Georgia D epartment Of Transportation Annual Report Fiscal Year 1985 THOMAS D. MORELAND COMMISSIONER ~.eparlm.ent of X.Uransportation - ~tate of eorgia ~o. 2 111 Walthourville to Hin,.,_ ville in Liberty Count\ and construction of fuurlane roadway on BaxleyHazelhurst Road in Arrling County; over $5 million was srent on maintenance, park and ride lots were opened, logo signs were installed and many roadways were tested for roughness. District Six Service. With supervision of approximately $70 million worth ofconstruction activity during Fiscal Year 1985, as well as continued maintenance operations, District Six experienced a successful year in its service to the Georgians of the sixteen northwestern counties of the state. From crucial work on the Appalachian Highway and I-575 to less glamorous but equally important work such as recycling asphalt, District Six met the challenge of providing quality transportation service to its constituents. One of the main components of the state's De- velopment Highway System is the Appalachian Highway. During Fiscal Year 1985, right-of-way acquisition progressed steadily on the portion of this corridor bet.veen Ellijay and Blue f'. idge, while nearly 19 r:. ~c ~,f roadway between Canton and Eilijay saw the completion of grading as paving got underway. Once complete, this highway will serve as a safe and efficient mute through scenic North Cieorgia. Sixth District transportatiun service was made smuother, safer and more efficient as over 1,000 miles of roadway were impwved .and 24 substandard bridges were let to contract, including tlw replacement uf Rume's 50-year-uld Secund A venue bridge, a lung-time himlrn ,,j the 1-85/1-285 ComnH >n section in Clayton Cuun t\, and the interchange recunstruction at 1-85/l-2tl'i. Progress was also made 011 non-interstate l'n 1jects such as the Austell h -!',tss, the Camp Creek P;nl._,,,t\', rhe Presidential Park 11. I\', and reconstruction of ~.I\. 400 from 1-285 to Ha\ tws Rridge Road and Old 1-:-.:) from Peachtree Road tu Buford Highway. In ~dl. District Seven was supLTvising activities on 301 ~Ic tive construction projects at the close of Fiscal Year 1985. The District Preconstruction Office laid the groundwork for construction to begin on other pn 1jects with surveys of interchange projects, widenint; and reconstruction pr, ,_ jeers, turn lane and passint; lane projects and new location projects. New right-ufway was staked and construction layouts com- pleted. State and consultant personnel worked t' 1gether during Fiscal Yc1r 1985 to efficiently obtain the necessary field data t~1r plan production, while plan production itself was made more efficient through the use of new computer software and hardware that allows designers to prepare plans faster and cheaper. The District cheduling section produced and i constantly monitoring programmed projects to insure contracts are let as scheduled, guaranteeing optimization of ava ilable funds. In order to assure federal and state fu nd are allocated properly, the Road In ventory ectio n completely re-inventoried Douglas and Rockdale Counties b r roads and was in the process of re- inventoring DeKalb and Fulton Counties at the close of Fiscal Year 1985. In order to make the existing state highway system safer and more efficient in Fiscal Year 1985, the District completed fata l accident inve tigation , traffic sign al reviews, peed zone ana ly es and provided ass istance to vario u citie and counties with regard to traffic igna l operatio ns. A new herbicide program that ha cut the necessity for mechanical mowing in half and a new sweeping program that allows fo r all barrier walls of the Interstate system to be swept mo nthly wer both im- 1 plemented ~y; Maintenance Office to prov ide an efficient, a well a attractive, y t m with a minimum pending of tax dollar . "Are they ever going to get through working on the Interstates ?" Yes, with a continuation of the efforts District Seven saw in Fiscal Year 1985, stagnate freeways will be greatly relieved and the safe, efficient and cost effective transportation system that District already pos esses can be fully appreciated by the traveling public in the years to c m. Administration Daniel 0. Kelly, Director Air Transportation With a cu rrent fl eet of seven aircraft, including a passenger jet, the Office of Air Transportatio n provides transportation to state offici als and agencies in all types of weather, and provides support to the Aerial Survey Lab with its Aerial Photography Aircraft. During Fiscal Year 1985, 1, 116 trips were flown for a total of 1,192 ,887 passenger miles. General Accounting The Office of General Accounting functions through five primary work groups. Payro ll processes all d istrict and gen eral office payrolls through checks and direct electronic de- posits. Wages and benefits disbursed during Fiscal Year 1985 t o t a le d $140,426,952.21. The Contractor Payments group processes contractor pay statements and pays con- tractors through direct de- posits into contractor es- crow accounts in 150 banks The DOT has a current fleet of seven aircraft. Computer systems monitor departmental activities. throughout the state. Contractor earnings over the last fiscal year totaled $544,057,987.55. Accounts Payable handles all cash management duties and genera l payment accounts. Proj ect Acco unting ma inta ins all project co t accounts and the Current Billing group collects all federal aid reimbursement due the Department. This gro up billed the Federal Highway Administration for $349,440,410.89 in Fiscal Year 1985 . Audits and Fiscal Procedures Internal Audit performs operational audits to insure the Department is in compliance with federal and state regulation. Beginning in Fiscal Year 1986, the findings of this group will be made a part of the State Auditors Annual Report. External auditors perform financial compliance cost audits on railroad and utility force account expenditures and pre-award reviews of consultant contracts. During Fiscal Year 1985, 394 audits and reviews were performed by this group. The Fiscal Procedures group reviews, develops and implements sound accounting and operating procedures for the Department. General Support Services From monitoring De- partment expenditures to installation and maintenance of heating and air conditioning units, the Office of General Support Services covers a broad spectrum of act ivities, most of which provide service to o ther offices in the Department. A total of 16,000 active project file are kept that require an average of 700 filing transactions daily. During Fiscal Year 1985, ove r 1, 126 cubic feet of records were transferred to the State Records Center. A computerized system monitors 8,000 pieces of Departmentowned equipment, and an 8.1 percent decrease in the operating cost of the De- partrnent's vehicle fleet was realized from Fiscal Year 1984 to Fi cal Year 1985. Disposal of urplus property, management of safety programs and procurement of suppliers and equipment are a! o functions of this office. The Legal Affair group was recently transferred to thi.s office. The group is responsible for non-bid contract preparation, conducting admi ni trative hearings on police and DOT law en forcement citations an performing legal researc for the Department whe needed. Special Staff John S. Hassell, ]r., Executive Assistant Office of Systems Development At the end of Fiscal Year 19 5, four Department co mputers were in opera- tion for use in Manage ment Information processing, Engineering Design , In- teractive Graphics, and Permits and Enforcement. The re pan ibility for man- ag ing and operating these c mputer y rem , as well a providing y tern analysis and programming upport t the va ri us office of the Department, belong to the Office of y tern Develop- ment. everal advance- ments were made in DOT computer operation in Fis- cal Yea r 1985. A new VAX computer was installed that ha given the Department additi o n a l computing powe r and uniformity of operating ystems and pro- ced ures. The Department has entered the world of in- te ractive graphics with the in talla tion of an Inter- graph System, and con- struction plans, topog- raphic m:.=tp , and other data for use on construction plans can now be p~;oduced interactively. In August 1984, the Department in- stalled a centralized net- work of multiplexors, up- grading the small , single- computer acces network to a larger, multiple-access network providing access to u er in the di triers, metro Construction crews build roads for Georgia's growing population. Atlanta locations, dial-up u er , and selected user in the General Office. The Department continued with the rede ign and update of the Contracts Administration ystem for installat ion of an in-house VAX computer, and the development of a c itation system for use with the issuing of permits for overweight and over-size vehicles which began in Fiscal Year 1985. Office of Engineering Services Engineering Services is responsible for plan review of all Fede ral Aid projects to insure that all construction plans satisfy the intended programming concept and that general and state design guidelines are met. This office also proposes final construction cost estimates for all projects let to contract and advises the Office of Construction on Value Engineering proposals and other negotiations necessary for on-going construction projects. In Fiscal Year 1985, Engineering Services continued to fulfill an importatnt role in the Preconstruction activities of the Department through arranging, conducting, and reporting on Location inspections and Field Plan reviews. The establishment of a cost-data base will provide a more accurate estimate of costs during the early planning stages of future projects. Office of Personnel The Office of Personnel provides personnel administration support through evaluation of personnel requirement atta inment, recruitment, training, and assurance of equal employment opportunities. With the retirement of many vet- eran employee and add. tiona! ones ant1c1pate over 60 Civil Engineerin Technologists and Civi Engineers have been re cruited and the pool schools from wh ich the D partment traditionally r cruits has been expanded. The employee career cou seling and employee assis ance programs were co tinued over the past fisc year, and the Employe Suggestion Program Com mittee ha been restruc tured to review employe suggestions submitted t the Merit System progra for improving Departmen policies and procedure Job cia sifications salaries were reviewed ave Fiscal Year 1985 resul tin in a 33 percent increa e i promotions within the De partment. Accomplish ments in the area of train ing in Fiscal Year 1985 in eluded updating th Maintenance Forema Academy, developing self-study text on erosio control, and completing video training tape on c n crete slab repair. The De partment's commitment t equal employment oppor tunities is documented b the fact that from Janua r 1, 1985 through Augu t31, 1985, 46.6 perce nt of a l newly hired employee were minorities and 20.4 percent were women. Also, from October 1, 1984 through June 30, 1985, 9.6% of the Department's construction expenditures went to Disadvantaged Business Enterprises or Women's Business Enterprises. Public Information As FY '85 drew to a close, the Public Information Office was able to reflect not only on the positive accomplishments of the Department, but also on the successes of our office as a communications outlet for the DOT. The publicatiom division of our office \\'d~ responsible for the production of several items during the year. The T ransformation, a weekly compilation of noteworthy articles from newspapers across the state, kept the Commissioner and all Division Directors informed of statewide media coverage. "The Georgia DOT News" was printed on a quarterly basis and continued to serve as the primary source for interdepartmental news. In addition to these publications, the Information Office also assisted with the completion of the 1985 Annual Report and periodically produced various departmental brochures and pamphlets. Aside from publications, the Information Office maintained continuous contact with the public during the year through a variety of sources. The Information office responded to :1umerous inquiries, both by mail and by phone, answering questions relative to the Department and its activities. Similarly, information was dispersed to radio and television stations and newspapers across the state through press releases, interviews and personal contacts. Information was provided concerning traffic interruptions and construction through the use of a telephone answering system set up after hours and on weekends. As always, the dour to the Information Office remained open so th<~, hctter communications mi~hr he enhanced within the Department and between the people of Georgia and the DOT. Community Relations The Office of Commu- nity Relations serves as a direct liaison for the Commissioner's office and the general public. The primary purpose of the Community Relations office is to interact with the citizens in order to solve problems that cannot be resolved through normal department channels. Policy Planning When asked the com- mon question, "What do you do?," employees of the Policy Planning Group have a difficult time choosing how to respond. The great diversity of tasks assumed by Policy Planning defies easy description, but can be broken down into the two categories of policy research and administrative 3ssistance. The area of policy research includes issues and trend tracking, which means searching through national newspapers and trade publications for the latest developments in transportation technology and also changes in the workplace. The daily news search yields pertinent articles which are circulated to managers, and also yields two weekly publications. One of th: 'e, "In Brief," is a compilation cf condensed transportation news from around the ~orld, while the tlther is a sheet of transpor- tation blurbs called "Around the USA," taken fn lll1 a national newspaper. Tlw-,e publications help kL'L'\' ,kpartmental personnel ~threast of environmenLd ~m,l social changes \\'h ic h attL'L't transportation sen ices. The r,)licy Planning Gmup ~ds,l m,tinrains files of resource infurm~ttion on a variety uf tLmspurration topics, anll em cumpile back-ground rep' lrts ,ll1 pol- icy issues as they arise by drawing from these filL'S and supplementing inform~ttion gained from within the De- partment. A record is kept, t~lr in- stance, of pertinent statis- tics concerning motor fuel taxes and alternative fund- ing options. From this data, comparative statistics showing Georgia's position relative to other states can be compiled. In addition, the Policy Planning Group regularly provides to DOT managers statistical infor- mation on a variety ofother topics and occasionally re- sponds to public inquiries. In FY '85, the group played an active role in compiling information about economic develop- ment in Georgia which showed the need for greater four-lane access to rural areas of the state. Policy Planning worked with Dr. Charles Floyd, a consultant from the University of Georgia, in compiling county-by-county data on economic growth. Analysis of the Appalachian De- velopmental Highway in other states, and a factory location study in Georgia added to the growing body nf evidence suggesting the need for more four-lane highways. Background reports pre- pared by the Policy Plan- ning Group sometimes serve as the ba~is for Policy Committee meetings, where DOT managers who are involved in a certain area come together to work out the best possible solu- tion based on the most ac- curate information availa- ble. This has been an effec- tive management tool in the past. Another policy tool for management is the process of program review, where a specific functional area is examined to deter- mine a level of maximum efficiency. The Policy Planning Group completed program reviews in FY '85 which examined the usage of telephone conference calls, among other things. The other activity area of the Policy Planning Group stems from the need of top management for a flexible response to ad- ministrative tasks as Lhey arise. Because of its usage of short-term student in- terns, Policy Planning is ideally suited to track legis- lative issues during the an- nual General Assembly ses- sion. The group maintains a list of all bills that may affect transportation in Georgia, and tracks each of these bills through the in- tricate tangle of legislative procedure. Federal legisla- tion and rulemaking are monitored through daily perusal of the "Congre sional Record" and "Federal Register." Other administrative dutie include a i ting the o mmi i ner in compi l- ing hi annual goal for management, assisting the Board by compiling infor- marion and staffing Board workshops where policy issues are discussed. Constr ctton Alva R. Byrom, Director Con truction The Office of Construc- tion i charged with the re- pon ibili ty of monitoring the progress and quality of all highway, bridge and highway-related construc- tion projects . This office is the clearing house for all re- vi ions and changes made on active construction pro- jects which includes the processing of time exten- sions, supplemental and ex- tension agreements, change orders and force ac- count agree ments. Con- truction progress and qual- ity are monitored by the Of- fice of Construction. Office staff members serve as liaison personnel to each of the seven field di tricts to furnish technical expertise on unusual and extraordi- nary construction problems that are encountered. These engi neer also have the respon ibility of making final acceptance of all federally-funded highway projects. Contract Administration The process of placing construction projects under contract with private contractor or local government i handled by the Office of Contract AdminisJration. Thi process includes proposal preparation, adverti ing for bids, conducting the letting, contract preparation and i su ing the notice to proceed with the work. During the project construction, Contract Administration activities include payment to the contractors and auditing of all the constructi on project records to assu re that tax reserves are properly spent. Fiscal Year 1985 saw the two largest contracts ever let by the De- partment, the $111 million I-75185 rec nstruction through downtown Atlanta and the $ 103 millio n I-75/ 85 - I-20 interchange recon truction. Materials & Research The Materials and Tests Bureau, the Research and Deve lopment Bureau and the Geotechnical Engineering Bureau comprise the Office of Materials and Re earch . The Mate ri als and T e t Burea u is respo nsible for quality contro l of material a well a workmanship incorporated into highway con truction by conducting test to insure conformance with approved plan and specifications. For example, a nuclear moisture density gauge is used on embankment, road base and asphaltic concrete to guarantee a properly densified, stable and durable pavement. The Re earch and Development Bureau evaluates newly developed material and innovative con truction procedure that are being developed continuously and recommends whether they should be implemented . Pavement condition surveys such as skid resistanc , smoothness and interstate pavement evaluations are conducted and the data is used to schedu le and design pavement rehabilitation. The Geotechnical Engi nee ring Bureau performs oi l survey and bridge foundation studies for design and construction of subsurface support structures for bridges and provides technical assistance when problems occur during various phases of construction opera tions such as retaining walls, subgrades and bases. The Department frequently uses cranes to aid in construction such as maneuvering bridge sections into place. Financing Georgia's Needs, Expended Income Sources of revenue for the department are the state motor fuel tax, state general funds and federal funds. Other funds available include motor fuel taxes carried over from previous years and miscellaneous funds. Unlike a lot of other states, Georgia does not utilize motor vehicle registration fees, auto license tag fees, tolls, dealer permits or inspection fees to supplement the transportation budget. Instead, Georgians pay a 7Yz per gallon motor fuel tax and a 3 percent sales tax on motor fuels to fund transportation in Georgia. Interest earned off motor fuel tax funds is also used to fund transportation. Not only is the user tax the foundation on which the system is built, it also is an important tool with which to leverage federal funds. Georgia, however, has the lowest highway user charge in the United States. It has been mcreased only once in the past 30 years - from 6Yz cents per gallon to 7Yz cents per gallon in 1971. Revenues from the motor fuel tax grew only 5 percent during FY '85, while state revenue from other sources increased by an average of 14.9 percent. Expenditures in FY '85 totaled more than one billion dollars. Although expenditures rose $324 million from FY '84 levels, much of the increase ($226 million) was for letting of contracts to widen I-75/85 (the downtown connector). Another major increase in FY '85 spending was an extra $34 million in general obligation bond debt service which includes a $35 million federal ACI payment. Also, the cost of personal services increased 7.8 percent and regular operating expenses rose 8.6 percent. In FY '85, the DOT cut the cost of travel expenses, publications, real estate rentals, harbor maintenance and geodetic control. The DOT held the line on most other budget items. Georgia also made significant steps toward funding the Developmental Highway System in FY '85, thanks largely to a state budget surplus during that year. Georgia's economic and social standing will be strengthened by the undertaking of this important program. But, future pressures on state budget growth and the slow growth of motor fuel tax revenues will make funding developmental highways a greater challenge. Georgians continue to benefit from austere budgeting and wise man- agement by the DOT. We enjoy well-maintained roads while some states are raising user fees and still others face problems of crisis proportions. Costcutting measures such as preventive maintenance, increased productivity and joint construction/maintenance projects mean taxpayers are getting the most mileage for their motor-fuel tax dollars. The DOT continues to meet the challenge of providing safe and adequate roads. In order to meet future challenges, the Department is continually seeking new ways to deliver services at the lowest possible cost. Increasing public pressure to control the cost of government services and declining fuel consumption will make the challenge even tougher. New methods of financing transportation must be explored. During FY '85, DOT continued to provide tran ~ portation in a co t effective and time efficient manner to get the most out of every tax dollar. The Office of Bridge and Structural De ign con~ tinued work on the exten~ sive retaining wall sy tern u ed on the I~ 75/85 con~ nector recon truction in downtown Atlanta. Use of retaining walls in this con~ struction allows widening of the roadway within exi t~ ing right~of~way with the retaining wall holding the roadway from adjacent property or vice~versa. Al~ though retaining walls are expensive to build, they can be cons~ructed at a frac~ tion of the cost of addi~ tiona! property in down~ town Atlanta that would have to be purcha ed if re~ taining walls were not used. Defunct projects and road abandonments result in excess or surplus property for the Department's Right~ of~Way office . Rather than letting this property fa ll idle, the Department has the land appraised and old at the market value with the fi r t ption going to the per on from whom the De~ partment originally ob~ rained the property. If the Department doe not sell the excess property it may swap the land for other land that may be needed. This policy helps to hold right~ of~way acquisition costs to a minimum. In FY '85, six direct sales of surplus prop~ erty returned $1,019,610 to the transportation fund. The disposal of other surplus property such as vehicles and equipment re~ turned $570,564. 81 in ad~ ditional motor fuel money to the Department. New, ta te~of~th e ~ a rt equipment acquired by various Department offices h as allowed for greater pro~ ductivity and better ser~ vice. The Location office's new photogrammetric and survey ing equipment ha more than doubled produc~ tion in that area while a new computer~aided cro s~ sectioning instrument ha increa ed production of cross~ ections at a three fold level. Planning Data Services acquired a new video logging system that will reduce costs and delay in providing uch informa~ tiona slope and horizontal and vertical grade data to Department engineers. Wise management and ef~ fective maintenance of existing equipment con~ tinued to provide cost sav~ ings in FY '85 . Using work~ ing parts fro m non~working equipment to replace worn parts of working equip~ ment, or cannibalization, resulted in $ 150,000 worth of parts for department equ ipment. Usage of recap tires increased 30% in FY '85 over FY '84. An e ti~ mated 2,000 recapped tires were used over the past fis~ cal year. FISCAL 1985 ACTUAL AUDITED EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES Agency Summary Personal Services ........................................................ $ 141,772,756.71 Regular Operating Expense .................................................. 49,778,628.52 Travel ............................................................................ 1,400,889.53 Motor Vehicle Equipment Purchases ....................................... 2,322,654.96 Publications and Printing ........................................................ 757,544.09 Equipment Purchases ......................................................... 11,723,781.14 Computer Charges ............................................................. 2,027, 748.52 Real Estate Rentals . .. .. .. . ... .. ... .. .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . .. . .. .. . .. . . .. ... . . ... . .. . 1,082,528.48 Per Diem, Fees and Contracts .............................................. 15,359,754.91 Capital Outlay ............................................................... 691,982,327.88 Authority Lease Rentals ..................................................... 24,452,288.76 General Obligation Bond Debt Service ................................... 38,436,028.61 Grants to Counties .. . . .. . .. . .. .. . .. .. .. . ... . . ... . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. .. . .. . 9,317 ,013.00* Grants to Municipalities .................................................... 9,317,000.00* Harbor Maintenance Payments ................................................. 399,986.04 MassTransitGrants ........................................................... 4,908,176.43 Geodetic Control .................................................................. 124,179.94 Capital Outlay Airport Development ......................................... 673,526.01 Capital Outlay Airport Operational Improvements .. . .. .. . . .. .. . .. . .. . .. 1,077 ,352. 93 Capital Outlay Airport Approach Aid ........................................ 150,130.68 Telecommunications ........................................................... 1,621,648.40 Spoilage Area Acquisition Clearing & Preparation ...................... 4,079,273.91 TOTAL ................................................................... $1,012,765,219.45 Not included in OOT Audit REVENUES State General Funds ....................................................... $ 18,224,340.87 Federal-Aid and Other* ................................................... 697,099,842.95 Motor Fuel Tax .............................................................. 297,441,035.63 *Other funds includes prior year and miscellaneous funds FISCAL 1985 ACTUAL AUDITED EXPENDITURES Planning and Construction Activity EXPENDITURES Personal Services ....... $ 69,836,403.48 Regular Operating Expense ........... 5, 126,131.57 Travel .............. ................ 894,662.92 Publications and Printing ............... 191,514.85 Equipment Purchases .................... 421,234.64 Real Estate Rentals ......................... 26,320.00 Per Diem Fees and Contracts ...... 12,705,201.64 Computer Charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141, 128. 14 Capital Outlay ....................... 648,799,735.07 Geodetic Control ......... ...... ... ...... . 124,179.94 Telecommunications ................... 1,109,990.35 Motor Vehicle Equipment Purchases ... 13,200.00 REVENUES State General Funds .............. $ 6,641 ,466.6H Fcder