<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:coverage>United States, Georgia, Clarke County, Athens, 33.96095, -83.37794</dc:coverage><dc:creator>Durkee, Melissa J.</dc:creator><dc:date>2020-01-01</dc:date><dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Originally posted on SSRN (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3717988). &lt;/p&gt;</dc:description><dc:description>&lt;p&gt;What role should non-state actors have in the work of international organizations? It is particularly fitting that this panel is titled “between participation and capture,” because the phrase calls up the conflicting values that animate this question. When we think of non-state actors “participating” in the work of international organizations, we think about open, transparent organizations that are receiving the benefit of diverse perspectives and expertise. We may associate this phrase with process, access, and legitimacy in governance. On the other hand, when we think about non-state actors “capturing” the agenda of international organizations, we have a conflicting set of mental images: We imagine corruption, mission-drift, and the erosion of legitimacy in global governance. Openness is both valuable and dangerous.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description><dc:description>international organizations -- international law -- global governance -- industry -- policymaking -- business -- lawmaking -- International Law</dc:description><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights><dc:subject>University of Georgia. School of Law</dc:subject><dc:subject>Law--Study and teaching</dc:subject><dc:subject>University of Georgia--Faculty</dc:subject><dc:title>Welcoming Participation, Avoiding Capture: A Five-Part Framework</dc:title><dc:type>Text</dc:type></oai_dc:dc>