<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:coverage>United States, Georgia, Clarke County, Athens, 33.96095, -83.37794</dc:coverage><dc:creator>Richards, Allison</dc:creator><dc:date>1993/2026</dc:date><dc:description>1</dc:description><dc:description>Trademark -- Parody -- Bad Spaniels -- Barbie -- License -- Intellectual Property Law</dc:description><dc:description>&lt;p&gt;This Note explores the blurred lines that now exist at the intersection of safeguarding trademark owners’ rights and protecting the public interest in freedom of expression, with a specific focus on the recent and unprecedented Supreme Court ruling in the ‘Bad Spaniels’&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;dog chew-toy trademark infringement case. The Supreme Court’s June 2023 decision in &lt;em&gt;Jack Daniel’s v. VIP Products&lt;/em&gt; prompts a critical analysis of the once-dominant &lt;em&gt;Rogers v. Grimaldi&lt;/em&gt; test, questioning its applicability in determining fair use and parody within the realm of trademark infringement. In examining what lies ahead for the evolving world of trademark law post-‘Bad Spaniels’, this Note draws connections to the cinematic landscape with a dissection of Greta Gerwig’s blockbuster film &lt;em&gt;Barbie &lt;/em&gt;(2023). The film serves as a compelling case study, demonstrating a trend in how major IP owners, such as Mattel, have begun strategically engaging in self-parody to bolster their brand through the licensing of IP rights. In the wake of the ‘Bad Spaniels’ ruling and its profound implications on both the legitimacy of the &lt;em&gt;Rogers&lt;/em&gt; test and trademark law more holistically, legal scholars are undoubtedly left in the dark as to the continued viability of the &lt;em&gt;Rogers &lt;/em&gt;framework and will certainly confront future nuances in the field of trademark law as a result. This Note asserts that perhaps this observed shift in trademark law following the ‘Bad Spaniels’ decision might offer assurances to big-player IP owners, suggesting greater protection for their marks in commercial cases, or alternatively, we will witness a surge in creative industries opting for increased licensing of IP rights, as shown in the case of Mattel’s fully-licensed &lt;em&gt;Barbie&lt;/em&gt; (2023) film, to steer clear of infringement issues entirely.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights><dc:subject>Intellectual property lawyers</dc:subject><dc:subject>Intellectual property</dc:subject><dc:subject>University of Georgia. School of Law</dc:subject><dc:subject>Law--Study and teaching</dc:subject><dc:title>Navigating the Trademark Parody Paradigm: Assessing the Impact of the ‘Bad Spaniels’ Decision on IP Owners, Creatives, and Self-Parody in the Post-Jack Daniel’s Era</dc:title><dc:type>Text</dc:type></oai_dc:dc>