<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:coverage>United States, Georgia, Clarke County, Athens, 33.96095, -83.37794</dc:coverage><dc:creator>Marie Amann, Diane</dc:creator><dc:date>2025-09-29</dc:date><dc:description>&lt;p&gt;The acceptance of commander’s responsibility is, in effect, acceptance of authority over persons permitted to kill. With that acceptance comes a heavy burden, grown out of practical and moral concerns and reflected in longstanding legal doctrine. At odds with this burden was the judgment of acquittal that the International Criminal Court Appeals Chamber entered in Bemba in 2018. An edited version of an essay originally appearing online as "In Bemba, Command Responsibility Doctrine Ordered to Stand Down (https://iccforum.com/responsibility#Amann)," this chapter argues for a statutory construction that would better serve the purposes of the ICC and the command responsibility doctrine.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description><dc:description>International Criminal Court -- international criminal law -- international humanitarian law -- children -- command responsibility -- modes of liability -- International Humanitarian Law -- International Law</dc:description><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights><dc:subject>Law--History</dc:subject><dc:subject>Constitutional law</dc:subject><dc:subject>Law--Study and teaching</dc:subject><dc:title>Weakening Command Responsibility Doctrine? The Bemba Appeals Judgment</dc:title><dc:type>Text</dc:type></oai_dc:dc>