- Collection:
- Georgia Government Publications
- Title:
- TEM : understanding components of the teacher effectiveness measure
- Creator:
- Georgia. Department of Education
- Date of Original:
- 2016
- Subject:
- Teacher effectiveness--Georgia
Teachers--Rating of--Georgia - Location:
- United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018
- Medium:
- color photographs
timelines (chronologies)
flow charts
tables (documents)
state government records - Type:
- Text
- Format:
- application/pdf
- Description:
- Description based on online resource harvested on March 25, 2015 from www.gadoe.org; title from PDF caption (Georgia Government Publications database, viewed June 9, 2016)
- External Identifiers:
- OCLC 951627965
NZ MMS ID 9910181176402931
Call Number E300.L4 M1 2016 T4 - Metadata URL:
- https://dlg.galileo.usg.edu/id:dlg_ggpd_s-ga-be300-pl4-bm1-b2016-bt4-belec-p-btext
- Digital Object URL:
- https://dlg.galileo.usg.edu/do:dlg_ggpd_s-ga-be300-pl4-bm1-b2016-bt4-belec-p-btext
- Language:
- eng
- Extent:
- 1 online resource (2 pages) : color illustrations
- Holding Institution:
- University of Georgia. Map and Government Information Library
- Rights:
-
OVERALL STUDENT GROWTH RATING
TEACHER KEYS EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM Generates a Teacher E ectiveness Measure
TEACHER ASSESSMENT
ON PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS
SUPPORT AND
Observations and DOCUMENTATION
Documentation
SURVEYS OF INSTRUCTIONAL
PRACTICE
Grades 3-5, Grades 6-8, Grades 9-12
STUDENT GROWTH
TEACHERS OF TESTED SUBJECTS
Student Growth Percentiles
TEACHERS OF NON-TESTED SUBJECTS
LEA Developed, DOE Approved Student
Learning Objectives
TEM DETERMINATION
IV
NEEDS DEVELOPMENT
PROFICIENT
EXEMPLARY
EXEMPLARY
III
NEEDS DEVELOPMENT
PROFICIENT
PROFICIENT
EXEMPLARY
II
INEFFECTIVE
NEEDS DEVELOPMENT
NEEDS DEVELOPMENT
PROFICIENT
I
INEFFECTIVE
INEFFECTIVE
NEEDS DEVELOPMENT
NEEDS DEVELOPMENT
I
II
III
IV
OVERALL TAPS SUMMATIVE RATING
Each teacher's TEM rating is determined by combininghis/her TAPS and Student Growth ratings using the TEM matrix. A teacher locates the row with his/her Student Growth rating and the column with his/her TAPS rating, and the cell where they meet contains his/her final TEM rating.
For example, if a teacher receives an overall Student Growth rating of Level III and an overall TAPS Summative rating of Level II, the teacher's TEM rating would be Proficient.
TEM TIMELINE
2013-2014 RT3 Districts/Locally-Approved Charters
Teachers of State Assessments 2013-2014 TEM:
2012-2013 CRCT/EOCT and 2014 TAPS SUMMATIVE
2014-2015 RT3 Districts/Locally-Approved Charters
All Teachers 2014-2015 TEM: 2013-2014 CRCT/EOCT/SLO and 2015 TAPS SUMMATIVE NON-RT3 Districts Teachers of State Assessments 2014-2015 TEM: 2013-2014 CRCT/EOCT and 2015 TAPS SUMMATIVE
2015-2016 All Teachers in Georgia
2015-2016 TEM: 2014-2015 GEORGIA MILESTONES/SLO
and 2016 TAPS SUMMATIVE
TEM will bevisiblein theGaDOE ElectronicPlatform, 2015-2016schoolyear
www.gadoe.org/school-improvement/ teacher-and-leader-e ectiveness
Georgia Department of Education Teacher and Leader E ectiveness Division
205 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive SE 1854 Twin Towers East Atlanta, GA 30334
TEM
Understanding Components of the
Teacher E ectiveness Measure
THE TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS MEASURE ( TEM )
The TEM consists of two components:
1 Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards (TAPS), and 2 Student Growth (SLOs/SGPs).
These two components contribute to the overall Teacher E ectiveness Measure (TEM) for each teacher.
TEM Rating: Exemplary,Proficient,NeedsDevelopmentI,ne ective
Both SLOs and SGPs : When a teacher has both SLO and SGP students, a weightedaverage of the teacher's SLO and SGP ratings will be calculated using the number of SLO and SGP student results in order to determine the teacher's overall Student Growth score. This average will be roundedaccording to standard roundingrules.
1 TEACHER ASSESSMENT ON
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ( TAPS )
The TAPS componentprovides evaluators with a qualitative, rubrics-based evaluation method by which they can measure teacher performance related to ten quality performance standards.
Summative scores are calculated by adding the values (0-3) for each of the ten performance standards.
TAPS Summative
Level I
Level II
Level III
Level IV
Summative Score Range
0-6
7-16
17-26
27-30
2 STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES
(SLOs )
The measure of student growth for non-state assessed courses is the Student Learning Objective.
The aggregatemeasure of SLO performance for all non-state assessed courses taught by a teacher will be used in calculating the TEM. (A teacher receives the highest rating for which he or she meets the criteria.)
SLO Rating
Level I Level II Level III
Level IV
Overall Student Results
< 50% demonstrates expected or high growth
50>-64% of students demonstrated expected /high growth
65>_-8890%%ofdsetumdoennststrates deemxopnescttreadteodrehxipgehcgterodw/htihgh growth
>>_9900%%odf setmudoennstsrates deexmpoecntsetdraoterdhiegxhpgercot-wth eAdN/hDigh growth and > 30% h>_ig5h0%grodwetmh oonnstthraeteSsLO high growth
2 STUDENT GROWTH PERCENTILE
(SGPs )
The measure of student growth for core state-assessed courses is the Student Growth Percentile.
A growth percentile can range from 1to 99. The mean Student Growth Percentile ( MeanGP ) for all students in state-assessed courses taught by a teacher will be used in calculating the TEM.
MeanGP Rating
Level I
Level II
Level III
Level IV
Mean Growth Percentile Range
MeanGP < 30
MeanGP >_ 30 and <_ 40
MeanGP > 40 and <_ 65
MeanGP > 65