9DR184 Unknown Indian 9DR186 Unknown Indian 9DR187 Unknown Indian 9DR190 Unknown Indian 9DR191 Unknown Indian 9DR193 Unknown Indian 9DR194 Unknown Indian 9DR195 Unknown Indian 9DR196 Unknown Indian 9DR197 Unknown Indian 9DR198 Unknown Indian 9DR208 Unknown Indian 9DR212 Unknown Indian 9DR24 Unknown Indian 9DR26 Unknown Indian 9DR28 Unknown Indian 9DR30 Unknown Indian 9DR36 Unknown Indian 9DR37 Unknown Indian 9DR38 Unknown Indian 9DR39 Unknown Indian 9DR57 Unknown Indian 9DR72 Unknown Indian 9DR76 Unknown Indian 9DR77 Unknown Indian 9DR78 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

28.46

Moderately well drained

27.14

Moderately well drained

27.02

Moderately well drained

30.01

Well drained

27.30

Well drained

27.21

Moderately well drained

26.13

Moderately well drained

25.52

Moderately well drained

24.81

Moderately well drained

23.41

Excessively drained

23.99

Excessively drained

24.33

Poorly drained

23.50

Poorly drained

32.62

Well drained

23.36

Poorly drained

24.20

Moderately well drained

24.66

Poorly drained

24.15

Well drained

27.07

Poorly drained

42.49

Well drained

26.86

Well drained

28.79

Well drained

27.72

Well drained

32.75

Well drained

24.71

Excessively drained

33.58

26.01

Excessively drained

28.50

23.34

23.31

23.33

23.36

23.34

23.33

23.33

23.33

43.45

Well drained

24.28

Excessively drained

36.64

Well drained

30.07

Poorly drained

31.48

Well drained

Geologic Description Stream Alluvium Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

Page 36 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 9.37041E-05 9.37041E-05 0.000286713 0.000286713 0.000286713 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000161981 0.000110291 0.000161981 0.000110291 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 6.8762E-05 0.00040199 0.000578895 0.000578895 0.00084478

Site Sub-Period 9DR79 Unknown Indian 9DR81 Unknown Indian 9DR82 Unknown Indian 9DR85 Unknown Indian 9DR86 Unknown Indian 9DR88 Unknown Indian 9DR89 Unknown Indian 9DR90 Unknown Indian 9DR91 Unknown Indian 9DR93 Unknown Indian 9DR97 Unknown Indian 9DR98 Unknown Indian 9DU100 Unknown Indian 9DU101 Unknown Indian 9DU102 Unknown Indian 9DU104 Unknown Indian 9DU105 Unknown Indian 9DU106 Unknown Indian 9DU107 Unknown Indian 9DU109 Unknown Indian 9DU11 Unknown Indian 9DU110 Unknown Indian 9DU112 Unknown Indian 9DU113 Unknown Indian 9DU114 Unknown Indian 9DU115 Unknown Indian 9DU116 Unknown Indian 9DU12 Unknown Indian 9DU121 Unknown Indian 9DU122 Unknown Indian 9DU128 Unknown Indian 9DU129 Unknown Indian 9DU13 Unknown Indian 9DU130 Unknown Indian 9DU131 Unknown Indian 9DU132 Unknown Indian 9DU133 Unknown Indian 9DU134 Unknown Indian 9DU135 Unknown Indian 9DU136 Unknown Indian 9DU137 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

31.35

Moderately well drained

36.80

Well drained

23.69

Poorly drained

34.79

Well drained

27.46

Well drained

25.49

Well drained

27.81

Well drained

29.90

Moderately well drained

48.61

Moderately well drained

26.57

Poorly drained

26.78

Somewhat excessively drained

27.82

Well drained

60.40

Well drained

58.82

Well drained

56.40

Well drained

55.81

Poorly drained

55.87

Poorly drained

55.46

55.30

60.79

Well drained

52.67

Somewhat poorly drained

69.48

Well drained

67.35

Somewhat poorly drained

67.00

Well drained

59.64

Excessively drained

66.72

Excessively drained

60.77

Somewhat excessively drained

66.05

Well drained

63.85

Well drained

63.85

Poorly drained

54.99

Somewhat poorly drained

50.90

Somewhat poorly drained

66.75

Well drained

66.10

Well drained

63.85

Poorly drained

63.53

Well drained

65.37

Well drained

55.43

Well drained

58.97

Somewhat excessively drained

72.05

Well drained

60.69

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Water Stream Alluvium Water Stream Alluvium Miccosukee Formation Water Water Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Water Water Water Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

Page 37 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.00084478 0.000578895 0.00040199 0.000286713 0.000286713 0.000161981 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.00040199 0.000110291 0.000286713 0.000286713 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000289308 0.000289308 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.0005513 0.000253543 0.000289308 0.000686915 0.000289308 0.000253543 0.000289308 0.000800569 0.0005513 0.00111595 0.00111595 0.000253543 0.000800569 0.0005513 0.00111595 0.00111595 0.000493239 0.0005513 0.00068923 0.000611689 0.000493239 0.000800569

Site Sub-Period 9DU138 Unknown Indian 9DU139 Unknown Indian 9DU14 Unknown Indian 9DU140 Unknown Indian 9DU141 Unknown Indian 9DU144 Unknown Indian 9DU146 Unknown Indian 9DU147 Unknown Indian 9DU149 Unknown Indian 9DU15 Unknown Indian 9DU152 Unknown Indian 9DU155 Unknown Indian 9DU158 Unknown Indian 9DU16 Unknown Indian 9DU160 Unknown Indian 9DU161 Unknown Indian 9DU162 Unknown Indian 9DU163 Unknown Indian 9DU164 Unknown Indian 9DU17 Unknown Indian 9DU18 Unknown Indian 9DU22 Unknown Indian 9DU27 Unknown Indian 9DU29 Unknown Indian 9DU3 Unknown Indian 9DU30 Unknown Indian 9DU31 Unknown Indian 9DU34 Unknown Indian 9DU35 Unknown Indian 9DU36 Unknown Indian 9DU37 Unknown Indian 9DU42 Unknown Indian 9DU43 Unknown Indian 9DU46 Unknown Indian 9DU47 Unknown Indian 9DU48 Unknown Indian 9DU52 Unknown Indian 9DU55 Unknown Indian 9DU56 Unknown Indian 9DU57 Unknown Indian 9DU58 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

57.77

Somewhat excessively drained

53.25

Excessively drained

64.84

Well drained

55.53

Well drained

63.85

Poorly drained

47.20

Poorly drained

57.01

Somewhat excessively drained

52.34

Poorly drained

55.88

Excessively drained

61.33

Well drained

53.54

Somewhat poorly drained

52.84

Somewhat poorly drained

50.38

59.90

Well drained

66.91

Well drained

66.92

Somewhat poorly drained

57.65

Well drained

54.73

Excessively drained

54.73

Excessively drained

58.20

Somewhat poorly drained

60.67

Well drained

61.20

Excessively drained

54.21

Well drained

50.56

Somewhat excessively drained

52.63

Somewhat poorly drained

57.61

Well drained

58.16

Well drained

63.85

Well drained

66.89

Well drained

62.39

Poorly drained

56.12

Excessively drained

54.69

Well drained

57.22

Somewhat excessively drained

59.26

Poorly drained

58.83

Well drained

57.75

Poorly drained

60.80

Well drained

70.02

Well drained

70.07

Well drained

64.70

Well drained

66.40

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Aeolian Sand Deposits formless deposits Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

Page 38 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000522164 0.000253543 0.0005513 0.00072722 0.00111595 0.000253543 0.000611689 0.000379085 0.000253543 0.0005513 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.0005513 0.000686915 0.00068923 0.000522164 0.000522164 0.000522164 0.0005513 0.0005513 0.000253543 0.0005513 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000493239 0.0005513 0.0005513 0.000800569 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000493239 0.000493239 0.000493239 0.000493239 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000253543

Site Sub-Period 9DU59 Unknown Indian 9DU60 Unknown Indian 9DU62 Unknown Indian 9DU64 Unknown Indian 9DU65 Unknown Indian 9DU66 Unknown Indian 9DU67 Unknown Indian 9DU71 Unknown Indian 9DU72 Unknown Indian 9DU73 Unknown Indian 9DU74 Unknown Indian 9DU77 Unknown Indian 9DU81 Unknown Indian 9DU83 Unknown Indian 9DU84 Unknown Indian 9DU87 Unknown Indian 9DU88 Unknown Indian 9DU89 Unknown Indian 9DU90 Unknown Indian 9DU91 Unknown Indian 9DU92 Unknown Indian 9DU93 Unknown Indian 9DU94 Unknown Indian 9DU95 Unknown Indian 9DU96 Unknown Indian 9DU97 Unknown Indian 9DU99 Unknown Indian 9DY16 Unknown Indian 9DY22 Unknown Indian 9DY23 Unknown Indian 9DY26 Unknown Indian 9DY27 Unknown Indian 9DY28 Unknown Indian 9DY29 Unknown Indian 9DY31 Unknown Indian 9DY33 Unknown Indian 9DY7 Unknown Indian 9ER102 Unknown Indian 9ER104 Unknown Indian 9ER108 Unknown Indian 9ER109 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

59.67

Well drained

60.22

Well drained

57.78

Moderately well drained

64.14

Well drained

63.51

Poorly drained

65.46

Somewhat poorly drained

65.74

Well drained

67.86

Moderately well drained

73.01

Well drained

68.07

Well drained

69.40

Well drained

63.91

Excessively drained

58.41

Well drained

56.24

Somewhat poorly drained

60.01

Well drained

53.07

Excessively drained

48.59

62.96

Well drained

62.79

Moderately well drained

63.87

Well drained

62.01

Well drained

61.65

Well drained

59.22

Poorly drained

61.69

Well drained

64.87

Well drained

64.43

Well drained

64.97

Well drained

82.93

Excessively drained

111.48 Well drained

132.74 Well drained

112.52 Well drained

97.01

Well drained

97.62

Poorly drained

108.76 Well drained

112.92 Well drained

120.28 Well drained

90.41

Well drained

38.11

Well drained

77.36

Somewhat excessively drained

39.55

Well drained

39.55

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Aeolian Sand Deposits formless deposits Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Eocene Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene Undifferentiated Eocene Undifferentiated Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Tallahatta Formation Tallahatta Formation Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium

Page 39 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000522164 0.000289308 0.000289308 0.000289308 0.000289308 0.000686915 0.00068923 0.000686915 0.000686915 0.000253543 0.000289308 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000289308 0.0005513 0.0005513 0.0005513 0.0005513 0.0005513 0.0005513 0.0005513 0.0005513 0.0005513 0.0005513 0.001442063 0.001163134 0.001431831 0.001298769 0.001093049 0.001093049 0.001163134 0.001163134 0.001298769 0.001093049 0.001487013 0.001487013 0.001615558 0.001615558

Site Sub-Period 9ER111 Unknown Indian 9ER112 Unknown Indian 9ER113 Unknown Indian 9ER114 Unknown Indian 9ER115 Unknown Indian 9ER120 Unknown Indian 9ER121 Unknown Indian 9ER122 Unknown Indian 9ER123 Unknown Indian 9ER124 Unknown Indian 9ER125 Unknown Indian 9ER126 Unknown Indian 9ER128 Unknown Indian 9ER129 Unknown Indian 9ER132 Unknown Indian 9ER134 Unknown Indian 9ER135 Unknown Indian 9ER136 Unknown Indian 9ER139 Unknown Indian 9ER141 Unknown Indian 9ER142 Unknown Indian 9ER143 Unknown Indian 9ER145 Unknown Indian 9ER150 Unknown Indian 9ER151 Unknown Indian 9ER152 Unknown Indian 9ER153 Unknown Indian 9ER154 Unknown Indian 9ER155 Unknown Indian 9ER180 Unknown Indian 9ER181 Unknown Indian 9ER182 Unknown Indian 9ER183 Unknown Indian 9ER184 Unknown Indian 9ER188 Unknown Indian 9ER191 Unknown Indian 9ER192 Unknown Indian 9ER194 Unknown Indian 9ER195 Unknown Indian 9ER196 Unknown Indian 9ER197 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

34.37

Excessively drained

39.52

Well drained

64.10

Well drained

56.66

Well drained

40.09

Moderately well drained

36.66

Excessively drained

51.00

Moderately well drained

48.20

Well drained

65.87

Well drained

50.35

Moderately well drained

50.85

Moderately well drained

37.39

Well drained

59.47

Somewhat excessively drained

45.75

Somewhat excessively drained

40.52

Well drained

42.59

Excessively drained

36.37

Well drained

43.04

Excessively drained

26.22

Well drained

30.96

Excessively drained

36.23

Well drained

39.36

Well drained

44.87

Somewhat excessively drained

48.70

Moderately well drained

69.95

Well drained

69.10

Well drained

79.25

Well drained

91.11

Well drained

66.90

Well drained

57.83

Poorly drained

59.62

Well drained

57.87

Poorly drained

57.38

Well drained

57.83

Poorly drained

88.30

Well drained

66.38

Well drained

62.46

Well drained

69.51

Somewhat excessively drained

51.82

Well drained

75.18

Well drained

73.41

Well drained

Geologic Description Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Lisbon Formation Lisbon Formation Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Lisbon Formation Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Lisbon Formation Lisbon Formation Water Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Lisbon Formation Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Lisbon Formation Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

Page 40 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001615558 0.001615558 0.001615558 0.001615558 0.001471782 0.00136049 0.001579022 0.00136049 0.001267191 0.00136049 0.00136049 0.00136049 0.001471782 0.001471782 0.001471782 0.00127936 0.00127936 0.00127936 0.000589451 0.000589451 0.000589451 0.000589451 0.001471782 0.000941979 0.001389486 0.001389486 0.001389486 0.001389486 0.001389486 0.000671497 0.001380187 0.001380187 0.001380187 0.001380187 0.001231318 0.001521256 0.001231318 0.00136049 0.001380187 0.000345168 0.000345168

Site Sub-Period 9ER198 Unknown Indian 9ER200 Unknown Indian 9ER201 Unknown Indian 9ER204 Unknown Indian 9ER206 Unknown Indian 9ER208 Unknown Indian 9ER209 Unknown Indian 9ER210 Unknown Indian 9ER211 Unknown Indian 9ER212 Unknown Indian 9ER213 Unknown Indian 9ER214 Unknown Indian 9ER215 Unknown Indian 9ER217 Unknown Indian 9ER218 Unknown Indian 9ER219 Unknown Indian 9ER220 Unknown Indian 9ER222 Unknown Indian 9ER223 Unknown Indian 9ER224 Unknown Indian 9ER226 Unknown Indian 9ER227 Unknown Indian 9ER228 Unknown Indian 9ER229 Unknown Indian 9ER230 Unknown Indian 9ER231 Unknown Indian 9ER234 Unknown Indian 9ER235 Unknown Indian 9ER237 Unknown Indian 9ER238 Unknown Indian 9ER244 Unknown Indian 9ER248 Unknown Indian 9ER250 Unknown Indian 9ER252 Unknown Indian 9ER256 Unknown Indian 9ER257 Unknown Indian 9ER263 Unknown Indian 9ER264 Unknown Indian 9ER267 Unknown Indian 9ER271 Unknown Indian 9ER274 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

70.02

Poorly drained

56.90

Well drained

68.03

Well drained

79.41

Well drained

88.00

Well drained

84.24

Well drained

84.50

Well drained

82.11

Well drained

82.22

Well drained

78.74

Poorly drained

81.58

Well drained

79.18

Well drained

80.75

Well drained

79.18

Poorly drained

76.12

Well drained

81.58

Well drained

81.57

Well drained

66.29

Well drained

64.88

Well drained

67.89

Well drained

66.82

Well drained

65.95

Well drained

69.71

Well drained

69.87

Well drained

70.02

Well drained

69.94

Well drained

75.39

Well drained

61.47

Well drained

72.91

Well drained

58.08

Well drained

57.88

Well drained

67.54

Well drained

60.89

Well drained

36.61

Well drained

65.92

Well drained

65.07

Well drained

67.08

Well drained

82.34

Well drained

63.14

Well drained

60.25

Well drained

76.17

Somewhat excessively drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Lisbon Formation Lisbon Formation Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000598552 0.000941979 0.001389486 0.001007474 0.001231318 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001619539 0.001389486 0.001231318 0.001267191 0.001007474 0.001471782 0.001267191 0.00136049 0.001389486 0.001389486 0.00127936 0.001007474 0.001260413

Page 41 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9ER275 Unknown Indian 9ER277 Unknown Indian 9ER278 Unknown Indian 9ER279 Unknown Indian 9ER91 Unknown Indian 9ER92 Unknown Indian 9ER94 Unknown Indian 9ER95 Unknown Indian 9ER96 Unknown Indian 9ER97 Unknown Indian 9ER98 Unknown Indian 9ER99 Unknown Indian 9GR20 Unknown Indian 9GR32 Unknown Indian 9LE1 Unknown Indian 9LE100 Unknown Indian 9LE101 Unknown Indian 9LE103 Unknown Indian 9LE104 Unknown Indian 9LE109 Unknown Indian 9LE110 Unknown Indian 9LE111 Unknown Indian 9LE115 Unknown Indian 9LE116 Unknown Indian 9LE12 Unknown Indian 9LE120 Unknown Indian 9LE125 Unknown Indian 9LE128 Unknown Indian 9LE129 Unknown Indian 9LE130 Unknown Indian 9LE131 Unknown Indian 9LE133 Unknown Indian 9LE134 Unknown Indian 9LE135 Unknown Indian 9LE136 Unknown Indian 9LE140 Unknown Indian 9LE142 Unknown Indian 9LE146 Unknown Indian 9LE147 Unknown Indian 9LE148 Unknown Indian 9LE151 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

78.83

Somewhat excessively drained

69.93

Somewhat excessively drained

66.96

Somewhat excessively drained

83.76

Well drained

36.76

Somewhat excessively drained

51.74

Poorly drained

40.38

Well drained

42.60

Well drained

35.86

Well drained

33.48

Well drained

41.35

Well drained

39.33

Well drained

42.47

Well drained

43.07

Well drained

76.79

Well drained

92.30

Well drained

92.92

Well drained

91.30

Well drained

89.08

Well drained

63.86

Well drained

57.76

Somewhat excessively drained

85.23

Somewhat excessively drained

75.25

Well drained

72.03

Well drained

69.96

Well drained

69.19

Somewhat excessively drained

75.97

Well drained

76.04

Well drained

75.54

Well drained

72.99

Somewhat excessively drained

73.06

Somewhat excessively drained

63.89

Somewhat excessively drained

74.21

Well drained

79.43

Well drained

69.95

Well drained

62.34

Poorly drained

69.97

Somewhat excessively drained

88.27

Somewhat excessively drained

88.47

Well drained

88.51

Somewhat excessively drained

82.16

Somewhat excessively drained

Geologic Description Claiborne Undifferentiated Water Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Tallahatta Formation Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001260413 0.001260413 0.001260413 0.001260413 0.000941979 0.001231318 0.001572355 0.001572355 0.001572355 0.001572355 0.001572355 0.001572355 0.000503312 0.000503312 0.000861966 0.001314299 0.001141014 0.001314299 0.001299864 0.000611689 0.000611689 0.001288351 0.000611689 0.000611689 0.000611689 0.000861966 0.000775896 0.00094367 0.00094367 0.00094367 0.00094367 0.00094367 0.000861966 0.000861966 0.000861966 0.000611689 0.001342568 0.001299864 0.001299864 0.001299864 0.001141014

Page 42 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9LE153 Unknown Indian 9LE155 Unknown Indian 9LE16 Unknown Indian 9LE18 Unknown Indian 9LE20 Unknown Indian 9LE22 Unknown Indian 9LE23 Unknown Indian 9LE24 Unknown Indian 9LE25 Unknown Indian 9LE26 Unknown Indian 9LE27 Unknown Indian 9LE28 Unknown Indian 9LE29 Unknown Indian 9LE3 Unknown Indian 9LE32 Unknown Indian 9LE35 Unknown Indian 9LE38 Unknown Indian 9LE4 Unknown Indian 9LE45 Unknown Indian 9LE46 Unknown Indian 9LE48 Unknown Indian 9LE49 Unknown Indian 9LE51 Unknown Indian 9LE56 Unknown Indian 9LE57 Unknown Indian 9LE61 Unknown Indian 9LE64 Unknown Indian 9LE65 Unknown Indian 9LE66 Unknown Indian 9LE67 Unknown Indian 9LE68 Unknown Indian 9LE69 Unknown Indian 9LE7 Unknown Indian 9LE70 Unknown Indian 9LE71 Unknown Indian 9LE73 Unknown Indian 9LE74 Unknown Indian 9LE75 Unknown Indian 9LE77 Unknown Indian 9LE81 Unknown Indian 9LE82 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

75.33

Well drained

75.81

Well drained

73.01

Moderately well drained

95.74

Well drained

94.43

Well drained

88.26

Well drained

75.03

Well drained

72.85

Well drained

73.00

Well drained

72.99

Well drained

72.99

Well drained

69.94

Well drained

71.63

Well drained

63.86

Well drained

89.04

Somewhat excessively drained

71.76

71.76

64.69

Well drained

71.77

71.77

Somewhat excessively drained

87.01

Moderately well drained

73.00

Poorly drained

88.25

Somewhat excessively drained

58.63

Somewhat excessively drained

57.82

Poorly drained

94.33

Well drained

73.10

Well drained

73.01

Well drained

73.00

Poorly drained

73.00

Somewhat excessively drained

61.10

Poorly drained

74.92

Well drained

74.77

Well drained

60.82

Somewhat excessively drained

67.76

Somewhat excessively drained

58.62

Well drained

62.54

Well drained

69.77

Well drained

60.79

Well drained

69.51

Poorly drained

68.55

Poorly drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Water Ocala Limestone Water Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000611689 0.000611689 0.000611689 0.001141014 0.001141014 0.001342568 0.000611689 0.000611689 0.000611689 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000611689 0.001299864 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000800569 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.001342568 0.000611689 0.001299864 0.000611689 0.000611689 0.000967301 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000967301 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000561599 0.000561599

Page 43 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9LE83 Unknown Indian 9LE84 Unknown Indian 9LE85 Unknown Indian 9LE86 Unknown Indian 9LE88 Unknown Indian 9LE89 Unknown Indian 9LE90 Unknown Indian 9LE91 Unknown Indian 9LE92 Unknown Indian 9LE95 Unknown Indian 9LE97 Unknown Indian 9LE99 Unknown Indian 9MA57 Unknown Indian 9MI100 Unknown Indian 9MI102 Unknown Indian 9MI105 Unknown Indian 9MI106 Unknown Indian 9MI107 Unknown Indian 9MI109 Unknown Indian 9MI11 Unknown Indian 9MI110 Unknown Indian 9MI111 Unknown Indian 9MI114 Unknown Indian 9MI117 Unknown Indian 9MI118 Unknown Indian 9MI120 Unknown Indian 9MI127 Unknown Indian 9MI128 Unknown Indian 9MI129 Unknown Indian 9MI130 Unknown Indian 9MI131 Unknown Indian 9MI132 Unknown Indian 9MI133 Unknown Indian 9MI134 Unknown Indian 9MI135 Unknown Indian 9MI136 Unknown Indian 9MI137 Unknown Indian 9MI138 Unknown Indian 9MI139 Unknown Indian 9MI14 Unknown Indian 9MI141 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

88.26

Somewhat excessively drained

88.06

Poorly drained

72.98

Somewhat excessively drained

72.97

Somewhat excessively drained

81.53

Well drained

69.98

Somewhat excessively drained

91.32

Well drained

89.78

Well drained

91.18

Somewhat excessively drained

90.12

Well drained

92.41

Well drained

91.34

Well drained

131.05 Well drained

56.18

Well drained

54.77

Moderately well drained

42.58

Well drained

38.59

Well drained

44.95

Somewhat excessively drained

45.34

Poorly drained

64.23

Poorly drained

49.16

Well drained

50.77

Well drained

39.22

Well drained

63.08

Moderately well drained

45.59

Well drained

36.49

Well drained

50.94

Well drained

52.82

Moderately well drained

54.26

Poorly drained

54.40

Well drained

54.87

Moderately well drained

55.35

Well drained

55.06

Moderately well drained

53.56

Moderately well drained

54.51

Well drained

55.05

Moderately well drained

54.79

Well drained

54.16

Moderately well drained

54.16

Poorly drained

67.14

Poorly drained

54.10

Moderately well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001342568 0.001342568 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.001548109 0.001314299 0.001299864 0.001299864 0.001299864 0.001314299 0.001314299 0.001314299 0.001242365 0.000970533 0.000970533 0.000871104 0.000871104 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000785911 0.000447204 0.000676376 0.000871104 0.001399507 0.000671497 0.000871104 0.000970533 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000676376 0.000671497

Page 44 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9MI142 Unknown Indian 9MI144 Unknown Indian 9MI145 Unknown Indian 9MI146 Unknown Indian 9MI147 Unknown Indian 9MI148 Unknown Indian 9MI149 Unknown Indian 9MI150 Unknown Indian 9MI151 Unknown Indian 9MI152 Unknown Indian 9MI153 Unknown Indian 9MI154 Unknown Indian 9MI155 Unknown Indian 9MI156 Unknown Indian 9MI157 Unknown Indian 9MI158 Unknown Indian 9MI159 Unknown Indian 9MI16 Unknown Indian 9MI160 Unknown Indian 9MI19 Unknown Indian 9MI21 Unknown Indian 9MI22 Unknown Indian 9MI25 Unknown Indian 9MI29 Unknown Indian 9MI30 Unknown Indian 9MI33 Unknown Indian 9MI34 Unknown Indian 9MI36 Unknown Indian 9MI37 Unknown Indian 9MI40 Unknown Indian 9MI42 Unknown Indian 9MI43 Unknown Indian 9MI45 Unknown Indian 9MI46 Unknown Indian 9MI47 Unknown Indian 9MI48 Unknown Indian 9MI49 Unknown Indian 9MI50 Unknown Indian 9MI52 Unknown Indian 9MI55 Unknown Indian 9MI56 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

55.77

Moderately well drained

53.04

Well drained

54.04

Moderately well drained

54.77

Moderately well drained

56.24

Well drained

48.67

Somewhat poorly drained

69.16

Poorly drained

48.49

Well drained

46.94

Poorly drained

47.14

Moderately well drained

47.79

Moderately well drained

54.10

Moderately well drained

48.67

Moderately well drained

49.62

Well drained

48.27

Well drained

51.56

Poorly drained

50.57

Well drained

67.94

Moderately well drained

50.36

Moderately well drained

73.48

Poorly drained

72.83

Poorly drained

62.98

Poorly drained

62.53

Well drained

61.21

Moderately well drained

61.20

Poorly drained

58.79

Poorly drained

58.69

Poorly drained

60.12

Poorly drained

62.73

Moderately well drained

59.03

Poorly drained

52.10

Moderately well drained

54.83

Moderately well drained

51.70

Moderately well drained

54.27

Well drained

51.67

Well drained

48.65

Moderately well drained

51.66

Well drained

51.92

Well drained

51.72

Poorly drained

46.13

Moderately well drained

45.33

Poorly drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

Page 45 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000794166 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.000785911 0.000671497 0.000676376 0.000676376 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000794166 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911

Site Sub-Period 9MI59 Unknown Indian 9MI6 Unknown Indian 9MI60 Unknown Indian 9MI61 Unknown Indian 9MI62 Unknown Indian 9MI63 Unknown Indian 9MI64 Unknown Indian 9MI65 Unknown Indian 9MI66 Unknown Indian 9MI67 Unknown Indian 9MI68 Unknown Indian 9MI69 Unknown Indian 9MI71 Unknown Indian 9MI73 Unknown Indian 9MI74 Unknown Indian 9MI75 Unknown Indian 9MI76 Unknown Indian 9MI77 Unknown Indian 9MI78 Unknown Indian 9MI79 Unknown Indian 9MI82 Unknown Indian 9MI89 Unknown Indian 9MI92 Unknown Indian 9MI93 Unknown Indian 9MI94 Unknown Indian 9MI95 Unknown Indian 9MI96 Unknown Indian 9MI97 Unknown Indian 9ML1 Unknown Indian 9ML10 Unknown Indian 9ML11 Unknown Indian 9ML118 Unknown Indian 9ML119 Unknown Indian 9ML12 Unknown Indian 9ML121 Unknown Indian 9ML123 Unknown Indian 9ML124 Unknown Indian 9ML127 Unknown Indian 9ML13 Unknown Indian 9ML130 Unknown Indian 9ML131 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

45.36

Poorly drained

58.06

Moderately well drained

48.70

Moderately well drained

47.46

Poorly drained

45.33

Poorly drained

48.65

Well drained

45.52

Poorly drained

50.76

Well drained

51.45

Well drained

53.90

Somewhat poorly drained

51.63

Well drained

54.96

Somewhat poorly drained

51.71

Moderately well drained

45.90

Poorly drained

45.63

Poorly drained

46.75

Well drained

45.84

Moderately well drained

44.67

Poorly drained

44.13

Poorly drained

45.61

Moderately well drained

65.20

Poorly drained

59.12

Well drained

51.80

Well drained

54.77

Well drained

42.92

Well drained

49.38

Well drained

39.81

Well drained

49.17

Well drained

57.91

Well drained

63.87

Well drained

61.50

Moderately well drained

51.87

Well drained

53.97

Well drained

74.25

Well drained

59.15

Well drained

57.96

Well drained

60.06

Excessively drained

60.81

Moderately well drained

75.24

Well drained

63.88

Poorly drained

66.91

Somewhat excessively drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Hawthorn Formation Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Miccosukee Formation Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Miccosukee Formation Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum

Page 46 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000881038 0.000881038 0.000881038 0.000881038 0.000881038 0.000881038 0.000881038 0.000785911 0.00100063 0.000671497 0.000676376 0.000970533 0.000871104 0.000871104 0.000981681 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.001229416 0.001229416 0.001229416 0.000792466 0.00138868 0.00138868

Site Sub-Period 9ML132 Unknown Indian 9ML133 Unknown Indian 9ML134 Unknown Indian 9ML135 Unknown Indian 9ML14 Unknown Indian 9ML147 Unknown Indian 9ML149 Unknown Indian 9ML15 Unknown Indian 9ML150 Unknown Indian 9ML151 Unknown Indian 9ML152 Unknown Indian 9ML153 Unknown Indian 9ML154 Unknown Indian 9ML155 Unknown Indian 9ML156 Unknown Indian 9ML157 Unknown Indian 9ML158 Unknown Indian 9ML159 Unknown Indian 9ML16 Unknown Indian 9ML160 Unknown Indian 9ML161 Unknown Indian 9ML162 Unknown Indian 9ML163 Unknown Indian 9ML164 Unknown Indian 9ML166 Unknown Indian 9ML167 Unknown Indian 9ML168 Unknown Indian 9ML169 Unknown Indian 9ML17 Unknown Indian 9ML170 Unknown Indian 9ML171 Unknown Indian 9ML172 Unknown Indian 9ML173 Unknown Indian 9ML174 Unknown Indian 9ML175 Unknown Indian 9ML176 Unknown Indian 9ML177 Unknown Indian 9ML18 Unknown Indian 9ML181 Unknown Indian 9ML182 Unknown Indian 9ML184 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

68.83

Well drained

66.91

Poorly drained

66.91

Moderately well drained

66.91

Moderately well drained

77.59

Well drained

46.50

Well drained

44.31

Well drained

79.41

Well drained

47.30

Well drained

38.87

Moderately well drained

40.36

Somewhat excessively drained

44.31

Well drained

39.35

Somewhat excessively drained

39.56

Somewhat excessively drained

37.81

Excessively drained

27.80

38.62

Somewhat excessively drained

37.63

Somewhat poorly drained

79.70

Well drained

37.18

Excessively drained

40.08

Moderately well drained

39.22

Somewhat excessively drained

46.98

Well drained

48.59

Well drained

43.69

Well drained

36.95

Moderately well drained

45.67

Well drained

39.14

Well drained

58.96

Moderately well drained

34.17

Excessively drained

39.33

Moderately well drained

43.75

Well drained

44.40

Well drained

44.09

Well drained

42.57

Well drained

44.19

Well drained

37.21

Excessively drained

58.30

Moderately well drained

40.99

Well drained

44.40

Well drained

42.36

Moderately well drained

Geologic Description Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Miccosukee Formation Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Miccosukee Formation Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Miccosukee Formation Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium

Page 47 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.00138868 0.001213644 0.001213644 0.001213644 0.000792466 0.000510238 0.000160345 0.000792466 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000792466 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000192057 0.000192057 0.000792466 0.000192057 0.000192057 0.000192057 0.000192057 0.000192057 0.000192057 0.000192057 0.000160345 0.000792466 0.000192057 0.000192057 0.000192057

Site Sub-Period 9ML185 Unknown Indian 9ML186 Unknown Indian 9ML187 Unknown Indian 9ML188 Unknown Indian 9ML19 Unknown Indian 9ML190 Unknown Indian 9ML191 Unknown Indian 9ML192 Unknown Indian 9ML195 Unknown Indian 9ML196 Unknown Indian 9ML197 Unknown Indian 9ML198 Unknown Indian 9ML2 Unknown Indian 9ML20 Unknown Indian 9ML203 Unknown Indian 9ML21 Unknown Indian 9ML210 Unknown Indian 9ML22 Unknown Indian 9ML23 Unknown Indian 9ML24 Unknown Indian 9ML25 Unknown Indian 9ML26 Unknown Indian 9ML27 Unknown Indian 9ML28 Unknown Indian 9ML29 Unknown Indian 9ML3 Unknown Indian 9ML30 Unknown Indian 9ML31 Unknown Indian 9ML32 Unknown Indian 9ML33 Unknown Indian 9ML34 Unknown Indian 9ML35 Unknown Indian 9ML36 Unknown Indian 9ML37 Unknown Indian 9ML38 Unknown Indian 9ML39 Unknown Indian 9ML4 Unknown Indian 9ML40 Unknown Indian 9ML41 Unknown Indian 9ML42 Unknown Indian 9ML43 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

35.39

Somewhat poorly drained

43.06

Somewhat excessively drained

48.19

Well drained

45.52

Well drained

60.84

Well drained

47.48

Somewhat excessively drained

47.91

Somewhat excessively drained

45.70

Somewhat excessively drained

46.31

Well drained

45.13

Well drained

47.49

Well drained

48.67

Somewhat excessively drained

59.06

Well drained

60.82

Well drained

48.62

Excessively drained

65.30

Well drained

84.46

Well drained

55.30

Moderately well drained

62.38

Well drained

62.52

Well drained

64.23

Well drained

64.06

Well drained

56.25

Somewhat excessively drained

56.24

Somewhat excessively drained

56.18

Moderately well drained

57.42

Well drained

66.90

Moderately well drained

66.10

Well drained

60.56

Well drained

58.30

Well drained

56.99

Well drained

60.92

Well drained

71.92

Well drained

57.77

Moderately well drained

59.69

Well drained

59.16

Well drained

57.83

Well drained

59.04

Well drained

57.70

Somewhat excessively drained

59.33

Well drained

57.77

Well drained

Geologic Description Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Miccosukee Formation Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Neogene Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Neogene Undifferentiated Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum

Page 48 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000192057 0.000319793 0.000185815 0.000185815 0.000792466 0.000185815 0.000185815 0.000185815 0.000192057 0.000160345 0.000192057 8.78234E-05 0.000792466 0.000792466 8.78234E-05 0.000792466 0.001005165 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.001399507 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000510238 0.000792466

Site 9ML44 9ML45 9ML46 9ML47 9ML48 9ML49 9ML5 9ML50 9ML51 9ML52 9ML53 9ML54 9ML55 9ML56 9ML57 9ML58 9ML59 9ML6 9ML60 9ML61 9ML62 9ML63 9ML64 9ML65 9ML66 9ML67 9ML68 9ML69 9ML70 9ML71 9ML72 9ML73 9ML74 9ML75 9ML76 9ML77 9ML78 9ML79 9ML8 9ML80 9ML81

Sub-Period Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

54.76

Well drained

53.39

Well drained

56.15

Poorly drained

55.95

Well drained

55.34

Moderately well drained

57.25

Well drained

56.75

Well drained

57.77

Moderately well drained

56.77

Moderately well drained

59.44

Well drained

59.31

Moderately well drained

54.50

Well drained

51.83

Somewhat excessively drained

54.73

Well drained

48.94

Moderately well drained

48.26

Moderately well drained

48.09

Well drained

55.27

Well drained

48.13

Well drained

50.19

Well drained

48.85

Well drained

48.89

Well drained

45.46

Well drained

46.30

Well drained

46.61

Well drained

45.87

Well drained

44.17

Well drained

48.17

Well drained

45.85

Well drained

51.25

Well drained

51.29

Well drained

50.39

Moderately well drained

52.48

Well drained

67.64

Poorly drained

60.30

Well drained

49.85

Poorly drained

48.94

Well drained

57.69

Well drained

59.68

Well drained

57.80

Well drained

34.46

Excessively drained

Geologic Description Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Hawthorn Formation Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium

Page 49 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000224971 0.000224971 0.000224971 0.000224971 0.000224971 0.000792466 0.000224971 0.000224971 0.000224971 0.000224971 0.000224971 0.000185815 0.000185815 0.000185815 0.000185815 0.000185815 0.000185815 0.000958071 0.000958071 0.001005165 0.000185815 0.000958071 0.001005165 0.001005165 0.001005165 0.000503312 0.000792466 0.000503312 0.000192057

Site Sub-Period 9ML82 Unknown Indian 9ML83 Unknown Indian 9ML84 Unknown Indian 9ML85 Unknown Indian 9ML86 Unknown Indian 9ML87 Unknown Indian 9ML88 Unknown Indian 9ML9 Unknown Indian 9ML91 Unknown Indian 9ML97 Unknown Indian 9RH12 Unknown Indian 9RH26 Unknown Indian 9RH39 Unknown Indian 9RH54 Unknown Indian 9RH57 Unknown Indian 9RH59 Unknown Indian 9RH65 Unknown Indian 9RH68 Unknown Indian 9RH71 Unknown Indian 9RH73 Unknown Indian 9RH75 Unknown Indian 9RH76 Unknown Indian 9RH8 Unknown Indian 9SE100 Unknown Indian 9SE101 Unknown Indian 9SE108 Unknown Indian 9SE109 Unknown Indian 9SE111 Unknown Indian 9SE112 Unknown Indian 9SE118 Unknown Indian 9SE120 Unknown Indian 9SE121 Unknown Indian 9SE122 Unknown Indian 9SE123 Unknown Indian 9SE125 Unknown Indian 9SE130 Unknown Indian 9SE132 Unknown Indian 9SE133 Unknown Indian 9SE18 Unknown Indian 9SE23 Unknown Indian 9SE25 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

45.38

Well drained

54.70

Well drained

42.76

Somewhat excessively drained

53.99

Well drained

57.58

Well drained

64.66

Poorly drained

42.56

Somewhat poorly drained

62.57

Well drained

76.87

Well drained

85.57

Well drained

104.52 Well drained

118.76 Well drained

122.32 Well drained

107.53 Well drained

113.35 Well drained

106.70 Well drained

108.91

137.13 Well drained

120.33 Well drained

117.69 Well drained

120.90 Well drained

109.02 Excessively drained

124.89 Well drained

27.17

26.79

Well drained

27.49

Well drained

26.23

Somewhat poorly drained

30.21

Well drained

26.95

Well drained

39.54

Well drained

30.61

Well drained

32.14

Well drained

29.86

Well drained

27.29

Well drained

19.97

Well drained

33.92

Well drained

27.62

Well drained

45.31

Poorly drained

27.24

Well drained

23.33

23.76

Somewhat poorly drained

Geologic Description Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Neogene Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Water Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Water

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.00018039 0.00018039 0.000503312 0.000503312 0.000503312 0.001229416 0.00018039 0.000792466 0.001213644 0.00138868 0.001092272 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.00060684 0.000799192 0.000799192 0.000799192 0.000799192 0.000799192 0.001092272 0.000353384 0.000353384 0.000409366 0.000409366 0.000286713 0.000189278 0.000511073 0.000589451 0.000589451 0.000353384 0.000353384 0.000353384 0.00084478 0.000189278 0.000766963 0.000511073 0.00040199 0.000409366

Page 50 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9SE30 Unknown Indian 9SE37 Unknown Indian 9SE39 Unknown Indian 9SE41 Unknown Indian 9SE42 Unknown Indian 9SE43 Unknown Indian 9SE44 Unknown Indian 9SE45 Unknown Indian 9SE47 Unknown Indian 9SE48 Unknown Indian 9SE49 Unknown Indian 9SE50 Unknown Indian 9SE52 Unknown Indian 9SE55 Unknown Indian 9SE56 Unknown Indian 9SE57 Unknown Indian 9SE59 Unknown Indian 9SE61 Unknown Indian 9SE62 Unknown Indian 9SE63 Unknown Indian 9SE64 Unknown Indian 9SE65 Unknown Indian 9SE66 Unknown Indian 9SE67 Unknown Indian 9SE68 Unknown Indian 9SE71 Unknown Indian 9SE72 Unknown Indian 9SE73 Unknown Indian 9SE74 Unknown Indian 9SE75 Unknown Indian 9SE78 Unknown Indian 9SE79 Unknown Indian 9SE88 Unknown Indian 9SE92 Unknown Indian 9SE93 Unknown Indian 9SE94 Unknown Indian 9SE95 Unknown Indian 9SE96 Unknown Indian 9SE99 Unknown Indian 9SU122 Unknown Indian 9SU127 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

23.33

33.47

Moderately well drained

36.74

Well drained

41.64

Well drained

42.13

Well drained

35.05

Well drained

35.29

Well drained

35.78

Well drained

33.91

Poorly drained

35.79

Poorly drained

39.67

Well drained

40.16

Well drained

36.66

Well drained

35.86

Poorly drained

39.33

Well drained

37.54

Moderately well drained

40.71

Well drained

38.14

Well drained

36.45

Poorly drained

36.96

Poorly drained

39.21

Poorly drained

39.21

Poorly drained

39.35

Poorly drained

39.24

Poorly drained

41.94

Well drained

24.36

Somewhat poorly drained

24.69

Somewhat excessively drained

30.45

27.17

Somewhat excessively drained

23.33

Well drained

30.33

Well drained

30.19

Well drained

23.33

Somewhat poorly drained

24.06

Somewhat poorly drained

26.44

Somewhat excessively drained

23.79

Somewhat poorly drained

28.24

Somewhat excessively drained

26.13

22.72

129.96 Well drained

137.22 Well drained

Geologic Description Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Water Ocala Limestone Water Water Stream Alluvium Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.00040199 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.000881038 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.00084478 0.000409366 0.000286713 0.000189278 0.000286713 0.000409366 0.000189278 0.000189278 0.000286713 0.000409366 0.000189278 0.000409366 0.000409366 0.000353384 0.000353384 0.001035085 0.001186313

Page 51 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9SU129 Unknown Indian 9SU13 Unknown Indian 9SU144 Unknown Indian 9SU147 Unknown Indian 9SU150 Unknown Indian 9SU151 Unknown Indian 9SU152 Unknown Indian 9SU153 Unknown Indian 9SU160 Unknown Indian 9SU163 Unknown Indian 9SU175 Unknown Indian 9SU182 Unknown Indian 9SU184 Unknown Indian 9SU186 Unknown Indian 9SU187 Unknown Indian 9SU188 Unknown Indian 9SU189 Unknown Indian 9SU190 Unknown Indian 9SU195 Unknown Indian 9SU201 Unknown Indian 9SU204 Unknown Indian 9SU205 Unknown Indian 9SU207 Unknown Indian 9SU209 Unknown Indian 9SU21 Unknown Indian 9SU212 Unknown Indian 9SU213 Unknown Indian 9SU214 Unknown Indian 9SU217 Unknown Indian 9SU27 Unknown Indian 9SU32 Unknown Indian 9SU33 Unknown Indian 9SU36 Unknown Indian 9SU4 Unknown Indian 9SU40 Unknown Indian 9SU47 Unknown Indian 9SU5 Unknown Indian 9SU54 Unknown Indian 9SU66 Unknown Indian 9SU68 Unknown Indian 9SU7 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

82.14

Well drained

91.28

Well drained

103.79 Poorly drained

109.04 Well drained

128.64 Well drained

124.76 Well drained

117.49 Well drained

118.55 Well drained

103.47 Well drained

109.96 Well drained

73.55

Well drained

81.51

Well drained

88.23

Well drained

89.01

Somewhat poorly drained

90.51

Well drained

90.31

Moderately well drained

90.92

Well drained

85.89

Well drained

94.35

Well drained

88.23

Well drained

119.23 Well drained

127.86 Well drained

88.21

Well drained

88.23

Well drained

98.69

Well drained

89.03

Poorly drained

128.51 Well drained

103.14 Well drained

91.62

Well drained

71.85

71.85

71.85

71.85

99.77

Well drained

77.88

Poorly drained

71.77

111.16 Somewhat excessively drained

71.77

71.77

71.77

105.83 Excessively drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Water Water Water Water Claiborne Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Water Claiborne Undifferentiated Water Water Water Claiborne Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001035085 0.001035085 0.001035085 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.00110159 0.000950185 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00132299 0.00132299 0.00132299 0.00132299 0.000950185 0.001499214 0.001583462 0.000950185 0.00110159 0.001399486 0.00110159 0.001035085 0.001499214 0.001499214 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.001499214 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.001581473 0.00110159 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.001035085

Page 52 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9SU70 Unknown Indian 9SU75 Unknown Indian 9SU91 Unknown Indian 9SU95 Unknown Indian 9SU97 Unknown Indian 9SU99 Unknown Indian 9TE100 Unknown Indian 9TE101 Unknown Indian 9TE105 Unknown Indian 9TE106 Unknown Indian 9TE107 Unknown Indian 9TE112 Unknown Indian 9TE16 Unknown Indian 9TE17 Unknown Indian 9TE18 Unknown Indian 9TE20 Unknown Indian 9TE21 Unknown Indian 9TE23 Unknown Indian 9TE24 Unknown Indian 9TE25 Unknown Indian 9TE27 Unknown Indian 9TE28 Unknown Indian 9TE30 Unknown Indian 9TE31 Unknown Indian 9TE32 Unknown Indian 9TE36 Unknown Indian 9TE39 Unknown Indian 9TE41 Unknown Indian 9TE45 Unknown Indian 9TE52 Unknown Indian 9TE58 Unknown Indian 9TE60 Unknown Indian 9TE61 Unknown Indian 9TE62 Unknown Indian 9TE63 Unknown Indian 9TE64 Unknown Indian 9TE65 Unknown Indian 9TE66 Unknown Indian 9TE67 Unknown Indian 9TE68 Unknown Indian 9TE69 Unknown Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

71.92

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

82.18

Poorly drained

72.74

Well drained

87.93

Well drained

91.33

Well drained

88.61

Well drained

89.80

Well drained

143.09 Well drained

142.97 Well drained

143.23 Well drained

124.37 Well drained

125.60 Well drained

141.58 Well drained

137.06 Well drained

133.46 Well drained

113.55 Well drained

135.51 Well drained

107.50 Somewhat excessively drained

107.79 Somewhat excessively drained

107.07 Somewhat excessively drained

109.60 Very poorly drained

83.34

Well drained

94.37

Moderately well drained

97.16

Well drained

94.21

Well drained

94.37

Well drained

97.42

Well drained

95.43

Well drained

93.40

Somewhat excessively drained

88.02

91.22

Well drained

88.67

Well drained

91.33

Well drained

91.33

Well drained

87.15

Well drained

80.48

Well drained

Geologic Description Water Water Water Water Water Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.001345783 0.00111595 0.001548109 0.001158547 0.001158547 0.001158547 0.00083219 0.00083219 0.00083219 0.001071746 0.001071746 0.00083219 0.001071746 0.001071746 0.001071746 0.000890527 0.000878886 0.000878886 0.00083219 0.00083219 0.000775896 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001285433 0.001285433 0.001288351 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109

Page 53 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9TE70 Unknown Indian 9TE72 Unknown Indian 9TE73 Unknown Indian 9TE74 Unknown Indian 9TE75 Unknown Indian 9TE77 Unknown Indian 9TE78 Unknown Indian 9TE79 Unknown Indian 9TE81 Unknown Indian 9TE85 Unknown Indian 9TE88 Unknown Indian 9TE89 Unknown Indian 9TE90 Unknown Indian 9TE91 Unknown Indian 9TE94 Unknown Indian 9TE95 Unknown Indian 9TE97 Unknown Indian 9TE98 Unknown Indian 9TE99 Unknown Indian 9TN87 Unknown Indian 9WB15 Unknown Indian 9WB16 Unknown Indian 9WO1 Unknown Indian 9WO16 Unknown Indian 9WO2 Unknown Indian 9WO23 Unknown Indian 9WO24 Unknown Indian 9WO25 Unknown Indian 9WO27 Unknown Indian 9WO3 Unknown Indian 9WO32 Unknown Indian 9WO4 Unknown Indian 9WO5 Unknown Indian 9BX129 Historic Non-Indian 9BX130 Historic Non-Indian 9BX134 Historic Non-Indian 9BX146 Historic Non-Indian 9BX147 Historic Non-Indian 9BX149 Historic Non-Indian 9BX150 Historic Non-Indian 9BX151 Historic Non-Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

87.45

Well drained

85.23

Well drained

81.99

Well drained

85.23

Well drained

85.23

Well drained

84.58

Well drained

84.97

Well drained

85.23

Well drained

76.74

Poorly drained

91.33

Well drained

80.99

Well drained

81.16

Well drained

84.79

Well drained

87.73

Poorly drained

84.53

Well drained

86.20

Well drained

85.23

Well drained

80.59

Well drained

88.27

Well drained

99.23

Somewhat poorly drained

134.31

129.88

74.79

Excessively drained

73.91

Excessively drained

60.80

Somewhat poorly drained

71.76

Poorly drained

76.70

Well drained

73.00

Well drained

85.18

Moderately well drained

69.10

Well drained

79.07

Well drained

68.93

Well drained

70.31

Well drained

63.91

Well drained

58.12

Well drained

49.27

Poorly drained

52.66

Somewhat poorly drained

52.66

Somewhat excessively drained

66.66

Well drained

54.76

Poorly drained

60.01

Well drained

Geologic Description Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001158547 0.001158547 0.001345783 0.001345783 0.001285433 0.001771187 0.000890527 0.000890527 0.000967301 0.000967301 0.001644527 0.001101161 0.000643505 0.000643505 0.001101161 0.00136139 0.00136139 0.000643505 0.000643505 0.000548364 0.000447204 0.000319793 0.00034848 0.00034848 0.000646133 0.000598552 0.000598552

Page 54 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9BX152 Historic Non-Indian 9BX154 Historic Non-Indian 9BX20 Historic Non-Indian 9BX21 Historic Non-Indian 9BX28 Historic Non-Indian 9BX29 Historic Non-Indian 9BX33 Historic Non-Indian 9BX34 Historic Non-Indian 9BX37 Historic Non-Indian 9BX38 Historic Non-Indian 9BX39 Historic Non-Indian 9BX40 Historic Non-Indian 9BX42 Historic Non-Indian 9BX43 Historic Non-Indian 9BX45 Historic Non-Indian 9BX46 Historic Non-Indian 9BX47 Historic Non-Indian 9BX48 Historic Non-Indian 9BX49 Historic Non-Indian 9BX50 Historic Non-Indian 9BX51 Historic Non-Indian 9BX53 Historic Non-Indian 9BX56 Historic Non-Indian 9BX57 Historic Non-Indian 9BX58 Historic Non-Indian 9BX59 Historic Non-Indian 9BX61 Historic Non-Indian 9BX63 Historic Non-Indian 9BX67 Historic Non-Indian 9BX7 Historic Non-Indian 9BX76 Historic Non-Indian 9BX77 Historic Non-Indian 9BX84 Historic Non-Indian 9BX85 Historic Non-Indian 9BX87 Historic Non-Indian 9BX89 Historic Non-Indian 9BX98 Historic Non-Indian 9BX99 Historic Non-Indian 9CP143 Historic Non-Indian 9CP15 Historic Non-Indian 9CP152 Historic Non-Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

52.04

Well drained

48.17

Well drained

47.01

Poorly drained

48.22

Well drained

57.82

Well drained

45.77

Somewhat excessively drained

48.10

Somewhat excessively drained

41.52

Somewhat poorly drained

38.22

37.69

37.21

Somewhat excessively drained

38.76

36.89

36.53

Excessively drained

36.86

33.96

33.75

Excessively drained

34.78

Excessively drained

33.08

33.16

32.30

Well drained

30.31

29.20

36.57

36.53

36.66

Somewhat poorly drained

35.92

Somewhat poorly drained

34.19

Moderately well drained

36.41

Well drained

45.09

Well drained

27.67

27.81

29.28

48.64

Poorly drained

51.71

Somewhat poorly drained

51.44

Somewhat poorly drained

45.39

Somewhat excessively drained

46.06

Well drained

130.19 Well drained

79.09

Well drained

83.53

Excessively drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Neogene Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium

Page 55 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000319793 0.000447204 0.000319793 8.78234E-05 0.000447204 0.000160345 0.000192057 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000319793 8.78234E-05 8.78234E-05 8.78234E-05 8.78234E-05 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000319793 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000218204 0.0002194 0.0002194 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000996178 0.000950185 0.000911254

Site Sub-Period 9CP156 Historic Non-Indian 9CP157 Historic Non-Indian 9CP159 Historic Non-Indian 9CP16 Historic Non-Indian 9CP162 Historic Non-Indian 9CP163 Historic Non-Indian 9CP164 Historic Non-Indian 9CP174 Historic Non-Indian 9CP178 Historic Non-Indian 9CP179 Historic Non-Indian 9CP180 Historic Non-Indian 9CP181 Historic Non-Indian 9CP182 Historic Non-Indian 9CP183 Historic Non-Indian 9CP184 Historic Non-Indian 9CP185 Historic Non-Indian 9CP186 Historic Non-Indian 9CP188 Historic Non-Indian 9CP189 Historic Non-Indian 9CP190 Historic Non-Indian 9CP195 Historic Non-Indian 9CP27 Historic Non-Indian 9CQ23 Historic Non-Indian 9CU12 Historic Non-Indian 9CU13 Historic Non-Indian 9CU15 Historic Non-Indian 9CU16 Historic Non-Indian 9CU17 Historic Non-Indian 9CU22 Historic Non-Indian 9CU25 Historic Non-Indian 9CU26 Historic Non-Indian 9CU28 Historic Non-Indian 9CU6 Historic Non-Indian 9CU7 Historic Non-Indian 9CU8 Historic Non-Indian 9CY109 Historic Non-Indian 9CY165 Historic Non-Indian 9CY166 Historic Non-Indian 9CY167 Historic Non-Indian 9CY168 Historic Non-Indian 9CY169 Historic Non-Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

85.19

Excessively drained

83.53

Excessively drained

94.32

Poorly drained

77.50

Well drained

106.51 Well drained

106.45 Well drained

104.47 Well drained

113.21 Moderately well drained

105.69 Well drained

98.21

Well drained

94.32

Well drained

91.27

Moderately well drained

89.69

Well drained

88.73

Somewhat poorly drained

91.27

Well drained

91.27

Well drained

91.27

Well drained

86.88

Well drained

86.61

Well drained

85.64

Well drained

83.61

Well drained

71.77

114.11 Well drained

69.99

Well drained

82.22

Well drained

86.96

Well drained

73.23

Well drained

70.03

Well drained

70.03

Well drained

78.46

Well drained

73.08

Well drained

63.90

Well drained

73.07

Well drained

73.07

Well drained

76.07

Well drained

67.03

Excessively drained

115.77 Well drained

121.80 Well drained

123.74 Well drained

124.46 Well drained

121.04 Well drained

Geologic Description Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Neogene Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Neogene Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000911254 0.000911254 0.000950185 0.001014457 0.000881856 0.000881856 0.000881856 0.001042538 0.001042538 0.000950185 0.001014457 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.001014457 0.001014457 0.001213644 0.000522164 0.00117253 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.000646133 0.00117253 0.00117253 0.00117253 0.001344885 0.00139855 0.00139855 0.001329975 0.001645307 0.001329975

Page 56 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9CY170 Historic Non-Indian 9CY172 Historic Non-Indian 9CY176 Historic Non-Indian 9CY179 Historic Non-Indian 9CY185 Historic Non-Indian 9CY187 Historic Non-Indian 9CY188 Historic Non-Indian 9CY194 Historic Non-Indian 9CY84 Historic Non-Indian 9CY88 Historic Non-Indian 9CY91 Historic Non-Indian 9DR111 Historic Non-Indian 9DR116 Historic Non-Indian 9DR117 Historic Non-Indian 9DR124 Historic Non-Indian 9DR157 Historic Non-Indian 9DR16 Historic Non-Indian 9DR19 Historic Non-Indian 9DR192 Historic Non-Indian 9DR196 Historic Non-Indian 9DR200 Historic Non-Indian 9DR202 Historic Non-Indian 9DR206 Historic Non-Indian 9DR207 Historic Non-Indian 9DR209 Historic Non-Indian 9DR210 Historic Non-Indian 9DR211 Historic Non-Indian 9DR3 Historic Non-Indian 9DR4 Historic Non-Indian 9DR49 Historic Non-Indian 9DR50 Historic Non-Indian 9DR58 Historic Non-Indian 9DR60 Historic Non-Indian 9DR8 Historic Non-Indian 9DR91 Historic Non-Indian 9DR92 Historic Non-Indian 9DR93 Historic Non-Indian 9DR99 Historic Non-Indian 9DU101 Historic Non-Indian 9DU102 Historic Non-Indian 9DU110 Historic Non-Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

120.00 Well drained

124.37 Well drained

122.92 Well drained

125.21 Well drained

112.62 Well drained

124.34 Well drained

127.95 Well drained

105.39 Well drained

95.90

Well drained

121.46 Well drained

122.26 Well drained

33.58

Well drained

36.43

Well drained

27.80

Well drained

51.57

Well drained

24.63

Well drained

32.07

Excessively drained

30.48

Well drained

68.57

Well drained

32.75

Well drained

82.86

Well drained

34.53

Well drained

24.57

Excessively drained

23.34

Excessively drained

40.97

Well drained

86.43

Moderately well drained

87.76

Well drained

30.35

Moderately well drained

25.97

Moderately well drained

24.45

Poorly drained

29.20

Well drained

32.62

Poorly drained

35.96

Poorly drained

24.24

48.61

Moderately well drained

25.31

Well drained

26.57

Poorly drained

55.63

Moderately well drained

58.82

Well drained

56.40

Well drained

69.48

Well drained

Geologic Description Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Hawthorn Formation Stream Alluvium Miccosukee Formation Ocala Limestone Water Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Miccosukee Formation Miccosukee Formation Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Miccosukee Formation Water Water Hawthorn Formation Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.00139855 0.001329975 0.00139855 0.00139855 0.00139855 0.001329975 0.001007474 0.001329975 0.00139855 0.00040199 0.000994571 0.000994571 0.00040199 0.000161981 0.000110291 0.000994571 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000648216 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000653141 0.001018931 0.000994571 0.000994571 0.000161981 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.000648216 0.000110291 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000110291 0.000110291 0.00040199 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000289308

Page 57 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9DU113 Historic Non-Indian 9DU123 Historic Non-Indian 9DU127 Historic Non-Indian 9DU138 Historic Non-Indian 9DU139 Historic Non-Indian 9DU145 Historic Non-Indian 9DU150 Historic Non-Indian 9DU152 Historic Non-Indian 9DU165 Historic Non-Indian 9DU166 Historic Non-Indian 9DU167 Historic Non-Indian 9DU168 Historic Non-Indian 9DU169 Historic Non-Indian 9DU170 Historic Non-Indian 9DU171 Historic Non-Indian 9DU172 Historic Non-Indian 9DU173 Historic Non-Indian 9DU184 Historic Non-Indian 9DU185 Historic Non-Indian 9DU32 Historic Non-Indian 9DU33 Historic Non-Indian 9DU4 Historic Non-Indian 9DU57 Historic Non-Indian 9DU58 Historic Non-Indian 9DU6 Historic Non-Indian 9DU60 Historic Non-Indian 9DU68 Historic Non-Indian 9DU77 Historic Non-Indian 9DU85 Historic Non-Indian 9DU86 Historic Non-Indian 9DU94 Historic Non-Indian 9DY1 Historic Non-Indian 9DY26 Historic Non-Indian 9DY3 Historic Non-Indian 9DY30 Historic Non-Indian 9DY32 Historic Non-Indian 9DY33 Historic Non-Indian 9DY34 Historic Non-Indian 9EF274 Historic Non-Indian 9ER131 Historic Non-Indian 9ER142 Historic Non-Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

67.00

Well drained

53.17

Excessively drained

52.79

Somewhat poorly drained

57.77

Somewhat excessively drained

53.25

Excessively drained

69.77

Well drained

72.65

Excessively drained

53.54

Somewhat poorly drained

61.13

Well drained

66.19

Well drained

65.36

Well drained

62.36

Well drained

62.34

Well drained

66.55

Well drained

75.80

Well drained

74.74

Well drained

79.50

Well drained

66.91

Well drained

61.34

Well drained

60.87

Well drained

63.75

Well drained

52.92

Poorly drained

64.70

Well drained

66.40

Well drained

52.74

Poorly drained

60.22

Well drained

68.44

Well drained

63.91

Excessively drained

56.51

Somewhat poorly drained

52.08

Somewhat poorly drained

59.22

Poorly drained

93.39

Well drained

112.52 Well drained

96.40

Well drained

113.34 Well drained

94.62

Well drained

120.28 Well drained

117.33 Well drained

126.99 Somewhat poorly drained

38.77

Well drained

36.23

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Aeolian Sand Deposits formless deposits Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Aeolian Sand Deposits formless deposits Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Eocene Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium

Page 58 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000289308 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000522164 0.000253543 0.00111595 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.00068923 0.00068923 0.00068923 0.00068923 0.00068923 0.00068923 0.00068923 0.00068923 0.000780615 0.00068923 0.00068923 0.000493239 0.000493239 0.000522164 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000522164 0.000253543 0.000289308 0.000253543 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.0005513 0.001093049 0.001298769 0.001093049 0.001163134 0.001383313 0.001298769 0.001298769 0.001298769 0.001471782 0.000589451

Site Sub-Period 9ER160 Historic Non-Indian 9ER183 Historic Non-Indian 9ER185 Historic Non-Indian 9ER186 Historic Non-Indian 9ER187 Historic Non-Indian 9ER188 Historic Non-Indian 9ER189 Historic Non-Indian 9ER190 Historic Non-Indian 9ER195 Historic Non-Indian 9ER199 Historic Non-Indian 9ER200 Historic Non-Indian 9ER202 Historic Non-Indian 9ER206 Historic Non-Indian 9ER207 Historic Non-Indian 9ER209 Historic Non-Indian 9ER211 Historic Non-Indian 9ER212 Historic Non-Indian 9ER215 Historic Non-Indian 9ER236 Historic Non-Indian 9ER249 Historic Non-Indian 9ER270 Historic Non-Indian 9ER93 Historic Non-Indian 9GR21 Historic Non-Indian 9GR22 Historic Non-Indian 9LE102 Historic Non-Indian 9LE103 Historic Non-Indian 9LE105 Historic Non-Indian 9LE106 Historic Non-Indian 9LE108 Historic Non-Indian 9LE109 Historic Non-Indian 9LE112 Historic Non-Indian 9LE113 Historic Non-Indian 9LE118 Historic Non-Indian 9LE119 Historic Non-Indian 9LE121 Historic Non-Indian 9LE124 Historic Non-Indian 9LE127 Historic Non-Indian 9LE130 Historic Non-Indian 9LE137 Historic Non-Indian 9LE138 Historic Non-Indian 9LE142 Historic Non-Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

60.89

Poorly drained

57.38

Well drained

91.00

Well drained

85.27

Well drained

84.90

Well drained

88.30

Well drained

85.27

Well drained

94.42

Well drained

51.82

Well drained

74.70

Well drained

56.90

Well drained

76.09

Well drained

88.00

Well drained

83.35

Well drained

84.50

Well drained

82.22

Well drained

78.74

Poorly drained

80.75

Well drained

71.97

Well drained

94.59

Well drained

69.61

Well drained

41.00

Moderately well drained

51.36

Well drained

51.15

Well drained

91.30

Well drained

91.30

Well drained

91.32

Well drained

91.32

Well drained

91.32

Well drained

63.86

Well drained

89.40

Well drained

76.15

Well drained

79.32

Well drained

79.11

Somewhat excessively drained

68.54

Somewhat excessively drained

71.58

Poorly drained

58.37

Well drained

72.99

Somewhat excessively drained

91.32

Well drained

76.05

Well drained

69.97

Somewhat excessively drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Lisbon Formation Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001231318 0.001380187 0.001260413 0.001389486 0.001231318 0.001231318 0.001231318 0.001260413 0.001380187 0.000345168 0.000941979 0.000598552 0.001231318 0.001231318 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001007474 0.001399507 0.001487013 0.001399507 0.001572355 0.000503312 0.000212461 0.001141014 0.001314299 0.001299864 0.001299864 0.001299864 0.000611689 0.001342568 0.001342568 0.000861966 0.000861966 0.000861966 0.000561599 0.000775896 0.00094367 0.001299864 0.000775896 0.001342568

Page 59 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9LE16 Historic Non-Indian 9LE17 Historic Non-Indian 9LE19 Historic Non-Indian 9LE21 Historic Non-Indian 9LE24 Historic Non-Indian 9LE26 Historic Non-Indian 9LE27 Historic Non-Indian 9LE28 Historic Non-Indian 9LE32 Historic Non-Indian 9LE49 Historic Non-Indian 9LE50 Historic Non-Indian 9LE53 Historic Non-Indian 9LE54 Historic Non-Indian 9LE55 Historic Non-Indian 9LE58 Historic Non-Indian 9LE59 Historic Non-Indian 9LE60 Historic Non-Indian 9LE61 Historic Non-Indian 9LE62 Historic Non-Indian 9LE63 Historic Non-Indian 9LE71 Historic Non-Indian 9LE72 Historic Non-Indian 9LE76 Historic Non-Indian 9LE86 Historic Non-Indian 9LE87 Historic Non-Indian 9LE88 Historic Non-Indian 9LE89 Historic Non-Indian 9LE9 Historic Non-Indian 9LE90 Historic Non-Indian 9LE93 Historic Non-Indian 9LE94 Historic Non-Indian 9LE96 Historic Non-Indian 9MA53 Historic Non-Indian 9MI100 Historic Non-Indian 9MI101 Historic Non-Indian 9MI104 Historic Non-Indian 9MI105 Historic Non-Indian 9MI107 Historic Non-Indian 9MI109 Historic Non-Indian 9MI112 Historic Non-Indian 9MI113 Historic Non-Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

73.01

Moderately well drained

79.11

Well drained

79.11

Well drained

85.21

Well drained

72.85

Well drained

72.99

Well drained

72.99

Well drained

69.94

Well drained

89.04

Somewhat excessively drained

73.00

Poorly drained

84.99

Well drained

100.47 Well drained

76.08

Poorly drained

81.27

Well drained

95.05

Well drained

94.63

Well drained

94.28

Well drained

94.33

Well drained

91.41

Well drained

91.31

Moderately well drained

67.76

Somewhat excessively drained

91.28

Somewhat poorly drained

80.45

Well drained

72.97

Somewhat excessively drained

79.89

Well drained

81.53

Well drained

69.98

Somewhat excessively drained

85.05

Moderately well drained

91.32

Well drained

103.16 Well drained

88.20

Well drained

90.90

Well drained

123.66 Excessively drained

56.18

Well drained

54.78

Poorly drained

42.92

Well drained

42.58

Well drained

44.95

Somewhat excessively drained

45.34

Poorly drained

62.42

Well drained

59.00

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000611689 0.000611689 0.000611689 0.001342568 0.000611689 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.000800569 0.001299864 0.000611689 0.000611689 0.001288351 0.001288351 0.001342568 0.000967301 0.000967301 0.000967301 0.000967301 0.000967301 0.000967301 0.000800569 0.000967301 0.000775896 0.000800569 0.00094367 0.001548109 0.001314299 0.000950185 0.001299864 0.001299864 0.001431029 0.001314299 0.001242365 0.000970533 0.000970533 0.000871104 0.000871104 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.00100063 0.000794166

Page 60 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9MI125 Historic Non-Indian 9MI143 Historic Non-Indian 9MI162 Historic Non-Indian 9MI81 Historic Non-Indian 9MI89 Historic Non-Indian 9MI96 Historic Non-Indian 9ML100 Historic Non-Indian 9ML101 Historic Non-Indian 9ML103 Historic Non-Indian 9ML105 Historic Non-Indian 9ML106 Historic Non-Indian 9ML107 Historic Non-Indian 9ML108 Historic Non-Indian 9ML109 Historic Non-Indian 9ML110 Historic Non-Indian 9ML111 Historic Non-Indian 9ML112 Historic Non-Indian 9ML115 Historic Non-Indian 9ML116 Historic Non-Indian 9ML117 Historic Non-Indian 9ML118 Historic Non-Indian 9ML119 Historic Non-Indian 9ML120 Historic Non-Indian 9ML121 Historic Non-Indian 9ML122 Historic Non-Indian 9ML125 Historic Non-Indian 9ML126 Historic Non-Indian 9ML133 Historic Non-Indian 9ML138 Historic Non-Indian 9ML139 Historic Non-Indian 9ML140 Historic Non-Indian 9ML141 Historic Non-Indian 9ML142 Historic Non-Indian 9ML145 Historic Non-Indian 9ML146 Historic Non-Indian 9ML147 Historic Non-Indian 9ML148 Historic Non-Indian 9ML157 Historic Non-Indian 9ML158 Historic Non-Indian 9ML163 Historic Non-Indian 9ML171 Historic Non-Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

37.16

Somewhat excessively drained

57.29

Well drained

45.08

Well drained

42.50

Well drained

59.12

Well drained

39.81

Well drained

42.69

Well drained

42.33

Well drained

44.38

Moderately well drained

48.73

Well drained

62.74

Well drained

60.58

Moderately well drained

66.06

Well drained

40.23

Somewhat excessively drained

44.08

Somewhat excessively drained

44.69

Well drained

43.65

Somewhat excessively drained

49.88

Moderately well drained

50.07

Moderately well drained

49.93

Moderately well drained

51.87

Well drained

53.97

Well drained

49.74

Poorly drained

59.15

Well drained

60.27

Moderately well drained

60.81

Well drained

60.81

Well drained

66.91

Poorly drained

82.85

Well drained

69.37

Somewhat excessively drained

66.19

Well drained

66.91

Moderately well drained

66.90

Moderately well drained

63.79

Well drained

60.81

Well drained

46.50

Well drained

51.68

Well drained

27.80

38.62

Somewhat excessively drained

46.98

Well drained

39.33

Moderately well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium

Page 61 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000578895 0.000671497 0.000718253 0.000970533 0.00100063 0.000871104 0.000503312 0.000503312 0.000503312 0.000503312 0.000503312 0.000503312 0.000503312 0.000503312 0.000212461 0.000503312 0.000503312 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.000792466 0.001229416 0.001229416 0.001213644 0.00138868 0.00138868 0.001229416 0.001213644 0.001213644 0.001229416 0.000510238 0.000510238 0.000510238 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000160345 0.000192057

Site Sub-Period 9ML177 Historic Non-Indian 9ML180 Historic Non-Indian 9ML181 Historic Non-Indian 9ML182 Historic Non-Indian 9ML183 Historic Non-Indian 9ML190 Historic Non-Indian 9ML193 Historic Non-Indian 9ML194 Historic Non-Indian 9ML197 Historic Non-Indian 9ML199 Historic Non-Indian 9ML201 Historic Non-Indian 9ML202 Historic Non-Indian 9ML204 Historic Non-Indian 9ML205 Historic Non-Indian 9ML206 Historic Non-Indian 9ML209 Historic Non-Indian 9ML211 Historic Non-Indian 9ML214 Historic Non-Indian 9ML216 Historic Non-Indian 9ML218 Historic Non-Indian 9ML219 Historic Non-Indian 9ML220 Historic Non-Indian 9ML221 Historic Non-Indian 9ML92 Historic Non-Indian 9ML93 Historic Non-Indian 9ML96 Historic Non-Indian 9ML99 Historic Non-Indian 9RH13 Historic Non-Indian 9RH32 Historic Non-Indian 9RH44 Historic Non-Indian 9RH46 Historic Non-Indian 9RH54 Historic Non-Indian 9RH57 Historic Non-Indian 9RH78 Historic Non-Indian 9RH79 Historic Non-Indian 9RH80 Historic Non-Indian 9SE10 Historic Non-Indian 9SE11 Historic Non-Indian 9SE134 Historic Non-Indian 9SE135 Historic Non-Indian 9SE136 Historic Non-Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

37.21

Excessively drained

42.83

Well drained

40.99

Well drained

44.40

Well drained

42.28

Well drained

47.48

Somewhat excessively drained

45.67

Well drained

43.03

Well drained

47.49

Well drained

53.89

Well drained

109.15 Well drained

57.65

Well drained

51.61

Well drained

51.68

Well drained

61.49

Well drained

58.07

Well drained

93.94

Poorly drained

48.91

Well drained

71.70

Well drained

71.47

Well drained

79.40

Well drained

69.02

Well drained

62.58

Well drained

97.28

Well drained

79.18

Well drained

81.98

Well drained

39.56

Well drained

109.59 Well drained

134.56 Well drained

95.77

Excessively drained

130.66 Well drained

107.53 Well drained

113.35 Well drained

130.53 Well drained

130.55 Well drained

122.14 Well drained

23.33

23.33

34.18

Moderately well drained

37.05

Well drained

36.28

Somewhat excessively drained

Geologic Description Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Neogene Undifferentiated Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Neogene Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Miccosukee Formation Miccosukee Formation Miccosukee Formation Miccosukee Formation Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Neogene Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Tuscahoma Sand Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000160345 0.000192057 0.000192057 0.000192057 0.000192057 0.000185815 0.000185815 0.000192057 0.000192057 0.000185815 0.000792466 0.00034848 0.000224971 0.00018039 0.00034848 0.000503312 0.00138868 8.78234E-05 0.000958071 0.000958071 0.000958071 0.000958071 0.000958071 0.00138868 0.00138868 0.001213644 0.000503312 0.001092272 0.001329975 0.00060684 0.000799192 0.001329975 0.001329975 0.0009741 0.00060684 0.00060684 0.00040199 0.000286713 0.000766963 0.000248601 9.37041E-05

Page 62 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9SE137 Historic Non-Indian 9SE138 Historic Non-Indian 9SE139 Historic Non-Indian 9SE140 Historic Non-Indian 9SE20 Historic Non-Indian 9SE22 Historic Non-Indian 9SE24 Historic Non-Indian 9SE28 Historic Non-Indian 9SE38 Historic Non-Indian 9SE72 Historic Non-Indian 9SE76 Historic Non-Indian 9SE77 Historic Non-Indian 9SU101 Historic Non-Indian 9SU104 Historic Non-Indian 9SU109 Historic Non-Indian 9SU110 Historic Non-Indian 9SU111 Historic Non-Indian 9SU112 Historic Non-Indian 9SU113 Historic Non-Indian 9SU114 Historic Non-Indian 9SU115 Historic Non-Indian 9SU116 Historic Non-Indian 9SU12 Historic Non-Indian 9SU121 Historic Non-Indian 9SU125 Historic Non-Indian 9SU145 Historic Non-Indian 9SU147 Historic Non-Indian 9SU149 Historic Non-Indian 9SU151 Historic Non-Indian 9SU153 Historic Non-Indian 9SU154 Historic Non-Indian 9SU160 Historic Non-Indian 9SU161 Historic Non-Indian 9SU162 Historic Non-Indian 9SU163 Historic Non-Indian 9SU164 Historic Non-Indian 9SU165 Historic Non-Indian 9SU167 Historic Non-Indian 9SU168 Historic Non-Indian 9SU169 Historic Non-Indian 9SU175 Historic Non-Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

33.39

Somewhat excessively drained

32.24

Well drained

42.35

Well drained

52.02

Well drained

23.32

23.32

24.19

Somewhat poorly drained

23.33

33.10

Well drained

24.69

Somewhat excessively drained

33.62

Well drained

38.19

Well drained

71.77

148.44 Well drained

96.84

Well drained

96.52

Well drained

98.55

Well drained

100.49 Well drained

102.19 Well drained

112.66 Well drained

111.77 Well drained

109.63 Well drained

91.28

Well drained

136.45 Well drained

144.43 Well drained

94.45

Well drained

109.04 Well drained

119.88 Well drained

124.76 Well drained

118.55 Well drained

94.73

Well drained

103.47 Well drained

115.72 Well drained

106.41 Well drained

109.96 Well drained

106.07 Well drained

100.48 Well drained

111.72 Well drained

127.40 Well drained

100.20 Well drained

73.55

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Water Water Water Water Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Water Ocala Limestone Water Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Tuscahoma Sand Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000286713 0.000286713 0.000511073 0.000511073 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000409366 0.00040199 0.00084478 0.000286713 0.000409366 0.000511073 0.000950185 0.001242365 0.001141014 0.001141014 0.001141014 0.001141014 0.001141014 0.001141014 0.001290564 0.001290564 0.000950185 0.001035085 0.001035085 0.001141014 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001035085 0.001035085 0.001141014 0.001244391 0.001290564 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001141014 0.001244391 0.001035085 0.001141014 0.00110159

Page 63 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9SU178 Historic Non-Indian 9SU179 Historic Non-Indian 9SU180 Historic Non-Indian 9SU181 Historic Non-Indian 9SU184 Historic Non-Indian 9SU185 Historic Non-Indian 9SU190 Historic Non-Indian 9SU191 Historic Non-Indian 9SU192 Historic Non-Indian 9SU193 Historic Non-Indian 9SU194 Historic Non-Indian 9SU195 Historic Non-Indian 9SU196 Historic Non-Indian 9SU197 Historic Non-Indian 9SU198 Historic Non-Indian 9SU199 Historic Non-Indian 9SU200 Historic Non-Indian 9SU204 Historic Non-Indian 9SU205 Historic Non-Indian 9SU206 Historic Non-Indian 9SU207 Historic Non-Indian 9SU209 Historic Non-Indian 9SU210 Historic Non-Indian 9SU218 Historic Non-Indian 9SU24 Historic Non-Indian 9SU26 Historic Non-Indian 9SU28 Historic Non-Indian 9SU29 Historic Non-Indian 9SU30 Historic Non-Indian 9SU31 Historic Non-Indian 9SU34 Historic Non-Indian 9SU35 Historic Non-Indian 9SU45 Historic Non-Indian 9SU87 Historic Non-Indian 9SU90 Historic Non-Indian 9TE100 Historic Non-Indian 9TE101 Historic Non-Indian 9TE102 Historic Non-Indian 9TE103 Historic Non-Indian 9TE104 Historic Non-Indian 9TE105 Historic Non-Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

122.74 Well drained

130.94 Well drained

133.59 Well drained

114.99 Well drained

88.23

Well drained

88.25

Well drained

85.89

Well drained

88.21

Well drained

91.29

Well drained

94.34

Well drained

92.60

Well drained

94.35

Well drained

105.10 Well drained

97.44

Poorly drained

100.42 Well drained

109.51 Well drained

107.66 Well drained

119.23 Well drained

127.86 Well drained

109.57 Well drained

88.21

Well drained

88.23

Well drained

88.76

Well drained

103.19 Well drained

97.42

Well drained

105.75 Excessively drained

71.85

71.85

72.91

Poorly drained

71.85

71.85

71.85

77.71

Well drained

71.77

71.77

82.18

Poorly drained

72.74

Well drained

141.22 Well drained

99.99

Well drained

88.28

Well drained

87.93

Well drained

Geologic Description Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Water Water Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Water Water Water Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001499214 0.001499214 0.001499214 0.001035085 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00132299 0.00132299 0.00132299 0.00132299 0.00132299 0.00132299 0.00132299 0.00132299 0.00132299 0.00132299 0.00132299 0.001499214 0.001583462 0.00132299 0.000950185 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.001499214 0.001141014 0.001581473 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.001345783 0.00111595 0.00083219 0.001158547 0.001548109 0.001548109

Page 64 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9TE108 Historic Non-Indian 9TE110 Historic Non-Indian 9TE113 Historic Non-Indian 9TE116 Historic Non-Indian 9TE118 Historic Non-Indian 9TE124 Historic Non-Indian 9TE125 Historic Non-Indian 9TE126 Historic Non-Indian 9TE127 Historic Non-Indian 9TE17 Historic Non-Indian 9TE19 Historic Non-Indian 9TE23 Historic Non-Indian 9TE25 Historic Non-Indian 9TE26 Historic Non-Indian 9TE27 Historic Non-Indian 9TE29 Historic Non-Indian 9TE40 Historic Non-Indian 9TE43 Historic Non-Indian 9TE48 Historic Non-Indian 9TE52 Historic Non-Indian 9TE56 Historic Non-Indian 9TE59 Historic Non-Indian 9TE6 Historic Non-Indian 9TE7 Historic Non-Indian 9TE70 Historic Non-Indian 9TE71 Historic Non-Indian 9TE73 Historic Non-Indian 9TE78 Historic Non-Indian 9TE80 Historic Non-Indian 9TE83 Historic Non-Indian 9TE84 Historic Non-Indian 9TE86 Historic Non-Indian 9TE87 Historic Non-Indian 9TE88 Historic Non-Indian 9TE92 Historic Non-Indian 9TE93 Historic Non-Indian 9TE94 Historic Non-Indian 9TE95 Historic Non-Indian 9TE96 Historic Non-Indian 9TE97 Historic Non-Indian 9TN86 Historic Non-Indian

Elevation Drainage Class

94.37

Well drained

85.23

Well drained

79.18

Moderately well drained

106.47 Well drained

117.22 Well drained

96.16

Well drained

93.14

Poorly drained

92.72

Poorly drained

91.34

Poorly drained

142.97 Well drained

147.17 Well drained

141.58 Well drained

133.46 Well drained

117.50 Well drained

113.55 Well drained

121.45 Well drained

94.38

Moderately well drained

96.56

Well drained

96.31

Well drained

94.21

Well drained

91.40

Moderately well drained

94.46

Well drained

99.85

Well drained

100.59 Well drained

87.45

Well drained

88.05

Well drained

81.99

Well drained

84.97

Well drained

83.11

Well drained

91.32

Well drained

91.28

Well drained

91.33

Well drained

94.37

Well drained

80.99

Well drained

109.10 Well drained

102.93 Well drained

84.53

Well drained

86.20

Well drained

87.43

Well drained

85.23

Well drained

113.18 Well drained

Geologic Description Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Neogene Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.001158547 0.001548109 0.000977975 0.000878886 0.000778824 0.000977975 0.000977975 0.000977975 0.000977975 0.00083219 0.001071746 0.00083219 0.001071746 0.001071746 0.001071746 0.000986086 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.000977975 0.000977975 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001548109 0.001158547 0.001285433 0.001158547 0.001158547 0.001158547 0.001345783 0.001771187

Page 65 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9TR130 Historic Non-Indian 9WB15 Historic Non-Indian 9WO14 Historic Non-Indian 9WO23 Historic Non-Indian 9WO24 Historic Non-Indian 9WO25 Historic Non-Indian 9WO27 Historic Non-Indian 9WO31 Historic Non-Indian 9WO33 Historic Non-Indian 9WO43 Historic Non-Indian 9WO5 Historic Non-Indian 9BX1 Unknown 9BX10 Unknown 9BX104 Unknown 9BX5 Unknown 9CP100 Unknown 9CP101 Unknown 9CP102 Unknown 9CP103 Unknown 9CP104 Unknown 9CP105 Unknown 9CP106 Unknown 9CP107 Unknown 9CP108 Unknown 9CP109 Unknown 9CP110 Unknown 9CP111 Unknown 9CP112 Unknown 9CP113 Unknown 9CP114 Unknown 9CP115 Unknown 9CP116 Unknown 9CP117 Unknown 9CP118 Unknown 9CP119 Unknown 9CP120 Unknown 9CP121 Unknown 9CP122 Unknown 9CP123 Unknown 9CP124 Unknown 9CP125 Unknown

Elevation Drainage Class

66.16

Well drained

134.31

97.91

Moderately well drained

71.76

Poorly drained

76.70

Well drained

73.00

Well drained

85.18

Moderately well drained

108.58 Well drained

85.11

Well drained

93.41

Well drained

70.31

Well drained

39.23

Well drained

35.73

Excessively drained

47.42

Well drained

51.69

Poorly drained

71.77

85.05

Moderately well drained

71.77

71.77

71.79

72.52

Somewhat poorly drained

72.37

71.77

72.04

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.83

72.04

71.77

71.77

71.92

Excessively drained

71.77

72.12

Excessively drained

71.80

71.80

71.76

71.95

72.20

71.81

71.81

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Claiborne Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Neogene Undifferentiated Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium

Page 66 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000785911 0.000890527 0.001293677 0.001101161 0.000643505 0.000643505 0.001101161 0.00147174 0.001293677 0.001293677 0.000643505 0.000319793 0.000319793 0.000160345 0.000522164 0.000911254 0.000911254 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185

Site Sub-Period 9CP126 Unknown 9CP127 Unknown 9CP128 Unknown 9CP129 Unknown 9CP130 Unknown 9CP131 Unknown 9CP132 Unknown 9CP133 Unknown 9CP158 Unknown 9CP17 Unknown 9CP25 Unknown 9CP26 Unknown 9CP28 Unknown 9CP29 Unknown 9CP30 Unknown 9CP31 Unknown 9CP32 Unknown 9CP33 Unknown 9CP34 Unknown 9CP35 Unknown 9CP36 Unknown 9CP37 Unknown 9CP38 Unknown 9CP39 Unknown 9CP40 Unknown 9CP41 Unknown 9CP42 Unknown 9CP43 Unknown 9CP44 Unknown 9CP45 Unknown 9CP46 Unknown 9CP47 Unknown 9CP48 Unknown 9CP49 Unknown 9CP50 Unknown 9CP51 Unknown 9CP52 Unknown 9CP53 Unknown 9CP54 Unknown 9CP55 Unknown 9CP56 Unknown

Elevation Drainage Class

80.69

Well drained

71.76

71.76

71.76

71.82

71.92

78.77

Well drained

72.43

Well drained

92.10

Somewhat poorly drained

94.32

Well drained

85.16

Well drained

92.58

Poorly drained

76.83

71.85

76.35

71.85

73.97

72.44

71.96

71.84

71.85

73.48

71.84

71.98

71.97

Well drained

71.33

71.82

71.85

72.17

73.63

72.35

71.77

71.78

71.77

71.77

71.77

76.04

Well drained

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

Geologic Description Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water Water

Page 67 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.001101161 0.001101161 0.001042538 0.001042538 0.000996178 0.001436739 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.001221166 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159

Site 9CP57 9CP58 9CP59 9CP60 9CP61 9CP62 9CP63 9CP64 9CP65 9CP66 9CP67 9CP68 9CP69 9CP70 9CP71 9CP72 9CP73 9CP74 9CP75 9CP76 9CP77 9CP78 9CP79 9CP80 9CP81 9CP82 9CP83 9CP84 9CP85 9CP86 9CP87 9CP88 9CP89 9CP90 9CP91 9CP92 9CP93 9CP94 9CP95 9CP96 9CP97

Sub-Period Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown

Elevation Drainage Class

76.13

Well drained

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.82

71.83

71.77

71.77

80.92

Well drained

73.41

Somewhat poorly drained

73.37

Well drained

72.66

71.78

71.81

Poorly drained

71.77

71.77

71.96

71.77

71.81

71.77

71.77

72.10

71.77

71.77

71.77

71.77

73.32

71.77

71.77

72.05

71.77

71.77

72.35

Excessively drained

76.03

Excessively drained

73.63

Excessively drained

71.79

71.79

72.89

Well drained

71.87

Poorly drained

76.29

Excessively drained

Geologic Description Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Water Water Water Stream Alluvium

Page 68 of 71

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.00110159 0.001014457 0.00110159 0.001014457 0.001014457 0.001014457 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000950185 0.000911254 0.000911254 0.000950185

Site Sub-Period 9CP98 Unknown 9CP99 Unknown 9CY67 Unknown 9CY70 Unknown 9DR20 Unknown 9DR40 Unknown 9DR41 Unknown 9DR42 Unknown 9DR45 Unknown 9DR47 Unknown 9DR48 Unknown 9DR51 Unknown 9DR56 Unknown 9DU1 Unknown 9DU10 Unknown 9DU123 Unknown 9DU124 Unknown 9DU125 Unknown 9DU126 Unknown 9DU127 Unknown 9DU51 Unknown 9DU79 Unknown 9DU82 Unknown 9ER156 Unknown 9ER158 Unknown 9ER162 Unknown 9ER164 Unknown 9ER171 Unknown 9ER174 Unknown 9ER178 Unknown 9ER179 Unknown 9ER193 Unknown 9ER2 Unknown 9ER58 Unknown 9ER59 Unknown 9ER70 Unknown 9ER86 Unknown 9ER87 Unknown 9LE11 Unknown 9LE44 Unknown 9LE47 Unknown

Elevation Drainage Class

71.77

71.77

42.46

Well drained

47.85

Excessively drained

23.34

23.33

23.33

23.33

23.34

23.33

23.34

27.37

Poorly drained

35.63

Well drained

57.78

Somewhat poorly drained

46.96

53.17

Excessively drained

50.56

Somewhat poorly drained

56.01

Excessively drained

54.46

Excessively drained

52.79

Somewhat poorly drained

60.80

Well drained

54.71

Well drained

59.25

Moderately well drained

60.89

Moderately well drained

74.73

Well drained

63.93

Moderately well drained

65.52

Well drained

51.89

Poorly drained

61.36

Well drained

59.92

Well drained

37.07

Somewhat excessively drained

64.62

Well drained

40.63

Well drained

44.01

75.03

Well drained

77.31

Well drained

78.47

Well drained

39.06

Well drained

89.75

Well drained

71.77

73.00

Well drained

Geologic Description Water Water Tuscahoma Sand Tuscahoma Sand Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Lisbon Formation Stream Alluvium Lisbon Formation Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Water Ocala Limestone

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000911254 0.000911254 0.001344885 0.001344885 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.00040199 0.000248601 0.000110291 0.000522164 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000253543 0.000493239 0.000379085 0.000800569 0.001389486 0.001389486 0.001007474 0.001231318 0.000752422 0.000752422 0.001007474 0.001505965 0.001579022 0.001471782 0.001471782 0.001389486 0.001389486 0.001389486 0.000589451 0.001141014 0.000950185 0.000611689

Page 69 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9MI12 Unknown 9MI17 Unknown 9MI27 Unknown 9MI41 Unknown 9MI70 Unknown 9MI87 Unknown 9MI88 Unknown 9MI89 Unknown 9ML143 Unknown 9SE110 Unknown 9SE126 Unknown 9SE128 Unknown 9SE31 Unknown 9SE34 Unknown 9SE36 Unknown 9SE38 Unknown 9SE81 Unknown 9SE82 Unknown 9SE83 Unknown 9SE84 Unknown 9SE85 Unknown 9SE86 Unknown 9SE90 Unknown 9SE91 Unknown 9SU117 Unknown 9SU118 Unknown 9SU119 Unknown 9SU120 Unknown 9SU122 Unknown 9SU123 Unknown 9SU124 Unknown 9SU7 Unknown 9TE10 Unknown 9TE11 Unknown 9TE12 Unknown 9TE13 Unknown 9TE14 Unknown 9TE15 Unknown 9TE3 Unknown 9TE5 Unknown 9TE6 Unknown

Elevation Drainage Class

68.94

Poorly drained

69.33

Moderately well drained

69.09

Poorly drained

53.81

Well drained

49.52

Well drained

50.16

Well drained

55.07

Well drained

59.12

Well drained

66.39

Somewhat poorly drained

32.77

Well drained

27.88

Well drained

27.56

Somewhat excessively drained

30.77

Poorly drained

23.33

27.22

Somewhat excessively drained

33.10

Well drained

29.15

Somewhat excessively drained

26.96

Somewhat excessively drained

23.33

23.34

Somewhat excessively drained

23.33

Somewhat poorly drained

30.87

Well drained

27.88

Somewhat excessively drained

24.25

Well drained

98.30

Well drained

97.52

Excessively drained

118.70 Well drained

112.99 Well drained

129.96 Well drained

122.06 Well drained

123.50 Well drained

105.83 Excessively drained

115.72 Well drained

118.85 Well drained

121.82 Well drained

111.81 Well drained

110.69 Well drained

112.25 Well drained

137.04 Well drained

122.55 Well drained

99.85

Well drained

Geologic Description Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Ocala Limestone Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Water Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Ocala Limestone Water Ocala Limestone Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000785911 0.000671497 0.000671497 0.00100063 0.001213644 0.000409366 0.000353384 0.000189278 0.000511073 0.000511073 9.37041E-05 0.00084478 0.000409366 0.000409366 0.000286713 0.000286713 0.000286713 0.000286713 0.000409366 0.000409366 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001244391 0.001035085 0.001035085 0.001035085 0.001035085 0.000826348 0.000878886 0.000878886 0.000878886 0.000878886 0.000878886 0.00083219 0.001158547 0.000977975

Page 70 of 71

Site Sub-Period 9TE7 Unknown 9TE8 Unknown 9TE9 Unknown 9WB15 Unknown 9WB2 Unknown 9WO13 Unknown 9WO14 Unknown 9WO19 Unknown 9WO20 Unknown 9WO21 Unknown 9WO22 Unknown 9WO8 Unknown 9WO9 Unknown

Elevation Drainage Class

100.59 Well drained

119.84 Well drained

112.69 Well drained

134.31

149.24

106.63 Well drained

97.91

Moderately well drained

71.76

71.82

72.19

71.79

83.38

Well drained

91.29

Well drained

Geologic Description Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Claiborne Undifferentiated Eocene and Oligocene Residuum Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Neogene Undifferentiated Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Stream Alluvium Water Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum Suwannee Limestone and its Residuum

24k Hydrolic Unit Density 0.000977975 0.000878886 0.000878886 0.000890527 0.00083219 0.001293677 0.001293677 0.001101161 0.001101161 0.001101161 0.001101161 0.001293677 0.001293677

Page 71 of 71