ANNUAL REPORT
of
Georgia
Department of Agriculture
for 1921

J. J. BRO Commissio

INCLUDING REPO

STATE BUREAU OF

STATE CHEMIST

CHIEF FOOD INSPECTour---------H--~

STATE VETERINARIAN DRUG INSPECTOR

GENEP./.L L ;; \t: I
TH E UNIVERSiTY f" c:.:.

BOOKKEEPER

GIFT OF "S""\Qt ~ \.-, """"""".1.-~'~

STATE STATISTICIAN

SERIAL NUMBER 88
Quarterly Bulletin of the
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
of 1922
First Quarter-January, February and March
Entered at Atlanta, Ga., as second-class matter, Oct. 7, 1900, under Act June 6, 1900. Accepted for mailing at a special rate of postage provided for in Sec. 1103, Act of Oct. 3, 1917, authorized on June 29, 1918.

ANNUAL REPORT

of

I

Georgia

Department of Agriculture

for 1921

J. J. BROWN, Commissi'oner

INCLUDING REPORTS OF
STATE BUREAU OF MARKETS STATE CHE:J}IIST
CHIEF FOOD INSPECTOR STATE VETERINARIAN DRUG INSPECTOR BOOKKEEPER STATE STATISTICIAN

SERIAL NUMBER 88
Quarterly Bulletin of the

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

of 1922

'

I

First Quarter-January, February and March

Entered at Atlanta, Ga., a s second-class matter, Oct. 7, 1900, under Act June 6, 1900. Accepted for mailing at a special rate of postage pro-
vided for in Sec. 1103, Act of Oct. 3, 1917, authorized on June 29, 1918.

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
First Floor, State Capitol, Atlanta
J. J. BROWN,
Commissioner of Agriculture
JAS. I. HICKS,
Assistant Commissioner
T. J. R. JOHNSON,
Chief Clerk
T. J. R. JOHNSON,
Bookkeeper
J. M. HILBURN,
Chief Recording and Shipping Clerk
LEM B. JACKSON
Director Bureau of Markets
B.A. HANCOCK
Assistant Director
S. H. WILSON,
State Chemist
L. W. BRADLEY,
Assistant Chemist
PETER F. BAHNSEN,
State Veterinarian
0. S. LEE,
Chief Food Inspector

J. E. BODENHEIMER,
Assistant Chief Food Inspector
J. J. HOLLOWAY,
State Oil Inspector
T. A. CHEATHAM,
Chief Drug Inspector
Laws administered or enforced by the Commissioner of Agriculture :
Bureau of Markets. Fertilizer. Oil. Pure Food. Concentrated Commercial Feeding Stuff. Drug. Immigration (Ex-officio Commissioner of Immigration.)
I
Commissioner of Agriculture is ex-officio member of the Board of Trustees of State College of Agriculture, Chairman of State Board of Entomology, Chairman of Board of Directors of Georgia Experiment Station, member of the Board of Trustees of the Georgia Coastal Plains Experiment Station and member of State Board of Geology.

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL.
To His Excellency, Hon. Thomas W. Hardwick,
Governor of Georgia.
Sir:
In compliance with an Act of the General Assembly I present you this, my annual report, for the year ending December 31, 1921.
In transmitting this report, allow me to commend to you the sincere and earnest efforts and the valuable service of the officers and employees of the various Divisions constituting the Department of Agriculture, as well as all individual members of the Boards with which I am officially connected, and to express, gratefully, my appreciation of the same.
I desire to state that it will be my purpose to make this, my annual report, as brief as .possible; and, in further keeping with the best policy of economy, I desire to call your attention to the importance, in my opinion, of the creation of a State Auditing Department. The duty of such Department bei'ng to audit every department of our State Government that handles the people's money, and the making of an annual report to the General Assembly, to the end that a complete accounting of our entire State Go:vernment will be placed in the hands of the General Assembly each year. After assuming the duties of Commissioner of Agriculture I recommend to the General Assembly the establishment of an auditing department for our State Government, and am more fully convinced each year that to establish such a department would be the part of wisdom and constructive statesmanship, and I heartily i'ndorse the

,
Bill now pending in the General Assembly known as the Manson State Auditing Bill.
I sincerely hope that the General Assembly will, at its approaching session, establish a State Auditing Department with suffici'ent financial support to audit each and every department of our State Government annually.
Respectfully submitted, J. J. BROWN,
Commissioner of Agriculture.

Report of the Commissioner of Agriculture
Since submitting the last annual report of this Department, many changes, as well as unseen problems, have arisen that greatly affect Georgia's agricultural interests; but the paramount issue now confronting the farmers of our State is that of an economical distribution of all farm products at stabilized prices as far as possible, that will give to the farmer cost of production plus a reasonable profit.
The continued ravages of the boll weevil -make it necessary that we grow diversified agricultural products-not only for domestic consumption but for the markets at large. Therefore, the necessity of permanent co-operati've marketing associations, organized specifically for the purpose of handling each respective commodity, cannot be questioned; and to this end the wisdom of the last General Assembly in making a substantial appropriation for the State Bureau of Markets has brought about a wonderful improvement i'n marketing conditions in our State. But, realizing, as all are forced to realize, that cotton is yet our money crop, and will be possibly for many years to come, and as Chairman of the State Board of Entomology, permit me to say in this connection that it is no longer a question as to whether Georgi'a can or cannot produce cotton under boll weevil ~on ditions. It is an established fact, and now a matter of record in the files of the State Board of Entomology, that we CAN grow cotton at the rate of one bale per acre on lands that were Gapable of producing one bale per acre before the advent of the boll weevil, in the worst boll weevil sections of our State a:nd under most unfavorable conditions. But it is a fact, established from the records of the State
Board of Entomology, that it costs far more to grow a:
satisfactory yield of cotton per acre, than i't did before the advent of the boll weevil, and the great question now to be settled between the grower and the manufacturer and consumer of cotton is whether the cotton consuming world is
,

8

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

willing to pay cost plus a reasonable profit for cotton, or whether they will insist that the farmer continue to grow cotton for less than cost of production.
I have an abiding faith that through the fairness and wi'sdom of the manufacturer and consumer of cotton, and through the co-operative associations of the cotton producing belt, this price will be amicably and fairly adjusted. And, upon a fair and equitable adjustment of the question of cost of production and price received, will depend the future production of the American cotton crop; for, it i's _the height of folly to expect the cotton producers of America to very much longer continue their production at a price far below cost, when to do so would mean the inevitable bankruptcy and ruin of the cotton states.
It is very gratifyi'ng to note that the business interests of our country are almost unanimous in manifesting great activity in bringing about a fair and equitable system of distribution for this world's product which is best grown i'n the cotton producing states of this country.

FERTILIZER INSPECTION.
In addition to the usual work of inspecting mixed fertilizers and cotton seed meal, the task of inspecting a million or more pounds of calcium arsenate used in controlling the boll weevil, has also been put upon the fertilizer inspectors attached to the Department. During the year 5336
samples were taken for analysi's, including calcium arsenate; and the work they are called upon to do is increasing every year.
Salaries paid the fertilizer inspectors and the amount allowed for traveling expenses, in my judgment, are not as much as they should be; and in this connection I am sorry to state that a Bill which was introduced in the House of Representatives at its 1920 sessi'on looking to the correcting of this matter failed to be passed. I regret to note that

I

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

9

there is some agitation for curtailing the number of fertilizer inspectors, as it is now almost impossible to respond to the requests of the farmers of our State with the limited number of i'nspectors we now have. When the law creating the present number of inspectors was enacted more than fourteen years ago, the use of commercial fertilizer was from one-fourth to one:-half what it is at the present time, and the money received for inspection fees was correspondingly the same.
As the farmer, and the farmer alone, passes this fertilizer fund into the State Treasury for his protection and the operation of his Department of Agri'culture, I feel that any legislation jeopardizing the farmers' interests in the way of lessening the protection and service, wquld be nothing short of gross discrimination; and my dnformation from direct associ'ation with the farmers is to the effect that they would unanimously oppose any curtailing of the service rendered them for the purpose of diverting their money into the general tax fund of the State; for it is well known that the farmers of Georgia already contribute, through ad valorem taxation, their prorata share of that fund.
FERTILIZER TAGS
In each of my annual reports I have called the attention of the General Assembly to the wisdom of the enactment of a law that would allow the State to use all tags on hand brought over from the previous season;
It is very grati'fying, indeed, that the last General Assembly enacted such a law, and very much can be said to their honor and credit in this connection, as such a law has enabled the Department of Agriculture to use up all old tags on hand, thereby effecting a saving to the State of approximately five thousand dollars; and it will always hereafter prevent the accumulation and destruction of a previous season's tags.

10

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

STATE BUREAU OF MARKETS

In calling your attention to the report of the State Bureau of Markets, which appears i'n another portion of this volume, I would especially direct your attention to the fact that the increased appropriation given this Department at the meeting of the last General Assembly did not become available until this spring. Yet, it is true, that through the earnest efforts of the State Bureau of Markets, in connection wi'th other factors, 'j{e wen; instrumental in completing the organization of the Georgia Cotton. Growers Co-operative Association, and also the organization ,of the Georgia Cane Growers Co-operative Association in the cane belt of our State. The last named organization has already, through the aid of the State Bureau of Markets, perfected arrangements with the Federal War Fi'nance Corporation and secured thirty-five thousand dollars at a low rate of interest for the purpose of carrying in bonded warehouses syrups which wuuld have otherwise been sacrificed at a price far below the cost of production.
In addition to the work of co-operative marketing, the State Bureau of Markets has established in many sections of our State small community grai'n elevators and depots which are being successfully used in preparing grain for the market-a thing which has been utterly impossible in the past, due to the fact that the farmer offered his corn frequently in the shuck, on the cob, or shelled uncleaned in irregular packages, all of which made it impossible to sell hi's products in competition with the markets of the country.
The Bureau is now the recognized clearing house for Georgia's diversified agricultural products, and the volume of products that are moving satisfactorily is highly gratifying.
The Bureau, through its weekly Market Bulletin, which is now read by more than 200,000 farmers and farm product buyers, has materially assi'sted Georgia farm producers in

DEPARTMEN'l' OF AGRICULTUE

11

the more prompt and more profitable marketing of their products of every kind. The .rapidly growing demand for this Bulletin is ample evidence of the good service it is rendering.
Briefly stated, no division i:n our great Department of Agriculture has done more to encourage agriculture and make farming profitable than has the Georgia State Bureau of Markets, and I urge your careful consideration of the report made by its Director.

OIL AND GAS INSPECTION
It is extremely gratifying to note, from the annual report of J. J. Holloway, State Oil Inspector, that deorgi'a has won her case against the Texas Company ; and that over $400,500 collected from this and twelve other companies from the inspection of oil and gas will now revert to the treasury of the State. The Court's order to this effect is expected to come any day. Permit me to direct your attention to the State Oil Inspector's report as it appears in full, elsewhere in this bulletin.

STATE VETERINARIAN
The report of the State Veteri'narian, Dr. Peter F. Bahnsen, appears elsewhere in this publication, and gives in full the work of that branch of our department.
STATE CHEMIST
In the report of Dr. S. H. Wilson, State Chemist, will be found a full account of the work done in the laboratories in analyzing foods, feeds, drugs, fertilizers, calcium arsenate and other insecticides and fungicides, as well as the work done in the bacteriological laboratory in the preparation of inoculation for legumes.

FOOD AND FEEDING STUFFS
Your attention is directed to the report of Mr. 0. S. Lee, Chief Food Inspector, who has charge of this branch of

12

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

our Department. The work done by the Chief Food Inspector and his assistants is one of the most frnportant wor~s connected with the State Department of Agriculture. The
name of this branch of our Department signifies purity in the various articles eaten by man and beast. Not only is it interested in the purity of the articles, but it enforces laws, rules and regulatfons having as their principal object in view the quantity and quality of nutritive elements found in the commercial feed stuffs offered for sale in our State. In this police capacity, many frauds are prevented from being perpetrated upon the purchasers of commercial feeding stuffs.

DRUGS
In compliance with the drug laws of our State, the State Drug Inspector, Dr. T. A. Cheatham, submits his report, based upon his fnspection of the various places of business, such as drug stores and pharmacies, operating in the State of Georgia, handling articles corning under his jurisdiction. His report appears later on in this publication.

PURE SEED LAW
I have repeatedly called attention to the need of a Pure Seed Law fn the State of Georgia. Bills to this effect have been introduced in the Georgia Legislature, but up to the present time no such bill has ever been enacted ip.to law. From time to time, farmers and dealers in Georgia complain to the State Department of Agriculture about the impurities of seeds and their lack of corning up to the expectations of the purchaser. There being nothing in the laws of Georgia to penalize those who would perpetrate such frauds, either by short weights and measures or shipping impure seeds, we areunable to render them any assistance, and can only refer them to the Georgia statutes relating to frauds in general.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUE

13

We recommend to the General Assembly the enactment . of a Pure Seed Law that will protect the farmers; as there is so much depending upon the seeding of their land with pure arid unadulterated seed.

STATISTICAL DIVISION
I take pleasure in calling your attenti'on to the report of our State Statistician, Mr. M. V. Calvin, appearing in another section of this report.

BOLL WEEVIL CONTROL
The State Board of Entomology, in its varied field of usefulness, has been abundant and faithful in service. The ever increasing multi'plication of crop pests and the invasion of new enemies, render the work of the Board an absolute necessity for the protection of the State's interest. The importance of Bee Culture has grown to an extent to justify the employment of a man to devote his entire time to its study and in combatting its enemies.
The sweet potato industry has grown to a gratifyi'ng extent but in comparison with its growth. is the increased responsibility of the Board. Curing houses and plant beds must be inspected both to protect the grower and to enforce the quarantine regulations.
The Mexican Bean Beetle is in our mi'dst and must be dealt with vigorously. The Board is doing especial investigative work in co-operation with Federal Agents at Thomasville, and hope to get results.
Nursery Stock and Orchards have to be inspected annually and direction i'n spraying given to all growers of fruit. The Board is doing especial work in co-operation with Federal Agents at Fort Valley in "spraying, dusting and controlling" curculio, brown-rot and other pests and diseases. The apple industry is being given careful attenti'on. A station is maintained at Cornelia for the protection of apple

14

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

growers and a man kept there devoting his entire time to this line of work.
The melon industry comes in for i'ts share of at!ention.
The cotton industry is paramount of course at this time. Especial work is being done along all li'nes for the protection of the crops. Methods of eliminating the Nematode and controlling the cotton wilt are being successfully worked out and gratifying results are being reached. The boll weevil is now in every cotton growing county of the State and is doing his deadly work i'n all sections.
We are glad to report substantial progress in methods of controlling the pest. The proper use of calcium arsenate together with other simple methods as a measure of combatting the weevil is an established fact-no longer an expermiment. The act of the last legislature creating a revolving fund authori'zing the Board to buy and sell the poison at cost, has enabled it to do the service of its history. To date, it has distributed more than a million pounds and at a cost saving the farmers approximately $100,000 dollars. Forty ($40,000) thousand more than the annual appropriation made for the work of the Board.
Instructing the growers in the use of calcium arsenate and other methods of cotton culture under weevil 'conditions is now engaging the energies and time of the Board and its staff. For detailed statement of the work of the Board, see its annual report.

FINANCIAL REPORT
A brief financial report follows, showing the amount collected from fertilizer, oil and feed fees and the amount received from the state treasury to defray the expenses of every branch of the Department of Agriculture and the balance left in the treasury.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUE

15

Paid to State Treasurer (Fert. and Feed Fees $102,386.90
Paid to State Treasuer (Oil Fees) ------------------------ $184,861.89 Vouchers held by Custodian (Oil Fees) ____________ $220,518.33

$507,767.12
Received from State Treasuer (Expenses of Department of Agriculture, including State Bureau of Markets, State Veteri'narian, State Chemist and Entomological Department) ________ 302,040.16

BALANCE ----------------- -- ----- ----- ------------ ------------- $205,726.96

.In this connection, I beg leave to call the attention of the General Assembly to the fact that the Georgia Department of Agriculture is the only department of our State government that turns into the State treasury an absolute sur/ plus annually, in excess of the amount they are allowed to spend from the revenues derived through that department, which revenues in my opinion were intended by those who framed the law solely for the purpose of maintai'ning and promoting the Department of Agriculture and its various branches. In other words, the Georgia Department of Agriculture, unlike any of the other State departments, is not a burden on the ad valorem taxpayers of the State; it is an. asset to the State of Georgia, because it provides, through its police tax system, a revenue in excess of the amount used for its own maintenance.
The Department of Agri'culture has been referred to time and again as st;mding about third or fourth, When compared with other State institutions, in the expenditure of money for its maiptenance and administration, but in consideration of the above stated facts, I feel confident that no Georgia taxpayer will insist upon, or even sanction, the idea of curtailing the work of the Department of Agriculture on account of the appropriations, until that great

16

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

Department of the State has at least consumed .the extra police tax levied for its maintenance.
For comparison, permit me to call the attention of the General Assembly to the fact that the State of Mississippi appropriated for her Entomological Department alone an amount almost equal to that appropriated to Georgia's entire Department of Agriculture, including all of its sub-branches, namely:
Fertilizer Department (including all laboratory scientific work),
Veterinary Department, Entomological Department, Pure Food Department, Drugs and Narcotics Department, Oil Department, Market Department, and the State of Flori'da contributes to its Entomological Department far more than does the State of Mississippi. And when we take into consideration Georgia's wonderful resources, in comparison with the above named states, you will see at a glance that Georgia's Department of Agriculture is bei~g compelled to operate with far less expenditures than those of her sister states.
We are reli'ably informed that some of our Southern States, with resources no greater than those of Georgia (if as great), spend in round numbers a million dollars annually for the maintenance of the Department of Agriculture.
With these facts in view, I insist that Georgia's Department of Agriculture is entitled, at ieast, to an amount equal to the amount of revenue derived through special tax, for i'ts maintenance and support, to be economically and judiciously spent in the building up of her agricultural resources.
Respectfully submitted, J. J. BROWN,
Commissioner of Agriculture.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

17

May 17, 1922.
Hon. J. J. Brown,
1
Commissioner of Agriculture,
State Capitol, Atlanta, Ga.
Dear Sir:
The State Bureau of Markets respectfully submi'ts the following report :
The increased appropriation for this Bureau made by the General Assembly of 1921 only bec~me available something over a month ago.
Our "Market Bulletin" which is published weekly, is now read by more than two hundred thousand Georgia farmers and farm products buyers. The circulation is increasing rapidly. The selli'ng power of the "Market Bul- . letin" is indeed marvelous. Frequently you hear it said, "If you don't want your products sold don't advertise them in the Market Bulletin." The farmers of the State say that the "Market Bulletin" has done them more good than anything ever .done in their behalf. Every item that is shown in the Market Bulletin is fresh, havi'ng been sent in for that week's issue. No advertisement is repeated unless new copy is received for each issue. We are receiving in the Bureau an average of five thousand pieces of first class mail weekly. The State Bureau of Markets has become in fact the clearing house for Georgia's diversifred agricultural products. Much of the enormous amount of our incoming mail requires individual handling. Where occasion requires we wire, telephone or send a special man on the problem presented. The volume of matter passing through for attention is increasing rapi'dly. The people of the State have learned that we are prepared to handle their marketing problems.
We are glad to report a fact, well known to you, that of the victorious completion of the sign-up campaign of the Georgia Cotton Growers Co-op~rative Association. Your



18

. ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

Departmen't, tinder your direction got behind this movement

at the begi'nning. We labored unceasingly for its success

until its gratifying completion. The cotton marketing spe-

cialist of this Bureau, Mr. J. E. Conwell, managed the vic-

torious campaign and the Board of Directors have elected

.him as President of the Association, and in so doing used the greatest wi'sdom as he is truly a giant in this work

and peculiarly fitted to make the Georgia Cotton Growers

Co-operative Association a success. All our field men aided

in this cotton campaign. We are proud of our participation

in this campaign as we believe it to mean the emanci'pation

of the cotton grower.

We further report the successful completion of the

Cane Growers Co-operative Association, embracing at present Grady, Brooks, Thomas and Lowndes Counties. The organization will be pushed rapidly into adjoining

counties. Thi's Syrup Association is signed up on the five-

year contract the same as the Georgia Cotton Growers Co-

operative Association. This organization campaign was

managed by J. H. Mills, co-operative marketing supervisor of this Bureau, and D. R. Wilder, our syrup specialist.

Twenty thousand cases of syrup have been canned under a

uniform grade. This syrup would have fermented had i't

not been canned as it was by the Association. A loan on

this syrup has now been approved by the War Finance Cor-

.poration. This is the first loan to be made in Georgia by

the War Finance Corporation direct to a farm organization. When thi's syrup association campaign was first started the

'syrup growers of South Georgia were just about ready to

give up hope. But J. H. Mills and D. R. Wilder of the staff

of this Bureau conducted schoolhouse meetings throughout

the syrup district and spoke to the farmers by day and by night and infused them with renewed life. The syrup cam-

paign was wonderfully conducted and today there stands a

farmers' syrup organization built on an ironclad contract

that will mean the salvation of the Georgia cane producer.



DEPAR"I:MENT OF AGRICULTUE

19

Our grain specialist, Mr. Fred T. Bridges, has been especially busy, having more calls than he could possibly answer. Through his work a number of corn shuckers and shellers have been installed. He has the foundation started for a number of grain elevators throughout the State. In addition to the work on grain Mr. Bridges has been of great assistance in the co-operati've marketing campaigns of cotton and syrup. He puts into his work an energy that is wellnigh irresistible.
Our veteran live stock specialist, Mr. W. W. Webb, practically lives in his car, answering calls all over South Georgia. Those having li've stock for sale greatly appreciate the help that Mr. Webb has rendered them so often. Not only does Mr. Webb devote himself to the live stock problem but to other crops as well.
Our co-operative marketing supervisor, Mr. J. H. Mills, when not busy with the syrup and cotton campaigns has devoted his time to the encouragement of community cooperative marketing associations and the enthusiasm he has put i'nto his work has put new hopes in many communities.
Mr. J. R. Lowe, sweet potato curing house specialist, has many calls to aid in planning the building of potato curing houses. He has prepared plans and blue prints that will save the builder one-third of the cost of other plans and yet obtain greater efficiency. Mr. Lowe is also circulation manager of the Market Bulleti'n and is in charge of the mailing department.
Mr. B. A. Hancock, my assistant, carries the responsibility of our sales organization. His task is arduous. Every known product of our farms is brought to us to sell and they are in every quantity and shape. Mr. Hancock has had more than thirty years' experience as a farm products broker and has every phase of the trade at his finger tips. He is ably assisted i'n the sales department by Messrs. Morgan, Crosby and Kehrer, high class men picked for special knowledge and long training in this line. Upon our office

20

ANNUAL REPORT O.F THE

sales force devolves the greatest strain of our organization.

I am glad to report that it is meeting the situation sati's-

factorily.

Our necessarily intricate filing system is in charge of

Mr. J. B. Allen and through the card index system he is

able to locate a paper or give us data instantly. Much

more depends on this work than one would think. It i's

being handled in an efficient manner. Our bulletin mailers,

stenographers and other clerical help deserve the highest

praise for their painstaking efforts. These men all loyally

work long after office hours when necessary.



The policy of this Bureau is to render practical help

and leave off theoreti'cal advice. Every man employed by

this Bureau has had it drilled into him that he should feel

that the farmer's marketing problem is our problem and

we all take hold of the farmer's products to sell for the

best possible returns just as if it was our own. The mes-

sage that we want to get to the farmers of Georgia is one

that will draw them closer to our work, that will cause them

to look on us as their employees who are ready and eager

to serve them for the asking.

We are continuing our co-operation wi'th the U. S.

Department of Agriculture in the Bonded Warehouse work

that was embraced in our last report. In addition to this

we have entered into a new agreement for the Market News

Service on peaches and watermelons. The Government told

us they would have to discontinue this work in Georgia on

account of the lack of funds. We made an agreement that

relieved this situati'on and saved this much needed service

for our peach and melon growers.

We are glad to report that many county agents are co-

operating with this Bureau to our mutual benefit. There

is no more welcome sight to us than that of a county agent

entering our door. Their letters and wire messages are

given the right of way. May this co-operation continue to

grow, is our wish.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

21

To the farmers, merchants and bankers of our State we would say that the State i's maintaining at the State Capitol a clearing house for Georgia's diversified agricultural ' products and we invite all to join in making this clearing house the clearing place for our agricultural products.
We invite suggestions for the betterment of the service.
Respectfully submi'tted,
STATE BUREAU OF MARKETS, L. B. Jackson, Director.

April 24, 1922.
Hon. J. J. Brown,
Commissioner of Agriculture,
Atlanta, Georgia.
Dear Sir:
I submit for your consideration a summary of the work done in the chemical laboratory from January 1st, to December 31st, 1921, inclusive, the same constituting the annual report of the State Chemist for the year 1921.
You will note that the bulk of thi's work is that done on official samples, and constitutes the analytical work incident to the enforcement of the Food, Drug, Feeding-stuff, Fertilizer and Insecticide laws.
In addition to this we have analyzed, when time would permit, quite a few miscellaneous samples, i'ncluding a preliminary report on Nitro-Bacter-Soil Vaccine, the preparation of which covered a period of sixty-five days.
In connection with miscellaneous work, I would like to state that we have many, many requests for work of this kind; and in a great many i'nstances I would like to render service to these people, but on account of the fact that no provision is made for this kind of work, and further on account of the fact that the analysis of official samples

22

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

takes most of our time, we are forced to decline to give our services. You will note that the bulk of the miscellaneous samples which we analyze are dairy products. Thi's is on account of the fact that none of the commercial laboratories in this section are devoting any time to work of this character. We have no one to whom we can refer them, so we undertake as much of it as time will permit, believing that chemical and bacteriological control i's necessary in the production of such products-baby milk, especially. There seems to be a steadily increasing demand for chemical supervision of milk which is intended for infant feeding. Hardly a week passes but that we have two or three requests from anxious mothers for assistance along this line.
The Laboratory published, for distribution during 1921, twelve monthly bulletin, entitled "Food, Drugs and FeedingStuffs," Volume VIII, Nos. 1 to 12, inclusive. These publications carry the analytical data and our conclusions as to whether or not the particular sample under consideration has violated the provisions of the Food and Drugs Act.
There has been published also, Georgia Department of Agriculture Bulletin, Serial 87, entitled "Commercial Fertilizers, Season 1921." This is a 138-page bulletin, and carries, besides the analytical data obtained in the inspection of Fertilizers and Fertilizer materials during last season, the fertilizer law, rulings of the Department, and much other valuable info.rmation for the manufacturers and consumers of commercial fertilizers.
You will note also that instead of publishing a Commercial Feeding-Stuffs Bulletin .once a year, as has been the custom in the past, we are now publishing these results monthly. The result of this change is that the feeders of our State can now know how the various brands of feeds that are offered for sale in our State are running at any time of the year.
The following i's a detailed report of the work done. You will note that quite a few violations have been found. These

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

23 .

were reported to your Department for whatever disposition you deemed best.

FERTILIZERS

There were analyzed during the season, 2,639 samples of Fertilizer and Fertilizer Materials, the character of which is as follows:

Completes ---------------------------------------- -------- -Acid and Nitrogen ---------------- ----------------Aci'd and Potash _____ ___ --------------------------
Nitrogen and Potash ---------------- -------------Plain Acids ------------------- ----------------------- -----Bones __ ____ __ _---------------------------------------------Phosphate Rocks -------------------------------------Muriates -------------------------------------- -------------Kainits --------------------------------------- -------------Manure Salts -------------------------------------------Nitrate of Soda ---- ---- -------------------------------Cotton Seed Meal -----------------------------------Sulphate of Ammonia ----------------------------

1420 350
86 2
278 2 1 3
102 18 121 230 26

One thousand, one hundred and seventy-two, or 44.5% of these samples met their guarantees in every particular. Eight hundred and seventy-nine, or 33.3 % of the-total num- , ber inspected did not meet the guarantee claimed for them, but had a commercial value equal to or above that claimed by the manufacturers. These samples were not subject to penalty. Five hundred and eighty-eight, or 22.2 % of the total number of samples worked did not meet their guarantee and were not up in commercial value. These samples were subject to the penalties prescribed by statute.

In addition to the regular work done in the inspection of fertilizers, we have examined 359 samples for the charac-. ter and availability of the Nitrogenous materials which they carry. These samples are taken from the registration books of the Department of Agriculture, and represent every man,.

I

24

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

ufacturer doing business in the State. We tried to get at least one high analysis sample and one low grade from each company, so that we could form an accurate opinion as to the character of the Nitrogenous materials bei'ng used.
The following is a summary of this work:-
Three hundred and fifty-nine samples were examined by the Neutral Permanganate method; 355 of these samples show an availability of 85 % or more, while 4 samples show an availability of less than 85 %.
Twenty-six samples show 85% or more of the total Nitrogen to be water soluble (Mineral Nitrogen) ; while 2 samples show all the Ni'trogen to be water soluble (Mineral Nitrogen).
The percentage of total Nitrogen soluble in water (Mineral Nitrogen) from an average of 359 samples is 59.44%. The percentage of water insoluble (Organic'Nitrogen) available from an average of 333 samples is 77.62%; and in some of these samples the availability of the water insoluble Nitrogen (Organic Nitrogen) i's as low as 34.00%.
Out of 333 samples, 206 samples, or 62.00 % , show 85% or more of the water insoluble (Organic Nitrogen) to be available; while 127 sample, or 38%, show less than 85 % of the water insoluble Nitrogen (Organic Nitrogen) to be available.
There is a slight improvement over the showing which was made by the various nitrogenous materials during last season. There was also a tendency on the part of the manufacturers to use smaller percentages of Mineral Nitrogen than during the previous season. This work shows that 59.44% of the total Nitrogen in the various samples offered during last season was derived from mineral sources. During the previous season, 66 2-3 % of the total Nitrogen was derived from mineral sources. The character of the organic materials used duri'ng the last season also show a slight improvement over those of the previous season.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

25

In carrying out the above outlined work on Fertilizers, it was necessary to make approximately 16,000 chemical determinations.
FOOD
There were 731 samples analyzed, as follows :
Beverages ------------ -------------- ------------------------ 358 Meats ------------- ------------------------ --------------------- 153 Syrups ------- ------------------------------------------------- 15 Tomatoes ------- -- --- ------------------------------------ ---- 23 Vinegar ---------------------- -------------------------------- 27 Catsup -- ------- ----- ----- ------------------------------------- 10 Fish -------------------------------------------------------------- 31 Evaporated Milks -- ------ ---------- -------------------- 4 Olive Oil --------------- ------- - ------------------------------ 3 Salad Dressing ------------ --- ------------------------- 8 Canned Peaches __ ___ _____ __ __ ------------------------ 4 Soda Fount Syrups --------- -- ------------------------- 10 Miscellaneous ---------- -------- ------------------------ --- 85
Of the above number, 50, or 6.8 % , were adulterated; 185, or 25.3%, of the total number were mi'sbranded; 23, or 3.1 % were both adulterated and misbranded. These samples were reported to the Inspection Department and were published in bulletin form. In carrying out the above work, approximately 2,000 analytical determinations were made.
DAIRY PRODUCTS
A total of 681 samples, including Milks, Creams, and Ice Creams, were worked. The bulk of these were sweet milks. Of the total number, 357, or 52 % , had a bacterial count above 100,000 per cubic centimenter; 107, or 15 % , of the total number, contained less butter fat than the legal standard (3.25%); 21 samples, or 3 % , of the total number, were watered.
The Laboratory has just installed a Hortvet Cryoscope for maki'ng freezing point determinations, and we hope to

26

ANNUAL REPORT OF TH~

be able in the future to detect very small amounts of added water.
Approximately 2,000 analytical determinations were made in carrying out the above inspection.

FEEDING-STUFFS
Five hundred and thirty-eight samples of commercial Feeding-Stuffs were inspected by the Laboratory. They are as follows:
Rice Feeds -------------------------------------- ---- -------- 13 Wheat Feeds ------- ------- -------------------------------- 124 Corn Feeds -------------------------------------------------- 3 Cotton Seed Meal Feeds ---------------------------- 77 Dairy Feeds ------------ ----------- - __ ______________ _______ 14
Peanut Feeds ---------------------------------------------- 9 Velvet Bean Feeds ___ -------------------------------- 3 Poultry Feeds ______________ __ ------- --------------- 20 Miscellaneous Feeds ------------------------- 275
Four hundred and forty of these samples met thei'r guarantees; 98, or 18.20 % , were illegal. These samples were reported to the proper authorities and published in bulletin form. In carrying out this work, between 3,000 and 4,000 separate determinations were made.

DRUGS
Five samples of drugs were analyzed, as follows : Tincture of Iodine ----------- ----------- 4 Spirits of Camphor .......... - ------- ..... ___ 1

COTTON SEED
The Laboratory analyzed, for the Bureau of Markets, 154 samples of Cotton Seed during the fall of 1921.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

27

INSECTICIDES

Fifty-nine samples were analyzed, as follows:
Calcium Arsenates ------------------------------------ 40 Dustfng Compounds ---------------------------------- 14 Lead Arsenate Powder ----- ---- ------------------- 4 Lead Arsenate Paste ------------- ------------------- 1 Of this number, 5, or 8.4 % , were below requirement.

BACTERIA
We prepared and distributed to farmers and market gardeners of our State during last season, 6,080 acres of Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria for legumes. Sufficient bacteria to inoculate seed for an acre are being distributed for thirty cents.

MISCELLANEOUS
The fo!lowing work of a miscellaneous nature was done durfng the past season:
Kerosene ------------------------------------------------------ 15 Salt ----------- ------ ----------------'- ------------------------- -- 4 Sweet Milk ----------------------------------- --------- ------ 37 Fertilizers ---- --------------------------------------------- 3 Feeds ----------- -------------- ------------ ----------------------- 4 Cream ----- ------- ---- ------------------------------------------ 1 Hog's Stomach -------------- -- ------- --- ---------- ------ -- 1 Crushed Beans -------------------------------- -- ---------- 1 Cotton Seed Meal ----------- ------ -------------------- --- 5 Ice Creams ----------------------------- ---------- -------- --- 2 Syrup ---- ------ ------ ---------------------------------- ------- - 8 I>eanut Meal ------------------------------------------- ---- - 2 Gasoline ---------------- ------------------------- ------------- 10 Water -------------------------------------- ----- --------------- 2 Wheat Brain --------------------------- ------------------- 1 Corn Meal Dough, for Poison ------------- ----- 1

28

ANNUAL REPORT OF

Linseed Oil -------------- ------------------------ - ------- ]

Rock

1

Lard ---------------------- ------------------------------------- 2

Soil ------------- ------------------------------------------------- 3

Calcium Arsenate -------------------------------------- 2

Acid Phosphate --------- ----- -------------------------- 2

Stable Manure ___ ----- --------- ------------------------ 1 Benzol _________ _______ _.___ __ ----------------------. _______ ___ _ 2

Liquid Soap --------------------------------------- ------- 1

Bone Meal ------ ---------------------------------------- 1

Cow's Stomach -------- ----------------------------- 1

Ashes ----------- -------------------------- --- ----------------- 2

Swine-Lixir ------------------------------------------------ 1

Rat Poison ------------- --------------------------------- 1

STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS OF CHEMICAL FUND OF STATE CHEMIST, FROM JANUARY 1, 1921 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.
DEBIT
Balance, December 31, 1920 ............................................................$ 689.19 Received from State Treasurer, 1921 .......................... ............... 6,000.00 Received from Sale of Typewriter ------- 15.00
CREDIT By amount paid Salaries ........................................$5,429.90 By amount paid General Expenses ........................ 741.13
$6,171.03 (Less checks outstanding December 31, 1921) .... 12.50
$6,158.53 Balance, December 31, 1921 .................................... 545.66
$6,704.19 $6,704.19
Respectfully submitted, S. H. WILSON, State Chemist.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

29

December 31, 1921.
Hon, J. J. Brown,
Commi'ssioner of Agriculture,
Atlanta, Ga.
Dear Sir:
I beg to hand you herewith for your consideration my report as Chief Food Inspector for the State of Georgia, covering the scope of work done by your Food Inspectors from January 1 to December 31, 1921.
The records in the office of the Pure Food Division shows that your Food Inspectors visited and .inspected 12,261 establishments where food was being handled in Georgia duri'ng the year 1921. In many instances 'they found food being sold under insanitary conditions, and in violation of the Sanitary Laws of Georgia, but in each instance the inspectors pointed out to the party in charge of such places the conditions that needed attention, and i'n most instances such parties willingly agreed to co-operate with the Department. However, in a few instances where the owners or managers of places being operated in violation of the Sanitary Laws fail~d to comply with the law, it was necessary to issue abatement noti'ces, allowing them a reasonable length of time in which to clean up. As a whole we believe that the food distributing places in Georgia are kept in a more sanitary condition than ever before in the history of the State. Where we were able to get the co-operation of the Food and Sanitary Departments of the various ci'ties over the State, our inspectors worked with such inspectors when they visited these towns, and in this way our work proves more effective. Furthermore, the public in general is taking more interest' in the Sanitary conditions of the stores from which they purchase their food.
During the year 1921 your Food Inspectors procured and turned into the State Laboratory for analysis, 731

30

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

samples of food, beverages, etc. Out of this number 473 met the requirements of the Pure Food Laws in every re-
spect, while 258 of the samples were either adulterated or misbranded, or both. A large amount of these adulterated or misbranded samples were soft drinks, which were misbranded in some form or another. However, in most instances the bottlers were willing to change their form of branding or labeling to meet the requirements of the Pure Food Laws, and where they di'd not agree to correct their labels, their products showing violations were withheld from sale until such time as it did meet the requirements. The same also applies to other articles of food.
During the year 1921 there were ~38 samples of feeding-stuffs procured and turned into the State Laboratory for analysis. Out of this number all but 98 analyzed within thei'r guarantee.
During the year 1921 this Division issued 343 withhold from sale notices covering various food and feeds found being offered for sale in violation of the Pure Food Laws of thi's State. Some of these withhold from sale notices were issued against food or feed for various reasons, such as misbranding, lack of inspection tax stamps, analysis tags, etc. In such instances the food or feed in question was permitted to go to sale when the same was made to meet the requirements of law. In,cases where food or feed was damaged, and could be disposed of for any purpose where it would not cause any deleterious results, it w9s directed i'n such channels as it could best serve, and in such instances such products were required to be sold under Section 17 of the Food and Drugs Act, which is by giving the purchaser notice in writing as to the nature and extent of the damage.
This Division during the year 1921 collected more than 60 samples for the Federal Government from shipments of food and feeding-stuffs shi'pped in interstate commerce, and through co-operation of the Federal Government we are

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

31

able to give the people of Georgia protection that they would not receive otherwise.
Attached you will find an itemized statement of the various articles of food and feeds found being offered for sale in violation of the Pure Food Laws of Georgia, and the same are withheld from sale under that authority.
Allow me to express to you the si'ncere gratitude and appreciation of each member of your Food Division for the hearty co-operation and kindly consideration we have recevied at your hands in the past, and to assure you that our best efforts will continue to be extended toward the most efficient service we are able to render to you personally as Commissioner, as well as to the people of the State.
Respectfully,
0. S. LEE,
Chief Food Inspector.

FOOD AND FEED WITHHELD FROM SALE DURING THE YEAR 1921 WHICH WAS BEING OFFERED FOR SALE IN VIOLATION OF THE PURE FOOD LAWS OF GEORGIA.

Alfalfa Meal ............................................,......................... Acetic Acid (Commercial) ......................................... .... Apples (Canned) ............................................................. Bacon .................................................................................. Beans (Canned) ............................................................... Beet Pulp .......................................................................... Beets ...........- .................................................................... Barley Feed .................................................... ...................
Blackberries ... ............................................. .................... Butter ............................................................................... Celery ............. ............. .. ........................................... ...... Cherries (Canned) ............... ................... ......................... Cherries .................................... .. ............... ......... ........ Cheese ..................... ........... .............................................. Chestnuts ........................................................................... Corn ................................................................ ... ............. .. Corn Meal ......................................................................... Corn Bran ...............................-............................ ...............
Corn Chops ......................................................... ..... ........

127-bags 4-barrels
20-cases
6-poun.ds 52-cases 923-bags 72-cases 1,300-bags
1,047-cases 25-pounds
180-cases 75-cases 20-gallons
170-pounds 20-pounds 1,275-bushels
30-bushels 1,033-bags
5-bags

32

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

Candy ........................................................ .................. .... .. SQO-pounds

CQcoa Pudding ............................................................ _.... 217-packages

Cotton Seed Meal ............................................................. 6,005-bags

Coffee Screenings .................................. .................. ..... 1,400-pounds

Fish ..................................................................................... 400-pounds

Fish ..................................................................... .......... ----- !137-cases

Fish ...................................................................... ............. .. 2,447-kits Filletti-D-Accreiga - ~------ ---- -------------------- . ..... .. ............ 14-cans

Grape Emulsion ........................................................... ... 1S-quarts

Hay ..................................................................................... 42,000-pounds

Ham ................................................................................... 16-pounds

Hominy ............................................................................. 52-cans

Hominy Feed ..................................................................... 1,075-bags

Honey ................................................................................. SO-gallons

Jellied Fruit ........................................ .... .......... ............... 10S-cans

Kraut ................................................................................. 1,500-cans

Log anberries ............................ ............ ............................ 100-cans

Lettuce .................................................. ............................. 100-cases

Meat (Pickled) ................................................................ 6,000-pounds

Mixed Feed .............................................. ......................... 5,030-bags

Mince Meat .. ..................................................................... ~l-eases

Milk (Dried) ..................................................................... SO-cases

Oysters ............................................................................... 2SS-gallons

Orange Ale (Daily Output of) ..................................... 15-concerns

Peaches .................................................... ......................... 215-cases

Peas (Canned) ........................................................... ...... 174-cases

Pickles (Dill) .......................................... ........................ 2SO-cases

Pork and Beans ...................................... ... ... .. . .. . ......... 150-cases

Potatoes (Sweet-Canned) .................. ......................... 100-cases

Pig Nose ...................................................... ..................... 250-pounds

Pig Tails ........................................................................... 125-pounds

Pig Feet .................................................... ......................... 75-pounds

Prunes .......... ............................................... .................... . 36-cases

Peanut Feed .............................................. ...................... 175-bags

Rye Middlings ...................................... .............................

9-bags

Rice Bran ............................................................................ 93-bags

Sardines ... .... ...... ...... .. ................ ...................... ........ ...... 1~9-case~

Salmon .............................................................. ............. .. 315-cases

Sausage .................................................... ............... ......... 150-pounds

Soft Drink Syrups .................................. ..... ....... ........... 222-gallons

Soft Drinks ..................................................................... 1,156-cases

Strawberries .................................................................... 348-cases

Syrup ........................................................ ... . ........... ......... 5,237-gallons

Tripe ...................................................................................

8-cases

Vinegar ..................................................... ....................... 278-cases

Vinegar .................... ................................. ........................ 26-barrels

Vinegar ....... ...................................................................... 340-gallons

Vinegar .............................................................................

1-tank

Vegetables (Mixed) .............................. ................... .... 27-cases

Wheat Feed .............................................. ......... ................ 10-631-bags

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

33

Hon. J. J. Brown,

Commi'ssioner of Agriculture,

Atlanta, Georgia.

Dear Sir:

In .accordance with law, I submit to you my annual

report as State Oil Inspector, covering the inspection work

of this Department for the calendar year 1921.



The books of my office show that for this period, inspection was made of:

Kerosene ---------------- -----------21,602,154 Gal. Gasoline ----------------------------------77,688,373 Gal.

Total __________________ ______ _____ ______ _99,290,527 Gal.
The total amount of money collected for the year was $497,268.26. Of this amount, your local inspectors retained,
Fees for inspecti'on --------------------- --- --$ 91,888.04 I hold treasury vouchers for __ ___ ___ __ 184,861.89 Custodian holds vouchers to end
of year for ------------------- ------ ------- 220,518.33

Total ------- ---------- ----------------------$497,268.26 To ascertain the amount of enjoined funds to the end of the year 1921, the $55,081.34 reported by my predecessor must be considered.
It is also proper to remember that inspection fees collected in December are reported to this office in the January reports.
Nine cars, approximately 72,000 gallons of kerosene, were rejected, because of failure to stand the test of our inspection law.
While some funds due the state have been held up temporarily, owi'ng to bank failures in various parts of the State, I am happy to say that not one dollar remains uncollected for the year. This fact shows vigilance upon the part of your inspection department.

34

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

I wish to state further in regard to the efficiency of your local inspectors, that with two or three exceptions,

their reports are coming in as correctly and as promptly

as one could wish.

In this connection I invite your attention to the speedy growth and increasing magnitude, of the oil and gasoline

industry of the state, for the last six years. A glance back no farther than 1916, will show that this business has in-

creased nearly 300 per cent as shown by the following figures:

Total gallons inspected:

1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921

39,164,225 59,138,647 79,821,271 . 93,203,672 108,389,017 99,290,527

While there was a slight falling off from the banner
year of 1920, of less than 81/2 per cent., this i's still proofi that it is a growing industry; for it is generally conceded

that since deflation started in 1920, most lines of business have fallen off at least 50 per cent.
During the period of this report, this office, together with the local inspectors, have had to handle separately,

the funds collected from the 13 compani'es which had enjoined us, and the 67 other companies doing business in the State. This l}.as entailed extra work on the local inspectors,

and nearly doubled the work of this office. When it is remembered that we are to keep trace of, and record every shipment coming into the state, it is clear that it requires

the alertness of your i'nspection department to serve this

growing business; and we have spared no efforts in looking after every detail. While the increase in the number of inspectors since 1916 has been less than 11 per cent, or from 158 then, to 175 now ( the volume of business has nearly

trebled, and is averaging about forty cars for every working

day of the year.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

35

Two accidents from bad oil, or what appears to have been the accidental mixing of gas wi'th oil, were reported to me during the year. In each case, your local inspector was prompt in making tests, and I obtained samples for the State chemist.
I have given prompt attention to every complaint coming to my notice, of which we have had but very few.
It is my observation that your inspection department fs managed economically, honestly, and.to the best interests of all the people.
Respectfully,
J. J. HOLLOWAY,
State Oil Inspector.

January 6, 1921.
Hon. J. J. Brown, Com'r.,
Atlanta, Georgia.
Dear Sir:
I enclose an itemized report of my work as Drug Inspector fot the year 1921, beginning January 1 and ending December 19. Among Druggists, I am much gratified to report, fewer violations of the law. During the year the State Board of Pharmacy held five meetings, and Licensed over five hundred applicants, the largest number licensed since the Board was organized i'n 1866. This means that there will absolutely be no excuse for Druggists attempting to conduct their stores without Licensed men in charge If a Bill known as the "Model Pharmacy Law," whose passage was attempted last legislature, and partially failed, finally becomes a law, it will correct many of the evils that afflict the Retail Druggists today. It i's to be hoped that this Bill will pass at the next session of the Legislature.
There has been so much legislation, and. the enactment of Federal laws, governing the sales of Drugs, Medicines,

36

' ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

etc., that the average "laymen" are at a loss to know when

they are complying with the law. As a matter of fact, there

are too many laws. Fewer, simpler and more conservative

laws, properly enforced, would serve a better purpose. I

honestly believe that the aevrage Merchant wishes, and

endeavors to comply wi'th the Drug Laws of the State. I

have no suggestions to make to you as regards the enact-

ment of new laws, or amending "Old" ones. 1921 was the

"Banner" year with me as Drug Inspector. I made more

than 400 more inspections in 1921, than I have made in any

previous years. This was done at a personal sacrifice of

time and personal comfort. I have never allowed "heat,

cold, rain, sunshine or storm" to interfere with my work.

I have slept in "Refrigerators," sometimes known as rooms

i'n Modern Hotels, and ate "hand-me-outs" at lunch tiine, in

order to make time, and save expense. For this I claim no

credit. ' Simply doing what I conceived my duty to do.

I wish to thank you, your affable and accommodating

Assistant, Mr. Jas. I. Hicks, the Honorable Samuel H. Wil-

son, State Chemist, and to those in the office with me, for

your many acts of kindness, and the valuable assistance that

you have at all times rendered me. Wi'thout your assist-

ance and co-operation, I could not have accomplished what

I have. With best wishes for your success, and at the

close of your present term, I trust the people of this great

State of ours, will by their vote return you to the office that you have so faithfully, efficiently and ~cceptably filled

for the past term. With assurance of high personal regard

for you, and with best wishes for your health and happiness.

beli'eve me,

Sincerely yours,

T. A. CHEATHAM,

State Drug Inspector.

/

I

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

37

PLACES VISITED AND INSPECTIONS MADE IN 192L

Number of Drug Stores visited, and License inspected____ l166
Number of Drug Stores visited not in charge of Licensed men ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210
Number of Drug Stores found who were exempt from having Licensed men -------------------------------------------------- 199
Number of Drug Stores reported to Commissioner for Violations ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 11
Number of Druggists who have since being reported, are complying with law ------------------------------------------------------ 10
Number of Druggists who are keeping Poison Registers as required --- ----------- ----- --- _____________ __ ____ __ ____ ________ __1000
/
Number of Drug Stores who were not required to keep Poison Registers --------------------- --- --------------------------------- 210
Number of Druggists whose License were recorded with Ordinaries ------- ------------ ------------ ----- --- __________________________1150
Number of Druggists who have since had License recorded ------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------- 16
Number of Unlicensed Druggists found selling Poison, Aspirin Tablets, etc. ----------- ------------------------------------ 3
Number of Wholesale Drug Stores visited and found complying with the law ______ -------------------------------------- 21
Number of Retaail Grocery Stores visited and Stocks inspected ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 300
Number of Retail Grocers found handling Patent Medicines in violation of the Pure Foods and Drugs Laws ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5
Number of Retail Grocers found handling Tinct. of Iodine, Powdered Nuxvomica, Bi-Chloride Tablets, Iodide of Potash, etc., in violation of law________________ 5

I

38

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

Number of Retail Grocers found handling Veterinary Remedies in vi'olation of the Narcotic Law of the State -------- ------------------------------- --------------------------------------- 3
Number of Wholesale Grocers visited and Stocks inspected ----------------------- --------------------------------------------------- 55
Number of Wholesale Grocers found selling Patent Medicines in violation of the Pure Foods and Drugs Laws ------- -------------------------- --------------------------------------------- 5
Number of Wholesale Grocers found Selling Rat Poisons, Tr. of Iodine, in violation of the Poison Law of the State ------------------ ------------- ----------------------------------- 2
Number of Wholesale Grocers found selling Veteri'nary Remedies in violation of law_ ____ ______ ____ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ______ 2
Number of General Dealers visited, and Stocks inspected -------------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------1085
Number of General Dealers found selling Patent Medicines in violation -of the Pure Food and Drugs Laws 12
Number of General Dealers found s elling Veterinary Remedies, Coli'c Remedies, Cough Remedies, Paregoric, Bateman's Drops, Etc., in violation of the Narcotic Law of the State ---------------------------------------- - 28
Number of General Dealers found selling Aspirin Tablets, C. C. Pills, Salicylic Acid, Boracic Acid, Quinine Capsules, Chloroform Liniment, from bulk packages -- --- ----- -------------------------------------------------------------- 18
Number of General Dealers, found selling Ti'nct. of Iodine, Carbolic Acid, Powd. Nux-Vomica, Strychnine Tablets, and Insecticides in violation of the Poison Law of the State ---- ---------------------------------------- 13
Total number of inspections made in 1921 _________________ __ _____3839
Total number of Places visited in 1921 ---- ---- -------------------- 853 Respectfully submitted,
T. A. CHEATHAM,
State Drug Inspector.

I

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

39

THE OFFICE OF STATISTICIAN
Offi'ce 334, State Capitol,
Atlanta, Ga., June 12, 1922.
Hon. J. J. Brown,
Commissioner of Agriculture and Ex-Officio
Commissioner of Immigration,
State Capitol.
Dear .Sir: I beg to submit a brief statement as to the work of
the Office of Stati'stician. Lack of space and the rule, which has obtained, suggest that the customary statistics be reserved for the regular Quartely Bulletin which is supplementary to the Commissioner's Annual Report.
I was called to the position of Statistician January 1, 1919. As soon as it became generally known that the office had been opened, inquiries have been comi'ng in from every section of Georgia and from outside the State. Quite all ' those inquiries reached me through the Executive Office of the Department.
It is proper to state that those inquiries embraced every topic in agriculture almost, and reached out i'nto the cognate industries. Those inquiries came from school children desirous to be informed as to Georgia's rank in corn culture compared with other States; from the headquarters of the American Association of National Banks in the form of multi'plied and searching questionaires; from the great advertising agencies of the United States; from the man~gement of the notable Convention of Cotton Growers and Cotton Goods Manufacturers in Manchester, England; from individual farmers and industrialists. To each and all these inquiries, which bore directly on Georgia and her possibilities in every walk of life, good sense, comprehensive and courteous reply was promptly made. The writer hereof spared neither labor nor time in making reply to the inquiries alluded to.

40

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

The files in the Executive Office of the Department carry a copy of the correspondence in which is set forth what Georgia has accomplished in agriculture, horticulture and in live stock farming, and, incidentally, in our leading industries outside farming.
The people have responded most encouragi'ngly to the
establishment of the Office of Statistician. It is true, in- ,
spiringly true, that farmers and bankers, business and professional men, specialists anq mechanics have shown appreciation of the work this Office is doi'ng. It has come to be well known that not a letter, not a questionaire, not a reasonable request has failed of immediate and satisfactory attention. That is the business side of the Office of Statistici'an; therefore, I am emphasizing it.
A great work is in the hands of the Office of Statistician-the work of leading our people into an appreciation of the immense practical value of accurate statistics on every public question in whi'ch they are in duty bound to feel and manifest a lively interest.
What applies to Georgia applies with equal force to every cotton producing State. We have, with one accord, been too long negligent of statistics-accurate and as full as possible. By degrees, we are coming into our own i'n this very important branch of education and progress.
The writer has utilized the press to the fullest extent possible in giving out, from time to time, valuable statistical informati'on in the clearest and most attractive form possible.
Our equipment for the present is small. It is being turned to good account in the interest of all the people of the Commonwealth of Georgia. In the near future, it is confidently hoped that the Statistician will be provided with ample working space.
Small as i's the space, frequent visitors, each an individual questionaire, are made perfectly at home, and sent home rejoicing in the possession of the information s'ought.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

41

You see, the people are beginning to regard the Office of Statistician as one of their favorites. They will stand by rt; it will continue to aid them.
Respectfully, MARTIN V. CALVIN, Statistician.

June 1, 1922. Hon. J. J. Brown,
Commissioner of Agriculture, Atlanta, Ga.
Dear Sir: I hand you herewith Statement of Receipts and Dis-
bursements of this Department for the year ending December 31, 1921.
Respectfully, T. J. R. JOHNSON, Cashier.

STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FROM JANUARY 1, 1921 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921. MA.INTENANCE F UND RECEIPTS
Balance on hand J anuary 1, 1921 ................................................$ 878.26 From State Treasurer .................................................................... 15,000.00
DISBURSEMENTS
For Salaries ............................................................$ 9,307.75 For General Expense ............................................ 5,330.23 Balance on hand Dec. 31, 1921 ............................ 1,240.28
$15,878.26 $15,878.26
FOOD AND DRUG FUND. RECEIPTS
Balance on hand J an. 1, 1921 ........................................................$ 4,147.11 From State Treasurer .................................. .......... ...................... 6,250.00



42

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

DISBURSEMENTS For Salaries ............................................................$ 8,307.50 For General Expense .......................................... 636.74 Balance on hand Dec. 31, 1921 .......................... 1,452.87
$10,397.11

$10,397.11

STATISTICS FUND.
RECEIPTS Balance on hand Jan. 1, 1921 ........................................................$ 634.11 From State Treasurer ............... ..................................................... 2,000.00
DISBURSEMENTS For Salaries ................. ...........................................$ 2,302.50 For General Expense ............................................ 74.54 Balance on hand Dec. 31, 1921 ............................ 257.07
$ 2,634.11 $ 2,634.11 I
INSECTICIDES FUND
RECEIPTS \ From State Treasurer ....................................................................$ 5,000.00
DISBURSEMENTS For Salaries ............................................................$ 2,500.00 For General EJFpense ............................................ 550.78 Balance on hand Dec. 31, 1921 ................... ......... 1,949.22
$ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00

FEES FROM THE SALE OF FERTILIZER AND COTT.ON SEED MEAL TAGS AND TAX ON BULK SALES OF FERTILIZER MATERIALS.
RECEIPTS From Cotton Seed Meal Tag Sales ...........................................$ 4,574.65 From Fertilizer Tag Sales ............................................................ 55,180.24 From Bulk Tax on Fertilizer Materials ...................................... 1,473.73 From Insecticide Stamp Sales .................................................... .. 302.23
Remitted to State Treasurer ................................................$61,530.85
DISBURSEMENTS For Salaries, Office and Inspectors ..................$26,385.06 For General Expense ............................................ 5,553.51 For Inspectors' Expense ...................................... 10,002.46
Total Expense ................................................$41,941.03 Net Income ...................................................... 19,589.82
$61,530.85 $61,530.85

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

43

FEES FROM THE SALE OF FEED INSPECTION STAMPS.

RECEIPTS

From Sales of Feed Inspection Stamps ......................................$40,856.05

Overpaid Treasurer through error --- -- (This was carried against balance on Bacteria Fund until Jan. 27, 1922, when it was replaced.)

65.00

From J. E. Bodenhamer, Refund of Expense Advance............ 100.00

Total Remitted to State Treasurer ......................................$41,021.05

DISBURSEMENTS
For Salaries, Office and Inspectors -----$18,174.97 For General Expense ............................................ 4,049.36 For Inspectors' Expense ------- 6,928.05 For Inspection Stamps .......................................... 846.75

Total Expense -- - ................$29,999.13 Net Income ...................................................... 11,021.92

$41,021.05 $41,021.05

FEES FROM THE SALE OF NITROGEN FIXING BACTERIA.
RECEIPTS Balance on hand Jan. 1, 1921 ........................................................$ 134.60 From Sale of Bacteria ------- 1,836.00

DISBURSEMENTS
For Salaries ............................................................$ For General Expense ............................................ Balance on hand Dec. 31, 1921 -------

425.00 846.54 699.06

$ 1,970.60 $ 1,970.60

CONTAGIOUS DISEASES OF CATTLE FUND.
RECEIPTS Balance on hand Jan. 1, 1921 ------ - --$ 655.99 From State Treasurer ------- 10,000.00
DISBURSEMENTS For Salaries ............................................................$ 7,699.50 For General Expense ----- ----- 2,366.14 Balance on hand Dec. 31, 1921 ------ 590.35
$10,655.99 $10,655.99

TICK ERADICATION FUND.

RECEIPTS

(

Balance on hand Jan. 1, 1921 ----------------$ 1,380.64 From State Treasurer ------ 25,000.00

44

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

DISBURSEMENTS
For Salaries ............................................................$25,493.97 For General Expense ............................................ 795.38 Balance on hand Dec. 31, 1921 .......................... 91.29
$26,380.64

$26,380.64

HOG CHOLERA SERUM FUND.
RECEIPTS Balance on hand Jan. 1, 1921 ........................................................$ 5,221.40 From State Treasurer .................................................................... 17,000.00
DISBURSEMENTS For Salaries ............................................................$15,088.67 For General Expense ............................................ 6,936.19 Balance on hand Dec. 31, 1921 ---------------------------- 196.54
$22,221.40 $22,221.40

LABORATORY FUND.

RECEIPTS
Balance on hand Jan. 1, 1921 ........................................................$ 2,401.93 From State Treasurer .................................................................... 7,000.00
DISBURSEMENTS
For Salaries ............................................................$ 7,317.50 For General Expense ............................................ 970.34 Balance on hand Dec. 31, 1921 ........................ 1,114.09

$ 9,401.93 $ 9,401.93

/
BUREAU OF MARKETS FUND.

RECEIPTS
Balance on hand Jan. 1, 1921 ........................................................$ 3,741.43 From State Treasurer .................................................................... 35,000.00 From Advertising, Sale of Cotton Samples, and Waste Paper 10,458.57 From Refund of Advance Expense:
J. C. Griffin .............................................................................. 50.00" Melvin Tanner .......................................................................... . 40.00

DISBURSEMENTS

For Salaries ............................................................$25,403.07

For General Expense ............................................ 23,886.50

Balance on hand Dec. 31, 1921 ..........................

.43

$49,290.00 $49,290.00

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

4'5

ANNUAL REPORT OF STATE VETERINARIAN

Hon. J. J. Brown,

Commissioner of Agriculture,

Atlanta, Georgia.



Dear Sir:

Obedient to legislative mandate, I herewith submit my

annual report.

Briefly outlined, the duties of the State Veterinarian,

as required by various acts, are:

1st. Promoting and improving the live stock industry

of the State.

2nd. The control and eradication of infectious and con-

tagious diseases of live stock.

3rd. Supervision of abattoirs, slaughter houses, meats

and meat food products.

4th. Supervision of dairies, creameries, milk and milk

products.

Little is to be said on promoting: live stock industry

during the year 1921.

In common with other agriculture interests, the live

stock industry experienced during the year of 1921 one of the most acute, and generally unexpected, periods of defla-

tion. Prices of live stock of every kind tumbled from war peaks to unprecedented low levels.

New and enthusiastic beginners were thrown out of

business. Even some, whose business had been well established, retired during the calamitous depression. Those who

weathered the storm are sure to reap the reward of their

courage and good business judgment.

Live stock has long been recognized as, and must ever

remain, the keystone in the arch of a successful and profitable agriculture.

But for the apparent disinclination of our farmers to produce a surplus of feeds, we should have made far greater

46

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

progress in all phases of live stock and dairy production. It is an outstanding, incontrovertible fact that no state or community has ever attained prominence in live stock or dairy production, except those who produced a superabundance of feed. Georgia cannot and will not be an exception.
In years gone by wiseacres bemoaned the lime deficiency in our soil as one of the principal causes for our undersized and unprofitable farm animals. Today hundreds of progressive, wideawake breeders and dairymen have demonstrated that an abundance of Georgia feed, fed to Georgiabred cattle or hogs, will produce animals that cannot be excelled anywhere. This plain and unvarnished truth must be accepted and practiced by all who would succeed in live stock or dairy production.
Hungry or insufficiently fed live stock, or live stock depending on store bought feed, inevitably leads to failure in the live stock business. It is better to keep a few cattle or hogs thrifty, growing and producing than to own many that are half cared for.
Per se feeding may not be responsible for many diseases, but both feeds and feeding are frequently active, contributory causes to animal diseases. A body properly nourished and cared for is naturally more resistant to diseases of various kinds than one debilitated and underfed. Much of the supposed merits of stock powders and other nostrums is primarily due to the better attention given the animals during the time the medicine ( ?) is given. Healthy animals, properly cared for, need no medicine or stock powders. A sufficient amount of good, wholesome feed and plenty of pure, cool water will keep more animals healthy than all stock powders combined.

TICK ERADICATION
The work of tick eradication in the State of Georgia has progressed to a point where only nineteen counties in the State remain under Federal quarantine because of tick infes-

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

47

tation. With reasonable co-operation on part of the people, the work can be completed by December of 1923.
Like other laws, tick eradication has at times met with opposition, but the intr.insic value of tick eradication invariably commended itself to the progressive citizens of each community, and through their influence and support the work was completed.
Today there are one hundred and twelve counties in the State that are absolutely tick free; twenty-six counties .in which only a few premises or ranges are still infested; and nineteen counties, as previously stated, which are still under Federal quarantine; seventeen of these counties are now actually engaged in tick eradication, and tick eradication will be completed in at least ten of these counties this year.
Anti-tick eradicators have spread much propaganda to the effect that tick eradication was impractical in open range territory. As a matter of fact, tick eradication was completed in such open range counties as Bulloch, Emanuel, Candler, Evans, Tattnall, Toombs, Montgomery, Treutlen, Wheeler, Wilcox, Pulaski, Bleckley and others in less than two years of actual systematic dipping.
Each and every other county can do as well if the law is upheld in their courts, and providing they are not interfered with by the lawless elements from adjoining counties.
Almost from the beginning of systematic tick eradication in Lowndes County, a lawless element from Echols County has dynamited the vats near the Echoll! and Lowndes County border, and, likewise, since the beginning of vat construction in Echols County, they have blown up the Echols County vats almost as fast as the county could build or repair them. During 1920 they dynamited fourteen vats iri Echols County and eleven on the Lowndes and Echols County border in Lowndes County; in 1921 twelve in Echols and seventeen in Lowndes; and in 1922 ten in Echols and four in Lowndes.

48

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

Coerced and intimidated by this lawless, law-defying element, the Commissioners of Echols County voted to abandon tick eradication.
The pernicious activity of this lawless, law-defying element has cost Lowndes County not less than $65,000 or $70,000 more than necessary to complete tick eradication, and unless the State can protect the rights of these good people, Lowndes County cannot finish tick eradication and remain tick free.
Some of the vats dynamited in Echols County were vats constructed and owned by private citizens, who built the vats at their own expense because they realized the value and benefits of dipping their cattle.
It would be wrong to think that vat dynamiting has the indorsement of many citizens in Echols County; there are many, in fact, a majority of the people in the county, who deplore these depredations; yet, the lawless, law-defying element have and are intimidating the law-abiding people and the Commissioners.
On a most conservative estimate, this lawlessness has cost Lowndes and Echols Counties not less than $100,000.
All tick eradication work is based on a perfect knowledge of the life cycle of the cattle tick. Reduced to a simple formula, successful and complete tick ,..eradication requires dipping all cattle in an infested community for from fourteen to sixteen times. This formula is so simple until many people wonder why the work is not always completed in record time.
The causes for failure are either one or more of the following three conditions:
First. Some cattle owners do not dip their cattle at all.
Second. Some cattle owners dip only a part of their cattle at each regular dipping, or,
Third. Tick infested cattle are brought in from sections in which tick eradication has not been completed.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

49

In stock law counties it is practical to quarantine only tick-infested premises and disinfect the cattle that are infested or exposed on these premises. In open range territory all the cattle in the county should be dipped until the work is completed, because range cattle are at any time prone to wander out of their specific range, and reinfest adjacent ranges and cattle.
Where proper co-operation is given by the people, it is no more trouble. to complete tick eradication in an open range county than it is to clean up a stock law county. If, however, co-operation is poor and anti-tick eradication propaganda is indulged in extensively, the completion of tick eradication is naturally delayed until the work can be completed in spite of the opposition. This is always costly to the county and annoying to a good many people who sincerely co-operate in tick eradication from the beginning.
The tick eradication law is a natural development due to the ,economic necessity of growing more and better cattle in the State of Georgia, and for the purpose of opening up the markets of other States for Georgia-grown cattle. When the work of systematic tick eradication was first started in 1906 nearly all Tennessee was tick infested and under quarantine. The opposition to tick eradication in Tennessee was equally as keen and bitter as is the opposition to tick eradication in some counties in Georgia. Since, however, tick eradication has been completed in Tennessee, they have made powerful improvements in both beef and dairy production, and no Tennessee cattleman would for a moment debate the value of tick eradication or its wonderful influence on the improvement of the cattle industry.
Likewise in Georgia the counties where the work has been completed are most enthusiastic over the beneficial results accomplished by this work, and many anti-tick eradicators grow enthusiastically in favor of this work after they observe the marked improvement of tick infested cattle when dipped in arsenical solutions.

50

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

Nothing is left to guesswork in tick eradication. The work is thoroughly organized and systematized. Every cattle inspector is supplied with individual 48-G cards, on which he makes a record of each herd or premise under his supervision, and the local inspector also keeps a separate 48-G vat record card. In addition to the 48-G cards kept by the inspector, he makes out daily 48-BB reports, showing number of cattle and herds of cattle dipped each day. This record also shows name of owner who fails to dip his cattle. The local inspector forwards these records to the supervising inspector, who compiles a complete record of every vat in the county under his supervision. Th~ supervising inspector forwards these records to the Atlanta office, where a complete record is kept and this record, in turn, is checked and condensed into a complete monthly report. A
complete tabulated monthly record of the progress of tick
eradication in each county is attached to this report.
In order to enable the inspectors to know whether or not all cattle in a given territory have been dipped, the cattle are paint-marked each dip day, and range riders are employed to ride the range to see if any cattle have been overlooked, missed or failed to dip.
Frequently anti-tick eradicators make the statement that the cost of dipping exceeds the value of the cattle in their community. I don't think this has ever happened, even under the most adverse circumstances. In counties where the work is completed in one year's time, which can be done by arty county, the cost of tick eradication will not exceed one dollar per head, and the following letter, received from a large Chicago packing house, under date of March 15, 1922, indicates that such a cost is only an insignificant fraction of the increase in value of cattle when freed of ticks and released from quarantine.
"Dr. Peter F. Bahnsen, Atlanta, Ga. Dear Sir: Responding to your inquiry as to value of cattle that are under quarantine as compared with the same grade of cattle that
I

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

51

are not under quarantine, will say that we will gladly embrace the opportunity to buy several thousand head of cattle now held in quarantine in Florida which cannot be purchased by us because of State and Federal restriction, at from $10 to $15 per head more than we have been told these cattle are selling for at present."
I have been agreeably surprised in observing the encroachment that carpet grass is making on gallberry bushes and palmettoes throughout the flat woods in the southern section of the State, and I predict that within the next five or, at the utmost, ten years the coastal plain section of Georgia will constitute one of the most valuable ranges for the growing of beef cattle in any State in the Union.
However, to make the growing of beef cattle profitable three things must be accomplished.
First. Cattle ticks must be eradicated.
Second. The scrub bull must be eliminated from the ranges.
Third. Some system must be adopted within the respective counties to avoid over-stocking the ranges. This last condition can largely be avoided by cattle owners planting from fifty to one hundred acres in velvet beans, and then taking such cattle as they decide to market during the late Winter and early Spring and placing them in the bean fields.
This will relieve the congested condition of the ranges, and, at the same time will enable the cattle owners to market their catlte to a fair advantage during the late Winter and early Spring.

/

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

~

MONTH OF JANUARY, 1921.

IInspected or

.

I Dipped

I County . ............. H. c.

PRELIMINARY.

- Amount I 1I I Infested

Quarantined Number

H. c. I H. c. B.A.I.

Inspectors 1I Vats State 1County IIn Co.

Appling .... .. . .. .... ... 1

I

Atkinson .. . ..... . . .. . .. .

8/ 30 0

0

60

16/ 30 0

0

12

Bacon ..................

26/ 30 0

0

7

~
~

Berrien .. .. ... . .. . ...... Bryan . . ................

I

1

0

,12/ 30 0

0

67

t"'

14/ 30 33

~

Camden ... . . . . .. ........ Charlton ................ Clinch ... . .............. Echols ..................

I

0

1

0

38

'"d 0

1j 30 0

0

1j 30 0

0

1j 30 0

0

12

~

15

12

~

Glynn

0. 0 0

Irwin .......... . ... . .. . .

Johnson ......... ,........

Liberty ........... . .... .

I

1/ 30 0

0

9/30 0

0

6 32

~
l".l

I

20/ 30 1

0

3

1/ 30 0

0

13

Mcintosh . . ......... . ....

1/30 0

0

17

Pierce .. .............. . . '

16/ 30 19/30 0

35

Ware . ............ .. .... Wayne . .. .. .......... . . .
I Total ......... . ..

I
I
----

9/ 30 0

0

34

22/ 30 0

0

33

5 24/ 30 2 19/ 30 14/ 30 429

I I I \Numb" County

Inspected or

Dipped

....... . ... . .. I H.

c. I

SYSTEMATIC.

Amount

Infested
H. c.

I

Qumn H.

t;

nco.

d

B.A.!.

I Inspectors Vats
State 1County 1In Co.

Candler .................

Ol

0

0

0 35 8062 2j 30 0

I o

34

Coffee ...... .. ..........

2 34

1

2 63 21500 14/ 30 0

1

61

tj

Cook . . ..... . . .. .........

5 40

0

0 39 8401 2/ 30 0

1

Crawford ... .. . . ........ Effingham ........... .. .

6 98

0

0

0 0

~I

41 514 0

12/ 30 0

19 3363 12/ 30 0

1

39 34 62

t::l
>"C ~

Emanuel ................

7 262

0

0 79 22966 28/ 30 0

1

Jeff :Oavis ... ~ ..... . ....

0

0

0

0 32 9000 4,130 0

0

79 32

is:
zt::l

Jenkins .................

0

0

0

0 26 6017 1

0

Montgomery 0

13 469

0

Ol 36 8799 116/ 30 0

0

43

>'3

20/ 30 40

~

Tattnall . . ........ . ......

6 94

0

Ol 69 16270 18j 30 0

Toombs . . ...............

4 10

0

Ol 48 13350 14/ 30 0

Treutlin ...... . ..........

0

0

0

Ol 20 5669 0

1

Wheeler

0 0 0

Worth . ..... . .. .. ..... . .

0

0

5 51

0 0

~I

34 7487 3/ 30 0

86 17385 1

0

0

69

>

0 0

48 20

Cj}
:.:.0..
0

0

34 c:::

22/ 30 86

~

Total .... . ......... 48 1058

1

~ I 627 148783 6 13/ 30 112/ 30 5 12/ 30 681

c:::
~

I 1Inspected or 1 Amt. Inf. Quarantined ISq.Mi.ll Number! Inspelctors

Vats

I I I 1 H.Dippecd.

H. C.

H. C. 1In Co.l B.A.!. I State 1County 1In Co.

Grand Total .. I 6431 83341 31 101 148412365981 36128125 11 3o l 5 21/ 30 122 28f 3ol 3358
c.n
Co>

c:n

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

"'"

MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1921.

PRELIMINARY.

1 Inspected or 1 Amt. Inf. Quarantined ISq.Mi.\ Number\ Inspectors 1Vats

1 Dipped 1
I H. c. I H.

C. I H.

I I
C. I In Co. I B.A.I. I State 1 County 1 In Cg.

Appling ...... .. . I Atkinson ......... Bacon ... ... ......
Berrien . .... ... . .
Brantley .. ...... 1 Bryan .. .. . . . .... .
Camden ... . .... . I
Charlton .... ... .. 1 Clinch ..... .. ... ..
Echols . ...... .. .. I Glynn . . . . .. . .. . . . Irwin ......... ... Johnson ...... .. . . Liberty ............ Mcintosh .. . .. . .... Pierce .. . . .... .. ..
Ware .......... 1 Wayne ...... : . .. .
Total . .. I

I

I
I I I I

I 604 16/ 30 15/ 30 2

* 18/ 30 0

0

311 16/ 30 0

0

..505 1

I 1

1/ 301 Q

I 2
I 2

431 9j 30I 0

I 1

60

21

7

I 71

I

7

34

zz>q
>
t"'
~

I
I
I

711 0

1

1063 1j 30 0

1077 1/ 30 0

365 0

0

I ~
I o
I o

43

12

15

I
I

0

"'d
0
~
0
~

I

468 1/ 301 0

0

I

378 24/ 30 0

0

258 12/ 30 1

0

6 33

:a
tr.l

17

976 1/ 30 0

I

429 1/ 30 0

I

518 16/ 30 0

I

I 676 8j 30 0

l_ I 766 13/ 30 0

0

I 13

0 1

I

17
3s

0

34

0

36

1 95361 5-18/ 301 3 15J 3ol 6

464

SYSTEMATIC.

I I I Inspected or r Amt. -Inf. Quarantined
I Dipped

I ISq.Mi. l Number

I

I

Inspectors I

1Vats
I

t:t
t?=:1

1 H. C. H. C.

Candler .... ...... Coffee ..... . .....

0 0

0 0

~I ~I

H. C. I In Oo. l B.A.I. I State I County 1In Co.

341 80621 300 10j 30 0

0

34

63 1 21500 920 12j 30 19/ 30 2

61

'"0
>
~ ~
~

Cook .............

0

0

0

0 391 8401 230 2/ 30 0

1

Crawford ......... 28 449

0

0 41 1 5i0 334 0

19/ 30 0

39

zt?=:1

34

~

Effingham 0 0 0.

0

0

0

0 19 1 3363 419 16j 30 0

0

62

0

Emanuel .........

0

0

0

0 79 1 22710 776 20/ 30 0

1

79

l"%j

Jeff Davis ..... . ..

0

0

0

0 321 9000 300 14/ 30 0

114/ 30 32

>
~

Jenkins ........ ..

23 100

0

0 43 1 6017' 400 0

12j 30 13j 30 43

.~...

Montgomery .. . .. . Tattnall ..... . .... Toombs . . . . ..... .

"13 591

0

0

7 192

0 0 1

0

36 1 7584 642 15/ 30 7/ 30 14/ 30

40

~~

691 16270 735 15/ 30 0

I o

481 13002 519 15j 30 8j 30 24/ 301

69 48

0c:: c~::

Treutlin ..........

0

0

0

0 20 5669 188 0

1

16/ 30

20

~

Wheeler ... .......

6 226

0

0 331 7215 300 7/ 30 1

0

34

t?=:1

Worth ..... . ... ...

6 27

0

0 851 17385 604 1

0

4 6/ 30 85

Total ... . I 831 15851

11 51 6411146688 1 66671 5 6j 30I 5 5/ 30111 27j 30 I 680

at at

at a>

RECAPITULATION.

I 1Inspected or 1 Amt. Inf. Quarantined ISq.Mi.\ Number~- Inspectors

Vats

I 1 I Dipped I
I H. C. I H. C.

H.

C.

I I In

Co. l

B.A.I.

I State

I County I In Co.

c z z >
>
t"'
~
tr.J
"0

Preliminary .... . .. Systematic .. .....

83 1585

1

1

9536 5 18f 3o \ 3 15f 3o\ 6

464

5 641 1146688 6667 5 6j 30 5 5/ 30 1127/ 30 680

0
~

Final . : . .......... 783 9954

7

35 1015 J103162 19925 14 27/~ l 218j 30I35 16j 30 2222

0
~ "':!

I Total ........ 8661 115391

81 401 1656 J249850 J ~~128 J 25 ll j 30I11 8j 30J53 23j 30J 3366

8
:X:

tr.J

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

MONTH OF JANUARY, 1921.

' F I N A L.

I Inspected or Amount I Quarantined I Number

Inspectors 1 Vats

I I Dipped

Infested

I I County ..... . ...... .. H. C. H. C.

H.

C. I B.A.I. State I County II In Co.

t:;j
l".1

Baker ... .. ... . .. . ... . . ..

0

0

0

0

7 2439 14/ 30 0

0

Ben Hill . .. . . .. .... . . . .. 14 332

0

0 14 332 16/ 30 0

0

30 27

~

Bibb .. .... .. . .. .. ... . . 10 244

0

0

8 157 1/ 30 0

Bleckley . ..... . ~ ....... . 10 27

0

0

2 16 1/ 30 0

Brooks . .... . .... . . . .....

0

0

0

0 37 6532 6/ 30 0

0

14 a::

0 0

.

22 65

zl".1
~

Bulloch . .. .. . . ... . ......

0

0

0

0 14 437 28/ 30 0

4

118

0

Ca l h o u n

0 0

0

0

0

0

1 30 2/ 30 0

0

27

"".!

Chatham . ........... . ... 16 581

1

1 38 131 6/ 30 0

1

Chattahoochee . ..........
Colquitt . .. ............ .

0 0

0 0

0 0

~I

10 62 2/ 30 0 41 2896 26/ 30 0

0 2

Crisp . . ...... ... .. . .. . .. 24 311

0

0 10 131 6/ 30 0

1

Decatur . ... .... ... .. ....

0

0

0

0 71 15534 5/ 30 0

0

33 30 68 43 71

~ >
c=
~

Dodge ...... .. .. . . .. . ... 225 1454

0

0 18 679 27/ 30 0

1

Dooley .... . . .. . ......... 18 392

0

0

8 238 6/ 30 0

1

66 48

i!j

Dougherty ... . . .. : .... . . 11 235

0

Ol 11 235 14/ 30 0

1

23

Early . . .. . . . ........ . . . . Evans . . .... . ........ . ..

0 0

0 0

0 0

~I

11 2345 5/ 30 0 5 939 12/ 30 0

0 0

57 36

Glascock ...... . ..... . .. . Grady . . ... .. ... . .... . . .

1 16

0

0

0 0

~I

8 79 0

10/ 30 0

7 1130 8/ 30 0

1

26 67

~

~

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

Ot 00

MONTH OF JANUARY, 1921.

FINAL.

(Continued)

I I Inspected or Amount

Dipped

Infested

I . I County . . ... . . . . .. ... H. C. I H. c.

I Quarantined 1Number H. c. II B.A.I.

I Inspectors Vats
State 1County 1In Co.

Harris .. ........ .. .. ....

0

0

0

51

5 161 1/ 30 0

Heard ... ........ . ......

3

6

0

0

1

2 2/ 30 0

0

36

3/ 30 33

z>z
c:::

Houston

0. 0

0

0

0

0

3 29 2/ 30 0

0

33 >

Jasper ... .... .. . ..... . ..

2 36

0

0

1 17 2/ 30 0

0

0

t"'

Jefferson .. .. ...........

0

0

0

0

0

0 0

4j 30 0

41

~ t'j

Jones .... .. ...... . ...... 15 121

0

0

7 85 16/ 30 0

Laurens .................

6 89

0

Ol 48 3857 6j 30 0

Lee . ... .. ....... . .. . ... . Lo~des , .. .............

8 24

0

0

0 0

~I

4 12 1j 30 0 84 15512 23/ 30 0

0

46

'i:l 0

1

86

~

3/ 30 33

>-3

0

74

0
>%j

Macon . . ... ...... . .... . .

Miller

0 0 0. 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

~I

0

0 1,130 0

3 690 4/ 30 0

Mitchell ... ..............

0

0

0

0

7 1483 2j 30 0

0

47

>-3

0

33

iJ:1
t'j

5/ 30 68

Monroe .. .. .. . ... . .. ... .

8 103

0

0

8 92 0

ll/30 0

36

Muscogee . ..... . ... : ....

0

0

0

0 11 370 0

9j 30 0

37

Polk .. .. . . . ...... .. .. . ..

2

7

0

0

2 15 2j 30 0

2j 30

0

Pulaski . ... ...... . ......

2 153

0

Ol 2 132 1/ 30 0

4/ 30 . 31

Screven . ....... .. ... .... Seminole .... .. ..... .. .. .

0 0

0 0

~I

Ol 62 70341 2j 30 0 Ol 28 1 5179 4j 30 0

0 0

81 28

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

MONTH OF JANUARY, 1921.

FINAL.

I (Continued)
1 lnspectedOr~- -Amount 1 Quarantined Number~-

Inspectors 1 Vats

t:J
t_:l:j

! Dipped

I Infested

I

>"'

County . . .. . . .. ...... I H. C. I H. C. I H. C. I B.A.I. I State 1 County 1 In Co.

::d >-3

Stewart ... ..... . ...... . 1
Sumter .. . . . .. . . ... . ... .

5 50 11 200

0 - 0 , - 30 1 350

0

Ol 4 64

1j 30 0 9/ 30 0

1

42

~

13j30 30

zt_:l:j

.. Talbot .. ....... .. . .... . .

0

0

0

0 16 170 5/ 30 0

Taylor .. . ........ . .. . ...

0

0

0

0 10 809 12/ 30 0

0

45

>-3

1j 30 52

~

Telfair . . . . ......... . .... 28 684

0

0

9 540 1j30 0

1

Thomas ........ ... . . . ...

0

0

0

0 25 9625 22,130 0

0

48 87

>
Gi

Tift ..... ... . . .... . .. ...

0.

0

0

Ol 30 - 4182 0

0

0

Troup . .. . .... . ...... . ...

0

0

0

O! 1

4 1/ 30 0

0

41

ES

()

58 c::

Turner . . . .. ....... . .. .. . Twiggs .. ..... . .. .. . ....

1

7

3 38

0 0

~I

7 1522 3 38

5/ 30 0 1/ 30 0

1

38

3j30

32

~

Warren .... .. .. . . .... . . . Washington ... .. .. . . . ...

1~1

46 0

~I

Ol 13 75 0 O! 14 111 0

9j 30 0 7/ 30 1

33

::d
t_:l:j

50

15~1 Wilcox ....... . ... . .. . . . .

2120

Wilkinson . ... . .. .. . ... ..

0

~I

Total . .... . . .. . .. . . I 5951 72761 21

71 76 1120 12/ 301 0

2

39

Sl0:

41 76 1 1/ 30 0

IO

I 49

857j 87815 111 24/ 301 1 20j 30 I22 2j 30I 2258

Cl1
"'

0)

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

0

MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1921.

FINAL.

l I 1 Inspected or Amt. lilt Quarantined ISq.Mi.l Number r Inspectors f Vats

I !

Dipped H. C.

J

H.

C.

I

I

I

I

H . C. I In Co.I B.A.!. I State I Oounty I In Co.

1

Baker ..... . .. ....

0

Ol 0

Ben Hill .. , . .... I 15 340

0

Bibb . ... .. .. . . . . I 11 160

0

Bleckley . ... . . ... I 0

0

0

Brooks .. . . . .. ....

0

0

0

Bulloch . .... . .. . . . 280 2330

0

Calhoun ... . . . ~ . . .

0

0

0

Chatham :"'........ 18 554

0

Chattahoochee .. . I 0

0

0

Colquitt . .. . . . ... .

0

0

0

0

71 2439 366 12/ 30 0

0 141 332 256 22/ 30 0

0

81 150 254 14/ 30 0

0

6 16 175 4/ 30 0

0 37 6532 463 1

0

0 118 2334 709 25j 30 0

0

1 30 276 3/ 30 0

0 38 731 400 5/ 30 0

0 10 62 231 3j 30 0

0 41 . 2896 565 24/ 30 0

15/ 30 30

1

27

0

14

z ~ q

0

22

>

0

65

t"

6

118

::0 t':l

0

27

"'C
0

1

33

::0

0

30

~

2

71

0 '1.1

Cr isp . . .. .. . . . . . . 21 365

0

0 10 148 285 6j 30 0

Decatur ... . . . .... .

0

0

0

0 70 1 1448

12j 30 0

Dodg e .. ...... ... 104 630

0

0 181 645 495 21/ 30 0

1

44

~

16/ 30 70

::X:
t':l

6

66

Dooley . . . . . . . . ... 26 391

0

0

81 310 400 6/ 30 0

1

48

Dougherty ....... . 14 208

0

0 11 208 339 15j 30 0

24/ 30 23

Early . ........ ...

0

0

0

0 46 8760 503 2/ 30 1

2

57

Evans ..... .. . . .. .

3 39

0

0

5 939 275 15/ 30 0

0

36

Glascock ..... . . . .

0

0

0

0

81 79 95 0

14/ 30 0

26

Grady .......... . .

2

8

2

2

71 1130 453 6j 30 0

1

67

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1921.

FINAL.

(Continued)

I I J Inspected or J Amt. Inf. Quarantined JSq.Mi.J Number\ Inspectors

J Dipped

J

J

J

I Vats

t:j t<j

J H. C. H. C.

H. C. JJin Co.J B.A.!. J State J County J In Co.

">t!

Harris . .. . ... . ...

0

OJ

0

0

5 161 486 1/ 30 0

Heard .. .. ........

2

4

0

0

1

2 313 1/ 30 0

1

36

::0

2/30 33

1a-:-3:

Houston . . .. ...... Jasper ... .. ......

4 27

0

0

2 27 591 3/ 30 0

1 18

0

0

1 18 410 1/30 0

2/ 30 33

0

0

zt<j
1--3

Jones ............ 15 110

0

0

7 74 397 10/ 30 0

4/ 30 46

0

Laurens ..........

7 137

0

0 45 3857 791 7j 30 0

2

86

l'%j

Lee .............. 21 153

0

0

41 15 436 1/ 30 0

2/30 33

>
Q

Lowndes 0 Macon ..... .. ..... Miller ......... . .. Mitchell ... . ...... Monroe 0 0 0 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

10 160

0 0 0 0 0

0 85 15512

* 110/ 30 0

17/ 30 75

0

OJ

0 369 1/ 30 0

0

47

0 32 J 6700 275 2/ 30 0

0

33

0 0

;I 1483 542 3j 30 0

0

78 480 0

11/ 30 0

68 36

~
c::::
~
c:::: ::0

Muscogee .... 0. 0.

0

0

0

0 11J 370 285 3/ 30 0

0

37

t<j

Polk .... . ...... . .

6 26

0

0

2J 16 292 4/ 30 0

4/ 30

0

Pulaski 0 0 0. 0 0

2 132

0

0

2J 132 477 3j 30 0

2/ 30 31

Screven .......... Seminole .........

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

62291

7034 / 8265

654
*

5j 30 0

0

5j 30 1j 30 0

81 20

Stewart ..........

6 84

1 15 30 J 350 440 1/ 30 0

0

~

42
.0..>.

0>
t-o

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STA'J'E OF GEORGIA,

MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1921.

FINAL.

(Continued)

I I r 1 Inspected or 1 Amt. Inf. Quarantined [Sq.Mi.[ Number-, Inspectors --~- Vat!;! .

II H.Dippecd. H. c.

H.

c.

IIIn

I
Co.[

B.A.I.

I

State

[
Oounty

I In

Co.

>
z ~

Sumter .. ..... .. I

Talbot . ... . ...... I

Taylor ...... . ... I

Telfair .......... I

Thomas .. . . .. . . . I

Tift I 0 0 .

0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

5 17~1
0

0 9

49~1

0

0

0

0

0 0 0 0 0 0

0

4[ 59 534 6j 30 0

0 161 170 408 5j 30 0 0 10 809 338 18j 30 0

0

91 496 412 6/ 30 0

0 0

3265 1

9625 5717

504 24j 30 0 271 1 6,130 0

Troup .... .. .. ... J 0

0

0

0

II 4 434 0

0

Turner ..... .. . ...
I1
Twiggs .. .......

7 1522 3 38

0 o

0

0

7[ 1522 326 38 423

8/ 30 0 1/ 30 0

15/ 30 30

>
t"'

10/ 30 45

l:tl

0

52

trl

2 15/ 30 48

"'d 0

1

87

l:tl '"'l

0

41

0

0

58

~

1

~8

3/ 30 32

'"'l
::t1
trl

Warren .......... , 0

0

0

0 1:1 75 298 0

7j 30 0

33

Washington .. . ...

0

0

I Wilcox ........ . . 161 1843

Wilkinson . . ... .. I 0

0

0

0

141 111 680 0

9/ 30 0

50

4 18 76 1102 403 10/ 30 0

2

39

0

0

51 151 431 7/ 30 0

5j 30 49

I Total ........

-
7831 99541

-----

---

7[ 35[ 10151103162[ 19925[14 27/ 30[ 2 18/ 30[35 16/ 30[ 2222

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF MARCH, 1921.

PRELIMINARY.

t:!



I Inspected or_I _Amt.. Inf. Quarantined I Not ISq.Mi.j Numberl Inspectors 1 In Co.

I I I Dipped I

\

H. C. H. C.

H.

I I I l I I

I

I

C. I Insp. In Co. I B.A.I. State 1 County .1 In Co.

tr.l "0 ;J> ::0 >-:3

Atkinson .. I Bacon . ... . Brantley ...

I

I

I

I

I

1/ 30 0

0

I

311 5/ 30 0

0

1j 30 0

0

24

ts:

7

ztr.l

7

>-:3

Camden ...

711 0

4j 30 0

43

0
>%j

Charlton ...

Clinch .. ...

Echols . . ...

Glynn .... I

Liberty . .. I

Mcintosh .. Pierce ..... Ware ...... Wayne .....

-
I
I I

1063 1/ 30 0

I

1077 8/ 30 0

365 1/ 30 0

I

468 4j 30 0

I

I 9761 1/ 30 0

I

I 429 1 1/ 30 0

I

I 5181 8/ 30 0

I

I 676 6/ 30 0

I

I 766 1 2/ 30 0

0 0

12 15

>
Q

0

0

:..:.0..

0

6

0
C!

0

13

~

0

17

C!

1

38

::0 tr.l

0

I 34

0

I 36

Total ... I

1 -7a6o l 1 21; 3o1 4; ao1 1

252

a> c.:>

SYSTEMATIC.

0)

'

j Inspected or j Amt. Inf. Quarantined J Not jSq.Mi.j Number J Inspectors j Vats

j Dipped j
I H. c. I H.

c. II H.

III I I I
C. J Insp. J In Co.J B.A.!. j State 1County J In Co.

Appling ... , 2022 J 23122 J 1858j 212071

Berrien* ... ~rya_n ..... J

OJ OJ 208 J 2174)

01

0

197 19941

60 30040 J 75 165001 46 11000 J

OJ 604

3~1 -

505 431

28j 30 1 27j 30 1 12/ 30 1

I! 3

60 75 46

I 17j 30J 1

2

34

I 19 j 30 j 1

4 22/ 30 65

') 11/ 301 15j 30 113/ 30

39

z ~
> 0

~ J o

1 22; 3o

I 11j 30 J 1

23/ 30 1

34 62

t"'
~

Emanuel .. j 4397 J 318681 180 j 1554 j 8oi20294 J Oj 776 j 20j 30 j 1

I 6

I 80

'tl 0



Irwin . ... . J 160 J 1493 J Jeff Davis . j 1827 j 24229 j
Jenkins . ... J 1248 j 9460 j
Johnson . I 436 1654J
Lanier . . .. j 227 30221 MontgomeryJ 2365 20209
Tattnall .. . j 3373 J 346191-
I Toombs .. 3296 J 29738 J
Treutlin . .. J 1659 J 11322J

93 1 131
33 1 179 23 j 20 J'
40 j 32 J
161

655J 974 j
90 J 6841 366 41 j
69 1 119
26 j

36 j l167 j
32 j 108521 441 5110 17 4300 j 17 3500 39 8988 69 16270 49 14005 20 6262

I I Oj 378J 1

1 14f 30 J 1 2f 3o J 36

Oj 300 j 25 j 30 J 1

4

32

OJ 4oo J 1

1 1

1 3

44

OJ 258 J 9/ 30 J 11j 30J 2

0

I 3j 30J 1

I 1

I 27 I 17.

0 642 12/ 30 J 1

12

0 735 18j 30 J 1

I 5

0 519 18/ 301 1

I 3

0 188 0

I 1 . J2

41
I 69
I 49 21

~
~ ~
trJ

Wheeler . .. j 1037J 7684 J 13 23J 331 5706 Worth .. . . . J 4454 J 24230 J 102 J 308 j 86 14612

0 300 10j 30 J 1

0 6041 1

I o

I:24/ 301

34 86

Total . I 31498 j273719 J 3185 j 32646 j

I
900 j214964 j

1

I

I

6nn0O1 O~I~Y!OnO I H .LnOf ' on Vn O I .LI- 2 j 30 J47 24j 30 j

951

I I I I I 1Inspected or 1 Amt. rnr.-Quarantined 1 Not ISq.Mi.l Number!

I Dipped I

I

Inspect~\ Vats I

I H. C. I H. C.

H. C. I Insp. I In Co.l B.A.!. I State I County 1 In Co.

Grand Total 1 58084\494487[ 3613\ 344491- 1912[344421\ 251 1 35902[26 25/30f29-8j30\120 4/3 01 3386

*Note-Dipping stopped in Berrien County by injunction.

t1

to.!

~

!PC
~
a::

'

zto.!
~

0
~
>
0
.!P..C.
C)
c:
~
!PC to.!



' __} ,

g:

.a.

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

P:

MONTH OF MARCH, 1921.

FINAL.

1 Inspected or 1 Amt. Inf. Quarantined

I I 1 Dipped 1 H. c. H.

I C. 1 H.

C.

1 Not ISq.Mi.l Number! Inspectors 1 Vats

I

I

I

I

I

I

I Insp. I In Co.l B.A.L I State 1 County 1 In Co.

Baker .... I 800 6459
Ben Hill .. .1 137 1647 Bibb .. .. .. 20 507

6 6

27 1 119

9 30291 13 406

0 366 14/ 30 15/ 30 1 9j30

0 256 18/ 30 0

1

30 27

4

5

8 1441 0 254 14/30 0

0

14

>zz
~

Bleckley .. I 6 16 Brooks ... I 1411 10123

0

0

65 326

6 161 67 65321

0 175 6j 30 0

2

0 463 1

14/ 30 4

22

>

67

t"' !:0

Bulloch .... 6312 54413 26 81 118 26367 1 0 709 1

1

Calhoun .... Chatham .. .

3 109 192 2525

1 2

1 44

1 301 38 780 1

0 0

276 1 400 .

2/ 30 0
6j 30 p

8 2j 30 118

tzj

5/ 3 0

27

'1::1
0

1

33

~

Chattah'chee l. 0

0

0

0 10 62 1 10 231 2/ 30 0

0

30

0

Colquitt . . I

0

0

0

0 41 2896 41 565 13j 30 0

7

76

'%J

Crisp .. ... I 107 796 Decatur ... 1731 17923

0

0

49 267

10 127 71 18182

0 285 4j 30 0

10

15/ 30 1

1

44

>-3

5 7/ 30

71

::r:::
t<j

Dodge ..... 3405 29623

10

12

19 634 1 0 495 20/ 30 0

6

66

Dooley . .... 199 1487

0

0

6 2151

0 400

3/ 30 0

Dougherty . 15 252

0

0 11 208

0 339 9/ 30 0

1 1

48 23

'E-arfY. .. ... , 0 0 0 0 11 23451 11 503 5/ 30 1

3

57

Evans .. . . . 1362 15706 14 25

Glascock . . I 34 171

0

0

Grady .... I 765 5798 20 60

8 939 1 6 62 1 7 11301

~I

275 12/ 30 1

2

95 0

8j 30 0

453 11 j 30 0

2

36 26 67

-

-

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

MONTH OF MARCH, 1921.

FINAL.

(Continued)

1 Inspected or 1 Amt. Inf. Quarantined I Not ISq.Mi.l Number! Inspectors 1 Vats

1 Dipped 1
I . H. c. I

Harris .. .. I

9 177

Houston Jasper

.

.....I,

10 2

76 36

Jefferson . I 51 315

H.
3 0 0 3

I c. H.

211

51

0

3

0

1

22 11

III I l I
C. I Insp. I In Co. I B.A.I. I State I County 1In Co.

1611

0 486 4j30 0

6j 30 36

25

0 591 2/ 30 0

3/ 30 33

18

0 410 2j 30 0

0

0

139

9 686 0

2/ 30 8/ 30

41

't=<=!'
~ ~
is:
zt<!
>-3

Jones .. ... I 22 123
Laurens .. I 1902 9172

0

0

57 327

7 83 48 5188

0 397 4/ 30 0 0 791 10/ 30 1

10/ 30 46

4 18/ 30

86

~

Lee ...... I

8 30

0

0

4 15

0 436 1/ 30 0

2/ 30 33

>

Lowndes .. I 0

0

0

0 85 155121 85 455 27j 30 1

5 18/ 30 ..86



Miller -.-... I - 0 Mitchell .. I 222 Monroe ... I 11
Muscogee . I 11

0 2651
140 88

6
4 1 3

0

3 690 33 275 3j 30 1

1

32

8

7 14831

0 542 11/ 30 0

110/ 30 68

1

8 69

0 480 0

5/ 30 0

36

3 11 3701 0 285 4/ 30 0

16j 30 37

8
c ~
~

Polk .... .. I 12 55

0

0

2 171 0 292 1j 30 0

5/ 30

0

t<!

Pulaski . . . _. 1 3 174

1

1

2 1741

0 471 1/ 30 0

2/ 30 31

Screven ... I 1486 10881

71 184 76 115181

0 654 14j 30 1

6

76

Seminole .. I 763 7716

1

1 29 98761 1

5j 30 1

2

29

Stewart .. I

0

0

0

0 30 350 1 30 440 1/ 30 0

1

42

Sull'lt~r_ ... I

4 70

0

Oj 4 701 0 534 0

0

.. -

10/ 30 30
Ql ..::1

C> 00

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF MARCH, 1921.

FINAL.

(Continued)

1 Inspected or 1 Amt. In. Quarantined

1 Dipped 1
I I II I I I II I I H. c. H. c.

H. C.

Not ISq.Mi.l Numberl Inspectors 1 Vats I Insp. I In Co. l B.A.I. State I County I In Co.

>zc~::

Talbot .. .. I 15 85

0

0 16 1701 1 408 3/ 30 0

1

45

t"'

Taylor . . .. I

5 176

0

0 10 8091

Telfair . . . I 2162 18483 10 10 13 10781

5 338 16/ 30 1 0 412 9/ 30 0

115/ 30

37

4

48

!;tl
t<l
'"C

Thomas ... I 2284 16480 36 124 25 96251

0 504 19/ 30 4j 30 5 10/ 30

87

0
!;tl

Tift ...... I 365 2305

6 14 36 5717

0 271 20/ 30 0

1 26/ 30 41

1"3

Troup .... . J 1

4

0

0

1

4

0 434 1/ 30 0

0

58

0
'%j

Turner ... I 184 1413

Twiggs ... I 15 115

Warren . .. I

3 11

W ashingfun 1 20 133'

2 1 0 1

2

7 1019

0 326 12/ 30 0

1

39

2

3 291

0 423 4/ 30 0

7/ 30 32

0 2

11 15

59 1 113

8 9

298 0 680 0

2/ 30 0 2/ 30 1

33 50

:>r-3:
t<l

Wilcox . .. I 4961 3570 Wilkinson . I 21 283

2~1

114 0

72 780 1 5 1921

~I 403 19j 30 10/ 30f 2

431 1j 30 0

16/ 30

39 50

--

Total .. I 26586J220768 J 4281 18031 9201103171 1 215 J 19699113 18j 30j12-2730I7110j 30J 2183

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

MONTH OF APRIL, 1921.

PRELIMINARY.

tj

1Inspected or 1 Amt. Inf. Quarantined I Not ISq.Mi.l Numberl Inspectors 1 Vats

t.".l

1 Dipped 1
I H. c. I H. C. \ H.

.I I
C. II Insp. II In Co. II B.A.I. II State 1County 1In Co.

~
::0
>-,3

Atkinson . I Ba.con ... . I

42 968

36 847

I I

10/30 0 311 6j30 0

25/ 30

24

~

0

9

zt.".l

Brantley .. I

I

4/ 30 0

0

7

>-,3

Camden .. I Charlton .. I Clinch .. . : I Echols ... I Glynn .... I Liberty .. . I

I

711 3/30 0

0

I

1063 1/30 0

0

I

1077 1/ 30 0

0

I

365 2/ 30 0

0

I

468 1/ 30 0

0

I

976 1/ 30 0

0

43

0 ".::

12 15

>
Cj1

0

:..:.0...

6 13

()
~
>-,3

Mcintosh . I

429 1/30 0

0

17

c:::

Pierce .... J

I

518 2/ 30 0

0

38

::0 t.".l

Ware .... . .

I
I

676 16/ 30 0

0

I 34

Wayne ... I 76 2173 75 1917

----

I

766 5/3 0 0

13/ 301 38

Total .. I 1181 31411 1111 27641

1 736ol 1 23J3ol o

18j 30I 256

Ccol>

._



~

SYSTEMATIC.

0

1 Inspected or 1 Amt. Inf. Quarantined

1 Dipped 1
I H. c. I H .

c. II H.

c

- j I Not /Sq.Mi. / Number/ Inspectors

Vats .

I I. I I I

/ Insp. / In Co. B.A.!. 1 State 1County 1In Co.

Appling . :I 2845 255761 1666 19077 60 350401 0 604 25/ 30 1

4

60

Berrien ... I 5201 13656 1970 2356 75 17656

0 505 25j 30 1

7

75

Bryan .... I Candler .. . I Coffee .. . I Cook 00 00 001

1409 186531 1031 2317 16813 67
29241 42607 1 55 2024 17478 - 13

11982 304
1912 1 14

46 10063 1
35 8252 /
65 21709 1
39 8405

0 431 8/ 30 1 0 300 5/ 30 1 0 920 20j 30 1 0 230 7j 30 1

3

46

2

35

5

65

2 10/ 30

40

z ~
>C!

Crawford . I 68 914

2

7 42 610

0 334 0

20/ 30 0

34

t"

Effingham I 1873 15586

0

0 14 2721

0 419 13/ 30 1

3 10/ 30

62

~

Emanuel .. I 6260 46321 32 101 80 22562

0 776 25/ 30 1

6

80

~

Irwin 0000 01 2367 \ 179071 785 4548 Jeff Davis I 1926 24365 32 106 Jenkins ... I 18461 13743 28 150

37 90571 33 11476 \ 46 6517

0 378 1

1

0 300 24/ 30 1

0 400 1

1

2 9j 30

37

4

33

~

3

46

0
~

Johnson .. I 1967 6923
Lanier . .. . I 6091 6023 Montgoonery l 2357 18389

347 1103

254 2441

1

2

27 4327 18 4159 39 8674

0 258 23/ 30 0

0

5/ 30 1

0 642 14/ 30 1

1 27/ 30 27

1

18

ta
l."'.l

2

41

Tattnall .. I 38271 401591

31

7 70 19381

0 735 21/ 30 1

5

70

Toombs . .. I 6599 1 29939

4

4 49 13619

0 519 16/ 30 1

3

49

Treutlin .. I 11851 78001 4

4 20 65271

0 188 0

1

2

21

Wheeler .. I 2102 150881 14 17 33 79401 0 300 1/ 30 1

2

34

Worth .... I 53441 32035 11

19 86 146121

0 604 1

0

10

86

Total .. I 51223 14099751 62181 440541 84912333071

Ol 8843 110 22j 30I17 20j 30I68 I26j 30 I 959 -

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

MONTH OF APRIL, 1921.

FINAL.

I I I 1 Inspected or 1 Amt. lnf. Quarantined

1 Dipped 1
H. c. H. C.

H. C.

I Not jSq.Mi. j Number j Inspectors 1 Vats
i I I I II Insp. In Co. jl B.A.I. State I County 1 In Co.

Baker .... I 1386 2351 Ben Hill .. I 475 2891

3 16

8 2651 1 0 366 12/ 30 1

6 28 13 406

0 256 6j 30 0

1 1/ 30 30 119/ 30 27

tj t.1j
>'1:!
~

Bibb ... ..I 33 613

0

0

8 1551 0 254 13/ 30 0

Bleckley .. I 1588 6021

0

0

6

71

0 175 12/ 30 0

Brooks ... I 4210 32399 23 90 66 157021 0 463 1

1

Bulloch .. . I 9344 56057

5 65 116 269911 0 709 1

1

Calhoun . . I 12 313

0

0

1 261 0 276 1/ 30 0

0

14

118/ 30 22

6

66

>--,3
is:
zt.1j
>--,3

8

116

0

9/ 30 27

"%j

CChhaattthaahm'che.eII

382 8

3997 50

0 0

0 35 757 0 10 62

0 400 2 231

9/ 30 0 2/ 30 0

1 2/ 30 33

>

0

30

Colquitt .. I 1451 11773 Crisp .. ... I 188 1099 Decatur .. I 3692 36753 Dodge ... . I 5023, 27068

19 101

0

0

45 64

1

6

41 2896
8 1141 30 6319 1 18 543

0 565 1

0 -

0 285 4/ 30 0

0

11/ 30 1

0 495 16/ 30 0

7

76

1

44

1017/ 30 ' -n

6

66

(')
c::: ~c:::
~

Dooley ... I 321 2041

0

0

6 1281 0 400 4/ 30 0

23/ 30 48

t.1j

Dougherty I 17 424

2

6 11 208

0 339 4/ 30 0

1

23

Early . .. .. I 3024 22384 29 320 18 4748

0 503 26/ 30 1

4 20/ 30 57

Evans .... I 1616 17336

0

0

8 2200

0 275 9j 30 1

2

36

Glascock . . I 34 193 Grady .. . . I 1269 8707

0 0

0 0

~I 62 1130 1 I

0 95 0

12/ 30 0

0 453 10/ 30 0

2

26
67
-,_l.



MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

~

MONTH OF APRIL, 1921.

FINAL.

(Continued)

I ! Inspected or 1 Amt. Inf.,uarantined

Not IISq.Mi. IINumberll

Inspectors

1 Vats

1 Dipped 1
I H. c. I H. C.

Harris .... I

8 234 '

OJ

Jasper .. .. I

1 21

Oj

I H.

0

5

0

1

I I
C. I Insp. I In Co.I B.A.I. I State I County 1 In Co.

161 1 21

0 486 0 410

2j 30 0 1/ 30 0

6j 30 36

0

0

zz>c::

Jefferson . I 28 298 22 249 22 249

0 686 0

6j 30 1

41 >

Jones ..... I 45 273 Laurens .. I 2918 13863

0

0

47 245

7 79 49 6599

0 397 3/ 30 0 0 791 25/ 30 1

12/ 30 46

4

87

t"'
~
t<.l

Lee . ..... I 14 69

0

0

4 15

0 436 1/ 30 0

2j 30 33

"tt
0

Lowndes . 0 I 2503 24573 153 608 51 7649 1. 0 455 28/ 30 0

9

75

~

Miller . I 0 1219 15891 Mitchell .. I 894 9539

12 200

1

1

7 1571 5 1096

0 275 4j 30 1 0 542 12j 30 0

2 7j 30 32

2

68

~

Monroe ... I 13 153

0

0

8 75 1 0 480 0

6j 30 0

Muscogee . I 13 131

0

0 11 3701 0 285 6j 30 0

1

36 38

~
t<.l

Polk ...... 1 7 34

2

2

3 21 1 (j 292 3/ 30 0

5/ 30

0

Pulaski . .. I 6 362

0

0

1 1481 0 477 l j 30 0

Screven ... 1 2593 20799 23 64 71 13912

0 654 1

1

6/ 30 31

6

72

Seminole .. 1257 13175

6

8 . 1 5621 0

7j 30 1

3 5j 30 29

Stewart ...
Sumter . . . .

36 275

4

11 202 . 0

32 0

30 3501 4 65

2 440 1/ 30 0 0 534 1/ 30 0

1

42

15j 30 30

Talbot .... 1 22 1 1991

0

0 16 1701 0 408 5j 30 0

1

45

I

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

MONTH OF APRIL, 1921.

FINAL.

t:j
t".l

I (Continued)
1 Inspected or 1 Amt. Inf. Quarantined Not ISq.Mi. l Number!

Inspectors

1 Vats

'ij
> ~

I 1 Dipped 1
I H. c. I H. c. H.

co) c. I Insp. II In

I I
B.A.I. II State 1 County 1 In Co.

a::
zt".l

Taylor . ... I 129 534

5

7 1(} 809 1 0 338 14j 30 13j 30 2

37

o-'3

Telfair . . . I 3485 31787

0

0 13 1006 1 0 412 13/ 30 0

4

48

0
'%j

Thomas ... I 3936 30269

8 13 25 9625 1 0 504 20j 30 1

6

Tift ...... I 2318 17018 41 351 37 8128 1 0 271 1

0

3

87 41

>
Q

Turner ... I 323 2356

0

0

7 11601 0 326 24/ 30 0

1

39

~

Twiggs ... I 8 124

1

3

3 391 0 423 1/ 30 0

7j 30 32

~
d

Warren .... 1 35 194
Washington .j 49 381

8 22 43 273

9 55 1 26 259 1

0 298 0 1 680 0

4/ 30 0 4/ 30 1

33 ti

50

d

Wilcox . . . I 800 4546

4 13 76 1036 1 0 403 16/ 30 1

2

39

~
t".l

Wilkinson I 42 551

5 26

6 3101 0 431 1/ 30 0

24/ 30 50

Total .. I 5584914203181 518 1 28131 9241119251 1 51 18674114 28/ 30113 16/ 301101 1 2o16

Zl

...:) ~

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

MONTH OF APRIL, 1921. FINAL.
(Continued)

z>zc:: >

t"

RECAPITULATION.
I I Inspected or J Amt. Inf. Quarantined Not JSq.Mi.j Number j

Inspectors

j Vats

~
trl "'0

I I

Dipped H. C.

I I

H.

I C. I H.

I I I I II C. I Insp. I In Co. I B.A.I. I State J County In Co.

:.0.:..;,

I Preliminary J 1181 3141 111 27641 0

Oj

Systematic 51223 409975 6218 44054 849 2333071

7360 1 23/ 30 0

1 8j 30 256

0 8843 10 22/ 30 17 20/ 30 68 26/ 30 959

0
.".%.,j

Final ..... J 558~j420318 518 28131 924' 1192611
-

5 18674 14 28/ 30 13 15/ 30 101

2076

:;I: trl

Grand Total j107190 j833434 l 6847 J 49631 j 1773 l352558 j 5] 34817f2713j 30 I3i- 5j 36ji71 4/ 301 3291

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

MONTH OF MAY, 1921.

PRELIMINARY.

County

Dipped H. C.

I Amt. Inf. Quarantined 1 Not

H. C. I H.

C. 1 Insp.

Supervising Inspector

t:i
t<j
~
~

Atkinson ............ 91 1574 50 887

Bacon .... . ..........

I

Brantley .. ..........

I I

Dr. G. W. Riley Dr. C. S. Hess Dr. J. F. Fahey

>-'3
is:
zt<j
>-'3

Camden .. .. ......... Charlton ............

I

Dr. J. F. Fahey

I

Dr. J. F. Fahey

~

Clinch

0 0 0 0 00

Echols

0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

55 385 18 68

Glynn ..... .... .. . . ..

Liberty 0 0

Mcintosh . ....... ... .

Pierce ...............

Ware

0. 0 0 0

I I I I I I
I

Dr. J. F. Fahey Dr. J. V. Knapp Dr. J. F. Fahey Dr. J. F. Fahey Dr. J. F. Fahey Dr. J. F. Fahey _ Dr. J. F. Fahey

>
Q
.~.....
0c: c~ :
~ t<j

Wayne ........ . ..... 201 5349
I Total ........... 3471 73081

4 574 721 15291

I I

Dr. W. M. Lynn

"'I 01

~

County

Dipped H. C.

SYSTEMATIC.
I Amt. Inf. Quarantined J Not
H. C. I H. C. 1 Insp.

Supervising Inspector

Appling .. . . ... . .. ... 3112 37195 51 226 601 183741 0 Dr. Wm. M. Lynn

Berrien

0 0

3214 40481

148 4037

751 182571

0 Dr. E. E. Peacock

Bryan .. . .. .. .... . ... 1527 19487 51 816

Candler . . . . . . . . . . : . I 2585 177251 2

3 .

Coffee .............. 1 3416 46476 20 294

Cook .. . . . .......... . 2451 21433

1

1

Crawford .. ... . . .. ... 69 1328

0

0

46 1 10763 1 35 J 8320
65 1 22109 1 39 1 7218 42 1 625

0 Dr. R. L. Brinkham 0 Dr. R. N. Lauderdale 0 Dr. G. W. Riley 0 Dr. J. J. Jones. 0 Mr. W. A. McClain

z z >
c:::
~

Effingham 0

Emanuel .... . .. . .....

Irwin

0

1424 12151 6750 49627 2481 18366

1

2

3

3'

39 100

11 1 2051 801 23059
41 1 9349 1

0 Dr. R. L. Brinkham

0 Dr. B. N. Lauderdale

0 Mr. R. L. Brawley

r

~ t<j
0 "~ '

Jeff Davis . ... . .. . .. . 1916 24167 21 57 33 J 11476

0 Dr. C. S. Hess

1-3

Jenkins

0 0. 0. 0 0 0

1896 14032

6

91 44 1 65171 0 Dr. J. H. Sweeney

0
"%j

Johnson ......... .... 2054 7464 42 100 28 1 393

1 Dr. C. E . Morris

1-3

Lanier

0 0 0. 0

627 9481

25

98

19 1 45471

0 Dr. E. E. Peacock

Montgomery ...... ... 2323 18794

0

0 39 1 86701 0 Dr. H. J. F . Arundel

=t<j

Tattnall . . ....... .... 4901 40237

1

2 701 19399

0 Dr. W. P. Cox

Toombs . ..... . ...... 3471 29493

0

0 49 1 133821 0 Dr. H. J. F. Arundel

Treutlin ..... ... .... . 1813 12656

0

0 20 1 6284 , 0 Dr. H. J. F. Arundel

Wheeler .. . . ... . . .. .. 2150 148921 5

7 33 1 7772 1 0 Dr. Murray King

Worth .... . ...... . . . . 5357 33074

1

1 861 158281 0 Dr. J. P. Mack

Total ............ 1 52537 I468559J 4171 57561 915 12144031

11

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF MAY, 1921.

County

Dipped H. C.

FINAL.
I I Amt. Inf. Quarantined Not
H. C. j H. C. I Insp.

Supervising Inspector

Baker ... . ..... .. . ... 1261 115581 3

31 71 2626

0 Dr. A. C. Stein

t:1 trl

Ben Hill ............ 561 3530

8 73 391 603

0 Mr. J. W. Hindsman '

~

Bibb . ....... . ....... 41 635

0

0 41 1 635

0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

~

Bleckley ........ .. .. . 1655 6207

0

0

41

7

0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

~
is:

Brooks .............. 3603 24580

4

4 251 4781

0 Dr. H . V. Porter

Bulloch 0 00 0

6197 51565

0

0 - 181 42661

0 Dr. J. R. Wirthlin

ztrl
~

Calhoun .. ... ... .....

3 103

0

0

81 261

0 Dr. A. C. Stein

0

Chatham .. ....... . .. 274 3078

3 19 391 753

0 Dr. R. L. Brinkman

'%j

Chattahoochee ....... 43 201

0

0 101 39

0 Mr. W. I. Holder

>

Colquitt ............. 3247 27178 35 104

Crisp

0 0

. 321 1333

0

0

46 1 18115 51 56

. 0 Dr. C. N. Clausen 0 Dr. T. H. Applewhite

!:;)
~
(j

Decatur ... . .. . . . . . . :

Dodge

0. 0

Dooley .. . ... . . ......

1875 13451 5304 29376
131 1221

44 376

0

0

0

0

301 6804 18 588
61 115

0 Dr. W. D. Martin 0 Dr. J. J. Vara 0 Dr. T. H. Applewhite

c::: ~ c:::
~

'

Dougherty . . ... ...... 24 415
I EaTly .. . ....... .' .. 33871 317791
j Evans . . ... .. . . ..... 18361 17340

0
181 0

0 38
0

101 187 181 4748 1 81 23311

0 Dr. A. C. Stein 0 Mr. J. B. Harris 0 Dr. W. P. Cox

Glascock .... .. .. ... . 26 128

0

0

6 62

0 Mr. G. 0. Kaigher

trl

I Grady ............. 13481 8498

I Harris ... ..... ... ..

36 452

4 18

0

0

9 14801 5 161

0 Dr. Harry Lebeson 0 Mr. W. I. Holder

""""

og
-MONTHLY REPORT-SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE ()F GEORGIA.

MONTH OF MAY, 1921.

FINAL.

County

Dipped H. C.

I (Continued)
Amt. Inf. Quarantined 1 Not H. C. I H. C. 1 Insp.

Supervising Inspector

Jasper ........ .. .... Jefferson . ... ... .... . Jones .... .. .. . . .. ...

4 60 58 471

0 16

0 80

2;1 393011

34 219

0

0

7j 701

0 Mr. T. H. Taylor 0 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler 0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

zzc>::

Laurens ............. 2916 13855

Lee ..... ...... . ...

9 30

Lowndes . ..... .. .... 3658 38453

21 80

1

1

65 161

4!1

73841 15

511 8125

0 Dr. A. M. Kirkpatrick. 0 Dr. A. C. Stein 0 Dr. J. V. Knapp

>
t"'
~

Miller ..... ......... . 1117 13164

4

6

71 157

0 Dr. W. D. Martin

'"C 0

Mitchell .. .. ......... 915 9472

0

0

51 1096

0 Dr. A. C. Stein

~ o-,3

Monroe ...... . .......

8 79

0

0

61 70

0 Mr. W. A. McClain

Muscogee . ... ..... .. . 17 595

0

0 111 370

0 Mr. W. I. Holder

~

Polk ................
Pulaski ........... ..

19 45 2 307

0 0

0 0

~I 17 153

0 Dr. T. H. Applewhite 0 Dr. J. J. Vara

-~
t:l!j

Screven ... . ......... 4291 30670 25 58 721 134021 10 Dr. A. D. Moore

Seminole - ....... ....... 939 9464

0

0

1

0

0 Dr. W. D. Martin

Stewart .. .. . . . ...... 48 539

2 29 27 292

0 Dr. W. D. Martin

$umter ........... -~ .

11 246

0

0

2 64

0 Dr. W. D. Martin

Talbot

0 0 0

40 349

0

0 16 170

0 Mr. W. I. Holder

Taylor ... .. ~ .. ..... . 398 1876

3

4 10 809

0 Dr. S. H. Moore

Telfair ...... . .. . .... 3487 32100

0

0 101 937

0 Dr. J. J. Vara

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF MAY, 1921.

FINAL.

(Continued)

I I Dipped 1 Amt. lnf. Quarantined Not

t::1

County

I

Thomas .. . .. ... .. .. I

Tift ............... I

Turner .......... .. . .

Twiggs

0. 0 0 0 0 0

H. C. 1
3850 1 387501 2321 16343\
288 2510 8 94

H.
1/ 24
2 0

C. 1
21 100
12 0

H.
25 1
27 1 ~I 3,,

C. 1 Insp.

Supervising Inspector

9642 1 ~~ Dr. Harry Lebeson

5897

1160 1 42 1

0 Mr. J. W. Hindsman 0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

t<j
~
~s:: zt<j

Warren

0 0. 0 0 0

36 120

0

0 11 1 54 1 0 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler

H

Washington 0 0.

30 377

0

0 301 3771

0 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler

0
l'%j

Wilcox ........ .. .. .. 817 4472

2

6 44 1 586 1 0 Dr. T. H. Applewhite

>

Wilkinson ...... .. ... 48 600

7 25

61 3341

Total ..... ... ... I 5654214378881 2921 11991 8041 957241

01 Dr. A. M. Kirkpatrick 101

~....
q 0

~
q

GRAND TOTAL.

::0
t<j

1Inspected or 1 Amt. Inf. Quarantined

I I I I I Dipped I
I I I H. C. 1 H. C.

H. C.

1 Not.I Sq.Mi.l Number! Inspectors I Vats

I

I

I

Insp. I In Co.l B.A.!. I State County I In Co.

Grand Total 116942619137551 7811 84841 171913101271 111 34877128 10 j30I34 1/ 301202 1/ 30/ 3646

~

00 Q

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

MONTH OF JUNE, 1921.

PRELIMINARY.

I I County
I I Atkinson .. ........ .
I Bacon ... ........ . . . .

Dipped

Amt. Inf. Quarantined 1 Not

H.

c. 1 H. C. 1 H.

C. 1 Insp.

481 20361 211 2341

I I

Supervising Inspector
Dr. G. W. Riley Dr. C. S. Hess

Brantley ...... . .. . . .

Dr. J. F. Fahey

>zzc::
>
t"'

Camden . . ....... . .. .

Dr. J. F. Fahey

1:0

Charlton . . . ..... ... .

Dr. J. F. Fahey

t'j "0

Clinch . .. .... ...... .

Dr. J. F. Fahey

0

Echols .. ..... .. . ... . 31 1 323 1 26 1 2511

I

I

I Dr. J . V. Knapp

1:0 1-':3

Glynn .... . .. .. ... .. . Liberty ... ........ . . Long . .. .. ... . . .... . Mcintosh ......... . . .

Dr. J . F. Fahey

0

Dr. A. M. Kirkpatrick

~

Dr. A. M. Kirkpatrick Dr. J. F. Fahey

=1-':3
t'j

Pierce ............. .

Dr. J. F. Fahey

Ware ...... .. .... .. .

Dr. J. F. Fahey

I Wayne .. ...... . . ... . Total ..... .. ....

3141_ 62121 -
393 1 85711

172J
21::~ 1

3276j
i51ti.ll

I

I

I Dr. Wm. M. Lynn

Dipped

SYSTEMATIC.
I Amt. Inf. Quarantined 1 Not

County

H.

C.

H. C. I H.

C. 1 Insp.

Supervising Inspector

I Appling .... .. ...... 2726 37358

22 1901 60 1 172091

0 Dr. W. M. Lynn

Berrien ..... .. : . . .. .. 1 2985 31954 100 704
Bryan ... : . . ... . ..... 1603 19025 85 313

75 / 18071 46 1 106131

0 Dr. E. E. Peacock 0 Dr. R. L. Brinkman

t:::! trl

Candler ... .. . : . .. .. . 2293 17403
Coffee .... .. .. . . . . . . 2356 48802
Cook .......... . . : .. . 1896 17207

0

0

15 182

9

9

35 / 8320
65/ 22828 1 141 3494

0 Dr. B. N. Lauderdale 0 Dr. G. W. Riley 0 Dr. J. J. Jones

'1::1
>
~
'"'3 ~

Crawford . .' . : .. :: . . : . 37 588

2

7 18 / 253 1 0 Mr: W. A. McClain

Effingham 0 0 0 1705 15847.

4

9 111 2240 1 0 Dr. R. L. Brinkman

ztrl
'"'3

Emanuel 0 0. 0 0 0

6525 49182

7

9 80 / 23059 / 0 Dr. B. N. Lauderdale

Irwin

0 0. 0

2021 16947

43

93 . 41 1 96061

0 Mr. R. 0. Brawley

~

Jeff Davis .... .. . ... 1946 24262

2 47 33 1 114341 0 Dr. C. S. Hess

>
C)

Jenkins

0 0 0

1913 13857

4

5 44 1 6566 1 0 Dr. J. H. Sweeney

.~...

Johnson . . . .... .. : . .. , 2572 9653

4

6 28 / 4108 1 1 Dr. C. E . Morris

Lanier ....... . . .. ... 670 10278
Montgomery ..... .. I 2391 19276,

24 0

67 0

19 / 4499 1 39 1 8580

0 Dr. E. E. Peacock 0 Dr. H. F. J. Arundel

(')
c:::
~
c:::

Tattnall . ... . .. . ..... 3850 40024

7 1Q 70 1 199411 0 Dr. W. P. Cox

~

Toombs ... . . . ..... .. 3147 28380

1

1 49 1 130881 0 Dr. H. F . J. Arundel

trl

Treutlin ..... . . ...... 1932 13901

1

4 20 1 6132 1 0 Dr. H. F. J. Arundel

Wheeler .. ..... : . ... ..
Worth ..... ........ I

2234 4916

169601 28955

1 7

11 33 / 80501 81 86 / 167341

0 Dr. Murray King 0 Dr. J. P. Mack

- -

T_ot al .. ... . -~ - / 49718/459859 1 338 / 1664 / 8671214825 1 1/

.0..0.

00

FINAL.

t-:1

County

Dipped H. C.

I Amt. lnf. Quarantined J Not
H. C. J H . C. J Insp.

Supervising Inspector

Baker .... .. . . .. . .... 1269 12116

1

1

7 J 2705 J

0 Dr. A. C. Stein

Ben Hill .... . ... .. .. 597 4269

11

39

44J 6251

0 Mr. J . W. Hindsman

Bibb ... ....... .. . . . . 28 499

0

0

8 J 200

0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

Bleckley 0. 0 0 0. 0. 0

41) 160

0

0

1J

OJ

0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

Brooks ....... .. . .. . . 3028 23110

24

72

28 J 492 J

0 Dr. H. V. Porter

Bulloch 0 0

3449 29804

0

0 18 J 4266 J 0 Dr. J. R. Wirthlin

zz>q

Calhoun . .. ......... . Chatham .. ........ ..

2 52 352 4229

0 4

0 17

1 J 26 1 43 J 793

0 Dr. A. C. Stein 1 Dr. R. L. Brinkman

>
t"'

Chattahoochee ... .. . . 23 115

0

OJ 10J 53 J 0 Mr. W. I. Holder

~ t_:<j

Colquitt . . . ... .. . .. . . 2404 19846 46 133 57 J 20544!

0 Dr. J. J. Jones

'1:l 0

Crisp

0 0 0 .

238 1132

0

0

4 J 45 1 0 Dr. T. H . Applewhite

Decatur ... .. . .. . ... . 1666 11626

4

6 30 1 69141 0 Dr. W. D. Martin

Dodge .. .. .. . .. . . ... 4939 27.743

0

0 18 1 630J

0 Dr. J. J . Vara

~
>-3 0 "'.l

Dooley ... .. . .. ... .. . 192 1673

0

0

6 J 1151 0 Dr. T. H. Applewhite

>-3

Dougherty .. ....... .. 31 722

1

1 10J 1871 0 Dr. A. C. Stein

::1:1
t_:<j

Early .. . . ........... 1445 9245 21 149 18J 4748 1 0 Mr. J. B. Harris

Evans .. . . . .......... 1598 17735

0

0

9 J 24071 0 Dr. W. P. Cox

Glascock . . . .. ... . ... 44 160

3

6

8 1 671

0 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler

Grady

o o o o o o o o o o o l oo o

1766 11458

14

16

141 3296

0 Dr. H. Lebeson

Jlarris ... . ..........

6 453

0

0

3 1 111 1 0 Mr. W. I. Holder

Jasper . .............

4 60

0

0

21 301

0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

Jefferson 0

101 1104

20

.90

371 478

0 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA. MONTH OF JUNE, 1921. FINAL. (Continued)

County

H.

C.

H. C. I H.

C. 1 Insp., Supervising Inspector

t:j

Dipped

Amt. lnf. Quarantined / Not

trl "'0

Jones ..... ... .... . .. 1 35 3041

1

1

5/ 34/

0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

> ~

Laurens ............ . Lee ... . ............. Lowndes 0. 0 0 Miller .............. 1
I Mitchell . ... .... . ...

2337 11357 11 29
3354 34273 1084 . 13845
520 5358

5 12

0

0

89 203

3

5

0

0

47/ 7380 /
4/ 14/ 51 / 7864 /
7/ 26541 51 1096/

0 Dr. C. N. Clausen 0 Dr. A. C. Stein 0 Dr. J. V. Knapp 0 Dr. W. D. Martin 0 Dr. A. C. Stein

>-3 ~
ztrl
>-3 0
>:rj

Monroe ....._. ....... ,

3

59

1 23

3/ 58 /

0 Mr. W . A. McClain

>

Muscogee .. .... ..... 23 642

2

5

8/ 306/

Polk ................ ,

8

36

0

0

3/ 18/

Pulaski .... .........

3 463

0

0

1/ 156/

Screven ....... .. . .. / 2495 19813 23 54 72/ 13402/

Seminole . .. ........ / 41 1052

2

2

2/ 462/

0 Mr. W. I. Hvlder
oj Dr. T. H. Applewhite
0 Dr. J. J. Vara 0 Dr. A. D. Moore 0 Dr. W. D. Martin

c;':l
.~....
q 0
c~ :
~

Stewart ............. 1 53 546 /

4

6 28 / 330/

0 Dr. W. D. Martin

trl

Sumter ......... . ... j 9 168

0

0

2/ 661

0 Dr. W. D. Martin

Talbot

0 0 0 0

29 297

0

0

8/ 70

0 Mr. W. I. Holder

Taylor . ..... ....... . 452 2133 39 94 10 / 809/

0 Dr. S. H. Moore

Telfair . . ....... .... . 3385 317711 Thomas ......... . .. . 3865 28125

!I 1 4

11/ 9741 25 / 9642

0 Dr. J. J . Vara 0 Dr. H. Lebeson

- - - ---

---- -

---

00

~

f

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF JUNE, 1921.

FINAL.

(Continued)

Dipped

I Amt. Inf. Quarantined 1 Not

County
Tift . . ... . . . .... . . ...
Turner .... .. .. . .....
Twiggs .... . ... . .. . .
Warren . . ......... . .
Washington .. .. .....

H. C.
1429 11294 253 2320 5 63 51 186 70 830

H.
21 1 0 1
15

C. 1
5~1
O!
5! j

H. C. 1 Insp.

Supervising Inspector

25 f 5305! 7f 1160! 3 ! 43 1 54 !
3110 1 3771

0 Dr. R. E. Ashley 0 Mr. J. W. Hindsman 0 Mr. T. H. Taylor 0 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler 0 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler

zc~::
>
t"'
~

Wilcox .............. 571 3217
Wilkinson .. ....... .. 56 643
I Total ........... 43365!346135!

5 0

2~1

365! 10751

43 1 6791 6f 3341 793!1020191

0 Dr. T. H. Applewhite 0 Dr. C. N. Clausen
11

'i:l 0
~
1-3 0

'1.1

RECAPITULATION.

=1-3
to:l

I Herds Cattle Herds Cattle Herds Cattle

Herds

Dipped

Amt. Inf. Quarantined

1 Not Inspected

I Preliminary .........

393! 8571f

2191 3761

I

Systematic .......... . ... . . ... 49718 459859!

338! 1664

8671 214825

1

Final ... ....... . .............. 43365 346135 J 365 f 1075

7931 102019

1

GRAND TOTAL ......... 93476 814565f

922 f 6500

1660 316844

2

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

MONTH OF JULY, 1921.

PRELIMINARY.

County

H.

C.

I I H. C. !Quarantined Vats

tj
trl

Dipped

Amt. Inf. H. C. 1 In Co.

>"0

Atkinson . ........... 92 2099 14 147

I

Dr. G. W. Riley

e

Bacon .............. . Brantley . .... . . . . . .. Camden . ............

I

Dr. C. S. Hess

I

Dr. J. F. Fahey

~
ztrl

I

Dr. J. F. Fahey

>-3

Charlton 0 0

I

Clinch

0 0 0. 0 0. 0 0 0

I

Echols . .. .. .. ....... 108 749 27 79

I

Dr. J. F. Fahey Dr. J. F. Fahey Dr. J. V. Knapp

0
'%j
>
Q

Glynn .... .. ....... ..

I

Dr. J. F. Fahey

.~.....

Liberty 0

20 250

3 17

I

Long . .. . .. .. .. ... . .

Mcintosh ...._. .. . .. ..

I

Dr. A. M. Kirkpatrick Dr. A. M. Kirkpatrick Dr. J. F. Fahey

(")
c::::
~
c::::

Pierce

0 0 0

Ware . . ..... . .. .....

I

Dr. J. F. Fahey

I

Dr. J. F. Fahey

~
trl

Wayne .............. 205 4301 51 445

I

I Total ........... 425 1 73991 95 1 688 1

Dr. W. M. Lynn

CXI
Qt

County

00

SYSTEMATIC.

"'

Dipped

I Amt. Inf. Quarantined 1 Not

H. C. H. C. 1 H . C. 1 Insp.

Supervising Inspector

Appling .. . .. .. ... .. I 3001 37508

601 17182

0 Dr. W. M. Lynn

Berrien 0 0

3166 39739

2:1 10!1 761 18207

0 Dr. E. E. Peacock

*Bryan

0

Candler . . . ......... .
Coffee ..... .........

Cook .... . . .... ......

625 2540 3520 1508

9193 18498 50397 13929

2~1 5o31 193 8

5

51

46 1 10613
351 8283 65 23078 151 3982

0 Dr. J. R. Wirthlin 0 Dr. B. N. Lauderdale
01 Dr. G. W. Riley 0 Dr. J. J. Jones

qzz>

Crawford .......... . 26 478

Effingham 0

1062 8919

1 3

4 3

151 241 1 15 2578

0 1 Mr. W. A. McClain 0 Dr. R. L. Brinkman

Emanuel 0

6632 49711

3

3

SO l 23051 1

0 Dr. B. N. Lauderdale

>
t"'
~
t<:l

Irwin

0 0

Jeff Davis ... ... . ...

3038 23974 1851 23528

16 0

2~ 1 41 1 9688 33 11460

Jenkins

0 0

1690 12552

3

6

43 1 6476

Johnson .. ... . . .. . . .. 2175 8184

3

24

28 1 4173

0 Mr. R. L. Brawley 0 Dr. C. S. Hess 0 Dr. J . H. Sweeney 0 Dr. C. E . Morris

"C 0
~ t-3
0
"%j

Lanier ......... . .... 589 9531

Montgbmery 0 0.

2234 18605

3 0

5

201 4906

0

39 8621

0 Dr. E. E. Peacock 0 Dr. H. F. J. Arundel

t-3 ~ t<:l

Tattnall ..... . ... .. . . 3882 39524

1

1

70 1 18831

0 Dr. W. P. Cox

Taylor . .. .. . .. . . .... 110 554

10

12

111 819

Toombs

0

3136 27791

0

0

49 13050

0 Dr. S. H . Moore 0 Dr. H. F. J. Arundel

Treutlin ...... . .... I 2006 14085 Wheeler ............ 1 2349 , 16710

0 0

~I

20 6088 33 8112

01 Dr. H. F . J. Arundel 0 Dr. Murray King

Worth .. . . .. .. ...... 6257 37934

3

31 86 15965

01 Dr. J. P. Mack .

Total . .......... I 513971447415 1 141~1_4.::::1_:_6IL___:_88:::..0:..!I..2:...::..09.:..:3.6.:8..-!.I_ _o.!....l_ _ _ _ __ __ _

'

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

MONTH OF JULY, 1921.

FINAL.

Dipped

I Amt. lnf. Quarantined f Not

County

H.

C.

H. C. f H.

C. f Insp.

Supervising Inspector

tl

Baker

0

Ben Hill ... .........

Bibb ............. ...

Bleckley 0 0

Brooks ..............

1443 15391 343 2438 40 744 0 .0 2676 19472

0

0

7[ 2705

2 10 42 527

1

2

8 208

0

0

1

0

5

7 28 499

0 Dr. A. C. Stein 0 Mr. J. W. Hindsman 0 Mr. T. H. Taylor fO Mr. T. H. Taylor 0 Dr. H. V. Porter

trl
'>i:i ~
a;:
ztrl

Bulloch ............. 7198 58861

0

0 18[ 3853

0 Dr. J. R. Wirthlin

1-:3

Calhoun ........ .. .. .

3 78

0

0

1f 26

0 Dr. A. C. Stein

0
~

Chatham ...... .. .... 102 1296

1

1 53 [ 566

0 Dr. R. L. Brinkman

>

Chattahoochee .. ... ..

8

Colquitt .......... : . . 3882

Crisp

0

198

Decatur .......... ... 1651

Dodge

0 . 0 0 0

2047

I Dooley .. ............ 168
Dougherty .. .. ...... 23

66 31094
994 11871 11308 1401
461

0

0

27 100

0

0

3 15

0

0

0

0

1

2

3~1 10 9548
3f 44 30 [ 7563
13 [ 337
1f 8 4f 203

0 Mr. W. I. Holder 0 Dr. J. J. Jones 0 Dr. T. H. Applewhite 0 Dr. W. D. Martin 0 Dr. J. J. Vara 0 Dr. T. H. Applewhite 0 Dr. A. C. Stein

Q :..:..0..
0c:: c~::
::0 trl

Early .... . . ......... 1297 17876 13 16 29 [ 6646

I Evans .. ... ... . .... 1541 16934
Glascock ........... 1 29 161

0 0

~I

9f 2435 4f 48

0 Mr. J. B. Harris 0 Dr. W. P. Cox 0 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler

Grady .... . .. . ....... 2216 13420

1

1f 15[ 3448

0 Dr. Harry Lebeson

00
"""

00

MONTliLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

00

MONTH OF JULY., 1921.

FINAL.

County

Dipped H. C.

(Continued)
I Amt. lnf. Quarantined 1 Not

H. C. 1 H.

C. 1 Insp.

Supervising Inspector

Harris

0

Jasper . . ... ... ... ...

Jefferson 0

9 503 4 62 87 1084

1

3

0

0

35 218

~I 239 31 581 759

0 Mr. W. I. Holder 0 Mr. T. H. Taylor 0 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler

z z >
c::::

Jones ....... . . .. . .. . 18 210

0

0

31 36

~urens ... . .. . ... . . . 2049 10533 11 26

7380

Lee ....... . . . . .. . .. .
Lowndes ... . .. . .....

4 3360

3518114 1

0 25

0 52

4!1 14 43 590

0 Mr. T. H. Taylor 0 Dr. C. N. Clausen 0 Dr. A. C. Stein 0 Dr. J. V. Knapp

>
t"'
::d t"l
'ij
0

Miller ... . ... . .. ... . . 911 11764

3 12

7 2830

0 Dr. W. D. Martin

::d >-3

Mitchell . . . . . ...... . . r 720 9359

0

0

5 1096

0 Dr. A. C. Stein

0

Monroe .. ...........
Muscogee ..... .....I

5 91 7 581

0

0

1 18

~I 29 306

0 Mr. W. A. McClain 0 Mr. W. I. Holder

>%j
>-3

Polk ........ .......-. Pulaski 0 0 0 0

6 20 11 715

0 0

0 0

~ I "4 166

0 Dr. T. H. Applewhite 0 Dr. J. J. Vara

~
t"l

Screven ...... . .. . . . . 2645 17704

Seminole .. . . ... .. . .. 180 1746
Stewart . .. . .. . . .... I 64 731

Sumter . . ......... .. .

9 216

Talbot Telfair

.. ........ ... I .... . .. . ..... I

43 1881

1077 1 18181 1

6 10

0

0

1

2

0

0

~I 237 0

401 6224
21 470 28 1 330
21 56 91 364 91 796

0 Dr. A. D. Moore 0 Dr. W. D. Martin
0 Dr. W. D. Martin 0 Dr. W. D. Martin 0 Mr. W. I. Holder
oJ Dr. J. J. Vara



MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

MONTH OF JULY, 1921.

FINAL.

County

I (Continued)
I I I 1 Dipped 1 Amt. Inf. Quarantined I Not
r H. c. H. c. H. c. Insp.

Supervising Inspector

1:1 trl

Thomas ... ......... I 4133 1 30188 1 11 31 25 1 9642 1 01 Dr. Harry Lebeson

Tift ................ I 833 1 6468 1 4

51 22 1 4960 1 Ol Dr. R. E. Ashley

>'1::1 ~

Turner .... ......... I 4601 3581 1 0

0

6! 11221 01 Mr. J. W. Hindsman

~

Twiggs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 93 1 0

01

31 46 1 01 Mr. T. H. Taylor

ztrl

Warren ...... .... . . I 181 71 1 01 01 71 371 01 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler

>-3

Washington . ... . ... , 1791 1794
I Wilcox .............. 3301 2307

33 187 63 1 636 1

0

01 31 1 531 1

01 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler 01 Dr. T. H. Applewhite

0
l"%j

Wilkinson . . ....... . I 40 1 588 1 01 0

61 334 1 01 Dr. C. N. Clausen

>
C1

Total . ...... . .. .. [42883T35872_81_-182T-769 I 7411 77697 1 O!

.~.....

(")

q

I RECAPITULATION.

H. c.

H. c.

I H.

c.

Herds

~
q
~
trl

Dipped

Amt. lnf. Quarantined

Not Insp.

Preliminary 0
Systematic ................ ...

425 7399 51397 447415

95 1 141 1

688 1 416 1

I
880 209368 1

0

Final ........................ 42883 358728

1821

709

741 77697

0

l GRAND TOTAL . . ..... . ... -94705] 813542 l

418 1 18131 16211 2870651

0

00
"'

co
0

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF AUGUST, 1921.

PRELIMINARY.

I I Dipped

Amt. Inf. Quarantined ! Vats

Count y
I Atkin son .. .. . . . .... I Bacon . .. . .. .. .. . ..
Brant ley 0

H. 80 J

C. 17871

H. 19

C. 1 H . 3031

C. 1 In Co.
24 Dr. G. W. Riley 14 Dr. C. S. H ess
7 Dr. J . F. Fahey

--

z z >
q
>
t"'

Camden ..... .. . . ....

43 Dr. J. F . Fahey

~

Charlton 0 . 0 0

'

12 Dr. J. F . Fahey

trl '"C

Clinch

0 0 0.

9 Dr. G. W . Riley

0
~

Echols

0 0

77 603 17 157

4 Dr. J. V. Knapp

>-3

Glynn .. . . .. . .. . ....

Liberty 0 0 0

Long

0 0 0 0. 0 0 0

6 Dr. J. F. Fahey

0

20 Dr. A. M. Kirkpatrick 3 Dr. A. M. Kirkpatrick

"'.l
~

Mcintosh . . : . ..... ...
Pierce .. . ... .. ..... .

I 17 Dr. J. F . Fahey

trl

38 Dr. J. F. Fahey

Ware

0 0 0

34 Dr. J . F. Fahey

Wayne .. . . .... . . .. . . 210 4399

5 32

30 Dr. W. M. Lynn

I Total . .. . ....... 367 J 67891 41 J 492 J

271 J

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF AUGUST, 1921.

SYSTEMATIC.

I I Dipped

I Amt. Inf. Quarantined Not

County

H. C. H. C. I H. C. 1 Insp.

Supervising, Inspector

tl

Appling ............ 1 2968 35733 Berrien .. ........... 3049 37250

2

3

28 171

601 16593 77 18204

-01 Dr. W. M. Lynn 0 Dr. E. E. Peacock

t.:rJ
~
~

Bryan

0

734 10362

23

79

46 1 10650

0 Dr. J. R. Wirthlin

Candler ...... ..... .. 2448 18056

0

0 35 j 8186 . o Dr. B. N. Lauderdale

Coffee .. ............ 3492 49619

4

7 65 , 22874

0 Dr. G. W. Riley

Cook .. . . . ......... 1 1352 12455

3

3 18 4543

0 Dr. J. J. Jones

Crawford . .. ........ 16 258

1

81

41 146

0 Mr. W. A. McClain

<:>s-3:
zt.:rJ
o-,3
~

Effingham .......... , 1567 12744 12 14J 25 1 3866

0 Dr. R. L. Brinkman

>

Emanuel ............ 6762 50793

0

0 80 j 22668

0 Dr. B. N. Lauderdale

Irwin ..... . ......... 2612 19671

1

1 . 42 1 9388

0 Mr. R. L. Brawley

Jeff Davis .......... 1875 23636

0

0 33 11273

0 Dr. C. S. Hess

~.... (c:):

Jenkins 0 0

1957 15071

0

OJ 43 1 6176

0 Dr. J. H. Sweeney

Johnson ............. 2593 9268
Lanier .... . ... . ... .. 616 9721

2 3

~I

28 1 4217 1 20 1 4590 j

0 Dr. C. E. Morris 0 Dr. E. E. Peacock

c~::
~
t.:rJ

Montgomery 0 0 . 2382 19460

0

OJ 39 1 8458

0 Dr. H. F. J. Arundel

Tattnall .. ....... .. . . 3649 37197

2

3 51 1 12990

0 Dr. W. P. Cox

Taylor ..............

Toombs

0 0 . 00

44 188 3275 27658

7 10 11 1 819

0

0 49 12924

0 Dr. S. H. Moore 0 Dr. H. F. J. Arundel

1946 12231 1 Treutlin 0 0 0 0.

0

0 20 1 6022

0 Dr. H. F. J. Arundel

<C

<0
1\:)

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

MONTH OF AUGUST, 1921. SYSTEMATIC.

>zzc::

(Continued)

>

I Wheeler .. . ......... 21041 158861
Worth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4304 26843
I Total ........... 4974514421001

~I

~I

331 80521 861 15020

911 3101 86512076591

01 Dr. Murray King 0 Dr. J. P. Mack
Ol

t"'
~
t".l '"C 0
~

1-3

0

RECAPITULATION.

~

I

Dipped

1

Amt. Inf. Quarantined

j Not Inspected

1-3 ti:

I GRAND TOTAL ... . ... 876461 727771 1 2971 12791 15991 2914671

0

t".l

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF AUGUST, 1921.

FINAL.

I I Dipped

I Amt. lnf. Quarantined Not

County

H. C. H. C. 1 H. C. I Insp.

Supervising Inspector

Baker .............. 1 10421 9846~

0

0

61 2300 1 0 Dr. A. C. Stein

t:l
t<j

Ben Hill ...... . ..... 236 2575

5 53 35 1 488

0 Mr. J. W. Hindsman

Bibb . . . ... . ..... .. .. 31 466

0

0

61 184[

0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

Brooks . .... ......... 2442 18241

0

0 28 1 499

0 Dr. H. V. Porter

Bulloch ............. 6026 52917

0

I Galh.oun . . .. ... ... I Chatham ...... . ....

21 521 119 1 1398

0 4

I Colquitt ' ... ........ 2982 r 22535

23

0 0 29 95

10 1 3774 11 26
351 441
351 106351

0 Dr. J. W. Wirthlin 0 Dr. A. C. Stein 0 Dr. R. L. Brinkman 0 Dr. J. J. Jones

>"0
~:>:'
>-3
rs::
zt<j
>-3 0
"%j

Decatur . ...... .. ....

Dodge

0 0

1676 13150 610 3808

3 13 30 1 8560

0

. 0

71 221

0 Dr. W. D. Martin 0 Dr. J. J. Vara

>
Q
~

Dougherty .. .. . . .... . 30 573

0

0

31 172

0 Dr. A. C. Stein

Early . .. ... .. . .. .... 2164 1737&

1

1 29 1 6646 1 0 Mr. J. B. Harris

Evans . . ............. 1417 16072

1

2

91 2413

0 Dr. W. P. Cox

Glascock 0 . 0

29 143

1

1

61 48 1 0 Mr. G. 0. Kaigle

("}
c: ~
d
~:>:'

Grady .. .. ... ... ..I 2016 2568

1

1 151 3448 [ 0 Dr. H. Lebeson

t<j

Harris

0 0. 0 0

Jasper ......... .. ...

36 516 23 366

0 0

0 0

:I 2081 31

0 Mr. W. I. Holder 0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

Jefferson 0

180 1219

9 ' 30

69 1 806 1

0 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler

Jones .. .......... ... 34 295

2 10

51 49

0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

Laurens ... .......... 2617 123341

8 21 49 1 73801 0 Dr. C. N. Clausen

co

c.>

<C

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

"'"

MONTH OF AUGUST, 1921.

,FINAL.

County

(Continued)

Dipped

I Amt. Inf. Quarantined I Not

I H.

I c. H. C. 1 H.

C. 1 Insp.

Supervising Inspector

Lee ... .. .. . . . . . .. .. 1 7 22

0

0

41 14

Lowndes ... ... ..... .
I Miller ........... . . I Mitchell ....... ... ..
Monroe .... . ... .....

3569 35462 1023 15053
588 5420 5 58

43 1 11 1

66 42 1 510

-1

71 3000

47

61 1019

6

21 18

0 Dr. A. C. Stein 0 Dr. J. V. Knapp 0 Dr. W. D. Martin 0 Dr. A. C. Stein 0 Mr. W. A. McClain

>zc>z::
t"'
~

Muscogee . .... . . .....

77 1462

0

0

71 149

0 Mr. W. I. Holder

Polk ..... . . .. .. .... .

6 20

0

0

21 3

0 Dr. T. H. Applewhite

tr.l
"0 0

Pulaski ... .......... .

2 231

Screven . .. . ... . . . ... 1347 9084

0 1

4~1 0

165

1

5781

0 Dr. J. J. Vara 0 Dr. A. D. Moore

~
1-3 0

Seminole . .... . ...... 441 4455

1

4.

31 612

0 Dr. W. D. Martin

1-l:j

Stewart . ... ... ..... .
Sumter ............ . .
Talbot . .. .......... .

96 1199 8 254 214 3142

4

6 38 1 423

0

0

21 130

7 10 111 326

0 Dr. W. D. Martin 0 Dr. W. D. Martin 0 Mr. W. I. Holder

1-3 :I: tr.l

Telfair ... . . .... ..... 1138 11336

1

1

91 785

0 Dr. J. J. Vara

Thomas . . ...... . .... 3521 2649
Tift ................ 794 6046

2 14 25 1 9642

1

2 221 9950

0 Dr. H. Lebeson 0 Dr. R. E. Ashley

Turner ............. 1 415 24171

0

0

51 10155

0 Mr. J. W. Hindsman

Twiggs ........ .... ..

17 607.

1

I Warren . . .. . .......

29

71[

0

5 0

41 276 5[ 27

0 Mr. T. H. Taylor 0 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler

tj

t_:1j

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

~

MONTH OF AUGUST, 1921. FINAL.
(Continued)

::0
>a-:3: zt_:1j
>-3

County

Dipped

Amt. Inf. Quarantined 1 Not I

0
>:rj

H. C. H. C. 1 H. C. 1 Insp. 1 Supervising Inspector

~

Washington 0. 0. 0 0 0 103 1052

15

32

76 1 8211

Wilcox . .......... . .. 414 267& 10 21 321 439

0 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler 0 Dr. T. H. Applewhite

.~...

Wilkinson . . . .... . .. .

8 80

3

5

61 . 3341

0 Dr. C. N. Clausen

(c":):

I - - - -Total .. ......... 37534 12788821 1651 4771 7341 838081

- - -- - - - - - .
01

c~::

::0

t_:1j

co
CTI

~ C>

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 1921.

PRELIMINARY.

I I Dipped

Amt. Inf. Quarantined I Vats

County

H.

C.

H.

C. I H.

I C. In Co.

I Atkinson ...... : . ...

66 1469

6 294

I

I 241 Dr. G. W. Riley

-

Bacon ............... Brantley ............

I I

J: I 14 Dr. C. S. Hess I 7 Dr. F. Fahey

z z >
c>:::
t"'

Camden .. ........... Charlton 0 0
Clinch ... .. .... .... I

I

I 43 Dr. J. F. Fahey

--

I

I 12 Dr. J. F. Fahey

::1J t.".l "0

I

I 8 Dr. G. W. Riley

0 ::1J

Echols . .............

77 689

5 18

I

I 4 Dr. J. V. Knapp

>-3

Glynn .. .............

I

I 6 Dr. J. F. Fahey

~

Liberty

0

49 431

5 51

I

I 22 Dr. W. P. Cox

>-3

Long

0 0 0. 0. 0 . 0 0 0 0.

Mcintosh .. .. . .. .. . . .

.

I

I 4 Dr. W. P. Cox

:I:

I

I 17 Dr. J. F. Fahey

t.".l

Pierce ..... .. .. : .....

I

I 38 Dr. J. F. Fahey

Ware .. . . .. .........

I

I 34 Dr. J. F. Fahey

Wayne .............. 212 4664 11 106

. I

I Total .... . . . .... 4041 7253 1 271 69 1

I 40 Dr. W. M. Lynn
2741

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF sEPTEMBER, 1921.

SYSTEMATIC.

I I Dipped

I Amt. Inf. Quarantined Not

County

H. C. H. C. I H . C. 1 Insp.

Supervising Inspector

tj

1 Appling ... . . . . .... . 2821 33354

1

1 60 ! 16153!

0 Dr. W. M. Lynn

Berrien . . ...... . ..... 2868 33510 25 69 77 1 17788! 0 Dr. E. E. Peacock

Bryan .... ..... . . .. .. 1506 20838

7 49 46 ! 10519!

0 Dr. E. Horstman

t?=.l
~
-~

Candler .. ... . .. . . . .. 2418 18282

0

O! 35! 8057! 0 Dr. B. N. Lauderdale

Coffee . ..... .. . .. . . . 3307 47763

4

5 54! 18365! 0 Dr. G. W. Riley

zt?=.l

Cook .. .. .... .... . .. . 1211 10819

5

5 19! 4662! 0 Dr. J. J. Jones

>-':3

Crawford ... .. .. . ... . 14 302

2 24

6! 132!

0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

0
"'.j

Effingham 0 1613 13901

0

0 28 ! 4288! 0 Dr. R. L. Brinkman

>

Emanuel . . . . . .. ... .. 6561 49106

1

1 80 ! 22494

0 Dr. B. N. Lauderdale

Irwin ..... .... . . . . . . 2462 18924

0

0 421 9416

0 Mr. R. L. Brawley

Jeff Davis . .. . .. .. .. . 1805 22728

1

3 21 1 7540

0 Dr. C. S. Hess

~..... 0c::

Jenkins 0

1729 12432

0

0 401 5812

0 Dr. J. H. Sweeney

~

Johnson . .. . .. .. ... . . 2316 7863 Lanier .. .. . . ... .. . .. 592 10059

3

4 28 1 4216 1 0 Dr. C. E . Morris

4 14 201 45271 0 Dr. E. E. Peacock

c::
~ t?=.l

Montgomery . ... . ... . 2280 18113

0

0 391 84561

0 Dr. H. F. J . Arundel

Tattnall . .... . ; ... ... 2289 25058

0

0 46 1 6919

0 Dr. W. P. Cox

Taylor ... . ........... 21 142

4 10 11 1 819

0 Dr. S. H . Moore

Toombs . .. . . .. ..... . 3061 27213

0

0 49 1 12640

0 Dr. H. F. J. Arundel

Treutlin ....... .. . ... 1930 12586

0

0 20 1 59451

0 Dr. H. F. J. Arundel

-
""""'

<0 00

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

(Continued)

County

Dipped
f H. C.

SYSTEMATIC. (Continued)
I Amt. lnf. Quarantined 1 Not
I I H. C. H. C. Insp.

Supervising Inspector

z z >
>c:::
t"'

I Wheeler . . ....... .. .. 22551155391

01 61 33 1 7250 1 01 Dr. Murray King

l:O
t?=:l

Worth .. . .. .. .. . .. .. . 6681 40450

1

1 86 1 150361

I Total . .. . . .. .. .. 49740 1438932 1 581 1861 840 11910341

0 Dr. J. P. Mack 01

0"'
l:O >-3

0
l,:j

RECAPITULATION

>-3

::I1

Dipped

1

Amt. Inf. Quarantined

1 Not Inspected-

t.")

I H.

c. I H.

C. I H.

c. I

I GRAND TOTAL ... .. .. 81239 1 702893 1 2371 11021 15601 256188 1

21

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA. MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 1921.

FINAL.

I I Dipped

Amt. lnf. Quarantined 1 Not

County

H.

C.

H.

C. I H.

C. 1 Insp.

Supervising Inspector

I Baker .. .. ... . .. ... . 5611 50631

0

0

41 14141 0 Dr. A. C. Stein

Baldwin ............ 1 2 1161 ' 1

I Ben Hill .... . ..... .

80 1286

2

I Bibb .......... ...... 31 651

1

I Brooks ...... .....,. . 2434 18171

7

1 11
1 38

II 161
30 ! 2401
61 2061 281 537 1

0 Mr. T. H. Taylor 0 Mr. J. W. Hindsman 0 Mr. T. H. Taylor 0 Dr. H. V. Porter

Bulloch .. . .. ........ , 2653 21650

0

0 101 37741 0 Dr. E. Hortsman

Calhoun . .. .... . . ....

4 50

0

0

l l 251 0 Dr. A. C. Stein

Chatham . .... .. . .. . . 148 1623

1

2 551 476 1 0 Dr. R. L. Brinkman

t;
t_:rj
>"'
~
1a-:3: zt_:rj
1-3
Sl

Clay ..... .. .... . .. . . 51 259

2

2

61 1231 0 Mr. J. B. Harris

>

Colquitt ........ . .... 3054 20429 13 18 34 1 100351

0 Dr. J . J. Jones

Decatur ...... . .. ... . 2864 26597 13 20 30 1 84571

0 Dr. W. D. Martin

- Dodge .. . . . . . .. .. . ... 251 1685

0

0

11 481

0 Dr. J. J. Vara

. Dougherty .. . ..... ...

29 677

Early .. . .. ...... .... 2044 16164

0 0

0

31 1721

0 Dr. A. C. Stein

0 29 1 6646 1 0 Mr. J. B. Harris

0 .~.... q 0
~
q
~

Evans ........ .... ... 725 8892

0

0 161 3529 1 0 Dr. W. P. Cox

t_:rj

I Glascock . . , .. . .... ..

12 80

0

0

41 45 1 0 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler

Grady ....... .. ..... 2066 12845

1

1

71 15701 0 Dr. H. Lebeson

Harris . .. .... . . ..... 24 286

0

0

41 202 1 0 Mr. W. I. Holder

Jasper ..... ... .. ..... Jefferson .. ... . .. . ...

3 54 22 126

0

0

21 311

0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

5 38 _6_3_l__2::_ ~1 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler

<a <a




....

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

0 0

MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 1921.

FINAL.

Dipped

I (Continued)
Amt. Inf. Quarantined [ Not

j County

H.

Jones ..............

21

Laurens ... . ... . ..... 925

Lee .. . . . . . . .. ...... . 11

C.
205 5725
29

H.
6 3 0

C. l
21 10
0

H.
Sf
49 [ 4[

C. [ Insp.

Supervising Inspector

10 [ 7380 [
14[

01 Mr. T. H. Taylor 0 Dr. C. N. Clausen Of Dr. A. C. Stein

z~c::

Lowndes 0 0 0

3012 29270

28

49

30 [ 500 1

0 Dr. J. V. Knapp

Miller . . . ........ ... . 762 9738

1

1

7[ 3027

0 Dr. W. D. Martin

~

Mitchell . . . ......... 591 7145

5

7

4 [ 855 [ 0 Dr. A. C. Stein

l:d
tz:j

Monroe 0 0

. .

8 73

3 22

5[ 31 [ 0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

"0
0

Muscogee ... . ..

22 427

Polk ........... .. ...

6 15

Putnam .............

3 29

I Screven .. .. ... . . . .. 1521 11363

Quitman ............ [ 11 55
I Seminole .... . .. : ... 417 4755

3 13

4 [ 31[

0

0

2[

5[

2

131

1[ 16[

7 18 39 [ 5232[

5 23[

0

0

3 [ 281 3[ 1079

0 Mr. W. I. Holder 0 Dr. T. H . Applewhite 0 Mr. T. H. Taylor 0 Dr. A. D. Moore 0 Mr. J. B. Harris 0 Dr. W. D. Martin

l:d 1-3 0 "'J
~
tz:j

Stewart . .. . ........ 1 82 894

2

3 39 [ 464 [ 0 Dr. W. D. Martin

Sumter ........... . ..

7 283

Talbot .. .......... .. [ 61 699
I Telfair ..... . ....... 992 8120 I Thomas . ........... 3127 234041 I Tift ... . .._.. . ... . ... 1376 9285

0 8

0 55

1[
11[

291 326

0 Dr. W. D. Martin 0 Mr. W. I. Holder

0

0

3[ 692 [ 0 Dr. J. J. Vara

0

0 - 5[ 762 [ 0 Dr. H. Lebeson

3

6J 18[ 4121[

0 Dr. :R. E. Ashley

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA,

ti
tzj

MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 1921.

'1j
>

FINAL.

~
>-:3

County

Dipped H. C.

I (Continued)
I Amt. Inf. Quarantined Not
H. C. 1 It. C. 1 Insp.

Supervising Inspector

~
ztzj
>-:3 0

Turner ... . ..... . . ... 262 18581

0

0

21 3321

0 Mr. J. W. Hindsman

"%j

Twiggs .......... .. .. 17 621

0

0

41 2621 0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

>
C')

Warren .... ... . .....

4 61

0

0

41 241

0 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler

~

Washington .... . . .. .. 580 3485 30 65 1061 847 1 01 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler

Wilcox ...... .... .... 191 1786

1

2 26 1 3321 01 Mr. J. W. Hindsman

Wilkinson ... .. .... . .

28 5991

2

6 . 81 4788 1 0 Dr. C. N. Clausen

0
c:::
~

I Total .. ...... ... 3109512566581 1521 4471 7201 65154 1 211

~

tzj

.0......

....
0 r-.:1

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF OCTOBER, 1921.

PRELIMINARY.
I Dipped 1 Amt. Inf. Quarantined ! Vats

County

H.

Atkinson ... . . .. . ... I

Bacon . ... .. . . ... . ... ,

Brantley ...... . . .. ..

C. 1 H.

C. 1. H . C. 1 lJ:! Co.

I

I 24 Dr. G. W. Riley

I

I 19 Dr. C. S. Hess

I

I 7 Dr. J. F. Fahey

z>qz
>
t"

Camden . ...... .. .. . .

/

I ~

43 Dr. J. F. Fahey

Charlton 0 0 0

I

I

12 Dr. J . F . Fahey

Clinch .. . . ....... . . ..

E chols

0

ss\ 441

4

91

I

8 Dr. J. F. Fahey , .

I

I 4 Dr. J. V. Knapp

~
trJ
0~"'

Glynn . .... .. . . ... ...

I

I 8 Dr. J. J. Vara

~

Liberty

0 0. 0 0

Long .... . . . . .. ... .. .

15 155

9 53

I

26 Dr. W. P. Cox

I

I 5 Dr. W. P. Cox

~

Mcintosh .... . ... . .. .

I

I 18 Dr. J. J. Vara

trJ

Pierce . .. . . ..... . . . . . , Ware . . .. . ... . . . . . . .
Wayne . . . .... . .. .. I

66 16961

I
2 45 1

I I I

I 38 Dr. J. F . Fahey I 34 Dr. J. F. Fahey I 42 Dr. W. M. Lynn

Total ........ . . .. 1 1361 2292 1 151 1071

2881



/

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA. MONTH OF OCTOBER, 1921.

Dipped

I SYSTEMATIC.
Amt. Inf. Quarantined 1 Not

County

H. C. H. C. 1 H. C. 1 Insp.

Supervising Inspector

Appling ............. 1982 22278

2

2 60 1 162001

0 Dr. Wm. M. Lynn

Berrien

0 0 0

2638 37242

6 14 771 166151

Bryan ...... . .. . ..... 1266 19880 6 18 461 199791

0 Dr. E. E. Peacock 0 Dr. E. Horstman

1:::1
t_%j
'"0

Candler ............. 2180 16154 ' 0

0 351 79721

0 Dr. B. N. Lauderdale

>
::0

Coffee ...... .. . ... 1 1876 29800

Cook ................ 1420 11445

I Crawford ... ...... . .

6 138

Effingham ......... I 1845 16153

I Emanuel ... .... .. . . 5915 46544

2

7 291 106061

9 22 191 46621

0

0

61 1131

0

0 301 41581

0

0 801 220861

0 Dr. G. W. Ril~y 0 Dr. J. J. Jones 0 Mr. T. H. Taylor 0 Dr. R. L. Brinkman 0 Dr. B. N. Lauderdale

s>-:3: zt_%j
>-3 0
>xj

I Irwin .............. 2308 16246 . 1

2 421 93611

0 Mr. R. L. Brawley

>

Jeff Davis ... . ....... 623 7049

0

0

11 1601

0 Dr. C. S. Hess

Jenkins 0. 0

1467 10939

0

Ol 411 51971

0 Dr. J. H. Sweeney

c;:l
:..:.0...
Ci

Johnson .. .... . .. ... . 1518 5741

1

2 28 1 42381

0 Dr. C. E. Morris

I Lanier ............ . 450 6830

2

9 201 42141

0 Dr. E. E. Peacock

I Mlontgomery . ...... . 2224 17963

0

0 391 85451

0 Dr. H. F. J. Arundel

I Tattnall ..... . ...... 1735 19200

1

5 271 65521

0 Dr. W. P. Cox

c:::
~
c:::
::0
t_%j

2501~1 Taylor .. . .... . ... .. 1

0

Toombs ............. 2973

0 2

0 111 8191 11 Dr. S. H. Moore

3 491 124931

0 Dr. H. F. J. Arundel

I Treutlin . . ... . . : .... 1591 10998

0

0 201 57141

0 Dr. H. F. J. Arundel

I Wheeler ............ 1455110295

0

0 331 54171

0 Dr. Murray King

I Worth .... .. ...... . 4084 24471 I Total ... . . ... .. . 39556\3543841

0

0

36j 1251

861 150361
....... _,
779/180

0 Dr. J. P. Mack
.. '
111

....
0
""

,_. -

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

0 II>-

MONTH OF OCTOBER, 1921.

County

Dipped H. C.

FINAL.
I I ~--AmT. Inf. Quarantined Not
H. C. 1 H. C. 1 Insp.

Supervising Inspector

Baker . . . . .... . . .... . , 2801 2142

0

0

3 1 1061 0 Dr. A. C. Stein

Baldwin .. ..... . . . . ..
I Ben Hill . . . . . , ... ..

3 1 42 63 1 917

0 0

0

11 101 0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

0 23 1 206 1 0 Mr. J . W. Hindsman

Bibb ... .. . ....... ... ,

81 198

0

0

41 90!

0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

z z >
c:!

Brooks .... . .. ... , ... 2092 15311

6 11 29 1 5471 0 Dr. H. V. Porter

>

Bulloch .. .. ... . ...... Burke .. . . . ... .......

1891 2373 37

0

0 101 22031 0 Dr. Edward Horstman

3 37

31 371 0 Dr. J. H. Sweeney

t"'
~ t_:l:j

Calhoun .. ....... . . . . 1!\ 129

7 62 1 3 1 31 1 0 Dr. A. C. Stein

'tl 0

Chatbam ....... ... . . 2371 1930

2

2 55 1 491 1 0 Dr. R. L. Brinkman

Clay ........ .... . ...

53 1 258

0

0

6 1 1231 0 Mr. J. B. Harris

Colquitt ..... . .. . .... 23941 17978

3

4 341 100341 0 Dr. J. J . Jones

~
>-3 0
"%j

I Decatur ....... ..... 20561 19832

0

0 30 1 131881 0 Dr. W. D. Martin

>-3

I Dodge .. ............ I 1071 850 1

Dougherty . ... ......

31 1 486

I Early . . ............ I Evans ... . ...... . ...

1082, 149571 339 3902

Glascock . . ... ....... , 12 64

0 2
~I
0

Ol 11 171

1~ 1

41 1591 291 6646 1

~I

41 12371 41 36

0 Dr. J. J. Vara 0 Dr. A. C. Stein 0 Mr. J. B. Harris 0 Dr. W. P. Cox 0 Dr. T. H. Applewhite

t:Ii
t_:l:j

Grady . . . . .. ... .. . . . 1186 8861$

1

1

41 9901 0 Dr. Harry Lebeson

Harris . . . : .. . . . ... . , 109 886 17 86 11 1 1791 0 Mr. W. I. Holder

Jasper . . .. : . ....... .

2 31

0

0

21 121 0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF OCTOBER, 1921.

FINAL.

Dipped

I (Continued)
I Amt. Inf. Quarantined Not

County

H. C. H. C. 1 H. C. 1 Insp.

Supervising Inspector

t::l

t.1j

J efferson . . . . .. . . . ... Jones ... .. .. ... .. ...

69 1 743 11 189

1

11 62 1 722 1 53 Dr. T. H. Applewhite

2

16

81 1431 0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

Laurens ..... . . . . .. . . 533 3741 10 33 30 1 702 1 0 Dr. C. N. Clausen

Lee . ... ...... . .

5 14

0

0

4 J 11 1 0 Dr. A. C. Stein

I

Lowndes 0 0 0

1767 15875

11

20

301 5001

. 0 Dr. J. V. Knapp

>'"0
~ ....,
s::
.zt...1.,j

Macon

0 0

28 240

6 52

9J 176

0 Dr. S. H . Moore

0

Miller ............... 753 9720

0

0

71 1985 1 0 Dr. W. D. Martin

"%j

Mitchell .. .. . .... . .. . 1157 8853

7 40

5 J 13651

0 Dr. A. C. Stein

>

Monroe .. .. ..........

5 33

1

2

4 1 141 0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

Muscogee ... .. . ..... , 2 29

0

0

4 J 291

0 Mr. W. I. Holder

r utnam . ... .... .... .

2 16

0

0

11 16

0 Mr. T. H. Taylor

Quitman ..... . ....... . 15 119

0

0

31 28 1 0 Mr. J. B. Harris

G'}
~ .....
(')
q
~
q

Screven . . . ....... .. . 1649 10640 10 14 32 1 1370 1 0 Dr. A. D. Moore

~

Seminole .. . .. . .... . . 48 834

0

0

4 J 5001 0 Dr. W. D. Martin

t.1j

Stewart .. ..... .. .... 81 913

1

2 341 485 1 0 Dr. W. D. Martin

Sumter . .. .. .. ... . . ..

4 40

2

4

11 601 0 Mr. W. I. Holder

Talbot . . .. .. .. . .. . .. . 56 990 Telfair .. . ... .. .. . . .. \ 600 37791

~I

70 0

15 1 4211 31 412 \

0 Dr. W. P. Cox 0 Dr. J. J. Vara

Thomas ...... .. . ... . 21171 163471

Ol 0

31 512

0 Dr. Harry Lebeson

~

Q1

.g...

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF OCTOBER, 1921.

FINAL.

Dipped

(Continued)
I I Amt. Inf. Quarantined Not

County
T i f t , I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turne~ .. ...... . . I Twiggs ............. I
Washington .........

H.
401 88
8 598

C.
3291 787 552
2953

H.
1 0 0 4

C. 1
21
~I
11 1

H.
31 21
II
45 1

C. I Insp.

Supervising Inspector

600 1
I
229 1 7901

01 Dr. R. E. Ashley 0 Mr. J. W. Hindsman 0 Mr. T. H. Taylor 0 Dr. T. H. Applewhite

cz>z:
>
t"'
~

Wilcox ... ... . ... . ... 127 749

0

Wilkinson .. .. .... . ..

111 1881 51

~I

I Total .. . . .. ..... 2129511566441 1061 4481

161 1801 31 81 1 5891 47683 1

0 Mr. J. W. Hindsman 0 Dr. C. N. Clausen
531

t::l 'i:l 0
~ ~

0
"%j

RECAPITULATION.

~

Dipped

Amt. Inf. Quarantined

INot Inspected

l:I:
t::l

H.

I c.

H.

c. I H.

c. I

Prelimina.ry .. . .. ... . ........ . . ,

1361 22921

151 - 107

I

I Systematic ..... . . . ........ ... . 395561 3543841
Final .. ..... .... ..... .... . .. 212951 156644

36 1 125 1061 448

779 1 18013,71 5891 47683

11 53

I GRAND TOTAL .. ........ 609871 5133201 1571

6801 13681 2278201

64

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 1921.

County

PRELIMINARY.

I I Dipped

I Amt. Inf. Quarantined Vats

H. C. H. C. I H. C. I In Co.

Atkinson ............ Bacon ... . ...........

I

I I

I 24 Dr. G. W. Riley I 20 Dr. W. M. Lynn

Brantley . .. . ....... .

I

I 7 Dr. J. F. Fahey

Camden .. ... . . . .....

I

I 43 Dr. J. F. Fahey

Charlton . . . .........

I

I 12 Dr. J. F. Fahey

Clinch .. . ..... .. ... ..

I

I 8 Dr. J. F. Fahey

Echols .. .. ..... .. ...

1 25

Glynn ......... . ... . 1

1 10

I

I 4 Dr. J. V. Knapp

I

I 23 Dr. J. J. Vara

Liberty . . .. ... ...... 17 213

1

1

I

I 29 Dr. W. P. Cox

Long

0 0. 0 0 00 0 0

82 1583

0

0

I

I 5 Dr. W. P. Cox

Mcintosh .. . ... .. . ...

I

I 21 Dr. J. J. Vara

Pierce

0 0

I

I 38 Dr. J. F. Fahey

Taylor ..... . ... .. ...

I

11 Mr. G. 0. Kaigler

Ware .. .. ......... ..

I

I 39 Dr. J. F. Fahey

Wayne .. . .... . ..... .

I

I 45 Dr. W. M. Lynn

Total ............ 1 1001 18211 21 21 1

3291

tj

t<1

-

>"~C

a::

zt<1

~

0
"%j

>
Q
.~...
q 0
~
q
~
t<1

.....
0
""'

......
0 00

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 1921.

Dipped

I SYSTEMATIC.
I Amt. Inf. Quarantined Not

County
Appling ..... . .. . .... Berrien 0 0
Bryan .. .. . ..... . . . .

H. C.

0

0

0

0

1159 14411

H. 0 0 3

C. 1
0 0 14

H . C. 1 Insp.
601 162001 60 77 1 16615 77 46 1 105191 0

Supervising Inspector
Dr. W. M. Lynn Dr. E. K Peacock Dr. E. Horstman

zzc>::
>
t"'

Lanier .. ... .. .. .. . ..

0

0

0

0 20 1 42141 20 Dr. E. E. Peacock

::0

I Total . . . .. ... . .. 11591 144111 31 141 203 1 475481 157/

t>j
"0

0

::0

t-3

RECAPITULATION.
I Quarantined

Released

IHerds

: I',

Dipped

H.

c.

Infected

H.

c.

I Premises

I H.

0.

II

Premises

H.

c;.

Not Insptd.

0
>%j
t-3
::Il
t>j

Preliminary .. .. . . .. Systematic ...... .. . Final . .. .. .. . . .. . ..
GRAND TOTAL I

100 1159 21041
22300 /

1821 14411 168923
185155 /

2]

21 1

3/

141 2031 475481

44 1 t25 L 874 84416

51~1 10358~1

157 65

49/

1601 1077 / 131964 /

519 / 103589/

222

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA. MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 1921. FINAL.

County

I I Dipped H. c;.

Inf.
Number
H. c.

Premises J Premises J
Released J Quarantined J Not
H. c. J H. C. JInsp.

Supervising Inspector

tj
t<.1

Baker .... ... .. .. I 101J 857
Baldwin ... ..... ... 10 192
Ben Hill . . . .. . . ... . 49 553

OJ 0

3 1064

4J 8

0

0

2J 8 17 144

0

0

5 47

8 73

0 A. C. Stein 0 T. H. Taylor 0 J. W. Hindsman

~
1-3
Is:

Bibb ..... . .... .. . .

9 174

Brooks ... ....... . . 831 5414

OJ 0

2 35

2 10

2J

2 48 11917 21 549

0 T. H. Taylor 0 H. V. Porter

zt<.1
1-3

Bulloch 0

171 2151

OJ

0 10 3774

0

0

0 F. Horstman

0

Burke .... ....... I 102J 300

7J 45

0

0

2 147

0 J. H. Sweeney

'%j

Calhoun .. ...... .. .

6 64

Candler .. .. . .. ... . 959 7212

OJ 0

0

0

OJ

0 35 7799

3 14

0

0

0 A. C. Stein 0 B. N. Lauderdale

>


Chatham .......... Clay ... .. ... .. .. .. Coffee ............

68 603 42 227 563 9051

2J

5 18 *160 18 160

OJ

0

0

0

6 123

1J

6

9 2033 20 6039

0 R. L_. Brinkman 0 J. B. Harris 0 G. W. Riley

(q"}
~
q

Colquitt ........ . .. 899 7483

1J

2

2 291 32 9743

0 C. T. Meyers

~

Cook ... ........... 255 2606 Crawford .......... / 9 190

~I

0 0

4 1092

0

0

15 3570 6 102

0 C. T. Meyers 0 T. H. Taylor

t<.1

Decatur . .. ..... .. . 736 5107

OJ 0 10 6188 20 7004

0 W. D. Martin

Dodge

0 0

Dougherty .........

66 463 17 471

0 0

0 0

0

0

1 17

0 o 4 159

0 J. J. Vara 0 A. C. Stein

Early .. ...... . .... . 247 2317

0

0

0

0 29 6646

0 J. B. Harris

.....

-

----

0

"'

~

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

~
0

MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 1921.

FINAL.

(Continued)

Dipped

Inf.

Premises 1 Premise5l - -~

Number

Released 1 Quarantined 1 Not

Supervising

County
Effingham ... .....
Emanuel 0. 0

H. C.
1179 10168 2281 18525

H. 0 0

C.

H.

C. 1 H.

C. 1 Insp. j

Inspector

0

21 369

32 45801

0 R. L. Brinkman

0 19 1 23424

1 34

0 B. N. Lauderdale

>czz

Evans

0

Glascock ... .... ..I

Grady . .. . ... .. ...

10 252 2 34
581 4319

0 0 0

0 0 0

Ol 0

~I

7 0

4 1231 4 34 4 490

0 W. P. Cox 0 T. H. Applewhite 0 H. Lebeson

>
t"
~ t_:r:j

Harris . . .... . . .. . . 34 256

0

0

0

0 11 148

0 W. I. Holder

"t1 0

Irwin

'
0 0 0 0

905 7478

0

0

0

0 42 10000

0 C. S. Hess

~

Jasper

0 0 0

Jeff Davis .. .. ... ..

2 18 59 961

1

1

0. 0

0

0

Ol 0

2 18 1 152

0 T. H. Taylor 0 W. M. Lynn

0
l'%j

Jefferson . .. ....... J en.kins
0 0 0.

0

0

1536 11570

0 0

0

Ol 0 62 722 62 T. H. Applewhite

0 41 1 5197

0

0

0 J. H. Sweeney

=o-,3
t_:r:j

J ohnson .... .. .. .. . Jones ... ....... ...

22 120 12 149

3 0

3 0

~I 4184 9

22 154 9 131

3 C. E. Morris 0 T. H. Taylor

Laurens . . . . ... .... 82 961

0

0 441 386 16 326

0 C. N. Clausen

Lee 000000 000000001

8 24

0

0

41 11

0

0

0 A. C. Stein

L owndes 0 0. 0

488 5450

6 10

Macon

0 0

18 369

1

1

Miller ... ....... . .. 185 2332

0

0

--

Ol 0 49 3282

0 J. V. Knapp

Ol Ol

~I

6 185 r 7 2030

0 W. I. Holder 0 W. D. Martin

-

--

--

MONTHLY ltEPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA. MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 1921.

FINAL.

(Continued)

County

I 1 Dipped 1 Inf.

I

Number

I H. C. H. C.

Mitchell . . . . . . . . . . . 373 2905

0

0

Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . .

6 52

0

0

Premises 1 Premises 1

1

Released I Quarantined 1 Not 1 Supervising

I I H. C. H. C. !Insp.

Inspector

0

0

5 1365

0 A. C. Stein

0

0

5 26

0 T. H. Taylor

t:;j t.1j
>'"d ~
~

Montgomery . . . . . . . Muscogee . . . . . . . . .

2 25 6 55

0

0 39 8454

1 10

0

0

0

0

5 52

0 H. F . J. Arundel 0 W. I. Holder

zt.1j
...;!

Putnam . . . . . . . . . . .

2 16

0

0'

0

0

1 16

0 T. H. Taylor

0

Quitman , . . .. .... .". 6 28

0

0

0

0

3 28

0 J. B. Harris

'%j

Richmond . . . . . . . . .

2 200

0

0

0 166

1

0

0 T. H. Applewhite

>

.

Screven . . . . . . . . . . . 128 751

0

0 13 937 11 233

0 A. D. Moore

Seminole . . . . . . . . . . 14 571

0

0

1 100

3 400

0 W. D. Martin

Stewart . . . . . . . . . . . 78 1007

0

0

2

4 32 412

0 W. D. Martin

0
.~... c(")

Sumter . . . . . . . . . . .

3 88

1

4

01

0

1 48

0 W. D. Martin

Talbot . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 312

0

0

0

0 19 312

0 W. I. Hold~r

cr3
~

Tattnall . . . . . . . . . . . 298 3857

8 14

81 2357 19 4192

0 W. P. Cox

t.1j

Telfair . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 804

0

0

0 216

3 196

0 J . J. Vara

Thomas . . . . . . . . . . . 1068 6831

0

0

01 0

3 512

0 H. Lebeson

Tift . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 909

2

3

01

0

8 850

0 R. E. Ashley

Toombs . . . . . . . . . . . 498 43881

0 ' 0 *40 1 11188 149 1305

0 H. F. J. Arundel

Treutlin . . . . . . . . . . . 873 4556

0

0 20 1 5714

0

O_

0 H. F. J . Arundel

..................

........
~

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 1921.

FINAL:

County

I Dipped H. c.

(Continued)

Inf.
I Number H. c.

Released
Premises
H. c.

I I 1Quarantined Not

I 1 Premises

I

1 H. C. 1Insp. 1

Supervising Inspector

> z z
q
>
t"

Turner ............

2 332

0

0

2

0

0

0

0 J. W. Hindsman

P::!

t1j

Twiggs .......... !. Washington 0

5 482 93 873

0 1

0 1

0

0

2 309

1 224 43 481

0 T. H. Taylor 0 T. H. Applewhite

0"'
P::!

Warren ........... 1 2

5

Wheeler 0 0 0 0.

507 5423

1 0

3~ 1 2

1

0

5417

2 0

4 0

0 T. H. Applewhite 0 Murray King

8
~

Wilcox . .. ..... . ... 73 673

0

0

5 353 11 135

0 J. W. Hindsman

Wilkinson ... . .. ...

9 163

0

0

0

0

3 81

0 C. N. Clausen

8
::r:

Worth . . . .. .. ..... 4193 25196

0

0

0

0 86 15036

0 J. P. Mack

t1j

I Total ......... 2104111689231 441 1251 51911035891 8741 844161 651

*Correction Chatham County, number released, 37358.

Note: Releases for systematic counties show vats with premises quarantined.

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF DECEMBER, 1921.

PRELIMINARY.

County

I

Atkinson .. . ...... ...

Bacon . .. . . . ...... . . .
Brantley .. ... .. .....

Camden . .. ..........

Dipped
H. c.

I I Amt. Inf. Quarantined
H. c. H. c.

I I

Not Insp.

Va t s In Co.

Supervising Inspector

I

24 G. W. Riley 20 W. M. Lynn

7 J . F. Fahey

43 J. F . Fahey

t1
t;rj
>"tt
~
>-3 ~
zt;rj
>-3

Cha r lto n 0 0

12 J. F. Fahey

0

Clinch

0

8 J. F. Fahey

>%j

E ch ols

0 0

Glynn . . ... . .........

I

Liberty ... . .... . .. . .

I

Long

0 0 0

3 80

3 80

Mcintosh ..... . ......

Pierce ... . .. ..... . .. .

Taylor . . .. ... .... . ..

Ware .. ... . ... .. .. ..
Wayne . . . . . .. .. ... . .

I

I I

I 31 - --- -- -
Total ..... . .....

SO l

31 SO l

4 J. V. Knapp

>

28 J . J. Vara 30 W. P. Cox 5 W. P. Cox

Q .~.....
0c::

24 J. J. Vara 38 J. F. Fahey 35 G. 0. Kaigler

c~::
~ t;rj

44 J. F. F ahey

48 W. M. Lynn

3701

........
c.:>

........
,j:o.

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF DECEMBER, 1921.

SYSTEMATIC.

I Dipped

AmCinf. Quarantined 1 Not \ Vats 1

Supervising

County

H.

Appling . ...... .. .... , Berrien .............

~I

Bryan ....... . .... . I Lanier .. .... : . ..... I

~I

C. H.

OJ 0

0

0

75

1

0

0

C. 1
Ol 0 75 0

H. C. I Insp. In Co. J

Inspector

60 162001 60 60 W. M. Lynn

77 . 16615 1 77 46 10519 46

75 E. E. Peacock 46 E. Horstman

20 4212 20 20 E. E. Peacock

>zzc::
>
t"
~

Total ... I

11 751

' 11 75 1 203 1 475481 203 1 201 1

t.:r:j
"tt

0

~

t-3

0

RECAPITULATION.

>%j

Dipped

Amt. Inf. Quarantined

Not

Released

tp-:3:

H.

C.

H.

C.

H.

C.

Insp.

H.

C.

t.:r:j

Preliminary ...... ..
Systematic . . . ... . . . Final ... ... ........
I GRAND TOTAL

3 1 2371
2375 1

80 75 25723
25878 1

3

80 1

1 11

75 1 24

203 47548 840 62573

203 159

0

0

129 20875

151 1791 1043 1 110121 1 362 1 129 1 20875

MONTHLY REPORT tSHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF DECEMBER, 1921.

County

I
I Dipped H. C.

FINAL.

I Number
1 Inf.
I H. c.

Released Premises
or H. C.

I I I1 Quarantined Premises Herds

I

or

I Not 1

J H.

C. . Insp. J

'
Supervising Inspector

Baldwin .. . ... . ... . 12 125

1

1

0

OJ 5 49

0 T. H, Taylor

Ben Hill . . . .. .. .. . . 15 122

0

0

0

0

8 73

0 J. W. Hindsman

l:j t:r:j
>"~0
~

Bibb .. .. ..... . ... . 10 413

0

0

0

0

2 10

0 T. H. Taylor

Brook s ......... .. . 92 985

0

0

9 100 20 549

0 H. V. Porter

zt:r:j
1--,3

Bulloch . ... ... . . .. .

1 147

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 E. Horstman

0

Burke . .... ... .. .. .

68 166

2 11

0

0

3 118

0 J. H. Sweeney

"'.1

Calhoun .... .. ... . . I'

6 64

0

0

0

0

3 14

0 A. C. Stein

Chatham .. . ...... . 23 963

1

1

3 175 18 128

0 R. L. Brinkman

> ~

Clay .............. ' 23 113

0

0

0

0

6 123

0 J. B. Harris

Coffee . . . .. . . .... . 173 3045

0

0

7 3955 108 2084

0 G. W. Riley

Colquitt .. . .... . .. . 326 4610

1

1

0

0 33 1 9748 1 01 C. T. Meyers

Cook ... .... ... .. . . 103 1027

0

0

0

0 15 3201

0 C. T. Meyers

H (')
c::: ~ c:::
~

Crawford . .. .... . . .

3 58

0

0

3 101

3 17

0 T. H. Taylor

t:r:j

Decatur .. .... .. .. .

0

0

0

0

0

0 20 7004 20 W. D. Martin

Dodge .... . . ...... .

2 24

0

0

0

4

1 12

0 J. J. Vara

Dougherty . .. . . . .. .

12 257

0

0

0

0

4 159

0 A. C. Stein

Early . . .. .. .. . .. . .

6 53

0

0

0

0 29 6646 29 J. B. Harris

Effingham .. . .... . 257 2337

0

0

OJ 0 32 4709

0 R. L. Brinkman

........

<:11

........

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

ell

MONTH OF DECEMBER, 1921.

FINAL.


County

I Dipped H. c.

(Continued)

I Number Inf. H. c.

Released Premises
or
H. c.

I I I1Quarantined Premises Herds

I 1 or

Not 1

1 H. C. . Insp. 1

Supervising Inspector

Emanuel ......... .
Evans . ..... . ......

8 67

.0

0

0

0

0 0

0 0

0 0

4 4

123617 1

0 B. N. Lauderdale 4 W. P. Cox

Glascock ..........

1

2

0

0

2

4

2 32

2 T. H. Applewhite

~zc::
>
t"'
!;d

Grady ...... . .. .... 26 647

0

0

Ol 0

4 990

0 H. Lebeson

Harris ...... ... . 0. 15 93

0

0

Ol

0 11 117

0 W. I. Holder

Irwin ............. 11 149

0

0

Ol 0 42 10000 31 C. S. Hess

t_:l:j
"'0
!;d o-3

Jasper ... .. ....... Jeff Davis ........ . Jefferson ........ ..
Jenkins ...........
Johnson . .... . .. ...

4 32

0

0

0

0

10 228

24 105

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

Ol 4

2 14

0 T. H . Taylor

~I

0

1 152

1 W. M. Lynn

0 62 722 62 T. H. Applewhite

~I

0

0 250

0 22 154

0 J. H. Sweeney 5 B. N. Lauderdale

~
=o-3
t_:l:j

Jones ... . . .. ... . . . 11 142

0

0

Ol 0

9 115

0 T. H. Taylor

Laurens ...........
Lowndes ....... ...

Macon

0 0

61 674 43 1091 33 530

0 5 0

0 6 0

Ol
~I

0 16 320

0 30 500

0

6 189

0 C. N. Clausen 0 J. V. Knapp
01 W. I. Holder

Miller . .. .... .. .... 40 854

0

0

51

0

7 2030

0 J. B. Harris

Mitchell .... . .. .. . .

0

0

0

0

Ol 0

5 1365

5 A. C. Stein

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

MONTH OF DECEMBER, 1921.

FINAL.

(Continued) 1 Released

I 1 Quarantined

~
0
~

County

I I Number

Dipped

Inf.

H . c. H. c.

Premises

Premises

I or

or

H. c. I H. c.

;;c;')
l;:j t_:r:j

Monroe . ....... . ... Montgomery . .. . .. .

5 26 1 40

0 0

0 0

~I

0 0

5 26

0

0

0 T. H. Taylor 0 H. F. J . Arundel

'>"0
~

Muscogee . ... . . . . . .

3 24

0

0

0

0

5 52

0 W. I. Holder

;~s:

Putnam .. . . . ......

7 83

1

5

0

0

2 48

D T. H. Taylor

Quitman 0

6 28

0

0

0

0

3 28

0 J. B. Harris

zt_:r:j
~

"'

Ri ch m ond 0 Scr even ... . .. . .... Seminole . . .. . . ....

2

7

0

6 87

0

5 182

0

0

01 0

1

4

0 T. H . Applewhite

0 0

~I 0 309

11 233 2 91

0 A. D. Moore 0 W. D. Martin

0
l'%j
>

St ewar t ...... ... . ~ Sumter . . .. . .. . . . ..

59 712

6

6

0 0

0 0

1~1

85 0

21 331 1 48

0 W. I. Holder 0 W. D. Mar t in

Talbot .. ... . . . . . . .
Tattnall . . .. . . . . . ..

2 34 51 1185

0 0

0 0

~I 0 619

15 401 19 4710

0 W. I. Holder 0 W. P. Cox

c;')
.~..... 0
~
~

Telfair . ....."". .. . . . 12 261

0

0

Ol 133

3 63

0 J . J. Vara

~ ~

Thomas ... . .. . . . . . Tift . ... .. . . .. .. . ..

49 767 43 450

0 0

0 0

~I

0 0

3 512 8 850

0 H. Lebeson 0 J . W. Hindsman

t_:r:j

T oombs 0 0

81 713

I Twiggs . . .. .. . .. ..

3 605

0 0

0 0

61 26 143 1879

Ol 0

1 190

0 H. F. J . Arundel 0 T. H . Taylor

..........

...;]

..........
00

MONTHLY REPORT SHOWING STATUS OF TICK ERADICATION, STATE OF GEORGIA.

County

I
1 Dipped
I H. c.

MONTH OF DECEMBER, 1921.

FINAL.

(Continued)

I Number
Inf.
I H. C.

Released Premises
or
H. C.

I I I Quarantined

1 Premises Herds

I or
I H.

C.

I Not
Insp.

I I

Supervising Inspector

z>cz
>r<
~
tr.l '1:1 0
~

Washington ..... . . Warren .. .... . ... .

6~ 1

668 2

0 0

0 0

31 281

Ol

2

40 2001

2

2

0 T. H. Applewhite 0 T. H. Applewhite

>-3 0 "'1

Wilcox ... . ....... . 54 231

0

0

41 78

7 57

0 J. W. Hindsman

>-3

Wilkinson .. ...... .

7 87

0

0

01

0

3 311

01 C. N. Clausen

Worth .......... . . j 427 2210

0

0 78 1 14999 1 8 525

0 J. P. Mack

1!:
tr.l

I Total ......... 2371 1 25723 1 111 24 1 129 1 208751 840 1 62573 1 1591

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

119

In January, 1922, immediately following the close of the the year's work in 1921, the Federal government called a conference of all State and Federal officials engaged in co-operative, systematic tick eradication work at Birmingham, Alabama.
Every phase of the work was carefully discussed and considered, and, at the conclusion of two days spirited debate, the following resolutions were unanimously passed:

Resolution No. 1.
Be it Resolved: After careful consideration by the conference of State, County and Federal Officials engaged in tick eradication, January 18,19, 1922, it is the unanimous consensus of opinion that the use of educational literature is of extreme importance in preparatory tick eradication work; and that selected motion pictures are of particular benefit, provided first-class equipment is used in presenting such pictures. The effectiveness of adequate and up-to-date equipment and the ineffectiveness of obsolete or poor equipment have been clearly demonstrated. In order to maintain and advance the public interest in tick eradication, new films should be provided from time to time which present in an interesting and instructive manner the essential facts relating to the general public benefits that are derived from tick eradication work.
Recognizing that at times psychological and financial conditions in a county or state may be adverse to the efficient prosecution of tick eradication, be it resolved that the advisability of beginning work in such territory be left to the direction of State and Federal authorities in charge of tick eradication in a State or County where such conditions exist.
It is the concensus of opinion of this conference that in open range counties no territory should be released from State and Federal quarantine until the work is fully com-

120

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

pleted, while in stock law counties the presence of a few tick-infested premises should not debar such county from being released from quarantine, provided county authorities furnish satisfactory guarantee that such tick-infested premises will be maintained under strict quarantine and that the work of tick eradication will be conducted under State and Federal diretction until eradication is complete.
Be it resolved that the efficient prosecution of tick eradication necessarily depends on active and congenial cooperation of the State, Federal and County forces. This conference especially desires to emphasize the need of selecting; for tick eradication, only such men as are qualified for and interested in this work. In addition to such qualifications as integrity, loyalty, moral character, and technical and practical knowledge, men selected should be convinced as to the feasibility of completing this important work, and interested in the development of the live stock industry of the State. It is the sense of the conference that these requirements are of greater importance than scientific and pathological training in animal diseases.

Resolution No. 2.
Whereas, experience and observation have proved that the movement of tick-infested cattle, at any time, or for any purpose, is detrimental to the progress and early completion of tick eradication:
Therefore, Be It Resolved, That the Act of Congress passed in 1884, which exempts tick-infested cattle from the list of infectious or contagious diseases prohibited to move move interstate, is a source of danger to cattle above the national quarantine line and a menace to the development of the cattle industry in the quarantined area.
Be It Further Resolved, That this conference urge Congress to repeal this Act.

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

121

Resolutidn No. 3.

Whereas, the cattle tick is found in practicall all stages of parasitic development during the Winter months throughout the area now engaged in tick eradication, and
Whereas, the practice of the past to suspend dipping during late Fall and Winter months affords opportunity for a general reinfestation of premises or areas during this period of suspended activity.
Therefore, Be It Resolved, That in all areas where systematic dipping is in progress, dipping should be continued of all infested animals, if climatic conditions permit, at reasonable intervals until the area is cleaned of ticks and released from quarantine.
Tick eradication in Georgia can and should be completed during 1923. Whether it is or not will depend on the attitude of the few counties that are at present defying the law, by refusing to comply with the provisions of the Statewide Tick Eradication Act.

TUBERCULOSIS.
The Department's first activities in a tuberculosis eradication campaign during 1912 culminated in a protest meeting by dairymen, which filled the General Assembly Hall to its utmost capacity. During the heated debate the Department announced as its firm conviction that "the consumer of milk was entitled to wholesome mi~k from healthy cows for sound money."
Leading dairymen present concurred and endorsed this principle, and as a result the Department was in a position to continue this work. notwithstanding the fact that no appropriations were made for tuberculosis eradication; neither did the State provide for any form of indemnity to owners whose cattle were condemned as reactors.

122

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

On some occasions these losses have been disastrous to owners but in every instance the reactors have been slaughtered under state of federal supervision. The work of the past ten years, including since 1918, the co-operation of the U. S. Bureau of Animal Industry, has proven the correctness of the Department's opinion in 1912 that less than one-half of one per cent of native cattle are infected with tuberculosis.
For many years the South had been the dumping ground for tubercular cattle from Northern states by unscrupulous dealers and breeders. In order to check this nefarious practice, the Department passed a regulation authorizing a 90 days retest on any cattle shipped into the State. Other Southern states followed this practice. By special agreement among Live Stoc ;k Sanitary officials certain states that made no effort to control bovine tuberculosis were blacklisted and cattle shipments from such states were refused admittance.
These agitations terminated in the establishment by the U. S. Bureau of Animal Industry of a Tuberculosis Eradication Division. This Department gratefully acknowledges the splendid cooperation of this division of the B. A. I. since 1918. The following list shows the herds tested during 1921. Herds designated with an asterisk indicate that such herds are accredited by State and Federal Governments as free of tuberculosis.
Many dairy herds have passed two or more tuberculin tests without finding any reactors, but because of the re~trictions of adding cattle to accredited herds, the owners do not desire to enter the accredited list.
All reactors to the tuberculin test are prompely removed from a tested herd and slaughtered under State or Federal supervision.

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM J ULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

Name

Address

J. V. Abel .. . ........... Macon ..... ... .... .... . B. A. Adams ... .. ... . ... Columbus ............. .

Jersey PB. Gr.
33 11

I Holstein

Hereford 1

PB. Gr. PB.~ Miscel.

ga
0
~
.>Q

Dr. H. D. Allen ........ . Milledgeville ........... . 35 15

l:j trj

W. P. Alexander .... . . .. Decatur . .. .... .. ....... j

31

G. A. Anderson .... ..... Macon ....... . ... . .... .

78

'>"C
~

J. C. Alexander ......... . Macon .... . ...... . .... . M. H. Andrews . ....... . . Plains .. . ... .. . .... .. . . H. A. Anthony ....... . .. Midland .. . .. ... ....... . J. F. Archbald ..... . ... .Thomasville ... .. ...... . Aries Plantation . . ...... Americus .. . ........... .

11 10
32
I 88 31
3 77

>-'3
is:
ztrj
>-'3
~

I

E. G. Arnold .. .......... Penia . . .... ...... ~ . ... .

27

>

T. J. Arnold .. .......... Rome . . .. ............. .

56

Q ~

H. F. Arnold .. .......... Decatur .. . ....... . .. . . . E. G. Bagley ............ Nona .. ... ..... . .... .. . G. L. Bagwell . . . . .... . . . Rome .... .... ....... . . . Dr. P. F. Bahnsen ....... Americus .... . ......... .

16

10

23

4

I 21 2

8c: c~ :
~

W. A. Baird ............ Columbus ........... . . .

16

trj

D. R. Barfield ... .. .. ... Atlanta . .............. .

25

E. A. Barnhart ... ...... Gainesville . ........... .

54

j E. W. Barker ......... .. Savannah .. . .. ..... . . ..

18

l I
l

.....

1\:)

'""'

CATTLE TE STED BY THE VETERINARY DIVI SION, GEORGIA DEPARTME NT OF AGRICUL-

...1-'
1:-:1

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

F ROM J U LY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

(Continued)



I Jersey

Holstein

I Hereford

j Name

Address

W. D. Barnes .. . .. . ..... Macon ......... . . . ... ,

PB. Gr. PB. Gr. PB . G::J Miscel. 33

H . B. Baskin . .... ... . ... Atlanta .... .. .. . . . .... .

10

I Geo. Bean ..... ... ... . . . Atlanta .. . ..... . ......

26

Asa Bearse ... ... .. . .. .. Atlanta ...... . ...... . . 1

l

29

F . Beatty ..... ... ... . . .Atlanta ............... .

15

I J . L. and W. 0. Berry .. .Columbus ...... . . . ....

40

>zzc::
>
t"'
~ t:j

Berry School ........ .. .Rome ........... . .. .... 1 26 94

"ti 0

'

Bessie Tift College . . .... Forsyth . ............ .. . J C. H. Beuchler .. . . . .. . . . Atlanta ..... . .. . .... .. .

26
I 16 7

~ ~
0

Mrs. Geo. Beverley .... . .Thomasville ........... .

12

"':!

J . C. Beverley ... .. ... . .Thomasville . . ....... .. .
I Bibb Mfg. Co. . ......... Porterdale . .. . . ... . . . .

13 18 1

I
I

~

I 92 S H

::11
t:j

t Bird Bros. . .. .. ...... . .. Rock Spring .. .. .

4 33

J . W. E. Black ..... ... .. Gainesville .. .. . .. .. . .. .

12

I W. P. Blackwell .. . . .. . .. LaFayette ...... .. ... ..

12

I S. E. Blanchard . . ....... Macon .......... .. .. . .

48

I

Robt. Bonds .... . .... . .. Chickamauga ........... ,

19

W. J . Born ... . .. . . . .... Decatur .. .. . ... . ... . .. .

10

I E. T. Boswell .. . . ... . . .. Siloam .. .. . . ... . ......

L

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

'

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

(Continued)

Name

Address

Mrs. L. N. Bowen ....... Macon ................ . J . N. Bowman . ... .. . ... Ringgold .............. . C. B. Bozeman ... ....... Nona Station . . .. .... . . . W. E . and D. E. BradfordAtlanta ............... . W. N. Bradley .... ... .. Decatur .......... ..... . W. L. Breedlove & Son . . Monroe .............. . J. D. Brennan & Sons ... . Columbus .... .... ....
i Brenau College .... ..... Gainesville ... ... . .. . .. .
J. W. Bridger .. .. .... .. Savannah . .......... ...
I H. D. Brogden .. ....... .Cordele ....... . . . . . . . . I Henry Brown . ... . . . ~ ... Lorane . . .... .... . .... . I J. F. Brown .. ..... ..... Lorane . . . .... . ....... . J. Palmer Browne .. ..... Savannah .... .. .. . . . .. I
J. S. Browne ........... E. Atlanta .... ....... .. H. F. Buford .. . ... ..... Macon . .. . ... .. . ... ... . M. E. & E . E. Bull .. ... . Savannah ............. . Miss E. Bullard ........Decatur ....... . .... ... .
W. T. Burt . .. ... . . .. ... Ellenville ... . . ..... ... I I Byrd Bros. . ............ Rock Spring . ... .......

Jersey PB. Gr.
241 11 23 29 29 17 45
'
6 10 ' 27 32 24 601 20 38 151 29
1 17 4 26

Holstein PB. Gr.
10
52 26 14
15 21

Hereford 1 PB. Gr. Miscel.

~
0
s ~
>
t::l
t<j
~
~
8
is:
zt<j
8 0
l'%j
> ~
c;:l
:..:..0..
0
c::::
~
c:::: ::0
t<j
...,....,.
at

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY, FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921. (Continued)

Name

Address

J ersey

Holstein

Hereford 1

J . P. Camp .. .... .. . ... Atlanta Mrs. I. G. Campbell . . . . . Atlanta Candler & Forkner ..... . Decatur

PB. Gr. 11

PB.

Gr.

r PB. Gr. l Miscel. PB Guer.

19

19

12 1

4 PB Guer.

zz>c:

C. E. Carnes ...... ...... Decatur V. P. Carpenter .. . ... .. Decatur . . . . . . . .... .. . . .

1 54 10

>
t:-<
~

G. B. Carroll . .. ........ Rossville .. . ...... . .. .. .

11

t:::j

I. A. Carter .. ... . .. .... Eatonton .. . .. . . ....... .

12

'"0 0

W. T. Chadwick .. . ..... Atlanta .. . ... ......... .

22

~
>-3

J. L. Champion ........ . Sander sville . .. ... . . .. . .

1 13

0

Mrs. J. C. Childs ..... .. . Atlanta ......... ...... .

11

'%)

J. W. Christian .. .. ... .. Rossville . ... ... . . ... .. .

15

>-3 ::I:

City of Atlanta ... . .... Atlanta .. ....... . . . ... .

71

t:::j

I J. C. Clay .. .. ...... . . .. Atlanta . .. . .. ...... . ..

20

Luther Clay . ..... . . . ... Atlanta .. . ... . .. . ..... I

26

I W. P. Clay ... . . ........ Lorane . ..... ... .. .. . ..

65

J . T. Clark ..... . . . .. .. Macon . . ....... . ...... I

67

I Luther Clemmons . . ..... LaFayette .... .........

57

I H . C. Cloud . . . ......... Atlanta .. .. ...........

16

I

C. W. Cochran & Bro. . .. Thomasville . . ...... .. .. .

2 221

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U. S. BUREAUOF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY 1, 1,920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

Name

Address

(Continued) Jersey

I Holstein [ Hereford J

Q tr.l 0 ~

PB. Gr. PB. G~ PB. Gr. J Miscel.

I J. T. Coffee ... . .. .. ... .Atlanta . . ... . .... . ....

25

I J . E. Collier .. .. ... . .. Atlanta .. . .. . ... . .... .

25

I Collins & McKinley . .. .. Milledgeville . .........

51

1 E. T. Comer Co... . . .... Millhaven .. . .. .... ....

I
13271

>Q......
t:l tr.l
~
~

I Harry Cooper ....... . .. Columbus ...... . .. . ... .
A. N. Cook . ........... . Atlanta . ......... ......

33 16

Nick Constantine . .. . .. . Savannah . . . . . . ....... .

91

J. E . Cou"rsey .... ..... . Atlanta ... .... .... .... .

16

>-3

~

I

ztr.l
>-3 0

A. C. Cox . ..... .. .. . ... Alb,any . .... : ... ..... . .

27

>%j

R. W. Cox . .. .... . . .... Atlanta ... ...... . ... .. .

2 8

W . B. Cox ............ .Atlanta ......... .. . . . . .

26

J. R. Crawford . . . .... .Atlanta .. .............. j

11

J. T. Crawford .. . ..... . .Greensboro ............. , 63 19

W. H. Crawford ........ LaFayette ... .. . ....... .

10

L. D. Cross ...... .. . .. .Atlanta ..... .... I

18

>
Q .~.....
c() c ~
~

I B. T. Crouch . . . ..... . .. Columbus . . ... . . . . . . ..

31

tr.l

I Mrs. A. B. Crusselle .... Atlanta ..... . .. .......

20

I *Peter S. Cummings & S.Lela .... . ....... .. .. ..

179 7

I L. W. Dance .... .. .. .. . Eatonton ....... .. .....

30

.....

1:-:l

"'I

......

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

"0"0

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

(Continued)

I Jersey

Holstein 1 Hereford I

Name

Address

PB. Gr. PB. Gr.l PB. Gr.l Miscel.

I *Daniel Bros ........... Hogansville ..... ......

71 89

J. E. Daniel ............ Atlanta ............... .

98

J. A. Davis ............ Atlanta .. ......... . ... .

26

zzc>::

S. M. Davis ...... .. : . .. Union City ............ .

10

J . C. Davis .. ... ....... Ringgold .............. .

17

>
t"' ::>;:!

R. B. Da.vis ............ Macon ................

18

t>:l

C. H. Dawson .......... Louisville .. .. ... ...... 15 37

'"d 0

Mrs. F. M. DeGroat . . .. Atlanta ............... .

19

::>;:!
>-3

W. P. Deakins ..... .. ... Wildwood

11

0

Dean & Brywn ......... LaFayette ..... ... ..... .

24

>%j

Demosthenes Bros. . ..... Savannah ... ... .......

76

>-3 ll1

A. A. Denham .......... Eatonton .... .'......... .

35

t>:l

E. T. Denham ... .. ...... Eatonton

10

H. F. Denham ....... '...Eatonton

1 18

C. W. Dennis ... ....... . Eatonton ..............

25

W. D. Dennis ..... .. ... Willard .... . .........

18

W. W. DeRenne ......... Savannah ....... . ...... .

8 33

Dismuke & Slappey .... Columbus . .. ..........

21

A. L. Dodd ............. Macon ................

12

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

(Continued)

~

Name

Address

G. L. Doby .... .. . ..... .Decatur

Jersey

Holstein Hereford 1

0
~

PB. Gr. PB. Gr. PB. Gr.l Miscel. 13

>c;')

H. D. Donehoo .......... Atlanta

18

W. L. Donehoo .... . . ... Atlanta ...... ......... .

29

M. C. Dorning . ...... .. . Dublin . ..... ....... . : . \

79

t:j t<j
>"C
~

Dr. Ellis Drewry .. ..... Griffin . ..... .. ...... .. . E. R. DuBose .......... Dunwoody .. ..... ..... . . T. R. Duggan ......... .. Warthen ............. .. T. E. Edwards ..... ....Walden ... .... . .... . .. . .

10

2

10 15 ,,

42

,,

""l

~

l 30

.zt<j
""l

T. E. Edwards .......... Macon ........ . ........ 'I

72

0
>%j

J. A. Elliott ......... ... Rossville . . ....... . . .. . . T. H. Elliott . . ...... . . .. Rossville . . ... ... ....... .
I T. T:- Ellis .... .. .. ...... Rossville ...... : .......
W. H. Emmett . . . . . . . . . Americus ....... ... ... .. , Fairview Farm . . .. ......Atlanta ........ . ...... . J. W. Fields . ...... ..... Atlanta ... . . . .. ..... . . .,

171 25

151

9

441 86

21

>
c;') ~
8 c
cS3
~

H. P. Fortson ...... ..... Columbus . ............ .

12

t<j

J. F. Freeman .. ... .. . .. Willard .. . ............ .

17

r

A. A. French ............ East Atlanta .. . . .... .. .
Mrs. I. c. Fulcher .. . ... .Rome .......... ... ..... I

36

I

101r

I

,...

~

,.,...

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

Co:> 0

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 19,21.

(Continued)

Name

Address

I Jersey

Holstein

Hereford I

PB. Gr.LPB. Gr. PB. Gr. Miscel.

W. P. Fussell . . ...... .. . Columbus . .... .... ... . . W. B. Gantier ... ..... ... Milledgevi.lle .. : ... . .. . .

I

25

17

L. S. Garner ... ..... ... . Atlanta . ...... . ... ... . .

18

Elwell Gay ......... . ... Atlanta . . ..... . .... .. . .

70

G. D. Gazaway . .. . ..... Decatur . ..... .... . .... .

261

I

L. P. Gazaway . .. . . . .. .Decatur .. ..... .. .. .... .

22

W. R. Gazaway .... . ... .Decatur ... ... .. . ...... .

14

(W. C. Clayton, Supt.

So. Ga. Normal School) . .Valdosta . ....... . .. . . .

1 12

Ga. A. & M. School ..... Carrollton .. ... . ...... . .

1 10

zzc>::

>

I 3 Ayr.

t"' ::d

. t'l

'"0

0

::d

>-3

0
1-:rj

Ga. 5th Dist . A.&M. Sch. . .Monroe ......... . .. . . . .. ,- 1 18 Ga. 6th Dist. A.&M. Sch... Barnesville .. .. ........ . 10 26

>-3
1!1
t'1

Ga. lOth Dist. A.&M. Sch. .Sparta ... . . . . ... . .. ... . ,

to I

I

Ga. School for Deaf . .. .. Cave Spring ........ ... .
Ga. State Col. of Agri. .. Athens . . . .. ......... : . I 36

161

35

6

I Ga. State Col. (Colored) .. Savannah ... .. .. . ... . .

14

I Ga. State Sanitarium .... Milledgeville ....... . ...

14 62

2

I

100

112 SH. 8 Guer.

I Ga. Tuberculosis Sani. . .. Alto . . ... .. .... . . . ....

27

2

'

T. C. Gibbs ............. Decatur . . ... . .... .... . I

10

I
101

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY, FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921. (Continued)

Name

Address

J. S. Gilford . .. .. .".. .... Waycross . . . . ....... .. . C. B. Gladden ....... . ... Decatur . .... .... .. .... . E. Gladden .. . .. . . . . .... Decatur . ... . ....... .. . . A. R. Gofford ... . ... . ... Macon .. .. ... . . .. ... . . . Mrs. T. E . Goodwin ..... Valdosta ...... .... . ... . J. A. Graham ...... .... Rossville . ........ . . : .. . H. F. Gray ......... . . . .Atlanta . . ....... . ..... . Louis Greeno ... ........ Savannah .... . . . ...... . Groover & Trotter .. . . .. Atlanta . . . .... ........ . R. E. Guffin ........ . ... East Point ... .... . . .. . . A. R. Gufford . ... . ... . .. Ma con ... . .... . .. . .. . . . L. G. Hall ...... ... .. .. . Savannah .. . ... . .. .. . . . Mrs. M. L. Hanley . ..... Savannah ............. . P. M. H arden ... . ... . ... Atlanta .. . ..... ..... .. . Dr. L. G. Hardman . . .... Commerce ... . . . ... . . .. . J. H. Hardy .... . ...... Macon . . .. .. . .... . . . .. . John T. Hardy . . . .... ... Lizella ... . ... .. ....... 1 J. F. Hargrove . .......Eatonton .... . ... .. .... .
John W. Harms . .... . ... Savannah .... .. . .... .. I

Jersey ~Holstein 1 PB. Gr. PB. Gr.l

19

15 20

20

28

51

15

8

13

33

3 23

11701

27 18

14

22

95

14

21

15

3 70

Hereford 1 PB. Gr.j Miscel.
j23 Grades
I I

~
0
~
> Q
l:j l'j
>'"1:1
~
'"'3
is:
zl'j
'"'3 0
'%j
> @ c 0
f:; c
~ l'j
,c...:...o..

.....

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

<:<>
~

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WI'.I;'H THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

(Continued)

Name

Address

Jersey

Holstein 1 Hereford

PB. Gr. PB. Gr.! PB. Gr.[ Miscel.

L. W. Harris ........ . .. Atlanta ........... ..... ,

21

S. B. Hatcher .... .. ..... Columbus ..... ....... .. .

15

C. W. Hawkins .. . . : ... . Nona Station .......... I

21

zz>q

Haygood Bros. . ..... .. ..Lorane ................ .

20

151

I

G. 0. Heath ........... . Macon ..... . . ......... .

24

>t"'
!;:1::1

J. B. Henry .. . ......... LaFayette .... .. ...... .

12

tx.l

W. P. Henry ......... .. Ringgold ... ..........

9 181

I

I Hepzipal Orphan Home .. Macon .... ............

10

C. G. Hewatt ........... Atlanta ..... ..... ... .. I

30

81

I

I R. A. Hicks . . ..... ..... Midland . .. .... ... .....

1 19

'"1:1 0
!;:1::1
>-3
0 "'J

Hill Bros. . ... . . . ......Macon ...... .. .... .... . ,

62

:>:-r3:

L. D. Hill .. ...... : . . . . Gough ................ .
I Redmond Hill ........... Decatut .... . ..........

3 991

27

4

I

tx.l

G. W. Hitchcock ...... . . Macon ........ ........ I

20

11

I Clyde Hogg ... . : . .. ... .Buena Vista ... . ..... ..
1 Glen Holcomb ..... .... .. Decatur .... ....... .. . .

15 22

J. P. Hollingsworth ... . .Macon .... . ... . . .. ... . .

23

T. W. Holloway ... . . . .. . Savannah .... : ......... , 21

J. H. Holsonback .... . ... Rossville . .. .. ......... .

20

CATTLE TE STED BY THE VETERINA RY DIVI SION, GEORGI A DEPARTME NT OF AGRICUL-

TURE , IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BURE AU OF AN IMAL I NDUSTRY,

FROM J ULY 1, 1920 TO DECE MBE R 31, 1921.

(Continued)

g.;

Name

Address

I Jersey . Holstein \ H ereford \
PB. Gr. PB. Gr.\ PB. Gr.\ Miscel.

0
e ~

J. H . Hooks ........... .Warthen ... ... . . ... ... \ 84 58

>-

W. C. House .. . ...... . .. Atlanta .. . . .. .. ... . . .. \

33

tj t".l

C. W. Howard ........... Macon . . ..... . ...... .. \

24

A. F. Hubbard ... . ...... Columbus . .. . ....... . .. I

15

~
~

L. L. H ubbard . ... . ..... Macon ... ...........-... \

26

Mrs. J. M. Huey .. . ... .. Decatur . . ... ... ... . .. . \

11

Huie Bros..... ... .... . .. College Park .. . ... . ... I B. W .Hunt . .. ... .. .... .Eatonton .... . ......... I 18

I 2 10
5

J . W. Hunt ........... . .Chickamauga .. ...... . . I

11

>-3 ~
zt".l
>-3
0
"%j

Tom H. Hunt .. ......... Chickamauga .. .. .... . . \

201

6

T. M. Jelks .... ..... .... Macon ..... . .. . .. ..... I

35

E . E. Jenkins .... ....... Savannah ........... . . I

45

E. H . Jenkins ..... . ..... !Widlan,d ........... . . . I

11551

>-
~
i:S 0c:::

C. C. Johnson .... .. . . . . .Decatur ... .. ........ .. . ,

50

9

~

J . H. Johnson . ... .. ..... Atlanta ..... .. .. . ... .. .

11

H. W. Johnson . . .. ..... . Albany ......... . . .. .. I

24

c:::
~
t".l

E. A. J ones ... .. . ....... Atlant a ............ . .. \

11

F. C. Jones . ... . .. . . .... Savannah ... .. . ....... I

21

L. D. Jones . ... ... ..... .Rome ............ . . . .. \

14

.....

c.>

c.>

,_.

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

C<:l
"""

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

'

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

(Continued)

Name

Address

Jersey 1 Holstein 1 Hereford I

PB. Gr. , PB. Gr., PB. Gr., Miscel.

T. W. Jones ... .. .. ... .. Columbus ...... .. . .... I W. P. Jones ...... . .. ... Savannah . ...... .. . .. . I W. T. Jones .. .......... Atlanta ..... ... .. .. .. . I I H. R. Jor~n . . .. . ...... Milledgeville ........ ... Harry A. Jorn ...... .. . .Fannin .. ..... ... ..... . I i L . M. Key .............. Rock Spring .. . . .. . ..... J. R. Keesee ... ..... . .. .Atlanta ... . ...... . .... I Hubert Kellar .. .. .... . . Savannah . ... ......... I J. M,. Kent .... ... ... .. . Savannah ...... ... .... I I H. M. Key ..... . . .. ..... Willard ............... W. T. Key ........ ... ... Atlanta ............... I G. M. Kilpatrick . . ...... Eatonton .... . ......... I W. R. Kilpatrick ... .. .. .Eatonton .. ...... ... ... I J . H. King .......... .. .. Fortson ... . .... ....... I H. A. Knight .. ...... ... Atlanta ........ .. ..... I W. S. Knox ............. Alton Park . ........... I C. B. Knuckles ... ..... .Atlanta .. ....... . . . ... I G. T. Lane ........ .. .: .. Atlanta .... .. ...... . .. I Mills B. Lane ........... Savannah . ... .......... I

26 34

30

12

17

1

1 25

18

100

14

20

11

28

23

22

29 17

20

20

201

121

II

53

z>cz:
>
t"'
~
l:rJ '"C 0
~ ~
0
"%j
~
l:rJ
18 SH

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

Name

Address

I I (Continued) Jersey

Holstein Hereford 1

C:l l?:l 0

PB. Gr. PB.

W. C. Lane ...... . ...... Valdosta .............. I

IT

Gr.

PB.

Gr.l Miscel.

LandePs & Burton ...... Atlanta ............... I W. G. Lang ............ Waycross ... . . ... ..... I I R. D. Lawrence . . ....... Willard .. ...... ... ... .

11

20

1

10

~
.C...:.l
>
l:i l?:l
>'ii

H. G. Lay and-G. A. Hall. Calhoun ............... .

t.

10PB.30Gr.

~ 1-3

J. W. Leake ...... ..... ,Rossville ...... .... .... .

20

11

~

R. C. Leathers .......... Atlanta .. ........ ... . . .

23

zl?:l

Ledbetter Bros.. .... ....Nona Station .. .. . .... . .

13

1-3

B. G. Lee & Son ........ Macon .. ... ....... ... . .

6 66

0

"1j

W. B. Lee .. .. . . ... ..... Columbus . . ... ... ... .. .

15

9

Stephen Leggett .. ......Albany ................ .

6 18

>
C:l

J. G. Leitch ............. Atlanta ....... ~ ..... ~ ..

39

.~....

J. W. Leitch ...... .. ... Atlanta ... , ........... .

20

19

C1 ~

C. I. Lindsey ........... Macon ................ .

48

I

~

E. L. Long and

~

R. G. Jennings ........ Macon ..... . ........ .. I

401

12

0. Lowther .............Thomasville . . ... . .. ... I

18

~
l?:l

J. B. Loyd ............. Decatur ............... I

14

I Evans Lunsford ..... .. .. Covington . ... .. . ....,. .

15

42

.....

0.0

<:71

...

....

..__

......

Col>

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

0>

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

N arne

Address

(Continued) I Jersey

I Holstein

Hereford 1

I PB. Gr. l PB. Gr. PB. Gr.! Miscel.

A. H. McClatchey ....... Chickamauga .......... I

19

H. MeCordell ........... Rossville .. .. .......... I

10

J. C. McDade ..... . .. .. Eatonton . .. . .. ... .. ... I

10

z>zc::

I L. J. McDade ....... . ... Willard . . . .... . .... .. .

11

I D. W. McDaniel ......... Ringgold .. .. ..........

15

McGarrah (Samuel) ..... Americus .. . .. ... ...... I

39

>
t" ::>:1
l"j

McGill Bros............. Rock Spring ........... I McGuire & Mulkey .. .. . .Atlanta ... ... . . . ..... . I

1 25 29

0 "~ '

W. A. McMichael ..... . . Columbus ...... ....... I

10

L. J. McPhaul .......... Doerun ............... I 11 11

~

MeWhorter Bros. . ...... Penfield .. ............. . J

MeWhorter & Copeland .. Buckhead .. ........... I

73

16

=>-3
l"j

L. N. Maddox ... .. ... .. Eatonton . .. ........... I

27

J. W. Manley ... . ...... Eatonton . ......... . . .. I

14

Harry Marks ... .. ...... Summerville .......... I 9 11

H. T. Marshall ..... . .... Eatonton ..... ..... . ... I 1 25

I Philip Martin .. .... ... .. LaFayette ..... ... .... .

12

Massachusetts Cotton

Mill ... . ............ . Lindale ................. I

481

CATTLE ::rE STED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

,TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF AN IMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

(Continued)

0

Name

Address

E. E. Mack & Son ..... .. Thomasville ...... , . . .. . I

I I Jersey

Holstein

Hereford 1

PB. Gr. PB. Gr. PB. Gr. l Miscel.

142 34

~
~
> 0

W. J. Maddox . . .. . . . ... Richwood .... . ... . ...... '

15

t:l

Manchester Cotton Mills .Manchester .. ... ..... .. . H. E. Martin ........... Savannah ..... ........ .

27 31 67

l".l
~
~

E. L. Massey .. ...... ... Columbus ............ . .

18

t-3

Masonic Orphan s Home .. Macon ..... .' . . . . . . . . . . .

10

4

J. G. Mathews .. ........ Buena Vista ... .. ...... .

25

is:
zl".l

Loyd Mathis ....... . .. ..Decatur .. . ..... . ... . .. .

10

11

t-3

A. B. Medlock ....... ... Atlanta ...... . ..... ... .

18

0
l'%j

J. J. Meers .. ..... ... ~ .. Decatur ... .. .......... .

31

>

L. D. Meers ..... . ... ... Atlanta .. . . . ... .. ..... .

34

A. M. Melton ..... . ..... Macon .... .. ..... ..... . .

19

Methodist Orphan Home .Macon . ........ .. ..... .

33

0 ~
0c::

W. G. Metz . . .......... Ringgold ........... ... .

12

T. R. Michael . ........ . . Eatonton .... ... ...... . .

10 1

I B. T. Michael . . ........ "'!:atonton . . .. .:. ....... .
Miller Bros. . ... .... .. .. Columbus .... . ... . .... I

2 103101

15

~
~
l".l

I E. C. Miller ... . . .. . .... Fairburn ........ . ...-. . R. F. Miller . ... ....... Fairburn .. ... . . ...... . I

171 17

.....

------~--------

~

-'1

'

....

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

C.<> 00

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

Name

Address

(Continued)

I I Jersey

Holstein

I Hereford

PB. Gr. PB. Gr. PB. Gr.j Miscel.

Lawrence Mitchell ..... .Decatur . . . ... ... ..... . I

14

E. W. Mood . . .. . ....... Savannah .... . ... ..... I

30

20

W. H. Moon . .. . .. .. .._. . Columbus ....... . . .. .. I

2 32

C. A. Moore ... .. .... .. .Atlanta .. ... ..... . .. .. I I H . H. Moore .. .. . .... ... Atlanta . ... . . ... ... ...

151 . 28

5

J. A. Moore ........ . ... C<Jlumbus . ... .. .. . . ... I

11

I Costos Morekis ... . .... . Savannah .. . ... .......

43

Miss Ida Munroe .. . .... .Putnam .. .. .. . . . .. . . . . I

36

J. G. & W. D. Nash . ... .Decatur .... ... . .. . .. .. I

12

A. H. Neison . .... ... ... Atlanta .... ... . . .. . . . . I

12

Neel Bros. . ... . ... ... .. Thomasville . . .. . . .. ... I 135

8

T. G. Nelms .. ... . ...... Decatur ....... .. . . .... I

15

12 Guer.

z z >

c:::

>

t"

~

t.:rJ '1:1 0
~
"'l

0
>:!j

:":r':l
t.:rJ

R. C. Neeley .. ....... .. Wa ynesboro . ... .. .. .... 1 . 71 57

Thos. Nesbit . .... . . .. .. Cordele . .. . . . . . ....... . I

72

I G. W. Newton .... . ... .. Norman Park . .... . .. . .

17

I 0. Nicholas .... .... .... Atlanta . ...... .. ... . ..

I
39

1 PB SH
I

K. A. Nisbit . . . .. .. . . .. Savannah . . .... . . ... ... j

11

G. & P. Nixon . . ...... .Rome ... . .. . . ... . .' . ... . i 17 56

G. W. Nolley ........... Hapeville . . .. ........ .. . j

14

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U. S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

(Continued)

Name

Address

I .Jersey
PB. Gr.

E. L. Olvey .... . ....... College Park ........... I

1 22

I Holstein

Hereford 1

PB. Gr. PB. Gr.l Miscel.

Cj) t<.:1
0
::0
>Cj)

Mrs. C. E. Orr ......... Macon ................. I

37

t:!

I A. J. Owens & Son .... . . Canon .. ...... .... ....

L. E. Oxley .. ...... . ... Macon ...... ..... .. . .. I

30

15

C. C. Parker .... . . ...... Decatur ............. . . I

23

Parker & Kent .. . ....... Decatur ... ..... .... ... I

31

Walter Parker ......... Atlanta .......... .... . I

25

25

7PB 30 Gr. Guer

t<.:1
~
::0

>a-:3:

zt<.:1

M. L. Parks ............. Decatur .. ........... . . I

43

>-3

I M. N. Parks : . .......... Atlanta ...............

21

0 '%J

s,. S. Patten ... .. .... .. .Union City .... ...... .. I J. M. Patterson ......... Waycross ..... ...... . . I E. W. Pierson .......... Decatur ............... I I J. C. Peek & Bros. ...... Atlanta . .. ...... . ... . .

13 28
4 20 18

>
Cj)
:..:.0...
(1
<::

J. C. & J. F. Pennington . .Milledgeville ............ J

1 57

~

B. A. Penny ............ Valdosta .... ...... .... I

10

11

S. Phelps ............ .. Waycross ............... i

48

<::
::0
t<.:1

Alex. Pinkerton ......... Eatonton .............. I 1 13

'

Pirkle Bros. . ........... Decatur ... . ........... I I Thos. H. Pitts .... ...... Atlanta ..... ..... .....

191 35 13

....,..

<D



,_.

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERIN ARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

11>0

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

N a rne

Address

(Continued)

I I I J er sey

Holst ein Hereford J

I PB. Gr . . PB. Gr. PB. Gr.J Miscel.

J. R. Ponder .. ... .. . .. . .LaFayette .. .. ... .. . . .. . John b . Porter . .... .... .Decatur . . . .. .... .. . .. . .

281
41

J . R. Potts ..... . . . . .. .. .Ringgold . . ... . ... ..... .

13

z>qz

W. H . Potts .. . . .... . .. .Ringgold . .. . .. . . . .. ... .

15

>

A. C. Powell . . . .. . . . .. . Moultrie . . .. .. . .. .. ... .

4 20

6

t"'

Justin B. Powell ... . . . .. Macon ..... . . .. . . ... . .. .

25

4 26

~ t'j

E. B. Preston .... . . .. ... Midla nd ... .. .. . . . ... . .. !

1
30 1

30

'"d 0

Robt. Preston . .. ... .. . .Columbus . . .. .... . . ... . j
I G. D. Price . . ... ... . .. . .Rock Spring .. . . .... ...

29 1 11

J . D. Price ... .. . .... . . .F armington ... . .. . .. . . . i

18

~
t-'3
~

Mrs. H. H. Prior ...... . Savannah . . ..... : ... ~ .. [

45

I R. J . Purcell ..... . . .. . . . Atlanta .. . . . ... ... ....

12

t-'3 ::I:i
t'j

I W. P. Purcell .... . . ... . Columbus .... .. .. ... ..

15

18

i Pursley & Cross . . . ... ... Rock Spring . ... ... . . . . . I
T. F . Rankin ... . .. . . ... Macon ... .. ... . ....... .

20 j 35

I C. G. Rawlings .. . ... . . . . San'dersville .. .. . . . . ...

4

3

I Dr. Wm. Rawlings ... . .. Sandersville .. ..... . ...

3 Gr. Guer. 77PB165

C. A. Reagan . . . ... . .. .. Louisville .. ... . .... .... I 1 36

Gr. Guer.)

I Redwine Bros. .... .. ... .F ayett eville ... .. . . . ...

15

--~------~------~----~~------

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

(Continued)

Name

Address

I Jersey

PB. Gr.

I T. C. Reese ............ Midland ...............

18

I Holstein

Hereford 1

PB. Gr. PB. Gr.l

Miscel.

Q l':l 0 ~
Q.....
il>

I A. H. Reid ............ .Eatonton ... .. .........

12

t:::1

A. P. Ricket .. ; ......... Decatur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , J. T. Ridgeway .........Savannah .. . ........... .
I Capt. W. B. Rice ........ Dublin . .. . ............

14 28 18 138

l':l
~
~ 1-3

I Columbus Roberts ....... Columbus ...... . ......

21

I Mrs. J. C. Roberts . . ..... Macon ..... .. .........

14

~
zl':l

W. B. Roddenberry ..... Cairo ................. .
I B. K. Rodgers ..... . .... Columbus . . . . . . . . . . . . .

I'
201

I R. J. Rogers ............ Decatur .. . .. . ......... I Rogers & Son ...... . .... Columbus . . ............

241
33

-I I

I C. H. Roland ...... : . .... Decatur .,. .... . .. .. ....

141

I A. J. Rossee : . .......... Eatonton . ........ . .. . .

201

I W. T. Rossman .... . ....Moultrie . .. ......... ..

11

20PB.l0Gr.

t-'l

Shorthorn

~

il>
Q
~
0
c:::
~

Dr. W. E. Rouse ........ Valdosta ............... 1

20

25

I F. H. Rowe .... . ....... .Dublin .... . .. . .... . ...

6 71

c:::
~
l':l

I C. A. Rowell ...... .. .... Albany ...............

14

I W. E. Rainey .......... Willard .......... . ....

30

I S. G. Ryals ............. Savannah ........ . ....

50

48

.....

.~ ....

.....

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

""'!>:)

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

Name

Address

I I (Continued) Jersey

Holstein

Hereford 1

PB. Gr. PB. Gr. PB. Gt.l Miscel.

H. 0. Samples ........ . .. Macon ...... . ....... . . .

17

D. Saul ........ . .. .. . . .Atlanta ............... .

16

C. E. Scott . . ..... .. . . .. Decatur . . .... . ........

23

zz>c::

I M. P. Scott .. . ...... . . . Decatur . . ... .. ........
W. C. Scott ..... .. .... . Macon ...... . .........

32 17

>
t"'

G. C. Selman . .. .. . . ... .Monroe ...... . .. . ...... .

4 51

16

~
tr.l

W. A. Shiff .... . . . .... . . College Park ..... . .... .

1 16

'i:! 0

J. P. Silas ....... . . .... . Macon .. ... . . . .... . ... .

26

~

Robt. Slappey ... . ... .. .Albany . . . . .. .. ........ .

2 67

0

Smith & Butts ... . ... .. .Atlanta ............... .

28

l:l:j

G. 0. Smith ........ . ....Savannah ............... 1

51

6

I Hugh Smith .... . .. .. ... Unadilla . .............

20

H. L. Smith .... ..... . . .Lindale .. .. ......... . . . I

42

1--,3
::r::
tr.l

I J. A. Smith ..... . . ... .. Atlanta .......... . ....

14

J. F. Smith . ... . . .. .... Atlanta . . ... . ......... .

13

J. E. W~ Smith .. . .. . .... Waycross ........... . . . .

26

J. S. Smith ... .. ........ Rossville . ............. .

12

M. B. Smith . .. . .. ... .. .Albany ..... . ... : ...... .

17

T. F. Smith .... . ........ Columbus ............. .

18

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

Name

Address

(Continued)
Jersey I
PB. Gr.

J. S. Snead ............ Atlanta ..... . ......... .

12

I Holstein

Hereford 1

PB. Gr. PB. Gr.l Miscel.

c;1
t_:>:j
0 ~
>c;1

W. S. Sniper . .......... Columbus .............

12

tj

F . C. Snow . . ..........Decatur ... . .. . .......

13

M. L. Snow ...... . ..... pecatur ...... .. ........ .

L. M. Solomon .......... Macon .... . ...........

42

So. Georgia Milling Co... Valdosta ..............

35

A. A. Spinks . . . . . . . . . . Atlanta ...........

22

J. F. Sprayberry ........ East Atlanta ........... .

22

20

t_:>:j

1 22

>"0
~

~

~

zt_:>:j

~

P. J. Sprayberry ... . .. . .East Atlanta . .......... .

18

0
"%j

Geo. T. Stallings ........ Haddock . ............. .

Harry Stewart .......... James . ................ . ,.

50

J. A. Stewart & Son . ... Gr~y ... . ....... .. ... .. . 25 24

I W. 0. Stevenson .......Trenton ... . ...........

4

12

W. W. Stephens . . .. . ... .Atlanta ............... .

15

J. F. Strozier .. . .. . ... .Lizella .. .... ......... . .

32

I Steadley Bros ........ . .. Waycross . . ........... .
c. H. Syms ... .. ........ Savannah ..... ... ......

36 15

24

I W. L. Taylor .... ... .... Midland ..... . . . .......

18

I M. Thomas .. . .. .. . ..... Savannah .............

68

106SH.PB.

>

c;1

~ .....

0

4 SH

c:::

~

c:::

~

t_:>:j

.....

>~>

'

~

......

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISIO~, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

t:

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY ,1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

Name

Address

I I (Continued) Jersey

Holstein

Hereford 1

PB. Gr. PB. Gr. PB. Gr. ! Miscel.

J. M. Thornton .......... Columbus ............. I

101

14

Thomasville L. S. Co. . .. Thomasville .... .... ... I 67

51

S. L. Thornton ......... Deweyrose .... ... ..... . . , A. D. Tolliver .... .. .. ... Macon ............. . .. .

71 6 13

261

20

W. M. Toney . . . . . . . . . . . Decatur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I

26

Touchstone & Wilbanks . , Tifton .............. .. I

53

J . D. Townsend . . ... . ... Ringgold .............. I

12

T. J. Treadway .. ....... Rome .................. ,

1 24

J . B. Tribble ............ Macon ................ .

13

1 The Trion Company ..... Trion ..... .. .. . . ......

23

Trott & Cooper ......... Decatur . ....... ..... .. .

15

15

I J. R. Tucker .... . ...... Savannah .............

1 38

I C. C. Tuggle ........... Atlanta .... . ..........

20

29

I Tuggle & Cooly . .. ...... Decatur ..... ... .... ...

15

15

I R. S. Tuggle .... .. .... ,_ .Atlanta ...............

19 ,,

J. D. Turner ..... ...... . Hartwell .............. .

R. C. Turner .. ...... .. . Atlanta .. . .. ... ....... I

12

University of Ga. . . .... Athens ... . ........... . I
I U. S. Penitentiary .. . ... . Atlanta ...............

18 14

10

4 39

z > z
c:::
>
t"'
~
'"ti 0
~
t-3
~

10 Guer.

t-3
1:!:

t>:1

I
I8PBSH2gr.
I
I

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA . DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

(Continued)

N arne

Address

I

1I
U. S. Penitentiary Farm .Atlanta . ..............

I Jersey
PB. Gr. 29

I Holstein Hereford 1
PB. Gr. PB. Gr.l Miscel.

~
0 ::d
0.>.....

B. F. Upchurch .. .. . .... Fairburn ... .. ... .. ... . .

8

10

t:l

I H. B. Upchurch .. ..... . .Fairburn .............. I J . C. Upchurch .... ... ... Fairburn ..... . ........
B. L. Wade ............. Atlanta ................ 1

26

12

1 12

31

t::j
'>ii .::.d.,

H. C. Wade ... .. ... .... Atlanta ....... . ..... .. I

29

I P. A. Wade ... .. ........ Buckhead ..... . .... . ...

28

I T. R. Wadley ....... .... Macon ... . ..... . . .... .

42

~
z.t.:.:,j

I R. 0. Walters ...... . .... Atlanta ...... .. .......

27

~

I W. A. Walton .. ... .... . . Eatonton .. . . ... . ...... I J. S. Wansley ........... Savannah ........ .. . . . I M. L. Warren ....... .. .. Atlanta .......... .. . . . I Mrs. M. P. Waters . ..... Gainesville .. ... .......

28 30 30 52 20 15

>
0 :..:.d...
0c::

Dr. C. G. Watson ....... Moultrie ..... . ........ I

27

~

I Mrs. L. Walz ...... .. .. . Savannah . .... .........

20

I E. H. Webster .... .... .. E-atonton ... . . .........

18

c::
::d
t::j

I J. W. Weems .. ........ . Eatonton ....... ........

35

I L. J. Weiner ............ Atlanta ...............

3 50

I Gray Wells ... .... .. .... Buena Vista .... . ......

28

......

"<":"

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

Name

Address

I I (Continued) Jeney

Holstein

Hereford 1

PB. Gr. PB. Gr. PB. Gr.l Miscel.

G. T. Wheeler ........... Eatonton . . .-~

131

I

J. L. Wheeler ......... . . Decatur . . . . .. ... .. .. .. .
I T. J. Whidden ..... . ..... Macon . . .. ............
A. L. White .. ...... .... Atlanta ............... I

47
21731

I
1~1

Geo. White . . .. ......... Columbus ..... . ....... I

60

Alex White ......... ... . Lindale . .. ......... ... j

39

81

z z >
~
>
t<
~
t<.1

J. C. White . . .. . ...... .. Rock Spring ..... ....... !

1 40

"0 0

P. E. White ............ Atlanta .. .. . .. .. ...... . ,.

28

R. D. White ............ Eatonton .... ... . ... .. . .

38

I

I T. E. V. White ......... . Hartwell ... ........ ...

1 181

I

T. 0. & 0 . E. White .... Atlanta . .. ..... . ... .. . I

23

I White Bros. . ... ... . ... . Rock Spring .. : . .......

1 34

I Felix Williams ..... .. . . Villa Rica .. . ..........

36

5

I G. W. Williams .. ...... . Columbus .... . .... ....

16

I I I

.~..,
.~..,
::q t<.1

J. M. Williams ......... Rossville .... .......... I

20

M. E. Williams ....... .. . Atlanta ... ..... . ...... I

191

I T. N. Williams ......... Buena Vista ...........

57J

G. G. Williamson ..... . . Jefferson .. .. . . ....... I R. L. Williamson ........ Macon ... . ... . ........ I

1 191 15

CATTLE TESTED BY THE VETERINARY DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL-

TURE, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,

Name

FROM JULY 1, 1920 TO DECEMBER 31, 1921.

~

Address

I I (Continued) J er sey

Holstein Hereford j

0
e ~

PB. Gr. PB. Gr. PB. Gr.j Miscel.

>

L. M. Willingham ....... Atlanta ............ . .. .

22

tj

t<j

A. N. Wilson . . . .... ... . Eatonton . . ............ .

1 26

'"1:1

M. G. Wilson ... ... .. . . . Macon .. . ......... .. .. .

37

>
~

E . J . Winn .. .. . ...... . .Columbus . ... . .. .. .... .

65

>-3

C. H. Wood . .. ... . ...... Decatur . .. .. . . ...... . . . Mrs. M. Leola Wolfe ..... Savannah . . . .. ........

11 1 41

is:
zt<j

Mrs. M. H. Woods .. . . ... LaFa yette .. ............ ,.

10

>-3

T. D. Wooldridge ..... . .. Midland .... .... .......

41

0
"%.:1

F. R. Wooten .. ......... Eatonton ............... j 1 11

C. S. Wright . . ... .. . .. . Reeves ....... . ........ I I J. M. Wright .. .. .. . .... Atlanta . ..............

I
I
121

,1

>

.j34PB. 9Gr. I Shorthorn

C1 .~..... 0

G. T. Young ...... .. .. .. Atlanta .... .. .......... )

21

c::::

I J. A. Young .... . . . ..... Macon . . .... . ... . .....

171

~

John C. Young and
Tenants . ............. LaFayette .. .. . ... . .... I

c::::

~

I

I

1 53 Mixed

t<j

Total ... ... .. .. . .. . ..... . . .. .. . .. . .. . . ... ,,, 995 107441 450 17961 472 14551 806

Total test ed July 1, 1920 to Jan. 1, 1922, 16,718.

,_.

,p..
...;:]

148

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

The list of cattle tested from July 1, 1920, to December 31, 19~n (herds containing 10 or more cattle) is not a complete number of cattle tested in that period, in that a large percentage of the cattle tested consisted of small scattered herds, which would swell the total of cattle tested.
The report rendered on December 31, 1921, shows the following: Total number of herds now under s~pervision . . . .. . 1469 Total number of cattle in above herds ............ . 22870 Passed one successful test-number of herds ...... . 1289 Total number of cattle in clean herds ... . . .... . ... . 14702
Nine accredited herds, containing 625 cattle. In the period from July 1, 1920, to December 31, 1921, there were 419 reactors found and slaughtered. The notation (x) on list represents Accredited Herds. The breeds were classified by the breed predominating ' in the herd. Herds represented as grade Jersey herds, in many cases contained a scattering of different breeds, but in making report; breeds were classified according to the above.

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

149

Of more than passing interest is the report of a herd of 96 cattle tested, out of which 85 reacted. Only a few cattle in this herd were native cattle. For general information and because of the unusual conditions observed, I herewith submit special report on this case.
"A Georgia herd of 96 cattle which had been regularly tuber~ulin tesJ;ed for several years with rather unsatisfactory results until the last two tests which indicated that the herd was virtually free from tuberculosis. The following extracts are taken from a letter reporting a recent test applied to this lot of cattle by Bureau and State Inspectors on co-operative tuberculosis eradicati01, work: . '
"On May lOth 96 cattle were injected with intradermic tuberculin. At the same time a sensitizing ophthalmic disc was placed in the right eye of each animal. At the 72nd hour observation all animals that had reacted to either the intradermal or sensitizing disc were exclud~d and the remainder of the herd, which consisted of only 24 animals, was each given an injection of subcutaneous tuberculin, also two more ophthamlic discs. Of these 24 animals that had not shown a reaction up to the time we gave the subcutaneous injection, all but ten later showed a reaction from the intradermic or ophthalmic injections. Only one animal out of the 24 reacted to the subcutaneous test. One was classed as a suspect to the subcutaneous test, but as she later showed a reaction to the intradermic test she was considered a reactor. We took every animal in the herd that showed any signs of reacting~in other words, we made no suspects.
"These 85 were slaughter under supervision and all showed lesions, although none were extensively infected; 5 animals were condemned, 80 passed for food.

150

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

Below is a list of the lesions found in the different glands an organs on post-mortem examination:

Retra-pharyngeal ------------19 animals Temporal -------- ------.4 animals
(No other glands in the head involved).
Submaxillary --- 1 animal (No other glands in the head involved).
Bronchial ---------------55 animals ' Mediastinal animals --------------65 Lungs animals - - ------ - --- 22 Pleura ------------- 1 animal Portal ------------ 9 a.Jnimals Mesenteric animals --- ---- -- ---28 Liver ------ --- ---13 animals Sub-Lumbar ------------ 1 animal Prescapular ----------- 1 animal Popliteal ------------- 1 animal Precrural ------------------- 1 animal Udder --.---------- 1 animal Skin (knee) --------- 1 animal
The animal showing the skin lesions was a cow we noticed when making the test as she had a thickened knee, with four or five nodules the size of a hazlenut, extending up the leg six to eight inches. We discussed the probability of this being tubercular, and made a note on the chart in order ~hat we would not forget to make an examination of this knee on post-mortem. The examination showed this thickening to be confined to the skin, but there is no doubt but that the lesions were tubercular. The owner informed us that the cow had a bad knee when he bought her. This animal also showed cervical bronchial and mediastinal gland lesions.
Twenty of the best cows in this herd were bought in the North and shipped South, in .single direct shipment, in January, 1919. The herd bull, an animal 8 years old, orig-

GEORGIA DEPARTl\:tENT OF AGRICULTURE

151

inally came from an Eastern state. This animal had evidently been tubercular for some time as many of the lesions, especially those of the mesenteric glands, were very old, calcified lesions; in fact it was almost impossible to cut some of them on account of the calcified condition.'
It is to be hoped that the General Assembly will appropriate a reasonable sum for the continuance of this work, which cannot be maintained under present conditions because the small appropriation for the control of contagious diseases, under which this work has been conducted, is needed to satisfy the growing demand for general field investigations of other live stock diseases, especially contagious abortion,

Contagious Abortion.
No disease is calculated to undermine the live stock industry more completely than contagious abortion. Calves and pigs represent the earning capacity of cows and sows respectively. Without offsprings the industry is doomed; profits in live stock production are inseparably connected with the size of the calf and pig crop. This is even true in dairy cattle. Few cows attain a full flow of milk except when they carry their calf to full maturity and normal delivery.
Though this disease is not extensively scattered through the State, it is yet far more prevalent than our first surveys indicated. Because of the insidious nature
of the disease, it is frequently well established in a herd
before the owner or others interested report the condition to this office.
Although it is fairly well established that the specific organism (Bang bacillus) is largely, if not exclusively, distributed through the ingestion of contaminated feed, yet our present methods _of control cannot, by any means, be considered satisfactory.

152

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

Careful farm sanitation, including segregation of all animals having premature deliveries until all discharges has abated, is absolutely essential. Cows should not be bred until their reproductive organs are again in normal condition.
The value of bacterins in the treatment of contagious abortion has not been a success. The use of living abortion bacilli organism in any except badly infected herds is contra-indicated.
It is to be hoped that extensive investigations now in progress by the Bureau of Animal Industry and by various states, will evolve some practical plan for the control and eradication of this disease.

Hog- Cholera.
A careful review of hog cholera extending over many years, seems to indicate a tendency for this disease to advance and abate in waves. The rise of the wave is invarriably preceded by an almost complete cessation of serum inoculation, because the disease is temporarily under control. Succeeding generations of pigs that have been immunized naturally are more susceptible to infecttion, and, therefore, once the disease is introduced in a community, we find it spreading rapidly, this is especially true under open range conditions. As soon as the disease assumes alarming proportions serum simultaneous treatment against hog cholera is practiced extensively, and in herds where this is not practiced the susceptible animals succumb to the disease. Thus in a most natural way the disease has reached the crest of the wave, and again dips down to the low point from whence, on account of the same conditions which caused the first rise of the wave, the wave will again rise and abate in logical sequence.
Under average field conditions, hog cholera is by no means the simple, uncomplicated specific infection that its name would indicate. To the contrary, the disease is fre-



GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

153

quently complicated, and, when so complicated, requires the most painstaking effort on part of qualified men to check its ravages, and even then, at times, the results are disappointing.
Until the differential diagnosis of hog diseases is more thoroughly understood and the indications and contraindications for treating these various complications have been materially simplified, the control of hog cholera, ih any of its phases, should only be entrusted to qualified veterinarians.
During the year of 1921, cholera was more completely under control than in any year since the establishment of this Department. This was exceedingly fortunate, in view of the low prices of hogs and the extreme scarcity of money among the farmers. Prudence, however, demands extraordinary precautions during the coming year; if past experiences are to be considered, the disease will be on the incline during 1922.
In co-operation with the Federal Government, t_he Department has maintained and effective free service in connection with high cholera. By distributing the veterinarians employed in this work throughout the State where they could be more nearly in personal contact with field conditions, we believe this service has been materially improved.

Meat Inspection.
Inadequate funds compelled us to temporarily discontinue the services of a veterinarian on Meat and Market Inspection.
This service is of great importance from a public service viewpoint. Annually large quantities of meats-sometimes entire carcasses-are condemned at abattoirs under inspection, because such carcasses or parts of carcasses are diseased and unfit for food. Since only about one-half of our meat supply is slaughtered under supervision, the ques-



154

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

tion is often asked: What becomes of meats unfit for hu-

man consumptionthat is not killed under supervision? The

answeris, much of it is sold by unscrupulous dealers.

With our limited inspection we have found and con-

demned thousands of pounds of spoiled meat that was about

to be manufactured into sausages. Serious illness is re-

ported every now and then as a result of botulism. Public

safety demands a material extension of this inspection serv-

ice by the Department.

'

Satistics preceding show that we have imported 100,-

426,465 pounds of meat and meat food products during 1921,

as against 105,918,909 pounds during 1920. The approxi-

mate five and one-half million pound reduction in our meat

bill pas probably largely due to the period of deflation, which

materially affected the State's purchasing power.

We expect to be in a position to furnish dependable

statistics in our next report for the number of meat animals

-shipped out of the State and also the number of animals

shipped into the State for immediate slaughter.

Our efforts at live stock production must at least reach

a stage where we :produce all we can consume, and if we do,
we will occasionally have a surplus for which we must find a

market.

,


RECAPITULATION BY COUNTIES, CO-OPERATIVE STATE AND FEDERAL TUBERCULIN TESTS MADE DURING YEAR 1921.

Number Passed 1 Number Reactors 1 Number Suspects 1 Total Number Tested

Baldwin ..... I Bibb .. ..... . I

PB. I Gradel Total I PB. I Grade l Total 1 PB. 1Grade l Total 1 PB. 1Grade 1Total

~I 1561 I 57 9361 937

I

I

I

I

II

II

I

I

I ~- ... ' ---

I

I

0
l:J:j
0
e ~

Burke .. ... . . I Campbell . ... I

~ I 571 64 I46 I48

I I

I

II

I

I

2

~I

8 2

Carroll .... . . I Catoosa ...... I

~I I321 I35 I8I I87

I

I

I21 I21

I I

~I

~I

3 6

Chatham . ... I 991 I38I I I480 I 28

11~ 1 Clarke . .. ... I
Clayton ..... I

I 51 I30I IO I I2 1

Colquitt .. . .. I IO I 92 I02 1 4

941 I22 l

I

I

I

46 1 50 1

I

71

71 I27 I 115

I

I

2

I

31

31 I4

Dade . . ..... . I Decatur ..... I DeKalb ...... I

I 591 59 \ I38 l I2 1 I 50
91 I283 I292 l

I I I

I

I

I38

59 1 59 I21 I50

71

71

II

9

IOI IO I299 l I309

Dooly . .. . ... I

II 4I I 42 1

Dodge ...... I

I I3l I3l

Dougherty ... I IO I 2451 255

2

Emanuel ..... I

I7 I7

II

II

I

I 21

I

I

I

I

I

421 43

I

I3l I3

I

II I3 245 1 258

I71 I7

;>
tj l:J:j '"d
;>
~
>-3 ~
zl:J:j
>-3
0
'%j
;> 0
~ .....
q 0
~
q
~

Fannin ... . .. I

I I7 I8

I

I

I

I71 I8

l:J:j

Floyd . ...... I 44 48I 525

91

91

I

31

3 44 493 1 537

Franklin ..... I 26

40

66 1

F ulton ....... I I06 I I355 I46I

I I I
31 I81 2II

IJ

I

I

271 401 67

21 22 1 24 Ill I395 l I506

......

01

01

,_.

RECAPITULATION BY COUN'l'IES, CO-OPERATIVE STATE AND FEDERAL TUBERCULIN

a0:1.

TESTS MADE DURING YEAR 1921.

(Continued)

Number Passed 1 Num):>er Reactors I Number Suspect s I Tota l Number Tested

PB. 1 Grade l Total 1 PB. I Grade l Total I PB. I Gra de l Total I PB. I Grade 1 Total

I Grady .......

13 10 23 1

Gordon ...... I 68 57 125

Greene .... .. I 56

56

I Hall ' ... ... ..

119 119

Hart ... ..... I 19 57 76

Jackson ...... I

1 19 20

Jefferson .... I 16 73 89

Jenkins ...... I

61 61

I

13 101 23

I 1

1 69 57 1 126

I

56

I 56

8

81

I 8

8

135 1 135

z ~
c:::

I I

I

I

I I

I

19 57 1 76

>

1 19 1 20 16 73 1 89

t"" ::0
t_:rj

61 1 61

"0
0

Jones . . .......
Lamar .. . .. . I Lee .. . , . . .. . I Lowndes . . . .. I Marion ...... I Muscogee . . .. I Newton . ..... I Oconee .. . .. . I Putnam ... . .. I Screven .. . . . I Schley . ..... I Sumter ...... I

90 122 212

10 26 36

9

9

2 170 172

1 164 165

50 970 1020

56 135 191

1 63 64

19 678 697

1270 1270

17

1 18

32 46 78

I 11 1

2 91 123 1 214

::0
>--,3

11 11

I

10 27 1 37

0

I I I

91 9

"j

I I I I

2 170 1 172 1 1641 165

>--,3
::II
t_:rj

1

11 31 5

8 53 9761 1029

I I

56 1351 191

I I

1 63 1 64

2

21

I 1

1 19 681 1 700

64 64 1

I

13341 1334

I

I I

I I

. 17

11 18

321 461 78

Cj)

l:tj

RECAPITULATION BY COUNTIES, CO-OPERATIVE STATE AND FEDERAL TUBERCULIN

0
::0

TESTS MADE DURING YEAR 1921.

9

I Number Passed

(Continued)
Number Reactors I Number Suspect s 1 Total Number Tested

>
t1
l:tj

I I I I I I PB. 1Gradel Total PB. Grade l Total PB. Gra-de l Total PB. Grade Total

>'"d

I Thomas ~ ..... 345 62 407

1

1 Tift ...... . .

53 53

Troup . . .. ... . 102 90 192

11 J I I I I

346 621 408

::0 >-3

531 53

is:

102 90 1 192

zl:tj

Walton . . . .. , .1 19 130 149

3

31

19 133 1 152

>-3

Walker ....... f 35 595 630

8

81

1

1 35 6041 639

0 "".1

Ware ...... .. . Washington ...
White ...... . .
Total .... I

I 139 140 134 194 328 81 11 92
1749l11993j 137421

I

1 1391 140

2

51

51 11 1 21 11

2 135 200 1 335 1 84 11_1 95

40j 280 1 3201 13 1 66 1 791 18021 123381 141-40

>
Cj)
::0
>-<
0 c::j

Total number of cattle tested, 14,140.

~

c::j

::0

l:tj

.....
c:n
-'1

158

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE

Report of Dairy Inspector.

Henry F. Branham.

This year's work shows plainly that the dairy industry in Georgia is in a stage of development. Many people are going into the milk business. Some have gone into it without preparation, and with no well defined ideas as to how the business should be conducted, consequently they have become discouraged; others have quit because of the discouragements incident to the hard work and comparatively poor financial returns. But, taken as a whole, it has not been a year of failure. The dairy business has grown in many places, and a good many people have been successful.
In many towns and cities the authorities are awake to the necessity of dairy and milk inspection, and in these communities the milk supply is better than it has ever been.
I have, during the last twelve months, made about one thousand visits to dairies, ice cream factories and creameries. Atlanta, Savannah, Augusta, Valdosta, Thomasville, Albany, Gainesville, Rome and other places in the State have made vast improvements in sanitary conditions surrounding their milk supply.
From the very nature of the case, it has been impossible for the State to have all the dairies inspectea, and my ~forts have been largely confined to those places that requested my services.
The greatest growth in dairying has been along the line of sour cream production for butter making. Two years ago butter was only being manufactured for commercial purposes in negligible quantities. Now there are twelve creameries and two cheese factories in operation, and several private individuals are undertaking to make cheese. The sour cream shipping gives a market to anyone near a railroad for any surplus cream they may have, and to a large extent will prove the salvation of the dairy business for men with a limited amount of capital and a few cows.

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

159

Creameries are in operation at Rome, Dalton, Athens, Augusta, Atlanta, Columbus, Dublin, Macon, Ashburn, Moultrie, Hawkinsville and Eatonton, and at present these creameries can and are using the sour cream produced. They are so situated as to furnish a market for practically the whole State; and, as I see it, it would be poor business to establish more until those already in business have an over-supply of raw material. The cost of producing a few hundred pounds of butter will be practically as much as the cost of making three or four thousand pounds, as far as the overhead charges are concerned. Nearly all of these creameries that are in successful operation are being run in con- . nection with ice cream factories, bottling works, etc. By this means the overhead charges are divided and the butter
I
can be made more cheaply. The success of creameries depend on, first, ample supply
of good milk and cream. Second, the production of high class butter, cream or other dairy products of high quality, and, third, on the establishment of a market for their products.
When creameries fail they naturally cause distress among the dairymen who supply them. If they fail to produce quality goods that sell at top market prices, they cannot pay their patrons a fair price for the raw material-the h1ilk and cream.
Respectfully submitted, PETER F. BAHNSEN, State Veterinarian.

MEATS AND MEAT FOOD PRODUCTS AND DAIRY PRODUCTS SHIPPED INTO GEORGIA DURING 1921.

IJanuaryl *Feb'y 1 March I *April J May I *June I July I *Aug. I Sept. 1 *Oct. 1 Nov. 1 *Dec. 1 Total

Dressed Cattle ..:. ............... ...... ........ 1 .822,782 11,032,935 1 788,994 1,238,168

Dressed Hogs .............. .......... ......... ............. 32,940 66,674

11,340

Dressed Sheep ...... ... ... .........

I 95,289 142,036 . 98,762 138,267

Dressed Calves ...... ....................... ........ ......! 113,060 121,500 48,398 84,483

348,357 340,910 269,222 524,304

278,127 440,710 233,070 385,470

2,044
Barreled Pork ............................................ . I 34,342

3,016 2,689 10,165 6,626 72,602 147,570

845,756 1,683,857 1,040,335 1,305,490 1,079,382 1,633,775 1,222,534 22,.007 10,532 4, 73 1 8,959 15,253 84,273 26,153 92,550 157,085 78,855 128,318 84,071 170,376 104,994 86,865 171,791 119,7n1 163,404 146,418 241,393 137,246
366,4101 542,638 424,788 600,045 489,769 592,887 291,468 164,6561 281,761 645,778 183,548 522,058 714,877 434,313
3,349 8,140 2,514 4,829 8,539 6,775 12,647 121,982 56,8 65 59,515 46,262 123,357 ' 16,341 71,404

974,365 71,627
129,728 110,349 313,396 248,763
2,052 67,671

13,668,373 354,489
1,420,331 1,544,698 5,096,194 4,533,331
66,759 824 ,537

Dry Sausage Beef Cuts Pork Cuts

26,482 42,365 30,049 54,4411 53,307 67,418 41,804 57 ,960 41, 193 50,351 28,367 32,383

1,176,610 1,813,7211,621,445 2,891,985 2,728,813 3,322,224 2,892,920 3,853,628 3,581,671 4,422,777 2,217,428 2,391,928

111,074 131,068 70,990 121,447 74,830 125,58 1 138,530 170,217 187,497 234,049 26,586 126,524

...........

15,606 21,425 15,210 46,543 96,563 83,329 109,197 149,096

19,165 47,014 79,084 106,529

20,842 60,440 45,345 1 111,048 30,164 30,694 52 ,941 111,500 74,029 141,570 114,639 109,191

521,067 535,467 324,077 519,445 370,065 436,059 549,031 468,646 416,493 719,234 543,859 456,359 87,719 37,968 8~.421 96,240 151,5981 282,233 195,23 1 322,354 306,917 1,153,689 229,703 112,986

853,653 1,389,520 1,140,975 1,581,981 1,546,356 11,732,892 1,623,985 2,170,002 242,373 2,371,720 1,663,187 1,711,371

8,164 13,294 11,460 9,0301 2,530 3,420 8,264 4,993 6,7741 18,328 11,800 7,910

.... 19,329 28,038 26,957 40,263 14,448 19,499 7,274 14,527 27,329 38,444 27,056 25,518

536,120 32,915,150
1,518,393 470,496
1,227,668 5,859,802 3,062,059 18, 028,015
105,967 288,682

Cheese

32,146 87,428 40,628 92,162 1 14,919 78,930 39,130 101,847 30,1291 130,880 36,225 103,677 788,101 ............ 66,704 200,798 77,752 211,098 123,978 192,775 117,014 167,805 83,556J 206;119 112,290 211,140 1,771,029

-.Including reports made by one Company sent every 60 days. **Includinl!" lard and lard compounds-.

j103,380,244