Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013 [2007]

Sonny Perdue, Governor
State of Georgia
Noel Holcomb, Commissioner
Georgia Department of Natural Resources

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

For more information about SCORP 2008-2013, additional online resources or to download the entire SCORP document, visit the Georgia State Parks & Historic Sites website at: www.GeorgiaStateParks.org/SCORP
You may also contact us: By phone at: 404-656-2770 By e-mail at: Director.GSPHS@dnr.state.ga.us
This plan was developed in part through a planning grant from the National Park Service, Department of Interior, under the provisions of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (Public Law 88-578, as amended).

Outdoor Recreation Strategies to Enhance Georgia's Future for Health and Livability, Economic Vitality and Resource Conservation
Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

ACKNOWLEdGMENTS
The Georgia Department of Natural Resources (DNR) acknowledges the significant contributions made by those who committed their time and expertise to help establish Georgia's official outdoor recreation policy. The following agencies, organizations and individuals have made particularly valuable contributions to this document.
A special thanks to Noel Holcomb, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Natural Resources (DNR), and Lauren Travis, Policy Assistant, Office of the Governor, for their continued insight and support; and to our financial assistance partners Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF), Georgia Recreation and Park Association (GRPA), Friends of Georgia State Parks and Historic Sites (FGSPHS), DNR Wildlife Resources Division (WRD) and Parks, Recreation and Historic Sites Division (PRHSD) -- without whom this report would not have been possible. Lastly, we wish to recognize the writing and editorial contributions of Susan Toal and the countless hours devoted to the SCORP by the staff of the Parks, Recreation and Historic Sites Division, notably:
Becky Kelley, LWCF State Liaison Officer and Director Paul Nelson, Assistant Director Antoinette Norfleet, Director of Grants Eric VanDeGenachte, Consultant Linda Patrick, Publications Coordinator

SCORP Advisory Committee

Georgia Board of Natural Resources

Association County Commissioners of Georgia Ross King
Todd Edwards

Jim Walters, Chairman Walter Hudson

David Allen

Mabel Jenkins*

Bill Archer*

Phyllis Johnson*

Friends of Georgia State Parks and Historic Sites Earl Barrs

Tom Johnson

Gene Bishop

Ray Lambert, Jr. Bob Rutland

Georgia Conservancy Kelly Jordan
Jill Johnson

Jenny Lynn Bradley* Warren Budd Bill Carruth

Loyce Turner* Jim Tysinger* Tom Wheeler

Georgia Department of Community Affairs Jim Frederick
Georgia Department of Human Resources Dafna Kanny

Joe Hatfield* *Parks, Recreation and Historic Sites Committee members

Georgia Department of Natural Resources Beth Brown

UGA Project Management Team

Steve Friedman

Fanning Institute

Bill Fletcher Mark Whitney

Langford D. Holbrook Danny Bivins

Georgia Municipal Association Tom Gehl

Jan Coyne Leigh Askew

Georgia Recreation and Park Association Tom Martin

Carl Vinson Institute of Government Rich Clark

Melvin Cooper

Leah Christian

Georgia Wildlife Federation Glenn Dowling

Eugene P. Odum School of Ecology Liz Kramer

Park Pride George Dusenbury

Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Gary Green

UGA Public Service and Outreach L. Steven Dempsey

Center for Community Design and Preservation Eleonora A. Machado

Page 1

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents
Acknowledgements 1 ...........................................................................................................................................................................

Letter from Governor Sonny Perdue 3 ...............................................................................................................................

Letter from the LWCF State Liason Officer 5 .........................................................................................................

Executive Overview 7 ............................................................................................................................................................................

Introduction 15 ...........................................................................................................................................................................................

1

1. Supply, Usage Patterns and Expressed Demand ............................................................................. 21
A. Supply: Recreation Service Providers

B. Usage Patterns: Participation in Outdoor Recreation

C. Expressed Demand: The Public Speaks

2

2. Trends Affecting Outdoor Recreation 29 ............................................................................................................
A. Socio-Demographic Shifts B. Increasing Urbanization and Regional Variations

C. Growing Appreciation for the Benefits of Outdoor Recreation

3

3. Priorities 39 ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
A. Promote Health/Fitness and Livability of all Communities B. Improve Economic Vitality

C. Conserve and Properly Use Natural Resources

4

4. Strategic Actions 53 .....................................................................................................................................................................
A. Health and Livability B. Economic Vitality

C. Conservation

D. Commitment

E. Education

F. Funding

5

5. Implications for LWCF and Georgia Law 61 ...................................................................................................
A. Guiding Principles for LWCF B. Wetlands Preservation

C. Fulfillment of Legal Mandate

References 67 ..............................................................................................................................................................................................

Glossary and Photo Credits 69 ..............................................................................................................................................

Appendices 70 ..............................................................................................................................................................................................

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page

Governor Sonny Perdue and grandchildren.
Governor Perdue's Goals for a New Georgia:
Healthy Georgia
Promoting healthy, active lifestyles and livable communities
Educated Georgia
Fulfilling our responsibilities for environmental protection and stewardship
Best Managed Georgia
Working with community partners to conserve and provide high-quality recreation opportunities for all

Page 3

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

LETTER FROM GOvERNOR SONNY PERduE

Sonny Perdue
GOVERNOR

STATE OF GEORGIA
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ATLANTA 30334-0900

Dear Fellow Georgians,
I am pleased to support this bold effort to ensure abundant opportunities for outdoor recreation for our ever-growing population and for the millions who visit and enjoy Georgia's natural resources and parks. Georgia's Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP 2008-2013) sets the benchmark for recreation policy throughout Georgia and guides the disbursement of federal dollars from the Land and Water Conservation Fund to both our local and state recreation agencies.
Georgia's popularity as a great place to live, work and play has resulted in unprecedented growth which is expected to continue for years to come. As we prosper, we must be evermindful to manage and protect our precious natural resources and ensure that all Georgians have adequate and easily-accessible areas to recreate and relax.
State and local governments are challenged by many critical issues. However, it is important to recognize the wide-ranging significance of our public recreation lands. The returns we enjoy from our investment in outdoor recreation are exceptional. Whether those benefits are realized through the attraction of new businesses and visitors, improved health and fitness, appreciation of home values, or enhanced cultural integration, our returns far outweigh our investments.
I commend the Georgia Department of Natural Resources and the SCORP Advisory Committee for crafting SCORP 2008-2013 with extensive public involvement and thorough data collection. It truly represents the desires and interests of all Georgians and responds to the trends affecting our future. It outlines how Georgia can provide outdoor recreation opportunities that promote fitness, reconnect our youth and families with nature, build the next generation of environmental stewards and enhance our state and local economy.
I urge each of you to answer the challenges set forth in this plan as we strive to be good stewards and improve the quality of life in Georgia. Come-on, let's Get Outdoors Georgia!
Sincerely,

Governor Sonny Perdue

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 4

"Thousands of tired, nerve-shaken, over-civilized people are beginning to find out that going to the mountains is going home; that wildness is a necessity; and that mountain parks and reservations are useful not only as fountains of timber and irrigating rivers, but as fountains of life." 1
- John Muir, 1901

Page

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

L E T T E R F R O M T H E l w cf state l i aIson off i cer

Georgia Department of Natural Resources Parks, Recreation and Historic Sites Division
Becky Kelley, Director
Dear Governor Sonny Perdue and Citizens of Georgia,
Even though naturalist John Muir spoke these words over one hundred years ago, they describe what we are experiencing in Georgia today. Georgians have strong connections with parks and natural resources, visiting them often to relax and participate in a variety of recreation activities. We also value our natural environment, parks and greenways because they help to sustain our quality of life. I am proud to report that these core values and fundamental principles have been substantiated through the update of Georgia's Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP).
SCORP has also brought to light many serious challenges facing the well being of our state, our local communities and our parks and natural resources. Georgia's prosperity has resulted in rapid growth and development that has consumed thousands of acres of our natural environment. As a result, the open fields, creeks and woods where we once played and relaxed are being consumed by development. Because we have not been able to preserve natural areas at rates that counterbalance this development, many of our citizens no longer have access to a natural environment or places to play and relax.
Other realizations of our growth include the rapid influx of millions of new Georgians, shifting demographic trends and lifestyle changes that affect how we recreate. Demand for recreational services exceeds supply. Because of urban growth and increased cultural diversity, some traditional forms of recreation and natural resource use are giving way to new interests and recreational demands. And, our increasingly sedentary lifestyles have created serious health concerns for both Georgia adults and children.
The ultimate declaration of SCORP 2008-2013 is that Georgia is at a critical crossroad. The preservation of our state's priceless natural resources and the provision of accessible and affordable public outdoor recreation opportunities are now, more than ever, important responsibilities that we as a state and as a society must forthrightly address. Our actions today will dictate the health and vitality of communities tomorrow. The time has come when we must recognize the major role that parks have in promoting public health, livable communities, economic vitality and conserving our irreplaceable natural resources.
While the window of opportunity still exists to turn these trends around, our federal, state and local governments must work with our citizens, non-profit support organizations, businesses and service delivery partners to efficiently and responsibly address the threats facing our natural environment. We must work together in new and innovative ways to maximize the opportunities to ensure a healthy and prosperous Georgia with abundant green spaces and recreation opportunities for future generations to enjoy.
By enacting the recommendations of Georgia SCORP 2008-2013, we can ensure that future Georgia residents and visitors are able to prosper from our natural resources and experience the sheer joy of the outdoors that we have grown to love so much.

Becky Kelley
LWCF State Liaison Officer Director, Parks, Recreation and Historic Sites Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page

EXECUTIVE

OVERVIEW
Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013
We can no longer take our natural environment and outdoor recreation for granted. The future of Georgia, the protection of our natural resources and the provision of quality outdoor recreation opportunities for future generations are in our hands-- and we must act now.

Page

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Findings Reveal a Sense of Urgency
Rapid urbanization and loss of greenspace
Significant demographic
transitions
Obesity epidemic and
declining health
Diminished conservation
ethic
Local communities need economic
growth
Growing support for
outdoor recreation

Outdoor Recreation in Georgia and the SCORP Mandate:
This Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) presents a bold agenda for outdoor recreation from 2008 to 2013. It has been crafted for two primary reasons:
1) To fulfill Georgia law mandating the development of a state policy on outdoor recreation (Georgia Code 12-3-1); and
2) To keep Georgia eligible for federal Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) grant dollars.
Developing the 20082013 SCORP has been a true collaboration with a wide variety of allied partners. We took a multi-faceted, data-driven approach in order to fully understand the status of recreation in Georgia. Data collection consisted of:
A comprehensive resource inventory of all federal, state, county and city outdoor recreation areas and facilities;
Trends and benchmarks analysis of the emerging trends impacting our state;
Statistically valid public telephone surveys to quantify opinions on outdoor recreation resources; and
Public meetings, stakeholder groups, online comments and various other public involvement avenues for people to express their opinions.

Trends:

Trends impacting outdoor recreation in Georgia:
Rapid urbanization Loss of greenspace Need for diverse recreation opportunities Declining health Diminished conservation ethic Growing support for outdoor recreation

Compelling Trends
Rapid urbanization and demographic shifts are resulting in the loss of natural resources, a greater demand for outdoor recreation opportunities and the need for diverse recreational offerings.
Georgia's population is growing and will reach nearly 11 million by 2015. Statewide, over 106 acres are lost each day to development--55 acres per day in Atlanta alone. By 2015, only two years beyond the horizon of this SCORP, 12 counties are projected to experience growth in excess of 75%.
In addition, Georgia is becoming home to an increasingly diverse population in terms of ethnicity, age and income. Forty percent of Georgia's new resi-

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page

E x ec u t i v e O V E R VI E W

OVERVIEW

EXECUTIVE

dents are foreign-born. By 2015, ten percent of Georgia's population will be Hispanic and Georgia will have the largest proportion of African Americans when compared to the other top ten most populous states. As we grow more diverse, we are also seeing increases in both our elderly and youth populations. And, while our economy is relatively strong, 12.5% of our citizens continue to live in poverty.

It is clearly our generation's responsibility to recognize the impact of this growth and diversity and to take decisive action to properly guide it to the best of our ability.

Georgia Housing Density Increase 2000-2030 2000

2030

Source: Georgia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

SILVIS Lab, University of Wisconsin-Madison U.S. Forest Service Northern Research Station
Georgians' increasingly sedentary lifestyles and disconnection from nature are resulting in alarming health declines and a diminished conservation ethic.

Georgia is facing an obesity epidemic. At a time when obesity rates among adults and children are skyrocketing, the important role of physical activity and access to outdoor recreation resources cannot be underestimated.

Our `target market' is primarily the insufficiently active segment of Georgians

who will choose to be more active if they can find fun and rewarding outdoor

recreation activities. This segment

represents just over 40% of Georgia's population, and is over-represented by women, minorities, people aged

INACTIVE

REG

65 years and over, people with low

17%

income or low education and non-

metro residents.

42%

ULARLy ACTIVE INSUFF

As Georgia becomes more urbanized, sustaining a connection to our natural resources becomes extremely challenging. Parks and nature-based outdoor recreation opportunities provide critically important connections to our natural world and help to advance an effective conservation ethic.

41%
ICIENTLy ACTIVE
Our target market

Page 9

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

E x ec u t i v e O V E R VI E W

Americans and Georgians are financially supporting outdoor recreation at record levels.
President Bush has called on all Americans to work together to prepare our national parks for another century of conservation, preservation and enjoyment. He has submitted a $100 million appropriation request for our national park system in the 2008 budget and has issued a challenge to fund an additional $100 million/year for the next ten years, if matched by private donations.
Georgians are demonstrating their support for city and county bond referendums for local park improvements in record numbers. In fact, 88% of Georgians support public investments in parks and outdoor recreation areas, according to the telephone survey conducted for SCORP.
Recent Funding Examples
National Park Service 2008 Budget Request $ 40.6 million 3,000 new employees $ 35.0 million cyclic maintenance $ 3.4 million expand volunteer programs $ 1.0 million Junior Rangers/Web Rangers $ 20.0 million resource protection
Presidential Challenge $3 Billion
($100 million/year for 10 years if matched with private donations)
Texas State Parks & Wildlife (2007) $180 million
(includes $36.5 million for their local park grant program)
Cobb County, Georgia (2006) $40 million
(park land acquisition)
Paulding County, Georgia (2006) $15 million
(collaboration with GA DNR to purchase 7,020-acre Paulding Forest Wildlife Management Area; total federal, state, local and foundation investment of $45 million)
City of Atlanta, Georgia $3 million increase (2006) and $2 million increase (2007)
(park operations and maintenance)

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 10

OVERVIEW

EXECUTIVE

Priorities
It is imperative for local, state and federal governments to work collaboratively with private sector organizations to secure a future where Georgians live healthier lifestyles, the economic well being of communities is sustained and wildlife and natural resources are conserved. Priorities for SCORP 20082013 build on the science-based research and insights from both current and previous plans, addresses anticipated trends and takes Georgia into the coming decade with vision, focus and urgency.

Georgia's Outdoor Recreation Priorities for 20082013

1Promote Health/ Fitness and Livability of All Communities

2Enhance
Economic Vitality

3Conserve
and Properly Use Natural Resources

1 Promote Health/Fitness and Livability of All Communities We must act now to make tangible contributions toward healthy living by reinforcing the connection between health, quality of life and outdoor recreation.
Key recommendations include:
Improve access to outdoor recreation resources and facilities by establishing parks near where people live and work and by exploring ways to connect existing facilities for pedestrians and non-motorized vehicles (bikes, in-line skates, horses, etc.).
Attend to segments of the population that are under-served by existing facilities (e.g., seniors, young adults and African American populations).
Work with statewide organizations such as the Department of Human Resources, the Georgia Recreation and Park Association and others to develop programs that promote health and livability and to incorporate those programs into state and local outdoor recreation.
2 Enhance Economic Vitality We must act now to support and maintain Georgia's outdoor recreation resources so that we remain attractive to new business and industry, draw tourists across our borders and grow our tax base.
Key recommendations include:
Document the economic benefits of outdoor recreation in Georgia and track the financial return from investing in outdoor recreation facilities.
Facilitate collaborations between government agencies and the private sector to advance the economic benefits of outdoor recreation and natural resource conservation.
Market our natural and recreation resources to increase public participation and foster support, advance tourism and opportunities for economic development and encourage volunteerism.
Rehabilitate, update and upgrade existing public outdoor recreation facilities to maximize marketability.

Page 11

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

ExECuTivE OvERviEw

Promote outdoor recreation events, programs and facilities that attract day travelers and overnight visitation by creating partnerships with businesses such as convention and visitor bureaus, recreation equipment vendors and guide services.

3

Conserve and Properly Use Natural Resources
We must act now to conserve our natural resources and wildlife so that we stay ahead of the state's rapid population growth, take advantage of the recent increase in support among Georgians for conservation and cultivate the next generation of environmental stewards.

Key recommendations include:
Identify and prioritize key lands for acquisition, particularly in the fastestgrowing areas of the state.
Establish and provide resource data and tools by establishing a Technical Assistance Unit within the Parks, Recreation and Historic Sites Division to aid local governments that are focusing on land conservation needs in accordance with SCORP 2008-2013, the Georgia Land Conservation Plan and the Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan.
Expand the SCORP inventory of outdoor recreation resources and other GIS databases to identify lands suitable for conservation.
Support land use planning that encourages conservation of natural resources and opportunities for outdoor recreation opportunities.
Expand nature-based programming opportunities at the state and local level.

Georgia
STATE APPROPRIATIONS OVERVIEW*

Land Acquisition Initiatives ($300+ million over 17 years)
Preservation 2000 RiverCare 2000 Chattahoochee River Campaign Georgia Greenspace Initiative
Georgia Land Conservation Program

Acquisition, Development & Rehabilitation Initiatives Specifically for Public Recreation
($11 million over 21 years)
Recreation Assistance Fund (1978-1999)
*Not including single purpose or discretionary project appropriations

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 1

OVERVIEW

EXECUTIVE

Three Critical Ingredients for Success
1 Commitment We must act now to follow through with implementation of the SCORP recommendations. Collaboration among agencies with common missions will provide the synergy needed for all Georgians to have access to quality outdoor recreation resources that meet their needs.
Key recommendations include: Create the Georgia Outdoor Recreation Partnership (GORP) to shepherd implementation of the Strategic Actions from SCORP. Enhance DNR's efforts to provide statewide recreation research, planning and technical assistance services. Explore alternative funding sources, ways to improve service delivery and means to maximize the benefits that outdoor recreation has on local communities. Pursue creation of a multi-jurisdictional Georgia Scenic Trails System as outlined in Ga. Code 12-3-113 and 114.
2 Education We must act now to share tools and resources to conserve recreation lands and provide high quality opportunities for all. By heightening the awareness of recreation's benefits for community health and livability, economic vitality and conservation of our natural resources, we will elevate the priority of outdoor recreation with policymakers, planners, practitioners, partners and the public.
Key recommendations include: Provide balanced interpretation, education and outdoor recreation programs to expand the knowledge and appreciation of Georgia's natural and recreational resources in a manner consistent with the conservation of the resource. Work with the Georgia Board of Regents to advance healthy lifestyles and natural resource conservation in Georgia schools.
3 Funding We must act now to use funds efficiently at all levels of government, leverage with other private and non-profit investments and seek consistent funding to guarantee outdoor recreation for current and future generations.
Key recommendations include: Work with the Governor's Office of Planning and Budget and state legislative leaders to maximize existing funds and develop new funding resources that support state and local recreation land acquisition, conservation, development, rehabilitation and maintenance projects. Create and sustain partnerships to minimize reliance on tax revenues to support the operation and maintenance of public parks and outdoor recreation areas. Advocate for the continuation of state and local funding assistance through the Land and Water Conservation Fund program and other federal programs that support outdoor recreation opportunities in Georgia.

Page 13

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

ExECuTivE OvERviEw

Key criteria for recreation funding:

1Comprehensive recreation plan

2Identified
conservation priorities

3Improves the
health, livability & economic vitality of their community

4Leverages funding opportunities

5Economically challenged

Implications for LWCF
Beginning in 2008, LWCF application criteria will directly correlate with the SCORP 20082013 strategic recommendations. Key criteria for LWCF disbursements will favor jurisdictions that:
Have developed a thoughtful recreation plan; Demonstrate awareness of the outdoor recreation and natural re-
source conservation priorities in their communities; Show a direct relationship between proposed projects and their affect
on health, fitness and livability, economic vitality and resource conservation; Create alternative approaches to funding and develop partnerships that leverage and supplement requested state and federal funds.
Alternatively, LWCF disbursements should also go to jurisdictions that demonstrate a need, but have little opportunity to invest in outdoor recreation due to their economic condition.

The challenges inherent in providing outdoor recreation opportunities for ALL Georgians are profound.
However, we can--and we will--successfully meet those challenges by leveraging the efforts and expertise of partners and by implementing the recommendations from SCORP 2008-2013.
Doing this will ensure that Georgia serves as a model for the nation in providing abundant outdoor recreation, high-quality service and strong resource protection.

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 14

SCORP

INTRODUCTION
Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013
To protect and preserve outdoor recreation resources for our continued use and enjoyment, we must be vigilant. Georgia's state and local governments and all allied partners concerned about the future of our environment must commit to a comprehensive strategic plan to establish and protect natural areas and opportunities for outdoor recreation.
The SCORP 20082013 is that plan. It documents the urgency of the situation and suggests creative ways for all Georgians to work together for our public parks and greenspace. Georgia has reached a point where government--at all levels-- needs to demonstrate leadership in conserving our natural spaces and providing outdoor recreation opportunities for our burgeoning population. Only through such committed leadership will we ultimately make outdoor recreation accessible for all our residents and visitors.

Page 15

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Urgency about:

Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plans (SCORPs) have provided guiding frameworks for Georgia planners, service providers and policy makers since the mid-1960s. What is different about the 2008-2013 SCORP is the heightened sense of urgency that Georgians feel about the many issues facing our state:
The need for economic growth in our local communities
The obesity epidemic and declining health
Significant demographic transitions
Diminished conservation ethic
Rapid urbanization and loss of greenspace
Growing support for outdoor recreation

Legal Mandate to Plan
Georgia law mandates the development of a state policy on outdoor recreation (GA Code 12-3-1). The Department of Natural Resources (DNR), as the responsible agency, must:
Appraise recreation needs and disseminate recreation-related information.
Assist local governments with recreation planning. Aid recreation professionals by providing programs for education,
recruitment, placement and retention. Promote conferences and institutes within both the public and
private sectors. Define and promote recreation standards. Report achievements and recommendations to the governor and
general assembly.

Federal Funding for Outdoor Recreation
Federal funds for recreation are made available through the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF). States are eligible for these funds upon approval of a Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan or SCORP. In Georgia, the agency responsible for SCORP is DNR's Parks, Recreation and Historic Sites Division (PRHSD). The division uses LWCF funds to help state and local governments acquire, develop and rehabilitate recreation facilities and resources.

40 years $150 million invested 95% benefited

LWCF grants provide critically needed funds for recreation projects. In the last 40 years, Georgia has received more than $75 million from the LWCF program, but that is only part of the story. More importantly, those grants have leveraged an additional $75 million from local governments through matching funds (for a total of $150 million). Nearly 95% of all counties have benefited from LWCF funding since 1965.

The LWCF requires that SCORP plans be updated every five years, something Georgia has been doing since the mid-1960s. This plan provides guidance for the 20082013 funding cycle, replacing the existing plan that expires in September 2007.

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 1

iNTROduCTiON

INTROdUCTION

GA SCORP

State Funding for Outdoor Recreation
DNR and local governments have benefited from funding for acquisition of greenspace and natural resources through RiverCare 2000, Preservation 2000 and most recently the Georgia Land Conservation Partnership (GLCP).
During the years 19781999, the State of Georgia provided financial assistance to local governments for recreational developments through the Recreation Assistance Fund totalling $11,166,000.
Georgia
STATE APPROPRIATIONS OVERVIEW*
Land Acquisition Initiatives ($300+ million over 17 years)
Preservation 2000 RiverCare 2000 Chattahoochee River Campaign Georgia Greenspace Initiative Georgia Land Conservation Program
Acquisition, Development & Rehabilitation Initiatives Specifically for Public Recreation ($11 million over 21 years)
Recreation Assistance Fund (1978-1999)
*Not including single purpose or discretionary project appropriations
However, unlike many states, Georgia has no consistent funding source that supports acquisition, development and rehabilitation of outdoor recreation areas.
Southeastern States Providing Consistent Funding Sources to their Parks and Recreation Agencies
Legend States with Consistent Funding Sources States without Consistent Funding Sources

States in light red (Georgia and South Carolina) have no consistent funding (other than sales tax from tourism). States in green have dedicated funding through any one or combina-
tion of the following sources: real estate transfer, tobacco, petroleum, investment interest, vehicle registration.
Figure 1. Southeastern States Providing Consistent Funding Sources to Their Parks and Recreation Agencies

Page 1

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Intro d u ct i on

Georgia is one of
14 states with no consistent source of funds for parks and
recreation agencies

Alaska Connecticut Georgia Hawaii Kentucky Louisiana Massachusetts

Missouri New Mexico Oklahoma Rhode Island South Carolina Vermont Virginia

Future Direction of Outdoor Recreation in Georgia
The strategic directions outlined in SCORP 20082013 build on science-based research as well as insights from allied planning efforts that provide a solid foundation for strategic action and a progressive vision.
Through new and innovative technology and the unprecedented collaboration among an array of organizations and individuals committed to quality outdoor recreation, this SCORP identifies:
Trends: Examines social, demographic and recreation trends for Georgia supplemented with data from the National Survey on Recreation and the Environment (NSRE).
Benefits: Identifies the benefits of outdoor recreation in the context of current economic, health, natural and social trends.
Inventory: Contains a comprehensive electronic inventory of local, state and federal governments and other public-access outdoor recreation resources applying Geographic Information System (GIS) technology to map important factors--such as existing recreation areas and notable natural habitats. This inventory serves as the baseline to benchmark the successful accomplishments of this and future SCORPs.
Assessment of need: Reflects a comprehensive assessment of recreation needs based on a survey of Georgians and supplementary qualitative information from town hall meetings, online questionnaires and focus groups.
Roles: Identifies current roles and responsibilities for state and local, public, quasi-public and private outdoor recreation service providers and examines the changes in those roles as Georgia experiences urbanization and demographic shifts.
Strategies: Proposes strategies and priorities for land acquisition, resource protection and conservation and recreation facility development and rehabilitation; and delineates options for implementation at a statewide, regional and local level.
Cohesive effort: Incorporates and advances the current recommendations and strategic plans of many partners (e.g., the Georgia Land Conservation Partnership Program, Coastal Management Plan and Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan).

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 18

INTROdUCTION

GA SCORP

CHAPTER

OUTLINE
for SCORP 2008-2013
1 Supply, Usage Patterns and Expressed Demand SCORP 2008-2013 begins with a snapshot of the current state of outdoor recreation in Georgia--defining supply, usage patterns and expressed demand.

CHAPTER

2 Trends Affecting Outdoor Recreation With this foundation, the report examines recent demographic and socio-economic Trends affecting outdoor recreation and the formidable challenges they pose.

CHAPTER

3 Priorities Three priorities emerge that command our attention: 1) promoting health/fitness and livability of all communities, 2) enhancing economic vitality, and 3) conserving and properly using natural resources.

CHAPTER

4 Strategic Actions An ambitious agenda of strategic actions is then outlined to guide policy makers and recreation providers as they develop programs and policies from 2008 to 2013.

CHAPTER

5 Implications for Land and Water Conservation Fund and Georgia Law Implications for LWCF and Georgia law are addressed.

Page 19

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

iNTROduCTiON

Definitions
Active or Passive Recreation: What's the difference?
Definitions vary by author and purpose. Often, resource agencies focus on the `extractive' element of recreation (hunting vs. walking). Others focus on the `facilities' element (ballfields vs. wildlife areas). Still others focus on the `team-sport' element (baseball vs. birdwatching).
For our purposes:
ACTIVE RECREATION
Active recreation is based on physiology and is defined as activities that result in a healthy increase in aerobic rate.
PASSIVE RECREATION
In contrast, passive recreation includes those activities that do not result in increased aerobic rates. Passive recreation provides important benefits for mental health and stress reduction.
The terms active and passive recreation describe activities, not sites or facilities.
HIGH-INFRASTRUCTURE ANd LOW-INFRASTRUCTURE SITES
To differentiate between facilities like ballfields and wildlife preserves, we use the terms "high-infrastructure" site and "low-infrastructure" site.
While it is commonly assumed that active recreation occurs at high-infrastructure sites (soccer on soccer fields) and that passive recreation occurs at low-infrastructure sites (birdwatching at a wildlife preserve), it is certainly possible to conduct both types of recreation at either type of site. For example, stargazing from a baseball field at night is an example of passive recreation conducted at a high-infrastructure site; whereas mountain-biking is active recreation conducted at a low-infrastructure site.

Important Things to Know
SCORP 2008--2013 Survey Regions
For the SCORP 20082013 random sample public survey, Georgians age 18 and over with residential telephone landlines were randomly sampled from each of four regions (figure 2). Town hall meetings were also conducted within each region to provide perspectives on regional variations.

DADE

CATOOSA

WALKER

WHITFIELD

MURRAY

CHATTOOGA

GORDON

FLOYD

BARTOW

FANNIN

UNION

TOWNS

RABUN

GILMER PICKENS CHEROKEE

LUMPKIN

WHITE HABERSHAM STEPHENS

DAWSON FORSYTH

HALL

FRANKLIN BANKS

JACKSON

MADISON

HART ELBERT

POLK

PAULDING

COBB

GWINNETT

BARROW

HARALSON CARROLL

DOUGLAS

FULTON

DE KALB

CLAYTON

WALTON
ROCKDALE
NEWTON

CLARKE OCONEE
MORGAN

OGLETHORPE

WILKES

GREENE TALIAFERRO

LINCOLN COLUMBIA

HEARD

COWETA

FAYETTE

HENRY

SPALDING

BUTTS

JASPER

PUTNAM

HANCOCK

WARREN MCDUFFIE GLASCOCK

RICHMOND

TROUP

MERIWETHER

PIKE

LAMAR

MONROE

UPSON

JONES

BALDWIN

WASHINGTON

JEFFERSON

BURKE

HARRIS

TALBOT

CRAWFORD

BIBB

WILKINSON

TWIGGS

JOHNSON

JENKINS

SCREVEN

MUSCOGEE

TAYLOR

PEACH HOUSTON

BLECKLEY

LAURENS

EMANUEL

CHATTAHOOCHEE MARION

MACON

SCHLEY

STEWART

WEBSTER

SUMTER

QUITMAN TERRELL LEE
RANDOLPH
CLAY

DOOLY CRISP

PULASKI WILCOX

TURNER

DODGE

TREUTLEN

MONTGOMERY

WHEELER

TOOMBS

CANDLER

BULLOCH

EFFINGHAM

EVANS TATTNALL

BRYAN

CHATHAM

TELFAIR BEN HILL

JEFF DAVIS

APPLING

LONG

LIBERTY

CALHOUN

DOUGHERTY

WORTH

IRWIN TIFT

COFFEE

BACON

WAYNE

MCINTOSH

EARLY MILLER

BAKER

MITCHELL

COLQUITT

BERRIEN COOK

ATKINSON

PIERCE

WARE

BRANTLEY

GLYNN

SEMINOLE

DECATUR

GRADY

THOMAS

BROOKS

LANIER LOWNDES

CLINCH

CHARLETON

CAMDEN

ECHOLS

Figure 2. SCORP 20082013 Survey Regions

SCORP Survey Regions

North

Metro Atlanta

Southwest

Southeast

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 0

CHAPTER

1

CHAPTER

1 Supply, Usage Patterns and Expressed Demand
To learn about the supply, usage patterns and demands for outdoor recreation in Georgia, a comprehensive inventory was developed of existing public outdoor recreation opportunities and extensive public input was elicited through town hall meetings, focus groups, an online questionnaire and a statewide survey divided by metro Atlanta, north Georgia, southwest Georgia and southeast Georgia (see Figure 2).

Page 21

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

C h a p t e r 1 : S u P P LY, u S A G E PAT T E R N S A N d E x P R E S S E d d E M A N d

A. Supply: Recreation Service Providers

Georgia is fortunate to have a variety of recreation service providers--local, state and federal governments, as well as private and quasi-public organizations.

Local recreation providers are the park and recreation departments of both city and county governments. Historically, their focus has been on establishing high-infrastructure sites such as athletic fields, outdoor courts, playgrounds, playfields and comfort stations. During the past ten years, their focus has been expanded to include low-infrastructure sites--greenspace and watershed protection--for activities such as hiking and bird watching.

According to an intensive inventory conducted by the University of Georgia, there are 2,340 sites managed by local service providers totaling 63,103 acres. The majority of those sites (1,405) are high-infrastructure sites, like ballfields; the remaining 935 are low-infrastructure sites. Of these 935 sites, state greenspace programs helped locals protect 310 sites totaling 9,692 acres.

When you consider that the total area of the

state is roughly 17.2 million acres, the per-

centage of the land owned or managed by

local recreation service providers is about

Figure 3. Number of Local Recreational Facilities in Each Georgia County

one third of one percent (0.36%). Consider also that Georgia's population of roughly

nine million relies on a tiny number (1,405)

of high-infrastructure facilities for much of their day-to-day needs for active

outdoor recreation needs. Statistically, that places a burden on parks to satisfy

an average of 6,500 people per facility. Imagine having any one of these facili-

ties with an attendance of 6,500 people per day--some sites would barely have

enough room for attendees to stand shoulder-to-shoulder, let alone recreate.

State of Georgia recreation providers offer a blend of both low- and high-infrastructure sites--from natural areas to golf courses, with most sites being large-acreage tracts. Despite this balanced approach, the state has long placed a premium on establishing low-infrastructure sites designed to conserve natural resources and greenspace. This approach underscores the importance of SCORP to provide for high-infrastructure sites where active recreation most frequently occurs.

The principle providers at the state level are the DNR Parks, Recreation and Historic Sites Division (PRHSD) and the Wildlife Resources Division (WRD).

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page

CHAPTER

1

While PRHSD's mission encompasses resource protection, its central focus is on the "people" element of parks. It manages 48 parks, 15 historic sites and other undeveloped properties totaling 83,344 acres. By contrast, the WRD focuses primarily on "resource-oriented recreation" like hunting and fishing. WRD has management responsibility for 89 Wildlife Management Areas, 10 Public Fishing Areas, and 17 Natural Areas totaling 1,087,704 acres. Of this total, the state owns, in fee simple, only about a third (321,520 acres). About a third (203,184 acres) are under annual short-term leases and the re-
maining third (563,000 acres) are protected via long-term lease agreements or memoranda of understanding.
Other state-level providers include the Georgia Forestry Commission and state authorities such as those at Stone Mountain and Jekyll Island.
State lands accommodate a host of outdoor recreation activities including hiking, camping, picnicking, hunting, fishing, boating, nature study, horse-back riding, golf, swimming and caving.

Georgia DNR Responsibilities
Relative to Outdoor Recreation
To provide policy and programs to assist and guide natural resource protection and use.

Figure 4. Parks and Wildlife Management Areas of the GA DNR and Select Federal Agencies (USFS, USFWS, USACE, NRCS)

Examples related to recreation include:
the creation of a recreation policy (Ga. Code 12-3-1), a Georgia Scenic Trails System (Ga. Code 12-3-113/114) a Georgia Youth Conservation Corps (Ga. Code 12-11-1).

Federal recreation providers offer primarily low-infrastructure sites with largeacreage tracts, supporting such recreation opportunities as hiking, camping, fishing, hunting, nature study, canoeing, boating, swimming, picnicking, biking and horseback riding. These types of activities are encouraged unless they are incompatible with the resource objectives. Some key federal providers are: the National Park Service (55,629 acres), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (482,703 acres), the U.S. Forest Service (863,167 acres), the Tennessee Valley Authority, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Corps owns and manages 524,740 acres of land and water, plus 4,724 miles of shoreline on Corps lakes. Additionally, over 784,000 acres of protected natural areas are contained within Georgia's military bases.

In addition, several conservation organizations are actively involved in acquiring and protecting greenspace and land possessing unique natural resources. The activities of the Trust for Public Land, The Conservation Fund, The Nature Conservancy, land trusts, and similar organizations have gained prominence in recent years in assisting state and local communities in the preservation of natural areas and the provision of outdoor recreation opportunities. These efforts have been further extended by the significant support of Georgia's philanthropic community. An example of total collaboration with all of these

Page 3

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

C h a p t e r 1 : S U P P LY, U S A G E PAT T E R N S A N D E X P R E S S E D D E M A N D

agencies, state and local governments is the multi-million dollar acquisition program for lands along the Chattahoochee River.
Quasi-public recreation providers include a wide diversity of partners and services. A few examples:
The Georgia Power Company has developed 57,084 acres of lakes, 1,350 miles of coastline and dozens of areas that offer fishing, boating, swimming, hiking, camping and picnicking.
Charitable social organizations--like YMCA/YWCAs, Boys and Girls Clubs, Boy and Girl Scouts, and churches--provide outdoor recreation facilities for public use, some for a user-fee. Facilities typically consist of high-infrastructure sites (e.g., athletic fields for softball, baseball, and soccer programs). Churches in urban areas, particularly the large "mega" churches, are increasingly providing high-infrastructure facilities for their congregations and in many cases for the surrounding community.
One significant example of a non-profit partner in the provision of outdoor recreation opportunities is the PATH Foundation. Working with the state and several local governments, PATH has constructed more than 100 miles of hiking, biking, walking trails with endowments for perpetual maintenance.
Private recreation providers include dozens of for-profit entities that support a wide range of services and facilities for outdoor recreation: golf courses, tennis facilities, swimming pools, campgrounds, hunting preserves, outdooroutfitters, guide services, shuttle services, and others. While SCORP assesses and guides provision of public recreation opportunities, it is important that governmental entities consider the financial and geographic accessibility to private service providers when expressed public need overlaps with privateprovision opportunities such as those listed above.
B. Usage Patterns: Participation in Outdoor Recreation
SCORP survey: questions and answers revealed
The SCORP survey was the first time that valuable information was collected from across the state to characterize the status of, and needs for, recreational sites and facilities. Through this survey, we found that Georgians take advantage of outdoor recreation resources frequently--and do so for a variety of reasons.
Top Five Reasons Georgians Participate in Outdoor Recreation
1. To have fun 2. To be with family and friends 3. To relax or reduce stress 4. To exercise and improve health 5. To experience or enjoy nature

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 24

CHAPTER

1

Participation and use

Most Georgians (68%) participated in outdoor recreation activities somewhere in the state during the past twelve months. And nearly three of every four Georgians visited a public outdoor recreation area in that same period but did not necessarily participate in an activity. Participation varies by place of residence, level of education, age, ethnicity, income, family status and gender.

Participating in last 12 months
Highest participation
Lowest participation

68%
Metro Atlanta
Southeast Georgia Region

Participation by . . .
. . . Education . . . Age
. . . Ethnicity . . . Income . . . Family status . . . Gender . . . Urban status
Visiting more than once a month

More Likely
Highly educated
Under 55 Middle-aged

Less Likely
Less educated
Over 55 young adults, seniors

Whites, Hispanics Higher income With children Females
Urban populations

African Americans Lower income
Without children Males
Rural populations

41%

Nearly half (41%) of Georgians who visited a public outdoor recreation area in the past 12 months did so at least a few times a month. The survey asked about participation and the frequency of participation. Statistics on frequency followed the same patterns shown above, with two exceptions: non-whites visit public recreation sites more frequently than whites; and African Americans who visited recreation sites did so more frequently than any other ethnic group. In short, while some demographic groups may have relatively low levels of participation, members of those groups who participated did so more frequently than anyone else.

Page

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Barriers to participation
The Most Important Barriers Are . . .

For
Three-fourths
of all Georgians

For
Rural
residents

Not having enough time Not having enough money

For
Urban dwellers
Not feeling safe

C h a p t e r 1 : S U P P LY, U S A G E PAT T E R N S A N D E X P R E S S E D D E M A N D

For Whites
(more than Non-whites)

For Non-whites
(more than whites)

The Most Important Barriers Are . . .

Not having enough time

Not having activities or programs of interest

Crowded recreation areas

Not feeling safe

Not having adequate transportation

For those who did
participate in outdoor recreation activities in past year

For those who did not
participate in any outdoor recreation activities in past year

The Most Important Barriers Are . . .

Not having enough time
Not having enough information
Facilities in poor condition or needing maintenance

Personal health issue or disability
Not having enough money
Not having adequate transportation

Significant issues facing outdoor recreation
Georgians feel that limited funding is the most significant statewide issue facing outdoor recreation, followed by a lack of information. Those living in metro Atlanta are also concerned about safety.

All Georgians
88% support public
funding sources
Of the 88%, 74% support additional
public funding

Support for funding
Georgians support both public funding and additional public funding (special purpose local option sales taxes, user fees, etc.) of outdoor recreation by large margins.
88% of all Georgians support public funding sources. Of the 88%, 74% support additional public funding. In addition:
Educated Georgians were more likely to support public funding. The Metro Atlanta region expressed the highest support for additional
funding. The Southeast region expressed the lowest support for additional
funding.

The findings of this survey provide recreation planners and policy-makers with valuable data on areas of need. However, the survey does not provide the level of detail needed to answer specific questions like: Which pieces of land should we protect? What types of outdoor recreation facilities should we build? What might the costs be?

Acquiring detailed information to answer such specific questions will require a more intensive focus on local service areas, needs and opportunities. This is a task being delegated to the Georgia Outdoor Recreation Partnership or simply, GORP. GORP will be a DNR-initiated partnership of professionals and stakeholders charged with implementing the vision for SCORP 20082013 (see Chapter IV).

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

P a g e 26

CHAPTER

1C.

Expressed Demand: The Public Speaks
Data collection and survey results
The PRHSD conducted seven town hall meetings across the state to give Georgians an opportunity to speak directly to state officials about the importance of outdoor recreation. The selected meeting sites--Atlanta, Brunswick, Camilla, Columbus, Milledgeville, Rome and Tallulah Falls--were within an hour's drive of most Georgians.

In addition, feedback was solicited from six focus groups of Georgians who have particular expertise or experience with outdoor recreation. The six focus groups were:
1) African Americans 2) High school age students 3) Elementary school age students 4) Recreation professionals with the Georgia Recreation and Park
Association (GRPA) 5) Managers of large public land tracts 6) SCORP Advisory Committee

Georgians also had the opportunity to provide input through online comments at the official SCORP website, http://gastateparks.org, and at multiple public presentations across the state to a variety of interest groups.

Three questions were posed to participants of town hall meetings and focus groups:
1) Why is outdoor recreation important to you and your family? 2) What should be done to improve outdoor recreation in your area? 3) What obstacles will keep improvements from being made?

For the elementary school student focus group, the questions posed were similar, but more straightforward and direct:
1) What do you like to do outside? 2) What do you do at parks? 3) What do you want that you don't have?

Appendix B conveys the most common responses heard from all of these groups except the elementary school students. Additional comments worth noting follow.

P a g e 27

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

C h a p t e r 1 : S U P P LY, U S A G E PAT T E R N S A N D E X P R E S S E D D E M A N D

Focus group perspectives
African Americans Outreach and marketing specific to the African American population should be expanded using familiar faces, traditions and institutions. This approach can also be applied to the needs of other ethnic and cultural groups in our state. Improve the number, variety and diversity of activities available.
Elementary School Students Their favorite activities outdoors and in parks are swimming, bike riding and team sports such as soccer, kickball, basketball and baseball. And they wanted more:
Parks closer to their homes Safe places for riding bikes, not the street Places for individual activities such as skateboarding, playing on play-
grounds or playscapes and jumping rope.
GRPA Professionals This SCORP must be compelling and lead to action. Outdoor education should be integrated into our school systems. DNR must assume a leadership role, particularly in facilitating collaborations. Work with Georgia Public Broadcasting to "get the word out" about the benefits, values and opportunities of outdoor recreation.
SCORP Advisory Committee We need to study efforts of other states to learn from their successes and challenges. We need to conduct in-depth research on the benefits of outdoor recreation in Georgia, specifically the economic, health and environmental benefits.
Online Respondents Georgia needs to:
Increase use of volunteers and advocacy Increase opportunities and activities for beginners and toddlers Limit commercialization and development on public lands Distribute financial burden fairly, e.g., hunter and anglers pay for WMAs
through fees but hikers and campers that use the same areas don't pay fees Increase public land available for hunting, particularly for waterfowl.

Through this extensive data gathering effort, we understand better which outdoor recreation opportunities are available, how Georgians use them and what improvements they would like to see. Planning for the coming decade requires that we also project into the future and take into account anticipated trends that may impact supply, use and demand for outdoor recreation. Such an exploration is presented in Chapter 2.

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

P a g e 28

CHAPTER

2

CHAPTER

2 TRENDS AFFECTING OUTDOOR RECREATION
To truly plan for 20082013, we must do more than assess the current state of outdoor recreation and must consider the significant trends likely to impact the future. Conducting a trends analysis from our survey and inventory work was a critical component of defining priorities and strategic directions.
Major Trends Impacting Outdoor Recreation in Georgia A) Socio-demographic shifts B) Increasing urbanization and regional variations in perspectives and needs C) Growing appreciation for the benefits of outdoor recreation

Page 29

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Chapter 2: TRENDS AFFECTING OUTDOOR RECREATION

A. Socio-Demographic Shifts

Cultural and ethnic diversity

From 1920 until 1970, Georgia's residents were primarily Caucasian and

African American. In recent years, however, the largest growth has occurred

in the Hispanic American population. In fact,

the Hispanic population is growing faster in

Georgia is home to an increasingly diverse population in terms

the south than anywhere else in the nation-- and is expected to account for almost ten percent of the state's population by 2015.2

of culture, ethnicity, income and age.

Although the Hispanic population may be growing the fastest, African Americans still

comprise our largest minority group. By 2015

Georgia's population will have the largest

proportion of African Americans when compared to the other top ten most-

populous states.2

Migration currently accounts for more than half of Georgia's annual population growth with 40% of those migrants being foreign nationals.2

Income
Georgians' incomes have been increasing over the past decade.3 However, poverty continues to be a persistent problem, with an estimated 12.5% of our residents living below the poverty level.3 Although poverty has declined in north Georgia, rates of 15-20% still dominate the southwest corner and eastern central portion of the state.4
Household income and poverty rates vary widely across the state. In 2005, the median household income statewide was $45,926, including the Atlanta metropolitan region and the other metropolitan areas near Albany, Augusta, Brunswick, Columbus, Macon and Savannah. Only 35 counties of our 159 counties had median household incomes in excess of $40,000. Our poorest counties, with household incomes less than $30,000, are primarily located in southwestern and eastern Georgia.
Age diversity
Georgians are living longer and retirees are flocking here. As of the last U.S. Census, about 10% of Georgia's population was 65 years old or older. By 2015,
these seniors will comprise 13.6% of our state's population. In some counties, this percentage will be even higher: 20% in 35 counties and 25% in another six counties. The highest concentrations of older adults will live in the north Georgia mountains, in southwestern counties along the state line with Alabama and in several central counties.3
At the other end of the spectrum, the census estimated that 26% of Georgia's population is 18 years old or younger, and by 2015, 34% of Georgians will be under age 20.3

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 30

CHAPTER

2

Socio-demographic Shifts (cont.)
What these trends mean
Shifts in ethnicity and culture will result in changes in the recreation preferences of participants in terms of types of activities, frequency, location, etc. Equally critical is an understanding of the barriers or constraints to recreation participation, such as discomfort due to the perception of discrimination or possible language barriers.5

Also, as a result of income disparities, the ability to pay for outdoor recreation will vary considerably. All Georgians deserve to have access to recreation activities that best suit their needs and their pocketbooks. This begs the question, what is the role of government in ensuring recreational opportunities for "all" when "all" cannot afford to recreate?

Outdoor recreation opportunities must also accommodate a growing active senior population as well as an expanding youth population.

B. Increasing Urbanization and Regional Variations
Georgia's population is growing, with most of that growth occurring in our metropolitan areas--particularly in the urban `fringes'. Urbanization has reduced the amount of land available for outdoor recreation in the same areas where it is needed most--and the remaining available land is rapidly increasing in cost.

Projected Fastest Growing Counties in Georgia
from
2000-2015
(in order of anticipated growth)

Forsyth Henry Newton Paulding Cherokee Lee

Pickens Butts Dawson Barrow Walton Gwinnett

Currently, Georgia is the ninth most populous state with a growth rate expected to be nearly twice that of the nation.6 If current trends continue, our population will be nearly 11 million by 2015 and 14.4 million by 2030.7
Between 2000 and 2015, twelve Georgia counties will experience significant growth in population by more than 75%--and another 36 counties will grow by more than 34%.7 Four counties--Forsyth, Henry, Newton, and Paulding-- are expected to see increases of more than 100%.7 All of the fastest growing counties are in or adjacent to metropolitan Atlanta, with the exception of Pickens and Dawson Counties in north Georgia and Lee County in the southwest region.
In contrast, 23 counties are expected to lose population from 2000 to 2015.7 Eight of these counties--Calhoun, Liberty, Quitman, Randolph, Stewart, Taliaferro, Warren, and Webster--are projected to lose more than 10% of their residents.7

Page 31

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

2000

2030

Chapter 2: TRENdS AFFECTiNG OuTdOOR RECREATiON

Figure 5. Georgia Housing Density Increase 2000-2030. SILVIS Lab, University of Wisconsin-Madison, U.S. Forest Service Northern Research Station
Where we live: Mostly urban
Almost 75% of Georgia's current population of nine million is concentrated in metropolitan areas. 7 It is in those same metropolitan areas that growth rates are expected to be the highest.
By contrast, about 62% of our counties (100 of 159) have populations less than 35,000. 7 One way to "visualize" the disparity between urban and rural counties is to consider that Turner Field in Atlanta has seating capacity for 50,000 spectators. An entire county's population could attend a ballgame and the stadium would still be half empty. This disparity between rural and metro Georgia
creates significant challenges for outdoor recreation service providers.
Regional variations
Economic well-being Regional variations can be anticipated in household income and poverty rates. If an imaginary line were drawn across the state, east to west through Macon, all of the counties south of this line--except Bryan, Camden, Effingham and Lee Counties-- would have median household incomes less than $40,000. And a majority of these southern counties have household incomes lower than $30,000.

Figure 6. Prevalence of Obese Adults by Health District (2000-2005 data) and Distribution of Local Parks and Recreation Areas

Public health The prevalence of obesity and other chronic diseases such as diabetes, arthritis, and high blood pressure vary throughout the state. Counties with the highest prevalence of obesity and other chronic diseases are in the southern regions, while the lowest prevalence is in metro Atlanta.8 Residents of eastern and southern Georgia, in the traditional agricultural areas,

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 3

CHAPTER

2

have the highest rates of death by heart attack and stroke in the state.9 At the same time, the distribution of high-infrastructure sites for active recreation is most scarce in these same areas.
It is important to note that while park lands play an important role in combating obesity through physical activity, the epidemic we are experiencing today is the result of several complex factors that are not necessarily related to the provision of outdoor recreation opportunities, including social and cultural values, traditional cuisines of the area and many other factors.
Funding recreation Residents in metro Atlanta expressed the highest support for additional funding, while those in the southeast were the least supportive. Many metropolitan counties have the population and tax base to support public referenda specifically for the purpose of acquiring natural areas and park land and building recreational facilities (e.g., Paulding, Cobb, Gwinnett and DeKalb). However, other counties--due to their small size or population base--are limited in their ability to support bond sales or special purpose local option sales tax alternatives.
Participation in outdoor recreation Residents of metro Atlanta and north Georgia claimed the highest rates of participation (roughly 73% and 72%, respectively). Residents of the southwest and southeast were ten percentage points lower (roughly 62% and 64%, respectively).
Access to public transportation While public transportation systems do not usually make `stops' at recreation areas, they often provide incidental access to adjacent recreation sites. Because urban areas typically have extensive transportation systems, access by public transportation is a more likely choice for urban residents than it is for rural residents.
Preferences in recreation Residents of metro Atlanta and north Georgia are more likely to engage in a wider diversity of activities than are residents of the southeast and southwest. It is likely that rural communities have greater access to more unstructured forms of outdoor recreation because of their access to large expanses of countryside and undeveloped land.
Urban vs. Rural: What To Do?
With the limited funds available, should service providers focus their efforts on the metro areas or rural areas? The easy answer is that funds should be made available to both, but defining (and justifying) the proportion that each area should get becomes complicated very quickly.
Table 1 illustrates the dilemma.

Page 33

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Chapter 2: TRENDS AFFECTING OUTDOOR RECREATION

Appropriating Funds for. . .

Urban Areas

Rural Areas

PROS. . .

1. Highest visitation rates 2. Highest support for public
and alternative funding 3. Public transportation to
facilities more frequently available 4. Establishment and durability of "Friends" groups and access to volunteers is probably high 5. Diverse populations are served 6. Funds are applied to the fastest-growing areas 7. High access to (and benefit from) the abundance and diversity of experts in the local community

1. Very few recreation facilities in the areas, some in poor condition
2. Little capacity to provide for themselves
3. More facilities would address the obesity epidemic in rural Georgia
4. The sites that do exist likely bring in more tourist dollars than do smaller urban parks
5. Acquisition dollars buy much more land
6. Under-served groups are better served

CONS. . .

1. Range of certain activities limited
2. Acquisition dollars don't go very far
3. Already have the highest concentration of recreation sites and facilities
4. Many sites serve the local population and don't necessarily draw touristdollars

1. Fewer people served 2.Diversity of participants
may be comparatively lower 3. Service providers may
need continual support to properly manage areas 4. Establishing durable "Friends" groups may be more difficult 5. Fewer people in the community have expertise from which to draw

Table 1. Pros and Cons of Appropriating Funds for Urban vs. Rural Areas

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 34

CHAPTER

2

Increasing Urbanization and Regional Variations (cont.)
What these trends mean
Georgia's population will reach nearly 11 million by 2015--only two years after this SCORP expires. Increased urbanization will continue to take a tremendous toll on our physical environment: the loss of natural and recreation resources; compromised air and water quality; and disappearance of greenspace and natural areas due to development.

The demand for outdoor recreation will soon out-pace the supply of land and available recreation resources as well as the ability of recreation providers, including local and state government, to afford to meet this need.

Unless we act now, the development demands of increasing urbanization will outweigh the opportunities to conserve and increase greenspace and outdoor recreation resources. As a result, land for parks and greenspace will not be protected and many current and future Georgians may never see a forest, paddle in a stream, marvel at our abundant wildlife or have the chance to play ball.

No "one size fits all" solution will suit Georgia. We must anticipate regional variations and adjust the state's outdoor recreation resources to meet the needs of all our residents.

C. Growing Appreciation for the Benefits of Outdoor Recreation

Public health, economic vitality and community livability are all strongly and positively affected by the presence of lands providing for recreation and resource protection.
Public health
The physical activity associated with many outdoor recreation activities has powerful benefits for our overall physical and mental health.10
Trees and greenspace also help to clean the air, reducing respiratory diseases such as asthma, particularly in children and the elderly.11,12 Access to nature has also been proven to have significant positive impacts on mental health, and can even lessen the symptoms of attention deficit disorder in children.12

Page 3

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Chapter 2: TRENdS AFFECTiNG OuTdOOR RECREATiON

Reduces the risk of dying from coronary
heart disease
Reduces the risk for stroke, colon cancer,
diabetes and high blood pressure

Helps to promote healthy bones,
muscles and joints

Reduces symptoms of anxiety and depression

Benefi ts of Regular Physical
Activity

Reduces risk for falls among
older adults

Helps to control
weight

Helps to relieve the pain of arthritis

The Georgia Department of Human Resources Division of Public Health (DHR) recently issued Georgia's Nutrition and Physical Activity Plan, outlining strategies to prevent and control obesity and other chronic diseases through increased physical activity.13 This SCORP intends to further the objectives of that plan.

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 3

CHAPTER

2

Economic vitality and livable communities
It can be demonstrated that local economies are stimulated by, and new business attracted to, areas where conservation and recreation have been promoted.
Tourism In 2005, Georgia hosted 62.4 million tourists, who spent an estimated $16.6 billion. Traveling for leisure was the primary purpose for the vast majority (74%) of tourists. State parks draw more than 10 million visitors annually--contributing significantly to that $16.6 billion.14 Anglers alone spend more than $859 million each year with an estimated $1.5 billion in economic impact.15 The best news is that tourism is growing! In a single year, visitation grew by 9%.
Appreciation of home values In addition, recreation opportunities of all types have been shown to increase the value of adjoining and surrounding properties. For example, after Centennial Olympic Park in Atlanta was built, the average price of adjacent condominiums increased from $115 to $250 per square foot.16
Attracting business Outdoor recreation also tends to attract business and industry. One dollar spent on recreation yields multiple dollars to the local economy. And, the more physically active those workers are in their free time, the more productive they are on the job (with lower rates of absenteeism and fewer incidences of job-related accidents).17
Reducing costs of health care and transportation Assuring adequate distribution of greenspaces, both large and small, provides recreation opportunities for a health conscious society--particularly in light of the recent increase in obesity and the need for expanded physical activity opportunities. Greenspace also helps build communities by lessening our reliance on automobiles and connecting schools, libraries, shopping centers and work sites.
Land conservation efforts The growing need for land and wildlife habitat conservation prompted Governor Perdue to mandate the development of Georgia's first comprehensive land conservation plan. One of the plan's eight key goals was to "Promote creation of land conservation partnerships among the state, private sector, local governments and other public institutions." DNR plans to work toward this goal through GORP and other partnerships and collaborations.
Wildlife and greenspace are vital to the livability of our communities. Increasing the density of greenspace supports successful animal migration and continued survival of wildlife populations, while the loss of such habitats puts animals in ever-closer proximity to humans. Preserving a significant portion of every watershed in a near-natural condition also protects the quality and supply of our water sources.

Page 37

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Growing Appreciation for the Benefits of Outdoor Recreation (cont.)
What these trends mean
Increasing participation and access to outdoor recreation resources plays a significant role in keeping Georgians healthy. Close collaboration and partnership with DHR is vital to support physical activity in parks and natural areas throughout the state.
Georgia and its communities can also reap significant economic benefits from outdoor recreation resources in terms of tourism, enhanced property values and attracting new business and industry. It is important for all jurisdictions to collaborate and partner with their chambers of commerce, economic development agencies and other interested organizations to advance the provision of outdoor recreation amenities.
We must protect and maintain our valuable store of wildlife and greenspace to assure clean air, clean water, wildlife habitats, diverse plant and animal populations and the outdoor recreation opportunities that they inspire. Close collaboration and partnership with the Georgia Land Conservation Plan is vital.

Chapter 2: TRENdS AFFECTiNG OuTdOOR RECREATiON

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 3

CHAPTER

3

CHAPTER

3 PRIORITIES

The urgency triggered by current and anticipated trends compels outdoor recreation providers to secure a future where Georgians live healthier lifestyles, the economic well being of communities is sustained, and wildlife and natural resources are conserved.

The strategic directions and priorities of this plan focus on the critical role of outdoor recreation in shaping the Georgia yet to come.
Georgia's Priorities for 20082013 A) Promote health through fitness and livable communities B) Enhance economic vitality C) Conserve and properly use natural resources

To make the case for these strategic priorities, we posed several pertinent questions: Why pursue this direction? What challenges lie ahead? Why must Georgia act now?

Page 39

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Chapter 3: PRiORiTiES
ULARLy ACTIVE INSUFF

A. Promote Health Through Fitness and Livable Communities

Why pursue this direction?
The prevalence of obese adults in Georgia has tripled during the last two decades; we currently have the 15th highest prevalence of obese adults in the United States. In 2005, 1.5 million adult Georgians were obese.8

Childhood obesity is a problem as well. In 2005, 24% of our third grade students,18 16% of middle school students, and 12% of high school students19 were obese. Obese children and adults are at increased risk for chronic conditions such as high blood pressure, Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The cost of obesity in Georgia, including health care costs and lost productivity, is $2.1 billion a year.20 Costs will only continue to rise as rates of obesity increase in our population.

Fortunately, the adverse health consequences of obesity and its associated costs to health care can be prevented by balancing energy intake (nutrition) and energy expenditure (physical activity). In addition to weight control, research consistently demonstrates that regular physical activity has a broad range of physical and mental health benefits to the population.10 Despite these benefits, less than half of Georgia adults (42%) and only one-third of Georgia high school students (36%) are regularly active.8, 19 In addition, nearly half of Georgia middle school (49%) and high school students (42%) spend excessive amounts of time watching television instead of getting exercise outdoors.19

INACTIVE
17%

REG
42%

41%
ICIENTLy ACTIVE
Our target market
Figure 7. Physical Activity Levels Among Adults in Georgia, 2005

Source: Georgia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

The most promising approach to reverse the obesity epidemic is to incorporate healthy eating and physical activity into people's daily routines. While individuals must ultimately make the commitment to adopt a healthy lifestyle, characteristics of the physical and social environment play an important role in promoting physical activity. A Georgia survey found that neighborhood sidewalks and streets, public parks, school running tracks, fitness centers, shopping centers, and walking trails are the most common places for adults to walk.21 Those who have access to such places are more likely to be physically active than those who do not. Given that 41% of adults are insufficiently active (Figure 7), recreation facilities in the community are an opportune setting to help more people become regularly active. The benefits of designing communities with a variety of safe walking places go beyond physical activity and obesity; walkable communities are also thought to increase social interactions between residents and improve air quality.22, 23

One priority of this SCORP plan has been to identify the inactive and insufficiently active segments of Georgia's population--those who are the least invested in outdoor recreational activities. This segment comprises just over 40% of Georgia's population, and is over represented by women, minorities, people aged 65 years and over, people with low income or low education and

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 40

CHAPTER

3

non-metro residents. This target audience generally prefers low-intensity, low-commitment recreational activities such as walking for pleasure, family gatherings, gardening, driving for pleasure and picnicking. Although many suitable recreational opportunities may already be offered for this target audience, more specific strategies are needed to reach them in a meaningful and engaging manner.

Challenges to Promoting Outdoor Recreation
Lack of time or money
Lack of transportation
Personal limitations
Poor site conditions
Changing demographics

What challenges lie ahead?
Lack of time In the SCORP survey, three-fourths of Georgians feel "not having enough time" is the single most important barrier to their participation in outdoor recreation. Between work, children's activities, running a household and other commitments, we are all very busy. Locating parks and other recreation resources close to our homes and jobs is critical.
Cost 40% of residents statewide report that "not having enough money" was a barrier to their participation in outdoor recreation activities. In the southwestern and southeastern regions, which include the traditional agricultural areas of the state, almost half of the respondents identify lack of money as an obstacle. The NSRE also found low income to be a key inhibitor of participation.
Lack of transportation More than half of Georgians report that public transportation is not available to the areas they wish to visit. This is particularly a problem in rural areas, which have the highest rates of obesity and death from heart disease and stroke and, in many cases, have the lowest household incomes and highest rates of poverty.
Personal limitations Non-users of outdoor recreation resources are also more likely to cite a "personal health issue, disability or other physical limitation" as a barrier to their participation in outdoor recreation. Improving the health of this group is important and requires full accessibility. In addition, some Georgians, particularly in urban areas, are afraid to visit certain recreation areas. Although this may be more perception than reality, it should be addressed if it is inhibiting use of existing resources and facilities.
Poor conditions Many recreation areas are too crowded and over-used, in poor condition or not well maintained. This challenge was identified in both the SCORP survey and the NSRE as well as during the town hall meetings, online survey and focus groups. During the GRPA focus group, lack of money at the local level to properly operate, maintain and rehabilitate outdoor recreation facilities was a top concern. Many counties and towns are finding ways to acquire and develop facilities by using special purpose local option sales taxes (SPLOST), bonds and impact fees, but these funds cannot be used for maintenance and operations.

Page 41

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Changing demographics As we grow more ethnically diverse, culture and language differences can make use of facilities difficult for those who do not understand English or do not come from a tradition of outdoor recreation. The increase in the proportion of the population under age 20 and those over 65 will also present new challenges. Many youth today are bored without technology, so outdoor recreation providers will need to find ways to attract them. Geocaching, outdoor treasure hunts using handheld GPS (global positioning system), and similar "gadget" oriented activities should be considered.

Chapter 3: PRiORiTiES

Why must Georgia act now?
Collaboration opportunities It is a perfect time for DNR to promote healthier living through outdoor recreation. Our sister agency, the Department of Human Resources, recently launched a major initiative to combat obesity--with its primary platform to promote physical activity. A coordinated effort, joined by other partners, not only improves the chances for success, but also highlights the importance that outdoor recreation can play in combating some of the leading causes of death in Georgia.

Public support for funding The SCORP survey found that there was resounding support for pub-

EXAMPLES OF LOCAL FUNDING SUPPORT

lic funding of outdoor recreation facilities (88% of all respondents). Although poorer sections of the state

Cobb County, Georgia $40 Million (2006)
Park land acquisition

had somewhat lower levels of sup-

port (statistically-speaking), 64% of respondents from the southwest region were still in favor of additional funding--more than enough to win a referendum. However, Georgia is one of 14 states nationwide and one of two

Paulding County, Georgia $15 Million (2006)
collaboration with GA DNR to purchase 7,020-acre Paulding Forest Wildlife Management Area; total federal, state, local and foundation investment $45 million

states in the southeast region that does not have a consistent funding stream for parks and recreation.

City of Atlanta, Georgia $3 Million Increase (2006) and $2 Million Increase (2007)

park operations and maintenance

Increased appreciation for benefits

Acting now will also capitalize on the

fact that we are increasingly recognizing the linkage between outdoor rec-

reation and healthy living. In fact, when town hall meeting participants

were asked why outdoor recreation was important, the most frequently

cited reason was that it improved both mental and physical health. These

results are reinforced by the SCORP survey and the NSRE.

Demonstrated demand The SCORP survey found that 68% of respondents visited a public outdoor recreation area during the past year, and almost half of them (41%) did so a couple times a month. In 2005, 12 counties received federal funds through the Land and Water Conservation Fund. Five times as many counties actually applied for that funding, but did not receive awards because the money simply `ran-out.'

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 4

CHAPTER

3

DADE

CATOOSA

WALKER

WHITFIELD

MURRAY

CHATTOOGA

GORDON

FLOYD

BARTOW

FANNIN

UNION

TOWNS

RABUN

GILMER PICKENS CHEROKEE

LUMPKIN

WHITE HABERSHAM STEPHENS

DAWSON FORSYTH

HALL

FRANKLIN BANKS

JACKSON

MADISON

HART ELBERT

Legend
Acquisition Development Rehabilitation Not Funded

POLK

PAULDING

COBB

GWINNETT

BARROW

HARALSON CARROLL

DOUGLAS

FULTON

DE KALB

CLAYTON

WALTON
ROCKDALE
NEWTON

CLARKE OCONEE
MORGAN

OGLETHORPE

WILKES

GREENE TALIAFERRO

LINCOLN COLUMBIA

HEARD

COWETA

FAYETTE

HENRY

SPALDING

BUTTS

JASPER

PUTNAM

HANCOCK

WARREN MCDUFFIE GLASCOCK

RICHMOND

TROUP

MERIWETHER

PIKE

LAMAR

MONROE

JONES

BALDWIN

HARRIS

UPSON

TALBOT

CRAWFORD

BIBB

WILKINSON

TWIGGS

WASHINGTON

JEFFERSON

JOHNSON

BURKE

JENKINS

SCREVEN

MUSCOGEE

TAYLOR

PEACH HOUSTON

BLECKLEY

LAURENS

EMANUEL

CHATTAHOOCHEE MARION

MACON

SCHLEY

STEWART

WEBSTER

SUMTER

QUITMAN TERRELL LEE
RANDOLPH
CLAY

DOOLY CRISP

PULASKI WILCOX

TURNER

DODGE

TREUTLEN

MONTGOMERY

WHEELER

TOOMBS

CANDLER

BULLOCH

EFFINGHAM

EVANS TATTNALL

BRYAN

CHATHAM

TELFAIR BEN HILL

JEFF DAVIS

APPLING

LONG

LIBERTY

CALHOUN

DOUGHERTY

WORTH

IRWIN TIFT

COFFEE

BACON

WAYNE

MCINTOSH

EARLY MILLER

BAKER

MITCHELL

COLQUITT

BERRIEN COOK

ATKINSON

PIERCE

WARE

BRANTLEY

GLYNN

SEMINOLE

DECATUR

GRADY

THOMAS

BROOKS

LANIER LOWNDES

CLINCH

CHARLETON

CAMDEN

ECHOLS

Figure 8. 2005 LWCF Requests and Awards

We must act now to make tangible contributions toward healthy living by reinforcing the connection between health, quality of life and outdoor recreation. We must respond to the public's support for outdoor recreation and enact strategies for change. Together we must chart a course to:
Educate the public and officials at all levels, in both the public and private sectors, on the importance of outdoor recreation and the role it will play in helping Georgians live healthier.
Improve access to outdoor recreation resources and facilities including locations nearer to work and home; reduce the cost of participation; improve transportation to sites and accessibility to those with physical limitations.
Enhance security in outdoor recreation areas where needed and reduce perceptions that participating in outdoor recreation activities is unsafe.
Create an inviting atmosphere to all who want to visit regardless of their ethnicity.
Explore ways to help providers in the public and private sectors with funding for maintenance and operations of existing and future outdoor recreation areas.
Explore ways of meeting the needs of a population that is becoming more diverse, ethnically and culturally.
Explore ways of meeting the needs of both the young and retirees. Strengthen communication and collaboration among providers at all
levels to broaden and enrich partnerships to improve the health of all Georgians through participation in outdoor recreation.

Page 43

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Case Study:
Neighborhood Parks and Active Living Survey

Starting in the summer of 2007, Emory University and the Rollins School of Public Health are conducting a survey to assess the levels of physical activity of people visiting county parks as well as residents near those parks. e goal of the survey is to identify the factors that predict park-use and physical activity. ese factors might include anything from dog ownership to proximity of parks or participation in organized sports.
e Neighborhood Parks and Active Living (NPAL) survey is being conducted in 12 DeKalb County parks and is funded by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. In addition to asking participants a series of questions, they are asked to wear an `accelerometer.' An accelerometer is a small device much like a pedometer - that attaches to your belt and takes precise measurements of movement and calculates physical activity.
e series of questions to which participants are asked to respond relate to where they live, their park-use, and their level of physical activity. Participants in the survey include both park-users as

well as a control group of non-park-users that reside near the parks.
To ensure that the results of the survey reach those that really need it (like local parks managers) the project convened an advisory group that includes local officials (e.g., the Director of DeKalb County Parks and Recreation, the Director of Decatur's Recreation and Community Services Department, the Executive Director of Park Pride) as well as citizen advocates and public health officials.
One aspect of the study of particular interest is accessibility. While many parks that have wonderful amenities are fairly well maintained, some have limited access for a variety of reasons. Other factors, like determining demographic diversity, are also important elements of the study.
Communities contribute a great deal to creating and maintaining parks, trails and greenspaces, but little is known about the degree to which visitors are getting the level of physically active needed to derive health benefits. Preliminary results should be available late in 2007.

Chapter 3: PRiORiTiES

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 44

CHAPTER

3B.

Improve Economic Vitality

Why pursue this direction?

Tourism dollars

The economic impact of outdoor recreation in Georgia is immense. Out-

door recreation is big business; anglers alone bring in $1.5 billion in total

revenue when considering license fees, restaurants, hotels, gas stations, out-

fitter operations and other service-oriented

"As a state, we have outstanding potential to attract tourists...whose

businesses. Moreover, the sales taxes paid to local governments and the state on those purchases is a significant revenue source.

dollars will give a major

More than 10 million people visit our state

boost to communities across

parks and historic sites every year, and

the state". - Governor Sonny Perdue

spend over $32 million. The total economic impact of that revenue is much greater, ex-

ceeding $769 million per year for the state

and local communities.24

Tax benefits

Outdoor recreation also positively impacts ad valorem tax revenue for lo-

cal governments and the state. Numerous studies over the past 30 years

have found a direct relationship between the value of a given property and

Property

A national study by Professor John Crompton of

values increase Texas A&M University estimated that property

20%

values abutting or fronting a passive park are 20% higher than similar property not situated near a park. Moreover, parks have a substantial, positive

when near a park impact on property values within 500 feet.28

its proximity to parks and greenways, resulting in higher tax revenues and improved aesthetics.25 In a study of sales transactions in Oregon, it was found that the proximity of natural outdoor recreation areas has the greatest influence on property values. This study found that, on average, homes within

1,500 feet of a natural area sold for $10,648 more than homes outside the

1,500-foot buffer.26 This study also found that urban parks and specialty

parks increased sale values for adjacent properties. Another 2002 study

in Athens, Georgia found that properties located near a 690-acre wildlife

sanctuary and riverine trail system sold for approximately $7,400 more

than properties that were located more than 3,000 feet away.27

Appreciation of home values Outdoor recreation areas also positively impact the private sector. A recent survey of 2,000 homebuyers found that trails, parks and playgrounds are among the five most important amenities considered when selecting a home.25 A similar survey found that 50% of homebuyers would be willing to pay 10% more for a house located near a park or a protected greenspace.

57% want to live near a park

A 2001 survey by the National Association of Realtors found that 57% of respondents would choose a home close to parks and open space over one that was not. In addition, the survey found that 50% would be willing to pay 10% more for a house located near a park or protected open space.25

In Boston, real estate agents contend that lease rates for office space facing a new urban park commanded a 10% premium over offices in the same building without a park view.29 And, in Atlanta, after Centennial Olympic Park was opened, adjacent condominium prices rose from $115 to $250 per

square foot.16 Additional Georgia-specific research must be conducted to

further confirm these impacts here at home.

Page 45

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Attracting newcomers Outdoor areas also attract and retain affluent retirees who want communities with leisure and recreation amenities. In one study, the top three considerations for retirees looking to relocate were: scenic beauty, recreation opportunities and mild climate.30 When they move, retirees bring expendable income with them. If 100 retired households come to a community in a year, each with a retirement income of $40,000, their impact is similar to that of a new business spending $4 million annually in the community.31
Cultural integration Outdoor recreation is an important tool for enhancing interaction among individuals of different racial and cultural groups. It can bring people of different backgrounds together and offer outlets for improving community relations and quality of life.32

Chapter 3: PRIORITIES

What challenges lie ahead?
Lack of knowledge The greatest challenge to expanding the economic impact of outdoor recreation is a lack of appreciation for the role outdoor recreation plays in our state's economy. Without that awareness, communities will continue to resist land use planning and other changes needed to ensure adequate outdoor recreation areas.
Fear of the unknown A prevailing culture of NIMBYism (Not in My Back Yard) also gets in the way. Concern over who may use a recreation area and the kinds of activities that will occur there can cause controversy that may delay approval of new or improved recreation areas.
Competition for land Developers need to understand that reserving land for outdoor recreation or greenspace in their plans will only increase the value of the properties they are trying to sell.

Challenges to Improving Economic Vitality
Lack of knowledge
Not in my backyard-ism (NIMBYism)
Competition for land

Why must Georgia act now?
Tourism to replace lost industries Georgia needs the jobs and income that outdoor recreation resources can provide. With the decline of textile and other industries, our communities need alternative, reliable sources of revenue. Both the private and public sectors will benefit from increasing the economic impact of outdoor recreation. With the projected growth of the state's population approaching 11 million by 2015, state and local governments will need the additional income to meet the needs of the new residents.
Local officials seeking help Urgent action also is needed to educate policy makers in our fastest growing areas on the economic benefits of converting land into outdoor recreation or conservation uses. These areas experience significant pressure to meet the recreation needs of their residents.

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 46

CHAPTER

3

We must act now to support and maintain Georgia's outdoor recreation resources so that we remain attractive to new business and industry, draw tourists across our borders and grow our tax base. Together we must chart a course to:
Educate the public and officials on the economic impact of outdoor rec-
reation resources on the state, our communities and our residents.
Study more thoroughly the economic benefit of outdoor recreation.
Continue to demonstrate, quantitatively, the economic benefits of out-
door recreation.

Case Study:
Arabia Mountain National Heritage Area

e Arabia Mountain National Heritage Area is a multi-jurisdictional initiative that protects and interprets natural and cultural resources in DeKalb, Rockdale and Henry Counties. e State of Georgia is working with each of these jurisdictions, the Arabia Mountain Alliance and local community groups to create a magnificent green corridor that will connect Arabia Mountain Nature Preserve, Panola Mountain State Park, the South River and the Monastery of the Holy Spirit to outstanding natural and cultural resources in the area all within a 20-minute drive from downtown Atlanta.

is a great example of how Georgians can advance tourism in our state by showcasing our natural resources and heritage. Archeological and historical sites within the heritage area include remnants of Native American culture, early European settlements, one of the oldest African American settlements in Georgia and sites from Lithonia's granite mining heyday of the 1890's to 1920's. By linking these important cultural riches with bicycle paths and interpretive trails, we will attract visitors to the area who can learn about Georgia history while also having a chance to explore the natural beauty of the region.

e Arabia Mountain National Heritage Area represents a unique environmental place in Georgia because of its preservation of a rare landscape with historic, natural and cultural significance in the south. e goal is to protect 7,000 acres of greenspace through public ownership and another 3,000 through private protection (conservation easements). ese lands will be available for public education and enjoyment.
e Arabia Mountain National Heritage Area project

Congressional declaration of the Arabia Mountain Heritage Area as a National Heritage Area occurred in late 2006. e National Heritage Area Program is administered by the National Park Service with the goal of helping the local sponsors manage the area's assets, encourage tourism and to bring new, sustainable development into the heritage area. e Arabia Mountain National Heritage Area is eligible for federal funding of up to $1 million annually, for a total of $10
million.

Page 4

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

C. Conserve Natural Resources

Why pursue this direction?
Conservation of our natural resources and wildlife is vital to the future of outdoor recreation in Georgia. While this is true for many reasons, a few stand out.

"Buy land. They ain't making any

more of the stuff."



- Will Rogers

Family time First, spending time in nature is a popular, traditional, family-oriented pastime--and doing so encourages good stewardship of the state's resources. Respondents in the town hall meetings and focus groups repeatedly commented that outdoor recreation was important because "it enables us to maintain Georgia's outdoor tradition of people and families being in nature and enjoying it." Another frequent response was that outdoor recreation is important because it encourages the conservation/preservation of natural resources.

Top Five Outdoor Recreation Activities in Georgia

62% Walking, jogging or running 50% Picnicking or outdoor social gatherings 42% Swimming outdoors 39% Viewing, identifying & photographing nature 33% Fishing

Chapter 3: PRIORITIES

Of the top five outdoor recreation activities in Georgia, two of them are directly related to conservation of natural resources and wildlife: fishing and viewing, identifying and photographing nature. The other three top outdoor recreation activities in the state--walking, jogging or running; picnicking or outdoor social gatherings; and swimming outdoors--can all be done in natural areas. The NSRE also found that experiencing and enjoying nature is a significant reason people participate in outdoor recreation and predicted that activities such as viewing, learning about and photographing nature will become even more popular in the foreseeable future.
Economic benefits A second reason conservation is vital to the future of outdoor recreation is that it has significant economic benefits. These benefits, explored earlier in this plan, increase our tax base and offset funding from state and local coffers for improving and maintaining our recreation areas.
Environmental quality Third, conservation directly impacts environmental quality. As noted in the Georgia Land Conservation Partnership Plan, among the most important benefits that conservation lands can provide are clean and abundant water, clean air and biodiversity. Since so many of us enjoy spending time outdoors, it is important that our natural environment be as clean and healthy as possible.
Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 48

CHAPTER

3
Challenges to Conservation
Competition for limited funds
development pressure Lack of knowledge

Preserving greenspace directly offsets the negative environmental impacts of development. This connection is becoming more apparent, with a sense of urgency keenly felt in the fastest growing metropolitan areas. Georgia and its local governments must establish and enforce developmental guidelines that encourage natural solutions to developmental impacts (e.g., storm-water retention ponds, grassed strips along streams and pedestrian corridors). Developments must also be encouraged to include greenspace and park setasides as fundamental elements.
Conservation encourages good stewardship of Georgia's natural treasures, has significant economic benefits and directly impacts environmental quality.
What challenges lie ahead?
Competition for limited funds This challenge, identified in previous versions of Georgia's SCORP, is one of the most significant obstacles to ensuring easily-accessible, high-quality facilities, additional land protection, and improved resource conservation. Competition exists for all public and private providers of outdoor recreation.
Development pressure Land that is good for conservation is often also profitable for development. This development pressure tends to inflate the cost of protecting land for conservation and recreation.
Lack of knowledge The public, elected officials at all levels of government and the private business sector are not fully educated on the importance of outdoor recreation and the role it plays in the local economy and conservation of our state's natural resources and wildlife.
Why must Georgia act now?
Urbanization The sense of urgency for conserving Georgia's natural resources and wildlife stems directly from the rapid population growth projected for the state and the urbanization that accompanies it. This loss is most acute in those areas experiencing the fastest population growth, primarily the Atlanta metropolitan area along with a few other metropolitan areas across the state. Every day, metropolitan Atlanta loses 50 acres of trees and gains 55 acres of asphalt and concrete due to development.33 We must adopt policies that are forward-looking to help protect natural resources, encourage sustainable economic development and preserve the standard of living that makes the region so attractive. The map in Figure 9 shows the progression from 1991 to 2005 of greenspace converted to impervious surfaces. Impervious surfaces are pavement, buildings and other development.

106 acres/day Undeveloped land in Georgia is being converted to development at a rate of 106 acres per day.

Page 49

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Chapter 3: PRiORiTiES

Figure 9. Conversion of Greenspace to Impervious Surfaces, Georgia, 19912005
Habitat loss In rapidly growing urban areas, sprawl is destroying natural habitats at an unprecedented rate. In rural Georgia, economic pressures are forcing more landowners to sell their property, often to developers. This development also increases a variety of pollutants in the air and water and increases the threat of releasing non-native plants and animals. By recognizing these facts and by setting priorities for natural resource management and use, we can continue to provide and grow Georgia's outdoor recreation opportunities, ensuring that developments are compatible with resource objectives.25

40%

35%

30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0% Florida MarylandLouisiana

TAexVasERAGWEest VirginiaArkaSnsoausth Carolina VirginiaTennessee MissNoourrtih CaroGlinEaORGIAMississippiKentuckyOklahoma Alabama

Figure 10 Percent of Land Area in Protection, by State

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 0

CHAPTER

3

"I've made a career from sports that I grew to love while growing up in Georgia, so I know how important our parks and ballfields can be. Outdoor recreation helps shape young minds as well as young bodies".
Dan Reeves Former Atlanta Falcons Head Coach and Georgia State University Football Consultant
Georgians supporting change The good news is that Georgians sense this urgency and support change. Those attending the town hall meetings frequently identified conservation of natural resources as a primary reason for their participation in outdoor recreation. SCORP survey respondents also reinforced the value of conservation. In addition, there is strong support (from the SCORP survey and the NSRE) for the use of public funds to create outdoor recreation opportunities in the state. The time is right to capitalize on this support and move forward.

We must act now to conserve our natural resources and wildlife so that we stay ahead of the state's rapid population growth, take advantage of the recent increase in support among Georgians for conservation and build the next generation of environmental stewards. Together we must chart a course to:
Increase the amount of land in conservation before opportunities are lost.
Explore ways to expand greenspace conservation, especially among nongovernmental partners.
Initiate planning at all levels of government to identify key lands for conservation.
Ensure that community land use planning provides for the conservation of natural resources and access for those living in residential developments to nature and other outdoor recreation resources and opportunities.
Educate the public and officials in both the public and private sectors on the importance of conservation.
Strengthen communication and collaboration among providers at all levels to broaden and enrich partnerships statewide.
Expand the SCORP inventory of outdoor recreation resources to identify lands suitable for conservation.
Initiate the Georgia Scenic Trail System. Explore the reconstitution of the Georgia Youth Conservation Corps.

Page 1

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Case Study:
Cobb and Paulding Counties

Cobb County is facing a greenspace crisis. It is a rapidly developing suburban county that had not adequately planned in advance for greenspace and parklands. In contrast, neighboring Paulding County is experiencing a recent population growth spurt and is planning ahead for its future greenspace and recreation needs. Both counties placed bond referendums on the 2006 general election ballots and both passed with strong support. e Cobb County referendum included $40 million dollars in bonds and passed with 72% support. e Paulding County referendum was for a $15.2 million bond issue that passed by 71%. In addition, Paulding County has several partners, including DNR, contributing resources for a total investment of $45 million dollars.

So what are these tax payers getting for their purchases? Cobb County residents will be able to see approximately 300 acres of new parks scattered around the county. Paulding County residents are getting a large reserve encompassing over 7,000 acres.
Why is the difference so great for these neighboring counties? Because land values in Cobb County have skyrocketed over the past decade as land supplies decreased. Paulding County saw what was happening in neighboring counties such as Cobb and Gwinnett and decided to act before they would be forced to pay high prices for limited land resources.

Chapter 3: PRiORiTiES

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page

CHAPTER

4

CHAPTER

4 STRATEGIC ACTIONS
The future of outdoor recreation in Georgia can be positive if the major challenges facing our state are addressed forthrightly. Critical issues such as rapid population growth, loss of natural resources, growing cultural diversity, urbanization, increases in obesity and other chronic diseases, and contrasts of recreation preferences between regions of the state deserve our immediate attention - before there is little to no opportunity to effectively respond.

Page 3

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

STRATEGIC ACTIONS OF
SCORP 2008-2013

This SCORP 20082013 provides a framework for collective action by providing a solid vision, based on data and public input, and offering recommendations for making that vision a reality. Its recommendations are grouped into six strategic actions which, for the next five years, will serve as a `to do' list for all stakeholders in outdoor recreation, from the state of Georgia to city and county governments. Implementing the recommendations from this SCORP will make Georgia a model for the nation in outdoor recreation, quality service and resource protection.

A
Health and
Livability

B
Economic
Vitality

C
Conservation

D
Commitment

E
Education

F
Funding

Chapter 4: STRATEGiC ACTiONS

There are six strategic action categories, all of equal importance. The focus on Health and Livability, Economic Vitality and Conservation results from analysis of all the findings of the SCORP 20082013 process. Commitment, Education and Funding strategies identify essential components for successful implementation of the SCORP recommendations. Actions within each of the six strategic areas are numerically coded so that they can be applied to Land and Water Conservation Fund criteria and tracked for performance measurement purposes.
A. Health Through Fitness and Livability Recreation providers, public health officials, planners and policy-makers must collaborate to fight Georgia's obesity epidemic, combat other serious health conditions and improve overall health by promoting and accommodating active lifestyles. The connection between positive physical and mental health and spending time outdoors is undeniable.
It is critical that Georgia and all city and county governments make comprehensive connections between planning, zoning, natural resource conservation and outdoor recreation. Livable communities strengthen social bonding among diverse cultures and create a sense of community, while they also slow the fragmentation of our landscape. These elements are vitally important in areas of Georgia that are experiencing demographic shifts.
All Outdoor Recreation Providers and Other Partners will:
A.1. Improve access to outdoor recreation resources and facilities by providing locations near where people live and work and exploring ways to connect existing facilities for pedestrians and non-motorized vehicles (bikes, in-line skates, horses, etc.).
A.2. Collaborate with local health departments to create programs and activities in parks and outdoor recreation areas promoting `healthy lifestyle choices.'
A.3. Identify and reduce barriers that prevent the use of outdoor recreation facilities (e.g., safety concerns, cost of participation, incorporation of public transportation networks and accessibility by those with physical limitations).
A.4. Attend to segments of the population that are under-served by existing facilities (e.g., seniors, young adults and African American populations).
Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 4

CHAPTER

4

A.5. Recognize how recreation preferences change with shifts in demographic composition (e.g., growing Hispanic populations).
A.6. Create opportunities to "cross-culturalize" activities to increase participation in outdoor recreation activities by Georgia's diverse populations.
A.7. Enhance security for outdoor recreation areas where appropriate.
The State of Georgia will:
A.8. Work with statewide organizations such as the DHR, GRPA, and others to advance the "Healthy Georgia" initiative and incorporate health and livability programs in state and local outdoor recreation sites.
City and County Governments will:
A.9. Provide a variety of outdoor recreation areas and parks in close proximity to where people live and work.
A.10. Promote the development of residential areas that retain greenspace, include recreation facilities and provide safe pedestrian access to public parks from schools, business and retail centers.

B. Economic Vitality
Agencies at all levels must seek ways to capitalize on the public's growing desire and ability to travel in order to experience nature and participate in outdoor recreation events and programs. Efforts should be made to maximize the tourism potential associated with conservation of our natural resources and provision of recreation and sports activities as key visitor attractions for Georgia and its local communities.
Preservation of greenspace is a cost effective and value-added means to address flood management, air and water quality and other municipal infrastructure needs. Wise planning and utilization of natural areas can address these issues while providing highly desirable greenspace for growing communities.
The state of Georgia and its local communities can benefit from the significant and multi-layered return on investment from outdoor recreation and natural resource conservation expenditures.
All Outdoor Recreation Providers and Other Partners will:
B.1. Rehabilitate, update and upgrade existing outdoor recreation facilities to maximize marketability.

The State of Georgia will:
B.2. Collaborate with other partners to document the economic benefits of outdoor recreation in Georgia through market research and tracking the financial return of investments in outdoor recreation facilities.
B.3. Facilitate collaborations between state agencies to advance the economic benefits of outdoor recreation and natural resource conservation.
B.4. Market our natural and recreation resources to gain public participation and support, advance tourism and economic development opportunities and encourage volunteerism, collaborating with other state agencies that specialize in market analysis and promotion to significantly strengthen any marketing effort.

P a g e 55

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Chapter 4: STRATEGIC ACTIONS

City and County Governments will:
B.5. Promote outdoor recreation events, programs and facilities that attract day travelers and overnight visitation.
B.6. Create partnerships with local businesses that provide direct or indirect materials or services for outdoor recreation such as local convention and visitor bureaus, recreation equipment vendors and guide services.
C. Conservation
All partners must act immediately and collaboratively to conserve Georgia's natural resources, address Georgia's rapid growth and urbanization, build a new generation of environmental stewards and capitalize on the state's strong support for both natural resource conservation and enhanced outdoor recreation opportunities.
All Outdoor Recreation Providers and Other Partners will:
C.1. Identify and prioritize key lands for acquisition, especially in the fastest-growing areas of the state.
C.2. Create plans to manage and operate facilities and sites to 1) efficiently use limited funds, 2) ensure the protection of biodiversity, and 3) respond to recreation preferences and needs. These plans should be functional and include specific measures for defining success.
C.3. Explore and expand partnerships with land trusts and other conservation organizations as a means to permanently protect greenspace.
C.4. Develop multi-jurisdictional projects to satisfy several important objectives: 1) to coordinate land protection efforts for connectivity, 2) capitalize on complementary strengths and weaknesses, and 3) ensure resource conservation and outdoor recreation opportunities.
C.5. Provide balanced interpretation, education and outdoor recreation programs to expand the knowledge and appreciation of our natural, cultural and recreation resources in a manner consistent with conservation
The State of Georgia will:
C.6. Establish and maintain resource data for use by local government officials focusing on land needs and unique areas needing protection in accordance with the Georgia Land Conservation Plan, the Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan and the Coastal Management Plan.
C.7. Facilitate collaborations and partnerships for the protection of wetlands and the provision of greenway and blueway trail corridors, including the creation of the Georgia Scenic Trail System.
C.8. Expand the SCORP inventory of outdoor recreation resources and other GIS databases to identify lands suitable for conservation.
C.9. Seek opportunities for state agencies to work together to facilitate increased conservation of Georgia's natural resources.
C.10. Work with the federal government to ensure permanent protection of natural areas within military bases in Georgia.
C.11. Investigate the reconstitution of the Georgia Youth Conservation Corps.

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

P a g e 56

CHAPTER

4

City and County Governments will:
C.12. Encourage land use planning that includes natural resource conservation and outdoor recreation opportunities.
C.13. Develop corridors to link recreation sites and residential areas using multi-use pathways.

D. Commitment
Collaborations must be maximized to improve the quality and availability of recreation opportunities throughout Georgia. An implementation plan with measurable goals and timeline expectations must be developed to ensure progressive fulfillment of SCORP 2008-2013 recommendations.

All Outdoor Recreation Providers and Other Partners will:
D.1. Foster advocacy organizations to advance the benefits of outdoor recreation, modeled on the "Friends of the Georgia State Parks and Historic Sites" group and other successful collaborations.
D.2. Facilitate, fund and collaborate in efforts to advance the recommendations of SCORP, including the development of educational and support materials.
D.3. Seek ways to further individual agency missions by leveraging the efforts of state and local partners.
D.4. Refine and reinforce a systematic plan identifying the status and future needs for land acquisition, and facilities development and operation.
D.5. Acknowledge and integrate the preferences of ethnic and socio-demographic groups, tailoring facilities and programs to serve diverse constituencies.

The State of Georgia will:
D.6. Pronounce the creation of the Georgia Outdoor Recreation Partnership (GORP) through the Department of Natural Resources and charge it with prioritizing and implementing the vision of SCORP 20082013. GORP will be comprised of members of the existing SCORP Advisory Committee along with representatives from state departments (DNR, DCA, DHR, DED, DOE, DOT, etc.) and allied agencies and organizations sharing a common mission and commitment. Report SCORP implementation status in a fall 2008 Conference on Outdoor Recreation.
D.7. Conduct regular statewide assessments on outdoor recreation preferences by socio-demographics; modify the DNR Strategic Plan and PRHSD System Plan to address these findings; and share data with other outdoor recreation providers to use in developing their own local plans and programs.
D.8. Provide technical assistance to outdoor recreation providers by serving as or providing for a clearinghouse for information on planning, development, management and funding. Research and technical assistance will include: a. Best practice models and case studies for recreation planning for cities, counties and other outdoor recreation providers, including best practice models for natural resource stewardship and sustainability.

P a g e 57

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

b. Converting the SCORP inventory GIS database to a web-based format for use as a planning tool for recreation planners and an informational resource for the public.
c. Working to commit resources for maintaining and improving the current database of recreation and conservation lands.
d. Establishing recreation standards and specific metrics for outdoor recreation providers that outline target service delivery goals by population for outdoor recreation land and facility types.
e. Planning assistance for local recreation providers to help them protect parks and greenspace and provide high quality recreation service opportunities based on emerging trends (for example, counties experiencing explosive growth and those facing population loss have very different recreation needs).
f. Information and educational materials that advance a conservation ethic and promote environmental awareness.
g. Investigate recreation property liability constraints.

Get Out. Get Dirty. Get Fit.

One of the initiatives of PRHSD is the "Get Outdoors Georgia" campaign designed to highlight the link between participation in outdoor recreation and improved health for people of all ages and abilities; achieve decreased obesity; and emphasize children's early involvement in nature for establishing life-long physical, mental and community benefits. Part of this initiative is to post, on the DNR website, activity-based events taking place at state parks and historic sites.

Chapter 4: STRATEGiC ACTiONS

City and County Governments will:
D.9. Work with DNR to explore: alternate funding sources, ways of improving efficiency in service delivery, and ways to maximize benefits to the community for every dollar spent on outdoor recreation efforts.
D.10. Seek ways to incorporate the principles of environmental planning into zoning policies and into the construction of their own buildings and facilities.
D.11. Stay current with the needs of their constituents for outdoor recreation opportunities.
D.12. Acknowledge the economic and health benefits that outdoor recreation sites provide to their communities.
D.13. Enter into an agreement with DNR to assist GORP with its efforts (e.g., gathering database information, county-level information and plats defining).
E. Education
Tools and resources are available and must be shared to conserve recreation lands and provide high quality opportunities for all. Elevating the priority of outdoor recreation with policymakers, planners, practitioners, partners and the public will heighten their awareness of the benefits in terms of community health and livability, economic vitality and conservation of Georgia's natural resources.
Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page

CHAPTER

4

All Outdoor Recreation Providers and Other Partners will:
E.1. Advance SCORP objectives by educating policy makers on the value of outdoor recreation for community health, livability, economic vitality and ecological integrity. Use SCORP as a policy document to drive decision-making on recreation initiatives.
E.2. Collaborate to develop training opportunities and programs for policymakers, planners and outdoor recreation providers designed to: a. Demonstrate the benefits of outdoor recreation for quality of life, healthy communities and economic vitality. b. Delineate and reinforce a conservation ethic. (The Green Infrastructure Toolkit created by the Atlanta Regional Commission, The Georgia Conservancy and The Trust for Public Land is suggested as a good model.)
E.3. Broadcast the vision of SCORP through aggressive marketing, conferences, newsletters and other outreach tools.
E.4. Integrate principles of healthy living, livable communities, economic vitality and resource conservation into the mission statements of service providers.
E.5. Provide balanced interpretation, education and outdoor recreation programs to expand the knowledge and appreciation of our natural, cultural and recreation resources in a manner consistent with conservation.
The State of Georgia will:
E.6. Through the Governor's Office and DNR, educate members of the Georgia General Assembly and all state agencies about the findings and recommendations of SCORP 20082013.
E.7. Work with the Department of Education to advance healthy lifestyles and natural resource conservation in Georgia public schools.
E.8. Inspire and facilitate the efforts of the Georgia Department of Education and the university system to create curricula and degree programs designed to educate students and produce well-trained professionals in the fields of recreation (leisure services) and resource management, ensuring planning competency and responsiveness to the community.
City and County Governments will:
E.9. Commit themselves to understanding the value of recreation in their communities.
E.10. Capitalize on the assistance provided by DNR, including applying for LWCF funding and working with PRHSD to seek other sources of funding and support.
E.11. Encourage site managers and service providers to attend training sessions and to utilize tools provided by DNR and its partners.
E.12. Explore ways to collaborate with partners to achieve objectives for recreation (e.g., memoranda of agreement, management agreements, cost-sharing and staff-sharing).

Page 59

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Chapter 4: STRATEGIC ACTIONS

F. Funding
The issue of funding is multi-faceted since it covers recreation land acquisition, facility construction, operations and appropriate recapitalization. It also includes the efficient use of existing funds at all levels of government, leveraged with private and non-profit investment and the creation of consistent funding streams.
Solid data and science are among the best tools available to recreation providers to ensure adequate funding. They reveal strong and direct correlations between recreation and community wellness as well as justify the need for additional state and federal funding.
All Outdoor Recreation Providers and Other Partners will:
F.1. Identify both short- and long-term funding options for land acquisition, conservation and management as well as for facility development, maintenance and rehabilitation.
F.2. Develop staffing plans, cost estimates and options for service delivery (e.g., in-house staff, contracted services, staff-sharing arrangements and volunteer networks) as well as for the operation and maintenance of recreation facilities. It is important that this information is provided to local officials before the construction of new facilities to ensure that needs are being met to provide safe, clean and attractive facilities.
F.3. Develop training and certification programs for operations and maintenance personnel to ensure the most cost-effective methods are used.
F.4. Expand the use of volunteers, interns and other staffing alternatives. F.5. Create and sustain partnerships to minimize reliance on tax revenues
to support the operations and management aspects of public parks and outdoor recreation areas.
The State of Georgia will:
F.6. Work with the Governor's Office of Planning and Budget, allied state agencies and state legislative leaders to develop a funding source to parallel the goals of the federal Land and Water Conservation Fund in supporting state and local needs for outdoor recreation including land acquisition, resource conservation and management as well as facility maintenance, rehabilitation and development.
F.7. Seek collaborations and synergies to maximize existing state and federal funding sources (e.g., LWCF, Forest Legacy, SAFETEA-LU and Urban Parks and Recreation).
City and County Governments will:
F.8. Pursue the use of special purpose local option sales tax (SPLOST), impact fees, business and industry partnerships and foundation grants as additional funding mechanisms to fund land acquisition, conservation and management as well as facility development, maintenance and rehabilitation.

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 60

CHAPTER

5

CHAPTER

5 IMPLICATIONS FOR LANd ANd WATER CONSERVATION FUNd (LWCF) ANd GEORGIA LAW
Existing state and federal funding levels are not sufficient to address all our outdoor recreation needs. Too often, other priorities take precedence over outdoor recreation facilities and maintenance. Therefore, we must use sound science to establish stronger and more strategic positions that support additional state and federal funding for outdoor recreation land acquisition, development, rehabilitation, operations and maintenance.

Page 1

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Chapter 5: iMPLiCATiONS FOR LANd ANd wATER CONSERvATiON FuNd (LwCF) FuNdiNG ANd GEORGiA LAw

A. Guiding Principles for LWCF
Funding
Appropriation of available state and federal funds should go to jurisdictions that have demonstrated knowledge and awareness of their outdoor recreation and natural resource conservation priorities and how these priorities affect the health, livability and economic vitality of their communities. Preference should be extended to communities that:
Show commitment to improve their outdoor recreation opportunities; Seek creative or alternative approaches to service delivery funding;
and Establish partnerships that leverage and supplement requested state
and federal funding.
At the same time, we must be mindful of and committed to assisting communities that demonstrate a need, but have little opportunity to invest in outdoor recreation due to their economic condition.

DADE

CATOOSA

WALKER

WHITFIELD

MURRAY

CHATTOOGA

GORDON

FLOYD

BARTOW

FANNIN

UNION

TOWNS

RABUN

GILMER PICKENS CHEROKEE

LUMPKIN

WHITE HABERSHAM STEPHENS

DAWSON FORSYTH

HALL

FRANKLIN BANKS

JACKSON

MADISON

HART ELBERT

POLK

PAULDING

COBB

GWINNETT

BARROW

HARALSON CARROLL

DOUGLAS

FULTON

DE KALB

CLAYTON

WALTON
ROCKDALE
NEWTON

CLARKE OCONEE
MORGAN

OGLETHORPE

WILKES

GREENE TALIAFERRO

Legend
Acquisition Development Rehabilitation Not Funded
LINCOLN
COLUMBIA

HEARD

COWETA

FAYETTE

HENRY

SPALDING

BUTTS

JASPER

PUTNAM

HANCOCK

WARREN MCDUFFIE GLASCOCK

RICHMOND

TROUP

MERIWETHER

PIKE

LAMAR

MONROE

UPSON

JONES

BALDWIN

WASHINGTON

JEFFERSON

BURKE

HARRIS

TALBOT

CRAWFORD

BIBB

WILKINSON

TWIGGS

JOHNSON

JENKINS

SCREVEN

MUSCOGEE

TAYLOR

PEACH HOUSTON

BLECKLEY

LAURENS

EMANUEL

CHATTAHOOCHEE MARION

MACON

SCHLEY

STEWART

WEBSTER

SUMTER

QUITMAN TERRELL LEE
RANDOLPH
CLAY

DOOLY CRISP

PULASKI WILCOX

TURNER

DODGE

TREUTLEN

MONTGOMERY

WHEELER

TOOMBS

CANDLER

BULLOCH

EFFINGHAM

EVANS TATTNALL

BRYAN

CHATHAM

TELFAIR BEN HILL

JEFF DAVIS

APPLING

LONG

LIBERTY

CALHOUN

DOUGHERTY

WORTH

IRWIN TIFT

COFFEE

BACON

WAYNE

MCINTOSH

EARLY MILLER

BAKER

MITCHELL

COLQUITT

BERRIEN COOK

ATKINSON

PIERCE

WARE

BRANTLEY

GLYNN

SEMINOLE

DECATUR

GRADY

THOMAS

BROOKS

LANIER LOWNDES

CLINCH

CHARLETON

CAMDEN

ECHOLS

Figure 11. Land and Water Conservation Funds (LWCF) Requests and Awards, 2005
Priorities and action strategies
As stated in the introduction, SCORP 20082013 must be completed in order for Georgia to be eligible for federal Land and Water Conservation Fund grant dollars. These funds must be used to address the priorities that were established during the development of SCORP (see Chapter 3) and the six key strategic actions for SCORP (see Chapter 4). But how do these priorities and recommended actions really relate to LWCF and grant awards?

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page

CHAPTER

5

Below is a listing of the strategic actions that have a direct correlation to the LWCF funding process. Based on these strategic actions, criteria will be developed for scoring applications and ultimately making grant awards. These criteria will be based on the strategic actions below:

Key Element

A
Health and
Livability

B
Economic
Vitality

C
Conservation

D
Commitment

E
Education

F
Funding

Coded Action Strategy

A.1., A.3., A.4., A.7., A.9., A.10.

B.1., B.6.

C.1., C.2., C.3., C.4., C.12., C.13.

d.5.

E.12.

F.1., F.2., F.4., F.8.

Table 2. Strategic Actions Related to Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF)

Standards for recreation facilities
SCORP 20082013 recognizes the importance of establishing universal standards for the identification, establishment and maintenance of recreational sites and facilities. However, this SCORP is designed to provide a comprehensive overview of recreation needs throughout the state, not necessarily to define the specific set of metrics for judging individual facilities or services.

Developing specific metrics and standards for outdoor recreation are tasks delegated to GORP (Georgia Outdoor Recreation Partnership). GORP will be a DNR-initiated partnership of professionals and stakeholders responsible for implementing the objectives and strategic actions of SCORP 20082013. GORP will report its findings on recreational standards at a conference on outdoor recreation.

Wetlands Preservation
Benefits of wetlands
Wetlands provide a wide variety of Wetlands: A Definition benefits including: maintaining water
supplies, enhancing water quality, conExpanses of land periodically trolling floodwaters, erosion control
inundated or saturated by and providing recreation opportunigroundwater or surface water at a ties. frequency and duration sufficient to support vegetation adapted for Wetlands and SCORP
life in such conditions. Section 303 of the Federal Emergency Wetlands Act requires that the SCORP
address wetlands as an important
outdoor recreation resource and that protection priorities be established in
consultation with both DNR's Environmental Protection Division (EPD) and
WRD. The priorities established in this SCORP satisfy that requirement.

Area of wetlands in Georgia According to the USFWS, Georgia currently has about 20% of its land area in wetlands (7.7 million acres).34 This total includes nearly 367,000 acres of estuarine wetlands and 7.3 million acres of palustrine wetlands. The National

Page 3

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

C h a p t e r 5 : I M P L I C A T I O N S F O R L A N D A N D W A T E R C O N S E R V A T I O N F U N D ( L W C F ) F U N DI N G A N D G E O R G I A L A W

Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration estimates that, by the 1980s, about 23% of Georgia's original wetlands acreage was lost to conversion.35
Loss of wetlands in Georgia The greatest loss of wetlands occurred in the Atlantic Coastal Plain. Much of the land conversion was from deciduous forested wetlands to intensively managed pine plantation. The major conversion of wetland areas to pine plantation occurred between 1985 and 1992. The greatest conversion of wetlands to agriculture occurred from 1974 to 1985. An increase in harvesting occurred in 19982001, perhaps due to the record droughts that allowed access to riverine areas from low flows.
Population growth and wetland conservation Georgia ranks second among EPA Region 4 states in estimated wetland acreage and its complex physiography results in a rich diversity of wetland types. A large proportion of our anticipated population growth over the coming decade is projected for areas proximal to wetlands such as coastal counties. Currently, we have no coordinated statewide program to identify and prioritize landscape-level wetland areas for development of wetland mitigation banks or other wetland restoration activities. As a result, current restoration projects, while benefiting the immediate area and satisfying no-net-loss standards, may not contribute greatly to the overall health of the watershed. Developing and using a prioritization map of potential wetland restoration areas will help natural resource managers focus restoration efforts in areas that will provide the greatest positive cumulative effect on the health of a watershed and surrounding communities. Augmentation of funding opportunities for the restoration of wetlands also would be advised.
Comprehensive wetlands protection plan In response to this lack of coordination, DNR-EPD has begun a process to develop a comprehensive assessment to identify high priority areas for wetland restoration, mitigation and protection. This project will provide state, federal and non-governmental natural resource managers with a database of potential areas for wetland mitigation banks, conservation activities and restoration projects through the development of a GIS model that establishes priorities for wetland functions and values. The priorities are: wildlife habitat, water quality/quantity, flow regulation/flood control, ecological services, biodiversity conservation, recreation, education, connectivity, ease of restoration and scenic value. The results of this effort will provide information and coordination for a number of statewide planning activities such as the Comprehensive Statewide Water Management Plan, activities of the Land Conservation Partnership, the State Wildlife Action Plan and the State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan.
B. Fulfillment of Legal Mandate
As stated in the introduction, DNR is legally mandated to prepare outdoor recreation planning documents by the Official Code of Georgia: Section 123-1. Table 3 identifies the specific requirements under Section 12-3-1 and the elements of this SCORP that address them.

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 64

CHAPTER

5

SCORP Elements Addressing Legal Requirements

Legal Requirements
Formulate a comprehensive recreation policy for the state of Georgia.

SCORP Elements
This document, SCORP 20082013, and anticipated development of an implementation team (GORP).

Appraise recreation needs of the state and disseminate information relative to recreation.

Conducted GIS analysis, town hall meetings, focus groups, statewide telephone survey, online questionnaire, NSRE survey, "Outdoor Recreation Participation and Trends for Georgia."

Cooperate in the promotion and organization of local government recreation systems--advise them in the planning of facilities and consult with them in the financing.

Proposing establishment of a "technical assistance" service to be coordinated by PRHSD. Open invitation for local service providers to attend and participate in GORP.

Aid in recruiting, educating and placing recreation workers and promoting recreation institutes and conferences.

Collaborating with the Departments of Recreation and Leisure Studies at the University of Georgia (Athens) and Georgia Southern University (Statesboro) and the Recreation Curriculum at Georgia State University.

Help establish and promote recreation standards.

Exploring various mechanisms to define measurable standards, including CEPAE (Comprehensive Evaluation to Promote Active Engagement).

Cooperate with public and private interests in promoting recreation opportunities.

Sharing GIS data, providing technical assistance, invitation to participate in the SCORP implementation team (GORP). Proposed Conference on Outdoor Recreation in Fall 2008. Health initiatives with DHR.

Submit a report of activities and recommendations to the Governor and notify the General Assembly of its availability.

This document, SCORP 20082013, as well as progress reports prepared by GORP.

Table 3. SCORP Elements Addressing Legal Requirements

Page

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

REFERENCES / GLOSSARY / PHOTO CREDITS / APPENDICES
Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page

References
1. Muir, J., 1901. Our National Parks. Boston (MA): Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
2. Georgia Office of Planning and Budget; Policy, Planning, and Technical Support, 2005. Georgia 2015 Population Projections. Atlanta (GA):Georgia Office of Planning and Budget. Also available from: <http://www.opb.state.ga.us/Budget/Population_Projections/Georgia_ Population_Projections_Reduced_Web_5_25_05.pdf>
3. U.S. Census Bureau. State & County QuickFacts (website of U.S. Census Bureau). Accessed June 2007 from: <http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/13000.html>
4. U.S. Census Bureau. Percent Total Population In Poverty: 2004. (map). Washington (DC): U.S. Census Bureau. Accessed June 2007 from: <http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/saipe/ maps/iy2004/Tot_Pct_Poor2004.pdf>
5. Patterson, J., 2003. Encouraging All Citizens to Participate. Parks & Recreation. 38(2):81-2.
6. University of Georgia, Carl Vinson Institute of Government, 2007. Georgia Policy Atlas. Athens (GA): University of Georgia.
7. Glenwood, R., 2006. The Demographics Of Georgia I: Population Trends and Projections to 2030. Policy Brief (a newsletter of the Georgia State University; Andrew Young School of Policy Studies). No.120.
8. Bryan, L., S. Thompson, M. Patel, 2006, 2005 Georgia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Report. Atlanta (GA): Georgia Department of Human Resources; Division of Public Health; Chronic Disease, Injury, and Environmental Epidemiology Section. Publication Number: DPH06/154HW.
9. Gregory K., M. Wu, D. Kanny, 2005. Cardiovascular Disease in Georgia, 2005. Atlanta (GA): Georgia Department of Human Resources, Division of Public Health, and the American Heart Association, Southeast Affiliate. Publication Number: DPH05/094HW.
10. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1996. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Chronic Disease and Health Promotion.
11. Schmidt, C.W., 1998. The Specter of Sprawl. Environmental Health Perspectives. 106(6):A274-9.
12. Viegi, M., S. Maio, F. Pistelli, S. Baldacci, L. Carrozzi, 2006. Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Health Effects of Air Pollution. Respirology. 11(5):523-32.
13. Georgia Department of Human Resources; Division of Public Health, 2005. Georgia's Nutrition and Physical Activity Plan to Prevent and Control Obesity and Chronic Diseases in Georgia. Atlanta (GA): Georgia Department of Human Resources. Publication number: DPH05/048HW.
14. Georgia Department of Industry Trade and Tourism, 2002. The Economic Impact of Expenditures by Tourists on Georgia. Kennebunk (ME): Davidson-Peterson Associates.
15. American Sportfishing Association. Sportfishing in America. Southwick Associates, 2002. National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-associated Recreation. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Department of Commerce and the Fish and Wildlife Service, 2001 Economic Activity Report. Recreational Saltwater Fishing in Southeast Georgia, 2002.
16. American Planning Association, 2002. City Parks Forum Briefing Papers 03. How Cities Use Parks for Development. Chicago (IL): American Planning Association. Available from: <http://atfiles.org/files/pdf/citiesparksecon.pdf>
17. Proper, K.I., B.J. Staal, V.H. Hildebrandt, A.J. van der Beek, and W. van Mechelen, 2002. Effectiveness of Physical Activity Programs at Worksites with Respect to Work-Related Outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2002 28(2):75-84.

P a g e 67

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

REFERENCES

18. Falb, M. and D. Kanny, 2006. Obesity in Georgia's 3rd Grade Children. Atlanta (GA): Georgia Department of Human Resources; Division of Public Health. Publication Number: DPH06/004HW.
19. Kanny, D., 2006. 2005 Georgia Student Health Survey Report. Atlanta (GA): Georgia Department of Human Resources; Division of Public Health, Publication Number: DPH06/076HW.
20. Finkelstein, E.A., I.C. Fiebelkorn, and G. Wang, 1998. State-Level Estimates of Annual Medical Expenditures Attributable to Obesity. Obesity Research. 12:18-24.
21. Powell, K.E., L. Martin, and P.P. Chowdhury, 2003. Places to Walk: Convenience and Regular Physical Activity. American Journal of Public Health. 93(9):1519-21.
22. Poortinga W., 2006. Perceptions of the Environment, Physical Activity, and Obesity. Social Science and Medicine. 63:2835-46.
23. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003. Travel and Environmental Implications of School Siting. Washington (DC): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Report number: EPA 231-R-03-004.
24. Georgia Department of Natural Resources, 2007. Strategic Plan. Atlanta (GA): Georgia Department of Natural Resources.
25. Pack. A. and S. Schanuel, 2005. The Economics of Urban Park Planning. Parks & Recreation. 40(8):64-67.
26. Lutzenhiser, M. and N.R. Netusil, 2001. The Effect of Open Space Type on a Home's Sale Price: Portland, Oregon. Contemporary Economic Policy. 19(1):291-8.
27. Nelson N., J. Dorfman, and L. Fowler, 2002. The Potential for Community Forests to be Self-Financing: A Hedonic Analysis for the Enhancement Value of Georgia's Trees. Athens (GA): Institute of Ecology, The University of Georgia.
28. Compton J., 2005. Real Estate Impact Review of Parks and Recreation. Illinois Association of Park Districts. ERA Project Number: 15543.
29. National Recreation and Parks Association, 2005. Parks and Economic Development: Why Public Parks, Open Space and Greenways are Wise Investments. Ashburn (VA): National Recreation and Parks Association.
30. Miller, W., et al, 1994. Retirement In-Migration Study: Attractive Features, Economic & Social Impacts. Mississippi State (MS): Southern Rural Development Center.
31. Crompton, J.L., 2001. Parks and Economic Development. Chicago (IL): American Planning Association. PAS Report No. 502.
32. Bell, C.M and A.R. Hurd, 2006. Research Update: Recreation Across Ethnicity. Parks & Recreation. October:28-34.
33. Harris, L.V., April 6, 2007. Growing Pains. Atlanta Journal Constitution (newspaper). Atlanta (GA).
34. Hefner, J.M., B.O. Wilen, T.E. Dahl, and W.E. Frayer, 1994. Southeast Wetlands; Status and Trends, Mid-1970`s to Mid-1980`s. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of the Interior; Fish and Wildlife Service.
35. Stedman, S.M., J. Hanson, 2007. Habitat Connections: Wetlands, Fisheries and Economics: Part Two: Wetlands, Fisheries, & Economics in the South Atlantic Coastal States. (Website of the U.S. Department of Commerce; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; National Marine Fisheries Service). Accessed in June 2007 from: <http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/habitat/habitatconservation/publications/habitatconections/ num2.htm>

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

P a g e 68

G L O S S A R Y A N D P H O T O C R E DI T S

Glossary

ACCG: ADA: CRD: DCA: DHR: DNR: EPD: FGSPHS: GFC: GIS: GLCP: GMA: GORP: GRPA: GWF: LWCF: MSA: NRCS: NSRE: PRHSD: RDC: SAFETEA-LU:
SCORP: SPLOST: TVA: UGA: USFS: USFWS: USACE: WIC: WRD:

Association County Commissioners of Georgia Americans with Disabilities Act Coastal Resources Division, DNR Georgia Department of Community Affairs Georgia Department of Human Resources Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division, DNR Friends of Georgia State Parks and Historic Sites Georgia Forestry Commission Geographic Information System Georgia Land Conservation Partnership or Plan Georgia Municipal Association Georgia Outdoor Recreation Partnership Georgia Recreation and Park Association Georgia Wildlife Federation Land and Water Conservation Fund Metropolitan Statistical Area Natural Resource Conservation Service National Survey of Recreation and the Environment Parks, Recreation and Historic Sites Division, DNR Regional Development Center Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation
Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax Tennessee Valley Authority University of Georgia United States Forest Service United States Fish and Wildlife Service United States Army Corps of Engineers Women, Infants and Children Program Wildlife Resources Division, DNR

Photo Credits
The photographs used throughout this document were provided by: Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Georgia Department of Economic Development, Gwinnett County Georgia Parks & Recreation Department and Peachtree City Parks & Recreation Department.
P aP ag ge e6 96 9 G e oGr geioar gS ita tSetwaitdeew iCdoemCporme hper en shiev en s Oi vuet dOouot dr oRoerc Rr eeactrieoan t iPol na nP l2a0n0 82 -020081- 32 0 1 3

A P P E N DI C E S

Appendices
Technical Supplements
Additional technical information, supporting documents, survey results,
(etc.) are on file in the PRHSD Director's Office and are available for review.

APPENDIX APPENDIX APPENDIX APPENDIX APPENDIX APPENDIX

A Page 71 Systematic Process for Crafting the SCORP

B Page 73 Top Responses from Georgians to Three Standard Questions

C Page 77 How SCORP Relates to Other Planning Documents and Surveys of DNR and DHR

D Page 81 SCORP Public Comment Summary

E

Page 85 Interactive Website Mapping of Recreation and Conservation Areas

F

Page 86 SCORP Board Resolution

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 70

APPENDIX

A

APPENDIX A: Systematic Process for Crafting the SCORP
Phase I: Orientation and Information Gathering
To begin the planning process, representatives from key federal and state agencies and non-governmental organizations met to discuss process details, agree on the scope of the plan and confirm the resources available for its development. A SCORP Advisory Committee served as a governing body for assuring that a plan was developed that would meet all requirements yet was progressive, comprehensive yet focused and challenging yet achievable.
PRHSD contracted with the University of Georgia (UGA) to oversee and coordinate the SCORP development process. Together they reviewed several relevant state and regional planning documents to identify: socio-economic trends in Georgia's population demographics, industry sectors, employment, etc.; available infrastructure and services to support outdoor recreation; existing promotion and communication systems; and potential resources for implementation. They also studied Georgia SCORPs from prior years and recent plans from other states.
Phase II: Inventory of Existing Resources
The second phase aimed to document as many existing local, state, federal, non-governmental and other public outdoor recreation and conservation resources as possible given time and resource constraints; and to create--for the first time--an interactive inventory in a Geographic Information System (GIS) database. To accomplish this, PRHSD and its partners, including UGA:
Collected information on outdoor recreation resources from municipal and county comprehensive plans and web pages.
Located each recreation area spatially in a GIS from aerial photographs or via satellite imagery.
Created a database and populated it with information on the outdoor recreation attributes of each area.
Worked with local park and recreation departments to assess the accuracy of the locations and attribute data.
Phase III: Public Input
Survey In the third phase, UGA conducted a statewide telephone survey of Georgia adults aged 18 and older about outdoor recreation. The survey asked Georgians about their support for outdoor recreation; their participation in outdoor recreation activities and access to outdoor recreation; the barriers or constraints that limit their participation in outdoor recreation; why outdoor recreation is important to them; and their assessment of issues facing outdoor recreation in Georgia. Georgians with residential telephone landlines were randomly sampled from each of the four geographic regions (see Figure 2), creating four independent random samples of 400 adults for a total of 1,600 Georgians who responded to the telephone survey. Finally, the survey data were weighted to improve the accuracy of population estimates and the maximum sampling error was 5% for each regional sample and the statewide sample.

Page 71

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

A P P E N DIX A : S y s t e m a t i c P r o c e s s f o r C r a f t i n g t h e S C O R P

Public town hall meetings DNR held seven public meetings across the state, drawing an estimated 170 attendees. Meetings were held in conveniently accessible locations in a variety of urban, suburban, and rural settings: Atlanta, Brunswick, Camilla, Columbus, Milledgeville, Rome, and Tallulah Falls. The meetings were publicized using websites, stakeholder mailing lists, and newspaper advertisements. Advisory Committee members actively encouraged participation through personal invitations to their constituents. Attendees provided input on four questions: Why is outdoor recreation important to you and your family? What should be done to improve outdoor recreation in your area? What obstacles will keep improvements from being made? What else do we need to know about the future of outdoor recreation in Georgia?
Online comments A dedicated website was offered to those individuals who were not able to attend the town hall meetings, for whatever reason. This site, gastateparks. org/scorp, posed the same questions as the meeting facilitators. More than 400 people recorded their comments online through January 2007.
Stakeholder focus groups and briefings To elicit specific input from stakeholder groups, DNR conducted focus groups and briefings with public land management agencies and companies, government agencies and user groups. These groups targeted the unique needs and concerns of: African Americans High school age students Elementary school age students Recreation professionals with the Georgia Recreation and Park Association (GRPA) Managers of large public land tracts SCORP Advisory Committee.
Phase IV: Analysis and Strategic Planning
During this phase, data was analyzed by county, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), micro Statistical Areas, and U.S. Congressional Districts. Supplementary findings from the National Survey of Recreation and the Environment (NSRE) and the Georgia Survey of Recreation and the Environment (GSRE) were examined to compare Georgia's experience with that of other states across the southeast and the nation. Results were used to generate strategies for policies and programs at state and local levels, along with actions for implementing them. These were presented to the Advisory Committee in April 2007 for discussion and subsequent modification.
Phase V: Adoption and Implementation
The draft document was presented to the DNR Board in May 2007 and made available for public comment (see Appendix D for comments). It was subsequently modified, finalized, and adopted by the Board and the Governor for submission to the National Park Service.

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

P a g e 72

APPENdIX

B

Appendix B: Top Responses from Georgians to Three Standard Questions

Town Hall Participants

African Americans

Managers of Large Acreage Tracts

WHy
is outdoor recreation important to you and your family?
WHAT
should be done to improve outdoor recreation in your area?

SCORP Advisory Committee

Recreation Professionals

WHAT
obstacles will prevent
improvements from being made?

Online Survey Respondents

High School youth

Page 3

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

APPENdix B: Top Responses from Georgians to Three Standard Questions

Town Hall Participants

WHy
is outdoor recreation important to you and your family?
WHAT
should be done to improve outdoor recreation in your area?
WHAT
obstacles will prevent improvements from being made?

1. Improve both physical and mental health 2. Maintain outdoor lifestyle/tradition, enjoy
nature 3. Provide opportunity to acquire education/
knowledge 4. Strengthen family/social connections 5. Encourage conservation/preservation of
natural resources
Other noted reasons: Positive economic impact Improves quality of life Access to water Counter rapid urbanization/sprawl Enjoy equine activities Trail/park connectivity Enjoy diversity of opportunity/activity ATV businesses are dependent on access to public lands
1. Increase conservation/preservation of natural resources
2. Increase number and diversity of outdoor recreation opportunities/activities
3. Increase/improve education/knowledge of outdoor recreations benefits
4. Increase overall funding for outdoor recreation
5. Increase/accelerate acquisition 6. Increase the number of trails of all kinds
Other common responses: Improve collaboration efforts Improve planning techniques Improve marketing/public relations Improve safety/security Increase number of bike trails/lanes Increase water access
1. Lack of funds 2. Low priority/support 3. Lack of communication and collaboration 4. Lack of education/knowledge of the benefits
of outdoor recreation 5. Development pressures
Other obstacles mentioned often: Competing values, needs and interests Land scarcity/rapid urbanization Lack of planning (recreation and land use)

African Americans
1. Provide an urban escape/connect with nature 2. Provide educational opportunities about
nature
Other important reasons: Positive impact on physical and mental health Provide a variety of activities Provide family/social activities Contribute to a sense of place Activities for all ages
1. Marketing for the African American/urban population, specifically: Use familiar faces as spokespersons Get churches and schools involved Use popular cultural themes Emphasize the history of African American contributions/involvement with outdoor recreation
2. Improve the number/variety/diversity of activities available
Other suggestions: Be flexible/try something different Improve/upgrade/maintain existing resources Educate the public/officials on benefits/ value of outdoor recreation based on input from the community
1. Political priorities 2. Inadequate marketing/public relations 3. History/traditions
Other frequently mentioned obstacles: Lack of money Inadequate planning Perception that participating in outdoor recreation is unsafe

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 4

APPENdIX

B

SCORP Advisory Committee

Online Survey

WHy
is outdoor recreation important to you and your family?
WHAT
should be done to improve outdoor recreation in your area?

1. Relax and escape 2. Improve health, physical and mental/exercise 3. Engage in positive/affordable family/social
activity 4. Connect with nature 5. Encourage conservation/preservation
Enjoyment of outdoor activities was also mentioned (specifically, paddling, canine related, and shooting/archery)
1. Increase/improve access/opportunity 2. Increase funding 3. Increase education of benefits/values 4. Increase/improve marketing/public relations,
specifically diversity in markets and message and development of common/consistent messages across all providers 5. Maintain/upgrade/update existing facilities/ resources
Other issues identified: Increase/improve advocacy Increase connectivity between existing facilities/resources Increase communication/collaboration, particularly with schools, local governments and organizations, and corporate America

WHAT
obstacles will prevent improvements from being made?

1. Lack of education/knowledge of the benefits/ value/urgency, specifically health, economic development impact, and environmental benefits
2. Low priority/support with public/decision makers
3. Lack of funds, specifically Need to find non-governmental funds Need consistent funding sources that cannot be raided Need sources the public supports Impact fees in fast growing areas
4. Lack of leadership/common message 5. Competing interests/needs/values
Another key obstacle: Lack of communication/collaboration, specifically with Georgia Department of Economic Development (on economic impact/benefit of outdoor recreation), with urban populations and with schools

1. Connect with nature/outdoor tradition/urban escape
2. Improve health (physical and mental) /exercise
3. Engage in positive/affordable family/social activity
4. Enjoy outdoor activities 5. Education opportunities
1. Increase access Public land for hunting Equine Water activities Closer to home/residential areas Active/sports Elderly or disabled Picnic areas Middle and South Georgia ATV/OHV/motorcycle All ages
2. Increase trails/connectivity Hiking/walking Bicycle--mountain and others ATV/OHV/motorcycle Equine Closer to home/residential areas
3. Increase conservation/preservation Acquire more land
4. Update/upgrade existing facilities Restrooms
5. Improve/increase maintenance of existing facilities Reduce litter/trash Restrooms
1. Lack of money Increase grants More budget flexibility
2. Low priority/support Equine Protecting Piedmont Park (Atlanta)
3. Rapid urbanization/development pressure 4. Land scarcity/loss of public land 5. Activism
Environmental Anti OHV/ATV/motorcycle 6. Lack of knowledge/education of benefits/ value of outdoor recreation 7. Competing interests/needs/values

Page

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

APPENdix B: Top Responses from Georgians to Three Standard Questions

High School youth

Recreation Professionals

WHy
is outdoor recreation important to you and your family?

1. Good opportunity for family time/ bonding in nature
2. Provide fun and relaxation

WHAT
should be done to improve outdoor recreation in your area?

1. Increase access to/convenience of/opportunities at outdoor recreation resources
2. Increase number of trails/paths/sidewalks specifically for walking/hiking, biking, and jogging/running
Other improvements mentioned: Updating and
maintaining existing facilities and resources Reduce trash/litter at existing facilities

1. Has a positive influence on character 2. Positive impact on physical and mental
health
Other, less frequently mentioned responses: Provide a diversity of opportunity/
activity Positive impact on quality of life Connection with nature Educational opportunities Contribute to a sense of community
1. Increase funding overall for outdoor recreation
2. Need for more money for maintenance and operations
3. Educate the public and officials on the value/benefits of outdoor recreation
4. Increase/improve communication/collaboration among partners, particularly closer coordination between the Georgia Municipal Association (GMA) and the Association County Commissioners of Georgia (ACCG) on outdoor recreation issues
Other solutions noted: Expand/update/maintain existing
resources and facilities Increase conservation/preservation
efforts Increase/improve/diversify marketing
and public relations

WHAT
obstacles will prevent improvements from being made?

1. Low priority/support of outdoor recreation
2. Need to make outdoor recreation more appealing to all ages including activities that are more teen oriented
Other frequently mentioned obstacles: Ignorance/lack of
education about benefits/value of outdoor recreation Lack of money Development pressures/competition Perception not safe/ secure

1. Low priority/support for recreation 2. Competing interests/needs/values
(specifically, development pressures) 3. Lack of funding, specifically lack of a
consistent funding stream
Other frequently mentioned obstacles were:
Ignorance/lack of education on benefits/value of outdoor recreation
Inadequate planning, specifically lax land use/development regulations
Lack of flexibility/fear of trying something new

Managers of Large Acreage Tracts
Not applicable
1. Adopt a market based approach Go where the users are Maintain, update and rehabilitate existing facilities
2. Increase education/knowledge of the benefits/values of outdoor recreation in terms of economic impact, human character and health
3. Focus on mission, both nature based and passive
4. Increase/improve communication/collaboration between providers and partners
5. Link outdoor recreation/nature to communities Aim for everyone to live within a 15 minute walk of some form of outdoor recreation Increase connectivity to schools, existing parks and downtowns
1. Doing more with less, decreasing funds, budget cuts
2. Increasing demand/use 3. Competing interests,
needs, and values (particularly related to fisherman vs. paddlers and ATVs) 4. Demographic shifts (especially related to ethnic/cultural diversity) 5. Development pressure on public lands (e.g., hotels and resort development)

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page

APPENdIX

C

Appendix C: How SCORP Relates to Other Planning documents and Surveys of dNR and dHR

1

Coastal Management Plan

2

2005 Survey by dNR of Attitudes of the Public, Stakeholders, and Employees

3

dNR Strategic Plan

4

Georgia Land Conservation Plan

5

dHR Nutrition and Physical Activity Plan

6

Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy

Coastal Management Plan

Guiding Principle or Issue Database development for natural & social elements Promote recreational opportunities Promote impact assessments for green developments

Plan Reference Obj. 1; Program Goal Obj. 2; Program Goal Obj. 4; Program Goal

Promote collaborative participation Encourage public input Technical assistance to local governments Support of wildlife and biodiversity conservation Support for clean water Support for wetlands

Obj.3; Goal 3; Program Goals
Obj.3; Goal 4; Program Goals
Obj.3; Goal 3; Program Goals
Obj.1-5; Goal 1; Resource Goals
Obj.10; Goal 1; Resource Goals
Obj.14; Goal 1; Resource Goals

SCORP Continuity - Cohesion Call for database Self-evident Promote good development GORP
Survey, calls for constituent-preference monitoring, database development, etc. GORP, Technical Assistance Branch
Resource Conservation one of three tenants of the SCORP Wetlands per Section 303, discussion of environmental quality & ecosystem services Wetlands focus per Section 303

Page

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

APPENdix C: How SCORP Relates to Other Planning documents and Surveys of dNR and dHR

2005 Survey by dNR of Attitudes of the Public, Stakeholders, and Employees

Guiding Principle or Issue
DNR & Employees cited preservation and maintenance of existing historic and archaeological sites a major concern related to urban sprawl
Public cited too few facilities or poor quality facilities for outdoor recreation
Public cited sub-par performance for DNR in nonregulatory assistance and land acquisition
Public cited great performance for DNR in recreation
Public said education and outreach were very important, but DNR's performance was not up to par
Public placed the highest level of importance among issues of recreation, education, non-regulatory assistance, outreach, and communications
Top performance ratings among public was for management of state parks
Land acquisition very important to public more so than other programs of importance
Lowest ratings for DNR performance were related to issues of land protection for urbanizing areas, obtaining federal funding, and long-range planning

Survey Reference Exec. Summ. 4th bullet
Exec. Summ. 5th bullet Exec. Summ. 13th bullet Exec. Summ. 14th bullet Exec. Summ. 15th bullet Exec. Summ. 22nd bullet
Exec. Summ. 24th bullet Exec. Summ. 34th bullet Exec. Summ. 35th bullet

Largest disparity between importance and DNR's performance was with land acquisition

Exec. Summ. 39th bullet

DNR employees rated land acquisition performance highest for parks, historic, archaeological, cultural areas, and public fishing areas
Public: Top importance for recreation was for variety of opportunities
Public: Importance ratings higher than performance ratings for outdoor recreation opportunities, and for recreation on state lands
Public & Employees: Importance ratings for recreation were highest for recreation opportunities beyond fishing, hunting, or boating
All groups: Importance ratings inverse of DNR performance ratings for recreation
Education on state parks rated highly among all groups with respect to importance
Public rated high importance for programs providing grants and technical assistance
Public rates most important outdoor recreation issue: 21% (second highest response) Not enough parks

Exec. Summ. 41st bullet
Exec. Summ. 57th bullet Exec. Summ. 59th bullet
Exec. Summ. 60th, 63rd bullet Exec. Summ. 62nd bullet Exec. Summ. 69th bullet Exec. Summ. 79th bullet p. 14

SCORP Continuity - Cohesion Urbanization a continual theme. Focus on maintenance and operation of sites also a continual theme Too few, poor condition a continual theme
GORP, Technical Assistance Unit
Attentive to public preferences Identified need for additional outreach
GORP, Technical Assistance Unit
Attentive to public preferences
Strong focus on land acquisition
Continual theme
Continual theme
Attentive to public preferences
Focus on diversity of activities and attentiveness to demographic groups Continual theme
Focus on diversity of activities and attentiveness to demographic groups
Attentive to public preferences
Attentive to public preferences, Focus on education & outreach GORP, Technical Assistance Unit
Attentive to public preferences

Outdoor recreation was the highest rated issue among employees of DNR and stakeholders

p. 16, 18

Attentive to public preferences Focus on acquisition & activities diversification

Public: low quantity/quality sites a top problem

p. 20

Focus on facilities rehabilitation

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page

APPENdIX

C

Guiding Principle or Issue Resource inventory and monitoring
Public use and access

dNR Strategic Plan

Plan Reference p.3

SCORP Continuity - Cohesion SCORP Survey of public opinion & assets

p.3

Re-occurring theme and conclusion

Safe, high-quality recreational opportunities
Building a conservation ethic Public education, outreach, and communications Science-based decision-making
Ecosystem functions - clean water, clean air, biodiversity, recreational and educational opportunities Recognition that DNR is only one part of resource conservation in the state (DNR facilitates collaboration) & need for stakeholder-participation Public/private partnerships
Expand DNR technical assistance All levels of government Recognize economic benefit of tourism
Recognize a diversity of outdoor activities - not heavily skewed toward hunting Quantify economic impacts Encourage tourism Resource awareness & responsibility
Public involvement Sustainable economic development

p.7 (Objective 1 - Public Access Issue)
p.6
p.7 (Objective 1)
p.7 (Objective 1 - Resource Management Issue)
p.10

A continual theme
A continual theme A continual theme A continual theme
Focus on wetlands

pp.10, 12

Elevation of importance of local service providers

p.10

GORP, DNR w/ local service providers, cooperating

with NGOs

p.11

Technical Assistance Unit, GORP

p.12

Continual theme throughout document

pp.12, 14 (Objective 2 - Public Access Issue)

Economic benefits of recreation areas one of three Strategic Directions

p.13 (Objective 2 - Resource SCORP survey, recognize need to diversify based on

Management)

culture and age preferences

p.14

Element of economic vitality

p.14

Tourism a continual theme

p.18 (Obj. 1 - Public Ed)

Educating public & officials of value of recreation & recreation lands

p.19 (Obj. 1 - Public Ed)

SCORP survey, call for local needs assessment

p.2 (Obj. 3 - Regulatory Issue) Encouraging developers to build `green'

Guiding Principle or Issue Prioritizing land protection Integration of local governments Partnerships
Secure reliable (consistent) funding source Explore alternate funding sources Critical value of land resources Quality of life, economic competitiveness Focus on planning

Georgia Land Conservation Plan

Plan Reference Recommendation 1 Recommendation 2 Recommendation 3
Recommendation 7 p. 71 Guiding principles Guiding principles Guiding principles

SCORP Continuity - Cohesion Local needs assessment Focus on local service providers Continual theme
Repeated objective Repeatedly mentioned Repeatedly mentioned Repeatedly mentioned Repeatedly mentioned, particularly for local service providers

Page 9

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

dHR Nutrition and Physical Activity Plan

APPENdix C: How SCORP Relates to Other Planning documents and Surveys of dNR and dHR

Guiding Principle or Issue Greenspace in developments

Plan Reference

SCORP Continuity - Cohesion

p.34 Community Setting #4 Recommendation in the Economic Vitality section

Educate community officials

p.34 Community Setting #4 Continual theme

Promote pedestrian and non-motorized protection

p.34 Community Setting #4 Continual theme, focus on active recreation

Skill-building for physical activity

p.37 Community Setting #8 Outdoor recreation facilities and activities are safe

Assessing barriers

p.40

A fundamental element of SCORP

Promoting access to activity programs

p.40

Assessing college curriculum (targeted to medical) p.49

Mirrors effort to improve access to recreation areas Mirrors effort to support leisure-services curricula

Provide joint-training opportunities (including CMEs p.50 and CEUs).
Educate health insurance plan providers and legisla- p.50 tors on the benefits of physical activity in preventing disease

Promote reimbursement for physical activity via Medi- p.50 care, PeachCare, private insurance and state health benefits plans.

Provide training to schools via resource guides for

p.52

physical activity / outdoor recreation

Promote state standard for physical activity in schools p.55

Mirrors effort to support leisure-services curricula
Implementation issue discussed for GORP, not in SCORP per se
Implementation issue discussed for GORP, not in SCORP per se
Outdoor classroom concept
Outdoor classroom concept

Provide skill-building opportunities as part of worksite p.57 wellness programs.
Maintain and enhance current surveillance systems p.58 to monitor physical activity.
Implement tools to monitor policy changes related to p.58 physical activity at the community level.
Collaborate with the Philanthropic Collaborative for a p.58 Healthy Georgia.

Implementation issue for GORP. Work with private partners
Monitoring attendance, use, preferences, DCA Comprehensive Planning Docs, etc.
Educating local governments, rewarding and assisting proactive partners
GORP, more than SCORP, calls for working with philanthropic community

Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy
(a.k.a.: State Wildlife Action Plan)

Guiding Principle or Issue Conduct a statewide wetland mapping and assessment effort. Develop projections of future land use trends.
Assess environmental literacy among the public.

Plan Reference
p. 172 Statewide Themes: Highest Priority Actions
p. 172 Statewide Themes: Highest Priority Actions
p. 180

SCORP Continuity - Cohesion Wetlands focus
Land-use trends, local assessment of recreation needs Conservation-ethic, education missions

Develop educational materials to deliver conservation p. 181 messages to the public.

Establish a network of regional educators and community contacts to provide workshops and programs for key conservation.

p. 181

Establish a consistent source of funding for land protection for wildlife conservation.

p. 181

Improve capacity to work with corporate landowners. p. 181

Provide technical support through staff or contractors. p. 181

Education of public & officials on value of recreation areas Education of public & officials on value of rec areas
Continual theme
A task identified for GORP GORP, Technical Assistance Unit

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 0

APPENDIX

D

Appendix D: SCORP Public Comment Summary
The public comment period for the draft plan of the 20082013 Georgia State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) was open from May 22, 2007 to midnight on June 22, 2007. Interested people could download the draft plan from the PRHSD website and submit their comments at the same site. PRHSD also accepted written comments mailed to their office. Staff also mailed hard copies of the draft plan to those people who requested. Both online and mailed comments are included in this summary.
Eighty total responses, some with multiple comments, were received during the public comment period.

There were five categories of comments that were mentioned more than five times. They are listed below:
Increase equine access/opportunity (20 mentions)
Specifically mentioned were the following: Longer trails, 10 to 20 miles Areas for camping with horses Space for trucks and horse trailers More opportunity in southwest Georgia
Increase conservation/preservation of natural resources including land and wildlife (14 mentions)
Specifically mentioned were the following: Conservation of large, undeveloped tracts Conservation of native species and habitats Conservation of greenspace Less development in parks More coastal parks Conservation of land along streams, rivers and in watersheds
Increase birding access/opportunity (11 mentions)
Increase access/opportunities for OHV (off highway vehicle)/ATV/ motorcycle (7 mentions)
Specifically: Increase access in Atlanta area Keep horse and hiking trails separate Tighter restrictions on off highway vehicles
Increase number of state/public parks (6 mentions)
Specifically: In the Savannah area In the Lake Lanier area In rural areas of the state

Page 81

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

A ppen d i x D : S C O R P P u b l i c C o m m e n t S u m m a r y

There were many other topics that came up more than once. These are listed below:
Increase land acquisition (5 mentions)
Specifically: Near residential areas Near work areas Near small/rural towns Both local and state acquisitions
Increase access to, use of, and increase variety of activities offered in existing parks and facilities (5 mentions)
Specifically: Open Wildlife Management Areas to more activities
Increase tent camping (4 mentions)
Specifically: Allow reservation of specific sites Separate from RV camping areas Increase quiet/peaceful camping areas away from more active recreation Increase camping opportunities in the Atlanta area
Increase number of trails (4 mentions)
Specifically: Hiking Biking Interpretive Near Atlanta
Increase outdoor recreation funding (4 mentions)
Specifically: For school recreation equipment For parks and historic sites For wildlife management For construction/acquisition of new facilities
Increase water access (4 mentions)
Specifically: Boat ramp at U.S. Hwy 41 and the Chattahoochee River Increase law enforcement and good stewardship on water
Increase use of volunteers (4 mentions)
Specifically: Trail maintenance Interpretation
Improve/increase use of technology (3 mentions)
Specifically: Improve online reservation system Increase details of park facilities on website Provide for wired and wireless internet access in parks
Increase interpretation (3 mentions)
Specifically: Increase interpretive staff, perhaps using volunteers Increase interpretative signs, trail maps and other media

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

P a g e 82

APPENDIX

D

Increase linear parks and connectivity between parks (3 mentions) Increase separation between quiet/passive activities and active/ noisy activities (3 mentions) Increase funding for maintenance and operations (2 mentions) Increase nature based education (2 mentions) Increase/improve access for disabled and elderly (2 mentions) Increase collaboration between parks (2 mentions)

In addition to the previous comments that were identified more than once, there were several individual comments and some that were specific to areas of the state. These follow:
Playground at Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park
Increase yurt access
Increase use of fire to promote biodiversity
Albany, Georgia issues, specifically:
Radium Springs site needs to be improved so people can access it Chehaw Park needs stable funding
Outdoor recreation is a vital urban escape
Increase off-leash dog areas
No more hotels should be constructed in state parks
Bid concession services out to private contractors

Number of Comments by City or Town

Acworth

1

Albany

1

Alpharetta

1

Athens

2

Atlanta

4

Augusta

1

Avondale Estates 1

Bainbridge

1

Barnesville

2

Bishop

1

Blairsville

1

Blue Ridge

2

Bonaire

1

Bowdon

1

Calhoun

1

Canton

1

Cleveland

1

Conyers

2

Culloden

1

Cumming

1

Dacula

1

Dallas

1

Decatur

1

Douglas

1

Duluth

1

Dunwoody

1

Eatonton

1

Elberton

1

Ellijay

2

Fitzgerald

2

Glendale

1

Greensboro

1

Grovetown

1

Haddock

1

Hampton

1

Hiram

1

Hogansville

1

Hoschton

1

Kennesaw

2

Lawrenceville 2

Page 83

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Lithia Springs 1

Loganville

1

Macon

1

Marietta

6

Nicholson

1

Palmetto

1

Rincon

1

Rome

1

Snellville

2

Statesboro

2

Suches

1

Summerville 1

Talking Rock 1

Tennille

1

Toomsboro

1

Tucker

3

Tybee Island 1

Valdosta

1

APPENDIX

A ppen d i x E : I n t e r a c t i v e W e b s i t e M a p p i n g R e c r e a t i o n a n d C o n s e r v a t i o n A r e a s

E

Appendix E: Interactive Website Mapping of Recreation and Conservation Areas
The PRHSD is working with several partners to make it easy for people to locate local and state parks and to learn about the amenities they provide by producing an online mapping program. As it is envisioned, the public would be able to search for recreation sites that provide specific amenities, or simply identify parks that are close to their homes or travel destinations.
The map on the following page provides an idea of the kind of results visitors can expect to see from the website once it is up and running.
While this interactive website is still undergoing development, a link will be established on the PRHSD website once it is ready for public launch sometime before the summer of 2008. The link is www.GeorgiaStateParks.org/SCORP.

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

Page 84

APPENDIX

E

P a g e 85

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

APPENDIX

F

RESOLUTION
Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) 2008-2013
WHEREAS, Georgia Code 12-3-1 requires the Department of Natural Resources to appraise recreational needs in Georgia, assist local governments in recreation planning, establish and promote recreation standards and develop a state policy on outdoor recreation; and
WHEREAS, a Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) is required for continued eligibility for federal funding under the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF), as managed by National Park Service for the United States Department of Interior; and
WHEREAS, over the past 40 years, Georgia's SCORP has guided the federal allocation of over $75 million in LWCF grant funds to the state and its local governments; and
WHEREAS, these funds have been matched to achieve over $150 million in direct outdoor recreation investments for Georgia citizens and visitors; and
WHEREAS, through these LWCF-leveraged investments, Georgia has protected important natural resources, developed an array of outdoor recreation facilities, rehabilitated existing outdoor recreation assets and provided affordable and accessible recreational opportunities for all; and
WHEREAS, to fulfill the requirements of the law and LWCF program, the Parks, Recreation and Historic Sites Division convened an Advisory Committee to assist in updating SCORP; and
WHEREAS, SCORP 2008-2013 is based on extensive public input, a comprehensive inventory, an analysis of trends and benchmarks, a statistically-valid public opinion survey, as well as input from a broad array of allied federal, state and local governments and non-profit agencies; and
WHEREAS, the findings of the eighteen month effort reveal a sense of urgency due to rapid urbanization and loss of greenspace, changing demographics, obesity and declining health, a diminished conservation ethic, the desire for economic growth in local communities, and the growing support for outdoor recreation; and

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

P a g e 86

A ppen d i x F : S C O R P B o a r d R e s o l u t i o n

APPENdIX

F

WHEREAS, SCORP 2008-2013 addresses the findings through forward thinking strategic actions that will guide and enable jurisdictions to work with citizens, non-profit support organizations, business and service delivery partners to address the challenges facing our state and find new and innovative ways to maximize opportunities to ensure a healthy and prosperous Georgia with abundant greenspace and recreation opportunities for future generations to enjoy; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Georgia Board of Natural Resources adopts SCORP 2008-2013 as Georgia's official policy document guiding the provision of outdoor recreation for the next five years; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Department of Natural Resources Commissioner will incorporate this resolution into the Parks, Recreation and Historic Sites Division's operating policy manual and seek all opportunities to ensure continuous implementation of SCORP 2008-2013, including the creation of the Georgia Outdoor Recreation Partnership (GORP), a task force comprised of the SCORP Advisory Committee, representatives from state agencies, allied organizations and others charged with the responsibility to ensure implementation of SCORP recommendations.

Adopted this 29th day of August, 2007

Respectfully submitted by:

______________________________ J. A. Walters, Chairman Georgia Board of Natural Resources

ATTEST:

______________________________ Secretary

Page

Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013

This publication is printed on paper containing 10% post-consumer recycled content which is certified by the Forest Stewardship Council to be environmentally sustainable.

Outdoor Recreation Strategies to Enhance Georgia's Future for Health and Livability, Economic Vitality and Resource Conservation
Georgia Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2008-2013