GA- T7ooPb HI IggE) C,6 CUTHBERT BYPASS STUDY Randolph County Prepared By: Office of Planning Ulysses Mitchell June 3, 1998 city and if nothing is done to relieve the heavY truck traffic in the downtown area, the level of service in the square and along SR 50 will reach an unacceptable level by the year 2017. The Office of EnvironmentlLocation projects that, if constructed, 1,150 vehicles will use the proposed south bypass by the year 2022 (See Figure 3). It isalso projected that 12% of the daily traffic on the bypass would be trucks. Designating the proposed south bypass and the existing bypass as an alternate truck route would greatly reduce the need for through trucks to use the square. CONCLUSION A 1985 study done by the Office of Planning proposed that the square be reconstructed to eliminate the one-way traffic patterns and that left turn lanes and traffic signals be added (see Figure 4). The study noted that constructing a bypass would not be cost effective and that the projected ADT would only reach 1,000 vehicles by the year 2004. Reconstructing the square is still an alternative. It would eliminate the problems trucks are having maneuvering around the square. However, it will make parking less convenient and may increase the accident rate in the downtown area. The current (1996) accident rate in the square (Traffic Count Station 113) is 895 accidents per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled (MVMT). The statewide accident rate for a Rural Principal Arterial is 144 MYMT. For additional accident rates see Appendix "0". Reconstruction of the square would cost an estimated one million dollars. Although this alternative would cost less than constructing a bypass, it would receive the most opposition from the local citizens and government. 12 SR 1/US 27 -, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENT/LOCATION ... W SR 50 (10250 ) 6600 (10950 ) 7050 (7050) 4550 ( 10600) 6850 ( 7750) 5000 <, <, <, <, <, (1150 ) 750 ~~ BYPASS (32001 2050 ( 1300) 850 27001 1750 SR I/US 27 CR 158 -.,. ~ C :mII w PROPOSED CUTHBERT SOUTHWEST BYPASS RANDOLPH CO FILENAME 499992 == 2002 ADT 000 2022 24 AOT HR T = (OOOl 127. COSTMUB===84778..7. BUILD JCC 3/98 I FIGURE 4 . (fl D!. ' . j :'1) +- ._. . N .. ~. .. ill U1 ~ -. Vl STE..~ I -,...-..) lA,5, 82-/ S"R SO 'I ----: I I., ~ <, :) c~o ~ -.f \L t'ttl - ('! vjty' 14 ~ {) t;.{,s.S''Z-/ S-e 50. ST~r_ F-I 0 u1 ~ ~ I \.J ,{ tJ P- Constructing the south bypass and restricting truck usage of the Cuthbert square would greatly reduce the current truck problems along the square. The bypass would be approximately 1.67 miles with two new rail crossings. A two lane bypass with two rail crossings would cost an estimated $3.4 million. However, the benefit-eost ratio for . construction the bypass is 3.11. This means, over a 20-year period, the benefits the public derives from us!ng the bypass would be 3.11 times greater than the cost of constructing and maintaining the bypass. Obtaining approval from rail companies for grade crossings can be difficult and may require the elimination of an equal number of crossings. Providing communities access to SR-50 via the proposed bypass is one way of eliminating grade crossings. The two proposed rail crossings will require gates, bells, and signals. RECOMMENDATIONS A south bypass is a cost effective project and would result in a savings to the public. However, the traffic volume is only projected to reach 1100 vehicles per day by the year 2022. Thus, the Office of Planning recommends the project be placed in long range at 2010. We also recommend this study be reviewed in five years to see if traffic warrants moving the project up to an earlier construction date. 15 APPENDIX A 15 APPENDIXB 20 Level-of-Service Level-of-Service is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream. There are six identified levels of service a roadway can operate. Each of the six are identified by a letter, A through F. Level-of-Service A representing the best operating conditions and Level-of-Service F the worst. . For example, Level-of-Service A represents free flow. Individual users are virtually unaffected by the presence of others in the traffic stream. The general level of comfort and convenience provided to the motorist is excellent. Level-of-Service C marks the beginning of a range of flow in which the operation of the individual users becomes significantly affected by interactions with others in the traffic stream. The general level of comfort declines noticeably at this level. Level-ofService E represents operating conditions at or near capacity. All speeds are reduced to a low, but relatively uniform value. Comfort and convenience levels are extremely poor. Level-of-Service F is when traffic flow has shut down completely and the traffic stream is characterized by stop-and-go traffic. Information on Level-of-Ser-vice was taken from "Highway Capacity Manual" Special Report 209. 21 .. 0.. O. 0 APPENDIXC 22 List of trucks passing through the Cuthbert square in a single 45 minute span, August 1997. McElroy Truck Lines Schneider International Carriers Waggoners Trucking M&D Trucking BAT Inc. Milan Express Co., Inc Sunbelt Transport Werner enterprises Arctic Express Rhett Butler Hub Truck Lines Tidwell Transport America Holland Trucking P&R Trucking Empire Express Wal-Mart & Other Discount Gold Kist Shaffer Southeastern Freight Lines LT Lumber Transport Service Express Interstate Nationalease Inc. Merchants Truck Lines Ryder Truck Transamerican Carriers Leon Jones TDI Jet-Pep Richbourgs Truck Lines Atlanta Motor Lines Glenn Whitehead Vernon Sawyer Boyd Brothers Going West Willis Trucking Inc. United Van Lines Lane List furnished by the Cuthbert-Randolph county Chamber of Commerce and does not include logging trucks. 23 APPENDIXD 24 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Scope 1 Background 1 Roadway Characteristics 4 Traffic Characteristics 6 Analysis. 11 Conclusion 12 Recommendations 13 Appendix A 16 Appendix B 20 Appendix C 22 Appendix D 24 -- ..~ ... .. ,. ', c i' .... \)-'>,<. \i + MAP 1 --- 'T~; .~~::: -,,/' .'>: .~ ... -: / i ., I ,'. .,'-, ~. \' II 1/ II II II II :9 110 II /I, II. '\\, " II, D~ ,. ".~ \ , II'\- II "1\ /I ~' I ( -,.......... .- '.' ...-.._---: .,I ,, \, I '''-'~'\ I, !, ---- ' " ., I -, I "" _- \. -, -, .... ..,.... -"._--- -, <, -, <, " <, ':.'- ".:'.' _ _ - ' ... .. -'_.,_.-_..._--.:---..," '''::-= 8M 441 SCALE 1:24000 o o lOOO 2000 3000 4000 \1'" - '."' J/'\ 2 ! ; \... ',', - - . - - -.- - - - - ; - - , .--------, , \ 5000 6000 ", . .: ", " .-.,--;.---:-I-, ---- i .. "'i ) .~:.~..-...-..-..-:'. ( "'--. '. '---1 FIGURE 1 12,000 POPULATION TREND 1970 - 2015 10,000 8,000 6,000 Randolph County 11 City of Cuthbert 4,000 2,000 o 1970 1980 1990 2000 2015 Information for the year of 2000 and 2015 is projected Population information taken from ';The Georgia County Guide". 3 .....'...~. :- Br_-:;.~:'" F.::-:;.-;.:,.... {:~; ... ~~. - ,.-; ":;.- ,:.= r>: :J-1C- . :-:-..: E..~ .3 o-ro _C-:, .=lc: Ci:; ... :=.j:; 1:1; <, " ------. -.91o:r, .. ;':2 .. i\.;;: ;:.1'; i(.,: :"';.,2 . C: 1-1.1 [,C Coo, MAP 3 TRAFFIC COUNT MAP N . Cuthbert bypass opened September 6, 1995. 9 Station ~ 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 MAP 4 N Station -nlL __ 3678 3700 3900 4000 3300 TRAFFIC --------------r------------------' 10 Station -Number 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 '. TRUCKS EXITING SQUARE ~. ""rV' -:', ,. J oF- .. Truck turning onto SR:'O go i n g east. Truck turning onto SR50 going east. 18 ) TRUCKS ENTERgNGSQUARE [ruck turning north III s q ua r e from SR50. Truck turning e a s t In square from SRI Bu. 19 .. ACCIDENTS PER lOOMVM ACCIDENT RATE 700 i 600 1 500 400 ~ CIt 300 200 ~n m 1 . ,.1993 I- 1994 ,- 1995 01996 100 o TRAFFIC COUNT STATIONS a.. ~ '-'" '-'"