SHERMAN'S HISTORICAL RAID. THE MEMOIRS IN THE LIGHT OF THE RECORD. A REVIEW BASED UPON COMPILATIONS FROM THE FILES OF THE WAR OFFICE. H. V. BOYNTOff, WASHINGTON CORRESPONDENT OP THE CINCINNATI GAZETTE. CINCINNATI: WILSTACH, BALDWIN & CO., 1875. ENTERED according to Act of Congress, in the year 1875, b "WILSTACH, BALDWIN & CO., In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. PREFACE. GENERAL SHEKMAN in the introduction to his Memoirs, says: " What is now offered is not designed as a history of the war, or even as a complete account of all the incidents in which the writer bore apart; but merely as his recollection of events, corrected by a reference to his own memoranda, which may assist tlie future historian when he conies to describe the whole, and account for the motives and reasons which influenced some of the actors in the grand drama of the war." The object of the present compilation, chiefly from the offi cial records, is to show wherein the Memoirs of General Sherman fall far short of presenting the correct history of many great events of which they treat; how much they lack of giving a complete account of incidents which they relate; how far the author's recollection, even when corrected by his own memoranda, is at fault; and to furnish the future historian with facts which will guard him against perpetuating the error and the injustice which pervade both volumes of the work. This book is a criticism upon Sherman as a general, only so far as the official records presented furnish such criticism. There is no attempt to contradict his statements, except as the records contradict them. Wherever these show that he has done grave injustice both to the living and to the dead, they are produced with as little comment as is needed to set them in connected order, and point out the refutations which they contain. While by this method of review, his mistakes only 'C3) 4 PKEFACE. are presented., there has been no intention to underrate the great and brilliant services which he performed. If these pages serve in any degree to correct error and do justice, where error uncorrected, and injustice done, affect the reputations of men or officers, who, either in humble position or exalted station, freely periled their lives, or laid them down for the country, the object for which they have been written will be accomplished. i CONTENTS. CHAP. ' PAGE I.--INTRODUCTORY .......... 7 II.--FOETS HENRY AND DONELSON--THE CREDIT WHICH SHERMAN DEFIES GBANT ........ 10 III.--SHILOH--THE QUESTION OF SURPRISE--UNFAIR TREATMENT OF BUELL AND ms ARMY ...... 25 IV.--ITTKA AND SECOND COBINTII--GENEBAL BOSECRANS MISREP RESENTED .......... 44 V.--CHICKASAW BAYOU--PLUNGING AN AKIMY THBOUGH SWAMPS AND AGAINST IMPBEGNABLS BLUFFS ... .54 VI.--CHATTANOOGA AND CHICKAMATIGA--INJUSTICE' TO EOSECBANS, THOMAS, AND THE AIMY OP THE CUMBEBLAND . . 65 VII.--THE MEBIDIAN CAMPAIGN--UNJIIST AKKAIGNMENT OF GENEBAL W. SOOY SMITH ....... 89 VIII.--EESACA--THE FAILURE THEBE ATTBIBUTED TO MCPHEKSON 96 IX.--KENESAW--UNGENEBOTIS TREATMENT op THOMAS; INACCTTBATE STATEMENTS . . . . . . . .107 X.--THE BATTLE OP ATLANTA AND ITS POLITICAL GENEBALS . 119 XI.--THE MARCH TO THE SEA--DID GBANT OB SHEEJIAN PLAN IT? . . . . . . . . . . .128 . XII.--HAEDBE'S ESCAPE FKOM SAVANNAH . . . . .162 XIII.--AFFAIRS AT NASHVILLE CRITICISED PKOM SAVANNAH . 173 (5) 6 CONTEXTS. CHAP. PAGE XIV.--THOMAS' TROUBLES AT NASHVILLE--THE HISTOBY OF HIS CONTEMPLATED KEMOVAL ....... 183 XV.--THE CAPTURED COTTON AT SAVANNAH--CHARACTER o~e THE ATTACK ON SECRETARY STANTON; THE JEFF. DAvis GOLD ........... 198 XVI.--BATTLE OF BENTONVILLE--THE CARELESS ADVANCE OP AN ARMY ........... 208 XVII.--THE TEEMS AVITH JOHNSTON--FIKST DEAFT MADE BY A CONFEDEBATE CABINET OpFICEB--FAC-SlMILS OF THE ORIGINAL .......... 219 XVIII.--OPINIONS OP JEFF. DAVIS' CABINET OFFICERS ON SHEBMAN'S TEEMS . . . . . . . . . 244 XIX.--SNEERS AT THE STAFF--THE CONTROVERSY WITH THE5 WAR DEPARTMENT OVEE THE CONTROL OF THE STAFF COEPS 259 XX.--CONCLUSION--THE CASE AGAINST THE MEMOIRS SUMMED UP 272 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY. GENEBAL SHEEMAN" is one of the most popular heroes of the late war. He has published his book after ten years of reflection upon events in which he bore most conspicuous and honorable part. During these years he has had uninterrupted access to the official records, including their most confidential papers; and in view of his high position, his opportunities for intimate knowledge and his popularity, what he has now written will, In spite of himself, be accepted as history by most readers who have not the means of testing his story by the records. It is believed that the extracts from these, pre sented in this volume, will prove sufficient to thoroughly fortify General Sherman in the claim that his book is not history, and so in part prevent the injustice which will be done to many distinguished officers and brave armies, if what he has written be received as accurate. ISTo criticisms of the strategy or the tactics of General Sherman will be found in these pages, except such as are plainly called forth by the records produced. High, as is the position which he occupies, great as is the authority with which he speaks, there is nothing in either which should afford him the least protection in the eyes of his countrymen, if he be found detracting from the merit or the fame which belongs to his associates. It might be pardoned in one who accomplished so much if ho had contented himself with moderately magnifying his own achievements, but when he goes beyond this, and claims the 8 INTRODUCTORY. merit which belongs to others, and steps still beyond and attempts to belittle the deeds of men in no respect his inferiors as generals or soldiers, and does cruel injustice to whole armies, the harmless vanity of the successful general becomes the gigantic wrong of the false historian. In a broad and high sense, the merit of every man who bore a musket faithfully, and slept finally in the grave of the "unknown," is as great as his. Sis Memoirs arraign the dead as well as the living. The files of the War Department aGbrd an answer for both. These orders, letters, telegrams, and reports, written either before, at the time, or immediately after the occurrence of the events ordered, in progress, or accomplished, photographed the truth, and in these the living and the dead find just defense. Here Thomas, McPherson, Stanton, and their companions, speak for themselves, *and vindicate themselves from unjust aspersions. Sere, in short, truth is made manifest, and exact justice done. The position which General Sherman occupies now, and that which he held during the war, will naturally, and of nec essity, give the force of history to what he has written^ in spite of any disclaimer he may make, and this historical character will attach to these Memoirs so long as they remain nncorrected by the ofScial record. For the benefit of comrades living, who can not conveni ently consult these records, and especially in vindication of such as are dead, it should be esteemed a duty by all who .'can reach the files, to search them carefully, with a view to over throw error and establish truth. So far as General Sherman?s book conforms to official papers, their production can only strengthen him; so far as it fails to agree with these, it not only deserves to be condemned, but its condemnation should be measured by the prominence of the author and his abund ant facilities for obtaining accurate information. Judged by the official record, the verdict must be that the work is intensely egotistical, unreliable, and cruelly unjust to nearly all his distinguished associates. Our erratic General INTRODUCTORY. 9 thrusts his pen recklessly through reputations which are as dear to the country as his own. He detracts from what right fully belongs to Grant; misrepresents and belittles Thomas; withholds justice from Buell, repeatedly loads failures for which he was responsible, now upon Thomas, now upon Schofield, now upon McPherson, and again upon the three jointly; is unjust in the extreme to Rosecrans; sneers at Logan and Blair; insults Hooker, and slanders Stanton. The salient points of the long story are readily found by those who either followed, or made themselves familiar by study with his campaigns. The reader turns naturally for explanations of the surprise and attending disgrace at Shiloh; the ill-judged and fatal assault at Chickasaw Bayou; the protest against the move by which "Vicksburg was captured; his failure to carry the point assigned him at the battle of Chattanooga; the escape of Johnston from Dalton and Resaca; the terrible mistake of the assault on Kenesaw; the plunging of his army, marching by the flank, into Hood's line of battle under the supposition that Atlanta was evacuated; the escape of the rebel army from Savannah; the careless and inexcus able periling and narrow escape of his own army at Bentonville; and lastly, the political surrender to Johnston at Raleigh: these are points upon which every reader desires light. But instead of gaining it, he finds that for most, the chief aim of the author seems to be to make the darkness more impenetrable. The succeeding chapters will treat, in their order, of the prominent movements and battles which General Sherman passes in review in his Memoirs, and in each of these the ver sion of his book will be compared with the facts as disclosed by the records now on file in the War Department. CHAPTER II. FORTS HENRY AND DONELSON----THE CREDIT WHICH SHER- MAST DENIES TO GRANT. OP the many remarkable things in General Sherman's book few will excite more comment than the deliberate attempt to take from General Grant the credit which belongs to him for several very important movements, and either assign at to others, as in the case of the move against Forts Henry';and Donelson, or appropriate it for himself, as is clone in claiming that he planned the "March to the Sea." No one general officer of his rank was under greater obligations to another throughout the war than Sherman to Grant, and on this account any unjust treatment of the latter deserves severer condemnation. General Sherman wrote his book while in Washington. A staff officer at his headquarters copied the rough manuscript daily. All the records of the "War Department,, including re ports, field telegrams, and all. other species of official corres pondence pertaining to every movement of which he wrote, and arranged for ready reference, were at his disposal. ":He had only to ask for them, or to send an orderly after them. A\d yet, incredible as it may seem, he scarcely availed himself of this collection of records, but wrote from memory and from some portions of these which happened to be in his own possession. In reviewing the campaign up the Cumberland and Tennes see Rivers, Sherman thus gives the credit to Halleck--or to "Cullum or I"--on page 219 of Vol. I: " Though it was midwinter, General Halleck was pushing liis preparations most vigorously, and surely he brought order out of chaos in St. Louis with (10) FORTS HENRY AND DONELSOX. 11 commendable energy. I remember one night sitting in his room, on the sec ond floor of the Planters' House, with him and General Cullum, his chief of staff, talking of things generally, and the subject then was of the much-talkedof 'advance,' as soon as the season would permit. Most people urged the movement down the Mississippi River; but Generals Polk and Pillow had a large rebel force with heavy guns in a very strong position at Columbus, Ky., about eighteen miles below Cairo; Commodore Foote had his gun-boat fleet at Cairo; and General U. S. Grant, who commanded the district, was collecting a large force at Paducah, Cairo, and Bird's Point. General Halleck had a map on his table, with a large pencil in his hand, and asked, ' Where is the rebel line ?' Cullum drew the pencil through Bowling Green, Forts Donelson and Henry, and Columbus, Ky. ' That is their line,' said Halleck; ' now where is the proper place to break it?' And either Cullum or I said, 'Naturally the center.' Halleck drew a line perpendicular to the other, near its middle, and it coincided nearly with the general course of -the Tennessee River, and he said,' That's the true line of operations.' " This occurred more than a month before General Grant began the move ment, and as he was subject to General Halleck's orders, I have always given General Halleck the full credit for that movement, which was skillful, suc cessful, and extremely rich in military results; indeed it was the first real success on our side in the civil war. The movement up the Tennessee began about the 1st of February, and Fort Henry was captured by the joint action of the navy under Commodore Foote, and the land forces under General Grant, on the 6th of February, 1862. About the same time General S. R. Curtis had moved forward from Rolla, and on the 8th of March, defeated the rebels under McCulloch, Van Dorn and Price at Pea Ridge. "As soon as Fort Henry fell, General Grant marched straight across to Fort Donelson, on the Cumberland River, invested the place, and, as soon as the gun-boats had come round from the Tennessee, and had bombarded the water front, he assaulted; whereupon Buckner surrendered the garrison of twelve thousand men, Pillow and ex-Secretary of War General Floyd having personally escaped across the river at night, occasioning a good deal of fun and criticism at their expense." If General Sherman had taken the trouble to send for Gen eral Halleck's letter-book for the time he mentions above, he would have found a letter to General McClellan, then Generalin-Chief of the army, showing that he (Halleck) had no settled plans for a movement up the Cumberland and the Tennessee, and only general ideas of it at most, and that he did not ex pect such a movement could take place till long after the time General Grant actually captured both Forts Henry and Donel son, and effectually opened these rivers. 12 FORTS HENRY AND DONELSON. This letter, lying at General Shopman's very elbow, is dated at Headquarters Department of the Missouri,, St. Louis, Jan uary 20, 1862. The following extracts are sufficient to settle the question at issue: I have received no information in respect to the general plan of campaign, and therefore feel much hesitation in recommending any line of operations for these and other troops which I may be able to withdraw from Missouri. Of' course this line must be subordinate to some general plan. I take it for granted General, that what has heretofore been done has been the result of "political policy rather than military strategy, and that the want of success on our part is attributable to the politicians rather than to the generals. * * I am aware General, that you are in no way responsible for this; these movements have been governed by political expediency, and in many cases directed by politicians in order to subserve party interest. * s ^ But is it not possible, with the new Secretary of War, to introduce a different pol icy, and make our future movements in accordance with military principles. On this supposition I venture to make a few suggestions in regard to opera tions in the West. '~ The idea of moving down the Mississippi by steam, is in my opinion im practicable, or at least premature. It is not the proper line of operations, at least now. A much more feasible plan is to move up the Cumberland and Tennessee, making Nashville the present objective point. This would threaten Columbus, and force the abandonment of Bowling Green. * * * * This line of the Cumberland and the Tennessee is the great central line of the Western theater of war, with the Ohio below the mouth of Green Siver as the base, and two great navigable rivers extending far into the theater of op erations. But the plan should not be attempted without a large force--not less than sixty thousand effective men. * * The main central line will also require the withdrawal of all available troops from this State, also those in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Wisconsin, and Ohio, which are armed, or still to be armed, and also the transfer to that route, or near it, of all the Kentucky troops not required to secure the line of Green River. 1;v The force at Cairo and on the Ohio River below the mouth of Green River is now about fifteen thousand. Seven regiments have just been ordered there from Missouri. By the middle or last of February I hope to send fifteen thousand more. If thirty thousand or forty thousand can be added from the sources indicated, these will be sufficient for holding Cairo, Fort Holt, and Paducah, and form the column proposed. * * * ":|i These suggestions are hastily written out, but they are the result of much anx ious inquiry and mature deliberation. I am confident that the plan, if properly carried out, will produce important results. I also believe it to be feasible. I have not designated any particular line or lines of movement; that must PORTS HENRY AND DONELSON. 13 be a matter for further study, if the general idea should be approved. Per- liaps the main column should move from Smithland, between the rivers, by Dover, etc. Perhaps the line east of the Cumberland, or that west of -the Tennessee, would be preferable. These questions, however, are matters easily determined. *s* H. W. HALLECK, Major-General. As General Grant formally proposed, on January 28th, to General Halleck to take Fort Henry, captured it on the 6th of February, moved on Fort Douelson the next day, and took it on the 16th of February, it'will be seen from the above letter, that General Halleck, at the time Grant had accom plished this work and opened both rivers, did not expect to have men enough by thirty or forty thousand to begin the vague movement he had in his mind. But if General Slierman had searched the records with the least care he would have found that even these identical ideas of Halleck, about a move on a line perpendicular to one join ing Bowling Green and Columbus were suggested by General Buell. For the records show that as early as November of the pre ceding year, Buell had proposed to General McClellan to move around the right flank of the rebels at Bowling Green, and advance on Nashville, while supplies and troops from Halleck should move up the Cumberland, guarded by the fleet. General McClellan urged cooperation on Halleck, who delayed answer ing dispatches for some time. Finally, on January 3d, at the request of President Lincoln, General Buell wrote General Halleck, setting forth most of the ideas that Halleck afterward submitted as his own to McClellan, and which are given above in the letter dated January 20th. The records give a connected history of the discussion at this time between the authorities at Washington, and Generals Buell and Halleck. General BUELL, Louisville, Ky. WASHINGTON, D. C., December 31, 1861. General McClellan is sick. Are General Halleck and yourself in concert? When you move on Bowling Green, what hinders it being reenforced from Columbus? Answer. A. LIHCOLN. 14 FORTS HENRY AND DONELSON. To A. LINCOLN, President. LOUISVILLE, KY., January 1, 1862. There is no arrangement between General Halleck and myself. I have been informed by General McClellan that he would make suitable disposition for concerted action. There is nothing to prevent Bowling Green being reenforced from Colum bus, if a military force is not brought to bear on the latter place. D. C. BuEUj, Brigadier-General. Tn President LINCOLN. LOUISVILLE, 11 P. M., January 1, 1S62. I have already telegraphed General lialleck with a view to arranging a concert of action between us, and am momentarily expecting his answer. D. C. BUELL, Brigadier General. General HALLECK, St. Louis. WASHINGTON, D. C., December 31, 1861. ? General McClellan is sick. Are General Buell and yourself in concert ? When he moves on Bowling Green, what hinders it being reenforced from Columbus ? A simultaneous move by you on Columbus might prevent, i^. Answer. A. LINCOLN. HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE MISSOURI, ST. Louis, January 1, 1862. A. LINCOLN, President U. S. A., Washington. I have never received a word from General Buell. I am not ready to co operate with him ; hope to do so in a few weeks. Have written fully on this subject to General McClellan. Too much haste will ruin everything here. H. W. HALLECK, Major-General. Major- General HALLECK, St. Louis. LOUISVILLE, KY., January J. 1862. I understand General McClellan is sick. Has any concerted action been arranged for us? If not, can any be arranged between us? If possible, it-is desirable it should be done speedily. V D. C. BUELL, Brigadier-General commanding. HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE MISSOURI, ] ST. Louis, January 2, 1862. Brigadier- General BUELL, Louisville. I have had no instructions respecting cooperation. All my available troops are in the field, except those at Cairo and Paducah, which are barely sufficient to threaten Columbus, etc. A few weeks hence I hope to be able to render you very material assistance, but now a withdrawal of my troops from this State is almost impossible. Write me fully. H. W. HALLECK, Major-General. .FOBT3 HENRY AND DONELSON. 15 HEADQCAETEES DKPAETMENT OF THE OHIO, ] LOUISVILLE, January Z, 1862. J General W. H. HALLECK, Commanding Department of the Missouri. GENERAL: I received your dispatch, and, with more delay than I meant, proceed to the subject of it, in compliance with your request, and I may add also, at the wish of the President. I do not underrate the difficulties in Missouri, but I think it is not extrava gant to say that the great power ol the rebellion in the West is arranged on a front, the flanks of which are Columbus and Bowling Green, and the center about where the railroad between those points crosses the Tennessee and Cumberland Kivers, including Nashville and the fortified points below. It is, I have no doubt, within bounds to estimate their force on that line at eighty thousand men, including a column about Somerset, Ky. In rear of their right flank it is more. Of their force, forty thousand may be set down as at Bowling Green, twenty thousand at Columbus--though you, doubtless, have more information on that point than I have--and twenty thousand at the center. Considering the railroad facilities, which enable the enemy to concentrate in a few hours on any single point of this front, you will at once see the importance of a com bined attack on its center and flanks, or at least of demonstrations which may be converted into real attacks, and fully occupy, the enemy on the whole front. It is probable that you may have given the subject, as far as Columbus and the center are concerned, more attention than I have. With reference to the former, at least, I can make no more than the general suggestion already expressed, that it should be fully occupied. The attack upon the center should be made by two gun-boat expeditions', with, I should say. twenty thousand men on the two rivers. They should, of course, be organized with reference to the depth of water in the rivers; and whether they should be of equal or unequal strength, would depend upon that and other considerations, and can hardly be determined until the moment of departure. The mode of attack must depend on the strength of the enemy at the several points and the features of the localities. It will be of the first importance to break the railroad communication, and, if possible, that should be done by columns moving rapidly to the bridges over the Cumberland and Tennessee. The former probably would not be reached at first, being some thirty-one miles above the first principal battery that I know of at Dover. The other is eighteen miles above Fort Henry--the first I know of on the Tennessee. If the expeditions should not be strong enough to do the work alone, they should establish themselves firmly at the nearest possible point, and remain at least until they ascertained that reinforcements from my col umns, or some other source, would not reach them. By uniting, they could establish themselves permanently under the protection of the gun-boats. I say this much rather to lay the subject before you than to propose any iefinite plan for your side. Whatever is done should be done speedily, within 16 FORTS HENRY AND DONELSON. a few days. The work will become more difficult every day. Please let me hear from you at once. Very truly yours, D. C. BTJELL, Brigadier-General commanding. Four days later General Buell telegraphed as follows: General HALLECK, St. Louis. LOUISVILLE, January 7, 1862. I am telegraphed by the President. Can you fix a day for concerted action ? D. C. BUELL, Brigadier- General. To which Halleck replied: General BTJELL, Louisville. ST. Louis, January 7, 1862. Designate a day for a demonstration. I can do nothing more. See my letter of yesterday. H. W. HALLECK, Major-General, The letter thus referred to was as follow; HEADQUARTERS DEEPPAARRTMENT op THE MISSOURI,) ST. Louis, January 6, 1862. Brigadier- General D. C. BTJELL, Louisville, Ky. GEXEKAL : I have delayed writing to you for several days in hopes of get ting some favorable news from the South-west. The news received to-day, however, is unfavorable, it being stated that Price is making a stand near Springfield, and that all our available forces will be required to dislodge and drive him out. My last advices from Columbus represent that the enemy has about twenty- two thousand men there. I have only about fifteen thousand at Cairo, Fort Holt, and Paducah, and after leaving guards at these places I could not send into the field over ten or eleven thousand. Moreover, many of these are very imperfectly armed. * , Under these circumstances, it would be madness for me to attempt any serious operation against Camp Bsauregard or Columbus. Prooably, in the, course of a few weeks, I will be able to send additional troops to Cairo and 1 Paducah to cooperate with you, but at present it is impossible; and it seem? to me that, if you deem such cooperation necessary to your success, your movement on Bowling Green should be delayed. I know nothing of the plan of campaign, never having received any information on the subject; but it strikes me that to operate from Louisville and Paducah, or Cairo, against an enemy at Bowling Green, is a plain case of exterior lines, like that of McDowell and Patterson, which, unless eaeh of the exterior columns is superior to the enemy, leads to disaster ninety-nine times in a hundred. Very respectfully, your obedient servant, H. W. HALLECK, Major-General. FORTS HENRY AND DONELSON. 17 On the 6th of January McClellan wrote to Buell as follows: "Halleck, from his own accounts, will not soon be in condi tion to support properly a movement up the Cumberland." And again on the 13th: "Halleck is not yet in condition to afford you the support you need when you undertake the movement on Bowling Green." On the 10th of January Halleck telegraphed Buell: HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE MISSOURI, 1 ST. Louis, January 10, 1862. j General BTJELL, Louisville. Troops at Cairo and Paducah are ready for a demonstration on Mayfleld, Murray, and Dover. Six additional regiments will be there next week. Fix the day when you wish a demonstration; but put it off as long as possible, in order that I may increase the strength of the force. H. W. HALLECK, Major-General. On the same day Halleck telegraphed Grant: "Reenforcements are receiving arms. Delay your movements until I telegraph. Let me know when the channel is clear." And on the next day: " I can hear nothing from Buell, so fix your own time for the advance. Three regiments will come down Monday." Subsequently the following passed between Halleck and Buell: ST. Louis, February 2, 1862. Brigadier- General BtrELL, Louisville, ICy. GENERAL : Yours of the 30th ultimo is received. At present it is only proposed to take and occupy Fort Henry and Dover, and, if possible, cut the railroad from Columbus to Bowling Green. * * * But it will take some time to get troops ready to advance far south of Fort Henry. Very respectfully, your obedient servant, H. W. HALLECK, Major General. To General BUELL, Louisville. ST. Louis, February 1, 1862. You say you regret that we could not have consulted on this matter earlier. So do I most sincerely. I had no idea of commencing the movement before the 15th or 20th ingt., until I received General McClellan's telegram about the reinforcements sent to Tennessee and Kentucky by Beauregard. Although 18 FORTS HENRY AND DONELSOX. not ready, I deemed it important to move instantly. I believe I was right. Fort Henry most be held at all hazards. H. W. HALLECK, Major-General. From all of which it will appear that General Halleck had not originated, up to the time General Grant was ready to execute it, any such move as the latter was anxious and waiting to make, and General McClellan did not even con sider Halleck as prepared to afford a support. As a matter of fact. General Grant began preparations for the move he had in contemplation the latter part of Decem ber, and consequently before the date of the correspondence between President Lincoln and Generals Eucll and Halleck. Nor is there any thing in the records to indicate that General McClellan, the President, or General Euell com municated with General Grant upon the subject of a move up the Tennessee or Cumberland. In iact, as he was subordinate to General Halleck, they would not have written him directly. On the 6th of January, 1862, General Grant, then in com mand at Cairo, telegraphed to General Halleck ibr permission to visit St. Louis, for the purpose of obtaining authority from General Halleck to move against Forts Henry and Donelson. At nrst, leave to visit headquarters was refused; but on the 22d of January it was granted, and on the 23d Grant started for St. Louis, called on Halleck, and suggested a move on Fort Henry. According to Badeau, who wrote by authority, when Grant " attempted to broach the subject, Halleck silenced him so quickly and sharply that Grant said no mo^e on the matter, and went back to Cairo with the idea that his commander thought him guilty of proposing a great military blunder." Grant, however, had been quietly engaged for three weeks In preparing for this move, had studied it carefully, and quite set his heart upon it. He was the more convinced of its fea sibility, from a report of a partial rcconnoissance of Fort Henry, made by General C. F. Smith, and forwarded to Gen eral Halleck on January 24th. FORTS HENRY AND DONELSON. 19 Upon reaching Cairo he telegraphed Halleck: Major- General H. "W. HALLECK, St. Louis, Mo. CAIRO, January 28, 1S62. With permission I will take Fort Henry on the Tennessee, and establish and hold a large camp there. U. S. GRANT, Brigadier-General. On the same day Commodore Foote, then in command of the gun-boats in that section, and in full accord with General Grant, also telegraphed Halleck as follows: Major-General H. W. HALLECK, St. Louis, Mo. CAIKO, January 28, 1862. Commanding General Grant and myself are of opinion that Fort Henry, on the Tennessee River, can be carried with four iron-clad gun-boats and troops to permanently occupy. Have we your authority to move for that purpose when ready? A. H. FOOTB, Flag Officer On the 29th General Grant wrote Halleck as follows: HRAPQUAARETERES DISTRICT OF CAIRO, 1 CAIRO, January 29, 1862. Major- General IT. W. HALLECK, St. Louis Mo. In view of the large force now concentrating in this district, and the present feasibility of the plan, I would respectfully suggest the propriety of subduing Fort Henry, near the Kentucky and Tennessee line, and holding the position. If this is not done soon, there is but little doubt but that the defenses on both the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers will be materially strengthened. From Fort Henry it will be easy to operate, either on the Cumberland, only twelve miles distant, Memphis, or Columbus. It will, besides, have a moral effect upon our troops to advance them toward the rebel States. The advan tages of this move are as perceptible to the General commanding as to myself, therefore, further statements are unnecessary. U. S. GRANT, Brigadier-General. To these dispatches of Grant and Commodore Foote, Hal leck replied: HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMIENXT oOFr THE MISSSOOUURRII,,]) ST. LomBIsS, January 29, 1862. j Brigadier- General GKANT, Cairo. Make your preparations to take and hold Fort Henry. I will send you written instructions by mail. H. W. HALLECK, Major-General. 20 FORTS HENRY AND DONELSON. Commodore FoOTE, Cairo. HEAIXJUAHTEHS DKPAETJIENT op THE MISSOURI, 1 ST. LOTJIS, January 29, 1862. j I am waiting for General Smith's report on the road from Smithland to Fort Henry. As soon as that is received will give orders. In the meantime have every thing ready. H. W. HALLECK, Major- General On the 1st of February permission to make the movement arrived from Halleck, and on the 2d Grant began the cam paign with seventeen thousand men, less than one-third the force Halleck had in mind for the operations he thought might be carried on along this general line. On the 8th of February Fort Henry was taken, and on the 8th Grant tele graphed Halleck that he should immediately take Fort !p>onelson and return to Fort Henry. On the 16th he had accomplished the work, and the cam paign for which Hallcck wanted "not less than sixty thousand effective men," thirty thousand of which he hoped to have " by the middle or last of February," had been made a suc cess by Grant with a force of seventeen thousand men and four gun-boats. General Sherman closes the chapter in which he treats of the movements on Forts Henry and Donelson as follows: " From the time I had left Kentucky General Buell had really made no substantial progress; though strongly reenforced, beyond even what I had asked for, General Albert Sidney Johnston had remained at Bowling Green until his line was broken at Henry and Donelson, when lie let go Bowling Green and fell back hastily to Nashville, and on BuelPs approach he- did not even tarry there, but continued his retreat southward." V Three chapters previous to the one containing this unkind allusion to General Buell, General Sherman, writing of his selection as Superintendent of the Louisiana Military College, says : " For this honorable position I was indebted to Major D. C. Buell and General G. Mason Graham, to whom I have made full and due acknowledgment." While the General of the army should have felt himself, by virtue of his position and opportunities for obtaining exact FORTS HENRY AND DONBLSON. 21 information, under strong obligations to correctly present all matters of which he wrote, he was thus peculiarly bound to treat General Buell with common fairness. But in the above extract he wholly ignores the fact that after he left Ken tucky, General Buell had organized and made efficient the Army of the Ohio, which, from that time forward, under Buell, Eosecrans, and Thomas, held high rank among the armies of the Union. A portion of it under General Buell's directions and the immediate command of General Thomas, had broken the Confederate right at Mill Springs, killed the commander of its army, captured its fortified camp, with all its artillery, several thousand stand of small arms, transporta tion, and stores, and there achieved a victory which at the time was regarded by the nation as a most important one. It was the Western Bull Run for the Confederacy. General Thomas, in his report upon the battle, thus speaks of the captures: " On reaching the intrenchments we found that the enemy had abandoned every thing and retired during the night. Twelve pieces of artillery, with their caissons packed with ammunition, one battery wagon and two forges, a large amount of small arms, mostly the old flint-lock muskets, and ammuni tion for the same, one hundred and fifty or sixty wagons, and upward of one thousand of horses and mules, a large amount of commissary stores, intrench ing tools, and camp and garrison equipage, fell into our hands. A correct list of all the captured property will be forwarded as soon as it can be made up and the property secured. "The steam and ferry-boats having been burned by the enemy on their re treat, it was found impossible to cross the river and pursue them; besides, their command was completely 'demoralized, and retreated with great haste and in all directions, making their capture in any numbers quite doubtful if pursued." Besides this, General Buell had contributed a considerable force to aid General Grant in the movement on Fort Donelson, and Bowling Green was evacuted in the face of an advance upon it by General Buell, and before Fort Dpnelson had fallen. But whether any "substantial progress" had been made by 22 FOETS HENRY AND DONELSON. General Buell after General Sherman left Kentucky, vail best appear from portions of three letters written by General Sher man while in Kentucky, the first two bearing date about ten clays before he relieved General Robert Anderson in com mand, and the third about a week before he was in turn relieved by General Buell. Mulclraugh's Hill is about forty miles south of Louisville, on the railroad to Nashville, and was one of the first points of consequence occupied 011 that line by the Union forces. General Sherman gives the follow ing account of the movement upon it, and the condition of affairs after his troops were established there : HEADQUARTERS MULDRAUGH'S HILL, ) September '27, 3S61v. j Captain OLIVER D. GHEES, Adjutant-General. - Sift: When I left Louisville on the cars in charge of the Home Guards, followed by Rosseau's brigade, I understood my orders to be to station parties along the road at all the bridges, secure the road and occupy Muldraugh's Hill. * * * ' This is not an isolated hill, but a range separating the waters of the Boiling Fork of Salt Creek and Green River, the ascent from the north being very abrupt, and the descent to the south being very gradual. Our position is far from being a strong one when held against a superior force. Eoads will enable the enemy with cavalry to pass round us and cut off our communications and starve us out. I have no safe line of retreat, but must stand our ground let what will happen. Our opponents, led by General Buckner, who is familiar with the ground, are now supposed to be along the railroad from Green River to Bowling Green. Their forces are variously estimated from seven thousand to twenty thousand men; and, I doubt not, they have fifteen thousand, some well ^and some poorly armed, but all actuated by the one purpose to destroy us. I" am fully alive to the danger of our position and to all its disadvantages, especially that of supplies. Our provisions have been hauled up the rugged valley 61 Clear Creek by hired wagons, and by some which were brought along by the Thirty-ninth Indiana. We can barely supply our wants, and are liable at any moment to have these wagons seized. The reason I came to Muldraugh's Hill was for effect. Had it fallen into the hands of our enemy the cause would have been lost, and even with it in our possession for a week nobody has rallied to our support. I expected, as we had reason to, that the people of Kentucky would rally to our support, but, on the contrary, none have joined us, while .hundreds, we are told, are going to Bowling Green. The railroad from Bowling Green toward us is broken at Nolin, ten miles off, and and at another trestle beyond some seven miles. I doubt if this was done by FORTS HENBY AND DONELSON. 23 Buckner's orders, but rather by the small parties of guards left to protect them and who are scared at our approach. I have from time to time given you telegraphic notice of these events, and must now await the develop ments We should have here at least twenty thousand men, but that has been an imposibility. Xruly yours, W. T. SHEKMAX", Brigadier-General. From this first letter it appears how "the cause would have been lost" if the enemy had gained Muldraugh's Hill. The second one shows how the conduct of the Union troops after securing the Hill, was about to " ruin our cause." HEADQUARTERS MULDHATOH'S HILL, ) September 28, 1861. j General ROBERT AJTDEKSOJT, Louisville, Rj. DEAR GENERAL: I am sorry to report that in spite of my orders and entreaties, our troops are committing depredations that will ruin our cause. Horses and wagons have been seized, cattle, sheep, hogs, chickens, taken by our men, some o whom wander for miles around. I am doing and have done all in my power to stop this, but the men are badly disciplined and give little heed to my orders or those of their own regimental officers. We have received no accessions from the country, and I have only a few weak, scattered camps, such as Curran Pope's at New Haven, and General Ward's at Green- burg. Of course, the chief design of our occupying Muldraugh's Hill was to afford an opportunity for the people to organize and arm, but I can not learn that such is the case. A great many people come into our camps, take the oath of allegiance and go away. I have no doubt spies could enter our camp and we can not con ceal the strength of our command. Although Buckner is not at Green Biver he has many locomotives and cars there, and can march from there in a day or a day and a half, and I feel uneasy about our communications. The Home Guards have all returned, leaving us whom they deem outsiders alone, and the whole country would raise round about us, leaving us with an ambush all the way. To be effective, a force here should be very large, too large to be attacked in position. As to us we could make a good fight, but would soon be starved out. I know how you are situated and will do my best, and only want you not to draw too strong inferences from the destruc tion of the Green Biver bridges. This was, no doubt, intended as an obstruc tion to our advance, until other designs of their's were completed, but as soon as Buckner is ready, he will surely advance on Elizabethtown where lie lives. I hear nothing of Thomas' moves or those at Paducah. Our lines are broken and I have sent down to examine. W. T. 24 FOETS HEXRY AND DONELSOtf. The third letter was written a few days before he was relieved by General Buell: HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE CUMBERLAND, ) LOUISVILLE, November 6, 1861. j General L. THOMAS, Adjutant-General. SIR : General McClellan telegraphs me to report to him daily the situation of affairs here. * * * * We should have here a very large force, sufficient to give confidence to the Union men of the ability to do what should be done--possess ourselves of all the State. But all see and feel we are brought to a stand still, and this produces doubt and alarm. With our present force it would be simple madness to cross Green River, and yet hesitation may be as fatal. In like manner the other columns are in peril, not so much in front as rear; the railroads over which our stores must pas? being much exposed. I have the Nashville Railroad guarded by three regi ments, yet it is far from being safe, and the moment actual hostilities com mence these roads will be interrupted and we will be in a dilemma. To meet this in part, I have put a cargo of provisions at the mouth of Salt, River guarded by two regiments. All these detachments weaken the main force and endanger the whole. Do not conclude, ss before, that I exaggerate-, the facts. They are as stated, and the future looks as dark as possible. It'would be better if some man of sanguine mind were here, for I am forced to order according to my convictions. Yours truly, W. T. SHERMAS", Brigadier-General commanding. In the light of these letters it would seem as if there had really been most "substantial progress" under General Buell after General Sherman left Kentucky. CHAPTER III. SHILOH--TEE QUESTION OF SURPRISE; UNFAIR TREATMENT OF QUELL ASTD BIS ARMY. the extended discussions over the events preceding and attending the battle of Shiloh, in some of which contro versies General Sherman himself participated, and all of which have called out extracts from the official records, that, taken together, effectually settle some of the earlier questions in dispute, it must surprise all readers of the Memoirs to 3nd their author ignoring these records, and at this late day pre senting many inaccurate statements in regard to the operations about Pittsburgh Landing. The main questions at issue have always been whether the TJnion army was surprised at Shiloh j if it was, who was mainly responsible, and how far Bucll's army can lay claim to having made the victory possible? General Sherman labors ingeniously, but inaccurately, as the of&cial records show, to relieve himself from responsi bility :fbr it, and even attempts to create the impression that there was no general surprise. Ever since this battle, most who believed that the Union army was unexpectedly attacked on that occasion, have laid the chief load of responsibility upon General Grant, and he through all these years has made no cJTbrt to shift the burden. But now it will appear through the records which these Memoirs have called out, that General Shcrman was mainly responsible, since he was encamped in advance; his division, as he wrote to the DmZecZ /S%aZea &)Tice j-fizyazme in 1865, "forming as it were the outlying picket," so that he was jn charge of the picket front looking toward (25) 26 SHILOII. the roads over which an enemy must approach; and while not technically in command of the entire camp, in the absence of General Grant, whose headquarters were at Savannah, some twelve miles distant, he was constantly treated, trusted, and consulted by General Grant, as if he were the senior officer at the front. General Sherman, holding steadily till the last, and against all evidence, to the belief that no immediate attack was probable, by impressing his convictions upon General Grant, misled the latter as to the real condition of amiirs along the front, and thus did the author of the Memoirs become primarily responsible for the surprise. The records disclose both the blindness which prevailed as to the real situation, and where the responsibility for itJnainly rested, and some comparison of these, with the statements of the Memoirs, will set the case in a clear light. ^ On the 14th of March General C. ?. Smith, then in Two succeeding efforts to secure a new position fro.m which to attack failed, and two days afterward, as Pemberton was moving reinforcements into Vicksburg and out to Sherman's front, the expedition was abandoned, with a total loss of about two thousand men in killed and wounded. On returning to the mouth of the Yazoo, Slierrnan found McClernand there with orders to relieve him. He thus concludes his account: "Still my relief, on the heels of a failure, raised the usual cry at the North of 'repulse, failure, and bungling.' There was no bungling on my part, for I never worked harder, or with more intensity of purpose in my life; and General Grant, long after, in his report of the operations of the siege of Vicksburg, gave us all full credit for the skill of the movement, and described the almost impregnable nature of the ground; and although in all my official reports I assumed the whole responsibility, I have ever felt that, had General Morgan promptly and skillfully sustained the lead of Frank Blair's brigade on that day, we should have broken the rebel line, and effected a lodgment on the hills behind Vicksburg. General Frank Blair was outspoken and indig nant against Generals Morgan and DeCourcey at the time, and always abused me for assuming the whole blame. But had we succeeded, we might have found ourselves in a worse trap, when General Pemberton was at full liberty to turn his whole force against us." And so, according to General Sherman himself, bad as the assault at Chickasaw Bayou turned out to be, success CHICKASAW BAYOU. 59 might have proved still worse. But had an army of forty-two thousand men gained a position in rear of Vicksburg, it might, with the cooperation of the gun-boats, have held its own against Pemberton and all the forces he then could bring. JSTo amount of blame distributed among division command ers can conceal the recklessness with which an army was pushed through swamps and bayous against inaccessible bluffs, and the best answers to all Sherrnan's unjust attacks upon officers who fought with him there, are found in his own report of the action: HEADQUARTERS RIGHT WING THIRTEENTH ARMY CORPS, ) CAMP, iliLLiKEN's BEKD, LA., January 3, 1863. j Colonel J. H. KAWLINS, Assistant Adjutant-General to Major-General GBAST, Oxford, Miss., at last reliable accounts. SIB : * * * As soon as we reached the point of debarkation DeCourcey's, Stuart's, and Blair's "brigades were sent forward in the direction of Vicksburg about three miles, and on the 27th the whole army was disem barked and moved out in four columns: Steele's above the mouth of Chickasaw Bayou; Morgan, with Blair's brigade of Steele's division, below the same bayou; Morgan L. Smith on the main road from Johnson's plantation to Vicksburg, with orders to bear to his left, so as to strike the bayou about a mile south of where Morgan was ordered to cross it; and A. J. Smith's divis ion keeping on the main road. All the heads of columns met the enemy's pickets and drove them toward Vicksburg. During the night of the 27th the ground was reeonnoitered as well as possible, and it was found as difficult as it could possibly be from nature and art. Immediately in our front was a bayou, passable only at two points, on a narrow levee, or a sand bar, which was perfectly commanded by the enemy's sharp-shooters that lined the levee, or parapet, on its opposite bank. Behind this was an. irregular strip of bench, or table-land, on which were constructed a series of rifle pits and batteries, and behind that a high, abrupt range of hills, whose scarred sides were marked all the way up with rifle trenches, and the crowns of the principal hills presented heavy batteries. The county road, leading from Vicksburg to Yazoo City, runs along the foot of these hills, and answered an admirable purpose to the enemy as a cov ered way, along which he moved his artillery and infantry promptly to meet . us at any point at which we attempted to pass this difficult bayou. Never theless that bayou, with its levee parapets, backed by the lines of rifle pits, batteries, and frowning hills, had to be passed before we could reach terra firina, and meet our enemy on any thing like fair terms. Steele, in his progress, followed substantially an old levee back from the Yazoo to the foot of the hills north of Thompson's Lake, but found that, in 60 CHICK AS AW BAYOU. order to reach the hard land, he would have to cross a long corduroy cause way, with a battery enfilading it, others cross-firing it, with a similar line of rifle pits and trenches before decribed. He skirmished with the enemy on the morning of the 28th. whilst the other columns were similarly engaged, but on close and critical examination, of the swamp and causeway in front, with the batteries and rifle pits well manned, he came to the conclusion that it was impossible for him to reach the county road without a fearful sacrifice. As soon as he reported this to me officially, and that he could not cross over from his position to the one occupied by our center, I ordered him to retrace his steps and cross back in steamboats to the south-west side of Chickasaw Bayou, and to support General Morgan, which he accomplished during the night of the 28th, arriving in time to support him and take part in the assault of the 29th. General Morgan's division was evidently on the best of all existing roads from Yazoo River to the firm land. He had attached to his train the pon toons with which to make a bridge, in addition to the ford, or crossing, W;)dch I knew was in his front, the same by which the enemy's pickets had retreated. This pontoon bridge was, during the night, placed across a bayou supposed to be the main bayou, hut which turned out to be an inferior one, and it was, therefore, useless; but the natural crossing remained, and I ordered him to cross over with his division, and carry the line of works to the summit of the hill by a determined assault. On the 28th a heavy fog, during the early part of the day, enveloped the whole country, hut General Morgan advanced DeCourccy's brigade and engaged the enemy. Heavy firing of artillery and infantry were sustained, and his column moved on until he encountered the real bayou. This again checked his progress, and was not passed until the next day. At the point where Morgan L. Smith's division reached the bayou was a narrow sand spit, with abattis thrown down by the enemy on our side, with the same deep and boggy bayou, with its levee parapet, and system of cross bat teries and rifle pits on the other side. To pass it by the flank would have been utter destruction, for the head of column would have been swept away as fast as it presented itself above the steep bank. General M. L. Smith, whilst reconnoitering it early on the morning of the 28th, was, during the,, heavy fog, shot in the hip by a chance rifle bullet, which disabled him, and " lost to me one of my best and most daring leaders, and to the Unites States the services of a practical soldier and enthusiastic patriot. I can not exag gerate the loss to me personally and officially of General Morgan L. Smith at that critical moment. His wound in the hip disabled him, and he was sent to the boat. General D. Stuart succeeded to his place and to the execution of his orders. General Stuart studied the nature of the ground in his front and saw all its difficulties, but made the best possible disposition to pass over his division, the Second, whenever he heard General Morgan engaged. To his right, General A. J. Smith had placed Burbridge's brigade of his division next to Stuart, with orders to make rafts and cross over a portion of CHICKASAW BAYOU. 61 his men; to dispose his artillery so as to fire at the enemy across the bayou, and produce the effect of a diversion. His other brigade, Landrum's, occupied a key position on the main road, with pickets and supports pushed well for ward into the tangled abattis, within three-fourths of a mile of the enemy's forts, and in plain view of the city of Vicksburg. Our boats still lay at our place of debarkation, covered by the gun-boats and by four regiments of infantry, one of each division. Such was the dispo sition of our forces during the night of the 28th. The enemy's right was a series of batteries or forts, seven miles above us on the Yazoo, at the first bluff, near Snyder's house, called Drumgould's Bluff; his left, the fortified city of Vicksburg; and his line connecting these was near fourteen miles in extent, and was a natural fortification, strengthened by a year's labor of thousands of negroes, directed by educated and skilled officers. My plan was by a prompt and concentrated movement to break the center, near Chickasaw Creek, at the head of a bayou of the same name; and once in position to turn to the right (Vicksburg), or left (Drumgould's Bluff), according to information then obtained. I supposed their organized forces to amount to about fifteen thousand, which could be reenforced at the rate of about four thousand a day, provided General Grant did not occupy all the attention of Pemberton's forces at Grenada, or Kosecrans those of Bragg in Tennessee. Not one word could I hear from General Grant, who was supposed to be pushing south, or of General Banks, supposed to be ascending the Missis sippi. Time being every thing to us, I determined to assault the hills in front of Morgan on the morning of the 29th; Morgan's division to carry the position of the hills, Steele's division to support him and hold the county road. I had placed General A. J. Smith in command of his own division (First) and that of M. L. Smith (Second), with orders to cross on the sand spit, under mine the steep bank of the bayou on the further side, and carry at all events the levee parapets and first line of rifle pits to prevent a concentration on Morgan. It was near twelve o'clock (noon) when Morgan was ready, by which time Blair's and Thayer's. brigades of Steele's division were up with him and took part in the assault, and Hovey's brigade was close at hand. All the troops were massed as close as possible, and all our supports were well in hand. The assault was made and a lodgment effected on the hard table-land near the county road, and the heads of the assaulting columns reached different points of the enemy's works, but then met so withering a fire from the rifle pits and cross-fire of grape and canister from the batteries, that the columns faltered and finally fell back to the point of starting, leaving many dead, wounded, and prisoners in the hands of enemy. For a more perfect understanding of this short and desperate struggle I refer to the reports of Generals Morgan, Blair, Steele, and others inclosed. General Morgan's first report to me was that the troops were not discour aged at all, though the losses in Blair's and DeCourcey's brigades were heavy, 62 CHICKASAW BAYOU. and he would renew the assault in half an hour; but the assault was not again attempted. I urged General A. J. Smith to push his attack, though it had to be made across a narrow sand bar, and up a narrow path in the nature of a "breach," as a diversion in favor of Morgan, or real attack, according to its success. During Morgan's progress he passed over the Sixth Missouri under circum stances that called for all the individual courage for which that admirable regiment is justly famous. Its crossing was covered "by the United States regulars deployed as skirmishers up to the near bank of the bayou, covered as well as possible by fallen trees, and firing at any of the enemy's sharp shooters that showed a mark above the levee. Before this crossing all the ground opposite was completely swept by our artil lery, under the immediate supervision of Major Taylor, Chief of Artillery. The Sixth Missouri crossed over rapidly by companies, and lay under the bank of the bayou, with the enemy's sharp-shooters over their heads within a few feet, so near that these sharp-shooters held out their muskets:.>and fired down vertically upon our men. ', The orders were to undermine this bank and make a road up it, but it was impossible; and after the repulse of Morgan's assault I ordered General A. J. Smith to retire this regiment under cover of darkness, which was successfully done. Their loss was heavy, but I leave to the brigade and division com manders to give names and exact figures. Whilst this was going on Burbridge was skirmishing across the bayou at his front, and Landrnm pushed his advance through the close abattis or entanglement of fallen timber close up to Vicksburg. When the night of the 29th closed in we stood upon our original ground, and had suffered a repulse. The effort -was necessary to a successful accom plishment of my orders, and the combinations were the best possible under the circumstances. I assume all the responsibility and attach fault to no one, and am gener ally satisfied with the high spirit manifested by all * * * * The naval squadron, Admiral Porter, now holds command of the.l Missis sippi to "Vicksburg and the Yazoo up to Drumgould's Bluff, both of which points must in time be reduced to our possession, but it is for other minds than mine to devise the way. The officers and men comprising my command are in good spirits, disap pointed of course at our want of success, but by no means discouraged. We reembarked our whole command in the sight of the enemy's batteries and army unopposed, remaining in full view a whole day, and then deliberately moved to Milliken's Bend. I attribute our failure to the strength of the enemy's position, both natural and artificial, and not to his superior fighting; but, as we must all in the future have ample opportunities to test this quality, it is foolish to dis cuss it. I will transmit with this detailed reports of division and brigade com- CHICKASAW BAYOU. 63 manders, with statements of killed, wounded, and prisoners, and names as far as can be obtained. The only real fighting was during the assault by Morgan's and Steele's divisions, and at the time of crossing the Sixth Missouri, during the afternoon of December 29th, by the Second Division. Picket skirmishing and rifle practice across Chickasaw Bayou was constant for four days. This cost us the lives of several valuable officers and men, and many wounded. I have the honor to be, Your obedient servant, W. T. SHEKJIAS, Major-General commanding. Accompanying this report is a list of casualties, which shows the following losses of each division: Killed. A. 3. Smith's.......^............ 1 M. L. Smith's.................. 26 George W. Morgan's......... 62 F. Steele's........................ 102 Total.................. 191 Wounded. 1 103 447 431 982 Missing. ...... 6 386 364 756 An aggregate of nineteen hundred and twenty-nine, con cerning which General Sherman made the following indorse ment : "My belief is that, of the missing, four hundred were taken prisoners after reaching the enemy's trenches, and the remainder will turn up on boats not their own." From this report of General Sherman's it will be seen that the very divisions to which he now attributes his failure, and upon whose commanders he visits severe censure, were the identical troops and officers he reported at the time as having done his hardest fighting, and accomplished every thing it was possible to perform. The reports of these division commanders, whom he then commended, in turn relieve the brigade officers he now abuses from the blame he attempts to fix upon them, and show that the conduct of Generals Morgan, DeCourcey, and Thayer, and the fighting of their troops were such as should have com manded high praise, even from General Sherman. 64 CHICKASAW BAYOU. Immediately after this action General George Morgan was assigned to an equal command with General Sherman, namely, that of the First Corps, Army of the Mississippi, Sherman taking the Second Corps, while General McClernand succeeded him in command of the army. It would be difficult to find material for more severe criti cisms of the statements made in the Memoirs, concerning the failure at Chickasaw Bayou, than is contained in this report of Sherman's, written when the facts were vividly present to his mind. CHAPTER VI. CHATTANOOGA AND CHICKAMAUGA--INJUSTICE TO KOSECKANS, THOMAS, AND THE ARMY OF THE CUMBERLAND. IN a previous chapter it has been seen how coldly, unjustly, EDO! almost contemptuously General Sherman's book treats of Buell and his army at Shiloh--a general and an army that, beyond all room for question, brought salvation to Grant's forces, to which sore disaster had come through a dis graceful surprise, for which Sherman was in person largely responsible. Following him in his book through his excuses for bloody failure at Chickasaw Bayou, his protest against Grant's plan for capturing Vicksburg from the rear, and his assertion that it might have been taken six months earlier by another route, we find him again misrepresenting and sneering at the Army of the Ohio, under its successive commanders, Ilosecrans and Thomas, then operating about Chattanooga under its new title, the Army of the Cumberland. With the records of the war at his control, and at his very elbow, this is the version of Rosecrans' movement on, and capture of Chattanooga, which General Sherman puts forth: "While we were thus lying idle in camp on the Big Black, the Army of the Cumberland, under General Rosecrans, was moving against Bragg at Chattanooga; and the Army of the Ohio, General Burnside, was marching toward East Tennessee. " General Kosecrans was so confident of success that he somewhat scattered his command, seemingly to surround and capture Bragg in Chattanooga; but the latter, reenforced from Virginia, drew out of Chattanooga, concentrated his army at Lafayette, and at Chickamauga fell on Bosecrans, defeated him and drove him into Chattanooga. 5 (65) 66 CHATTANOOGA AND CH1CKAMAUGA. " The whole country seemed paralyzed by this unhappy event; and the authorities in Washington were thoroughly stampeded. From the East the Eleventh Corps (Slocum) and the Twelfth Corps (Howard) were sent by rail to Kashville, and forward under command of General Hooker. Orders were also sent to General Grant by Halleck to send what reinforcements he could spare immediately toward Chattanooga. "Bragg had completely driven Eosecrans' army into Chattanooga. The latter was in actual danger of starvation, and the railroad in his rear seemed inadequate to his supply. The first intimation which I got of this disaster was on the 22d of September, by an order from General Grant to dispatch one of my divisions immediately into Vicksburg to go toward Chattanooga, and I designated the First, General Osterhaus'--Steele, meantime, having been appointed to the command of the Department of Arkansas, and had gone to Little Eock. General Osterhaus marched the same day, and on the 23d I was summoned to Vicksburg in person, where General Grant showed me the alarming dispatches from General Halleck, which had been sent from Memphis by General Hurlbut, and said, on further thought, that he wKjuld send me and my whole corps. But, inasmuch as one division of MePhersqn's corps (John E. Smith's) had already started, he instructed me to leave one of my divisions on the Big Black, and to get the other two ready to follow at once. I designated the Second, then commanded by Brigadier-General Giles A. Smith, and the Fourth, commanded by Brigadier-General Corse."--Page 346, Vol. I. Before considering General Sherman's story further, a state ment of General Rosecrans' operations, which is sustained by the record, may properly be considered: General Eosecrans, with his magnificent army, had, by his brilliant strategy, driven Bragg without serious battle out of Murfreesboro, out of Tullahoma, out of "War-trace, and finally across the Tennessee, here a deep and wide river, where lie took post in the fortified city of Chattanooga. The ojective point of Eosecrans' next campaign was the latter city. Two plans were open to him. He could cross the river above, in the face of Bragg's army, and assault the place. Had he done this, and at the cost of never so bloody a battle wrested that stronghold from Bragg, the whole nation would have applauded, and the movement been so plain that even General Sherman might have been compelled to write it correctly, notwithstanding his prejudices against the Army of the Cumberland. CHATTANOOGA AND CHICKAMAUGA. 67 The other course open to Rosecrans was the one lie adopted, namely, to cross the Tennessee far below the city, and the three intervening mountain ranges, come down in the rear of Chattanooga, and force Bragg to evacuate it. Long before the single line of railroad could bring him the needed supplies for such a campaign, Halleck, who knew nothing of the ground and its great difficulties, was telegraph ing from Washington peremptory orders to move. But, wait ing till he had twenty-five days' scant supplies, Rosecrans cut loose from his base and crossed the Tennessee under great disadvantages, one of his largest divisions actually crossing in canoes and upon rafts constructed by the men, many of the soldiers piling their clothes, guns, and cartridge-boxes on two or three rails, and pushing the whole over before them as they swam the half mile of deep water. The three ranges were all difficult in the extreme; but finally the main part of the army came down from Lookout Mountain into McLemore's Cove, in rear of Chattanooga, and Bragg, giving up the city without a blow, being unable to hold it and at the same time confront Rosecrans with any portion of his force, evacuated it and retreated to Lafayette, behind Pigeon Mountains. Here, he was virtually reenforced by Longstreet from Virginia, although the forces of the latter were still only within sup porting distance, and not, as General Sherman writes, before he evacuated Chattanooga. And because he was thus reen foreed he set out to re-occupy the city he had abandoned, and which he knew to be Rosecrans' objective point. Then occurred the widely misunderstood and misrepresented battle of Chickamauga. "Bragg, strengthened by Longstreet, started to interpose between Rosecrans and the stronghold he had lately evacu ated. Rosecrans was also marching to occupy it as the objective point of his campaign. Thus marching, the heads of the two armies met where their respective roads to Chatta nooga intersected, about six miles from the city, and facing toward each, other and closing together like the blades of a 68 CHATTANOOGA AND CHICKAMAUGA. pair of shears, these armies fought two days Jor Chatta nooga. The key positions of the whole movement were the passes in Missionary Ridge, which controlled the roads to Chatta nooga, and these lay less than two miles from the field, and directly on the roads both armies were pushing over toward the city. The history of the fighting is well known. The breaking of the right on the second day has been widely treated as if it were the rout of the Union forces. But Thomas, who remained with the largest part of the army intact, fought through to the close of the battle with his lines unbroken. The last divisions of our line to leave the field \vcre in uiidisturbed possession of their ground, and withdrew quietly and unmolested. Thomas left the field mainly because the passes which controlled Chattanooga--the objective point of the campaign--were in his rear, and if he did not occupy them that night the chances were that the rebels would do so, and thus make successful their plan of battle, which was to turn the Union left and interpose between Rosecrans and Chatta nooga. The rebels did not follow till noon of the next day, and finding our army in the passes did not attack it. The follow ing day Rosecrans' army marched undisturbed into Chatta nooga, and Union troops held it till the close of the war. - -:'. Chickamauga, then, was the battle for Chattanooga; and at the end of a campaign which, when impartial history is written, will assuredly rank among the most brilliant for its strategy, the prize for which Rosecrans contended was won. The troops which fought longest and suffered most never looked upon the battle as a defeat, and were fully satisfied with the part they had played. To the Army of the Cumber land it was but the battle for^ and the winning of Chattanooga. And this, though Sherman's readers would not dream of it, is how it came to pass that "Bragg had completely driven Rose crans'army into Chattanooga." CHATTANOOGA AND CHICKAMAUGA. 69 General Rosecrans' movements which secured Chattanooga resembled in many of their main features those by which Sherman captured Atlanta. Rosecrans had successively flanked Bragg out of all positions from Murfreesboro to Chattanooga, and instead of assaulting this he moved to the rear, compelled its evacuation, fought for it in the open field, and occupied it. Sherman, chiefly by flanking Johnston, drove him back upon Atlanta. After many assaults, against the earnest advice of Thomas and others who wished him to go the rear and compel an evacuation, he finally yielded and marched to Lovejoy's and Jonesboro, leaving Slocum to watch, for the evacuation of Atlanta, as Crittenden had watched for Rosecrans at Chattanooga. The movement drew Hood out of Atlanta, and Slocum marched in, as Crittenden had passed into Chattanooga when Rosecrans' army flanked Bragg out of it. Sherman's army, at the moment of occupation, was quite as much scattered below Atlanta, as Rosecrans' had been south of Chattanooga. Suppose some story-teller of the Avar had then written: "Hood had completely driven Sherman's army into At lanta !" If it be answered that Sherman marched back to his objective point without a fight, the scales may still settle even, for Sherman did not start to flank till after serious battle, while Rosecrans avoided assaulting a stronghold in the outset. After these misrepresentations of the movement by which the Army of the Cumberland won this rebel stronghold on the Tennessee, the reader will be better prepared for the misstatements written in regard to the same army when it passed under the command of General Thomas, and took part in the battles of Lookout Mountain and Missionary Ridge. That army had well nigh starved in carrying out its purpose to hold the city it had taken. Thousands of horses and mules had died for want of food. There were brigade headquarters where the officers lived chiefly on parched corn ; there were regimental headquarters where the daily food was mush or 70 CHATTANOOGA AND CHICKAMAUGA. gruel; there were officers of high rank, who lived for days on sour pork and wormy and moldy bread. But the lofty spirit of these men was unbroken, and no army stood any where during the rebellion whose faith in final victory was stronger than the faith of these soldiers under George H. Thomas and yet at this late day, and in the light of the immortal charge they, as an army, made up the heights of Missionary Kidge, the General of the armies affirms that General Grant doubted whether they would come out of their trenches for a fight. But let General Sherman speak for himself as he does on page 361 of his first volume. Before perusing it let the reader bear in mind that the line of supplies of Thomas' army had been fully opened before Sherman arrived, through the cooperation of Generals Howard and Slocum, and witho'ut any help from him, and that the suffering for food was entirely at an end and not a present thing, as his words imply ; that Chattanooga was no longer besieged, except as a rebel army was in front of it, while the communications to the rear, though not all that could be wished, were still ample to enable General Thomas to hold the place. Says General Sherman, speaking of his arrival: "Of course I was heartily welcomed by Generals Grant, Thomas, and all, who realized the extraordinary efforts we had made to come to their relief. "The next morning we walked out to Fort Wood, a prominent salient of the defenses of the place, and from its parapet we had a magnificent view of the panorama. Lookout Mountain, with its rebel flags and batteries, stood, out boldly, and an occasional shot fired toward Wauhatchee or Moccasin Point gave life to the scene. These shots could barely reach Chattanooga, and I was told that one or more shot had struck a hospital inside the lines. All along Missionary Eidge were the tents of the rebel beleaguering force; the lines of trench from Lookout up toward the Cbickamauga were plainly visible, and. rebel sentinels in a continuous chain were walking their posts in plain view, not one thousand yards off. 'Why,' said I, 'General Grant, you are besieged;' and he said, ' it is too true.' Up to that moment I had no idea that things were so bad. The rebel lines actually extended from the river below the town to the river above, and the Army of the Cumberland was closely held to the town and its immediate defenses. General Grant pointed out to me a house on Missionary Eidge where General Bragg's head quarters were known to be. He also explained the situation of affairs gen- CHATTANOOGA AND OHICKAMAUGA. 71 erally; that the mules and horses of Thomas' army were so starved that they could not haul his guns; that forage, corn, and provisions were so scarce that the men in hunger stole the few grains of corn that were given to favor ite horses; that the men of Thomas' army had been so demoralized by the battle of Chickamagua that he feared they could not be got out of their trenches to assume the offensive; that Bragg had detached Longstreet with a considerable force up into East Tennessee to defeat and capture Burnside; that Burnside was in danger, etc.; and that he (Grant) was extremely anxious to attack Bragg in position, to defeat him, or at least to force him to recall Longstreet. The Army of the Cumberland had so long been in the trenches that he wanted my troops to hurry up to take the offensive first;- after which, he had no doubt the Cumberland Army would fight well. Meantime the Eleventh and Twelfth Corps, under General Hooker, had been advanced from Bridgeport along the railroad to Wauhatchee, but could not as yet pass Lookout Mountain. A pontoon bridge had been thrown across the Ten nessee Biver at Brown's Ferry, by which supplies were hauled into Chat tanooga from Kelly's and Wauhatchee." And tliis from a General whose own army alone, of the three engaged, failed in this very battle of Chattanooga to execute what was expected of it, and what it was ordered to do. It fought splendidly and persistently, but failed to gain a foothold on the main ridge upon. Bragg's extreme right. Hooker carried Lookout, Thomas advancing and supporting his left as it swept around the mountain and reached downsvard toward the city. Thomas' men needed no example from Sherman; had not seen his army, saw none of his fighting, and knew very little of his movements, rose early from their bivouacks the day after Lookout, swung round over the plains and woods which the rebels had occupied, to make sure of their retreat to Missionary Ridge,, then faced the ridge for two miles, formed that grand storming party, and, in the face of an army with sixty cannon in position, climbed those rugged heights and drove Bragg into sudden, unexpected, and rapid retreat. It was more than two hours after the battle was thus ended, by these men, who, forsooth, it was feared would not come out of their trenches to fight till Sherman had set them an example, before Sherman himself heard that the victory had been gained. And ten years after he assumes 72 CHATTANOOGA AND CHICKAMATJGA. to sneer at the men who formed Thomas' storming army at Missionary Ridge. Let the official record answer him! Gen eral Grant, without waiting till Thomas' men could see Sherman fight and take courage, ordered an assault on the ridge. And, on this point, the records afford the means of correcting a common error in regard to this movement. The matter will be briefly presented here, although not mentioned in the Memoirs. It has been frequently said that, after all, the Army of the . Cumberland carried the ridge only by chance, and that no orders were given for going beyond the line of rifle pits at its base, but that the forward movement from that point was caused by a portion of the line starting on without order;;;, and thus leading the whole toward the summit. General Grant, however, in his report states the character of the orders he gave General Thomas, and shows that the ' storming of the ridge was intended from the first: "His (Hooker's) approach was intended as the signal for storming the ridge in the center with strong columns, but the time necessarily consumed in the construction of the bridge near Chattanooga Creek detained him to a later hour than was expected. * s" * '* Thomas was accordingly directed to move forward his troops, ':s * * * with a doable line of skirmishers thrown out, followed in easy supporting distance by the whole force, and carry the rifle pits at the foot of Missionary Bidge, and when carried to reform his lines in the rifle pits, with a view of carrying the top of the ridge." The form in which General Thomas communicated thisorder to his own troops, is shown by a paragraph from the report of General Baird who commanded his left division: "I had just completed the establishment of my line, and was upon the left of it, when a staff officer from Major-General Thomas brought me verbal orders to move forward to the edge of the open ground which bordered the foot of Mission Ridge, within striking distance of the rebel rifle pits at its base, so as to be ready at a signal, which would be the firing of six guns from Orchard Knob, to dash forward and take those pits. He added this was preparatory to a general assault on the mountain; that it was doubtless designed by the Major-General commanding that I should take part in this movement; so that I would be following his wishes were I to push on to the summit." CHATTANOOGA AND CHICKAMAUGA. 73 "General Rosecrans was so confident of success that he somewhat scattered his command," say the Memoirs. There was another thing of which General Rosecrans was confident, and which a just or accurate writer should have mentioned when dealing out severe criticism. He had been notified from Wash ington, early in August, that Burnside would move through East Tennessee with an effective force of twelve thousand men upon his left, and was informed almost daily, before and after the battle of Chickamauga, that he would be on the ground for cooperative movements. The record history of this failure on the part of Burnside, is necessary to any fair Z'eview of Rosecrans' campaign against Chattanooga, and enough to show its real bearing will now be presented. The dispatches which follow are from. General Halleck at Washington, to Burnside on the march and in East Ten nessee : . " August 5th.--You will immediately move with a column of twelve thousand men by the most practicable route on East Tennessee, making Knoxville or its vicinity your objective point. * * * * You will report by telegraph all the movements of your troops. As soon as you reach East Tennessee you will endeavor to connect with the forces of General Rosecrans, who has peremptory orders to move forward. The Secretary of War repeats his orders, that you move your headquarters from Cincinnati to the field, and take command of the troops in person." "September 5th.--Nothing from you since August 31st. Keep General Rosecrans advised of your movements, and arrange with him for coop eration." "September llth.--Connect with General Eosecrans at least with your cavalry. * * * * General Eosecrans will occupy Dalton or some point upon the railroad, to close all access from Atlanta, also the mountain passes on the west. This being done it will be determined whether the moveable forces shall move into Georgia and Alabama, or into the Valley of Virginia and North Carolina." "September 13th.--It is important that all the available forces of your command be pushed forward into East Tennessee. All your scattered forces should be centered there. As long as we hold Tennessee, Kentucky is per fectly safe. Move down as rapidly as-possible toward Chattanooga to connect with Eosecrans. Bragg may hold the passes in the mountain to cover At lanta, and move his main army through Northern Alabama to reach the Tennessee River, and turn Eosecrans' right and cut off his supplies. In that case he will turn Chattanooga over to you, and move to intercept Bragg." 74 CHATTANOOGA AND CHICKAMAUGA. "September Uth.--There arc reasons why you should reenforce General Rosecrans with all possible dispatch. It is believed that the enemy will concentrate to give him battle. You must be there to help him." " September 15A.--From information received here to-day it is very prob able that three divisions of Lee's army have been sent to reenforce Bragg. It is important that all the troops in your department be brought to the front with all possible dispatch, so as to help General Bosecrans." September 18th.-- TM * * "' A part, at least, of Longstreet's corps is going to Atlanta. It is believed that Bragg, Johnston, and Hardee, with the exchanged prisoners from "Vicksburg and Port Hudson are concentrating against Bosecrans. You must give him all the aid in your power." "Major-General BTJBNSIDE, Knoxmlle. " General Bosecrans is on the Chickamauga Biver, twenty miles south of Chattanooga, He is expecting a battle, and wants you to sustain his lvith my whole force; then he would retreat to the south west, drawing me as a decoy away from Georgia, which is his chief object. If he ventures north of the Tennessee Biver, I may turn in that direction and endeavor to get below him on his line of retreat; but, thus far, he has not gone above the Tennessee Biver. General Thomas will have a force strong enough to prevent his reaching any country in which we have an interest, and he has orders, if Hood turns to follow me, to push for Sefma, Alabama. No single army can catch Hood, and I am convinced the best results will follow from our defeating Jeff. Davis' cherished plan of making me leave Georgia by maneuvering. " 'Thus far I have confined my efforts to thwart this plan, and have reduced baggage so that I can pick up and start in any direction ; but I regard the pursuit of Hood as useless. Still, if he attempts to invade Middle Tennessee, I will hold Decatur, and be prepared to move in that direction; but, unless I let go of Atlanta, my force will not be equal to his.' "From that place, on the same day (November 2), [I] again telegraphed to G-eneral Grant: "' j-U turn back the whole effect of my campaign will be lost. By my movements I have thrown Beauregard (Hood) well to the west, and Thomas will have ample time and sufficient troops to hold him until the reenforcements from Missouri reach him. We have now ample supplies at Chattanooga and Atlanta, and can stand a month's interruption to our communications. I do not believe the Confederate army can reach our railroad lines, except by cavalry raids, and Wilson will have cavalry enough to checkmate them. I am clearly of opinion that the best results will follow my contemplated movement through Georgia.' " That same day I received, in answer to the Borne dispatch, the following: '"CITY POINT, VA., November 2, 1864,11:80 A. M. "' To Majar-General SHEEMAN. "' Your dispatch of 9 A. M. yesterday is just received. I dispatched you the same date, advising that Hood's army, now that it had worked so far north, ought to be looked upon now as the object. With the force, however, you THE MARCH TO THE SEA. 133 have left with General Thomas, he must be able to take care of Hood and destroy him. I do not see that you can withdraw from where you are to follow Hood without giving up all we have gained in territory. I say, then, go on as you propose. U. 8. GKAXT, Lieutenant- General.' " This was the first time that General Grant assented to the March to the Sea, and, although many of his warm friends and admirers insist that he was the author and projector of that march, and that I simply executed his plans, General Grant has never, in my opinion, thought so or said so. The truth is fully given in an original letter of President Lincoln, which I received at Savannah, Georgia, and have at this instant before me, every word of which is in his own familiar handwriting. It is dated : " ' WASHINGTON, D. 0., Deeemler 26, 1864. * * * * " 'When you were about leaving Atlanta for the Atlantic coast, I was anxious, if not fearful ; but, feeling that you were the better judge, and remembering ' nothing risked, nothing gained.' I did not inter fere. N ow, the undertaking being a success, the honor is all yours ; for I believe none of us went further than to acquiesce: and. taking the work of General Thomas into account, as it should be taken, it is indeed a great success. * * * s A. Following this, in General Sherman's narrative, is the extract from page 167, given in the opening of this letter. A few brief extracts will close the account : "On the 6th of November, at Kingston,! wrote and telegraphed to General Grant [General Sherman does not give these papers] reviewing the whole situation, gave him my full plan of action, stated that I was ready to march as soon as the election was over, and appointed November 10th as the day for starting. On the Stli I received this dispatch : " ' CITY POINT, V.t., November 1, 1864, 10:30 P. M. "'Major-General SHEKMAN. '"Your dispatch of this evening received. I see no present reason for changing your plan. Should any arise, you will see it, or if I do I will inform you. I think every thing here is favorable now. Great good fortune attend you ! I believe you will be eminently successful, and at worst can only make a march less fruitful of results than hoped for. " ' U. S. GKAXT, Lieutenant-General.' " On the 10th of November the movement may be said to have fairly The above is a full and fair summary of the account in the Memoirs of the discussion attending Sherman's starting for 134 TEE MARCH TO TEE SEA. Savannah. It is in brief an extended argument to show that General Sherman planned the March to the Sea, and that General Grant and the authorities at Washington opposed his plan for several weeks, but Anally gave a reluctant consent to its execution. This view has been impressed upon the country ever since the close of the war. It is doubtful whether a more skillfnl misuse of ofScial records has ever before been made to uphold an erroneous history of a military movement, and this will now be made to appear. The question under discussion between the parties named was MoZ whether General Sherman should make a campaign to the sea, but whether he should begin it by abandoning Atlsata and the line of the railroad, and especially 6e/bre he destroyed Hood's army. A campaign to the sea to cut the Confederacy in two, was decided upon by General Grant during the previ ous January, when he was in command at Nashville, and eight months beibre the time when General Sherman claims to have had such a move in his " mind's eye/' General Thomas, General Salleck, and General Sherman were each notined at that time of this plan of General Grant. The 6rst idea of the latter, as expressed in January, 1864, was to march through to Mobile, holding Atlanta and Mont gomery as intermediate points, but the Union forces having occupied Mobile Bay on the 23d of August, just before the capture of Atlanta, General Grant, immediately after the fall of the latter place, telegraphed General Sherman that, as our forces had now secured the control of Mobile, he thought Sherman had better move on Augusta as soon as his men were rested, while Canby acted on Savannah. The following letters and telegrams are suniciently explicit upon these points : EEADQFABTEBS MILITARY DlVISIOX OF TZK MISSISSIPPI, xKS., January 15, 1864. * * * * I look npon the next line for me to secure, to be that from Chattanooga to Mobile, Montgomery and Atlanta, being the important THE MARCH TO TEE SEA. 135 intermediate points. To do this, large supplies must be secured on the Tennessee Siver, so as to be independent of the railroad from here to the Tennessee for a considerable length of time. Mobile would be a second base. The destruction which Sherman will do the roads aroond Meridian will be of material importance to us in preventing the enemy from drawing supplies and in clearing' that section of all large bodies of rebel troops. I do not look upon any points except Mobile in the south and the Tennessee Siver in the north as presenting practical starting points from which to operate against Atlanta and Montgomery. They are objectionable as starting points to be all under one command, from the fact that the time it will take to com municate from one to the other will be so great 3ut, Sherman or McPbcrson, one of whom would be entrusted with the distant command, are officers of such experience and reliability, that all objections on that score, except that of enabling the two armies to act as an unit, would be removed. * * The same objection will exist probably not to so great an extent, however, if the movement is made in more than one column. This will have to be with an army of the size we will be obliged to use. Heretofore I have refrained from suggesting what might be done in other commands than my own, in cooperation with it, or even to think much over the matter. But, as you have kindly asked me in your letter of the 8th of January, only just received, for an interchange of views on our present situa tion, I will write you again in a day or two, going outside of my own opera tions. U. 8. Afterward, when General Grant was made LieutenantGeneral and ordered East, turning over bis command at Nash ville to General Sherman, he sent the latter a copy of the above letter for his guidance. Four days after time unfolding his plan for the Atanta and Gulf campaign to General Sallcck, and while General Sher man was on the Mississippi preparing his Meridian campaign, General Thomas, who was then in command at Chattanooga, was made acquainted with General Grant's design by the following letter : HEADQCABTE2S MILITARY DIVISION OF THH MISSISSIPPI, KiSKYILLE, Vizfmary 19, 1864. .Mo)'or- Genera! GEORGE H. TnOMAB, Owing to the presence of Longstreet in East Tennessee it will be impossible to attempt any movement from your present position while he remains. The great number of veterans now absent and yet to be furloughcd will be another difSculty in the way of any movement this "Winter. Sherman, how- 136 THE MARCH TO THE SEA. ever, will be able to collect about twenty thousand men from that part of his command now along the Mississippi River available for a movement eastward from Vicksburg. He expects to have these ready to start about the 24th inst. He will proceed eastward as far as Meridan, at least, and will thoroughly destroy the roads east and south from there, and, if possible, will throw troops as far east as Selma; or if he finds Mobile so far unguarded as to make his force sufficient for the enterprise, will go there. To cooperate with this movement, you want to keep up appearances of preparation of an advance from Chat tanooga. It may be necessary even to move a column as far as Lafayette. The time for the advance, however, would not be before the 30th inst., or when you might learn the enemy were contemplating an attack. Logan will also be instructed to move, at the same time, what force he can from Eellefontaine toward Borne. We will want to be ready at the earliest possible moment in the Spring for the advance. I look upon the line for this army to secure in the next campaign to be that from Chattanooga to Mobile. Atlanta and Montgomery being the important intermediate points. I look upon the Tennessee Biver and Mobile as being the most practicable points from which to start, and to hold as bases of supplies if the line is secured. I have so written to the General-in-Chief, only giving my views more fully, and shall write him to-day, giving my views of the cooperation we should have from the Eastern armies. I shall recommend that no attempt be made toward Richmond by any of the routes heretofore operated upon, but that a moving force of sixty thousand men be thrown into Newbern or Suffolk, favoring the latter place; and move out, destroying the road as far toward Richmond as possible. Then move toward Raleigh as rapidly as possible, hold that point, and ope7i com munication with Newbern, even "Wilmington. From Raleigh ihc enemy's most important line would be so threatened as to force them to keep on it a guard that would reduce their armies in the field much below ' | ; I I | |:" I f I THOMAS' TROUBLES AT NASHVILLE. 193 see, General Canby is obliged to keep large forces on the Mississippi River to protect its navigation, and to hold Memphis, Vicksburg, etc., although General Grant had directed a part of these forces to cooperate with Sherman. Every day's delay on your part, therefore, seriously interferes with General Grant's plans. H. W. HALLECK, Major-General and Chief of Staff. On the 14th General Grant himself left City Point for Nashville to assume command, but was met at Washington bv J o ; the news of Thomas' victory. NASHVILLE, December 14, 1864, 8 P. M. Major-Gens-o.1 H. W. HAILECK, Washington, D. O. Your telegram of 12:30 jr. to-day is received. The ice having melted away to-day, the enemy will be attacked to-morrow morning. Much as I regret the apparent delay in attacking the enemy, it could not have been done before with any reasonable prospect of success. GEO. H. THOMAS, Major-General V. S. Vols. commanding. NASHVILLE, TESX., 9 P. M., December 15. 1864. Major-General HAI/LECK, Chief of Staff. Attacked enemy's left this morning, drove it from the river, below city, very nearly to Franklin pike, distance about eight miles. * *' * GEO. H. THOMAS, Major-General. The body of the above dispatch contains a lengthy account of the movements. WASHIXGTOX, December la, 1864, 11:30 P. M. Major- General GEO. H. THOMAS, Nashville. I was just on my way to Nashville, but receiving a dispatch from Van Duzen. detailing your splendid success of to-day, I shall go no further. Push the enemy now, and give him no rest until he is entirely destroyed. Your army will cheerfully suffer many privations to break up Hood's army, and make it useless for future operations. Do not stop for trains or supplies, but take them from the country, as the enemy has done. Much is now expected. U. S. GBANT, Lieutenant-General. WASHIXGTOS, December 15, 1864, 12 Midnight. Major-General GEO. H. THOMAS, Nashville. Your dispatch of this evening just received. I congratulate you and the ariay under your command for to-day's operations, and feel a conviction that to-morrow will add more fruits to your victory. U. 8. GEANT, Lieutenant-General. 13 194 THOMAS' TROUBLES AT NASHVILLE. HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF TDK CUMBERLAND, EIGHT MILES FROM NASHVILLE, 1 6 P. M., December 16, 1864. j To the President of the United States, Hm. E. M. STANTON and General U. S. GBA>TT. This army thanks you for your approbation of its conduct yesterday, and begs to assure you that it is not misplaced. J have the honor to report, etc. [Here follows a second report in detail.] GEO. H. THOMAS, Major-General. On reaching Louisville, General Logan learned that Thomas had made a successful move, and in reporting to General Grant, requested that he might be ordered back to his com mand : LOUISVILLE, KY., 10 A. M., December 17, 1864. Lieutenant- General U. S. GBAKT, Burlington, N. J. . S Have just arrived. Weather bad; raining since yesterday morning. Peo ple here jubilant over Thomas' success. Confidence seems to be restored, I will remain here to hear from you. All things going right. It would seem best that I return to join my command with Sherman. JOHN A. LOGAN, Major- General. In reply to this, General Grant telegraphed an order direct ing Logan to report to General Sherman. Immediately after the congratulatory dispatches, and while every effort was being made to press Hood's retreat, General Thomas was appealed to by Halleck to "capture or destroy Hood's army in order that General Sherman can entirely crush out the rebel military power in all the Southern States." WASHINGTON, December 21, 1864, 12 M. Major-General GEO. H. THOMAS. t Permit me, General, to urge the vast importance of a hot pursuit of Hood's army. Every possible sacrifice should be made, and your men for a few days will submit to any hardships and privations to accomplish the great result. If you can capture or destroy Hood's army General Sherman can entirely crush out the rebel military force in all the Southern Stales. He begins a new campaign about the first of January, which will have the most important results if Hood's army can now be used up. A most vigorous pursuit on your part is, therefore, of vital importance to General Sherman's plans. No sacrifice must be spared to obtain so important a result. H. W. HALLECK, Major-General and Chief of Staff. THOMAS' TROUBLES AT NASHVILLE. 195 To this General Thomas replied at length and with spirit: IN THE FIELD, December 21, 1864. Major-General HAI/LECK, Washington, D. G. Your dispatch of 12 Jl., this day, is received. Genera] Hood's army is being pursued as rapidly and as vigorously as it is possible for one army to pursue another. We can not control the elements, and you must remember that, to resist Hood's advance into Tennessee, I had to reorganize and almost thoroughly equip the force now under my command. I fought the battle of the 15th and 16th instants with the troops but partially equipped; and, notwithstanding the inclemency of the weather and the partial equipment, have been enabled to drive the enemy beyond Duck Biver, crossing two streams with my troops, and driving the enemy from position to position, without the aid of pontoons, and with but little transportation to bring up supplies of provisions and ammunition. I am doing all in my power to crush Hood's army, and, if it be possible, will destroy it. But pursuing an enemy through an exhausted country, over mud roads completely sogged with heavy rains, is no child's play, and can not be accomplished as quickly as thought of. I hope, in urging me to push the enemy, the department remembers that General Sherman took with him the complete organization of the Military Division of the Mississippi, well equipped in every respect, as regards ammunition, supplies, and trasportation, leaving me only two corps, partially stripped of their transportation to accommodate the force taken with him, to oppose 'the advance into Tennessee of that army which had resisted the advance of the army of the Military Division of the Mississippi on Atlanta, from the commencement of the campaign till its close, and which is now, in addition, aided by Forrest's cavalry. Although my progress may appear slow, I feel assured that Hood's army can be driven from Tennessee, and eventually driven to the wall by the force under my command. But too much must not be expected of troops which have to be reorganized, especially when they have the task of destroying a force, in a Winter's campaign, which was able to make an obstinate resistance to twice its numbers in Spring and Summer. In conclusion, I can safely state that this army is willing to submit to any sacrifice to oust Hood's army, or to strike any other blow which may contribute to the destruction of the rebellion. GEO. H. THOMAS, Major-General. WASHINGTON, December 22, 1804, 9 P. M. Major-General GEO. H. THOMAS. I have seen to-day General Halleck's dispatch of yesterday, and your reply. It is proper for me to assure you that this department has the most unbounded confidence in your skill, vigor, and determination to employ to the best advantage all the means in your power to pursue and destroy the enemy. No department could be inspired with more profound admiration 196 THOMAS' TROUBLES AT NASHVILLE. and thankfulness for the great deeds which you have already performed, or more confiding faith that human effort could do no more, and no more than will be done by you and the accomplished and gallant officers and soldiers oi your command. E. >f. STANTOX, Secretary of War. On the same day General Grant telegraphed: Major-General G-EO. H. THOMAS. CITY FOOT, December 22, 1864. You have the congratulations of the public for the energy with which you are pushing Hood. I hope you will succeed in reaching his pontoon bridge at Tuscumbia before he gets there. Should you do so, it looks to me that Hood is cut off. If you succeed in destroying Hood's army, there will be but one army left to the so-called Confederacy, capable of doing us harm. I will take care of: that, and try to draw the sting from it, so that in the Spring we shall have easy sailing. You have now a big opportunity, which J; know you are availing yourself of. Let us push and do all we can before,the enemy can derive benefit, either from the raising of negro troops on the plantations or white troops now in the field. -g. S. GBAXT, Lieutenant-General. Two dispatches properly close this correspondence: Major-General THOMAS, Nashville. WAR DEPARTMENT, December 24, 1864. With great pleasure I inform you that for your skill, courage, and conduct in the recent brilliant military operations under your command, the President has directed your nomination to be sent to the Senate as a Major-General in the United States Army, to fill the only vacancy existing in that grade. No official duty has been performed by_me with more satisfaction, and no commander has more justly earned promotion by devoted, disinterested, and valuable services to his country. EDWIK M. STANTOS, Stxntary of War. To which General Thomas, then in the field directing the pursuit of Hood,, replied: HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE CUMBERLAND,| McIvAXF.s' CHOROH, TENS, j Son. E. M. STANTON, Secretary of War. I am profoundly sensible of the kind expressions of your telegram of December 24th, informing me that the President had directed my name to be sent to the Senate for confirmation as Major-General United States Army, and beg to assure the President and yourself, that your approval of my services is of more value to me than the commission itself. GEO. H. THO>IAS, Major- General commanding. THOMAS' TBOUBLES AT NASHVILLE. 197 In the succeeding July, General Grant in that portion of his final report which related to the campaign about Nash ville, made the following manly acknowledgment that the result had vindicated General Thomas'judgment: "Before the battle of Nashville I grew very impatient over, as it appeared to me, the unnecessary delay. This impatience was increased upon learning that the enemy had sent a force of cavalry across the Cumberland into Kentucky. I feared Hood would cross his whole army and give us great trouble there. After urging upon General Thomas the necessity of im mediately assuming the offensive, I started West to superintend matters there in person. Keaching Washington City, I received General Thomas' dispatch announcing his attack upon the enemy, and the result as far as the battle had progressed. I was delighted. All fears and apprehensions were dis pelled. I am not yet satisfied but that General Thomas, immediately upon the appearance of Hood before Nashville, and before he had time to fortify should have moved out with his whole force and given him battle, instead ol waiting to remount his cavalry, which delayed him until the inclemency of the weather made it impracticable to attack earlier than he did. But his final defeat of Hood was so complete, that it will be accepted as a vindication of that distinguished officer's judgment." General Sherman himself, after introducing into his book several passages that he has for years suppressed, and which severely reflected upoa General Thomas' action before Nash ville, closes his consideration of the subject with these more generous words: "Meantime, on the 15th and IStli of December, were fought in front of Nashville, the great battles in which. General Thomas so nobly fulfilled his promise to ruin Hood, the details of which are fully given in his own official reports, long since published." CHAPTER XV. THE CAPTURED COTTON AT SAVASTXAH-- CHAEACTEE OF THE ATTACK ON SECEETAEY STANTON -- THE JEFF. DAYIS GOLD. ATTACKS upon dead men may fairly be called one :!;of the features of General Sherman's Memoirs. Thomas, MdPherson, and Stanton, with others less prominent, are in turn rudely and unjustly assailed in their graves. In writing history it would have been not only allowable for an honorable author to set down exact truth in regard to these noted actors in the war, even though it were unpalatable to their friends, but his bounden duty to do so. But when an author of General Sherman's position writes of his famous associates, having close at hand and conveniently arranged for reference all means of ascertaining the exact facts about every question which could arise, he stands without excuse before his countrymen if he wrongfully writes disgrace over graves where he should strew laurel. On page 243, Vol. II, of his Memoirs, General Sherm&ii relates that he was instructed by Mr. Stanton to transfer the cotton captured in Savannah to an agent of the Treasury. This General Sherman did by an order dated January 12, 1865. He then continues as follows, charging that Mr. Stauton's action in this matter caused great loss to the Gov ernment : "Up to this time all tlie cotton had been carefully guarded, with orders to General Easton to ship it by the return vessels to New York for the adjudi cation of the nearest prize court, accompanied with invoices and all evidence (198) THE CAPTURED COTTON AT SAVANNAH. 199 of title to ownership. Marks, numbers, and other figures were carefully preserved on the bales, so that the court might know the history of each bale. But Mr. Stanton, who surely was an able lawyer, changed all this, and ordered the obliteration of all the marks, so that no man, friend or foe, could trace his identical cotton. I thought it strange at the time, and think it more so now. for I am assured that claims real and fictitious have been proved up against this identical cotton of three times the quantity actually captured, and that reclamations on the Treasury have been allowed for more than the actual quantity captured, viz., thirty-one thousand hales." Here General Sherman, once a practicing attorney, forgot both his law and the facts, for cotton thus captured would not fall within the jurisdiction of a prize court, and the records show that what he charges upon Mr. Stanton never occurred. As there were nearly forty thousand bales of this cotton, in view of the high price then prevailing and the necessities of the Treasury, the proper care and handling of this most valuable capture were matters of the greatest importance to the Gov ernment. That Mr. Stanton was fully aware of all this, that he caused the business to be promptly and properly attended to, and that every reflection made upon him by General Sher man in the above extract is utterly unfounded, will now be made to appear. Secretary Stanton's first dispatch, upon learning of the capture of Savannah, related to the care of this cotton, and a copy of it was immediately sent to General Sherman and its receipt acknowledged by him. It was as follows: Lieutenant-General Git AST, City Point. WAR DEPARTMENT, | WASHINGTON, December 26, 1864. j I wish you a merry Christmas if not too late, and thank you for the Savannah news. It is a sore disappointment that Hardee was able to get oft' his fifteen thousand from Sherman's sixty thousand. It looks like protracting the war while their armies continue to escape. I hope you will give imme diate instructions to seize and hold the cotton. All sorts of schemes will be got up to hold it under sham titles of British and other private claimants. They should all be disregarded; and it ought not to be turned over to any Treasury agent, but held by the military authorities until a special order of the department is given for the transfer. Thomas has been nominated for Major-General. EDWIX M. STAXTOS, Secretary of War. 200 THE CAPTURED COTTON AT SAVANNAH. The part relating to cotton was sent by General Grant to General Sherman, and was thus answered by the latter: HEADQUARTERS MILITARY DIYISIOX OP THE MISSISSIPPI, ) IN THE FIKLD, SAYAXXAH, GA., January 2, 1885. j Hon. E. M. STANTON, Secretary of War, Washington, D. G. I have just received from Lieutenant-General Grant a copy of that part of your telegram to him of December 26th relating to cotton, a copy of which has been immediately furnished to General Baston, Chief Quartermaster, who will be strictly governed by it. I had already been approached by all the consuls and half the people of Savannah on this cotton question, and my invariable answer was that all the cotton in Savannah was prize of war, belonged to the United States, and nobody should recover a bale of it with my consent; that, as cotton had been one of the chief causes of this war, it should have to pay its expenses-gthat all cotton became tainted -with treason from the hour the first act of hostility was committed against the United States some time in December, 18GO/!and that no bill of sale subsequent to that date could convey title. My orders were that an officer of the Quartermaster's Department, United States Army, might furnish the holder, agent, or attorney a mere certificate of the fact of seizure, with description of the bales, marks, etc., the cotton then to be turned over to the agent of the Treasury Department to be shipped to New York for sale. But since the receipt of your dispatch I have ordered General Easton to make the shipment himself to the quartermaster at New York, where you can dispose of it at pleasure. I do not think the Treasury Department ought to bother itself with the prizes as captures of war. W. T. SHEBMAX, Major-General. Soon after Mr. Stanton reached Savannah, and his first order there in regard to the cotton was this: AVAR DEPARTMENT, ) ! SAVAXSAH, GA., January 12, 1865. j ' , Brevet Major- General MEIGS, Quartermaster-General U. S. A.., Savannah. Go. ', SIB : The Secretary of War directs that you assume the charge of the cap tured cotton in this city, and provide for its proper care and preservation until further orders. You will consider yourself charged with the duty of having sufficient guards and precautions for its security, and will apply to the commanding general for any force required. You will also detail a competent quartermaster for the special duty of seeing to its being turned over and receipted for by the agents of the Treasury Department. I am, sir, very respectfully, your obedient servant, E. D. TOWKSESD, Assistant Adjutant- General. THE CAPTURED COTTON AT SAVANNAH. 201 In pursuance of this order General Mcigs, then in Savan nah, issued the following: [Special Orders, No. 1.] SAVANNAH, GA., January 12, 1865. The Secretary of War having directed the Quartermaster-General to assume the charge of the captured cotton in this city and provide for its proper care and preservation, and to detail a competent quartermaster for the special duty of seeing to its being turned over and receipted for by the agents of the Treasury Department, Lieutenant-Colonel H. C. Hansom is hereby detailed for this duty. Brevet Brigadier-General L. C. Easton will place Lieutenant-Colonel Eansom in charge of all the cotton in his possession. Lieutenant-Colonel Eansom will immediately make a careful inspection of the stores containing the captured cotton, and will make requisition for guards sufficient to prevent all danger of unauthorized persons entering the storehouses or meddling with the cotton. No person not in the employment of the United States will be permitted to enter into or to loiter about the neighborhood of the buildings. He will afford every facility for the operations of the Treasury agent, Simeon Draper, collector of the port of New York, who is charged by the Treasury Department with the care and disposition of this captured property. He will employ competent clerks to attend to the weighing of each bale, who will keep an accurate register of the number and weight of each bale, and will take duplicate receipts in detail from the special agent of the Treas ury Department before allowing any of it to' leave the harbor. He will forward one copy of these receipts to the Quartermaster-General's office in Washington by the first mail after their execution. The other copy and the books and all papers containing the records of this business he will himself carry in person to Washington, and will deliver them to the Quartermaster-General. For the cotton already stored on board vessels, he will take receipts in detail from the special agent, based upon the accounts and invoices of this property prepared by Captain George B. Cadwallader, heretofore in charge of this duty. In default of such receipts he will order the vessels to proceed to New York, invoicing the cotton to Brevet Brigadier-General Van Vliet, Chief Quartern) aster, forwarding with the bills of lading an official copy of this order. General Van Vliet will transfer the cotton in this case to the special agent of the Treasury in New York, upon receiving such receipts as are herein prescribed. Lieutenant-Colonel Ransom will collect and register all the information offered to him of claims to the former ownership of this cotton. He will take this information with him to Washington, but will give copies or ex tracts from it to no one in Savannah but the Quartermaster-General. 202 THE CAPTURED COTTON AT SAVANNAH. The utmost vigilance will be exercised by Colonel Ransom in the execu tion of this important trust committed to him. He will himself visit the guards, and the presses and storehouses continually. He will see that no fires are lighted near the storehouses, or in the open streets or squares sur rounding them. He will report to the officer commanding the guards all neglect or inattention on the part of the guards, and if this does not imme diately produce a reform he will report the facts to the commanding officer of the post of Savannah. * * * * Lieutenant-Colonel Hansom will confer freely with the special agent of the Treasury Department, and will call for such military assistance as may be necessary to discover and place him in possession of all the cotton in the city of Savannah, or within the lines occupied by its garrison. It is all prize of war. * * * * M. C. MBIGS, Quartermaster-General, Brevet Major-General. Next, in order that there might bo no mistake in rcgarcfcto the responsibility of the various parties charged \vith these duties, the following memorandum was drawn up, signed, and put on record : OFFICE OF THE GENERAL ACESCY FOE CAPTURED AND ABANDONED FHOPERTY, 1 SAVANNAH, GA. j 1. Cotton captured in Savannah, that is, all the cotton within the military post of Savannah and its defenses, has been taken possession of and is now held by the Quartermaster-General, under the order of the Secretary of War. 2. The Quartermaster-General has also, under the order of the Secretary of War, detailed Lieutenant-Colonel Ransom, of the Quartermaster Depart ment, to take charge of the cotton personally, to cause it to be weighed and a careful and accurate account to be taken and recorded. To exclude all persons not employed by the United States and needed in this operation from the warehouses and docks and their vicinity. To transfer the cotton to the special agent of the Treasury Department, taking duplicate receipts therefor in detail, said receipts specifying the num ber and weight of every hale thus transferred to the special agent of the Treasury Department. To allow none of the cotton to leave the harbor until said receipts are given to him by the agent aforesaid. * * * 5i .4. The original instructions of the Secretary of the Treasury of 28th December, 1864, designated Simeon Draper, Esq., as the special agent to take charge of the captured cotton, and to give receipts therefor as provided by law. The instructions of the 7th January to Albert G. Brownc, special agent, communicated also to Simeon Draper, Esq., direct that Mr. Browne shall receive from the military authorities who are in possession of the cotton, THE CAPTURED COTTON AT SAVANNAH. 203 and give receipts therefor in the form prescribed by the Treasury regula tions. * * * ~ M. C. MEIGS, Q. M. Gen., 'Brevet Major-Gen. U. 8. A. . ALBERT G. BKOIVSE, Supervising Special Arjt Treas. Dep't. S. DRAPER, Treasury Agent. S. H. KATJITMAN. In addition to the above, Mr. Draper carried special instruc tions from Secretary Fessenden, and approved by the Presi dent, for his " government in the examination of marks and numbers, former ownership, as near as it can be ascertained, and its shipment." Among many other details these instructions provided that: " The marks and numbers must be carefully recorded^ not only such as are complete, but also such as have been in part obliterated, as nearly as can be ascertained. " These directions you will cause to be carefully observed, that the records may be complete in regard to any bales, or package, or number of packages, belonging to the same lot, so that any package or lot, or the proceeds thereof, may be clearly identified should any question in relation thereto hereafter be brought before the Court of Claims." These various extracts from the open records are quite sufficient to show that, so far from ordering any marks ob literated, directions were given to have the greatest care exercised to obtain a full record of them. The single para graph in the order given by Mr. Stanton, directing all receipts to be given in the form prescribed by the Treasury regula tions, insured the preservation of every mark. As a matter of fact, the records in Washington which relate to this cotton are very complete. Every bale captured was fully and carefully registered, and the military officers in charge received and filed a receipt from the Treasury agents for every pound of it. These receipts are on file in the "War Department and in the Treasury, and accessible to all who desire information, and they have been constantly consulted by counsel of the United States and of claimants in all cases yet tried or prepared for trial. In a few instances, in re- 204 THE CAPTURED COTTON AT SAVANNAH. : pressing and repairing torn covering, some of the marks were unavoidably defaced. The officers charged with preserving all means of identifica tion, employed a force of citizen clerks, who had long been engaged in the cotton warehouses of Savannah, to superintend the re-pressing and shipping of the cotton, and they selected the books and blanks in common use for this purpose, and copied into and upon these all marks by which the merchants of Savannah and the shippers from that port had been accus tomed to insure the perfect identification of cotton. Aside from the records thus made, and forwarded afterward to Washington, there existed in each of the great cotton -ware houses of Savannah a full record and description of each bale on hand when General Sherman's army took possession of the city, and these have been accessible to all interested.- . Of the existence and completeness of the records here, General Sherman could have satisfied himself in a very few moments on any occasion. He could have ascertained all the above facts any day, and in less time than it must have taken him to compile the page of errors concerning the matter which his book contains. If these records had been filed away among the musty docu ments pertaining to the war, there would have been a slight show of excuse for General Sherman; but what shall be said for him in view of the fact that he wrote thus recklessly about Secretary Stanton, with these records open to all men, in the War Department, with duplicates of them in the Treasury, in the Court of Claims, and in the printed files of Congress. They are records of the most public character. They have been consulted by the parties to every suit in which this cotton was involved. The War Department had furnished transcripts of the marks for seventy-seven cases to the Court of Claims, and the Government had printed them. Congress had called on the War Department for the entire record, em bracing all the orders and directions which were given, and the receipts in full taken by Colonel Ransom, setting forth all THE CAPTURED COTTON AT SAVANNAH. 205 the marks collected by the officers detailed for the duty by Mr. Stanton's order, and had printed the whole of it, and furnished copies to the War Department, and the completed history of the matter was at Sherman's elbow in the very building where he wrote. The statement of the Memoirs that the Treasury Depart ment has allowed claims for more than the total amount of cotton captured, and that claims have been proved up amount ing to three times the whole capture, is without the least foundation. The following is a statement prepared at the Treasury Department in regard to this Savannah cotton: " The Treasury Department has not passed upon a single claim for cotton captured at Savannah, nor has it paid out a dollar on such claims, except upon judgments of the Court of Claims, under the act of March 12th, 1863. "The following is a statement of the proceeds of said cotton and the claims therefor: No. balea sold at 5few York .................. 39,333 No. bales ullowed by Court of Claims... 31,6f>7 7,701 No. bales claimed in cases pending in Court of Claims.................................... 4,901 2,800 Net proceeds paid into Trea&mry...$7,259,499 78 Amount allowed by the Court of Claims............... ......................... 5,873,159 90 81,336,339 88 Proceeds claimed in pending cases, Sii5,67S 26 3520,661 62 "If all pending claims are allowed there will remain tiro thousand eight hundred bales which are unclaimed, and a balance of 520,661 62 in the Treasury." And now it will be interesting, in view of the severe though unjust strictures in which General Sherman indulges upon Mr. Stanton, to see what kind of orders Sh.er.rnau gave looking to the preservation of the marks upon this cotton, when it was passing from his possession into the hands of the Treasury Department. He had previously preserved the marks, but on transferring it, directed the receipt to be taken in gross. This is the order: [Special Field Orders "So. 10.] HEAiDDQQDDAAKKTTFF..KKSS M MIlLLIITTAAEEYY DDIIVVIISSIIOONN OF THE MISSISSIPPI, Is THE I?!Er,D, SAVANXAH, GA.., January 12, 1865. 1. Brevet Brigadier-General Easton, Chief Quartermaster, will turn over 206 THE CAPTURED COTTON AT SAVANNAH. j to Simeon Draper, Esq., agent of the United States Treasury Department, all cotton now in the city of Savannah, prize of war, taking his receipt for the same in gross, and returning for it to the Quartermaster-General. * * !i By order of General W. T. SHEBMAS. L. M. DAYTON, Aide--de-Camp. And so it appears that General Sherman's transfer called only for a receipt in gross, and that Mr. Stanton's orders alone secured the full record with which the Government has pro tected itself against fictitious claims. There is another instance in which General Sherman attempts, with as little reason and success, to be severe upon Mr. Stanton, which may properly be presented in this con nection. '- In the second bulletin which the Secretary of War published,, on April 27th, concerning General Sherman's arrangements with General Johnston, the following paragraphs appeared from a dispatch of General Halleck's. dated Richmond, April 26th, 9:30 p. M.: "The bankers here hare information to-day that Jeff. Davis' specie is moving south from Goldsboro, in wagons, as fast as possible. * * * * " The specie taken with them is estimated here at from six to thirteen million dollars." Commenting upon these paragraphs, General Sherman says: "The assertion that Jeff. Davis' specie train, of six to thirteen million dollars was reported to be moving south from Goldsboro in wagons as fast as possible, found plenty of willing ears, though my army of eighty thousand men had been at Goldsboro from March 22d to the date of his dispatch, April 26th; and such a train would have been composed of from fifteen to thirty-two six-mule teams to have hauled this specie, even if it all were in gold. I suppose the exact amount of treasure which Davis had with him is now known to a cent; some of it was paid to his escort when it disbanded at and near Washington, Georgia, and at the time of his capture he had a small parcel of gold and silver coin, not to exceed ten thousand dollars, which is now retained in the United States Treasury vault at Washington, and shown to the curious. "The thirteen millions of treasure with which Jeff'. Davis was to corrupt our armies and buy his escape, dwindled down to the contents of a hand valise! To say that I was merely angry at the tone and substance of these published bulletins of the War Department, would hardly express the state of my .'; THE CAPTURED COTTON AT SAVANNAH. 207 ; feelings. I was outraged beyond measure, and was resolved to resent the in sult, cost what it might." This ridicule of Halleck is based upon a perfectly evident misprint of "Goldsboro'' for "Greensboro" in transmitting Halleck's dispatch of the 26th April, as it was through the latter place the rebel Cabinet passed. How little reason he had for this outburst upon the question of Jeff. Davis' gold, will appear from the fact that the day before this telegram of Halleck's was written, General Sherman had himself telegraphed substantially the same thing to Admiral Dahlgren, and also to General Gillmore. The following is Sherman's gold dispatch: KAIKIGH, N. C., April 25, 1865. Major-General G. A. GILLMOBE, Commanding Department of the South, and Seal-Admiral JOHX A. DAHLGREX. Commanding S. A. B. Squadron. I expect Johnston will surrender his army. We have had much negotia tion, and things are settling down to the terms of Lee's army. Jeff. Davis and his Cabinet, with considerable specie, is making his way toward Cuba. He passed Charlotte, going south, on the 23d, and I think he will try to reach the Florida coast either at Cedar Keys or lower down. It would be well to catch him. Can't you watch the East coast, and send word round to the West coast? W. T. SHEKMAIT, Major-General. The facts presented from the records in this chapter, are quite sufficient to show the totally unreliable character of what the General of the army has written reflecting upon the great War Secretary. CHAPTER XVI. THE BATTLE OP BEXTONVILLE-- THE CARELESS ADVAXCE OF AN ARMY. THE battle of Bentonville affords one of the most marked examples of carelessness in the management of a great army which can be found in the history of the war. > Unlike the march from Atlanta to the sea, that from Savannah northward through the Carolinas originated with General Sherman. And in all respects it was a wonderful movement. The first instructions of General Grant contemplated an entrenched camp near Savannah, and the transportation of the bulk of Sherman's force by sea to City Point. General Sherman was very anxious, however, to capture Savannah, and then march northward by land. The reasons he gave Grant were such as to induce the latter to accept Sherman's plan as better than his own. The campaign from Savannah was in every way more difficult and hazardous than the march from Atlanta. In coming down to the sea there had been no veteran enemy in front, nor indeed, any force worthy of mention, nor had there been important garrisons on either flank to threaten or annoy. The roads were in the general direction of the larger, streams, and the country was well adapted to the march of an army. But from the moment of leaving Savannah grave difficulties were to be expected at every step. The country was low and exceedingly swampy, the rains had swollen the streams and (208) I f| : THE BATTLE OF BENTONVILLE. 209 i: flooded the low lands, and the direction of the march was ; across them all. In front was Hardee with a force which might be formidable in contending the passage of the largei rivers. On the right were the garrisons of Charleston, Georgetown, and Wilmington. There was reason to expect that a portion of Hood's army would arrive on the left and strike from the direction of Augusta. Lastly, "Wade Hamp ton, then popular in South Carolina, had been sent down from Lee's army to rally an opposing force. And, as the result proved, before serious battle was delivered, an army esti mated at thirty-seven thousand veteran Confederate troops con centrated at Bentonville, under Sherman's old antagonist Johnston. The Union force at the time was fifty-seven thousand. In free conversation between General SchofielcFs officers and the prominent commanders in the Confederate forces, when they were paroled a few weeks later, all expressed great admiration for the campaign northward from Savannah and astonishment at its success. They had confidently expected, when the Union army began to push through the great swamps, that it would lose its artillery and its trains, and never emerge in an organized condition. But the roads, con structed of logs and brush, which sunk to the axles of the artillery under the march of each successive division, were rebuilt by the division which followed, and the resistless columns moved steadily and surely against natural difficulties such as no other army breasted during the Avar. Sherman had left smoking South Carolina, with its ruined railroads, behind him ; his four corps had converged atFayetteville, and there crossed the Cape Fear River. Here the right and left wings again separated, but marched in the general direction of Goldsboro. All the Confederate garrisons of points below were piled up in his front, the provisions were running low in his trains, and there was need of unusual care and prudence. How great was the neglect instead, and how narrow the, escape of Sherman from serious disaster, the history* 1o4f the battle of Bentonville will show. 210 THE BATTLE OF BENTONVILLE. ;;i Little became known at the time, of the real character of : this battle. The surrender of Lee, which occurred before the ; facts connected with Bentonville could be disclosed, and the appalling death of Mr. Lincoln, occupied the full attention of the country. By the time it so recovered as to turn its mind toward North Carolina, Johnston had offered to sur render, and so Bentonville passed almost unnoticed. It is just to General Sherman to say, that in his Memoirs he brings the real facts connected with this action into bolder relief than any other of his mistakes of which he treats. But the official record supplies some important omis sions. ,, Concerning the start from Savannah northward, General Sherman writes: "I knew full well at the time that the broken fragments of Hood's army (which had escaped from Tennessee) were being hurried rapidly across Georgia, by Augusta, to make junction in my front, estimating them at the maximum, twenty-five thousand men, and Hardee's, Wheeler's, and Hamp ton's forces at fifteen thousand, made forty thousand, which, if handled with spirit and energy, would constitute a formidable force, and might make the passage of such rivers as the Santee and Cape Fear a difficult undertaking." His whole army reached Fayetteville, North Carolina, and crossed the Cape Fear to move on Goldsboro, where he expected to make a junction with General Schofield, then advancing from Newbern. From this point, in a letter to General Grant, dated March 12, 1865, he said: " Jos. Johnston may try to interpose between me here and Schofield about Newbern, but I think he will not try that, but concentrate his scattered armies at Saleigh, and I will go straight at him as soon as I get our men reolothed and our wagons reloaded." And in another letter of the same date to General Terry, he wrote: "I can whip Jos. Johnston provided he does not catch one of my corps in flank, and I will see that the army marches hence to Goldsboro in compact form," THE BATTLE OF BE^TONVILLE. 211 But. in spite of this good resolution, the right and left wings were marched on roads from ten to fifteen miles apart, and each wing was strung out at great length. Of the start from Fayetteville, General Sherman writes: "I then knew that my special antagonist, General Jos. Jolmston, was back, with part of his old army; that he would not be misled by feints and false reports, and would, somehow, compel me to exercise more caution than I had hitherto done. I then overestimated his force at thirty-seven thousand infantry, supposed to be made up of S. D. Lee's corps, four thousand; Cheatham's, five thousand; Hope's, eight thousand; Hardee's, ten thousand; and other detachments, ten thousand; with Hampton's, Wheeler's, and But ler's cavalry, about eight thousand. Of these, only Hardee and the cavalry were immediately in our front, while the bulk of Johnston's army was sup posed to be collecting at or near Baleigh. * * * * " On the loth of March the whole army was across Cape Fear Biver, and at once began its march for Goldsboro--the Seventeenth Corps still on the right, the Fifteenth next in order, then the Fourteenth and Twentieth on the extreme left, the cavalry acting in close concert with the left flank. With almost a certainty of being attacked on this flank, I had instructed General Slocum to send his corps trains, under strong escort, by an interior road, holding four divisions ready for immediate battle. General Howard was in like manner ordered to keep his trains well to his right, and to have four divisions, unencumbered, about six miles ahead of General Slocum, within easy support." * * * * On the 16th, about Averysboro, "the opposition continued stubborn," and General Slocum had quite a brisk fight, losing twelve officers and sixty-five men killed, and four hundred and seventy-seven wounded. The succeeding events are thus described in the Memoirs : "From Averysboro the left wing turned"east toward Goldsboro, the Four teenth Corps leading. I remained with this wing until the night of the 18th, when we were within twenty-seven miles of Goldsboro, and five from Bentonvilte; and, supposing that all danger was over, I crossed over to join How ard's column, to the right, so as to be nearer to Generals Schofield and Terry, known to be approaching Goldsboro. I overtook General Howard at Falling Creek Church, and found his column well drawn out, by reason of the bad ro'ads. I had heard some cannonading over about Slocum's head of column, and supposed it to indicate about the same measure of opposition by Hardee's troops and Hampton's cavalry, before experienced. But, during the day, a messenger overtook me, and notified me, that, near Bentonville, General 212 THE BATTLE OF BENTONVILLE. Slocum had run up against Johnston's whole army. I sent back orders for him to fight defensively, to save time, and that I would come up, with reinforce ments, from the direction of Cox's Bridge, by the road which we had reached near Falling Creek Church. The country was very obscure, and the maps extremely defective. " By this movement I hoped General Slocum would hold Johnston's army facing west, while I would come on his rear from the east. The Fifteenth Corps, less one division (Hazen's), still well to the rear, was turned at once toward Bentonville; Hazen's division was ordered to Slocum's flank; and orders were also sent for General Blair, with the Seventeenth Corps, to come to the same destination. Meantime the sound of cannon came from the di rection of Bentonville. "The night of the 19th caught us near Falling Creek Church; but early the next morning the Fifteenth Corps, General C. B. "Wood's division leading, closed down on Bentonville, near which it was brought up by encountering a line of fresh parapet, crossing the road and extending north towarf Mill Creek. " After deploying, I ordered General Howard to proceed with due caution, using skirmishers alone, till he had made junction with General Slocum, .on his left. These deployments occupied all day, during .which two divisions of the Seventeenth Corps also got up. At that time General Johnston's army occupied the form of a V, the angle reaching the road leading from Averysboro to Goldsboro, and the flanks resting on Mill Creek, his lines embracing the village of Bentonville. " General Slocum's wing faced one of these lines, and General Howard's the other; and, in the uncertainty of General Johnston's strength, I did not feel disposed to invite a general battle, for we had been out from Savannah since the latter part of January, and our wagon trains contained but little food. I had also received messages during the day from General Schofield, at Kiriston, and General Terry, at Faison's Depot, approaching Goldsboro; both expected to reach it by March 21, During the 20th we simply held .our ground, and started our trains back to Kinston for provisions, which would be needed in the event of being forced to fight a general battle at Benton ville. The next day (21st) it began to rain again, and we remained quiet tiil about noon, when General Mower, ever rash, broke through the rebel line on his extreme left flank, and was pushing straight for Bentonville and the bridge across Mill Creek. I ordered him back to connect with his own corps, and, lest the enemy should concentrate on him, ordered the whole rebel line to be engaged with a strong skirmish fire. " I think I made a mistake there, and should rapidly have followed Mowers' lead with the whole of the right wing, which would have brought on a gen eral battle, and it could not have resulted otherwise than successfully to us, lay reason of our vastly superior numbers; but at the moment, for the rea sons given, I preferred to make junction with Generals Terry and Schofield, before engaging Johnston's army, the strength of which was utterly unknown. THE BATTLE OF BENTONVILLE. 213 The next day he was gone, and had retreated-on Smithfield; and, the roads all being clear, our army moved to Goldsboro. The heaviest fighting at Bentonville was on the first day, viz.: the 19th, when Johnston's army struck the head of Slocum's column, knocking back Carlin's division. But as soon as General Slocum had brought up the rest of the Fourteenth Corps into line, and afterward the Twentieth on his left, he received and repulsed all attacks, and held his ground, as ordered, to await the coming back of the right wing." General Sherman's formal report of this battle, dated Golds boro, April 4, 1865, contains the following very contradictory .statements concerning the attack : "All the signs induced me to believe that the enemy would make no fur ther opposition to our progress, and would not attempt to strike us in flank while in motion." A few paragraphs below, in the same report, he again refers to the matter, as follows : "Johnston had moved, by night, from Smithfield, with great rapidity, and without unnecessary wheels, intending to overwhelm my left flank before it could be relieved by its cooperating columns. But he reckoned without his host. I had expected just such a movement all the way from Fayetteville, and was prepared for it." From the above extracts it is quite evident that Johnston attempted to concentrate his forces, fall upon the left wing of Sherman's army, crush it before the others could arrive, and then, in turn, attack the right, and that he came much nearer success than it is pleasant to contemplate. The warnings of such a concentration, as will be seen, were abundant. That they were not heeded seems marvelous and the extreme of carelessness. Some of the telegrams accompanying a former printed report of General Sherman make the situation stil 1 clearer. The advance of the left wing began at seven o'clock on the 19th of March, and was stubbornly contested from the first. About ten o'clock General Slocum became convinced that he had encountered the enemy in force. He therefore concluded to assume the offensive, and communicate with General Slier- 214 THE BATTLE OF BENTONVILLE. man. The two wings were so far separated that it was six or seven hours before the commanding general, who was with the right wing, could be reached. At five P. Ji., of the 19th, he sent the following dispatch to General Schofield, then approaching Goldsboro : " Since making my dispatch to-day (2 p. M.) General Slocum reports the enemy in force between him and Cox's Bridge; thinks it is the main army of the enemy. I can hardly suppose the enemy will attempt to fight us this side of the Neuse, "but will direct all my columns on Cox's Bridge to-morrow. You must secure Goldsboro, and fortify." At the same hour he dispatched General Balpatrick : "Your report of to-day is received. General Slocum thinks the wMie rebel army is in his front. I can not think Johnston would fight us with tie Neuse to his rear." On the morning of the 20th, at 4 A. M., General Sherman : wrote as follows to General Terry: " Johnston, with his concentrated force, made an unsuccessful attack on my left wing yesterday, near Bentonville. I am just starting with my right wing to attack him." And again to General Terry at 6 A. M.: " Yesterday Johnston, with his force concentrated, struck my left wing, near Bentonville, and they had a severe battle, lasting until night. General Slocum beat them off, but was uneasy. I am now turning the right wing on Bentonville. * * * * By to-night I will know if Jos. Johnston; intends to fight me in force, when I will communicate further." To General Schofield, at 2 p. M., of the 20th, he wrote: " I am now within two miles of Slocum, but Johnston is between us. We are now skirmishing." As will be observed, this was twenty-eight hours after the attack in force began on Slocum. At 8 P. M., of the 20th, he wrote General Slocum: "We struck the enemy on his left rear about noon and have pressed him very hard, and have dislodged him from all his barricades except the line THE BATTLE OF BENTONVILLE. 215 constructed as against you, which may be double or inclosed, for our men find parapets from the road well down to Mill Creek. Jolmston hoped to over* come your wing before I could come to your relief; having failed in that I can not see why he remains, and still think lie will avail himself of night to get back to Sinithfield. I would rather avoid a general battle if possible, but if he insists on it we must accommodate him. In that event, if he be in posi tion to-morrow, I want you to make a good road around his flank into this, and to-morrow night pass your trains and dispose your troops so that we have our back toward Faison's and Goldsboro. General Schofield was to leave Kinston for Goldsboro to-day, and General Terry has arrived with nine thousand infantry at Faison's, and I have ordered him to Cox's Bridge to be drawn up here if we need him. I can also draw ou General Schofield in a few days for ten thousand men, but I think we have enough." At 9 P. M. of the same day the following dispatch was sent General Terry: "We struck Jolmston on his left rear to-day, and have been skirmishing pretty hard all day. We have opened communication with General Slocum, who had a hard fight yesterday. We are now ready for battle, if Jolmston desires it, to-morrow; but as he has failed to overcome one wing he will hardly invite battle with both. I don't want to fight now or here, and therefore won't object to his drawing off to-night toward Smithfield, as he should." To General Schofield he wrote, March 21, from Bentonville: "Captain Twining is here, and I send by him an order that you will per ceive looks to stayirg here some days. " I thought Jolmston, having failed as he attempted to crush one of my wings, finding he had not succeeded, but that I was present with my whole force, would withdraw; but he has not, and I must fight him here. He is twenty (20) miles from Smithfield, and with a bad road to his real-, but his position is in the swamps, difficult of approach, and I don't like to assail his parapets, which are of the old kind." In a letter to General Grant dated March 22; quoted in the Memoirs, reviewing the affair of Bentonville at length, the following passage occurs: "I wrote you from Fayetteville, North Carolina, on Tuesday, the 14th instant, that I was all ready to start for Goldsboro, to which point I had also ordered General Schofield from Newbern and General Terry from Wilmington. I knew that General Jos. Johnston was in supreme command against me, and that he would have tried to concentrate a respectable army to oppose 216 THE BATTLE OF BENTOSVILLE. the last stage of this march * * * * On Tuesday, the 15th [probably a misprint for Thursday the 16th], General Slocum found Hardee's army from Charleston, which had.retreated before us from Cheraw, in position across the narrow swampy neck between Cape Fear and North Elvers where the road branches off' to Goldsboro. There a pretty severe fight occurred, in which Gen eral Sloenm's troops carried handsomely the advanced line, held by a South Carolina brigade commanded by a Colonel Butler. * * * - "We resumed the march toward Goldsboro. I was with the left wing until I supposed all danger had passed, but when General Slocum's head of column was within four miles of Bentonville, after skirmishing as usual with cavalry, he became aware that there was infantry at his front. He deployed a couple of brigades, which, on advancing, sustained a partial repulse, but soon rallied, and he formed a line of the two leading divisions, Morgan's and Carlin's, of Jeff. C. Davis' corps. The enemy attacked these with violence, but was repulsed. This was in the forenoon of Sunday, the 19th. General Slocum brought forward the two divisions of the Twentieth Corps, hastily disposed of them for defense, and General Kilpatriek massed his cavalry, on the left. "General Jos. Johnston had the night before marched his 'whole army (Bragg, Cheatham, S. D. Lee, Hardee, and all the troops he had drawn from every quarter), determined, as he told his men, to crush one of our corps and then defeat us in detail He attacked General Slocum in position from 3 P.M. on the 19th till dark, but was every where repulsed and lost heavily. At the time I was with the Fifteenth Corps marching on a road more to the right, but on hearing of General Slocum's danger directed that corps toward Cox's Bridge, in the night brought Blair's corps over, and on the 20ih marched rapidly on Johnston's flank and rear. We struck him about noon and forced him to assume the defensive and to fortify. Yesterday we pushed him hard and came very near crushing him, the right division of the Seventeenth Corps, however, having broken in to within a hundred yards of where Johnston himself was, at the bridge across Mill Creek. Last night he retreated^ leaving us in possession of the field, dead, and wounded." ' * * * The report of General Hazen, commanding the First Di vision of the right wing which started to the relief of the left, gives a clear idea of the distance of the left wing from the nearest support. Writing of his march to the relief of Gen eral Slocum, he says: " On the 15th the march was resumed in the direction of Goldsboro, which was continued at slow stages till midnight of the 19th, when I received orders to turn back to the assistance of General Slocum, and reported to him with the division near Bentonville at daylight, having marched since sunset twenty miles. TEE BATTLE OF BENTONVILLE. 217 "At 12 M, of the 20th the division was moved to the rear of the Fourteenth Corps, and two regiments were deployed and connected with the First Division of the Fifteenth Corp? on the right and the Fourteenth Corps on the left, engaged the enemy on their lines." # * The extent to which, the left wing was stretched out on the road is shown by a paragraph in General Slocum's report: " On the following morning (20th) Generals Baird and Gear?, each with two hrigades of their respective divisions, and General Sazen, of the Fifteenth Corps, with his entire division, arrived on the field." The first-named generals belonged to the left wing and Bazen to the right. As to the arrival of the left wing in force General Slocum says: " On the morning of the 21st the right wing came up and connected with General Sazen." The battle began about ten o'clock on the 19th. One division of the right wing, by a long night march, came up the next morning, but the main body of that wing was not ready to strike the enemy until the morning of the 21st. The situation of affairs around Bentonville, then, was about this: With a full knowledge that Johnston was rapidly con centrating all available forces in his front, the two wings of the Union army, each inferior to John stones supposed num bers, were allowed to march in extremely open order, and so far apart that, when an attack in force began on the left wing at ten o'clock on the 19th, it was not until noon of the next day that part of the other wing came within striking distance, and even then it was not able to communicate directly with the left wing because the enemy was interposed in force. The total strength of the left wing was less than twenty-six thousand, and only a portion of this could be brought up for the first day's fight. General Johnston's force was then esti mated at thirty-seven thousand, though he afterward stated that he had only fourteen thousand infantry engaged. The Union ofScers and men fought splendidly, and thus 218 THE BATTLE OF BENTONVILLE. neutralized the effect of General Shermaii's carelessness and saved their wing of the army. Still, in spite of their gallant fighting against superior numbers, it was probably owing to a mistake on the Confederate side that the left wing was not wholly overpowered. A general assault had been contemplated by the Confederate generals about an hour before sundown. But by some error in conveying commands, or in obeying them, night came on before their lines were ready for the movement, and so the opportunity for crushing Sherman's left wing passed. Thus narrowly did this magnificent army escape serious disaster in its last battle. General Sherman speaks repeatedly of Generals SchofieSl and Terry as if they were independent commanders, and says* ""Wilmingtou was captured by General Terry on the 22d of February." Accurately, General Terry's forces formed a portion of the command of General Schofield, and advanced on Wilmington upon the left bank of the Cape Fear Kiver, while the TwentyThird Corps formed the other part of Schofield's army, and advanced on the right bank of the river. General J. D. Cox's troops of this latter corps, with one division of Terry's troops, assisted by the fleet, drove the enemy out of Fort Anderson, and then by secretly passing Casement's brigade in flats over Town Creek near its mouth, General Cox secured the main crossing over that strongly guarded stream, and opened the way to the rear of Wilmington, which, as a consequence, was immediately evacuated. As General Sehofield directed all the movements, a careful writer would have said Wilmington was captured by General Schofield. CHAPTER XVII. THE TERMS WITH JOSXSTOX--THE FIRST DRAFT MADE BY A CONFEDERATE CABINET OFFICER. SHEBMAN sneers at political generals, and then devotes thirty pages of his Memoirs to an inaccurate history of his own political surrender to General Jos. E. Johnston near Ealeigh. The country will never forget its joy over the news from Appomattox, or the chill which shortly after fell upon it when the true character of Sherrnan's terms became known. If the country at large ever does forget the circumstances attending the latter event, those who were at Ealeigh at the time never will. The real character of these terms was carefully concealed there, even from very prominent officers, and was known first at the North. It was given out at Sherman's head quarters that the terms granted Johnston were virtually the same as those extended by Grant to Lee, and special stress was laid upon the statement that in no sense had General Sherman recognized the political existence of the Confederacy. When General Grant arrived and announced the prompt rejection of these terms, their real nature first became known. There was much indignation in consequence at Sherman'a course, and many comparisons of views among officers of rank as to his motives. The speedy and successful correction of his great error, and the immediate close of the war, over which the Nation was so busy with its rejoicing, alone saved him from damaging criticism. If it had been made known then that (219) 220 THE TERMS WITH JOHNSTON. :l the first draft of Shermau's terms was written by the rebel iii; Postmaster-General at a consultation had between this mem- ;; ber of Davis' Cabinet, his Secretary of War, Generals John- ;;: stem, and Wade Hampton, it would have made General : Sherman's position most uncomfortable before the people. But in view of the services he had rendered, this, and other unpleasant facts did not find their way to the public then. Now that he has so recklessly invited criticism, and published an inaccurate version of these very negotiations, he can not complain if the beliefs which were entertained among promi nent officers at Raleigh, find expression, and documents cap tured soon after the surrender are made public. ., The theory of General Sherman's negotiation with General Johnston, as held by many prominent officers, whose oppor tunities for obtaining knowledge were excellent, was about, this: General Sherman Avas elated almost beyond measure at his March to the Sea, and northward through the Carolinas. He had rested and refurnished his army at Goldsboro, and had just issued an order for it to march for the purpose, of joining the Army of the Potomac, when down came the news, first, of the evacuation of Richmond, and, following close, of the sur render of Lee. General Grant had captured the great army of the Confederacy; all the rest must follow, as a matter of course; Sherman was not in at the death; the war was to' close with General Grant its greatest military hero. Then came the proposal for a conference from Johnston. While first writing to Johnston that he would extend the same terms given by Grant to Lee, and immediately writing General Grant that he would "be careful not to complicate any points of civil policy;" yet, doubtless influenced by his own inflec tions upon the secondary position in which events were leav ing him, and by the cunning manipulations of the rebel Cabinet, he conceived the idea, not only of receiving the surrender of the remaining military forces of the rebellion, and declaring "peace from the Potomac to the Rio Grande," but of becom- ? THE TERMS WITH JOHNSTON. . 221 ing the political reconstructor of the Nation, and thus the most prominent character emerging from the war. Before any pronounce this theory chimerical, let them read the narratives, extracts, and records which follow. The material points of General Sherman's account of his negotiations with General Johnston are these: On April 14,1865, a note was received from Johnston, dated the day before, asking whether, since "the results of the recent campaign in Virginia have changed the relative military character of the belligerents," General Sherman was willing, in order "to stop the further effusion of blood and devastation of property," to ask from General Grant a suspension of hos tilities for the purpose of permitting "the civil authorities to enter into the needful arrangements to terminate the existing war." General Sherman wrote Johnston the same day that he had authority to suspend hostilities, that he would meet Johnston to confer upon the subject, and added: "that a basis of action may be had, I undertake to abide by the same terms and con ditions as were made by Generals Grant and Lee at Appomattox Court House on the 9th inst., relative to our two armies." The same evening he wrote General Grant as follows, vhough this letter is not given in the Memoirs: "I send copies of a correspondence begun with General Johnston, which I think will be followed by terms of capitulation. I will grant the same terms as General Grant gave General Lee, and be careful not to complicate any points of civil policy." ' On the 17th the opposing commanders met alone in a farm house near Durham Station, when, after some conversation over the assassination of Mr. Lincoln, Sherman says: "I then told Johnston that he must be convinced that he could not oppose my army, and that since Lee had surrendered he could do the same with honor and propriety. He plainly and repeatedly admitted this, and added that any further fighting would be 'murder,' but he thought that instead of 222 THE TERMS WITH JOHNSTON. surrendering piecemeal we might arrange terms that would embrace all the Confederate armies. I asked him if he could control other armies than his own. He said not then, but intimated that he could procure authority from Mr. Davis. I then told him that I had recently had an interview with Gen eral Grant and President Lincoln, and that I was possessed of their views. * * * * That the terms that General Grant had given to General Lee's army were certainly most generous and liberal. All this he admitted, but always recurred to the idea of a universal surrender, embracing his own army, that of Dick Taylor in Louisiana and Texas, and of Maury, Forrest, and others in Alabama and Georgia. * * * * " Our conversation was very general and extremely cordial, satisfying me that it could have but one result, and that which we all desired, viz.: to end the war as quickly as possible; and, being anxious to return to Baleigh before the news of Mr. Lincoln's assassination could be divulged, on General Johnston's saying that he thought that, during the night, he could procure authority to act in the name of all the Confederate armies in existence, we agreed to meet again the next day at noon, at the same place, and parted, he for Hillsboro and I for Ealeigh." 5 On the 18th. the two Generals met again near Durham. The Memoirs give the following account of the interview: * * * * "We again entered Bennett's house and I closed the door. General Johnston then assured me that he had authority over all the Con federate armies, so that they would obey his orders to surrender on the same terms with his own, but he argued that, to obtain so cheaply this desirable result, I ought to give his men and officers some assurance of their political rights after their surrender. I explained to him that Mr. Lincoln's proclama tion of amnesty of December 8, 1863, still in force, enabled every Confederate soldier and officer below the rank of colonel to obtain an absolute pardon by simply laying down his arms and taking the common oath of allegiance, and that General Grant, in accepting the surrender of General Lee's army, had extended the same principle to all the officers, General Lee included. Such a pardon, I understood, would restore to them all their rights of citizenships' But he insisted that the officers and men of the Confederate army were unnecessarily alarmed about this matter as a sort of bugbear. He then said that Mr. Breckinridge was near at hand, and he thought that it would be well for him to be present. I objected on the score that he was then in Davis' Cabi net, and our negotiations should be confined strictly to belligerents. He then said Breckinridge was a Major-General in the Confederate army, and might sink his character of Secretary of War. I consented, and he sent one of his staff officers back, who soon returned with Breckinridge, and he entered the room. General Johnston and I then again went over the whole ground, and Breckin ridge confirmed what he had said as to the uneasiness of the Southern officers and soldiers about their political rights in case of surrender. While we were THE TERMS WITH JOHNSTON. 223 in consultation, a messenger came with a parcel of papers, which General Johnston said were irom Mr. Beagan, Postmaster-General. He and Breckinridge looked over them, and, after some side conversation, lie handed one of the papers to me. It was in Beagan's handwriting, and began with a long preamble and terms, so general and verbose that I said they were inadmissible. Then recalling the conversation of Mr. Lincoln at City Point, I sat down at the table and wrote off the terms, which, I thought, concisely expressed his views and wishes, and explained that I was willing to submit these terms to the new President, Mr. Johnson, provided that both armies should remain in statu quo until the truce therein declared should expire. I had full faith that General Johnston would religiously respect the truce, which he did; and that I would be the gainer, for, in the few days it would take to send the papers to Washington and receive an answer, I could finish the railroad up to Baleigh, and be the better prepared for a long chase. "Neither Mr. Breckinridge nor General Johnston wrote one word of that paper. I wrote it myself, and announced it as the best I could do, and they readily assented." General Johnston, in his Narrative, gives the following account of the consultation held at President Davis' quarters at Charlotte, after the news of Lee's surrender was received: "In a telegram dated Greensboro, 4:30 P.M., the President directed me to leave the troops under Lieutenant-General Hardee's command, and report to him there. "Taking the first train, about midnight, I reached Greensboro about eight o'clock in the morning on the 12th, and was General Beauregard's guest. His quarters were a burden car, near, and in sight of those of the President. The General and myself were summoned to the President's office in an hour or two, and found Messrs. Benjamin, Mallory, and Beagan with him. We had supposed that we were to he questioned concerning the military resources of our department, in connection with the question of continuing or terminating the war. "But the President's object seemed to be to give, not to obtain information; for, addressing the party, he said that in two or three weeks he would have a large army in the field by bringing back into the ranks those who had abandoned them in less desperate circumstances, and by calling out the enrolled men whom the conscript bureau, with its forces, had been unable to bring into the army. It was remarked, by the military officers, that men who had left the army when our cause was not desperate, and those who, under the same circumstances, could not be forced into it, would scarcely, in the present desperate condition of our affairs, enter the service upon mere invitation. Neither opinions nor information was asked, and the conference terminated. Before leaving the room, we learned that Major-General Breckinridge's arrival was expected in the course of the afternoon, and it was not 224 THE TERMS WITH JOKNSTON. doubted that he would bring certain intelligence of the state of affairs in Virginia. " General Breckinridge came as expected, arid confirmed the report of the surrender of the army in Virginia. General Beauregard and myself, con versing together after the intelligence of the great disaster, reviewed the con dition of our affairs, and carefully compared the resources of the belligerents, and agreed in the opinion that the Southern Confederacy was overthrown. In conversation with General Breckinridge afterward, I repeated this, and said that the only power of government left in the President's hands was that of terminating the war, and that this power should be exercised without more delay. I also expressed my readiness to suggest to the President the absolute necessity of such action, should an opportunity to do so be given me. General Breckenridge promised to make me this opportunity. " Mr. Mallory came to converse with me on the subject, and showed great anxiety that negotiations to end the war should be commenced, and urged that I was the person who should suggest the measure to the President. I, on the contrary, thought that such a suggestion would come more .prop erly from one of his ' constitutional advisers,' but told Mr. Mallory of my conversation with General Breckinridge. "That gentleman fulfilled his engagement promptly; and General Beauregard and myself were summoned to the President's office an hour or two after the meeting of hia Cabinet there next morning. Being desired by the President to do it, we compared the military forces of the two parties to the war: ours, an army of about twenty thousand infantry and artillery, and five thousand mounted troops; those of the United States, three armies that could be combined against ours, which was insignificant compared with either--Grant's, of a hundred and eighty thousand men; Sherman's, of a hundred and ten thousand at least; and Canby's, of sixty thousand--odds of seventeen or eighteen to one, which in a few weeks could be more than doubled. " I represented that, under such circumstances, it would be the greatest of human crimes for us to attempt to continue the war; for, having neither money nor credit, nor arms but those in the hands of our soldiers, rior ammunition but that in their cartridge boxes, nor shops for repairing arm's or fixing ammunition, .the effect of our keeping the field would be not to harm the enemy, but to complete the devastation of our country and ruin of its people. I, therefore, urged that the President should exercise at once the only function of government still in his possession, and open negotiations for peace. "The members of the Cabinet present were then desired by the President to express their opinions on the important question. Genera! Breckinridge, Mr. Mallory, and Mr. Beagan, thought that the war was decided against us; and that it was absolutely necessary to make peace. Mr. Benjamin expressed the contrary opinion. The latter made a speech for war, much like that of Sempronius in Addison's play. The President replied to our suggestion as THE TEEMS WITH JOHNSTOX. 225 if somewhat annoyed by it. He said that it was idle to suggest that he should attempt to negotiate, when it was certain, from the attempt previ ously made, that his authority to treat would not be recognized, nor any terms that he might offer considered by the Government of the United States. I reminded him that it had not been unusual, in such cases, for military commanders to initiate negotiations upon which treaties of peace were founded; and proposed that he should allow me to address General Sherman on the subject. After a few words in opposition to that idea, Mr. Davis reverted to the first suggestion, that he should offer terms to the Government of the United States--which he had put aside; and sketched a letter appropriate to be sent by me to General Sherman, proposing a meeting to arrange the terms of an armistice to enable the civil authorities to agree upon terms of peace. That this course might be adopted at once, I proposed that he should dictate the letter then to Mr. Mallory, who was a good penman, and that I should sign and send it to the Federal commander im mediately. The letter, prepared in that way, was sent by me with all dis patch to Lieutenant-General Hampton, near Hillsboro, to be forwarded by him to General Sherman. It was delivered to the latter next day, the 14th, and was in these terms : '"The results of the recent campaign in Virginia have changed the rela tive military condition of the belligerents. I am, therefore, induced to address you, in this form, the inquiry whether, in order to stop the further effusion of blood and devastation of property, you are willing to make a temporary suspension of active operations, and to communicate to Lieu tenant General Grant, commanding the armies of the United States, the request that he will take like action in regard to other armies--the object being to permit the civil authorities to enter into the needful arrangements to terminate the existing war.' " After mentioning the means taken to secure a meeting, the Narrative continues with an account of the interview, which General Sherman thus indorses: " General Johnston's account of our interview, in his Narrative (page 402, et seq.), is quite accurate and correct, only I do not recall his naming the capitulation of Loeben to which he refers." Johnston's statement, thus referred to and indorsed, is as follows: "When General Sherman understood what seemed to have escaped him in reading my letter, that my object was to make such an armistice as would give opportunity for negotiation between the 'civil authorities' of the two countries, he said that such negotiations were impossible, because the Govern ment of the United States did not acknowledge the existence of a Southern 15 226 THE TEEMS WITH JOHXSTON. Confederacy; nor, consequently, its civil authorities as such. Therefore, he could not receive, for transmission, any proposition addrevSsed to the Govern^ ment of the United States by those claiming to be the civil authorities of a Southern Confederacy. He added, in a manner that carried conviction of sincerity, expressions of a wish to divert from the South such devastation as the continuance of the war would make inevitable; and, as a means of accomplishing that object, so far as the armies we commanded were con cerned, he offered me such terms as those given to General Lee. " I replied that our relative positions were too different from those of the armies in Virginia to justify me in such a capitulation, but suggested that we might do more than he proposed; that, instead of a partial suspension of hostilities, we might, as other generals had done, arrange.the terms of a permanent peace,, and among other precedents reminded him of the prelimi naries of Loeben, and the terms in which Napoleon, then victorious, pro posed negotiation to the Archduke Charles, and the sentiment he expressed, that the civic crown earned by preserving the life of one citizen, confers truer glory than the highest achievement merely military. General Sherman replied, with heightened color, that he appreciated such a sentiment, and that to put an end to further devastatfon and bloodshed, and restore, the Union, and with it the prosperity of the country, were to him objects of ambition. "We then entered into a discussion of the terms that might be given to the Southern States, on their submission to the authority of the United States. General Sherman seemed to regard the resolutions of Congress and the declarations of the President of the United States as conclusive that the restoration of the Union was the object of the war, and to believe that the soldiers of the United States had been fighting for that object. A long official conversation with Mr. Lincoln, on Southern affairs, a very short time before, had convinced him that the President then adhered to that view. " In the course of the afternoon we agreed upon the terms expressed in the memorandum drawn up on the 18th, except that General Sherman did >not consent to include Mr. Davis and the officers of his Cabinet in an otherwise general amnesty. This consideration was mine of course. General Shermaridid not desire the arrest of these gentlemen. He was too acute not to foresee the embarrassment their capture would cause; therefore, he wished them to escape. Much of the afternoon was consumed in endeavors to dispose of this part of the question in a manner that would be satisfactory both to the Government of the United States and the Southern people, as well as to the Confederate President; but at sunset no conclusion had been reached, and the conference was suspended, to be resumed at 10 o'clock next morning. Thinking it probable that the confidential relations of the Secretary of "War with Mr. Davis might enable him to remove the only obstacle to an adjust ment, I requested him by telegraph to join me as soon as possible. "General Breckinridge and Mr. Reagan came to General Plampton'a THE TERMS WITH JOHNSTON. 227 quarters together an hour or two before daybreak. After they had received from me as full an account of the discussion of the day before as my memory enabled me to give, and had learned the terms agreed upon, and the difficulty in the way of full agreement, Mr. Beagan proposed to reduce them to -writing to facilitate reconsideration. In doing so, he included the article for amnesty without exceptions, the only one not fully agreed to. This paper being unfinished when General Breckinridge and myself set out to the place of meeting, was to be sent to me there. When we met, I proposed to General Sherman that General Breckinridge should be admitted to our discussion, as his personal relations with the Presi dent of the Confederacy might enable him to remove the obstacle to agree ment that we had encountered the day before. He assented, and that gentleman joined us. " We had conversed on the subject discussed the day before, perhaps a half hour, when the memorandum written by Mr, Reagan was brought. I read this paper to General Sherman, as a basis for terms of peace, pointing out to him that it contained nothing which he had not already accepted, but the language that included the President and Cabinet in the terms of amnesty. After listening to General Breckinridge, who addressed him six or eight minutes in advocacy of these conditions of peace, General Sherman wrote very rapidly the memorandum that follows, with the paper presented by me before him. He wrote so rapidly that I thought at the time that he must have come to the place prepared to agree'to amnesty, with no exceptions. His paper differed from mine only in being fuller." General Sherman gives the following account of his consul tations with his principal officers after his first interview with Johnston in regard to the character of terms that should be offered: "During the evening of the 17th and morning of the 18th, I saw nearly all the general officers of the army (Schofield, Slocum, Howard, Logan, Blair), and we talked over the matter of the conference at Bennett's house of the day before, and without exception, all advised me to agree to some terms, for they all dreaded the long and harassing march in pursuit of a dissolving and fleeing army; a mareh that might carry us back again over the thousand miles that we had just accomplished. We all knew that if we could bring Johnston's army to bay, we could destroy it in an hour, but that was simply impossible in the country in which we found ourselves. We dis cussed all the probabilities, among which was, whether, if Johnston made a point of it, I should assent to the escape from the country of Jeff. Davis and his fugitive Cabinet; and some one of my general officers, either Logan or Blair, insisted that if asked for, we should even provide a vessel to carry them to Nassau from Charleston." 228 THE TERMS WITH JOHNSTON. ::;;||| In Craven's Prison Life of Jeff. Davis, the author this version of the circumstances attending the surrender oh : Johnston, which contains also an allusion to the proposition : for Davis' escape, mentioned in the Memoirs. Mr. Craven ; says: " At Lexington he (Davis) received a dispatch from Johnston requesting that the Secretary of War, (General Breckinridge) should repair to his head quarters near Raleigh--General Sherman having submitted a proposition for laying down arms which was too comprehensive in its scope for any mere military commander to decide upon. Breckinridge and Postmaster-General Eeagan immediately started for Johnston's camp, where Sherman submitted the terms of surrender on which an armistice was declared; the same terms subsequently disapproved by the authorities at Washington. "One of the features of the proposition submitted by General ShermaSi was a declaration of amnesty to all persons, both civil and military. Notice, being called to the fact particularly, General Sherman said: 'I mean just that,' and gave as his reason that it was the only way to have perfect peace* He had previously offered to furnish a vessel to take away such persons as Mr. Davis might select, to be freighted with whatever .personal property they might want to take with them, and to go wherever it pleased. " General Johnston told Sherman that it was more than useless to carry such a proposition as the last to him (Davis). Breckinridge also informed General Sherman that his proposition contemplated the adjustment of certain matters which even Mr. Davis was not empowered to control. The terms were accepted, however, with the understanding that they shotild be liberally construed on both sides, and fulfilled in good faith; General Breckinridge adding that certain parts of the terms would require to be submitted to the various State Governments of the Confederacy for rati fication." These statements of General Sherman and Mr. Davis cor respond with those made by General Johnston. By comparing the accounts of Generals Sherman and John ston, it will appear that the former officer says he read the draft of terms drawn np by Mr. Reagan, the Confederate Postmaster-General, but found them so general and verbose as not to be admissible. Johnston's account (indorsed as accurate by Sherman) states that the latter wrote his memo randum with Reagan's paper before him, and that it differed from Reagan's only in being fuller. THE TEEMS WITH JOHNSTON. 229 A copy of this draft was afterward sent to the War Depart ment by General Sherman,, indorsed in his own hand as fol lows: "Copy of a project sent by General Johnston, being the production of Mr. Eeagan, P. M. General of the Con federates." The original of this draft was soon after captured by a Union officer, and below is an exact copy of it and of the attached note transmitting it to General Johnston during the interview: "As the avowed motive of the Government of the United States for the prosecution of the existing war with the Confederate States is to secure a reunion of all the States under one common government, and as wisdom and sound policy alike require that a common government should rest on the consent and be supported by the affections of all the people who compose it, now, in order to ascertain whether it be practicable to put an end to the existing war and to the consequent destruction of life and property, having in view the correspondence and conversation which has recently taken place between Major-General W. T. Sherman and myself, I propose the following points as a bais of pacification : " 1. The disbanding of the military forces of the Confederacy; and "2. The recognition of the Constitution and authority of the Government of the United States, on the following conditions: "3. The preservation and continuance of the existing State Governments. " 4. The preservation to the people of all the political rights, and rights of person and property, secured to them by the Constitution of the United States and of their several States. "5. Freedom from, future persecutions or penalties for their participation in the present war. "6. Agreement to a general suspension of hostilities pending these nego tiations." The above draft of terms was accompanied by the follow ing note: General Johnston will see that the accompanying memorandum omits all reference to details, and to the necessary action of the States, and the prelim inary reference of the proposition to General Grant for his consent to the suspension of hostilities, and to the Government of the United States for its action. He will also see that I have modified the first article, according to his suggestion, by omitting the reference to the consent of the President of the Confederate States, and to his employing his good offices to secure the 230 THE TERMS WITH JOHNSTON. acquiescence of the several States to this scheme of adjustment and pacifica tion. This may be done at a proper subsequent time. April 17,1865. JOHN H. REAGAN. By comparing the above draft with the one written by General Sherman with Reagan's before him., it will be seen that Johnston is correct in asserting that Sherman's paper diifered from his only in being fuller, and that Sherman's principal additions were the provisions restoring the courts, and the submission of questions pertaining to divided States to the Supreme Court: Memorandum, or frosts of agreement, made this 18fA day of April, A, D. 1865, near Durham's Station, in the State of North Carolina, by and between General Josef/h E. Johnston, Commanding the Confederate Army, and Major-Qeneral W. T. Sher man, Commanding the Army of the United States in North Carolina, both present. I. (See 6, Reagan's draft.) The contending armies jio>v in the field to maintain the status quo until notice is given by the Commanding General of any one to his opponent, and reasonable time, say forty-eight hours, allowed. II. (See 1, Reagan.) The Confederate armies now in existence to be dis banded and conducted to their several State capitals, there to deposit their arms and public property in the State arsenal, and each officer and man to execute and file an agreement to cease from acts of war, and to abide the action of the State and Federal authorities. The number of arms and muni tions of war to be reported to the Chief of Ordnance at Washington City, subject to the future action of the Congress of the United States, and in the meantime to be used solely to maintain peace and order within the borders of the States respectively, III. (See 3, Reagan.) The recognition by the Executive of the United States of the several State Governments on their officers and Legislatures taking the oaths prescribed by the Constitution of the United States, and where conflicting State Governnents have resulted from the war, the legiti macy of all shall be submitted to the Supreme Court of the United States. IV. The reestablishment of all Federal courts in the several States, with powers as defined by the Constitution and laws of Congress. V. (See 4, Reagan.) The people and inhabitants of all States to be guar anteed, so far as the Executive can, their political rights and franchises, as well as their rights of person and property, as defined by the Constitution of the United States and of the States respectively. VI. (See 5, Reagan.) The Executive authority of the Government of the United States not to disturb any of the people by reason of the late war, so long as they live in peace and quiet, abstain from acts of armed hostility, and. obey the laws in existence at the place of their residence. FAC-SIMILE OF THE ORIGINAL DRAFT SHERMAN'S TERMS WITH [OHNSTON, AS DRAWN BY THE REBEL POST-MASTER GENERAL JOHN H. REAGAN. / ---- Iti. THE TEEMS WITH JOHNSTON, 231 VII. In general terms the war to cease, a general amnesty, so far as the Executive of the United States can command, on condition of the disbandment of the Confederate armies, the distribution of the arms, and the resumption of peaceful pursuits by the officers and men hitherto composing said armies. Not being fully empowered by our respective principals to fulfill these terms, we individually and officially pledge ourselves to promptly obtain the necessary authority, and to carry out the above programme. W. T. SHEBMAK, Major- General Commanding Army of the United States in North Carolina. J. E. JOHKSTON, General Commanding Confederate Slates Army in North Carolina. Both the Confederate and National Cabinets held a consul tation over Sherman's terms on the same day, the former at Charlotte, North Carolina, and the latter at Washington. All the members of President Davis' Cabinet advised him to accept the terms; all the Cabinet officers at Washington advised that they be rejected. General Johnston thus relates what occurred at his head quarters upon the receipt of information that the terms had been rejected at Washington : "In the afternoon of the 24th, the President of the Confederacy, then in Charlotte, communicated to me, by telegraph, his approval of the terms of the Convention of the 17th and 18th, and, within an hour, a special messen ger from General Hampton brought me two dispatches from General Sherman. In one of them he informed me that the Government of the United States rejected the terms of peace agreed upon by us; and in the other he gave notice of the termination of the armistice in forty-eight hours from noon that day. "The substance of these dispatches was immediately communicated to the Administration by telegraph (at 6 p. St.), instructions asked for, and the disbanding of the army suggested, to prevent further invasion and devasta tion of the country by the armies of the United States. The reply, dated eleven o'clock p. M., was received early in the morning of the 25th; it sug gested that the infantry might be disbanded, with instructions to meet at some appointed place, and directed me to bring off the cavalry, and all other soldiers who could be mounted by taking serviceable beasts from the trains, and a few light field pieces. I objected, immediately, that this order provided for the performance of but one of the three great duties then devolving upon us--that of securing the safety of the high civil officers of the Confederate Government; but neglected the other two--the safety of the people and that 232 THE TERMS WITH JOHNSTON. of the army. I also advised the immediate flight of the high civil function aries under proper escort. " The belief that impelled me to urge the civil authorities of the Confederacy to make peace, that it would be a great crime to prolong the war, prompted me to disobey these instructions--the last that I received from the Confederate Government. "They would have given the President an escort too heavy for flight, and not strong enough to force a way for Mm; and would have spread ruin over all the South, by leading the three great invading armies in pursuit. In that belief, I determined to do all in my power to bring about a termination of hostilities. I therefore proposed to General Sherman another armistice and conference for that purpose, suggesting as a basis, the clause of the recent convention relating to the army. This was reported to the Confederate Government at once. General Sherman's dispatch, expressing his agreement to a conference, was received soon after sunrise on the 26th; and I set out for the former place of meeting, as soon as practicable, after announcing to tjie Administration that I was about to do so. "We met at noon in Mr. Bermett's house as before. I found General Sherman, as he appeared in our previous conversation, anxious to prevent further bloodshed, so we agreed without difficulty upon terms putting an end to the war within the limits of our commands which happened to be co-extensive--terms which we expected to produce a general pacification." As will be remembered, Mr. Stanton caused to be made public the following "among others," as the grounds upon which the original terms were rejected : "First--It was an exercise of authority not vested in General Sherman, and on its face shows that both he and Johnston knew that General Sherman had no authority to enter into any such arrangement. "Second--It was an acknowledgment of the rebel Government. "Third--It is understood to reestablish rebel State Governments that had' been overthrown at the sacrifice of many thousands of loyal lives and immense treasure, and placed arms and munitions of war in the hands of rebels at their respective capitals, which might be used as soon as the armies of the United States were disbanded, and used to conquer and subdue loyal States. "Fourth--By the restoration of the rebel authority in their respective States, they would be enabled to reestablish slavery. " Fifth--It might furnish a ground of responsibility by the Federal Gov ernment to pay the rebel debt, and certainly subjects loyal citizens of the rebel States to debts contracted by rebels in the name of the States. "Sixth--It put in dispute the existence of loyal State Governments, and the new State of West Virginia, which had been recognized by every depart ment of the United States Government. "Seventh--It practically abolished the confiscation laws, and relieved THE TEEMS WITH JOHNSTON. 233 rebels of every degree who had slaughtered our people, from all pains and penalties for their crimes. "Eighth--It gave terms that had been deliberately, repeatedly, and solemnly rejected by President Lincoln, and better terms than the rebels had ever asked in their most prosperous condition. "Ninth--It formed no basis of true and lasting peace, but relieved the rebels from the pressure of our victories, and left them in condition to renew their effort to overthrow the United States Goverment, and subdue the loyal States, whenever their strength was recruited, and any opportunity should offer." While waiting to hear from "Washington in regard to the fate of his terms, General Sherman, in the course of a letter transmitting some orders to General J. H. Wilson, then operating with cavalry in Georgia, thus expressed his ideas concerning slavery to General Johnston : HEADQUARTERS MILITARY Dirrsio-v OF THE MISSISSIPPI, ) IN THE FIELD, RALEIGH, N. C., April 21. J General J. E. JOHNSTOU, Commanding Confederate Army. GENERAL: * * * * I shall look for Major Hitchcock back from Washington on Wednesday, and shall promptly notify you of the result. By the action of General Weitzel in relation to the Virginia Legis lature, I feel certain we will have no trouble on the score of recognizing existing State Governments. It may be the lawyers will want us to define more minutely what is meant by the guarantee of rights of person and property. It may be construed into a compact for us to undo the past as to the rights of slaves, and "leases of plantations" on the Mississippi, of "vacant and abandoned" plantations. I wish you would talk to the best men you have on these points, and, if possible, let us in our final convention make these points so clear as to leave no room for angry controversy. I believe, if the South would simply and publicly declare what we all feel, that slavery is dead, that you would inaugurate an era of peace and prosperity that would soon efface the ravages of the past four years of war. Negroes would remain in the South, and afford you abundance of cheap labor, which otherwise will be driven away; and it will save the country the senseless discussions which have kept us all in hot water for fifty years. Although, strictly speaking, this is no subject of a military convention, yet I am honestly convinced that our simple declaration of a result will be accepted as good as law every where. Of course, I have not a single word from Washington on this or any other point of our agreement, but I know the effect of such a step by us will be universally accepted. I am, with great respect, your obedient servant, W. T. SHEBMAS, Major-General U. S. A. 234 THE TEBMS WITH JOHNSTON. ''.\ Through the unheralded arrival of General Grant at Kaleigh,: : General Sherman was made acquainted with the primary dis approval of his terms by the former, and their subsequent; rejection by the Cabinet. He was also instructed to give im mediate notice of the termination of the truce at the close of the forty-eight hours required by its provision. Such notice was sent forward early on the 24th of April, and on the same day General Sherman notified General Johnston that he was instructed not to attempt civil negotiations, and further, that he demanded the surrender of the Confederate army simply upon the terms extended to Lee. To these notes General Johnston sent the following replies : HEADQUARTERS ARMY OF THE TEXNESSEE, ) ', is THE FIKLD, April 25, 1865. } Major- General SHERMAN, United States Army. Your dispatch of yesterday is received. I propose a modification of the c terms you offer, such terms for the army as you wrote on the 18th, they also modified according to changes of circumstances, and a further armistice to arrange details, and a meeting for that purpose. J. E. JOHNSTON, General. IN THE FIELD, April 26,1865. Major-General W. T. SHERIIAN, Commanding United States Forces. GENERAL : I have had the honor to receive your dispatch summoning this army to surrender on the terms accepted by General Lee at Appomattox Court House. I propose, instead of such a surrender, terms based on those drawn up by you on the 18th for the disbandment of this army, and a further armistice and conference to arrange these terms. The disbandment of General Lee's army has afflicted this country with bands having no means of subsistence but robbery, a knowledge of which would, I am sure, induce you to agree to other terms. Most respectfully your obedient servant, J. E. JOHNSTON, General. At a subsequent meeting, and after a protracted discussion, final terms of surrender, drawn up by General Schofield, not by General Sherman, were agreed upon, approved by General Grant, and forwarded to Washington. Then arrived the Northern papers containing Mr. Stanton's bulletins in regard to the character of the first terms, the action thereon by the Cabinet, and the orders given by General THE TERMS WITH JOHNSTON. 235 i Halleck, who had been placed in command of the Army of the James, to push on, cut off Johnston's retreat, and pay no ; attention to orders from Sherman. These awoke that storm of abuse which the latter poured out upon Mr. Stanton and General Halleck. For his criticisms upon the latter, General Grant so far reprimanded him, as to formally suggest the modification of the report in which he reflected upon that officer. The letter upon this subject was as follows: HEADQUARTERS ARMIES OF THE UNITED STATES. ) WASHINGTON, D. C., May 25, 1865. } Major-General W. T. SHERMAN, Comd'g Military IKvision of the Mississippi. GENERAL: General Grant directs me to call your attention to the part of your report in which the necessity of maintaining your truce, even at the expense of many lives, is spoken of. The General thinks that, in making a truce, the commander of an army can control only his own army, and that the hostile general must make his own arrangements with other armies acting against him. Whilst independent generals, acting against a common foe, would naturally act in concert, the General deems that each must be the judge of his own duty, and responsible for its execution. If you should wish, the report will be returned for any change you deem best. Very respectfully your obedient servant, T. S. BOWERS, Assistant Adjutant-General. The part of the report thus alluded to was as follows: HEADQUARTERS MILITARY DIVISION OF THE MISSISSIPPI, 1 IN THE FIELD, CITY POINT, VAV May 9, 1865. ) GENERAL : * * * * It now becomes my duty to paint, in justly severe characters, the still more offensive and dangerous matter of General Halleck's dispatch of April 26th, to the Secretary of War, embodied in his to General Dix of April 27th. General Halleck had been chief of staff of the army at Washington, in which capacity he must have received my official letter of April 18th, wherein I wrote clearly that if Johnston's army about Greensboro were " pushed " it would " disperse," an event I wished to prevent. About that time he seems to have been sent from Washington to Richmond to command the new Mili tary Division of the James, in assuming charge of which, on the 22d, he defines the limits of his authority to be the " Department of Virginia, the Army of the Potomac, and such part of North Carolina as may not be occu pied by the command of Major-General Sherman." (See his General Orders No. 1.) 236 THE TEEMS WITH JOHNSTON. :iii Four days later, April 26th, he reports to the Secretary that he has: ordered Generals Mead, Sheridan, and Wright to invade that part of Norths Carolina which was occupied by my command, and pay "no regard to any truce or orders of " mine. They were ordered to " push forward, regardless of any orders save those of Lieutenant-General Grant, and cut off Johnston's retreat." He knew at the time he penned that dispatch and made those orders that Johnston was not retreating, but was halted under a forty-eight hours' truce with me, and was laboring to surrender his command and prevent its dispersion into guerrilla bands, and that I had on the spot a magnificent army at my command, amply sufficient for all purposes required by the occasion. The plan of cutting off a retreat fi'om the direction of Burksville and Dan ville is hardly worthy one of his military education and genius. "When he contemplated an act so questionable as the violation of a "truce" made by competent authority within his sphere of command, he should have gone himself, and not have sent subordinates, for he knew I was bound in honor to defend and maintain my own truce and pledge of faith, even at the cost of many lives. When an officer pledges the faith of his Government, he is bound to defend it, and he is no soldier who would violate it knowingly. As to Davis and his stolen treasure, did General Halleck, as chief of staff or commanding officer of the neighboring military division, notify me of the facts contained in his dispatch to the Secretary? No he did not. If the Secretary of War wanted Davis caught, why not order it, instead of, by publishing in the newspapers, putting him on his guard to hide away and escape? No orders or instructions to catch Davis or his stolen treasure ever came to me; but, on the contrary, I was led to believe that the Secretary of War rather preferred he should effect an escape from the country, if made "unknown" to him. But even on this point, I inclose a copy of my letter to Admiral Dahlgren,. at Charleston, sent him by a fleet steamer from Wilmington on the 25th of April, two days before the bankers of Richmond had imparted to General Halleck the important secret as to Davis' movements, designed, doubtless, to stimulate his troops to march their legs off to catch their treasure for their own use. I know, now, that Admiral Dahlgren did receive my letter on the 26th, and had acted on it before General Halleck had even thought of the matter; but I don't believe a word of the treasure story; it is absurd on its face, and General Halleck or anybody has my full permission to chase Jeff. Davis and Cabinet, with their stolen treasure, through any part of the country occupied by my command. The last and most obnoxious feature of General Halleck's dispatch is wherein he goes out of his way, and advises that my subordinates, Generals Thomas, Stoneman, and Wilson, should be instructed not to obey "Sherman's " commands. This is too much, and I turn from the subject with feelings too strong for THE TERMS WITH JOHNSTON. 237 words, and merely record my belief that so much mischief was never before embraced in so small a space as in the newspaper paragraph headed " Sherman's Truce Disregarded," authenticated as " official," by Mr. Secretary Stanton, and published in the New York papers of April 28th. * * * * "VV. T. SKEEMAN, Major-General commanding. General Sherman, however, declined to make the change suggested by General Grant, and gave his reasons at length: HEADQUARTERS MILITARY DIVISION OP THE MISSISSIPPI, ) WASHINGTON, D. C., May 26, 1865. j Colonel T. S. BoWEES, Assistant Adjutant- General, Washington^ D. O. COLONEL : I had the honor to receive your letter of May 25th last evening, and hasten to answer. I wish to precede it by renewed assurance of my con fidence and respect for the President and Lieutenant-General Grant, and that in all matters I will be most willing to shape my official and private conduct to suit their wishes. The past is beyond my control, and the matters em braced in the operations to which yon refer are finished. It is but just the reasons that actuated me, right or wrong, should stand of record, but in all future cases, should any arise, I will respect the decision of General Grant, though I think it wrong. * * * * In discussing this matter, I would like to refer to many writers on military law, but am willing to take Halleck as the text (see his Chapter No. 27). In the very first article he prefaces that " Good Faith" should always be ob served between enemies in war, because when our faith has been pledged to him, as far as the promise extends he ceases to be an enemy. He then defines the meaning of compacts and conventions, and says they are made some times for a general or a partial suspension of hostilities, for the surrender of an army, etc. They may be special, limited to particular places, or to particular forces, but of course can only bind the armies subject to the general who makes the truce, and co-extensive only with the extent of his command. This is all I ever claimed, and clearly covers the whole case. All of North Carolina was in my immediate command, with General Schofield its depart ment commander, and his army present with me. I never asked the truce to have effect beyond my own territorial command. General Halleck himself, in his Orders No. 1, defines his own limits clearly enough, viz.: "Such part of North Carolina as was not occupied by the command of Major-General Schofield." He could not pursue and cut oft' Johnston's retreat toward Saulsbury and Charlotte without invading my command, and so patent was his purpose to defy and violate my truce that Mr. Stanton's publication of the fact, not even yet recalled, modified, or explained, was headed: "Sherman's Truce Disregarded," that the whole world drew but one inference. It admits of no other. I never claimed that the truce bound Generals Halleck and Canby within the sphere of their respective commands as defined by them- 238 THE TERMS WITH JOHNSTOK i;;; selves. It was a partial truce of very short duration, clearly within my limits: : and rights, justified by events, and, as in the case of prisoners in my custody,; i or the violation of a safeguard given by me in my own territorial limits, 1;; was bound to maintain "Good Faith." ;'.: I prefer not to change my report; but again repeat that in all future cases . I am willing to be governed by the interpretation of General Grant, although: I again invite his attention to the limits of my command and those of Gen- eral Halleck at the time, and the pointed phraseology of General Halleckt dispatch to Mr. Stanton, wherein he reports that he had ordered his generals;: to pay no heed to my orders within the clearly defined area of my own com- mand. I am, etc., W. T. SHEBMAN, Major-General commanding. The movements of General Halleck, of which General Sherman thus pointedly complained, were made in pursuance , of the following order from General Grant: FORTRESS MONROE, April 22, 1865. Major-General HALLECK, Richmond, Va. The truce entered into by Sherman will be ended as soon as I can reach Raleigh. Move Sheridan with his cavalry toward Greensboro, North Caro lina, as soon as possible. I think it will be well to send one corps of infantry also, the whole under Sheridan. The infantry need not go further than Dan ville, unless they receive orders hereafter to do so. U. S. GKANT, Lieutenant-General. General Sherman's report and the subsequent correspond ence in relation to it between himself and General Grant, having been brought to the attention of General Halleck, the latter thus reviewed the whole subject: HEADQUARTERS MILITARY DIVISION OF THE JAMES, ) RICHMOND, VA., June 1, 1865. j Hon. E M. STANTON, Secretary of War. SIR : I have just received the Army and Navy Gazette of May 30th, con taining an official publication of Major-General Sherman's letters of May 9th and 26th, with other papers on the same subject, parts of which had been previously published in the newspapers. In these letters and papers General Sherman has made statements and reflections on my official conduct, which are incorrect and entirely unjustified by the facts of the case. 1st. He charges that I encroached upon his military command, by directing a portion of my troops to march upon Greensboro in North Carolina. By direction of the President, I was, on the 19th of April last, assigned to the command of the Military Division of the James, which included "such THE TERMS WITH JOIINSTON, 239 parts of North Carolina as were not occupied by the command of MajorGeneral Sherman." At the time my troops were ordered to Greensboro, General Sherman's troops did not occupy that part of North Carolina; it was occupied by the enemy, and consequent!}' within my command, as defined by General Orders, No. 71, of the War Department. But whether or not Greensboro, or any part of North Carolina, was in my command, General Sherman's remarks are equally without justification. On the 22d of April Lieutenant-General Grant notified me that Sherman's arrangements had been disapproved and orders given to resume hostilities, and directed me to move my troops on Danville and Greensboro, precisely as I did move them, there to await his further orders. My instructions to Gen erals Meade, Sheridan, and Wright were just such instructions as General Grant had directed me to give. The offense, or whatever he may please to call it, if any there was, of marching my troops within territory claimed by General Sherman, was not mine; but General Grant's, and all the abuse which he has directed upon me for that act must fall upon the General-inChief. 2d. General Sherman charges that by marching my troops into North Carolina I violated his truce, which he was bound to enforce even at the cost of many lives by a collision of our respective armies. General Sherman had never sent me his truce; I had never seen it and did not know its terms or conditions. I only knew that his truce or "arrangement," whatever it was, had been disapproved and set aside by the President, and General Grant in ordering the movement of my troops simply notified me of this fact and of the renewal of hostilities. Even if Sherman's truce had been binding on me, which it was not, I had no knowledge of the clause relating to forty-eight hours' notice. It is strange that he should seek to bind me by conditions of the existence of which I was ignorant, and he had taken no measures to inform me. But even had I known them I could not have acted otherwise than I did. I simply carried out the orders of my superior officer, who had seen the truce and knew its terms. If General Sherman was, under the circumstances, justified in stopping the movements of my troops, even by destroying the commands of General Sheridan and General Wright, the responsbility of this sacrifice of human life must have rested either upon General Sherman or upon General Grant, for I simply obeyed the orders of the latter in regard to these movements. General Sherman reflects on me for not going in person to violate, as he is pleased to call it, a truce which he "was bound in honor to defend and main tain," "even at the cost of many lives," and upon the marching powers of the troops which I sent into North Carolina. In reply to this I can only say that I was not ordered to go with these troops, but to send them under their e,ommanders to certain points, there to await further orders from LieutenantGeneral Grant, precisely as I directed. The troops were mostly selected by Gen eral Grant, not by me, and as he had commanded them for a year he probably 240 THE TERMS WITH JOHNSTON. : ; ;|| knew something of their capacity for marching, and whether or not they would march their legs off "to catch the treasure for their own use." 3. Again, General Sherman complains that my orders of April 26th to push forward against Johnston's army were given at the very time I knew -; that that army was surrendering to him. In making this statement he forgets time and circumstances. He must have known that I did not have, and could not possibly have had at that time, any official information of any new arrangements between him and Johnston for the surrender of the latter's army. Neither General Sherman nor any one else could have sent me such official information otherwise than by sea, which would have required several days. I only knew from General Grant that Sherman's " arrangements " had been disapproved, that orders had been given to resume hostilities, and that I was directed by him to push for ward my troops to Greensboro, where they would receive further orders. All other information from North Carolina came from rebel sources. 4th. The burthen of General Sherman's complaint on this subject is, that I* ordered Generals Sheridan and Wright to push forward their troops as directed by General Grant, "regardless of any orders from any one except General Grant." This was simply carrying out the spirit of my instructions from General Grant. He had notified me that orders had been given to resume hostilities, and had directed me to send certain troops to Greensboro to a.wait his further orders. As these troops approached the boundaries of North Carolina, John ston, Beauregard, and other rebel officers tried, on the alleged grounds of arrangements with Sherman, to stop the movement ordered by General Grant When informed of this, I directed my officers to execute the commands which General Grant had given to me, regardless of orders from any one except Grant himself. I respectfully submit that I could not have done less without neglecting my duty. 5th. General Sherman sneers at my sending troops from the direction of Burkesville and Danville against Davis in North Carolina as " hardly worthy of" my "military education and genius." However ridiculous General Sherman may consider these movements, they were made precisely as General Grant had directed them. 6th. He complains that I did not notify him in regard to Davis and his stolen treasure, For the reason that I had no communication open to him. My most direct way of communicating with him was through the Depart ment at Washington, and I sent all information to the Department as soon as it was received. However "absurd" General Sherman may have considered the information, it was given by some of the most respectable and reliable business men in Richmond, through a gentleman whose character and position would prevent me from pronouncing his statements '' absurd," and of saying, without exam ination, "I don't believe a word of the treasure story." 7th. In order to sustain his position that the movements of my troops ;: THE TEEMS WITH JOHNSTON. , 241 ordered by General Grant were in violation of his truce, which I was bound to :observe, even without knowing its terms, and that he would have been justified to resent, "even at the the cost of many lives," General Sherman refers to a chapter of International Law. His reference is most pointedly against his positions and doctrines, and the case given in illustration in paragraph 4 was one of which General Sherman was personally cognizant. In that case a subordi nate commander refused to be bound by a truce of his superior commanding another department. General Sherman was not even my superior. I con tend that all my orders were justified by the laws of war and military usage, even if they had not been directed by superior authority. 8th. General Sherman says that General Grant "reached the Chesapeake in time to countermand General Halleck's orders and prevent his violating my truce." This is not true. General Grant neither disapproved nor countermanded any orders of mine, nor was there at that time any truce. It had ceased by General Grant's orders to resume hostilities and the subsequent surrender of Johnston's army of which he then notified me, and recalled a part of the troops which he had directed me to send to Danville and Greensboro. 9th. There is but one other point in General Sherman's official complaint that I deem it necessary to notice. I refer to the suggestion made to you in regard to orders to Generals Thomas and Wilson for preventing the escape of Davis and his Cabinet. Although these officers were under the nominal command of General Sherman, yet after he left Atlanta, they received their instructions and orders from yourself and General Grant direct, not through General Sherman. This is recognized and provided for by the regulations of the War Depart ment and has been practised for years. I have transmitted hundreds of orders in this way, and General Sherman was cognizant of the fact. The movements of Generals Thomas, Stoneman, Wilson, A. J. Smith, etc., while within General Sherman's general command, have been directed in this way for more than six months. In suggesting that orders be sent to these officers directly and not through General Sherman, I suggested no departure from well established official channels. But even if I had, the responsibility of adopting that course must rest upon the authority who sent the orders. If his complaint is directed against the form of the suggestions, I can only say that I was innocent of any intended oftense. My telegram was hurriedly written, intended for yourself, not the public, and had reference to the state of facts as reported to me. It was reported that orders purporting to come from General Sherman had been received through rebel lines for General Wilson to withdraw from Macon, release his prisoners, and that all hostilities should cease. These orders threw open the doors for the escape of Davis and his party. This I knew was contrary to the wishes and orders of the Gov ernment; but I had no means of knowing whether or not Sherman had been so informed. I at the time had no communication with him or with General Grant, and I was not aware that either could communicate with our officers 16 242 THE TERMS WITH JOHNSTOX. : in the West, except through rebel authorities, who, of course, could not be: relied on. I repeat that my suggestions had reference only to the facts and wishes of the Government as known to me at the time, and was intended in no respect to reflect npon, or be disrespectful to General Sherman. If I had been able to communicate with General Sherman, or had known at the time the condition of affairs in North Carolina, there would have been no necessity or occasion for any suggestion to you, and most probably none would have been made. With these remarks, I respectfully submit that General Sherman's report, so far as he refers to me, is unjust, unkind, and contrary to military usage, and that his statements are contrary to the real facts of the case. I beg leave further to remark that I have, in no way, shape, or manner, criticised or reflected upon General Sherman's course in North Carolina, or npon his truce, or as General Grant styles it "arrangement" with Johnston and Breckinridge, but have simply acted upon the orders, instructions, and expressed wishes of my superiors as communicated to me, and as I und:?~, stand them. Very respectfully, your obedient servant, H. W. HALLECK, Major-Genera! ' The same officer who captured the original of Mr. Reagan's draft of the rejected terms, also secured the written opinions of the different members of Mr. Davis' Cabinet, rendered in accordance with his request, made at the session of his Cabinet held on the 2ist of April, at Charlotte, N. C. All reviewed the situation at length. A few extracts from these opinions will serve to show that the rebel Cabinet held substantially the same views of the scope of Sherman's terms as, according to Mr. Stanton, were entertained at Washington. Mr. Reagan wrote: * * * * "The agreement under consideration secures to our people, if ratified by both parties, the uninterrupted continuance of the existing State Governments; the guarantees of the Federal Constitution, and of the Constitutions of their respective States; the guarantee of their political rights, and of their rights of person, and property, and immunity from future prosecutions, and penalties for their participation in the existing war, on the condition that we accept the Constitution and Government of the United States, and disband our armies by marching the troops to their respective States, and depositing their arms in the State arsenals, subject to the future control of that Government, but with a verbal understanding that they are only to be used for the preservation of peace and order in the respective THE TEEMS WITH JOHNSTON. 243 States. It is also to be observed that the agreement contains no direct reference to the question of slavery; requires no concessions from us in regard to it, and leaves it subject to the Constitution and Laws of the United States and of the several States just as it was before the war." Mr. Benjamin, Secretary of State, summed up the terms as follows: " The Military Convention made between General Johnston and General Shermah is, in substance, an agreement that if the Confederate States will cease to wage war for the purpose of establishing a separate government, the United States will receive the several States back into the Union, with their State Governments unimpaired, with all their Constitutional rights recognized, with protection for the persons and property of the people, and with a general amnesty." Mr. George Davis, Attorney-General, wrote: "Taken as a whole, the convention amounts to this, that the States of the Confederacy shall reenter the old Union upon the same footing on which they stood before seceding from it." In the light of these opinions, how unjust does General Sherman's attack upon the memory of Secretary Stanton appear! General Sherman relates that at the first meeting with John ston, after the rejection of these terms, the latter, " without hesitation agreed to, and we executed" the final terms. But even these were drawn up by General Schofield, and this officer, during the subsequent absence of General Sherman, also made supplementary terms with Johnston, which were found to be necessary to complete the details of the surrender. From all of which it appears that the records tell a very different story of the negotiations with General Johnston from that contained in the Memoirs. CHAPTER XVIII. OPINIONS OF JEFF. DAVIS' CABINET OFFICERS ON SHERMAN'S TERMS. GENERAL SHERMAN, in his Memoirs, returns Avith increased violence to his old attack upon Secretary Stanton, and attempt^ to hold him chiefly responsible for a course in regard to the Sherman-Johnston terms, which at the time was approved by the President, General Grant, General Halleck, every member of the Cabinet, and by the loyal North. He attempts to convey the impression that Mr. Stanton exceeded his authority in the matter, by the statement that President Johnson, and nearly all the members of the Cabinet assured him, after his arrival in Washington, that they knew nothing of Mr. Stanton's publications setting forth the nature of his terms and the reasons of the Cabinet for rejecting them. This is an attempt to escape upon a technicality. The Presi dent, and every member of the Cabinet, had united in rejecting the terms on the grounds which Mr. Stanton made known. ; It is doubtless true that none of them, except Mr. Stanton, knew that these reasons were to be made public in the shape they were till they saw them in the newspapers. And, as the Secretary of War " offered no word of explanation or apology," General Sherman concluded to insult him in public, which he seems to think he afterward did, by refusing to take Mr. Stanton's hand, or as he expresses it, speaking of his own behavior on the stand at the great review, "I shook hands with the President, General Grant, and each member of the Cabinet. As I approached Mr. Stanton, he offered me his (244) ; JEFF. DAVIS' CABINET ON SHERMAN'S TEEMS. 245 hand, but I declined it publicly, and the fact was univer sally noticed "--but how decidedly to the discredit of General Sherman he does not relate in his new capacity of historian. His main complaint is directed at the reasons assigned by Mr. Stanton for the rejection of his terms. He contends that personally lie "cared very little whether they were approved, modified, or disapproved in toto," only he "wanted instruc tions ;" and yet in a letter to Halleck, quoted in the Memoirs, and written the day these terms were agreed upon, is this appeal: "Please give all orders necessary according to the views the Executive may take, and influence him, if possible, not to vary the terms at all, for I have considered every thing, and believe that the Confederate armies once dis persed, we can adjust all else fairly and well." It is now known, from documents which might have slept but for General Sherman's revival of this matter, that the members of Jeff. Davis' Cabinet construed the ShermanJohnston terms exactly as Mr. Stanton and the other members of Lincoln's Cabinet did. It has already been made to appear that Mr. Reagan, the Confederate Postmaster-General; Mr. Breckinridge, Secretary of War; Wade Hampton, and General Johnston held a con sultation at the headquarters of the latter, late at night, after the first conference with General Sherman. Up to that time no draft of " terms" had been prepared by either side, and Mr. Reagan thereupon drew up outlines, based upon Johnston's conversations with Sherman, and this paper was the next day handed to the latter, and, with it before him, he wrote the memorandum, which was afterward signed. This was agreed to, and did not differ in its most important points from the draft prepared by Mr. Reagan. The latter, therefore, was well qualified to inform Mr. Davis of the character of these terms; and a few days later, when they had been under consideration in the rebel Cabinet, he, in common with his associate members, at the request of Mr. 246 JEFF. DAVIS' CABINET ON SHERMAN'S TERMS. .:::::i Davis, gave a written opinion upon the terms and the que,stioH::: of accepting them. . .;;;;; This paper, which is now both interesting and pertinent to i the questions General Sherman has raised, is as follows: \\ Views of Postmaster-General Keagan: To the President. CHAELOTTE, N. C., April 22,1865. SIB--In obedience to your request for the opinions in writing of the mem-: bars of the Cabinet on the questions: first, as to whether you should assent to the preliminary agreement of the 18th inst., between General Joseph E.. Johnston, of the Confederate army, and Major-General "VV- T. Sherman, of the army of the United States, for the suspension of hostilities and the adjust ment of the difficulties between the two countries; and, if so, second, the proper mode of executing this agreement on our part, I hare to say that,. painful as the necessity is, in view of the relative condition of the armies and resources of the belligerents, I must advise the acceptance of the terms of the agreement. General Lee, the General-in-Chief of our armies, has been compelled to surrender our principal army, heretofore employed in the defense of our capital, with the loss of a very large part of our ordnance, arms, munitions of war, and military stores of all kinds, with what remained of our naval establishment. The officers of the civil government have been compelled to abandon the capital, carrying with them the archives, and thus to close, for the time being at least, the regular operations of its several departments, with no place now open to us at which we can reestablish and put these departments in operation, with any prospect of permanency or security for the transaction of the public business and the carrying on of the Govern ment. The army under the command of General Johnston lias been reduced to fourteen or fifteen ---- infantry and artillery and ---- cavalry, and this force is, from demoralization and despondency, melting away rapidly by the troops abandoning the army and returning to their homes singly and in numbers large and small; it being the opinion of Generals Johnston and Beauregard that with the men. and means at their command they can oppose no serious obstacle to the advance of General Sherman's army. General Johnston is of opinion thai; the enemy's forces now in the field exceed ours in numbers by probably ten to one. Our forces in the South, though still holding the fortifications at Mobile, have been unable to prevent the fall of Selma and Montgomery in Alabama, and of Columbus and Macon in Georgia, with their magazines, workshops, and stores of supplies. The army west of the Mississippi is unavailable for the arrest of the vic torious career of the enemy east of that river, and is inadequate for the defense of the country west of it. The country is worn down by a brilliant and heroic, but exhausting and bloody struggle of four years. Our ports are JEFF. DAVIS' CABINET ON SHERMAN'S TERMS. 247 dosed so as to exclude the hope of procuring arms and supplies from abroad; and we are unable to arm our people if they were -willing to continue the struggle. The supplies of quartermaster and commissary stores in the country are very limited in amount, and our railroads are so broken and destroyed as to prevent, to a great extent, the transportation and accumula tion of those remaining. Our currency has lost its purchasing power, and there is no other means of supplying the treasury; and the people are hostile to impressments and endeavor to conceal such supplies as are needed for the army from the officers charged with their collection. Our armies, in case of a prolongation of the struggle, will continue to melt away as they retreat through the country. There is danger, and I think I might say certainty, based on the information we have, that a portion, and probably all of the States will make separate terms with the enemy as they are overrun, with the chance that the terms so obtained will be less favorable to them than those contained in the agreement under consideration. And the despair of our people will prevent a much longer continuance of serious resistance, unless they shall be hereafter urged to it by unendurable oppressions. The agreement under consideration secures to our people, if ratified by both parties, the uninterrupted continuance of the existing State Govern ments ; the guarantees of the Federal Constitution, and of the Constitutions of their respective States; the guarantee of their political rights and of their rights of person and property, and immunity from future prosecutions and penalties for their participation in the existing war, on the condition that we accept the Constitution and Government of the United States, and disband our armies by marching the troops to their respective States, and depositing their arms in the State arsenals, subject to the future control of that Govern ment, but with a verbal understanding that they are only to be used for the preservation of peace and order in the respective States. It is also to be observed that the agreement contains no direct reference to the question of slavery, requires no concessions from us in regard to it, and leaves it subject to the Constitution and Laws of the United States and of the several States just as it was before the war. With these facts before us, and under the belief that we can not now rea sonably hope for the achievement of our independence, which should be dearer than life if it were possibly attainable, and under the belief that a continu ance of the struggle, with its sacrifices of life and property, and its accumu lation of sufferings, without a reasonable prospect of success, would be both unwise and criminal, I advise that you assent to the agreement as the best you can now do for the people who have clothed you with the high trust of your position. In advising this course I do not conceal from myself, nor would I withhold from your Excellency, the danger of trusting the people who drove us to war by their unconstitutional and unjust aggressions, and who will now add the consciousness of power to their love of dominion and greed of gain. It is right also for me to say that much as we have been exhausted in men 248 JEFF. DAVIS' CABINET ON SHERMAN'S TERMS. and resources, I am of opinion that if our people could be induced to cofitinue the contest with the spirit which animated them during the first years of the war, our independence might yet be within our reach. But I see no reason to hope for that now. On the second question, as to the proper mode of executing the agreement, I have to say that whatever you may do looking to the termination of the contest by an amicable arrangement which may embrace the extinction of the Government of the Confederate States, must be done without special authority to be found in the Constitution. And yet, I am of opinion that, charged as you are with the duty of looking to the general welfare of the people, and without time or opportunity, under the peculiarity and necessities of the case, to submit the whole question to the States for their deliberation and action without danger of losing material advantages provided for in the agreement; and, as I believe that you, representing the military power and authority of all the States, can obtain better terms for them than it is probable they could obtain each for itself; and, as it is in your power, if the Federal) authorities accept this agreement, to terminate the ravages of way sooner than it can be done by the several States, while the enemy is still unconscious of the full extent of our weakness, you should, in case of the acceptance of the terms of this agreement by the authorities of the United States, accept them on the part of the Confederate States, and take steps for the disbanding of the Confederate armies on the terms agreed on. As you have no power to change the government of the country, or to transfer the allegiance of the people, I would advise that you submit to the several States, through their governors, the question as to whether they will, in the exercise of their own sovereignty, accept, each for itself, the terms proposed. To .this it may be said, that after the disbanding of our armies and the aban donment of the contest by the Confederate Government, they would have no alternative but to accept the terms proposed or an unequal and hopeless war, and that it would be needless for them to go through the forms and incur the trouble and expense of assembling a convention for the purpose. To such an objection, if urged, it may be answered that we entered into the contest to maintain and vindicate the doctrine of State rights and State sovereignty, and the right of self-government, and that we can only be faithful to the Consti tution of the United States, and true to the principles in support of which we have expended so much blood and treasure, by the employment of the same agencies to return into the old Union which we employed in separating from it and in forming our present Government; and that if this should be an unwel come and enforced action by the States, it would not be more so on the part of the States than on the part of the President, if he were to undertake to execute the whole agreement, and while they would have authority for acting he would have none. This plan would at least conform to the theory of the Constitution of the United States, and would, in future, be an additional precedent, to which the friends of State rights could point in opposing the doctrine of the consolida- : JEFF. DA VIS' CABINET ON SHERMAN'S TERMS. 249 tion of powers in the central government. And if the future shall disclose a disposition (of which I fear the chance is remote) on the part of the people of the United States to return to the spirit and meaning of the Constitution, : then this action on the part of the States might prove to be of great value to the friends of constitutional liberty and good government, In addition to the terms of agreement, an additional provision should be asked for, which will probably be allowed without objection, stipulating for the withdrawal of the Federal forces from the several States of the Confederacy, except a sufficient number to garrison the permanent fortifications and take care of the public property until the States can call their conventions and take action on the proposed terms. In addition to the necessity for this course, in order to make their action as free and voluntary as other circumstances will allow, it would aid in softening the bitter memories which must necessarily follow such a contest as that in which we are engaged. Nothing is said in the agreement about the public debt and the disposition of our public property beyond the turning over of the arms to the State arsenals. In the final adjustment we should endeavor to secure provisions for the auditing of the debt of the Confederacy, and for its payment in common with the war debt of the United States. We may ask this on the ground that we did not seek this war, but only sought peaceful separation to secure our people and States from the effects of unconstitutional encroachments by the other States, and because, on the princi ples of equity, allowing that both parties had acted in good faith, and gone to war on a misunderstanding which admitted of no other solution, and now agree to a reconciliation, and to a burial of the past, it would be unjust to compel our people to assist in the payment of the war debt of the United States, and for them to refuse to all ow such of the revenues as we might contribute to be applied to the payment of our creditors. If it should be said that this is a liberality never extended by the conqueror to the conquered, the answer is that if the object of the pacification is to restore the Union in good faith and to reconcile the people to each other, to restore confidence and faith, and prosperity, and homogenity, then it is of the first importance that the terms of reconciliation should be based on entire equity, and that no just ground of grief or complaint should be left to either party. And to both parties, look ing not only to the present but to the interest of future generations, the amount of money which would be involved, though large, would be as nothing when compared with a reconciliation entirely equitable, which should leave no sting to honor, and no sense of wrong to rankle in the memories of the people, and lay the foundation for new difficulties and for future wars. It is to this feature, it seems to me, the greatest attention should be given by both sides. It will be of the highest importance to all, for the present as well as for the future, that the frankness, sincerity, and justice of botli parties shall be as conspicuous in the adjustment of past difficulties, as their courage and 250 JEE^F. DA VIS' CABINET ON SHEEMAN'S TERMS. i:|: endurance liave been during the war, if we would make peace on a basis ;;;!: which would be satisfactory and might be rendered perpetual. ;!:: In any event provisions should be made which will authorize the Con- . federate authorities to sell the public property remaining on hand, and to apply the proceeds, as far as they will go, to the payment of our public liabilities, or for such other disposition as may be found advisable. But if the terms of this agreement should be rejected, or so modified by the Government of the United States as to refuse a recognition of the right of local self-government and our political rights, and rights of persons and property, or as to refuse amnesty for past participation in this war, then it will be our duty to continue the struggle as best we can, however unequal it maybe; as it would be better and more honorable to waste our lives and Y substance in such a contest than to yield both to the mercy of a remorseless conqueror. I am, with great respect, your Excellency's obedient servant, -..; JOHN H. BEAGAN, Postmaste,r-Ge.nera It will be seen that Mr. Reagan, whose opportunities for being well informed were excellent, looked upon the Sherman" terms as "preliminary," and held, as Mr. Stanton said our Cabinet did, that subsequently a claim might be made that the North should help pay the rebel war debt. The views of the other members of the Da vis Cabinet, sub mitted in writing at the same time, were as follows: Views of Mr. Benjamin, Secretary of State: To the President. CHARLOTTE, N. C., 22d April, 1865. SIE : I have the honor to submit this paper as the advice in writing which you requested from the heads of the departments of the Government. The military convention made between General Johnston and General \ Sherman is, in substance, an agreement that if the Confederate States will \ cease to wage war for the purpose of establishing a separate government, the United States will receive the several States back into the Union with their State Governments unimpaired, with all their constitutional rights recognized, with protection for the persons and property of the people, and with a general amnesty. The question is whether, in view of the military, condition of the belliger ents, the Confederate States can hope for any better result by continuing the war; whether there is any reason to believe that they can establish their independence and final separation from the United States. To reach a conclusion it is requisite to consider our present condition and the prospect of a change for the better. JEFF. DAVIS' CABINET ON SHERMAN'S TERMS. 251 The General-in-Chief of the armies of the Confederacy has capitulated, and his army, the largest and finest within our country, is irretrievably lost. The soldiers have been dispersed and remain at home as paroled prisoners. The artillery, arms, and munitions, of war are lost, and no help can be expected from Virginia, which is at the mercy of the conqueror. The army next in numbers and efficiency is known as the Army of Ten nessee, and is commanded by Generals Johnston and Beauregard. Its rolls call for more than seventy thousand men. Its last returns show a total present for duty, of all arms, of less than twenty thousand men. This number is daily diminishing by desertions and casualties. In a recent con ference with the Cabinet at Greensboro Generals Johnston and Beauregard expressed the unqualified opinion that it was not in their power to resist Sherman's advance, and that as fast as their army retreated, the soldiers of the several States on the line of retreat would abandon the army and go home. We also hear on all sides, and from citizens well acquainted with public opinion, that the State of North Carolina will not consent to continue the struggle after our armies shall have withdrawn further south, and this with drawal is inevitable if hostilities are resumed. This action of North Carolina would render it impossible for Virginia to maintain her position in the Confederacy, even if her people were unanimous in their desire to continue the contest. In the more southern States we have no army except the forces now defending Mobile and the cavalry under General Forrest. The enemy are so far superior in numbers that they have occupied within the last few weeks Selma, Montgomery, Columbus, and Macon, and could continue their career of devastation through Georgia and Alabama without our being able to pre vent it by any forces now at our disposal. It is believed that we could not at the present moment gather together an army of thirty thousand men by a concentration of all our forces east of the Mississippi River. Our sea-coast is in possession of the enemy, and we can not obtain arms and munitions from abroad except in very small quantities and by precarious and uncertain means of transportation. We have lost possession in Virginia and North Carolina of our chief resources for the supply of powder and lead. We can obtain no aid from the Trans-Mississippi Department, from which we are cut off by the fleets of gun-boats that patrol the river. We have not a supply of arms sufficient for putting into the field even ten thousand additional men, if the men themselves were forthcoming. The Confederacy is, in a word, unable to continue the war by armies in the field, and the struggle can no longer be maintained in any other manner than by a guerrilla or partisan warfare. Such a warfare is not, in my opinion, desirable, nor does it promise any useful result. It would entail far more suffering on our own people than it would'cause damage to the enemy; and 252 JEFF. DAVIS' CABINET ON SHERMAN'S TERMS. the people have been such heavy sufferers by the calamities of the war for the last four years that it is at least questionable whether they would be willing . to engage in such a contest, unless forced to endure its horrors in preference to dishonor and degradation. The terms of the convention imply no dishonor, impose no degradation, exact only what the victor always requires--the relinquishment by his foe of the object for which the struggle was commenced. Seeing no reasonable hope of our ability to conquer our independence, admitting the undeniable fact that we have been vanquished in the war, it is my opinion that these terms should be accepted, being as favorable as any that we, as the defeated belligerents, have reason to expect or can hope to secure. It is further my opinion that the President owes it to the States and to the people to obtain for them, by a general pacification, rights and advantages which they would, in all probability, be unable to secure by the separate action of the different States. It is natural that the enemy should be willing to accord more liberal conditions for the purpose of closing the war at once than would be granted if each State should continue the contest till separate terms could be made for itself. The President is the chief political executive of the Confederacy, as well as the Commander-in-Chief of its armies. In the former capacity he is power less to act in making peace on any other basis than that of independence. In the latter capacity he can ratify the military convention under consideration, and execute its provisions relative to the disbandment of the army and the distribution of the arms. He can end hostilities. The States alone can act in dissolving the Confederacy and returning to the Union, according to the terms of the convention. I think that if this convention be ratified by the United States, the Presi dent should, by proclamation, inform the States and the people of the Con federacy of the facts above recited; should ratify the convention so far as he has authority to act as Commander-in-Chief, and should execute the military : provisions; should declare his inability, with the means remaining at his disposal, to defend the Confederacy or maintain its independence, and should resign a trust which it is no longer possible to fulfill. He should further invite the several States to take into immediate consid eration the terms of this convention, with a view to their adoption and execution as being the best and most favorable that they could hope to obtain by a continuance of the struggle. Very respectfully, your obedient servant, 3. P. BENJAMIN, Secretary of State. "Views of Mr. Mallory, Secretary of the Navy: CHARLOTTE, N. C., 24th April, 1865. MB. PRESIDENT: In compliance with your suggestion I have the honor JEFF. DAVIS' CABINET ON SHEKMAN'S TERMS. 253 briefly to present the following views upon the propositions discussed in Cab inet council yesterday. These propositions, agreed upon and signed by General Joseph E. Johnston and W. T. Sherman, may fairly be regarded as providing for the immediate cessation of hostilities, the disbandment of our armies, and the return of our soldiers to the peaceful walks of life; the restoration of the several States of our Confederacy to the old Union, with the integrity of their State Govern ments preserved; the security of their "people and inhabitants" in their rights of person and property under the Constitution and the Laws of the United States, equally with the people of any other State, guaranteed, and a general amnesty for and on account of any participation in the present war. The very grave responsibility devolved upon you by these propositions is at once apparent. To enter at all upon their discussion is to admit that independence, the great object of our struggle, is hopeless. I believe and admit this to be the case, and therefore do I advise you to accept these propo sitions so far as you have the power to do so; and my conviction is that ninetenths of the people of every State of the Confederacy would so advise if opportunity were presented them. They are weary of the war and desire peace. If they could be rallied and brought to the field, a united and determined people might even yet achieve independence; but many circum stances admonish us that we can not count upon their cordial and united action. The vast army of deserters and absentees from our military service during the past twelve months, the unwillingness of the people to enter the armies, the impracticability of recruiting them, the present utter demoralization of our troops consequent upon the destruction of the Army of Virginia, the rapid decrease by desertion of General Johnston's army, which as it retreats south, if retreat it can, will retain in its ranks but few soldiers beyond the by-paths and cross-roads which lead to their homes, together with the recent successes of the enemy, the fall of Selma, Montgomery, Columbus, and Macon, his forces in the field and his vast resources, all dictate the admission I have made. I do not believe that by any possibility we could organize, arm, and equip, and bring into the field this side of the Mississippi fifteen thousand men within the next sixty days, and I am convinced that both General Beauregard and General Johnston are utterly hopeless of continuing the contest. A guerrilla warfare might be carried on in certain portions of our country for a time, perhaps for years, but while such a warfare would be more disastrous to our own people than it could possibly be to the enemy, it would exercise little or no influence upon his military operations, or upon his hold upon the country. Conducted upon our own soil our own people would chiefly feel its evils, and would afford it neither countenance nor support. Guerrilla warfare never has been and never can be carried on by and between peoples of a common origin, language, and institutions. 254 JEFF. DAVIS' CABINET ON SHERMAN'S TERMS.. Our sea-board and our ports being in the enemy's hands we can not rely upon supplies of arms and other munitions of war from abroad, and our means of producing them at home, already limited, are daily decreasing. The loss of Selma and of Columbus, where much valuable machinery for the construction of ordnance and ordnance stores was collected, must materially circumscribe our ability in this respect. Our currency is nearly worthless, and will become utterly so with further military disasters, and there is no hope that we can improve it. The arms of the United States have rendered the great object of our strug gle hopeless, have conquered a reconstruction of the Union, and it becomes your duty to secure to the people, as far as practicable, life, liberty, and property. The propositions signed by the opposing generals are more favorable to these great objects than could justly have been anticipated. Upon you, with, a more thorough knowledge of the condition of our country, the character and sentiments of our people, and of our means and resources, than is possessed by others, is devolved the responsibility: of promptly accepting or of promptly rejecting them. I advise their acceptanee; and that, having notified General Johnston of your having done so, you promptly issue, so soon as you shall learn the acceptance thereof by the .authorities of the United States, a proclamation to the people of the Confed erate States, setting forth clearly the condition of the country, your inability to resist the enemy's overwhelming numbers, or to protect the country from his devastating and desolating march, the propositions submitted to you, and the reasons which, in your judgment, render their acceptance by the States and the people wise and expedient. You can not, under the Constitution, dissolve the Confederacy and remit the States composing it to the Govern ment of the United States. But the Confederacy is conquered. Its days are numbered. Virginia is lost to it, and North Carolina must soon follow, and State after State, under the hostile tread of the enemy, must reenter the old Union. The occasion, the emergency, the dire necessities and misfortunes of the country, the vast inter ests at stake, were never contemplated by those who framed the Constitution. They are all outside of it, and in the dissolution of the Confederacy and the \ wreck of all their hopes, the States and the people will turn to you, whose antecedents and whose present position and powers constitute you, more than any other living man, the guardian of their honor and their interests, and will expect you not to stand upon constitutional limitations, but to assume and exercise all powers which to you may seem necessary and proper to shield them from useless war, and to save from the wreck of the country all that may be practicable of honor, life, and property. If time were allowed for the observance of constitutional forms I would advise the submission of these propositions to the executives of the several States to the end that, through the usual legislative and conventional action, the wills of the people of the States respectively might be known. But in JEFF. DAVIS' CABINET ON SHEBMAN'S TEEMS. 255 the present condition of the country such delay as this course would involve would be the death-blow to all hopes founded upon them. The pacification of the country should he as speedy as practicable, to the end that the authorities of the States may enter upon the establishment and maintenance of law and order. Negotiations for this purpose can more appropriately follow upon the overwhelming disaster of General Lee than at a future time. The wreck of our hopes results immediately from it. I omit all reference to the details which must be provided for by the con tending parties to this agreement for future consideration. Very respectfully, your obedient servant, S. K. MALIOBY, Secretary of the Navy. Views of Attorney-General Davis: To the President. CHARLOTTE, N. C., 22d April, 1865. SIB : The questions submitted by you to the members of your Cabinet for their opinions are: 1. Whether the convention agreed upon on the 18th inst., by and between General Johnston, commanding the Confederate forces, and Major-General Sherman, commanding the forces of the United States, in North Carolina, should be ratified by you. 2. If so, in. what way should it be done. The terms of that convention are substantially as follows: That the armies of the Confederate States shall be disbanded and their arms surrendered. That the several State Governments shall be recognized by the Executive of the United States, upon their officers and legislatures taking the oaths prescribed by the Constitution of the United States; and where there are con flicting State Governments the question to be referred to the decision of the Supreme Court. That all political rights and franchises, and all rights of person and prop erty, shall be respected and guaranteed. That a general amnesty be granted, and no citizen be molested in person or property for any acts done in aid of the Confederate States in the prosecu tion of the war. Taken as a whole the convention amounts to this, that the States of the Confederacy shall reenter the old Union upon the same footing on which they stood before seceding from it. These States having, in their several conventions, solemnly asserted their sovereignty and right of self-government, and having established for them selves, and maintained through four years of bloody war a government of their own choosing, no loyal citizen can consent to its abandonment and 256 JEFF. DAVIS' CABINET ON SHERMAN'S TERMS. destruction as long as there remains a reasonable hope of successful resistance to the arms of the United States. The question, therefore, whether the terms of the military convention should be accepted will depend upon whether the Confederate States are in a, condition further to prosecute the war with a reasonable hope of success, and this question will be answered by a brief review of our military situation. The Army of Northern Virginia, for four years the pride and boast of the Confederacy, under the lead of the General-in-Chief, whose name we have been accustomed, to associate with victory, after having been defeated and reduced to a mere remnant by straggling and desertion, has capitulated to the enemy. All who were not embraced in the capitulation have thrown away their arms and disbanded beyond any hope of reorganization. Our only other army east of the Mississippi, the Army of Tennessee, con tains now about thirteen thousand effective men, of infantry and artillery, and is daily melting away by desertion. It is confronted by one of the best armies of the United States, fifty thousand strong. Manifestly it can not fight, $nd if it retreats, the chances are more than equal that, like the Army of Nort&rn Virginia, it will dissolve, and the remnant be forced to capitulate. 16 it should retreat successfully, and offer itself as a nucleus for reorganization, it can not be recruited. Volunteering is long since at an end, and conscription has exhausted all its force. East of the, Mississippi, scattered through all the States, we have now about forty thousand organized troops. To oppose these the enemy have more than two hundred thousand. Persevering efforts for many months past have failed to overcome the obstacle to the removal of troops from the west to the east of the Mississippi. We can, therefore, look for no accession of strength from that quarter. If a returning sense of duty and patriotism should bring back the stragglers and deserters in sufficient numbers to form a respectable army, we have not the means of arming them. Our supply of arms is very nearly exhausted, our means of manufacturing substantially at an end, and the blockade of our ports prevents their intro duction from abroad, except in small quantities, and at remote points. In view of these facts our two generals highest in command in the field have expressed in decided terms our inability longer to continue the struggle. Observation has satisfied me that the States of Virginia and North Carolina \< are finally lost to our cause. The people of the latter are utterly weary of the war, broken and despairing in spirit, and eager to accept terms far less liberal than the convention proposes. In the absence of a general arrange ment they will certainly make terms for themselves. Abandoned by our armies, the people of Virgina will follow their example, and it will be im possible to arrest the process of disintegration thus begun. This melancholy array of facts leaves open but one conclusion. I am unhesitatingly of the opinion that the convention ought to be ratified. As to the proper mode of ratification, greater doubt may be reasonably enter tained. The Confederate Government is but the agent of the States, and as its chief executive you can not, according to our governmental theory, bind JEFF. DA VIS' CABINET ON SHERMAN'S TEEMS. 257 the States to a government which they have not adopted for themselves. Nor can you rightfully, without their consent, dissolve the government which they have established. But there are circumstances so desperate as to over ride all constitutional theories, and such are those which are pressing upon us now. The Government of the Confederate States is no longer potent for good. Exhausted by war in all its resources to such a degree that it can no longer offer a respectable show of resistance to its enemies, it is already virtually destroyed. And the chief duty left for you to peform is to provide as far as possible for the speedy delivery of the people from the horrors of war and anarchy. I therefore respectfully advise that upon the ratification of the convention by the Executive of the United States, you issue your proclamation, plainly setting forth the circumstances which have induced you to assent to the terms proposed, disbanding the armies of the Confederacy, resigning your office as chief magistrate, and recommending to the people of the States that they assemble in convention and carry into effect the terms agreed on. GEOKGE DAVIS. Views of Mr. Breckinridge, Secretary of War: CHARLOTTE, N. C., April 23, 1865. To Sis Excellency the President. Sis: In obedience to your request I have the honor to submit my advice as to the course you should take upon the memorandum or basis of agreement made on the 18th inst. by and between General J. E. Jolmston, of the Con federate States Army, and Major-General W. T. Sherman, of the United States Army, provided that paper shall receive the approval of the Government of the United States. The principal army of the Confederacy was recently lost in Virginia. Considerable bodies of troops not attached to that army have either dis banded or marched toward their homes, accompanied by many of their officers. Five days ago the effective force, in infantry and artillery, of General Johnston's army was but fourteen thousand seven hundred and seventy men, and it continues to diminish. That officer thinks it wholly impossible for him to make any head against the overwhelming forces of the enemy. Our ports are closed, and the sources of foreign supply lost to us. The enemy occupy all or the greater part of Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and North Carolina, and move almost at will through the other States to the east of the Mississippi. They have recently taken Selma, Montgomery, Columbus, Macon, and other important towns, depriving us of large depots of supplies and of muni tions of war. Of the small force still at command, many are unarmed, and the Ordnance Department can not furnish five thousand stand of small arms. I do not think it would be possible to assemble, equip, and maintain an army of thirty thousand men at any point east of the Mississippi Ever. 17 258 JEFF. DA VIS' CABINET ON SHERHAST'S TERMb, The contest, if continued after this paper is rejected, will be likely to lose entirely the dignity of regular warfare, many of the States will make such terms as they may, in others separate and ineffective hostilities may be prose cuted, while the war, wherever waged, will probably degenerate into that irregular and secondary stage out of which greater evils will flow to the South than to the enemy. For these and for other reasons which need not now be stated, I think we can no longer contend with a reasonable hope of success. It seems to me that the time has arrived when, in a large and clear view of the situation, prompt steps should be taken to put an end to the war. It may be said that the agreement of the 18th inst. contains certain stipula tions which you can not perform. This is true, and it was well understood by General Sherman that only a part could be executed by the Confederate authorities. In any view of the case grave responsibilities must be met and assumed. If the necessity for peace be conceded, corresponding action must be taken. Th::: mode of negotiation which we deem regular and would prefer is imprae^' ticable. "' The situation is anomalous and can not be solved upon principles of theo retical exactitude. In my opinion you are the only person who can meet the present necessities. I respectfully advise: 1. That you execute, so far as you can, the second article in the agreement of the 18th inst. 2. That you recommend to the several States the acceptance of those parts of the agreement upon which they alone can act. 3. Having maintained, with faithful and intrepid purpose, the cause of the Confederate States while the means of organized resistance remained, that you return to the States and the people the trust which you are no longer able to defend. Whatever course you pursue opinions will be divided. Permit me to give ,. mine. Should these or similar views accord with your own, I think the better judgment will be that you can have no higher title to the gratitude of your countrymen and the respect of mankind than will spring from the wis dom to see the path of duty at this time, and the courage to follow it, regardless alike of praise or blame. Respectfully and truly your friend, JOHN C. BBECKINRIDGE, Secretary of War. General Sherman deserves thanks for bringing to light the above interesting and valuable historical papers. CHAPTEE XIX. SNEERS AT THE STAFF--THE CONTROVERSY WITH THE WAE DEPARTMENT OVER THE CONTROL OF THE STAFF CORPS. GENERAL SHERMAN, in his last chapter discusses at consid erable length the same issues which he raised with the Secretary of War and the statute law, when he assumed the duties of general and promulgated an order assigning all officials in the War Department, except the Secretary himself, and possibly his chief clerk, to duty on his staff. In his treatment of this question he indulges in many undignified sneers at staif officers. For example: " The subordinates of these staff-corps and departments are selected and chosen from the army itself, or fresh from West Point, and too commonly construe themselves into the elite, as made of better clay than the common soldier. Thus they separate themselves more and more from their comrades of the line, and in process of time realize the condition of that old officer of. artillery, who thought the army would be a delightful place for a gentleman if it were not for the d----d soldier; or, better still, the conclusion of the young lord in 'Henry IV.,' who told Harry Percy (Hotspur) that 'but for these vile guns he would himself have been a soldier.' This is all wrong; utterly at variance with our democratic form of government and of universal experience; and now that the French, from whom we had copied the system, have utterly 'prescribed' it, I hope that our Congress will follow suit." General Sherman's own military history, however, will show that it was not until he attained the rank of brigadiergeneral that his antipathy to staff duty began. But from that time forward it has been marked. Even the large body of staff officers in his own army, who, on the Atlanta campaign, had been continuously on duty and most of the time under (259) 260 SNEERS AT THE STAFF. fire from May till September, did not escape being made to feel this prejudice. While the army was moving from Atlanta on Hood, who had passed to its rear, Lieutenant-Colonel "Warner, inspectorgeneral on the staff, was appointed by the Governor of Ohio to the command of one of the new regiments from that State. Whereupon General Sherman issued the following order: [Special Field Orders No. 98.] HEADQUARTERS MILITARY DIVISION OF THE MISSISSIPPI, 1 IK THE FIELD, SUMMERVILLE, GA., October 19, 1864. j 1st. Lieutenant-Colonel Willard Warner, acting Inspector-General on the staff of this military division, having been appointed colonel of the OneHundred and Eightieth Ohio, is hereby relieved from duty at these headqifarters, and will proceed to Nashville arid assume command of his new regiment. 2d. The General commanding thanks Colonel Warner for his most zealous and intelligent service during the past campaign, compliments him on his good sense in preferring service with troops to staff duty, and predicts for him the highest success in his professional career. By order of Majar-General W. T. SHEHMAST. Colonel Warner was an able and gallant officer. As lieu tenant-colonel of an Ohio regiment, he was detailed for duty on the staff of General Sherman, and afterward, upon being appointed to a colonelcy, he naturally desired to assume com mand of his regiment. Certainly there were very few, if any, of the hundreds of staff officers serving with General Sher man who would not gladly have exchanged places with. Colonel Warner. They were for the most part, men who had volunteered for the war without stopping to bargain for1*; place or power, and accepted their staff positions and obeyed the orders detailing them for such duty as they would have obeyed any other military orders they might have received. It was a fact universally recognized that promotion came chiefly from the line, and none of them, with the same oppor tunity, would have failed to follow Colonel Warner's example. In the nature of things it was impossible for many of them to receive such promotion in the line as would justify them in asking to be relieved from staff duty, and under the circum- SNEERS AT THE STAFF. 261 stances, General Sherman's order was to these officers both a cruel wrong and a gratuitous insult. But if General Sherman in writing his final chapter had remembered the facts set forth in the opening of his book, he might have tempered his language in regard to staff service. The Memoirs begin with the information that in the Spring of 1846 he was first-lieutenant in the Third Artillery, and present with his company at Fort Moultrie, South Carolina. In April of the same year he was detailed for recruiting service. In June he was ordered to California with Company F of his regi ment, and assigned to staff duty as quartermaster and commis sary. In March, 1847, he returned to company duty. The next month (April) he was assigned as aid-de-camp to Gen eral Kearney. In May General Kearney left California, and Lieutenant Sherman became acting assistant adjutant-general on the staff of Colonel R. B. Mason. In February, 1849, he was relieved from this service and assigned in the same capacity to the staff of General Persifer F. Smith. While thus acting his duties were changed to those of aid-de-camp on the same staff, in which capacity he continued to act until September, 1850, when he rejoined his company in St. Louis with the assurance that he would soon receive a regular staff appointment. This promise was soon after fulfilled, and on the 27th of the same month he was appointed captain and commissary of subsistence in the regular army. This position. he held until his resignation some three years after, Sep tember 6th, 1853, having thus completed an almost unbroken record of seven years' service as an officer of the staff. And when, after the hesitation about reentering the army at the beginning of the war, which he details at length, he finally decided to take part in the struggle, he applied for staff duty again, as is plain from the close of the letter in which he tendered his services. "Should they be needed," he writes May 8, 1861, to the Secretary of War, "the records of the War Department will enable you to designate the sta tion in which I can render the most service/' As these 262 SNEERS AT THE STAFF. records for seven preceding years of his former army duty pertained mainly to varied staff service, the intent of the application is manifest. However, he was made colonel of the Thirteenth Infantry, and this was his "new regiment." But, instead of following Colonel "Warner's example, who went from inspector on the staff to the command of a regiment, he reversed it, and with his colonel's commission in his pocket passed to duty as inspector on the staff of General Scott, and this duty con tinued until he was assigned to the command of a brigade some weeks later. From this time forward he "had the good sense to prefer service with troops to staff duty." In this last chapter General Sherman argues that military;;:correspondence with higher officials should pass through the' hands of the intermediate generals, in order that they may never be ignorant of any thing that concerns their command. This has always been considered sound doctrine in the army, and yet General Sherman's records show that he constantly corresponded directly with General Halleck, on matters inti mately affecting the whole army, without sending the letters through his OAvn superiors. Now he writes: " I don't believe in a chief-of-staif at all." But up to the 18th of April, 1865, he sustained most intimate, cordial, and confidential relations with General Halleck as chief-of-staff, and on that date, as has been seen, wrote, asking him to influence the President, "if possible, not to vary the tirst terms made with Johnston at all." So close were these relations as to suggest the idea that his present non-belief in a chief-of-staff dates from a few days later, when, in addressing General Grant after his terms had been rejected, he wrote: " It now becomes my duty to paint in justly severe characters the still more offensive and dangerous matter of General Halleck's dispatch of April 26th to the Secretary of War, embodied in his to General Dix of April 27th." Out of the circumstances attending the rejection of the Johnston-Reagan terms, grew the controversy with the Secre- SNEERS AT THE STAFF. 263 tary of War over the relative rights and powers of this officer and those of the General of the Army, which subject is dis cussed at some length in the Memoirs. Ever since Secretary Stanton's fearless performance of duty in connection with the political features of Johnston's surren der, General Sherman has maintained that this officer was a mere clerk, and in his last chapter he contends that the Gen eral of the Army should have command of all the heads of staff-corps, and that the President and Secretary of War should command the army through the general. What he leaves to the Secretary of War is thus described : " Of course, the Secretary would, as now, distribute the funds according to the appropriation bills, and reserve to himself the absolute control and supervision of the larger arsenals and depots of supply." And while he declares that the law or its judicial interpre tation is against the right for which he contends, the removal of army headquarters to St. Louis resulted in great degree from the fact that when he became general he could not bring himself to conform to this law. The history of this controversy is pertinent to his present discussion of the organ ization and control of the staff-corps. One of his first official acts, when made General of the Army, was to issue an order reducing the Secretary of War to the position which he had frequently before with great em phasis assigned him, namely, that of a mere clerk. The preliminary order to effect this he obtained from the President. It was as follows : [General Orders No. 11.] HEADQUARTERS op THE AHMT, } ADJUTANT-GrENEKAL's OFFICE, WASHINGTON, March 8, 1869.J The following orders of the President of the United States are published for the information and government of all concerned : WAR DEPARTMENT, j WASHINGTON CITY, March 5, 1869. j By direction of the President General William T. Sherman will assume command of the Army of the United States. 264 SNEERS AT THE STAFF. The Chiefs of Staff Corps, Departments, and Bureaus will report to and act under the immediate orders of the General commanding the Army. All official business, which by law or regulations requires the action of the President or the Secretary of War, will be submitted by the General of the Army to the Secretary of War; and, in general, all orders from the Pres ident or Secretary of War to any portion of the army, line, or staff, will be transmitted through the General of the Army. J. M. SCHOFIBLD, Secretary of War. By command of the General of the Army. E. D. TOWNSEKD, Assistant Adjutant-General. General Schofield, who expected to retire in a few days, did not care to make issue upon it, and contented himself with pointing out that it violated or contravened sometwenty-six express provisions of statute law, or regulations having the force of law. Based upon the above order Gen>v eral Sherman issued the following: [General Orders No. 12.] HEADQUARTERS OF THE ARMY, ) ADJUTAI?T-GENERAI/S OFFICE, WASHINGTON, March 8,1869. } By direction of the President of the United States, the undersigned hereby assumes command of the Army of the United States. His general staff will be: Brevet Major-General E. D. Townsend, Adjutant-General. Brevet Major-General B. B. Marcy, Inspector-General. Brevet Major-General M. C. Meigs, Quartermaster-General. Brevet Major-General A. B. Eaton, Commissary-General Subsistence. Brevet Major-General J. K. Barnes, Surgeon-General. Brevet Major-General B. W. Brice, Paymaster-General. .'. Brevet Major-General Joseph Holt, Judge Advocate-General. Brevet Major-General A. A. Humphreys, Chief of Engineers. Brevet Major-General A. B. Dyer, Chief of Ordnance. Brevet Brigadier-General A. J, Myer, Chief Signal Officer. His personal staff, Aids-de-Camp with the rank of Colonel from this date, will be: Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel J. C. McCoy, Second Lieutenant, Second In fantry. Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel L. M. Dayton, Captain, Seventh Cavalry. Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel J. C. Audenried, Captain, Sixth Cavalry. Brevet Brigadier-General C. B. Comstock, Major, Corps of Engineers. Brevet Brigadier-General Horace Porter, Major, Ordnance Department. SNEEKS AT THE STAFF. 265 Brevet Brigadier-General F. T. Dent, Lieutenant-Colonel, Thirty-third Infantry. II. Generals commanding military departments, in addition to the duties heretofore required of them, will give their special atttention to the econom ical administration of all tranches of the service within their command, whether of the line or staff', and to this end will exercise supervision and command of every part of the army within their limits not specially excepted. III. The military academy, general depots of supply, arsenals of con struction, permanent forts in process of construction or extensive repairs, general recruiting depots, and officers employed on duties not military, are excepted from the operation of the foregoing paragraph. IV. All orders and general instructions to the troops, or to staff officers serving in military departments, must go from the headquarters of the army through the Adjutant-General's office, and through the Generals commanding the military divisions and departments in which the officej's are serving; but ordinary correspondence relating to the details of execution may be carried on between the parties concerned and the heads of the staff department or corps charged with their execution. -yy. x. SHEKMAN, General. On the 13th of March General Kawlins assumed the duties of Secretary of War, and among his first aets he called the attention of the President to the various violations of law in volved in Sherman's order. These were too plain to admit either of doubt or extended discussion, and the following order was issued by direction of the President, revoking those printed above: [General Orders No. 28.] HEADQUARTERS OF THE ARMY, 1 ADJUTANT-GENERAL'S OFFICE, WASHINGTON, March 27,1869. } The following orders, received from the War Department, are published for the government of all concerned: AVAR DEPARTMENT, ] WASHINGTON CITY, March 26, 1869. j By direction of the President, the order of the Secretary of War, dated War Department, March 5, 1869, and published in General Orders No. 11, Head quarters of the Army, Adjutant-General's office, dated March 8, 1869, except so much as directs General W. T. Sherman to " assume command of the Army of the United States," is hereby rescinded. All official business which, by law or regulations, requires the action of the President or Secretary of War, will be submitted by the Chiefs of Staff Corps, Departments, and Bureaus, to the Secretary of War. All orders and instructions relating to military operations, issued by the 266 SNEERS AT THE STAFF. President or Secretary of War, will be issued through the General of the Army. JOHN A. BAWLINS, Secretary of War. By command of General SHEBMAKT. B. D. TOWSTSEND, Assistant Adjutant- General. The violations of law in General Sherman's Order No. 12, can be readily made to appear. The act of July 25, 1866, reviving the grade of General, authorized him, " under the direction and during the pleasure of the President, to com mand the armies of the United States." The same act author ized him to select " for service upon his staff such number of aids, not exceeding six, as he may judge proper," and the act of July 28, three days later, provided that " there shall be one General * * * * entitled to the same staff officers,.-: in number and grade, as now provided by law." The law provided only six; Sherman's order assigned sixteen--an excess of ten; and more than this, each of the ten was, by law, directly under the Secretary of War. But before following this branch of the subject to its conclusion, it will be well to present in brief some of the decisions upon the relations of the President as commanderin-chief under the Constitution, and those of the Secretary of War to the army: "By the Constitution the President is made Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States. The departments of war and of the navy are the channels through which his orders proceed to them respectively, and the secretaries of these departments are the organs by which he makes his will known to them. The orders issued by those officers are, in the con templation of the law, not their orders, but the orders of the President of the United States.--[1 Opinions, 380. By the act of August 7,1789, establishing the War Depart ment, the duties of the Secretary of War are thus defined: " There shall be an Executive Department, to be denominated the Depart ment of War, and there shall be a principal officer therein to be called the Secretary for the Department of War, who shall perform and execute such duties as shall from time to time be enjoined on or intrusted to him by the President of the United States, agreeable to the Constitution relative to mili tary commissions, or to the land or naval forces, ships or warlike stores of the SNEERS AT THE STAFF. 267 United States, or to such other matters respecting military or naval affairs as the President of the United States shall assign to the said department." Subsequently, upon the establishment of a Navy Depart ment, the supervision of naval affairs was withdrawn from the War Department. "The Secretary of War is 'The regularly constituted organ of the Presi dent for the administration of the military establishment of the nation, and rules and orders publicly promulgated through him must be received as the acts of the Executive, and as such be binding upon all within the sphere of his legal and constitutional authority.'--[U. S. vs. Eliason, 16 Peters, 291. " The War Department has a staff officer, the Adjutant-General, through whom the Secretary, in behalf of the President, that is, the President, speaks when he sees fit, in matters pertaining to the army."--[7 Opinions, 473. And yet General Sherman, in the first line of his assign ments, boldly invaded the official household of the President, his military superior, and ordered the chief staff officer there to report to him at the headquarters of the army. This did not differ, in any material respect, from what General Sheridan or any other general officer would be guilty of in issuing an order directing staff officers to report to him, who, by express provision of law, had been placed under the General of the Army. The Quartermaster and Commissary Departments are placed by law directly under the Secretary of War, and yet General Sherman attached them both to his staff, and assumed that they were under his direction. The law regulating their duties reads as follows: "In addition to their duties in the field, it shall be the duty of the Quarter master-General, his deputies, and assistant deputies, "when thereto directed by the Secretary of War, to purchase military stores, camp equipage, and other articles requisite for the troops, and generally to procure and provide means of transport for the army, its stores, artillery, and camp equipage.--[Act March 28, 1812. " Supplies for the army, unless in particular and urgent cases the Secretary of War should otherwise direct, shall be purchased by contract, to be made by the Commissary-General * * * '* under such regulations as the Secretary of War may direct."--[April 14, 1818. 268 SNEERS AT THE STAFF. These officers are also severally directed by law to make their reports to the Secretary of War. And none of these acts were changed when the grade of General was revived. By another section it is made the duty of the Quartermaster- General, " under the direction of the Secretary of War/' to receive and distribute all clothing and camp and garrison equipage, and, "under the direction of the Secretary of War," to enforce a system of accountability for the same. In the same manner the Surgeon-General by law performs his duties under the direction of the Secretary of War, and, in short, the whole general staff is, by law, governed by regu lations which the Secretary of War is, by direct, statute pro vision, obliged to make. ;s By the law creating it, the Bureau of Military Justice was "attached to and made a part of the War Department." Paragraph 1,063 of Revised Army Regulations, which were enacted by Congress into law, reads as follows: "The Signal Officer shall have charge, under the direction of the Secretary of War, of all signal duty, and of all books, papers, and apparatus connected therewith." The following extracts from regulations, taken from many similar provisions, show clearly that Congress placed the gen era,! staff under the Secretary of W"ar, and these regulations have been recognized by Congress since the office of General was established: : "Paragraph 1,010. The Chief of such Military Bureau in the War Department shall, under the direction of the Secretary of War, regulate, as far as practicable, the employment of hired persons required by the adminis trative service of his department. " Paragraph 1,043. Chiefs of the Disbursing Department shall, under the direction of the Secretary of War, designate -where principal contracts shall be made, etc." Paragraph 1,197 makes the approval of the Secretary of War necessary to rules which the Surgeon-General may pre scribe for supplying hospitals. SNEEKS AT THE STAFF. 269 By various paragraphs of regulations the Paymaster-General is directed to report to the Adjutant-General, the legal staff officer of the Secretary of War. " Paragraph 1,360. The Chief Engineer, with the approbation of the Sec retary of War, will regulate and determine the number, quality, form, and dimensions of the necessary vehicles, pontoons, tools, etc." By paragraphs 1,377, 1,378, 1,379, all the operations of the Ordnance Department are placed under the Secretary of War. The officers of the Engineer Corps are placed under the sole direction of the President. These various citations are quite sufficient to prove that the theory of Congress in all its legislation relating to army organization has been, that the President is Commander-inChief, while the Secretary of War is his representative at the head of the army, and his organ of communication with it; that the Adjutant-General is the staff officer of the Secretary of War, that is, of the President; and that the chiefs of the various staff corps form the general staff of the President, and are in consequence under the direction of the Secretary of War. Thus it will be readily seen that Sherman's order contra vened, or directly violated the laws and regulations which have the full force of law, for the government of the army. After that order was revoked, and his attention had been thus pointedly called to the law, every subsequent protest against it was unsoldierly, and in short, insubordination. The same conduct in any officer of less rank would not have been allowed to go unpunished. If the general of an army con stantly frets over the restraints of the regulations, what attention can he rightfully expect to be paid them by the army at large? Although at the time his order was revoked, he' was made fully acquainted with the law, a few months later he was found not only violating it, but reporting and defending his disregard both of orders and the law. The facts upon 270 SNEERS AT THE STAFF. which this statement is based will be found in his annual report for 1869. General Rawlins died September 6, following the issuing of General Order, No. 28, given above. General Sherman was assigned temporarily to the desk of the Secretary of War. The following paragraph of the President's order, as given above, was still in force : 'By direction of the President, * * * * all official business which, by law or regulations, requires the action of the President or the Sec retary of War, will be submitted by the Chiefs of Staff Corps, Departments, and Bureaus to the Secretary of War." No order revoking this had been issued by the President. ;|E General Sherman was also aware that this order had been ' framed solely to control his official acts. It was not an order that he would for a moment forget. And yet, while speaking in his annual report of these same Chiefs of Staff Corps, Depart ments, and Bureaus, General Sherman said: "The heads of. these departments reside in Washington, and submit annually a written report of their operations for the past year. It so hap pened that I was Secretary of War during the month of October, when by law these reports were made in order to reach the Public Printer by the first of November, and I required all the annual reports to be addressed, like all other military reports, to the Adjutant-General for the perusal of the General of the Army, who could make use of such information as they contained, and then lay them before the Secretary of War. This is, in my judgment, the course that should always be pursued--though a different one has heretofore prevailed--for otherwise we would have the absurdity of a general com manding an army with his chief staff officer reporting to somebody else." A little further on in the same paper he called attention to a report made by the Military Committee of the House, upon which, however, the House had taken no action, much less Congress, in which the Committee expressed the opinion that the staff corps should be as directly under the control of the general and the department commanders as the officers of the line. He then added: "I heartily concur in these views, and, so far as my authority goes, will carry them out." And this SNEERS AT THE STAFF. 271 in a formal report, after he had been expressly ordered by the President not to carry out these identical views. Throughout this controversy of General Sherman's own raising and pressing, there was no attempt by the War Depart ment to assume unlawful authority over the General of the Army, nor had there been any other limitations placed upon his power than the law imposes. The case was simply this: The Secretary of War had been guided by the law as it exists. General Sherman had constantly protested against the law in the case, and, so far as he could, ignored it. The whole trouble on his side was this: He had not been regarded as Commander-in-Chief, and had not been allowed to command the army as such. Instead of exercising his authority under the law and in accordance with the terms of his commission-- that is, " under the direction and during the pleasure of the President, to command the armies of the United States"--he insisted upon being allowed to exercise that authority as if both law and commission read, "under the direction and according to the pleasure of W. T. Sherman." CHAPTER XX. CONCLUSION--THE CASE AGAINST THE MEMOIRS SUMMED UP. IN closing this review, based throughout upon facts dis closed by the official files, the case against the author of the Memoirs may be summed up as follows: :| Ten years after the close of the war, when the open, and all the secret official records, collected and arranged for ready reference, were at his service, he has published to the world a story of his campaigns, crowded with inaccuracies, and stained with injustice done associate commanders and cooperating armies. The kindly years which, for most who followed the flag, have effaced whatever jealousies and misunderstandings arose in the field, leaving prominent in memory only the central and enduring fact of common service in a worthy cause, seem to have exerted no such influence upon him, but rather acted as mordants to fix all unpleasant things indelibly upon his pages. By following the statements of his book, and com paring them with the records of the same events, made at the time of their occurrence, and often by his own hand, many grave differences have been established. Where the Memoirs give the credit of the move on Forts Henry and Donelson to Halleck, the records show that it belongs to Grant. Where General Sherman argues against the idea of a surprise at Shiloh, the records prove it to have been complete, and due mainly to his own blindness and neglect. Where he seeks to detract from the service rendered there by Buell and his army, the records set that service in (272) CONCLUSION. 273 clear light. While he intimates that Rosecrans acted dis creditably at Iiika and Corinth, and that Grant was deeply offended over some failure or blunder not clearly denned, the reports of the latter are found to commend Rosecrans strongly for these brilliant battles. Where he now visits severe cen sure, in connection with his failure at Chickasaw Bayou, his own report of the action,, written at the time, commends the very officers, thus unjustly arraigned, for having done the heaviest fighting, and accomplished all that was possible. Where he assails General Sooy Smith for causing the partial failure of his Meridian expedition, his own orders, then issued, claimed complete success; and while he now declares he never had any intention of going to Mobile, the letters of General Grant (who ordered his movement) to Halleck and Thomas, informed these officers that in certain contingencies Sherman was to push for Mobile. He describes Rosecrans' flanking movement to capture Chattanooga as a march from that city to attack the enemy; and the battle which secured this strong hold, as a defeat before it, and its occupation after the battle as a retreat into it. He describes the terrible condition of affairs in Chattanooga, following the battle of Chickamauga, and seeks to create the impression that Rosecrans alone was in fault, when the records show that Burnside failed him on one flank and Sherman on the other--this too after the pressing necessities of the case had been repeatedly represented to them both--aud that finally Burnside never came, and Sherman himself was seven weeks behind the time set for his arrival at Chattanooga, exhibiting no special activity in his advance until after Rosecrans was removed, when suddenly, under Grant's request to come on, the energy of his movement sur passed praise. While he states that Grant was afraid the Army of the Cumberland could not be drawn out of its trenches to attack Bragg, and wanted Sherman's men to come up and coax them into fighting by the power of their example, the records show that Grant had confidence enough in Thomas' army to order it--before Sherman was within sup- 18 274 CONCLUSION. porting distance even--to do what the latter afterward failed to perform; and further, that when General Thomas insisted upon giving orders for an attack without waiting for Sherman, who was still delayed with the greater part of his troops, Grant assented, and Thomas actually accomplished that part of the battle assigned for the first day, before Sherman arrived; and lastly, that the Army of the Cumberland stormed and carried the whole line of Missionary Kidge hours before Sherman even received the news of the great success, he alone, of the three army commanders, having failed, though after splendid fighting, to carry the point assigned to him. While he contends that the failure to bring Johnston to bat tle at Hesaca, was due to the timidity of General McPherson, the records show that this officer acted exactly in accord-r anee with Sherman's own orders; and while the latter claims* that from the outset of the movement, it was his intention merely to feign through Buzzard Roost on Dalton, and press the bulk of the army through Snake Creek Gap on Johnston's rear, the records show that for three days he " assaulted precipices" in front of Dalton, with Thomas' and Schofield's armies, before he allowed McPherson to make more than a diverson on Johnston's rear, so that the latter, being warned in time, withdrew safely. At Kenesaw he assaulted impreg nable works to teach his veterans that flanking was not the only means of attacking an enemy, and failed at a cost of two thousand men, claiming now that Thomas, McPherson, and Schofield agreed with him that the assault was necessary, when the records clearly reveal Thomas' stern dissatisfaction, and a bold extension to the right by Schofield, which plainly indicates that the latter looked for success in the direction from which it finally came, through their old and sure method of flanking. He describes the battle before Atlanta, where McPherson fell, in such a manner that no reader would dream of its being a great surprise, and well nigh serious disaster; but the records disclose an army, plunged by the flank against an enemy in position behind heavy works, on the supposition CONCLUSION. 275 that Atlanta was evacuated, suddenly and unexpectedly at tacked by the enemy ivpon its left and rear, before it had ceased to exult over the announcement from Sherman that the enemy had abandoned Atlanta, and his order for a vigorous pursuit- While he claims that he originated the March to the Sea, and had it in his "mind's eye" by the 21st of September, the records prove that Grant had planned the campaign through to Mobile in the previous January, notified Halleck of it on the loth of that month, Thomas on the 19th, and that in February Thomas was arranging the details of the move as far as Atlanta. The records show further, that on the 10th of September Grant suggested a move from Atlanta on Augusta or Savannah, instead of Mobile, since the control of the latter had passed into the hands of the Union forces. Concerning Savannah, the records reveal an escape of Hardee with ten thousand, from Sherman's sixty thousand, without disclosing even a plausible excuse. Here the Memoirs show Sherman looking back to Nashville, from whence alone, through defeat of Hood, could come a success that should vindicate his March to the Sea, and finding fault with Thomas, who, though crippled in all ways by Sherman, was through superhuman efforts there, saving him from the jeers of the Nation. In treating of Savannah, he also attacks Mr. Stanton for carelessness in connection with the captured cotton, and transactions relating thereto, while the records show not only that he had absolutely no foundation for his charges, but that in most respects the exact opposite of what he wrote was true. After a magnificent and really wonderful march through the Carolinas, with every warning, as the Memoirs relate, that the enemy was rapidly concentrating in his front, the records show that he neglected all precautions, and marched the two wings of his army, neither moving in close order, so far apart that when the head of the left wing was attacked at 10 o'clock one forenoon, by the whole rebel army, estimated by himself to have been from thirty-seven to forty thousand, the advance 276 CONCLUSION. of his right wing, marching to the sound of battle, to support the left, did not arrive till the next morning, while the bulk of this wing-did not reach the field till the following after noon ; and then, when his whole force was in front of and on the flank of the enemy, the latter escaped. Such is the record history of Bentonville, the last battle of his army. What shall be said of the political negotiations which followed ? What need be said further than the records show, that, beginning with a proposition to receive the sur render of Johnston's forces upon the same terms Grant had extended to Lee, he ended by surrendering to Johnston upoa terms drawn up by a member of the rebel Cabinet?