IC 31 GEORGIA 
STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION 
DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY A. S. FURCRON, Acting Director 
THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 31 
A SUBSURFACE STUDY OF PLEISTOCENE DEPOSITS IN COASTAL GE.ORGIA 
By Stephen M. Herrick 
U.S. Geological Survey 
Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey 
ATLANTA 
1965 
 
 IC 31 GEORGIA 
STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION 
DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY A. S. FURCRON, Acting Director 
THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 31 
A SUBSURFACE: STUDY OF PLEISTOCENE DEPOSITS IN COASTAL GEORGIA 
By Stephen M. Herrick 
U.S. Geological Survey 
Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey 
ATLANTA 
1965 
 
 A SUBSURFACE STUDY OF PLEISTOCENE DEPOSITS IN COASTAL GEORGIAl 
Stephen M. Herrick2 
 
ABSTRACT 
Coastal Georgia is underlain by Pleistocene deposits consisting of interbedded sands and gravels containing local inclusions of kaolin in updip areas. In downdip areas the sands and gravels interfinger with marine sands and clays. A subsurface study of well cuttings from approximately 200 wells in 28 counties indicates that these deposits dip coastward at about 2 feet per mile. The sediments form a wedge which is thickest at the coast but progressively thins in a west-northwesterly direction, finally pinching out inland. The area of greatest thickening apparently is in southeastern Charlton and Camden Counties, and a similar area but of somewhat less pronounced thickening underlies eastern Chatham, Bryan, and Liberty Counties. Fossils from these deposits include chiefly vertebrate remains and molluscan shells. These sediments appear to belong, stratigraphically, to one mappable unit of Pleistocene (undifferentiated) age. This formation is of potential economic importance, as it contains valuable sand and gravel deposits as well as local concentrations of potentially valuable but commercially unproved heavy mineral and phosphate deposits. Water-bearing sands belonging to this formation constitute a valuable but hitherto untested source of ground water in this part of Georgia. 
INTRODUCTION 
Previous investigators of the Pleistocene in southeastern Georgia have divided these deposits into formations on the basis of physiographic form rather than on lithologic character. It is the purpose of this report to show that these sediments form a simple, wedge-shaped, stratified mass which constitutes a single lithologic unit upon which physiographic forms have been superimposed. Although similar deposits are known to underlie other parts of the Coastal Plain of Georgia, as for example in the coastal-plain part of the Flint River Valley, this report is arbitrarily limited to southeastern Georgia because most of the available wells penetrating identifiable Pleistocene deposits are limited to that area. Cuttings and cores from approximately 200 wells penetrating deposits of Pleistocene age in Georgia and from 50 wells penetrating similar deposits in 4 
1 Prepared in cooperation with the Georgia Department of Mines, Mining, and Geology. Published by permission of the Director, Geological Survey, United States Department of the Interior. 
'Geologist, U.S. Geological Survey, Atlanta, Georgia. 
 
counties in northeastern Florida were studied and logged; it is on these logs that this report is based. 
 
This report is one outgrowth of a previous publication (Herrick, 1961) listing well logs of the Coastal Plain of Georgia and was prepared in cooperation with the Georgia Department of Mines, Mining, and Geology. Thanks are due Dr. Robert 0. Vernon, State Geologist, Florida Geological Survey, for permission to examine well cuttings from wells in Baker, Duval, Hamilton, and Nassau Counties, Florida. All other well samples utilized in the preparation of this report are contained in the well-sample library maintained by the Georgia Geological Survey. 
 
Literature dealing with the Pleistocene of the 
 
Atlantic and Gulf Coasts is voluminous. However, 
 
by limiting this survey to articles that are pri- 
 
marily concerned with the Pleistocene deposits 
 
of Georgia the number of pertinent publications 
 
is significantly reduced. Lyell (1846) was appar- 
 
ently the first to notice the coastal terraces in 
 
Georgia. Veatch and Stephenson (1911) differen- 
 
tiated the Pleistocene deposits on physiographic 
 
grounds, regarding them as fluviomarine terraces 
 
composed in part of fluvial and marine deposits 
 
and assigning them formational names. Following 
 
the work of Veatch and Stephenson, most of the 
 
later investigators-Brantley (1916), Prettyman 
 
and Cave (1923), Cooke (1925, 1936, 1943, and 
 
1945), Flint (1940), MacNeil (1950), Toulmin 
 
(1952), Richards (1954), and Doering (1960)- 
 
tended to treat the Pleistocene deposits in Geor- 
 
gia as physiographic forms, classifying them as 
 
marine terraces consisting of a combination of 
 
marine and fluvial sediments. Moreover, each ma- 
 
rine terrace, or former marine shoreline, was re- 
 
garded as representative of a single geologic for- 
 
mation and was given a formational name. Al- 
 
though essentially agreeing as to their physio- 
 
graphic form, most of these workers disagreed 
 
as to the total number of marine terraces, or 
 
formations occurring in coastal Georgia. Flint 
 
(1940) thought there were only two but possibly 
 
three higher marine terraces, or fossil shorelines 
 
in Georgia, whereas Cooke (1945) recognized 
 
eight such marine terraces, or Pleistocene fo:ma- 
 
tions map 
 
~finTocuolmasitnal(1G9e5o2r)gisah.owIns 
 
tcho.entcroamstbitnoedth~1hsi,c~a 
 
nesses of the Pleistocene and Phocene depos1ts m 
 
Georgia and adjacent states. Though not exclu- 
 
sively concerned with the Pleistocene, as far as 
 
the writer is aware, this is the first paper in 
 
2 
 
 83" 
 
82 
 
EXPLANATION 
---10--- 
Contour showmg thiCkness of Pleistocene, contour mterval 10 feet 
Approxmote boundary of Plestocene outcrop 
4591301 
Well 459-Georgo Geologcol Survey number 
(30)-ThiCkness of Plestocene 
 
0 
 
,_ .,. 
2: 
 
<l 
 
_J 
N 
I- 
 
<l 
 
1 
 
83" 
 
82 
 
20 
 
30MILES 
 
Figure 1.-Map showing thickness and areal extent of Pleistocene deposits in coastal Georgia. 3 
 
 A 
EVANS 773 zoo' All. 188ft 
150' 
 
200' 
" \ 
150' 
 
100' 
50' 
L~~L 
8 
200' CLINCH 791 All. 176 ft 
150' 
 
Micaceous sand 
 
CHATHAM 6 1 Alt. 6 ft 
 
100' 
 
A' 
 
50' 
 
CHATHAM 772 All.12 ft 
 
SEA LEVEL 
 
50' 
 
100' 
 
150' 
 
~r 
J 
Vtttocol HOlt 
 
100' 
 
100' 
 
50' 
 
8' 50' 
 
SEA LEVEL 
50' 
 
SEA LEVEL 50' 
 
100' 
 
50' 
 
c 
 
CAMDEN 54 Alt.l3 ft 
 
SEA LEVEL 
 
0 
 
10 
 
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL 
 
15 MILES 
GLYNN 713 All 10 ft 
 
50' 
~pliocene(?) 
100' 
coarse sand 
~ 150' 
 
Micaceous sand 
 
-) 
 
Lignitic clay 
 
r Pleistocene 
 
- - --- - - - - ? - __Go?ars-e- sand 
 
1 
 
Granular micaceous cloy 
 
Miocene 
 
100' 
150' 
LIBERTY 548 Alt. 10ft 
 
BRYAN 621 Alt. 12 ft 
 
Figure 2.-Geologic sections showing subsurface stratigraphy of PI eistocene deposits in coast aI Georgia. 
 
4 
 
5 
 
0 
c' 50" 
CHATHAM 772 Alt. 12ft 
SEA LEVEL 50' tOO' 150' 
 
 which these deposits were viewed as a 3-dimensional geologic structure and treated as a single subsurface stratigraphic unit. In this report the Pleistocene deposits of Georgia are considered to be a stratigraphic unit rather than a physiographic form. 
GENERAL FEATURES 
The part of the Coastal Plain of Georgia covered by Recent to Pleistocene deposits lies between the Tifton Upland on the west and the Atlantic Ocean on the east and is called the Coastal Terraces by Cooke (1925, fig. 2). These sediments have the physiographic form of marine terraces, having flat-topped areas with rather steep seaward slopes, or scarps, representing according to 
Cooke (1943, p. 3) * * * ... "former Pleistocene 
sea bottoms laid bare by the retreat of the sea to successively lower levels." 
The Recent to Pleistocene represents the youngest deposits in the Coastal Plain of Georgia and overlies deposits of Miocene and Pliocene ( ?) age. These sediments consist of interbedded sands and some clays, the clays becoming progressively more prominent in downdip coastal areas. The major source of these deposits was doubtless the crystalline rocks underlying the Piedmont province of central and northeastern Georgia and adjoining parts of South Carolina, though a part was apparently derived from the erosion and reworking of preexisting, geologically older formations of the Coastal Plain. The presence of weathered crystals of feldspar and heavy minerals points to the crystalline rocks of Georgia and South Carolina as the main source of these sediments. The presence of phosphatic pebbles, particularly in the basal part of this stratigraphic unit, suggests reworking of the underlying, geologically older sediments. So far as can be deduced from well cuttings, these deposits are not disturbed by faulting or folding but have a gentle easterly regional dip from their area of outcrop toward the coast. 
Although Recent deposits overlie those of Pleistocene age, particularly along the major river valleys (alluvium) and in extreme coastal areas, for purposes of this report all Recent to Pleistocene sediments are considered as one stratigraphic unit, that is, Pleistocene, and are treated as such. 
GEOLOGY 
Lithology 
The Pleistocene deposits in updip areas consist predominantly of fine- to medium-grained, subangular, arkosic, cherty, sparsely phosphatic sand interbedded with minor amounts of very thinbedded white micaceous, sandy kaolin. In downdip areas much of the sand is apparently replaced by tongues of dark-brownish-gray to black, blocky, rather tough, sandy, coarsely micaceous, lignitic, locally fossiliferous clay. Beneath the lignitic clay is a basal unit consisting of subangular to subrounded, sparsely phosphatic sand and gravel, which is pea size in updip areas (figure 2). 
 
Structure and Thickness 
The Pleistocene deposits of Georgia form a wedge-shaped block of sediments that is thickest at the coast but progressively thins inland. These sediments have a coastward dip of approximately 2 feet per mile. The area of greatest thickness is in southeastern Charlton and Camden Counties while a similar area but of less pronounced thickening underlies eastern Chatham, Bryan, and Liberty Counties (figure 1). Both areas of greatest thickening occupy what LeGrand (1961, p. 1559) calls the "southeast Georgia Embayment." He indicates that this embayment area is the result of regional downwarping between two strong positive areas-the Cape Fear Arch on the north and the Ocala uplift to the south. In Georgia the area of greatest thickness underlies Charlton and Camden Counties, where approximately 60 feet of sediments of Pleistocene age were noted in well cuttings. Similarly, the area of thickening underlying Chatham, Bryan, and Liberty Counties has an approximate thickness of 50 to 55 feet. However, it is likely that the base of the Pleistocene is locally irregular. Several of the major streams are known to have cut deep channels when sea level was lower during part of the Pleistocene and pre-Pleistocene time. These channels have been subsequently filled with Pleistocene deposits. At such places the overall thickness of the Pleistocene may be greater than indicated in figure 2. 
Paleontology 
Except for the extreme coastal area, the Pleistocene deposits of Georgia are uniformly nonfossiliferous. In sediments occurring in downdip coastal areas both vertebrate and invertebrate fossils have been found in abundance. The more important contributions to the Pleistocene paleontology of Georgia include articles by Veatch and Stephenson (1911), Richards (1936, 1943, 1954), Cooke (1943, 1945), and Hurst (1957). 
Vertebrate remains that have been found in Georgia include chiefly mammals with some reptiles all of which lived in Georgia during Pleistocene time but are now extinct. Some of these extinct species include fossil remains of a giant beaver, ground sloth, armadillo, elephant, mastodon, bear, cougar, lynx, saber-tooth tiger, deer, buffalo, and horse. In addition to the mammalian remains, sharks teeth and a crocodile have been found in these deposits along the coast of Georgia. Most of these vertebrate fossils have been found in the so-called "bone bed" whose type locality, according to Cooke (1943, p. 115), is near tide level on Skidaway Island in coastal Chatham County. Other localities in Georgia where these vertebrate remains have been found include shallow dredgings from a canal near Brunswick in Glynn County, and similar dredgings along the Savannah River from Savannah coastward. For an interesting account of these vertebrate fossils, some of which are illustrated, the reader is referred to an article by Hurst (1957). 
Invertebrate molluscan shells consisting chiefly of various species of pelecypods and gastropods, 
 
6 
 
 all of which are living today off the coast of Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida, have been reported from a few surface outcrops and shallow dredgings in Chatham and Glynn Counties. Abundant molluscan shells have been observed by the writer in some wells situated in coastal Georgia, particularly in wells in Chatham and Glynn Counties. Richards (1936, 1954) and Cooke (1943) give good lists of these molluscan fossils, some of which are illustrated by Richards (1954). 
As far as the writer is aware, no bona fide microfossils such as Foraminifera have been reported from the Pleistocene of Georgia. Regarding other microfossils, it is quite probable that diatoms and pollen grains occur in these deposits. Therefore, a search should be made for fossils of this type in some of these Pleistocene sediments, particularly in the lignites and clays belonging to this stratigraphic unit. 
Stratigraphic Relations 
In the part of coastal Georgia north of Glynn County the Pleistocene deposits are underlain by a relatively thin wedge of sediments of late Miocene age. These deposits are considered by Veatch and Stephenson, Cooke, and others as belonging to the Charlton Formation of Pliocene age. However, recent foraminiferal studies by the writer indicate that these deposits are equivalent to the Duplin Marl of late Miocene age. Moreover, clays belonging to these deposits are abundantly phosphatic locally, another indication of their probable Miocene age. In southeastern Brantley and Charlton Counties and all of Glynn and Camden Counties Pleistocene deposits rest upon interbedded, locally fossiliferous clays and coquina-like limestone of Pliocene(?) age (see figure 2). The probable Pliocene(?) age of these sediments is evidenced through the occurrence of the varieties of Ammonia beccarii in the clays directly underlying the Pleistocene deposits penetrated by several wells in southeastern Brantley and Charlton Counties. In this regard Cole (1944, p. 23) noted a similar occurrence in stratigraphically equivalent clays penetrated by the Hilliard No. 1 well, Nassau County, Fla. Beneath the inner margin of the area covered by Pleistocene sediments the underlying deposits belong to the Hawthorn Formation of middle Miocene age. In all observed instances the clays of the Miocene deposits are readily distinguishable from the less argillaceous sediments of the Pleistocene. 
As noted by Cooke (1943, p. 104), the surface expression of the Pleistocene deposits of Georgia consists of a series of marine terraces that were formed, in part, on the sea bottom and in estuaries when the sea stood at various levels, ranging from its present level up to 270 feet above present sea level. Cooke has shown that these terraces, or formations, were originally established on the basis of their topographic form, each 
terrace being defined "* * * as the sum of the 
deposits that accumulated while the sea stood at a definite level" (Cooke, 1943, p. 104). All were correlated by Cooke with their counterparts in South Carolina and Florida. These eight formations, or marine terraces, and their correspond- 
 
ing altitudes above present sea level, are summarized as follows: 
 
Formation 
Brandywine Coharie Sunderland Wicomico 
 
Altitude 
270 feet 215 feet 170 feet 100 feet 
 
Formation 
 
Altitude 
 
Penholoway 70 feet 
 
Talbot 
 
42 feet 
 
Horry Present sea level 
 
Pamlico 
 
25 feet 
 
All these Pleistocene formations are based on topographic form, no consideration being given to their occurrence in the subsurface as a threedimensional geologic structure. On the basis of the evidence presented here it seems clear that the Pleistocene deposits of Georgia represent one formation, lithologically, paleontologically, and structurally, rather than eight formations as originally conceived. The sediments composing this unit change from nonmarine sands containing lenses of kaolin in updip areas to marine clays and sands in downdip areas. Both types of lithology interfinger in middip areas in accordance with normal deltaic sedimentatio:q (figure 2). Viewed as a whole, these deposits constitute a mappable subsurface unit throughout their areal extent in the Coastal Plain of Georgia, a characteristic not strictly true of the eight formations noted above. Moreover, they contain fossils that effectively define these sediments as a legitimate stratigraphic unit, or formation. On the basis of the evidence here presented it is suggested that these deposits be considered as one formation of Pleistocene (undifferentiated) age. 
 
GEOLOGIC HISTORY 
After Pliocene ( ?) time, coastal Georgia was covered by an overlap of the sea at some time during the Pleistocene Epoch. The level of this sea fluctuated and the shoreline advanced and retreated in accordance with the advances and recessions of the continental ice sheet, which was centered at that time in northeastern North America. During fluctuations of the sea the Pliocene ( ?) , the uppermost Miocene, and some of the early Pleistocene sediments were doubtless reworked along the coast of Georgia. At the base of these deposits, for example, is a coarse-grained sand and gravel containing some black subrounded phosphatic pebbles, the latter probably reworked from the underlying sediments of Pliocene ( ?) and late Miocene age. Cutting and redeposition during successive retreats and lower stands of the sea during Pleistocene time caused the surficial flat-topped terraces and their corresponding scarps to develop in coastal Georgia. In the subsurface, however, these sediments remained, in spite of surficial changes in sea level, as one lithologic and stratigraphic unit, or geologic formation, resting upon geologically older sediments. 
 
ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE 
The Pleistocene deposits of coastal Georgia have economic potential as rock products such as sand and gravel, phosphate, and heavy minerals. The prevalent sands, particularly in updip areas, h~ve value in various types of concrete construction. The gravels are often utilized in the construction 
 
7 
 
 of artifically gravel-walled water wells. Although phosphate occurs locally in these deposits, there has been to date no effort to develop it as a source of agricultural fertilizer in Georgia. It is well known that certain Pleistocene sands contain important heavy minerals such as monazite, ilmenite, zircon, staurolite, and rutile. So far such deposits have not been commercially exploited. Herrick and Wait (1956, p. 83) suggested the importance of the Pleistocene sands in coastal Georgia as potential sources of ground water. Such sands, particularly the basal sands of downdip areas, might represent a valuable and relatively cheap source of domestic water supply. Along some of the major rivers, sands and gravel deposits may offer a potentially large source of ground water. In some areas these deposits might be recharged with river water. 
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 
Brantley, J. E., 1916, A report on the limestones and marls of the Coastal Plain of Georgia: Georgia Geol. Survey Bull. 21, 300 p. 
Cole, W. Storrs, 1944, Stratigraphic and paleontologic studies of wells in Florida: Florida Geol. Survey Bull. 26, 168 p. 
Cooke, C. W., 1925, Physical geography of Georgia; the Coastal Plain: Georgia Geol. Survey Bull. 42, p. 19-54. 
----1936, Geology of the Coastal Plain of South Carolina: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 867, 196 p. 
----1943, Geology of the Coastal Plain of Georgia: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 941, 121 p. [1944]. 
----1945, Geology of Florida: Florida Geol. Survey Bull. 29, 339 p. 
Doering, J. A., 1960, Quaternary surface formations of southern part of Atlantic Coastal Plain: Jour. Geology, v. 68, no. 2., p. 182-202. 
 
Flint, R. F., 1940, Pleistocene features of the Atlantic Coastal Plain: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 238, no. 11, p. 757787. 
Herrick, S. M., 1961, Well logs of the Coastal Plain of Georgia: Georgia Geol. Survey Bull. 70, 462 p. 
Herrick, S. M., and Wait, R. L., 1956, Ground water in the Coastal Plain of Georgia: Am. Water Works Assoc. Jour., Southeastern Sec. v. 20, p. 73-86. 
Hurst, V. J., 1957, Prehistoric vertebrates of the Georgia Coastal Plain: Georgia Geol. Survey Mineral Newsletter, v. 10, no. 3, p. 77-98. 
LeGrand, H. E., 1961, Summary of geology of Atlantic Coastal Plain: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, v. 45, no. 9, p. 1557-1571. 
Lyell, Charles, 1846, On the newer deposits of the southern States of North America: Geol. Soc. London Quart. Jour., v. 2, p. 405-410. 
MacNeil, F. S., 1950, Pleistocene shorelines in Florida and Georgia: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 221-F, p. 95106 [1951]. 
Prettyman, T. M., and Cave, H. S., 1923, Petroleum and natural gas possibilities in Georgia: Georgia Geol. Survey Bull. 40, 164, p. 
Richards, H. G., 1936, Fauna of the Pleistocene Pamlico Formation of the southern Atlantic Coastal Plain: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 47, p. 1611-1656. 
----1943, Pliocene and Pleistocene mollusks from the Santee-Cooper area, South Carolina: Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. Notulae Naturae 118, 7 p. 
----1945, Correlation of Atlantic Coastal Plain Cenozoic formations, a discussion: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 56, p. 401-408. 
----1954, The Pleistocene of Georgia: Georgia Geol. Survey Mineral Newsletter, v. 7, no. 3, p. 110-114. 
Toulmin, L. D., Jr., 1952, Sedimentary volumes in Gulf Coastal Plain of the United States and Mexico; Part II, Volume of Cenozoic sediments in Florida and Georgia: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 63, p. 1165-1176. 
Veatch, J. 0., and Stephenson, L. W., 1911, Preliminary report on the geology of the Coastal Plain of Georgia: Georgia Geol. Survey Bull. 26, 466 p. 
 
8