35 THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET REPORT _______________________________________________________________________________ FISCAL YEAR 2003 ROY E. BARNES GOVERNOR STATE OF GEORGIA THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET REPORT Fiscal Year 2003 Ending June 30, 2003 ." 1776 Roy E. Barnes, Governor Director of the Budget Office of Planning and Budget Bill Tomlinson Jerome Crockett Director Deputy Director CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Governor's Introduction..............................................................................................................................6 Budget Highlights.........................................................................................................................................8 Special Initiatives........................................................................................................................................13 An Economic Report ..................................................................................................................................29 Results-Based Budgeting...........................................................................................................................37 State Strategic Plan.....................................................................................................................................38 Reader's Guide............................................................................................................................................40 FINANCIAL SUMMARIES Estimated State Fund Availability, Budget and Surplus......................................................................44 Georgia Revenues, Actual and Estimated ..............................................................................................45 Expenditures and Appropriations by Department State Funds........................................................46 Expenditures and Appropriations by Department Total Funds .......................................................48 Sources of State Revenue by Amount.....................................................................................................50 Sources of State Revenue by Percentage................................................................................................51 How State Dollars are Spent.....................................................................................................................52 Statement of Financial Condition.............................................................................................................53 Changes in Fund Balances ........................................................................................................................54 Revenue Shortfall Reserve........................................................................................................................55 Lottery Reserves .........................................................................................................................................56 Lottery Recommendations........................................................................................................................57 Recommended Salary Adjustments.........................................................................................................60 DEPARTMENT SUMMARIES State Organization Chart ...........................................................................................................................64 Legislative Branch General Assembly ...............................................................................................................................65 Department of Audits and Accounts ...............................................................................................66 Judicial Branch .........................................................................................................................................67 Executive Branch Department of Administrative Services ..........................................................................................71 Department of Agriculture ................................................................................................................83 Department of Banking and Finance...............................................................................................91 Department of Co mmunity Affairs ..................................................................................................97 Department of Community Health................................................................................................ 107 Department of Corrections............................................................................................................. 123 Department of Defense................................................................................................................... 133 State Board of Education................................................................................................................ 141 Employees' Retirement System .................................................................................................... 167 1 CONTENTS State Forestry Commission............................................................................................................ 173 Georgia Bureau of Investigation................................................................................................... 181 Georgia State Financing and Investment Commission ............................................................. 191 Office of the Governor.................................................................................................................... 197 Department of Human Resources ................................................................................................. 205 Department of Industry, Trade and Tourism............................................................................... 235 Department of Insurance ................................................................................................................ 245 Department of Juvenile Justice...................................................................................................... 253 Department of Labor....................................................................................................................... 263 Department of Law.......................................................................................................................... 275 Merit System of Personnel Administration................................................................................. 281 Department of Motor Vehicle Safety ........................................................................................... 287 Department of Natural Resources................................................................................................. 295 State Board of Pardons and Paroles.............................................................................................. 313 Department of Public Safety.......................................................................................................... 321 Public School Employees' Retirement System .......................................................................... 334 Public Service Commission........................................................................................................... 337 Regents, University System of Georgia ....................................................................................... 345 Department of Revenue.................................................................................................................. 373 Office of Secretary of State............................................................................................................ 381 State Soil and Water Conservation Commission........................................................................ 391 Georgia Student Finance Commission......................................................................................... 399 Teachers' Retirement System........................................................................................................ 411 Department of Technical and Adult Education .......................................................................... 417 Department of Transportation........................................................................................................ 427 Department of Veterans Service.................................................................................................... 437 State Board of Workers' Compensation...................................................................................... 445 State of Georgia General Obligation Debt Sinking Fund ......................................................... 452 CAPITAL OUTLAY Summary of Funds Recommended by the Governor......................................................................... 454 Capital Outlay Requests and Recommendations Department of Administrative Services ....................................................................................... 455 Department of Agriculture ............................................................................................................. 456 Department of Community Affairs ............................................................................................... 457 Department of Corrections............................................................................................................. 458 Department of Defense................................................................................................................... 461 State Board of Education................................................................................................................ 462 State Forestry Commission............................................................................................................ 463 Georgia Bureau of Investigation................................................................................................... 464 Department of Human Resources ................................................................................................. 465 Department of Industry, Trade and Tourism............................................................................... 467 Department of Juvenile Justice...................................................................................................... 468 2 CONTENTS Department of Labor....................................................................................................................... 470 Department of Natural Resources................................................................................................. 471 Department of Public Safety.......................................................................................................... 475 Regents, University System of Georgia ....................................................................................... 476 Office of Secretary of State............................................................................................................ 481 Department of Technical and Adult Education .......................................................................... 482 Department of Transportation........................................................................................................ 486 Department of Veterans Service.................................................................................................... 488 Capital Outlay Projected Needs for Fiscal Years 2004-2007 Department of Agriculture ............................................................................................................. 489 Department of Community Affairs ............................................................................................... 490 Department of Corrections............................................................................................................. 491 Department of Defense................................................................................................................... 492 State Board of Education................................................................................................................ 493 Georgia Bureau of Investigation................................................................................................... 494 Georgia State Financing and Investment Commission ............................................................. 495 Department of Human Resources ................................................................................................. 496 Department of Industry, Trade and Tourism............................................................................... 497 Department of Juvenile Justice...................................................................................................... 498 Department of Labor....................................................................................................................... 499 Department of Natural Resources................................................................................................. 500 Department of Public Safety.......................................................................................................... 502 Regents, University System of Georgia ....................................................................................... 503 Department of Technical and Adult Education .......................................................................... 509 Department of Transportation........................................................................................................ 512 RESULTS-BASED BUDGETING Department of Administrative Services ....................................................................................... 514 Department of Agriculture ............................................................................................................. 524 Department of Banking and Finance............................................................................................ 531 Department of Community Affairs ............................................................................................... 533 Department of Community Health................................................................................................ 541 Department of Corrections............................................................................................................. 545 Department of Defense................................................................................................................... 547 State Board of Education................................................................................................................ 550 Employees' Retirement System .................................................................................................... 570 State Forestry Commission............................................................................................................ 571 Georgia Bureau of Investigation ................................................................................................... 573 Georgia State Financing and Investment Commission ............................................................. 578 Office of the Governor.................................................................................................................... 579 Department of Human Resources ................................................................................................. 588 Department of Industry, Trade and Tourism............................................................................... 607 Department of Insurance ................................................................................................................ 609 3 CONTENTS Department of Juvenile Justice...................................................................................................... 612 Department of Labor ....................................................................................................................... 615 Department of Law.......................................................................................................................... 621 Merit System of Personnel Administration................................................................................. 622 Department of Motor Vehicle Safety ........................................................................................... 626 Department of Natural Resources................................................................................................. 627 State Board of Pardons and Paroles.............................................................................................. 636 Department of Public Safety.......................................................................................................... 639 Public School Employees' Retirement System .......................................................................... 645 Public Service Commission........................................................................................................... 646 Regents, University System of Georgia ....................................................................................... 649 Department of Revenue.................................................................................................................. 667 Office of Secretary of State............................................................................................................ 670 State Soil and Water Conservation Commission........................................................................ 678 Georgia Student Finance Commission......................................................................................... 680 Teachers' Retirement System........................................................................................................ 683 Department of Technical and Adult Education .......................................................................... 684 Department of Transportation........................................................................................................ 688 Department of Veterans Service.................................................................................................... 693 State Board of Workers' Compensation...................................................................................... 695 APPENDIX State Funds Surplus......................................................................................................................... 698 Summary of Positions..................................................................................................................... 699 FY 2004 Budget Estimates............................................................................................................. 701 Impact of Capital Outlay Program on the FY 2003 Recommended Budget......................... 703 Financing Capital Outlay Needs - Issuance of Debt.................................................................. 704 Total Debt Authorized by State in General Obligation and Revenue Bonds........................ 706 Outstanding Debt Owed by State of Georgia .............................................................................. 707 Principal and Interest Owed on Outstanding Bonds.................................................................. 708 State Debt as Percentage of Treasury Receipts .......................................................................... 709 Basis of Budgeting and Accounting............................................................................................. 710 The Budget Process in Georgia ..................................................................................................... 711 Georgia Statistics ............................................................................................................................. 714 Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................... 718 Glossary............................................................................................................................................. 723 4 Introductionx 5 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY: It is my pleasure to present this FY 2003 Budget Recommendation for the continued improvement of services to the citizens of our state. This budget reflects the commitment to many of the initiatives implemented in the first three years of this administration. However, this budget also reflects a cautious investment in important services and infrastructure while recommending certain budget reductions that are necessary due to the nationwide economic slowdown. Georgia has not been immune from the downward economic trend. However, our prudently conservative revenue projections in past years and the somewhat better economic condition here in Georgia when compared to our neighboring states have softened the fiscal impact for this budget. While my recommendations reflect our continuing commitment to comprehensive education reform as well as other important statewide initiatives such as protecting our most vulnerable children, creating an aggressive cancer initiative, implementing a state level response to terrorism and improving driver's licensing processes, we must make difficult budget adjustments without hindering services to the citizens of Georgia. As a normal precaution and in light of present economic conditions, I have established a conservative revenue estimate of $14,534,000,000 for FY 2003. First, to fulfill my promise to reduce taxes, I am including $329 million for property tax relief for the citizens of Georgia. An additional $24 million is included to cover statewide exemptions for city property taxes. Second, education reform must continue to be at the forefront of our investments for Georgia's future. This budget proposes to continue the initiatives created in the A+ Education Reform Act of 2000 and HB 656 that was passed by the General Assembly last year. This budget recommendation includes $195 million to provide funds for QBE formula grants based on an enrollment growth of 1.75 percent. To support the implementation of our accountability system for K-12 education, I am recommending $8.5 million to continue the development of Criterion Referenced Competency Tests (CRCT) and another $4.6 million to develop end-ofcourse tests for eight core subjects in high school that will measure high school student achievement and eventually replace the Georgia High School Graduation Test. Also, I am adding $12.8 million to continue funding for school improvement teams presently working in 163 local schools that need and requested assistance. I am also including $24.8 million to provide funds for equalization grants with local systems limited to 55 percent of the gain or loss from the prior year. A key component of education reform is quality teaching in every classroom in Georgia. To support teachers in this task and to retain quality teachers while attracting new ones, I am recommending a 3.5 percent salary increase effective September 1, 2002. This increase will keep Georgia as the leader in the southeast and at the national average at a time when most other states are unable to increase teacher salaries. To support my goal of 1,000 nationally board certified teachers for Georgia, I am recommending $1.8 million to fund a 10 percent salary supplement based on teacher's annual salary for our existing 426 National Board Certified teachers. This policy is a departure from the past when the 10 percent salary supplement was fixed at 10 percent of the teacher's salary in the year after initial certification was obtained. The health and well being of our citizens must always carry the highest priority. To continue our support of the Georgia Cancer Coalition, I am recommending a total of $31 million in tobacco funds to fund a variety of cancer programs, including $2 million to cover treatment expenses for uninsured cancer patients and another $1.5 million for eminent cancer clinicians and scientists. We must also target state services to the children and families of the state who are most in need. I am recommending $4.4 million to add 100 child protective services caseworkers and supervisors. I am also recommending $3.3 million to provide an array of support services for children and families in need of child protective services. I am including $20.4 million for increases in enrollment and utilization of PeachCare for Kids benefits. And there is $235.6 million recommended to cover growth and utilization in Medicaid Benefits. While our economy is slowing, it is important to utilize every source of funds available to ensure economic development. I am recommending $65.4 million in tobacco settlement proceeds for the OneGeorgia Authority to continue grant and loan programs targeted at Georgia's most needy counties. All Georgians deserve safe and secure communities, and this budget increases prison programs and facilities. I am including operating and startup funds of $3.7 million for additional diversion and transition center beds as well as $4.8 million to fund subsidies for local county beds coming online. I am also recommending over one- half million dollars for the Georgia Bureau of Investigation to add 8 additional positions to open the Augusta and Savannah Medical Examiners offices. To assist in our commitment to election reform, I am recommending $3.4 million for the Secretary of State to add 13 positions and associated costs for voter education. We have great challenges before us. Even in these economically uncertain times, we are still in a financial condition to support these critical investments that will foster the improvement of services to our citizens. As always, I am looking forward to working with you during this legislative session as we craft the future of Georgia. Sincerely, [signed] Roy E. Barnes REB/rj FY 2003 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS Governor's Recommendations APPROPRIATIONS AND REVENUES Appropriations totaling $16,177,689,408 are recommended for FY 2003, which begins July 1, 2002 and ends June 30, 2003. The appropriations would be funded from the following sources: - $14,534,000,000 from taxes and fees as estimated by the Governor, an increase of $667,000,000 or 4.8% over the FY 2002 budget of $13,867,000,000. - $625,000,000 from lottery proceeds. - $148,828,880 from the Indigent Care Trust Fund. - $249,000,000 from the FY 2001 surplus. - $173,002,372 from the Tobacco Settlement Fund. - $500,000 from the Brain and Spinal Injury Trust Fund. - $447,358,156 from early return of FY 2002 Surplus. RECOMMENDED EXPENDITURES PROPERTY TAX RELIEF $329,000,000 to continue the Governor's Property Tax Relief Program, which will raise the statewide homestead exemption value from the current $8,000 to $10,000. This will result in no general county tax liability for the first $25,000 of fair market value on homesteads. An additional $24,000,000 is included to cover statewide exemptions for city property taxes. SALARY ADJUSTMENTS $274,023,130 to provide for the following salary increases: Public School Employees - 3.5% for public school teachers effective, September 1, 2002. - 2.5% for school bus drivers and lunchroom workers, effective July 1, 2002. State Employees - 3.5% funding level for merit increases for Board of Regents faculty effective fall semester 2002 and nonacademic staff, effective October 1, 2002. - 3.5% for public librarians effective September 1, 2002. - 3.5% for technical college teachers and adult literacy instructors, effective September 1, 2002; 2.5% for technical college support staff, effective October 1, 2002. - Performance based increase range (0% or 2.5%) for state employees effective October 1, 2002. - 2.5% for staff employees of the Legislative Branch and the Judicial Branch, effective October 1, 2002. - 2.5% for each state official (excluding members of the General Assembly) whose salary is set by Act 439, effective October 1, 2002. - 2.5% cost of living adjustment for members of the General Assembly, effective October 1, 2002. - Provide 3% increase to the structure of the Statewide Salary Plan and provide for a 2% one-time lump -sum payment for "exceeds expectations," both effective October 1, 2002. - Recommend to the Teachers Retirement System's Board of Trustees that a total cost-of-living adjustment of 3.5% be granted for retired teachers. (See pay raise section for details.) EDUCATION (LOTTERY FUNDS) Office of School Readiness $240,333,989 to serve 4-year olds through the Voluntary Pre -Kindergarten Program. $3,753,907 to provide funds for a 3.5% salary increase for certified and 4-year degreed Pre -Kindergarten teachers and a 2.5% salary increase for 2-year degreed PreKindergarten teachers and teacher assistants. $1,098,901 to increase operating funds for public and private Pre -Kindergarten providers. Student Finance $324,283,562 for the HOPE Scholarship Program to provide tuition, mandatory fees and a book allowance to approximately 215,000 students enrolled in public colleges and technical colleges. $41,856,010 for the HOPE Private College Scholarships. 8 FY 2003 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS $4,114,476 for Promise Scholarships for individuals who aspire to be teachers in Georgia public schools. $4,204,658 to provide for Teacher Scholarships for individuals seeking advanced education degrees in critical shortage fields of study. $178,467,577 of lottery funds has been set-aside for the Shortfall Reserve Sub-account ($68,382,700) and Scholarship Shortfall Sub-account ($110,084,877) as of June 2001. The lottery reserve increased by $25,030,216 from June 2000. EDUCATION (STATE GENERAL FUNDS) Public Schools $194,983,141 to provide funds for Quality Basic Education (QBE) formula grants based on enrollment growth of 1.75% ($107,826,972), training and experience ($42,227,584) and annualization of the FY 02 pay raise ($44,928,585). $24,800,889 to provide equalization grants with local systems limited to 55% of the gain or loss from the prior year. $12,752,803 to continue school improvement for the 163 schools entering the second year of the state-funded America's Choice model. These funds will also provide the technical support infrastructure for a new set of schools that will participate in the Georgia's Choice school improvement program. $1,838,490 to fund a 10% salary supplement based on teachers' annual salary for 426 National Board Certified teachers. This policy is a departure from the past when the 10% salary supplement was fixed at 10% of the teacher's salary in the year after certification was obtained. $4,015,000 for a revised Post Secondary Options (PSO) program that pays 93.75% of tuition and eligible fees at public and private colleges and pays local systems an amount equivalent to the indirect cost component of the QBE formula for the PSO students. $7,225,000 to continue the development of the Criterion Referenced Competency Tests (CRCT) in science and social studies for grades 3 through 8; in reading, English/language arts, and mathematics in grades 1 through 8; and implement the web-enabled delivery system. $4,615,848 to develop end-of-course tests for 8 core courses in high school to replace the Georgia High School Graduation Tests. $2,446,671 for FTE and training and experience growth for the Georgia Psycho-educational Network serving severely emotionally disturbed children. $1,147,272 to provide for an increase in the percentage of students in the Pre-school Handicapped Program to reflect the actual number of students being served. Payment obligations of more than $15,000,000 have been removed from local school systems related to local salary supplements due to the state's 2.05% reduction in the employer's share of retirement. For systems with 100% locally and federally funded positions there are substantial savings based on the full salary of those positions. Student Finance $32,663,446 for Tuition Equalization Grants to reflect a 2.98% increase in eligible students. University System $27,705,346 to offset funding challenges due to semester conversion. $25,469,913 to provide funds for Regents formula adjustment due to a 2.04% increase in student enrollment. $2,182,500 to pilot a program to offer four-year degrees in certain fields at two-year schools for nontraditional students and to conduct research on college access and participation of African-American males. $1,530,000 to apply the Intellectual Capital and Partnership Program (ICAPP Advantage) model to health professions and provide strategic response initiatives. $160,000 for Phase I of a Southern Regional Education Board Doctoral Scholars Program that will fund minority students who are pursing a Ph.D. in a discipline that is traditionally underrepresented by minorities. $150,000 to enhance the Regents Accountability Plus II system by providing funds for accountability survey instruments. $2,201,434 to pay for six months of the lease on the new Yamacraw building. $752,633 to fund the cost increase in the contract with Medical College of Georgia Health Incorporated due to salary increases and rate increases in health care costs. $150,000 to conduct and develop facility program and pre-design for a facility to house the Regional Library for 9 FY 2003 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS the Blind and Physically Handicapped, Office of Public Library Services and the state library collection. $500,000 to appropriate Brain and Spinal Injury Trust Fund benefits. Technical and Adult Education $29,164,573 in formula driven increases for the Department of Technical and Adult Education to compensate for increased enrollment. GEORGIA CANCER COALITION (TOBACCO FUNDS) $2,021,660 to the Department of Human Resources to provide additional funding to the Cancer State Aid Program to cover medical expenses for uninsured cancer patients. $3,474,205 transferred from the Department of Human Resources to the Department of Community Health for the Cancer State Aid Program to leverage federal Medicaid funding for breast and cervical cancer treatment. $1,500,000 for eminent cancer clinicians and scientists. HUMAN RESOURCES $144,213 to draw down the full allotment of federal Family Caregiver funds. CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES $4,352,129 to add 100 child protective services caseworkers and supervisors. $3,265,879 to provide an array of support services such as counseling, in-home case management, in-home parent support services, behavioral aids and transitional services. $2,143,677 to support growth in the number of children in family foster care and those receiving adoption assistance. $1,347,500 to fund the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale CAFAS) to measure the progress and well-being of children in Department of Family and Children Services (DFCS) out-of-home placements. $5,798,320 including $2,833,950 to purchase Microsoft Enterprise Licenses and $2,964,370 to annualize the cost of purchasing Master License Agreements. $3,659,911 to annualize the cost of contracts with District Attorney Offices in 9 judicial circuits to conduct Child Support Enforcement services. $3,060,732 to restore state funds reduced in department budgets for specific services in anticipation of revenue maximization. $700,000 to provide intensive support services to prevent a child's removal from the home. $573,873 to fund training staff and costs associated with curriculum development and evaluation. $505,373 for 41 Multi-Agency Team for Children (MATCH) wraparound slots. $423,600 to fund 2 pilot sites in Fulton and DeKalb counties to expand private emergency foster care services. $2,527,122 to annualize funds provided for the AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) to cover the increase in drug costs. $2,412,290 to provide Intensive Family Intervention services in homes, schools and other community locations for families with children who are seriously emotionally disturbed (SED). $375,840 for 135 institutionally supervised family foster care slots. $354,838 to cover increased costs for institutional foster care. $60,000 for 1 Office of Regulatory Services contracted surveyor. $1,838,763 to annualize 725 community-based Mental Retardation Waiver Program slots filed in FY 2002 and phase in 507 additional slots beginning July 1, 2002. $1,596,629 to transition 65 children with mental retardation from state hospitals to community placements. $1,513,940 to cover the cost of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar) immunizations not covered by the federal Vaccines for Children Program. $40,073 to provide operational funds for the Office of Child Fatality Review of the Statewide Child Abuse Prevention Panel. GEORGIA EARLY LEARNING INITIATIVE $1,580,000 in new funds to add tiered reimbursement childcare pilot programs in Berrien, Clayton, Dougherty, and Tift counties to enhance childcare quality. 10 FY 2003 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS COMMUNITY HEALTH $235,613,997 to cover growth and utilization in Medicaid Benefits. $20,426,282 for increases in enrollment and utilization of PeachCare for Kids Benefits. $18,346,436 to increase reimbursement rates for inpatient hospital providers by using 90% of adjusted calendar year 2000 cost data. $16,251,795 to reimburse physicians and related providers based on 90% of the 2000 Resource Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) data. $11,923,330 to adjust reimbursement rates for nursing home providers using the base year 2001 cost report and 1 year of DRI inflation. $79,800 to annualize the cost of 2 positions added in FY 2002 to support department planning, cost benefit analyses and financial forecasting. JUVENILE JUSTICE $1,879,922 to fund 45 Juvenile Probation and Parole Specialists previously funded by an expired federal grant. $1,397,041 to provide inflationary increases for contracted services as required by contractual agreements in YDCs, RYDCs, and Community Corrections. $1,253,673 to annualize the cost of adding in FY 2002 24 full-time and 7 part-time nurses to provide facility-based medical and mental health care. $167,544 to annualize the cost of adding 2 transportation teams in FY 2002. $3,346,299 to cover implementation of the Department of Community Health's health care information and claims payment system. $206,187 to provide 3 Regional Mental Health Coordinators to help develop and monitor appropriate mental health services provided by the department. $1,627,008 to implement an increase in Hospice Rates. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT $1,368,912 to increase reimbursement rates for adult and children's dental services. $1,339,678 to increase Independent Care Waiver Program reimbursement rates for personal support services by 10%. $996,293 for Morehouse School of Medicine based on a new medical education funding formula. $587,500 to implement programs and activities recommended in Code Blue: Workforce in Crisis to address non-physician health care workforce shortages. $65,430,712 in tobacco settlement proceeds for the OneGeorgia Authority to continue grant and loan programs targeted at Georgia's most needy counties. $7,972,000 reduction in scheduled payback for the Georgia Ports Authority to allow for paving projects, additional truck process gates, and a grain tank for the Colonel's Island Bulk Facility. $307,939 to annualize operation of the Southwest Georgia Rail Excursion Authority. NATURAL RESOURCES $433,581 to the Department of Community Health to provide additional funding to cover increased enrollment in the tobacco-funded eligibility expansion for pregnant women and children up to age 1 with incomes between 200% and 235% of the federal poverty level. $315,000 to provide funding for Georgia Better Health Care member education. $213,000 combined with $1,917,000 in federal and other funds for implementation of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPAA) standards. $252,324 to initiate operations of the Yahoola Creek regional reservoir and recreational area. $141,946 in additional operating funding for the Department of Natural Resources for new facilities coming on-line in FY 2003. $141,762 for equipment funds for the Department of Natural Resources as part of the state's coordinated terrorism response plan. TRANSPORTATION $149,890 to add 2 positions and related costs for a Compliance Manager and Assistant Architect in the Division of Health Planning. $46,117,447 in motor fuel tax receipts appropriated to the Department of Transportation to be used for state funded construction projects. 11 FY 2003 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS $18,794,228 in additional motor fuel tax collections appropriated to the Department of Transportation to fully match federal funds, bringing total state match to $207,440,535. $3,000,000 to support a special aviation maintenance and technical training program for the Heart of Georgia Regional Airport. $200,000 for the Georgia Regional Transportation Authority to initiate the new Developments of Regional Impact review process. $4,170,791 in state matching funds for the federal Mass Transit Grant Program. PUBLIC SAFETY Department of Corrections $3,749,347 to provide start-up and operating funds for the LaGrange Transitional Center, Dublin Diversion Center and Dalton Diversion Center. $4,825,994 to fund subsidy for 1,120 additional county beds coming online. $133,909 in state funds and $401,727 in federal matching funds to open the Atlanta Day Reporting Center. Georgia Bureau of Investigation $437,909 to fund 14 additional positions to handle increased caseloads in Intelligence Unit, Financial Investigation Unit and Health Care Fraud Unit. $837,151 to fund opening of a new Lab Annex and Morgue at Headquarters. $552,612 to add 8 additional positions to open the Augusta and Savannah Medical Examiners offices. Department of Motor Vehicle Safety $4,126,668 to fund 68 additional positions for 4 new facilities to be located in Cobb, DeKalb, Fulton and Gwinnett counties. $3,222,777 to fund 22 additional positions to initiate 3 new drivers license systems: mail-in, Internet and telephone renewal. GENERAL GOVERNMENT Department of Administrative Services $919,057 for 3 positions and system development to initiate an Office of Fleet Management. Office of Secretary of State $3,366,586 for 13 positions and associated costs for voter education. CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT The Governor has recommended a total of $726,530,000 in General Obligation Bonds for new projects requested by agencies for Fiscal Year 2003 in the Fiscal Year 2002 Amended Budget recommendations to the General Assembly. These include: - $11,790,000 for public school equipment. - $196,205,000 for colleges and universities in the University System for facilities and equipment. - $87,345,000 for technical colleges' facilities and equipment. - $23,220,000 for projects in the Georgia Research Alliance. - $150,000,000 for Governor's Road Improvement Program projects. - $45,240,000 for public parks and recreation projects. - $48,760,000 for projects related to physical and economic development. - $18,000,000 for projects in the juvenile justice system. - $15,665,000 for projects at state hospitals and veterans facilities. - $18,785,000 for projects at prisons and detention centers. - $2,920,000 for armories and law enforcement facilities. - $36,600,000 for repairs and renovation projects at other state facilities and farmer's markets. - $18,000,000 for a new state data center. - $54,000,000 for the purchase of voting machines. Details of all the above capital related projects are in the Governor's Amended Budget Report, Fiscal Year 2002 and also are summarized in the Capital Outlay section of this FY 2003 Report. 12 SPECIAL INITIATIVES Implementing Education Reform In 1999, when Governor Barnes took office he promised to make education his number one priority. In delivering on that promise the Governor's Education Reform Study Commission (GERSC) was identified and began its work conducting an overall assessment of the state of affairs in Georgia's public schools comparing the reality of our state's public schools with research-proven strategies of effective schooling. Equipped with some of Georgia's brightest and most respected professionals, GERSC I (1999) and GERSC II (2000) presented Governor Barnes with recommendations and alternatives to current practice. The Georgia General Assembly passed two pieces of Governor Barnes' education reform legislation into law: HB 1187 and HB 656. As 2003 approaches and our nation and state experience an economic slowdown, Governor Barnes recognizes that it is important, now more than ever, to sustain the momentum of education reform as we move forward with the implementation of HB 1187 and HB 656. Accordingly, at this critical juncture funds must be directed in a strategic and targeted to effort to maximize the impact of state dollars toward improving student achievement. Appropriately, the Governor's efforts in FY 2003 focus on several key elements of the state's education reform: accountability, teacher quality, teacher supply, K-12 construction and ensuring seamless educational policy and programming. OFFICE OF EDUCATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY The 2002 2003 school year will be the first benchmarking period for Georgia's public school. The Office of Educational Accountability (OEA) will issue its first "accountable" report card for schools in the fall of FY 2005. The grades issued will be based on school performance on tests only during the 2002 2003 school year. Among the indicators that will be reported but not graded are school completion and student attendance. Georgia's school accountability system comes complete with financial rewards for those schools that exceed state standards and assistance for schools that are below state standards. A significant shift in state policy, OEA's work ensures that public schools are not allowed to continually fail our students. Each year, schools will receive disaggregated data on academic performance. In this way, they will have the information necessary to drive their school resources in the areas where they are most needed. Schools that remain below standard for two years can have sanctions on them placed by the State Board of Education. Additionally, OEA will analyze data on differences in student achievement by sub-group and the achievement gap that exists between disaggregated student groups, including socioeconomic and racial groups. As part of an effort to explore this complex state and national issue, in the fall of 2001 Governor Barnes named a "Closing the Gap Commission" that will be responsible for identifying the nature of the achievement gap in Georgia and providing recommendations for addressing it. TESTING A centerpiece to Georgia's accountability plan is determining what our children know and can do as measured in part by their performance on standardized tests. In order to ensure that our children are equipped to compete on a national level, Georgia now administers national norm referenced tests in addition to criterion referenced tests. The Stanford 9 norm referenced test, first administered to Georgia students in grades 3, 5, and 8 in spring 2001, replaced the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS). Results of the Stanford 9 compare the performance of Georgia's students with their national counterparts. Overall, Georgia's 3rd, 5th and 8th graders ranked in the 46th, 50th and 47th percentiles, respectively, when compared to their national counterparts. The Criterion-Referenced Competency Test (CRCT) measures students' level of achievement on the Georgia's Quality Core Curriculum (QCC). The results of the CRCT are provided in a detailed disaggregated report that includes information on students' strengths and weaknesses by subject. As a result of HB1187 all students in grades 1 8 are required to take the reading, English/language arts, and mathematics portions of the CRCT effective spring 2002. This requirement ensures that regular and consistent information is collected on student achievement and that those students needing additional instruction receive it in the area in which it is most needed. Appropriately, Governor Barnes recommends $4,385,810 in the FY 2002 Amended budget to expand the CRCT in science and social studies for grades 3 through 8, and expand the English/language arts, math and reading portion for grades 1- 8th. These funds will also be used to pilot a web-enabled CRCT. This pilot will help Georgia identify and address the various issues related to web-based testing. This method has the added advantage of immediate scoring and may serve as an ideal method for re-taking the exam for those students who failed the CRCT during the first sitting. Governor Barnes also recommends $6,226,000 13 SPECIAL INITIATIVES for additional CRCT tests development and continuance of the web-enabled pilot in FY 2003. SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT TEAMS As the rollout to school report cards and accountability draws near the Governor has made a focused effort to assist our neediest schools, providing $11,000,000 in FY 2002 to high priority schools for school improvement teams as part of a targeted assistance strategy. This strategy provides those high priority schools that desire state assistance with the necessary resources and support to impact student achievement, immediately, and 163 schools requested to participate employing the America's Choice school reform model. The America's Choice model combines the key variables that research has proven are critical to effective schools: 1) a rigorous curriculum and high standards for all students; 2) collaboration among staff in working toward clear goals; 3) high quality staff development that also ties directly to the school's goals; 4) instructional leadership; and 5) meaningful and sustained parental involvement. The model intends to engage the entire school community in the efforts towards reform. A technical assistance infrastructure comprised of 32 Team Leaders, 8 Regional Managers, and 25 Business Advisors provides on-going training and monitoring. In the FY 2002 Amended Budget, Governor Barnes recommended an additional $9,055,969 to continue school improvement for the first group. These 163 schools are receiving intensive training and support that will help them direct all of their school's resources in a comprehensive manner toward improving student achievement. Ultimately, these schools will have the tools to sustain the reform. The America's Choice model is being adapted to align specifically with Georgia's Quality Core Curriculum and the tenets of HB 1187. In FY 2003 and beyond all schools that opt to participate in this initiative will receive training in the Georgia's Choice School Reform Program. Accordingly, from their inception in the program these schools will be required to use their many sources of staff development funds, particularly federal Title I funds, as the first step in a comprehensive strategy to re-direct their schools resources into an integrated program of school improvement. The state will continue to provide the technical assistance infrastructure and training. In FY 2003 Governor Barnes recommends $12,752,803 to continue full funding for the 163 schools participating in their second year of the state funded America's Choice reform and the technical assistance infrastructure that will provide additional training and support to a new group of schools participating in Georgia's Choice. STAFF DEVELOPMENT Georgia's efforts to ensure that all children achieve at high levels are driven by a multi-faceted approach that includes improving teacher quality and developing effective school leadership. While staff development is a critical component of achieving both of these goals, teachers and school leaders require different skills and support from staff development. Appropriately, Governor Barnes has developed two strategies to ensure that staff development is aligned with the distinct needs of teachers and school leaders. Teachers face a new and dynamic challenge to educate a diverse group of learners and ensure that all are able to successfully meet our state's high stakes standards. While teachers are eager to rise to the challenge of high standards they must receive professional development that is well integrated into the larger organizational goals of their schools and systems. On the other hand, school leaders must be able to lead in a dynamic environment to craft their schools' mission working closely with parents and faculty. Improving student achievement must drive that mission. Ultimately, the leadership must be able to identify the unique needs of the student body and develop a school-wide strategy that encompasses what happens both inside and outside of the classroom. Fundamentally, today's school leaders must also be instructional leaders. Accordingly, they require staff development that helps them to develop and hone the skills necessary to ensure the success of everyone in their school, students and teachers alike. Appropriately, in the FY 2002 Amended Budget Governor Barnes recommends $250,000 for a statewide evaluation of staff development. This evaluation will identify the various types of staff development currently provided and determine their respective impact on student achievement. The findings of the evaluation will be used to set new standards that tie teachers' staff development directly with the larger mission of their schools and also ties re-certification requirements for all educators with staff development that improves student achievement. Specific to developing effective school leadership, in FY 2002 the Governor provided $150,000 to the Professional Standards Commission for the development of a statewide Leadership Institute for educational leaders. Since that time, a Coordinating Board for Georgia's Action Plan in Educational Leadership has been identified, and funding from the Gates Foundation for $2,970,000 over 3 years for the development of the Institute has been secured along with an additional $5,137,489 from other private sources. The first class is expected to receive train ing in March 2002 The Governor is also recommending that the Leadership Academy, currently operating at GDOE, be folded into the new Leadership Institute. Funds have been 14 SPECIAL INITIATIVES provided to allow the three groups currently receiving training to complete their respective programs. In the FY 2002 Amended and the FY 2003 budgets, Governor Barnes recommends funds to match the Gates Foundation grant in the amounts of $499,000 and $1,039,348, respectively. NATIONAL BOARD The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) provides a clearly articulated set of standards for what teachers should know and be able to do in their respective fields. Its credential, National Board Certification (NBC), is hailed as the most rigorous and respected credential of the profession. Teachers, administrators, and elected officials alike suggest that the application process alone improves classroom performance. The NBC process emphasizes those components that research has consistently identified as central to improving teacher quality: reflective practice, collaboration with peers, and performance-based assessment. Acknowledging NBC as a corollary to improved teacher quality and a prestigious signature of professional accomplishment, Governor Barnes initiated a sustained commitment to recognizing and increasing Georgia's pool of National Board Certified teachers. Governor Barnes minimized the practical and financial barriers to applying for NBC by providing technical assistance for Georgia's NBC candidates via the Georgia Teacher Center housed at Kennesaw State University (FY 2001), and providing a $1,000 stipend for all teachers who successfully pass the PSC screening process (FY 2002) to help offset the $2,300 application fee. Candidates that do not pass the screening process are provided technical assistance via a precandidacy institute to ensure that they are ready to enter next year's application process. Governor Barnes also worked closely with the Georgia Partnership for Excellence in Education (GPEE) and PSC to raise additional private funds that assist these teachers in paying a portion of the remaining $1,300. Governor Barnes provided the support and issued the challenge that by 2004 Georgia would have 1,000 NBC teachers. Georgia's teachers have responded in-kind indicating that they are equipped to rise to the challenge. In November of 2001, with the announcement of the most recent set of teachers to achieve National Board Certification, Georgia scored high marks increasing its pass rate from 41% to almost 50% and tripling its pool of NBC teachers from 116 to 426. With a total of 310 new NBC teachers, Georgia had the seventh highest number of successful candidates of all the states in the 2001 certification results. In FY 2003, Governor Barnes recommends $1,838,490 to provide a 10% salary supplement for 426 teachers based on their annual salary. This 10% salary supplement is a policy shift that increases the financial incentive for teachers who achieve National Board Certification. In 1999, Governor Barnes increased the state salary supplement from 5% to 10%. Since 1994, it has been the state's policy to provide a salary supplement the school year after the teacher achieved certification. In following years, that amount of the supplement would be held constant. Governor Barnes' new policy will effectively provide an additional 10% of a teacher's salary every year. As the salary increases over time, so will the supplement. The Governor is also recommending an additional $234,000 to provide an application stipend for a new group of teachers to participate in the NBC application process. ALTERNATIVE PREPARATION In FY 2002, Georgia implemented its first statewide alternative teacher certification program joining the ranks of states like Texas, North Carolina, California and New Jersey that have successfully utilized alternative certification programs as one element in a larger strategy toward reducing the teacher shortage. Georgia Teacher Alternative Preparation Program (TAPP) provides an alternative option of entry into teaching for professionals who already hold a baccalaureate degree. Individuals who participate in this intensive preparation program must begin with a concentrated four to six week summer session, then teach in a classroom for a two year period with careful guidance from a teacher-mentor and receive follow-up instructions from the TAPP training providers. Georgia TAPP combines research-proven elements of teacher preparation to ensure that its teacher-candidates increase the pool of qualified teachers and also remain in the profession. In the spring of 2001 with the announcement of the program, Georgians demonstrated their overwhelming concern for our children and their education as more than 6000 individuals attended information sessions for TAPP around the state. While initial plans for the program anticipated identifying a pool of 200 qualified teachercandidates, PSC was inundated with inquiries about the program and received more than 1500 applicants. The final cohort consisted of a distinguished and diverse group of 753 candidates. TAPP is an important component of Georgia's efforts to address teacher supply issues: 1) It provides a rigorous field-based preparation component; and 2) it supports candidates at the most critical phase of their professional teaching experience by providing a mentor during their first year in the classroom. Governor Barnes has expressed a commitment to ensuring that TAPP delivers on its promise. $65,000 has been recommended in the FY 2002 Amended Budget to develop a candidate-tracking database and to initiate a program evaluation. In FY 2003, Governor Barnes recommends $1,000,000 for a new group of 750 teacher- 15 SPECIAL INITIATIVES candidates and to continue an evaluation of TAPP and the impact of its candidates on student achievement. As part of an on-going strategy to address teacher retention Governor Barnes has provided second year funding of $333,000 to be matched by federal funds to ensure that new teachers graduating from three of our state's teacher preparation programs (University of Georgia, Valdosta State and Albany State University) receive intensive mentoring. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES In anticipation of the significant impact that the class- size reduction requirements of HB 1187 would have on K12 construction, GERSC's Facilities Subcommittee made several key recommendations: 1) Make more technical assistance available to local systems in planning, predesign, design and construction, 2) Adjust the state's cost per square foot for construction; and 3) Develop a protypical design school program. In implementing these recommendations Governor Barnes asked the Georgia State Finance and Investment Commission (GSFIC) to be responsible for moving these efforts forward in a timely manner. In FY 2002, GSFIC retained a Program Management (PM) team to assist local school systems with all phases of HB 1187-related facilities development. This PM firm now provides every system with 40 hours of technical assistance annually. Systems are allowed to access the technical assistance in the areas in which they are most in need of additional direction. Additionally, the state's neediest systems receive top priority for PM services. The State Board of Education has responded to Governor Barnes' recommendation to increase the state's reimbursement per square foot. In FY 2003 the new per square footage reimbursement rate will increase from $49 to $54 for new elementary schools, $51 to $56 for new middle schools, and $53 to $58 for new high schools. These increases will bring the state's share in line with the average minimum cost of school construction in Georgia. Finally, Governor Banes has instituted a prototypical school design program and library, which provides a 2% reduction in local systems match to state funds for schools that employ a prototype school model for school construction. A design is considered a prototype if it has been built two or more times in Georgia, has a similar layout and the gross square footage and number of classrooms do not vary by more than 10%. In total, from the FY 1999 Amended through the FY 2003 budget, Governor Barnes has put over $1,180,000,000 in bonds, lottery funds, and cash toward K-12 school construction which has helped build over 11,650 classrooms. EDUCATION COORDINATING COUNCIL There is no variable in the education paradigm that functions and is sustained in isolation. Education from pre kindergarten to college completion is a continuum. As toddlers receive or fail to receive the fundamentals of education during those critical years (ages 3 and 4 years) they bring those skills or deficits into the classroom when they enter kindergarten. If schools consistently produce varying results among students from different socioeconomic and racial backgrounds on standardized tests, then those disparities are exacerbated at the college level. Furthermore, we are likely to observe similar trends among our teachers in test performance. This understanding is at the core of the Education Coordinating Council (ECC). Governor Barnes chairs the ECC which includes the CEO's and board chairs of all state education agencies from pre-school through college. Meeting quarterly, the ECC provides a forum for interagency communication of educational policy and program, insuring and promoting seamless education in the state of Georgia. 16 SPECIAL INITIATIVES Children's Protective Services The Division of Family and Children Services (DFCS) in the Department of Human Resources (DHR) investigated over 54,000 allegations of child abuse and neglect in calendar year 2000. Of these allegations, 34,079 incidents were confirmed as cases of child abuse and neglect. In addition, over 15,644 children were in the custody of the department at the end of June 2001. Major initiatives are now underway to reform child welfare in Georgia. DHR has developed a strategic plan to implement this reform known as SAFE FUTURES. This plan brings to the table many of the same public and private partners who were involved in the Governor's Child Protective Services Task Force, thus continuing and expanding on the work of the Task Force. The major initiatives addressed in SAFE FUTURES are: improved accountability for achieving positive outcomes for children and families; new community partnerships focused on prevention and early intervention in child abuse and neglect; responsive child protective services investigations; redesigned child welfare practice; a well-trained and stable workforce; a fully developed foster care continuum; expedited permanency for children in foster care; and an integrated information system to support reform. Part of DHR's child welfare reform plan also involves addressing major program issues identified by the recent Federal Child and Family Services Review. Georgia was the eighth state in the country to participate in this review. Reviews have been completed in 17 states to date and major problems have been identified in all states. Among the problems identified in Georgia were the need for additional caseworkers and support services for children including mental health. In continuing his commitment to creating a strong child protective system that safeguards Georgia's most vulnerable citizens, Governor Barnes has recommended funding for a second year of child welfare reform. The Governor's recommendations address both the SAFE FUTURES plan and the federal review findings. RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF CPS CASEWORKERS Funding is recommended for 90 new Child Protective Services (CPS) caseworkers and 10 new supervisors to help reduce the average caseload per worker. All CPS workers will have additional training opportunities as the Governor has recommended funding for curriculum development and review including the creation of a computerized training component. PREVENTION The Governor supports services that prevent a child's unnecessary removal from the home and services that ensure a child is in the safest and most appropriate environment when removed from the home. To that end the Governor recommends new funding to perform the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS) test for all children in DFCS out-of-home placements. CAFAS aids caseworkers to more accurately and thoroughly assess a child's progress and well being in the out-of-home setting. The Governor has also recommended an array of support services, including intensive mental health services, counseling, and transitional services to help prevent removal from the home or the return of a child to an out-of home placement. Finally, to ensure the safety of children in out-of-home settings, the Governor recommends the addition of one regulatory services surveyor to monitor health and safety in out-of-home settings. CAPACITY FOR OUT-OF-HOME SERVICES When CPS caseworkers have determined that a child resides in a dangerous home setting, they must have resources available to place the child in a safe and protected place. The Governor recommends funding for several items that will provide capacity in out-of-home programs for children: Pilot sites in DeKalb and Fulton counties to expand private emergency foster care services A 2.5% increase in funds for foster care placements 135 institutional foster care placements 41 MATCH program wrap-around placements for severely emotional disturbed (SED) children A 5% increase in funds for adoption assistance Expansion of support services, including mental health, counseling, and transitional services for children in family foster care settings Additional funds to cover the increased costs for institutional foster care FOSTER CARE/ADOPTION SUPPORT To support and promote the successful future of Georgia's foster children, the Governor has recommended funding to expand the Foster Children Postsecondary Grant program. This program awards tuition grants and scholarships to children in foster care. There are currently 170 students assisted by this program. The Governor's recommendation supports an additional 40 students to achieve their academic goals at the state's technical schools and colleges. 17 SPECIAL INITIATIVES FATALITY REVIEW In the extremely unfortunate incident of a child's death, the state has an obligation to thoroughly investigate the case to identify the cause of death and, if appropriate, to build a legal case for prosecution of the person(s) responsible. To make certain that fatality investigations are handled correctly, the Governor recommends adding funds to support the operation of the Office of Child Fatality Review. CHILDREN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES FY 2003 Budget Summary Use of Funds RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF CPS CASEWORKERS - Additional 90 new child protection caseworkers and 10 supervisors - Staff training (trainers, curriculum development, training sessions) - Computers and equipment for new staff PREVENTION - Funding for the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS) to measure the progress and physical and mental well being of children in DFCS out-of-home placements - Intensive mental health services to prevent children's removal from the home - An array of support services including counseling, in-home case management, in-home parent support services, behavior aids and transition services - Office of Regulatory Services additional contracted surveyor CAPACITY FOR OUT-OF-HOME SERVICES - Funding to support a projected 2.5% increase in the number of children in foster care and a 5% increase in the number of children needing adoption assistance - Provide 135 institutionally supervised family foster care placements - Provide 41 Multiple Agency Team for Children (MATCH) wraparound slots - Pilot sites in Fulton and DeKalb counties to expand private emergency foster care services - Additional funds to cover increased costs for institutional foster care FOSTER CARE/ADOPTION SUPPORT - Increased funds for students in the foster care higher education scholarship program using new eligibility criteria FATALITY REVIEW - Operating funds for the Office of Child Fatality Review Total Funds FY 2003 FY 2003 State Funds Total Funds $3,4 66,845 573,873 885,284 $5,600,053 1,330,700 885,284 1,347,500 1,374,500 700,000 3,265,879 60,000 1,000,000 6,518,416 60,000 2,143,677 375,840 505,373 423,600 354,838 2,873,349 587,250 1,098,636 1,095,000 887,095 260,000 260,000 40,073 40,073 $14,402,782 $23,610,356 18 SPECIAL INITIATIVES Drivers' License Services HB 1441 was passed by the General Assembly during the 2000 Legislative Session and was signed into law by Governor Barnes. This bill created a new state agency, the Department of Motor Vehicle Safety (DMVS). One of the more significant functions of the DMVS is to issue drivers licenses to Georgia drivers. Over the last several years the process for issuing licenses has not kept pace with the demand, causing longer and longer lines for citizens to perform this necessary function. It is not uncommon for people to wait 6 hours or more at some licensing facilities in urban areas. Recognizing this situation, Governor Barnes instructed the new DMVS to prioritize the problems of drivers' license issuance and present him with an aggressive plan of action. Included in the Amended FY 2002 and the FY 2003 Budgets are over $14 million in additional funds to implement the Governor's strategic initiative to increase efficiency and effectiveness and achieve a much more acceptable level of customer service. The Governor's proposal focuses on the first principle of customer service: access. One of the most basic weaknesses in the current issuance system is that demand significantly overwhelms existing capacity. Over the past 5 years population growth has increased demand while system capacity has remained constant at best and in some instances has actually decreased. The Governor's strategic initiative proposes to achieve this objective in two ways. Although customer service issues cross the entire state, the worst situation exists in the metropolitan Atlanta area. Population explosion in the core metro counties has completely overwhelmed the capacity of license issuance facilities to meet demand. This has led to the 6 plus hour waits that now exist in far too many instances. Customer experiences with this situation and constant media attention continue to inform citizens of this expectation. A natural reaction to this has been for people to flee the core metro area for facilities in outlying areas. These facilities are small to begin with and were never intended to handle the large numbers of citizens now seeking service. The result has been an ever-expanding area of long lines and intolerable customer service. Thirty four percent (34%) of the DMVS customer base for drivers' license issuance lives in four counties: Cobb, Dekalb, Fulton and Gwinnett. The Governor's proposal includes $6,943,138 to locate a new full service customer service center for license issuance in each of these 4 counties. To respond more quickly, renovation of existing retail or commercial space will be utilized instead of building new space. A key consideration for each of these new facilities is their ability to accommodate on-the-road driving tests. The Department intends to move to this requirement as soon as it is able. The second component of the Governor's plan also deals with the issue of access, but approaches from a different direction. The Governor proposes to initiate 3 forms of automated license renewal that could be accomplished by Georgia drivers without having to physically visit a DMVS customer service center. This proposed budget includes $7,090,497 to accomplish this initiative. First will be the ability to renew the most comon Georgia license (class C) by mail. The proposal calls for this capability to be operational by June 2002. This new process will create the possibility for as many as 1.3 million eligible drivers to renew their license through the mail, much like an automobile tag is done today. Citizens will be mailed a renewal form by the DMVS informing them that they are eligible to renew by mail and that their license is about to expire. If they fill out the required form and include the license fee, a new license will be mailed to them prior to their expiration date. Licenses that are suspended, revoked or expired will not be eligible. Neither commercial driver licenses nor special permits will be handled with this procedure. Certain statutory changes are required to implement this process. The capacity to renew your licenses using IVR (interactive voice response) will also be activated with the mail-in process. An eligible person receiving the initial form from DMVS could choose to renew with this method rather than mailing in their form. Payment would be made using a credit card. The third avenue of automated license renewal will be through use of the Internet. Georgia drivers receiving a notice in the mail from DMVS will be given a RIN (renewal identification number), which will allow them to access a web page and complete their renewal transaction. Payment will be made by credit card. This capability is expected to be available in July 2002. All three of these automated renewal options allow for a secure method of renewal while providing the Georgia driver with a much more convenient and customer friendly means by which to renew their license. 19 SPECIAL INITIATIVES Statewide Uniform Electronic Voting Initiative The unprecedented events of the 2000 presidential election raised public awareness of a nationwide problem that was not new, but that had not previously received sufficient attention. Most equipment used to cast and count votes is antiquated. Many systems currently in use have unacceptably high error rates, and some appear to be extraordinarily prone to voter error or incomplete results computation. Error rates also vary widely from county to county, and even from precinct to precinct within counties. The advances in technology that have positively transformed so many aspects of our commercial life have not, for the most part, been applied to the business of elections. Too many voters in too many communities cannot be assured that their electoral choice will be properly computed when votes are counted. In the 2001 session, the General Assembly recognized the need for electoral reform and passed Senate Bill 213, which put Georgia at the very forefront of national efforts to improve the management of elections. To fulfill the legislative mandate of a modern, uniform system of voting for every Georgia citizen, Governor Barnes is recommending $54,000,000 in bonds to establish a uniform voting system in every county by November 2002 by purchasing voting machines, as well as, $3,366,586 to provide the necessary resources for voter education and technical support. THE 2000 ELECTION: A WAKE-UP CALL FOR REFORM A careful analysis of the 2000 general election results reveals that, unfortunately, the existence of significant numbers of under votes discovered across the nation was true for Georgia as well. The election resulted in 93,991 Georgia ballots, or 3.5%, not registering a vote for President of the United States, a rate that compared unfavorably with the national under vote average of 1.9% and the Florida average of 2.9. In fact, the Georgia under vote rate was one of the highest in the nation. The equipment utilized for gathering votes is varied, inconsistent, and, in many cases, outdated. Consider the four systems available to Georgia voters: paper ballots in 2 counties, punch cards in 17 counties, lever machines in 73 counties, and opti-scans in 67 counties. Media coverage of the 2000 presidential election led some to believe that the problem of inaccurate voting systems begins and ends with punch cards and "hanging" or "dimpled chads." Georgia data, however, reveals that error rates in fact vary widely, even among counties using the same equipment. Optical scan is the most modern of the four systems, and while some optical scan counties demonstrate good accuracy rates, it is also true that some of the highest under vote rates in the state were found in counties using optical scan equipment. Having four different voting equipment platforms in use creates other problems as well. It is nearly impossible to conduct effective statewide voter education, to help make sure voters understand how to properly use the equipment and cast a valid ballot. Likewise, local election officials offer literally 159 different approaches to training poll managers and poll workers in how to prepare for and conduct an election. IN PURSUIT OF ELECTION REFORM In light of the well-documented deficiencies of the Georgia election system, Governor Barnes, the Secretary of State and legislative leaders, initiated a bi-partisan reform package in the 2001 General Assembly with the adoption of Senate Bill 213. Provisions of the legislation established the policy and the framework for Georgia to move very aggressively toward identifying and deploying essential changes in the election system. Chief among these changes was the policy directive that, subject to funding, "...the equipment used for casting and counting votes in the county, state and federal elections shall, by the July, 2004, primary election and afterwards, be the same in each county in this state and shall be provided to each county by the state". With adoption of this provision, Georgia became the first state in the nation to set a deadline for the installation of a uniform voting system. Senate Bill 213 also provided authorization for the state to conduct a pilot project to test and evaluate the use of electronic voting systems during the 2001 municipal elections. To oversee the pilot project, and to offer recommendations to the General Assembly and Secretary of State as to the best solution for a uniform election system, the "Twenty-first Century Voting Commission" was created. Based upon the recommendation of Governor Barnes, $200,000 was appropriated in the FY 2001 Amended budget to support the Commission and to conduct the electronic equipment pilot project. 21ST CENTURY VOTING COMMISSION COORDINATES PILOT PROJECT To fulfill the legislative assignment to develop recommendations for a uniform voting system by December 31, 2001, the 18 members Voting Commission began work in April on the pilot project. The first task was to select cities that would best represent the economic, geographic, demographic and political diversity of the state. Thirteen cities would combine to conduct the most extensive test of electronic voting equipment in the nation. Each municipality was teamed with one of six electronic 20 SPECIAL INITIATIVES voting equipment vendors that had met both national and state certification standards, as required by state law. Through a short term lease agreement, the vendors agreed to provide sufficient certified electronic voting equipment, known as "direct record electronic" (DREs), extensive training of local election officials as well as a sufficient number of public demonstrations to promote voter understanding of the project and equipment. During the Voting Commission meetings held in five different regions of the state, two major mandates consistently voiced by voters, election officials and Commission members were: (1) the antiquated equipment in the state must be replaced; and (2) concerted efforts to inform and involve the general public are critical for success. In light of the need and demand for voter education, Governor Barnes allocated $65,000 from discretionary funds to provide grants of $3,000 to $5,000 to each pilot city for temporarily employing "voter education coordinators." These local citizens worked with election officia ls and equipment vendors to devise an agenda for public demonstrations of the electronic equipment. Active registered voters in each pilot city also received a direct mailing that discussed the electronic voting pilot project and provided instructions as to how to cast a ballot on the particular devices being tested in their city. VOTERS RESPOND POSITIVELY Polls opened on November 6, 2001 with much attention from voters, local and state officials, visitors from out of state, and the media focused on the 13 pilot cities. The experience was flawless. Throughout the day, voters expressed a positive experience and election officials gained confidence in the system. Poll closing proved efficient as well, with all DRE systems generating final election results in all cities within 30 minutes. Voters responded overwhelmingly positive to electronic voting "ease of use", with 97.2% stating that the equipment was "very easy" or "easy" to use and also responded at a rate of 89.6% that they found this "review and confirmation process" helpful. The Commission's commitment to educate and inform voters in advance of the election also proved successful. Results of the survey indicate that nearly seven out of ten voters surveyed recalled receiving information and voters expressed a strong desire to move to DRE as the uniform voting system for the state with 94.5% expressing that they "Strongly Agree" or "Agree". VOTING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS Drawing from the first-hand experience of conducting and witnessing elections using electronic devices, as well as weighing all components and resources brought to bear for a successful pilot project, the Twenty-first Century Voting Commission unanimously approved the following recommendations: (1) The uniform system shall be a DRE voting system used for precinct voting, and if authorized by new legislation, for in-person "advance" or "early" voting: (2) The uniform system shall also be composed of an optical scan voting system to be used for absentee voting: (3) The uniform system will be operated by an election management system or software program; and (4) The state should seek to maximize benefits of deploying a uniform system that will translate into long-term benefits for local governments. The need to upgrade election equipment is apparent. Public opinion survey findings showed extremely high public support for Georgia's election reform efforts. Nearly four out of five polled approve of the uniform statewide voting initiative, and some 69 percent of respondents said they support increased state spending for modernizing election equipment. Since the events of November 2000, Georgia is one of only three states to undertake tangible public policy changes to achieve election reform. To fulfill the mandate of SB 213 that the voting system "...be the same in each county in this state and shall be provided by the state..." proposed plans for deployment will seek to secure a vendor capable of providing each county during the implementation period with: A complete election system; Adequate training and training resources for election officials, poll managers and poll workers to the point of instilling confidence in their ability to conduct an election independently; and Equipment warranty and maintenance, as well as technical support for a prescribed period. Intergovernmental agreements between the state and counties will identify certain minimum standards as (prescribed by Senate Bill 213) for long-term technical support and adequate polling places, in addition to storage requirements. After the implementation period, counties would be responsible for maintenance of the systems, as well as for the purchase of additional or replacement election units. TECHNICAL SUPPORT VIA "CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN ELECTIONS" Recognizing the need for immediate and long term technical support, Governor Barnes recommends funding a proposal by Kennesaw State University in the amount of $500,000 to create a "Center for Excellence in Elections", that would serve as a technical "help desk" and election training center for local election officials. This function serves to compliment an ongoing arrangement with 21 SPECIAL INITIATIVES Kennesaw, whose computer science department has for many years served as the testing and certification entity for all Georgia election systems. VOTER EDUCATION INITIATIVES Lessons learned in the electronic equipment pilot project make clear that a framework for coordinated voter education is critical to the success of statewide deployment. With the advent of a uniform voting system, the ability to conduct a statewide voter education program -- through a training video, "How to Vote" pamphlets, and other communication vehicles becomes a more cost effective initiative of the state. To create voter education materials, Governor Barnes recommends $1,443,370. Along a similar vein, voters and elections officials in each city praised the introduction of "voter education coordinators". In that light, the Governor recommends funding 13 positions to serve as regional voter education coordinators to provide a critical and consistent link between the state and local election officials. The Governor also recommends that one-time grants of $4,000 to $10,000 be provided to local governments to again help support short-term voter education coordination. For both elements of this voter education outreach initiative, the Governor recommends funding of $ $1,423,216. STATEWIDE UNIFORM VOTING BY NOVEMBER 2002 Governor Barnes concurs with the findings of the Secretary of State and the Voting Commission that the state is ready to move forward with a uniform system and is confident in the recommendations regarding electronic voting systems. Therefore, the Governor recommends funding in the amount of $54,000,000 in bonds to purchase over 18,000 voting machines for full deployment statewide prior to November 2002. Statewide deployment of a uniform election system within the next year offers a number of important advantages, including: Assures equitable treatment of all voters in every county and region by deploying the most accurate, convenient and reliable systems in all jurisdictions simultaneously. Minimizes voter confusion and maximizes the benefits of voter education efforts by converting all 159 county systems to the new uniform electronic platform at the same time. Achieves economies in deployment through regional approach for installation and training Builds on the recently gained experience and expertise of election officials who participated in or observed the Pilot Project. Assures all Georgia citizens that their government is committed to quickly addressing their concerns about the accuracy and fairness of elections. By taking a leading role in election reform, Georgia is also setting the stage to be among the first states to participate in federal assistance. Based upon the current provisions of the most promising Congressional election reform initiatives, including legislation passed by the House of Representatives, Georgia meets all conditions for receiving matching funds, except for requirements that states offer "provisional balloting" and for standardized definitions of what constitutes a "vote", both of which will be proposed in the 2002 General Assembly. An evaluation of proposed funding formulas suggest that Georgia would be eligible to receive approximately $50,000,000 to $60,000,000 in federal funding for equipment replacement and voter education. Georgia is poised to be the national model for election reform. Governor Barnes recommends that Georgia build on its strong start in modernizing election systems and that the uniform voting initiative be taken forward to full deployment. 22 SPECIAL INITIATIVES Georgia's Plan for Homeland Security In the Amended FY 2002 and FY 2003 appropriation recommendations, the Governor provides funding to match available federal dollars for Georgia's Plan for Homeland Security. Due to the events of September 11, 2001, much scrutiny was given to the current coordination of terrorism prevention and preparedness by various state agencies. As part of the recommendation, the Georgia Information Sharing and Analysis Center (GISAC) will be created, constructed and equipped. There is a recognized need to establish a single point, state level contact for collecting, analyzing and disseminating credible threat intelligence, information, and data from and to government agencies, the private sector and identified infrastructure targets. Staff from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Public Safety, Georgia Bureau of Investigation, Department of Human Resources Division of Public Health, Georgia Technology Authority, Georgia National Guard, the Department of Natural Resources, Georgia Emergency Management Agency, and the U.S. Military will operate the GISAC and will produce daily situation reports, special analyses, warnings and bulletins as necessary. $1,022,488 was recommended as the state's portion of a 50% federal match to construct the GISAC in amended FY 2002. $377,000 in matching funds is recommended in FY 2003 in the Department of Public Safety to equip the center. The Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety is currently serving as the Director of Homeland Security for the State of Georgia. Another component of this recommendation is to provide additional staff and associated expenses to the Department of Public Safety, Georgia Emergency Management Agency, and the Georgia Bureau of Investigations to handle the increased responsibilities associated with the operation of the GISAC and other related activities. An additional $795,744 state match was recommended in the amended FY 2002 budget for the three agencies and $1,298,238 state match is recommended in the FY 2003 budget. $75,000 in additional funding match for amended FY 2002 will allow the Department of Natural Resources to more adequately equip the current emergency preparedness and response staff. Along with the additional funding in amended FY 2002, $141,762 state match is recommended for FY 2003 for additional equipment needs. Part of the Homeland Security Plan will be addressed by the Division of Public Health by enhancing preparedness and detection activities and enhancing the response capacity. Various changes such as increasing the number of and investigation capacity of district epidemiologists throughout the state, training public health staff and community partners to recognize and respond to bioterrorism, and enhancing traditional disease surveillance mechanisms and rapid communication, notification, and collaboration with federal agencies such as Centers for Disease Control and the Federal Bureau of Investigations. A total of $698,750 is recommended in amended FY 2002 and $2,060,000 in FY 2003 to match federal funding for bioterrorism preparedness and response for the Division of Public Health. 23 SPECIAL INITIATIVES Technology Initiatives USING TECHNOLOGY TO CONNECT GEORGIANS WITH THEIR GOVERNMENT Governor Barnes envisions making state government function like a successful business, with an external focus on its customers (citizens and businesses) instead of an internal focus on rules and procedures. Georgia stands at the threshold of a new day when technology can be a powerful tool in public life as well as in homes, businesses and schools. The Georgia Technology Authority created during the 1999 Regular Session is spearheading these sweeping changes to create new commercial opportunities throughout the state, connect citizens with government services, and provide educators, law enforcement and other state workers with the tools they need to do their jobs effectively and efficiently. CREATING A PORTAL TO GOVERNMENT INFORMATION Georgians' needs are at the center of the state's plans to create a portal, a new electronic door to government information and services. When it is completed over the next several years, the portal will simplify and streamline the way Georgians do business with state government. People and businesses using the portal will have online access to the government information they want 24 hours a day, with the assurance that their privacy is protected. Online services, such as drivers' license renewal and vehicle registration, will enable Georgians to complete many transactions faster and more conveniently. The portal also will mean "no wrong door" to government information, presenting information organized around the public's needs, not just agency boundaries. For example, for someone looking for information about starting a new business, finding employment leads or locating services for an elderly relative, the portal will collect information from several different agencies and present it in one place. As more transactions move online, it becomes even more important that the state be a trusted and secure custodian of citizens' private information and a secure operator of automated transmissions. GTA is coordinating development of a privacy policy for all government information. Information will be classified by level of privacy, ranging from confidential to public. Agencies will determine how their own information should be classified. The Governor is recommending for the Amended FY 2002 Budget $8.7 million to develop the portal for nine systems in the Department of Human Resources: Child Support Enforcement, Eligibility, Child Care, Vital Records, Aging, Immunization, Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse, Women Infants and Children and Child Welfare. These funds will be matched with federal funds at 50%. Additionally, the new Department of Motor Vehicle Safety will also be a part of the first phase. For both agencies, the Governor recommended additional funding for upgrading computer software. MODERNIZING THE DATA CENTER GTA is developing a security plan for state government, which includes preparing for disaster recovery and business continuity and safeguarding state information systems . One aspect is the physical security of the state's networks and computers. Further, the data center provides support for more than 125 state systems, including personnel, payroll, purchasing, invoice payments, billing and revenue collections for 76 agencies. It also operates systems that track child support payments, determine eligibility for various health and human services benefits and issue drivers' licenses. Built more than 30 years ago, the data center is outdated and not as productive as judged by private sector standards. The state needs an up-to-date, secure data center able to safely house network-based computers to operate the thousands of applications that support state agency services. In addition to enhanced security, this arrangement also is expected to offer substantial operational savings for taxpayers. To address this issue, the Governor is recommending $18 million in bonds in the Amended FY2002 Budget to purchase a facility to relocate the main data center to a more secure, modern environment. 24 SPECIAL INITIATIVES Tobacco Settlement Funds As a participating state in the master settlement agreement with five cigarette manufacturers, the State of Georgia is slated to receive over $4.8 billion in payments throughout the next 25 years. Upon receipt of the state's first payment in December 1999, Governor Barnes committed that, over time, one-third of the funding would be dedicated to Rural Economic Development, while the remaining two-thirds would be committed to Healthcare. The Governor's recommendations for the appropriation of tobacco settlement funds in FY 2002 and in FY 2003 continue to honor that commitment as presented in the following chart. Recommended Appropriation of Funds FY 2002 - FY 2003 Healthcare 67% Rural Economic Development 33% The following describes the use of the tobacco settlement funds as recommended in the Governor's amended FY 2002 and FY 2003 appropriations. RURAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THE ONEGEORGIA AUTHORITY The latest tool in Georgia's effort to support local and regional economic development efforts was rolled out in FY 2001 with the creation of the OneGeorgia Authority. The authority utilizes one third of the state's tobacco settlement to assist the state's most economically challenged areas. An estimated $1.6 billion in funding for rural development is anticipated over the 25-year term of the settlement. OneGeorgia tobacco-funded investments are targeted towards Georgia's poorest counties. Recognizing the importance of recruiting companies to provide jobs in rural Georgia, Governor Barnes set up the EDGE (Economic Development, Growth and Expansion) Fund within the OneGeorgia Authority to facilitate the location and expansion of firms in rural Georgia. Eligible uses of EDGE funds are the development of public infrastructure, land acquisition and site development. Financial assistance is provided only in instances where a project would not come about in the absence of the assistance. As of December 2001, EDGE Fund awards have been made for 14 projects in tier 1 and 2 counties. In all, 2,778 jobs will be created as a result of these projects. This investment will substantially benefit rural Georgia communities for years to come. The Equity Fund, which is the infrastructure and capacity building portion of the OneGeorgia Authority, is centered on the principle that Georgia's communities must be empowered to help themselves. Equity Fund regulations were written to be very broad and flexible and can be used for a variety of activities to assist in preparation for economic development. As of December 2001, OneGeorgia had awarded over $17.8 million in Equity funds for 47 projects. Successful projects have included infrastructure improvements designed to facilitate existing business growth, targeted investments aimed at improving the competitiveness of a region or community, and projects involving agricultural innovation, tourism product development, and downtown revitalization projects. In addition to EDGE and Equity Fund awards, OneGeorgia provides other forms of financial assistance to rural Georgia. In FY 2001, OneGeorgia provided $13 million in tobacco industry assistance, matching federal funds for a total of $26 million in assistance. This will be continued in FY 2002. OneGeorgia also provided $10 million in low interest loans for water and sewer infrastructure projects benefiting tier 1 and 2 communities through the Georgia Environmental Facilities Authority in FY 2001. Finally, $4.5 million was provided to implement the Flint River Drought Protection Act. These funds went to farmers in the Flint River region who did not irrigate following the irrigation auction. The auction withdrew over 33,000 acres from surface water irrigation. If a drought auction is called for in FY 2002, OneGeorgia will again provide funds to reimburse farmers for keeping acreage out of irrigation. The Governor's FY 2003 Budget includes $65,430,712 for rural development through the OneGeorgia Authority. 25 SPECIAL INITIATIVES HEALTHCARE POPULATION-BASED HEALTHCARE In FY 2001, Governor Barnes utilized the first receipts from the master agreement to enhance several populationbased healthcare programs. These enhancements were funded to increase the number of Georgians receiving statesponsored healthcare and to create new healthcare initiatives to support the general well being of Georgia's citizens. For FY 2003, the Governor's recommendations continue the existing tobacco settlement funding levels for the following population-based healthcare initiatives: Medicaid and PeachCare for Kids eligibility expansions for children and pregnant women with incomes between 200% ($35,300 for a family of four in 2001) and 235% ($41,478) of the federal poverty level Home and community-based services to prevent hospitalization or institutionalization for persons with physical and/or mental disabilities School nursing services for each school system Annual screening costs for newborn hearing screenings and follow-up treatment for the low-income uninsured Prevention services to reduce the prevalence of chronic diseases like asthma, diabetes, and heart dis ease Drug therapy for persons HIV positive or in the early stages of AIDS to prevent further progression of HIV/AIDS Early intervention for at-risk families to promote successful family functioning to prevent child abuse In FY 2002, $3.5 million in tobacco settlement funding was appropriated to support critical access hospitals. Critical access hospitals, so designated because they provide basic emergency care and inpatient services in rural or underserved areas, are now reimbursed at an amount at least equal to their cost. The Governor recommends $3.5 million in tobacco settlement funds to continue enhanced critical access hospital reimbursement in FY 2003. GEORGIA CANCER COALITION The Georgia Cancer Coalition (GCC) was formed as a private/public partnership to make the state a leading contributor in the effort to eradicate cancer. The GCC represents a comprehensive, statewide consortium of all public and private sector cancer stakeholders and seeks to serve as a conduit for the best prevention, treatment, and research practices available across the state and around the nation to reduce cancer incidence, morbidity, and mortality rates in Georgia. from federal sources, foundations, pharmaceutical and biotechnological firms, and venture capital firms. As a part of the state's commitment to the cancer initiative, the Governor is recommending the use of $23.6 million in additional tobacco settlement funds in the amended FY 2002 budget for the following: $5.8 million for the Unite Georgia media campaign for smoking cessation and prevention $5.1 million to award grants to regional and community cancer coalitions and healthcare providers to support local cancer prevention, outreach, and care through cancer education programs and screening and detection initiatives $3.2 million for a joint collaboration with the Georgia Research Alliance to fund eminent scholars and equipment for cancer related research in the areas of neuroscience, bioinformatics, computational human genetics and genomic medicine $3 million for a Target Markets Seed Capital Fund, administered through the Advanced Technology Development Center (ATDC), to support the growth and development of a statewide biotechnology and associated life sciences industry with a primary focus on cancer related areas (ATDC will administer the seed fund for biotechnology and life sciences with the same parameters as the seed capital fund for Yamacraw: three private dollars are required for every state dollar invested) $2 million in medical benefits for the Cancer State Aid treatment program $1.55 million for Public Health's multimedia campaign for cancer awareness $924,000 for Georgia Cancer Coalition treatment network development $800,000 to match private sector contributions for a Cancer Tissue and Tumor Sample Repository to provide researchers access to human cells and tissues vital to cancer research $710,000 for additional screening and detection costs for county health departments $365,000 for systems costs to support the information infrastructure of the Georgia Cancer Coalition $200,000 to supplement clinical drug trial costs Together with $10 million in bonds for a Cancer and Biotechnology Research Center at the Medical College of Georgia, these funds will be added to the $39.2 million in tobacco settlement funding already appropriated in FY 2002 for items that support the GCC's mission. In the next 10 years, the Governor's goal is to leverage more than $300 million in tobacco settlement funding with monetary and in-kind contributions from the public and private sectors to support the Coalition's goals. The state expects to leverage as much as 60% with contributions Tobacco settlement funds recommended for FY 2003 total $30.9 million and are earmarked to continue many of the GCC initiatives started in FY 2002 and will support 10 new eminent cancer scholars and clinicians. 26 SPECIAL INITIATIVES Use of Tobacco Settlement Funds Rural Economic Development OneGeorgia Authority Tobacco Settlement FY 2002 Current $34,131,677 Healthcare Population Based Healthcare: Medicaid Expansion for Pregnant Women and Infants PeachCare for Kids Expansion for Children Independent Care Waiver Program Critical Access Hospital reimbursement School Nurses Community Care Services Program Home and Community Based Services for the Elderly Mental Retardation Waiver Programs Chronic Disease Prevention Program Newborn Hearing Screening AIDS Drug Assistance Program Early Intervention for At-Risk Families Federal Financial Participation changes Subtotal Population Based Healthcare: $8,193,814 4,539,084 2,143,025 3,500,000 30,000,000 4,190,586 3,808,586 10,251,882 1,350,000 2,840,000 1,226,667 3,341,218 220,650 $75,605,512 Georgia Cancer Coalition: Public Education Campaign Smoking Prevention and Cessation Screening and Early Detection Initiatives Cancer Screening Cancer Network Development Cancer Treatment for Low-Income Uninsured Eminent Cancer Scientists and Clinicians Tumor and Tissue Repositories Clinical Trial Programs Training for Cancer Caregivers Ovarian Cancer Alliance Bioinformatics Lab equipment and software Endowments for Eminent Cancer Scholars Seed Capital Fund Coalition Staff Cancer Registry GCC Information System requirements Subtotal Georgia Cancer Coalition: $2,237,500 20,765,890 685,125 1,437,500 5,000,000 3,340,000 2,000,000 125,000 2,400,000 921,821 350,000 $39,262,836 Subtotal $114,868,348 Total Tobacco Settlement Funds $149,000,025 FY 2002 Revised $34,131,677 $8,193,814 4,539,084 2,143,025 3,500,000 30,000,000 4,190,586 3,808,586 10,251,882 1,350,000 2,840,000 1,226,667 3,341,218 220,650 $75,605,512 $4,900,000 26,515,890 1,366,375 2,147,090 4,224,036 7,021,660 3,340,000 800,000 200,000 2,000,000 125,000 1,200,000 4,431,000 3,000,000 921,821 415,000 300,000 $62,907,872 $138,513,384 $172,645,061 FY 2003 Proposed $65,430,712 $9,001,967 4,972,665 2,143,025 3,500,000 30,000,000 4,190,586 3,808,586 10,251,882 1,350,000 2,840,000 1,226,667 3,341,218 $76,626,596 $180,250 15,165,890 203,875 1,437,500 7,021,660 4,840,000 400,000 1,295,889 350,000 50,000 $30,945,064 $107,571,660 $173,002,372 27 SPECIAL INITIATIVES Medicaid - Upper Payment Limit Credits and Intergovernmental Transfers In the amended FY 2002 and FY 2003 appropriation recommendations, the Governor plans to utilize upper payment limit credits to obtain additional federal Medicaid funding for payments to non-state, public Medicaid providers of hospital and nursing services and to use intergovernmental transfers to help offset the everincreasing cost of Medicaid health benefits. The following are questions and answers that explain this initiative. WHAT IS AN UPPER PAYMENT LIMIT CREDIT? As a condition of the receipt of federal Medicaid funds, the state must demonstrate a Medicaid service has been provided to an eligible recipient. The state has latitude in terms of the reimbursement paid to providers of care; however, the receipt of federal matching funds is capped at the upper payment limit (UPL), or the amount equal to what Medicare would have paid for the same service. The difference between what the state pays and the amount of the UPL is known as the UPL credit. WHY CAN THE STATE DO THIS? Historically, Medicaid payments to certain providers such as hospitals and nursing homes have been lower than the UPL, thus creating UPL credits. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) allows Georgia to use state funds or intergovernmental transfers (IGTs) to obtain the UPL credits. WHAT IS AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFER (IGT)? To receive federal Title XIX (Medicaid) funds, the state must provide state matching funds. In FY 2003, the state must contribute about $0.41 of every dollar spent or 41% of the cost of a Medicaid service. The state can generate the matching funds by either directly appropriating the funds from state general revenues or by soliciting intergovernmental transfers (IGTs) from public Medicaid providers (e.g., public hospitals, nursing homes, etc.). Upon agreement by the providers to contribute an IGT, the intergovernmental transfer can be used in a manner similar to state general funds and can serve as a match for the upper payment limit credit. WHAT HAPPENS TO THE UPL CREDITS? The state pays the Medicaid provider an amount equal to 120% of their IGT contribution in a combination of IGTs and federal UPL credits. The amount in excess of the initial IGT contribution can be used by the provider to offset the cost of medical services for the indigent and uninsured and is expected to net non-state public hospitals and nursing homes $85 million for FY 2002. WHERE DO THE REMAINING UPL CREDITS GO? The remaining IGT amount, leveraged with available federal Title XIX Medicaid funding and Title XXI Children's Health Insurance Program funding, has been utilized by the state to help offset the ever-increasing costs of Medicaid and PeachCare for Kids services. In FY 2001 and FY 2002, the state utilized $57.5 million and $69.7 million in intergovernmental transfers, respectively, to help offset Medicaid Benefits deficits. The Governor recommends the use of an additional $319.2 million in IGTs in the amended FY 2002 budget and $62.6 million in the FY 2003 budget. These transfers will continue to help cover prior and current year deficits in Medicaid Benefits and supplement new state funding that will cover the cash needs of Medicaid and PeachCare for Kids in FY 2003. FY 2003 IGTs are significantly lower than FY 2002 credits as a result of federal rule changes made by CMS in December 2001. Fiscal Year of UPL Credit FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Total Prior UPL Credits Budgeted N/A N/A $57,500,000 69,700,000 69,700,000 $196,900,000 FY 2003 Governor's Recommendation Proposed Total $29,196,144 $29,196,144 47,647,563 47,647,563 108,732,219 166,232,219 133,613,066 203,313,066 62,631,092 132,331,092 $381,820,084 $578,720,084 28 k'" ECO~O)UCREPORT Publk _Pri\'ate Sector Interac:lIoll ill the Budgl't "', _-_. __ .llIrpu _ _ ..... _~~.-I' , " _ f I I l _ _ _ot. ,..,fiII __ ._ . o_ IIpa,l."...... 4 01 01"' _ _ _ oflllrclo< dn_bjr 4 ~ .. -e._-_. - . ,_ Allo foo . . - WlIl ........ _ of e.c _ _ .. 00 .... _ Ib<)' IlAd OIl pn< _ 11<\'<1"". n. " " ' . - In!lioJ otol'll , _.. _..-do ",~".;,;", 111>4 0'''1'_ ~tkh porti.,;".".J '" b<'- _oN"l f .. lI"'''''''''.... I>lic JOOdo lIIl- T... ..-h boMoIIJ< d,'" hmlpt",,-fIIl - . . offor _of""' ...._ .. ~ _ pmUiol prJ.... ..t_1I+oo: <__. . . -"loc~ f al 't fCOI:iI _ . . .-I loc ... ' - -__po ' 1l>1tfy-_. --...,-.1,ux_ - _.--. ' .4 .. TIl< B .. "II _ _ 4 , :;"~.:.;, r __ _ ... _ _ . . - ,., ....... _~ aaI:c """ - . ~ , ........ of""' _ _ .~~l\O'. Ii""""'" r.-. "" on _ Ga,_ _.............. 4o<,h-.:r ol pIl,.... _~ for ......,1:<1 foIlwu" .. "Tu!~" _I """<\0 poi.... ___tiono rntaiL I" IIJ< r"" 'J \I I ..... tbr<>uP - - . ol..-dl . . ._ _ _ typ""", aad l' _ -sao:t S F'u - r -- t J-. "'"-" 1 U11o0.p./J(.1-8 _ peop-I< -. .- . . k _ , ,cA_ ..... _ .......... - . . llC poay of """__ 00 ~ yl< blJJld ... I. "')' c.<, bllds<""s bocoma ""tmnon _ " , . . 0_' lri_ """',.. Ito.j*, _ '"..~, awl ,.... _ ... _ n .. fY XIOl AIIl pIMooaos. T1o>oV'''' ..._1)< b< ... F'....b' "'- _ .. .oI..).'M.~ IOo-I .I_r".s".o' _ fto"d'bye.". p"l"a<"c"."" " by" "'yO~ doI .T_l ~ .....I0<..... ....- ........ r... ....... - . . 8o< _ _ ". ,.-.J. -n.-."_' ,- -, 1_0 ) ' .". -".'"_. fill ... "'Gooa'po' _ _ ......... _or - .. __.1IIlC.. . fYl991. _ _ eo '. ~........,.... oIfY4'l9O ..... fYl""....... 'PU:"'- __ 1qIpUl....-""" 4 -... ...-- - ""- _. ' . ;u"1. . .-.-;,y .... _ o l _ d. 41 .. . . . - p .....s0l1llC-"' _ _ AN ECONOMIC REPORT _!>oJ S1iU 6%, re>O, 10 ra>io, >lid '" ""II" i. 1m. of I"""'i""- If ull, kit ""roo><' "'" doliveryof IiAl=l '" tb t00w11.,..,.1;<"".",o .1>1f)' or - 00"1'<'"'''''' . - Pfi ...t< _ . 1h< .. rho nol,~ tD ....,.,.., ........... incrcrnc... to ..ut Ihe trrnd of itO""" i _ iD "II, u ,eI"...... p'll>l;'; .." ~~ SlIIlpl y"" Ii'lI> ,. ~"" r< senet>tN! ....nlood ",...,.b,h.,. i. livery. To ""'" oo..:r". Ii i< l'CowbI>l< mot (be 1<,~l.,t"'"".." i'""ro' and f '1>100I skoold ,.,,'" ...)'0<1'" trlhtly OIl'!ep ~ith 'ggrl i"""",< for .., IQ"ll' .""",,1 j>attem. i"'......,. ",",,",,,",,,, of ............. IfId ,""",,1ooId> ""'.. !ho. ~. ooly d"'j"" from ""- poi,.., ....,,....I...-.l>.rn doe, "", "",,01;'" I""td.;';O- of("of .." ..... and "',.. P""""" ~f ,,'d;'m""""''' 'Ao ni"",...." til< "";e TI>< rUk nf or" (J.ly of 1'i90)1.1ld ' _ " ' " ,!Ie ".u of tl>< nur (M."h of:WOl~ TML!1 THE n".T!'$ ECO~O"UC PAAncIPATIO~ 'Y1ttO-'VlOO1 ~, -,., ....... ~ -..-.. (~I>.tl ~otloof ~ .."... tf 1ch'."a.',;,,<,,-,1l "'=PO"'" '" ""." ... u f.""""Iu"l: W>l<, th< _ os ODd Ihe opd.Iti"l: <>f Ia>. tho w"""" ",.~io" troo. 'he ..1e> on oflood pur_ for offthe- prOlri... ~"'., 10= ,00 "'" proper""lllY, tho fI< l""I""iooo1 porti< iI'''LOO oftil< ""Ie~", io Geomrn IIoe p",poni"" n:...h<:d 6j%. III, GWRGI""S PRIVAn [OO:;O.\lV In paiod< ~'h<, DO Ol>jo< ' ' ' ' - '" r1:>< ,,,Ie parti"l"'i~. proportioo on: feat...d, "" br .110<:..", to jt< prcfml proer- .00 "".""" will ..lid ,~ """" ;0 harmony ~ith ow< D;Dta,,', """"II" The notiooll "to of pin ",'U ""-'ghIy ~'t. per )~.., GWII "'''''tW """""'" ~.. J, 1'10 ODd .n",,',d .,... incIi"";n the ".""",1 growlb re". '" """ _ 1''''; ",.. ""'" froot 4.0% "' 1\191, , """,;06,,/% in 2000."", bit _ of""""",,,,,. ("_..... ..." ,-.; .. ""'I, I~"'g Il-orn 4.!I%", 1991 '" 7.2% .. 1000. Wi'" tbt : l y..n of ~_ ,,,,Iy '" Ihe f ,t<. ...,,"" I">""h ",to. l.1l'Ml.t <>: oil "" .. ond JSh ....... "" Il ","th..,~ ""... (I ......,"'g!y,"' the ...,....",,"ofl9U 19iJ and of 1913_1911-, 0>'3"" .-..>l.< in grow13"" fI<"""-'l ;"'0"'"' l!'r>V """, <>p.... of do: _vi", U!IIY 2. 1%".. y"" 0,... Ihe _ ~ .., .... i. "" ,,""""" gro~th , _ """ .1><. . "If .. '''1' On. l"" copi.. "..... G""I;", Inc""", <.- 1.8% per ye..-in 'ett'" ~f I"'__f""'ho .... ie,,I. ~fl"""""'-l I"'om< i" ho< 1'I9O-2OCJ(I po"' 2.1%, Th, "'.. ~ "" 1.1N.rn Lj"f. ""'P'di'" p;", of til< ,ipi<" and ""=C. ..".,... Th< 'o<>U.lml ;'volv=frl-c Fw,-.I R.em.-e _ ) . N,,~""'I..~ ~ ..... tIocde<. AI~ ,.-oo.cti>i", r~..." r.. r~ .-.:_ .,-.iJobl it Orm ......".1>1. '" =urn< tho. pw ill til< . - fl:>llou~ oil. 10...... "f", ~" """" t 1!lftt , (il"'!~[' II ~'Ifiifltll f~ !I~IIII~~ tr lmluH IH, lihu .HHhtfih !~i~mHn~n: Hn~h ci i hi""" .' ill ~ - '[ ['I 'H t 1,JI1 :' H'Hi P I . ,. ,I .. " '11:J[."j ~>!~ll!f'l'III"I:~I,"~ai~ 1'1 ~.t~.if!e~to~!;'1i~1r, :lJ&H"l thll'~,ltrrhf .1IIllif'rll,li~JjI.jj'lllal. h.~.!.. I ; IfIl,i;j ~~ e - "'1IJ1iH1i1f1'i1l'l(' ~"Hfl !!,~rl I "!mdHl!-IJ~m!iJfI~-ti~~lIfiiII~'t'' l~tl~iji!tilllll{t, ~ ['IiI!IIh~l lfl~,hl~f'l . iI"~ftIl,Ii.lI~i'1I''ll~,l~."!i~ftlIlI'" i''t"I'J~~' ;ll! H h! fld.li; ~~ is toft'llt11.Jtagl,a n ~ " Iii." c,: HHlf -,"4il' ;:".,...".,.::..~.. ,".<'~~I,~i'g~".II~,ffh1fH!1~ ~ ~ ","" "I" :r n t~~, < '" a .. 'h' ' '" ... " ". ! ...... )1.. ". ~ .[~Jlr[illi!i !Jnl AN ECONO,\lIC REPORT ' ....e.Lf 2 fMl'LOlNfHT AND IN(;O~ ~:..S,...\ UNlffD STAffS.o.ND GfDRGlA ~'f\l Unit.d Slot.. .----- ._- , ,- '. Y, ",,"""_" ~- - ~ >000 ,. . ., ,. ,"00 OOW "" ... < oJfICial ",bit in tIti, mat"r, Ib< O'I"'OIi"" oftb.< """',;.,. III !he U.S < 11>< ,I;pp.o~ Md "'" il)'. on",,,,, ><.Ii""TIt ,lid found " ~-eal;_ The ;m,," io rcal c'POC''Y cased. In 1h< informltlOO thnclogy i,d<.>s/1y. in'tn,orie> plOvoo t<> be "",,,~,-< 8u'",,>o<'" l.,-g< >I1 "'",;n", to bul' ,nfumla,,,,,, Proot''''8 "1"'1""'"' '""" oon~_ " tho "t.. of tho 1>11 Mlf of ","-1km> 1""""" or i'<"'S owed 'troI>lI .ilP'" of j>Ot<'nt_ Th< q""'",ly <1001,,,,, in in"""",.t In .,d ...,fl...",.;po.ioe", ,.,'~' in 10"1101....... lor~, ~ 111", ;, OOg bul .hkh;, ,imo: 10.." OW I"""~'_ Tb< ',,",'~< 1"1"< ofti"" from to< O"tput l"'ok ~-hen ion .- FIG"Rf 2 PROPOlnlONATf CftAl.lGfS IN EARNINGS ANO fMPLOYMENT s __ 1990-1995 AND 1995-2000 'oo I: , 00 R_T~ c"' -Co"n's.n>.<,tio"n'~ I I! 0_ ":".----"-------'~- --. - o , AN ECONOMJC REPORT 1-..".. ends u>d 1'""'1)' hos IIooot II """,1M fu1!h< 10 <)0"1"",""" W",1d War JJ. 11>< ihott<>t ~ (Ill< (...... d< ~of ,"M",","8 til< C""""",,,;,'. fo=o "'" l'eOletUnJ- ,"",iIl* Nm......1< ,each to til< law<, 1""01 of II>< cycl. w.. 001 """Wed. IV, TUF,ST"TF.'SPUBUCI:CO/oiOMY .... iodicoteoJ =li"" tl>et< h.. !><-<-rI. Iet>:ltlXy in Go<:>'Ji. with 11>< pf jlCTSOOOl ;"00,.,. (Tlble I~ Smce 11>. "." i""'n'IIl101l' ~, to ,0< <110<..., '1>0 ",,",itiY0 1e",,1 of !!'''''mm'<'It ""'<0 mo pl<:><>i." cap'" fit> O "nd.ocy for to ri>< <01"".. to inrorno per "'I"" ;, 'ho y.... of ..."" "","",,"" ",!h< n;".," .. ..-.J 'd""'~ 10, til< ,.."'en",,, '" r,,11 l>tl.. III i""""", p< l ""II. lonbg. ~""k1 00l1I'''''.. f!,lOOlI'" "' !he "iIJCli<:~ Go,," th< ',:venuo- g""" ioc<:>m<: I,.... boUrJrisl1ll lIlal p'OI'th in .-<0Il.. ""'" . '1'w:>rW", tb< F,om FY I'lltO '" FY 200(1, th< ...1<', boo, 6.7 ,"< pert"'" p""~. O>..,-!h< ....... 1"'0><1, I"';v_ ""'_ ,,,,,,,mo, """ .. an "",,,,,I or 7.1 p<1,,_< J'O"'d for "','.,..,'" """'" "' 111o ""ill from t'Y 1991 ..-.J FY 1991. AI>""'4!' 'h< economy b< ,b"d quort' 19'11, ,..,V"""<~'"" forI Y"'" """" =bf ..,.-.to)""<", I" botll FY 19'11 .rwJ FY 1'191, ",n_ .gr","lbu>l ''''pl''J'''''"' f.1I bn",,'Y, 19"1,. Corn<\i""",ly. ""enue> c1im1x>l by ,b" oo1y ~.'I% in FY 1991 ODd I- 1.4110 in FY 19'/l. From third QlWt'" ~r FY 1992 10rw>J'<1. "'~,... i:fO..th q"""" ""'" 1",,1<0 to "",h I 5.l% i" til< third '1"""'" of FY I 'l9J ond llll'l> in Illo fOU'1h FOTtlo:: =< of"'" niJo:oies, "*""" T<'<-rnua 1< >I, ...no,.", """"Id tIx m"" .." of ut-..",< or """'"""-'. R<\","", I;fOWl~ w", 100&11<" j, FY moo (8.6%t ,too _ ,n sro~'''' ~ FY 1'193 (B%) "< f)uri,~ ,"" ",""'ioo>, thor<: ..... "",ft m oomposi'i~ of "''''''''' ~,n<..t"n. A, ,,",wn ,n Figw-< ~, ,... ",<1\,';000] ir.::<>me ,'-'< IlIIJ "" ..... "" ~"'" ofro.glLly "" ....... imp<>rt.IJC~"''''''''''' """'''' ill FY 19'10. Byl'Y 2001, II<>w"v", II>< ,rwJ...d",l ;,."",< tu nod ''''''' 10 _oato ,.",,,,.. g..'",",," 1" .... or rev"",,,,, woe ""'1"'''''' from ]9% to 4~. in l!>< """..... In """""'- Ill. COIlI,ib",,,:,,,,, from booilll>< ..I.. &rt",', ~ dn:>pplfmon 7% '" 5%. ,.., 1}, I! "", " FIGURe 3 REYENUE RESPONSE TO INCOME PER CAPITA FY 193J FY 2000 (Constant 0011.'" . '. , " " 13 ,~ Po..on.II""""", Poo' C."iI> " AN F.CONOMJC RErORT R<>'Cll"" Lo lbe lOft IWm" A~"""gh til< ,"i.ti"" ~ '1".rt til< 1><1""''"1 of PY 1'>W 1i>N~M, fto '""'i"d "" , ""., "d., "'J""'O"'" I>il" ""'" "'" 4 qut<' _-hi<, or< ~ OIl ,0. """""" ~O' io Fipt \ O>;ji" p""PO"i".,. ofpin or 10< rro~1l:l in 011 ~rt<.. i. 'w=<-'. 1.9 of .... 13 q"""", !h< '''''' ofwrit","" th< ......... ""1'0'_ S ".",.", in """"""'" ill _lii ill IT lOOl will rcP>tU ..low"",,, ";11"',', IT 2001 1t,,1. Tho i"""P<"" '"' 'i" ." 0..,1.., '" th< l,l% to l,(l% ~. IftW 0UrS, ",..., ,i,.,., 0..,100>1 foo-""Iy tI>o _ " " " '9X1, Tk fVsl ,j"", ;0<". infIaI,," ~... ill IT 19~J " "" ""'" of tI>o 191319.\-1 "",$I"", (J,"i", ....., r""" 'flo rol< '''Y<1",," Q.5% """ Q.1l% ROICl>e.I l!It """''''' of .... r"",1 ~....,. \\'Ii<, ,,~o"' "',Ii"".. onlj''''''' of, f>S<.Ol ""'" Rod ...ff.=l I" FY I~J l!It _""-'I, Y'" ..... ,tlI"" r.....1 }'O>l hoi'.. ori .... >pi. ill FY 200J, The...,..."", .. f,'" G>o-&i...... "",if",;, ,~"l'l"'I' ill Joly, Rc",,"<> 'lipped in Iuly" ~,II. E>,epc lOt, """"'"'sIy-'" 000 ~.I in fY 2002 w'illljl<'!;, ~.... p1 ".te nu rcp>11 "" the M>d~'" fo< PY ZOOllw "",...d I/l~ ~em"""",,,,~ til< ILnInil the pen~-tJ:L woLLld be ,,,,,,dod. For. tim<, "''''''''0 ""'r< """M nO< 'lo.o~ly than 1'0'""".1 """,n><_ I" vi'.... of JOb. the ~rom~"",,, ~'ith ",!nob pri,-....o1or ~"'. oLlt Il"'''l! ,"'" "" ,eu";"" io 1000 aod 1001, ,II<", "PP''''' to bu....., be oooW"abl, risl th.. u.elinatio", 10 I"~ "" l>l"" month, or FY 1001 ""l' low Til< i"',,'r'l"nt ''''g< dunng lho ox"",,,"'" of tho ML.t"" ~... tcod ... 1nformltlOO lOChool"l:.)' h"" ... Itr1ent io "'lllipm:m' and ..,n~..,.. will ,oo-ohie., t!le T*" of .... ry ;ovOl.trncnt will "",..inly ooolliby io.....""""- G;"... ~1OO'1 ,ondi,WllS, pin> oro lilolyl() b< w.It '" !be tJl 5.04 5.54 > 4.58 5.21 > 4.54 5.08 > 5.61 6.01 > IBC Fund > IBC Fund Note 1: Since future rates of return can not be forecast reliably, the returns shown in this table are the same as FY 2001 actual returns. 517 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1b: Risk management and health insurance portfolios shall achieve an annual return equal to or better than the appropriate Merril Lynch Treasury Indexes. (9.10) [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Merril Lynch Treasury Index NA Actual Result - Risk Mgt & Health Ins Portfolios NA > 4.96 5.13 > 4.62 5.96 7.89 > Index > Index NA Note 1: There is a possible data problem with this measure. Contact OPB for additional information. Desired Result 1c: State core deposit portfolios shall achieve an annual total return calculated on an arithmetic, geometric, or dollar weighted basis equal to or better than the appropriate modified duration Merrill Lynch Treasury Indexes of 9.02. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Merril Lynch Treasury Index NA > 4.91 > 4.67 8.41 > Index > Index Actual Result - State Core Deposit Portfolio NA 5.06 4.88 NA Note 1: There is a possible data problem with this measure. Contact OPB for additional information. Goal 2: The systematic and non-systematic risk of all portfolios managed by OTFS shall be commensurate with the rate of return. Desired Result 2a: All portfolios managed by OTFS shall maintain systematic and non-systematic risk profiles consistent with the overall risk profiles of indices composed of similar duration and sector securities. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 100% (3/3) 100% (3/3) 100% (3/3) 100% (3/3) NA Actual Result 100% (3/3) 100% (3/3) 100% (3/3) NA Note 1: The three funds are: Georgia Fund 1, Risk Management and the State Core Deposits. Goal 3: Funds will be managed in such a manner as to maintain liquidity consistent with on-going cash needs. Desired Result 3a: One hundred percent of the funds necessary to meet on-going cash needs shall be available in order to fund cash withdrawals requested according to OTFS policies and procedures. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result 100% 100% 100% 100% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $683,993 $120,154 FY 2002 Budget $884,148 $243,546 FY 2003 Recommended $847,874 $207,273 CASH MANAGEMENT Purpose: Maximize the efficient and effective use of the state's cash resources for state government. Goal 1: Ensure that state government cash requirements are met in a proper, profitable manner. Desired Result 1a: The state should realize a net return of $3 million on the fee payment program. [1.] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA $4 million $4.2 million $4.2 million $10 million Actual Result $8.3 million $1.8 million $19.1 million $20.3 million Note 1: Net return = interest income less fees. FY 2003 $10 million 518 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1b: All 377 state depository banks will have the amount of collateral required to ensure they have adequate assets to cover investor's deposits in F.Y. 2002. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 100% 100% (306) 100% 100% 100% Actual Result 100% (377) 100% 100% NA [1.] Note 1: There is a possible data problem with this measure - contact OPB for additional information. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $286,323 $50,297 FY 2002 Budget $370,108 $101,949 FY 2003 Recommended $354,924 $86,765 REVENUES AND DISBURSEMENTS Purpose: Account accurately for all funds received and disbursed by the Office of Treasury and Fiscal Services in accordance with state law, employing the proper internal controls in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Goal 1: All funds will be received, disbursed and recorded in accordance with state law, employing the use of proper internal controls in conformity with GAAP. Desired Result 1a: 100% of receipts from state revenue collections and the Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP) will be recorded properly within one working day. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Desired Result 1b: 100% of the disbursements allotted and LGIP's will meet all control and state requirements. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result 100% 100% 100% 100% Desired Result 1c: 100% of accounting records will correctly identify Lottery reserves, proceeds and disbursements. Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA 100% FY 1999 100% 100% FY 2000 100% 100% FY 2001 100% 100% FY 2002 100% FY 2003 100% Desired Result 1d: 100% of payments of General Obligation Debt will be accurate and paid on the first working day of each month. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $620,366 $108,977 FY 2002 Budget $801,901 $220,891 FY 2003 Recommended $769,002 $187,992 519 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - Results-Based Budgeting OFFICE OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS Purpose: To resolve issues between citizens and state agencies through the administrative hearing process. Goal 1a: Hearings and other proceedings will be conducted in an impartial manner. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of Office of State Administrative Hearings' (OSAH) clients that report the process is impartial. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 95% 95% 95% 95% 96% 100% 84% 100% 95% Desired Result 1b: Percentage of OSAH cases resolved within the mandated time frames. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA 85% 85% 85% Actual Result 79% 87% 60% 65% FY 2002 85% FY 2003 85% Desired Result 1c: Percentage of DHR cases upheld on appeal at agency review. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 94% 89% 76% 77% Note 1: Case files are returned to the referring agencies after a hearing decision is issued. Therefore, OSAH relies on referring agencies to provide information regarding appeals. Desired Result 1d: Percentage of DPS cases upheld on review. [1.] FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result 95% 95% Actual Result 97% NA FY 2000 95% NA FY 2001 95% NA FY 2002 95% FY 2003 95% Note 1: Case files are returned to the referring agencies after a hearing decision is issued. Therefore, OSAH relies on referring agencies to provide information regarding appeals. Note 2: No DPS appeals reported to OSAH in Fiscal Years 1999, 2000, and 2001. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $4,587,965 $4,124,041 FY 2002 Budget $4,913,438 $4,609,514 FY 2003 Recommended $4,674,521 $4,370,597 Other Funds (Not Allocated): Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual 225,268,766 34,593,110 FY 2002 Budget 40,989,592 37,819,542 FY 2003 Recommended 35,982,931 32,812,880 Total - All Programs (Unit A): Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $257,281,495 $46,030,620 FY 2002 Budget $69,708,154 $48,668,185 FY 2003 Recommended $64,825,527 $43,785,558 520 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - Results-Based Budgeting GEORGIA BUILDING AUTHORITY BUILDING OPERATIONS Purpose: Provide tenants of GBA owned or managed facilities with well maintained and repaired, clean and comfortable, suitably configured, and safe leased space. Goal 1a: Hearings and other proceedings will be conducted in an impartial manner. Desired Result 1a: The number of accidents due to physical or operational aspects of GBA facilities. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 19 26 24 22 22 Actual Result 20 27 NA 23 Desired Result 1b: Percentage of tenants and visitors responding to a customer survey that report being satisfied with the maintenance and repair, cleanliness and comfort in GBA buildings. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 65% 70% 70% 75% 75% 60% 56% NA 75% Desired Result 1c: Percentage of tenants responding to a survey that report being satisfied with GBA space reconfiguration services. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 75% 75% 75% 80% Actual Result 70% 59% NA 75% FY 2003 80% Desired Result 1d: Percentage of tenants and visitors responding to a survey that report being satisfied with the landscape and grounds maintenance of GBA properties. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 65% 70% 75% 80% 80% 60% 62% NA 75% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $14,150,735 $0 FY 2002 Budget $25,665,368 $0 FY 2003 Recommended $26,054,069 $0 PARKING AND TRANSPORTATION Purpose: Provide vehicle parking for users of GBA facilities and coordinate the provision of van pool services. Goal 1: Parking spaces will be occupied by the proper vehicles. Desired Result 1a: Incidents of illegal parking in assigned spaces FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 283 375 337 490 490 Actual Result 298 417 295 546 521 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: Use of average daily van pool ridership. Desired Result 2a: Average daily van pool ridership. FY 1998 Desired Result NA Actual Result 330 FY 1999 375 359 FY 2000 394 430 FY 2001 424 454 FY 2002 500 FY 2003 500 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $4,310,690 $0 FY 2002 Budget $2,893,412 $0 FY 2003 Recommended $2,844,608 $0 STATEWIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM Purpose: Collect and process materials produced by state agencies operations. Goal 1: State government will recycle most of its waste. Desired Result 1a: Recyclable material collected from state agencies. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result NA 4257 tons 4000 tons Actual Result 4054 tons 3972 tons 3600 tons FY 2001 4200 tons 3152 tons FY 2002 4400 tons FY 2003 4400 tons Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $535,504 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommended $359,440 $340,843 POLICE AND SECURITY SERVICES Purpose: Protect the personal safety of tenants and visitors to facilities in the jurisdiction of GBA; protect the property of the state; and enforce the law. Goal 1: Tenants and visitors of GBA facilities will feel safe. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of persons responding to a survey that perceive their safety as "Good". FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 67% 70% 72% DPS Transfer Actual Result 65% 67% 96% 95% Desired Result 1b: Part 1 Crimes (Major Felonies) committed within GBA jurisdiction. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA 283 262 256 Actual Result 289 268 226 203 FY 2002 FY 2003 DPS Transfer 522 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1c: Percentage of "cleared up" crimes (Resolved) committed within GBA jurisdiction when compared to the previous year. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 13% 25% 25% DPS Transfer Actual Result 11% 21% 8.40% NA Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $4,969,042 $0 FY 2002 Budget $3,178,677 $0 FY 2003 Recommended $0 $0 FOOD OPERATIONS Purpose: Provide tenants and visitors to GBA food service facilities as needed. Goal 1: Cafeteria patrons and contract customers will receive quality services. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of persons responding to a survey that rates cafeteria operations as good. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 75% 80% 85% 85% Actual Result NA NA NA 85% FY 2003 85% Desired Result 1b: Percentage of persons responding to a survey that rate special event/banquet operations as good. Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA NA FY 1999 80% 85% FY 2000 85% 90% FY 2001 85% 90% FY 2002 90% FY 2003 90% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $3,957,392 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommended $3,893,586 $4,349,218 Other Funds (Not Allocated): Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $14,561,161 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommended $7,859,343 $10,261,088 Total - All Programs (UNIT B): Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $42,484,524 $0 FY 2002 Budget $43,849,826 $0 FY 2003 Recommended $43,849,826 $0 523 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Results-Based Budgeting Marketing and Promotion Purpose: To expand sales of Georgia's agricultural commodities from growers by promoting the commodities at home as well as abroad. Goal 1: Georgia agricultural products will be promoted in international markets. Desired Result 1a: The value of Georgia's new export sales that occur due to Agriculture's International Sales Representatives' activities. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA NA 3 million NA NA 500,000 2.8 million Note 1: The number is underreported because all sales generated by the Office of International Trade are not represented due to the inability to track every sale. Desired Result 1b: The number of Foreign Importers that the International Trade Representatives assist who purchase Georgia agricultural products. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA NA 1,000 100 100 125 300 Goal 2: Area Marketing Coordinators will assist Georgia producers in selling Georgia-grown products in the United States' domestic market. Desired Result 2a: The number of Georgia farmers, retailers, and wholesalers that the area market coordinators assist who sell their produce in the US but outside Georgia. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA NA 1000 NA NA NA 926 [1.] Note 1: 624 farmers were assisted and 302 buyers were assisted. Desired Result 2b: The value [1] of domestic sales other than those in Georgia of Georgia-grown products that are due to the efforts of Area Marketing Coordinators. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result (in dollars) NA NA NA NA NA 30 million Actual Result (in dollars) NA NA NA 28 million Note 1: This number is an estimate. Further details were not available at publication. Goal 3: Farmers and agribusinesses will have access to Farmers' Market facilities to buy and sell agricultural products. Desired Result 3a: The number of Georgia farmers, retailers, and wholesalers served by the 16 farmers' markets around the State. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA NA 4,350 4,792 4,134 4,394 4,220 524 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 3b: The value of Georgia's agricultural products sold at the 16 State Farmers' Markets. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - dollar value NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result - dollar value 512,081,567 520,911,754 578,681,647 843,626,167 FY 2003 868,934,952 NOTE 1: This number includes the sales figures for the Atlanta Farmer's Market which also sells produce grown outside the State of Georgia. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $9,745,272 $6,516,863 FY 2002 Budget $8,291,683 $8,216,683 FY 2003 Recommended $7,594,036 $7,519,036 Food Supply Safety (Non-restaurants) Purpose: Ensure that all food and food products produced and/or sold in Georgia are safe and wholesome. Goal 1:The supply of food products available to consumers is safe, wholesome, unadulterated, properly labeled, and the consumer will be protected from deceptive practices. Desired Result 1a: Number of medically documented food borne illnesses caused by food processed, produced and sold from establishments regulated by the Georgia Department of Agriculture. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 485 [1] 0 Note 1: This was caused by a single incident: one food born illness outbreak at one location. Desired Result 1b: Percent of the food remaining in trade that is found not to be in compliance with state and/or local regulations that is removed from sale. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% [1] 100% 100% Note 1: All identified unsafe food is removed from sale. Total retail value of food removed in FY 2001 - $1,533,444. Desired Result 1c: Percent of dairy farms and milk processing plant enforcement scores that are above the 90% compliance level during ratings and check ratings. Desired Result Dairy Farms FY 1998 NA FY 1999 100% FY 2000 100% FY 2001 100% FY 2002 100% FY 2003 90% Actual Result 96 % 97 % 97% 95% 4,331/4,511 4,120/4,240 3,571/3,681 2,686/2,828 Desired Result Milk Plants NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 90% Actual Result 99 % 131 / 132 99% 106/108 99% 124/125 99% 140/142 525 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1d: Percent of dairy farms and milk plants originally cited for repeat violations on sanitary and quality requirements will, upon re-inspection and after official notification, be corrected or taken out of service. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result Dairy Farms NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Desired Result Actual Result Milk Plants NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Desired Result 1e: Percent of food products found to have significant label violations, according to state and/or federal regulations that are re-labeled or removed from sale. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result 100% 100% 100% 100% Desired Result 1f: Percent of meat plants reviewed that meet standards. FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result NA 96% Actual Result 97 % 147/152 94 % 235/250 FY 2000 96% 98% FY 2001 96% 97% 256/264 FY 2002 98% FY 2003 96% Desired Result 1g: Percent of meat plants originally cited as unacceptable that are acceptable upon re-inspection. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result 100% 5 100% of 5 16 of 16 100% 100% 8 10 of 10 of 8 FY 2003 100% Desired Result 1h: Percent of meat products sampled for fat, moisture, protein and additives that originate from state inspected establishments that comply with requirements. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% Actual Result 97.5% 97.2% 98.0% 97.3% 541/556 Goal 2: Food animals will be free of diseases regulated by the USDA eradication program. Desired Result 2a: Number of cattle infected with tuberculosis. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA 0 0 0 Actual Result 0 0 0 0 FY 2002 0 FY 2003 0 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $16,453,581 $13,684,389 FY 2002 Budget $17,659,874 $14,652,739 FY 2003 Recommended $17,172,971 $14,165,836 526 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - Results-Based Budgeting Non-food Regulatory Services Purpose: Assure the availability of accurate and safe non-food agricultural products and services. Goal 1: Non-food agricultural products will meet legal quality and quantity standards. Desired Result 1a: Percent of motor fuel sold in Georgia that meets minimum quality and quantity standards. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 97% 97% 97% 97% Actual Result 97% 98% 98% 98% 17,251/17,572 14,524/14,748 12,541/12,763 Note 1: This is based on a representative sample that is analyzed by the Department of Agriculture's petroleum laboratory. FY 2003 Desired Result 1b: Percent of fuel pumps inspected that meet the legal standards for accuracy during routine and complaint inspections. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 97% 97% 97% 97% 90% Actual Result 97% 91% NA 94% [2] Note 1: Routine and complaint inspections are not disaggregated. Note 2: 147,450 of 157,874. Desired Result 1c: Percent of fuel pumps cited as not meeting the legal standard for accuracy that either meet the standard for accuracy or are taken out of service upon re-inspection. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result 100% 15,656 100% 18,939 100% 16,901 100% 10,424 Desired Result 1d: Commercial scales [1] that meet the legal accuracy standards when inspected. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA 94% 94% 94% Actual Result 96% 95% 38,954/40,639 30,183/31,900 NA 94% 20,768/22,058 Note 1: Data not provided by agency FY 2002 94% FY 2003 90% Desired Result 1e: Commercial scales that did not meet the legal standard on initial testing that meet those standards or are taken out of service upon re-inspection. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 100% 2,291 100% 100% 100% 100% 1,700 100% 1,505 100% 1,290 100% 100% Desired Result 1f: The percent of treated wood that meets the standards specified in the Georgia Treated Timber Act. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 97% 97% 97% 97% 75% Actual Result 93% 94% 71/75 79% [1] 144/181 68% 46/68 Note 1: This measure has been revised and does not match the percentage in the FY 2002 Budget Report. 527 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1g: Percent of structural pest control companies that are found to have violated federal and state regulations. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA NA NA NA Actual Result 400 236 573 45% companies companies companies 1,903/4,240 Note 1: There are 4,240 structural pest control companies operating in Georgia. Changed to a percent in FY 2003. FY 2002 35% FY 2003 35% Desired Result 1h: The percentage of structural pest control companies that are found to have violated federal and state regulations that comply with the regulations upon re-inspection. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% Actual Result 85% 340 57% 135 70.5% 58% 294 of 400 of 236 404 of 573 of 507 Goal 2: Pets and equine (horses) in the marketplace and in licensed facilities will be disease free and treated humanely. Desired Result 2a: Percent of equine (horse) anemia tests that are positive. FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result NA 0.019% Actual Result 0.02% 0.01% 5 of 45,586 Note 1: Data collected from 10-1-2000 through 08-31-2001. FY 2000 0.019% 0.09% 6 of 68,955 FY 2001 [1] 0.019% .0088% 6 of 67,484 FY 2002 0.019% FY 2003 0.019% Desired Result 2b: Valid equine abuse complaints. Desired Result FY 1998 NA Actual Result 70% FY 1999 65% 69% FY 2000 65% 67% 427 of 638 FY 2001 65% 65% 481 of 740 FY 2002 65% FY 2003 64% Desired Result 2c: Licensed animal protection facilities that meet legal standards of humane care. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA 96% 96% 96% Actual Result NA NA NA 96% [1] 809 of 845 Note 1: Data is for the period 04-10-2001 through 6-30-2001. FY 2002 96% FY 2003 90% Desired Result 2d: The percentage of licensed animal protection facilities originally cited that comply with the law upon reinspection. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% Actual Result 95% 96% 94% 241 of 250 262 of 279 97% 35 of 36 528 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 3: The commodities (feed, fertilizer, pesticide, seed and lime) available to the public will meet minimum legal quality standards. Desired Result 3a: Samples of feed for sale that meet legal standards. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% Actual Result 93% 92% 91.6% 90% 2,210/2,403 1,998/2,181 2,536/2,818 Desired Result 3b: Samples of fertilizer for sale that meet minimum quality standards. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result NA 70% 70% Actual Result 70% 67% 65.9% 547/830 FY 2001 70% 70.9% 891/1,257 FY 2002 70% FY 2003 70% Desired Result 3c: Samples of pesticides for sale that meet minimum quality standards. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result NA 98.0% 98.0% Actual Result 93.3% 95.7% 96.1% 616/614 FY 2001 98.0% 80% 969/1,207 FY 2002 98.0% FY 2003 85.0% Desired Result 3d: Samples of seed for sale that meet minimum quality standards. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result NA 98% 98% Actual Result 92.4% 92.7% 94.9% FY 2001 98% 96.7% FY 2002 98% FY 2003 98% Desired Result 3e: Samples of lime products for sale that meet minimum quality standards. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA 98% 98% 98% Actual Result 89% 85% 94.2% 49 75.6% 59 of 52 of 78 FY 2002 98% FY 2003 98% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $9,405,303 $7,843,994 FY 2002 Budget $9,492,849 $8,861,849 FY 2003 Recommended $9,292,213 $8,063,039 529 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - Results-Based Budgeting ATTACHED AGENCIES SEED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Seed Technology and Development Purpose: To maintain genetic integrity, propagate and license seed and vegetative material of important plant cultivars and make such seed and plant stocks available to qualify producers in Georgia and other states or countries as appropriate. Goal 1: Georgia seed-persons will have access to genetically pure foundation seed of important developed cultivars. Desired Result 1a: Foundation seed, sod, sprigs and plants are maintained at 99.5% genetically pure. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA 99.5% 99.5% 99.5% Actual Result 100% 99% 99.5% 99.6% FY 2002 99.5% FY 2003 99.5 Goal 2: Genetically pure sprigs and/or sod of important turf-grass cultivars will be adapted to use in Georgia Desired Result 2a: Enough foundation sprigs and requested cultivars will be available so at least 90% of the qualified turf-grass and forage grass producers will be able to purchase the quantity that they desire. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 96% 90% 96% 90% 100% 90% 100% 90% 90% Goal 3: Act as the agent for the University of Georgia and USDA to commercialize plant cultivars. Desired Result 3a: At least 95% of the cultivars released by UGA/USDA for Georgia producers will be available. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 95% 95% 95% 95% Actual Result 100% 90% 100% 100% FY 2003 95% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $855,939 $2,413 FY 2002 Budget $678,539 $0 FY 2003 Recommended $678,539 $0 Other Funds (Not Allocated): Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $18,707,455 $15,185,831 FY 2002 Budget $19,371,402 $15,935,482 FY 2003 Recommended $18,429,799 $14,993,879 TOTAL - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $55,167,550 $43,233,490 FY 2002 Budget $55,494,347 $47,666,753 FY 2003 Recommended $53,167,558 $44,741,790 530 DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE Results-Based Budgeting FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS APPLICATIONS AND REGISTRATION PROGRAMS Purpose: To ensure financial institution applications for new charters, expansions, relocations, licenses, and registrations are in compliance with statutory, legal and department policy requirements in order to maintain an appropriate level of competition among financial institutions in Georgia. Goal 1: All applicants who are granted a new charter or license, are approved for expansion or relocation, or receive a certificate of registration will comply with state laws, regulations, and department policy requirements. Desired Result 1a: In FY 2003, 95% percent of all applicants who are granted a new charter or license, are approved for expansion and relocation, or receive a certificate of registration that have complied with state laws, regulations, and department policy requirements. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 90% 92% 91% 92% 99% 95% 100% 95% 95% Goal 2: All check cashers will be engaged in legal business activities and charge fees for services in accordance with state laws. Desired Result 2a: Fifty percent of the state's check cashers which were targeted for an examination will be in compliance with the law at their annual examination. [1.] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% Actual Result 50% 48% 36% NA [1.] Note 1: Licensed check cashers are examined at least once every 36 months and possibly more often if a complaint is registered against the company. Data not available for 2001. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $1,670,491 $1,670,491 FY 2002 Budget $1,808,915 $1,808,915 FY 2003 Recommended $1,702,452 $1,702,452 FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SUPERVISION PROGRAMS Purpose: To ensure the safety and sound operation of financial institutionsand public confidence in financial institutions, and that financial institutions are responsive to the needs and convenience of customers; protect the interest of depositors, creditors and shareholders of financial institutions; and ensure appropriate competition among financial institutions. Goal 1: Management of all financial institutions in Georgia will operate in a fiscally responsible manner and will employ acceptable practices. Desired Result 1a: Ninety-five percent of Georgia's financial institutions will receive an acceptable evaluation rating at their annual examination. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 95% 95% 90% 95% 88% 95% 89% 95% 95% 531 DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE -- Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1b: Fifty percent of the financial institutions examined that did not receive an acceptable evaluation rating at their annual examinations will have improved ratings within 12 months. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 100% 100% 11% 100% 36% 50% 48% 50% 50% Goal 2: Ensure that the general public will have confidence in the soundness and operation of the financial institutions in Georgia. Desired Result 2a: In a random sample survey of customers targeted, at least 90% of the customers assisted by the department will be satisfied with the response and assistance provided to them. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% Actual Result 90% 97% 77% 82% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $488,801 $488,801 FY 2002 Budget $529,305 $529,305 FY 2003 Recommended $498,153 $498,153 GEORGIA RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE PROGRAM Purpose: To provide the examination of licensed mortgage lenders and brokers to assure compliance with the Georgia Residential Mortgage Act and investigate potential fraud cases and consumer complaints. Goal 1: All residential mortgage lenders and brokers licensed in Georgia will comply with the laws of Georgia and operate in a manner which protects the contractual and property rights of the citizens of this state. Desired Result 1a: At least 50 % of the licensed mortgage lenders and brokers will comply with requirements at the time of their annual examination. Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA 50% FY 1999 50% 79% FY 2000 50% 55% FY 2001 50% 38% FY 2002 50% FY 2003 50% Desired Result 1b: Ninety-five percent of the licensed mortgage lenders and brokers receiving an unacceptable evaluation rating at their annual examination will have improved that rating within 12 months. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% Actual Result 95% 80% NA [1] Note 1: 191 licensees received an unfavorable examination rating during the 12 months prior to the beginning of FY 2001. 55 of the 191 licensees are now inactive. Due to staffing shortages, only one follow-up examination was conducted within 12 months on those licensees remaining active. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $8,504,326 $8,504,326 FY 2002 Budget $9,209,028 $9,209,028 FY 2003 Recommended $8,667,035 $8,667,035 Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $10,663,618 $10,663,618 FY 2002 Budget $11,547,248 $11,547,248 FY 2003 Recommended $10,867,640 $10,867,640 532 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS Results-Based Budgeting COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM Purpose: To strengthen Georgia communities by fostering economic development and job growth. Goal 1: Communities will improve through financing job creation and retention projects. Desired Result 1a: The number of low and moderate income persons that obtain employment as a result of the Employment Incentive Program (EIP). Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA NA FY 1999 NA 1,126 FY 2000 500 730 FY 2001 500 1,780 FY 2002 500 FY 2003 500 Note 1: Measuring the number of jobs created and retained by the EIP program is referenced in the Interim Consolidated Plan of the State of Georgia on page 172. Note 2: Definitions of employment and low-moderate income vary and are adjusted for family size and by county. Contact DCA for further details. Desired Result 1b: The number of low and moderate income persons that retain employment for at least 6 months as a result of the Employment Incentive Program (EIP). [1][2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result Note 1: Data is not collected for this measure. NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Note 2: Measuring the number of jobs created and retained by the EIP program participants is referenced in the Interim Consolidated Plan of the State of Georgia on page 172. Goal 2: Services offered by communities will improve as a result of block grants and AmeriCorps programs. Desired Result 2a: The total dollar amount distributed to Federally designated Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Communities (EZ/EC) [1]. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Dollars Actual Result - Dollars Note 1: Includes technical assistance. NA 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 6,239,502 14,968,000 4,797,573 Desired Result 2b : The total dollar amount awarded to local governments by the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program [1]. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Dollars NA NA Actual Result - Dollars 46,000,000 38,980,516 Note 1: CDBG funds facilitate community and economic development. 36,297,340 40,891,761 36,297,340 40,253,000 42,661,340 40,000,000 Desired Result 2c : The percentage of CDBG funds that support activities related to low and moderate income people. (Data is not collected for this measure.) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA 70% [1] 70% [1] NA NA NA NA Note 1: See page 11 of the FFY 2000 (Interim) Consolidate Plan for the State of Georgia. (http://www.dca.state.ga.us/housing/act00.html) 533 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 2d: The number of senior citizen day care and health buildings built or expanded. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA 30 32 28 Actual Result 30 21 28 19 [1] Note 1: A total of 38 such building grants were applied for. FY 2002 24 FY 2003 15 Desired Result 2e: The number of AmeriCorps members participating in State funded programs. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA 375 397 400 Actual Result 350 400 500 375 FY 2002 452 FY 2003 450 Goal 3: Downtown revitalization will stimulate tourism with a resultant increase in jobs. Desired Result 3a: The number of jobs created as a result of the Main Street Revitalization efforts. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 1,500 1,500 1,530 NA Actual Result 1,386 1,778 NA NA Note 1: This was transferred from the Department of Industry, Trade and Tourism. FY 2003 1,000 Desired Result 3b: The total investment in Main Street communities. FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result - dollars NA 133,000,000 Actual Result - dollars 127,000,000 78,400,000 FY 2000 80,000,000 NA FY 2001 81,600,000 NA FY 2002 NA FY 2003 75,000,000 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $135,526,493 $84,327,997 FY 2002 Budget $62,785,875 $33,185,322 FY 2003 Recommended $40,410,553 $5,420,000 COMMUNITY COLLABORATION AND PLANNING PROGRAM Purpose: To assist communities with their plans and the associated planning process in addition to enhancing community collaboration and fostering effective regional control. Goal 1: The department will assist local governments in improving the use and implementation of their comprehensive plans. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of local governments [1] that document the use and implementation of their comprehensive plan on an annual basis. Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA 141 FY 1999 NA 131 FY 2000 153 149 FY 2001 120 98% 117 of 120 FY 2002 176 FY 2003 100% (129) Note 1: There is a potential data problem regarding the number of local governments included in this measure. Contact the Office of Planning and Budget for additional information. 534 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: The department will enhance community collaboration and foster effective regional approaches and cooperation. Desired Result 2a: Percentage of users who rate the Regional Services as "useful" or "very useful". [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 90% 90% 90% 90% Actual Result NA 99% 99% 91% Note 1: 221 surveys were sent to local elected officials, local government staff and various development organizations. 100 responded to the survey and of those 87 indicated they received services from the regional offices. Of the 87, a total of 86 rated the services useful or very useful. Desired Result 2b : Percentage of users who rate the "community facility GIS database" as very useful. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA NA 90% 90% 90% Actual Result NA 100% 38% 33% Note 1: Typical users include local and regional governments. FY 2003 90% Desired Result 2c : Percentage of users who rate the Regional Development Information System (RDIS) as very useful. FY 1998 Desired Result NA Actual Result NA Note 1: Typical users include local and regional governments. FY 1999 NA 90% FY 2000 90% 88% FY 2001 90% 42% FY 2002 90% FY 2003 90% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $14,878,724 $13,189,337 FY 2002 Budget $15,043,724 $13,239,337 FY 2003 Recommended $14,704,820 $12,774,615 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM Purpose: To work with communities to ensure a reduction in waste through efficient waste management, a solid waste public education effort and improvement in fundamental infrastructure. Goal 1: Georgia's solid waste will be managed in an efficient, effective and environmentally sound manner. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of Georgia counties that are not compliant with State law or do not offer solid waste management services. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA 10% 10% 10% 10% NA 4% 7% 6% Note 1: See map titled "Solid Waste Management Index" in the community indicators section of DCA's website @ www.dca.state.us/commind/maps.asp . Desired Result 1b: Percentage of Georgia counties that make an "Extra Effort" to comply with Georgia's solid waste management effort. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA 50% 50% 55% 60% NA 36% 45% 45% Note 1: See map titled "Solid Waste Management Index" in the community indicators section of DCA's website @ www.dca.state.us/commind/maps.asp . 535 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1c: Percentage of Georgia's counties that participate in the litter reduction program. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA ? 79% 80% 70% Actual Result ? 67% 65% 80% FY 2003 70% Goal 2: The department will assist communities in improving their waste reduction efforts through public education and awareness programs. Desired Result 2a: Number [1] of "local affiliates" that participate in the Keep Georgia Beautiful Program in conjunction with the Keep America Beautiful Program in a given FY. (This is not cumulative.) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 57 57 60 65 Actual Result NA 55 60 63 Note 1: A "Local Affiliate" is defined as a "community" that receives the Keep America Beautiful certification. Desired Result 2b : Percentage of solid waste workshop attendees who rate them as helpful. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA NA 90% 95% Actual Result NA NA 92% 97% FY 2002 95% FY 2003 95% Note 1: Two solid waste workshops were held in FY2000. All participants were asked to complete an evaluation form following each workshop to determine to what degree the workshop met their expectations. There were 81 attendees at the two workshops and 51 individuals completed an evaluation. 47 of the 51 felt the workshop they attended was helpful ("very good" and "excellent"). Goal 3: Buildings and residences will be soundly constructed. Desired Result 3a : The percentage of local governments [1] that have construction code enforcement programs. [2.& 3.] Proxy Measure Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA NA FY 1999 NA 448 FY 2000 448 65% 453 FY 2001 448 66% 453/688 FY 2002 448 or 65% FY 2003 66% Note 1: Local Governments include county and city governments in Georgia. Note 2: Building code enforcement is a standard indicator of safe housing. Note 3: DCA's Construction Codes staff conducts a survey of all local governments throughout the state every two years to identify all counties and cities that have established construction code enforcement programs. The results of the 2000 survey have been used to document the number of cities & counties that have established their own local code enforcement programs. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $4,539,487 $4,311,487 FY 2002 Budget $4,767,808 $4,539,732 FY 2003 Recommended $4,539,131 $4,311,055 536 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS - Results-Based Budgeting COMMUNITY HOUSING AND SHELTER Purpose: To work with communities to ensure that all Georgian's have a safe, sanitary and affordable housing or temporary shelter until they are able to relocate to permanent housing. Goal 1: Georgia's citizens will live in safe and sanitary housing. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of dwellings with lead as a known hazard that are deemed "lead safe". [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA NA NA Note 1: This demonstration program has been discontinued. The HUD grant is ending. Note 2: Over 800,000 housing units occupied by low and moderate income families may contain lead paint - FFY 2000 Consolidated Plan for the State of Georgia. Goal 2: Georgia's citizens will have access to affordable housing. Desired Result 2a: The number of rental units financed through the State's HOME Rental Housing, HOME CHDO Loan Programs, or the State's Low Income Housing Program through new construction or rehabilitation. Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA 2,413 FY 1999 2,862 2,496 FY 2000 3,023 3,585 FY 2001 2,823 2,176 FY 2002 3,200 FY 2003 3,200 Note 1: There is no reliable estimate of the rental units needed so this result is not a displayed as a percentage. Although there are approximately 507,712 extremely low-low-moderate households that are estimated to have rented units in Georgia n CY 2000 - FFY 2000 Consolidated Plan for the State of Georgia pages 7, 9 and 11. Desired Result 2b: Number [1] of first mortgage loans made to low and moderate income households via the single family home buyer program. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 1,260 1,260 1,700 1,700 1,400 Actual Result 1,200 1,572 1,625 1,121 Note 1: There is no reliable estimate of the low/moderate income households in need of loans so this result is not displayed as a percentage. Desired Result 2c: Number [1] of households that receive down payment assistance via the Own Home program. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 690 690 850 850 600 900 945 820 458 Note 1: There is no reliable estimate of the low/moderate income households in need of loans so this result is not a displayed as a percentage. 537 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 2e: The number of housing certificates and vouchers provided to low income families through the HUD section 8 program. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 12,500 12,500 12,500 15,500 15,750 Actual Result 11,800 12,472 12,086 14,951 Note 1: In FY 2000 there are estimated to be 293,076 households in Georgia that are classified as low income - FY 01 Consolidate Plan for the State of Georgia - page 9. Note 2: The estimated number of low and moderate-income families eligible for certificates and vouchers is 160,000. Goal 3: Georgia's homeless will have access to temporary shelter. Desired Result 3a: The number of supportive housing awards made to local agencies for shelter and supportive housing. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 250 250 250 250 Actual Result 210 227 253 238 Note 1: The estimated number of additional beds for the jurisdictions covered by the DCA Continuum of Care area is 6472. FY 2003 250 Desired Result 3b: The number of beds made available to the homeless due to DCA funded programs. [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA 5,000 Actual Result NA NA NA 4,791 Note 1: See the FFY 2000 (Interim) Consolidated Plan of the State of Georgia - page 3. Note 2: The estimated average homeless population in Atlanta each night is 11,000 - FFY 2000 (Interim) Consolidated Plan for the State of Georgia, page 3. Goal 4: Georgia's "Section 8" citizens will achieve self sufficiency through participation in the State's Section 8 selfsufficiency program. Desired Result 4a: Number of households the section 8 Family Self Sufficiency Program assists. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 500 500 500 500 500 Actual Result 225 474 394 459 Note 1:New HUD regulations and program policies resulted in a significant number of program participants withdrawing from the program. DCA is adding a sixth and seventh program site in Albany and Troup County to increase program participation. Self-sufficiency is an ongoing process. It is desired that 80% of the initial participants meet Year 1 & 2 goals and that 50% complete the program within 5 years. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $113,756,298 $9,989,482 FY 2002 Budget $76,195,488 $4,695,488 FY 2003 Recommended $71,145,972 $3,214,209 538 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS - Results-Based Budgeting ATTACHED AGENCIES GEORGIA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (GRTA) GEORGIA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Purpose: Provide Georgia citizens with improved air quality, transportation, and land use. Goal 1: Improve Air Quality. Desired Result 1a: Number of 1-hour ozone standard exceedances per year averaged over a three year period. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - # of 1-hr exceedances NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result - # of 1-hr exceedances 13.3 18.7 18.3 [1] NA Note 1: This is a three year average (1998 - 2000). FY 2003 NA Desired Result 1b: Unhealthy days for sensitive groups and the general population during ozone season. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Sensitive Groups Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA 45 days NA General Population Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA 13 days NA Note 1: A data reporting and disclosure form was not received for this measure. New measure. FY 2003 NA NA Desired Result 1a: Percentage of all new vehicle purchases by covered fleets that are clean fueled. (Proxy) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - % Light Duty / % Heavy Duty NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result - % Light Duty / % Heavy Duty NA 30% / 50% 50% / 50% 70% / 50% Goal 2: Improve Transportation Mobility and Accessibility. Desired Result 2a: Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) per person per day in the non-attainment areas. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result 35.5 miles 34.3 miles 32.9 miles NA Note 1: A data reporting and disclosure form was not received for this measure. New measure. Data is Calendar Year. FY 2003 50% FY 2003 NA Desired Result 2b: Total summer-adjusted Vehicle Mile Traveled (VMT) per day in the non-attainment area. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - VMT in millions NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result - VMT in millions 119.2 million 119 million 121.6 million NA Note 1: This is a new measure. Data is Calendar Year. FY 2003 NA [1] 539 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS - Results-Based Budgeting GEORGIA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (GRTA) GEORGIA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Desired Result 2c: Distances ridden annually by transit passengers in the non-attainment areas. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result - passenger miles NA NA NA NA Actual Result - passenger miles 160.8 million 166.1 million 169.9 million NA Note 1: This is a new measure. FY 2002 NA FY 2003 NA [1] Program Fund Allocation: Other Funds (not allocated): Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds Total Funds State Funds Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $7,964,097 $7,964,097 FY 2001 Actual $1,628,441 $58,696 FY 2001 Actual $278,293,540 $119,841,096 FY 2002 Budget $4,335,762 $4,335,762 FY 2003 Recommended $4,535,762 $4,535,762 FY 2002 Budget $2,054,446 $101,399 FY 2003 Recommended $412,642 $203,583 FY 2002 Budget $165,183,103 $60,097,040 FY 2003 Recommended $135,748,880 $30,459,224 540 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH Results-Based Budgeting COMMUNITY HEALTH Purpose: Provide value-based health care purchasing to improve the health status of all Georgians. Desired Actual Desired Actual Desired Desired Goal 1: Minimize barriers to the accessibility of health care services. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of children eligible for the Peachcare program who have been provided healthcare [1] 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 92% 93% 87% 87% 72% 50% 40% 30% 20% 26% 20% 10% 0% 0/ 123,063 32,256/ 123,062 FY98 FY99 85,625/ 119,000 FY00 132,498/ 143,000 FY01 FY02 FY03 Note 1: The number of children eligible for the program is based upon 1990 census data adjusted w ith Current Population Survey. Desired Result 1b: The percentage of Medicaid-eligible children who are enrolled in Medicaid [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A 64% 70% 75% 77% Actual Result - Percentage 59% 56% 60% 74% - Number 247,297 of 231,986 of 248,217 of 415,815 415,815 415,815 306,430 of 415,815 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 2000 data. Note 2: The number of children eligible for the program is based upon 1990 census data adjusted with Current Population Survey. Desired Result 1c: The percentage of low-income (up to 235% federal poverty level) persons with HIV/AIDS who have access to treatment in FY 2002 through a 5-year demonstration project [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY2003 The project will report its first year of Actual Results in FY 2002; projections for Desired Results will be made from this baseline data. Desired Result 1d: The percentage of residency program graduates practicing medicine in Georgia that meet or exceed the national average of 50% for all specialties combined Desired Result - Percentage Actual Result - Percentage - Number FY 1998 N/A N/A N/A FY 1999 N/A N/A N/A FY 2000 N/A N/A N/A FY 2001 50% Available Spring 2002 FY 2002 50% FY2003 50% Desired Result 1e: At least 10% of medical clinics and hospitals that have interpreters available at least 8 hours every day to assist limited English speaking persons FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY2003 This data is not collected. Desired Result 1f: Percentage of respondents to a survey of Medicaid recipients that rate nonemergency services as good or very good. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY2003 Desired Result - Percentage Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 85% 85% 85% N/A N/A N/A 83% - Number N/A N/A N/A 675 of 811 Note 1: A mail survey was sent to 4,001 randomly selected Medicaid recipients who used nonemergency transportation during the fourth quarter of FY 1999; 20% (811) responded to the survey. 541 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1g: Percentage of the rural population in Georgia that have access to rural health delivery systems FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY2003 This data is not collected. Desired Result 1h: Percentage and dollar value of hospitals' adjusted gross revenue committed to indigent and charity care [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.8% 5.0% - Number [in millions] N/A N/A N/A $377 $600 $620 Actual Result - Percentage 4.8% 4.5% 4.3% 4.8% - Number [in millions] $518.6 $519.3 $540.8 $604.6 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY2000 data. Desired Result 1i: Percentage of the female population that will be reached through education (media campaigns, health fairs, and conferences) about access to care and health care services [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 10% 15% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A - Number N/A N/A N/A N/A Note 1: Data for this measure will be first collected in FY 2002. Goal 2: Promote a culture of wellness, significantly minimize disparities, and improve the health status of all Georgians. Desired Result 2a: Minimize potential disparity in rates of availability and/or utilization of specialized health care services (for example, cardiac catheter, radiation therapy, and ambulatory surgery) in rural communities, using strategies that move rural rates of utilization closer to the state's average use rates and national access goals FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY2003 These data are currently unavailable. Desired Result 2b: Percentage of counties in Georgia meeting the Graduate Medical Education National Advisory Committee Standard of 191 physicians per 100,000 population [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A [1] 10% [1] 10% [1] Actual Result - Percentage 8% [1] 8% [1] [1] - Number 13 of 159 [1] 13 of 159 [1] [1] Note 1: Data for this measure are collected biennially when physicians renew their medical licenses. Desired Result 2c: Percentage of the participants in the Country Doctor and Loan Repayment Programs who practice in "Health Professional Shortage Area" counties [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A [1] 61% [1] Actual Result - Percentage 77% [1] 82% [1] - Number 24 of 31 [1] 27 of 33 [1] Note 1: Data for this measure are collected biennially when physicians renew their medical licenses. Desired Result 2d: Decrease in the percentage of incidence of morbidity and mortality from prostate cancer in the state through earlier detection and more prompt treatment while the cancer is still confined to the prostate FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY2003 Desired Result N/A N/A N/A N/A 12% 15% Actual Result - Change in rate N/A N/A N/A N/A - Morbidity and Mortality Rate N/A N/A N/A N/A 542 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 3: Improve cost containment, quality of care, and customer service by establishing and enhancing partnerships. Desired Result 3a: Change in the rate of pharmacy expenditure increases due to expansion of the maximum allowable price program, preferred drug list, and other cost-effective initiatives through the pharmacy benefit manager services [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY2003 Desired Result - Change in rate of increase N/A N/A N/A >-3% >-3% >-3% Actual Result - Change in rate of increase N/A N/A N/A 9.63% - Rate of increase N/A N/A N/A N/A Note 1: In the foreseeable future, pharmacy costs are expected to rise. This measure assesses the degree to which the program has been able to manage and minimize annual increases. It compares the increase in expenditures between FY 2001 and FY 2000 and the prior year increase - FY 1999 and FY2000. The result is the difference in the rate of increase between the two years. Desired Result 3b: Percentage of participants in the Service Options Utilizing Resources in Community Environments (SOURCE) Demonstration Project will delay nursing home placement an average of 2 years after entering the program Desired Result - Percentage Actual Result - Percentage - Number FY 1998 N/A N/A N/A FY 1999 N/A N/A N/A FY 2000 N/A 59% 236/400 FY 2001 20% 76% 425/559 FY 2002 65% FY2003 70% Desired Result 3c: Percentage of hospitalized individuals covered by the State Health Care, Peach Care, and Medicaid plan that are readmitted within 15 days after discharge from the hospital [1] [2] 6% 5.1% 5% 4.4% 3.7% 4% 5.3% 5.2% 3.7% 3.5% 4.8% 4.8% Note 1: Readmission to hospital within 2 weeks of discharge is often an indicator of premature discharge; this indicator is used in conjunction with Desired 3d to help ensure that shortening the length of hospital stay does not adversely impact the quality of care a patient receives. State Health - Actual Peach Care - Actual Medicaid - Actual Desired % Re-admitted State Health - Actual Peach Care - Actual Medicaid - Actual Desired % Re-admitted Desired % Re-admitted 3% 2% 1% 0% FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 Note 2: The numbers of readmissions by plan for the FY 2000 and FY 2001 Actual Results are shown below: FY 2000 FY 2001 State Health 1,669/44,866 1,350/38,244 Peach Care 54/1190 82/2,216 Medicaid 10,070/ 10,230/ 195,914 195,229 Desired Result 3d: Percentage decrease in the average length of hospital stay for individuals covered under State Health Care, Peach Care, and Medicaid plans [1] Desired Result - % Decrease Actual Results: % Decrease - State Health Care - Average days of hospital stay Actual Results: % Decrease - Peach Care - Average days of hospital stay Actual Results: % Decrease - Medicaid - Average days of hospital stay FY 1998 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A FY 1999 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A FY 2000 N/A N/A 4.66 N/A 3.36 N/A 4.04 FY 2001 N/A -4% 4.48 +7% 3.61 +8% 4.79 FY 2002 -5% FY2003 -5% Note 1: Advances in medicine have permitted shorter hospital stays for most illnesses. However, since providers are paid by DRG (Diagnosis Related Group) which results in financial incentives for discharging patients early, the department reviews this measure to ensure that patients are not being discharged earlier than is medically advisable. 543 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 3e: Percentage and amount of the cost of projects denied through the certificate of need process to protect consumers against unnecessary health care expenditures [Proxy Measure] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY2003 Desired Result - Percentage cost savings N/A N/A N/A 10% 10% 10% Actual Result - Percentage cost savings - Amount cost savings N/A N/A N/A 9% N/A N/A N/A $61,442,563 Note 1: The certificate of need program is to ensure that adequate health care facilities are developed in an orderly and economical manner and to avoid unnecessary duplication of services. The Department measures program impact by the cost saving resulting from the denial of applications. It is assumed that projects denied would have had an adverse affect on economy and duplication of services. Desired Result 3f: Percentage decrease in the number of emergency room visits for asthma by Georgia Better Health Care (Proxy measure for improved management of chronic diseases.) [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY2003 The Department begin collecting these data in FY 2002 . Program Fund Allocation Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $6,030,923,236 $1,604,139,750 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommendation $5,956,930,513 $1,528,336,917 $6,703,700,915 $1,715,986,120 Total - All Programs Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $6,030,923,236 $1,604,139,750 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommendation $5,956,930,513 $1,528,336,917 $6,703,700,915 $1,715,986,120 544 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Results-Based Budgeting PROBATION PROGRAMS Purpose: To serve the courts, manage probationers' risk to the public, and probationers' accountability to the community and victims. Goal 1: To protect the public by insuring appropriate levels of supervision, based on offender risk. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of probationers revoked for a subsequent conviction. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percent NA 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% [1] Actual Result - Percent / Number 3.36% / 2,290 3.23% / 2,244 3.49% / 2,366 3.93% / 2,504 [2] Note 1: The population is increasingly comprised of felons rather that misdemeanor offenders. Consequently, holding the rate at 4% represents an improvement. Note 2: Total "releases" in FY 2001 - 63,667. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $101,585,496 $98,408,593 FY 2002 Budget $106,372,012 $103,920,683 FY 2003 Recommended $106,922,906 $104,229,357 FACILITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS Purpose: Ensure the safety and well being of the public, staff and offenders by providing well managed facilities. Goal 1: Operate safe and secure facilities for housing offenders at the lowest possible costs. Desired Result 1a: The rate of inmate initiated assaults. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Rate / Actual number NA NA NA NA 0.1157 / 5090 0.1099 / 4836 Actual Result - Rate / Actual Number 0.1564 / 5696 0.1411 / 5589 0.1363 / 5658 0.1222 / 5358 Note 1: Includes inmate on inmate assaults and inmate on staff assaults. Desired Result 1b: Prison related deaths per 100,000 inmates. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result - Actual deaths / Mortality rate NA 90 / 230 Actual Result - Actual deaths / Mortality rate 85 / 230 82 / 202 FY 2000 91 / 230 96 / 240 FY 2001 93 / 230 93 / 230 FY 2002 95 / 230 Desired Result 1c: The percentage of medical contracts complying with medicaide standards. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA 70% 80% 80% Actual Result NA 65% 59% 59% Note 1: Meeting medicaide standards provides a constitutionally required level of health care to inmates. FY 2002 80% FY 2003 97 / 230 FY 2003 80% Desired Result 1d: The cost of care [1] in comparison with national averages. [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA < Average < Average < Average Actual Result - (Other States' $ , Georgia $) NA < Average < Average < Average $7.78, $7.58 $8.86, $8.24 $9.17, $9.06 Note 1: Data is compiled from surveys of comparable systems. Note 2: At or Below Average of Comparable States Nationally. FY 2002 < Average FY 2003 < Average 545 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1e: The average cost per day of an offender housed in a state facility during a fiscal year. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA $44.94 $47.97 $48.93 $48.64 Actual Result $45.94 $47.03 $47.68 NA Note 1: Due to cost accounting differences, a relevant national average cost is not available. FY 2003 NA Program Fund Allocation: Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $821,919,013 $796,214,979 FY 2001 Actual $923,504,509 $894,623,572 FY 2002 Budget $860,646,275 $840,812,800 FY 2003 Recommended $865,103,510 $843,310,255 FY 2002 Budget $967,018,287 $944,733,483 FY 2003 Recommended $972,026,416 $947,539,612 546 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Results-Based Budgeting NATIONAL GUARD MILITARY READINESS PROGRAM Purpose: Provide a trained military organization to serve, protect, and defend the citizens of Georgia and the nation when called upon by the Governor or the President. Goal 1: Provide the state and nation with trained military personnel in adequate numbers and in a timely manner to respond when called upon by the Governor or President. Desired Result 1a: Achieve and maintain 95% of military positions filled [1] with 80% trained in their Military Occupational Specialty Qualifications/Armed Forces Service Course. Proxy [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 81% filled 95% filled 95% filled 95% filled 75% trained 80% trained 85% trained 85% trained Actual Result 81% filled 83% filled 88% filled 89% filled 75% trained 76% trained 73% trained 85% trained Note 1: The number of positions properly filled is an indicator of readiness. Note 2: Detailed information regarding unit readiness is classified. Desired Result 1b: Upon "Alert Notice" by the Georgia Emergency Management Agency and Army/Air National Guard command post, achieve 100% response within 24 hours of notice to unit. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - 24 hour response NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result - 24 hour response 100% 100% 100% 100% Note 1: Guard units responded 3 times in FY 2001. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $2,996,524 $1,329,599 FY 2002 Budget $2,565,443 $1,473,417 FY 2003 Recommended $2,551,197 $1,438,669 COMMUNITY SERVICE AND SUPPORT Purpose: Through the use of Georgia Department of Defense resources, provide services and support to improve the quality of life in Georgia communities. Goal 1: Provide non-emergency assistance to communities, consistent with mission and resources, that will improve the quality of life in Georgia's communities. Desired Result 1a: The number of State Defense Force voluntary [1] days. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 917 395 858 579 Note 1: Days that members of the State Defense Force volunteered for community projects. 547 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1b: Provide 1 civic action project using National Guard soldiers in conjunction with unit training annually. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 1 1 1 1 Actual Result 7 1 1 0 Note 1: National Guard units provide construction type services to local governments in conjunction with their training. Goal 2: Intervene with at-risk youth who are high school dropouts to produce employable and self-sufficient citizens. Desired Result 2a: Percentage of at-risk youth who graduate annually from the Youth Challenge Academy. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA 91% 91% Actual Result 84% 80% 84% 83% 513 of 612 338 of 423 364 of 435 535 of 647 Desired Result 2b: Percentage of program graduates that meet the DOD standard for success 6 months after graduation from the Youth Challenge Academy. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA Not Given Actual Result 91% (467) 91% (308) 92% (335) NA Goal 3: Assist law enforcement in reducing the flow of illegal drugs into, through and manufactured in Georgia. Desired Result 3a: The percentage of requests for assistance made by drug law enforcement agencies that are filled. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA 85% 85% Actual Result 71% 93% 84% 76% (361 of 508) (341 of 368) (448 of 531) (381 of 500) Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $8,461,305 $2,396,216 FY 2002 Budget $6,257,178 $2,053,418 FY 2003 Recommended $6,188,208 $1,980,226 548 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE - Results-Based Budgeting FACILITIES SUPPORT TO THE GEORGIA NATIONAL GUARD Purpose: Provide and maintain modern, community-based facilities that support and enhance the training and readiness of the Department of Defense to perform its state and federal mission. Program Note: Facilities have a major impact on State DOD unit readiness. This is a separate program due to the cost of facility repairs and upgrades. Goal 1: Every facility will be equipped to enhance training and readiness requirements for Georgia. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of facilities requiring major repairs (>100k) . Proxy [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA 49% 15% Actual Result 100% 72 of 72 96% 69 of 72 90% 65 of 72 72 % 52 of 72 Note 1: The state of repair of DOD facilities have a major impact on unit readiness. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $31,492,958 $4,261,572 FY 2002 Budget $27,984,311 $5,140,322 FY 2003 Recommended $27,863,129 $5,043,864 Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $42,950,787 $7,987,387 FY 2002 Budget $36,806,932 $8,667,157 FY 2003 Recommended $36,602,534 $8,462,759 549 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Results-Based Budgeting REGULAR EDUCATION Purpose: Ensure that Georgia's K-12 students are academically prepared for their futures in the 21st century. ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT (Subprogram) Purpose: Ensure that Georgia's K-12 students are academically prepared for further education and the workplace by providing leadership and support to initiate, promote, enhance, and communicate curriculum and programs of study in all academic areas for education and the general public. Goal 1: Students will be adequately prepared for further education and the workforce. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of students requiring learning support courses (remedial coursework) when they enter public colleges and universities FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% Actual Result - Percentage - Number 23% 22.10% 21.30% N/A 5,368/23.339 5,318/24,063 5,200/24,413 N/A Desired Result 1b: Georgia's students average Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) score FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result N/A 975 975 Actual Result 968 969 974 National average SAT score 1,017 1,016 1,019 FY 2001 1,000 980 1,020 FY 2002 1,000 FY 2003 1,000 Desired Result 1c: The percentage of students scoring 3 or above on Advanced Placement (AP) exams and the number taking AP courses FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 63% 64% 65% 65% 65% Actual Result - Percentage - Number 60% 54.30% 55.50% N/A 9,183/15,305 7,069/13,018 8,116/14,623 N/A Desired Result 1d: Percentage of Kindergarten students who score 161 or higher on the GKAP-R and are promoted to first grade FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 94% 95% Actual Result - Percentage N/A 93% 92% 93% - Number N/A 98,121/ 105,146/ 102,463/ 105,597 114,289 110,175 Desired Result 1e: Average score for Georgia's students on the National Assessment of Educational Progress Test (NAEP) 300 Math 250 215 220 222 228 200 150 262 266 271 275 300 Reading 250 210 220 215 200 150 257 260 261 Georgia National Georgia National Georgia National Georgia National Georgia Actual National Actual Georgia Desired Georgia Actual National Actual Georgia Desired 100 100 50 50 0 FY 1998 FY 2000 4th Grade FY 1998 FY 2000 8th Grade Note 1: The math portion of the NAEP is given every 4 years. In FY 2000, 19% of Georgia's 4th graders and 22% of 8th graders were rated "proficient" or better in math. 0 FY 2000 FY 2002 4th Grade FY 2000 FY 2002 8th Grade Note 1: The reading portion of the NAEP is given every 4 years. In FY 2000, 29% of Georgia's 4th graders and 26% of 8th graders were rated "proficient" or better in reading. 550 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting NAEP Scores : Science and Writing FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Science 4th/8th grade N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A - Writing 8th grade Actual Result - Georgia: Science 4th grade N/A N/A N/A N/A 150 N/A N/A N/A 143 N/A N/A N/A - National Average: Science 4th grade N/A N/A 148 N/A N/A N/A - Georgia: Science 8th grade N/A N/A 144 N/A N/A N/A - National Average: Science 8th grade N/A N/A 149 N/A N/A N/A - Georgia: Writing 8th grade 146 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A - National Average: Writing 8th grade 148 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Note 1: The Science and Writing portions of the NAEP is given every four years. In FY 2000, 26% of 4th graders and 23% of 8th graders were rated "proficient" or better in Science and 24% of Georgia's 8th graders were rated "proficient" or better in writing. Desired Result 1f: Percentage of students who have enrolled in postsecondary education within one year of graduation [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result - Total N/A N/A N/A 45% Actual Result - Total N/A 45.20% 44.70% N/A - Number N/A 29,268/64,752 N/A N/A DTAE Institution N/A 7.7% 7.4% N/A BOR Institution N/A 37.5% 37.3% N/A Note 1: Actual Results do not include students who have enrolled in private or out-of-state institutions. FY 2002 47% FY 2003 48% Desired Result 1g: Percentage of students graduating from high school within 4 years of entering 9th grade FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 72% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A 70.7% N/A - Number N/A N/A N/A N/A FY 2003 74% Desired Result 1h: Percentage of high school graduates earning each of the six types of diplomas offered by Georgia's public schools. [1] [2] Cert/Attend 3% 2,008 Special Ed 3% 1,712 General 17% 10,203 Tech 17% 10,737 College/ Tech 12% 7,095 College 48% 29,249 Cert/Attend 6% General 2% 4.192 1,349 Tech 23% 14,962 College/ Tech 16% 10,799 Special Ed 3% 2,055 College 50% 32,191 FY 1998 - Number of Diplomas: 61,004 Cert/Attend 5% General 1% 3,122 441 Tech 24% 16,108 College/ Tech 18% 11,973 Special Ed 3% FY 1999 - Number of Diplomas: 64,199 2,212 College 49% 34,040 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Data notavailable. Note 2: DOE did not submit Desired Results for FY 2002 and FY 2003. FY 2000 - Number of Diplomas: 67,896 551 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: Students will be proficient in English/language arts. Desired Result 2a: Average percentile ranking in English/language arts on norm-referenced tests [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 ITBS ITBS ITBS STAT-9 STAT-9 STAT-9 Desired Result - 3rd grade - 5th grade - 8th grade Actual Result - 3rd grade - 5th grade - 8th grade N/A N/A N/A 62% 61% 58% 63% 62% 59% 64% 63% 60% 65% 64% 61% 63% 62% 60% 65% 64% 62% 61% 61% 63% 69% 68% 65% 72% 71% 69% Note 1: In FY 2001, the Georgia public schools replaced the Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS) with the STAT-9 (Stanford-9). In general, ITBS scores are 5 - 10 points higher than the comparable STAT-9 score. Desired Result 2b: Percentage of student's passing the English/language arts portion of Georgia's Criterion Referenced Competency Test the first time they take the test [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - 1st grade N/A N/A 70% 75% - 2nd grade N/A N/A 70% 75% - 3rd grade - 4th grade - 5th grade - 6th grade - 7th grade - 8th grade Actual Result - 4th grade The Language Arts portion of the CRCT was given for the first time in FY 2001; Only students in the 4th, 6th, and 8th grades took the test. Beginning in FY 2002, the assessment will be given in grades 1 through 8. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 71% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 74% 70% 75% 75% 65% 65% 70% 75% 80% 80% 70% 70% 75% - 6th grade 61% 64% - 8th grade 65% 68% Desired Result 2c: Average verbal SAT score of Georgia students compared to the national average [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result N/A 493 493 500 500 Actual Result - Georgia 486 487 488 491 - National Average 502 502 501 506 Note 1: The numbers represent scaled scores on a scale of 200 to 800. FY 2003 502 Goal 3: Students will be proficient in mathematics. Desired Result 3a: Average percentile ranking in mathematics on norm-referenced tests [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 ITBS ITBS ITBS STAT-9 Desired Result - 3rd grade N/A 61% 65% 65% - 5th grade - 8th grade N/A 58% 64% 64% N/A 55% 61% 62% Actual Result - 3rd grade 61% 61% 62% 42% - 5th grade - 8th grade 58% 55% 59% 56% 59% 57% 51% 42% Note 1: See Note 1 on Desired Result 2a. FY 2002 STAT-9 50% 55% 50% FY 2003 STAT-9 55% 60% 55% 552 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 3b: Percentage of students meeting expectations on the mathematics portion of Georgia's Criterion Referenced Competency Test the first time they take the test. Desired Result - 1st grade - 2nd grade - 3rd grade - 4th grade - 5th grade - 6th grade - 7th grade - 8th grade Actual Result - 4th grade - 6th grade - 8th grade FY 1998 FY 1999 The mathematics portion of the CRCT was given for the first time in FY 2001; Only students in the 4th, 6th, and - 8th grade took the test. Beginning in FY 2002, the assessment will be given in grades 1 through 8. FY 2000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 62% 66% 54% FY 2001 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 63% 69% 58% FY 2002 65% 65% 655 70% 70% 70% 65% 65% FY 2003 70% 70% 70% 75% 75% 75% 70% 70% Desired Result 3c: Average mathematics SAT score of Georgia students compared to the national average [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Georgia N/A 493 493 500 500 Actual Result - Georgia - National Average 482 482 486 489 509 508 510 Not Available Note 1: The numbers represent scaled scores on a scale of 200 to 800. FY 2003 500 Goal 4: Students will be proficient in science. Desired Result 4a: Percentage of students meeting expectations on the science portion of Georgia's Criterion Referenced Competency Test the first time they take the test [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The science portion of the CRCT will be given for the first time in FY 2002. FY 2002 Actual Results will be used as baseline data to project subsequent Desired Results. Desired Result 4b: Average percentile ranking in science on norm-referenced tests (ITBS and STAT-9) [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 ITBS ITBS ITBS STAT-9 STAT-9 Desired Result - 3rd grade N/A 61% 65% 65% 69% - 5th grade - 8th grade N/A 58% 64% 64% 68% N/A 55% 61% 62% 65% Actual Result - 3rd grade 59% 59% 59% 44% - 5th grade - 8th grade 59% 55% 60% 56% 60% 56% 48% 46% Note 1: See Note 1, Desired Result 2a. FY 2003 STAT-9 73% 72% 69% Goal 5: Students will be proficient in social studies. Desired Result 5a: Percentage of students meeting expectations on the social studies portion of Georgia's Criterion Referenced Competency Test the first time they take the test. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The Social Science portion of the CRCT will be given for the first time in FY 2002. FY 2002 Actual Results will be used as baseline data to project subsequent Desired Results. 553 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 5b: Average percentile ranking in social studies on norm-referenced tests [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 ITBS ITBS ITBS STAT-9 Desired Result - 3rd grade N/A 63% 65% 67% - 5th grade - 8th grade N/A 62% 64% 66% N/A 59% 61% 63% Actual Result -3rd grade 62% 64% 65% 51% - 5th grade - 8th grade 61% 58% 63% 60% 64% 62% 56% 54% Note 1: See Note 1 for Desired Result 2a. FY 2002 STAT-9 55% 60% 60% FY 2003 STAT-9 60 65 65 READING (Subprogram) Purpose: Improve the reading ability of all students by developing and implementing a program of reading instruction that focuses on research-based instructional practices. Goal 1: Improve students' reading and comprehension abilities. Desired Result 1: Percentage of students meeting or exceeding requirements to pass the Criterion-Referenced Competency Test for reading [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - 1st grade - 2nd grade - 3rd grade - 4th grade - 5th grade - 6th grade - 7th grade - 8th grade Actual Result - 4th grade - 6th grade N/A N/A The reading portion of the N/A CRCT was given for the first N/A time in FY 2001; Only N/A students in the 4th, 6th, and 8th grade took the test. N/A Beginning in FY 2002, the N/A assessment will be given in N/A grades 1 through 8. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 65% 71% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 70% 70% 75% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 75% 75% 80% - 8th grade N/A 75% Note 1: Georgia schools use 11 different reading programs. Beginning with the FY 2004 State Budget Report, Actual Results will also be shown by the 11 programs so that each program's relative effectiveness can be shown. FOREIGN LANGUAGE (Sub-program) Purpose: Ensure that Georgia's K-12 students are academically prepared for further education and the workplace by providing them with an extended sequence of foreign language study. Goal 1: Students who have had an extended sequence of foreign language study will perform better than their peers who have not had this foreign language study on the verbal and math portions of the SAT. Desired Result 1a: Mean verbal SAT scores of Georgia students who have had two, three, four or mores years of a foreign language compared to students taking less than one year of a foreign language [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - More than 4 years N/A N/A 560 565 - 4 years N/A N/A 555 560 - 3 years - 2 years Actual Result - More than 4 years - 4 years - 3 years This is a new measure; N/A N/A 495 500 thus, there are no Desired N/A N/A 460 465 Results prior to FY 2002 582 N/A and no Actual Results prior 582 526 to FY 2000. 527 477 - 2 years 478 449 - less than 1 year 390 393 554 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1b: Mean math SAT scores of Georgia students who have had two, three, four or mores years of a foreign language compared to students taking less than one year of a foreign language FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - More than 4 years N/A N/A [1] [1] - 4 years N/A N/A [1] [1] - 3 years - 2 years This is a new measure; N/A N/A 500 505 thus, there are no Desired N/A N/A 465 470 Actual Result - More than 4 years - 4 years - 3 years Results prior to FY 2002 572 N/A and no Actual Results prior 558 526 to FY 2000. 524 475 - 2 years 475 443 - less than 1 year 387 389 Goal 2: Students who study foreign language in the Georgia ESFL Model Program will be proficient in speaking a second language. Desired Result 2a: The mean oral fluency ratings for fifth and third graders in the program compared to the mean oral fluency ratings for kindergarten students [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Kindergarten N/A 1.5 1.5 - 3rd grade - 5th grade Actual Result - Kindergarten - 3rd grade N/A 2.5 2.5 This is a new measure, thus, there are no N/A 3.5 3.5 Desired Results prior to FY 2002 and no Actual Results prior to FY 2001. 1.64 2.74 - 5th grade 3.87 Note 1: The improvement between kindergarten assessments and 3rd and 5th grade assessments are statistically significant. TECHNOLOGY/CAREER (VOCATIONAL) EDUCATION (Subprogram) Purpose: Provide quality programs and services that enable Georgia's secondary students to develop the knowledge and skills needed to successfully transition to postsecondary programs and to enter career areas in rapidly changing workplace environments. Goal 1: Increase the academic achievement of secondary students in Technology/Career (Vocational) Education programs. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of students with technology/career and dual diploma seals passing the Georgia high school test in 1-5 attempts FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A 67.53% 67.53% 68.03% 68.53% Actual Result - Percentage - Number [1] [1] 67.03% [1] [1] [1] 8,649/12,903 [1] Note 1: Prior to FY 2000, this data could not be disaggregated to show only Technology/Career students; FY 2001 data were not disaggregated before the publication of the FY 2003 State Budget Report. Desired Result 1b: The percentage of students achieving a "C" and above or "Satisfactory" grades in vocational courses (post-secondary non-developmental) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 85.87% 86.37% 86.87% Actual Result - Percentage - Number N/A 84.87% 85.37% N/A N/A N/A 33,852/39,653 N/A 555 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: The number of students who graduate from high school with credentials to succeed in post-secondary education will increase. Desired Result 2a: The percentage of students that have the credentials to enter college or other post-secondary education because they have earned a dual career/tech and college prep seal 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 87% Actual Desired 66% 70% 72% 56,013 of 64,714 43,990 of 61,356 42,990 of 61,356 40,014 of 60,513 75% FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY02 75% FY03 Note 1: This is a new measure; thus, there are no Desired Results prior to FY 2002. Goal 3: Increase the vocational/technical skill proficiencies of students in technology career education. Desired Results 3a: Percentage of students successfully completing four or more courses in a concentrated vocational program area that receive or qualify to receive dual diploma or technology career seal FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage [1] [1] 77.49% 77.50% 86.3% 87.13% Actual Result - Percentage - Number [1] [1] 86.13% [1] [1] [1] 12,334/14,321 [1] Note 1: Prior to FY 2000, this data could not be disaggregated to show only Technology/Career students; FY 2001 data were not disaggregated before the publication of the FY 2003 State Budget Report. Desired Result 3b: Percentage of employers satisfied with students who complete youth apprenticeship and other structured work-based learning programs [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 95% 96.5% 95% 95% 95% Actual Result - Percentage N/A 95.5% 96.1% Not Yet - Number N/A 599 of 628 621 of 646 Available Goal 4: Students graduating with college prep/technology prep seal or technology/career prep seal will be prepared for the workforce and higher education. Desired Result 4a: Percentage of graduates with college prep/technology prep seal or technology/ career prep seal that are employed, enrolled in a post-secondary institution or in the military within 3 months of graduation FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A 68.50% 94.75% 95.25% 95.25% Actual Result - Percentage - Number N/A N/A 94.25% Not Yet N/A N/A 22,607/23,985 Available. AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION (Subprogram) Purpose: Provide students with personal, managerial, and academic skills for employment in the agriculture industry and successful entry into a postsecondary program. Goal 1: Promote the development of agricultural competency and academic skills. Desired Result 1a: Average academic performance in Mathematics of the agriculture completers on the High Schools that Work Assessment (National Assessment of Education Progress - NAEP ) [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Agriculture completers N/A [1] 300 [1] 301 [1] Actual Result - Agriculture completers 295.3 [1] 298 [1] - All students 298.1 [1] 297.3 [1] Note 1: The NAEP test is given every other year to a random sample of 60 students in each of Georgia's 112 High Schools That Work . In FY 2000, 5,813 students were assessed; 3.7% (216) were identified as agricultural students. 556 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1b - Average academic performance in Science of the agriculture completers on the High Schools That Work Assessment (National Assessment of Education Progress - NAEP ) [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result -Agriculture Completers N/A [1] 295 [1] 296 [1] Actual Result -Agriculture Completers 287.3 [1] 292.8 [1] - All students 289.7 [1] 286.5 [1] Note 1: See Note 1, Desired Result 1b Goal 2: Agriculture education students will find jobs in their field of study or enroll in postsecondary education. Desired Result 2a: Percentage of agriculture education students employed in agricultural-related jobs FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A [1] 30% 31% 33% 33% Actual Result - Percentage [1] [1] 31.6% 27.5% - Number [1] [1] 1,058/3,344 792/2,880 Note 1: Seventy-one percent of the schools with programs in agricultural education that were surveyed for this data responded. Desired Result 2b: Percentage of agriculture education students who enroll in post-secondary education FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A 30% 31% 33% Actual Result - Percentage [1] [1] 33.6% 40.6% - Number [1] [1] 1,124/3,344 1,172/2880 Note 1: See Note 1, Desired Result 2a. FY 2003 33% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual 4,258,221,834 4,121,793,940 FY 2002 Budget 4,348,873,254 4,216,115,541 FY2003 Recommended 4,406,031,572 4,272,458,922 EXCEPTIONAL STUDENTS GIFTED AND TALENTED STUDENTS (Subprogram) Purpose: Provide Georgia's gifted and talented students with appropriately challenging and enriching educational opportunities that are designed to encourage them to meet their full academic potential and assist them in the acquisition of the skills, knowledge, and attitudes necessary to become independent, life-long learners. Goal 1: Students who participate in the Governor's Honors Program (GHP) will be empowered to take charge of their own learning. Desired Result 1: Percentage of GHP students that reported their experiences during the summer contributed "a lot" or "totally" to their being able to turn future learning experiences to their advantage [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 86% 86% 86% 86% 86% Actual Result - Percentage - Number 79% 94 of 119 90% 76 of 84 86% 90 of 105 89% 105 of 118 Note 1: The 675 GHP students were sorted by 16 major areas of instruction; every 7th student was selected for survey. Goal 2: Students who participate in Georgia's Programs for Gifted Students will excel academically; demonstrating exceptional performance on measures of mastery of Quality Core Curriculum standards in their areas of strength, as well as advanced research and communication skills, and creative thinking and creative problem solving skills. Desired Result 2a: The percentage of gifted students in grades 1-8 who have received gifted education services in a content area exceeding expectations on that portion of the Georgia Criterion-Referenced Competency Test [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The Departments current data collection system does not provide this data; however, Program staff are working with Technology Services and Research, Evaluation, and Testing staffs so that this data will be available by the end of FY 2002. 557 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 2b: The percentage of gifted students in grades 9-12 who have received gifted education services in a content area exceeding expectations on the end-of-course tests for those courses. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 End of course tests are being developed and should be in place for FY 2003. Desired Result 2c: The percentage of gifted students in grades 9-12 who have received gifted education services in a College Board Advanced Placement (AP) class scoring three, four, or five on that AP exam [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The Departments current data collection system does not provide this data; however, Program staff are working with Technology Services and Research, Evaluation, and Testing staffs so that this data will be available by the end of FY 2002. Desired Result 2d: The percentage of gifted students in grades 9-12 who have received gifted education services in an International Baccalaureate (IB) class scoring a five, six, or seven on that IB exam [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 DOE's current data collection system does not provide this data; however, program staff are working with Technology Services and Research, Evaluation, and Testing staffs so these data will be available by the end of FY2002 Desired Result 2e: The percentage of gifted students who have participated in gifted education classes for at least two years demonstrating skills in critical and creative thinking, logical and creative problem solving , research, and communication as evidenced by the development of innovative products and performances that reflect individual initiative and are advanced in relation to students of similar age, experience, or environment [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Although data in not now collected, program representatives are now trying to identify valid measures for this measure. EARLY INTERVENTION PROGRAM (Subprogram) Purpose: Raise achievement of students who are below grade level to grade level achievement. Goal 1: Raise achievement level of Kindergarten students who are in the Early Intervention Program. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of students in the program who pass the Georgia Kindergarten Assessment Program (GKAP-R) sometime during kindergarten FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 These data are not currently collected. Desired Result 1b: Percentage of students in the Early Intervention Program who either met or exceed requirements the Criterion-referenced Competency Test FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The first Actual Results for this measure will be available in FY 2002. Subsequent years' Desired Results will be projecteed using this baseline data. REMEDIAL EDUCATION PROGRAM (Subprogram) Purpose: Raise achievement of students who are in grades 9 -- 12 and below grade level to grade level achievement. Goal 1: Students who participate in the Remedial Education Program will Complete high school. Desired Result 1: Percentage of students in the Remedial Education Program that graduate from high school within four years FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Originally the REP was established as an elementary school program. It has been replaced by the Early Intervention Program in grades 1 -- 8 and now serves students in grades 9 -- 12. There is no assessment tool available at this time that measures annual progress in reading, writing, and mathematics (the subjects addressed in the program) at these grade levels. 558 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting SPECIAL EDUCATION (Subprogram) Purpose: Ensure that all students with disabilities have available to them a free, appropriate public education that emphasizes access to the general education curriculum and provides special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and to provide the opportunity to develop into productive, successful citizens. Goal 1: Students with disabilities will successfully transitioned to post-secondary education or the workplace. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of students with disabilities who attend post-secondary education programs [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - % Total N/A 7% 9% 23% 26% 29% - % University or College N/A N/A N/A 17% 18% 19% - % Technical College N/A N/A N/A 6% 8% 10% Actual Result - % Total 5% N/A 20.37% - Number N/A N/A 119 - % University or College N/A N/A 15.75% - Number N/A N/A 92 - % Technical College N/A N/A 4.62% - Number N/A N/A 27 Note 1: This information was collected in a sample survey of approximately 25% of all school systems in Georgia. This information will be collected from all school systems for students graduating in FY 2001. Desired Result 1b: Percentage of students with disabilities who are employed within 12 months of exiting school [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 6% 8% 64% 65% 66% Actual Result - Percentage 4% N/A 63% - Number N/A N/A 367 Note 1: See Note 1, Desired Result 1a. Goal 2: Students with disabilities will succeed academically. Desired Result 2a: Percentage of students with disabilities ages 17-22 who earn a regular education diploma [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - % Mild Disabilities N/A N/A N/A 38.5% 37.0% 38.0% Desired Result - % Severe N/A N/A N/A 15.5% 15.5% 15.5% Desired Result - % Sensory N/A N/A N/A 60.0% 61.0% 62/0% Actual Result - % Mild N/A N/A N/A 37.1% - Number N/A N/A N/A 108 % Severe N/A N/A N/A 14.2% - Number N/A N/A N/A 52 % Sensory N/A N/A N/A 59.0% - Number N/A N/A N/A 56 Note 1: Previously, the percentage of students with disabilities who earned regular education diplomas were not segregated by disability level and type. Total percentages had been erroneously reported to show the number of students with disabilities earning a regular education diploma divided by the number of all students, not just students with disabilities. Note 2: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on FY 2000 data. Desired Result 2b: Percentage of students with disabilities ages 14-22 who drop out of school [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage Mild N/A N/A N/A N/A 47% 45% Desired Result - Percentage Severe N/A N/A N/A N/A 15.5% 14.5% Desired Result - Percentage Sensory Actual Result - Percentage Mild Number N/A N/A N/A N/A 28.0% 27% N/A N/A 46.44% 48.30% N/A N/A 2,982 3,357 Percentage Severe N/A N/A 24.64% 16.28% Number N/A N/A 152 97 Percentage Sensory N/A N/A 19.80% 29.09% Number N/A N/A 20 32 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on FY 2000 data. 559 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting 45% 40% 35% 30% Desired Result 2c: Percentage of students meeting 25% expectations on the reading portion of Georgia's Criterion 20% Referenced Competency Test the first time they take the 15% test [1] [2] [3] 10% Mild Intellectual Disability - Reading 35% 30% 31% 33% 28% 32% 34% 33% 35% 31% 41% 35% 33% 36% 38% FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired 5% 0% 4th Grade 6th Grade 8th Grade 45% Severe Intellectual Disability - 40% Reading 36% 35% 30% 37% 39% 35% 30% 23% 27% 24% 26% 25% 22% 27% 26% 28% 20% 30% 20% 15% 10% Note 1: Students "pass" the CRCT if they meet or exceed expectations. Note 2: The reading portion of the CRCT was given for the first time in FY 2001. Only students in the 4th, 6th, and 8th grades took the test. Beginning in FY 2002, the assessment will be given in grades 1 -- 8. FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired 5% 0% 4th Grade 6th Grade 8th Grade Note 3: The percentage of students with severe intellectual disabilities appears to be higher than they are. This is because the most severely intellectually disabled students are assessed using other, more appropriate, methods. 60% 50% 40% Sensory Disability - Reading 48% 52% 49% 51% 54% 46% 43% 42% 44% 46% 48% 47%49% 51% 46% 30% FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY02 Desired FY03 Desired FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired 20% 10% 0% 4th Grade 6th Grade 8th Grade 45% Mild Intellectual Disability - English/Language Arts 40% 34% 36%35%37% 35% 32% 30% 25% 19%19% 20% 22% 20% 21% 19% 24% 20% 18% 18% FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY03 Desired FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired 15% 10% 5% 0% 4th Grade 6th Grade 8th Grade Desired Result 2d: Percentage of students meeting expectations on the English/Language Arts portion of Georgia's Criterion Referenced Competency Test the first time they take the test [1] [2] [3] 560 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Note 1: Students "pass" the CRCT if they meet or exceed expectations. 45% 40% 35% Severe Intellectual Disability - English/Language Arts 38%34%39%41% 38% 25%39% 41% 37% 33% 35% FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY03 Desired FY00 Actual FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY02 Desired FY03 Desired 30% Note 2: The English/Language Arts portion of the CRCT was given for the first time in FY 2001. Only 25% students in the 4th, 6th, and 8th grades took the 20% test. Beginning in FY 2002, the assessment will be 15% given in grades 1 -- 8. 10% 22% 23% 19% 20% 5% 0% Sensory Disability - English/Language Arts 60% 51%52%52%54% 49% 50% 43%38% 44% 46% 41% 39% 38% 40% 35% 42% 40% 30% 4th Grade 6th Grade 8th Grade Note 3: The percentage of students with severe intellectual disabilities appears to be higher than it is. This is because the most severely intellectually disabled students are assessed using other, more appropriate, methods. 20% FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY03 Desired FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired 10% 0% 4th Grade 6th Grade Desired Result 2e: Percentage of students meeting expectations on the mathematics portion of Georgia's Criterion Referenced Competency Test the first time they take the test [1] [2] [3] 8th Grade Mild Intellectual Disability - Mathematics 35% 30% 31% 27%28%24%29% 27%24% 28% 30% 26% 25% 20% 15% 16% 16%17% 19% 14% 10% FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY03 Desired FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired 5% 0% 4th Grade 0% 6th Grade 8th Grade 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Severe Intellectual Disability - Mathematics 38% 40% 41% 38% 7% 23% 23%5% 20% 4% 18% 6% 8% 6% 8% FY00 Actual FY01 Actual FY00 Actual FY01 Actual FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY03 Desired 4th Grade 6th Grade 8th Grade Note 1: Students "pass" the CRCT if they meet or exceed expectations. Note 2: The mathematics portion of the CRCT was first given in FY 2001. Only students in the 4th, 6th, and 8th grades took the test. Beginning in FY 2002, the assessment will be given in grades 1 -- 8. 561 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Note 3: The percentage of students with severe intellectual 50% disabilities appears to be much higher than it is. This is because the most severely intellectually disabled students are assessed using other, more appropriate, methods. 40% 30% Sensory Disability - Mathematics 45%32%46%48% 43% 44% 45%47% 43% 38% 31% 33% 29%30%28% FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY03 Desired FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired FY00 Actual FY01 Desired FY01 Actual FY02 Desired FY03 Desired 20% 10% 0% 4th Grade 6th Grade 8th Grade Goal 3: Children with disabilities will be identified early to avoid falling behind in school. Desired Result 3a: Percentage of the total number of children age three and four identified as children with disabilities and served through an Individualize Education Plan by the local school system [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Estimated % age 3 N/A 2%-2.2% 2%-2.2% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% - Estimated % age 4 [1] [1] 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% Actual Result - % served age 3 2% 2.18% 2.09% Actual Result - % served age 4 [1] [1] 4.71% - Number 2,304 2,474 7858 Note 1: Public Health statistics show that between 2% and 2.2% of children have disabilities. Note 2: Data collected prior to the FY2000 school year included only three year old students. Desired Result 3b: Percentage of students with disabilities who pass the GKAP-R and meet academic and behavioral requirements to progress to first grade FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 This is a new Desired Result. The first Actual Results data (FY 2001 baseline data) will be available in CY 2002. Goal 4: Students with disabilities will be taught in the regular classroom with their peers to the maximum extent possible. Desired Result 4: Percentage of the total number of children with disabilities who are able to successfully participate in regular education classrooms [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - >80% of day N/A 37.3% 48% 40% 42% 44% - 40% -- 80% of day N/A N/A 28% 30% 33% 34% - <40% of day N/A N/A 20% 26% 25% 24% Actual Result - >80% of day 36.3% 37.4% 38% 36% - Number 53,633 55,269 52,095 56,011 - 40% -- 80% of day N/A N/A 39% 35% - Number N/A N/A 52,604 54,328 - <40% of day N/A N/A 27% 27% - Number N/A N/A 40,781 41,356 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on FY 2000 data. 562 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting STATE SCHOOLS (Subprogram) Purpose: Prepare sensory-impaired and multi-disabled students to become productive citizens by providing a learning environment addressing their academic, vocational, and social development. Goal 1: Students attending state schools will be adequately prepared for successful employment and further education . Desired Result 1a: Percentage of students who are successfully employed or attending a post secondary program 12 months following graduation [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result-Percentage: Total N/A 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% Actual Result - Percentage: Total N/A 73% 54% 81% - Number N/A 22 of 30 6 of 11 17 of 21 - Percentage: Workforce N/A 60% 45% 76% - Number N/A 18 5 16 - Percentage: Post-secondary N/A 13% 9% 5% - Number N/A 4 1 1 - Percentage: Other/unknown N/A NA 5 NA - Number N/A NA NA Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are of students graduating in FY 2000. Goal 2: Students will achieve academically. Desired Result 2a: Percentage of sensory impaired students who attend state schools who take the Criterion Referenced Competency Test (CRCT) as determined by statewide testing rule [Indicator] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage NA NA N/A N/A 80% 85% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N N/A 62% - Number N/A N/A N/A 37 of 60 Note 1: Some students have multiple disabilities that make other learning assessments more appropriate. Desired Result 2b: Percentage of students demonstrating significant improvement in the reading portion of the CRCT FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2001 data are not yet available. FY 2003 Desired Results will be based on FY 2001 Actual Results. Desired Result 2C: Percentage of students demonstrating significant improvement in the English/Language Arts portion of the CRCT FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2001 data are not yet available. FY 2003 Desired Results will be based on FY 2001 Actual Results. Desired Result 2D: Percentage of students demonstrating significant improvement in the mathematics portion of the CRCT FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2001 data are not yet available. FY 2003 Desired Results will be based on FY 2001 Actual Results. FY 2003 Goal 3: Sensory impaired children will be ready to learn in school. Desired Result 3b: Percentage of sensory impaired kindergarten students whose families had received early intervention services before the children's third birthday [Interim Indicator] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The program will begin collecting this data during FY 2002. Early intervention and brain research has shown that early identification and intervention improves learning outcomes for children with disabilities. This particularly important for the language and reading development of children with hearing impairments. 563 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting ENGLISH TO SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES (Subprogram) Purpose: Assist students whose native language is not English in developing proficiency in the English language sufficient to perform effectively at the currently assigned grade level. Goal 1: ESOL students will gain sufficient English proficiency to succeed in school. Desired Result 1a: Students' scores on the Language Assessment Battery Test 12 months after entering the program compared to their initial scores [Proxy] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The program does not collect these data. Because many factors affect educational achievement many factors, and the families of children in the ESOL program tend to be highly mobile, it is difficult to measure the academic progress of ESOL children. At a minimum, however, the program should begin assessing each child's progress in understanding and communicating English. ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION PROGRAM (Subprogram) Purpose: Facilitate psychological, disciplinary, health, and counseling services enabling students to be successful in their academic , social, emotional, and career development. Goal 1: Program services will enable students, who have had difficulty in traditional classroom settings, to succeed academically. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of Alternative Education Program students in grades 6-12 who pass 100% of their English/Language Arts, Math, Science, and Social Studies courses FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage Actual Result - Percentage - Number N/A N/A N/A N/A 18.7% 19.6% N/A N/A N/A 17.8% N/A N/A N/A 3,301/18,573 Desired Result 1b: Percentage of Alternative Education Program students in grades 6-12 who pass at least 51% of their core academic courses (English/Language Arts, Math, Science, and Social Studies) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 73.8% 77.3% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 70.3% - Number N/A N/A N/A 13,057/18,573 Goal 2: Fewer students referred to the Alternative Education Program will drop out of school. Desired Result 2: Percentage of current and former Alternative Education Program students who drop out of school FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 17.3% 16.4% Actual Result - Percentage - Number N/A N/A N/A 18.2% N/A N/A N/A 3,376/18,573 AT-RISK (Subprogram) Purpose: Children who are most at-risk of school failure will complete and succeed in school. Goal 1: Kindergarten students in Title 1A schools will meet or exceed State performance standards. Desired Result 1: Percentage of students attending kindergarten in schools that receive Title 1A funding that pass the GKAP- R and are promoted to first grade compared to kindergartners in all public schools [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - % Title IA schoolwide N/A N/A N/A N/A 95% 95% - % Title IA targeted assistance N/A N/A N/A N/A 96% 96% Actual Result - % Title IA schoolwide - Number N/A N/A N/A 91% N/A N/A N/A 7,365/8,062 - % Title IA targeted assistance - Number N/A N/A N/A 95% N/A N/A N/A 1,959/2,056 - All Public Schools N/A N/A N/A 93% 564 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Notes: At-Risk Subprogram; Goal 1; Desired Result 1. Note 1: Title 1A serves eligible children who are failing or most at-risk of failing to meet the state's performance standards. Title IA schools with 50% or more poverty may elect to become schoolwide and serve both eligible and non-eligible children. In FY 2000, 54% of Georgia's schools (1,032 of 1,911) were Title 1A schools. Note 2: Student achievement data reported for targeted assistance schools include all students in the grade assessed, thus, the scores of Title IA students in some schools may be masked by the scores of more numerous other students. Goal 2: Students in grades 4 and 8 attending schools receiving Title IA funding will meet or exceed State performance standards. Desired Result 2a: Percentage of students assessed in Title IA schools that are at proficient or better on the reading portion of the CRCT compared to percentage of student in all public schools [1] [2] 100% 80% 4th Grade Reading 75% 67% 65% 80% 72% 81% 73% 90% 85% 8th Grade Reading 87% 82% 80% 87% 81% 60% 80% 76% 75% 40% 75% Title 1A School Title IA-Targeted All Schools Title 1A School Title IA-Targeted Title 1A School Title IA-Targeted Title 1A School Title IA-Targeted All Schools Title 1A School Title IA-Targeted Title 1A School Title IA-Targeted 20% 70% 0% FY 2001 Actual FY 2002 Desired FY 2003 Desired Note 1: Number of 4th grade students proficient in FY 2001: Title IA Schoolw ide: 34,551 of 51,628; Title IA Targeted: 14,284 of 19,022 65% FY 2001 Actual FY 2002 Desired FY 2003 Desired Note 2: Number of 8th grade students proficient in FY 2001: Title IA Schoolw ide: 19,867 of 26,171; Title IA Targeted: 12,971 of 15,808 Desired Result 2b: Percentage of students assessed in Title IA schools that are at least proficient on the mathematics portion of the CRCT compared to percentage of student in all public schools [1] [2] 100% 80% 60% 4th Grade Math 64% 63% 54% 80% 72% 81% 74% 100% 80% 60% 8th Grade Math 87% 80% 56% 58% 48% 88% 82% Title IA School Title IA Targeted All Schools Title 1A School Title IA-Targeted Title 1A School Title IA-Targeted Title IA School Title IA Target All Schools Title 1A School Title IA-Targeted Title 1A School Title IA-Targeted 40% 40% 20% 20% 0% FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Actual Desired Desired Note 1: Number of 4th grade students proficient in FY 2001: Title IA Schoolw ide: 27,618 of 51,400; Title IA Targeted: 12,163 of 19,096. 0% FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Actual Desired Desired Note 2: Number of 8th grade students proficient in FY 2001: Title IA Schoolw ide: 12,376 of 25,924; Title IA Targeted: 8,852 of 15,700. Goal 3: Students in grades 9-12 attending schools that receive Title IA funds will meet or exceed State performance standards. 100% 91% 94% 95% 89% 91% 96% 91% 94% 91% 94% Title 1A School All Schools Title IA School Title IA-Targeted All Schools Title 1A School Title IA-Targeted Title 1A School Title IA-Targeted Desired Result 3a - The percentage of students assessed in Title 1A schools that pass the English/Language Arts portion of the Georgia High School Graduate Test the first time they take it compared to students in all public schools 80% 60% 40% 20% 3,665/ 2,027/ 0% 4,028 2,157 FY 2000 Actual 3,894/ 3,106/ 4,364 3,420 FY 2001 Actual FY 2002 Desired FY 2003 Desired 565 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Title 1A School Title IA-Targeted All Schools Title IA School Title IA-Targeted All Schools Title 1A School Title IA-Targeted Title 1A School Title IA-Targeted 100% 88% 94% 92% 80% 60% 40% 20% 3,542/ 2,024/ 4,041 2,144 0% FY 2000 Actual 84% 86% 96% 88% 94% 94% 88% 3,675/ 2,957/ 4,364 3,420 FY 2001 Actual FY 2002 Desired FY 2003 Desired Desired Result 3b - The percentage of students assessed in Title 1A schools that pass the mathematics portion of the Georgia High School Graduate Test the first time they take it compared to students in all public schools Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual 1,862,972,052 1,335,229,023 FY 2002 Budget 1,885,603,804 1,375,582,768 FY 2003 Recommended 1,859,520,838 1,350,299,017 EDUCATION SUPPORT Purpose: Ensure that all Georgia's K-12 students are able and willing to learn by providing services that support academic achievement. SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION (Subprogram) Purpose: To provide safe, cost effective, and timely transportation to and from Georgia's public schools. Goal 1: Reduce the number of school bus accidents per 100,000,000 miles. Desired Result 1a: School bus accidents per 100 million miles [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Actual Results data are unreliable. The program receives accident reports from the Department of Public Safety and local school systems. When program staff try to match reports from the two sources, it is evident that neither source remits all reports. SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY NUTRITION (Subprogram) Purpose: To deliver healthy foods, meals, and education that contribute to our customers' nutritional well-being and performance at school and work. Goal 1: Students will eat nutritious meals at Georgia schools. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of Georgia's public school students K-12 in attendance and choosing a school lunch as their midday meal at school [Proxy Measure] [1] Desired Result - Percentage Actual Result - Percentage - Number FY 1998 N/A 70.9 955,144 of 1,346,623 FY 1999 71.2% 73.6 939,719 of 1,276,163 FY 2000 72% 73.3 949,748 of 1,294,868 FY 2001 73% 73.8 964,098 of 1,305,937 FY 2002 73.5% FY 2003 74% Note 1: The use of this measure as a proxy for the degree to which students have access to nutritious noonday meals is hampered by the Actual Results reported in Desired Result 1d: In FY 2001, only 22% of schools met basic federal nutrition standards. Desired Result 1b: Percentage of economically needy students that choose a school lunch as their midday meal compared to percentage of economically needy students [Proxy Measure] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage Total N/A N/A N/A N/A 86% 87% Actual Result - Percentage - Total - Number N/A 87% 85.2% 86.2% 512,834 of 505,119 of 519,368 of N/A 589,616 592787 602,492 566 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Note for Nutrition Program; Goal 1, Desired Result 1b. Note 1: The adjacent graph shows the precentage of students qualifying for free and reduced lunches that choose school lunches. 100% 80% 60% 88% 82% 86% 81% 87% 83% Free Lunch 433,682/493,405 Reduced- Price 79,152/96,211 Free Lunch 420,939/488,771 Reduced- Price 84,180/104,016 Free Lunch 428,882/492,855 Reduced- Price 90,486/109,637 40% 20% 0% FY99 FY00 Desired Result 1d: Percentage of schools certified as meeting new federal nutrition standards [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 16% 16% 20% Actual Result - Percentage 13% 17% 16% 22% - Number 244/1,820 305/1,820 318/1,946 430/1,946 Note 1: Results are cumulative. FY01 FY 2002 30% FY 2003 40% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual 532,277,729 348,320,615 FY 2002 Budget 554,760,187 363,297,055 FY 2003 Recommended 535,830,435 344,383,024 Total - All Programs FY 2001 Actual FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommended Total Funds State Funds 6,653,471,615 5,805,343,578 6,789,237,245 5,954,995,364 6,801,382,845 5,967,140,963 ATTACHED AGENCIES OFFICE OF SCHOOL READINESS PREKINDERGARTEN PROGRAM (PRE-K) Purpose: Successfully prepare children and their parents for school by providing appropriate instruction and learning experiences through a balance of teacher-directed and child-initiated activities. Goal 1: Children who participate in lottery-funded Pre-K programs will be academically prepared for school. Desired Result 1: Percentage of children who participated in the state's lottery funded Pre-K program that demonstrate evidence of the necessary level of readiness on the academic portion of GKAP-R developmental screen the first time they are assessed compared to the percentage who did not attend a preschool program [1]. Note 2: In FY 2000, 49,149 children were reported through GKAP-R test results as attending Pre-K. The actual Pre-K enrollment was higher. Efforts are underway to improve the accuracy of future data. Pre-K Actual No Pre-K Actual Pre-K Desired No Pre-K Desired Pre-K Actual No Pre-K Actual Pre-K Desired No Pre-K Desired Pre-K Desired No Pre-K Desired 85% 90% 80% 70% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% FY00 85%65%85% 64% FY01 85% 65% FY02 85% 65% FY03 567 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: Children who participate in lottery-funded Pre-K programs will be behaviorally prepared for kindergarten. Desired Result 2: Percentage of children who participated in the state's lottery-funded Pre-K program that demonstrate evidence of the necessary level of readiness on the behavioral skills basic developmental screen the first time they are assessed compared to the percentage who did not attend a preschool program FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - % pre-k students N/A N/A 75% 75% 80% 80% - % students with no pre-k N/A N/A 70% 70% 70% 70% Actual Result - % pre-k students N/A N/A 79% 79% - % students with no pre-k N/A N/A 73% 69% - number pre-k students N/A N/A 49,088 51,140 - number students with no pre-k N/A N/A 19,646 12,951 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Lottery Funds FY 2001 Actual 368,188,939 232,645,928 FY 2002 Budget 373,481,513 237,868,003 FY 2003 Recommendation 322,331,654 245,186,797 CHILD CARE SERVICES Purpose: Ensure that child care learning centers participating in the Prekindergarten Program are in compliance with state rules and regulations and are providing care in a safe, healthy, and properly operated facility. Goal 1: All child care learning centers that participate in the Prekindergarten program will provide a safe, healthy, and well-operated learning environment. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of Pre-K learning centers that meet the criteria for Center of Distinction Certificates, an award for meeting high quality program standards [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A 9% 10% 10% 12% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A 5% 7% - Number N/A N/A 42 44 Note 1: The Standards of Care (SoC) program standards are based on nationally recognized assessment tools for center-based care and address categories in centers that indicate the total quality of the center, including Space and Furnishings, Personal Care Routines, Language-Reasoning, Activities, Interaction and Program Structure. Data Note 2: SoC participants must be participating in the Pre-K program and licensed by OSR. Desired Result 1b: Percentage of centers that have no deficiencies identified during their annual inspections FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 4% 5% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 3% - Number N/A N/A N/A 32/1,067 FY 2003 6% Desired Result 1c: Percentage of centers in which deficiencies were identified during their annual inspections that have corrected the deficiencies at the time of the first follow-up visit. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 15% 17% 19% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 15% - Number N/A N/A N/A 144 of 960 568 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1d: Percentage of centers with a history of not complying with serious health and safety requirements that are brought into compliance and comply with health and safety requirements for at least a year. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 10% 12% 15% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 8% - Number N/A N/A N/A 1 of 13 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual 368,188,939 1,269,256 FY 2002 Budget 373,481,513 1,326,677 FY 2003 Recommendation 322,331,654 1,308,583 NUTRITION Purpose: Children and adults attending and/or participating in child care centers, adult day care centers, emergency shelters, family day care homes, after-school programs, and the summer food service program will have access to nutritious meals. Goal 1: Children and adults in participating year-round programs will be provided nutritious meals. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of program sponsors with documentation sufficient to support their compliance with USDA nutritional standards FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A 40% 40% 40% 40% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A 40% 34% - Number N/A N/A 124 of 310 156 of 459 Desired Result 1b: Percentage of program sponsors who could not document compliance with USDA nutritional compliance at their initial inspection that corrected deficiencies before the follow-up inspection FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Baseline data for this new measure will be based on FY 2002 Actual Results. Goal 2: All eligible children will have access to nutritious meals and snacks provided through the summer food service program. Desired Result 2: Percentage of counties that participate in the Summer Food Service program FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 60% 67% 68% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 67% - Number N/A N/A N/A 108 of 159 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual 368,188,939 0 FY 2002 Budget 373,481,513 0 FY 2003 Recommended 322,331,654 0 Total - All Programs Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual 368,188,939 233,915,184 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommended 373,481,513 239,194,680 322,331,654 246,495,380 569 EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM Results-Based Budgeting EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM Purpose: To provide all state personnel in qualified positions and their families retirement benefits relative to their service and compensation in the event of their retirement, death, or disability. Goal 1: Ensure adequate financing for future benefits due and other obligations of the retirement system by using a conservative long-term philosophy to invest prudently the retirement system assets. Desired Result 1: The retirement system's Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) will liquidate between 15 and 25 years. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 15-25 15-25 15-25 15-25 15-25 Actual Result 20 20 7 negative [1] Note 1: The actual result represents the number of years that the UAAL is expected to liquidate per the Report of the Actuary. The UAAL is the amount that the Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL) exceeds the Actuarial Value of Assets. A negative UAAL means that the Actuarial Value of Assets exceeds the AAL. Program Fund Allocation: Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $11,416,521 $2,992,000 FY 2001 Actual $11,416,521 $2,992,000 FY 2002 Budget $6,899,083 $0 FY 2003 Recommended $6,861,230 $0 FY 2002 Budget $6,899,083 $0 FY 2003 Recommended $6,861,230 $0 570 STATE FORESTRY COMMISSION Results-Based Budgeting FOREST PROTECTION Purpose: Protect Georgia's forest acreage from devastation by wildfire and provide citizens a safe environment to live in. Goal 1: Forest fires and damage associated with forest fires will decline. Desired Result 1a: The number of forest fires FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result - Forest Fires NA 7,898 8,194 Actual Result - Forest Fires 6,579 11,004 11,712 FY 2001 6,579 8,194 FY 2002 8,743 FY 2003 8,743 Desired Result 1b: The number of acres burned in forest fires. FY 1998 Desired Result NA Actual Result 36,600 FY 1999 31,745 47,370 FY 2000 32,062 71,737 FY 2001 31,745 32,062 FY 2002 37,084 FY 2003 37,084 Desired Result 1c: Homes and outbuildings destroyed by forest fires FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result NA 210 Actual Result 236 301 FY 2000 214 251 FY 2001 222 214 FY 2002 222 FY 2003 222 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $38,289,765 $30,630,804 FY 2002 Budget $36,590,184 $32,095,072 FY 2003 Recommended $35,328,425 $29,994,622 FOREST MANAGEMENT Purpose: Optimize the economic and environmental benefits of Georgia's forests by providing leadership and technical assistance in managing forest resources. Goal 1: Georgia's forests will be well managed and erosion resulting from improper forest operations will not impair water quality. Desired Result 1a: Landowners managing forests with a written plan will increase. Proxy Measure [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 3,140 3,391 3,560 3,345 3,700 Actual Result 2,890 3,720 3,690 4,822 Note 1: Data indicate that forests managed with a written plan are managed in a more efficient and sustainable manner. Desired Result 1b: Percent of logging operations that are in compliance with best management practices will be stable. Proxy Measure [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 67% 75% 75% 75% [2] 75% 80% 79% 85% 85% Note 1: Compliance with best management practices reduces erosion. Note 2: Compliance survey is only conducted bi-annually, both actual and desired results will have the same number for two consecutive years. 571 STATE FORESTRY COMMISSION - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: Forest land will be more productive Desired Result 2a: Acres reforested with genetically improved trees will remain stable. Proxy Measure [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result (acres) NA 76,900 76,900 76,900 76,900 Actual Result (acres) 75,400 70,800 79,230 58,838 Note 1: Genetically improved trees improve productivity by 10-25%. FY 2003 76,900 Desired Result 2b: Amount of waste residue that results form the processing of raw logs FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA NA Note 1: This function was eliminated due to a budget reduction. FY 2001 NA NA FY 2002 NA FY 2003 NA Goal 3: Teachers, community leaders and the general public will be more aware of the value of Georgia's forest resources. Desired Result 3a: Percent of workshop participants that rate the information they received as valuable. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% Actual Result 98% 98% 98% 72% Goal 4: Urban forests will be managed in an effective manner to improve tree health, increase the populations of trees and be sustainable. Desired Result 4a: Number of Georgia's 533 cities that are certified as a "Tree City USA" by the national arbor day foundation. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 85 85 85 87 88 79 81 81 91 Program Fund Allocation: Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $8,405,070 $6,723,835 FY 2001 Actual $46,694,835 $37,354,639 FY 2002 Budget $8,031,992 $7,045,260 FY 2003 Recommended $7,758,448 $6,584,185 FY 2002 Budget $44,622,176 $39,140,332 FY 2003 Recommended $43,086,873 $36,578,807 572 GEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Results-Based Budgeting GEORGIA CRIME INFORMATION CENTER Purpose: Provide accurate, timely and complete criminal justice information to criminal justice agencies to enable them to carry out their public safety functions and to the public at large to be used as provided by law. Goal 1: The criminal justice information available from GCIC to all entities authorized by law will be more complete. Desired Result 1a: Law enforcement agencies will report 95% of all arrests to the Georgia Crime Information Center. Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA 80% FY 1999 85% 85% FY 2000 90% 90% FY 2001 95% 86% FY 2002 95% FY 2003 95% Desired Result 1b: 85% of the felony arrests on file for a reporting period of 1-7 years prior will have a corresponding disposition reported. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 82% 90% 82% 90% 80% 85% 78% 85% 85% Desired Result 1c: Georgia law enforcement agencies needed to represent 90% of Georgia's population will continue to maintain participation in the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program by submitting UCR data to GCIC. (# of agencies/% of population). FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 85% 90% 88% 90% 86% 90% 100% 90% 90% Goal 2: Criminal justice information will be processed by the central repository accurately and in a timely manner. Desired Result 2a: The Georgia Crime information Center (GCIC) will continue to process at least 95% of all reported arrest data processed through the central repository within 2 days of receipt. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 85% 95% 95% 95% 99% 95% 95% 95% 95% Desired Result 2b: GCIC will process at least 95% of all reported disposition data through the central repository within 35 days of receipt. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 85% 95% 95% 95% 98% 95% 95% 95% 95% Desired Result 2c: GCIC will continue to process 95% of submitted applicant cards within 5 days of receipt by the central repository. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% Actual Result 90% 95% 95% 95% 573 GEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 2d: GCIC will continue to maintain an accuracy rate of 97% for all criminal history information processed by the central repository. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 90% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 96% 95% 95% Desired Result 2e: The percentage of law enforcement agencies performing complete and timely validations of all Law Enforcement Data System/National Crime Information Center wanted person records will remain at 95% (380+ agencies). Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA 90% FY 1999 95% 97% FY 2000 95% 96% FY 2001 95% 100% FY 2002 95% FY 2003 95% Desired Result 2f: The percentage of criminal justice agencies audited that achieve a satisfactory compliance rating when the audit process is completed by GCIC will remain at 95%. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% NA 95% NA Goal 3: Background checks of potential firearm buyers conducted for federally licensed firearms dealers will be provided in a timely and accurate manner. Desired Result 3a: The percentage of all requested firearm purchase background checks to be completed in less than 3 minutes will remain at 85%. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% Actual Result 85% 85% 90% 100% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $14,441,535 $12,687,070 FY 2002 Budget $12,629,910 $12,629,910 FY 2003 Recommended $12,479,219 $12,479,219 CRIME LABORATORIES Purpose: Provide scientific support to criminal justice agencies to enable them to detect, apprehend, and prosecute criminals by performing accurate, useful, and timely laboratory analyses and testimony. Goal 1: To provide accurate, useful, and timely scientific analyses and testimony. Desired Result 1a: The GBI Crime Lab will pass an annual audit review which examines the adequacy of the laboratory's quality controls. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass NA Passed Passed Passed Note 1: No major non-conformities will be identified in the audit and no more than 20% minor non-conformities will be identified. 574 GEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1b: Maintain a customer satisfactory rating of 90% or above on a scale of (0-100) for scientific reports as measured by customer survey. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 90% 90% 91% 90% 93% 90% 91% 90% 90% Desired Result 1c: 90% percent of the single service [1] cases will be completed within 30 days. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA 55% 55% 60% Actual Result 46% 59% 62% 75% Note 1: A single service case is a case where only 1 lab test is performed. FY 2002 80% FY 2003 90% Desired Result 1d: 90 percent of the multiple service [1] cases will be completed within 60 days. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 55% 55% 60% 80% 90% Actual Result NA 40% 56% 78% NA NA Note 1: A multiple service case is one where multiple lab tests are performed. (Example: Blood covered gun - ballistics test for the gun and DNA test on the blood.) Desired Result 1e: 90 percent of multiple service cases requiring separate labs will be completed within 90 days. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 55% 55% 60% 80% Actual Result NA NA 56% 36% FY 2003 90% Desired Result 1f: 75 percent of death cases completed within 60 days. FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result NA 55% Actual Result NA 44% FY 2000 55% 58% FY 2001 60% 46% FY 2002 60% FY 2003 75% Goal 2: Improve the breath and depth of forensic services. Desired Result 2a: The GBI Crime Lab will enable the DNA unit to have complete DNA profiles on all offenders covered by current Georgia statute within 30 days. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 30 days 60 days 60 days 60 days 60 days 30 days 120 days 30 days 30 days Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $23,936,699 $20,849,446 FY 2002 Budget $22,215,781 $22,215,781 FY 2003 Recommended $21,720,009 $21,720,009 575 GEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION - Results-Based Budgeting INVESTIGATIVE DIVISION/CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS Purpose: Provide investigative services, intelligence information, specialized units and training to criminal justice agencies in order to promote public safety. Goal 1: Assist criminal justice agencies in solving crimes. Desired Result 1a: Maintain a rating of met or exceeded from at least 80% of the criminal justice agencies that requested and utilized investigative assistance. FY 1998 Desired Result 80% Actual Result 96% Note 1: Survey to be conducted in January 2002 at Command College. FY 1999 80% 97% FY 2000 80% 96% FY 2001 80% [1] FY 2002 80% FY 2003 80% Desired Result 1b: Maintain a rating of met or exceeded from at least 80% of the criminal justice agencies that requested drug enforcement assistance. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% Actual Result 94% 83% 84% [1] Note 1: Survey to be conducted in January 2002 at Command College. Desired Result 1c: Maintain a rating of met or exceeded from at least 80% of the criminal justice agencies that requested specialized law enforcement assistance. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result 80% 94% 80% 80% 80% 92% 80% [1] 80% 80% Note 1: Survey to be conducted in January 2002 at Command College. Goal 2: Participate in drug abuse awareness training of 5th and 6th grade students by providing law enforcement officers with the specialized skills necessary to teach the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) program. Desired Result 2a: The percentage [1] of the qualified officers that apply for DARE Officer slots who successfully graduate from training. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result 90% 92% 90% 96% 90% 97% 90% 93% 90% 90% Note 1: This program trains qualified officers to a standard set by DARE, and passing the course meets the standard. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $37,228,195 $29,079,169 FY 2002 Budget $31,806,882 $31,806,882 FY 2003 Recommended $32,645,925 $31,232,255 576 GEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION - Results-Based Budgeting ATTACHED AGENCIES CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATION Purpose: To provide leadership in the coordination of the major components of the state's criminal justice system. Goal 1: Assist statewide criminal justice program initiatives by providing financial assistance. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of approved project sub-grantees who report that crime prevention efforts were positively enhanced as a result of CJCC's efforts. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 98% 98% NA NA NA [2.] Actual Result 98% [1] 318 of 324 NA NA NA [1] Note 1: Data is not currently collected for this measure. The data was last collected in FY 1998. Note 2: This measure will be revised for FY 2004 Budget Report. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $61,884,830 $395,160 FY 2002 Budget $31,628,055 $416,799 FY 2003 Recommended $31,601,843 $360,437 Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $137,491,259 $63,010,845 FY 2002 Budget $98,280,628 $67,069,372 FY 2003 Recommended $98,446,996 $65,791,920 577 GEORGIA STATE FINANCING AND INVESTMENT COMMISSION Results-Based Budgeting CONSTRUCTION Purpose: Ensure that state building construction meets the needs of state agencies and is completed as expeditiously and economically as possible by providing construction management services when requested. Goal 1: Agencies requesting assistance will be satisfied with the program's construction management. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of construction projects completed that are within 100% of the budget. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 95% 95% 95% 95% Not given NA 100% 84% Not given Desired Result 1b: The percentage of clients requesting services who report that they are satisfied with GSFIC's services. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA Not given Actual Result NA NA NA NA Note 1: This is a new measure and data for past years is not available. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $11,577,324 $0 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommended $6,932,010 $6,584,610 $0 $0 FINANCING AND INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT Purpose: Ensure that Georgia's general obligation bonds are issued at the lowest possible rates and earn the maximum amount of income permitted by law and that the process used to issue bonds and invest bond proceeds and cash appropriations and to disburse bond proceeds and fund capital projects that are efficient and effective. Goal 1: Reduce the state's cost of borrowing for capital projects by issuing general obligation bonds at the lowest possible rate. Desired Result 1a: Bond issues will sell at the lowest possible cost to the state as shown by the effective interest rate that is within 5 basis points (.05%) of other state AAA debt issued during the same time period. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result (Basis Points) Actual Result (Basis points) NA 5.0 5.0 5.0 NA Not given 4.8 4.4 5.2 Not given Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $1,286,369 $0 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommended $770,223 $731,623 $0 $0 Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $12,863,693 $0 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommended $7,702,233 $7,316,233 $0 $0 578 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR Results-Based Budgeting OFFICE OF PLANNING AND BUDGET PLANNING, BUDGET AND EVALUATION Purpose: Guide and monitor the implementation of the Governor's annual budget, ensuring that state agencies use strategic plans to implement policies, and evaluate programs and operations. Goal 1: The state's annual budget will reflect the Governor's priorities and policies, and set the tone for fiscal accountability. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of agency measures [1] in the FY 2003 Budget Report that are outcome oriented results. [2] Desired Result FY 1998 NA FY 1999 70% Actual Result - outcomes / all measures 47% 73% Note 1: Sample counted represents 95% of agencies and 99% of funding. Note 2: This includes Proxy measures and Indicators. Actual Result FY 2000 80% 79% FY 2001 80% 89 % 484 / 544 FY 2002 80% FY 2003 90% Desired Result 1b: Percentage of desired results in the budget report that are achieved. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA 55% 55% 55% Actual Result 33% NA 69% 56% [1] Note 1: Sample counted represents major agencies who represent the majority of the state budget. FY 2002 55% FY 2003 60% Desired Result 1c: The annual budget will be balanced and total expenditures will not exceed total revenues. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA Yes Yes Yes Yes Actual Result Yes Yes Yes Yes FY 2003 Yes Desired Result 1d: The state's general obligation bonds will maintain a AAA rating. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result NA AAA AAA Actual Result AAA AAA AAA FY 2001 AAA AAA FY 2002 AAA FY 2003 AAA Desired Result 1e: Issue papers that address emerging public concerns to develop and implement policy FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Number of papers NA 6 4 6 6 Actual Result - Number of papers NA 54 [1] 20 [1] 22 [2] Note 1: A large percent of OPB's staff was involved in drafting papers for the Governor's Education Reform Commission. Note 2: Papers were prepared in Fall 2000 for the Governor's Education Reform Commission - 2000. FY 2003 6 579 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: State executive agencies will use strategic planning , RBB information and program evaluation information to implement policy and improve agency management. Desired Result 2a: The percentage of strategic plans that are consistent with and linked to the state strategic plan. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 60% 65% 65% 65% 65% Actual Result 49% NA NA [1] NA [1] Note 1: The new state strategic plan had not been released. Desired Result 2b: The percentage of agencies submitting RBB data that report having used results data for policy and decision-making. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 40% 40% 40% 40% Actual Result NA NA 63% [1] 64% [1] Note 1: Based on a sample. Please see the FY 2002 Budget Report for details. Desired Result 2c: The percentage of state agencies that report at least 70% of the recommendations in evaluation and management service reports [1] completed in FY 2001 were implemented within 12 months of the report's release. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 68% 70% NA [2] 70% NA [2] 70% 100% [1] 70% 70% Note 1: There was one evaluation/management service report completed in FY 2001 that recommended positions for transfer to a new agency. Note 2: Program evaluation staff was fully committed to GERSC. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $9,799,088 $9,688,421 FY 2002 Budget $11,980,552 $11,980,552 FY 2003 Recommended $11,748,723 $11,748,723 GEORGIA COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS STATEWIDE ARTS DEVELOPMENT Purpose: Stimulate public interest and participation in the arts by encouraging artistic expression; assisting communities in creating performing, visual and literary art; and preserving the state's artistic heritage. Goal 1: Opportunities will exist for Georgians to experience the broadest possible range of the arts, and Georgia's cultural heritage will be preserved. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of Georgia's counties that GCA supported arts education programs serve. (coverage) Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA 25% (40 of 159) FY 1999 20% (32 of 159) 23% (36 of 159) FY 2000 25 % (40 of 159) 20 % (32 of 159) FY 2001 20% (32 of 159) NA FY 2002 25% (40 of 159) FY 2003 NA 580 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1b: The percentage of master artists that have individuals apprenticing with them to learn traditional arts who are selected for council funding. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - # funded / # applied NA 47% 44% 50% NA NA Actual Result - # funded / # applied NA 66% (6 / 9) 38% (8 / 21) 50% (12 / 24) Note 1: The folk-life director screens out artists who do not meet the "master" criteria. The applicants selected for funding are those that meet the "master artist" criteria. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $5,837,268 $4,879,985 FY 2002 Budget $5,853,643 $5,139,798 FY 2003 Recommended $5,333,568 $4,624,475 ATTACHED AGENCIES GEORGIA COMMISSION ON EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IMPLEMENTATION OF ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS Purpose: To promote the elimination of discrimination in public employment and the sale, rental or financing of dwellings in Georgia. (O.C.G.A. 45-19-20, et seq., & 8-3-200, et seq.) Goal 1: All aspects of public employment and the housing market will be free from illegal discrimination. Desired Result 1a: The number of complaints regarding discrimination in employment and housing that are supported by fact and settled in some manner. [1.] FY 1998 Desired Result NA Actual Result NA Note 1: This is a new measure that was recommended by OPB. FY 1999 NA NA FY 2000 NA NA FY 2001 NA NA FY 2002 NA FY 2003 NA Desired Result 1b: The dollar value of settlement awards that victims of employment and housing discrimination receive. Indicator [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA $176,898 $176,898 $70,000 $70,000 NA Actual Result [2] $176,898 $67,695 $687,050 NA Note 1: This is the total amount collected for: (1.) public employment and (2.) housing. Note 2: In FY 2000 the commission collected an unusually large amount in housing settlements. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $1,446,686 $848,998 FY 2002 Budget $1,203,532 $900,561 FY 2003 Recommended $1,137,493 $834,522 581 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR - Results-Based Budgeting GEORGIA OFFICE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS CONSUMER PROTECTION/LAW ENFORCEMENT Purpose: To protect consumers and small business from unfair and deceptive practices. Goal 1: Address proactively the problem of consumer civil and criminal fraud by investigation, providing assistance to attorney's and preventive education. Desired Result 1a: The amount of savings [1] consumers benefit from due to the Office of Consumer Affairs' actions. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA $3,500,000 $5,000,000 $3,900,000 Actual Result $1,641,507 $6,674,438 $6,246,000 $1,349,733 Note 1: The definition of the "amount of savings" was not provided by the agency at the time of publication. FY 2002 $3,900,000 FY 2003 $3,900,000 Desired Result 1b: At the close of presentations, the percentage of participants in consumer education endeavors who state that the presentation benefited them. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% Actual Result NA 63% 66% 72% Desired Result (recommended): The number of violations [1.] of the fair business practices act and other applicable laws that the Office of Consumer Affairs oversees. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Note 1: Data is not collected for this measure. Goal 2: Provide assistance to consumers with lemon law complaints. Desired Result 2a: The amount consumers save through vehicle repurchase or replacement as a result of the OCA's lemon law involvement. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA $9,300,000 $9,300,000 $9,500,000 $9,500,000 $9,500,000 $13,356,000 $7,560,000 $12,180,000 $10,437,000 Desired Result 2b: The number of vehicles replaced or repurchased as a result of OCA's lemon law involvement. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 500 500 500 500 500 Actual Result 636 360 580 497 582 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR - Results-Based Budgeting PUBLIC UTILITY\CONSUMER AND SMALL BUSINESS PROTECTION (SubProgram) Purpose: To represent residential and small business users of gas, electric and telecommunications before the Public Service Commission and the courts. Goal 1: Represent the interests of the class comprised of rate paying utility residential customers and small business. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of PSC hearings and other forums that staff of the Consumer's Utility Council attends to represent the consumer's point of view. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Note 1: There is no measure available that can rate the quality of this function. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $4,258,114 $3,778,121 FY 2002 Budget $4,214,048 $4,016,048 FY 2003 Recommended $3,951,971 $3,734,282 OFFICE OF HUMAN RELATIONS Program Note: This is a new program with a new director. The goals and measure are suggestions that represent the types of measures required by RBB. They were developed using information from the OHR web page and the O.C.G.A.. STATE ASSISTANCE IN IMPROVING HUMAN RELATIONS Purpose: To assist the state and its people to achieve a positive human relations climate that assures fairness among all individuals and groups. [1] Goal 1: Enhance the capacity of the state to foster a more positive and fair climate for human relations. Desired Result 1a: The number of interventions by that result in a more positive climate for human relations. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA NA NA Note 1: This is a new program with a new director. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $452,877 $452,877 FY 2002 Budget $540,870 $540,870 FY 2003 Recommended $521,288 $521,288 583 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR - Results-Based Budgeting GEORGIA EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY DISASTER PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY Purpose: Reduce the effects of disasters and emergencies by coordinating aggressive response and recovery programs for local and state governments to save lives and protect property. Goal 1: State and local emergency personnel will be prepared for disasters and emergencies. Desired Result 1a: The percent of state agencies and local emergency management agencies that have approved plans for protecting people and property from harm in disaster and emergency situations. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA Actual Result 37% (51) Note 1: School system emergency plans were included in FY 1999. 55% 131 [1] > 83% 84% 136 of 161 > 84% 86% 138 of 161 > 84% > 84% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds OFFICE OF THE CHILD ADVOCATE FY 2001 Actual $45,064,338 $2,971,309 FY 2002 Budget $6,664,884 $2,582,517 FY 2003 Recommended $6,318,179 $2,235,812 Program Note: This is a new program with a new director. Their RBB will appear in next years Budget Report. Check the OCA web page for additional information Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $383,014 $299,415 FY 2002 Budget $392,659 $392,659 FY 2003 Recommended $779,776 $779,776 OFFICE OF CONSUMERS' INSURANCE ADVOCATE Program Note: This is a new program with a new director. The goals and measure are suggestions that represent the types of measures required by RBB. They were developed using information from the OCIA web page and the O.C.G.A. CONSUMER ADVOCACY Purpose: To serve consumers as an independent voice to promote and protect their interests on insurance matters. Goal 1: Georgia consumers will be assured appropriate and quality insurance coverage at the lowest reasonable rates. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of recommendations to the Insurance Commissioner [1] that are implemented. [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA NA Note 1: These recommendations can be regarding rate hikes or other regulatory matters. Note 2: This is a new measure suggested by the Office of Planning and Budget. FY 2001 NA NA FY 2002 NA FY 2003 NA 584 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1b: The percentage of consumer complaints that are successfully resolved. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA NA NA Note 1: The definition of a successfully resolved complaint is not currently available because this is a suggested measure. FY 2003 NA Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $802,318 $802,318 FY 2002 Budget $1,013,306 $1,013,306 FY 2003 Recommended $906,666 $906,666 OFFICE OF EDUCATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY Program Note: This is a new program with a new director. The Office of Educational Accountability is finalizing it's measures and setting up data collection systems. Their RBB will appear in next years Budget Report. Please refer to the Office of Educational Accountability's web site at http://www.ga-oea.org/ or contact the Governor's Office of Planning and Budget for additional information. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $2,080,105 $2,080,105 FY 2002 Budget $2,761,345 $2,761,345 FY 2003 Recommended $2,718,331 $2,718,331 PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS COMMISSION EDUCATOR PREPARATION Purpose: Ensure Georgia educators are prepared through a variety of programs; enter the profession skilled, knowledgeable, and able to address the diverse needs of students in Georgia; and remain current and effective throughout their careers. Goal 1: Second career teaching candidates without a degree in education, but with bachelor's degrees in recognized shortage fields will be certified through a program provided by school systems and RESAs and approved by the Professional Standards Commission. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of program participants who agree that following their internship, they were ready for the classroom. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result Note 1: Data is not collected for this measure. NA NA 85% 85% 85% 85% NA NA NA NA [1] 585 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1b: The percentage of employers of program participants who agree that, following an internship, they were ready for the classroom. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA 80% 80% 80% 80% NA NA NA NA [1] Note 1: Data is not collected for this measure. Goal 2: Georgia educators entering the profession from Georgia's educator preparation programs will be skilled, knowledgeable, and able to address the diverse needs of Georgia's students. Desired Result 2a: The percentage of first year teachers educated in Georgia who agree that they were adequately prepared to address daily classroom management problems. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 95% 96% 97% 97% 97% Actual Result NA 94% (4,245) NA NA Note 1: Data reporting disclosure forms were not turned in for PSC's results. Desired Result 2b: The percentage of first year teachers educated in Georgia who agree that they were adequately prepared to integrate technology into their instruction. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA 80% 83% 83% Actual Result 71% (2,904) 74% (3,141) NA NA Note 1: Data reporting disclosure forms were not turned in for PSC's results. Goal 3: Out-of-field teaching will decrease in Georgia's schools. Desired Result 3a: The percentage of Georgia's high school teachers that have at least a minor degree (12 semester/20 quarter hours) in the subject they teach, even if taught part of the day. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 90% 90% 95% 95% Actual Result NA NA 94.5% (15,732) 96.3% (11,481) Note 1: Data reporting disclosure forms were not turned in for PSC's results. Desired Result 3b: At least 94% of Georgia's middle school teachers will have a minimum of a minor degree (20+ quarter hours) in the subject they teach, even if taught part of the day. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 90% 90% 94% 94% Actual Result NA NA NA NA Goal 4: Attrition of beginning teachers will decrease. Desired Result 4a: The percentage of beginning secondary teachers that leave the profession after the first year. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 15% 12% 17% (193) 13% (140) 20% (159) 12% NA 10% 10% 586 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 5: Individuals entering Georgia public education as paraprofessionals will meet higher standards of competency upon licensing. Desired Result 5a: The percentage of paraprofessionals [1] holding at least a college degree. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA NA NA Note 1: A "paraprofessional" is a teacher's classroom aid who does not instruct students as a teacher. 10% 10% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $6,630,085 $5,658,618 FY 2002 Budget $8,186,333 $8,074,403 FY 2003 Recommended $9,484,778 $9,372,778 Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $76,753,893 $31,460,167 FY 2002 Budget $42,811,172 $37,402,059 FY 2003 Recommended $42,900,773 $37,476,653 587 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES Results-Based Budgeting COMMUNITY SERVICES Purpose: Assist Georgians and their families in living healthy, independent, and self-sufficient lives in their homes and communities. INDEPENDENCE (Subprogram) Purpose: Assist older Georgians and persons with disabilities to live healthy, independent and self-sufficient lives in their homes and communities, and to avoid or delay costly nursing home placements by providing a continuum of services. Goal 1: Older Georgians and Georgians with disabilities will avoid costly nursing home placements and will improve their health and nutritional status. Desired Result 1a: Average number of months that Community Care Services Program participants delay admission to nursing homes FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Number of Months N/A 32 32 32 35 35 Actual Result - Number of Months 33 35 34 36 Desired Result 1b: Number of Community Care Services Program participants diverted from nursing home placement and remaining in the community FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Number of participants - Rate of increase N/A 15,400 15,400 16,160 Data not provided. N/A N/A 0% 4.90% Actual Result - Number of participants 14,194 14,949 14,848 16,873 - Rate of increase N/A +5% -1% 13.60% Desired Result 1c: Amount taxpayers save per client annually by delaying nursing home placement FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Per Client Savings N/A $12,100 $12,100 $12,296 $13,100 Actual Result - Per Client Savings $11,904 $12,024 $12,959 13,003 - Total Savings All Clients (In millions) $169 M $180 M $ 192 M $219 M FY 2003 13,300 Desired Result 1d: Percentage of nutrition program participants that improve or maintain nutritional status within 12 months of first service FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 50% 50% 50% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A 84% 70% - Number N/A N/A 3,508 5,338 Desired Result 1e: Percentage of older adults participating in the Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Program with improved strength, range of motion, flexibility, endurance, aerobic fitness or balance FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2002 will be the baseline year for this measure. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $118,032,595 $59,221,052 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommendation $111,825,085 $112,203,470 $63,935,755 $63,446,807 588 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting WORK (Subprogram) Purpose: Provide training, placement services, and support services to low income persons and persons with disabilities so that they can obtain and retain employment and not be dependent on government benefits and services. Goal 1: The number of families needing Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) will be reduced through increased employment and reduced recidivism. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of TANF participants who are employed during the third quarter following their exit from TANF [1] Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on employment data for TANF participants who left TANF during the first 3 quarters of FY 2000. Desired Actual Desired Actual Desired Actual Desired Desired 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 66% 69% 63% 59% 58% 59% 58% 25,530 of 43,292 24,540 of 42,071 14,769 of 25,140 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 52% FY03 Desired Result 1b: Percentage of TANF adults who are employed during the quarter in which they exit TANF [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 67% 70% 73% 63% Actual Result - Percentage - Number N/A 63% 63% 63% N/A 27,452/43,292 26,561/42,071 21,436/33,893 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on employment data for TANF participants who left TANF during FY 2000. FY 2003 60% Desired Result 1c: Percentage of former TANF families with incomes of at least 100% of Federal Poverty Level [1] Desired Result - Percentage FY 1998 N/A FY 1999 N/A FY 2000 N/A FY 2001 N/A FY 2002 11% FY 2003 10% Actual Result - Percentage - Number N/A 13% 12% 12% N/A 5,323/42,654 4,764/41,269 1,892/15,515 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on employment data for participants who left TANF in the first 2 quarters of FY 2000. Desired Result 1d: Number of families receiving TANF assistance FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result - Number N/A N/A Actual Result - Number 84,525 65,198 FY 2000 N/A 54,091 FY 2001 N/A 50,904 FY 2002 56,174 FY 2003 58,712 Desired Result 1e: Percentage of TANF clients who remain employed for 12 months after exiting TANF [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 57% 57% Actual Result - Percentage - Number N/A 61% 59% 59% N/A 16,769/27,452 17,197/29,399 7,680/12,970 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on employment data for participants who left TANF in the first 2 quarters of FY 2000. Goal 2: Low-income older Georgians will develop marketable skills and obtain competitive employment, thereby reducing their dependence on public assistance. Desired Result 2a: The percentage of authorized positions and number of Senior Community Service Employment Program participants who obtain and retain unsubsidized employment for at least 3 months FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Rate N/A 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% Actual Result - Rate 23.2% 30% 48% 38% - Number 68 of 293 82 of 273 129 of 271 102 of 272 Desired Result 2b: Percentage of Senior Community Service Employment Program participants beginning the program that obtain and retain employment for 6 months after program completion FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 DHR does not collect data for this measure. 589 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 3: Persons with mental retardation, mental illness, and substance abuse problems will be able to function more independently in the community. Desired Result 3a: The percentage of consumers who participate in supported employment [Proxy Measure] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Rate of increase N/A N/A +9% +9% +10% 9% - Number N/A N/A 6,142 6,756 7,432 Actual Result - Rate of increase N/A N/A +10% +55% 3422 - Number N/A N/A 6,192 9,614 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $668,776,753 $170,389,359 FY 2002 Request $633,595,308 $183,954,387 FY 2003 Request $635,739,220 $182,547,599 FAMILY SUPPORT (Subprogram) Purpose: Support healthy, self-sufficient families by ensuring that needy families receive temporary cash assistance, employment supports, and can buy necessary food, and that noncustodial parents provide financial support for their children. Goal 1: Noncustodial parents will provide financial support for their minor children. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of current support owed to families that is paid [Proxy Measure] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 52% 54% 56% Actual Result - Percentage - Number (In millions) N/A N/A 48% 48% N/A N/A $280m/$583m $305m/$632m Note 1: DHR's information system cannot track individual family support cases, but does segregate current payments due and overdue support payments. Desired Result 1b: The percentage of noncustodial parents that are now in arrears that make payments on past due amounts [Proxy Measure] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 70% 72% 74% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A 71% 75% - Number in Arrears N/A N/A 255,005 279,980 - Number Paying in Arrears N/A N/A 180,811 209,074 Desired Result 1c: Percentage of cases with support orders [Interim Indicator] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A Actual Result - Percentage 55% 55% 55% Actual Result - Number of cases 474,142 493,319 542,271 - Number of Cases w/support orders 262,470 269,064 300,576 FY 2001 65% 61% 514,435 313,807 FY 2002 68% FY 2003 70% Desired Result 1d: Percentage of participants that began the Fatherhood Initiative Program in the previous fiscal year who completed the program and obtained employment for at least four months and made regular child support payments during the period FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage employed/paying N/A N/A N/A N/A 75% 75% Actual Result - Percentage employed/paying N/A N/A N/A 49% - No. completing program/employed/paying N/A N/A N/A 1,628 - Number of Participants Starting Program N/A N/A N/A 3,300 Desired Result 1e: Percentage of confirmed court-ordered medical coverage of children by noncustodial parents FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A NA 97% 97% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 96% - Number N/A N/A N/A 295,022 590 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: Georgians will receive the nutritional assistance to which they are entitled by the accurate and prompt determination of their eligibility for the Food Stamp Program. Desired Result 2a: Georgia's Food Stamp error rate compared to the federal tolerance level [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result -Variation from tolerance level N/A N/A N/A N/A <0% <0% Actual Result - Variation from tolerance level N/A +2.9% +1.6% -.3% - Georgia Error Rate 11.9% 13.6% 10.9% 8.6% - Federal tolerance level 9.8% 10.7% 9.3% 8.9% Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on Federal Fiscal Year 2001 data. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $239,412,671 $118,795,878 FY 2002 Budget 226821600% $128,253,448 FY 2003 Recommended $227,589,102 $127,272,632 PREVENTION Purpose: Prevent chronic and infectious disease, developmental disabilities, injury, premature death, dependence on public services/benefits and improve the quality of life of Georgians. Goal 1: Reduce the number and rate of teen pregnancies in Georgia. Desired Result 1a: Pregnancy rate for adolescents ages 10-19 [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Rate (No. per 1,000) N/A N/A N/A N/A 44.5 44 Actual Result - Rate (No. per 1,000) 49.8 48.3 45.7 45.1 - Number 25,672 of 515,865 25,491 of 527,434 24,693 of 540,603 24,895 of 552,097 Note 1: There is an 18-month time delay in data reporting; thus, FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 1999 data. Desired Result 1b: Repeat Pregnancy rate for teens ages 15 - 17 [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Rate (per 100) N/A N/A N/A N/A 19% Actual Result - Rate (per 100) 21.6% 21.1% 18.7% 19.4% - Number 2,139/9,920 2,068/9,785 1,657/8,881 1,649/8,511 Note 1: There is an 18-month time delay in data reporting; thus, FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 1999 data. FY 2003 18% Desired Result 1c: Pregnancy rate for specific age groupings (number per 1,000 population) [1] 146.6 142.5 137.1 138.3 137 136 Ages 18 - 19 Note 2: Number of adolescent pregnancies by age FY 98 FY99 FY00 FY01 Ages 887 of 10 -14 257,939 801 of 261,853 726 of 267,424 703 of 275,065 Rate per 1,000 Actual Actual Actual Actual Desired Desired Ages 9,920 of 15 -17 156,546 9,785 of 160,998 8,881 of 163,125 8,511 of 163,682 63.4 60.8 54.4 52 51 50 Ages 15 - 17 Ages 14,865 of 18 -19 101,380 14,905 of 104,583 15,086 of 110,054 15,681 of 113,350 3.4 3.1 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 Ages 10 - 14 S1 FY98 FY 99 FY00 FY01 FY 02 FY03 Note 1: FY 01 Actual Results are based on CY 1999 data. 591 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: Reduce infant morbidity and mortality resulting from inherited, treatable disorders and preventable conditions. Desired Result 2a: Georgia's infant mortality rate [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Rate (per 1,000) N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.1 8 Actual Result - Rate (per 1,000) 9.2 8.6 8.50 8.2 Note 1: There is an 18-month time delay in data reporting; thus, FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 1999 data. Desired Result 2b: Infant mortality rate among infants born with low birth weight (1,500 -2,499 grams) [1] Desired Result 2c: Infant mortality rate from very low birth weight (less than 1,500 grams) [1] Actual Actual Actual Desired Desired Actual Actual Actual Desired Desired 19.8 20 17.6 17.1 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 146/8,262 4 155/7,814 2 142/8,303 0 17 16.5 350 302 300 268 258 250 200 150 100 573/2,138 50 580/1,922 564/2,190 0 250 245 Note 1: There is an 30-month delay in DPH's Data Reporting; thus, FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 1998 data. Note 1: There is an 30-month delay in DPH's Data Reporting; thus, FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 1998 data. Desired Result 2d: Infant mortality rate due to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Deaths per 1,000 N/A .93 .91 .89 .91 Actual Result - Deaths per 1,000 .96 .97 .83 .85 - Number 109 115 102 108 Note 1: There is a 18-month delay in the reporting of these data; thus, FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 1999 data. FY 2003 .90 Desired Result 2e: Percentage of newborns who are screened for metabolic disorders and sickle cell disease [Program Coverage] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 99% 99.5% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 97% - Number N/A N/A N/A 124,830 of 129,248 Note 1: There is an 30-month time delay in data reporting; thus, FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 1998 data. Desired Result 2f: Percent of newborns that test positive for inherited metabolic disorders that receive early treatment within 21 days of test results [1] [Interim indicator] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result - Percentage 100% 95.9% 99.5% 99.5% - Number 37 of 37 47 of 49 199 of 200 181 of 182 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 2000 data. Desired Result 2g: Percent of newborns screened for hearing loss prior to hospital discharge [Program Coverage] [1] Desired Result - Percentage FY 1998 N/A FY 1999 N/A FY 2000 N/A FY 2001 N/A FY 2002 80% FY 2003 95% Actual Result - Percentage 20% 31% 36% 44% - Number 23,600 of 118,069 38,118 of 122,366 45,311 of 126,494 55,613 of 126,494 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 2000 data on number of tests and CY 1999 birth data. 592 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 3 : Infants with mothers who participate in the Women, Infant, and Children (WIC) program will be healthy. Desired Result 3a: Percentage of infants in the WIC program that weigh more than 2500 grams when born FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 88% 88% Actual Result - Percentage - Number 92.6% 92.1% 89.5% 87.8% 58,519/63,202 58,538/63,573 55,969/62,521 53,213/60,593 60% 50% 41.4% 47% 43.9 47.3%44.8%51.14%9.5% 46.5% 46% Actual Desired Actual Desired Actual Desired Actual Desired Desired Desired Result 3b: Percentage of infants in the WIC program that are initially breastfed [Interim Indicator] [1] 40% 30% 20% 10% 31,229 32,249 34,530 31,373 0% FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 Note 1: Actual Results are based on the federal fiscal year. FY 2001 data is based on the first three quarters of FFY 2001. Goal 4. Improve the overall health status of children with chronic health conditions and minimize developmental delays. Desired Result 4: Percentage of Individual Family Service Plan (IFSP) outcomes written for children and families in the Babies Can't Wait Program that are met FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 70% 75% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A 29% 54% Goal 5: Fewer children will be severely injured or killed in accidental deaths and suicides. Desired Result 5a: Death and treatment rate of children who die or are treated in hospitals because of accidental poisoning Desired Result - Number Deaths per 1,000 - Number Treated per 1,000 Actual Result - Number Deaths per 1,000 - Number - Number Treated per 1,000 - Number FY 1998 N/A N/A 0.4 8 N/A N/A FY 1999 N/A N/A 0.6 14 4.0 86 FY 2000 N/A N/A 0.4 9 3.4 72 FY 2001 N/A N/A 0.4 9 3.4 72 FY 2002 0.3 3.2 FY 2003 0.3 3.2 Desired Result 5b: Accidental death rate for children under age 18 FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result - Per 1,000 N/A N/A Actual Result - Per 1,000 19.6 20.1 - Number 419 436 FY 2000 N/A 19.4 413 FY 2001 N/A 19.4 413 FY 2002 19.2 FY 2003 19.2 Desired Result 5c: Suicide rates and attempted suicide rates of children age 18 and under FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result - Suicides per 1,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A - Attempted Suicides per 1,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A Actual Result - Suicides per 1,000 1.8 2.3 3.4 3.4 - Number of deaths 39 49 72 72 - Attempted Suicides per 1,000 N/A 3.3 4.0 4.0 - Number of Attempted Suicides N/A 71 84 84 FY 2002 3.1 3.8 FY 2003 3.1 3.8 593 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Actual Desired Actual Desired Actual Desired Actual Desired Desired 800 746 700 631 600 631 585 605 600 530 532 500 400 300 200 100 0 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 535 FY03 Goal 6: Fewer Georgians will suffer from preventable diseases. Desired Result 6a: Number of Tuberculosis cases reported in Georgia Desired Result 6b: Number of reported cases of indigenous pertussis, mumps, diphtheria, hib invasive (bacterial meningitis), hepatitis B, measles, polio, rubella, and tetanus [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 0 Actual Result - Total 323 367 497 497 - Measles 2 0 0 0 - Mumps 2 4 2 2 - Rubella 0 0 0 0 - Tetanus 0 0 1 1 - Diphtheria 0 0 0 0 - Pertussis 38 52 52 52 - Polio 0 0 0 0 - Hib (invasive) 69 81 87 87 - Hepatitis B (acute) 212 230 355 355 Note 1: There is a 18-month delay in data reporting, therefore, FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 2000 data. Goal 7: Prevent complications from chronic diseases. Desired Result 7a: Adult death rate in Georgia from stroke [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result - per 100,000 N/A N/A Actual Result - per 100,000 N/A 67 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 2000 data. FY 2000 N/A 77 FY 2001 N/A 71 FY 2002 71 FY 2003 70 Desired Result 7b: Adult death rate in Georgia from cardiovascular disease [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result -Rate per 100,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 40 Actual Result - Rate per 100,000 N/A N/A N/A 399.3 - Number of deaths N/A N/A N/A N/A Note 1: There is a 30-month delay in vital records reporting; thus, FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 1998 data. FY 2003 60 Desired Result 7c: Percentage of patients in the Stroke and Heart Attack Prevention Program (SHAPP) with blood pressure readings of less than 140/90 [Interim Indicator] [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 56% N/A N/A 55% 55% Actual Result - Percentage N/A 57% 50% 52% - Number N/A N/A N/A N/A Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 2000 data. Note 2: High blood pressure is associated with strokes and heart attacks. Goal 8: Fewer Georgians will die from cancer. Desired Result 8a: Death rate (per 100,000) of women from breast cancer [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Deaths per 100,000 N/A 23.9 23.8 23.7 23.7 Actual Result - Deaths per 100,000 N/A N/A 23.9 26.4 - Number N/A N/A 1,035 1,000 Note 1: There is a 30-month delay in the reporting of this data; thus, FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 1998 data. Note 2: The apparent increase in death rate is due to better data collection. FY 2003 27.5 594 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 8b: Death rate (per 100,000) of women from cervical cancer FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Deaths per 100,000 N/A 2.9 2.89 2.87 2.86 Actual Result - Deaths per 100,000 N/A N/A 3.3 3.4 - Number N/A N/A 123 124 Note 1: There is a 30-month delay in the reporting of this data; thus, FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 1998 data. FY 2003 2.85 Desired Result 8c: Percentage of women screened through the state program and identified with problems indicative of breast cancer that were diagnosed when the cancer was pre-invasive or in early stages[1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - # women screened 10,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 - % w/cancer diagnosed at early stage 50% 55% 87% 88% 70% 75% Actual Result - # women screened 11,560 7,276 8,773 8,773 - # detected with breast cancer 88 79 70 70 - % w/cancer diagnosed at early stage 53.4% 36.7% 41% 41% - # w/cancer diagnosed at early stage 47 29 29 29 Note 1: There is a 6-9 month reporting delay for these data. Desired Result 8d: Percentage of women screened through the state program and identified with problems indicative of cervical cancer that were diagnosed when the cancer was pre-invasive or in early stage [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - # women screened 10,000 7,000 6,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 - % w/cancer diagnosed at early stage 18 (90%) 12.6 (90%) 10.8 (90%) 18 (90%) 18 (90%) 18 (90%) Actual Result - # women screened 9,098 7,276 4,652 4,652 - # detected with cervical cancer 23 15 16 16 - % w/cancer diagnosed at early stage 91.3% 80% 100% 100% - # w/cancer diagnosed at early stage 21 12 16 16 Note 1: There is a 6-9 month reporting delay for this data. Desired Result 8e: Death rate due to lung cancer [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Number per 100,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 47.8 Actual Result - Number per 100,000 N/A N/A 53.9 50.9 - Number of deaths N/A N/A 3,975 3,876 Note 1: There is a 30-month delay in the reporting of this data; thus, FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 1998 data. FY 2003 46.8 Desired Result 8f: Death rate due to colorectal cancer [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Number per 100,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 Actual Result - Number per 100,000 N/A N/A 14.9 14.4 - Number of deaths N/A N/A 1,160 1,172 Note 1: There is a 30-month delay in the reporting of this data; thus, FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 1998 data. FY 2003 12.6 Desired Result 8g: Death rate due to prostate cancer FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Number per 100,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 25.1 Actual Result - Number per 100,000 N/A N/A 27 25.9 N/A - Number of deaths N/A N/A 801 799 Note 1: There is a 30-month delay in the reporting of this data; thus, FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 1999 data. FY 2003 24.9 N/A 595 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 9 : Fewer Georgian will develop smoking-related health problems. Desired Result 9a: Percentage of children in middle school (6-8 grades) surveyed who report smoking cigarettes or using other tobacco products [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - % Middle School N/A N/A N/A N/A 18% 18% Actual Result - % Middle School - Number N/A N/A 17% N/A N/A N/A 211/1,243 [1] Note 1: FY 2000 Actual Results are based on a FY 1999 Youth Tobacco Survey. Current data will be available in January 2002. Desired Result 9b: Percentage of adult Georgians who report that they smoke daily FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A Actual Result - Percentage 23.6 24.0 24.3 - Number 472/2,000 480/2,000 486/2,000 FY 2001 N/A 23.6 472/2,000 FY 2002 22.3 FY 2003 22.0 Desired Result 9c: Rate of lung, throat, and mouth cancers per calendar year [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Number per 100,000 - Male N/A N/A N/A N/A 32.4 - Female N/A N/A N/A N/A 86.5 Actual Result - Number per 100,000 - Male N/A N/A 32.6 N/A - Female N/A N/A 86.7 N/A Note 1: There is a 30-month delay in the reporting of this data; thus, FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 1998 data. FY 2003 32.2 86.3 Goal 10 : Reduce the incidence of sexually transmitted disease and risky behavior Desired Result 10a: The percentage and number of patients with reported syphilis that are treated [Proxy Measure] [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 84.5% 84.0% Actual Result - Percentage 90.6% 89.3% 85.9% 85.2% - Number 1,913/2,111 1,703/1,906 1,420/1,654 995/1,168 Note 1: Syphilis continues to show up in blood tests, when individuals are properly treated, it is inactive and not contagious. Note 2: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 2000 data. Desired Result 10b: The percentage and number of patients with other reported STDs (gonorrhea and chlamydia) who receive adequate treatment [Proxy Measure] [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 19.5% 19.2% Actual Result - Percentage - Number 75.1% 35.1% 44% 20% 34,519/45,949 18,356/52,311 21,280/48,404 6,905/35,069 Note 1: While there is no follow-up on patients who have been treated, Z-Pac considered an effective cure. Note 2: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 2000 data. Desired Result 10c: Rate of reported STD (gonorrhea, chlamydia, and primary and secondary syphilis) [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result -Gonorrhea: No. per 100,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 159.4 - Chlamydia: No. per 100,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 290.1 - PSS Syphilis: No. per 100,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 14.9 Actual Result - Gonorrhea: No. per 100,000 270.9 275.9 246.9 159.8 - Number of cases 20,703 21,487 19,230 12,447 - Chlamydia: No. per 100,000 330.3 395.8 374.6 290.5 - Number of cases 25,246 30,824 29,174 22,622 - PSS Syphilis: No. per 100,000 27.6 24.5 21.2 15.0 - Number of cases 2,111 1,906 1,654 1,168 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 2000 data. FY 2003 159.0 289.7 14.5 596 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 10d: Rate of reported Sexually Transmitted Diseases among adolescents 10-19. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result - Gonorrhea: No. per 100,000 N/A N/A 506.8 506.8 - Chlamydia: No. per 100,000 N/A N/A 1054.1 1054.1 - PSS Syphilis: No. per 100,000 N/A N/A 5.8 5.8 Actual Result - Gonorrhea: No. per 100,000 540.7 564.3 506.8 506.8 - Number of cases 6,130 6,397 5,745 5,745 - Chlamydia: No. per 100,000 916.3 1139.2 1054.1 1054.1 - Number of cases 10,387 12,914 11,949 11,949 - PSS Syphilis: No. per 100,000 8.2 6.1 5.8 5.8 - Number of cases 93 69 65 65 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 2000 data. FY 2002 506.4 1053.7 5.4 FY 2003 506.0 1053.3 5.0 Desired Result 10e: The number of deaths due to complications from AIDS [1] 700 644 580 570 600 512 500 392 400 353 318 Actual Desired Actual Desired Actual Desired Desired 300 200 100 0 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 2000 data. Desired Result 10f: Change in the number of AIDS cases by year of diagnosis [1] Desired Result - Percent change Actual Result - Percent change FY 1998 N/A FY 1999 N/A -19% FY 2000 N/A -42% - Number of cases diagnosed 1,407 1,146 660 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 2000 data. FY 2001 N/A 0% 660 FY 2002 -10% FY 2003 -10% Goal 11: Improve the Oral health of Georgians Desired Result 11a: Proportion of Georgians served by fluoridated community water systems who are provided optimal levels of fluoride [1] [2] FY 1998 FY1999 FY2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 64% 64% 64% 65% 65% Actual Result - Percentage N/A - Number N/A Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on FY 2000 data. 63% No data 64% No data 63% 2,751,935/ 4,393,420 Note 2: This measure estimates the percentage of Georgians who live in areas served by community water systems in counties that are reporting on fluoridation tests; Georgians who obtain their water from wells, etc. are not included. Desired Result 11b. The proportion of low income elementary school children who have received protective sealants [1] Desired Result - Percentage Actual Result - Percentage FY 1998 N/A N/A - Number N/A Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on FY 2000 data. FY 1999 2% 1.7% 5,998 of 347,021 FY2000 2.25% 1.8% 6,338 of 347,021 FY 2001 2.50% 5.0% 9,852 of 197,330 FY 2002 2.80% FY 2003 3% Goal 12: Georgians will live healthier lifestyles. Desired Result 12a: Percentage of Georgians who are regularly physically active FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A Actual Result - Percentage 25% 24% 26% FY 2001 N/A 26% FY 2002 26% FY 2003 27% 597 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 12b: Percentage of Georgians who are obese (body mass index greater than 30) [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 54% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A 58% N/A Note 1: Data for this measure is not routinely collected. FY 2000 Actual Results are based on FY 1999 data. FY 2003 54% Desired Result 12c: Percentage of Georgians who report eating 5 or more vegetables and fruits per day FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 28% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 24% - Percentage Female N/A 23% N/A N/A - Percentage Male N/A 18% N/A N/A FY 2003 28% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $287,614,967 $151,374,769 FY 2002 Budget $272,488,866 $163,426,009 FY 2003 Recommended $273,410,893 $162,176,211 PROTECTION Purpose: Provide services and conduct activities necessary to protect Georgians from violence and exploitation in their homes, unsafe conditions in health and child care facilities, infectious and chronic disease, and environmental hazards. CHILD AND ADULT PROTECTION (Subprogram) Purpose: Protect children, the elderly, and disabled adults from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Goal 1: Fewer children will be abused or neglected. 18 Desired Result 1a: Rate and number of substantiated 16 maltreatment incidents during the fiscal year. [1] [2] [3] [4] 14 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 2000 data. 12 10 Note 2: Data is collected and entered by county DFCS staff; thus, 8 it may not be complete or current and is not verified. 6 11.5 12.4 13.3 11.1 15.7 10.3 13.3 14.1 Desired Actual Actual Actual Desired Desired Note 3: This is a measure of the extent of reported child 4 maltreatment in Georgia. Increases in the rate or number of abuse 2 incidents may be due to a variety of factors ranging from better 0 24,567 FY99 27,377 FY00 34,080 FY01 FY02 FY03 reporting, more prompt or comprehensive case investigation, failure to remove children from unsafe environments, and Note 4: The chart following this note shows the number and rate of substandard intervention. substantiated child maltreatment for FY99 -- FY01 by type. 25,000 23,704 20,000 16,415 18,507 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 8.3 9.0 10.9 3,515 2,050 2,305 2,807 3,650 2,354 2,718 3,872 4,059 1.8 1.0 1.4 1.8 1.1 1.3 1.8 1.1 1.9 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY 1999 -- FY 2001 child maltreatment by type. ~ Physical Abuse Sexual Abuse %0i Neglect Emotional or Other Maltreatment. Desired Result 1b: The number of confirmed child physical abuse requiring medical treatment during FY 2003 will not FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Number N/A N/A N/A N/A 850 900 Actual Result - Number N/A 733 801 828 Note 1: See Notes for Desired Result 1a. 598 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1c: Number of substantiated, repeat child maltreatment incidents within a 12-month period [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Number N/A N/A 3,908 3,888 3,714 3,650 Actual Result - Number N/A N/A 4,350 2,034 Note 1: See Notes for Desired Result 1a. Note 2: Not all counties report repeat maltreatment the same way. Some counties do not consider an incident "repeat abuse" if a case for a previous abuse is still open. Goal 2: Children in state custody will benefit from stable foster care placements that help meet their physical, emotional and medical needs Desired Result 2a: Percentage of children in care with no more than 2 placements FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The federal Child and Family Service Review identified data validity problems with this data. Desired Result 2b: Median number of placement moves within a 12-month period for children in foster care [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Number N/A 2.5 2.25 2.03 1.83 1.75 Actual Result - Number 2.78 2.32 2.13 2.07 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results pertain to children in care in June 2001. Note 2: The federal Child and Family Service Review identified potential data validity problems with this data. Desired Result 2c: Number of children maltreated (abused or neglected) while in foster care during the fiscal year [1] Desired Result - Number FY 1998 N/A FY 1999 N/A FY 2000 N/A FY 2001 N/A FY 2002 55 FY 2003 55 Actual Result - Number N/A 118 101 89 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 2000 data. Goal 3: Children in state custody will benefit from safe, stable, long-term placements. Desired Result 3a: Percentage of children who have been in the legal custody of the state for 24 months or less that have achieved a permanent placement [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 41% 42% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 40% - Number N/A N/A N/A 5,269/13,215 Note 1: Chart A shows where children who have been in the legal custody of the state for 24 months or less and have been placed in "permanent homes" are living; Chart B shows where children who have not been permanently placed are living. Family Reunification 60% Other 2% Institution Trial Home Visit Group 4% Home 5% 3% Foster Family (Relative) 20% Other 5% 4% Living w/ Relative 29% 2% Guardianship Adoption 5,269 Children Chart A: Permanent Placement by Type Foster Family (Non-relative) 65% 7,946 Children Chart B: Placement of Children in State Legal Custody 599 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 3b: Percentage of children who have been in the legal custody of the state for 25 months or more that have achieved a permanent placement [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 56% 57% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 55% - Number N/A N/A N/A 7,530/13,746 Note 1: Chart A shows where children who have been in the legal custody of the state for more than 24 months and have been placed in a "permanent home" are living; Chart B shows where children who have not been permanently placed are living. Adoption 58% Other 3% Guardianship 8% Family Reunification Living w/ 18% Relative 13% Pre-Adoptive 7% Trial Home Visit 6% Institution Group 9% Home 9% Foster Family (Relative) 16% Other 6% Foster Family (Non-relative) 47% 7,530 Children Chart A: Permanent Placement by Type 6,216 Children Chart B: Placement of Children in State Legal Custody Desired Result 3c: Average time children who are free for adoption remain in the Office of Adoptions' system before their adoptions are finalized FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Number of months N/A 24 24 24 24 24 - Projected number of children to be adopted N/A N/A N/A N/A 888 949 Actual Result - Number of months 25.7 23.1 23.5 22 - Number of children adopted 748 996 1,140 831 Goal 4: Access to shelter and services for victims of domestic violence will be improved. Desired Result 4: Number of adult domestic violence victims denied shelter or services due to lack of capacity [Proxy Measure] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Number N/A 1,167 1,141 1,121 1,099 1,000 Actual Result - Number 1,191 1,622 1,314 Note 1: This is an incomplete measure as it does not address whether there are an adequate number of shelters or whether shelters are accessible. Goal 5: Adults in non-institutional settings will be free from abuse, neglect, or exploitation. Desired Result 5: The number of incidents of repeated abuse, neglect, or exploitation of adults FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result - Number N/A 282 282 282 Actual Result - Number 282 211 294 745 FY 2002 282 FY 2003 282 PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY ASSURANCE (Subprogram) Purpose: Protect Georgians from unsafe conditions in health, childcare, and long-term facilities and from infections, chronic disease, and environmental hazards. Goal 1: Providers of regulated childcare, health care, and long-term care facilities will comply with all federal and state health and safety regulations and respond to complaints. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of inspected facilities that comply with regulations at their annual inspection [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - All Facilities N/A N/A N/A N/A 21% 23% Actual Result - All Facilities N/A N/A 14% 19% - Number N/A N/A 9,520/68,000 9,353/49,226 Note 1: Inspection results are not collected by type of facility; this information will be available for the FY 2002 Actual Result. 600 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1b: Percentage of inspected facilities requiring follow-up inspections that are in compliance with applicable regulations at first follow-up visit [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - All Facilities N/A 16.3% 18% 23% 32% Actual Result - All Facilities 8.50% 13.0% 31.4% 30.2% - Number 577/6,792 811/6,246 841/2,677 956/3,166 Note 1: Inspection results are not collected by type of facility; this information will be available for the FY 2002 Actual Result. 23% Desired Result 1c: Percentage of complaints brought to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program which were satisfactorily resolved FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 70% 70% 75% 78% Actual Result - Percentage 76% 94% 93% 94% - Number 4,805/6,323 4,609/4,924 5,288/5,671 6,977/7,422 FY 2003 75% Desired Result 1e: Percentage of complaints, other than abuse or gross neglect complaints, referred to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program to which LTCO responded within 7 working days [Efficiency measure impacting results] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 This is a new measure. FY 2002 will be the baseline year. Goal 2: There will be a reduction in the rate of food-related illness. Desired Result 2: Number of food-borne outbreaks during the fiscal year FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result - Number 28 28 Actual Result - Number 30 15 FY 2000 24 33 FY 2001 21 avail 03/02 FY 2002 18 FY 2003 15 Goal 3: The Georgia Public Health Laboratory will perform tests, determinations, and examinations prompty and accurately specimens received for testing in support of Public Health programs to control the spread of infectious diseases, investigate disease outbreaks, to identify newborns at risk for metabolic disease. Desired Result 3a: Percent of tests, determinations, and examinations within the 95% standard of timeliness FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% Actual Result - Percentage 94.8% 97% 99% 99% - Number 2,328,515/ 2,629,700/ 2,686,376/ 2,369,402/ 2,415,068 2,711,031 2,713,511 2,393,335 Desired Result 3b: Perform tests, determinations, and examinations on proficiency test (PT) specimens within the 100% standard for proficiency test performance [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result - Percentage 99% 100% 100% 98% - Number 371 of 375 375 of 375 425 of 425 402 of 410 Goal 4: Reduce the risk that children will die or contract disabling conditions from lead poisoning. Desired Result 4a: Number of children that died or were diagnosed with disabilities due to lead poisoning FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Number N/A N/A N/A N/A Actual Result - Number N/A N/A N/A N/A FY 2003 601 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 4b: Reduce to under 15 micrograms the level of blood lead in children identified as having high levels of blood lead of 20 micrograms or higher [1] Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 N/A 801 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Data for this desired result was not collected for FY 1999 and FY 2000. Program staff are collecting data for FY 2001 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $628,784,771 $291,918,141 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommendation $595,716,039 $597,731,778 $315,158,311 $312,748,142 TREATMENT AND HABILITATION Purpose: Increase the self-sufficiency of persons with mental illness, mental retardation and substance abuse problems by providing a range of community and hospital services that develop and maintain the skills necessary to live and participate in MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES (Subprogram) Purpose: Increase the self-sufficiency of persons with mental illness by providing a range of community and hospital services that develop and maintain the skills necessary to live and participate in the community. Goal 1: Adults with mental illness will participate more independently in the community. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of adult consumers with mental illness who participate in supported employment [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percent N/A N/A N/A N/A 6% 6.5% Actual Result - Percent N/A N/A N/A 5.5% - Number N/A N/A N/A 4,467 Note 1: Supported Employment does not include wage subsidies, but provides a range of supports and skill development activities that enables the consumer to remain in a competitive employment position. Desired Result 1b: The percentage of adult consumers with mental illness who receive supported employment services and who remain employed at least six months Desired Result - Percent Actual Result - Percent - Number FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 There are no historical data for this new measure. FY 2001 N/A 64.6% 2,216/3,433 FY 2002 67.8% FY 2003 71.2% Desired Result 1c: The percentage of adult consumers with mental illness surveyed that responded that they had a voice in choosing where they live [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percent Actual Result - Percent - Number N/A N/A N/A 80% 80% 80% N/A N/A 75.4% 78.3% N/A N/A 3,392/4,499 3,528/4,508 Note 1: Data are collected through the PERMES annual survey which is performed by consumers who have been trained in survey procedures. These surveyors are selected based upon ability to establish rapport with consumers enrolled in care, including those who may have difficulties with communication about their preferences. Goal 2: The functioning of adults with mental illness and children and adolescents with serious emotional disturbance will improve through effective treatment in community-based treatment programs and inpatient crisis and stabilization care. Desired Result 2a: The percentage of adult consumers with mental illness who receive community-based treatment and gain improved functioning FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Baseline data will be available for this new measure at the end of FY 2002; Desired Results will be based on these data. 602 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 2b: The percentage of adult consumers with mental illness who receive inpatient treatment and gain improved functioning. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Baseline data will be available for this new measure at the end of FY 2002; Desired Results will be based on these data. Desired Result 2c: The rate of adult consumers with mental illness who have two or more annual admissions to inpatient services during a three-year period FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Rate per 100,000 Actual Result - Rate per 100,000 - Number of admissions There are no historical data for this new N/A 2.22 2.10 measure. 2.34 138/5,883,626 Desired Result 2d: The percentage of children and adolescents with serious emotional disturbance in community-based treatment who gain improved functioning FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 A similar measure for community services was reported in previous years based upon assessment protocols that are now discontinued. Baseline data derived from the new required assessment instrument, the CAFAS, will be available at end of FY 2002 and will be used to determine the Desired Result. Desired Result 2e: The percentage of children and adolescents with serious emotional disturbance who receive inpatient services and gain improved functioning FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Actual data will be available at the end of FY 2002; subsequent desired results will be based on these data. Desired Result 2f: The percentage of children with serious emotional disturbance who are readmitted to inpatient service within 60 days of discharge. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percent Actual Result - Percent N/A N/A N/A N/A 13% 12% N/A N/A N/A 14% - Number N/A N/A N/A 248/1,768 Goal 4: Children with SED who are in placement through the MATCH program will be safe from harm to themselves or others. 4.41 6 2.8 2.52 Desired Result 4: Percentage change in average frequency of critical incidents by children after 6 months in MATCH placements between the 6month evaluation and the 12-month evaluation 4 2 2.22 3.17 1.6 0 FY99 FY00 FY01 % change 6 months Desired 12 months Actual FY 1999 N/A -21% FY 2000 -20% -28% FY 2001 -20% -36% FY 2002 -20% FY 2003 -20% MENTAL RETARDATION SERVICES (Subprogram) Purpose: Increase the self-sufficiency of persons with mental retardation by providing a range of community and hospital services that develop and maintain the skills necessary to live and participate in the community. Goal 1: Consumers with Mental Retardation will participate more independently in the community. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of adult consumers with mental retardation who participate in supported employment [1] Desired Result - Percent FY 1998 N/A FY 1999 N/A FY 2000 N/A FY 2001 N/A FY 2002 37% FY 2003 39% Actual Result - Percent - Number N/A N/A N/A 35.4% N/A N/A N/A 4,519/12,766 Note 1: See Desired Result 1a for Mental Health Services Subprogram. 603 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1b: The percentage of adult consumers with MR who move to competitive employment FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 These data are not currently collected but are under consideration for inclusion in DHR's data collection system. FY 2003 Desired Result 1c: The percentage of adult consumers with mental retardation and/or their families surveyed that respond that they had a voice in choosing where the consumers live [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percent N/A N/A 80% 80% 80% 80% Actual Result - Percent - Number N/A N/A 82.6% 77.6% N/A N/A N/A 1,622/2,091 Note 1: See Desired Result 1c, Mental Health Services Subprogram. Desired Result 1d: The percentage of adult consumers with mental retardation and/or their families surveyed that respond that they have choice and opportunity for community and social activities [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percent N/A N/A 80% 80% 80% 80% Actual Result - Percent N/A N/A 89% 81% - Number N/A N/A N/A N/A Note 1: See Desired Result 1c, Mental Health Services Subprogram. Goal 2: The functioning of consumers with mental retardation will improve through effective services in community- based programs. Desired Result 2a: The percentage of adult consumers with mental retardation who receive community-based services and gain improved functioning FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 This information has not previously been collected by the program. An assessment tool that measures improved functioning for consumers with mental retardation is now being evaluated. Desired Result 2b: Percentage of adult consumers with mental retardation who receive services in the least restrictive environment FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percent N/A N/A N/A N/A 90.7% 91.4% Actual Result - Percent - Number N/A N/A N/A 88.9% N/A N/A N/A 11,896/13,383 Desired Result 2c: The percentage of consumers with mental retardation served in hospitals that have stable or improving medical status FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 MHMRSA hospitals report data on patient injuries and falls. These data can be compared to national norms and are considered a measure of effective hospital care, especially for medically fragile consumers. However, data are now collected in aggregate for all consumer populations and cannot be disaggregated by consumer type. The department is working to identify appropriate outcome measure(s) for impatient consumers with mental retardation. SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES (Subprogram) Purpose: Increase the self-sufficiency of persons with substance abuse problems by providing a range of community and hospital services that develop and maintain the skills necessary to live and participate in the community. Goal 1: Adults with substance abuse problems will be able to participate more independently in the community Desired Result 1: Percentage of adult consumers with substance abuse problems who participate in supported employment [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percent N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.8% 1.90% Actual Result - Percent N/A N/A N/A 1.7% - Number N/A N/A N/A 588/34,588 604 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: The functioning of adults and youth with substance abuse problems will improve through effective community treatment services. Desired Result 2a: Percentage of adult and youth consumers with substance abuse problems in community-based treatment who gain improved functioning FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Data will be first collected for this new measure in FY 2002. FY 2002 Actual Results data will be used to project future Desired Results. Desired Result 2b: Percentage of adult and youth consumers with substance abuse problems who receive at least 90 days continuous treatment [Proxy Measure] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percent (Adults) N/A N/A N/A N/A 38.3% 39% Actual Result - Percent - Number N/A N/A N/A 37.5% N/A N/A N/A 10,157/27,066 Desired Result - Percent (Adolescents) N/A N/A N/A N/A 50.5% 51.4% Actual Result - Percent N/A N/A N/A 49.46% - Number N/A N/A N/A 602/1,217 Note 1: Significant improvement in outcomes is associated with treatment stays of 90 days or more. Desired Result 2c: Percentage of adult and youth consumers with substance abuse problems who complete treatment [Proxy Measure] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percent (Adults) N/A N/A N/A N/A 37.4% 38.2% Actual Result - Percent - Number N/A N/A N/A 36.7% N/A N/A N/A 12,651/34,486 Desired Result - Percent (Adolescents) N/A N/A N/A N/A 30.4% 31% Actual Result - Percent N/A N/A N/A 29.8% - Number N/A N/A N/A 291/976 Note 1: Significant improvement in outcomes is associated with completion of treatment. Desired Result 2d: Percentage of consumers with substance abuse problems who are readmitted within 90 days FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.2% 6.8% Actual Result - Percent N/A N/A N/A 7.5% - Number N/A N/A N/A 100/1,325 Desired Result 2e: Percentage of consumers with substance abuse problems who maintain abstinence for three years following completion of treatment. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 At this time there is no way to collect these data. The Department is examining various methods to measure long-term sobriety of former consumers. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $956,174,021 $542,913,114 FY 2002 Request $905,884,626 $586,115,903 FY 2003 Recommended $908,959,225 $581,637,170 605 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting ATTACHED AGENCIES GOVERNOR'S COUNCIL ON DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Purpose: To collaborate with Georgia citizens, public and private advocacy organizations, and policy makers to positively influence public policies that enhance the quality of life for people with developmental disabilities and their families. Goal 1: Individuals with disabilities, their families, advocates, service providers, and other relevant groups will have access to the information and educational resources they need to advocate effectively. Desired Result 1a: Percentage and number of respondents to an annual customer satisfaction survey that say they are very satisfied with the Council's: FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result -Leadership, current practice and disability issue training - Information about services and supports - Support of advocacy organizations' services and information needs The information for this new Desired Result will first be collected during FY 2002; FY 2002 Actual Results will be - Usefulness of council information and training used as baseline data for projecting future Desired - Impact on qualify of life of persons with developmental disabilities Results. - Advocacy for people with developmental disabilities and their families Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $1,701,074 $16,832 FY 2002 Budget $1,615,245 $37,750 FY 2003 Recommended $1,611,376 $33,880 CHILDREN'S TRUST FUND COMMISSION Purpose: Help prevent the incidence of child abuse and neglect by providing grant support for community-based prevention programs throughout the state. Goal 1: Reduce the incidence of first-time child abuse through prevention programs. Desired Result 1: Percentage of families who participate in child abuse prevention programs during FY 2003 who have no substantiated instances of child maltreatment FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A 90% 90% 95% 95% Actual Result - Percentage - Number N/A N/A 99.7% 99.0% N/A N/A 2,029/2,036 2,606/2,633 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $6,211,074 $5,018,448 FY 2002 Budget $5,884,424 $5,417,977 FY 2003 Recommended $5,904,336 $5,376,543 Total All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $2,906,698,836 $1,339,647,593 FY 2002 Budget 2,753,831,193 $1,446,299,540 FY 2003 Recommended 2,763,149,400 $1,435,238,984 606 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY TRADE AND TOURISM Results-Based Budgeting BUSINESS RECRUITMENT, RETENTION AND EXPANSION Purpose: Recruit new businesses and work to retain and facilitate the expansion of existing businesses in order to create new jobs and investment in Georgia's communities. Goal 1: Expand the current level of job creation in Georgia by recruiting companies and encouraging existing industry to expand in Georgia. Desired Result 1a: New jobs created in Georgia as a result of ITT's projects and activities. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result 15,016 16,923 20,112 NA Note 1: Data is reported for the calendar year. (FY 2000 = CY 2000) Note 2: Data disclosure was not submitted with this measure. Goal 2: Increase the current level of capital investment in Georgia by new and expanding businesses. Desired Result 2a: New capital investment in Georgia as a result of ITT's projects and activities. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result $1,082,000 $1,294,000 $3,155,000 NA Note 1: Data is reported for the calendar year. (FY 2000 = CY 2000) FY 2003 NA Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $13,696,341 $13,696,341 FY 2002 Budget $16,342,757 $16,342,757 FY 2003 Recommended $14,146,625 $14,146,625 INTERNATIONAL TRADE DEVELOPMENT Purpose: Strengthen Georgia's economy by increasing the volume of international sales from current exporters and involving more small and medium sized companies in the export process. Goal 1: Georgia companies currently exporting will sell their products and services into additional international markets, and current Georgia exporters will increase their volume in existing international markets. Desired Result 1a: The number of international transactions brokered [1] as a result of assistance provided by ITT. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA 180 198 160 168 NA NA 195 163 Note 1: Examples of international transactions brokered include foreign direct sales; representation agreements; export of professional services included but not limited to architectural services, construction, franchising, joint ventures, etc. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $6,677,792 $6,677,792 FY 2002 Budget $5,640,358 $5,640,358 FY 2003 Recommended $5,249,114 $5,249,114 607 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY TRADE AND TOURISM - Results-Based Budgeting TOURISM PROMOTIONS Purpose: Bring additional money into the Georgia economy by promoting the state as a vacation destination. Goal 1: Increase visitation to Georgia among individual or group travelers by generating inquiries through effective marketing or advertising. Desired Result 1a: The number of tourist inquiries fulfilled as a result of the tourism marketing program. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 476,291 483,761 390,188 772,857 850,143 Actual Result 432,992 439,783 354,716 702,598 Desired Result 1b: The number of visitor nights that result from the tourism marketing program. [New measure] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA FY 2003 NA Desired Result 1c: The direct economic impact of the visitor nights that resulted from the tourism marketing program. (This new measure is dependent on the results from 1b, and the data will be available in April 2002.) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $4,515,529 $4,515,529 FY 2002 Budget $3,935,956 $3,935,956 FY 2003 Recommended $3,926,244 $3,926,244 VISITOR INFORMATION CENTERS Purpose: Encourage travelers to visit Georgia's communities and attractions by providing visitor information services through the operation of the Visitor Information Centers (VIC). Goal 1: Visitor Information Centers will provide quality services that increase visitation to Georgia's communities. Desired Result 1a: The number of nightly hotel reservations made as a result of Visitor Information Center service. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 16,672 16,485 15,033 22,006 24,206 Actual Result 15,157 14,987 13,366 20,006 Desired Result 1b: The percent of travel parties who choose to stay in Georgia or extend their stay due to one of the VICs. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA 30% 30% 30% 30% NA NA 34% 35% Program Fund Allocation: Other Funds (Not Allocated): Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds Total Funds State Funds Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $4,649,337 $4,649,337 FY 2001 Actual $81,238,963 $79,823,774 FY 2001 Actual $110,777,962 $109,362,773 FY 2002 Budget $4,052,589 $4,052,589 FY 2003 Recommended $4,042,588 $4,042,588 FY 2002 Budget $34,131,677 $34,131,677 FY 2003 Recommended $65,430,712 $65,430,712 FY 2002 Budget $64,103,337 $64,103,337 FY 2003 Recommended $92,795,283 $92,795,283 608 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE Results-Based Budgeting INSURANCE ENFORCEMENT Purpose: To provide legal advice regarding the enforcement of specific provisions of state law relating to insurance companies, agents, and other licensees. Goal 1: Ensure that insurance companies, agents, and other insurance licensees are in compliance with state law. Desired Result 1a: The number of valid complaints involving insurance companies . FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 60 60 60 60 Actual Result 72 65 35 80 Note 1: A complaint is classified as valid when some kind of enforcement action is considered. Desired Result 1b: The number of valid complaints involving agents and other insurance licensees. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA NA 826 826 Actual Result 964 870 1,514 1,675 Note 1: A complaint is classified as valid when some kind of enforcement action is considered. FY 2002 826 FY 2003 826 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $5,442,285 $5,442,285 FY 2002 Budget $5,571,428 $5,571,428 FY 2003 Recommended $5,509,416 $5,509,416 INSURANCE REGULATION Purpose: To ensure insurance entities licensed in Georgia comply with state law and to review and approve all rates and forms used by insurance companies. Goal 1: Insurance companies licensed in Georgia are financially stable and capable of fulfilling their obligations. Desired Result 1a: The number of licensed insurance companies that are financially unstable and unable to fulfill their obligations. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 8 8 8 8 Actual Result 15 9 10 9 Desired Result 1b: The number of customers suffering financial loss from insurance companies which have become financially unstable. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 2,296 2,296 2,296 2,296 Actual Result 2,679 2,417 2,606 2,237 Desired Result 1c: The number of insurance complaints regarding unfair or improper treatment by insurance companies. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA 74,662 74,662 74,662 Actual Result 80,715 78,592 95,105 84,762 Note 1: This is the total number of complaints. The department did not provide data regarding complaints that are investigated and found to be valid. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $5,556,920 $5,556,920 FY 2002 Budget $5,890,672 $5,890,672 FY 2003 Recommended $5,645,927 $5,645,927 609 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE - Results-Based Budgeting INDUSTRIAL LOAN REGULATION Purpose: To regulate and examine - in an effort to protect consumers - finance companies that provide loans of $3,000 or less. Goal 1: Consumers are protected from suffering financial loss when financial companies become unstable or charge illegal interest rates. Desired Result 1a: The dollar amount of refunds to consumers paid by finance companies that have not complied with state law. [Indicator] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA $84,423 $84,423 $84,423 $84,423 Actual Result $91,614 $88,866 $179,087 $257,251 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $522,957 $522,957 FY 2002 Budget $547,144 $547,144 FY 2003 Recommended $538,095 $538,095 FIRE SAFETY EDUCATION AND PREVENTION Purpose: To create a fire safe environment that protects and limits the loss of life and property. Goal 1: Newly constructed and existing buildings will comply with fire safety building codes. Desired Result 1a: All new construction within the commissioner's jurisdiction will comply with fire safety building codes before a certificate of occupancy is issued. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 900 900 900 900 Actual Result 1,065 819 772 1,207 Note 1: Meeting the code is a proxy for the actual number of fires directly caused by code violations. Goal 2: Hazardous materials facilities will comply with state laws and standards. Desired Result 2a: All newly constructed hazardous materials facilities within the commissioner's jurisdiction will comply with standards before an operating permit is issued. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 484 484 484 484 Actual Result 452 509 540 656 Note 1: This is a proxy for the actual number of hazardous material spills due to the violation of standards. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $5,031,543 $4,016,528 FY 2002 Budget $5,500,900 $3,716,414 FY 2003 Recommended $4,502,299 $3,465,799 610 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE - Results-Based Budgeting SPECIAL INSURANCE FRAUD Purpose: To investigate, upon request, instances of insurance fraud in cooperation with federal, state, and local government agencies and insurance companies. Goal 1: Deter the occurrence of insurance fraud. Desired Result 1a: The number of fraud cases referred from department and industry sources. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 484 484 484 484 Actual Result 452 509 493 249 Note 1: Cases referred is an indication that fraud is likely to have occurred. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $555,017 $555,017 FY 2002 Budget $651,665 $651,665 FY 2003 Recommended $637,193 $637,193 Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $17,108,722 $16,093,707 FY 2002 Budget $18,161,809 $16,377,323 FY 2003 Recommended $16,832,930 $15,796,430 611 DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE Results-Based Budgeting COMMUNITY-BASED JUVENILE OFFENDER PROGRAM Purpose: Assist juvenile offenders in becoming law-abiding citizens through community based programs and services. Goal 1: Juvenile offenders will become law-abiding citizens. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of committed youth released from a community program in FY 2000 that are recommitted or sentenced to the Department of Juvenile Justice during the 12-month period following release [1] [2] [3] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 16% 15% 14% 15% 15% Actual Result - Percentage: Total [1] [1] [1] 10% - Number [1] [1] [1] 150/1,432 - Percentage: DJJ 17% 16% 9% 10% - Number 746/4,397 659/4,167 266/3,066 149/1,432 - Percentage: Corrections [1] [1] [1] 0.07% - Number [1] [1] [1] 1/1,432 Note 1: Prior to FY 2001, only recidivism to DJJ facilities was reported. Note 2: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on FY 2000 data. Note 3: Designated felons, Superior Court youth, or youths who are committed or sentenced to federal, local, other states' correctional facilities or programs are not included in these statistics. Estimated release from custody dates have been used instead of release from placement date because data on release dates were sometimes missing. 45% Desired Result 1b: Percentage of committed youth 40% released from community programs that are recommitted or 35% sentenced to Georgia's criminal justice system within the three years following their release. [1] [2] [3] 30% 25% Note 1: FY 2001 3-year recidivism data is based upon statistics for 20% juveniles released in FY 1998 15% Note 2: Prior to FY 2001, only recidivism to DJJ facilities was 10% reported. FY 2001 Actual Results show that of the 39% of youth 5% recommitted or resentenced, 3% were remanded to Georgia's adult correctional facilities and 36% were remanded to DJJ. 0% 38% 39% 40% 36% 40% 35% 39% 40% 1,849/ 1,523/ 1,663/ 1587/ 4,850 4,285 4,760 4,036 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 Actual Desired Actual Desired Actua l Desired Actual Desired Desired 40% FY03 Note 3: Designated felons, Superior Court youth, or youths who are committed or sentenced to federal, local, other states' correctional facilities or programs are not included in these statistics. Desired Result 1c: Percentage of probated youth that are committed to the Department of Juvenile Justice or sentenced to a Short Term Program during the 12-month period following probation release [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 7% 6% 6% 6% 6% Actual Result - Percentage - Number 8% 734/9,712 9% 4% 9% 869/9,398 526/12,684 1,143/13,211 Note 1: Designated felons, Superior Court youth, or youths who are committed or sentenced to federal, local, other states' correctional facilities or programs are not included in these statistics. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $73,464,337 $72,248,466 FY 2002 Budget $80,967,173 $76,552,940 FY 2003 Recommendation $79,016,664 $74,602,432 612 DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE - Results-Based Budget YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CAMPUS JUVENILE OFFENDER PROGRAMS Purpose: Protect the public by supervising juvenile offenders in a secure and safe setting and assist juvenile offenders in becoming law-abiding citizens. Goal 1: Juvenile offenders will be supervised in a safe and secure environment. Desired Result 1a: Number of escapes from YDCs FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Number of escapes N/A 0 0 0 0 0 Actual Result - Number of escapes 5 1 2 2 Desired Result 1b: Assault rate of juvenile by other juveniles [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Assaults per 100 juveniles N/A 15 per 100 14 per 100 14 per 100 14 per 100 14 per 100 Actual Result - Assaults per 100 juveniles - Number of incidents/number of youth 16 per 100 35 per 100 36 per 100 44 per 100 1,184/3,338 3,702/10,184 4,310/9,688 Note 1: FY 1999 Actual Results data is incomplete. Due to a changeover in DJJ's computer systems, only the last 6 months of data (January through June 2000) were available. Goal 2: Juvenile offenders will become law-abiding citizens. Desired Result 2a: Percentage of committed youth discharged from a YDC that are recommitted to the Department of Juvenile Justice or Department of Corrections during the one-year period following release FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% Actual Result - Percentage 16% 19% 22% 33% - Number 138/864 218/1,136 180/828 376/1,144 70% 60% 63% 50% 40% 30% 38% 39% 38% 40% 40% 32% 40% 40% Actual Desired Actual 20% 10% 0% 335/ 893 FY98 292/ 791 FY99 250/ 784 FY00 523/ 834 FY01 FY02 FY03 Desired Result 2b: Percentage of committed youth released from a YDC that are recommitted or resentenced to Georgia's criminal justice system within the three years following their release [1] [2] [3] Note 1: FY 2001 3-year recidivism data is based upon statistics for juveniles released in FY 1998 Note 2: Prior to FY 2001, only recidivism to DJJ facilities was reported. In FY 2001, 35% of the youths recidivated to the Georgia Department of Corrections; 28% recidivated to DJJ. Note 3: Designated felons, Superior Court youth, or youths who are committed or sentenced to federal, local, other states' correctional systems are not included in these statistics. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $135,689,728 $132,105,854 FY 2002 Budget $131,324,806 $124,165,135 FY 2003 Recommendation $128,161,175 $121,001,505 REGIONAL YOUTH DETENTION CENTER JUVENILE OFFENDER PROGRAMS Purpose: Protect the public by supervising juvenile offenders in a safe and secure setting and assist juvenile offenders in becoming law-abiding citizens. Goal 1: Juvenile offenders will be supervised in a secure and safe environment. Desired Result 1a: Number of escapes from RYDCs during the fiscal year Desired Result - Number of escapes Actual Result - Number of escapes FY 1998 N/A 7 FY 1999 0 2 FY 2000 0 2 FY 2001 0 3 FY 2002 0 FY 2003 0 613 DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE - Results-Based Budget Desired Result 1b: Assault rate of juvenile by other juveniles [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Assaults per 100 juveniles N/A 18 per 100 17 per 100 17 per 100 17 per 100 17 per 100 Actual Result - Assaults per 100 juveniles - Number of incidents per number of youths 19 per 100 4 per 100 653/15,331 6 per 100 7 per 100 1,704/27,694 1,757/25,267 Note 1: FY 1999 Actual Results data is incomplete. Due to a changeover in DJJ's computer systems, only the last 6 months of data (January through June 2000) were available. Goal 2: Youth held in detention will be housed in appropriate conditions of confinement. Desired Result 2: Percentage of available bed space used by youths throughout the fiscal year (Utilization Rate of RYDC beds) [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result - Percentage capacity used N/A N/A N/A <=100% Actual Result - Percentage capacity used N/A 185% 115% 100% - Average number of youths in RYDCs N/A 1,346 1,255 1,096 - Number of authorized beds in RYDCs N/A 726 1,089 1,096 Note 1: This measures overcrowding in RYDCs; FY 2001 RYDC Average daily population and capacity FY 2002 <=100% FY 2003 <=100% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $72,855,100 $71,480,992 FY 2002 Budget $83,929,389 $7,935,366 FY 2003 Recommendation $81,907,520 $77,331,791 JUVENILE DELINQUENCY PREVENTION ASSISTANCE Purpose: To provide assistance to local communities in preventing juvenile delinquency Goal 1: Assist local communities in reducing the risk factors associated with juvenile delinquency. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of funded local programs that are successful in reducing the risk factors associated with juvenile delinquency [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percent NA 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% Actual Result - Percent NA 84% 80% 86% - Number N/A N/A N/A 80 of 93 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on data collect for Federal Fiscal Year 2001. Desired Result 1a: Percent of the communities and agencies assisted that report they are satisfied with the support they receive from the council [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percent NA 80% 80% 80% 80% 90% Actual Result - Percent (Number) NA 100% 100% 100% N/A N/A N/A 93 of 93 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on data collect for Federal Fiscal Year 2001. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $8,021,176 $438,720 FY 2002 Budget $2,557,915 $647,915 FY 2003 Recommendation $2,497,909 $587,909 Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $282,009,165 $275,835,311 FY 2002 Budget $298,779,283 $280,719,650 FY 2003 Recommendation $291,583,269 $273,523,636 614 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - UNIT A Results-Based Budgeting WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT Purpose: Assist individuals with employment preparation and training, to match eligible job seekers with available positions and to provide employers with training and employment-related services. Goal 1: Job seekers will be matched with appropriate employers and job openings. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of job seekers that find employment following job preparation services. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 122,314 129,788 123,608 136,277 133,986 143,091 124,996 143,091 NA 118,000 NA Desired Result 1b: The level of satisfaction of employers with the workforce services received. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA 70% 73.5% 77% Actual Result 69% 73.1% NA 73.5% Note 1: The desired result for FY 2002 was revised to match the level negotiated with the USDOL. FY 2002 71.5% [1] FY 2003 73% Goal 2: Maximize quality services and training opportunities that enable individuals to find jobs. Desired Result 2a: The percentage of adults that obtain jobs as a result of Workforce Investment Act activities and are employed in the quarter following the last services received. [New Measure] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA 71.0% Actual Result NA NA NA 74.9% Desired Result 2b: The percentage of adults included in DR2a that are employed in the third quarter following the last services received. [New Measure] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA 84.5% 84.5% NA NA NA 89.2% Desired Result 2c: The number of youth that obtain jobs or further their education following Workforce Investment Act services. [New Measure] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA 450 500 NA NA NA 415 Desired Result 2d: The percentage of graduates in the Jobs for Georgia program that achieve a full time placement. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA NA NA NA 88.0% Actual Result NA NA NA 87.9% Note 1: Full time placement includes fulltime jobs, part time jobs with post secondary school, or military service. FY 2003 88.0% 615 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - UNIT A - Results-Based Budgeting Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $108,817,910 $9,324,952 FY 2002 Budget $99,987,530 $10,648,439 FY 2003 Recommended $99,532,994 $10,823,520 LABOR MARKET INFORMATION Purpose: Gather, analyze and distribute a wide range of employment and employment-related data and statistics to support informed employment and economic development activities. Goal 1: Provide complete, accurate and useful employment and employment-related data and analyses to the business community and the workforce. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of data users that find labor market information data and publications useful. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 87% 87% NA 89% NA 91% NA 91% 91% Note 1: Data surveys are conducted periodically by the division. It should be noted that no funds are provided for this activity; however, electronic customer feedback or customer surveys of certain products will be undertaken during FY2002. Desired Result 1b: The survey response rate of the Occupational Employment Statistics survey. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 65% 68% 71% 71% Actual Result 59% 78% 77% 74% Note 1: The response rate is an indicator of quality. FY 2003 72% Desired Result 1c: The accuracy rate of industrial codes to which employers are assigned in the Employment and Wages Report (ES-202). [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA 94% 95% NA NA NA 92% Note 1: This is a new measure. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $9,826,863 $0 FY 2002 Budget $9,039,433 $0 FY 2003 Recommended $9,225,486 $0 616 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - UNIT A - Results-Based Budgeting UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PROGRAM Purpose: Enhance Georgia's economic strength through collecting unemployment insurance taxes from Georgia's employers and through providing short-term income maintenance to eligible individuals who are unemployed through no fault of their own. Goal 1: Provide eligible individuals with timely and accurate benefit payments. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of eligible individuals who file an unemployment insurance claim that are paid within 21 days. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 92% 92% 91% 92% 92% 92% 91% 92% 92% Desired Result 1b: The percentage of unemployment insurance benefit recipients that are paid accurately. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA 95.9% 97.6% Note 1: This is a new measure, and the accuracy rate will fluctuate widely based on the claims load and other factors. FY 2003 NA Goal 2: Maintain and protect the solvency of the unemployment insurance trust fund. Desired Result 2a: The percentage of delinquent employer accounts. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA 16,610 15,780 14,991 Actual Result 16,610 25,721 33,182 14.7% 28,263 Note 1: Data will be converted from number (old measure) to percentage in FY 2001. FY 2002 14,991 FY 2003 13% Desired Result 2b: The percent of audits in which employer-reported wages are found to be inaccurate. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA NA NA Note 1: Data is not collected for this measure. FY 2003 NA Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $67,726,627 $12,084,596 FY 2002 Budget $54,187,197 $12,162,371 FY 2003 Recommended $55,693,684 $13,225,294 617 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - UNIT A - Results-Based Budgeting REGULATION OF YOUTH EMPLOYMENT Purpose: Promote the safety and well-being of Georgia's working youth. Goal 1: Enforce compliance with Georgia laws regulating youth employment. Desired Result 1a: The percent of serious child labor violations found during initial audits that remain upon re-inspection. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA 12% Actual Result NA NA NA NA Note 1: Serious violations are those which present health risks to minor workers. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $421,525 $421,525 FY 2002 Budget $434,914 $434,914 FY 2003 Recommended $448,420 $448,420 SAFETY INSPECTIONS Purpose: Promote and protect public safety through a comprehensive inspection and enforcement program for boilers, pressure vessels, elevators, amusement and carnival rides. Provide training and information on workplace exposure to hazardous chemicals to state employees. Report industrial accidents and deaths. Goal 1: Reduce the number of accidents caused by faulty boilers and pressure vessels, elevators and escalators, and amusement and carnival rides. Desired Result 1a: The number of amusement and carnival ride accidents due to mechanical or structural failure. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Desired Result 1b: The number of elevator and escalator accidents due to mechanical failure. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result 5 5 5 5 Actual Result 5 4 4 5 FY 2002 5 FY 2003 5 Desired Result 1c: The number of boiler and pressure vessel accidents due to mechanical failure. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result 2 2 2 2 2 Actual Result 2 1 0 1 FY 2003 2 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $3,054,316 $3,054,316 FY 2002 Budget $2,988,119 $2,988,119 FY 2003 Recommended $3,174,228 $3,174,228 Total - All Programs (UNIT A): FY 2001 Actual FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommended Total Funds $189,847,241 $166,637,193 $168,074,812 State Funds $24,885,389 $26,233,843 $27,671,462 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - UNIT A - Results-Based Budgeting 618 WORK Purpose: To assist people with disabilities to go to work. Goal 1: People with disabilities who are eligible for Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Program services and who commit to and participate in a work plan will obtain and retain employment for at least three months. Desired Result 1a: Of the people who commit to a work plan and participate in the VR program, 60% will obtain and retain employment for at least three months in the fiscal year. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 56.0% 60% 59.0% 60% 64.0% 60% 59.2% 60% 60% Goal 2: Georgia Industries for the Blind (GIB) will employ individuals who are blind in manufacturing and packaging facilities. Desired Result 2a: People who are blind or severely visually impaired will perform at least 75% of direct labor hours. Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA 75.4% FY 1999 75% 75.6% FY 2000 75% 67.1% FY 2001 75% 65.6% FY 2002 75.0% FY 2003 75.0% Goal 3: Through entrepreneurial opportunities, the Business Enterprise Program (BEP) will assist people who are blind in becoming successful contributors to the state's economy. Desired Result 3a: BEP will provide entrepreneurial opportunities to more blind vendors by increasing the number of BEP locations and blind vendors by 5% annually. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA NA 5% NA NA NA NA Desired Result 3b: The overall average BEP vendor earnings will increase by 5% annually. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA NA NA FY 2002 NA FY 2003 5% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $92,996,492 $21,692,802 FY 2002 Budget $104,207,287 $23,114,238 FY 2003 Recommended $100,156,072 $19,054,354 619 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - UNIT B - Results-Based Budgeting DISABILITY ADJUDICATION Purpose: To efficiently process applications for federal disability programs so that eligible Georgia citizens can obtain support. Goal 1: The program will accurately and promptly determine whether applicants for disability benefits are eligible for the federally administered disability benefits program. Desired Result 1a: Federal quality reviews will show that at least 91.6% (the federal standard) of a statistically significant random sample of disability benefit determinations are correct. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 91.6% 91.6% 91.6% 91.6% Actual Result 94% 93.9% 92.9% 94.5% Desired Result 1b: Federal disability claims will be determined within 120 [1] days. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 75 days 115 days 115 days 120 days Actual Result 72 days 78 days 94 days [1] 118 days Note 1: The federal agency changed its standard and method of counting days to include federal field office application time. The new standard is 120 days. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $48,697,620 $125 FY 2002 Budget $54,867,080 $0 FY 2003 Recommended $54,867,080 $0 ROOSEVELT WARM SPRINGS INSTITUTE FOR REHABILITATION Purpose: To empower individuals with disabilities to achieve personal independence. Goal 1: The self-sufficiency of persons with physical disabilities at Roosevelt Warm Springs Institute for Rehabilitation will increase so that they can better manage their disabilities. Desired Result 1a: Ninety-five percent of discharged patients with a physical disability will demonstrate an overall increase in functional gain between admission and discharge, as indicated by 18 self-care measures. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 92% NA 94% 95% 94% 95% 93% 95% 95% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $29,444,702 $5,701,425 FY 2002 Budget $29,541,144 $7,301,904 FY 2003 Recommended $32,174,344 $9,943,773 Total - All Programs (UNIT B): Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $171,138,814 $27,394,352 FY 2002 Budget $188,615,511 $30,416,142 FY 2003 Recommended $187,197,496 $28,998,127 620 DEPARTMENT OF LAW Results-Based Budgeting Purpose: Protect the interests of the state and its citizens by providing legal services and legal representation to the Executive Branch of state government. Goal 1: The legal representation of the state, including cases, transactions, and opinions will be handled in an efficient manner. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of cases, administrative hearings, and potential litigation matters that are completed. [1] FY 1998 Desired Result NA Actual Result 5,052 Note 1: Measure was changed from a count to a percentage. FY 1999 5,600 5,876 FY 2000 5,544 42% 4,114 FY 2001 5,683 42% 4,736 FY 2002 4,217 FY 2003 4,000 Desired Result 1b: The percentage of legal transactions (real property acquisitions, bonded indebtedness matters and legal advice/opinions.) that are completed. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 3,534 3,576 2,948 3,612 2,983 19% 2,740 21% 3,626 2,773 2,500 Note 1: Measure was changed from a count to a percentage. Desired Result 1c: The percent of requests for written opinions that are completed within 90 days. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA 97% 97% 70% [1.] Actual Result NA 64% 44% 40% Note 1: Desired result was revised after initial actual result data was reviewed. FY 2002 70% FY 2003 70% Desired Result 1d: The percent of state executive agencies that respond to a survey that the Department of Law's services met their expectations. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Note 1: Data is not collected for this measure. Program Fund Allocation: Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $43,585,889 $15,398,545 FY 2001 Actual $43,585,889 $15,398,545 FY 2002 Budget $37,454,547 $16,147,017 FY 2003 Recommended $36,885,757 $15,404,031 FY 2002 Budget $37,454,547 $16,147,017 FY 2003 Recommended $36,885,757 $15,404,031 621 MERIT SYSTEM OF PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION Results-Based Budgeting EMPLOYEE BENEFITS Purpose: To recruit and retain state employees while minimizing employee and employer cost of high quality benefits. Goal 1: The state will have a total compensation and rewards program that attracts and retains high quality employees. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of state employees who rate the Flexible Benefits Plan as satisfying in terms of product, cost, and services offered. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 87% 85% 95% 85% 95% 85% 81% 85% 85% Desired Result 1b: Percentage of state employees who rate the Deferred Compensation Plan as satisfying in terms of product, cost, and services offered. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% Actual Result 87% 93% 93% 75% Desired Result 1c: Percentage of surveyed employees who rate the Flexible Benefits Plan as a good value in terms of product, cost, and services offered. Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA 87% FY 1999 85% 88% FY 2000 85% 88% FY 2001 85% 78% FY 2002 85% FY 2003 85% Desired Result 1d: Percentage of surveyed employees who rate the Deferred Compensation Plan as a good value in terms of product, cost, and services offered. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% Actual Result 92% 95% 95% 75% Desired Result 1e: Maintain favored tax status of the benefit plan for employers. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result (FICA Savings) Actual Result (FICA Savings) NA $9.2m NA $9.5m NA $10.6m FY 2001 $9.5m $11.9m FY 2002 $12m FY 2003 $12m Desired Result 1f: Maintain favored tax status of the benefit plan for employees. Desired Result (FICA Savings) Actual Result (FICA Savings) FY 1998 NA $9.2m FY 1999 NA $9.5m FY 2000 NA $10.6m FY 2001 $9.5m $11.9m FY 2002 $12m FY 2003 $12m 622 MERIT SYSTEM OF PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1g: Rate of return of each investment option to that of the appropriate index (ROI) based on 3 and 5 year returns. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA [1] [1] [1] [1] [1] Actual Result [1] [1] [1] [1] Note 1:See http://www.gms.state.ga.us/employee/defer-perfdata.asp for rate of return information or contact the Merit System. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $5,397,528 $0 FY 2002 Budget $5,241,585 $0 FY 2003 Recommended $5,176,485 $0 STATE EMPLOYEE HIRING, PAY AND TRAINING Purpose: Provide customer agencies with technical assistance and direct services to recruit, develop, and retain skilled and productive employees. Goal 1: The Merit System will satisfy the human resource needs of state government through effective leadership and practices in recruiting, selecting, developing, managing, and retaining its workforce. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of new employees receiving initial performance evaluation of "meets expectations" or better. Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA 99% FY 1999 95% 99% FY 2000 95% 99% FY 2001 95% 74% FY 2002 95% FY 2003 95% Desired Result 1b: Percent of users that evaluate the services of hearing officers for grievances as meeting or exceeding their needs. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 80% 85% 86% 87% 86% 87% 85% 87% 87% Desired Result 1c: Percentage of surveyed user agencies and participants that evaluate the Alternative Dispute Resolution Service as satisfactory. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 100% 85% 91% 85% 91% 85% 97% 85% 85% Desired Result 1d: Percentage of users that evaluate technical assistance in policy development services as very good and attest that it meets their needs. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 92% 93% 93% 88% 97% 88% 88% 623 MERIT SYSTEM OF PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: Georgia Merit System products and services are accessible and responsive to the needs of state agencies, employees, and the public. Desired Result 2a: Percentage of customers (hiring managers) surveyed who evaluate referred applicants as "qualified" or "well qualified" FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 80% 85% 88% 87% 88% 87% 74% 87% 87% Desired Result 2b: Percentage of personnel and staff managers surveyed who rate Merit System consulting and technical assistance as "effective" or "highly effective" in meeting their objectives. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 89% 85% 95% 85% 95% 85% 93% 85% 85% Desired Result 2c: Percentage of surveyed employees who attend training who respond that productivity of employees improved because of skills/competencies acquired from training. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 65% 85% 93% 85% 90% 85% 89% 85% 85% Desired Result 2d: Percentage of surveyed managers of the employees who attended training who respond that productivity of employees improved because of skills/competencies acquired from training. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 87% 85% 98% 85% 92% 85% 100% 85% 85% Desired Result 2e: Percentage of organizations who receive human resource development, organizational development, or coordination services who respond that services met desired objectives. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% N/A 100% 100% 100% Desired Result 2f: Percentage of customer agencies surveyed who respond that training services provided met agreed upon objectives. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 100% 85% 99% 85% 100% 85% 100% 85% 85% 624 MERIT SYSTEM OF PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 3: The Georgia Merit System will use information technology systems to provide timely, accurate, and valuable information to state agencies, employees, and the public. Desired Result 3a: Percentage of customer organizations receiving distance learning services who respond in post assessment that services met agreed upon human resource development objectives. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 100% 85% 93% 85% 100% 85% 100% 85% 85% WORKFORCE PLANNING (Subprogram) Purpose: Establish workforce planning as the vehicle state agencies utilize to determine their human resource needs. Goal 1: Establish workforce planning as the way state agencies align their human resources with strategic business goals. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of executive agencies using workforce planning, as indicated in the agency plans submitted to GMS. (Target percentage is 75%.) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA 75% 75% NA NA NA NA Desired Result 1b: Percentage of non-executive agencies using workforce planning as indicated in the agency plans submitted to GMS. (Target percentage is 50%.) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA 50% 50% Actual Result NA NA NA NA Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $8,527,982 $0 FY 2002 Budget $8,281,759 $0 FY 2003 Recommended $8,178,739 $0 Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $13,925,510 $0 FY 2002 Budget $13,523,343 $0 FY 2003 Recommended $14,175,899 $0 625 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY Results-Based Budgeting Program Note: This RBB displays the goals and measures for the functions that transferred to the Department of Motor Vehicle Safety (DMVS). This is a new agency and the measures will likely be revised for the FY 2004 Budget Report. Data was not collected DRIVERS SERVICES Purpose: Improve the quality of driving in Georgia through the regulation (licensing, suspension, revocation and reinstatement) of individuals to ensure they are deserving the privilege to drive. Goal 1: The Department of Motor Vehicle Safety will provide efficient and courteous services when customers are applying for and receiving a driver's license. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of customers that rate the level of services they receive at driver service facilities as satisfactory or better. Program Fund Allocation: FY 2001 Actual FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommended [1] Total Funds $23,813,913 $37,040,300 $82,407,014 State Funds $23,813,913 $36,380,300 $78,019,148 Note 1. The function and budget recommendation of Drivers Services and Tag and Title have been combined under the Department of Motor Vehicle Safety. ENFORCEMENT Purpose: To maintain and improve commercial and vehicle safety to protect the lives and property of anyone using Georgia's roadways. Goal 1: Overweight trucks will be kept off the roads. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of heavy trucks in compliance with weight guidelines. Goal 2: Reduce the number of commercial vehicle crashes, injuries and fatalities due to mechanical defects and driver violations of state and federal regulations. Desired Result 1a: The number of commercial motor vehicle crashes per million miles traveled. Desired Result 1b: The number of commercial motor vehicle crashes per million miles traveled in high crash corridors. Program Fund Allocation: FY 2001 Actual FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommended Total Funds $19,471,709 $20,593,555 $21,235,455 State Funds $2,208,404 $2,556,560 $13,969,428 MOTOR VEHICLE SERVICES Purpose: To establish motor vehicle ownership by maintaining timely title and registration records. Goal 1: Motor vehicle tag and title registrations will be processed in a timely manner. Desired Result 1a: The average number of days to process a motor vehicle registration. Desired Result 1b: The average number of days to process a motor vehicle title application. Program Fund Allocation: FY 2001 Actual FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommended [3] Total Funds $36,226,370 $22,901,680 State Funds $33,945,565 $21,601,680 Note 3. See Drivers Services Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $79,511,992 $59,967,882 FY 2002 Budget $80,535,535 $60,538,540 FY 2003 Recommended $103,642,469 $91,988,576 626 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - UNIT A Results-Based Budgeting PARKS, RECREATION AND HISTORIC SITES PROGRAMS Purpose: Protect and enhance the state's natural and cultural resources, and interpret and make those resources available for Georgia's current and future citizens to use and enjoy. Goal 1: Balance the preservation of the resource and the availability of the resource for visitation and use by guests. Desired Result 1a: Maintain the level of visitation in popular and over-utilized parks (Region 1) and increase the visitation in underutilized parks (Regions 2 & 3). FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 REGION 1 Desired Result (Number of visitors) Actual Result (Number of visitors) REGION 2 NA 6,700,000 6,700,000 7,399,030 7,399,000 7,547,003 7,399,000 7,018,924 7,547,003 7,018,924 Desired Result (Number of visitors) Actual Result (Number of visitors) REGION 3 NA 2,866,500 2,730,000 2,475,452 2,600,771 2,914,646 2,987,512 2,665,740 3,062,199 2,732,383 Desired Result (Number of visitors) NA 6,090,000 5,746,528 Actual Result (Number of visitors) 5,800,000 5,469,629 5,662,507 Note 1: Desired results for Region 1 should include "or less" and for Region 2 & 3 "or more." 5,804,070 5,663,075 5,949,172 5,804,651 Goal 2: Provide visitors with an affordable, safe and high quality recreational experience. Desired Result 2a: Visitors to recreation centers who state that the facility met their expectations. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result (Met Expectations) NA 75% 75% 75% 75% Actual Result (Met Expectations) 75% 84% 96% 98% Note 1: Determined by comment cards rating "overall visitor experience." FY 2003 75% Desired Result 2b: Golfers who rate their experience at DNR's courses as good or above. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result (Good or excellent) NA 90% 90% 90% Actual Result (Good or excellent) NA 99% 99% 98% FY 2002 90% FY 2003 90% Goal 3: Students and visitors will develop an appreciation of Georgia's natural and cultural resources. Desired Result 3a: Participants who state that the educational program met their expectations. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result (Met Expectations) 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% Actual Result (Met Expectations) 75% 85% 95% 91% Note 1: Almost all parks and historic sites conduct educational programs to inform and enhance visitors' experiences. Subjects include wildlife, environmental, survival skills, living history, etc. FY 2003 75% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $57,951,479 $32,257,505 FY 2002 Budget $53,329,084 $32,174,674 FY 2003 Recommended $52,650,687 $30,641,354 627 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting WILDLIFE RESOURCE PROGRAMS Purpose: Conserve Georgia's wildlife, fish and botanical resources and provide wildlife-associated and boating recreation for Georgia's citizens and visitors. Goal 1: Effectively manage Georgia's wildlife, fish and plant populations and their habitats. Desired Result 1a: Catch rate for Atlantic striped bass in the Savannah River, and Gulf Striped Bass in the Flint River. [1] [2] [3] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Atlantic Striped Bass (Savannah River) Desired Result (fish/hour) NA 6 3 3.0 3.0 3.0 Actual Result (fish/hour) 2.8 6.5 1.5 0.5 Gulf Striped Bass (Flint River) Desired Result (fish/hour) NA 1.4 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 Actual Result (fish/hour) 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.3 Note 1: Atlantic Striped Bass are native to the Savannah River drainage and Gulf Striped Bass are native to the Flint River. Note 2: Both of these native species have declined dramatically due to habitat degradation and other factors Note 3: Electrofishing catch rates are used to monitor the population level these species. Desired Result 1b: White tailed deer populations, black bear populations and the wild turkey populations. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 DEER Desired Result (population estimate) NA 8,000,000 - 800,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 800,000 - 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 Actual Result (population estimate) 1,388,000 1,300,000 1,150,000 1300000 TURKEY Desired Result (population estimate) NA 250,000 500,000 250,000 500,000 250,000 500,000 250,000 500,000 Actual Result (population estimate) 400,000 400,000 375,000 350,000 BEAR FY 2003 1,000,000 1,200,000 250,000 500,000 Desired Result (population estimate) NA NA 1,250 - 1,800 1,250 - 1,800 1,250 - 1,800 1,250 - 1,800 Actual Result (population estimate) 1,600 1,700 1,600 1,800 Desired Result 1c: Five year average for the Federally listed endangered animal species in Georgia. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 LOGGERHEAD TURTLE NESTS Desired Result (number of nests) NA 1,081 1,081 1,058 1,058 Actual Result (number of nests) 1,058 1,246 1,420 801 WOOD STORK COLONIES Desired Result (number of colonies) NA 14 14 14 14 Actual Result (number of colonies) 14 12 7 12 NA RIGHT WHALE CALVES Desired Result (number of calves) NA 5 5 5 5 Actual Result (number of calves) 5 4 1 30 FY 2003 1,058 14 NA 5 628 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting BALD EAGLE NESTS Desired Result (number of nests) Actual Result (number of nests) RCW PERMITS RECEIVED Desired Result (number of permits) Actual Result (number of permits) NA 26 26 26 26 26 26 34 49 53 NA 0 0 7 7 7 0 0 0 4 Desired Result 1d: Percent of the met conservation needs for state protected plants. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result (Conservation needs met) NA 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% Actual Result (Conservation needs met) 13.6% 8.8% 14.4% 28.0% Note 1: For a list of the state protected plants, see Board of Natural Resources Rule 391-4-10-.09. FY 2002 10.0% FY 2003 10.0% Desired Result 1e: Songbird populations. POINT COUNTS Desired Result Actual Result BLOCKS SURVEYED Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA 1350 NA 100 FY 1999 1000 1277 200 225 FY 2000 1000 987 200 360 FY 2001 1000 1007 200 75 FY 2002 1000 200 FY 2003 1000 0 Desired Result 1f: Rating on the quality of technical services relating to the Private Lands Initiatives. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result (rating of good or better) NA 70.0% 70.0% 90.0% 90.0% Actual Result (rating of good or better) 90.0% 95.0% 90.0% 100.0% FY 2003 90.0% Note 1: The Wildlife Resources Division works with corporate forest landowners and private individuals to implement wildlife friendly practices through Forest Stewardship Program, the Forestry for Wildlife Program, and other technical assistance from professional wildlife biologists. Goal 2: Provide safe and abundant hunting, fishing, bird watching and other wildlife-related recreational and boating opportunities for Georgia's citizens and visitors. Desired Result 2a: Hunting, Fishing and wildlife-associated recreational opportunities FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 HUNTING LICENSES Desired Result (estimated number sold) NA 350,000 350,000 325,000 330,000 330,000 Actual Result (certified license number) 366,680 331,705 332,635 330,151 FISHING LICENSES Desired Result (estimated number sold) NA 653,000 653,000 653,000 653,000 653,000 Actual Result (certified license number) 677,504 622,027 660,425 674,548 REGISTERED BOATS Desired Result (estimated number registered) NA 302,000 320,000 320,000 320,000 335,000 Actual Result (certified number registered) 308,706 305,364 319,123 325,000 629 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 2b: Citizen days spent hunting and fishing. FY 1998 FY 1999 HUNTING DAYS Desired Result (person days) NA 6,504,000 Actual Result (person days) 6,504,000 6,504,000 FISHING DAYS Desired Result (person days) NA 11,591,000 Actual Result (person days) 11,951,000 11,591,000 FY 2000 6,504,000 7,161,985 11,591,000 11,591,000 FY 2001 6,504,000 7,856,000 11,591,000 11,591,000 FY 2002 6,504,000 11,591,000 FY 2003 6,504,000 11,591,000 Desired Result 2c: Rating of the quality of hunting or fishing from randomly selected hunters and anglers. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 HUNTERS RATING Desired Result (Satisfactory or better) NA 70% 70% 70% 70% Actual Result (Satisfactory or better) 78% 78.00% 79.70% 87.20% ANGLERS RATING Desired Result (Satisfactory or better) NA 70.00% 70.00% 70.00% 70.00% Actual Result (Satisfactory or better) 93.00% 93.00% 93.00% 93.00% FY 2003 70.00% 70.00% Desired Result 2d: Hunter and Boater accident rate . FY 1998 HUNTERS ACCIDENT RATE Desired Result (Per 100,000 licensed hunters) NA Actual Result (Per 100,000 licensed hunters) 16 BOATERS ACCIDENT RATE Desired Result (Per 100,000 registered boats) NA Actual Result (Per 100,000 registered boats) 51 FY 1999 21 25 40 41.0 FY 2000 21 16.7 40 50 FY 2001 21 16.7 40 60 FY 2002 21 40 FY 2003 20 40 Program Fund Allocation Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $59,809,740 $46,824,855 FY 2002 Budget $50,632,034 $46,810,475 FY 2003 Recommended $49,187,322 $45,017,842 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAMS Purpose: Protect and improve Georgia's natural environment and the welfare of citizens by striving for clean air, clean water, productive land and healthy people. Goal 1: Ensure that no land in Georgia is incapable of productive use as a result of contamination or waste. Desired Result 1a: Hazardous waste cleanup projects in progress and projects completed. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 CLEANUPS IN PROGRESS Desired Result NA 313 361 419 482 554 Actual Result 272 314 364 426 CLEANUPS COMPLETED Desired Result NA 85 100 121 133 146 Actual Result 77 91 110 128 Note 1: There are currently 534 hazardous waste sites listed as potential candidates for cleanup with the state Superfund. 630 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1b: Underground Storage Tank (UST) cleanup projects in progress and projects completed. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 CLEANUPS IN PROGRESS [1] Desired Result NA NA 5,130 4,500 3,800 3,200 Actual Result NA NA 4,534 4,210 CLEANUPS COMPLETED Desired Result NA NA 3,280 5,000 6,000 6,800 Actual Result NA NA 4,445 5,243 Note 1: The cleanups above are cumulative end of fiscal year totals. Since 1988, a total of 9,453 UST leaks have been reported. Goal 2: Ensure that Georgia's streams, lakes and ground water are of the highest possible quality. Desired Result 2a: River miles, Lake acres and estuary square miles that meet water quality standards. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 RIVER MILES Desired Result NA 37 37 37 37 Actual Result NA 87 643 106 LAKE ACRES Desired Result NA 1,825 1,825 1,825 1,825 Actual Result NA 130 7,032 438 ESTUARY SQUARE MILES Desired Result NA 5 5 5 5 Actual Result NA 0 0 74 FY 2003 37 1,825 5 Desired Result 2b: Percent of people in Georgia on community water systems that meet drinking water standards. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% Actual Result NA 97.6% 96.1% 98.6% Note 1: There are currently 6.9 million Georgians served by 2,554 community water systems Goal 3: Ensure that Georgia's air is of the highest possible quality. Desired Result 3a: Percent of time that the air quality in the 13 county metro area meets the ozone standard and all other standards. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FEDERAL OZONE STANDARD Desired Result NA 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% Actual Result 99% 95% 93% 98% ALL OTHER AIR STANDARDS Desired Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result 100% 100% 100% 100% 631 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 3b: Percent of time that the air quality in Georgia excluding the 13 county metro area meets the ozone standard and all other standards. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result (Percent) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result (Percent) 100% 100% 99% 99% Program Fund Allocation Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $133,997,316 $55,474,979 FY 2002 Budget $72,316,514 $63,273,743 FY 2003 Recommended $69,623,709 $60,767,778 COASTAL RESOURCES PROGRAM Purpose: Protect, conserve and enhance Georgia's costal lands, marshes, tidal waters, submerged lands, sand dunes, beaches, and marine fisheries to optimize ecological, social, and economic benefits for present and future Georgia citizens and visitors. Goal 1: Ensure sustainable marine fisheries for commercial and recreational uses and ecosystem health. Desired Result 1a: Pounds of shrimp that are harvested. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.5 Actual Result 4.5 4.4 [1] 4.4 [1] 3.5 [1] Note 1: Harvests in FYs 99,00, and 01 adversely impacted by long term (3 year) drought; harvest in 2002 will be adversely impacted by winter freeze. Desired Result 1b: Crab harvest POUNDS OF CRAB Desired Result (In millions) Actual Result (In millions) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 NA 7.8 7.8 7.4 4.0 5.0 6.9 5.1 [1] 6.0 [1] 5.0 [1] CRAB HARVESTERS Desired Result Actual Result NUMBER OF TRAPS USED Desired Result Actual Result NA 250 NA 38,000 175 159 27,000 22,150 159 159 27,000 21,650 159 159 21,500 20,700 159 21,500 159 21,500 Note 1: License numbers are available for the 01-02 license year (runs Apr 1-Mar31), although harvest is not. Harvest data are collected on a calendar year. *Harvest in FYs 99,00, 01 (and likely 02) adversely impacted by long term (3 year+) drought which has impacted natural mortality. Goal 2: Reduce the impact of marsh fill and other illegal activities on Georgia's coasts. Desired Result 2a: Incidents of illegal fill of marshes. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 56 56 56 39 Actual Result 62 58 96 39 FY 2003 39 632 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 2b: Average of acres filled per permit issuance. FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result (acres filled) NA 0.1 Actual Result (acres filled) 0.1 0.0 FY 2000 0.1 0.0 FY 2001 0.1 0.0 FY 2002 0.1 FY 2003 0.1 Goal 3: Ensure quality recreational saltwater fishing opportunities for Georgia citizens and visitors. Desired Result 3a: Recreational saltwater angling trips along Georgia's coast as reported in the Federal Marine Fisheries Survey. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result (Number of trips) NA 624,891 624,891 624,891 624,891 624,891 Actual Result (Number of trips) 568,083 571,589 472,577 793,932 Program Fund Allocation Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $5,497,842 $3,315,142 FY 2002 Budget $3,387,603 $3,383,965 FY 2003 Recommended $3,177,796 $3,181,732 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM Purpose: Identify, protect and preserve Georgia's historic places and archaeological sites for the use, economic benefit, education and enjoyment of present and future generations. Goal 1: Georgia's Historic sites will be identified and preserved through state and local community preservation activities. Desired Result 1a: The number of historic properties in Georgia that are identified by historic and archeological surveys. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA 98,000 95,500 101,000 Actual Result NA NA 85,252 91,151 Desired Result 1b: The number of historic properties in Georgia that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 43,862 54,562 52,500 53,500 54,500 Actual Result 47,212 50,548 52,087 52,570 Desired Result 1c: The number of state owned historic properties that are identified or protected as a result of HPD's technical assistance. (Properties identified or preserved were submitted as one number.) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result (# Identified / #Protected) NA 32 40 27 50 50 Actual Result (# Identified / # Protected) NA 22 37 52 Desired Result 1d: The number of "effective" [1] community historic preservation programs as determined by an annual survey. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA 163 183 Actual Result NA [2] 19 [2] 15 [2] 143 Note 1: Effective community programs include established programs that directly promote the preservation of historic resources at the local level. Examples include: "Mainstreet" programs, Better Hometown Programs, Certified Local Governments and the like. Note 2: The previous years (FY 1998 - FY 2000) actual results for this measure were deleted due to poor data quality. 633 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1e: Number of historic properties that are being preserved as documented by the use of the Federal Rehabilitation Investment Tax Credit and State Preferential Property Tax Assessment Program for Rehabilitated Historic Property. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 450 [1] 350 [1] 90 90 Actual Result NA 437 [1] 278 [1] 91 NA NA Note 1: The previous years (FY 1998 - FY 2000) actual results for this measure were deleted due to poor data quality. Desired Result 1f: The number of historic properties that are preserved through HPD's grant assistance program. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA 20 30 30 Actual Result NA NA NA 25 Program Fund Allocation Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $4,581,405 $3,928,299 FY 2002 Budget $4,213,901 $3,830,418 FY 2003 Recommended $3,777,430 $3,385,463 POLLUTION PREVENTION ASSISTANCE (P2AD) PROGRAMS Purpose: Facilitate programs and activities that reduce pollution through non-regulatory means by improving industrial, commercial, and agricultural processes, developing new industry opportunities for the productive use of waste by-products, and installing a pollution prevention ethic in the general public. Goal 1: Decrease pollution in the form of emissions to air, land and water by manufacturing, commercial, institutional and agricultural operations Desired Result 1a: Percent of on site assessment clients that implement at least one waste reduction or natural resource conservation recommendation. (Proxy) [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 [2] FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA 75% Actual Result NA NA 45% 15/33 NA [2] Note 1: Total number of clients = 33, Number of clients who implemented at lease one recommendation = 15 Note 2: Data is reported for the colander year (CY). (FY 2000 = CY 2000) Desired Result 1b: Pollution prevention participants at the model and achievement levels that achieve an overall waste reduction of 25% and 50% of their goal respectively. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 [1] FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result (percent/number) NA NA NA NA NA 100% Actual Result (percent/number) NA NA 100% / 6 NA [1] Note 1: Data is reported for the calendar year (CY). (FY 2000 = CY 2000) Goal 2: P2AD will promote strategic implementation of byproduct recovery, reuse, recycling and diversion of nonresidential solid waste from landfills as cost effective techniques to minimize industrial waste. Desired Result 2a: Recycling of solid waste at Georgia's military bases. (Calendar year data.) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result (tons of waste recycled) NA NA NA 52,066 54,669 47,584 Actual Result (tons of waste recycled) NA NA NA NA 634 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 2b: Number of clients receiving assistance that successfully diverted materials through the recycling assistance program. Data is reported for the calendar year (CY). (FY 2000 = CY 2000) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA 160 Actual Result NA NA 121 NA Goal 3: P2AD will promote the proper management of household hazardous waste by providing local governments and the public with assistance. (This goal is based on the assumption that individuals interested enough to seek out information from P2AD are likely to act on that information and properly manage their hazardous household waste.) Desired Result 3a: The number of contacts: (1.) that provide information to individuals regarding the proper disposal of hazardous household waste (2.) and the number of individuals that receive information directly from P2AD. (Calendar year data: FY 2000 = CY 2000). [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA 10,612 Actual Result NA NA 7,974 NA Note: 1. These contacts can be hits to the P2AD website, phone calls to P2AD or requests for pamphlets. Desired Result 3b: The number of individuals reached by P2AD's radio and TV ads. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA 3,798,100 NA [2.] Note 1: Information obtained by radio and TV stations who ran the programs. Note 2: Data is reported for the calendar year (CY). (FY 2000 = CY 2000) FY 2002 NA FY 2003 5,055,271 Goal 4: P2AD will assist the manufacturing, commercial, institutional and agricultural sector in their pollution prevention efforts through education and awareness. Desired Result 4a: Percent of workshop attendees who rate the value of the information as good or better. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA NA NA 90% 90% FY 2003 100% Actual Result NA NA 100% (2 of 2) NA Program Fund Allocation Other Funds Total Funds State Funds Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $2,550,743 $2,452,906 FY 2001 Actual $2,319,955 $2,319,955 FY 2002 Budget $1,034,433 $1,104,583 FY 2002 Budget $3,497,182 $3,497,182 FY 2003 Recommended $440,696 $474,001 FY 2003 Recommended $3,006,541 $3,006,540 Total - All Programs (Unit A) Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $266,708,480 $146,573,641 FY 2002 Budget $188,410,751 $154,075,040 FY 2003 Recommended $181,864,181 $146,474,710 PROGRAM NOTE: The Agricultural Exposition Authority (Budget Unit B) RBB was not displayed in the RBB section this year. Please contact OPB for additional information. 635 STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES Results-Based Budgeting PAROLE SELECTION AND SUPERVISION Purpose: Contribute positively to public safety in Georgia by investigating offenders' criminal histories in order to determine inmates who will be paroled and those who will not, and to provide supervision, monitoring, programming and other services in the community that ensures compliance with release conditions and successful transition of parolees back into the community as law abiding citizens and responding to the needs of crime victims and their families. Goal 1: Provide safe and effective supervision of parolees that creates and maintains an efficient, low cost community-based alternative to prison incarceration. Desired Result 1a: Daily cost of regular parole supervision. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA $2.55 $2.62 $2.50 $2.65 $2.70 $2.50 $2.91 $2.92 $2.90 Note 1: In FY 2000, the average cost per day to keep a state inmate incarcerated was almost $50.00, compared to a daily cost of $2.70 for a parolee to be supervised in the community. Desired Result 1b: Percentage of parolees that have their parole revoked for failing to comply with their release conditions. [1] [2] Desired Result FY 1998 NA FY 1999 13% FY 2000 14% FY 2001 14% FY 2002 14% FY 2003 14% Actual Result 14% 12% 10.4 % 3,465 of 33,308 10.4% 3,383 of 32,461 Note 1: Revocations are categorized as 1) technical violation only, 2) new crime, or 3) new conviction, reporting this measure as a total of the 3 provides the most accurate assessment of this area. Reporting just 1 of these categories could be very misleading since most parolees arrested for a crime do not "have their day in court" until after the parole period has ended. Note 2: Total Revocations FY 2001 = 3,383 (Technical Violation = 1,021; New Crime = 1,719; New Conviction = 643) Goal 2: Community supervision will produce a parolee who is law abiding, employable and self sufficient. Desired Result 2a: Percentage of parolees maintaining employment during parole supervision. (Indicator) [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 87% 88% 88% 88% 88% Actual Result 86% 87% 88% 11,865 of 13,415 85% 11,963 of 14,118 Note 1: Parolees exempted from the employable category include those who are 1) receiving SSI of physically incapacitated, 2) in custody, 3) absconded, 4) full-time students, 5) homemakers with children (spouse supports), and 6) special exemption (with Chief PO approval). 636 STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 2b: Percentage of parolees on Electronic Monitoring (EM) as a final sanction because of problems, but before revocation, that successfully complete the EM period and return to regular parole supervision. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result NA 50% Actual Result 48.9% 55.6% 116 of 231 586 / 1,054 Note 1: The FY 2001 Actual Result is based on a 12 month average. FY 2000 FY 2001 50% 50% 47.6% 44.6% 605 454 of 937 / 1,358 FY 2002 50% FY 2003 50% Desired Result 2c: Parolees placed on EM supervision upon their initial release from prison will achieve a 78% successful completion rate. (Indicator) [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% Actual Result 75.4% 75.4% 77.3% 72.7% 1,045 of 1,386 1,063 of 1,409 1,385 of 1,736 1,161 of 1,596 Note 1: Outcome data was not available on 42 of the 1,596 Mandate (Board and Chief) cases reported in FY 2001. Note 2: FY 2001 data is for a 7 month period Desired Result 2d: The number of parolees involved in substance abuse (SA) treatment will increase as a percentage of the in-state parole population. (Proxy Measure) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 20% - 25% 20% - 25% 25% NA NA Actual Result 19.2% 3,800 of 19,850 [1] 16.7% 3,214 of 19,204 15.3% 3,262 of 21,398 [2] 19.4% 6,291 of 32,374 [3] Note 1: Eight month average. Note 2: Six month average. Note 3: Cumulative activity for entire year. Desired Result 2e: The number of positive drug tests will not exceed 12% of the total tests administered (24% of all episodes administered). (Proxy Measure) [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Drug Episodes NA <14% of all <12% of all <24% of all <24% of all <24% of all tests tests episodes episodes episodes Actual Result - Drug Episodes 10.7% 6,893 of 64,510 tests 11.6% 8% 21.3% [2] 11,952 of 9,736 of 124,299 12,508 of 58,637 102,600 tests tests epi. Note 1: A test episode is 1 set of drug tests for 1 parolee on a day, regardless of the number of tests conducted. Focusing on an episode instead of individual tests is a more accurate way of viewing and reporting drug usage. (Verbal admission of drug usage is considered a positive episode). Note 2: This measure was amended to count drug "episodes" in FY 2001 because this is a more accurate measure of drug use. 637 STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 3: Respond in a timely manner to the needs of crime victims and their families. Desired Result 3a: Percentage of respondents who rate the services provided by Victim's Services as excellent or good. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result 94% 95% 95% 95% 95% Actual Result 94% 97% 99% 99% [2] 155 of 165 279 of 289 164 of 166 363 of 367 Note 1: Response cards were inserted in all mailed correspondence for two 3 - month periods during the fiscal year. Note 2: Out of a total of 1,298 cards mailed, 367 were returned for a response rate equal to 28%. FY 2003 95% Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $50,837,957 $50,069,275 FY 2002 Budget $52,691,248 $52,691,248 FY 2003 Recommended $50,325,279 $50,325,279 638 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - UNIT A Results-Based Budgeting TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT (GEORGIA STATE PATROL) Purpose: Provide the citizens of Georgia with safe highways and roads through enforcement of motor vehicle laws. Goal 1: Increase vehicle occupant safety. Desired Result 1a: Number of injuries that result from not wearing seat belts. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 19,000 18,200 17,700 17,000 Actual Result 19,481 NA 22,582 NA [1] Note 1: Data is now collected by the Department of Motor Vehicle Safety, and will not be available until early 2002. FY 2003 80% Desired Result 1b: Number of motorcycle accidents that result from operator error. [See Note 1 in Result 1a.] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA NA 1,050 1,030 1,000 Actual Result 1,176 NA 1,877 NA FY 2003 1,000 Desired Result 1c: Percentage of accidents relating to excessive speed on highways and Interstates. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA NA NA Note 1: Data is not collected for this measure. FY 2003 NA Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $87,437,924 $70,173,520 FY 2002 Budget $90,279,905 $86,138,470 FY 2003 Recommended $88,661,993 $84,143,558 Total - All Programs (Unit A): Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $87,437,924 $70,173,520 FY 2002 Budget $90,279,905 $86,138,470 FY 2003 Recommended $88,864,494 $84,244,809 639 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - Unit B - Results-Based Budgeting ATTACHED AGENCIES - UNIT B GEORGIA FIRE ACADEMY FIRE, RESCUE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRAINING Purpose: Develop and deliver training that is consistent with the contemporary needs of Georgia's fire, rescue and emergency medical personnel. Goal 1: The availability of quality training programs that result in competent on-the-job performance. Desired Result 1a: Annually the Georgia Fire Academy satisfies 100% of all training requests received. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result NA NA NA 93.1% Goal 2: The delivery of quality training programs that result in competent on-the-job performance. Desired Result 1: In an annual follow-up survey, 100% of employers will state that the course-work at the Fire Academy was relevant and helpful. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result NA NA NA 95.54% Note 1: Agencies send numerous students throughout the year. Conducting individual follow-up interviews is not cost effective. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $1,306,814 $1,112,629 FY 2002 Budget $1,490,211 $1,357,354 FY 2003 Recommended $1,193,866 $1,081,009 GEORGIA POLICE ACADEMY LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CORONERS TRAINING Purpose: Develop and deliver training that is consistent with the contemporary needs of Georgia's law enforcement personnel. Goal 1: The availability of quality training programs that result in competent on-the-job performance. Desired Result 1: Annually the Georgia Police Academy satisfies 100% of all training requests received. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result NA NA NA 97.22% 640 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - Unit B - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: The delivery of quality training programs that result in competent on-the-job performance. Desired Result 1a: In an annual follow-up survey, 100% of employers will state that the coursework at the Police Academy was relevant and helpful. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% NA NA NA 98.06% Note 1: Agencies send numerous students throughout the year. Conducting individual follow-up interviews is not cost effective. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $1,606,931 $1,169,376 FY 2002 Budget $1,510,615 $1,175,122 FY 2003 Recommended $1,440,789 $1,105,296 GEORGIA PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING CENTER LAW ENFORCEMENT, FIRE, CORRECTIONS AND EMERGENCY SERVICES TRAINING Purpose: Develop, deliver and facilitate training that is consistent with the contemporary needs of Georgia's public safety personnel. Goal 1: The availability of quality training programs that result in competent on-the-job performance. Desired Result 1a: Annually the Georgia Public Safety Training Center satisfies 100% of all training requests received from Georgia Public Safety Agencies. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result NA NA NA 89.10% Desired Result 1b: In an annual follow-up survey, 100% of Georgia Public Safety Agencies will state that adequate training resources and opportunities are available through the Training Center. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result NA NA NA 88.54% Note 1: Agencies send numerous students throughout the year. Conducting individual follow-up interviews is not cost effective. Goal 2: The delivery of quality training programs that result in competent on-the-job performance. Desired Result 2a: 100% of all training provided by or through the Georgia Public Safety Training Center meets or exceeds certification criteria as established by the respective standards and accreditation authority. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% NA NA NA 100% 641 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - Unit B - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 2b: In an annual follow-up survey, 100% of employers will state that training received from or through the Training Center was relevant and helpful. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result NA NA NA 97.23% Note 1: Agencies send numerous students throughout the year. Conducting individual follow-up interviews is not cost effective. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $14,897,908 $11,544,839 FY 2002 Budget $12,629,950 $10,714,349 FY 2003 Recommended $12,268,207 $10,308,851 GEORGIA FIREFIGHTER STANDARDS AND TRAINING COUNCIL FIREFIGHTER AND FIRE DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION Purpose: Improve the safety of Georgia citizens by ensuring that fire departments/stations comply with established requirements and that all career firefighters are adequately trained and posses the technical skills to perform fire service operations. Goal 1: Provide the state with properly equipped, staffed, and managed fire departments and with adequately trained well-qualified firefighters. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of all fire stations [1] known to be operating in violation of state requirements for equipment, staffing, and firefighting preparedness that are identified, notified, and placed in a non-compliant status. [2] [3] FY 1998 [4] FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA NA 5% 5% 5% Actual Result NA NA 5% NA [4.] 86 of 1,789 Note 1: This is a new result measure and data was not tracked in previous years. Note 2: This data is collected and reported for calendar years, and not state fiscal years. Note 3: Additional information relating to this goal is available from the Governor's Office of Planning and Budget. Note 4: All data is collected on a Calendar Year schedule. FY 2003 5% Desired Result 2a: The percentage of all incumbent career firefighters [1] known to be working in violation of annual training and certification requirements are identified, notified, and placed in a non-compliant status. [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 79 140 140 140 140 Actual Result 73 79 140 NA Note 1: There were 9,474 certified firefighters in Calendar Year 2001. Note 2: This data is collected and reported for calendar years, and not state fiscal years. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $481,129 $481,129 FY 2002 Budget $514,409 $514,409 FY 2003 Recommended $486,504 $486,504 642 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - Unit B - Results-Based Budgeting GEORGIA PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING COUNCIL PEACE OFFICER CERTIFICATION, REGULATION AND TRAINING Purpose: Ensure the highest degree of professional conduct in public service by establishing and regulating verification and training standards for peace officers. Goal 1: Ensure that peace officers and criminal justice professionals uphold a high standard of professional conduct. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of POST certified officers that the POST Council sanctions. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 1.1% NA 1.2% NA 1.6% NA 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 496/45,363 559/45,881 739/47,689 485/49,770 Desired Result 1b: Percentage of law enforcement agencies that report the required information on POST Officers to the POST council. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA 75% 80% Actual Result NA NA NA NA Note 1: Accurate data is not available. Actual Result data will be reported for FY 2002. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $1,660,651 $1,565,072 FY 2002 Budget $1,647,930 $1,647,930 FY 2003 Recommended $1,503,177 $1,503,177 643 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - Unit B - Results-Based Budgeting GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY INCREASE AND PROMOTE HIGHWAY AND MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY Purpose: To assist in saving lives, and reducing injuries and the economic costs associated with traffic crashes. Goal 1: Highways will be safer as a result of the Office of Highway Safety's programs. Desired Result 1a: Fatality and injury rates for speed related crashes for drivers age 16-24 per 100 million vehicle mile. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA 0.495 0.49 0.27 Actual Result 0.50 0.35 NA NA Note 1: This agency supports DPS's main mission through coordination in educational programs. FY 2002 0.25 FY 2003 0.23 Desired Result 1b: Percentage of drivers using safety belts. FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result 73% 75% Actual Result 70% 77.4% Note 1: A data disclosure reporting form was not submitted for this measure. FY 2000 77% 77% FY 2001 80% 79% FY 2002 83% FY 2003 85% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $9,335,096 $510,585 FY 2002 Budget $4,496,478 $690,480 FY 2003 Recommended $4,310,633 $492,684 Total - All Programs (Unit B): Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $29,288,529 $16,383,630 FY 2002 Budget $22,289,593 $16,099,644 FY 2003 Recommended $21,203,176 $14,977,521 644 PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM Results-Based Budgeting PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Purpose: To provide public school employees in qualified positions and their families retirement benefits relative to their service. Goal 1: Ensure adequate financing for future benefits due and other obligations of the retirement system by using a conservative long-term philosophy to invest prudently the retirement system assets. Desired Result 1aa: The retirement system's Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) will liquidate between 15 and 25 years. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result 15-25 15-25 15-25 15-25 15-25 15-25 Actual Result negative negative negative negative Note 1: The actual result represents the number of years that the UAAL is expected to liquidate per the Report of the Actuary. The UAAL is the amount that the Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL) exceeds the Actuarial Value of Assets. A negative UAAL means that the Actuarial Value of Assets exceeds the AAL. Program Fund Allocation: Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $17,642,000 $17,642,000 FY 2001 Actual $17,642,000 $17,642,000 FY 2002 Budget $13,499,104 $13,499,104 FY 2003 Recommended $15,258,226 $15,258,226 FY 2002 Budget $13,499,104 $13,499,104 FY 2003 Recommended $15,258,226 $15,258,226 645 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Results-Based Budgeting NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SAFETY PROGRAM Purpose: To protect customers, providers, the general public from injury, and protect property and the environment from damage caused by fires, explosions, and other accidents involving Georgia's natural gas pipelines. Goal 1: Ensure that no natural gas fires, explosions, or other accidents are due to the failure of system operators to comply with all applicable state and federal natural gas pipeline safety regulations.. Desired Result 1a: The number of natural gas fires, explosions, or other accidents due to system operators non-compliance with applicable natural gas pipeline safety regulations. Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA 28 FY 1999 23 47 FY 2000 42 101 FY 2001 96 80 FY 2002 76 FY 2003 72 Goal 2: Ensure that contractors and operators are educated and trained in locating facilities and the general public is aware of and uses the Utilities Protection Center "Call Before You Dig" program to reduce third party damage to Georgia's natural gas pipelines. Desired Result 2a: The number of natural gas fires, explosions, or other accidents resulting from third party damages due to lack of training and awareness of the Utilities Protection Center "Call Before You Dig" program. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 105 156 199 437 415 Actual Result 110 164 210 460 Note 1: All third-party damage incidents are reviewed to identify those where the excavator failed to call the UPC for a locate request and where the facility owner failed to respond to a locate request. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $552,003 $279,726 FY 2002 Budget $790,491 $517,180 FY 2003 Recommended $779,206 $505,895 UTILITIES REGULATION PROGRAM Purpose: To ensure that telecommunications, natural gas, and electric utility services provided in Georgia under PSC jurisdiction are accessible, affordable, and reliable either through traditional economic regulation or through the facilitation of competitive markets. Goal 1: Ensure that an effectively competitive local exchange market exists so that prices and choices of services will be market-based. Desired Result 1a: The percent of market share (in the aggregate) that new competitive providers of local exchange service in the largest metro areas will have. Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA 6% FY 1999 12% 6% FY 2000 9% 8% FY 2001 12% 16% FY 2002 25% FY 2003 30% Goal 2: Continue to ensure reasonable rates and reliable service with economic regulation of non-competitive local exchange companies in accordance with existing statutes. Desired Result 2a: Results are measured by evaluating the outcome of cases that are appealed to the Courts. Desired Result - Percent of cases upheld Actual Result - Percent of cases upheld FY 1998 NA 100% FY 1999 100% 100% FY 2000 100% 100% FY 2001 100% 100% FY 2002 100% FY 2003 100% Note 1: Because the commission acts a quasi-judicial body, prejudging the results of PSC legal proceedings - such as rate cases - is grounds for the Courts overturning commission decisions. Results are measured by evaluating the outcome of cases that are appealed to the Courts. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION - Results-Based Budgeting 646 Goal 3: Maintain a high level of customer satisfaction with telecommunication services in the local telephone exchange market. Desired Result 3a: The number of valid telecommunication complaints resolved satisfactorily by the PSC. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 4,644 5,159 5,300 6,500 6,000 Actual Result 4,962 4,913 5,298 6,378 Note 1: A valid telecommunication complaint is a complaint submitted by a consumer to the commission regarding an act or practice of a carrier that is found to be within the purview of the commission's regulatory authority. Resolved satisfactorily means that the resolution balances the interests of both the customer and the provider. Goal 4: Ensure that universal service is maintained or enhanced. Desired Result 4a: Local telephone exchange service is provided to at least 96% of all Georgia homes. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 94 95 95 95 Actual Result 92 94 94 92 FY 2003 96 Goal 5: Ensure that an effectively competitive retail natural gas market develops so that prices and choices of service will be market-based. Desired Result 5a: An effectively competitive natural gas market will exist with non-affiliates of the existing local distribution company having at least a 50% market share. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 50 50 50 50 Actual Result - Trade Secret NA NA >50 >50 Note 1: Data on exact market share data are proprietary and protected under the trade secret rules. However, the desired results have been achieved in that non-affiliates have at least a 50% market share, as reported in public documents. UTILITIES REGULATION PROGRAM Goal 6: Continue to ensure reasonable rates for, and the reliability of, the natural gas distribution network through economic regulation in accordance with existing statutes. Desired Result 6a: Results are measured by evaluating the outcome of cases that are appealed to the Courts. (Percent upheld.) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result NA NA 100% 100% Note 1: Because the commission acts a quasi-judicial body, prejudging the results of PSC legal proceedings - such as rate cases - is grounds for the Courts overturning commission decisions. Results are measured by evaluating the outcome of cases that are appealed to the Courts. Goal 7: Maintain a high level of customer satisfaction with natural gas services. Desired Result 7a: The number of valid natural gas complaints resolved satisfactorily by the PSC. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 1,644 5,798 12,000 15,000 12,000 Actual Result 415 5,042 12,992 16,483 Note 1: A valid natural gas complaint is a complaint submitted by a consumer to the commission regarding an act or a practice of a gas marketer or a local or an electing distribution company that is found to be within the purview of the commission's regulatory authority. Resolved satisfactorily means that the resolution balances the interests of both the customer and the provider. 647 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 8: Continue to ensure reasonable rates and reliable service in the electric utility market through economic regulation in accordance with existing statutes. Desired Result 8a: Results are measured by evaluating the outcome of cases that are appealed to the Courts. (Percent upheld.) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result 100% 100% 100% 100% Note 1: Because the commission acts a quasi-judicial body, prejudging the results of PSC legal proceedings - such as rate cases - is grounds for the Courts overturning commission decisions. Results are measured by evaluating the outcome of cases that are appealed to the Courts. Goal 9: Maintain a high level of customer satisfaction with electric services. Desired Result 9a: The number of valid electric complaints resolved satisfactorily by the PSC. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 744 785 750 600 600 572 748 738 579 Note 1: A valid electric complaint is a complaint submitted by a consumer to the commission regarding an act or practice of an investor owned utility that is found to be within the purview of the commission's regulatory authority. Resolved satisfactorily means that the resolution balances the interests of both the customer and the provider. Program Fund Allocation: Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $7,625,825 $7,624,844 FY 2001 Actual $8,177,828 $7,904,570 FY 2002 Budget $8,099,725 $8,099,725 FY 2003 Recommended $7,513,242 $7,513,242 FY 2002 Budget $9,190,216 $8,916,905 FY 2003 Recommended $8,752,448 $8,479,137 648 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA Results-Based Budgeting INSTRUCTION Purpose: To assist students in receiving certificates, associate, bachelor, master and doctoral degrees in order to produce a more educated citizenry who can earn economic and social benefits. Goal 1: Students entering Georgia's universities and colleges will enhance their lives by obtaining a post- secondary education. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of entering full-time freshmen seeking a baccalaureate degrees that graduate within 6 years of entering university [1] [2] [3] Note 1: While Regents seeks to improve results, setting specific targets would require System input and consensus and Board approval, a process that could not be accomplished in a short period of time. 70% 60% 60.0% 59.3% 61.3% 61.9% 50% 39.8% 40% 30% 39.3% 28.7% 40.9% 28.0% 41.6% 28.0% 29.5% Total Research Universities Region/State Total Research Universities Region/State Total Research Universiteis Region/State Total Research Universities Region/State Note 2: Institutions are grouped by sector. Research universities 20% (Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia State University, Medical 10% College of Georgia, and University of Georgia) offer an array of degree programs including professional and doctoral degrees. Regional and state universities offer limited certificate and 0% FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 associate programs, baccalaureate, masters, and educational Note 4: The following chart shows the number of first time degree- specialist programs, and a limited number of doctoral programs seeking freshmen entering university and the number graduating within (Ed.D). State Colleges offer certificates, associates, and a limited 6 years. number of baccalaureate programs; 2-year colleges offer certificate programs and associate degrees. FY1998 FY1999 FY2000 FY 2001 Total 7,156/17,998 7,447/18,929 8,002/19,545 8,583/20,647 Note 3: Six-year baccalaureate graduation rates are not yet Research 3,830/6,388 4,059/6,850 4,651/7,586 4,758/7,682 calculated for state colleges. Reg/State U. 3,326/11,610 3,387/12,079 3,350/11,959 3,823/12,965 Desired Result 1b: Number of students that earn an baccalaureate degrees [Output] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result - Total N/A N/A N/A N/A Actual Result - Total 21,069 20,852 20,259 19,938 - Research Universities 10,363 10,334 9,858 9,644 - Regional and State Universities 10,706 10,505 10,360 10,208 - State Colleges N/A 13 41 86 Note 1: See Note 1, Desired Result 1a. FY 2002 [1] FY 2003 [1] Desired Result 1c: Number of students that earn advanced degrees [Output] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result - All Universities N/A N/A N/A Actual Result - All Universities 8,539 8,374 7,803 - Research Universities: Doctorates 795 756 702 : Masters 4,258 4,238 3,990 - Regional & State U.: Doctorates (Ed.D) 13 15 19 : Masters 3,473 3,365 3,092 Note 1: See Note 1, Desired Result 1a. FY 2001 N/A 7,940 753 4,184 10 2,993 FY 2002 [1] FY 2003 [1] Desired Result 1d: Number of students that earn associate degrees and certificates [Output] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - N/A N/A N/A N/A [1] [1] Actual Result - Associate Degrees 5,807 4,832 4,569 5,894 - Certificates 588 572 662 651 Note 1: See Note 1, Desired Result 1a. REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting 86% 86% 649 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting 90% 80% 70% 85% 86% 85% 86% 73% 72% 75% 68% 68% 74% 74% 70% 69% 75% 68% 74% 66% 78% 69% 66% Total Research Universities State/Regional State Colleges 2-Year Colleges Total Research Universities State/Regional State Colleges Total Research Universities State/Regional State Colleges Total Research Universities State/Regional State Colleges 2-Year Colleges 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 Desired Result 1e: Percentage of students who pass the Regents Test the first time they take it [Indicator] [1] [2] Note 1: Number of Students taking and passing the test. FY 1998 FY1999 FY2000 FY2001 Total Research U. 22,475/30,745 20,564/27,382 21,977/29,603 23,519/3,825 7,648/9,019 7,982/9,303 8,743/10,310 8,986/10,473 State/Reg. U. 9,178/13,477 8,014/1,498 8,470/12,372 9,436/13,713 State Colleges 2-yr. Colleges 768/1,066 4,883/7,213 630/853 3,626/5,278 669/889 3,981/6,032 662/854 4,451/6,785 Note 2: See Note 1, Desired Result 1a Desired Result 1f: Percentage of course sections taught by full-time faculty [1] [2] Fall 1998 Fall 1999 Fall 2000 Fall 2001 Fall 2002 Fall 2003 Desired Result -Total N/A N/A N/A N/A [1] [1] Actual Result - % Total - Number NA 67.8 66.6 N/A N/A 25,503/37,615 25,608/38450 N/A - % Research Universities - Number NA 66.3 64.0 N/A NA 10,425/15,724 10,390/16,235 N/A - % Regional and State Universities - Number NA 71.19 70 N/A NA 12,732/17,884 12,690/18,129 N/A - % State Colleges NA 75.9 76.2 N/A - Number NA 886/1,167 932/1,223 N/A - % Two-Year Colleges NA 60.8 61.8 N/A - Number NA 3,962/6,517 4,041/6,539 N/A Note 1: See Note 1, Desired Result 1a; FY 2001 data is not yet available. Goal 2: Students graduating from Georgia's colleges and universities will be prepared for the workplace. Desired Result 2a: Percentage of graduates with baccalaureate degrees who are either employed in a relevant professional or technical field or enrolled in the next level of higher education within one year of graduation FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The University System of Georgia does not collect these data. Desired Result 2b: Percentage of graduates in the schools of education who pass the PRAXIS test to be certified as teachers the first time they take the test FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The University System of Georgia is working with the Professional Standards Commission to develop this information; Data are not now available. Desired Result 2c: Percentage of graduates who pass common professional licensing and certification examinations the first time they take the tests FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The University System of Georgia currently does not collect these data. Desired Result 2d: Percentage of graduates surveyed three years after graduation who respond that their college or university adequately prepared them for the workplace FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The University System of Georgia does not survey businesses; however, funds for surveys are included in the FY 2003 Governor's budget. Desired Result 2e: Percentage of surveyed businesses seeking to relocated to, expand in, or remain in Georgia responding that the quality the graduates of Georgia's universities and colleges is superior or satisfactory FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The University System of Georgia does not survey businesses; however, funds for surveys are included in the FY 2003 Governor's Budget Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual 2,033,940,067 948,626,177 FY 2002 Budget 1,997,764,709 951,942,738 FY 2003 Recommended 2,959,806,582 1,203,567,109 650 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting RESEARCH Purpose: Expand the existing body of knowledge and promote the application of research findings for problem solving for improving the quality of life for Georgia citizens. Goal 1: Provide quality and useful information to business, industry, and government. Desired Result 1a: Number of start-up companies that develop from university research FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The University System of Georgia does not collect these data. Desired Result 1b: Dollar value of rights to use intellectual property developed and licensed by the university system [Proxy] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result N/A N/A N/A N/A $8,010,816 $5,290,817 $14,509,111 $8,850,731 NA NA Note 1: Individual institutions provide this information to the System Office through an annual survey. Desired Result 1c: Number of research reports that are accepted for publication in peer reviewed journals and, thus, have been considered useful in the development of basic knowledge FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The University System of Georgia does not collect these data. Desired Result 1d: Percentage of clients that contracted for research services during the fiscal year who say the were "satisfied" with the University System of Georgia's research product FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The University System of Georgia does not survey businesses; however, funds for surveys are included in the Governor's FY 2003 budget. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual 1,122,428,601 539,344,270 FY 2002 Budget 1,093,198,497 510,798,711 FY 2003 Recommended 459,074,972 186,673,123 PUBLIC SERVICE Purpose: Foster economic, technical, social, and cultural development among the citizens of Georgia by providing continuing education, outreach, consulting, and other services and programs Goal 1: Contribute to the economic development and health of the State. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of targeted businesses surveyed that say the quality of Georgia's state university system is one of the top three reasons they would relocate, expand, or remain in Georgia FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The University System of Georgia does not survey businesses; however, funds for surveys are included in the Governor's FY 2003 budget. Desired Result 1b: Percentage increase in sales revenue for the business that were assisted by the Small Business Development Center compared to the sales revenue increases of all Georgia businesses. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - SBDC Rev. Increase N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Actual Result -SBDC Rev. Increase N/A N/A N/A 19.9% - Increase All Businesses N/A N/A N/A 6.6% Desired Result 1c: Increase in employment for the businesses that were assisted compared to the employment increases of all Georgia businesses FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The University System of Georgia does not collect these data. Goal 2: Assist Georgians and Georgia's communities in their technical, social, and cultural development. 651 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 2a: Percentage of organizations for which the system provided consulting services that rated the services "satisfactory " or better FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Regents does not survey businesses; however, funds for surveys are included in the FY 2003 Governor's Budget. Desired Result 2b: Percentage of Georgian's surveyed who say they have taken a course or attended a cultural or educational event offered by one of Georgia's colleges and universities within the last year. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Regents does not survey businesses; however, funds for surveys are included in the FY 2003 Governor's Budget. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual 278,700,606 80,533,671 FY 2002 Budget 251,158,217 55,011,282 FY 2003 Recommended 100,113,807 40,709,161 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER Purpose: Support the growth of Georgia's technology job base by forming and growing new technology companies, commercializing university technologies, and attracting new technology companies to Georgia. Goal 1: Georgia's high-technology companies will continue to grow and have a positive impact as a result of ATDC services. Desired Result 1a: Number of high-tech jobs provided by ATDC-affiliated companies [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Cumulative N/A 3,173 4,300 4,700 5,200 5,400 Actual Result - Cumulative 2,759 4,100 4,100 4,614 Actual Result - Calendar Year N/A 1,341 0 514 Note 1: Results are based with interviews with personnel of member and graduate companies and are verified when possible. Desired Result 1b: Number of companies whose use of ATDC services results in self-sufficiency and high growth [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Cumulative N/A 89 100 110 125 130 Actual Result - Cumulative 81 93 112 122 Note 1: Results are cumulative and based on interviews with all currently incubated companies and graduates. Fifty-two companies were surveyed in CY 2000; 20 responded. These results were generalized to the entire population. Desired Result 1c: Annual revenue generated by member and graduate companies [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result - In Millions N/A $380 $380 $420 Actual Result - In Millions $330 $351 $639 $691 Note 1: About 50% of the companies responded to a survey; information was supplemented by other sources. FY 2002 $775 Desired Result 1d: Number of new companies formed or licensing agreements generated FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result N/A 3 4 5 Actual Result 1 4 4 3 FY 2002 5 FY 2003 $850 FY 2003 8 652 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $22,290,923 $9,530,323 FY 2002 Budget $22,959,563 $9,683,195 FY 2003 Recommended $23,415,151 $10,141,783 AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAMS Purpose: Encourage the development and growth of Georgia Agribusiness (especially poultry) through technology exploration and transfer, technical assistance, and general education programs. Goal 1: Develop and introduce new or emerging technologies (for example, automation, sensors, computer systems, and waste treatment systems) capable of enhancing industry productivity or addressing priority needs through engineering research. Desired Result 1: Number of field testing and demonstration of research prototypes in development to accelerate technology introduction FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result: # tested or demonstrated N/A 6 6 6 6 6 Actual Result: # tested or demonstrated 6 5 7 5 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $1,727,010 $1,727,010 FY 2002 Budget $1,879,313 $1,879,313 FY 2003 Recommended $1,801,938 $1,801,938 GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH INSTITUTE Purpose: To plan and conduct research and development programs that enhance the economy, economic competitiveness and the well-being of Georgia and its citizens, as well as the region and the nation. Goal 1: Directly or indirectly impact Georgia's economy by performing externally sponsored, customer focused contracts. Desired Result 1: Private, non-profit and public organizations will judge GTRI's research to be beneficial to the state's economic development by increasing the number and size of research projects awarded to the institute. [Indicator of value of research to clients] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - In Thousands N/A $98,869 $98,702 $103,637 $92,917 $96,608 Actual Result - In Thousands $94,161 $94,002 $90,211 $92,857 - Increase or Decrease 0% -4% 2.9% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $112,616,589 $6,986,794 FY 2002 Budget $104,805,092 $7,475,297 FY 2003 Recommended $103,976,609 $6,646,814 653 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE Purpose: Promote the growth of business and industry in Georgia by improving the competitiveness of existing companies, retaining existing and attracting new companies to Georgia, and helping communities prepare for growth through programs of research, technical and managerial assistance, and professional development. Goal 1: Georgia's manufacturing companies will increase their performance and competitiveness by implementing appropriate and/or new technology and business practices provided through EDI assistance, training, and information. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of the companies assisted by EDI that take action as a result of the services provided and implement changes that have positive impacts on the companies' performance/competitiveness [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 83% 85% 88% 90% 90% Actual Result - Percentage 80% 83% 85% 92% - Number 174 of 218 153 of 188 127 of 150 151 of 164 Note 1: Survey of companies that received 8 or more hours of assistance; generally about 50% of the companies respond. Desired Result 1b: Percentage of respondents to a client survey that report cost savings, sales increases, and/or other quantifiable operating improvements as a result of EDI's assistance, service, or information [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 33% 45% 50% 53% 55% Actual Result - Percentage 23% 40% 53% 48% - Number 49 of 218 75 of 188 79 of 150 78 of 164 Note 1: Survey of all companies that received 8 or more hours of assistance; generally about 50% of the companies respond. Goal 2: Georgia communities will be able to retain or expand existing business and industry and attract new business and industry as a result of timely and appropriate information, research, and assistance provided by EDI to economic development organizations. Desired Result 2: Number of new or existing manufacturing jobs saved by providing new and expanding manufacturing companies with technical assistance through the FaciliTech program FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - New Jobs N/A N/A N/A N/A 450 500 - Existing Jobs Saved N/A N/A N/A N/A 50 100 - Total Jobs Impacted N/A 500 500 500 500 600 Actual Result - New Jobs N/A N/A N/A 572 - Existing Jobs Saved N/A N/A N/A 90 - Total Jobs Impacted 1,500 480 728 662 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $22,290,923 $9,530,323 FY 2002 Budget $22,956,563 $9,683,195 FY 2003 Recommended $23,415,151 $10,141,783 CENTER FOR ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACCESS [ Formerly: The Center for Rehabilitation Technology] Purpose: Provide support to individuals with disabilities within the State of Georgia and beyond through expert service, research design, technological development, information dissemination and education. Application of these resources is intended to enhance the lives of Georgia's citizens with disabilities. Goal 1: Develop products and technologies enabling people with disabilities to participate in the full range of normal activities, including: activities of daily living, recreation, education and employment. Desired Result 1: Number of new products and technologies designed to help people with disabilities Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 N/A 2 FY 1999 2 3 FY 2000 4 12 FY 2001 6 3 FY 2002 6 FY 2003 4 Goal 2: Clients who have disabilities will become productive and self-sufficient individuals. 654 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 2a: Percentage of clients who obtain assistive technology through the center so they can function in their schools, jobs, and communities, earn income, and avoid workers compensation and similar payments FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 20% 20% 30% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 59% - Number N/A N/A N/A 30 of 51 Desired Result 2b: Percentage of clients receiving Assistive technology that say they used the technology for its intended purpose at least one year after obtaining it [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 The Center had initiated the collection of this data, but could not continue the effort due to budget constraints. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $6,313,087 $1,534,691 FY 2002 Budget $7,217,659 $1,069,392 FY 2003 Recommended $7,158,860 $1,010,593 MARINE EXTENSION SERVICE Purpose: Enhance the economic stability and diversity of marine industries; provide technical assistance to marine industries while reducing their environmental impact on the fragile coastline environment; and improve K-12, college, and adult students' knowledge of Georgia's marine environmental resources. Goal 1: Marine industries will remain a viable business while complying with mandated regulations. Desired Result 1: Percentage of seafood firms that comply with the new FDA program, Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP), which regulates the handling and processing of seafood FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/;A 20% 70% 80% 90% 90% Actual Result - Percentage N/A 58% 78% 86% - Number N/A 18000% 192 216 Goal 2: Students and the public will learn about Georgia's Marine environmental resources. Desired Result 2: Point difference between pre-test and post-test scores of 2,000 students going through the marine science education program FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Point Improvement N/A 22 19 20 25 25 Actual Result - Point Improvement 18 17 24 20 Goal 3: New marine industries will prosper. Desired Result 3: Total number of new softshell crab operations established during the fiscal year FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result - Total New Operations N/A 5 6 5 Actual Result - Total New Operations 3 4 0 2 FY 2002 3 FY 2003 5 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $2,756,359 $1,646,559 FY 2002 Budget $2,850,280 $1,765,480 FY 2003 Recommended $2,752,176 $1,667,376 655 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting MARINE INSTITUTE Purpose: Conduct and support research on the ecology of salt marshes. Goal 1: Enhance the basic knowledge of salt marsh estuarine ecosystems and publish and disseminate that knowledge broadly to allow wise and sustained utilization of Georgia's coastal resources. Desired Result 1: Number of non-state grants and contracts for research projects and articles accepted for publication in peer-reviewed journals for use by other researchers [Indicator] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Number grants/contracts N/A 17 13 13 10 10 - Journal articles N/A 22 17 17 20 20 Actual Result - Number grants/contracts 16 13 8 11 - Journal articles 21 17 21 18 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $27,756,359 $1,646,559 FY 2002 Budget $2,850,280 $1,765,480 FY 2003 Recommended $2,752,176 $1,667,376 SKIDAWAY INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHY Purpose: To provide a center of excellence in marine and ocean science, which expands the body of knowledge on the marine environments and disseminates this information to educators, students, decision-makers, industry and citizens. Goal 1: Disseminate research results regarding marine environments to be used by scientists and decision-makers in the expansion of basic knowledge, which may lead to the development of policies and products to help industry and the environment. Desired Result 1: Number of articles disseminating research results that were judged worthy of publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result 30 30 30 30 30 30 Actual Result 23 26 36 42 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $5,204,604 $1,853,484 FY 2002 Budget $5,265,207 $1,921,787 FY 2003 Recommended $5,148,843 $1,805,423 STUDENT EDUCATION ENRICHMENT Purpose: Provide underrepresented/disadvantaged students in Georgia the opportunity to acquire educational experiences and academic support on the campus of the Medical College of Georgia to become motivated and prepared to obtain careers in the health professions. Goal 1: Increase the number of underrepresented and/or disadvantaged students choosing careers in the health professions. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of the underrepresented and/or disadvantaged high school students that participate in the summer program have enrolled in college and percentage successfully completing their first year of college FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - % Enrolling N/A 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - % Completing 1st year N/A 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result - % Enrolling 100% 100% 100% 100% - Number 26 of 26 20 of 20 16 of 16 20 of 20 - % Completing 1st year 100% 100% 100% 100% - Number 28 of 28 24 of 24 20 of 20 20 of 20 Desired Result 1b: Percentage of under-represented/disadvantaged students that participated in the summer program that graduate from the School of Medicine 656 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result - Percentage Graduating Actual Result - Percentage Graduating - Number FY 1998 N/A N/A N/A FY 1999 N/A N/A N/A FY 2000 N/A N/A N/A FY 2001 N/A 100% 8 of 8 FY 2002 100% FY 2003 100% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $368,223 $368,223 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommendation $377,264 $360,923 $377,264 $360,923 AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATIONS Purpose: Expand the body of scientific knowledge related to the agricultural and environmental sciences to promote economic growth and environmentally sound practices by Georgia's farmers, food processors, and agribusiness, thereby ensuring a safe, nutritious, plentiful and affordable supply of food and fiber. Goal 1: Georgia farmers will sustain or increase their profitability and productivity while producing a safe, nutritious, plentiful and affordable supply of food and fiber. Desired Result 1a: Royalties earned from products developed FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result - In millions N/A 2 Actual Result - In millions N/A 1.98 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on CY 2000 data. FY 2000 2.1 2.57 FY 2001 2.2 2.54 FY 2002 2.4 FY 2003 2.4 Desired Result 1b: Valued added to Georgia farms due, in part, to research which has provided higher valued alternative crops [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Total Farm Gate Value [3] N/A $7.70 $7.90 $7.90 $8.07 $8.24 Actual Result - In billions $7.55 $7.75 $7.75 $7.92 Desired Result - Value per farm N/A $191,011 $194,830 $198,727 $202,702 $206,756 Actual Result $187,266 $192,289 $196,510 $205,669 Desired Result - Value per acre of farmland N/A $722 $736 $751 $766 $781 Actual Result $708 $727 $743 $777 Note 1: Research is used to provide higher valued alternative crops and increase value added on farms. Note 2: "Farm Gate Value" is the market value of 75 commodities grown in Georgia. Goal 2: Protect, improve and preserve Georgia's natural resources. Desired Result 2a: Acreage planted according to conservation practices within USDA/National Resource tolerance levels (soil type specific) as a method of improving soil conservation and decreasing erosion [Indicator] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Number of Acres N/A 643,052 729,640 736,936 744,305 Actual Result - Number of Acres 636,685 715,985 729,640 736,936 - Percentage of Total Agricultural Acreage N/A N/A N/A N/A Desired Result 2b: Agricultural acreage lost to erosion. FY 1998 Desired Result - Number of Acres Actual Result - Number and % Total Acres FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 These data were not reported. FY 2003 657 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 3: Develop and disseminate information in agricultural research. Desired Result 3a: Number of refereed journal articles published to disseminate information for further research FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result N/A 136 156 161 161 161 Actual Result 132 156 162 179 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $77,811,850 $46,350,255 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommendation $76,542,384 $73,789,905 $48,401,665 $45,649,186 AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE Purpose: Disseminate relevant and timely information and data to assist Georgia's farmers, agribusiness, consumers and communities in improving the quality of life. Goal 1: Improve peanut profitability and sustainability: Peanut producers will reduce losses due to disease. Desired Result 1: Percentage of peanut producers that use at least four of the Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV) Risk Index parameters to reduce losses to this disease [Proxy Measure] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 20% 30% 50% 65% 75% Actual Result - Percentage - Number 16% N/A 40% N/A 50% 2,600/5,200 65% 3,380/5,200 Note 1: The impact of TSWV cannot be isolated from other factors that affect losses to crops such as peanuts. Goal 2: A safe, secure food and fiber system: Georgians will reduce their risks for food-borne illness. Desired Result 2a: Percentage of food safety program participants that adopt two or more practices to reduce their risk for food borne illness [Proxy Measure] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 49% 50% 60% 65% 65% Actual Result - Percentage - Number 48% N/A 60% N/A 76% 5,168/6,800 76% 7,386/9,719 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on data collected during the prior federal fiscal year and are self-reported by program participants. Since not all county agencies always submit these data, data may be incomplete. Desired Result 2b: Percentage of institution and commercial food handlers participating in ServSafe Certified food handler education programs that become certified in FY 2003 [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 70% 75% 94% 75% 75% Actual Result - Percentage 65% 93% 77% 87% - Number 130/200 124/133 176/230 1,411/1,617 Note 1: FY2000 Actual Results are based on the prior federal fiscal year. This is a voluntary reporting system so data may be under-reported. Goal 3: An adequate supply of forest resources: Georgia will increase its supply of forest products. Desired Result 3: Exhibit growth trend over a four-year period of planned forest regeneration [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Number N/A N/A 380,000 380,000 390,000 - 4-Year Growth Trend N/A N/A 26% 26% 30% Actual Result - Number 300,000 370,000 400,000 410,000 - Rate of Increase from FY 1998 N/A 23% 33% 36% Note 1: Actual results are compiled one year previous to the reporting year. FY 2003 420,000 40% 658 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 4: Distance diagnostics through digital imaging: Losses to plant disease will be reduced. Desired Result 4: Percentage of high value perishable sample diagnoses being processed by DDDI resulting in a more timely diagnosis, more complete information, and savings to commercial growers [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 15% 15% 15% 17% 20% Actual Result - Percentage .03% 14.45% 22.05% 16.26% - Number of DDDI Samples 127/4,326 N/A N/A 581/3,573 Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Results are based on FY 2000 data; FY 1998 Actual Results were based on partial year's data. Note 2: The use of DDDI as a proxy measure is based upon a data showing that DDDI diagnoses were made in an average of one day compared to four days using overland mail submission of physical disease samples. This resulted in a direct savings to Georgia's commercial agricultural growers of over $17.7 million dollars over its 18 -- 24 months of operation. Goal 5: Environmental awareness: Georgia's youth will learn to appreciate their own environment. Desired Result 5a: Percentage of children participating in 4-H environmental education programs who score higher on post- tests than on pre-tests FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A 75% 80% 95% 96% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A 80% 85% - Number N/A N/A 28,766/35,958 31,629/37,211 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $61,586,702 $38,009,168 FY 2002 Budget $63,607,846 $40,513,709 FY 2003 Recommended $61,120,484 $38,026,347 MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISES Purpose: Assist in starting, maintaining and expanding minority-owned businesses in Georgia. Goal 1: Minority businesses will have the knowledge and skills to stay in business. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of minority clients that received assistance from Minority Business Enterprises who increased their median annual revenues FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result: - Percentage N/A 71% 71% 71% 71% 71% Actual Result - Percentage 71% 73% 71% 77% - Median Sales $118,000 $123,900 $114,000 $100,000 Desired Result 1b: Percentage of minority business clients that remain in business throughout the entire fiscal year FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 91% 91% 91% 91% 91% Desired Result - Percentage 91% 93% 100% 96% - Number 924/1,015 1,082/1,163 990/990 926/965 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $1,172,156 $1,172,156 FY 2002 Budget $1,738,576 $1,738,576 FY 2003 Recommended $1,157,425 $1,157,425 659 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting VETERINARY MEDICINE EXPERIMENT STATION Purpose: Conduct and coordinate research on animal health problems of present and potential concern to animal owners, producers, and industries in Georgia. Goal 1: Obtain new knowledge and disseminate information to solve animal health problems in infectious diseases, noninfectious diseases, disease diagnosis, and disease treatment affecting beef cattle, dairy cattle, swine, horses, poultry, fish, wildlife, and companion animals. Desired Result 1: Number of accomplishments (such as new vaccines, drugs, and diagnostic tests) applicable to animal disease and patents from research results, new vaccines, drugs and diagnostic tests and other significant development accomplishments developed every three years [1] Desired Result - Number of accomplishments Actual Result Desired Result - Number of patents Actual Result FY 1998 N/A 1 N/A N/A FY 1999 1 N/A N/A FY 2000 1 N/A N/A FY 2001 N/A N/A FY 2002 FY 2003 1 1 Note 1: This measures "significant" accomplishments which require several years to develop. For example, in FY99, a nested polymerase chain reaction assay was developed that helps the diagnosis of caprine arthritis-encephalitis, an viral disease of goats. Goal 2: Train veterinarians in animal health research to ensure future availability of this important personnel resource and enhance training of scientists and staff in animal health research. Desired Result 2: Percentage of the Veterinary Medicine Experiment Station supported veterinarians completing the PhD, MS, or MAM degree that are employed in an animal health field in academia, industry, or government within one year after accepting their degree [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result - Percentage 81% 100% N/A 100% - Number 17 of 21 2 of 2 0 of 0 Note 1: The program used 5 years' of data to compute its FY 1998 baseline percentage. 2 of 2 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $2,511,450 $2,511,450 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommendation $2,714,460 $2,634,368 $2,714,460 $2,634,368 VETERINARY MEDICINE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Purpose: Develop and disseminate new knowledge in poultry disease control by conducting and coordinating research on poultry disease problems of present and potential concern to Georgia's poultry producers and industries, thereby ensuring an inexpensive and wholesome supply of poultry products to the consumer. Goal 1: Obtain and disseminate information needed for improved detection, control, and prevention of diseases affecting poultry. Desired Result 1: Number of significant accomplishments in applied animal health (such as new vaccines, drugs, and diagnostic tests) developed over a three-year period FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result N/A 1 1 Actual Result 1 0 1 1 Note 1: Several years are needed to develop significant accomplishments. For example, in FY00, a polymerase chain reaction for rapid detection and DNA fingerprinting procedures were developed as routine diagnostic services for detecting and typing infectious laryngotracheitis virus. In FY01, a rapid test for detecting salmonella or campylobacter was developed. 660 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: Train new scientists and clinical specialists in poultry health research to ensure future availability of this important personnel resource. Desired Result 2a: Percentage of Veterinary Medicine Agricultural Research-supported scientists completing Ph.D. or MS degrees and percentage of graduates in the Masters of Avian Medicine (MAM) program that are employed in some aspect of poultry health activity within one year of graduation [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage: Ph.D. ,MS, MAM N/A 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result - Percentage Ph.D. and MS 73% 100% 100% 100% - Number 8 of 11 8 of 8 3 of 3 6 of 6 - Percentage MAM 100% 100% 50% 100% - Number 9 of 9 2 of 2 1 of 2 3 of 3 Note 1: The FY 1998 baseline data were developed using graduate data over a five-year period (FY 1994 -- FY 1998). Desired Result 2b: Percentage of graduates of the MAM program that pass the certification examination of the American College of Poultry Veterinarians within three years of graduation [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result - Percentage 100% 100% 100% N/A - Number 9 of 9 2 of 2 2 of 2 N/A Note 1: The FY 1998 baseline data were developed using graduate data over a five-year period (FY 1994 -- FY 1998). Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $1,057,775 $1,057,775 FY 2002 Budget $1,211,120 $1,089,101 FY 2003 Recommended $1,063,461 $1,031,444 VETERINARY MEDICINE TEACHING HOSPITAL Purpose: Ensure that there are enough qualified veterinary health care professionals to meet the needs of Georgia's pets and livestock by providing clinical training for veterinary students, veterinary technician students, and postgraduate veterinarians. Goal 1: The clinical training received by veterinary students will prepare them for clinical veterinary practice. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of the graduates that pass the national board examination [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 97% 98% 98% 98% 98% Actual Result - Percentage 89% 100% 88% 93% - Number N/A N/A N/A 71 of 76 Note 1: Because the National Board Examination was replaced by the North American Veterinary Licensing Examination (NAVLE) in 2000, FY 1998 and FY 1999 results may not be comparable with those for subsequent years. Desired Result 1b: Percentage of veterinarians who rate their clinical education as providing good or excellent preparedness for veterinary practice [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 100% 100% 100% Actual Result - Percentage 77% 87% 75% 78% - Number 53 of 69 49 of 56 60 of 80 56 0f 72 Note 1: Surveys are sent all graduates of the College of Veterinary Medicine one year after graduation. Graduates were asked how well their education prepared them for the practice of medicine. About 1/2 of graduates typically respond to the survey. 661 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: Animal owners who are clients of the hospital will be satisfied that their animals received high quality medical care. Desired Result 2: Percentage of respondents to a random survey who respond that they received good to excellent service from the hospital [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 94% 99% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result - Percentage 69% 95% 96% 97% - Number 116 of 168 261 of 276 203 of 212 316 of 327 Note 1: Surveys were mailed to a random sample of 956 hospital clients during the previous fiscal year; 39% (327) responded. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $6,824,471 $576,097 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommendation $6,611,391 $6,535,034 $604,391 $528,034 ATHENS AND TIFTON VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC LABS Purpose: Provide diagnostic support and surveillance for naturally occurring diseases affecting livestock, companion animals, and wildlife for veterinarians and regulatory agencies. Goal 1: Provide accurate and timely results to veterinarians, thereby contributing to the quality of veterinary medical practice available to animal owners. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of veterinarians responding to a customer satisfaction survey that rate the diagnostic support provided by the laboratories this year as good or excellent [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 85% 90% 90% 90% 90% Actual Result - Percentage 99% 99% 94% 98% - Number 145 of 146 66 of 67 128 of 136 106 of 108 Note 1: Two random samples of 150 veterinarians were drawn from the Athens and Tifton laboratories customer database; 108 (36%) of the 300 surveys mailed were completed and returned. Desired Result 1b: Percentage of satisfactorily completed tests in the external proficiency testing programs FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 90% 90% 90% 90% Actual Result - Percentage 100% 97% 100% 95% - Number N/A 38 of 39 24 of 24 37 of 39 FY 2003 90% Desired Result 1c: Number of days after sample submission to the laboratory that veterinarians receive test results [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result N/A 5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Actual Result 3.25 3.2 3.4 3.5 Note 1: While this is an efficiency measure, many laboratory tests are time sensitive, thus, this can be an important laboratory outcome. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $4,843,781 $89,811 FY 2002 Budget $3,356,971 $3,001 FY 2003 Recommended $3,353,617 $0 662 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting GEORGIA MILITARY COLLEGE Purpose: Prepare students for successes in life by enabling them to transfer to senior colleges and university, pursue careers, and becoming participating citizens in the democratic process. Goal 1: Provide high quality educational services that will enable students to develop intellectual proficiencies and acquire basic knowledge needed for success. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of high school graduates and graduates with associate degrees who are either employed in their field or have enrolled in a school of higher education within 3 months of graduation [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Data were not provided for this result. Desired Result 1b: Percentage of employers surveyed during the fiscal year reporting that they are satisfied with the academic preparation of Georgia Military College students FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage NA 80% 85% 90% 90% 90% Actual Result - Percentage 100% NA 92% NA NA NA - Number 24 NA 12 of 13 N/A Desired Result 1c: Average SAT scores for Georgia Military College students compared to state average FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA NA NA NA 950 Actual Result - Georgia Military 996 978 950 970 NA - Georgia Public Schools 1,017 1,016 1,019 1,020 FY 2003 950 NA Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $15,579,178 $2,834,794 FY 2002 Budget $15,470,753 $2,245,253 FY 2003 Recommended $15,681,532 $2,456,032 GEORGIA RESEARCH ALLIANCE Purpose: The Georgia Research Alliance (GRA) aims to expand Georgia's economy by creating and developing advanced technology industries using university-based research and development programs in advanced communications, biotechnology, and environmental technologies. Goal 1: Enhance Georgia's economic development by developing the research infrastructure for recruiting companies, creating new companies, and enhancing the productivity/profitability of Georgia companies that develop, manufacture or use advanced communication, biotechnology, or environmental technologies. Desired Result 1a: The number of jobs created by companies expanding, locating or starting in in high technology fields in Georgia during the fiscal year [1] Desired Result - Number of new jobs - Rate of increase FY 1998 N/A N/A FY 1999 N/A N/A FY 2000 223,582 N/A FY 2001 242,715 8.6% FY 2002 254,851 5.0% FY 2003 267,593 5.0% Actual Result - Number of new jobs 204,621 212,935 231,157 226,133 [1] - Rate of increase N/A 4% 9% [1] Note 1: FY 2001 Actual Result is based on 9 months of data; 12-month data will be available during the first quarter of CY 2002. Desired Result 1b: The number of new Georgia-based enterprises formed based on the intellectual property portfolios of the research universities [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result N/A 8 10 12 13 12 Actual Result 8 7 11 18 Note 1: Actual Results are based on a survey of GRA member universities and their technology development centers. Desired Result 1c: The number of Georgia companies engaged in funded research relationships with GRA universities during the fiscal year [Interim Indicator ][1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 663 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result N/A 194 373 437 459 N/A Actual Result 348 355 416 167 [2] Note 1: This measure shows the number of companies engaged in contract research with GRA universities. The companies work with faculty who have access to core laboratories and specialized facilities/equipment provided by GRA investments. Note 2: GRA is now attempting to verify the FY 2001 Actual Results because the data reported may be in error. Desired Result 1d: Federal and private funding to Georgia research universities conducting research in advanced communication technologies, biotechnology, or environmental technologies [Proxy Measure] [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - In millions N/A N/A $900 million $900 million $900 million $900 million Actual Result - In millions N/A $732 million $788 million $870 million Note 1: Actual Results data are obtained from the National Science Foundation; there is a one-year lag in NSF reporting. Goal 2: Increase venture capital investment in new high-tech industry in Georgia thereby leveraging the state's investment in its technological infrastructure. Desired Result 2: Number of Georgia high-tech companies funded with venture capital during the fiscal year FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Number N/A 60 65 70 76 80 Actual Result - Number N/A 25 96 N/A Actual Result - Cumulative Number 57 82 178 N/A Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual _ $32,750,000 FY 2002 Budget _ $3,450,000 FY 2003 Recommended _ $30,000,000 TRADITIONAL INDUSTRIES PROGRAM Purpose: The Traditional Industries Program (TIP) is a research partnership of the University System of Georgia and the state's traditional industries -- pulp and paper, food processing, carpet/textiles -- dedicated to improving the competitiveness of these industries in Georgia. Goal 1: Maintain/increase the international competitiveness of Georgia's traditional industries by operating an industry-driven research-and-development program. Desired Result 1a: Number of companies that improve their competitiveness by implementing TIP technologies and research findings FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Number N/A 100 120 125 130 130 Actual Result - Number 80 100 N/A 113 Desired Result 1b: Number of TIP research-and-development projects that are licensed or commercialized during the fiscal year FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result N/A 1 2 3 5 6 Actual Result 1 3 N/A 6 Desired Result 1c: Federal and private research funds that the University System attracts each year to benefit Georgia's traditional industries by leveraging the TIP infrastructure FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - In Millions N/A $5 $5 $5 $12 Actual Result - In Millions $5 $8 N/A N/A Program Fund Allocation: FY 2001 Actual FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommended Total Funds _ _ _ State Funds $3,935,000 $3,635,000 $3,643,000 OFFICE OF PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICES 664 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting Purpose: Provide assistance, information, materials, programs, and services to meet the information, education, recreational, and enrichment needs of all citizens and local communities throughout Georgia. Goal 1: Increase the usage of the educational, informational, and recreational resources available to all Georgians through their public libraries. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of library patrons surveyed who are satisfied with public service FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA N/A N/A 85% 85% 85% Actual Result 89% N/A 90.8% N/A NA NA Desired Result 1b: The number of books read by children during summer reading programs [Proxy Measure] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 3,148,183 2,894,912 2,894,912 2,894,912 Actual Result 2,998,270 2,894,912 Data not provided. FY 2003 2,894,912 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $36,803,901 $33,119,029 FY 2002 Budget $37,384,579 $34,775,371 FY 2003 Recommended $39,619,325 $37,110,177 ATTACHED AGENCIES GEORGIA PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION PEACHSTAR EDUCATION SERVICE Purpose: To provide quality programming and services that enhance the learning opportunities and expand the resources of the education community and others via the PeachStar Network. Goal 1: Enhance the quality of education available to students, teachers and other education professionals. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of schools surveyed that responded their teachers who used PeachStar rated the program and services as good or very good [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 95% 95% 95% 95% Actual Result - Percentage 48% {1] 95% 95% - Number N/A N/A 1,041/1,095 286/302 Note 1: The FY 2001 Actual Data was collected from 326 respondents to 2,000 surveys sent to all public schools. FY 2003 95% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $7,327,700 $7,327,700 FY 2002 Budget $9,255,861 $6,324,207 FY 2003 Recommended $8,662,419 $5,730,765 665 REGENTS, UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA - Results-Based Budgeting GEORGIA PUBLIC BROADCASTING Purpose: Provide Georgia communities with unique, noncommercial radio and television programs and services by creating, producing, and delivering high quality programming that educates, informs and entertains the diverse audiences of GPTV's nine-station television network and Peach State's 14-station radio network. Goal 1: Increase the knowledge, understanding, and awareness of Georgia issues, history and culture, economic and social trends, and legislative actions impacting the lives of our state's citizens by creating television and radio programs and broadcasting-based initiatives. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of viewers that say Georgia Public Television specific programming is informative, educational, and entertaining. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A 97% 94% - Number N/A N/A 335/346 318/338 Note 1: The FY 2001 Actual Data was collected from 338 respondents of 500 registered voters polled. Desired Result 1b: Percent of television viewers that report viewing Georgia Public Television-specific programming [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A - Number N/A N/A Note 1: The FY 2001 Actual Data was collected from 500 registered voters polled. FY 2000 N/A 72% 346/483 FY 2001 70% 68% 340/500 FY 2002 70% FY 2003 70% Goal 2: Provide quality children's television programming that supports Georgia's education goals for students, promotes school readiness, and that can be used with confidence by parents, educators and child care providers. Desired Result 2a: Percentage of educators that rate GPTV's children's (PBS Ready to Learn programming) and Instructional Television (ITV) programs good or very good. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result N/A 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A N/A 97% - Number N/A N/A N/A 65/67 Note 1: The FY 2001 Actual Data was collected from 167 respondents to 2,000 surveys sent to all public schools. Desired Result 2b: Percentage of parents that find GPTV's children's and ITV programming educational for their children. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 90% 90% 90% Actual Result - Percentage N/A N/A 96% 90% - Number N/A N/A 124/129 9/10 Note 1: The FY 2001 Actual Data was collected from 180 respondents of 500 registered voters polled. FY 2002 90% FY 2003 90% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $27,029,118 $11,717,776 FY 2002 Budget $29,951,323 $14,477,530 FY 2003 Recommended $30,340,413 $17,314,620 Total Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $34,356,818 $19,045,476 FY 2002 Budget $39,207,184 $0 FY 2003 Recommended $39,002,832 $23,045,385 666 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Results-Based Budgeting TAX ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM Purpose: Administer and enforce state tax laws and provide taxpayer assistance in order to maximize and promptly collect revenues that help fund state and local government programs. Goal 1: Taxpayers and tax administrators will be provided with the training, assistance, and information needed to promote their understanding of the tax laws. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of taxpayers surveyed who sought assistance at regional offices that agree that they received useful and accurate information. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA 95% Actual Result NA NA NA NA Note 1: This is a new measure. Desired Result 1b: The percentage of taxpayers surveyed who sought assistance at regional offices that agree that they received prompt customer service. (Service Measure) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 95% 95% 95% 96% 97% Actual Result NA 97% 97% 98% Desired Result 1c: The percentage of persons surveyed who attended taxpayer education workshops and seminars that reported the programs were beneficial to them. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 90% 90% 92% 93% 94% Actual Result 90% 96% 93% 96% Goal 2: Tax payments and tax returns will be processed in a timely manner in order to collect the revenues used to fund state and local government programs. Desired Result 2a: The average number of days from the initial receipt of a "coupon" type tax document & check (Withholding Payments) until the funds are deposited in the bank. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA 3.5 Actual Result NA NA NA NA Note 1: This is a new measure. Desired Result 2b: The average number of days from the initial receipt of a "return" type tax document & check (Sales Tax Returns) until the funds are deposited in the bank. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA 4.5 Actual Result NA NA NA NA Note 1: This is a new measure. Desired Result 2c: Improve payment processing time by increasing electronic funds transfer payments in dollar volume (billions) and as a percentage of total collections. (Indicator Measure) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 55.0% 56.0% 57% 58% 58% Actual Result 54.0% 55.1% 10.0 Billion 10.9 Billion (56.7%) (58.1%) 667 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 2d: The number of individual income tax returns that are filed electronically. (Proxy Measure) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 525,000 700,000 900,000 1,000,000 Actual Result 487,242 658,000 891,000 1,245,305 FY 2003 1,500,000 Goal 3: Encourage compliance with the tax laws so that the tax responsibility is distributed uniformly and in accordance with the law by increasing the number of business and individual tax audits, and by conducting audits of property assessment. Desired Result 3a: The percentage of business tax audits that find businesses are not in compliance with tax laws. (Proxy) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result NA NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA NA NA Note 1: Contact the Governor's Office of Planning and Budget for additional information regarding this measure. FY 2002 NA FY 2003 40% Desired Result 3b: The percentage of non-resident individual income taxpayer audits that find the taxpayer not in compliance with tax laws. (Proxy) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA 73% Actual Result NA NA NA NA Note 1: These are not random audits. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $276,406,618 $253,484,602 FY 2002 Budget $340,966,039 $336,887,584 FY 2003 Recommended $448,224,780 $443,875,345 ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM Purpose: Ensure compliance with state laws governing the control, distribution, and taxation of alcoholic beverages and tobacco products in order to protect the public's interest and safety. Goal 1: Alcohol and tobacco retail and wholesale businesses will comply voluntarily with state laws and regulations. Program Note: Illegal tobacco sales to minors are reported by the Department of Human Resources Prevention Program. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of alcohol and tobacco businesses inspected that are in compliance with applicable state laws and regulations. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 86% 87% 87% 88% Not Given Actual Result 85% 90% 82% 87% Desired Result 1b: The percentage of alcohol and tobacco distributors that are audited who do not properly remit excise taxes. [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA Not Given Actual Result 100% 100% 100% 100% Note 1: DOR audits all (100%) of the alcohol and tobacco distributors each year to ensure compliance. Note 2: This is a new measure. 668 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: Illegal alcohol sales to underage persons will be reduced. Desired Result 2a: The percentage of retail vendors investigated who make illegal alcohol sales to underage persons. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 41% 40% 40% 39% Not Given Actual Result 59% 40% 45% 30% Note 1: These investigations are not random. They are usually made pursuant to a complaint. Desired Result 2b: The number of investigations of illegal alcohol sales to underage persons that lead to a sanction of some type. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA Not Given Actual Result 325 461 517 628 Note 1: This is a new measure. Goal 3: Illegal tobacco sales to underage persons will be reduced. Desired Result 3a: The percentage of retail vendors investigated who make illegal tobacco sales to underage persons. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA 21% 21% Not Given Actual Result NA NA NA 18% Note 1: These investigations are not random. They are usually made pursuant to a complaint. Desired Result 3b: The number of investigations of illegal tobacco sales to underage persons that lead to a sanction of some type. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA 250 Actual Result NA NA NA 77 Note 1: This is a new measure. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $3,163,869 $2,920,639 FY 2002 Budget $3,011,039 $3,011,039 FY 2003 Recommended $2,923,505 $2,923,505 Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $279,570,487 $256,405,241 FY 2002 Budget $343,977,078 $339,898,623 FY 2003 Recommended $451,148,285 $446,798,850 669 OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE - UNIT A Results-Based Budgeting VOTER REGISTRATION AND ELECTIONS Purpose: To assure fair and honest elections throughout the state and to provide for every eligible person to register to vote. Goal 1: To assure fair and honest elections throughout the state and to provide for every eligible person to register to vote. Desired Result 1a: The number of documented cases of fraud in Georgia elections. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 74 67 52 50 40 Actual Result NA 74 67 52 Desired Result 1b: The percentage of citizens eligible to vote who are registered to vote. Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA N/A FY 1999 100% N/A FY 2000 100% N/A FY 2001 100% 75.66% FY 2002 100% FY 2003 100% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $5,101,464 $3,919,338 FY 2002 Budget $4,804,512 $4,784,512 FY 2003 Recommended $8,467,616 $8,447,616 INFORMATION SERVICES - ARCHIVES Purpose: The purpose of the Georgia Department of Archives and History is to identify, select, preserve and make accessible records that constitute Georgia's recorded history; to increase the efficiency of State Government through effective records management; and to improve the quality of records and archives management throughout the state. (Revised: December 2000) Goal 1: Georgia's historical information will be identified, preserved and accessible. (Archives) Desired Result 1a: Percentage of state agencies which have completed a historical records survey FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA NA NA 0% 0% Actual Result 0% 0% 0% 0% FY 2003 10% Desired Result 1b: Percentage of state agencies transferring historical records on an annual basis. Indicator FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 5% 5% 5% 5% Actual Result 5% 5% 5% 5% FY 2003 10% Desired Result 1c: Percentage of customers (public) using the archive's services that rate the overall service as satisfactory. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 98% 100% 98% 100% 98% 100% 98% 100% 100% 670 OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE - UNIT A - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: The records of Georgia's State Agencies will be managed, stored and disposed efficiently and cost effectively. (State Records Center) Desired Result 2a: Percentage of records in the State Records Center which are part of the automated records management system. [1.] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA Actual Result NA Note 1: This is an indicator of accessibility and efficiency 5% 10% 15% 20% 50% 5% 5% 15% Desired Result 2b: Percentage of state agencies transferring non-historical records on an annual basis. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA NA NA FY 2003 NA Goal 3: Records and archives management will improve in local governments and historical agencies throughout the state. Desired Result 3a: Percentage of counties that have conducted a records survey or records facilities assessment. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA NA 1% 2% 2% Actual Result NA NA 1% 2% Note 1: This indicates that the archives and history division is encouraging counties to identify and preserve historical records. FY 2003 10% Desired Result 3b: Percentage of GHRAB (Georgia Historical Records Advisory Board) grants awarded to nongovernmental historical agencies. Indicator [1.] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 25% 25% 40% Actual Result NA NA 25% 25% Note 1: This indicates that the archives and history division is facilitating private historical record identification and preservation. 45% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $4,779,463 $4,677,083 FY 2002 Budget $5,755,861 $5,680,861 FY 2003 Recommended $6,424,387 $6,349,387 CORPORATIONS Purpose: To facilitate commerce by reviewing and maintaining documents regarding corporations, limited partnerships, limited liability companies, trademarks and service of process. Goal 1: All filings will be incompliance with Georgia Law and be handled in a customer oriented manner. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of filings certified within two business days. (Service Proxy) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 75 75 90 100 100 43 44 75 80 671 OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE - UNIT A - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1b: Percentage of business customers using the corporations division's services that rate them as satisfactory. (Surveys are non-scientific.) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result NA 97% 98% 99% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $2,265,610 $1,947,199 FY 2002 Budget $2,336,475 $1,616,475 FY 2003 Recommended $2,229,006 $1,509,006 SECURITIES - REGISTRATION AND REGULATION Purpose: To protect the citizens of Georgia from fraud and economic loss resulting from violations in the areas of perpetual care cemeteries, charitable solicitations and securities investments. Goal 1: Ensure that all regulated organizations follow Georgia law and no citizens are victims of fraud. Desired Result 1a: The number of proven violations committed by the operators of perpetual care cemeteries. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA 10 9 8 7 NA 1 14 4 Desired Result 1b: The number of proven violations of the law committed by charitable organizations. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 15 10 9 8 Actual Result NA 12 4 5 FY 2003 7 Desired Result 1c: The number of proven violations committed by in-state investment advisor firms and in-state broker dealer firms. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 5 5 4 3 2 NA 2 2 1 Desired Result 1d: The number of proven violations of securities law. FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result NA 25 Actual Result NA 22 FY 2000 20 18 FY 2001 15 14 FY 2002 10 FY 2003 8 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $2,283,735 $2,259,699 FY 2002 Budget $2,225,429 $2,175,429 FY 2003 Recommended $2,117,737 $2,048,387 672 OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE - UNIT A - Results-Based Budgeting Capitol Education Center/Capitol Tours Purpose: Provide citizens (particularly schoolchildren) with information regarding the importance of civic involvement, the functions of state government, history of the Georgia and the State Capitol as well as providing a venue for public forums and special events. Goal 1: To provide citizens of all ages with meaningful opportunities to learn about the importance of civic involvement, the functions of state government, the history of Georgia and the State Capitol. Desired Result 1a The average tour size will decrease during peak season (currently January-May) so that tour guides may provide a more meaningful and personal experience for visitors and answer more questions during each tour. [1] (Proxy for satisfaction) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Average tour size NA NA NA 75 50 Actual Result - Average tour size NA NA 94 55 Note 1: Tours are often primary school groups and it was determined that a survey of individuals would not be appropriate. FY 2003 45 Goal 2. To provide a venue for civic programs as well as public forums, meetings, and special events sponsored by the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government as well as civic groups and organizations. Desired Result 2a. The percentage of CEC "days in use" will rise to 100%. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result NA NA 100% Actual Result NA 42% 81% Note 1: For a part of FY 99 and FY 2000 the Center was under construction, limiting its use FY 2001 100% 94% FY 2002 96% FY 2003 99% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual FY 2002 Budget $375,873 $375,873 FY 2003 Recommended $357,833 $357,833 673 OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE - UNIT A - Results-Based Budgeting STATE ETHICS COMMISSION ATTACHED AGENCIES Program Note: The State Ethics Commission did not participate in the Office of Planning and Budget's FY 2003 RBB development process. Further, no data disclosure reporting forms were turned in for this program. Consequently, the data quality is unknown. DISCLOSURE LAW ENFORCEMENT Purpose: Ensure compliance by candidates, public officials, lobbyists and vendors with Georgia's campaign and financial disclosure requirements, public official conduct requirements and lobbyist disclosure requirements. Goal 1: Ensure compliance with state ethics laws . Desired Result 1a: The number of candidates, public officials, lobbyists and vendors who are sanctioned for violations of Georgia's campaign and financial disclosure requirements, public official conduct requirements and lobbyist disclosure requirements. [1.] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA NA NA NA NA Note 1: The commission did not respond to OPB's suggestion or provide data for this measure. Desired Result 1b: Percent of non-defective complaints that work begins on within 5 days. (Activity Measure) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result 100% 100% 100% 100% FY 2003 100% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $476,719 $476,555 FY 2002 Budget $549,478 $549,478 FY 2003 Recommended $515,887 $515,887 674 OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE - UNIT A - Results-Based Budgeting EXAMINING BOARDS OCCUPATIONAL REGULATION Purpose: To enhance the health, safety and welfare of the public through professional occupational regulation. Goal 1: Individuals that practice in the regulated professions will comply with standards. Desired Result 1a: The number of regulated individuals that are sanctioned by the examining board that regulates the profession for violations. [1.] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 REGISTERED NURSES (85,763 active) Desired Result (number sanctioned) See note 2. NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result (number sanctioned) 111 105 82 55 PHARMACISTS (15,765 active) Desired Result (number sanctioned) See note 2. NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result (number sanctioned) 38 33 32 21 NURSING HOME ADMINISTRATORS (940 active) Desired Result (number sanctioned) See note 2. NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result (number sanctioned) 1 10 0 1 LICENSED PRACTICAL NURSES (27,889 active) Desired Result (number sanctioned) Actual Result (number sanctioned) See note 2. NA NA NA NA NA 46 43 57 58 Note 1: There are 35 boards that license and oversee various professions. Information of the results of boards not listed here can be obtained from the Office of Planning and Budget. A list of the professional licensing boards is available at "http://www.sos.state.ga.us/plb/contact.htm". Note 2: The desired result for the PLB is to provide the information necessary for a Board to make a decision in regard to whether a licensee should be sanctioned. Every case is reviewed on its own merits. Also, different Boards may approach violations differently, so Board policy must be considered. There are also many outside factors that affect the number of sanctions. Those factors make it difficult if not impossible to determine a desired result. The best result is that all consumers are protected in the best manner possible from unlawful practices. In achieving this goal, it is our desired result to have fewer sanctions to show that practitioners are increasingly in compliance with rules; or is it to desire increasing sanctions as a manifestation of greater demand for more aggressive enforcement actions by the agency and Boards. The boards have not traditionally determined a "desired result" in this area. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $9,216,882 $9,027,192 FY 2002 Budget $10,098,325 $9,948,325 FY 2003 Recommended $9,445,246 $9,295,246 675 OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE - UNIT A - Results-Based Budgeting GEORGIA DRUGS AND NARCOTICS AGENCY REGULATION OF DRUGS AND NARCOTICS Purpose: To protect the health, safety and welfare of the general public by providing an enforcement presence to oversee all laws and regulations pertaining to dangerous drugs and controlled substances. Goal 1: Law enforcement agencies, health care professionals, and the public will have access to technical expertise relating to dangerous drugs and controlled substances. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of law enforcement agencies that use the Drug and Narcotic Agencies Services that rate the services as satisfactory. [1.] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result - Percent NA 100% 100% 100% Actual Result - Percent NA 90% 90% 90% Note 1: Data Quality Warning - There was no data disclosure reporting form turned in for this measure. FY 2002 100% FY 2003 100% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $1,370,971 $1,369,919 FY 2002 Budget $1,503,909 $1,503,909 FY 2003 Recommended $1,323,507 $1,323,507 Other Funds (Not Allocated): Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $6,194,377 $6,004,724 FY 2002 Budget $5,071,233 $5,041,233 FY 2003 Recommended $4,864,747 $4,834,747 Total - All Programs (UNIT A): Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $31,689,221 $29,681,709 FY 2002 Budget $32,721,095 $31,676,095 FY 2003 Recommended $35,745,966 $34,681,616 676 OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE - UNIT B - Results-Based Budgeting REAL ESTATE COMMISSION REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS BOARD REGULATION OF BROKERS AND APPRAISERS Purpose: To protect individuals involved in real estate transactions by regulating real estate brokers and real estate appraisers. Goal 1: Real estate brokers and appraisers will be well qualified and provide competent service. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of completed investigations that result in a finding of negligence (does not include findings of dishonesty). FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 25% (400) 25% (400) 25% (400) 25% (400) Actual Result 28% (411) 23% (385) 29.3% (380) 27.5% (527) Desired Result 1b: Georgia's passing rates on the qualifying examinations will be within 5 points of the average passing rates of other states giving the same examinations. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA +/-5% +/-5% +/-5% +/-5% +/-5% Actual Result NA 8.9% Above 10.4% Above 7.6% Above Goal 2: Responds promptly to requests from applicants, licensees and the public for information. Desired Result 2a: Percentage of applicants, licensees and the public requesting information or materials who report that the staff provided useful and complete information. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA NA NA Actual Result NA NA NA 90% Note 1: Contact the Office of Planning and Budget for additional information. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $2,232,696 $2,213,732 FY 2002 Budget $2,390,311 $2,390,311 FY 2003 Recommended $2,280,522 $2,280,522 Total - All Programs (UNIT B): Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $2,232,696 $2,213,732 FY 2002 Budget $2,390,311 $2,390,311 FY 2003 Recommended $2,512,335 $2,512,335 677 STATE SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION COMMISSION Results-Based Budgeting SOIL CONSERVATION Purpose: Conserve and protect soil, water and related natural resources by encouraging the application of proper soil erosion and sedimentation practices. Goal 1: Maintain the amount of soil lost on pasture and forest lands at an acceptable level. Desired Result 1: Maintain soil loss on pasture lands to less than 0.5 tons per acre average. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - tons per acre NA NA .50 tons/acre .50 tons/acre .50 tons/acre .50 tons/acre Actual Result - tons per acre .40 tons/acre .40 tons/acre .40 tons/acre .46 tons/acre Goal 2: The amount of soil lost as a result of land-disturbing activities will be reduced. Desired Result 2a: Fewer tons of agricultural soil will be lost due to implementation of best management practices. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - decrease in lost soil (tons) NA 1.15 million 1.25 million 1.40 million 0.60 million 0.60 million fewer tons fewer tons fewer tons fewer tons fewer tons Actual Result - decrease in lost soil (tons) 1.0 million 1.0 million 1.0 million 1.0 million fewer tons fewer tons fewer tons fewer tons Note 1: The FY 1999 Actual Result was revised. Goal 3: Increase the number of cropland acres that meet tolerable levels of soil loss. Desired Result 3a: Percentage [1] of acres of cropland that exceed tolerable [2] levels of soil loss. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result - Fewer acres NA NA 2.75% 1.70% 1.70% Actual Result - Fewer acres 125,000 124,133 1.70 % 2% Note 1: This measure was changed to a percentage in the FY 2003 Budget Report. Note 2: The definition of a "tolerable level" was not available at publication. FY 2003 1.70% Goal 4: Georgia's farmers will voluntarily implement best management practices Desired Result 4a: Percentage of Georgia's 40,000 farmers who will voluntarily implement best management practices to reduce soil erosion. Proxy [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 2.5% 2.75% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% Actual Result 1.8 % 2.5 % 3.0 % 1185/40,000 2.99% Note 1: Implementing best practices has been proven to reduce erosion. 678 STATE SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION COMMISSION Results-Based Budgeting Goal 5: Local government authorities will adopt erosion and sediment control ordinances in accordance with the Erosion and Sedimentation Act of 1975, as amended. Desired Result 5a: The number of local government authorities that are not in compliance with the erosion and Sedimentation Act of 1975, as amended. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 315 303 298 NA Actual Result 326 326 [1] [1] Note 1: This measure was deleted from the FY 2002 Budget Report. It should be part of Soil and Water's RBB. Not Given Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $2,695,185 $2,349,883 FY 2002 Budget $3,595,287 $2,954,882 FY 2003 Recommended $3,290,162 $2,649,757 WATERSHED DAM MODIFICATION AND COMPLIANCE Purpose: Ensure the quality of educational programs and provide consumer protection for students by regulating and authorizing private postsecondary colleges and schools. Goal 1: Bring all 139 watershed dams which would cause loss of human life upon failure (Category 1) into compliance with the Georgia Safe Dams Act by 2025. Desired Result 1a: Percentage (see note 1) of non-compliant Category 1 watershed structures (dams). [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 98 72 64 [2] 80 % [2] 80% Actual Result - Percent, (Non-compliant / Total) 87 % 82.0% 81.3 % (121 of 139) (114 of 139) (113 of 139) 58.3% [1] Note 1: Soil and water did not provide the result data or disclosure in the format requested by the Office of Planning and Budget. Note 2: This was changed from a count to a percent for the FY 2003 Budget Report. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $461,212 $461,212 FY 2002 Budget $501,817 $501,817 FY 2003 Recommended $418,299 $418,299 Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $3,156,397 $2,811,095 FY 2002 Budget $4,097,104 $3,456,699 FY 2003 Recommended $3,708,461 $3,068,056 679 GEORGIA STUDENT FINANCE COMMISSION Results-Based Budgeting ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT SCHOLARSHIPS Purpose: To raise the academic achievement of Georgia's students by providing scholarships for education beyond high school. Goal 1: Increase and sustain the levels of academic achievement by Georgia's students. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of college level Governor's Scholars maintaining at least a "B" average FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 79% 73% 74% 83% 84% Actual Result - Percentage 72% 72% 81% 82% - Number 1,646/2,286 1,921/2,668 2,045/2,518 2,003/2,433 Actual Desired Actual Desired Actual Desired Actual Desired Desired Actual Desired Actual Desired Actual Desired Actual Desired Desired Desired Result 1b: Percentage of Georgia's high school students that meet the new requirements of maintaining a "B" average in core curriculum subjects 70% 60% 50% 45% 45% 45%46% 44%46%43%46% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 20,498/ 25,015/ 45,551 55,589 FY98 FY99 27,215/ 29,621/ 62,215 69,265 FY00 FY01 FY02 47% FY03 70% 60% 65% 65%67%66% 68% 61%64% 65% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 43,015/ 64,201 39,641/ 60,986 45,130/ 65,548 43,769/ 67,896 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 66% FY03 Desired Result 1d: Percent of college level HOPE scholars maintaining at least a "B" average Goal 2: Georgia's high-achieving students will attend college in Georgia. Desired Result 2a: Percentage of Governor's Scholars attending college in Georgia FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 66% 67% Actual Result - Percentage 66% 74% 68% - Number 892/1,352 997/1,347 850/1,248 FY 2001 74% 73% 910/1,246 FY 2002 73% FY 2003 74% Desired Result 2b: Percentage of HOPE-eligible students that attend college in Georgia FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 68% 69% 69% Actual Result - Percentage - Number 68% 68% 63% 68% 26,798/39,409 29,276/43,053 28,395/45,134 29,598/43,769 FY 2002 69% FY 2003 70% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State funds Lottery Funds FY 2001 Actual $215,013,174 $4,581,302 $209,486,122 FY 2002 Budget $237,586,281 $3,693,967 $232,939,314 FY 2003 Recommended $258,832,786 $3,693,967 $254,185,819 680 GEORGIA STUDENT FINANCE COMMISSION - Results-Based Budgeting FUNDING FOR ACCESS TO EDUCATION BEYOND HIGH SCHOOL Purpose: To increase access to education beyond high school for students who are residents of Georgia by providing and servicing student loans, and awarding grants. Goal 1: All eligible students will have access to loans for education beyond high school. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of the loan demand for eligible students who qualify for private loans that is met through the efforts of the Georgia Higher Education Assistance Corporation (GHEAC) FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result - Percentage 100% 100% 100% 100% - Number of students 41,251 40,005 42,754 43,033 Desired Result 1b: Percentage of loan demand that the Georgia Student Finance Authority provides to eligible students who have selected GSFA as a lender FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result - Percentage 100% 100% 100% 100% - Number of students 10,358 10,657 10,918 10,372 Goal 2: Award educational grants to increase access to education beyond high school for eligible students. Desired Result 2a: Funds will be awarded to 100% of eligible students in each grant program FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result - Percentage 100% 100% 100% 100% - Eligible 169,476 175,210 182,251 204,300 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State funds Lottery Funds FY 2001 Actual $399,873,319 $29,715,086 $66,713,536 FY 2002 Budget $426,031,261 $31,025,962 $85,060,903 FY 2003 Recommended $470,033,352 $34,107,602 $109,455,830 EDUCATIONAL LOANS FOR CRITICAL SHORTAGE OCCUPATIONS Purpose: To increase the number of qualified professionals in critical shortage areas. Goal 1: More qualified professionals in critical shortage occupations will choose to stay in Georgia. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of qualified professionals in critical shortage occupations who cancel their loans by serving their repayment commitment in Georgia FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 85% 86% 81% 81% 81% Actual Result - Percentage 82% 88% 83% 78% - Number 4,589/5,626 4,631/5,239 8,246/9,876 6,568/8,440 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State funds Lottery Funds FY 2001 Actual $11,841,450 $5,028,150 $6,813,300 FY 2002 Budget $13,148,679 $5,500,053 $7,648,626 FY 2003 Recommended $15,242,125 $4,939,941 $10,302,184 681 GEORGIA STUDENT FINANCE COMMISSION - Results-Based Budgeting Total - All Programs FY 2001 Actual FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommended Total Funds $626,727,943 $676,766,221 $744,108,263 State funds $39,324,538 $40,219,982 $42,741,510 Lottery Funds $283,012,958 $325,648,843 $373,943,833 ATTACHED AGENCIES NONPUBLIC POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION COMMISSION AUTHORIZATION PROGRAM FOR PRIVATE AND PROPRIETARY POSTSECONDARY COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS. Purpose: Ensure the quality of educational programs and provide consumer protection for students by regulating and authorizing private postsecondary colleges and schools. Goal 1: All private and proprietary postsecondary colleges and schools authorized to operate in Georgia will be educationally sound and financially stable. Desired Result 1: Percentage of authorized colleges and schools that meet prescribed academic and financial standards annually without remediation Desired Result - Percentage Actual Result - Percentage - Number FY 1998 N/A N/A N/A FY 1999 N/A 56% 69/124 FY 2000 N/A 47% 63/133 FY 2001 N/A 49% 67/138 FY 2002 75% FY 2003 75% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual 629,323 629,323 FY 2002 Budget 754,848 754,848 FY 2003 Recommended 729,052 729,052 Total - All Programs Total Funds State funds FY 2001 Actual 629,323 629,323 FY 2002 Budget 754,848 754,848 FY 2003 Recommended 729,052 729,052 682 TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM Results-Based Budgeting TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM Purpose: To provide all personnel in covered positions of the state's public school systems, county libraries, regional libraries, regional educational service agencies, and colleges and universities of the University System of Georgia and their families' retirement benefits relative to their service and compensation in the event of their retirement, death, or disability. Goal 1: Ensure adequate financing for future benefits due and other obligations of the retirement system by using a conservative long-term philosophy to invest prudently the retirement system assets. Desired Result 1: The retirement system's Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) will liquidate between 15 and 25 years. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 15-25 15-25 15-25 15-25 15-25 Actual Result 18 8 7 7 Note 1: The actual result represents the number of years that the UAAL is expected to liquidate per the Report of the Actuary. The UAAL is the amount that the Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL) exceeds the Actuarial Value of Assets. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $14,912,722 $2,895,306 FY 2002 Budget $17,820,795 $3,090,000 FY 2003 Recommended $15,271,579 $2,670,000 Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $14,912,722 $2,895,306 FY 2002 Budget $17,820,795 $3,090,000 FY 2003 Recommended $15,271,579 $2,670,000 683 DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL AND ADULT EDUCATION Results-Based Budgeting TECHNICAL EDUCATION Purpose: Provide students with career, occupational and technical skills to obtain employment, and/or achieve job advancement. Goal 1: Meet employment market needs by providing technical diploma and degree credit programs. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of technical diploma and degree program graduates who are employed in their field of study by October 1 of the following fiscal year. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 82% 83% 83% 80% Actual Result - Employed in field / Total grads. 79% 81% 80% 75% 7480 / 9964 Goal 2: Help participants get a job, retain a job, or advance in their career path by providing Technical Certificate of Credit (TCC) programs and services. Desired Result 2a: The percentage of TCC program graduates who are employed in their field of study. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 73% 74% 74% 60% Actual Result 71% 73% 68% 54% [1] Note 1: There were 13,129 TCC's conferred in FY 2001, and, of these, 7,035 were employed in their field of study. Desired Result 2b: The percentage of TCC program graduates who advance in their career path by continuing their education. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 9% 10% Actual Result 8% 8.5% 15% 33% [1] Note 1: There were 13,129 TCC's conferred in FY 2001, and, of these, 4,335 continued their education. 10% 25% Goal 3: Help welfare recipients to prepare for and obtain employment through the new Connections to Work/Georgia Fatherhood program. Desired Result 3a: The percentage of New Connections to Work program participants who obtain jobs after receiving assistance. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result [1] NA NA NA NA 35% 36% Actual Result [1] NA NA NA 27% Note 1: Result data is based on the calendar year. CY 2000 data is reported in the FY 2001 column. Desired Result 3b: The percentage of New Connections to Work program participants who retain their jobs for at least 120 days after receiving skill training through short term training or TCCs from a technical college/institute. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result [1] Actual Result [1] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Note 1: Data is not currently available for this measure. 684 DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL AND ADULT EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 3c: The percentage of Georgia Fatherhood program participants who obtain jobs after receiving assistance. Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA 32% FY 1999 NA 33% FY 2000 34% 35% FY 2001 35% 34% FY 2002 36% FY 2003 36% Desired Result 3d: The percentage of Georgia Fatherhood program participants who retain their jobs for at least 120 days after receiving skill training through short term training or TCCs from a technical college/institute. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Note 1: Data is not collected for this measure. Desired Result 3e: The percentage of Georgia Fatherhood program participants enrolled in a credit or non-credit program of training at a technical college. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA 88% NA NA NA 87% Note 1: Participants that continue their education rather that going directly to work is a success indicator for this program. FY 2003 88% Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $363,210,985 $223,783,252 FY 2002 Budget $299,990,343 $234,094,426 FY 2003 Recommended $319,967,855 $254,041,938 ADULT LITERACY Purpose: Teach basic literacy skills to adults and to provide instruction to adults seeking to achieve a General Education Development (GED) diploma. Goal 1: The basic reading, math, and writing skills of program participants will improve. Desired Result 1a: The number of Adult Basic Education (ABE) students awarded certificates of completion for improved literacy skills. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 1% increase 1% increase 1% increase 1 % increase Actual Result 24,969 25,402 26,938 27,261 Note 1: The total number of adults in Georgia in need of literacy training per the 1990 census is 4,023,420. Goal 2: Increase the number of participants who obtain a General Education Development (GED) diploma Desired Result 2a: The number of examinees who obtain a GED. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 2% increase 1% increase 2% increase maintain [3] Actual Result NA 17,774 19,402 18,703 Note 1: The total number of adults in Georgia in need of a GED is 1,170, 815. (This is based on 1990 census data.) Note 2: A new GED test format will result in fewer individuals taking the test. Note 3: This is collected during a calendar year. The latest actual result data is for CY 2000, and this is reported in FY 2001. Goal 3: Increase the number of English Literacy Program (ELP) students who acquire adequate English proficiency. 685 DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL AND ADULT EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 3a: The number of ELP students who achieve an improved literacy level as shown by passing standardized literacy test. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 6,495 NA 8,457 2% increase 2% increase 2% increase 2% increase 9,104 9,313 Note 1: The total number of residents in need of English training, and on waiting lists was not available. Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $19,888,214 $12,096,802 FY 2002 Budget $19,997,058 $12,205,646 FY 2003 Recommended $19,774,524 $11,983,112 CUSTOMER DRIVEN TRAINING (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT) Purpose: Promote job growth and economic development by providing customer-driven training to new, expanding, and existing businesses through technical colleges/institutes or through the direct delivery of services. Goal 1: Quick Start training will meet employers' workforce training needs. Desired Result 1a: After project completion, the percentage of companies that use quick start training that rate their overall satisfaction with the training at the "very good" level. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 80% 81% 82% 82% Actual Result 75% 80% 84% 95% (36 of 38) Desired Result 1b: The percentage of companies that used Quick Start training that are satisfied with the work performance of the quick start trainees. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA NA 80% 80% 85% Actual Result 77% 80% 98% 92% (35 of 38) NA FY 2003 85% NA Desired Result 1c: The number of companies contracting for customized training. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA 3% increase 3% increase 3% increase 3% increase Actual Result 251 266 279 296 686 DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL AND ADULT EDUCATION - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: Quick Start training will result in more jobs for Georgians. Desired Result 2a: The number of jobs created or retained because Quick Start training was available. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA NA 2% increase 2% increase Actual Result NA NA NA 9,600 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $12,340,384 $12,340,384 FY 2002 Budget $13,409,648 $13,409,648 FY 2003 Recommended $13,451,893 $13,451,893 Total - Unallocated Funds: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $32,614,784 $6,714,148 FY 2002 Budget $19,607,290 $17,547,502 FY 2003 Recommended $8,627,675 $6,597,887 Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $428,054,367 $254,934,586 FY 2002 Budget $353,004,339 $277,257,222 FY 2003 Recommended $361,821,947 $286,074,830 687 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Results-Based Budgeting PUBLIC ROAD NETWORK Purpose: The public road network throughout the state will be operationally efficient in moving people, goods and services in and out of communities. Goal 1: The public road network throughout the state will be operationally efficient in moving people, goods and services in and out of communities. Desired Result 1a: The percentage of Georgia's Inter-state highways, state highways, and roads in category designated "Good" based on DOT "ride-ability" standards. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 99.8% 99.8% 95.0% 95.0% 95.0% Actual Result 99.6% 95.3% 95.0% 96.5% 8909/9235 Desired Result 1b: Increase the percentage of met needs versus identified needs based upon state fund availability for the Local Assistance Road Program (LARP). [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA 54% 55% 57% 57% NA 50% 54% 30% Note 1: Local governments submit a list of roads to be considered for resurfacing under this program on a yearly basis. Goal 2: The public road network will be planned, designed, constructed and maintained for safe travel by all users. Desired Result 2a: Operate and maintain the safest public road network in the southeast as reflected by annual fatalities for southeastern states by reducing the number of fatalities/100M vehicle miles traveled. Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA 1.7 FY 1999 1.69 1.63 FY 2000 1.68 1.52 FY 2001 1.68 1.68 FY 2002 1.5 FY 2003 1.5 Desired Result 2b: The percentage of accidents reduced at high accident locations improved with Federal Highway Safety Funds. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 8% 8% 10% 10% 10% 8% 8% 8% 10% Goal 3: Improve the efficiency of the highway system through innovative traffic management technologies. Desired Result 3a: Reduce incident detection and response time of the HERO units resulting in improved efficiency of freeways. (Proxy) [1] [2] FY 1998 FY 1999 [2] FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 9 minutes 7 minutes Actual Result 9 minutes 11 minutes 11 minutes Note 1: The response time of HERO units is important in continuing the flow of traffic. 11 minutes 11 minutes 12 minutes 13 minutes Note 2: The actual result for FY 1999 was revised upward from 9 minutes to 11 minutes. 688 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 3b: The number of major incidents HERO responded to. (Proxy) [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Desired Result NA NA NA Actual Result NA 5,928 5,520 Note 1: The number of incidents is an indicator for improved traffic flow. FY 2001 6,000 5,632 FY 2002 6,000 FY 2003 6,000 Desired Result 3c: The number of minor road blocking incidents and motorist assists HERO units responded to. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 Desired Result NA NA Actual Result 28,708 29,004 Note 1: The number of incidents is an indicator for improved traffic flow. FY 2000 NA 28,750 FY 2001 29,000 28,903 FY 2002 29,000 FY 2003 29,000 Goal 4: Support and promote sustainable economic development throughout Georgia. Desired Result 4a: Increase the multi-lane roadway mileage of the Governor's Road Improvement Program (GRIP), currently open or under construction. (Proxy) [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - miles Actual Result - miles NA 1,371 1,436 1,485 1,481 1,531 1,570 1,545 1,686 1,846 Note 1: One of the key factors impacting economic development in rural areas is 4 lane access for semi trailer trucks. Goal 5: Support and promote environmental sensitivity in road construction projects. Desired Result 5a: Wetland acreage each year that is created or rehabilitated (mitigated) as compared to the wetland acres destroyed for bridge and construction projects. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Acres mitigated / destroyed Actual Result - Acres mitigated / destroyed NA 400 / 220 1,800 / 220 400 / 220 400 / 220 1,000 / 250 1,000 / 250 1,800 / 250 400 / 220 1,802 / 111 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $1,805,319,929 $655,948,898 FY 2002 Budget $1,974,418,186 $659,450,922 FY 2003 Recommended $2,044,753,472 $639,000,000 NON-HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS Purpose: Offer citizens and businesses opportunities for improved quality of life and economic development prospects through a balanced transportation system investing in public transit, aviation, rail, harbor, waterway projects, bicycle and pedestrian access facilities. Goal 1: Support public transportation services at the local and regional levels of the state to meet the needs of transit users. Desired Result 1a: Increase access to public transportation services as reflected by transit system one way passenger trips. Desired Result Actual Result FY 1998 NA NA FY 1999 791,069 [1] 791,096 FY 2000 2,344,477 2,400,477 FY 2001 2,461,700 2,620,641 FY 2002 894,167 [2] FY 2003 898,637 Note 1: The large increase of the actual result over the desired result for FY 1999 reflects an unanticipated increase in passenger trips from MARTA. Note 2: The decrease is due to a decline in MARTA ridership and a decline in transit ridership in Athens. 689 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 2: Improve the safety, reliability, capability and utility of the statewide air transportation system to meet existing and future aviation needs by providing financial and technical support to publicly owned airports. Desired Result 2a: Reduce the maximum threshold level of public use airports which are not in compliance with the state licensing standards. [1] Proxy FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Number of Airports Actual Result - Number of Airports NA 41 38 39 36 36 44 40 39 40 Note 1: Proxy for safety. Relevant accident data is not available. Desired Result 2b: The percentage [1] of general aviation airports that have pavement conditions that are rated as good in comparison to established standards. [2] Proxy FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - number & % of airports Actual Result - number & % of airports NA 60 (64%) 63 (67%) 68 (72%) 65 (69%) 68 (72%) 68 (72%) 70 (75%) 70 (75%) 70 (75%) Note 1: . This result was changed from a count to a percentage in FY 2003. Note 2: This is a proxy for safety. Desired Result 2c: The number of airports with expanded runway lengths to accommodate larger and more sophisticated aircraft. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Desired Result NA 2 3 8 4 Actual Result 0 3 2 5 Note 1: This is an indicator of capacity. FY 2003 4 Goal 3: Provide adequate dredge material containment areas to support waterborne shipping access to ports. Desired Result 3a: Federal waterway dredging schedules will experience no delays attributed to deficient disposal areas. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA No Delay No Delay No Delay No Delay No Delay No Delay No Delay No Delay No Delay Note 1: Containment areas for soil, sediment etc. that is dredged from shipping channels is the limiting factor in keeping the shipping channels open. Goal 4: Provide and maintain safe and adequate railroad segments that link to the regional and national rail systems. Desired Result 4a : The [1] light density rail miles maintained at or above Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Class II Track Standards. [2] Proxy FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA 106 miles 558 miles 106 miles 65 miles 65 miles 143 miles 65 miles 187 miles 171 miles Note 1: Program personnel cannot estimate the total mileage of light density rail lines in Georgia because the number "floats". Consequently, this number is not displayed as a percentage. Further, some results were revised due to data problems. Note 2: FRA standards address safety and adequacy and is a proxy for safe and adequate rails. 690 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 5: Minimize the adverse economic impacts of changes in rail service by acquiring and preserving rail corridors of strategic importance. Desired Result 5a: The [1] of strategically important light density rail miles that are purchased and inventoried. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA 145 miles 96 miles 59 miles 64 miles 59 miles Actual Result 156 miles 106 miles 96 miles 0 miles Note 1: Program personnel cannot estimate the total mileage of strategically important light density rail lines in Georgia because the number "floats". Consequently, this result is not displayed as a percentage. Goal 6: Promote economic development of the state by supporting the air transportation needs of the Department of Industry, Trade and Tourism. Desired Result 6a: The flights supporting the Department of Industry, Trade and Tourism. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Flights NA NA NA 132 132 132 Actual Result - Flights 100 flights 146 flights 150 flights 150 flights Note 1: All state flights are either for ITT's economic development purposes or for public officials and state employees. Desired Result 6b: Percent of ITT users that state the DOT provided flights were very helpful in their economic development efforts. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Note 1: Data is not available for this measure. Goal 7: Meet the air transportation needs of public officials and state employees. Desired Result 7a: The flights supporting public officials and state employees. FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Desired Result - Flights NA NA NA 720 Actual Result - Flights NA 759 1,046 888 FY 2002 720 FY 2003 720 Desired Result 7b: Percent of state employees using the flight service that state the DOT provided flights were very helpful in helping them perform their jobs more efficiently. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result Actual Result NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Note 1: Data is not available for this measure. 691 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 8: Provide a statewide network of bicycle routes and facilities that support a broader range of travel opportunities Desired Result 8a: The number of state network roads posted for bike routes according to the statewide bicycle plan. (new plan in development). [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result NA NA NA Actual Result NA 0 0 Note 1: This measure is an indicator that a "broader range of travel opportunities" is available. 3 roads 0 3 roads 2 roads Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $27,946,436 $21,987,979 FY 2002 Budget $52,241,015 $13,860,138 FY 2003 Recommended $58,493,557 $17,475,729 Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $1,833,266,365 $677,936,877 FY 2002 Budget $2,026,659,201 $675,313,466 FY 2003 Recommended $2,103,247,029 $656,475,729 692 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS SERVICES Results-Based Budgeting VETERANS ASSISTANCE Purpose: Assist Georgia veterans to obtain all benefits to which they are legally entitled in recognition of their military service. Goal 1: Veterans will receive the benefits for which they apply and are entitled, and veterans and their families will be satisfied with the services they receive. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of respondents to a survey of randomly selected veterans and their families or representatives receiving assistance that rate degree of satisfaction as either good or excellent. Desired Result - Percentage Actual Result - Percentage - Number Program Fund Allocation: FY 1998 N/A N/A N/A FY 1999 80% 87% 485 FY 2000 85% 89% 710 FY 2001 90% N/A N/A FY 2002 91% FY 2003 91% Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $6,705,844 $6,325,626 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommendation $7,706,310 $7,272,465 $7,290,049 $6,926,157 VETERANS NURSING HOME AND DOMICILIARY Purpose: Provide daily skilled nursing and domiciliary care to eligible Georgia Veterans at the Georgia War Veterans Home in Milledgeville and the Georgia War Veterans Nursing Home in Augusta. Goal 1: Ensure that veterans residing at the Georgia War Veterans Home in Milledgeville and Georgia War Veterans Nursing Home in Augusta receive quality, cost-effective care. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of facilities that successfully pass annual U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and State Licensure Inspections FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A N/A [1] 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual Result - Percentage N/A [1] 100% 100% 100% - Number N/A [1] 2 of 2 2 of 2 2 of 2 Note 1: The baseline data for the FY 1998 Actual Result was the percentage of inspected areas that passed each year. Because the inspection instrument is so extensive, the cost in time and resources to continue this measure is prohibitive; thus, the result was changed in FY 1999 to measure substantial compliance with all sections of inspection form. Desired Result 1b: The percentage of veterans and their families surveyed who received care at the Georgia War Veterans Homes or the Georgia War Veterans Nursing Homes that rate their care as good or better[1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 80% 85% 87% 87% 88% Actual Result - Percentage 82% 86% *82% **100% - Number [2] [2] [2] 92/92 Note 1: 197 surveys were distributed by the Georgia War Veterans Nursing Home to residents and family; 92 (53%) were returned with 29 rating care as "Good" and 63 reporting an "Excellent" rating. Note 2: The number of surveys distributed and number returned was not retained and is not available. 693 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS SERVICES - Results-Based Budgeting Desired Result 1c: Per day patient costs compared to the southeast regional average FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Skilled Nursing Cost Difference N/A =<0 =<0 =<0 =<0 =<0 Actual Result - Cost Difference GA : SE Ave. -$34.74 -$18.31 -$30.09 N/A - Skilled Nursing Care Cost - Georgia $100.94 $109.96 $111.91 N/A - Skilled Nursing Care Cost - Southeast $135.68 $128.27 $142.00 N/A Desired Result - Domiciliary Cost Difference N/A =<0 =<0 =<0 Actual Result - Cost Difference GA : SE Ave. -$12.47 -$10.50 -$14.24 N/A - Domiciliary Care Cost - Georgia $60.71 $63.50 $63.50 N/A - Domiciliary Care Cost - Southeast $73.18 $74.00 $77.74 N/A Program Fund Allocation: Nursing Homes Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $22,427,233 $12,440,398 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommendation $25,859,344 $25,091,060 $15,945,720 $11,679,953 Total - All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $29,133,077 $18,766,024 FY 2002 Budget FY 2003 Recommendation $33,565,654 $32,363,525 $23,235,769 $22,033,640 694 STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION Results-Based Budgeting WORKERS' COMPENSATION SERVICES Purpose: To provide superior access to the Georgia Workers' Compensation program for injured workers and employers in a manner that is sensitive, responsive and effective and to ensure efficient processing and swift resolution of claims, while encouraging work place safety and return to work, while protecting employers from tort liability. Goal 1: Ensure access to medical care for all workers injured on the job so that those workers can return to work. Desired Result 1a: Percentage of workers injured on the job that return to work within one year of their injuries. [1] FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 84% >85% >84% >84% >84% Actual Result - Percentage - Number 70% 69% 66% 53% 13,606/19,560 13,296/19,363 12,416/18,864 9,468/17,823 Note 1: There is a lag in the reporting of this data; thus, for example, FY 2001 actual results are based upon FY 2000 actual data. Note 2: Due to tracking limitations on the data collection system, numbers reflect only the most recent activity and not all activity on the claims; thus, numbers may not be accurately reflected. Desired Result 1b: Number of workdays lost by each employee with a work related injury will decrease in FY 2003 compared to the FY 1998 average of 98 workdays FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - N/A 60 days 60 days 60 days 60 days 60 days Actual Result 98 days 90 days 72 days 40 days Note 1: There is a lag in the reporting of this data; thus, for example, FY 2001 actual results are based upon FY 2000 actual data. Note 2: Due to tracking limitations on the data collection system, numbers reflect only the most recent activity and not all activity on the claims; thus, numbers may not be accurately reflected. Goal 2: Control the growth of workers' compensation costs by developing reasonable fee schedules and specialized managed care programs. Desired Result 2a: Percentage increase in the cost of medical care for injured workers over the prior fiscal year's total costs for medical-only claims FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Cost (in millions) - Percentage Increase $84,000 $91,000 $109,200 $131,040 $157,248 N/A 20% +20% +20% +20% +20% Actual Result - Cost $76,158 - Percentage Increase Note 1: FY 2000 Actual Results are based on CY 2000 data. $80,973 6% $97,760 21% Available 1/2002 695 STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION - Results-Based Budgeting Goal 3: Payments of entitled benefits to injured workers by employers and insurers will be correct and timely. Desired Result 3a: Percentage of injured workers receiving their first weekly payment on or before the twenty-first day after their injury or the date the employer was made aware of the injury FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage Actual Result - Percentage N/A 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 86% 85% 85% - Number 22,124 of 26,058 20,934 of 24,558 16,008 of 18,864 15,284 of 17,823 Note 1: There is a one-year lag in the reporting of this data; thus, for example, FY 2001 actual results are based upon FY 2000 actual data. Goal 4: Ensure prompt due process to any party in a workers' compensation claim case by providing a judicial forum to address legal complaints with a trial level decision and by evaluating settlement agreements. Desired Result 4a: Percentage change in the number of cases settled without the need for a formal hearing FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage change N/A +3% +3% +3% +3% +3% Actual Result - Percentage change N/A +12% +13% +6% - Number 2,460 2,752 3,115 3,311 Desired Result 4b: Percentage of trial decisions for workers' compensation claims rendered within 63 days of the initial trial FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 75% 75% 75% 755 755 Actual Result - Percentage 74% 67% 73% 71% - Number 1,011/1,366 859/1,275 872/1,199 878/1,239 Goal 5: Increase communication and improve relations between private industry and all users of the workers' compensation system. Desired Result 5a: Percentage of employer attendees satisfied with the Board-sponsored workers' compensation training seminars FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Desired Result - Percentage N/A 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% Actual Result - Percentage 98% 98% 99% 98% - Number 1,618/1,643 1,122/1,145 1,204/1,221 1,245/1,275 Program Fund Allocation: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $12,328,288 $11,934,288 FY 2002 Budget $12,748,917 $12,488,917 FY 2003 Recommendation $12,519,832 $12,155,832 Total All Programs: Total Funds State Funds FY 2001 Actual $12,328,288 $11,934,288 FY 2002 Budget $12,748,917 $12,488,917 FY 2003 Recommendation $12,519,832 $12,155,832 696 Appendixx 697 STATE FUNDS SURPLUS Departments/Agencies General Assembly Audits and Accounts, Department of Judicial Branch Administrative Services, Department of Agriculture, Department of Banking and Finance, Department of Community Affairs, Department of Community Health, Department of Corrections, Department of Defense, Department of Education, State Board of Forestry Commission, State Georgia Bureau of Investigation Governor, Office of the Human Resources, Department of Industry, Trade and Tourism, Department of Insurance, Office of Commissioner of Juvenile Justice, Department of Labor, Department of Law, Department of Natural Resources, Department of Pardons and Paroles, Board of Public Safety, Department of Public Service Commission Regents, University System of Georgia Revenue, Department of School Readiness, Office of Secretary of State, Office of Soil and Water Conservation Commission, State Student Finance Commission, Georgia Teachers' Retirement System Technical and Adult Education, Department of Transportation, Department of Veterans Service, Department of Workers' Compensation, State Board of Total Surplus Audited State Funds Surplus, June 30 Unallotted State Funds Lapse, June 30 Estimated Lottery Funds Surplus, June 30 Estimated Tobacco Funds Surplus, June 30 Total Surplus Fiscal Year 2000 $4,049,536.40 293,100.99 722,254.93 115,203.31 182,092.36 67,459.70 19,643.70 3,532,949.51 11,322,039.11 34,715.41 18,572,354.36 1,154,016.01 50,934.69 2,229,453.50 11,434,487.99 524,711.69 606,234.13 1,700,676.61 66,214.20 1,436,498.72 1,522,045.91 69,553.03 596,316.09 462,195.98 2,250,566.55 6,552,328.55 854,575.92 7,954.91 1,772,483.66 60,625.10 707,728.03 452,455.41 1,054,258.06 151,223.15 $74,628,887.67 $67,304,653.09 885,907.39 6,438,327.19 $74,628,887.67 Fiscal Year 2001 $605,141.67 484,112.81 745,544.00 376,127.35 169,526.78 1,556,235.51 18,797,882.94 8,210,439.62 140,257.43 17,145,300.83 455,004.78 77,060.00 3,471,049.11 40,845,652.55 573,890.09 66,791.01 52,408.95 54,919.94 404,497.46 807,260.55 208,909.21 1,223,008.21 488,918.98 2,737,753.77 9,008,143.39 1,380,963.41 350,925.59 12,907.12 386,935.95 374,693.93 1,591,009.82 877,559.20 (704,831.07) 19,304.06 $112,995,304.95 $96,917,893.58 640,842.25 8,573,075.07 6,863,494.05 $112,995,304.95 698 SUMMARY OF POSITIONS Departments/Agencies Administrative Services, Department of - Unit A Georgia Building Authority - Unit B Agriculture, Department of Banking and Finance, Department of Community Affairs, Department of Community Health, Department of - Unit A PeachCare for Kids - Unit C Corrections, Department of Defense, Department of Education, State Board of - Unit A School Readiness, Office of - Unit C Employees' Retirement System Forestry Commission, State Georgia Bureau of Investigation Georgia State Financing and Investment Commission Governor, Office of the Human Resources, Department of Industry, Trade and Tourism, Department of Insurance, Office of Commissioner of Juvenile Justice, Department of Labor, Department of - Unit A Rehabilitation Services, Division of - Unit B Law, Department of Merit System of Personnel Administration Motor Vehicle Safety, Department of Natural Resources, Department of - Unit A Ga. Agricultural Exposition Authority - Unit B Agrirama Development Authority, Georgia - Unit C Pardons and Paroles, State Board of Public Safety, Department of - Unit A Units Attached for Administrative Purposes - Unit B Public Service Commission Regents, Board of - Unit A Regents Central Office - Unit B Ga. Public Telecommunications Commission - Unit C Revenue, Department of Secretary of State, Office of Real Estate Commission - Unit B Soil and Water Conservation Commission, State Student Finance Commission, Georgia - Unit A [continued on next page] FY 2001 Actual 1,113 551 870 146 431 491 7 15,215 416 712 83 54 722 868 103 354 10,482 202 326 4,402 1,992 1,895 184 143 0 2,041 55 21 848 2,034 183 152 36,002 7,814 235 1,430 376 31 34 8 FY 2002 Budgeted 1,681 551 870 147 438 497 7 15,557 448 728 84 54 724 868 103 331 11,442 201 327 4,088 1,993 1,923 188 146 1,364 1,611 55 22 846 1,465 208 94 38,194 3,622 235 1,114 381 31 34 8 FY 2003 Recommendations 1,684 460 878 147 431 502 7 15,609 448 710 85 54 724 914 103 356 11,548 201 327 4,181 1,993 1,923 189 146 1,493 1,603 51 22 846 1,471 208 94 38,400 3,622 235 1,114 394 31 33 8 699 SUMMARY OF POSITIONS [Continued] Departments/Agencies Teachers Retirement System Technical and Adult Education, Department of - Unit A Transportation, Department of Veterans Service, Department of Workers' Compensation, State Board of TOTAL FY 2001 Actual 132 3,513 6,380 133 164 103,348 FY 2002 Budgeted 133 3,510 6,041 133 166 102,663 FY 2003 Recommendations 133 3,510 6,041 133 166 103,228 700 FY 2004 DEPARTMENT BUDGET ESTIMATES The budget process used for Fiscal Year 2003 incorporates a multi-year estimating process required of state agencies. Agencies were required to estimate future costs of their Fiscal Year 2003 request. Estimating future cost of actions taken in any budget year should be an integral part of the budget decision making process. Agencies were asked to include Fiscal Year 2004 estimates of their budget requests and future operating costs associated with capital outlay projects. The table below is a summary of the agencies' Fiscal Year 2004 estimate of their Fiscal Year 2003 budget requests. Departments/Agencies Administrative Services, Department of - Unit A Agriculture, Department of Banking and Finance, Department of Community Affairs, Department of Community Health, Department of - Unit A Indigent Care Trust Fund - Unit B PeachCare for Kids - Unit C Corrections, Department of Defense, Department of Education, State Board of - Unit A Lottery for Education - Unit B School Readiness, Office of - Unit C Forestry Commission, State Georgia Bureau of Investigation Governor, Office of the Human Resources, Department of Industry, Trade and Tourism, Department of Insurance, Office of Commissioner of Juvenile Justice, Department of Labor, Department of - Unit A Rehabilitation Services, Division of - Unit B Law, Department of Motor Vehicle Safety, Department of Natural Resources, Department of - Unit A Pardons and Paroles, State Board of Public Safety, Department of - Unit A Units Attached for Administrative Purposes - Unit B Public School Employees Retirement System Public Service Commission Regents, Board of - Unit A Regents Central Office - Unit B Lottery for Education - Unit D Revenue, Department of Secretary of State, Office of Real Estate Commission - Unit B Soil and Water Conservation Commission, State [continued on next page] FY 2003 Requests $49,580,243 51,974,109 11,626,372 60,799,166 1,738,322,895 148,828,880 75,153,858 1,029,057,249 9,177,647 5,988,663,648 73,503,450 254,625,701 39,636,454 69,710,148 52,490,308 1,533,978,271 64,633,305 16,195,686 294,144,845 31,677,095 34,542,210 16,645,025 98,493,300 155,705,918 55,130,576 88,284,716 17,633,949 12,238,226 12,117,294 1,682,556,637 259,178,095 26,366,000 91,686,845 56,129,526 2,512,335 3,472,157 FY 2004 Estimates $49,391,767 51,806,706 11,423,200 26,479,585 1,738,322,895 148,828,880 75,153,858 1,049,534,131 9,209,844 5,988,663,648 73,503,450 254,625,701 40,964,151 69,710,148 53,250,746 1,476,393,957 30,682,127 15,758,071 294,721,116 31,677,095 38,316,871 16,645,025 98,493,300 152,458,672 55,130,576 90,933,257 16,820,197 12,238,226 12,598,524 1,733,033,336 266,953,438 26,366,000 91,686,845 57,771,632 2,605,195 3,749,860 701 FY 2004 DEPARTMENT BUDGET ESTIMATES [Continued] Departments/Agencies Student Finance Commission, Georgia - Unit A Lottery for Education - Unit B Teachers Retirement System Technical and Adult Education, Department of - Unit A Lottery for Education - Unit B Transportation, Department of Veterans Service, Department of Workers' Compensation, State Board of TOTAL STATE FUNDS FY 2003 Requests 46,305,580 375,381,098 2,670,000 316,266,081 14,933,737 1,046,167,326 26,916,540 12,678,119 $16,047,790,620 FY 2004 Estimates 48,364,248 421,641,522 2,670,000 316,266,081 14,933,737 1,046,167,326 25,675,978 12,840,257 $16,054,461,179 702 IMPACT OF THE CAPITAL OUTLAY PROGRAM ON THE FY 2003 RECOMMENDED BUDGET The Capital Outlay Program consists of projects and activities to: acquire property; procure equipment; develop and construct new facilities and structures; renovate, enlarge, enhance, preserve, and improve existing facilities and structures; and conduct major repairs to ensure capital assets achieve their service life. Funding is considered in the Capital Outlay Program for projects that are primarily facility related, non-recurring on an annual basis, and it is deemed desirable to request and recommend funding separate from the operating budget for ongoing agency expenses. For example, annual motor vehicle replacements and other routine equipment needs are usually funded as part of an agency's general operating budget, and are not considered capital outlay. The Capital Outlay Program impacts the state's operating budget through a mix of debt service payments for bond-funded projects and "pay-as-you-go" financing using lottery, tobacco settlement, and cash revenues. Also, as completed capital projects become operational, there may be associated additional operating expenses. The following table summarizes the impact of the Capital Outlay Program on the FY 2003 Recommended Budget. In summary, $984 million of the FY 2003 Governor's $16.2 billion Recommended Budget directly supports the Capital Outlay Program, representing 6.1% of the total. Details of funding expenses of major capital projects becoming operational are contained in the Department Budget Summaries and Budget Highlights sections. Also, as the major capital projects recommended in the FY 2003 and Amended FY 2002 budgets are completed, there will be additional operating expenses in future years. The total future additional operational impact of these recommended capital projects is estimated at $25 million on an annual basis. The state has developed and maintains a sound debt management plan, overseen by a Debt Management Advisory Committee, for the effective and prudent use of debt in addressing Georgia's growing capital needs. In recognition of the state's sound fiscal policies, moderate debt levels well within constitutional and statutory controls, conservative revenue estimates, diverse economic base, and responsive leadership, the state currently enjoys triple-A ratings from Moody's, Fitch, and Standard & Poor's. General Obligation Debt Sinking Fund Existing Obligations, Issued Debt Service Bond Funded FY 2003 Projects, New Debt Subtotal, Debt Cash Funded FY 2003 Projects Tobacco Funded FY 2003 Projects Additional FY 2003 Operating Cost of Completed Capital Projects Total FY 2003 Budget $621,114,0 74 0 $621,114,074 $328,097,299 $1,500,000 $33,446,281 $984,157,654 Percentage of Budget 3.8% ____ 3.8% 2.0% 0.01% 0.2% 6.1% 703 FINANCING CAPITAL OUTLAY NEEDS - ISSUANCE OF DEBT In November of 1972, the voters of the State of Georgia approved a comprehensive amendment to the Constitution of 1945 (Ga. Laws 1972, p. 1523, et seq.), which permitted the state to finance its needs directly through the issuance of general obligation debt. Prior to the adoption of the amendment, the state's capital outlay needs were met through the issuance of bonds by 10 separate state authorities and secured by lease rental agreements between the authorities and various state departments and agencies. The provisions of the amendment were implemented by the General Assembly in 1973 with the enactment of the act, and the constitutionality of the new system of state financing was favorably adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia in a decision rendered on July 16, 1974, in Sears v. State of Georgia, 232 Ga. 547 (1974). In November of 1982, the voters of the State of Georgia ratified a new state constitution that became effective July 1, 1983, and such new constitution continues the amendment in full force and effect. GEORGIA STATE FINANCING AND INVESTMENT COMMISSION The commission is an agency and instrumentality of the state and its members are the Governor, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the State Auditor, the Attorney General, the Director of the Office of Treasury and Fiscal Services, and the Commissioner of Agriculture. The commission is responsible for the issuance of all public debt of the state, including general obligation debt and guaranteed revenue debt. The commission is further responsible for the proper application of the proceeds of such debt to the purposes for which it is incurred. The commission has two statutory divisions, a Financing and Investment Division and a Construction Division, each administered by a director who reports directly to the commission. commission contracts with the Department of Transportation or the Georgia Highway Authority for the supervision of and contracting for designing, planning, building, rebuilding, constructing, improving, operating, owning, maintaining, leasing, and managing of public roads and bridges for which general obligation debt has been authorized and in all other cases when the commission shall contract with a state department, authority, or agency for the acquisition or construction of projects under the policies, standards, and operating procedures established by the commission. The Construction Division is also responsible for performing such construction-related services for state agencies and instrumentalities as may be assigned to the commission by executive order of the Governor. PURPOSE OF BONDS The Constitution of the State of Georgia [see Article VII, Section IV, Paragraph I] provides that the state may incur public debt of two types for public purposes: 1) general obligation debt and 2) guaranteed revenue debt. General obligation debt may be incurred to acquire, construct, develop, extend, enlarge, or improve land, waters, property, highways, buildings, structures, equipment, or facilities of the state, its agencies, departments, institutions, and certain state authorities, to provide educational facilities for county and independent school systems, to provide public library facilities for county and independent school systems, counties, municipalities, and boards of trustees of public libraries or boards of trustees of public library systems, to make loans to counties, municipal corporations, political subdivisions, local authorities, and other local government entities for water or sewerage facilities or systems, and to make loans to local government entities for regional or multijurisdictional solid waste recycling or solid waste facilities or systems. Guaranteed revenue debt may be incurred by guaranteeing the payment of certain revenue obligations issued by an instrumentality of the state to finance certain specified public projects. The Financing and Investment Division performs all services relating to the issuance of public debt, the investment and accounting of all proceeds derived from the incurring of general obligation debt or such other amounts as may be appropriated to the commission for capital outlay purposes, the management of other state debt, and all financial advisory matters pertaining thereto. The Construction Division is responsible for all construction and construction-related matters resulting from the issuance of public debt or from any such other amounts as may be appropriated to the commission for capital outlay purposes, except that in the case of bond proceeds for public road and bridge construction or reconstruction, the CONSTITUTIONAL DEBT LIMITATIONS The Constitution [Article VII, Section IV, Paragraph II] provides that: No debt may be incurred at any time when the highest aggregate annual debt service requirements for the then current year or any subsequent year for outstanding general obligation debt and guaranteed revenue debt, including the proposed debt, and the highest aggregate annual payments for the then current year or any subsequent fiscal year of the state, exceed 10% of the total revenue receipts, less refunds, of the state treasury in the fiscal year immediately preceding the year in which any such debt is to be incurred. 704 FINANCING CAPITAL OUTLAY NEEDS - ISSUANCE OF DEBT No debt may be incurred at any time when the term of the debt is in excess of 25 years. No guaranteed revenue debt may be incurred to finance water or sewage treatment facilities or systems when the highest aggregate annual debt service requirements for the then current year or any subsequent fiscal year of the state for outstanding or proposed guaranteed revenue debt for water facilities or systems or sewerage facilities or systems exceed 1% of the total revenue receipts less refunds, of the state treasury in the fiscal year immediately preceding the year in which any debt is to be incurred. The aggregate amount of guaranteed revenue debt incurred to make loans for educational purposes that may be outstanding at any time shall not exceed $18 million, and the aggregate amount of guaranteed revenue debt incurred to purchase, or to lend or deposit against the security of, loans for educational purposes that may be outstanding at any time shall not exceed $72 million. The Constitution [Article VII, Section IV, Paragraph I(b)] also provides that the state may incur public debt to supply a temporary deficit in the state treasury in any fiscal year created by a delay in collecting the taxes of that year. Such debt shall not exceed, in the aggregate, 5% of the total revenue receipts, less refunds, of the state treasury in the fiscal year immediately preceding the year in which such debt is incurred. The debt incurred shall be repaid on or before the last day of the fiscal year in which it is incurred out of taxes levied for that fiscal year. No such debt may be incurred in any fiscal year under the provisions of this subparagraph if there is then outstanding unpaid debt from any previous fiscal year which was incurred to supply a temporary deficit in the state treasury. No such debt has been incurred under this provision since its inception. 705 TOTAL DEBT AUTHORIZED BY STATE IN GENERAL OBLIGATION AND REVENUE BONDS The following table sets forth by purpose the aggregate general obligation debt and guaranteed revenue debt authorized by the General Assembly of the State for the fiscal years ended June 30, 1975, through June 30, 2002. The amounts of such general obligation debt and guaranteed revenue debt actually issued, and the amounts authorized but unissued, have been aggregated for presentation in the third and fourth columns of this table. Agency Department of Transportation State Board of Education Regents, University System of Georgia Georgia World Congress Center Department of Human Resources Georgia Ports Authority Department of Corrections Department of Public Safety Georgia Bureau of Investigation Department of Revenue Department of Labor Department of Natural Resources Dept. of Technical and Adult Education Ga. Environmental Facilities Authority Department of Administrative Services Department of Agriculture Georgia Building Authority Stone Mountain Memorial Association Department of Veterans Service Jekyll Island State Park Authority Office of Secretary of State Department of Defense Department of Community Affairs Dept. of Industry, Trade and Tourism Ga. Emergency Management Agency State Soil & Water Conservation Commission Department of Juvenile Justice Georgia Golf Hall of Fame Georgia Forestry Commission Georgia Agricultural Exposition Authority Other Subtotal Net Increase resulting from the 1986B, 1992A, 1993E, GEFA Series 1997, GA 400 Tollway Series 1998, and 1998E Refunding Bond Issues. Total General Obligation Debt Authorized $2,681,910,000 2,363,468,000 2,093,907,000 570,805,000 218,166,000 435,055,000 661,745,000 65,130,000 77,585,000 900,000 36,400,000 463,720,000 479,119,000 236,500,000 57,605,000 26,240,000 416,940,000 48,400,000 4,930,000 23,140,000 1,050,000 7,020,000 8,200,000 24,265,000 200,000 3,840,000 178,470,000 6,000,000 1,600,000 14,057,000 18,000,000 $11,224,367,000 $159,780,000 Guaranteed Revenue Debt Authorized $446,105,000 97,470,000 $543,575,000 $6,925,000 State Obligations Issued $2,778,015,000 2,363,465,000 2,093,905,000 570,805,000 218,165,000 435,055,000 661,745,000 65,130,000 77,585,000 900,000 36,400,000 417,720,000 479,115,000 333,970,000 57,605,000 26,240,000 416,940,000 48,400,000 4,930,000 23,140,000 1,050,000 7,020,000 8,200,000 24,265,000 200,000 3,840,000 177,470,000 6,000,000 1,600,000 14,055,000 18,000,000 $11,370,930,000 $166,705,000 Unissued Authorized Indebtedness $350,000,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 46,000,000 4,000 1,000,000 2,000 $397,012,000 $11,384,147,000 $550,500,000 $11,537,635,000 $397,012,000 Source: Georgia State Financing and Investment Commission 706 OUTSTANDING DEBT OWED BY STATE OF GEORGIA The following table sets forth the pro-forma outstanding principal amount of indebtedness of the State on November 30, 2001. State Obligations: General Obligation Debt Guaranteed Revenue Debt Net State Obligations Original Amount $11,337,135,000 $200,500,000 $11,537,635,000 Outstanding $5,725,090,000 $138,190,000 $5,863,280,000 Authority Debt: Georgia Highway Authority Georgia Education Authority (Schools) Georgia Education Authority (University) Georgia Building Authority Georgia Building Authority (Hospitals) Georgia Building Authority (Penal) Georgia Building Authority (Markets) Georgia Ports Authority Jekyll Island-State Park Authority Stone Mountain Memorial Association Total Authority Debt $492,735,000 $0 $514,924,000 $358,985,000 $33,550,000 $88,760,000 $12,000,000 $13,925,000 $43,535,000 $21,370,000 $14,550,000 $1,594,334,000 $0 Summary of Indebtedness: Net State Obligations Authority Debt Total Source: Georgia State Financing and Investment Commission $5,863,280,000 $0 $5,863,280,000 707 PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST OWED ON OUTSTANDING BONDS The following table sets forth the aggregate fiscal year debt service of the State of Georgia on all outstanding general obligation and guaranteed revenue debt, as of November 30, 2001. Fiscal Year General Obligation Debt Principal Authority Debt Principal Guaranteed Revenue Debt Principal 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total $125,890,000 370,805,000 406,790,000 419,750,000 437,730,000 436,635,000 379,965,000 392,190,000 413,365,000 391,635,000 364,515,000 308,530,000 255,620,000 253,795,000 194,245,000 160,075,000 148,130,000 109,865,000 85,610,000 51,000,000 18,950,000 $5,725,090,000 $0 11,525,000 12,050,000 12,565,000 13,115,000 13,730,000 13,980,000 14,675,000 15,340,000 14,305,000 16,905,000 $0 $138,190,000 Source: Georgia State Financing and Investment Commission Total Principal $125,890,000 382,330,000 418,840,000 432,315,000 450,845,000 450,365,000 393,945,000 406,865,000 428,705,000 405,940,000 381,420,000 308,530,000 255,620,000 253,795,000 194,245,000 160,075,000 148,130,000 109,865,000 85,610,000 51,000,000 18,950,000 $5,863,280,000 Total Interest $174,398,943 318,916,829 296,381,438 271,623,581 245,901,199 219,895,963 193,945,418 169,584,513 144,634,654 119,693,230 96,749,203 76,602,276 60,489,803 47,041,951 33,869,895 24,701,844 16,890,306 10,369,835 5,524,101 2,109,500 473,750 $2,529,798,230 Total Debt Service $300,288,943 701,246,829 715,221,438 703,938,581 696,746,199 670,260,963 587,890,418 576,449,513 573,339,654 525,633,230 478,169,203 385,132,276 316,109,803 300,836,951 228,114,895 184,776,844 165,020,306 120,234,835 91,134,101 53,109,500 19,423,7500 $8,393,078,230 $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 .... H $200 $100 $0 Outstanding Debt - Principal and Interest .... .'.1 ..'1 .. Interest Principal Outstanding Debt [Millions] 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Fiscal Year 708 STATE DEBT SERVICE AS PERCENTAGE OF PRIOR YEAR NET TREASURY RECEIPTS The following sets forth the highest aggregate annual debt service, including recommended debt, as a percentage of the net treasury receipts for the prior fiscal year. The maximum percentage allowed by the current state Constitution is 10%, effective in FY 1984. Prior to FY 1984 the maximum percentage allowed by the Constitution was 15%. Fiscal Year 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 Highest Annual Debt Service $885,824,615 (Est.) 885,824,615 (Est.) 730,856,404 700,994,815 702,079,328 606,591,877 588,641,451 568,226,855 504,930,220 491,857,523 Prior Year Net Treasury Receipts $15,468,461,703 (Est.) 15,768,578,047 14,959,980,702 13,539,916,503 12,478,602,944 11,905,829,999 11,166,835,592 10,303,573,061 9,409,526,943 8,346,376,907 Percentage 5.7% (Est.) 5.6% (Est.) 4.9% 5.2% 5.6% 5.1% 5.3% 5.5% 5.4% 5.9% Source: Georgia State Financing and Investment Commission Percentage of Prior Year Debt as a Percentage of Prior Fiscal Year Net Receipts 20% 15% 15%, Pre-FY1984 Constitutional Limits 10% 10%, Effective FY1984 5% State Debt 0% 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 Fiscal Year 1995 2000 2005 709 BASIS OF BUDGETING AND ACCOUNTING BUDGETING The annual budget of the State of Georgia is prepared on the modified accrual basis utilizing encumbrance accounting with the following exceptions: federal and certain other revenues are accrued based on the unexecuted portion of long-term contracts; and intrafund transactions are disclosed as revenues and expenditures. The budget represents departmental appropriations recommended by the Governor and adopted by the General Assembly prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. Annual appropriated budgets are adopted at the department level. All unencumbered annual appropriations lapse at fiscal year end unless otherwise specified by constitutional or statutory provisions. Supplementary and amended appropriations may be enacted during the next legislative session by the same process used for original appropriations. Encumbrances are used to indicate the intent to purchase goods or services. Liabilities and expenditures are recorded upon issuance of completed purchase orders. Goods or services need not have been received for liabilities and expenditures to be recorded. FUND ACCOUNTING The State of Georgia uses funds to report on its financial position and the results of its operations determined in conformity with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by statutes and regulations of the State of Georgia. Fund accounting is designed to demonstrate legal compliance and to aid financial management by segregating transactions related to certain governmental functions or activities. A fund is a separate accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts. Funds presented in this report are follows: Budget Fund - The fund used to account for activities and functions as set forth in the Appropriations Act. General Fund (Statutory Basis) - The fund used to account for the collection of specific revenues of the State of Georgia as provided by statute or administrative action; and transfers to the various state organizations for operational costs in the fiscal year. This is not a General Fund as defined by generally accepted accounting principles. No appropriations of expenditures are made to the General Fund (Statutory Basis). Debt Service Fund (Statutory Basis) - The fund used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of, general obligation bond debt principal, interest and related costs. The unretired principal balance of general obligation bond issues is also reported in this fund, as is an "amount to be provided" (from future appropriations) for retirement of bond principal. This is not a Debt Service Fund as defined by generally accepted accounting principles. All funds included in this report are reported in conformity with statutory requirements. BASIS OF ACCOUNTING The State of Georgia maintains its Budget Fund and its Debt Service Fund in accordance with the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized when susceptible to accrual (i.e., when they become both measurable and available). "Measurable" means the amount of the transaction can be determined and "available" means collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the current period. Further, the modified accrual basis of accounting calls for expenditures to be recorded when the related fund liability is incurred. Contractual obligations for services that have not yet been performed and for goods that have not been delivered at the end of the fiscal year are recognized as expenditures and liabilities. The recognition of encumbrances as expenditures and liabilities is in accordance with Constitutional provisions and State budgetary policy. The General Fund (Statutory Basis) is maintained substantially on the cash receipts and disbursements basis of accounting, with the exception of the accrual of amounts due to the various state organizations for operational costs of the fiscal year. 710 THE BUDGET PROCESS IN GEORGIA An understanding of the budget process in Georgia will help readers to use more easily the contents of the Budget Report. The following information is presented for this purpose. Annual state appropriations, as approved by the General Assembly and signed into law by the Governor, are the authority for the expenditure of all state funds. Budgets are established for each agency based on appropriations, and state laws prescribe strict conditions that govern all expenditures. FUNDING Budgets are based on the availability of state general funds, state dedicated funds (such as motor fuel taxes, state lottery funds and the Indigent Care Trust Fund), reserves and surpluses, funds collected and retained for expenditure by agencies, federal funds, and a few smaller categories. Broadly, funds are identified in the Budget Report and in general use as state funds and total funds. The term "funds" as generally used in this budget report, unless otherwise noted, refers to revenues available or received by the state. Funding sources are also described in the Glossary section of the Budget Report. [The state's specific governmental accounting fund classifications are noted in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report prepared by the Department of Audits and Accounts.] State funds include: (1) The taxes and fees collected by the state and deposited directly into the state treasury to be appropriated; (2) Reserves; (3) Surplus funds; (4) Lottery receipts; (5) Indigent Care Trust Funds; (6) Motor Fuel tax funds; and (7) Tobacco Settlement funds, all of which form the basis for the Governor's revenue estimate. Total funds are all funds available for appropriation, including: (1) State funds as described above; (2) Federal funds; and (3) Other funds from a number of sources, mostly fees and charges assessed and retained by agencies. State funds generally comprise over half of the total appropriations in the budget. The state fund total is most frequently used in news reports and is the total that most often generates public debate and deliberations by the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. The level of state fund appropriations often drives the level of federal and other funding. Taxes represent the largest portion of state revenue sources, about 90%. The two largest tax sources are the income tax and the sales tax. Other major revenue sources include fees and sales, lottery funds, and Indigent Care Trust Funds. Federal funds flow directly to state agencies from the many federal programs that provide grants to state and local governments. While most federal funds for local governments go directly to the recipient cities and counties, some grant funds are distributed to local governments through the state budget. Other funds include a broad category of revenues that are collected by agencies and retained for expenditure without going through the state treasury. They are expressly approved by an appropriations act or can be amended into an agency's budget with approval of the Office of Planning and Budget (OPB). Funds that are collected by agencies and turned over to the state treasury by law become state general funds and are available for appropriation by the General Assembly for any purpose. Funds retained by state agencies for direct expenditure include college tuition fees, state park revenues, and a host of other fees and collections for various services rendered. REVENUE ESTIMATE Georgia's State Constitution requires that the General Assembly approve a budget that balances expenditures with anticipated fund availability. Therefore, each year's budget cannot exceed the total of revenues expected to be collected and any surplus or reserve funds that are available for expenditure. The Governor, who is the Budget Director, is responsible for establishing the official revenue estimate. The Governor is assisted in this responsibility by a state economist under contract as a consultant with OPB, which serves as the budget staff for the Governor. The basis for making revenue projections is a computerized econometric model. From this model, a range of estimates is provided to the Governor by his economic advisor. In December, just prior to finalizing his budget recommendations to the General Assembly, the Governor adopts a final revenue estimate--an action that, when added to surplus and reserve funds, determines the size of the forthcoming appropriations bill. SURPLUS FUNDS Surplus funds come from two sources: (1) Excess revenue collections over the revenue estimate; and (2) Unspent appropriations that were lapsed back to the state treasury and may be available for re-appropriation. Lapses occur in two ways: (1) Appropriation amounts that OPB never allotted to agencies for expenditure, an action that automatically puts the funds back into the 711 THE BUDGET PROCESS IN GEORGIA treasury; and (2) Appropriations that were allotted for expenditure but were unspent at the end of the year. These funds are lapsed back into the treasury by the State Auditor following the annual audits of each agency. RESERVES Two reserves are established by the state on June 30, the end of the state's fiscal year, if funds are available--the Midyear Adjustment Reserve and the Revenue Shortfall Reserve. The Midyear Adjustment Reserve is established by the State Auditor on June 30 each year and represents 1% of net revenue collections for that fiscal year, to the extent surplus funds are available up to that total. The Reserve is set aside to be appropriated in an amended budget at the next session of the General Assembly. The Reserve is considered to be the primary fund source for the State Board of Education's "Midterm Adjustment." This adjustment is appropriated in the upcoming amended budget each year to provide the state's share of the increased cost of new students enrolled in the fall. The Revenue Shortfall Reserve is also established on June 30 after the Midyear Adjustment Reserve has been filled. It is equal to not less than 3% nor more than 5% of the fiscal year's net revenue collections, to the extent surplus funds are available. The Revenue Shortfall Reserve is often referred to the state's "rainy day" fund and is available to offset an unexpected shortage in revenues during the upcoming fiscal year. Occasionally, other reserves can be available for appropriation. For instance, the Motor Fuel Reserve represents funds earmarked for expenditure by the Department of Transportation in years when motor fuel tax collections exceed the original budgeted estimate for motor fuel collections in the preceding fiscal year. All motor fuel tax collections are constitutionally allocated to the Department of Transportation whether appropriated or not, but are routinely included in the state's amended budgets. HOW BUDGETS ARE APPROVED The budget process for any given year, from the first planning stages to post-auditing, involves a series of actions spread over about two and one-half years. Three kinds of budgets can be approved in Georgia - -an original budget, an amended budget, and a supplementary budget. An original budget is just what is says - - the first budget passed for a fiscal year. Generally, this budget remains in effect until the General Assembly convenes in January, at which time the budget is generally changed by adding appropriations, decreasing appropriations, or shifting expenditures between object classes. An amended budget is one in which any type of change can be made - additions, deletions, or transfers. A supplementary budget is one which includes only new spending. Generally, a supplementary bill is passed early in the session to provide appropriations needed before a more extensive amended bill can be passed. All of these budgets, at the end of the session, become one operating budget for the state, with no distinction made for the various appropriations acts that are passed. The General Assembly can meet at any time in special session and amend the budget in effect. These occasions are rare, having occurred only twice in recent decades. Both were triggered by economic recessions in Georgia that required major budget cuts to avoid spending more money than was available for expenditure. State law requires all state agencies to submit a request for appropriations for the next fiscal year to OPB no later than September 1 of each year. Most agencies start preliminary work on these requests in the spring for a fiscal year that is 14 to 15 months in the future. At the same time, agencies may request amendments for changes in the current fiscal year's budget. In early September, the Governor begins a four-month period in which he studies the budget requests of each department and develops his recommendations to the General Assembly. During this interim, he meets with department heads and consults with OPB staff in finalizing his proposals. BUDGET ANNOUNCEMENTS The Governor normally appears before a joint meeting of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees during the first week in January to announce his recommendations for amending the current year's budget. The Governor announces the next year's budget recommendations during the annual Budget Message, which is delivered to a joint legislative session during the first week of the annual session. The Legislature convenes on the second Monday in January. LEGISLATIVE ACTION By law, an appropriations bill is introduced in the House of Representatives and first goes to the House Appropriations Committee for consideration before being voted on by the entire House. The bill follows a similar path through the Senate. The House and Senate versions usually differ. While still working within the total revenue estimate established by the Governor, a conference committee is then appointed to reach a compromise on the two versions. The conference committee's version must be totally accepted or rejected by each house. A rejection results in appointment of a new conference committee. 712 THE BUDGET PROCESS IN GEORGIA The process is the same for amended and outyear appropriations bills. The only difference is the General Assembly generally takes actions on amended and supplementary bills before taking up the budget for the following year. That is done because changes in the current year's budget often impact the following year's budget. ADMINISTRATION OF THE BUDGET Once an Appropriations Act has been signed into law, OPB, on behalf of the Governor, is responsible for ensuring that all state expenditures conform to the legislative mandate. State agencies are responsible for ensuring that they do not exceed spending authorizations by total appropriations or by object class. This is accomplished through approval by OPB of an annual operating budget, quarterly allotments and expenditure reports. After the fiscal year ends, the State Auditor is responsible for auditing all expenditures of every state agency and operation, including all colleges and universities, authorities and school districts. OBJECT CLASS APPROPRIATIONS All funds are appropriated through common and unique object classes. There are more than a dozen common object classes such as personal services, regular operating expenses, capital outlay, travel and real estate rentals. Unique object classes, of which there are almost a hundred in the State Board of Education alone, usually relate only to a specific agency. The Appropriations Act in recent years has provided some flexibility for state agencies by authorizing some transfers between common object classes. The limits are: no common object class spending can exceed 102 percent of appropriations for that class, and total spending on all common object classes cannot exceed the total funds authorized. Further transfers between these object classes are possible with permission of the Fiscal Affairs Subcommittee of the General Assembly, as recommended by the Governor. Budget Development Calendar July August September 1st October December January February March April May June July 1st Agencies develop and finalize budget request information. Agencies submit budget requests to the Office of Planning and Budget (OPB) for compilation, review, and analysis. OPB assists the Governor in developing the official revenue estimate and expenditure recommendations, and in preparing the budget report documents. The Governor presents the budget reports to amend the current fiscal year budget, and for the upcoming fiscal year budget, to the General Assembly. Legislative committees hold budget hearings. Legislative committees develop appropriations recommendations. Appropriation acts are passed to amend the current fiscal year budget ending June 30th, and for the upcoming fiscal year effective July 1st. Governor signs appropriations acts into law, and may veto specific appropriations. Budgets are loaded into financial systems and verified for consistency with final appropriations actions. OPB issues instructions for next round of budget requests that are due September 1st. New fiscal year begins. 713 GEORGIA STATISTICS Socio-Economic Characteristics, Population and Demographics Georgia's Population Densit People per Square Mile Cd 0 to 100 Iii 101 to 200 201 to 500 501 to 5,000 Population (Millions) 10 5 3.12 0 1940 3.44 1950 Georgia Population Growth 3.94 1960 4.59 1970 5.46 1980 6.48 1990 8.19 2000 Georgia's resident population doubled between 1960 and 2000. Georgia's resident population is slightly younger than the national population Georgia has a higher percentage of minority residents than the US as a whole. Georgia's Hispanic population tripled between 1990 and 2000, increasing from 108,922 to 435,277. Population Georgia U.S. Population (2000 Census) % of Population Age 17 & Under (2000 Census) % of Population 65 & Older (2000 Census) % of Population by Race (2000 Census) White only African American/Black Only Asian only Some Other Race or Multiple Races % of Population by Hispanic/Non-Hispanic (Census 2000) Hispanic/Latino 1Rank is based on 1 being the highest Non-Hispanic 8.19 million 26.5% 9.6% 65.1% 28.7% 2.1% 4.1% 5.30% 94.70% 281.42 million 25.7% 12.4% 75.1% 12.3% 3.6% 9.0% 12.50% 87.40% State Rank1 10 9 47 43 5 NA 27 714 GEORGIA STATISTICS Employment and Income Georgia had the highest average annual pay in the Southeastern United States every year between 1995 and 2000. Georgia led the Southeast with an average personal income growth of 7.2% between 1992 and 2000 and was the 5th fastest growing state in the US. Georgia's unemployment has been lower than the US average for the past ten years. Georgia's Growth in Median Household Income $45,000 $40,000 $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 31,175 1969 33,968 1979 39,134 1990 40,827 2000 Georgia Per Capita Income 1994-2000 $50,000 27,940 $40,000 26,145 27,324 $30,000 23,586 24,546 22,230 21,170 $20,000 $10,000 $0 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Average Annual Pay -- 1996-1998-2000 $40,000 $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 '~ $10,000 $5,000 $0 II I :.:.- US Avg SE Avg Ala. Fla. Ga. Ky. Miss, NC 1996 1998 2000 - III SC Tenn. Percent GA and US Unemployment Rates 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1991 1993 1995 Georgia 1997 US 1999 Jun 2001 Major Industry Groups Government 16% Manufacturing 17% Services Wholesale & Retail Trade 0% 10% 20% Percent of Total Employment of 4.0 million (2000) 26% 25% 30% 715 GEORGIA STATISTICS Number of School Districts Education Characteristics Post Secondary Institutes Number of Board of Regents' Institutes Number of Department of Technical & Adult Education Colleges Public Schools Total K-12 Enrollment (calculated FTEs for school year 2001-2002) Number of High School Graduates (2000) Number of Graduates HOPE Scholarship Eligible (2000) Number of GEDs granted (2000) Students Receiving HOPE Scholarship Awards (2000) Board of Regents Department of Technical & Adult Education Private Colleges and Universities in Georgia Total Awards: Students Dollars 180 34 33 1,426,534 67,996 39,119 18,703 # per System 70,625 68,955 13,497 153,077 $209,024,716 % of Total 46.1% 45.0% 8.8% Students Postsecondary Education Enrollment & Graduations 2000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 203,806 101,194 Enrolled 34,373 15,304 Graduates Regents DTAE Land Area Total Land Under Public Ownership Total Forested Land Highest Elevation Largest Lake (all lakes are man-made) Longest River Physical Characteristics 57,919 square miles 4,982 square miles (9%) 37,500 square miles (64%) Brasstown Bald Mountain, 4,784 feet Clark Hill Reservoir (112 square miles) Chattahoochee (426 miles) 716 GEORGIA STATISTICS State Bond Ratings Standard & Poor's Ratings Group Moody's Investors Service, Inc. Fitch Investors Service, Inc. (Georgia is one of only nine states awarded the top rating by all three rating services.) AAA Aaa AAA Georgia's Debt Ratios Total State Debt (including the Bonds (as of 09/20/01) 2000 Population 2000 Total Personal Income Estimate 2000 Assessed Valuation (Real Esate and Personal Property) 2000 Estimated Actual Value (Real Estate and Personal Property) 2000 Debt per Capita 2000 Debt to Personal Income 2000 Debt to Estimated Actual Value 2000 Debt to Assessed Valuation $5,652,205,000 8,186,453 $228,692,342,000 $215,038,169,131 $574,200,718,641 $690.43 2.47% 0.98% 2.62% $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 Appropriation History Fiscal Year Appropriation History Fiscal Year The FY2002 total appropriation was $15,454.6 million.. This does not include the FY2002 amended budget amount. Political Characteristics Number of Counties 159 Number of Cities 535 Number of State Representatives 180 Number of State Senators 56 Millions 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 717 ADA ADAP ADR AFIS AGTEC AHEC AIDS AOB AP APS ARC ASAC ATDC BLS BOR BOS CAC CAMS CBD CCACTI CCH CCSP CDBG CHIP CJCC CJIS CMAQ CMI COE CPI CPS CRCT CTA CTR DARE DCA DD DCH DFCS DHR DITT DJJ DLEA DMA ACRONYMS Americans with Disabilities Act Alcohol and Drug Awareness Program [or AIDS Drug Assistance Program] Alternate Dispute Resolution Automated Fingerprint Identification System Applied Genetics Technology Facility Area Health Education Center Acquired Immunity Deficiency Syndrome Annual Operating Budget Advanced Placement Adult Protective Services Appalachian Regional Commission Assistant Special Agent-in-Charge (GBI) Advanced Technology Development Center at Georgia Tech Federal Bureau of Labor Statistics Board of Regents Business Outreach Services at University of Georgia Clean Air Campaign Cost Accounting Management System Central Business District Consortium on Co mpetitiveness for the Apparel, Carpet & Textile Industries Computerized Criminal History Community Care Services Program Community Development Block Grant Children's Health Insurance Program Criminal Justice Coordinating Council Criminal Justice Information System Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Chronically Mentally Ill U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Consumer Price Index Child Protective Services Criterion Referenced Competency Test Centralized Taxpayer Accounting System Centralized Taxpayer Registration System Drug Abuse Resistance Education Department of Community Affairs Developmental Disability Department of Community Health Division of Family and Children Services Department of Human Resources Department of Industry, Trade and Tourism Department of Juvenile Justice Drug Law Enforcement Agency Division of Medical Assistance 718 ACRONYMS DMVS DNA DNR DOAS DOT DPS DRG DRI DRS DTAE DUI DVS EBT EDI EDS EFT EIP EM EMS EPA EPD ERS EZ/EC ESOL FACETS FFELP FFP FICA FLEX FoodPAC FPL FTE FY GAAP GALILEO GAPP GBA GBHC GBI GCC GCIA GCIC GDC Department of Motor Vehicle Safety Deoxyribonucleic acid Department of Natural Resources Department of Administrative Services Department of Transportation Department of Public Safety Diagnosis Related Group Data Resources Inc. (DRI/McGraw Hill) Division of Rehabilitation Services Department of Technical and Adult Education Driving under the influence Department of Veterans Services Electronic Benefits Transfer System Economic Development Institute at Georgia Tech Electronic Data System Electronic Fund Transfer Employment Incentive Program or Early Intervention Program [Education] Electronic Monitoring Program Emergency Medical Services Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Protection Division Employees Retirement System Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Community Program English for Speakers of Other Languages Family and Children Electronic Tracking System Federal Family Education Loan Program Federal Finance Participation Federal Insurance Contributions Act Flexible Benefits Program Food-processing Advisory Council Federal Poverty Level Full-Time Equivalent Fiscal Year Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Georgia Library Learning Online Georgia Addiction, Parenting and Pregnancy Report Georgia Building Authority Georgia Better Health Care Georgia Bureau of Investigation Georgia Cancer Coalition Georgia Correctional Industries Administration Georgia Crime Information Center Georgia Department of Corrections 719 GDOE GED GEFA GELI GEMA GEMS GENESIS GERSC GEP GFC GFOA GHFA GIS GIST GLRS G.O. Bonds GPA GPB GPSTC GPTC GPTV GRA GRATIS GRPA GRTA GRIP GSAMS GSFIC GSHF GTA GTRI GTSG GWCC HB HMO HOPE HR HUD HVAC HWTF ICAPP IGT ICTF IN$ITE ACRONYMS Georgia Department of Education General Education Development diploma Georgia Environmental Facilities Authority Georgia Early Learning Initiative Georgia Emergency Management Agency Georgia Emp loyment Management System Georgia Education Network Student Information System Governor's Education Reform Study Commission Georgia Environmental Partnership Georgia Forestry Commission Government Finance Officers Association Georgia Housing and Finance Authority Geographic Information System Georgia Interactive Statewide Telecommunications Georgia Learning Resources System General Obligation Bonds Georgia Ports Authority Georgia Public Broadcasting Georgia Public Safety Training Center Georgia Public Telecommunications Commission Georgia Public Television Georgia Research Alliance Georgia Registration and Title Information System Georgia Rail Passenger Authority Georgia Regional Transportation Authority Governor's Road Improvement Program Georgia Statewide Academic and Medical System Georgia State Financing and Investment Commission Georgia Sports Hall of Fame Georgia Technology Authority Georgia Tech Research Institute Georgia Temporary Support Grant Georgia World Congress Center House Bill Health Maintenance Organization Helping Outstanding Pupils Educationally House Resolution Housing and Urban Development Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Hazardous Waste Trust Fund Intellectual Capital Partnership Program Intergovernmental Transfer Indigent Care Trust Fund Financial Analysis Software 720 ISO 9000 ITBS JCO JPPS JTPA LARP LEPD LOS MOA M&O MARTA MATCH MHMRSA MIS MOA MR MRR NAFTA NCEA NET NPEC NVRA O.C.G.A OCA OECD OPLS OPB ORS PBIS PFA POSTC PSC PSG PREP PY QCC QBE QS 9000 R&D RBB RBRVS RDC REBA RESA ACRONYMS International Standardization Organization 9000 manufacturing standards Iowa Test of Basic Skills Juvenile Corrections Officer Juvenile Probation / Parole Specialist Job Training Partnership Act Local Assistance Road Program Law Enforcement Personnel Dependents Level of Service Memorandum of Agreement Maintenance and Operations Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Multi-Agency Team for Children Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Management Information System Memorandum of Agreement Mental Retardation Major Repair and Rehabilitation North American Free Trade Act National Consortium for Educational Access Non-emergency Transportation Nonpublic Post-secondary Education Commission National Voter Registration Act Official Code of Georgia, Annotated Office of Consumer Affairs Office of Economic Cooperation and Development Office of Public Library Services Office of Planning and Budget Office of Regulatory Services Performance Based Inspection System Public Fishing Area designated by the Department of Natural Resources Peace Officer Standards Training Council Public Service Commission Partnership for a Smog-free Georgia Post-secondary Readiness Enrichment Program Program Year Quality Core Curriculum Quality Basic Education Act Quality Standards 9000 Research and Development Results-Based Budgeting Resource Based Relative Value Scale Regional Development Center Regional Economic Business Assistance Grants Regional Education Services Agencies 721 ROTC RYDC SAAG SAT SB SBWC SCH SCRIBE SED SHCFCU SIS SOC SR SREB SWCC STARS SWTF SUCCESS TANF TAPP T&E TEG TIP TIP3 TIS TMDL TRS UCR UGA UI USGS WIA WMA WORM YCA YDC YDF ACRONYMS Reserve Officers' Training Corps Regional Youth Detention Center Special Assistant Attorney General, Department of Law Scholastic Achievement Test Senate Bill State Board of Workers' Compensation Semester Credit Hours Statewide Correctional Repository and Information System Severely Emotionally Disturbed State Health Care Fraud Control Unit Student Information System State Operations Center Senate Resolution Southern Regional Education Board Soil and Water Conservation Commission State Tracking, Accounting, and Retrieval System Solid Waste Trust Fund System for the Uniform Calculation and Consolidation of Economic Support Services Temporary Assistance to Needy Families Treatment and Aftercare for Probationers and Parolees Program Training and Experience Tuition Equalization Grant Traditional Industries Program Traditional Industries Program in Pulp and Paper Transportation Information System Total Maximum Daily Loads (environmental standards) Teachers' Retirement System Uniform Crime Report University of Georgia Unemployment Insurance United States Geologic Survey Workforce Investment Act Wildlife Management Area Write Once, Read Many Youth Challenge Academy Youth Development Campus Youth Development Facility 722 GLOSSARY ADJUSTED BASE--The beginning point for development of the state budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The adjusted base consists of the current fiscal year Annual Operating Budget, less non-recurring expenditures, plus the amount to annualize pay for perfo rmance. AGENCY FUNDS--Funds collected by the various agencies of state government and retained to be spent on agency programs. These funds are estimated in the Governor's Budget Report and the Appropriations Act. The agencies can change the amount of ht ese funds by amendments to the Annual Operating Budget based on actual collections during the year. Also known as Other Funds. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE TAX--A state excise tax of 50 cents per liter upon the first sale, use, or final delivery within the state and an import tax of 50 cents per liter of distilled spirits; an excise tax of 70 cents per liter upon the first sale, use, or final delivery within the state and an import tax of 50 cents per liter on all alcohol. ALLOTMENT--The authorization for a state agency to withdraw funds from the state treasury for expenditure. Before each fiscal year begins, agencies must file an annual operating budget plan based on an Appropriations Act. Allotments are requested quarterly based on the plan. Once a quarterly allotment is approved for an agency, that agency can draw funds as needed. AMENDED BUDGET REPORT--A document submitted by the Governor to the General Assembly in which the Governor recommends spending changes in the current fiscal year for the agencies of state government. The Amended Budget Report can involve budget additions, budget deletions or transfers of funds within agency object classes. Also known as the "supplemental budget" or the "little budget." ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET (AOB)--A plan for annual expenditures based on the Appropriations Act, by agency and functional budget. The plan details a level of expenditure by object class for a given fiscal year and must be approved by OPB before taking effect. ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AMENDMENT-Revisions to the annual operating budget, which must be submitted to OPB for approval. Typically, these revisions are due to the receipt of funding that was not included during the appropriations process or transfer of funds from one activity/function to another. APPROPRIATION--An authorization by the General Assembly to a state agency to spend, from public funds, a sum of money not in excess of the sum specified for the purposes in the authorization. APPROPRIATIONS ACT--Legislation that has been passed by the General Assembly to authorize expenditure of state, federal and other funds during a given fiscal year. While under consideration, it is called an appropriations bill. ATTACHED AGENCIES--Smaller agencies are sometimes attached to a larger state agency for "administrative purposes only" to reduce administrative costs by consolidation. These small agencies operate autonomously but receive funding through the larger agency. Authorities by law cannot directly receive state funds and are attached to budgeted state agencies for any state appropriations that might occur. ATTRITION--A means of reducing state employment, especially during economic slowdowns, by eliminating positions as they become vacant rather than filling them with new employees. AUSTERITY REDUCTIONS--Spending cuts throughout all departments of state government as a result of slower growth in revenues than expected, resulting in projected shortfalls in anticipated revenue growth. AUTHORITY--A public corporation formed to undertake a state responsibility that operates in a competitive financial and business environment and should be run like a business corporation. Most authorities generate revenue and need to operate without the strict regiment of rules that confine most departments of government. Authorities usually have the power to issue revenue bonds to construct facilities. BUDGET--A complete financial plan for a specific fiscal year as proposed in the Governor's Budget Report and as modified and adopted by appropriations and revenue acts. BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY AND PLANNING ACT--An Act passed by the 1993 General Assembly that fundamentally changed Georgia's budget process. The Act made accountability and efficiency the driving forces behind budget decisions, as well as the attainment of agreed-upon goals that have been outlined in comprehensive strategic plans for the state and each of its agencies. Through the implementation of Results-Based Budgeting, which is now underway, expenditures will be more closely linked to program achievements and results. The measure mandated an ongoing review of agency continuation budgets and a more detailed review of expenditures at the individual program level. Procedures and requirements for grant awards by state agencies also were established. 723 GLOSSARY BUDGET CLASS--See object class. BUDGET CYCLE--A period of time in which a specific budget is in effect, usually 12 months. See fiscal year for dates applying to state and federal budgets. BUDGET ESTIMATE--A statement which accompanies explanations, as required by state law, in which a budget unit states its financial requirements and requests for appropriations. Also known as an agency's budget request, which must be submitted to OPB by September 1 of each year. BUDGET MESSAGE--A speech by the Governor to the General Assembly in which the Governor outlines his spending proposals and revenue projections, including recommendations for increasing or decreasing revenues, that are embodied in an accompanying budget document. The formal budget message, dealing primarily with the following year's budget, is made to a joint session during the first week that the Legislature convenes. A speech detailing the Governor's Amended Budget recommendations is made to a joint session of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees during the week before the session. BUDGET REPORT--A document that displays all programs, efforts and expenditures that are recommended by the Governor for each agency during a specific fiscal year. The Budget Report includes the Governor's official estimate of state revenue to be collected during the fiscal year and details any surplus, reserve or other funds that are available for expenditure. The fund availability outlined by the Governor determines the size of the budget for any given year. The Budget Report for the upcoming fiscal year is also known as the "big budget," the "outyear budget" and the "Governor's budget." The Amended Budget Report, which recommends changes to the current fiscal year budget, is known as the "little budget." BUDGET UNIT--A department, board, commission, office, institution or other unit of organization that has, under general law, an independent existence and thus is authorized to receive and expend an appropriation. A department or agency may have one or more budget units in the Appropriations Act. CAPITAL OUTLAY--Funds designated specifically to acquire, construct, renovate or repair public facilities and other assets. These funds may be appropriated in cash-- from state general funds, lottery funds or other funds--or be provided through the sale of general obligation bonds or revenue bonds. CIGAR AND CIGARETTE TAX--The state tax on cigars is 13% of the wholesale cost price; the tax on cigarettes is 12 cents per pack of 20 ($1.20 per carton). CONFERENCE COMMITTEE--A group of six legislators--three Representatives and three Senators --who are appointed by the presiding officers of the respective houses to reconcile different versions of the appropriations bill and other legislation that have been passed by the House and Senate. CORPORATE INCOME TAX--The tax is a nongraduated percentage tax based on a corporation's federal taxable net income. The tax rate is 6% of a corporation's taxable net income attributed to business done in Georgia. DEDICATED FUNDS--Funds collected from a specific revenue source that must be appropriated for a specific expenditure. An example in Georgia is motor fuel tax funds, which must be constitutionally appropriated for programs related to providing and maintaining an adequate system of public roads and bridges. DEBT LIMITATION--The State Constitution places a ceiling on state indebtedness by limiting general obligation bond debt service payments to 10% of net treasury receipts for the prior fiscal year. EMERGENCY FUND--An appropriation to the Office of the Governor that is set aside for the Governor to provide grants to state agencies to meet emergency needs. Grants from the fund cannot involve a recurring obligation. ENHANCEMENT FUNDS--Funding for required services that are above adjusted base level. ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS --Certain programs, usually federal in origin, that provide benefits to individuals based on specific eligibility requirements. Medicaid is the largest entitlement program operated by the state. FEDERAL FUNDS--Funding from the federal government to pay for all or portions of specific programs. Often, federal funds require a state fund "match" in order to receive the federal allocation. FISCAL AFFAIRS SUBCOMMITTEE--Twenty members of the House of Representatives and the Senate comprise the Fiscal Affairs Subcommittee, which is authorized to meet when the General Assembly is not in session to consider fiscal affairs transfers as described below at the request of the Governor. The membership includes the House Speaker and four other State Representatives appointed by the Speaker, the Lieutenant 724 GLOSSARY Governor and four Senators appointed by the Lieutenant Governor, and five members of each house appointed by the Governor. FISCAL AFFAIRS TRANSFERS--Appropriations are made through allocations to specific object classes, and funds must be spent within those object classes. Language in each Appropriations Act states that "...no funds whatsoever, shall be transferred between object classes without the prior approval of at least 11 members of the Fiscal Affairs Subcommittee in a meeting called to consider said transfers. This...shall apply to all funds of each budget unit whatever source derived." Fiscal affairs transfers can be considered at any time at the Governor's request but are usually considered near the end of the fiscal year to help agencies to meet emergency needs and to address unanticipated budget problems. FISCAL YEAR--Any 12-month period at the end in which financial accounts are balanced. The state fiscal year begins July 1 and ends June 30. The federal fiscal year begins October 1 and ends September 30. FRINGE BENEFITS --Benefits that are provided to state employees over and above their salaries, as an inducement to employment. These benefits include retirement, health insurance and employer Social Security contributions. Fringe benefits are about 36% of an employee's salary. FUNCTIONAL BUDGET--A group of related activities aimed at accomplishing a major service or program for which a unit of government is responsible. Used synonymously with activity. FUNDS--[i.e., state, total, other] As used for the general purposes of the budget summaries and schedules in this document, unless otherwise noted, refers to state revenues available or received. The state's specific governmental accounting fund classifications are documented in the state Comprehensive Annual Financial Report prepared by the Department of Audits and Accounts. GENERAL FUNDS--State money that is used for general purposes of state government. General funds are derived from taxes, fees and other general revenues and are appropriated to finance the ordinary operations of governmental units. These funds are included in the Governor's Revenue Estimate and are a part of the State's Budget Fund for accounting purposes. GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS--Bonds sold by the state to fund major capital outlay projects or for the management of state debt. The bonds are backed by "the full faith, credit and taxing power of the state." GUARANTEED REVENUE BONDS--State-sold bonds that have the principal and interest payable from earnings of a public enterprise. The state is required by law to appropriate one year's debt payment and to retain the total at that level until the bonds have been retired. Guaranteed Revenue Bonds can only be issued for specific purposes as outlined in the State Constitution. INDIGENT CARE TRUST FUNDS--A program that involves the use of Medicaid funds to compensate disproportionate share hospitals for indigent care and to support expanding primary care programs. Participating hospitals make payments into the Trust Fund, and these payments are used to match with Medicaid funds. Most of the funds are then returned to the hospitals, with a small amount used for state-level programs. An amendment to the State Constitution authorized the newly revamped program and restricts the use of these funds. These funds are included in the Governor's Revenue Estimate and are a part of the State's Budget Fund for accounting purposes. INDIRECT FUNDING--The Appropriations Act each year allocates direct funding to the Department of Administrative Services (DOAS) for computer and telecommunications services to be provided to seven state agencies. These funds are allocated in this manner to facilitate cash flow for DOAS but are available to DOAS only as services are provided to each agency. INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX--The tax is based upon an individual's federal adjusted gross income with specific adjustments as provided by state law. The tax is computed at a graduated rate and assessed in a range of 1% to 6% dependent on income levels and filing status. INHERITANCE TAX--Based on the value of the estate of residents as required to be reported for federal tax purposes. The Inheritance Tax is the amount equal to the amount allowable as a credit for state tax credits under the Internal Revenue Code. INSURANCE PREMIUM TAX--Tax based on premiums on persons, property, or risks in Georgia written by insurance companies conducting business in the state. The tax rate is 2.25% of gross direct premiums, with reductions for companies with certain percentages of their assets in Georgia. INTER-AGENCY TRANSFERS --A transfer of funds between state departments, either in an Appropriations Act or by the State Office of Planning and Budget pursuant to a legislative authorization. LAPSE--The automatic termination of an appropriation. Since most appropriations are made for a single fiscal year, 725 GLOSSARY any unexpended or unencumbered fund balances at the end of the fiscal year lapse into the state's general treasury, unless otherwise provided by law. There are two kinds of lapses. Non-allotted lapses occur when appropriations are never allotted to a state agency for expenditure and automatically revert to the state treasury on June 30 of each year. Audited lapses occur when budgeted funds are allotted to a state agency for expenditure but are not spent. These unspent funds are identified and lapsed by the State Auditor in the annual audit of each state agency. LAPSE FACTOR--A budgeting tool that withholds funds from appropriations, based on anticipated employee turnover and lower employee replacement costs. LEGISLATIVE BUDGET OFFICE--An agency within the Legislative Branch that serves as budget advisor to the General Assembly. LINE-ITEM APPROPRIATION--An appropriation spelled out in language in the Appropriations Act that authorizes specific expenditures for a state agency. LOTTERY FUNDS --The net proceeds from the sale of lottery tickets dedicated to funding educational purposes and programs. By law educational purposes include capital outlay projects for educational facilities; tuition grants, scholarships or loans to citizens of Georgia to attend postsecondary institutions in Georgia; training to teachers in the use of electronic instructional technology; costs associated with purchasing, repairing and maintaining advanced electronic instructional technology; a voluntary prekindergarten program; and an education shortfall reserve. These funds are included in the Governor's Revenue Estimate and are a part of the State's Budget Fund for accounting purposes. LUMP SUM--A single appropriation for a specific purpose that does not specify a breakdown by object class expenditure. MALT BEVERAGE TAX--Taxed at $1.08 per standard case of 24 12-ounce containers; $10 per 31 gallons for draft malt beverages. MATCHING FUNDS--A type of federal or state grant that requires the government or agency receiving the grant to commit funding for a certain percentage of costs to be eligible for it. MIDTERM ADJUSTMENT--Additional appropriations to the State Board of Education in an Amended or Supplementary Budget to fund State Quality Basic Education (QBE) requirements for increased enrollment. Initial QBE funding cannot fully and accurately anticipate future enrollment. Midterm adjustments in funding are based on full-time equivalent enrollment counts during the fall quarter. MIDYEAR ADJUSTMENT RESERVE--A reserve of funds that is set aside each year from prior fiscal year surplus funds to provide additional spending for state agencies in an Amended or Supplementary Budget. The reserve totals 1% net revenue collections, to the extent that surplus funds are available. It is established prior to the Revenue Shortfall Reserve, which is explained els ewhere. MOTOR FUEL RESERVES --If actual motor fuel tax collections exceed the estimate, these funds are set-aside in a reserve and are appropriated to the State Department of Transportation in a subsequent Appropriations Act. MOTOR FUEL TAX FUNDS--All motor fuel revenue collections are allocated for public highway and bridge construction or maintenance by provisions of the State Constitution. These funds are included in the Governor's Revenue Estimate and are a part of the State's Budget Fund for accounting purposes. The state tax is 7 cents per gallon plus 3% of the retail sales price. MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSE TAX--Collected for the title registration and license tags of motor vehicles, trailers, and truck tractors. The cost of a regular license plate for a passenger car or light truck is $20. NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS--Monies received or spent that are not contemplated by an Appropriations Act. These funds must be amended into an agency's budget through a request to the Office of Planning and Budget. OBJECT CLASS--A grouping of similar expenditure items that form the basis of appropriations and records of expenditure. Establishment of budget object classes and changes are coordinated with the State Auditor's Chart of Accounts to ensure consistency in statewide financial reports. Common object classes are those that are shared by almost all agencies, including personal services, regular operating expenses, travel, motor vehicle purchases, postage, equipment, computer charges, real estate rentals and telecommunications. Unique object classes are those that apply to only one or a few agencies, such as public library materials and driver's license processing. OFFICE OF PLANNING AND BUDGET (OPB)--A part of the Office of the Governor with the responsibility of providing the Governor with assistance in the development and management of the state budget. OPB also is responsible for working with the State Auditor's Office in evaluating each program in state government at least once 726 GLOSSARY every 10 years. The Governor is the Director of the Budget. ORIGINAL APPROPRIATION--The first budget passed that sets appropriations for all of state government for the next full year after a legislative session. The budget is generally amended in midyear to more accurately reflect current needs of state agencies. OTHER FUNDS--Funds received by state agencies and institutions for services performed such as tuition fees paid by students to colleges, universities and technical institutes and fees collected by state parks. These funds are not turned into the state treasury but are retained by agencies and spent in accordance with an Appropriations Act or state law. Also known as agency funds. PERSONAL SERVICES --The cost of state employees, including salary, fringe benefits and other expenses. This also includes temporary labor. PRIVATIZATION--A general term for the strategy that refers to the transfer of public sector activities to the private sector. Georgia's current privatization efforts are based on three considerations: government should not be in the business; and the private sector can perform more effectively, and more efficiently. PROPERTY TAX--Taxable value (assessed value) of real and personal property is 40% of fair market value, except for certain property as specified in state law. The state millage rate is 0.25 mills, or 25 cents per $1,000 of assessed value. The state tax is collected locally with local property taxes and is remitted to the state. RESULTS-BASED BUDGETING--A form of budgeting in which resources are allocated in such a way as to achieve specified, agreed-upon results--for instance, a reduction in infant mortality. The emphasis is shifted from reporting efforts to reporting results. Results -based budgeting, which is required in Georgia by Senate Bill 335, is being phased in over several years, beginning in FY 1998. REVENUE ESTIMATE--An estimate of revenues that will be collected by the state during a fiscal year. These revenues include taxes, fees and sales, and other general revenues that flow into the state treasury and are available for expenditure in a budget recommended by the Governor and approved by the General Assembly. REVENUE SHORTFALL RESERVE--An account established by the State Auditor to make up shortages that might occur in revenue collections at the end of the fiscal year. More commonly known as the "rainy day" fund. The reserve is equal to 3% of the state's net revenue collections, to the extent that surplus is available. Funds are set-aside in the Revenue Shortfall Reserve only after the Midyear Adjustment Reserve is fully funded. SALES TAX--Common name for the state Sales and Use Tax levied upon retail sales, rentals, leases, use or consumption of tangible personal property, and certain services. The statewide sales tax rate is 4%. Various items are exempt from the state sales tax by state law. STATE AID--Grants and other funding provided by Georgia's state government to assist cities, counties, public schools and other allied groups in providing various services and programs to the citizens of Georgia. STATE FUNDS--Includes (1) The taxes and fees collected by the state and deposited directly into the state treasury to be appropriated; (2) Reserves; (3) Surplus funds; (4) Lottery receipts; (5) Indigent Care Trust Funds; (6) Motor Fuel tax funds; and (7) Tobacco Settlement funds, all of which form the basis for the Governor's revenue estimate. STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION--A statement which discloses the assets, liabilities, reserves and equities of the state and its governmental units at the end of each fiscal year. STATE TREASURY--A function of state government that receives, manages, invests and allocates all state revenues that are available for expenditure through the state's general fund budgetary process. The function is managed by the Office of Treasury and Fiscal Services within the Department of Administrative Services. STRATEGIC PLANNING--The process through which a preferred future direction and organizational mission are established and periodically updated in light of changing trends and issues. Goals, objectives and strategies are adopted and implemented to guide an organization toward that preferred future direction. SUBOBJECT CLASS--The lowest level of detail used in recording expenditures. Supplies and materials is a subobject class of regular operating expenses. SUPPLEMENTARY APPROPRIATIONS--Increased funding that is approved by the General Assembly in a separate, stand-alone Appropriations Act, usually passed early in the session to get new mo ney into projects with a high time priority. A supplementary appropriations act, which is often called a "speedy bill," cannot reduce spending or transfer funds previously appropriated. SURPLUS --Unspent funds at the end of a fiscal year. Surplus funds come from two sources: excess revenue 727 GLOSSARY collections over the revenue estimate, and unspent appropriations that were lapsed back to the state treasury and are available for re-appropriation. TOBACCO SETTLEMENT FUNDS--Funds received as part of the 1998 national settlement with five major tobacco manufacturers to recover smoking related costs. The settlement provides for annual payments to Georgia based on a formula, with annual adjustments based on inflation and future national sales of cigarettes. As a matter of policy, the Governor will recommend these funds for only two purposes - rural economic development and improving health care. These funds are included in the Governor's Revenue Estimate and are part of the State's Budget Fund for accounting purposes. UNIT--A state agency or a division within an agency that is authorized to receive an appropriation. Functions or activities are a part of a unit. USER TAXES AND FEES --Charges associated with using a particular service provided by state government to its citizens. The charge generally recovers the cost of providing the service. Examples include state park receipts and driver's licenses. VETO--An action by the Governor that rejects appropriations passed by the General Assembly. The Governor is authorized to veto by line-item specific spending authorizations or language within an appropriations bill or the entire bill. Line item vetoes are more customary. WINE TAX--An excise tax of 11 cents per liter on the first sale, use, or final delivery within the state and an import tax of 29 cents per liter for table wines; dessert wines have an excise tax of 27 cents per liter and an import tax of 40 cents per liter. 728