<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:coverage>United States, Georgia, Clarke County, Athens, 33.96095, -83.37794</dc:coverage><dc:creator>Frye, Brian L.</dc:creator><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:description>&lt;p&gt;What is fair use? In &lt;em&gt;Warhol v. Goldsmith&lt;/em&gt;, the Supreme Court held that licensing a painting based on a photograph wasn’t a transformative fair use, because the painting competed with the photograph in the market for images of the same person. This article tells the story of &lt;em&gt;Warhol v. Goldsmith&lt;/em&gt;, analyzes the opinion, and explains how it changed copyright doctrine. It also presents a theory of how appropriation artists can use the public domain to insulate themselves from liability for copyright infringement.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description><dc:description>Warhol -- Copyright -- Fair Use -- Art and Design -- Intellectual Property Law -- Law</dc:description><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights><dc:subject>Intellectual property lawyers</dc:subject><dc:subject>Intellectual property</dc:subject><dc:subject>University of Georgia. School of Law</dc:subject><dc:subject>Law--Study and teaching</dc:subject><dc:title>Art Wants to Be Free</dc:title><dc:type>Text</dc:type></oai_dc:dc>