Hydraulic Properties of the Floridan Aquifer Systen1 and Equivalent Clastic Units in Coastal Georgia and Adjacent Parts of South Carolina and ~..,lorida 
by 
s. c. John Clarke~ Oavkl Leeth~ DaVette TaylorNHarris, 
Jaime A.. Pah1ter! and James L Labowski 
U.S. Geological Survey 
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT O.F NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION GEORGIA GEOLOGIC SURVEY 
Prepared in cooperation with the 
lJ.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 
DOCUl'ASNTS 
INFORMATION CIRCULAR 109 UGi\ LlbRARlES 
 
 Cover photograph: Ship in Savannah Harbor, Georgia. 2001 Photograph by: Edward H. Martin, U.S. Geological Survey 
 
 HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES OF THE FlORIDAN AQUIFER SYSTEM AND EQUIVALENT ClASTIC UNITS 
IN COASTAl GEORGIA AND ADJACENT PARTS OF SOUTH CAROLINA AND FLORIDA. 
by JohnS, ctarke,. David C Leeth, DaVeHe Taylor-HmTis, hirne A, Painter, and Jan1% L, Labowski U5. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 
GEORGIA DEPARTivlENT OF NAfURAL RESOURCES Lonicc C', Barrett, Commissiont'1' 
EN\l!RONMENTAL PROTECT10N DJVISlON Carol Couch, Director 
GEORGIA GEOLOGIC SURVEY WjUiam R McLemore, State Geoiogist 
Prepan~d in cooperation witb the LLS, GEOLOGICAL SURVE"'l 
Athmta, Georgia 2004 
INf.~ORM.4TION CIRClTLAR 109 
 
  ABSTRACT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...  ........  . . . . ...  . l lNTRfJt)lfC'r{C>N ~ .... ~ ~ . , ............ , .. , . , ........ , ......................... l 
J>urpo9it~ llnd Scop~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Des..:ription of Study Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 We!HdentificHtion Sy<;tems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. 2 Previous Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................ 2 Admowiedgment<; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... 4 HYRDOGFOLOGY ...................................................... 4 G<?.o!Dgic Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............ 4 Floridan Aquifer Sy>te;m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 HYDRGLOGfC-PROPERTY DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................. 7 Transmissivity and Storage Coefn(:ient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. 7 'lerti<:al Hydraulic Conductivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... 8 Aquikr-Te:>tData Qualifiers............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................ S HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES OF THE :FlORlD..,\N AQUIFER SYSTE"f-.1 ............... 9 tipper Floridan Aquifer and Equivalent Cla::>tic Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Lower Floridan Aquifer and Equivalent Clastic Un:its ............................ W Vertk.al Hydraulic Conductivity . . . ........................................ ! B. s u~"n"L\l{Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 SELECTED REFERENCES ................................................... 23 ..,.\PPHJDIX A ....... ' .. ' .... ' . . . . . . . . . . . ...... ' .. ' ' ' .. ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 
L M'ap showing location of t<tudy area, ph)'l'iographic and structural features, and Hne ofhydwgeolDgic t<ectkm in coaswl Georgia and a~iB.<:em part'-; d: S!)llth C.lmlina and. Florida ......................................... 3 
2. Chart showing geologic. and hydrogeologic unit<; ~1f the upper and. !ower Coastal 
Plain, ;;oa1ta1 Georgia, and adjacent parts of South Carolhm and Florida ..... 5 3. D1agmrn ::<.1mwing hydrogeoiogk section of lhe Flmi.dB. aquifer syste:m 
along dip, upper to lowe:r C!)a:->tal Plain, ~oastal GeOt>i;ia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4. Box:plot showing tmnsmissivity ofthe Upper and Lower Fbrid<tn aquifer~ 
in fhe ~mdy area in coa.<;tal Georgia and adja<:ent parts of Snuth Carolina snd florida, and at multi>lqui:f...)r wdls wmpleted in the 'Upper and Lo'.ver Floridlill aquifers, Duval Cmmty, Florid>l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Figure<; 5...9: Maps 9ihowing: 5a. Tran.8mbsivity of the Upper Floridan aquifer and equivalent da9iti~ units in coagtal Georgia and at1janml parts !)f So=ttth Carolina and Florida . . . . . . . . . . 14 5b. Tnmsn:ni<sivity of the Opper Floridan aq\!tter in Chatham and Glynn Cnum:ies, Georgia, and Beaufnn and Jasper C~1unties, South Carolina , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1:' 6a. StMage coeft1dent of the Upper :Florida.u aquifer and equivalent clastic units in n)asl:ai Georgia and adjacent pans of South Carolina a.'1d Florida . . . . . ~ . . 16 6b. Storage coetlk.ient ofthe Upper Flori.daJ! ll.(}Uif~r in Chathmn C('Jmty, Georgia, an.d Beaubn and Jasper Counties, South Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 6c. Storage ;;oefficieut oftk Upper Floridan aquifer in Glynn County, Georgia .. , !8 
 
 Figure 
 
7. Transmissivity of the Lower Floridan aquifer and equivalent clastic units in (A) coastal Georgia and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida; (B) Barnwell and Allendale Counties, South Carolina; and (C) multi-aquifer wells completed in the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers in Duval County, Florida. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 
8. Storage coefficient of t.~e Lower Floridan aquifer and equivalent clastic units in Allendale and Barnwell Counties, South Carolina, and at multi-aquifer wells completed in the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers i."1 Duval County, Florida .................................. 20 
9. Location of sites with vertical hydraulic-conductivity data for the Floridan aquifer system, Burke, Chatham, and Glynn Counties, Georgia, and Barnwell and Beaufort Counties, South Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 
10. Distribution of vertical hydrauiic conductivity for selected hydrogeologic units of Floridan aquifer system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 
 
Table L Vertical hydraulic conductivity of the Floridan aquifer system, coastal Georgia and adjacent parts of Souln Carolina and Florida . . . . . . . . . 11 
A-1. Transmissivity and storage coefficient of the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers and equivalent clastic units, coastal Georgia and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Fiorida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 
 
Vertical Datum 
Vertical coordinate information is referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). Historical data collected and stored as National Geo- 
Idetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29) have been converted to North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) for this publication. 
Horizontal Datum 
Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83). Historical data collected and stored as North American Datum of 1927 (NAD 27) have been converted to NAD 83 for use in this publication. 
 
 Hydraulic Properties of tbe Floridan Aquifer System and Equivalent Clastic Units in Co~stal Georgi.a and Adjacent Parts of South Carohna and Flortda 
bV Johns. Clarke, David C. Leuth, DaVette Tay!orHarris, Jaime A. Painter, and James L Labowski 
 
JJydmulh.>pF~'JX:l"ty d.a!a l~"'~' the Floridan aqMife:r ~ys!.em and equivalen; d.astk. ~e<hments i!1 a 67-county area of coa.~. tal 
Georgia a:nd a,;J_i>3.<:ent part-;; of South Carolina and Fhxida were 
evaluated to provide. data necessary fot development of ground\ater fbw and solutetran:;;p;xt models. Dat1 include transmis-- 
:>iv:i!v at 324 wdls, swrage cc.efficient at 115 wells, and vertical 
hvd;w.Jli;; ctmdllctivity of T2 core samples from 27 sites. 
 Hydraulic pmpert:ie:> of the Vpper Floridan aquifer vary 
greativ i11 the study area due ;.<' the he-terogeneity (and hx:al1y to ;nis~1t~opy! of the aquifer and to variation,~ in the degree of (;m~~ Hm;rm:mt provided by (:>::mfining tmit:s. Pmnri11Cnt s-trndural feu~ nm% in the areu,-----the Southeast Georgia Embayment, >he Beau- 
fort ;\rch. and the Gulflrough-----i:nHuence the thickness :md hydraulic prOfX:!iies of the sooimentf< i.Xm:lprbing the Floridan aquif~r system. Tnnlsmiss1vity of the tipper Floridan aqu1:fi-~r 
and equivalent updip units was C<!mpikd for 1J9 wdh and range~ from 530 feet squured per day (ftt/d) ai Ikauf0rt Coanty, 
South C.;rroHrm, w 600,000 fi11<1 in Coffee County, Deorgia, h> 
<:arhonate rock settings of the lower Coastal Plain, !:mnsmi~siv ity of th.<-: Opper Floridan aquifer generally is g!eater man 20,000 fi2!<L, with value::< exceeding l 00,000 fr!d in the oouthea:>tern and sm1thwesrem pans of the Stl.ldy area (generally coi11~ ~!ding ',vith the area of gl'eatest aquifer thickness}. Transmissiv- 
itY nf the Opper F1ori.da1l aquifer generaHy is less Hum 
1i),{){}O ttl!d in and near the upper Coastal Plain, where the aquifer h thin md ~onsb1.s b:rgdy of clastic :;;ed!ments, and in the 
vi(:inity ofttw Gulf Trough, where th~ aquiier <.;ons!sls of low permeability rocks and.wd.hnentt:;, Large variabihty in the range ohrausmis:>ivi.ty in Camden and Glynn Countk~, Georgia, and Nas~au (\")Unty, Florida, demon:>trates the an:isotmpic distribu- 
tion ofhyd.rauhc properties that may ref<u.1t fu:nn tracmres <!r f;duti:on openings in th<-: catbonate !\.x.b. Swrag~ .:oefficien.t of 
!l,e Upper Floridan aquife1 waf; compiled t<..'l' ! 06 weHs an.d 
ranges from about 0,()0004 at Beaufort County, South Carolina, 
to 0.04 in Baker County, Honda. 
Transmissivi.ty ofme L;>wer F%nridan aquifer and equivalent 
updip dastic ~mils wa.<> compiled for 53 wells an~ range:> fmm about 170 ft2id in Harnvidl County, South Carolina, to about 
n 43,{}00 1:d in Camden County, Georgia. T:ran:-.mit<t<ivit'y' of the 
 
Lower r:loridan aquihlr is greatest where the aqmfer is thick- 
 
est-----in ~t>lltheasn:::rn Ge-:xgi.a :md northeastern Florida-----where 
 
0stimm.:::s are gre-ater than 10.0()(} ft:!!d.: at nne wdl in snu!.hem>t 
 
fl2 ern Georgia tran&1nissivitv wa:> <-:stimat-~d to !x. ;1--;; high as 
1\){),000 /;,i, Storaue-c:>~ffi<:ient data fi>:r the l.A."'Wer Floridan 
t;,; aquifer are limited three estimates in Ha:nl'Ndl and AHendak 
 
Counties. Sou!h Carolina, and to estimates det-~rm!ned from six 
 
mult1-B.quier tests in IJuval Cotmty, Florida, In the South Cam- 
 
.oorn linu tests. storage coeftkiem :ranges :trom 0 
 
to 0Jl004: !his 
 
runge is indk:ative ofa confined aquifer. The storage cDeffidcnt 
 
for the combined Upper and Lower Floridan weHs in Duval 
 
County, Florida, ranges from 0.\}0002 !o (}X)1. 
 
\/erticaJ hydraulic wnductivity was compiled frorn cre 
 
~ampks wlie<:ted a! 27 sit~, For the tipper Flond;m confining 
 
unlt, vn.1ues from 39 <.~ore &amples at 17 siks range from 0.0002 
 
to 3 feet per <hy {fi/d). For the txvw-~r Floridan mnGning unit 
 
value~ from 10 core ~ampks at 9 she~ range from abm1! 
 
(),()00004 w !). 16 ft/d. Ye:rticai hyd:muhc cowhl~tivity of the 
 
Upper Floridan .aquifer wa;:; compikd frum l6 core ,;=;ampks at 
 
five sttes, mos!ly in the Brtll!swick, Georgia. ar<-.)a and values 
 
range from OJ10134 to 160.4 ft!d. Verti<.~al hydraulic o>ndud:iv- 
 
ity fbr the ~emiconflning t:nit separating the upper a1~d l(lWer 
 
watcr~hearhlg zones nfthe Upper FlGridan at Brtmswick, i.:ko:r 
 
gia, xnnpHed fmm 6 core ~arnpks at tht~ s1Ws ranges from 
 
0/100008 to 0.000134 ft!d, The vert1,~al hydraulic cond',!ctivity 
 
of the Lower Floridan aquifer in a core sample fro:m a weH at 
 
Brunswick, Georgia, is 5.3 ft!d; ll!i,s value is comparahk to val- 
 
ues for the Upper Florid>l.u aquifer. 
 
Saltwater contamination b :restricting lit<~ a,-ailabihty of fresh ground-water supplies in coastal Georgia and adjacem patts of South Caro!inB. and Florida. The principlll source of 
i!e:shwate:r in the coasm.! ar<:a is the Upper f'l,:>ridan aquifer, an 
extremely permeable, high--yidding aquifer that was firs; developed in the late 1800s, and has been used ext~nsoh~~ly in the area sinc.e. Pm:npi.ug the llquifer has resulted b substantial waterkvc1 decline and stlbwqu~.mt encroach...<uen! of se;rwater into the aquif~r at the northern end ofHiltnn Head island, S.C.: and in 
 
 2 Hydraulic Property of the Floridan Aquifer System 
 
saltwater intrusion of the aquifer from underlying brine-filled strata at Brunswick, Ga., and near Jacksonville, Fla. 
The Coastal Sound Science Initiative is a series of scientific and feasibility studies to support development of the State of Georgia's final strategy to protect the Upper Floridan aquifer from saltwater contamination (Georgia Environtnental Protection Division, 1997). As part ofthe Coastal Sound Science Initiative, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)-in cooperation with the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GaEPD}--is developing numerical models to simulate ground-water flow and solute transport (saltwater contamination). To support this effort, detailed information regarding the hydraulic properties of the Floridan aquifer system were compiled; these data include transmissivity, storage coefficient, and vertical hydraulic conductivity. 
Purpose and Scope 
This report presents a compilation of existing hydraulicproperty data for the Floridan aquifer system and equivalent aquifer units of coastal Georgia, southeastern South Carolina, and northeastern Florida. Data include analysis of transmissivity at 324 well.s, storage coefficient at 115 wells, and vertical hydraulic conductivity of72 core samples from 27 sites. Data were compiled largely from the literature and from data flles of the USGS, GaEPD, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC), South Carolina Depart~ ment of Natural Resources, and the St. Johns River Water Management District. Interpretations relating hydraulic-property values to hydrogeologic settings were made on the basis of available published hydrogeologic data. 
Description of Study Area 
The GaEPD defmes the coastal area of Georgia (fig. 1) to include the 6 coastal Georgia counties and 18 adjacent inland counties; a 24-county area of 12,240 square miles (mi2). To facilitate the development of ground-water models for the coastal area, the study area was expanded to include natural hydraulic boundaries that lie outside the 24-county area-an additional44 counties. The 68-county area encompasses an area of 32,660 mi2 and includes 56 counties in southern Georgia, 7 counties in southeastern South Carolina, and 5 counties in northeastern Florida. 
The study area is located in the Coastal Plain physiographic province {Clark andZisa, 1976). For discussions in this report, the Coastal Plain has been divided into the upper Coastal Plain, comprised of the Fall Line Hills District of Clark and Zisa (1976); and the lower Coastal Plain, comprised of the Vidalia Uplands, Bacon Terraces, and Banier Island Sequence Districts ofClark and Zisa ( 1976). Topographic reliefranges from low in the lower Coastal Plain to steep in the northern Coastal Plain. Land-surface altitudes are as high as 100 feet (ft) in the lower Coastal Plain and 300 ft in the upper Coastal Plain. Land use is largely urban in industrial areas and cities such as Savannah and 
 
Brunswick; outside of these areas, land use is a mix of forest, grazed woodland, cropland with pasture, marsh, and swampland. 
Well-Identification Systems 
Wells in Georgia are identified according to a system based on the USGS index to topographic maps of Georgia. Each 7Y:z-minute topographic quadrangle in the State has been given a number and a letter designation beginning at the southwest comer of the State. Numbers increase eastward and letters increase alphabetically northward. Quadrangles in the northern part ofthe State are designated by double letters. The letters "I," "0," "II," and "00" are not used. Wells inventoried in each quadrangle are numbered sequentially, beginning with l. Thus, the fourth well inventoried in the 34H quadrangle in Glynn County is designated 34H004. 
The SCDHEC assigns identifiers to wells on the basis of their location as determined by use ofa latitude-longitude grid system. The entire State is divided into a grid matrix of 5 minutes of latitude and 5 minutes of longitude, forming 5- by 5-minute cells. Each cell has a corresponding number and uppercase letter(s), for example, 36Y. The 5-minute cells are further divided into a grid of twenty-five !-minute latitude by 1-minute longitude cells, each having a lowercase letter that starts with "a" and continues through "y"; for example, 36Y-e. Wells located within a 1-minute ceH are numbered consecutively; for example, the first well inventoried in 36Y-e would be assigned the number 36Y-el. 
ln addition to a SCDHEC identifier, each well in South Carolina is assigned a county designation by the South Carolina Department ofNatural Resources; this consists of a three-letter abbreviation for the county name and a sequentialiy assigned number. For example, BAM-62 represents the sixty-second well that was inventoried in Bamburg County. In Florida, there is no uniform system employed to number wells; local well names or well numbers are used for identification. 
Previous Studies 
This report updates aquifer hydraulics data presented in reports for the Floridan aquifer system by Bush and Johnston (1988) as part of the USGS Regional Aquifer System Analysis (RASA) program. Bush and Johnston ( 1988) mapped the distribution of transmissivity of the Upper Floridan aquifer and produced a comparative evaluation of the reliability of these data (their plate 2) and a tabular compilation of aquifer-test data (their table 2). Krause and Randolph (1989) mapped horizontal hydraulic conductivity and transmissivity for the Upper Floridan aquifer and extrapolated these data into zones of similar hydraulic conductivity (their plate 7); they also presented a transmissivity distribution for the Upper Floridan aquifer based 
on simulation (their plate 8). Clarke and Krause {2000) described 
updates to previously calibrated ground-water flow models in coastal Georgia, including maps showing simulated transmissivity and leakance for the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers. 
 
 .. ....... ..._.~ 
 
_____ . 
 
8~a rrs.ox.&t.:OO n-...:-~-: t:.S. G:::uKJgi:>: S,...;n.-y 1:/.>;J!!,OO\!-::<c&:% <1<!l~:ol l~!!< g:apt,s. &mG!~m: lealw~s ;,l()tj:lil:!>::: tmm f<WS!,0. <.:;s;ta: 
f>&<S>>&f<:Y,. Lal:<>)tel<'<'Y w-:.m: '>t,>e=s ;snd 
Ed->Us. 200i; ;lt!d K!)!iam ;m;:; (;l@a>f. 1%<>. 
Nt1f$~$S!'!'~ 8mi:. !9. F:!.l!'itWn &Vliita$ ~~~:-:-: 1t).:*1l Kfaw.;~ a~<Hlanil)" (HlsSi.  
 
15 
 
EXPLANA.T!ON 
Approximate northern extent of the Southfllast Georgia Embayment 
Approximate focatioo of the 
satmaune 
A - A' Une of hydrogeolog~ $1!!etion- 
Sh~:Jwn in figUf{! 3 
 
Agurn 1, Locator. nf study area in coastal Gemgia and adjacant parts of South Carolina anrl Horirla, physiographic ano structural 
featun~s, entlliM cf hydrogeologic sectinrt 
 
 4 Hydraulic Property of the Floridan Aquifer System 
 
Brooks and others (1985) and Faye and McFadden (1986} presented data on hydraulic characteristics of clastic aquifer units that are updip equivalents to the Floridan aquifer system. Faye and Mayer ( 1996) presented maps showing model-calibrated hydraulic characteristics of equivalent clastic units. Clarke and West ( 1998) simulated ground-water flow in and around the Savannah River Site i11 South Carolina and Georgia; their model was based, in part, on aquifer tests performed and analyzed by personnel with Clemson University (Moore and others, 1993; Snipes and others, 1995a, b), and on transmissivity estimates derived from specific-capacity tests of wells and from borehole resistivity logs. 
Szell ( 1993) provided a compilation of transmissivity and storage-coefficient data from analyses of aquifer tests in northeastern Florida. Aucott and Newcome (1986) and Newcome (1993, updated 2000) presented transmissivity and storage coefficients derived from aquifer-test analyses in the South Carolina Coastal Plain. Jones and Maslia (1994) compiled data from four large-scale aquifer tests conducted in the Brunswick area in Glynn County, Ga., and reanalyzed data from one test conducted during 1962-63 at the Hercules, Inc., wellfield at Brunswick. 
Acknowledgments 
Because this study relied heavily on the works by previous investigators, the authors of previous USGS reports containing large-scale compilations of aquifer properties were consulted regarding their interpretations. Peter W. Bush (U.S. Geological Survey), and Richard E. Krause and Richard H. Johnston {both U.S. Geological Survey retired) discussed their work and provided helpful suggestions on the approach for this study. Roy Newcome (U.S. Geological Survey retired and currently (2004] with the South Carolina Department ofNatural Resources) provided supplemental information from his published work that greatly enhanced the data coverage for the South Carolina part of the study area. Harold E. Gill and Robert E. Faye (both U.S. Geological Survey retired) provided a reinterpretation and reevaluation of the Waycross, Wayne County, Ga., aquifer test originally reported by Matthews and Krause (1984). Richard M. Spechler and Trudy G. Phelps (U.S. Geological Survey, Alta~ monte Springs, Fla.) and Paula F. Presley {St. Johns River Water Management District) provided data for northeastern Florida, including unpublished data from current investigations. 
 
Geologic Setting 
Geologic strata within the Coastal Plain physiographic province consist of unconsolidated to consolidated layers of sand and clay a.1d semiconsolidated to very dense layers of limestone atld dolomite (Clarke and others, 1990). These sediments range in age from Late Cretaceous to Holocene (fig. 2), and unconformably overlie Paleozoic to Mesozoic igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks. These sedimentary units generally strike northeast, and dip and thicken to the southeast; maximum thickness is about 5,500 ft in Camden County, Ga. (Wait and Davis, 1986). Prominent structural features in the area (fig. l ), such as the Southeast Georgia Embayment, the Beaufort Arch, and the Gulf Trough, influence the thickness of sediments. 
The Southeast Georgia Embayment is a shallow east-tonortheast-plunging syncline that subsided at a moderate rate from the Late Cretaceous until the late Cenozoic (Miller, 1986). The thickness ofCoastal Plain deposits is greatest in the vicinity of the Southeast Georgia Embayment (fig. 3}. 
The Beaufort Arch is centered near Hilton Head Island and trends parallel to the coast (fig. 1). The Beaufort Arch interrupts the regional southward dip of the sediments in that area. Within the area influenced by the Beaufort Arch, Coastal Plain deposits thin and are present at shallower depths than in the vicinity of the Southeast Georgia Embayment. 
The Gulf Trough (figs. 1 and 3) is a zone of relatively thick accumulations of fine-grained clastic sediments and argillaceous carbonates, in which permeability and thickness of Coastal Plain deposits decrease. In this area, ground-water flow is partially impeded by the juxtaposition of rocks ofhigher permeability updip and downdip ofthe trough, with those of lower permeability within the trough (Krause and Randolph, 1989). 
In addition to the aforementioned geologic features, the "Satilla Line" (fig. I) is a postulated hydrologic boundary identified by GaEPD based on a change in the configuration of the potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer, and by linear changes depicted on aeromagnetic, aeroradioactivity, 
gravity, and isopach maps (William H. McLemore, Georgia 
Environmental Protection Division, Geologic Survey Branch, oral commun., 2000). This feature may have an impact on ground-water flow in the area; however, its geologic origin and nature are unknown. 
 
HYDROGEOLOGY 
A comprehensive study of the hydrogeologic framework of the Floridan aquifer system, which includes the study area, was conducted as part of the USGS R.ASA study and presented by Miller (1986); the reader is referred to that publication for details. Other useful summaries are included in Krause and Randolph (1989) and Clarke and others (1990)" The discussion that follows provides a frame of reference for the hydraulicproperty data presented herein. 
 
Aoridan Aquifer System 
The principal source of water for all uses in the coastal area ofGeorgia is the Floridan aquifer system, consisting ofthe Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers {Miller, 1986; Krause and Randolph, 1989). The Floridan aquifer system {Miller, 1986) consists of carbonate rocks of mostly Paleocene to Oligocene age that locally include Upper Cretaceous rocks (fig. 2). Thickness of the Floridan aquifer system in the study area ranges from less than 100ft where the aquifer system crops out in South Carolina to about 2,800 ft in Brunswick, Ga. (Miller, 1986). 
 
.................. ................................................................................................... 
 
 'Modified imrn P<&l1(lt~ph n-i n!hers, 199 l :. Cmi'l<l.l ;md Krause, 2:00!), 
2Moctifilld !rom Rarciolpl1 anti other;,. 1991; WMfN.: ~r.d Etlw~f<ls, 200 l "l\,1<1dffittiHmm Fails ar.<i o1hera, i 991 "!n k>cill Maas iflCh;c.ss Milk1m Pen<! aqurrer. 
Figur~ 2, Geologic sncl hydrogeologic units nf the upper aml lower Coastal P!ain, coastal Genrgia, and adjacent parts of Snuth Carolina anrl Flor!rla. 
 
 6 Hydraulic Property of the Floridan Aquifer System 
 
FEET 
600 
 
A 
 
UPPER COASTAL i 
 
PLAIN 
 
j 
 
Hydrogeologic Un!t j 
 
Upper Three Runs aqui!er 
0 
Gordon aquifer 
 
500 
 
1,000 
.J I 
2,000 
 
:t Cl 
6 
!>': l- 
Permeable uni! 
 
A' 
 
i 
 
SOUTHEAST lLOWER COASTAL 
 
l GEORGIA j 
EMBAYMENT 
 
PLAIN 
 
------ :! ~~ 
 
!Hydrogeologlel.Jn!t 
j Surficial aquifer 
 
?~~i ~~I 1 
 
 
 
11, 
 
i ,__..,.!_ _ _ __,! 
 
i 
 
Upper 
 
i 
 
Floridan aquifer 
 
I 
 
' 
 
Lower Floridan aquifer 
Confining unit 
 
0 
 
20 
 
40MILES 
 
0 20 40 KILOMETERS 
VERTICAl SCALE GREATLY EXAGGERATED NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAl DATUM OF ~ 988 
 
Fernandil'.a 
permeable 
zone 
 
3,000 -1-------------------------------J.....l-Hytlrogeology mOO!!ied from Brooks and others, 1985; Miller. 1986 
Figure 3. Hydrogeologic section of the Florida aquifer system along dip, upper to lower Coasta! Plain, coastal Georgia (modified from Krause and Randolph, 1989). line of section is shown in figure 1. 
 
The Upper Floridan aquifer is highly productive and consists of Eocene to Oligocene limestone and dolomite (Clarke and others, 1990). Lithologic units comprising the aquifer crop out or are near land sutface in the northwestern part of the study area (upper Coastal Plain) and near Valdosta in Lowndes County. Ga. (fig. 1), where the aquifer is under unconfined or semiconfined conditions. To the southeast (lower Coastal Plain). the aquifer becomes more deeply buried and conf'med. In this report, clastic sediments of the Upper Three Runs aquifer (FaHs and others, 1997) in the upper Coastal Plain that are hydraulically connected to carbonate deposits of the iower Coastal Plain are included as part of the Upper Flmidan aquifer (fig. 3). The transition from carbonate 
 
to clastic deposits generally occurs north of the Gulf Trough {figs. 1 and 3). 
In some areas, several distinct water-bearing zones within the Upper Floridan aquifer have been identified. McCollum and Counts (1964) identified five water-bearing zones in and 
around the Savannah-Hilton Head Island area in strata that 
would later be defined as part of the Floridan aquifer system; the upper two zones are part of the Upper Floridan aquifer (Krause and Randolph, l989).ln the Brunswick-Glynn County, Ga., area. Wait and Gregg (1973) identified two distinct water~bearing zones (fig. 2} in the Upper Floridan aquifer (their "principal artesian aquifer"} and estimated that about 70 percent ofthe total flow from wells open to both zones 
 
 ':as coming from the upp<2T wne. In Beat:.fort County, S.t., the term middle Floridan is U..'>ed by the State of S:>nth Carolina (Ransom and White, 1999) t\.>r a '-'iatcrbearillg zone approx.imately 7..50-550 Hbeh>w land surfa<.:e. For the purposes <lf this study, thb zone is piat;ed in the iowennost pan of the llppel Floridan ;tquikr (W.F. hlb, US. Geoiogical Survey, \vti;ten c;ommlm.. 2002: und Li\. Gellici, St>uth Carolina Dep:.:nment dNamral Resources, writ;en commu:n., 2iXl2). 
The Upper Fb:rid;;m aquif.n is overlain. by Olig<ce:ne layers of silty day and de.n~ phosphatic J;,>lmnite that confine ami s<,par;ate the aquifer from overl;yiJJ}?; penneable tmits ofthe Bnmswid>: aquiv..;:r systet:n (Clarke, 2003}. The Upper F1orid>3.n aqnifer is underlain by a confining unit nf dense, re0ry,;;taHized limestmle anJ dolomite of the middle to upper Eocene that bydrau1ically separak the aquifer to varying degrees :from the Lower Floridan aquifer (fig 2 L Locally in the Brm!s',:vick, (ii.L an~<>-, (he ctmhning tmit i~ breached by f:mcturcs or <v->lutiml t<penin:gs tha.t enhanc.e the vmt!cal e-xchange of <.vmc:r between th<~ Upper and iA>wer F!;:)rician aquifers {Krause and Rawblph, 1989} and aflect the :>t~>r.age properties '->f !he .aquifers. 
The Lov?er Floridan aquifer i,.;; cnsnposed main!y of1ower and middle Eoce.1:e <kf!mnitk hmeswne; but at Brun.:;wick, Cr>L the Hquif.er indude:> htghly permeable Paleocene and Late Cretaceous lime,.;;tone (Krause and Rand~1tph, l9S9), ht the upper Coastal Plain, the dastic Gordon aquifer {Brnob and (>tht'ts, 1985; L~!L.;; ar:.d others, l 997'l !san updip eqmvakn! unit that is hyd:rudicully GOm~ted t(l t'f.e Lc>wer F!nridali aqt1ife.r tflgs, 2 and. 3). tn some earhe:r publications {Le., C<nmt.;; and DmL-sky, !963\ s;mtigraphi<.::. units (sw;h as the Ta11ahatta or Lisbon Fnmraticns'lor an .age tcrn1 (such us Claibomian, as used i:n Faye and Md'adden, 1986) C!>rtdare with the LovierFhridrrn 
rrquiier or its eqllivaknt clM,tk aq<nfers. Such nomenclature, 
though no kmger used by !he USGS, is :;ho,,vn in some of the teferenc.e:. in Appendix A 
The Lower Floridan aquifer include:.; several waterlx~aring zt.mes in pans of th<~ study aw.L ln the Savannah-Hilton. Head area, the lowennost \Vater~bearing zt<n.e ofMcCoUum and Counts (!964'! is induJ.w i:n the Lower Floridan aquifer n-V F. F>~1l:s, US. Geological Survey, written c.on1murL, 2.()03) hi routheastem South Carolina, Pak!)Cene and lower Eocene. uni~:;; can contain permeable beds, and production wdh :in this are<> are screened in these zones h>gcther with the overlymg Santee Umeswne {.Newc,om{\ 1993, 200{)), ln this report, these productive z~me.s, tugether with the Santee Limeston<~, are considered to be part nf the Lower Floridan aq\!ifer. l;; s<mtheasrem Georgia and nonl:v~astern florida, the Lower Flonda1l includes .a deeply buried and b.1ghly transn_1issive, saline '.vater~bearing tmit known as the I:ernandina permeable zone (Kram;e and Randolph~ !989). This unit is the probable snnrce nf saltwater conta.m.inatim> in.lhe Upper and Lo'w-er :Flo:rid;m aquifers at Bron:;wi<:.k, Ga" ;md JR<:honv:Ble, F1a. {Krause .and Randol:ph, 19~9}, 
 
Hydraulic conductivity, tnmsmissivity, and storage cu({finent are terms ust.)d to describe und quantify lhe capacity of the materials composing aquifers and conf:in.ing units to tm.n~mit and swre water, Detailed di~wnt<sinns of the$<: ;eml~ can be f<nmd in Lohman(! 972'! and Heath (1985}, 
Hydtw..llic pmpetties compiled and presented herein were derived fmm a variety of :.m1n::es including published reports, files (;f the USGS iJ; .i\tlanta, Ga,, and the USGS GrotH.::J,W.akr Site ln.venmry {GWSD database. T1K, GWSr database :3:nd USGS fik:; wmain USGS-approved aquifer,test resnlts !nduding most of the da!.a repnrted by Bush an.d Johnston (198S} fm Georgi>3.. Where possible, a pubht<hd ref~rence for th<~t<e test re:;uhs is med rather than citing the USGS fi1es, aithough in a few instances, th~ latter WU$ dw only source availabk Likm.ture hom 1944 thww&h 2003 was induded in !hi:; C!)mpi!atimL 
The prefe.rred source (>f tr<.msmh.;;;ivity data compiled !!erein was f'lom nmhiple,wdl ;lquifer rests, :followed by :s:ingle-weH aquifer tests. Transmi%ivity esumates derived from ::>pecifk capacity data and reported by previou:; investigators also are inchtded; however, these data shoul.d he giv<m.ies:; crede11te than data derived fiom .aquifer tests i:n areas where both ty-pes of data e;ot<L Transmissivity derived from mul!:ipkwdl aquifer wsts are more repret<eniativc offidd condinons than est.hnates derivd from :;!l1gleweH a<pJi:fer tests (:->pcdtlc~capacity) because they retlect mea:mrem.en.t of a iarger vdume of aquifer matc-riat In this report, tm:nsm!ssivities reponed by previous i:nvestig.awr-s arc rounded to one significrr1;t figure. 
Th.-j reliability of specific~capavity data for tran.:>missivitv estimates i,;;; influenced. by a variety of f<H.::tor.-s {Heat1l, l9R3) including: (1) transmissivity {lf the zone supplying water w th<~ well {which may ht~ kss than the transmiss1v:itv of the ll.quitert 
{2) the storage coefficient of the aquifer: Oi the pu.mpi~g ' . 
period; {4\ the effe(;tive :radiu;:; ofthe wen~ and (5) !he pumping rate. As the wdl eftkiency app:n>adm.& 10{) percent, the more ::;pecHk <:apa.c.ity :is reflective of aquifer transmtssivitv. Gener~ 
ally, wd1 efficiency is ~~onsi<kw.hly less than 100 pe:cent in 
scrt>,ew.ed wells atl<i is higher, apprcut.hing 100 p;,e:r;..:.;nt in s(;-;:ne open~hok wells. Thus, specific-capacity estimatet< in op.m~hok~ 
wens may be ;.;:onsidered cbt<er w actual aquifer transmissivity, 
wherea:; values derived in s-:;:reerwd wdl~ vuch as in areas whev-..) the Floridan aquifer system i:-; clastic) mav be C!)nsidered lower or minimum values <1f m:msmi~.siviiy, ,. 
Faye and Smith (V>94'lused form:.1tim:> :resistivitv deri've:d from borehole geophysical log;:; to estimate hvdrautic ;,xmdw> dvity. These estimates then tan be couverte:ito transmbsivitv 
us;d by multiplying by the aquifer !hickness. This approach wa~ 
to J)rovide transmissivity estimates for rmmcrica} sin:mlatinn of gro1.1n<.hs:1lter flow near the Savannah Rivet Site (Clarke and West, 1998), in the n<~rdnve,.;;tern p.art d' the study area. 
 
 8 Hydraulic Property of the Floridan Aquifer System 
 
The methods of aquifer-test analysis or other methods used to estimate transmissivity are provided in Appendix A in order to qualify the estimates and the level of data reliability. Aquifertest analyses are categorized as nonleaky (Theis, 1935) or leaky (Hantush, 1960; Hantush and Jacob, 1955). Bush and Johnston {1988) noted that single-well tests may yield questionable transmissivity values when compared to those based on multiplewell tests. Consequently, the nonequilibrium, nonleaky analyses are further divided into Theis (193.5) for multiple-wen tests and Cooper and Jacob (1946) for single-well tests to provide a qualitative division of the derived estimates of transmissivity. The nonequilibrium, nonleaky analysis methods ofTheis (1935) and (or) the modified nonequilibrium analytical solution ofCooper and Jacob {1946) are (by a large margin) the most commonly used for tests conducted in the study area. In some older publications, the analysis method is not specified. In these instances, the most likely analysis method employed (based on the year of test analysis) is listed in Appendix A followed by a question mark. For aquifer tests that have both drawdown and recovery data and analysis, the transmissivity and storage coefficient entries listed in Appendix A generally are those computed from the drawdown data, unless otherwise noted. Estimates for both transmissivity and storage coefficient computed from recovery data are listed in the "Remarks" section of Appendix A. 
In the Brunswick area, some selectivity was applied for aquifer-test results presented in this report. Maslia and Prowell (1990) concluded that some earlier aquifer-test analyses resulted in overestimation of transmissivity by not considering the upward vertical leakage to wells from lower water-bearing zones, a condition that has been documented in the area (Wait and Gregg, 1973). Additionally, it is possible that overestimation of pumpage may be a factor in overestimation oftransmissivity for some of the recovery tests that involved cessation of pumping at industrial weHfields in the area (L.E. Jones, U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 1993, 2002}. As such, aquifer-test results presented in Jones and Maslia (19~4) are listed for the Brunswick area; earlier aquifer-test results were included only if they were consistent with results presented by Jones and Maslia (1994). 
Verlical Hydmulic Conductivity 
Estimates of vertical hydraulic conductivity were based on laboratory analyses of undisturbed core samples. Data include samples from the Upper Floridan and Lower Floridan aquifers and the overlying confming units. In publications in which laboratory analyses ofcores are presented, some depth intervals are given without assigning the laboratory result to a specific hydrogeologic unit. For these cases, depth intervals were assigned to a specific hydrogeologic unit during this study on the basis ofcorrelating the altitude ofth.e sampled interval with maps showing the altitude of tops of hydrogeologic units as described and mapped by Miller (1986) and Clarke and others (1990). 
Laboratory analyses of core samples are limited by (1) very small sample size relative to field conditions, and (2) bias 
 
toward more competent rock samples because core from fractured, solution-riddled, and friable rocks typically are only pa1i:ia1ly recovered or not recovered at an. Because of these limitations, core data may not be comparable to field tests, and results ofcore analyses may be biased toward th.e iower values that reflect matrix permeability rather than secondary permeability features, 
Aquifer-Test Data Qualifiers 
To help the reader evaluate the quality of aquifer-test results, qualifiers provided for analyses by Newcome (1993, 200()) and Jones and Maslia (1994) are listed in Appendix A. Newcome {1993, 2000) rated aquifer test results as follows: 
 E (Excellent)- Drawdown and recovery plots agree closely, or if data for only one plot is available, the plot provides a definitive value for transmissivity. Boundaries, if any, appear near to the same time on drawdown and recovety plots. Specific capacity is believable (well efficiency equal to or less than WO percent). No unexplainable extraneous effects. Discharge effectively constant. 
 G (Good}- Narrow range in possible solutions for transmissivity. Discharge held reasonably constant. If drawdown and recovery plots do not agree closely, then the reason is apparent. Specific capacity is believable. Few unexplainable extraneous effects. 
 F (Fair}- Plot of data for one phase of test may be clear but is unclear during other phases, or where only one plot is available, there may be substantially different possible interpretations. Discharge may have been poorly controlled. 
 P (Poor)- Plot(s) difficult to interpret or drawdown and recovery do not agree reasonably welL Extraneous effects distort plots. Discharge not held constant Discharge substantially increased or decreased near end of test, so recovery cannot be analyzed properly, There may be a substantial range in possible interpretations of the plots. 
It should be noted that the Newcome (1993, 2000) rating system reflects not only the operational quality of an aquifer test, but also may be an indication of field conditions that do not fit the assumptions inherent in the analytical method. 
Jones and Maslia (1994) rated aquifer-test results based on the fit of the drawdown or recovery curve to published type curves. Their definitions are as follows: 
 Excellent - all data points closely match the type curve. 
 Good- one or two data points fall off the type curve. 
 Fair- more than two data points fan off the type curve, making determination of unique match-point values questionable. 
Where applicable, the Newcome (1993, 2000) and Jones and Maslia (1994) qualifiers are included in the "Remarks" section of Appendix A. 
 
 HVDRAUUC PROPERTIES OF THE 
FLORIDAN AOlJIFER SYSTEM 
fk~;,:pkt~ $UlUmarizing transmissivity data from 239 upper 
::n Floridan \ells, \) 1..()Wer Fbridan wells, Rm:1 :multi-aquifer 
wdb conmkted in b0d1 the Uppt":T :3.w.i Lower Fl!)ridan aquiters in DuvuJ C~mn.ty, Fla., are ~h<.nvn in figure 4; th~)';~~ dam are listed in Appendix A. The ho;<pbt:> indica!<: that reported tr.an$m!ssivitv d' th0 Upner F\midan is :.xm.sid<:~!!!hly highe:r thml that for the 
L.~nq:r Floridan aquif<~r in th<; study area and that multiaquikr 
wells ~~om:pkted in th"' Upper and Low~-r Fk>ridan aquifers 
~hi)w trarJsnrissivitie:s cmnparable w th.<~ Uf)per Horidan. Stor 
a-ge-o..::etTi~;:ic-nt d.at>l are limited to 115 wdh, of~,vhidl 106 are ti;r the Upper FkHidan, 3 lllC for the L;)wer Floridan, and f, are for mu!ti-aauifer wells completed in the Upper ami Lov;er Floridan aq;lifers. The folkw?lng sec1ions describe the distributim> ofhydnmlk propertie~ by hydrogeologic unit 
Upper Floridan Aquifer and 
Equivalent Clastic Units 
Hydraulic pmpe-nies 0f the tipper Floridnn aquifer vary gr~atly in t!m stady are~, d.tl:e to the .heterogeneity (and h:;aHy Kl anisotropy"! of the aquifer awi !n the conilnemem (oT lack thereof) provided by c;:>!J.tlning units {Krause and Randd:ph, !9/N. p, 2A-25 )..A chara(~teri.stic ofthe Hs)ridan aquifer system, e:;pe~~iaUy the Upper F1orid;m a<pJ.ifer. is that in many places. zones of very high hydraulic conductivity exi$t within rdativdy smal.1 portions <.lfthe aquifer For ~xamp!e, borehole flmvmetel" tests ;.xmdm::ted at \Vaycmss, Ga. {Matthewt< and Krause:, 1984), mdi<:ate high penueahility zone:-> at de-pths below !and surface of 1,070.! ,090 ft 1240 g>3.liNls per minute {gal.!min.lt 75(L900 ft (500 ga1!min}, and 635~7.50 ft (L,lOO gal!min) timt aresepatated by zones of lower permeability. 
Maps s.howi:ng L.'1e distributim> nftransmissivity and storage.:xx;:ffkient data forth<~ Upp~-r Floridan aqu!fet ba..'>ed on data hsted in Appendix A are $hown irt figures S mtd 6, re.>;pectively. Tranf<tnbsivitv of !.he l!pper Fhxidan aquikr and equivalent 
clastk ~wits ~nges from 53{) n:t:d at weH 27JJ,i10 in Beaufort County, S.C.,, t>:>600,000 :ft2!d.a! wen 231JJ04 in Cs.<ffeeCounty, 
Ga. (Appendix J\}. A! Waycw~s, Ware Cou11ty, Georgia, esti 
mate.d !mn~mi,;;~ivity of the Upper Fklridan aquifer at wen 27G004 ranges from 1:m,NlO w l ,000,000 ft2:d, with the larger 
vll1ue N1gin.ally mpotted by f'<h:!!lmws ~uid Krause 0 984). 
Am~1y~i:-; ~1f the Waycmss aquifer test that produced the larger vabe oft<ansn.ri&'>ivity m.ayhavcheen complicated by an oscillatory w;rter-lcvd resp<.mf<e, resulting in an underrepresentation ofdrawdown and an (!Verpn~<iid:ion oftransmissivity. A re;ma1ysis of these data. using a van der K.amp mmlysis (see Kruseman and de Ritter, 1994) to eliminate til. oscillatory wate-r-level response, indicates that the transmissivity wu1d he as h)W as 150,000 ft1id (RL Faye, U.S, Geologkal Surey .relire(i, 'J<'ritten commun., 2002}, 
 
ln Utmer Floridan aqmfer ~arhcmate wcks l:>f the bwer 
 
A~ 
 
~ 
 
Coastal Pb:i;1, the trm:tsmis.'>ivity i;;, b'l"e;lt;.-;r than 20,000 fhd 
 
over a large area. with vatue,;; ex'.:<~eding 100,(}00 ft1!d in the 
 
soulhe;bi~rn an<.i sou.tv.w<~ste:m p-art;; of the study Mea (figs, 5a 
 
and 5b}, High lr>J.nsmbsivity JJl the southeastern parl of the 
 
stu.dy ar~a ge;1eraUy s:.oin~:ides v>'ith the a:n;:a Gf: greatest aquifer 
 
thi.ckne% (see thic1mes..;; maps by Mi!kr, 19%). Tr.xnsmi1>1>ivity 
 
ofthe Upper Floridan aqu1fer is lowe;;,t north offhe GuHTrow~h 
 
w1mn.; the aquifer i~ lhin and ct>nsists of1argdy cbstic sd:i 
 
m.en.t:<, and along the Gulf Trough., whew 1ov<'twrmeabihty 
 
r<:H;ks ;md :'iediment:> were dep<>sited. h! th<~ lh1r'.heastem pan of 
 
study area {Burke ;md Screven C!)unt!es, Ga., an.d Hampton 
 
County, S.C.), reported !mnsmi.::>;;,ivity of (tw Upper Flomh3.n 
 
a..'1d Upper Thre<: Runs aquifers. (Appendix A) generally isle;:;;:; 
 
than H)J}(){) n::;d, ranging from. 840 flid in northern Burke O:>unty, Ga., to! 1.000 B2td i11 Screven Co-umy,. Ga. {fig. 5al in 
 
the .are<l z:,f the GuifTmugh, tran~~missl.vity ofth.e Upper Flori- 
d;m aquifer is less thanlO,OOO t't2/d, t'JX!l;ing from L 700 f!2id at 
 
wdll9KO{l5 in Berrien Cs:>m!ly, Ga., to '7/)00 t1;?hl in v,;ell 
 
24POD6 in Tdiair C<m:nty, Gtt 
 
Large variability in the range of tmnsmi~~ivity where the 
 
tlpper Floridan aquifer is largdy carhnnate m~y indi,.:ate the 
 
i1:1uence of fra<.:mr~ or Mimion openings and rda1e:d a:nisott-o- 
 
pic d.islrihution ofhydmuhc properties. For example, reported 
 
transmissivity of the Upper Florida:n >3.quife:r in ( 1} f.:amden 
 
Com>ty,, Ga. ranges from 19,000 t'?id at \veH JJDOl 3 to 
130.000 tt2Jd at wel133E027, located about 5 miles (mi) apart; 
 
{2) Nasslr'J County, Fla,, ranges fr;}m about 30,000 fi'-/d in the 
n vicinity of weH Nassau l to about i 70,.()()0 1id ill the vkinily 
 
nf wdl33DN:W. a!.xnrt l m:i apart; (3) Glynn C<.:unty, Ga. range:; from 23,(X)0 ft2/d at wen J4H344,, to J60fi00 ft2Jd at 
 
',eH 34H097, about 2 mi apart; and {4) Beaufort C!)unty, S.C., r-:mges frou1 530 ft1!d at weH 17JJ~i1D to 1 H\000 tY!d <H wdl. 
 
27KK-f2J. about 3 mi apart (Appendix. A, fig. Sa,h). Given that 
 
differences 1n aquifer thickness should 1x~ minimal over Ml.<.:h 
 
&hmt distances in each area., the w!d-t range in tran:-;rnissivity 
 
may be the result nf dl.t1hences in the distr!hutian offractures <tr 
 
solution openings with-in ihe aquifer. 
 
l'ossihk presence ofstnlCtm:al fen.tu:res that oou!d impm:.t 
 
the d:istributis.:m of ,5;.d:utim1 ftlatnres h1 the Upper Floridan 
 
aquifer were rep0rted in the Bnmswick, Glynn County, Ga., 
 
atea by M.asli.<t ;md Pmwd.1 (19%) and in northeastern Florida 
 
(indud:!ng Duval Co1m1:{) by Leve (l%6, 1983). Be-::.ause 
 
Camden County, Ga,. is midway be1wee:n Gtynn and Duval 
 
Countiesv it li< possihk that simiiar structural feaHl.n:~s are pre:<>.es1t 
 
in that area~ however, presence of such Jeatures has not been 
 
do>;l!r.Her!ted.. ln. Beaufort County, S.C., uplift !n the vicinity of 
 
.the Beaufort A:rdl. (t1g. 1) may have induced greater d.is..<>olutkm in the Upper Flori<hm aquit<;)r in t!mt area nnd, thus, a<.:~x<m!t for 
 
som.c of the largevariatim: in aquifer tm:nsmhsivity.In addition 
 
w structural influences, it is possible t}Jat:;;om~ ofthe variabiHty in aq~tifer transmi%:ivity tesuhs irom differe.m;es iJ! test 
 
conditions or ana!ytical mel11od. 
 
 10 Hydraulic Property of the Fltnidan Aquifer System 
 
NUMBER OF VALUES 
 
i ,000,000 ~ 
 
239 
 
100.~~ ffi. 
 
53 
 
32 
 
rrLl-I - 
 
10,000 f: 
 
1 
 
,~.. ....i.... 
 
~ 
 
~ 
 
i 
 
1,000 ~ 
 
E 
 
~ 
 
~ 
 
I 
 
100L-------------------------~ 
 
Upper Pioridan lower Floridan Uooer 
 
aquifer 
 
aquifer 
 
and.LO'Ner 
 
Floridan aqullers 
 
EXPLANATION 
 
-,..- - 90th Percentile -75th Percentile 
-50th Percentile 
 
-25th Percenli!e -10th Percentile 
 
Figure 4. Boxpiot shov.ing transmissivity of the Upper ami Lower 
Floridan aquifers in the study area in coastal Georgla and parts of 
South Carolina and Florida, and at multi-aquifer wells cam plated in 
the Upper and lower Roridan aQuifers, Duval County, Florida. 
 
Previous studies by Maslia (1987} and Wamer and Aulenbach (1999) have shown that the Upper Floridan aquifer is anisotropic in parts of the study area. The Maslia (1987} study indicated that the Upper Floridan aquifer is anisotropic at Brunswick and Jesup, Ga., with the principal axis ofthe transmissivity tensororiented north-northeast Thedegree ofanisotropy is greateratBrunswick than at Jesup, and there is greater variability bctween local- and regional~scale tests at Brunswick than at Jesup, Local-scale tests are defmed as tests conducted using a single pumping well and one or more observation wells; regional-scale tests are defined as those involving several pumping wells (such as those that might be present at an industrial we11field} and several observation wells. Regional-scale tests encompass a larger area than localscale tests and, thus, are representative of a huger volume of aquifer materiaL Maslia (1987) attributed greateranisotropy and variability between local- and regional-scale tests at Brunswick to preferential flow along vertical solution channels associated with high-angle reverse faults and fractures similar to those described by Prowell (1985). Maslia {1987} also indicated that because of the large variation between results derived from regional- and local-scale tests at Brunswick, local-scale aquifer tests "should not be extrapolated for use in regional aquifer analyses." Warner and Aulenbach {1999) reported that the Upper Floridan aquifer is anisotropic at St Marys, Ga., with the principal axis ofanisotropy oriented north-northeast, as was reported for Brunswick and Jesup, Ga. 
 
At Savannah, Ga., Warner and Aulenbach (1999) reported that the Upper Floridan aquifer generaHy is isotropic with an anisotropy ratio of 1.2:1. The isotropic distribution ofhydraulic properties is demonstrated by reported tran.smissivities at aquifer~test sites in the Savannah area. In 12 ofthe 13 tests reported in Chatham County, Ga,, the transmissivity ranges from 20,000 
to 46,000 rt2/d, with a higher transmissivity of 80,000 rt2/d 
reported at well38Ql15 {Appendix A, fig. 5b). Storage coefficient oft.i.e Upper Floridan aquifer (Appendix 
A, fig. 6a-d) ranges from about 0.00004 at weH 27HH-o3 in Beaufort County, S.C., to 0.04 at "Well 1" in Baker County, Fla. The latter storage coefficient is higher than the range for a typical confined aquifer (0.0001 to O.OOI, Heath, 1983). Higher storage coefficients normally would be expected in updip areas {western and northern parts ofthe study area) where the aquifer is semiconfined or unconfined, and lower storage coefficients would be expected in downdip areas where the aquifer is more tightly confined. In parts of the study area, however, high storage coefficients have been reported in some downdip areas where the Upper Floridan aquifer is deeply buried and confined. In the Brunswick, Ga., area {fig. 6c), the wide range of storage coefficient values were attributed either to pumping interferences during testing or to vertical leakage upward from deeper zones (Jones and Maslia, 1994). 
I.Dwer Aoridan Aquifer and Equivalent Clastic Unils 
Transmissivity ofthe Lower Floridan aquifer and equivalent clastic units ranges from about 170 ft2/d at wel138Y-h6 in Barnwell County, S.C., to about 43,000 rt2!d at wen 33E039 in Camden County, Ga. {Appendix A, fig. 7). In northern areas where the aquifer is comprised largely of clastic sediments (Gordon 
aquifer, fig. 2), transmissivity ranges from 170 to 15,000 rtlid with a median of3,500 ttl/d. In areas where the aquifer is largely carbonate, transmissivity ranges from 500 to43,000 ft2/ 
d. with a median of2,900 &!d. 
Although no aquifer tests were conducted in wells completed solely in the Lower Floridan aquifer in northeastern Florida., it is likely that t:ransmissivity ofthe aquifer is hig!J..-.possibly exceeding 100,000 ttl/d. Krause and Randolph (1989) stated that the transmissivity ofthe Lower Floridan aquifer in the vicinity of Jacksonvi.Ue, Fla., may be as high as 400,000 Wid, hut added that their transmissivity estimates for the Lower Floridan aquifer are qualitative and primarily based on thickness and estimates ofpermeability from geophysical well logs. An estimate ofthe transmissivity of the Lower Floridan aquifer in northeastem Florida can be obtained from tests conducted in multi-aquifer production wells in Duval County, Fla, that are open to the entire thickness ofthe Upper Floridan aquifer and a hlghpenneability freshwater zone at the top ofthe Lower Floridan aquifer {Spechler, 1994). Such multi-aquifer wells are designated as "IJF, LF" in Appendix A. Spechler (1994) stated, "Although the relative contribution ofwater from each zone cannot be determined, multi-aquifer wells probably derive much oftheir yield from the upper zone of the Lower Floridan aquifer." 
 
 Tablet Vert!ca~ hydrauHc conductivity of the F!tHidan aquitar system, cu:hta! Georgia, and adjac~~nt parts ot South Catu!ina anrl F!orirla. 
fit f<e*t: f"Jd, ii;>:t pn thy;'', :kgr~:<: ',minute;;;''. so:md;;; <f..<J, <.iittn. ''.lltlt~ertain: , ;.k;:>;h nf :;;->.mpk t\N repcrtd. Svw~ 0/\ . C<:,,q~ia; 5C, S;:.;.;;h Cmt>hn<l. Hydml<Jg.ic tJ;)i!: :..FC, L;-w<:r Fhrith~n aquil<:r 
cmrl!Hin;,: mti!, OFA. Li!'l~~=l' rlcrida aquik<: UFC. Upp'f Flodd<tn aquii<.;r ;;w;l~nirsf; ;mi.; t:FSC Ur;p.:'t HNithl ~>-tuif::~ :<Nni~(>Hiini.'":g tmit; LFA, L<.>w~r ri<Jridan &q,:ikr: hydwl.>;,;it tmi! ,;k::litl;:r;: <;rd::>,.t'tl in P'nntht~-x:s <k<ignaw equi,sk:nt :;la~ti;: uni!J 
 
State County 
 
___ ........... .,. , 
 
~............. 
 
GA Hurb: 
 
d(.). Ci;atham 
 
do. 
 
dt>. 
 
d(}. 
 
do. 
 
d<>. 
 
do. 
 
~~f.l. 
 
Glynn 
 
dn. 
 
do. 
 
dfi. 
 
do. 
 
t1(!. 
 
do. 
 
$.; 
 
do. 
 
ik> 
 
.;b_ 
 
do 
 
i.J\>. 
 
do 
 
dH. 
 
do. 
 
d~!. 
 
<k 
 
<J;.> 
 
dG. 
 
<.\<.> 
 
dt.~. 
 
do. 
 
dt.'. 
 
<.k> 
 
de. 
 
d.o. 
 
d:.::-. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
dn. 
 
4>. 
 
d<>. 
 
<k>. 
 
d:o. 
 
(Kl. 
 
J;,_ 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
W~! 
!clootmt3r 
~~2 '{;)2fi 
 
Depth below land aurfuc.~ Ve-rtical 
 
tat!tooe LMgltu 'l!:>p of 
 
~rtom~--- nydrauHc 
 
te!lt lntervai test Interval eonductlvlty 
 
Sowrce ~f cla1a 
 
Hyclmloglc urr!t 
 
(ft) ......................................................................... 
 
J3'\~TS3'' Sl"4Y.l5" 
 
3(~55 
 
{it) 
 
(ftld) 
 
......................... ~~--- 
 
---"" .... ~~~~~~~~ 
 
3r~r.~ 
 
<>JXiO:lJG 
 
L~::~:-:h hi>-.'i H~hcrs ~ j Y~:-6 :) 
 
;Lf(.) 
 
Remar!>:z 
........................~~~~~~~- 
 
~>i.ii:WiJi, 
 
32""07"39'~ S1''l!'iW 
 
l:(U~~. 
 
g{(~ 
 
{}{}535 
 
C;mnt.s<H~d lxm;;ky <,l%3:' 
 
\.:FA. 
 
;k, 
j~..PiH5 
 
do. Jl <sg:~f}"' 
 
du. 
8o=-s9~54"' 
 
J .ll}.) 
2!1 
 
Ul16 ::!4 
 
ll()Ut.M .Otlt\'1 
 
dl.). 
Fmh<<'(J96<il 
 
!..l'C l.fFC 
 
C~:;J~!.(y hrr~::~v. ~n~~~ f)1;g<.':<:t~Bt::~ 
 
dt.'. 
 
d<;. 
 
do. 
 
226 
 
~~4 j 
 
.0()4 
 
ck. 
 
de. 
 
:..h~. 
 
HHH5 
 
:)l<'Hr.~4x 
 
8~'=-30\56'' 
 
6!5 
 
635 
 
.67 
 
Wai;. (l%5) 
 
Ub\ 
 
Ff>:<Si iif:::t<)\.:S gray iim<.v6t:m<: 
 
dn. 
 
ih 
 
d<:>. 
 
7()~ 
 
7l2 
 
2L39 
 
d<; 
 
(!\-,. d;- 
 
dt~. 
 
>.1<. 
 
do. 
 
f>(j(J 
 
gl2 
 
.c:o:34 
 
d<.> 
 
d~.1. 
 
il<; 
 
df>. 
 
<.h 
 
do. 
 
<}U(j 
 
i;\2 
 
.000!34 
 
do 
 
msc D<.1k>mitk !.imeslcr.c 
 
~HH!32 
 
3:~'"l(V~!.O~ 
 
~:<2~?S2" 
 
5!9 
 
'fl9 
 
,<;>;)6 
 
d<.>. 
 
tFA 
 
l:0s~;ihfe~H~~: g~~~?' hrH~:::;hw~~:- 
 
rl;,. 
 
do. 
 
.k>. 
 
%(1 
 
5SO 
 
Un32 
 
do.. 
 
d<). 
 
d(>. 
 
dll. 
 
do. 
 
.k>. 
 
642 
 
662 
 
6.6845 
 
d~":t. 
 
<'k>. 
 
d:!. 
 
;l;,. 
 
do 
 
;J;. ~, 
 
6112 
 
702 
 
!8.1"2 
 
dn. 
 
(b. 
 
d,.-,_ 
 
:h 
 
do. 
 
<.k>. 
 
744 
 
765 
 
Ai~l! 
 
t.kt. 
 
dn. 
 
do. 
 
d<). 
 
367 
 
a8s 
 
,i/!674 
 
d. . ~. 
 
fb. 
 
;J'.). 
 
;.};). 
 
r.1~nr:-1i~.:J.: ~inh~Ston:c 
 
;.h 
 
dn. 
 
do. 
 
97i; 
 
9'1<~> 
 
04Ull 
 
<k>. 
 
tln. 
 
<.!(>. 
 
;J,"t. 
 
d~-..:. 
 
do. 
 
L.(W.i 
 
!.f5l 
 
OWOU 
 
(b, 
 
t=fSC 
 
D:>l<:..:ni!K: Jir.''''"';me; :><mbmJining by~t "'Ta>~)ting !he t~pp::r ;md k>W>.:'f W>~ter,J.><e.i>f i;;.~~ .z<)ne:; ;;fthe- Upp<~f Flmldar: <l(j<..<ifcr 
 
'.k>. 
 
<ln. 
 
do. 
 
lJJ53 
 
j,tl65 
 
iJOliM 
 
dn. 
 
tk>. 
 
d.-,. 
 
do. 
 
l_(j'il. 
 
j,i)!,<4 
 
i):)){)54 
 
<k, 
 
dn. 
 
df,. 
 
t!tl. 
 
(!\>. 
 
do. 
wn:n 
 
Jt\ 
3 !"i)ii'24" 
 
dn. 
~n<;:~?42" 
 
U.H 347 
 
l.l ~4 
.36'1 
 
.Q<.)(l26"i .()Hl'! 
 
ch 'Nait anJ Git~~~ i !9'!"<.) 
 
(!;,. 
 
d<.o 
 
UFC tvl i::>::<:n<: nnil C <Jf Clark: amJ. <.>thd":< 1!990) 
 
d<>. 
 
flF 
 
dn. 
 
367 
 
1'7 
 
A 
 
:k:. 
 
(;F/<, 
 
S:;_:_td:-,. hr~eE<:H.r;-:z: (>hgo.:-:c:r:t: 
 
d<>. 
 
do 
 
>.1). 
 
587 
 
607 
 
l61>A 
 
dn. 
 
&;. 
 
d<J. 
 
678 
 
091> 
 
!2( 
 
<if}, 
 
dG. 
 
,j;_,, 
 
7N 
 
'f~}:) 
 
6.68 
 
do, 
 
(k> 
 
Up::.x:r b:)<.~e,~n~' ~~,~)Htf~::ov.s firr:;:~;t(>H~:- 
 
uo. 
 
<i<.>. do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
f.~f$(1:-:r Et~~:t.~ne l~~n~~4~::~t'-' 
 
a 
a;=iii 
'tl 
~ 
i~ ' 
a 
g. 
t1i 
; 
:::!, 
~ 
~ 
=: 
i... 
~ 
'1j 
Ss ' 
-.... 
 
 Table 1. Vertical hydraulic conductivity of the Floridan aquifer system, coastal Georgia, and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida. 
 
[ft, 
 
feet; 
 
ftld, 
 
feet 
 
per 
 
day; 
 
0 , 
 
degrees;', 
 
minutes; 
 
, 
 
seconds; 
 
do., 
 
ditto; 
 
?, 
 
uncertain;, 
 
depth 
 
of sample 
 
not 
 
reported. 
 
State: 
 
GA, 
 
Georgia; 
 
SC, 
 
South 
 
Carolina. 
 
Hydrologic 
 
unit: 
 
LFC, 
 
Lower 
 
Floridan 
 
aquifer 
 
confming unit; UFA, Upper Florida aquifer; UFC, Upper Floridan aquifer confming unit; UFSC', Upper florida aquifer semiconfming unit; LFA, Lower Floridan aquifer; hyd;ologic unit identifiers enclosed in 
 
parentheses designate equivalent clastic unit] 
 
State 
 
---~~-~~-~~~-~-~-~-------------..........-..------ 
 
--------- 
 
County 
 
Well Identifier 
 
latitude 
 
Longitude 
 
Depth below land surface 
------------------ 
Top of Bottom of 
 
Vertical hydraulic 
 
testinterval testlntervsl conductivity 
 
(ft) 
 
(ft) 
 
(ftld) 
 
Source of data 
 
------.---------------------~-----------~ 
 
Hydrologic unit 
 
Remarks 
 
GA Glynn 34H337 31"08'24" 81"29'42" 
 
935 
 
--~----------.....-..--------~-~-------------~----- 
 
954 
 
0.000008 
 
Wait and Gregg ( 1973) 
 
----~ 
UFSC Probably semiconfining layer separating the 
 
upper and !ower water-bearing zones ofthe 
 
Upper Floridan 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do, 
 
do. 
 
1,088 
 
1,105 
 
.000004 
 
do. 
 
LFC Included in Wait and Gregg's aquifer test interval, but likely Lower Floridan confin ing unit 
 
do. 
 
do, 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
1,490 
 
1,503 
 
5.3 
 
sc Barnwell BW-243 33"12'09" 8134'40" 
 
238 
 
238 
 
.16 
 
do. Bledsoe{l988) 
 
LFA Lower Eocene limestone LFC 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
BW-246 33"12'55" 8i 0 37'27" 
 
172 
 
112 
 
.0012 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
258 
 
258 
 
.034 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
BW-308 3318'42" 8136'22" 
 
136 
 
136 
 
.566 
 
do. 
 
(UfA) 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
169 
 
169 
 
.12735 
 
do. 
 
LFC 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
BW3!4 33!1 '28" 81"30'47" 
 
141 
 
141 
 
.00037 
 
do. 
 
UFC 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
62 
 
62 
 
.00048 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
BW-316 3310'57" 8140'43" 
 
98 
 
98 
 
.00037 
 
do. 
 
LFC 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
BW-335 3308'48" 81"36'27" 
 
161 
 
161 
 
.0019 
 
do. 
 
UFC 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
BW-375 33"16'30" 81".34'25" 
 
210.5 
 
211 
 
.00257 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
BW-379 33"12'38" 8139'26" 
 
167.5 
 
168 
 
.00022 
 
do. 
 
LFC 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
BW-.391 33"15'10" 8140'2!. 
 
262 
 
262 
 
.04 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. Beaufort BFT-1672 3215'30" 8039'34" 
 
--- 
 
- 
 
.0056 
 
Smith (1994) 
 
UFC 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
- 
 
- 
 
.0056 
 
do. 
 
do . 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
- 
 
- 
 
.0141 
 
do . 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
- 
 
.072! 
 
do . 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
BFt~l6"/4 32"16'36" 80"42'46" 
 
- 
 
.01082 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
- 
 
- 
 
.00852 
 
do . 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
- 
 
- 
 
. 22948 
 
do . 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
- 
 
- 
 
.000557 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
BFT-1675 32 11'15" 8040'16" 
 
~--~ 
 
- 
 
.00279 
 
do. 
 
do . 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
- 
 
0.005570 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
-N 
:::: 
<c.... 
I 
5;:;.- 
a"'Q 
'cCo 
~ 
a 
.f , 
0 ;a::3., 
=Ill 
l;lo 
.&13 
.1;.::.:: 
en 
1 
 
 Tablet Verti1~<11 hydraulic conductivitY' of the Floridan aqHifar syshlm, cuastal G~wrgia. and adjat:ant !-lMts at St)Uth Garoiina and florida. 
 
rn. f0,'l; ltd, 1i;d p~r <ily; ,,, {bg!'C<.,'!<; ', minu!c;;; ", S0,(.'ii<.i?;; d;J" <Ji:.ttL ~'. tt!K'enain; ..... dq~~h ,_,f s;.unpk n<)t r>.tmrtcd. Statr:: (;;\, (Jf:<">fg.i3; ;;c' Sf,;.::.h (ar:.>hn:l. Hyt\r:,!<:.j,~.i<.: <miL L.FC' {.(,wi:f Fbridan <l<.luif~t 
 
__ ...... c<m.fini~;g <mit PF:\. Uppe:t nmida aquik!: VFC Um~n Fi<.:.:id<~n squifut wr:!h::.ing uait; U!'SC Ppp<'r F:od;h aquil':r s<miwnfirsi.:.\e. ttni!: UA, L:.)w::r Hmid<m ;;;.wikr.: hyd:1>bgic unit idcat<tkrs <>nd;)sd in 
 
ponmth<'~";,s de~<i),.<nati: equi,skr:t .;;'la$\it: <mit] 
 
._..,..,...,....................................,.~~~---~~ -~........................-..., 
 
...................... -.......... 
 
..............................................., ,..~~-~- 
 
Depth below !ami ~urtace Vmic.1! 
 
...... ,.,.,,.,~.~~---- 
 
___ . State Ct~t.mty 
 
W&!! 
icl~mtifier 
 
tatltud& l.<!ngffl.ldQ T~ of 
 
Btrttt~m of 
 
fQSt ifrt(!fVS~ t~st interval 
 
..............,..,. ......................... 
 
{ft} 
 
{ft) 
 
~----------~ ._.........................,.., 
 
hydraulic eonduethtlty 
 
Soufc& ot data 
 
{ft!d} 
 
.........................................,.,_,,..,_, 
 
sr: 
 
J.k<~Uli;rt Bi-f!6A'> 32'';4'40" 1);)''4(!\~) ., 
 
.0{!~~79 
 
Smith (1 <r-i4) 
 
Hydrotogic unlt 
t~ff: 
 
Rem<'lrli:s 
.............................~-~-........... 
 
do 
 
d~). 
 
d<). 
 
<3<.: 
 
dr:. 
 
J.tHIWi; 
 
do. 
 
d<_} 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
();) 
 
de,. 
 
.tl.l:Zi% 
 
d<). 
 
do. 
 
de. 
 
d<). 
 
dn. 
 
do. 
 
d(>, 
 
.00557 
 
dn. 
 
do. 
 
d<). 
 
dt\ 
 
BHcl617 32''!7'.18'' H{f42(rn< 
 
.0\>~525 
 
<ln . 
 
d<>. 
 
>h 
 
d<), 
 
do. 
 
d<). 
 
de. 
 
,OiHID 
 
<h. 
 
do. 
 
;.h 
 
d<.:. 
 
HFl'l679 3:n2'42'' ~v~3T4ft 
 
,f}i){~~~6 
 
d;.), 
 
<'b. 
 
d:.J:. 
 
d<), 
 
~.Y.:o. 
 
dn. 
 
dn. 
 
.426'229 
 
<.k>. 
 
ik<. 
 
d<>. 
 
dt). 
 
<lo. 
 
::k>, 
 
d<.1. 
 
_(1(!622'1 
 
do, 
 
<.k>. 
 
d<>. 
 
de. 
 
mT-l6!W 32"!7'!6'' so:-JY}49)~ 
 
.no.-?7R7 
 
dn. 
 
d<>, 
 
d<>. 
 
:Jn. 
 
do. 
 
1n 
 
d:..--r. 
 
.nr~~~25 
 
<b. 
 
d(>, 
 
dn. 
 
do. 
 
tln. 
 
:b. 
 
do. 
 
.? 
 
..t.>. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
dn. 
 
d(,, 
 
<.k>. 
 
do. 
 
,2 
 
d:), 
 
:.k"t. 
 
~ 
Q. 
 
;;! 
 
<.k> 
 
d:J. 
 
BF.1-!Nr::< .F'l6'i.r\" S(Y;43122x 
 
do 
 
<J,>. 
 
fb. 
 
do. 
 
d-). 
 
J)t\>\li)? 
 
d<>, 
 
<k>. 
 
.no:w:>4 
 
do. 
 
d::>. 
 
.,a 
(;~ 
 
do. 
 
(~(} 
 
t~l'T-224'> JJ.<'04'01') (ltl''44'41" 
 
52.4 
 
.~2.!> 
 
,0(~~)252 
 
Gf~-,qi7~.dmk~~ L;sb~}r&tr:-t}' Tc$; 
 
dn. 
 
i 
 
Re]X>fl. f'r<;_i<><;t N<.>. ~'tlflff-228  
 
~ 
 
(ll, F! p.. S>:fMmber 5, 2\J(x) 
 
$' 
 
::!(,, 
 
do-. 
 
d:.>. 
 
ds; 
 
dn. 
 
67J 
 
6~ 
 
Jl0t123? 
 
d<>, 
 
dn. 
 
a 
 
~ 
 
<};_<, 
 
tln. 
 
BFT1:250 Y~~~~iJ41'iTt f>W4fi'42" 
 
7il.l5 
 
7~ 65 
 
Jl00249 
 
<h 
 
d(>. 
 
~ 
 
1n. 
 
do. 
 
}}fLC:295 n"04'!4'' ~W42'55" 
 
43.5 
 
d::>. 
 
de. 
 
H!'T-2.291 3l';~ill3(' 3il'49\l(l'' 
 
.)63 
 
439 
 
,()()651.\ 
 
Gwt~-.chnics, I.al<onlt<.~ry T<':'>t UFC('1} Coarse-grain<".! ~alky :l:l 
 
R<~pnrt Pn,jr:a Nn. 2001-2::5 .. 
 
U!, 29 p.. Augus\ .29. 2(P.)! 
 
Yi< 
 
.4~ :95 
 
<.k>. 
 
un::i'') t ~nc..,~nt1m:~d ~~~r:<1 
 
~ 
~- 
t *~ ' 
 
do. 
 
de. 
 
do. 
 
d(!, 
 
de. 
 
~<cg 
 
57J 
 
(!00534 
 
<.k>. 
 
\'fCC') Fin~::.. ~:.ra::r:~:d vaiky Hll? 
 
_____ do. 
 
de. 
....,........... 
 
... 
 
.do. 
 
1o. 
 
:Je. 
 
72..1 
 
n ~ 
 
;}ON54 
 
d<>. 
 
1'fCf:'J 
 
W' 
t""n' 
"' 
~ 
 
~ 
 
.w... 
 
 14 Hydraulic Property of the Floridan Aquifer Syst&m 
 
() 
 
15 
 
30M!LES 
 
() 15 30 KILOMETERS 
Bass modified hom U.S. Geological Survey 1:2,000,()()()-scafe digital data 
 
EXPLANATION 
Transmissivity, in feet squared per day 
500 to 1,000 
" 1,000to 10,000 
e 10,000 to 50,000 e 50,000 to 100,000 
e 100.000 to 600,000 
~~ Estimated from 150,000 to i ,000,000 ()Nare County only} 
 
Figure Sa. Transmissivity ofthi! Upper Floridan aquifer and equivalent clastic units in coastal Georgia and adjacent parts of South Caronna and Florida. 
 
 ... 
 
~ :'$~ G<'8-;">ft :t;:::1~GB-c8 {: 
 
,. .... .-' 
 
EXPLANATION Tr.ansmi:SSWity, in teet 
squared per (lay 
5M lo i,non 
" LOC!O to 10,000 
- 50,000 to WIJ,Qt.J @= 100,000 to 6Cfl,if.;O 
 
... ......_ 
34JC.u;$:, 
34J(J(,~* 
 
.................... 
 
:; 
 
<- 
 
~HO?>J. 
 
* :...::. i~i 
 
:3:3!--l\ml 
 
:33Hd<i-.. ~- 
 
... 
 
~.34H371 
 
:'*'34-M1{!(l 
~.34-H<}!.ll 
 
.. J,-.-.-~-~ 
 
jo 
 
... 
 
.. -(""' ~ 
 
i -...,.-.-....:......,-~ !---: jo 
 
figure Sb. Transrniss.istfty oftha Upper Flariaer: aquih.~r in Chatham and 61yrm Counties, Ge-orgia, ami Beaufort and J!lspar Cmmti-es, Sr1uth Gam!irm. 
 
 16 Hydraulic Property of the Floridan Aquifer System 
 
N 
 
Clinch 
 
t ....... Lown-de~.......,....... ............,_ 
 
/ 
 
' 
 
0 
 
15 
 
0 15 30 KILOMETERS 
Base modified from U.S. Goo!ogical Survey 1:2,000,000-sca!e digi!!l! data 
 
Well1 
 
' e Lake City Well No. 2 '~--c----{._ 
 
i 
 
! Colurnbtn..-J 
 
--...._. 
 
EXPLANATION Storage coefficient 
0.0000'1 to 0.0001 0.0001 to 0.001 
0.001 to 0.01 
 Greaterthan 0.01 
 
Figure 6a. Storage coefficient of the Upper Floridan aquifer and equivalent clastic units in coastal Gemgia aml adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida. 
 
 -...- 
 
 .... , 
.2&.tM4  
 .. <$: : 
 
/ ;27KK-Y.8. 
~- .'" 
 
EXPLANATtON 
Storage coefficient 0.00001 to 0.0001 
 
 ... 
 
$ 0.0001 to lJX!Oi 
 
 O.OlJ1 !u O.Oi 
 
Base rrKJdme{l fmm 
s. !} Qeo!oglc8l SW"'&~i 
1:2,\lQO,O{l{l-.sm;~ (llgi".~J dat3. 
 
() 
 
S 
 
H'!M!LES 
 
t---~-.~nnf~~~~~~lnTJ 
 
0 
 
5 
 
'l(H<:iL<t.tTER~< 
 
Figure Sb. Stmagf.l tnefficient a! tfm Upper Floridan aquifer in Chatham County, Beorgla, Md Beeufart and Jasper Cmmtias, South Carolina. 
 
 18 Hydraulic Property of the Floridan Aquifer System 
 
GLYNN 
 
{) 
 
5 
 
0 
 
5 
 
tO KilOMETERS 
 
Base mooifioo from U.S. Goo!Qgical Survey 1:2.000.00(}-scale tligita! <ia!a 
 
EXPlANATION 
Storage coefficient 
" 0.000001 to 0.00001  0.0001 to 0.001  0.001 to 0.01 
 
Figure 6c. Storage coefficient of the Upper Floridan aquifer in G!ynn County, Georgia. 
 
Ba..o:;ed on Spechler's {1994) remarks, the transmissivity at these multi-aquifer wells is assumed to be mostly representative of the Lower Floridan aquifer (fig. 7c). Transmissivity at these multi-aquifer wells ranges from 2,100 f~/d in well D-168, to 200,000 ifld in well M503 {Appendix A, fig. 7c). The higher transmissivities in Duval County, Fla., likely are dependent on whether a solution feature is present in the vicinity of the well {G.G. Phelps, U.S. Geological Survey, oral commun., 2002). 
Storage-coefficient data for the Lower Floridan aquifer are 
limited to three estimates in Barnwell and Allendale Counties, S.C., and to six estimates from multi-aquifer wells in Duval County, Fla. (Appendix A, fig. 8). For the South Carolina tests, the storage coefficient ranges from 0.0003 to 0.0004. indicative ofa conftned aquifer (Lohman, 1972; Heath, 1983). The storage 
coefficients for the mutti-aquifer Upper and Lower Floridan weBs in Duval County, Fla., range from 0.00002 to 0.02, with the latter value higher than the range generally cited for a confmed aquifer (Lohman, 1972; Heath., 1983). In the Brunswick, Ga., area, a similar wide range ofstorage-coefficient values for the Upper Floridan aquifer were attributed to either pumping interferences during testing or to leakage from deeper zones (Jones and Maslia, 1994). 
Although transmissivity and storage-coefficient data are unavailable for the Fernandina permeable zone ofthe Lower Floridan aquifer, borehole~geophysicallogs from wells in the Brunswick, Ga., and Fernandina Beach, Fla., areas, show that iarge cavities are present in this zone, suggesting high transmissivity {Krause and Randolph, 1989; Jones and others, 2002; Phelps and Spechler, 1997). Krause and Randolph (1989) suggested that the Fernandina permeable zone may have transmis- 
 
sivity comparable to southern Florida's "boulder zone," which 
Meyer (1974) reported to be greater than 3,000,000 tt2Jd. 
Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity 
Estimates of vertical hydraulic conductivity for the study area are sparse and restricted to the Brunswick, Ga., area (Wait, 1965; Wait and Gregg, 1973), the Savannah River Site area {Bledsoe, 1988; Leeth and others, 1996), the Savannah-Hilton Head Island area (Counts and Donsky, 1963; Furlow, 1969), and the Port Royal Sound area (Smith, 1994). Clarke and others (1990) summarized data for the Brunswick and Savannah, Ga., areas and related values to more-current hydrogeoiogic nomenclature. vertical hydraulicconductivity data for both coruming 
units and aquifer units are listed in table 1, and locations are shown in figure 9; values are plotted graphically by hydrogeologic unit :in figure 10. 
Thirty-nine measurements ofvertical hydraulic conductivity for the Upper Floridan confining unit were compiled from corepenneameter analysis of samples collected at 17 sites, 12 of which are offshore of Tybee Island, Ga., and Hilton Head Island, S.C. (table l, fig. 9). Vertical hydraulic conductivity ranges from 0.000232 ftld at well BFT-2249 to slightly greater than 3 ft/d at well BFT-1676, both ofwhich are located offshore of Hilton Head Island, S.C. Vertical hydraulic conductivity of the Upper Floridan confining unit at Brunswick, Glynn County, Ga., is represented by a single value of0.0107 ft/d at well 
34H337 (table 1). In the Savannah River Site area, vertical hydraulic conductivity of the confining unit at three sites ranges from 0.00037 ft!dat well BW-314 to 0.00257 ft!d at well BW-375. 
 
 ..... / 
 
t 
 
0 
 
15 
 
:Y::>MlLES 
 
{r-1---~---J 
 
0 i 5 30 K!WMEH:J!S 
 
U<l<W w!i!ed rrom O.S. G<:<<;~ii;<>; 
Sur. . .~,.l 1.?:~(XX:,noG.-...~t~~ tiigil..~ d&% 
 
::.......... ..e......~  ) 
 
N<...Ya! &:brrserlrs.;s 
ease 
Kings Bay 
..,... .......__./ 
 
EXPLANATION Tnm:smisstvity In 
5quaro f~ per day 
10C!to 500 50\Ho 1,000 
 
c. 
.:;:: 
'?l(>.?t>'<'f<l: 
 
$ HWOO to 100,000 @ iOO,OOtHc >,000.0!:)0 
 
....~......~.....~ ~..~... 
5 
 
figure 7, Transmisswity of the L<lwer Fl<Jriclan aqurf~r and equhral!fnt cla~;tk: units in {Al cnasta! Georg!a aM adi~ct:~nt parts nf South CamHna and F!ofi{ia; (B} Barnwell and Af!enda!e CountiRs, South Carolina; and (C} mu!t!a{luifer weHs compieted !n th Uppf!t and lawer Floridan aqBikrs in Omrai Cuunty, Fioricla, 
 
 20 Hydraulic Property of the Roridan Aquifer System 
 
EXPLANATlON 
Storage coefficient 
e 0.00001 to o.ooo: e 0.0001 to 0.001 
 Greaterthan 0.01 
 
ALLENDALE 
 
PW2. 
We!i H a Wel!A \P 
DU\lAL 
 
 WeU3 
 
N 
 
20MfLES 
 
t 
 
(} 
 
10 
 
20 KILOMETERS 
 
Figure B. Storage coefficient of the lower Flnridan aquifer and equivalent clastic units in Allendale and BarnweU Counties, South Carolina, and at multi-aquifer W9l!s cnmpleted in the Upper and lower Floridan aquifers in Ouvai County, Florida. 
 
In addition to vertical hydraulic conductivity values compiled from core samples, Hayes ( 1979) estimated values for the Upper Floridan co11fining unit in Beaufort County, S.C., based 
on aquifer-test resuits analyzed using the Hantush-Jacob leaky 
aquifer analysis method (Hantush and Jacob, 1955). Although exact locations ofwell sites were not provided in the Hayes (1979) report, estimates ofver>Jcal hydraulic conductivity range from 0.005 ft!d at the Port Royal Clay Company in Port Royal, S.C., to 0.01:5 ftidat the Burton weUfieid at Burton, S.C. Hayes (1979) concluded that an average vertical hydraulic conductivity for this unit for Beaufort and Jasper Counties, S.C., would be 0.001 ftld. Estimated vertical hydraulic conductivities reported by Hayes (1979) likely are somewhat higher than actual values because the Hantush-Jacob method does not distinguish between leakage coming from units above or below an a4uifer. Thus, it is possible that some of the leakage was derived from underlying units. 
Vertical hydraulic conductivity of the Upper Floridan 
aquifer was compiled for five sites, three of which are located 
in the Brunswick, Glyn..11 County, Ga., area (table I, figs. 9-1 0). Reported vertical hydraulic conductivity ranges from 0.00134 ftld at we1133H115 to 160.4 ftld at well34H337. Lower vertical hydraulic conductivity was measured in parts of the aquifer that are dominated by matrix permeability; higher 
 
values occur where dissolution of rock has produced secondary permeability. 
At Brunswick, Glynn County, Ga., upper and lower waterbearing zones of the Upper Floridan aquifer are separated by a semiconfining unit consisting oflow-penneability limestone (Wait and Gregg, 1973). Vertical hydraulic conductivity for this unit was determined at three sites and ranges from 0.000008 ftld at wel134H337, to 0.000134 ft/d at well 33Hl15 (table l, figs. 9-10). 
Vertical hydraulic conductivity of the Lower Floridan confming unit was compiled from 10 samples at 9 sites, most of which are located in Barnwell County, S.C., :in the vicinity of the Savannah River Site :in th.e northeastern part of the study area (table l, figs. 9-10). Near the Savannah River Site, values for the Lower Floridan (Gordon) confining unit range from 0.00022 ft/d at well BW-379 to 0.16 ftld at well BW~243 (table 1, fig. 9). Elsewhere, vertical hydraulic conductivity for this unit is 0.000004 ft!dat well 34H337 at Brunswick. Ga., and 0.000668 ftld at well 36R006 near Savannah, Chatham CoUllty, 
Ga. {table 1, fig. 9). 
Only one estimate for the Lower Floridan aquifer is available at a well at Brunswick, Ga. (table 1, fig. 9). At well 34H337, the vertical hydraulic conductivity is 5.3 ft!d at a depth of 1,490-1 ,503 ft below land surface; this value is comparable to values for the Upper Floridan aquifer. 
 
 .-- 
 
 ...... 
 
-...... 
 
~32Y020 
 
 ....._ 
 
 ...... 
 
'--: 
:... 
--... 
 
../ 
 
EXPLANATiON 34H337  Well and &Jte name 
 
i 
 
0 
 
20 KJLOMET1"!S 
 
N 
 
...  
 
t 
 
f.!aAA mMl!il:>d lit-tr< !.lcS. G&o!ogiclli Survey ~ .:2..(l{!(},(K}(!"-;'~~ <!igit&l d;m 
 
/ 
 
figure !l Location ni site:s with srort~Cui hy<lral;!i{>CMdm:tivity data torthe norrriuf1 aquifer -WStflm, Burkt.l, Chlrtham, and Gts{l"ln Counties, Gl2"0rgi!l, anri Bamwen and BsaufortCcfurttit.~s, Sm<th Carolina. 
 
 22 Hydraulic Property of the Floridan Aquifer System 
 
............... ~~~~~"~'"~!~~~.~~~~~~~~~ 
 
i UPPER FLORIDAN CONFiNING UNIT 
 
 
 
1 UPPER FLORIDAN AQUIFER ! 
I 
i 
'j SEM!CONFINING UNIT (Brunswick area only) 
 
......   
 
  
 
LOWER FLORIDAN CONFINING UNIT 
 
 
 
 * 
 
LOWER FLOR!OAN AQUlFER 
 
+ 
 
0.000001 
 
.l 
0.01 
 
-!~ 
100 
 
VERT!CAL HYDRAUliC CONDUCTIVITY. IN FEET PER DAY 
 
10,000 
 
figure 10. Distribution of vertic a! hydraulic conductivity for selected hydrogeologic units of Floridan aquifer system. 
 
SUMMARY 
The Coastal Sound Science Initiative is a series ofscientific and feasibility studies to support development of the State of Georgia's final strategy to protect the Upper Floridan aquifer from saltwater contamination. To support this effort, detailed information regarding the hydraulic properties of Floridan aquifer system and equivalent clastic sediments in a 67-county area ofcoastal Georgia and adjacent parts ofSouth Carolina and Florida were compiled and evaluated to provide data necessary for development of ground-water flow and solute-transport models. Data include transmissivity at 324 wells, storage coefficient at 115 wells, and vertical hydraulic conductivity of 72 core samples collected from 27 sites. 
In the upper Coastal Plain, sediments equivalent to the Floridan aquifer consist of thin clastic sediments; in the lower Coastal Plain, the aquifers consist of a thick accumulation of carbonate rocks that commonly have solution features and in some places have fractures. Prominent structural features in the area-the Southeast Georgia Embayment, the Beaufort Arch, and the Gulf Trough-influence the thickness and hydraulic properties of sediments comprising the hydrogeologic units. The Southeast Georgia Embayment is a shallow east-tonortheast-plunging syncline in which Coastal Plain deposits are thickest in the study area. In the vicinity of the Beaufort Arch, centered near Hilton Head Island, S.C., Coastal Plain deposits are thinner and are at shallower depths than near the Southeast Georgia Embayment. The Gulf Trough is a zone of relatively thick accumulations offme-grained clastic sediments and argillaceous carbonates in which permeability and thickness of Coastal Plain deposits are low. 
 
Hydraulic properties of the Upper Floridan aquifer vary greatly in the study area owing to the heterogeneity (and locally to anisotropy) of the aquifer and to the confmement (or lack thereof) provided by confining units. Transmissivity of the Upper Floridan aquifer and equivalent clastic units was detetmined at 239 wells and ranges from 530 feet squared per day (ft2/d} in Beaufort County, S.C., to 600,000 f~/d in Coffee County, Ga. In carbonate rocks of the iower Coastal Plain, transmissivity ofthe Upper Floridan aquifer generaHy is greater 
than 20,000 ttZici, with values exceeding 100,000 ftZ!d in the 
southeastern and southwestern parts ofthe study area {generaHy the area of greatest aquifer thickness}. Transmissivity of the Upper Floridan aquifer generally is less than 10,000 f~/d north ofthe GulfTrough where sediments comprising the aquifer, or its equivalents, are thin and consist largely ofclastic sediments, and in the vicinity of the Gulf Trough where low~permeability rocks and sediments are present. 
Large variability in transmissivity in Camden and Glynn Counties, Ga., and Nassau County, Fla., indicates anisotropic distribution of hydrauHc properties, which may result from fractures or solution openings in the carbonate rocks. Storage coefficient of the Upper Floridan aquifer was determined at 106 wells and ranges from about 0.00004 in weB 27HH-o3 in Beaufort County, S.C., to 0.04 in weH 1 in Baker County, Fla. Although higher storage coefficients normally would be expected in updip areas where the aquifer is semiconfmed or unconfined, high storage coefficients have been reported in some downdip areas where the aquifer is deeply buried and confmed. In the Brunswick, Ga., area, previous investigators attributed a wide range of storage-coefficient values either to pumping interferences during aquifer tests or to leakage from deeper zones. 
 
 Tntl11-"mis:>tVl!Y rf the i./.;we-r Flondau aquif<::r <Hid 
e{{uivak:rt updip, cia.:"tic B?it::; was detennined at 53 'Nel!s, ranging from alxm> l/0 fbd in Harnwdl Cnnnry, S.C, to about 43.{)00 tt2!d in Carnd.en c~runty, Gtt Transmi:->:->iv:ily d' flK~ LOW!?f Fklridan aquith is greate:->1 where ihe ;;;.quith is !hickest~~-in :-><)Uthea$tem Georgia and twrthea$tem Florid<J;---wben' estimates >f :r.an::;miss!vity are greater than 10/H)0 f('::d and ~n <.:<n~ weH whew the value is<!;-; b.gh a-; 200,{)00 ft2:d. AWwugh no aqt1ifer tthts were conducted in wdl-s cm:nplete--J. Si)kly :i:n the L.:>wer Fbridan aquifer in northea-:;;tern Florida, it is likdy th;tt tran$m:!f<sivity of this aqu!er b high, po$;-;ibly exe--~ding 100,000 f?/d. Trans-missivity of1he Lower Floridan aqu:&:r in northeMtem fk--.rida was ~stimated from te;-;ts ;.xmducttd !11 nmhi-aquifer pr{ldu;,;tion 
weHs located i11 f>uval Cmmty, Fla., that are open io th<:: Upper Floridan aquife-r an<!: to ~l h!gh~pemwabiiizy fresJ:n.vat-er zone al the top d th<~ L:~wer Horidan aqu:ilb. Tnm;-;mi.ssivity a! these multi~aquifer wens mnges from 2,100 to 200/)00 fe/& with larger mmsmi.ssivities dep.:-ndem <m whether a soluti-on feature is presem in the vi;.;:ln!~:; Bfthe weU. 
St<!rage~c{~.-efficient dat;l K~r th<:: L}wl.CrFbridrul aquifer are limited W thr{ce estimates in Barn:weH and Allendale Counties, S.C. and to e$timates dekn:nined from six multi-aquifer tests in Duva! County, Ha. In the S:>uth Carolina test-;;, dt<:: ,-;;t,")mge coef- 
tkient ranges from 0.0003 to 0.0004 and is indkative of.a con fined aquifer. The swrage~coeflh.:ient values at the combined Upper .an.d Lmver Floridan weHs in Duv.al C->>tmty, Fh.,, ranges fl-om 0.00002 t;.} \Hl2, with the latter value higher than the range gen-ereH:y cited for a C!)trfind aquif<~L fn the Bmnf<wick, Ga., area, previml$ investigators attributed a similar wide ran_ge in st<lrage coefficient fbr th~ Urrxlr Fhx!cian aquifer either to pump:in_g interferences during aquifer t-ests or K! leakag-e of water from dee-per :wl!es, 
Thirt_y~n!ne measurements ofvertkal hy-draulic conductivity for the Upp<::r Floridan confining unit were <kten:nined fwm cor-e-per.ueanwter analysis of samples coHected from 17 sites, J:n<K"t of which an:l ioca!e:d at Tybee Island., Ga,. and ot1\hore of Hilt-on Head Jshrnd, S.C. Vertkal hydruuhc <:om1n~--:ti:vity s-ange-s fr-om 0,000232 fee1 per day {ftid) to t;l!ghtly greater than J flid a!. U site:--; kcawd a! Tybee bland., Ga." m!d ff>shore of Hilton Head bland. S.C~ h 0.0107 ft:d a! l site in B-n.msw:ick, Ga.; and ranges from 0.00037 to 0.002.57 Hid at 3 sites in the vicinity !)tttte Savannah River Sitt;. In additkm !.o values determined from core samples, vertk,al hydmulk G<)nductivity of the Opper Floridan cBnf!ning unit in Beaufort County, s-.C, was estimated by aprevbu..s :inv-estigator using the Hantu::;h--Jawb l-eaky aquifer analysis method-~" estim.ates rmwe from 0.00.5 fiid at Pmi Royal. S.C., to 0.015 fi!d ;rt Burtm!, S.C; however, these estimates likely are high due to l.eHkage of water from underlying tmit::-;. 
Venkul hydraulk c<axlm;tivity of the Upp-er f!o:ndan aqui~ fer W<lS determined at five sites, mostly located in tb.e Bru.nswick, Ga., area, ranging from 0.00134 ft!d tD 160 ft'd. Lower verticil hydraulic condw~tivity w.as me--asured in sanrples col lected from pam of the aquifer that are dominated by matrix 
 
permeability: higher values occur where dissolution h.a~ pro-- 
duced seC(;>lldary permeability. v~~rtica) hydraulic ~onductivity 
fi;r tiw :->em.kmrfi:ning unit separating the upper and ks'<ver '<vater-bearing zone;-; d dw llpper Floridan aquikr at Bnm~ ~;-wh.:k, Ga., range fmm O.OOOOOS to 0.009l34 ft/d. 
'V'ertic,al hydru\!l:i;.; conductivity {1f the Lo-.,ver Floridan confining unit ~/a.<; detem1iued from H) sam:pks <J;t nim3 :;;ite::-;, most of '<Vhi:.;h are lo<.:ated in :he vicini!y nf1he Savannah RiV(..'f Site iJ! 1lu3 no:rl1>easkm part ofthe study area. In thi8 area, valuec:; fGr the Lower Horidan (Gordon\ wnfining tmit range !imn ~109022 to 0, !6 ft!d. E1sewhere, vertical hydraulic conductiYity for this unit is 0Jl00004 ft/dat one wdl at Brunswick (h, ami 0.00(!6-5S !tid at <.:<m; wdl near Savannah. Ga, The vertical hydrauii;..: conductivity of the Lmver Floridan aquifer measured in a core san1:ple wllectei! from a well at Hrunswi~k (h., is 5.3 ft!d; this value !s cowiparable to vatues for the Upper Floridan aquifer. 
 
SELECTED REFERENCES 
 
Applie-d Coastal Re-E,earch Laboratory, 2{}02, GulfTrou~!h and SatiHu Line data an.aiysi:->; Oem-g:ia G<~o1ogk: Survey Project Report 48, variously paged. 
Au.n>tt, W.R., and Newcome, Roy, Jr., 1986, Selected aquifer test infor.umioo for ~he Coastal Flam aq:uiier,:;; of South Carolina: lJ.S. Gooiogica1 Survey Water~Resources Irrvestigatioms Report S&-4159, 50 p. 
 
Benta!l, Ray, l963a, Metlmds of detem1ining pem1e.ability, 
 
mmsmis.:;;il>itil;y, and drawdown: U ,S. Geoknri~~.al Survey 
 
Water~Supply Paper 1536-I, 104 p. 
 
-- 
 
 
 
Berrtdt Ray, 19-63b, Slwrtcut:-> and special problems in aquifer 
 
lests~ U.S. Geological Survey Wat-er~Supply Paper 1545-C., 
 
H7p. 
 
. 
 
Bentley, C.B., 1977a, Surface-w;;;.terand gn:.und-water ftamres, 
Clay County, .Fbrida: US, Geological Survey WaterResmuees hw-estigations Repolt 77-87, 59 p. 
BentLey, C.R, 1977b. Aquifer-test analysis for the Floridan aqu:ikt in Flagkr. Puutrun, and St. Johns Counties. florid~1: U.S. (-feologkal Survey W<Her~Supp!y Paper 77-36, 50 p. 
Bentley, C.B., 1979, Aquifer cocftkients determined fr(~m multiple wdl effects. Fernandina B~aeh, Florida: (irou;ld Water, v. l7, no, 6, p. 52.5---531. 
Bled;-;oe, R 'iN., 19~8, SRP baseline hydrogeologic inve$tigat!on -Phase IR Aiken, S.C,, EJ. du.P<.mt de Nemours & Co., Savannah River Laboratory, DPST-R8~627. variously page-d. 
Brooks. Rebekah, Clarke. J.S., and htye, ftE., 1985. Hydrogeology of the Gordon aqlti:!~r sy;-;tem of east-central 
Georgia: Georgia Geologic Swvey h1fom1ation Circular 75. 41 p, 
 
Burt, R.A. Bdval, f>.L, Crou..;h, t;.l.S,, and Hughes. 'WB. 
l. 98 7, GW.hydwlogic data from :Port Royal Sound, Re-aufon County, Smtth Caml!na: U.S. Geological Su:rvey Open.-Fiie R~port il6~49"7, 67 p. 
 
 24 .Hydraulic Property of the Floridan Aquifer System 
 
Bush, P.W., 1988, Simulation of saltwater movement in the Floridan aquifer system, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina: 
U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2331, 19 p. 
Bush, P.W., and Johnston, R.H., 1988, Ground-water 
hydraulics, regional flow, and ground-water development of 
t.1.e Floridan aquifer system in Florida and in parts ofGeorgia and South Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1403-C, 80 p. 
Ceryak, Ron, Knapp, M.S., and Bumson, Terry, 1983, The geology and water resources of the upper Suwannee River 
Basin, Florida: Florida Bureau of Geoiogy Report of Investigations No. 87, 165 p. Clark, W.Z, and Zisa, A.C., 1976, Physiographic map of Georgia: Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Geologic Survey Branch, Atlanta, Georgia. 1 map, scale 1:2,000,000. Clarke, J.S., 2003, The surficial and Brunswick aquifer systems-alternative ground-water resources for coastal Georgia, in, Hatcher, K.J., ed., Proceedings of the 2003 Georgia Water Resources Conference, held April23-24, 2003, at the University of Georgia: Institute of Ecology, the University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, p. 664-67L Clarke, J.S., Falls, W.f., Edwards, L.E., Frederiksen, N.O., BybeH, L.M., Gibson, T.G., and Litwin, R.J., 1994, Geologic, hydrologic, and water-quality data for a multiaquifer system in Coastal Plain sediments near Millers Pond, Burke County, Georgia: Georgia Geologic Survey Information Circular 96, 34 p. 
Clarke, J.S., Falls, W .F., Edwards, LE., Frederiksen, N.O., 
BybeU, L.M., Gibson, T.G., Gohn, G.S., and Fleming, Farley, 1996, Hydrogeologic data and aquifer interconnection in a multi-aquifer system in Coastal Plain sediments near Millhaven, Screven Co., Georgia: Georgia Geologic Survey Information Circular 99, 43 p. Clarke, J.S., Hacke, C.M., and Peck, M.F., 1990, Geology and ground-water resources ofthe coastal area ofGeorgia: Georgia Geologic Survey Bulletin 113, 106 p. Clarke, J.S., and Krause, R.E., 2000, Design, revision, and application ofground-water flow models for simulation of selected water-management scenarios in the coastal area of Georgia and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4084, 93 p. Clarke, J.S., and West, C.T., 1998, Simulationofgrotlnd-water flow and stream-aquifer relations in the vicinity of the Savannah River Site, Georgia and South Carolina, predeveiopment through 1992: U.S. Geological Survey Water~Resources Investigations Report 98-4062. 134 p. Cooper, H.H., and Jacob, C.E., 1946, A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history: Transactions American Geophysical Union, v. 27, no. 4, p. 526--534. Cooper, H.H., and Warren, M.A., 1945, The perennial yield of artesian water in the coastal area ofGeorgia and northeastern Florida: Economic Geology, v. XL, no. 4, p. 263-282. 
 
Counts, H.B., and Donsky, Ellis, I963, Salt-water encroachment, geology, and ground-water resources of the Savannah area. Georgia and South Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper ! 611, 1OD p. 
Dyar, T.R., Tasker, G.D., and Wait, R.L., 1972, Hydrology of the Riceboro area, coastal Georgia: U.S. Geological Survey Final Report To Georgia Water Quality Control Board and Interstate Paper Corporation, 74 p. 
Falls, W.E, Baum, J.S., Harrelson, L.G., and Brown, L.H., 1997, Geology and hydrogeology ofCretaceous and Tertiary strata, andconfinement in the vicinity ofthe U.S. Department ofEnergy Savannah River Site, South Carolina and Georgia: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4245, 125 p. 
Faye, R.E., and Mayer, G.C., 1996, Simulation ofground-water flow in southeastern Coastal Plain clastic aquifers in Georgia and adjacent parts of Alabama and South Carolina: U.S. Geologica! Sruvey Professional Paper 1410-F, 77 p. 
Faye, R.E., and McFadden, K.W., 1986, Hydraulic characteristics of Upper Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary clastic aquifers -eastern Alabama, Georgia, and western South Carolina: U.S. Geological Sruvey Water-Resources Investigations Report 86A210, 22 p. 
Faye, R.E., and Smith, W.G., 1994, Relations of borehole geophysics to the horizontal hydraulic conductivity and 
dissolved-solids concentration in water of clastic Coastal 
Plain aquifers in the Southeastern United States: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2414,33 p. Ferris, J.G., Knowles, D.B., Brown, R.H. and Stallman, R.W ., 1962, Theory ofaquifer tests: U.S. Geological Survey WaterSupply Paper 1536-E, 174 p. Furlow, J.W., !969, Stratigraphy and economic geology of the eastern Chatham County phosphate deposit: Georgia Department of Mines, Mining, and Geology Bulletin 82, 40p. Gawne, C.E., and Park, A.D., 1992, Water-supply potential of the middle Floridan aquifer in southern Beaufort County, South Carolina (report to the Town ofHilton Head Island Water Commission): South Carolina Water Resources Commission, Beaufort, S.C., 34 p. Gelbaum, Carol, 1978, The geology and ground water of the Gulf Trough, in Short Contributions to the geology of Georgia: Georgia Geologic Survey Bulletin 93, p. 38-49. Georgia Environmental Protection Division, 1997, Interim strategy for managing saltwater intrusion in the Upper Floridan aquifer of southeast Georgia, April23, 1997: Atlanta, Ga., Georgia Environmental Protection Division, 19 p. Gregg, D.O., and Zimmennan, E.A., 1974, Geologic and hydrologic control of chloride contamination in aquifers at Brunswick, Glynn County, Georgia: U.S. Geological WaterSupply Paper 2029-D, 44 p. Hantush, M.S., 1960, Modification of the theory of leaky aquifers: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 65, no. 11, p. 3713-3725. 
 
 Hantush, !YLS., ;mJ .hcoh. CE., l%5, Nok!';teady radial flow in <m infi:nite ieaky aquifer: Tramachons Ameri<:an Get~phy:-;ical Vni<>n, v. 36, no. l, p. 9510D. 
fbm~bon, L(9., and Fath, \V.F. 2{'1\}3, Hydwgeology and aql.Jikr !e::<h in the Floridan aquifer sy::.iem at ~1ected sites, ;;ou!';tal Georgia, ?.H01, in Lr;eth, D.C.. Clarke, JS., Craigg. SJ)., und Wipperfurth, C.L 2C~J3, (:f:rmmd-\vater oonditions and .~tudies in Georgia, 200!: U.S. (re<>iogka1 Su:rw;y \Vat..:rv Resm.lrces Inve,-;tigations Rep\;rt 03-4032, p. 82-87. 
Hayes, LR., \979, The ground-water reS<.urces offkauii>rt, C0Heton, Hamptt>!l, a:nd .k:sperCountie&, Sl:>uth Can.>hna: S;,>uth Car..11ina Wate:r Res<:m.r(:~sCommission Report No. <f, 
91 p. Heath, R.~.. l Yf!J, B<$$lC J.,>roundWa!x~r hydn.'h,gy: U.S. 
G!::oiogica1 Survey Wa!eJ~Supply Paper 1220, SSp. Jacob, C.E.. 1%3, Correction of dra-.vdowns caused by a 
pumped wdl tapping less than the fi..!l! thickne::<,-; of <tl1 a.quifer: in U.S, Ge!)logical Survey W<Itcr~Supp:ly Paper 
1536-L p. 272-292. Jones. LE, and Ma~Ha, 1-kl.. , 1994, Selected gr<Jun.d..wate:r 
dma, and results of aquifer t~b f<)r the Upper Fi<>rillim aquifer, Brunswick Glycrm (\!unty, Georgia, area: U.S. Geological Smvey Open.:File Report 94-520, i07 p. Jones, LE., ?mwdl, DL.. and rvtasha, M.L., 2002, Hydrogeology and wa!~~r quaht'/ {J978) of tite Floridan aquifer sy!!<tem at U.S. Ged<>g;i<;a! Survey Test WeH 26, on Coloneh l~hmd, near Brunir\.vick, Georgia: U.S. Geological Stl.rvey Water-Resource:,:: lnvestiga!ion5 Report 02-4020, 
44 p. Kdlam, \1.F . and Gnrd-ay, LL, 1990. Hydrogeology of1he 
GulfTwngh ... A!)aladr!cn!a embayment area, Georgia: Georgia Geol~>gic $urv13Y BuJk!i:n 94, 74 p. Krmtse,ll.t.. .:md Randdph.. R.R, l989, Hydrology i)f the Floridan aquifer system in. sowhea.~t Georgia and adjacem pa:rt~ ofFlodda and S<>uth Carolina: li.S Geo1ngka1 Survey Profes::>ionu:l Paper !403-D, fS p. Kru:-;eman, G.P., und d.e Rittt.'r, KlL !994, i\nalysb and evaiuati<>1l nfpumpwg test data: Publication 47, Intema! io:na1 Institute For Lmd RetJa.matim1 and llrtpn.wement, The Nederland~., 377 p. Leeth, D.C., Falls, W.F., F.d<.vard....:;, LE., fredrkksen, N.O., and Fleming, R.F.. ! 996, Get)i!>gic, hydrGlogic, and water chen:li::Mry datu for a nmlti-aqu.ifer system il! Coastal Plai:n sedim.:.nts near Girard, Burke County, Georgia: Georgia Geologic Survey h1formati<:'m (\r<~ular !00, 26 p. Lev<::, G.W., 1966, Gmund Wtltcr in Duva! an.d N3$t<au C,>unlies, Florida: florida Geo!ogkal Survey Rep<m of lnves!:igat!o:ns nt~.43, 9l p. Leve, G. W., 198..1, Relati-!)nof.;mK:eakd fault.<> to water quality and the fom<atk-n of$Ohttion feamres in fueFh>nd.anaquifer, nnrtheao:;tem F1orkk Jou:mal of Hydrology, v, 61, no. 4, p. 251<~64. Logan, \V.R., am) Eukr, GJvt, 1989, Geologyandgn>\md--wa!er re!';ou:mes ofAUendak, Bamburg, and Barnwell Counties and purt of Aiken C!)urtty South Carolinw South Crrniina Wat~~r Resoulces Commis!Si0n Report Number l5 5. 113 p, 
 
Lohm~m. S.W., !972, Gwtmd-wa.ter hydr'<1ulks: U,S. Gwlngica! Sm-vey Pmfessk,na! Paper 7(m, 7{) p. 
l\Jasliu, fvLL., l987, Reghmal and local !en..or comp!>nen.ts t>f a fr.acturedcarbona!e ;~quifer: in Farmer, LW.., D.aeme:n, JJ.K.. Desai,C.S., Gla~:?<. C. E., und:f'.ktmHUL, SJ~., ed.~., :Proceecih:g& o:ft!m 2f(h US Syn1pos:imn on mck mechantcs, lh!iver'>iiy of Arizona, June 29--July L l9S7. p. 441-452. 
Masha, M.L, and Prowell, D.C., 1990. Efkct.:.; oi"fat!lb on f1uid ibw a11d chloride <:onlaminati<>n in a <:arb<mal<: aquifer syskm: .k>mnal ofHydmlogy, v. U 5, nos, 1-4. p. 149. 
M1ltthews, S.L, and KrauM:. R..E., 19M, Hydmgeologk datu fwm !ht~ U.S. Ge(;Jogical Sarvey test wells near Waycn)ss, \VaJe County, Georgia: lLS. Ge-0iogka1 St!rvey WaterReS~>tln;e~ fnw;)Stigati<ms Repor! S3A204, 29 p. 
McCo!l:um. M.L and Com~t&, H.R, 1964, Relation ofsa!H;,va.ter encroachmew to !he m~jor ~~ql<ifer >~mH%, Savannah area, Geerg:ia a11d South Carolina: U.S. Geologi<:al Survey WaterSupply Parwr 16! :t~D, 26 p, 
MeCcm:neJl,JB., andH>l.cke, CM., !993, Hydroge(!logy, water qu.ah!y, and water-res~>mces development potential of !he tipper Floridan aquifer in the Viklosta ana, si)utlH::cntral Georgia: U.S. Geological. Survey Water-H.esources rnve:->tigatiml$ Report 93-4044,. 44 p. 
Mcfadden, S,S., Hetrit:;k, tH., Kdla:n1, M.F,, RGlknb.ack S.A. and Huddld<lun, P.F., 1986, Gec~.)k>gic data of the Gulf Trough area, Gemgia: Genrgia Goologk Survey Information Cin;ular 56, 345 p. 
Meyer. F,W,, 1962, Renmnai.:!':o;ance {)f the geology and gnmnd~ water n<.~;ounx:$ of Co!umbia Coun!y, Flmida; Florida Gedogicai Survey Repmt of Investigations No. 30, 74 p. 
l'>Jeyer, F.W., 1974. Evaluation ofthe hydrad1<: dm:r;l.ck!'istics of a deep artesian aquifer from natural water-kvel flm)1uati0l!s, Miami, Florida: Florida Bureau i)f Geology Rep~ni of lnvestigati<.>.us 75, 32 p. 
JviiUer, .LA., 19:?,{~, Hydtogedog1<: framework Bfthe Floridan aquifer system m Fbrid.a and in pans of Georgia, Ah~ham.a, and South CamH:na: U 5. Ge~;!log;ical Survey Pmfessi<mal Paper 1403-B, 9! p. 
Milkr, J.A., Hughes, GJI., Hull, R.W., Ve.cchioli, John. and Seaber, P.R., ! 978-, Impact of phosphate n:umng on !he hydmiogy of(.)s,~~eola N>l.tional Fo:rc.:>1:, Ht}dda: U-3. Ge!:>log:!<:a} Survey Water-Resomws Inve:->tigati!>n,~ Report 786, 1S9 p, 
:r~1~.:~ore. Jerry, Benson, SJ\1, Snipes, D.S., Daggett, .k!}m, James, April. Kroening. David. Price, Sard.h, Prke, '</an, Jr., and Temples, Thonm..~, ! 993, Ch.ara<:terizahon d' aquifer properties in Coastat Plain sediments in H1.!rke C\mnty, Georgia: Southea,:;tern Sectiol1 Meeting Geologkal Sodety of Amenca, Man;h ~993, Abstracts with Program.~., v.25, no. 4., p. 5l( 
Neuman,$.?., and Withen;poon, P.A., 1969, Applit.abili!y 1A t.urrent thet)rie!S o:filo\v in }eaky :aqui:kr;;: WB:!er Resources Research. v. 5,nt~. 4,p. iH7-829. 
Newc<>me, Roy, Jr., !993, Pumping tesH of the Ct~asta1 Plain aq_uifCn< in South Carolina: South Camlina \Vater Res;.>uv.x~ c~rruni~%i!)tl RepGri 174, 52 p. 
 
 26 Hydraulic Property of the Floridan Aquifer System 
 
Newcome, Roy, Jr., 2000, Results of pumping tests in the Coastal Plain of South Carolina: South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Water-Resources Open-File Report 5, 26p. 
Odum, J.K., Stephenson, W.J., Williams, R.A., Pratt, T.L., Toth, T.J., and Spechler, R.M., 1999, Shallow highresolution seismic-reflection imaging of karst structures within the Floridan aquifer system, northeastern florida: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, v. 4, no. 4, p. 251-261. 
Phelps, G .G., and Spechler, R.M., 1997, The relation between hydrogeology and water quality of the Lower Floridan aquifer in Duval County, Florida, and implications for monitoring saline water movement: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4242,58 p. 
Price, Van, Jr., Fallaw, W.C., and McKinney, J.B., 1991, Geologic setting of the new production reactor reference site within the Savannah River Site (U): Aiken, S.C., Westinghouse Savannah River Company, report no. WRSC-RP-91-96--EHS..EM, 80 p. 
ProweH, D.C., 1985, Index of faults of Cretaceous and Cenozoic age in the eastern United States: U.S. Geologica! Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-1269. 
Randolph, R.B., Krause, R.E., and Maslia, M.L., 1985, Comparison of aquifer characteristics derived from local and regional aquifer tests: Ground Water, v. 23, no. 38, p. 309-316. 
Randolph, R.B., Pernik, Maribeth, and Garza, Reggina, 1991, Water-supply potential of the Fioridan aquifer system in the coastal area of Georgia-a digital model approach: Georgia Geologic Survey Bulletin 116, 30 p. 
Ransom, Camille, Ill, and White, JJ., 1999, Potentiometric 
surface of the Floridan aquifer system in southern South Carolina: South Carolina Dept. ofHealth and Environmental Control Bureau of Water Publication No. 02B-99, 1 sheeL Sever, C.W., 1969, Hydraulics of aquifers at Alapaha, Coolidge, Fitzgerald, Montezuma, and Thomasville, Georgia: Georgia Geologic Survey Information Circular 36, l6p. Sever, C.W., 1972, Ground-water resources and geology of Cook County, Georgia: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 40 p. Singh, U.P., Eichler, G.E., Sproul, C.R., and GarciaBengochea, J.I., 1983, Pump-testing the Boulder Zone, South Florida: American Society of Civil Engineering, Journal of the Hydraulics Division, v. 109, no. 8, p. 1152-1160. Smith, B.S., 1994, Saltwater movement in the Upper Floridan aquifer beneath Port Royal Sound, South Carolina; U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2421,40 p. Snipes, D.S., Benson, S.M., and Price, Van, Jr., l995a, Hydrologic properties ofaquifers in the central Savannah River area--Volume l: Clemson, S.C., Department of Geological Sciences, Clemson University, 353 p. 
 
Snipes, D.S., Benson, S.M., and Price, Van, Jr., 1995b, Hydrologic properties of aquifers in the central Savannah River area-Volume 2: Clemson, S.C., Department of Geological Sciences, Clemson University, 204 p. 
Spechler, R.M., 1994, Saltwater intrusion and quality of water in the Floridan aquifer system, Northeastern Florida: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 92.4174,76 p. 
Spechler, R.M., 2001, The relation between structure and saltwater intrusion in the Floridan aquifer system, northeastern Florida: in U.S. Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings, St. Petersburg, Florida, Feb. 1316, 2001, p. 25-29. 
Spechler, R.M., and Wilson, W.L., 1997, Stratigraphy and hydrogeology of a submarine collapse structure on the continental shelf, northeastern Florida: in Proceedings of Sixth Multidisciplinary Conference on Sinkholes, Springfield, Missouri, April6--9, 1997, p. 61-66. 
SzeH, G.P., 1993, Aquifer characteristics in the St. Johns River Water Management District, Florida: St Jor..ns River Water Management District Technical. Publication SJ93-1, 495 p. 
Theis, C.V., 1935, The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration ofdischarge of a well using groundwater storage: Transactions American Geophysical Union, v. 16, part 2, p. 519-524. 
Vincent, H.R., 1982, Geohydrology ofthe Jacksonian aquifer in central and east-central Georgia: Georgia Geologic Survey Hydrologic Atlas 8, 3 sheets. 
Wait, R.L., 1965, Geology and occurrence of fresh and brackish ground water in Glynn County, Georgia: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1613-E, 94 p. 
Wait, R.L., and Davis, M.E., 1986, Configuration and hydrology ofthe pre-Cretaceous rocks underlying the Southeastern Coastal Plain aquifer system: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 86-4010, 1 sheet, scale 1:2,000,000. 
Wait, R.L., and Gregg, D.O., 1973, Hydrology and chloride contamination of the principal artesian aquifer in Glynn County, Georgia: Georgia Department ofNatural Resources Hydrologic Report, 93 p. 
Warner, Debbie, and Aulenbach, B.T., 1999, Hydraulic characteristics of the Upper Floridan aquifer, Savannah and St Marys, Georgia: Georgia Geologic Survey Information Circular 105, 23 p. 
Warren, M.A., 1944, Artesian water in southeastern Georgia: Georgia Geologic Survey Bulletin No. 49, 140 p. 
Weems, R.E., and Edwards, L.E., 2001, Geology of Oligocene, Miocene, and younger deposits in the coastal area ofGeorgia: Georgia Geologic Survey Bulletin 131, 124 p. 
Whiting, N.M., and Park, A.D., 1990, Preliminary investigation ofwater-level declines in wells near Estill, Hampton County, South Carolina, Spring, 1990: South Carolina Water Resources Commission Report No. 3 7, 18 p. 
 
.-.-.-.........-...................._. ..............:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-... 
 
 APPENDIX A 
 
  Table A1. Transmissivi-ty and storage cootfidoot of the Vpper and Urwe.r Floridan aquifers and eqlJ1vatent clastic units. c<Jast;~! Georgia 
and adjacent parts ot Soutn Carolina and Florida [tl:, !(>P<~ ft'id. !iz;-~; squared JX<t ;hy: %, p;:;mmt; do., d~tl.(>; ft!J/fl., fr,ot'<hy/foot; ''. ;.k:gn~c>.: ', mi:mk~~; ", se<:<mds; SJWMD, ~k John:; Rivt.-r Wattr l\-1;mag~lrli~nt !:hstrid; S, storag;:;; T, lr-<ill$lY~i:~~.;ivhy; 
USGS. l.LS. Ge(>h)gka1 Su.rvey; SC1JNR, Sonth CavJHna Depanrw;:nt ;>f Natm-al f{es<l:m:~;, Stak: FL Fh}rid~s:. Gt\ Ge<.)rgb; SC, S;luth Clmh.na. lvh::th<)d: NL non!c:1ky w;JUifcr anB!y~;is; L, k>lky <:qnif<.<t artr>!ysis; SC, tmr..smi;;sidty bW><ld.Nl ~p.::dfk c;rpa.:i!y; SL, ~lraight Hne an!l!ytical solution; V, v~n >k:::: KMnp ana1y:>i~ of(i%ilb!ing How {Km;;emm; and(\;;) Iht;.<::r, l1N4}; {7), lHJ;JJyti"al 
nwthtv.J not dtecl. Hydrologic on.U: Ul\ Upper Ftoridl.ln <lql!iter:, LF, hw,w F!nridan <l.<jllH~or; UfJY, Upp<.'t and L<)w~r rtorkbn ;Jql:i!i;rs~ hydml<)gi~:: \.mit i?n:Jm<::d in ps:;.;>;:nth~~~ l(fdkm<::~ <1 (;lac;!~"' 
updip aquifi:.r o::-.quivabnt w ttm carbonat(~ Upper or l,.(,wer fbridan aquiters] 
 
~--~---~-~~~~-~-- 
 
....,----~~--'"~------- 
Below ~nd $Urlsce 
 
---'--~---~~-"'"' 
 
State County 
 
Y/QH iclmitlf!er 
 
Other identifier 
 
~-~--~--~-~--- 
 
Fl.. 
 
B~>hx 
 
Wdil 
 
IW!;;~I C<.>m1!ji 
 
Ent-.:xpnse Eas! 
 
latitude 
 
"Top of longitude open 
in~arval 
 
6-otlam 
a10JMn !nter\1<3! 
 
Tt>SM 
mi$slvlty {ft2Jcl} 
 
Storag~ 
coefnc!em 
 
{ft) 
 
(ftJ 
 
4Hl} o.n4 ----------~-~~--- 
 
31Y!T5Y ll2"(>5'!W 
 
6~{} 
 
! 5 ,tR.'l') 
 
Me1hoo 
 
Refute-nee 
 
Hy~ro!ogN:: 
unit 
 
twtrulf~$ 
 
.... ...___ -~--"~--~--'~- 
 
,--~, 
 
NL P. Pr('s!cy, 
':)JWMI.\ wr:i"i.ti.'U 
 
Uf 
 
s" S "' ().flS .if fC<'\lV<~lV diltl <_.;;;;::<L 
T .,. 14,0.:.)0 H2id, 0/ll ihr 
 
C(.)((tffit..:..n,~ l.UH2 
 
obs<:~v:lti;m wdl 
 
<l<.>. 
 
C!.1lwribi;s J{) ll i)j:(iji:( !..ai-:<:Chy WeH 
 
.10'' ll'l I)" 
 
.;."'. R-'->~.-,."-'>"~1('1.:;,~ 
 
!57 
 
'N~~. 1 
 
2!5 3i>. UOO 
 
.ntm~ 
 
L 
 
Mey<:r (l%~~) 
 
df!. 
 
A!sn c:kd in i:ln~h :md J;_>hni:<>)tl 
 
{19%) 
 
di.>. 
 
i.kl. 
 
J\)!'{.1!-0tl 
 
ONF#2. 
 
l'1midan 
 
30"19'J4" ~2"35'\W 
 
!60 
 
262 :H,OOO 
 
;k Duval 
 
D-!00: (>JOtl 
 
302!\lT' S!"4i'W'" 
 
Uti:'< 
 
4,()0\) 
 
.f!f.~}:)7 
 
do Mi1 kt <md ,-,:h;.<ts 
(:1~::>7&} 
~c Phelps and Sp;e<:h!~ (19'!7 l 
 
d<) 
 
PELF" 
 
T ;,f4,5i)i> !'!:2/d \1-'l-s<m pmr1~d 
at 3 1:)w~~r ~a!).: 
 
dt>. 
 
dn. 
 
J)<>:~A: (>J(I.'} 
 
3H0 2.t '2:~ Bi.''4J'"i(j"' 
 
!3.>6 
 
15,(J(Jij 
 
di.> 
 
d<). 
 
rl<.> 
 
do. 
 
df:~. 
 
D-226; OtW)J 
 
-~<~<-25'27~ 8l"Yl'37"' 
 
!.296 fG.OOO 
 
~]J) 
 
do. 
 
dn 
 
&.r. 
 
;h. 
 
do. 
 
d::>. 
 
d:..~. 
 
de. 
 
i>-1:Jt!;Otllil 
 
30~'25;31 1( 
 
fH~39<25(o 
 
Ull 27,000 
 
D22D;H7N 3fY' ~~?37" 8!'"4?'!4" 
 
553 
 
!,:wn ::w,onn 
 
!),5}/<.; )(11}3 
 
3!i0 !8'4()'" 3.l''"~19lJ_~~i' 
 
UM, 
 
5,i:ti.i{l 
 
d<), 
 
do, 
 
>k. 
 
J)i 
 
d.;'J 
 
dn. 
 
d<.). 
 
T (<f24,fJOi.l wh<'U n\'d pump<xl 
 
:l! n $ lighlly higher l'"a<x l.>ut f!lr 
 
a i:!v~ner time p;;:r_i.<.xl 
 
de. 
 
T m''il" <)f 1;,s,nno k< J9,GGfl n1:d; 
 
Yillu~ p!t~;;entd is ihnl d:<il.lincd 
 
l\lr tJ;_,, :onw:s! r<umping p<:.rbi 
 
do, 
 
T r:JJs.g.e nf 4.2Jlli v.~ 5. ann l~"'<k 
 
value pr<::><'!lh':d is fuM nbi.sincd 
 
hm k>nge:<l f".!tl<pi.,-,_g pcri<.<il 
 
do. 
 
do 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
dn. 
 
d::>. 
 
do. 
 
D-l6il:<'i3()2 
u-2@; znn:l 
 
t2 _;.o-~:21' ~ 30~2 l'221) 
 
(J.J"4!'(}()x 
~H~4f2z)= 
 
U2\l 1,362 
 
2Ji)(l I4.iKK! 
 
!J-lf<l; l}}Ol 
 
3i!"2l''Yf" ~!!'"4! '23'' 
 
!J{)i;} 
 
21,000 
 
570f> 
 
!fi:<:rw<.><.>d .~ 
 
JiY{ l4<33~ 
 
~1~'32('26') 
 
5!9 
 
970 2G,Ol/l 
 
.ili.lti 
 
:ln. 
 
df,_ 
 
do 
 
d,~<. 
 
<i<), 
 
d~). 
 
SL 
 
P. F'"fe~~!ey, 
 
SJWMD. written 
 
wmmun., 2(liJ?: 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
f ;<!' l2,()0i.l 1/;;J whn< pumpd 
 
'~~ :< hi>?h<'lr-"t"' but l'.lr ~ :;h('!icr 
 
time rv:;ti<.xl 
 
d::>, 
 
i 
 
!.'F 
 
S :-/~1.}ne f~om (fh~~::p;ati(>H w.._~_u 
 
(T "'25JJOU f/:J in 
 
~ 
~ 
 
GbS<':'.vMion well) 
 
> 
 
!t 
 
 Table A-1. Transmissivity and storage coefficient of the Upper and lower Floridan aquifers and equivalent clastic units, coastal Georgia 
 
and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida--Continued 
 
[ft, 
 
foot; 
 
ft2/d, 
 
feet 
 
squared 
 
per 
 
day;%, 
 
percent; 
 
do., 
 
ditto; 
 
ft!d/ft, 
 
foot/day/foot; 
 
0 , 
 
degrees;', 
 
minutes; 
 
, 
 
seconds; 
 
SJWMD, 
 
St. 
 
Johns 
 
River 
 
Water 
 
Management 
 
District; 
 
S, 
 
storage; 
 
T, 
 
transmissivity; 
 
USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; SCDNR, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. State: FL, Florida; GA, Georgia; SC, South Carolina. Method: NL, nonlcaky aquifer analysis; L, leaky 
 
aquifer analysis; SC, transmissivity based on specific capacity; SL, straight line analytical solution; V, van der Kamp analysis of oscillating flow (Kruscman and de Ritter, 1994); (?),analytical 
 
method not cited. Hydrologic unit: UF, Upper Floridan aquifer; LF, LO\"CI' Floridan aquifer; UF,LF, Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers; hydrologic unit enclosed in parentheses indicates a clastic 
 
updip aquifer equivalent to the carbonate Upper or Lower Floridan aquifers] 
 
State County 
~----------------- 
FL Duval 
 
Well identifier 
 
Other Identifier 
 
--------- 
 
5901 
 
Ridenour 
 
--------~------- 
Latitude 
 
-------------------- 
 
Below land surface 
 
Top of 
 
----- 
Bottom 
 
Trans 
 
longitude open of open mlssivl1y 
 
Interval Interval {ft21d) 
 
----------~---- 
30"19'40" 81"29'30" 
 
{ft) 
 
(ft} 
 
----------.-----... 
 
430 
 
900 
 
21,000 
 
~'--~--- 
 
Storage coefficient 
 
Method 
 
Reference 
 
------- 
0.0003 
 
._._ _______________ 
SL P, Presley, 
SJWMD, written commun., 2002 
 
-------------~- 
 
----------~----~----.- 
 
Hydrologic unit 
 
Remarks 
 
------"' 
 
---------~---------- 
 
UF T from recovery analysis, S from 
 
observation well; leaky aquifer 
 
analysis at observation well yields T of24,000 t\2/d and 
 
Sof0.0003 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
5903 
 
Ridenour 
 
30"19'34" 8!"29'25" 425 
 
920 18,000 
 
.0003 
 
do. 
 
do, 
 
do . T from drawdown analysis at pumping well, S from observation well; leaky aquifer analysis yields T of 17,000 Wid 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Duvall 
 
D-650; 5304 3017'25# 81"30'50" 461 
 
1,276 50,000 
 
sc Phelps and 
Spechler ( 1997) 
 
UF,LF0 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Duval!O D857; 5403 
 
3020'05" 81"35'45" 
 
569 
 
1,104 
 
7,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
T of !0,000 ft2/d when pumped at 
 
a lower rate 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Duvall! D-479; 5402 
 
3020'07" 81"35'32" 
 
606 
 
1,350 50,000 
 
do. 
 
do, 
 
do, 
 
T range of27,000 to 61,000 ft2/d; 
 
value presented is that obtained 
 
from the longest pumping period 
 
(11) 
0 
=";!. 
;!!.. 
l 
'Cm 
i 
-a. 
::11' CD 
:!J 
C3 
S: 
=Ill 
> 
=.c0; 
.C.l.l 
(I) 
1 a 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Duvall2 D-673; 5404 .J0020'13" 81 "35'38" 578 
 
814 190,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Uf 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Duva113 
 
D-1323 
 
3020'45" 81 "32'31" 
 
580 
 
1,170 40,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Duvall4 D-46A;0305 30"21'30" 81"41'18" 530 
 
1,280 
 
9,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Uf,Lf'! 3 values presented ranging from 
 
21,000 to 170,000 W/d; 
 
intetmediate value presented 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
T of 13,000 ft2/d when pumped at 
 
a lower rate for a (slightly) 
 
longer time period 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Duvall5 D-227;0604 30"25'14" 8139'37" 
 
570 
 
1,257 34,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Ouvall6 D-329; 0602 
 
30"25'38" 81 39'25" 
 
545 
 
1,210 24,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
T of 21 ,000 ft2/d when pumped 
 
for a shorter duration at a 
 
slightly lower pumping rate 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Duval2 D-3825; 5305 30"17'43" 81"30'35" 440 
 
l,o93 84,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
 Tabl$ A1. TransmissiVity and stoMge co~ttldent ofth~ Upper anti Low~r f!orid<m <lqui!Ms and eq!li\lalen! dalOctic units, wat!af Geort.~ia 
 
and adjacent parts of South Carolina and F!or!da-Con!inued {H, toot; ff/<1, teet iltJll<l1W }X~f day;<}~, p(~rcent; <h, ditt<.); ft/dift. fnot!dayif<)Ht; '", d~gre~s; ', minuks; '', sec<mds: SJWMD, St- J<)lms Riwf Wat~'l Man;;gcm<::nt DistrictS, ;;!<>t:lg<:; T, transrr!issivity; 
 
USGS, U.S. Gm.!ogka! Stirvey; SCUNR, So\~th Carolina Departraent of Narum! Resources. State: FL, Florida; GA, Ge:.xgia; SC, South C1rohw;. ~<kt!Hxl: NL, m>nl~aky aquif.:r amly~.is; L. leaky 
 
aquifi::r analysls, SC, tramanissivi;y ba;;;;.'ll <m ~pcdfk (:armdty; SL, straight liM ana!ytk\11 :oluth:m: V, vt:n de Kmnp ar.a!y~:k of osdilating thw (Kn.!~<:tmm and d~ RiHcr, l W4l., ('?). >lna\ytitill 
 
m<cihod not cik'd. Hydrologic unit: UF, Up}X'r fbtidan <H~~tilh; LF, L<)W{~f Fls>d<lan aquif(~r~ J.lFJ.F. Lp~wr and LoW(..'"!' Fkidan aquifers~ hydmh>gi(: mrit endm~d in par<:.nth<ses indi.:a:e" :l d<;.>;;)c 
 
___________ apdip a<!<Jll>;;r equivalent 1o the <:atlxmili.e Up1x~r <Jf Lowcr Floridan aquiiersl 
 
-------------------.............. 
 
........-.....................................................,, 
 
~, .............................. 
 
Se<lt;.lW l~n{j ~Urf'-'c~ 
 
--~~--~----~~~- 
 
State Courdy 
 
W~ll 
!clernif!er 
 
O!h~r 
Identifier 
 
Lalliude 
 
-~--~--- .............~-------~ 
TQPof S<tttom Trams LMg!tude open of open mlsei\41y 
lnwrv&! !mer\1"81 (ft2fd} 
 
S!orJSge 
~()~fflciel'H 
 
Method 
 
RJefert!n<:n 
 
Hydro!ogh; <.mit 
 
Remarks 
 
FL Duvl.ll 
 
-------~--............................ 
 
fA:ssJ 3 
 
D- 213; .~J<.l l 
 
3()'' 11'4-3  fn'\~li'J9" 
 
{ff) 420 
 
(ft} U2S 
 
J9.0()(1 
 
.................................... 
sc Phdp~; and 
Spt'<:hks (.!997) 
 
.. .... ~ .......................... -.--~---- 
 
t.:F,LF'' 
 
Based <>...., 4 h<!'.<l"" p<lmping; r (<f JtJ,()IX! f1:2id wlwn i>umr<>~:l 
 
for O.S hm.H.'S, :Ji. 3 high"r 
 
p<.Jm!>ing 1ate 
 
ik:<. 
 
do. 
 
0UV>ll4 
 
D-649. 52fJJ 
 
30~1'1'52" 
 
~i\).36'0ri' 
 
5:>4 
 
l,l)()5 
 
l4,llOU 
 
(h 
 
de. 
 
!)uvl.ll5 
 
tl665; ~W.> 
 
Jfr'l7'5R" ~!1"30'}<}'' 
 
4!7 
 
1,!~5 
 
.2,0()() 
 
;J.-:. 
 
d<.'. 
 
d:.<. 
 
d:). 
 
dn. 
 
d~~. 
 
ds:.. 
 
dn. 
 
r><.w~J 6 
 
D--198: 50(!1 
 
30-,la''N" 1>1''39'?.!'' 
 
5~1. 
 
; ..:::f)7 }0.<Yl0 
 
:lH. 
 
d:). 
 
D<.J.v3l. 'l 
 
~)..20M; .55U1 
 
3ti0 l 8'40'' ~! 0 }S'Yl" 
 
,f!'? 
 
~.~!52 
 
l4JKtl 
 
;J,;, 
 
do. 
 
DuYa! S 
 
0.-2@5: 150! 
 
:}()").!>'4/i'' ~!"39'()3" 
 
321 
 
!,17<} 
 
L{~~i)(K} 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Duval '1 
 
D-113: 0?\H 
 
.'Ji.l"l9':l.iJ'' S1=-47~}6x 
 
553 
 
l/00 w.nno 
 
d<~. 
 
rh 
 
blstWdl. JEA Bnmdy 
 
;)00 !9'21" B;.~s6!4r' 
 
5.)6 
 
Btr>n~h 
 
SJ1 ! 5,0ti{) 
 
do. 
 
de). 
 
do. 
 
d(>. 
 
sc 
 
&,. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
NL 
 
.P. P.rf:::;l:::-_:~, 
 
SJWMD, written 
 
-:.x,..rnrfRff} ... /.He:.: 
 
(!J.) 
 
d<.). 
 
T or l:\f.!UO tt"-'d repm1d wh<'r: 
 
pumpt.>.l "' ;~ lower s;;.<.t.' 
 
., 
 
dn. 
 
1 nf 2 <. pon fi.':'d. .<~'P''ned wl1o::'J) 
 
_ptunpcd st '' ls;w~s mt<': 
 
de. 
 
UF 
 
T fr<.>m <>bservstirm wd.l (m:. ; 
 
given ll:>t- pn~d<l>;tbn well)-; 
 
;>.<.X~nnd (>h~.<~rl!ati<.>.:< wd! vidd~d 
 
aT of l&j.)(){) !f;d 
 
~ 
 
do-. 
 
do. 
 
MSO! Cummunity BaH 3WIY>'02  ~ l "1ii'fJ4'' 
 
46{1 
 
6.24 
 
9,i.HO 
 
i.Uln 
 
r-.il..: ''} 
 
dn. 
 
<.b 
 
T ?<. S vahJ~':$ hern :,:h~..f:t~~st~o.n 
 
wel1 {M 5{!3 }: kw T <'il..lm 
 
"'n'~"'s pal'tiill penctratiHn d 
 
the Vpp::r Fhx.idz.:.< U)<<ifer 
 
d(>, 
 
d\). 
 
M%2 
 
d!l. 
 
W''ll!l'S':l" ii!'':"l.Wf!S" 
 
46() 
 
%0 !1,(}00 
 
.002 
 
Nl 
 
(~). 
 
<io 
 
T &. ~;; li>:-:m <)OO<'tV>lHon wd1; no . 
 
T pn>'v<dv.l f<:>f pumr>iHJ~ <wl.L 
 
~ln~l~y:;i& tnetho:d ~~.hed ;~:;: . \: arve 
 
mllkhing" 
 
do. 
 
di>. 
 
MW.> 
 
di>. 
 
0!-iYO~'@" 8!''3/i'tlT' 
 
4.57 
 
{)25 
 
~~G(;/.tflii 
 
.iJ(J()i/! 
 
SL 
 
d;;. 
 
UF.!. F'' T &. S Y<<!uc~ <>Hai.ncd limn 
 
~ 
 
<>l>servstlN1 wd! (M304}; 
 
"g 
 
ml<h!i<.>;o;.! nh~~n-;<tiafi Vtdi 
yi,ild~ smaU;,;r T (67,01.'W Jl:dl 
 
ax 
 
df~. 
 
do. 
 
M5n5 
 
c.~). 
 
:>WH9'\W a1''?<!l'4l " 
 
41!2 
 
uoo 
 
jt),()()(l 
 
JJ("-)15 
 
do. 
 
d(>, 
 
d<.). 
 
l &. S flmn observatb!! wdl; 
 
> 
 
Y .. 7.4..(JOU r:<:<'l & S ''"' OJ><XKU:l 
 
w;ing Tb~i> am:~y;:i~. & r .. 
 
.t..:..<, 
 
s 25,1/f><) 11:':'::1 & ,~ i)(>::l("!()2 
 
""'mg H>lm.ush ;millyc;l:; 
 
 Table A~1. Transmissivity and storage coefficient of the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers and equivalent clastic units, coastal Georgia 
 
w 
 
and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florlda........Continued 
 
N 
 
[ft, 
 
foot; 
 
ft2/d, 
 
feet 
 
squared 
 
per 
 
day;%, 
 
percent; 
 
do., 
 
ditto; 
 
ft/d/ft, 
 
foot/day/foot; 
 
0 , 
 
degrees;', 
 
minutes; 
 
, 
 
seconds; 
 
SJWMD, 
 
St. 
 
Johns 
 
River 
 
Water 
 
Management 
 
District; 
 
S, 
 
storage; 
 
T, 
 
transmissivity; 
 
USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; SCDNR, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. State: FL, Florida; GA, Georgia; SC, South Carolina. Method: NL, nonleaky aquifer analysis; L, leaky 
 
< = 
 
aquifer analysis; SC, transmissivity based on specific capacity; SL, straight line analytical solution; V, van der Kamp analysis of oscillating flow (Krusernan and de Ritter, l994); (?), analytical method not cited. Hydrologic unit: UF, Upper Floridan aquifer; LF, Lower Floridan aquifer; UF,LF, Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers; hydrologic unit endose'-<1 in parentheses indicates a clastic 
 
;G=.. 
 
updip aquifer equivalent to the carbonate Upper or Lower Floridan aquifers] 
 
ir 
 
-----~- 
State County 
---------FL Duval 
 
---~ 
 
---- 
 
----- 
 
------- 
 
----------------- 
 
-------- 
 
--------- 
 
-..-------------- 
 
------- "0" 
 
Well identifier 
 
Other Identifier 
 
Latitude 
 
Below land surface 
 
Top of 
 
------ 
Bottom 
 
Trans 
 
Longitude open of open mlsslvlty 
 
Interval interval (tr/d) 
 
Storage coefficient 
 
Method 
 
Reference 
 
Hydrologic unit 
 
Remarks 
 
a."tetoS 
=!. 
 
MR-2 
 
____ ..... ---~-----_ 
JEA Monument 
 
__________.. 3020'32" 8! 0 32'09" 
 
(ft) - (ft) 
 
565 
 
807 
 
'"'------------ 
 
15,000 
 
0.0005 
 
--~-------- 
NL P. Presley, 
 
UF------------r--f--r-om 
 
re<:overy 
 
s ..... -------~- 
analysis, from 
 
f 
"0 " 
 
Road 
 
SJWMD, written 
 
observation well; additional 
 
m:::~.. 
 
commun., 2002 
 
observation well yields T = 
24,000 rtlrd & s = 0.0005 using 
leaky aquifer analytical solution 
 
i=Cll 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
PW-1 Anheuser-Busch 3026'09" 8138'4~" 
 
600 
 
908 9,400 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
...f T'" 8,300 ft2/d for recovery well, 
 
using leaky aquifer solution. T for production wdt is recovery T, dmwdown T~9.200 ft2/d using Theim method 
 
~ 
I 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
PW-2 
 
Bacardi 
 
3027'42" 81"38'35" 
 
620 
 
1,100 ll,OOO 
 
.02 
 
do. 
 
Beverages 
 
do. 
 
UF,LFa T ""8,400 ft2/d if recovery data 
 
utilized; S obtained from obser 
 
vation well (PW-l; T also of 
 
11,000 rtl!d). Leaky aquifer 
 
solution yields very high T value at observation well (!56,000 fl2/d) 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Well15 Jacksonville 3017'26" 81 23'59" 400 
 
900 20,000 
 
.001 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Beach 
 
UF T from recovery analysis at pumping wdl, S fium observation well, which also yielded aT of 32,000 ft2/d 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Well2 JEA San Pablo 3016'49" 8! 0 25'49" 
 
347 
 
835 20,000 
 
.0003 
 
NL(?) 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Drawdown & recovery T from 
 
pumping well close; Tat 
 
observation well 22,000 ftlld; 
 
method cited as "curve 
 
matching" 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Well2 JEA Brierwood 30"15'08" 8136'42" 
 
514 
 
950 13,000 
 
.002 
 
SL 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
S value from observation well 
 
(T ~ 14,000 ft2/d at observation 
 
well). 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Well3 
 
do. 
 
30"15'14" 8! "36'49" 
 
514 
 
1,100 22,000 
 
.0005 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Uf,LF" T'" 15000 if recovery analysis 
 
utilized; S from observation well 
 
(T"' 18,000 ft21d) 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
We11580l JEA Southeast 3015'41" 8127'13" 353 
 
875 26,000 
 
.0005 
 
L 
 
do. 
 
Regional 
 
UF T & S values from observation 
well 
 
 Table JVt Transmissivity and stcraw,;l coeffiCient o1 ~he Upper and Lower Floridan aqu~fe:rs and equiva!~nt dastlc units, coasta! Georg~~t 
and adja>~eni parts of So!..rth C<3J:>Hna and FJurida--Contim;1;:d [ft. f~Xll; ft 2!;i, k'et squaredpt~day; %, pt::rcem; do., ditto~ ftiJ!ft, fimt!d;ryifont; c, degrees;'. minutt:&; ",~~~-~on&>; SJV/r>..1D, St. Johns Riwr Wm~~r M:mag<:'!lKHi D!Arkt S. ;;!m-:;gc; T, ii"ansmi.~sivily; USGS. U.S. Gt:nh:sgi(~a! Survey; SCDNlt S0uth Ctm:>llna De;:mli:mcr:.t nfNatuml R{~sotir<:~s Stak~: FL Fkll'ida; GA, Gc;xgia; SC, Smtth Car<:>tina. Mdhml: NL. 1wnkuky :Kltdt:r ana!y:;,i;.;; L, kd;y Jquifet analysis; SC, ;.ransmi~;sivity hasecl on ;;pedlic <:apady; SL, :.;tra!ght line ~malytical sG!utk~n; V, van ~kr Kamp aml\Si:> <::fN;dHatir:.g !1ow tKruscrmm (Jtld de R!H{:t. l9~H}; ('!}., analy;i<:a! nw!.lK~l no! <:i;ed. Hydw!ogk unit: UF, Up}X-r F!<,)tidun <l!Hifer; LF, Lower Fkwidan aq;der; UF . LF, Upf->0! and L<riN<:.r F!orid:ln aquilC{;.;; hydrologic unit ~nclnsed in p<;r:::H\hl:':'.::~. indk::::t<:.~: a :.:k:$tk 
 
qxiip aquif~r C(JlJtvHkm tn tht: <.<nhmat~ Upper or Low~~r rloridafl aquilh"] 
 
 - - -   ..--- 
 
-------------- ----------................ 
 
.....................................................--~------- ..................................~~--- 
 
Below !~nd $umc~ 
 
Stilte co~mty 
 
Wei! 
!~ntifier 
 
Other 
~dootifl~r 
 
Top o~ Bottom Lat!tltde Longitude open atopen 
 
____ ---------------- ................................. 
 
mlervai interval 
 
(ft} 
 
(ft) 
 
................~-- 
 
FL 
 
l)':.lV;'ij 
 
\lieU A 
 
Gilt<:' M~rii.irm~ 
 
30''.:W.Jl" 1ll'<H'27" 
 
457 
 
l,l 'ff 
 
Tnms 
MI$Siv!ty {~Jcl) 
 
Stora~ 
co&ffldent 
 
Me!hod 
 
R~fere-nee- 
 
lHJ,UOO 
 
,-,-,-.-.-..o..-----~ 
 
(1.()2 
 
L 
 
V Fn~sley, 
SJWMD, "'>"'itk~n 
C<)nl!!lUn.- !(1()2 
 
Hydrologic unit 
 
R~mt~tk$ 
 
.,._. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 
ur.!.. f' T & S h<.>m nh~<~v,t!"i::<n wd!; 
;ldditiN1a1 h:;<:f;;;;_inn -wd l 
yJdd;, T of 65/KKi 1fi::l rmd 
S l'f () i_iiXH ~~) 
 
dn. 
 
do 
 
Wd! D!O! JEA Sh~i:fidd 
 
~~1)02S'04" 8!"34'22'" 
 
500 
 
75U 26/100 
 
.OOl 
 
dt>. 
 
\'1l!age 
 
do. 
 
d<) 
 
WeUH 
 
Gat<: M'lritim~~ 
 
311"24'34" !l.l'"~H'3Y" 
 
4SO 
 
l.04i?. 24,000 
 
.oo;:)4 
 
SL 
 
d<<. 
 
!.f{' 
 
T N(. S fron: ~:(h?~f.:r-vadrm wen 
 
;k, . 
 
t.ll',Lf" S v,,]!l<;; fr;,m l>bt>:tv~ttif>n wdl 
 
s {ali:o <.>!' (l. ()(J4 ;li. acditi;;mJ 
 
<ib:<erv:::ion well}; T';~ lkm 
 
'.)h;<:rv;<,\it)ll ;>.dl;; of 62.iXW ft?i:J 
 
a<t<! 1oJ)r< a\:i 
 
do. 
 
~J.o 
 
W~-st Wdl JEA l3!;;.ndy 
 
~>U'' l9'2(i" !$!"56'44'" 
 
533 
 
~ ,265 75JXI\l 
 
l.kr.:.h 
 
<.k>. Hunilwn IJU4:l600?s PCS f'rP.<:<. Swit1 JtP2 rf)~.f:( S/.''51.'5!" 
 
,~. 
~ .t j 
 
Cre-r:k Ch~~m. 
 
i:<Zl) H'U/l(li) 
 
&.l. Nas:sms .BDN20 
 
Vnmmv."i 
 
3WY;>\~9'' tWJl'Zi/' 
 
;.)hserv3tk>n wdl I!! 
 
Na;;:;mu (\mnly 
 
567 l7H. Offll 
 
<k'. 
 
;J;;. 
 
N;:;;;s:m I Fn-.d!P2timl wen 3(J>J<tJY' ~1"/.i:<':-rf" 
 
50 
 
~ .(YiH 
 
)(},{)(}{} 
 
.W39J5Gill.2-S37f!l 
 
.!)fll 
002 
i}i}(l~~ 
 
SLC'l 
 
).;_(} 
 
do 
 
Nu aualytko;;.l m;,t{w;J ::ited 
 
Nl. Ceryak :me otb<.-::-.o, 
 
ur 
 
(!9iU} 
 
<..lf}. W:ml<;;;a<::.d 
 
~.kr 
 
At,b::badl i l'i99) 
 
SL S:edl i !9'iJ). ,,,~,, 
P. l\-,sley, wr(U>:u 
'~t~rnnmn.., .tOD2 
 
<h 
 
Oh~<~-vat:cm wd! li.<r :lqt:il~~ h~t; 
 
additinnal f.;h:<etc<ttkn ~vcH 
 
y.:e.lds T " Jl ,(~)H H1.:<! & 
 
S ~ U.Unt14 
 
;);) 
 
do. 
 
'{0-l 
 
JEA 'l'ub: 
R;~gimlill 
 
JtPTr2.2:' ?sl"~~l'(ll ,. 
 
4</0 
 
<).(P:) 
 
17.00() 
 
.{(fi}J 
 
NL F p,,,siey. 
SJRWMD, wd!len <:mnm1m . 
 
<b . 
 
T lh>m rc<.'cvery ;mil!yt;i;: at 
 
p\:r~lpi_:~g we!L ~ ii ;.>m 
 
~hfrc::-vad;.J:n v..-~;;f! {leaky c:quH~-::r 
 
2fli)/. 
 
;m;l!Vt>i::, whkh vidd& a T cf 
<<?J;nr; n2.:(k , 
 
~ 
'i 
 
:z 
 
x~  
 
> 
 
w 
~ 
 
 Table A-1. Transmissivity and storage coefficient of the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers and equivalent clastic units, coastal Georgia 
 
(>) 
 
and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida-continued 
 
J;o 
 
[ft, foot; ft2/d, feet squared per day;%, percent; do., ditto; ft!dlft, foot/day/foot; 0 , degrees;', minutes;", seconds; SJWMD, St. Johns River Water Management District; S, storage; T, transmissivity; 
 
USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; SCDNR. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. State: FL, Florida; GA, Georgia; SC, South Carolina. Method: NL, nonleaky aquifer analysis; L, leaky <::1: 
 
aquifer analysis; SC, transmissivity based on specific capacity; SL, straight line analytical solution; V, van dcr Kamp analysis of oscillating flow (Kruseman and de Ritter, 1994); (?), analytical method not cited. Hydrologic unit: UF, Upper Floridan aquifer; LF, Lower Floridan aquifer; UF,LF, Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers; hydrologic unit enclosed in parentheses indicates a clastic updip aquifer equivalent to the carbonate Upper or Lower Floridan aquifers] 
 
a;t:l. 
c:r 
 
State County 
 
Well Identifier 
 
GA Appling 27NOOI 
 
... --.-------- 
 
Other 
Identifier 
 
latitude 
 
.......... ....... ,.., 
 
~----------~----- 
 
Baxley, Ga. 
 
3146'03" 
 
__---------~---------- 
Below...,.l_a___n_"'d"'__s__u__r_f_a__c__e__ 
 
--------- 
 
Longitude 
 
Top of open interval 
 
Bottom of open Interval 
 
Transmisslvlty Storage 
(tr/d) coefficient 
 
Method 
 
(ft) 
 
82"21'03" 
 
500 
 
(ft) 
 
... --...~~-~----~ ----~------------------------------------- 
 
764 25,000 
 
sc 
 
Reference Kellam and 
 
--------~-------------------- 
 
Hydrologic unit 
 
Remarks 
 
------------------------------- 
tJF 
 
a"0 
--- 
'aI.. 
=.a,., 
:r 
CD "'1'1 
Q 
 
Gorday (1990) 
 
t 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
27NOOJ City of Baxley 3146'41" 8221'04" 
 
564 
 
849 23,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
:g::11 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
27N004 Filtered Rosin 31"46'12" 8219'54" 
 
525 
 
625 
 
8,700 
 
Product Company 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
=~.... 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
27P00l Georgia Power# I 3153'54" 8221'30" 
 
455 
 
27P002 Georgia Power 3155'44" 8220'32" 
 
49{) 
 
680 48,000 711 30,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
fn 
! 
 
Company, Hatch, 2 
 
!! 
 
do. 
 
Bacon 
 
26LOOI 
 
City of Alma 3132'32" 82"28'00" 
 
363 
 
626 72,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
26L004 
 
Alma,Ga.,3 
 
3132'39" 8229'03" 
 
501 
 
840 21,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. Ben Hill l9MOOI 
 
City of 
 
3!0 42'56" 8315'41" 
 
283 
 
Fitzgt:iald D 
 
612 20,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
20M002 
 
City of 
 
3143'00" 8314'43" 
 
260 
 
825 16,000 
 
0.003 
 
NL Sever (1969) 
 
do. 
 
Fitzgerald D 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
20M003 
 
City of 
 
3! 043'03" 8314'42" 
 
260 
 
Fitzgerald D C 
 
750 !3,000 
 
sc Kellam and 
 
do. 
 
Gorday (1990) 
 
do. Berrien 
 
19H026 City of Naslwil!e 31"12'26" 8315'20" 
 
265 
 
#2 
 
450 360,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
!9K005 City of Enigma 3127'14" 8320'23" 
 
386 
 
620 
 
1,700 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
200009 City of Ray City 3104'22" 83"11'46" 
 
200 
 
350 360,000 
 
#I 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
20H003 City ofNashville 3112'34" 8313'52" 
 
283 
 
#4 
 
485 360,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
20K002 City of Alapaha 3122'56" 83"13'13" 
 
368 
 
do. Bleddey 19T006 Cochran 2 (new) 3222'07" 8320'24" 220 
 
550 32,000 417 !5,000 
 
SL Sever(i969) 
sc Brook$ and others 
(1985} 
 
do. 
 
T calculated from recovery 
 
analysis 
 
(LF) 
 
Screcn intervals 220 ~235 
 
(Jacksonian aquifer), 345-370, 
 
380-385,395400 (Gordon 
 
aquifer) 
 
 Table A-1. Tmnsmlsshrity aM storage coefficient of the Vpper >3!nd Lower F!o.idan aquifers >;ind equivalent c!a~;;tic units, C~;!<.):i';!a! Georgia 
 
and adjact:.lnt p.:trts of Soutn Carolina and F!orida-Dontinued 
[ft, ti:>Ot; H1,\t teet :;quar~d ptc'rdiw; %, perGent >lo,, ;litH>; fl:iuin, H)otAl3y/fo0t; '', <k~gn~~$; ',minute~.;'', S~iX>rHh; S.!V.'M!\ St. Johnc; Rivet W<:tk\l' Munagenw1:1 Distri;;;; \ o;l<>;<::ge; T. ;ran;;mi:<sivity: 
 
USGS, t).$, <ko!ogkd Survey:. SCONR, Snuth (\!rr>lirw DermrtmetH ofNamml Resources. StMe. FL, Flnrid>l~ GA, Ge<flgia; SC Si>t~th Car<:>! ina. Method.: NL. nnnkaky ~qui fer armlysh; L knky 
 
aq>lifer !lnaly,;i~;; SC, tmnsmis;;ivity ba~ed on s1wr:it1e .;~apB.dty; SL, stc>igh !inc analyti;:;a! :;o)mi<m~ V, van der Kump analys)s d. oseillatng How (Kn.l~enia.n :~nd d::l R!Her, I99'J.); (?), an:lly!ka! 
 
mf.!hod not dted. Hydtn!ogk uni!: Ul\ Upp<~r Fl<!ndan :~ql<i:k:r; Lf, {A)Wef f\oris.ian iH,J~ti!'<ct; UF,LF, Upper and l..::w<cr F1or~d;m aquifer;;: hydrobgk unit en~:is>~cd in ra:emhci:Ci: indk;Ji:('~ a d&stk 
 
updip aquifer ~-Jt1ivah:mt H>the eax-bm:a!e Upper ~Yt L,wr~r Fhxidan aquifbr~j 
 
..................... -~--------------. .................~------~-----~---------- , 
 
~........ 
 
8e!ow land smfaee 
 
- .............. ............................"'".... 
 
.............................----""""" 
 
SMe C<:lunty 
 
w~u M~nt!fh~f 
 
Other i<hmtifier 
 
Top of 
L&Hturl~ Lm-l~!Wd~ u~n 
 
________ lnt~rYa! (ft} _....................................................................................................... 
 
(~l.. 
 
Bty:l.<l 
 
3~1'10() Ri;.:hmlmd Hill 3FH',B" 8!''!3'5')" U.Htl 
 
LFlW 
 
Bottom 
otopen 
int~rat 
(fl:} 
l)7:'i 
 
Trams 
m!$~~vity 
(Wtd} 
 
Storag-e ooeff!Cclent 
 
M!!th<'3d 
 
R&im-~mce 
 
Hydro!o~lc 
1.mit 
 
iUUG 
 
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~-----~~---- 
 
SL !klrt<.'l;;c;n '~nd Fall;: 
 
LF 
 
(20!/l) 
 
R&.matk~ 
- .................... 
 
J~~. 
 
do. 
 
35P1W RJ-::hrm,sld Hill '!. p~;4'4:>' 1WH1'5()" 
 
.120 
 
44() 
 
71),(l(lil 
 
UFT\V 
 
d:J. 
 
,};), 
 
ur 
 
~1~~- .Bu!lodJ 
 
,,f J.HOW Ci;,y Srnu~slx>ro J2::2~f~~t 1H''46'46" 
 
:}2(J 
 
;? 2 
 
%5 
 
2,()(l() 
 
sc 
 
Kdh~m<~ml 
 
dn. 
 
Gor;Jay (! 99(!) 
 
tit!. 
 
dn. 
 
31T024 
 
Stateo;bsJl'<:> 
 
T!"22'4fl" !l j_'')(l'4J" 
 
.WS 
 
(;;sf<::W-!1)' ~s {p.:..Y~ ~ 
 
f,,,")',! 
 
4,3(lfi 
 
SL UlGS flks 
 
'.b. 
 
dG. 
 
do. 
 
-~ rru:b 
 
Statei.>:o.o 
 
32"22'3()" 81 ''"~r(~l4 i X 
 
405 
 
6"Jt} 
 
4,?!)() 
 
f),~}i)(~ 
 
N!. 
 
dG. 
 
dn. 
 
Gakwy! 
 
(c>hsorvrui('!! j 
 
do. 
 
<.k>. 
 
~~rmz; 
 
Stw~soo-:<:. 
 
32?2-:Z~~y< 
 
~ ~ < 5{}~~~~ ~ 
 
420 
 
58(} 
 
5~6UO 
 
.Gill!.~ 
 
d:::-. 
 
d(\ 
 
::ln. 
 
do 
 
d.l 
 
3iTf>28 
 
Sta~;~slx)n;, 
 
32'~{.1'J~l< fWSfl'Sl" 
 
W3 
 
540 
 
~.Zl(lti 
 
.t)IK>4 
 
de>, 
 
d~:., 
 
dn. 
 
Gati~way& 
 
(flbil<~tt'iltliln} 
 
(h. 
 
do. 
 
32T<.lD 
 
City ,-,f Btn;J~;Je!. 
 
32.:.-.22'4.2'~ 
 
~1"39'44" 
 
Yl2 
 
# l 
 
510 
 
3~70f.': 
 
sc Kel!amami 
 
de. 
 
<.k<rda;; <["}<XH 
 
df>. 
 
Hurk~ 
 
2WWO(i5 S:.."t~~th~~si. f}~'Jrgia 32~52'27'~ l<' 82t:l3 1 ~ 
 
434 
 
f)(perim<.,nt;;l 
 
St~tV.m (LN-An. i} 
 
5)5 
 
8)f)f: 
 
,};), !'b:';;f;,;; and >Jl)l<'l> 
(19tl,5) 
 
<Ln 
 
<j() 
 
(k, 
 
29YiliJ1 
 
trhy Cod:t:ln, l 
 
3:.~:{)YJe< 
 
&2"1!3'54" 
 
!! 
 
421 
 
.1,600 
 
de>. 
 
di.> 
 
;);). 
 
Open im.<'i'-al udude:; i;)w~:;r 
 
prJri:it~n nfthf: }~1:..~r.3fH3.::3J.l aquifer 
 
d(>. 
 
d;), 
 
29V<Xl4 
 
"Pmd Dy;::. r' 
 
32~\JTl)'' R1:;;{)4(32'' 
 
244 
 
.%4 
 
6,20(l 
 
:h 
 
do. 
 
dn. 
 
dr;. 
 
<.kl. 
 
)02022 
 
USGS M'lkr" 
 
:t~ =- J 3~-t~r: 
 
J ~ ::.~2t44tj 
 
~c) 
 
lW 
 
<'4f.! 
 
f\~<!'ld TW-4 
 
SL 
 
F;,H;; ;md <Xht~:;: 
 
{;q97J 
 
{UF} 
 
~ 
 
"W 
 
d(>, 
 
;Jx 
 
')!ZOO<! (i;.::(;tgi~~ Power 3J=-nft46}: ~ J"4.'i'S9'' 
 
22~} 
 
PbntVcgk 
 
25! 
 
6,<}(.!(! 
 
sc Bm<.>k;; rmd ;;i.h~~;-s 
 
(!.!') 
 
(!()S5l 
 
~ 
~ 
;(' 
 
(\~t~stru~t.ien~ S 
 
> 
 
,p ~" 
 
 Table A1. Transmissivity and storage coefficient of the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers and equivalent clastic units, coastal Georgia 
 
m 
 
and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida-Continued 
 
[ft, 
 
foot; 
 
ft2/d, 
 
feet 
 
squared 
 
per 
 
day;%, 
 
percent; 
 
do., 
 
ditto; 
 
ft!dlft, 
 
foot/day/foot; 
 
0 , 
 
degrees;', 
 
minutes;", 
 
seconds; 
 
SJWMD, 
 
St. 
 
Johns 
 
River 
 
Water 
 
Management 
 
District; 
 
S, 
 
storage; 
 
T, 
 
transmissivity; 
 
USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; SCDNR, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. State: FL, Florida; GA, Georgia; SC, South Carolina. Method: NL, nonleaky aquifer analysis; L, leaky 
 
.f 
Q, 
 
aquifer analysis; SC, transmissivity based on specific capacity; SL, straight line analytical solution; V, van der Kamp analysis of oscillating flow (Kruseman and de Ritter, 1994); (?),analytical 
 
I"" 
 
method not cited. Hydrologic unit UF, Upper Floridan aquifer; LF, Lower Floridan aquifer; UF,LF, Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers; hydrologic unit enclosed in parentheses indicates a clastic 
 
!. 
(;' 
 
updip aquifer equivalent to the carbonate Upper or Lower Floridan aquifers] 
 
'1:3 
 
,. . , . ,. ,.........~----~~~-~---..~o.-------1.--- 
 
State County 
 
Well Identifier 
 
Other Identifier 
 
Latitude 
 
--------~---- 
Below land surtaee 
 
longitude 
 
Top of 
open Interval 
 
Bottom of open 
Interval 
 
Trans 
mlsslvlty (ft21d) 
 
Storage coefficient 
 
----------------------- 
Method Reference 
 
Hydrologic unit 
 
...... ...... ~ 
 
---~---..._._._,_ 
 
0"" 
"Q 
;::t. 
 
Remarks 
 
Cll 
~ .... 
 
.................. 
 
(ft) 
 
(ft) 
 
GA 
 
Burke 
 
3!ZIIO GGS TR.92-6B 3310'44" 8147'09" 
 
!80 
 
200 
 
180 
 
NL Fails and others 
 
(LF) 
 
IIJ" <II> 
 
----~---~ 
 
:.c.I.! 
 
Thompson oak 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
32Y033 Brighams Landing 3305'48" 8139'11" 
 
150 
 
200 
 
3,500 
 
TW-3 
 
do. Camden 3300!3 KraftJSt Marys 3044'01" 8132'30" 
 
516 
 
1,060 19,000 
 
(1997) 
 
iS: 
 
SL 
 
do. 
 
SLa Warren ( 1944) 
 
do. 
 
tJF 
 
Warren cites T fange from 
 
=1':0 
:==a.E.t.: 
 
(Weill 55) 
 
observation wells as 14,000- 24,000 ft2/d, analyzed by Theim 
 
!t 
ft 
 
method 
 
aC\1 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
330069 National Park 3043'13" 8133'00" 467 
 
575 110,000 
 
0.001 
 
NL Warner and 
 
do. 
 
ScrviccCI 
 
Aulenhach ( 1999) 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
330073 St Marys Deep 3044'06" 81 "33'05" 1,365 
 
1,500 13,000 
 
TW 
 
SL Harrelson and Falls 
 
LF 
 
(2003) 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
33E007 Huntley Jiffey 30"45'12" 8134'36" 
 
552 
 
760 98,000 
 
.002 
 
(Davis) 
 
NL Warner and 
 
UF 
 
Aulenbach ( 1999) 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
33E027 USN Kings Bay 3047'56" 813l'll" 
 
555 
 
990 130,000 
 
.001 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
TWI 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
33E039 USN Kings Bay 3047'49" 8! 0 33'53" 
 
950 
 
1,150 4.3,000 
 
Observation 0 I 
 
do. Krause and 
 
LF 
 
Randolph ( 1989} 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
33E040 USN Kings Bay 3047'49" 81"33'53" S60 
 
Observation 02 
 
do. Candler 29T010 City of Metter # 2 3223'16" 82"03'57" 
 
386 
 
South 
 
750 43,000 616 17,000 
 
.00006 
 
do. Bush and Johnston 
 
UF 
 
(1988) 
 
sc Kellam and 
 
do. 
 
Gorday(\990) 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
29TOII City of Metter # 2 32"24'21" 82"03'56" 
 
321 
 
North 
 
540 83,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. Chatham 36Q002 Union Camp 04 32"05'58" 81"07'47" 237 
 
603 34,000 
 
.0003 
 
NL Counts and 
 
do. 
 
Donsky ( 1963) 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
36Q008 Layne-Atlantic 3205'30" 81"08'50" 
 
250 
 
406 32,000 
 
.0006 
 
do. Warner and 
 
do. 
 
Aulenbach ( 1999) 
 
 Tabl~ A1. TransmissivitV and storage coefficient of th$ Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers and equivalent c!asti<: units, (:oasta! Georgia 
 
and adjacent parts of South CaroHna and Fiorida-Contim.1ed 
fil~ fwt: ftc/d, k:~~t squar<Xl per day;%, per<X:-<1t; do., ditto; tVdift, t<x>t!day!fiXlt; "', d(~gr{~i~s: '., rni!lBWs; ", ~t:(:mXIi<; SJWMD, St. J<shns Ri~,;:- \V;Hcr M;.mag;::n.::!:t Di;:;.ri:<; S, storag"~; T, t.:<~n:;mi,;;;ivity; 
 
USGS, VS Gcologk.al Slif>'(.')'; SCDNR, Snuth C;Jrolillil D{!f!<~rtnwu! ofNat:mti Rc;wurcc$. Si:lt~; fL, Fhxida; GA. G:::<orgia; SC Soulll Carblin<!. iVi<dlwd: NL. nnkaky iHpii:h andysi~; L h::aky 
 
aquif~ aaalysis; SC tram;missiviiy hasd on spedfie ~!ap:.>dty; SL s<raight line analytical Si:>lt!tion; V, van dcr !(amp annlysi~ ofo;;;:iU;;ljag tl<)W (Knwem;J.n ;;nd de RiHcr. !9'clil-); C!). ~li-ul!yti,~al 
 
nH.~th<~d not dt;;,'<1 Hydrdogic tulit UF, Upp~;:r Pbrid@ aquifer: LF. L\)w~~r Flvridan uquiii~~~ UF,LF. Upper ;md l..mwr Flmidan aquifers; hydmlngi<: unit t~ncbsed. in parcmhes('S indieak; a cla:>tic 
 
:1pdip aqHikr equival!mt w the '-~af\XlllHtc Upper or iAN!(~< Floridan <lJ;{tdk'r(! 
 
-------------------------------------------Below !;md s;urta.<le 
 
---------------------- 
 
Stine C<t!.lnty 
 
W~! !d(!!'lt!f!Qf 
 
Other !cloot!f!er 
 
latitu4), 
 
---~~---------------------------- 
CA Chatham 36Q0:3(> H<Ot>:d!lS,!tJ~.. # :_ .Jt=fJ.5<t9(' 
 
longitude 
 
Top <)f 
~pen 
in1it!t>o<al 
 
&mom 
of open Interval 
 
Ttans- 
mls;slv!ty {~/cl) 
 
Storag~ 
s:;eeft}dent 
 
Me-thod 
 
Re-fereru:e 
 
Hydrologic unit 
 
R~marks 
 
{ft) 
 
(ft} 
 
'------------------------------~ -------------"-------------------:--:-- 
 
81"'/}t)~)J M 
 
25l 
 
750 
 
~HJKJO 
 
_()(J!j4 
 
NL C;>.m!> and 
 
Ul' 
 
(\"tunts. ~~nd Drm:::.ky aver::1gf:d &~x 
 
f.!<:>J1$ky i l ':i6.l) 
 
qdu;:;; Ji,)m \V:"rr<:ss 0944.) 
 
~~0. 
 
dn. 
 
.~i$Q:BU fk<\v::d:. l'hnt~ti;m J2"tH'39' 8!"1:>"40'' 
 
7~j{j 
 
: ,i.lt-:5 
 
K,:wn 
 
(H) 
 
SL R. Faye, USOt; 
 
J..F 
 
m~inxl, wrilt<:'!> 
 
;;.;>mm<m., 2002 
 
<k 
 
do. 
 
36Q33l Bzrwkk l'l:lni;Ji.i<>n :qfli'Y~ 
wn 
 
~!"1)'41)" 
 
353 
 
46\l 46_1)(>() 
 
fl.<X"K!(!Q 
 
NL 
 
d(>. 
 
{)F 
 
do. 
 
do 
 
]NWW l'<~rt Wt)n!wordl, 3Y09"l8"' lll"M'50'' 
 
2.34 
 
Ga. i 
 
6sn A.nnn 
 
Nu') (;(sums and 
 
d') 
 
D<m~;ky(l%3J 
 
do. 
 
::h 
 
36RQ3'? Savannah L'l:J'. 1.2:~uw~rr t.J."'llt-:'4:?." 
 
7.70 
 
9!i. ;n,nw 
 
.0()()2 
 
NL 
 
do. 
 
do 
 
Pt. W<":l'twurth 
 
~k:. 
 
'-~' 
 
TIQiYHl U. ~. !\>>l<ll5<:tvk;;: 32"04'40'" 8 5 t~;f}51J X 
 
274 
 
693 ::W.<WO 
 
,i}i}(i3 
 
d<J. 
 
dr; 
 
;j;;_ 
 
02 
 
d~}. 
 
$)S.i 
 
37QiJ16 Snn!"hcnl C<>as< :32'\W33" gl"f>4'27'' 
 
260 
 
Lin~ R.Rdoekr, 
 
5(f{! 
 
4~\f!<}(} 
 
.C~G(J? 
 
:b. 
 
\~=;,:n.:e:f and 
 
do. 
 
A~ll<:nbsch i l9'~'~) 
 
do. 
 
d(>, 
 
37QOlii Am<:!ican Cyanide 32>(1.-f%"' lll"iH'47'" 
 
205 
 
65H 
 
27.\:~Kl 
 
#1 
 
NL{?} Cm;;_us ;<ml 
 
dn. 
 
Donsky \ !4!\~ i 
 
do 
 
. 
 
.J7QU4<i Savann2il. El~'ttic Jt.=t:.5(H l ~ 8.!"'()5'46" 
 
2.10 
 
l.nn:~ 
 
J4.(!()f) 
 
& l'nw<~r C\>m!)-'lllY 
 
Rl 
 
NL\'1} 
 
d{>. 
 
d:,_ 
 
d~>~ 
 
&\ 
 
J7(>lR5 1-lut>lhis<:>n !.:;land ~~Y%11'" Sl"Hi/}i" 
 
274 
 
34A Jl.()OO 
 
.00! 
 
"!Wl 
 
NL Wameraad 
 
0<.). 
 
AulCilhads (l '}'}t}) 
 
do 
 
th 
 
J/R(RH S3v:mm!h Wi!dht<: _;~~D~Y..Y4~~' f>l'"!)TU!)'' 
 
.1-i-:U 
 
>.>"!! YU.K)O 
 
Rdi_;~"' 
 
<k 
 
do 
 
~j<) 
 
;);;, 
 
<.k> 
 
Ji:<QllS U!:lNPS Cn;:bpnr 32"0 l'36" 1}()"'53'?.6" 
 
f<UJXXJ 
 
.nu.'l 
 
;h 
 
Cmmt~aHd 
 
;k:. 
 
f)<.)nsky i l 'A\~ ) 
 
>"1::1 
 
:J.l. 
 
Cnfi<:;: 
 
~~3LOO~~ City ufr.J<.>ugla> 31'}3i}Jly, 1{2''59'55" 
 
504 
 
#4 
 
721!. 7.iJfJ. Oi.iZl 
 
~c 
 
Kcll~HH and 
 
\.ln. 
 
Gtr:day { f99f~.l 
 
"!=Sf 
=-i:i3 
~~r 
 
:P< 
 
I>! -->-1 
 
 Table A1. Transmissivity and storage coefficient of the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers and equivalent clastic units, coastal Georgia 
 
and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida--Continued 
 
Co) 
 
[ft, 
 
foot; 
 
JV/d, 
 
feet 
 
squared 
 
per 
 
day;%, 
 
percent; 
 
do., 
 
ditto; 
 
ftfdlft, 
 
foot/day/foot; 
 
0 , 
 
degrees;', 
 
minutes; 
 
", 
 
seconds; 
 
SJWMD, 
 
St. 
 
Johns 
 
River 
 
Water 
 
Management 
 
District; 
 
S, 
 
storage; 
 
T, 
 
transmissivity; 
 
01> 
 
USGS, U.S. Geologica! Survey; SCDNR., South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. State; FL, Florida; GA, Georgia; SC, South Carolina. Method: NL, nonieaky aquifer analysis; L, leaky 
 
aquifer analysis; SC, transmissivity based on specific capacity; SL, straight line analytical solution; V, van der Kamp analysis of oscillating flow (Kruseman and de Ritter, 1994); (?),analytical 
 
a::l: 
 
method not cited. Hydrologic unit UF, Upper Floridan aquifer; LF, Lower Floridan aquifer; UF,LF, Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers; hydrologic unit enclosed in parentheses indicates a clastic 
 
; 
 
updip aquifer equivalent to the carbonate Upper or Lower Floridan aquifers] 
 
=5" 
 
State County 
 
Well Identifier 
 
Other identifier 
 
........... 
GA Coffee 
 
-~~~--- 
23L004 City ofDoug1as 
 
latitude 
 
Betow land surface --- 
Top of Bottom longitude open of open 
 
Interval Interval 
 
------- 
 
{ft) 
 
(ft) 
 
----------- 
 
3132'16" 8251'20" 5!4 
 
684 
 
Trans 
mlaslvlty (tt2/d) 
 
Storage coefficient 
 
.... -~--------------- 
600,000 
 
Method 
 
Reference 
 
Hydrologic unit 
 
sc----- Kellam and 
 
-------- 
UF 
 
Remarks 
-~----------- 
 
:v 
 
Q 
 
"0 
 
a:..:t.l. 
 
--- 
 
-eCll 
Cll 
c 
(II 
 
#5 
 
Gorday ( 1990) 
 
::!:! 
Q 
 
::1. 
 
do. 
 
Cook 
 
l8GOI8 City ofCecil 3102'45" 83"23'40" 
 
214 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
1811002 City of Adel # 3 3!008'33" 83"25'27" 
 
231 
 
308 
 
6,700 
 
386 15,000 
 
SL Sever (1972} 
 
do. 
 
sc Kellam and 
 
do. 
 
=It 
):It 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
l8H005 City of Adel # 1 3!.0 08'16" 832:5'!9" 213 
 
375 :5,800 
 
Gorday ( !990) 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
=....&c::1: 
(II 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
18HOI6 
 
USGS Adel 
 
3108'13" 8326'03" 
 
207 
 
1est Well 
 
865 11,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
<U3 
! ; 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
18H033 City of Adel 3108'25" 8325'42" 207 
 
393 210,000 
 
.002 
 
NL Sever (1972) 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Doo!y 
 
16S002 
 
Unadill-<~ 3 
 
3215'04" 8344'23'' 247 
 
307 
 
6,600 
 
SL Faye and 
 
(LF) 
 
McFadden (1986) 
 
do. Effingham 34R043 
 
Dawes Silicia 32609'45" 81 "23'38" 
 
320 
 
Company 
 
689 51,000 
 
sc Kellam and 
 
UF 
 
Gorday (1990) 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
JST003 City of Springfield 3223'60" 8JOI9'l0" 180 
 
400 
 
6,200 
 
1950 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
36S004 Westwood Heights 3215'23" 81 13'36" 303 SID 
 
565 30,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
36S022 City of Rincon # 2 3217'22" 81"14'02" 281 
 
500 
 
2,800 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
36S025 Ft. Howard Paper 32"19'36" 81"12'09" 280 Company# l 
 
500 32,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
36S026 Ft. Howard Paper nJ9'52" 8112'27" 280 Company# 2 
 
520 !7,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
36S027 H. Howard Paper 32"20'01" !WI2'21" 282 Company#3 
 
500 
 
5,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. Evans 30ROOI City ofClaxton# 2 32"09'45" 8154'10" 401 
 
701 37,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
30R002 City ofClaxton 3209'45" 8154'47" 4.52 
 
805 56,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. Glascock 25Z003 
 
Gibson,3 
 
3313'35" 8236'04" 173 
 
203 
 
620 
 
do. Brooks and others 
 
(LF) 
 
(1985) 
 
 Table A1, Transm!sslvt!y and storage coefficient of the Upper and Lo.ver Floridan aquilers and ~~quiv;:dent dastic units, coastal Georgia and adja~.xmt f>aris of South Caronna and F!orida~Continued jf:, ti.JOt: fl2fd, !i::t.":! squared per day;%, per~xnt; ~.k, ditto: f./d!fi, f;l<)!/day:foot '', ;kgrees; ', mimHes~ , secom.h.: SJ\.VMD, SL bhns Riv;;r W::t~~:.' M,m:~.g;;::r;~,iH Di:<trk:.; S. storag;"\ T, tnmsroi~~ivhy: USGS, US Gcologi<:.a! S1trwy; SCDNR, South Camhtu f}{~pmtmel~t of Natural ResQU!c<:::s. State: FL, n~)rkla: GA, Gmrgi8; SC, Soulh Caro!iml, Methml. NC nonkahy aquifer analysi.s; L leaky a>..jttifer analysis; SC, tr:m~missivhy h>;;;;.>j on specik (:ap:.dty: $L, ::traight lin<.:: >'ndytkal sduti;)n: V, van der Kamp analysis (f nscil)ating flow iKJu$eman aitd d~ Ritt(>, 1~li4'!; n), ;m:~.!ytkal mtr:h<)d nN dt<:d. Hydmlogk unit: tT, Upper fk'>'fidan aquik-t~ LF, Lower F)(;:idill! aqnifer: UF. LF, Up1~r and L<<>,<:::r F!,)ridc:n :.;<.JtJ!fer"; hydn>k>gi;..~ emit i;m+;::->~:d in p~rr~'ntht~s0s ir,dka!~~ a cbsti<::: 
npdip a>:jdk.-t <:.':qHivaknt to the ~.~:~.dx)f:ii!e Upp<:r or Lo~i~r .Flotldan :Jqui!h;;j 
 
State County 
 
"u-r-.; 
 
Gb;;;;.c,.~k 
 
'"'~o,-.,..,..,ooooooo,u'-'-'-'-""" 
 
Be}l)w ~nd !!udace 
 
. .... ... .., -----~.., 
 
.,.. 
 
WQII 
ldentm~r 
 
Other identifier 
 
Top of Bortom l..etfiude longitude open of open 
 
!ntetllal fntervl 
 
Tran&> mh>sivity 
(ff!d) 
 
Ston~ge 
Coeff!c}ent 
 
Method 
 
{ff} 
 
(ft} 
 
-..<.'----------------.-,--.-,-,-,. 
 
21iAMH 'ibid;~ Ka~~iill, W-l 33"!5'46" 8Y27'!l'' 
 
145 
 
15.1 
 
lYX) 
 
sc 
 
R*ference 
.Hf.:.J:..>k::: ;Hsd r;t:.l:;;s::d%5) 
 
Hydrok>g!c 
W'lff 
~t F'l 
 
---~..--- ...........~~~ 
Remar!<;&- 
 
de. 
 
Glynn 
 
32Wi24 Lamar, Stut1';<rd jF(J9'l~" ~l"4iYilif' 
 
2!4 
 
th. 
 
d<), 
 
32W:r2t. 
 
O,;h;mt, N !~ 
 
}~.')Jtr~n~' &l '':l8'LZ'' 
 
~!92 
 
>h 
 
do. 
 
32J002 
 
SCLRR, 
Th{slm:lm.~ 
 
.Jl0l7')6" SF4l';rJ" 
 
70fJ 
 
5J~ t l(.!,ij(liJ 
44'i 66.non 
?40 WGOO 
 
(JOUJ 
.no5 
,OM 
 
NL k~t<~ and M;;:;;!ia 
(!994} 
 
~k}. 
 
<.1<.). 
 
d<) 
 
do 
 
IfF 
 
J(>!F:s tmd M;;::!ia r;iti~ ;;::sr~,, l;t ;s:; 
 
e,;cdkni.. 
 
de. 
 
knc> ami \{8slia cite tm<t;, ih <t> 
 
gnd 
 
rb. 
 
Inne.;:, and Ma:>li;; dte cur<:e !h u;; 
 
fair 
 
<h 
 
do 
 
:BHiliH 
 
M.adQ.<' i\{;~titt 
 
:wo;~9'' 
 
~!"35'54" 
 
550 
 
9'1! 
 
i>S,iJOO 
 
.UP 
 
;];) 
 
rko. 
 
<.iard<..'n(luh 
 
do. 
 
d;;, 
 
M'' 33H036 
 
<tf'.>m(lt, J\.ndr<:".',,. :W12'W' ~o~::;J(ss\ 
 
%0 
 
(.5i} 
 
SS,ilW 
 
.f}(:7 
 
J;;. 
 
d;.o. 
 
de. 
 
(k 
 
33H052 
 
Amkr:mn. L L 
 
3t''l4'UY' ~:<'32(14" 
 
560 
 
W"'/. ..' 
 
89/~(J(J 
 
JJU4 
 
;j~;. 
 
di;, 
 
(b. 
 
.J;m% mul 1->{a:;li;l dle cur<:e t1! u;; 
 
;:;<xx! 
 
<h 
 
d". 
 
du. 
 
J;me:< and Masliu ;:ite ;,tttY<; iil <t> 
 
i(>il 
 
d:.."t. 
 
dt<. 
 
.\~Wl7R 
 
Willis RB. 
 
.H'l2'39" stJ!'U" 55() 
 
730 <J5rKlU 
 
Zltll 
 
dn. 
 
dn . 
 
<.k>. 
 
Jones ;md .Mslia cite curv<' !h fJ~ 
 
<~x<;dkHt 
 
<h. 
 
<.k> 
 
:HHHJO Jenl<ins Th'-"<t:e J!"l.l'1<Y ~ !0 10':21'' 
 
~~;o 
 
777 7.HX'l0 
 
.fi0()4 
 
do. 
 
;b. 
 
fb. 
 
.km,;;; <\nd M:dh; d!c (i.llYC ill"' 
 
go<x:l; kakrHle;: IHKK.!;!J ft.:"diit 
 
;.J;.>. 
 
(.~(>. 
 
JJW33 Bna'!swit~k: TW-6 ~~ j "ll)'(j(;" &l "'.~(>' jf," 
 
52() 
 
7\lll 
 
63~i)(k} 
 
OtlU4 
 
d:..-r. 
 
dt). 
 
>.k>. 
 
J<>m'S ;;n;l M*'lia dt<: c~srH> !;t ''' 
 
gix>d:. ;.,.,~~bm~e 0.0>:}025 lhl/!l 
 
d<.1. 
 
;k;, 
 
.W.Kll.> .k~:yU !:<!and r~', )n13'!5" SP'24'l'\'' 
 
521( 
 
7&4 93J!fKl 
 
.o-ns 
 
dn . 
 
dn. 
 
th 
 
hne;; and tvh~lia t:.ik t~mv~ !lt as 
 
f;:,Sr 
 
;h 
 
dn. 
 
.'J4GiYl'i 
 
.idcy!llslrsnd l.J 
 
3 f ~!iJ(}~5s~ 
 
8!"25\W 
 
502 
 
7!:' 60,()\)i} 
 
,OOJ 
 
<.h 
 
d<.> 
 
(!.(i 
 
dn . 
 
d;,, 
 
do 
 
34H002 
 
f!b.;ie..!)hfien 
 
31 "!(/:'))' ~1~23'27" 
 
5:H 
 
~~(~ 
 
f,4,\l()0 
 
.(Ji):tJt. 
 
tkt 
 
<.k> 
 
(Ft<:>n:.J 
 
rJo 
 
J<>.:'H~> :~:id ~..:~as~ k~ c~t::; ct~rH: fct ~:::\. 
 
gmxl: btkmo.:e. (J (jiJiJ095 fiidilt 
 
do. 
 
$;,kr. 
 
34Hfi'!{i 
 
H~t<:llJ.~; be .M 
 
.J:'WiY~ !H''29'0l" 
 
48(] 
 
;.Ill 58,0()1) 
 
.{}i)i)2 
 
d.~). 
 
d(t, 
 
d~~- 
 
<.h 
 
34H()78 !l<XC~J!r:s far; 1) Jl''i}<)'4ii" 1W2&'52'' 
 
545 
 
~90 
 
)6/KK~ 
 
.00006 
 
do, 
 
d<). 
 
ii<.l 
 
i<).:J::;~ :!tld t.1asH3 cit:; curv~:~ ;jt ~"-:~ 
w;il; k~l~'"...,=' () i;ow. nid:fl 
 
~ 
"t:: 
 
do. 
 
.krn:~.':\ :;nd ~1;$:~1h ~.:it~ ~.::tW'.:'C t1t 
 
~;::~ excdk:nt.: t::~s~;~IH~;.:: ~1/KKJ0<:>5 
 
=el33: 
)1 
 
!':i<.i:'tt 
 
~ 
 
iwt> 
 
 Table A-1. Transmissfvlty and storage coefficient of the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers and equivalent clastic units, coastal Georgia 
 
.s:. 
0 
 
and adjacent parts of South Carolina and florida--Continued 
 
[ft, foot; ft2/d, feet squared per day;%, percent; do., ditto; ft/dlft, foot/day/foot; o, degrees;', minutes; , seconds; SJWMD, St. Johns River Water Management District; S, storage; T, transmissivity; 
USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; SCDNR, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. State: FL, Florida; GA, Georgia; SC, South Carolina. Method: NL, nonleaky aquifer analysis; L, leaky 
aquifer analysis; SC, transmissivity based on specific capacity; SL, straight line analytical solution; V, van dcr Kamp analysis of oscillating flow (Kruseman and de Ritter, 1994); (?), analytical 
 
< X 
; A 
 
method not cited. Hydrologic unit: UF, Upper Floridan aquifer; LF, Lower Floridan aquifer; UF,LF, Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers; hydrologic unit enclosed in parentheses indicates a clastic updip aquifer equivalent to the carbonate Upper or Lower Floridan aquifers] 
 
.5c..:,..r 
 
---------------------------- 
 
-- 
 
--------------- 
 
Below land surface 
 
------~--------- 
 
---- 
 
------------ 
 
0 'C 
 
~ 
 
State County 
 
Well identifier 
 
Other identifier 
 
Latitude 
 
Longitude 
 
Top of open interval 
(ft) 
 
Bottom 
of open 
Interval 
(ft) 
 
Trans missMty 
(fi2/d) 
 
Storage coefficient 
 
Method 
 
Reference 
 
Hydrologic unit 
 
Remarks 
 
-;~  
(II 
e 
f 
 
--~~------------ 
 
-----~------ 
 
GA 
 
Glynn 
 
34H085 Brunswick Coffin 31<'09'06" 81"28'46" 
 
514 
 
Park 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
34H097 Georgia Ports 3107'55" 81"1.9'27" 584 
 
Authority Main 
 
Office 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
34Hl00 Riley, Barney 3108'06" 8129'25" 595 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
34HJ25 U.S. Geological 3!0 09'06" 8129'31" 
 
535 
 
623 
 
... ---~---------~- ------~~------------ 
 
33,000 
 
.0006 
 
NL 
 
Clarke and others (1990) 
 
757 160,000 
 
.007 
 
do. Jones and Maslia 
(1994) 
 
786 33,000 
 
.0005 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
604 56,000 
 
.0003 
 
do . 
 
do. 
 
------"''""'*****----------------- 
 
:II 
 
UF 
 
T from recovery cited as 40,000 
 
0 ::l. 
 
do. 
 
ftltd; S as 0.00057 Jones and Maslia cite curve fit as 
 
A 
= ~ 
> 
 
excellent 
 
.Q 
c:: 
 
.i..f. 
 
do. 
 
Jones and Maslia cite curve fit as good 
 
-~ 
I'll Cll 
 
do. 
 
Jones and Maslia cite curve tit as ! 
 
Survey TWO! 
 
excellent; leakance 0.00023 
 
ftld!ft 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
34Hl32 U.S. Geological 3110'20" 81"29'52" 
 
540 
 
1,200 64,000 
 
SurveyTW02 
 
.0003 
 
do. USGS files 
 
do. 
 
Upper and lower water.bearing 
 
zones 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
34HJ33 
 
Brunswick 
 
3110'35" 8128'58" 520 
 
Goodyear Park 
 
800 57,000 
 
.0004 
 
do. Jones and Maslia {1994) 
 
do. 
 
Jones and Maslia cite curve fit as 
 
good; leakance 0.0012 fu'd/ft 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
34H205 SSI Lighthouse 31"08'01" 81"23'37" 477 
 
608 85,000 
 
.0003 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Jones and Maslia cite curve fit 
 
as excellent; leakance 0.00015 
 
ftfdifl 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
34H328 
 
USPS Fort 
 
3! 0 13'19" 8123'29" 600 
 
640 72,000 
 
.002 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Frederica 
 
do. 
 
Jones and Maslia cite curve fit 
 
as good 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
34H344 Brunswick: TW-7 3 109'38" 8128'52" 504 
 
770 23,000 
 
.0003 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Jones and Maslia cite curve fit as 
 
excellent; leakance 0.00023 fi/d/ 
 
ft for 7/85 aquifer test, 0.0012 
 
fu'd/ft for 12186 aquifer test 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
34H371 U.S. Geological 31"08'18" 8129'36" 606 
 
700 69,000 
 
.0005 
 
do. 
 
do . 
 
SurveyTW II 
 
do. 
 
Jones and Maslia cite curve fit as 
 
fair; leakance 0.00022 ftld/ft 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
34H374 U.S. Geological 3109'53" 8129'59" 52"7 
 
696 41,000 
 
.0003 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Smvey TW 14 
 
do. 
 
Jones and Maslia cite curve fit as 
 
fair; leakance 0.000076 ft/dlft 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
34H392 Brunswick Jr 31!1'08" 81"29'10" 541 
 
660 75,000 
 
.0004 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
College 
 
do. 
 
Jones and Maslia cite curve fit as 
 
fair; lea~:ance 0.00024 ftld!ft 
 
 Table A1, Tran$missivity and stora~ CC~~ffiel!nt ;,)f the Upp~r and L<rwer f:foridat) aquifers and eQIJivah~nt clastic unf!s, coas1al (.%org!a and ;;tdjacent parts of South Cato11na and F!orida--Contlnw:~d 
i1i, gmt; f(!d, teet squaml per day;%, p~:rccnt; do., ditto: fl!dift, f~mtJday/h}nl; ",degrees;', mi.n:lt<:s; ", ~<:::0nnds; SJ\VMD. St. Johns River W:J.t(:r ~kmagt~mcnt Distriu; S, :>i<>mg(:'; T. mm~nnssi<-ity: 
USGS, U.S. Gedngical Sutvcy; SCDNR, S<l:lth Cardlna Deparlrw~nt nfNatun~1 Rewurecs State: fL, Fh)tidu; GA, Ckm:gi~l: SC, i>nuth C;;rnhna. MdwJ: NL, nonkaky ;J.quikr am1!y->k L, ka:i<y aquHer aw;lysi.s; SC, t;<lW>mis~dvity base;! !Xt !lt-~ifie capw:ily; SL, ~.wright lin~~ ;n1aiyti<.,al whlti\)l); V, van dx---r Kmnp mmly<is of o;;dlh!ing How {KnlWlNtt: and de Ri!ter, !994}; {'(i, ~n;J.(y!u:a! 
method W}t c:it<:'::!. flydmk>g.ic lmil: Uf, Upper Floridutt aquifh; LF, Low(~!' Fl<)ridan ;J.qui-fer; UF,Lf, Uppl~.- and Lm>w Floridan aquif1;)1'S; hydroh>gk unit (~ndo~(~d in p;lr(:;nth;;;::.;>:~; indicak:; a c\a~;tic 
 
updip aquifm- eqBivalcnt t(> the cmlxmM>:. Uppet ot UiW0J' F!orid2.n aquil~:r:;J 
 
................ ~ ...... 
 
..._......._..........................................~... Bclew hllid $Utfaca 
 
..,..,.,..,.,.,..,..,..,.,.,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1.<.<.-..<. 
 
"""'"""'""' 
 
State County 
 
w~u ldemm~r 
 
Oth~r !d~nt!tler 
 
latft:~td~ 
 
--"'"""'""~- 
T~ot Bottom 
 
ll'an~- 
 
L<:mglW ~n 
lntt~rv1tl 
 
ofopetl 
in1~rva! 
 
mimsivity {f1~/d) 
 
S*or'ag~ 
(lt3effic(:ient 
 
Method 
 
Refereonceo 
 
Hydrol~!c 
unit 
 
Remarl<s 
 
----------- 
 
(ft.)........................(..f..t..j.........................- - - -  
 
G;-'\ G!yuu 
 
J4H4i.ll U.S, Ge;}iogka! 'H"(J9'4S" ill "::t'f~;:y' 
 
5"2~~ 
 
7:56 85,000 
 
0.0003 
 
NL USGSfUe-; 
 
t!F 
 
!harvey TW 21 
 
..,....,.,.,..,................................................. 
 
tli:O, 
 
dn. 
 
~54H412 
 
H.ereul*S ln<: Q JFHJ'l~>" 8!"29'22" 
 
54>$ 
 
630 64.000 
 
.I)OH;; 
 
~k}. J:m<:<S and Ma:<lm i l'~94) 
 
de. 
 
.i<~!~(;S ;md ;\{~;!ia dk <:un'<' fit :s:< 
 
~;<x>d~ l;:<lkam:.' (l.(ltit)2 5 !~:'din 
 
dc. 
 
<h 
 
H!-1424 
 
H~l"-'11!~,.,; ho.: T 
 
3l''!O'll" f$! 0 1<}'} l ,, 
 
550 
 
745 
 
67~i)(X} 
 
. i)(~)j 
 
~~0 
 
<.k> . 
 
f),,_ 
 
d;), 
 
34H425 !lcr>:uks hw U 3! ''!(l']6X l'>l 0 21;'5a'' 
 
~~u 
 
7{)\.l 
 
66,<XK> 
 
.O(X}J 
 
d.( 
 
<.k>. 
 
d"' 
 
<h. 
 
34H42i Champion, r: M 02 3i''Hl'i6" !l 1"2'~'42'" 
 
5(~-~ 
 
64D i, 7.,0i:l0 
 
oo:n 
 
d(>. 
 
d:). 
 
do 
 
J<}<\C:< aad M.aslia dtc eurl!l~ lit as 
 
::c~,,.~nent: krs~;r,-rK> 0.'~"><>11 
 
!'!/d.'!t 
 
do 
 
.loM~ ili~cl Maslia cit:; ,~un;~ i.it >l~ 
 
gm1d; kak~J\Ce (U}002l ili<:l 1li 
 
tk>. 
 
.h::v::.s :1nd ~i:~;E~ ~:~-;~~ :.~;>Y~"! f$t ;35 
 
t'X<.:di.;;:ni.; j,.::<)bilCC 0.00(!2'1 
 
iiJdif:. 
 
dt). 
 
de 
 
_1,Hi>J4<) 
 
(kx:>dy>~.;or Pro'!:. 
 
}l"l<Y~6" 
 
1'5.! 0~~8'57'" 
 
3SO 
 
75:? 
 
59.,ij(ii} 
 
.0006 
 
C<..). USGSiib 
 
do. 
 
dn. 
 
do. 
 
3'HW.i<) I.!.S G;;:;).k>gb1l 3P'liY20" 8!~29'52'" 
 
540 
 
Survey TW <!2 Pt ! 
 
.~66 
 
i,V)OO 
 
,0003 
 
d<). Jnm~:< <md M:sxli<< {l91::'4) 
 
(If,, 
 
Jt~r:>.$ ar:d !'-,ht:>Ha ch::;:~ curv~ fit as 
 
''-~<.:d.lent; l~kancc (U)\lil."l::t 
 
!Vdift 
 
do. 
 
d(>. 
 
J4Ji)t:i! 
 
BtWl!O=Wkl: 2-W 
Fi~;h 
 
.H"l'-}'37'' 
 
3!.'>:Ze4~rx 
 
ll(),i)i)i} 
 
.iJijiJ({ 
 
<i<.> 
 
<k). 
 
de. 
 
;.};), 
 
34JH09 
 
Newh<)!X' 
 
:>nsw 1<1"26'5!" )<\n 
 
no 140.(}00 
 
.nn~J; 
 
do. 
 
;J.> 
 
Pbnt:sli<.m 
 
d,), 
 
d'.). 
 
35HiJl.:! :;;.~a Islmo.i Gua :lF!t/,!9" 1!1''2!'29'' 
 
5!4 
 
64.0 56,()00 
 
.mu 
 
do. 
 
;J;<. 
 
Clu!:. Old 
 
dt:. 
 
kix:s ;md M1.!:<! i;,; dt.>: <.:m'-<' fit a,; 
 
i:2.\3\Xi 
 
do . .lone;; awl Mash,: ;:i:;c>:une fit<J,'i 
::.\Ct""::l~d""it 
 
f);_; 
 
Jon_e,; ar:d Mas\ia d;, cHtvc U! ;!s 
 
g(>(~d 
 
d>). 
 
d(>. 
 
35!Ul.li l3tu1Wwii:k: t>SCG JPflW45" 81 ~:22.'16'{ 
 
5Wi 
 
704 55,()fiij 
 
.Ui}' 
 
<.\;.> 
 
df>. 
 
35HM2 iki bbml C<'- }l"ll'41l" al ''1(r i r 
 
584 
 
l,il4i) f,4. 0U(J 
 
&--22ndSL 
 
;J;.<, 
 
l{;.>wi!ml 
 
liTOOl 
 
!:k~rd 
 
3J.<::::vu,r. il~VJ?"!S"' 
 
278 
 
Cr:trsJni%..'<::h':tl..;:t:;.. 
 
Hayr,~svl!k 
 
3.47 
 
l,l(!G 
 
do . 
 
d(>. 
 
de. 
 
d<). 
 
Sl.. 
 
\V~nf ~.n~d Of :;1:~g. 
 
(!473) 
 
df. 
 
Upp<'r ::rKl kwe1 'vatc't bc><ring 
 
J..<);-tCS 
 
w > 
 
~ 
 
) ........... ,_'}'k 
 
B1<.x>ks M<i others 
 
iLI-l 
 
~ ~ ~ 
 
{ l~i~S} 
 
X'' 
 
> 
 
...,. 
 
 Table A-1. Transmissivity and storage coefficient of the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers and equivalent clastic units, coastal Georgia 
 
N""' 
 
and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida-Continued 
 
[ft, 
 
foot; 
 
ft2/d, 
 
feet 
 
squared 
 
per day;%, 
 
percent; 
 
do., 
 
ditto; 
 
ft/d/ft, 
 
toot/day/foot; 
 
0 , 
 
degrees;', 
 
minutes;", 
 
seconds; 
 
SJWMD, 
 
St 
 
Johns 
 
River 
 
Water 
 
Management 
 
District; 
 
S, 
 
storage; 
 
T, 
 
transmissivity; 
 
USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; SCDNR. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. State: FL, Florida; GA, Georgia; SC, South Carolina. Method: NL, nonleaky aquifer analysis; L, leaky 
 
..=-<:I: 
 
aquifer analysis; SC, transmissivity based on specific capacity; SL, straight line analytical solution; V, van der Kamp analysis of oscillating flow (Kruseman and de Ritter, !994); (?), analytical method not cited. Hydrologic unit: UF, Upper Floridan aquifer; LF, Lower Floridan aquifer; UF,LF, Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers; hydrologic unit enclosed in parentheses indicates a clastic 
 
Ill 
-5. 
~ 
 
updip aquifer equivalent to the carbonate Upper or Lower Floridan aquifers] 
 
l 
 
State County 
 
Well Identifier 
 
-----.--.----------- 
 
Other 
Identifier 
 
Latitude 
 
___ ~~-~-- 
 
----- 
 
Belo,.w___l_a_n__d___s_u__r_f_a__c_e__ 
 
Longitude 
 
Top of open Interval 
 
Bottom of open interval 
 
Trans missivity 
(ft2/tt} 
 
--------- 
Storage coefficient Method 
 
---~- 
 
Reference 
 
Hydrologic unit 
 
- 
Remarks 
 
~--- 
 
"C 
:CaD. 
 
-a. 
:IF 
 
(ft) 
 
(ft) 
 
ell 
 
,----------~--- 
 
-...,--~-------- 
 
GA 
 
Irwin 
 
20L003 City ofOcilla# 3 3135'42" 8314'51" 
 
266 
 
-~---------- 
645 10,000 
 
sc 
 
---------------- 
Kellam and 
 
Uf 
 
------------~- 
 
:I! 
!. 
 
Gmday ( 1990) 
 
a. 
! 
 
do. Jefferson 26WOOI Wadley I (Ruby 3251'34" 8224'19" 370 St. Well} 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
26X002 
 
Louisville,4 
 
3259'45" 82"24'43" 
 
220 
 
473 
 
5,900 
 
308 
 
5,700 
 
do. Brooks and others 
 
(LF) 
 
(1985) 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
=E= 
.C.l.l 
en 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
26Y002 J.P. Stevens, 2 33"00'15" 8227'31" 214 
 
375 
 
5,800 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
-< 
I 
 
do. Liberty 33NOOI 
 
US Army, 
 
31"51'46" 81"36'49" 451 
 
816 124,000 
 
NL Warren (1944) 
 
Uf 
 
As cited in Bush and Johnston 
 
1! 
 
Ft Stewart 0 I 
 
(1988} 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
34MOI9 Interstate Paper, 31"44'31" 81"25'42" 200 
 
535' 
 
535 160,000 
 
0.0005 
 
do. Dyar and others (1972) 
 
do. 
 
T ~ 130000, S "'0.0004! in 
 
recovery analysis 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
34M021 Interstate Paper 31"44'42" 81 24'34" 
 
145 
 
445 160,000 
 
.0003 
 
do. 
 
do . 
 
Company, 445' 
 
do. 
 
T = 120,000, S ~ 0.00047 in 
 
recovery analysis 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
34MOSI Interstate Paper 3144'38" 81"24'25" 427 
 
810 160,000 
 
.0004 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Rust I 
 
do. 
 
T"' 88,000, S"' 0.00054 in 
 
recovery analysis 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
34MOS2 Interstate Paper 3144'35" 81"24'39" 418 
 
810 !60,000 
 
.0002 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Rust2 
 
do. 
 
T ~ 88,000, S "'0.00054 in 
 
recovery analysis 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
34M090 Riceboro, Ga., 31"43'35" 81"25'28" 502 
 
1985 
 
705 130,000 
 
.0004 
 
do. Krause and 
 
do. 
 
Randolph (1989) 
 
do. 
 
Long 
 
33M004 USGSTW3 
 
3138'54" 8136'04" 538 
 
870 250,000 
 
.0007 
 
do. Randolph and 
 
do. 
 
others ( 1985) 
 
do. Lowndes l9Ftol Valdosl!l, Ga. Deep 30"54'51" 8315'05" 
 
180 
 
Observation 
 
450 94,000 
 
SL McConnell and 
 
do. 
 
Hacke (1993) 
 
do. Mcintosh 35L08S Dan Hawthorne I 31"36'08" 81"18'27" 1,144 
 
1,422 
 
6,000 
 
do. Harrelson and falls 
 
LF 
 
(2003) 
 
do. MontgomCI)' 25R002 
 
Cityof Mt. 
 
32"10'47" 82"35'37" 
 
347 
 
Vernon 
 
400 
 
5,500 
 
sc Kellam and 
 
UF 
 
Gorday (1990) 
 
do. Pulaski !&SOI2 Opelika Mfg. 32"16'52" 8327'57" 306 
Company2 
 
36! 
 
9,800 
 
SL faye and 
McF;~dden{1986) 
 
(LF) 
 
 Table ANt . Transmissivity and storage coefficient oi the Upper and LOW(!f Floridan aquifers and E!QUivaient clastic units, wasta! Ge;.>qJ1a aM adja\:ent patt~< l>f Sowth Carolina and F!oridaContinut.!d (h, H)ot~ ft'~i<L l~<t squ;m,.-d j)(.<f day~%, fM(:tmt; <h, ditto:, ihHL. ih!)t!day!li:snt~ ", deg,rees; ', rnhmt<~s; ", !it:wnd~.; SJWMD, St. Jnhns River w~~t~r Managem1~"nt DistriN: S, :>t(~r;l.fi:.': T, tmnsmi5&ivHy; USOS, US. Geological. Survey: SCDNR, Sou!h Cm~iina Department of Natura! Ress)WC<!S, Stat;;;; FL Fhwicln: GA, G;e1xgia; SC, Sm:~th C~mlina. Met!K)d: NL, nonkaky aqBifer andy~is; L kaky 
en, aquitb an.;:oJy~i~; SC, transmi~<ivity baf.cd on Sp<;.-x;ifie ctip%ity: SL, :>U':'light line ;malyti~;l so!utf;)n; V, van skr Kamp analy!<l2< nf o;;dHaiing Hvw {K;':.lUm~Ul and de Rilt<T. l994); ana!yth:<il 
rndho<f tmt cit<."<L Bydroksgic unit: VF, Uppt~r Floridan ~K{Hifi~. l..L. Lnwt::r Floridan aquifi;.~-; UCLF, Up}X!t and Lower Floridan <lquifi:r&; hydmbgi;; unit ~!~dosed in par>;;nth<;.~:<~~~" in;)ka:e~> a d<Hic 
 
>lpdip aquilh i2'qHiva{<mt li.} the carbmmtt:: Upper 'X Lmv::::r fhxidan ~quik-t'i'] 
 
--~~ 
 
________.,..,..........................................................................................................................................................,............ 
aetow land !Surlooe- 
 
..,......,.,.. ........... . 
 
Srt(! Courrty 
 
Wei! 
W~mfifmr 
 
...................- 
 
GA 
 
Pt~kl~};j 
 
li$j',{l!5 
 
Other 
hientitrer 
lh~11K)rd 2 
 
LatUude- 
J1~J6~~2~ 
 
L<mglrude 
 
Top of 
oper~ 
tnwrvat 
 
BQttt)m of open lnterva! 
 
Trans~ 
mi~S8htlty 
{ft2/d) 
 
___ ____, 
 
(ft} 
 
(ft} 
 
......................................,""' 
 
83-::z~.:/24'' 
 
.3?4 
 
42<} 
 
/.,li.ii} 
 
Storage 
co~kiMt 
 
Mctlwd 
 
Referen~ 
 
Hydro!Qgie unit 
 
R9markz. 
 
- - _ ...... .......... ............_......................................- - - - -  
 
sc 
 
fh~;i'}k:< and Nh,,!':< 
 
n..F! 
 
(l'l~Yl 
 
do. 
 
Scnwcn 
 
]1\]i}l 
 
J.P. King# t. 
 
J2''3i/l8" ~!"44'2::<'' 
 
25,~ 
 
<k>. 
 
d;) 
 
}1WM5 
 
Sylvania ii2 
 
32'>4 5~1 ~}l( 1W3S'l2" 
 
!50 
 
670 D.OOO 
 
:lot 
 
4.. tf>O 
 
dn. 
 
<ln. 
 
Ul' 
 
SL vst:s i\ks. 
 
<k>. 
 
do. 
 
d;) 
 
;,\<.> 
 
~~~). 
 
l1X037 MiUhawu Bu~'lla 32~>5715{? Sl''37'2:2'' 
 
37U 
 
Vh=w 
 
:HX051 USGS MH!ha:;;;:u 3J.~s3~~s~ 8j::]f4T' 
 
5I) 
 
TWl 
 
565 
 
3,5iil} 
 
so 
 
!.</~}) 
 
;Ji;. 
 
F,w,~and 
 
McFadden {l%"i) 
 
d(;, Cl>rrk:c and othe-rs 
!l9%) 
 
{i..F) (UFl 
 
ci;< 
 
d<). 
 
~nXtlSl USGS Mil!ha~~n 32''53'.25'' ~WJ5'43'' 
 
!55 
 
205 
 
5,6<}.) 
 
nv.2 
 
di). 
 
~k~. 
 
de>. 
 
dn. 
 
;h 
 
.BX(}:H 
 
USGS MiUh~~v~;n 
 
J2~~.13:::r1:t 
 
f>l 0 ~~5'4Y' 
 
125 
 
1W..3 
 
nu 
 
l ,301.1 
 
do. 
 
~1n. 
 
d(). 
 
d<J, 'li;ttna!J 
 
U>Qml2 
 
{)corgia S~;;i<' JZ"OiYl3'' S2"G9'54" 
 
5()(! 
 
!'risen# l 
 
l!W 
 
'!.,liJi) 
 
sc Kdlam;;;:;.l 
 
d:). 
 
Omd,~y ! l;.><m} 
 
::b 
 
d.,'), 
 
29i,YJO! City <.:fll.;;:id.'.;vi!k P 32f;)'())" 20l\7'l(}x 
 
51)() 
 
l 
 
'lU 
 
,5i~> 
 
do. 
 
<io. 
 
;J;), 
 
<h 
 
1'tM~ir 
 
22Qt}}1 Clry ;.:fMd~~'' iJ l .U"04'lW' S2'>5J?4tt 
 
l2il 
 
<'b. 
 
do. 
 
22Q003 c;ty <)fMcR~<~ # .~ 32"01''54" 32'>54~4(}X 
 
235 
 
(>41) 
 
7&>ne~; 
 
545 
 
tl,(l()(> 
 
;k 
 
do. 
 
<.k> . 
 
;k, 
 
do. 
 
d<.>. 
 
do. 
 
d<). 
 
24Pi.li}6 City ;;{ l..ur:-lhm 31''55'~ il2'',!l'i){i" 
 
3Yl 
 
City# l 
 
45f; 
 
7/~ei.l 
 
,1;), 
 
do. 
 
<.k>. 
 
dt~. 
 
do 
 
241-'i)i}l,l 
 
N.S Wh<:"ks 
 
~~ j "%'2?" 82'~4<}'~H" 
 
40() 
 
'?'l8 
 
6)~~{) 
 
dn. 
 
do. 
 
;,.!<,>, 
 
de. 
 
Tift 
 
!7K(}6l City off<ftrm 112 )j~21'16'~ SYW'4<':>" 
 
21S 
 
)l)! 50,1)()() 
 
d;;, 
 
Kdbmm~ci 
 
<.k>. 
 
> 
~ 
 
Gosd:~y (l9:Xl} 
 
"g 
 
;:! 
 
do. 
 
dn. 
 
lSKOOl 
 
City <.>!'THbn :>!''24'5!.'' $}"29'24'' 
 
Y1i.i 
 
f,W 
 
}},(>(.!!) 
 
<.k>. 
 
dr:. 
 
do. 
 
~ ~> 
 
> 
 
-1>< 
~4 
 
 Table A~1. Transmissivity and storage coefficient of the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers and equivalent clastic units, coastal Georgia and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida--Continued 
 
t 
 
{ft, 
 
foot; 
 
ft2/d, 
 
feet 
 
squared 
 
per 
 
day;%, 
 
percent; 
 
do., 
 
ditto; 
 
ftldlft, 
 
foot/day/foot; 
 
0 , 
 
degrees;', 
 
minutes;*, 
 
seconds; 
 
SJWMO, 
 
St. 
 
Johns 
 
River 
 
Water 
 
Management 
 
District; 
 
S, 
 
storage; 
 
T, 
 
transmissivity; 
 
USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; SCDNR, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. State: FL, Florida; GA, Georgia; SC, South Carolina. Method: NL, non!eaky aquifer analysis; L, leaky aquifer analysis; SC, transmissivity based on specific capacity; SL, straight line analytical solution; V, van der Kamp analysis of oscillating flow (Kruseman and de Ritter, 1994); (?), analytical 
 
::; 
<.c... 
Ill 
 
method not cited. Hydrologic unit: UF, Upper Floridan aquifer; LF, Lower Floridan aquifer; UF,LF, Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers; hydrologic unit enclosed in parentheses indicates a clastic updip aquifer equivalent to the carbonate Upper or Lower Floridan aquifers] 
 
.5t:,r. 
 
----~-- 
 
......--------- 
 
~------- 
 
----------- 
 
~--~--------- 
 
-------- 
 
a 
 
State County 
 
Well Identifier 
 
Other Identifier 
 
Latitude 
 
Below land surface .......... 
Top of Bottom Trans longitude open of open miasivlty 
Interval interval (ft21d) 
 
Storage 
coefficient 
 
Method 
 
Reference 
 
Hydrologic unit 
 
Remarks 
 
1;, 
a:..X.. 
 
--------------.......- 
 
.........---~~- 
 
GA Toombs 26ROOI City of Vidalia # 2 3213'02" 82"24'36" 
 
(ft) 
 
(ft) 
 
------------------------- 
 
720 
 
1,000 
 
9,800 
 
:;r 
 
-------------------- 
 
sc Kellam and 
 
UF 
 
~------------ 
 
~ ..,.. 
a- 
 
Gorday ( 1990) 
 
c~.. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
26R003 City of Vidalia 3212'39" 8223'22" 
 
442 
 
800 14,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
=,t.. 
 
do. 
 
Ware 
 
27G004 USGSTW2, 31 07'05" 8215'56" 
 
636 
 
1,785 1,000,000 
 
Ware County 
 
150,000 
 
do. Washington 22Y007 
 
Test Hole2 
 
3302'36" 8256'49" 
 
36 
 
114 
 
2,700 
 
NL Matthews and 
 
Krause ( 1984 ); 
 
v 
 
R.E. Faye, USGS 
 
retired, written 
 
conunun., 2002 
 
do. Faye and 
 
Uf,LF (Lf) 
 
Well completed in Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers; flowmeter survey indicates 90% of flow from Upper Floridan aquifer 
Screen intervals 36 41. 54-69, 
 
.=..~ 
II: 
CD 
=<Ien 
 
McFadden ( 1986) 
 
and 104-U4; latter in 
 
Cretaewus strata 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
22Y008 
 
Test Hole 3 
 
3301'01" 8257'05" 
 
33 
 
200 
 
720 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Screen intervals 33-A3, 48-58, 
 
133-138, and 190-200; latter 
 
two zones in Cretaceous strata 
 
de. 
 
do. 
 
23X034 Holmes Canning 3256'!9" 82"45'01" 
 
!82 
 
Company, 2 
 
335 
 
2,400 
 
sc Brooks and others 
 
do. 
 
(1985} 
 
do. 
 
Wayne 
 
30K004 
 
.Justiss Mears 
 
3127'19" 8152'53" 
 
662 
 
770 270.,000 
 
0.0004 
 
NL Randolph and 
 
UF 
 
BP&P#l 
 
others (1985) 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
30L003 Homer Johnson 3137'01 .. 8154'34" 472 
 
584 240,000 
 
.0006 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
31LOOl BP&I' J Mears 2 3131'04" 8! 0 52'18" 
 
587 
 
691 260,000 
 
.0004 
 
do. 
 
do . 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
31M009 ITT Rayonier Dl, 3139'42" 8! 0 50'39" 
 
480 
 
1,009 280,000 
 
.0005 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
GGS-297 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
3lMOlO ITT Rayonier 02 3139'34" 81 50'22" 
 
486 
 
1,010 270,000 
 
.0005 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
3l.MOI3 11T Rayonier 05 3138'59" 8149'59" 
 
500 
 
1,000 220,000 
 
.0002 
 
do . 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
31MOl4 lTt' Rayonier D6 3! 0 39'11" stso:w 
 
493 
 
1,000 230,000 
 
.0004 
 
do . 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. Wheeler 22(>004 Little Ocmulgee 3205'42" 8253'09" 
 
194 
 
State Park 
 
248 
 
8,200 
 
sc Kellam and 
 
do. 
 
Gorday (1990) 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
23R001 City of Alamo # 2 32"08'59" 8246'43" 
 
352 
 
600 
 
3,300 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
 Table A1, Tfansmis..~ivi{f and str.~r<t>;Je <;O(!fficlen! of the Upper and Low Floridan aquih.:ll$ and equivaient c!aslh~ units, coastal G~nfgia and adil?lef.>nt parts of South Ca mlina and FlorldaContinued [tt font; lt'!d. ket sqtmcd per day;%, percent; do., diltn; 11/difL f~11.)!:/Jay!Rlot; ~.degrees;', minutes; , ~~;::>.}nds: S.lWtvW, St. Johns Riv<~r Wat>-"r Mm;:;gement Distrk:~ S. stnrag'-"; T, lr:::ne>mi::sivity: USGS, US. G<.>.}bgical Sw'vs:y; SCDNR, Swh Carolina !RputhMnt of Ni!l:ttri{ R>""'!<OU(<,..'e:S. Sbtw FL.. Florida: GA. (korgia: SC Sollth C;;trdimt t'>il:lhixl: NL, nnnJ.taky a4Bifcr armlysis: L l:;:r;~;y ;squilh ;ma!ysis; SC n<:n->missi~.=ity b:~scd on $pedtk. capudty; SL, ;;;rai8ht hai;' ;;nulylk~a.: ~dutisxt: '/, van der Kamp mmlysis of <.)e>~iUating !1GV; fK.rw->mnan ;l.nd <k Ritt>-"r, 1 (:>i}4.L ('!), :mal;tica! md})<)(! not citsxl. Hydm1ogk unh: !Jf, Upper Floridan aq\ti!'t!r; I..F, Lmver f!(ltid~om aquikr: UCLF, Upper and Lo-...v<~t Floridan uquikr8; hydrologk unit endosd in p'ilt~nth($~$ indi;;.:>K-5 ~: cbstic 
updip a*1ifer {~qHivaien:t ;.(>the <:1.-:tbunak Upp~~r nr Lmver Florid:m a4uifcr2.] 
 
.o~'-._.. 
 
State Coumy 
 
Wen 
identifier 
 
----------------' ~c Allt'ndak 3)At\-y5 
 
    .,...,.~.,.,..-, 
 
uooooooooooooo~'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'- 
 
..""""""'""""""" 
 
Below !ami aurfat:e 
 
.-,-,-,-.-_-,-.-.-.-.-_-.-.-.-,..,""'""""""""""""""'"'"'"'"'""'"'" 
 
'-"_ __ 
 
Ot!mr 
identifier 
 
tat!tucl~ 
 
Top of l<mgltude ~peft 
lnter'll!ll 
 
Bottom 
o1o~n !nt~ntil! 
 
Tram! misslvlty 
(ft2td) 
 
StOf8{!(! cooff!doot 
 
Method 
 
Re<fereMe 
 
Kydro!~:~gk: 
urs!t 
 
R~marka 
 
(ft} 
 
{#) 
 
--~---~----~ ------------~~~------ 
 
..................................................... 
 
-----~ 
 
ALL-!.5J 
 
.'l.1''fiif2 i" s!" l<i' l:'i" 
 
2'1() 
 
}4!} 
 
3,9{~~ 
 
SL 
 
Nf'..~-.;-:..~'>.n't~ ~ 100fJ) 
 
LF 
 
Ncw:..:'H~g: t;s~c~~ H:st l~ir 
 
<.\<.> 
 
dn. 
 
JJ13B-p1 
 
A!.J.-"!>26 
 
\F%'.W 1W14'1l" 257 
 
.N'i 
 
5iXl 
 
d;J. 
 
do. 
 
d<.>, 
 
Ne-,\t~,;::~u:J:~:: :2te:; v~:st pO~.') 
 
d<) 
 
;j;,), 
 
33l..-yl 
 
ALt4il 
 
JJ"{i5'1Rx 1Wi4'1()" 
 
ISO 
 
3!fi 
 
4,(li}i} 
 
d<l. 
 
do. 
 
<.k>. 
 
<b. 
 
d~). 
 
d..:.). 
 
:'l4/'>Aq2 /<,{l_..:;!{:i~ ~ l<>wn }J"ZH\il X iS l ''lS'(l'!" 
 
:140 
 
d A!knsia!e 
 
<.k> 
 
,1,). 
 
34A.-sdl} 
 
Al..t-nn 
 
s J.Fti I'(}I)" !"! 1rJ:2'' 
 
l.'l4 
 
32i:< 
 
2.,9iYJ 
 
444 
 
3.JZlU 
 
<.k. 
 
As;_.;_:~.:tt an-:.~ 
 
New~..:~.nne (; <!S.6) 
 
do. N,,.,,,,xm;:,, tznnm 
 
<.h. 
 
do. 
 
New~~ me r:~t;;:; h'S! fair 
 
<l<.> 
 
\l;), 
 
34,\A-:<.4 
 
/,,Lf..-3 !0 
 
Jj"'(i! 'i}l X Sl'"l8'tlT' 
 
240 
 
do. 
 
d<.> 
 
T~.A/-,.q;> 
 
ALL--375 
 
:tnww" Sl'"23'tlY' 1'U 
 
329 
 
J)lltl 
 
57t< 
 
9'?0 
 
0.0i)(4 
 
do. 
 
(b. 
 
NL USG:'i Ilks 
 
dt). 
 
Ncw-:_-.~_.~ne r::t~% t~:~st g<.xd 
 
(k<. 
 
<io 
 
do 
 
.15Msq1> 
 
ALL--374 
 
3T'U! '"5(l" 8F2.nH'' 450 
 
d<) 
 
do. 
 
3t)AAt)! A!..L::rl-- S*li.kn, 3T'Zln.y 81"2,:>'!\J'' 460 
 
ho.:. n<.>. ! 
 
;JJ;. 
 
d\'!. 
 
3n-q"! AU.. 66 Creek J3"i.l6'55x Sl':~:r%'' 
 
JQO 
 
l'lar:tatkm 
 
>:h Ui1mhm-g :llXm5 
 
BAM-24 
 
J.Yl7't;;l" sn12-zr 
 
l4H 
 
d(3 . 
 
d:.:. 
 
~HYq! 
 
!>.AM,62 
 
33''! 1'w" st'O!.nY 
 
4& 
 
de. 
 
sk>. 
 
JlZ-il 
 
BAM-26 
 
33'\!6'!0" 8l''iJiY liY' 
 
N 
 
dn. 
 
do 
 
32X-.d; 
 
BAM:B 
 
33"! 9'27" !',! "i}~'2.~'' 
 
!f!2 
 
.'fi5 
 
1,.20{} 
 
7~}4 
 
1,10() 
 
nu 
 
?)Oe 
 
Y4 
 
6an 
 
::!6(l 
 
t~7(3f: 
 
225 
 
f_t7{J 
 
29f~ 
 
U00 
 
.f!fKJ3 
 
do. 
 
;.lt), 
 
SL Fay>: and 
M.<.:hKldt~n ( l9%i 
 
N! 
 
;.l(.l. 
 
;)<; 
(Lfi 
do. 
 
Sl. 
 
N~~W<):._\~:) ~ 2~'-~'Y>) 
 
;J<.< 
 
dt'. 
 
<.k>. 
 
(!;;. 
 
:.!<>. 
 
(1\i. 
 
LF 
 
-N~.::\~. COfl1( n~tr~::-: t:;;~.:: p~)<))" 
 
d,)_ 
 
N~..,-:~~--~rae ;~l:f.~.~~: t:;~:_ ~~n: 
 
,'J<-,. 
 
Ncwc;,.~~-=}:; -:-at<t.:~ :~--st {~~~~~: 
 
&-J. 
 
Newc\)lr~::: -:-~it{;::~.. :~::st i1~ir 
 
dt). 
 
do. 
 
3:n:-g} 
 
;h B:mm<'ll BZ.nl 
 
BAM-22 
BRNC:!.<l5 
 
~rr1w:=:i'} 
 
ap:u~:t9' 1 
 
!62 
 
.}.1.::'(r1'.~ ~t<t 
 
31 ~; 3'41~1 
 
l7.J>j 
 
3()2 
 
R(!(} 
 
2f>(! 
 
6}(10 
 
d;). 
 
(!f.. 
 
do. 
 
;J;; 
 
.-h. 
 
NCW<.~\3m::: r~t-:;::~r t~~t {1f!O'! 
 
d:.<. 
 
Ncw<.x-:rm:: -rat~~~ :,:..1$-t (:.t~r 
 
;!;;. 
 
d(>. 
 
>h 
 
do. 
 
;h 
 
do. 
 
<.!<.>. 
 
dn. 
 
J4W>4 OJ4X..t!! 
~:>Y~l:>S 
35Yct 
 
f}l{N..J5 
BRN&86 !J!{N.&{) !JRNSI 
 
J3~:2 I 14i)l< Sl'"l83U'' 
 
204 
 
:.:~"15'4'1'' Sl'".lYtW 
 
NO 
 
"YP14'iYT' Sl"n.'W'. 
 
2lS 
 
rY!4'iO" Rl"22'45'' 
 
!l\0 
 
47U 
 
4,!0\) 
 
J45 
 
soe 
 
T.!"l 
 
11,00{) 
 
.120 
 
4,7\J() 
 
do. 
 
<io 
 
(h 
 
d.o. 
 
~LF) 
<.!.). 
 
fb. r~":tv..-u:~t~c rates tt-::~;t po-:_)r 
 
f 
 
<'b. 
 
do. 
 
.k>. 
 
fb 
 
i 
;(' 
 
&!. 
 
d<). 
 
dt>. 
 
J<). 
 
) 
 
~ Cl 
 
 ~ 
 
Table Ae1, Transmissivity and storage coefficient of the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers and equivalent clastic units, coastal Georgia 
 
and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida~ontinued [ft, foot; ft2/d, feet squared per day;%, percent; doe, ditto; ftldlft, foot/day/foot; 0 , degrees;', minutes;", seconds; SJWMD, St. Johns River Water Management District; S, storage; T, transmissivity; 
 
i 
 
USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; SCDNR, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. State: FL, Florida; GA, Georgia; SC, South Carolina. Method: NL, nonlcaky aquifer analysis; L, leaky 
 
01 
c:: 
 
aquifer analysis; SC, transmissivity based on specific capacity; SL, straight line analytical solution; V, van der Kamp analysis of oscillating flow (Kruseman and de Ritter, 1994); (?), analytical 
 
~ 
 
method not cited Hydrologic unit UF, Upper Floridan aquifer; LF, Lower Floridan aquifer; UF,LF, Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers; hydrologic unit enclosed in parentheses indicates a clastic updip aquifer equivalent to the carbonate Upper or Lower Floridan aquifers] 
 
e_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,w 
 
.~-----------e------------ 
Below fand surface 
 
---------w---e_ _ __ 
 
~ 
1a. Cll 
 
State County 
 
Welt identifier 
 
Other identifier 
 
Longitude Top of"'-BOttom- Trans 
 
latitude 
 
open of open mlsalvlty Storage 
 
Interval Interval (rt2/d) coefficient Mmhod 
 
Reference 
 
Hydrologic 
unit 
 
Remarks 
 
atil 
~ 
CD 
 
sc Barnwell 35Y.c7 
 
-w- 
 
BRN-61 
 
3314'30" 
 
lW23'10" 
 
(ft} 
 
(ft) 
 
---------~ 
 
220 
 
315 
 
5,900 
 
------------------e 
 
SL Newcome (2000) 
 
(LF) 
 
Newcome rates test fait 
 
~ 
:c::1.. 
! 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
37W-xl 
 
BRN-469 
 
33"20'30" 81"33'30" 
 
175 
 
200 
 
2,000 
 
do. 
 
doe 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test poor 
 
:E 
 
doe 
 
do. 
 
37X-wl 
 
BRN-810 
 
3315'58" 81"32'36" 
 
182 
 
213 
 
2,000 
 
0.0003 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test good 
 
...=c : 
Cll 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
37Y-f2 
 
BRN-268 
 
33"13'24" 81"34'54" 
 
360 
 
605 
 
6,700 
 
do. 
 
doe 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates lest fair 
 
~ 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
37Y-g2 
 
BRN-466 
 
33"13'19~ !W33'06" 
 
262 
 
335 
 
1)00 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
i 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
37Y-g3 
 
BRN-465 
 
33"13'20" 1W33'07" 
 
230 
 
374 
 
1,500 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
38Y-h6 
 
BRN-811 
 
33"1.3'24 81"37'02" 
 
260 
 
270 
 
170 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test poor 
 
do. Beaufort 24JJ..c 1 
 
BFI~49 
 
32"19'30" 80"27'37" 
 
96 
 
150 
 
1,900 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
UF 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
25HHpl2 
 
Bfl~l566 
 
32"26'15" 80"34'32" 
 
59 
 
66 
 
4,300 
 
do. Aucottand Newcome ( 1986) 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test fair 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
25HH-pl7 
 
BFT-1570 
 
3226'28 80"34'32" 
 
51 
 
59 
 
2,900 
 
do. Newcome (2000) 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test good 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
2SHH-p6 
 
BFT-1560 
 
3226'02" 80"34'56" 
 
50 
 
58 
 
2,500 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
25ll-e4 
 
BF1~1784 
 
32"24'03" 8034'32" 
 
73 
 
78 
 
5,600 
 
e002 
 
NL 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
26II-13 
 
BFT-1787 
 
32"22'04" 80"36'36" 
 
64 
 
66 20,000 
 
.000! 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test good 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test poor 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
261Is5 
 
BFT-1'788 
 
32"21'59" 8036'10" 
 
55 
 
70 20,000 
 
.0003 
 
do. 
 
do . 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
26!I-wl6 
 
BFT-Ie793 
 
3220'09" 80"37'36" 
 
90 
 
120 17,000 
 
.0001 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome n1tes test good 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
27HH-n9 
 
BFT-2066 
 
3227'18" 8043'05" 
 
120 
 
170 
 
790 
 
SL 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
27HH..o3 
 
BFT-114 
 
32"27'52" 8044'26" 
 
83 
 
100 
 
3,600 
 
.00004 
 
NL 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
27H-!30 
 
BfT-1973 
 
32"22'28" 80"41'37" 
 
52 
 
88 13,000 
 
.0001 
 
SL 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test poor 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test good 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
27UI5 
 
BfT-795 
 
32"22'26" 8041 '35" 
 
45 
 
94 15,000 
 
.0003 
 
NL 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test fair 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
27JJ-il0 
 
BFT 2255 
 
3218'25" 80"41'12" 
 
283 
 
603 
 
530 
 
SL SCDNR files 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test good 
 
 Table AN1, lfansmmsiv1ty and S{ontw; <:O(!ffi<:ient of the Upper and Lower Fk!lldan aquifers and eqHivaler;t dasUc unib;;, 1;o~~st~:l1 Oeotgia 
 
and ad}ac1;>nt parts of South Car<)!lna and Florida--Continued [tt, fnHt.; n"id, fe~t ;:;qtkited per day;'~\., pcn:.:nt; do., ditt<:l; ft!difL t<~inldayi{i.)<)t; ", dt:grce:s; ', mimm~;;; '', ~cwwJs; SJ\VMD, S;, .lohn~ River Water tvbnagm::wni Di;;;r;~t; S, ~;tora~,:w: T. trml$lr!iS$ivity: 
 
USGS, U.S. Gi:~'}logka! SuiT(:::y; SCDNR, Smtth Can:>!iml Depm:nn(:m of Natural Ri;..-svm\:<. State: FL, fh>dda: GA, (korgia; SC, SNlth Carvlin~1. lVkth;,x!: NL, nnnh:.">ky aqulfi.~r anaiy;;;,;;: L, kaky 
 
aq<lit'et ana!y~l~; SC, tr3X!f-n>iss.ivity bM~d on sp!~(:ifk ~apachy; SL stmight line ~malytka! ;;o)wion; V. v;w d<:r Kmnp ana!y$is of <ssciH~lting fh>w (KntS<i'>l11tm ar:d d;;; Ritter, !994}: (h. ar;<;lyt;c,11 
 
nwtllOd not cit~. Hydw!ogk uni~: UF, Uppt."l' Fk!lid;m aquikr; LF, Lower Fbddan tH]Uilb; UF,LL Upper and L<>wer Floridan aquil\::rs; hydrnlogic unit cndow!.l in parcnthC$C~ indkai:~'s a t:!>l~hc 
 
npdip aquik-r ~quivaient B> the c~rhonate Upper N Lo>~w F!oridm1 aqui.fers! 
 
................................. ~~--~~------------- 
 
---..~...........'" ......................."""'"'""" 
 
................................................................................ ~~ 
 
___ .................. 
-~~~~~-.--_. 
 
B!!!!Ow !and BUrfat'(! 
 
St&~e Cuunfy 
 
'lief! 100nt!11!!!f 
 
- 
 
- 
 
-s-c 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Be:1Hfmt 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
.......~--27JJ.)4 
 
Other identifier 
 
tatlturle 
 
Top of 
longltuda open inter11al 
 
!k.tlom lh'!r!S of open m!$shd!y {llh~f'Va! {ff1/d} 
 
Storage 
~;:ooffkient 
 
Me1h~d 
 
!Wferem:e 
 
Hydrci-gk; tm!t 
 
A~mark~ 
 
(ft} 
 
(ft} 
 
.~-------~---~------------ ................................................. ~----~~-.~---------~ 
 
!3VI~l84i) 
 
3Y!E':ZO'' BZl"4!'23" 
 
:'5(l 
 
1,()2 
 
UU(} 
 
SL 
 
Ncwc'.nr:c ~2{}{}~}~ 
 
UF 
 
N;;;'w(:orn~' .nlt,;:$ test fair 
 
do 
 
~t--.<. 
 
do. 
 
,.J;.'. 
 
27.H-i9 
:nu...q2: 
 
B!:vi~224S 
BFJ: tt>u<< 
 
32''HN4'' BZl"4l~JY 
 
~'.':15 
 
3216'\tl'' S\l"4.1'2.Z" 
 
227 
 
f. ~.....( .$.},... 
&90 
 
7(\ll ~.. 7tm 
 
<.k>. 
 
<.k>. 
 
<k>. 
 
<k>. 
 
;k: 
 
N<>wco.:~1e ~~~'""' te:s\ g<:x:><l 
 
do. 
 
N,.,,.come rot.~>:> k<:<( iilir 
 
dt}. 
 
<I<.> 
 
27tr.:.K.f12 
 
BFTl%8 
 
3!'' l 3'51'' E004Yi.l0" 
 
!4() 
 
:,>,~W 
 
92,0(l(l 
 
d<>. 
 
<b. 
 
dt:. 
 
Ne~''.:~~me ra.t:::s te?;:t }"X).r.r 
 
do. 
 
;io 
 
2?KK!13 
 
!Wl'l%9 
 
J!"!J'll'' 8(f44'44" 
 
t4ii 
 
226 110llOn 
 
do. 
 
dn. 
 
<k,. 
 
do. 
 
~'~i~!. 
 
do. 
 
Z7KKg l 
 
l:lFP)~5 
 
J2'' l T4l '' ?>fl'43'42" 
 
)42 
 
630 
 
27Jlii(j 
 
:h G~,~ne and ?ark 
(lW2) 
 
dfl, 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
d~~. 
 
27KKlll 
 
BF'I~f,S2 
 
32U'IY W"42'3W 
 
!35 
 
!GO 64-,tltm 
 
d::>. N<.,wwm<.:: {2WJ) 
 
<k>. 
 
~j~) 
 
do. 
 
d<). 
 
2'!KK-.M 
 
m'TI591 
 
.U'! J'31F S{l"42'ti8" 
 
Ul 
 
~'tm 
 
94,0()1) 
 
<k<. 
 
;);;, 
 
dn. 
 
Nev..:c~~n-;_e rat~:.$ t~:::-:t p:.):.:~r 
 
d<.::. 
 
;JF 
 
2'/KK-j) 
 
BFTlin.?< 
 
\~"D':)g' EW4WJ8" 
 
2'Hj 
 
dt'>. 
 
dn. 
 
27KKl12 
 
HFT-21~5 
 
.'52''!2'37'' 8H'41\H" .H4 
 
dt'>. 
 
;k 
 
27KKsn4~ 
 
HFf-1632 
 
3:2"12'44" 8(\"41'47'' 
 
un 
 
dn. 
 
d<J. 
 
17KK-nl5 
 
HFf-1685 
 
12"12'()7" SW43'32" 
 
ua 
 
::k>. 
 
dtl. 
 
::r!KKA>H! 
 
BfTlE20 
 
32''1?.'!7'' i:<Zl"44'57" 
 
~';I(> 
 
@f.: 
 
(;,{)(:~) 
 
@ij 
 
l~)<{HJO 
 
2(J(j S<'>,tlOO 
 
2H(i 67.tl00 
 
J!(! 11,nnn 
 
:!;;. 
 
do 
 
>.h 
 
do. 
 
dn. 
 
dn. 
 
<.k>. 
 
N~)\"'iCOtt";...;~- rat~:i:> t\:~~ g~;~;d 
 
de. 
 
<k. 
 
<k>. 
 
N".w~:::Jf~.l~ rate:s t:::$t ptxx 
 
::h 
 
dE 
 
do. 
 
Ne;;-:c:-"Jfne ~ti:S t:;.s.t f~:-rr 
 
::1~:.. 
 
Ch<wlw and far>. 
 
.h 
 
d<>. 
 
{ !99?.~~ Nf!Wf::J..un~: 
 
(200()) 
 
&!. 
 
d::>. 
 
27KK-q.~ 
 
IWfl58:1 
 
J2'll'W 8()''43\ll" 
 
!16 
 
lijj$ 5lJ!OO 
 
th:. Newwme (2000) 
 
do. 
 
Nc,vc~)nle r-t'='& tr::\.t pN-,r 
 
d:'i. 
 
d<>. 
 
?.YKK->;il 
 
!:WT758 
 
32~' ~ fr2:Y' 8(1''43':!.~" 
 
tt~ 
 
2f)(~ 
 
i;":.,(j(j(j 
 
G.GOtll 
 
NL 
 
~h,. 
 
::k>. 
 
N;;;~w<.:(:fn~~ raV~8 tc:$t n~if 
 
*' 
 
d<). 
 
2i'l.L& 
 
!3fTt.i7l 
 
32~'{J9'21"' arf\)43'56'"" 
 
145 
 
l2l 
 
~H-<}00 
 
~,.,~.} 
 
dn. 
 
27U...-dl 
 
BFl.~lS% 
 
.>;hw'44" 8{}..).44~ ~ 2~) 
 
J4i.l 
 
l9S i<4.Utl0 
 
SL 
 
ciE 
 
de. 
 
&.. 
 
<b. 
 
N-:.:~<:VC~~r:le rat~:~ tft pnH: 
 
:h 
 
<k>. 
 
do. 
 
d;. 
 
Z7Ll.--~d2- 
 
f-.IF'ft947 
 
32~i).:Jl42l( 
 
S~f'44'I2<) 
 
J4ll 
 
1<}t1 'N.ZltlO 
 
::!(>. 
 
~1$.} 
 
:h 
 
<!::>. 
 
.t 
 
do. 
 
d~... 
 
2ilGG.a!O 
 
BrT-!756 
 
JZ"J4'/.iF f>W45'0f, 
 
1.24 
 
214 
 
1,1nn 
 
..{~{}{} i 
 
NL 
 
~Jo 
 
:k 
 
Ncw,;mm: r;ste~; t<.';<! !~ir 
 
~ 
 
de. 
 
;l;;, 
 
28GGxl 
 
1Wl~l79U 
 
J2<~(V~j2:r f>W'4!S'Y>" 
 
33 
 
14(1 24/l(l{) 
 
~0{}{}2 
 
d;<. 
 
~].~) 
 
Jn_ 
 
N.cw<.~em;, t;Ji.e~; i ~>! p;;;>r 
 
1:13. ~' 
 
t!t'>. 
 
~k:, 
 
2~l{lgi2 
 
HFl'c;'IJl 
 
32.'Ti'22" ilfY4:''5i'' 
 
<')() 
 
q} 
 
j ,60!) 
 
SL 
 
~55) 
 
:ln. 
 
N-:::w<:crr~~:: -rate~; "l t~~t fnir 
 
) 
 
~ 
 
 Table A1. Transmissivity and storage coefficient of the Upper and lower Floridan aquifers and equivalent clastic units, coastal Georgia 
 
Iii 
 
and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida--continued 
 
[ft, foot.; ft2/d, feet squared pet day;%, percent; do., ditto; ftld/ft, foot/day/foot; o, degrees;, minutes;", seconds; SJWMD, St. Johns River Water Management District; S, storage; T, transmissivity; USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; SCDNR, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. State: FL, Florida; GA, Georgia; SC, South Carolina. Method: NL, nonleaky aquifer analysis; L, leaky aquifer analysis; SC, tnmsmissivity based on specific capacity; SL, straight line analytical solution; V, van der Kamp analysis of oscillating flow (Kruseman and de Ritter, 1994); (?), analytical method not cited. Hydrologic unit: UF, Upper Floridan aquifer; LF, Lower Floridan aquifer; UF,LF, Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers; hydrologic unit enclosed in parentheses it:~dicates a clastic 
 
i 
r5r. 
 
updip aquifer equivalent to the carbonate Upper or Lower Floridan aquifersJ 
 
__........... 
 
...................~ 
 
Beiow land surface 
 
---......................... 
 
----.. 
 
l 
l --- 
 
State County 
 
Well 
identifier 
 
Other Identifier 
 
sc 
 
Be<~ufort 28HH-t2 
 
BFTll5 
 
Latitude 32"26'15" 
 
Longitude 80"45'36" 
 
Top of 
open 
 
Bottom 
ofopen 
 
Trane- 
mleslvlty (t'Y-Id) 
 
Storage coefficient 
 
Method 
 
interval Interval 
 
Reference 
 
--(-ft-) ------(f-t)------- 
 
72 
 
95 
 
4.000 
 
.000! 
 
NL Newcome (2000) 
 
Hydrologic unit 
 
Remarks 
 
__________ _____ ..................,.. , 
 
. 
 
UF 
 
Newcome rates test fair 
 
= a 
:;. 
Cll 
:%2 
Q ~. 
 
A. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
28HH-t7 
 
Dff-22 
 
32"26'18" 80"45'50" 
 
80 
 
84 11.000 
 
.0001 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
28JJ"e8 
 
BFT-2067 
 
:uJ9'32" 80"49'25" 
 
240 
 
560 15,000 
 
SL 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test good 
 
:! c 
c:: 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
28JJ-f4 
 
BFT-1630 
 
32"18'27" 80"49'30" 
 
100 
 
200 45,000 
 
0.0004 
 
Nl 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
.~.. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
28JJ-b5 
 
Bff-2265 
 
32"18'16" 80"47'45" 
 
397 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
28JJ-m7 
 
BFT2233 
 
32" 17'31" 8047'37" 393 
 
587 ll,OOO 587 13,000 
 
SL 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test fair 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test good 
 
!R 
;sa. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
28JJ-n2 
 
BFT-1389 
 
32"17'03" 80"48'59" 
 
125 
 
192 18,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test poor 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
28JJ-p5 
 
BFT-1845 
 
32"16'51" 80"49'17" 
 
255 
 
600 
 
8,800 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
28JJ.y2 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
28JJ-y3 
 
Bff499 
Bl"f~500 
 
3215'08" 8049'42" 
 
97 
 
32"15'02n 80"49'43" 
 
100 
 
209 56,000 340 58,000 
 
.0002 
 
NL 
 
do. 
 
SL SCDNR files 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test good 
 
do. 
 
From a report by C.E. Nuzman to 
 
the BASF Corporation 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
28JJ-y4 
 
BF!~1326 
 
32"15'09" 80"49'11" 
 
140 
 
200 24,000 
 
do. Newcome (2000) 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test poor 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
28KKd 
 
Bf'l~2229 
 
32" 14'00" 80"48'00" 
 
357 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
28KK-d6 
 
BFI~l330 
 
n 14'25 so"48'37" 
 
140 
 
568 11.000 174 27,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test good 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test poor 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
28KK-el 
 
Bff-358 
 
32"14'55" 80"49'44" 
 
101 
 
380 78,000 
 
do. SCDNR files 
 
do. 
 
From a report by C. E. Nuzman to 
 
the BASF Corporation 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
29Il-s5 
 
BFT-2242 
 
3221'28" 80"51'42" 
 
298 
 
600 
 
4,000 
 
do. Newcome (2000) 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test fair 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
29H-y2 
 
BFT2273 
 
32"20'10" 8054'48" 
 
314 
 
582 
 
5,300 
 
do. SCDNR files 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test good 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
29JJ-d6 
 
BFT-2243 
 
32"19'57" 8053'27" 
 
357 
 
555 
 
4,000 
 
do. Newcome (2000) 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test fair 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
29JJ-ell 
 
BfT-1766 
 
3219'50" 80"54'32" 
 
130 
 
215 53,000 
 
.0003 
 
NL 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
2911-15 
 
Bff-2222 
 
32"17'08" 80"51'38" 
 
353 
 
490 
 
8,200 
 
SL 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
29JJ.m2 
 
BH-1452 
 
3217'36" 8052'06" 
 
160 
 
200 23,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test poor 
 
 Tablll!l A-1, Transmissivity and stN;:tge coefiici;:mt of the Upper and Low~u- Floridan aquil~H'::'< <md equiva!~n1t >::lastic units, co>.:~sla! Georgia aM adjacent parts d South Carolina and Florida--Continued 
!fl, f;,lot; f(id. leet ~~.Hli"W p>lr i!ay; %>, pw:,:.nt; d<>., d:iuo; it/d!H, n~<Jtiiby/l(>n:.; "", (.k~w.&-s; ',minutes; ", ~i<Xomls; SJWMD, S;. J<:>tms f{i~~~r W:;,kr\lan;:gcrw~~nt Di>.trki; S, ~>t<>mge; T. trammi%idty:. 
USGS, U.S- G<..'l)k>gicill Sn:rvcy; SCDNR, Seuth C:rroHna De:p:mr.h:::lt nf Na!um1 R~>mtrccs. St3te: FL, Florid;>; Gi\, G(\1rgi:r_ SC, Sl>uth Canihr:<i..Md!llxl; 'NL, nzmkaky aquiH~r analysis~ L, !ei:ky :lqiJiter analysis; SC, transmi;;:->irity bil~?-illl <m :;pccilk 1:apadty; SL, stmigilt !ine: analytiiO<ll s<:>btion; V, van der Kamp a.ndy:>is <>f oscillating thw (Krus(:m;m and ;,k Ritter. !994); ('?), mdytka! melh(!d nm dt<;.'X!. Hydrdogl~ unit: UF, UpJWr fhidan i!<!Hlkr; LF, i..wer Floridan ;3.quikr; UF,LF, Uprx~r and Low"'r Fk>ridan aqnifcr;;; hydfi)!ogk nni: <:n(:!l>sed in p:;,n.mtb~;;e;; indita:e~; a da;~tk 
updip <\tpHh <~qnivalcnt to the wrbmmk Uppt::t {\!" L!)\V<;< Fk>tidan ilql.;itietsj 
 
--"............. 
 
................,, 
 
....................... 
 
"'" 
 
...............,... 
 
Ekli('>W land surfa~e 
 
~ 
 
...................... ~~-- 
 
State C!3U!'ll:y 
sc Heuufort 
 
WM! idennfter 
 
01har ldentmer 
 
''--...... BVI~22il2 
 
Latitude l.()ngttude 
. ..,..,...,.,...............,. ,.......... 
.~2"!7'.52" !W"H'lif' 
 
Top of open 
 
Botteym 
ofop~m 
 
Ttl.l!I'!IS<* mis~S<ivity 
 
Storage 
 
r:oeffleient 
 
M$thocl 
 
___ lnterv~! in1erva! {ft2fd} 
 
(ft) 
 
(tt} 
 
"................ 
 
. ......................... 
 
...................... 
 
Referenc0c 
 
HydfOioglc !.ll'lit 
 
" .........................-~-- 
 
Rem~trks 
 
J5! 
 
Si>S 
 
J,.W\l 
 
SL 
 
N:;;~w<;fH.~<.::~ {2P~X~) 
 
tiF' 
 
Nl:':"r'~/(~~)n~~< r.;~x~-; ~<=:~i ~\<i:~d 
 
Jo. 
 
dt1. 
 
19ll-<:j2 
 
flrT!4lS 
 
J::r' H/)71\ S()~S3'0?'~ 
 
l6tl 
 
1{}(f :/.J,Oi.ltl 
 
dn. 
 
;.k. 
 
do, 
 
N;:;,r.orxsfne. f'&tes te~t p::..l:.:tt 
 
;15;, 
 
tk,. 
 
29J.I-1'2 
 
BFl'-l!:M1 
 
lYl:?~~x i!iF5l'47" 
 
!40 
 
2.U5 
 
J})/~0{} 
 
J.). 
 
d~"!. 
 
d(>. 
 
Newc~:mle rat~::s test. Q:l.>~:-cl 
 
d<) 
 
dt>. 
 
2'f1J.v) 
 
BFrc.2:.1.64 
 
32~l)\:~:JX 
 
Si/'~lriT" 
 
356 
 
576 l il,OOiJ 
 
J:..,. 
 
d\). 
 
:ln. 
 
<k), 
 
d<:>. 
 
du 
 
29KK.._q:l 
 
HfT!S{() 
 
:lrl4'54" 80"50'27' 
 
4:5 
 
1()5 
 
.~(!,iliJO 
 
dt1. 
 
d5.' 
 
<k 
 
N:;w~x.rn~:- r2fe?: t~;f i_:;_tr 
 
(k>- 
 
de. 
 
29LL-j4 
 
BrT3il9 
 
.U0 t)i!'l5'" 80"'50'5!:<:" 
 
!40 
 
<..1f,. 
 
de. 
 
2<)LIA;:6 
 
Bf'l~224l 
 
32t.{}T52< 8(f5tY4-~i_.,: 
 
44! 
 
242 4fl.OOO 
 
(j]i$ 
 
!.~.(}00 
 
(h SCDNRfik;; 
 
d<. 
 
Ncwt'<.>m<~ i2()(JO) 
 
do. 
 
N<:>~f,m<: raic> t<~.;! jXl<X 
 
do. 
 
N>~\1-\'\;me rate~ tl'"' e>:e<.":llent 
 
d~3. 
 
tk. 
 
.NLLH 
 
HFT:J!G 
 
yz::i5T53~' 
 
8~)0 ) j'l)(l< 
 
!25 
 
l<f2 
 
~tl.HO<} 
 
\l.("Kl! 
 
NL 
 
d::>, 
 
.do.. 
 
:'k:)N()..fnn:: r:~t~:K t~st rx:>::>f 
 
d>.."r, 
 
dt'. 
 
2<!1..!.-t' 
 
HFT-l4?<il 
 
J!."iY!'~;6" j${)"5) '4! < 
 
H!7 
 
140 
 
?..3\!f) 
 
ds.r 
 
df>. 
 
19f..t...~~ 
 
HIT!794 
 
n"06'2l'' fi(i"51'43'" 
 
I7H 
 
240 
 
4()Ji(") 
 
d<.> 
 
dt>. 
 
.J(iJJ-k! 
 
Bvrc~~tns 
 
JZ"'l ?"09"' ~(l"55T!'' 
 
-~-39 
 
z:w 
 
4~~.\)<XI 
 
ilL 
 
d(>. 
 
<.k>. 
 
d(!, 
 
do, 
 
d>:. 
 
d'"' 
 
do. 
 
do. d<:>. 
 
,;b_ 
 
Nc..,...,..._"':u:Jf: t~C?~ k-st f~h- 
 
C.o. 
 
do 
 
~~t)JJ..!l 
 
BFT-:Otl9U 
 
31~1'7"2>'' t~tr'.~6'5S'' 
 
-~46 
 
~20 
 
6,!)<.>(l 
 
<!;), 
 
di; 
 
o..k1, 
 
Ne-wr:;.~r:v~ t~nc~ t~~: ~~A~>.::~lent 
 
do. 
 
dF 
 
~WJJ..ml 
 
BFT-103~:} 
 
31'"1'7"22"' t\U''.~T1:2'' 
 
31! 
 
)23 
 
4,4i}(l 
 
d(>, 
 
do 
 
J:..,. 
 
. . . r-.:~~ ~~t..n~;z nlif:~ :.1;':'-).t pO<)f 
 
0<). 
 
do 
 
JOH-n! 
 
l3H1156 
 
37..:.:_--;~":~~ B0<-'l5S'54'} 
 
H6 
 
~!2 
 
.1.,JOU 
 
:1r:. 
 
d<.). 
 
de. 
 
N<.":w;:;:.;.ll<' mh~S tesi fait 
 
c.ln. 
 
do. 
 
301.ll2 
 
BfT2HS6 
 
32-:;1-sls~~( 
 
3o<ss:~;_., 
 
299 
 
45U 
 
?;20f} 
 
;}). 
 
df>. 
 
\k-. 
 
dn. 
 
d.( 
 
(),,!k~CI) 
 
27DD-hl 
 
CO!...:n5 
 
?<2"49'28" 1>0''4-l':'{>" 
 
!25 
 
575 
 
Z~HJ 
 
dt). 
 
df.<. 
 
LF 
 
N~;':WC<)ffW rat~~ r~::st rx~~1r 
 
d<) 
 
de. 
 
3ilA/"d 
 
cm. .n2 
 
3Y'i.W02" 80''5 7' i 4 X 
 
45H 
 
51(; 
 
2/KliJ 
 
:.lt). 
 
d(<. 
 
tkr 
 
dr,. 
 
do. Hamptm.:. ncr.:..!J.5 
 
HAMl.!>2 
 
}2''52'.!3"' ~(l''i.i6'5<Y 
 
~{(; 
 
!11) 
 
1..2'-!iJ 
 
.o~m 
 
NL 
 
d:.<. 
 
ur 
 
New~om;: E<t<''i l<;:>:t f:li.:' 
 
de. 
 
d0. 
 
.'<?<CC.p2 
 
Ht\M2f>9 
 
32~s t~3s} !H''I4'U" 
 
~1f~. 
 
{k. 
 
JJCC-p) 
 
HAM-219 
 
3?-"S l':>-t a;"l4'JO'' 
 
H}2 
 
ns 
 
~- ~'(_f(j 
 
lS(J 
 
fi.WG 
 
SL 
 
d:-:<. 
 
d.;_( 
 
Nl;':.;,",\~Ofl:i: Ei.~~~, ~-'=~~t JJf.H){ 
 
> 
 
!1n. 
 
J,). 
 
<.k> 
 
t<!~wwn;;; h'te> l.<.'=:;t !Mr 
 
~ 
1 
 
~ 
),'1' 
 
> 
 
,;,. > 
 
 Table A1. Transmissivity and storage coeffident of the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers and equivalent clastic units, coastal Georgia 
 
g 
 
and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida---Continued 
 
[ft, 
 
foot; 
 
ft2/d, 
 
feet 
 
squared 
 
per day;%, 
 
percent; 
 
do., 
 
ditto; 
 
ft/d!ft, 
 
foot/day/foot; 
 
0 , 
 
degrees;', 
 
minutes; 
 
",seconds; 
 
SJWMD, 
 
St. 
 
Johns 
 
River 
 
Water 
 
Management 
 
District; 
 
S, 
 
storage; 
 
T, 
 
transmissivity; 
 
USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; SCDNR, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. State: FL, Florida; GA, Georgia; SC, South Carolina. Method: NL, nonleaky aquifer analysis; L, leaky 
 
aquifer analysis; SC, transmissivity based on specific capacity; SL. straight line analytical solution; V, van der Kamp analysis of oscillating flow (Kruseman and de Ritter, 1994); (?),analytical 
 
i ; 
IC: 
 
method not cited. Hydrologic unit: UF, Upper Floridan aquifer; LF, Lower Floridan aquifer; UF,LF, Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers; hydrologic unit enclosed in parentheses indicates a clastic 
 
5' 
 
updip aquifer equivalent to the carbonate Upper or Lower Floridan aquitersJ 
 
a ~ 
 
<-----------------------"'---- 
 
---------------------~ 
Below land surface 
 
-------------~---- 
 
~.-<>----------~ 
 
"c=o 
~ 
 
State County 
 
Well Identifier 
 
Other identifier 
 
latitude 
 
Top of Bottom Trans ---------------------~- 
 
longitude 
 
open interval 
 
of open interval 
 
missivlty (ft~/d) 
 
Storage coefficient 
 
Method 
 
Reference 
 
Hydrologic unit 
 
Remarks 
 
i" 
....Ill 
Cl 
f 
 
(ft) 
 
sc 
 
Hampton 
 
--------------------------------------------------- 
 
33EE-c4 
 
HAM-195 
 
3244'52" 8112'32" 
 
131 
 
(ft) 251 
 
----~--.-----~--~~--------------------------------- 
 
12.000 
 
.0002 
 
NL Whiting and Park 
 
UF 
 
-------------- 
Newcome rates test good 
 
.a:C.l.l;! 
 
(1990); Newcome (2000) 
 
=Ill 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
33EH2 
 
HAM-211 
 
3244'58" 81!4'15" 
 
125 
 
160 11,000 
 
SL Newcome (2000) 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
~ = 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
33EE-v3 
 
HAM-208 
 
32"40'51" 81"11'18" 
 
145 
 
280 
 
.3,300 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test fair 
 
t...i 
 
do. 
 
Jasper 
 
2911-o l 
 
JAS-!04 
 
3222'11" 8054'51" 
 
145 
 
330 47,000 
 
0004 
 
do. Aucottand Newcome ( 1986) 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test good 
 
!R 
s ~ 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
JOHH-ol 
 
JAS-346 
 
3227'59" 80"59'36" 
 
130 
 
220 39.000 
 
do. Newcome (2000) 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test poor 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
3!GG-o3 
 
JAS-390 
 
32"32'05" 81 04'30" 
 
240 
 
500 51,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test good 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
31GG-p5 
 
JAS-389 
 
32:"31 '48" 81 04'23" 
 
140 
 
300 51.000 
 
0.0004 
 
Nl 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
31GG-x5 
 
JAS-384 
 
32".30'07" 81"03'32" 
 
115 
 
180 48.000 
 
SL 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test poor 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
31HH-b3 
 
JAS-375 
 
32"29'08" 8101'49" 
 
118 
 
220 53.000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Ncwcomc rates test fair 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
31HH-m3 
 
JAS-386 
 
3227'53" 81"02'45" 
 
118 
 
220 36,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test good 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
31Jj..tl 
 
JAS-342 
 
32"16'19" 8!"05'00'' 
 
208 
 
400 67.000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test poor 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
32GG-ni 
 
JAS-391 
 
3232'59" 81"08'17" 
 
252 
 
545 57.000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test fair 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
32GG-n2 
 
JAS-392 
 
32"32'35" 8108'08" 
 
252 
 
555 46.000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test excellent 
 
do 
 
do 
 
32HH-s2 
 
JAS-372 
 
32"26'48" 81"06'08" 
 
142 
 
204 35,000 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
do. 
 
Newcome rates test poor 
 
"a'A~~;rding.to Sp~hler ( 1994 ), muiti-aquifer wells c;~pi~t~d;~--;t;; Upper and Lower Floridan aq~if~;;;~i);;~;ilc~unty, Florida, probably deri;~-;;;~~h"ZTtheir.yield from the lower Florida aquif~~..........-~-~-- 
 
  THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER AND OFFERS 
ALL PERSONS THE OPPORTUNITY TO COMPETE AND PARTICIPATE IN EACH AREA OF DNR 
EMPLOYMENT REGARDLESS OF RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, NATIONAL ORIGIN, AGE, HANDICAP, 
OR OTHER NON-MERIT FACTORS.