TRACE FOSSILS OF THE OCONEE GROUP AND BASAL BARNWELL GROUP OF EAST-CENTRAL GEORGIA by Charles H. Schroder BULLETIN 88 Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Georgia Geologic Survey The Department of Natural Resources is an equal opportunity employer and offers all persons the opportunity to compete and participate in each area of DNA employment regardless of race, color, religion, sex. national origin, age, handicap, or other non-merit factors. Publications Editor: Eleanore Morrow Cover illustration: Typical configuration of Ophiomorpha sp. Oblique view of nearly horizontal surface. (See figure 6, page 11.) TRACE FOSSILS OF THE OCONEE GROUP AND BASAL BARNWELL GROUP OF EAST-CENTRAL GEORGIA by Charles H. Schroder DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Joe D. Tanner, Commissioner ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION J. Leonard Ledbetter, Director GEORGIA GEOLOGIC SURVEY William H. McLemore, State Geologist Atlanta 1982 This work is dedicated to Robert Duryea Schroder of Charl~ston. 11 Contents Page DEDICATION.. .. .... ... ......... . . ...................... . .. . ...... . ... .. ..... .. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 INTRODUCTION .... . ... .. .. . .. . .... ... ... ... .. . ... ....... ... ... . .. . .... .. .. .. 2 Sedimentology.................. . ...................... ...... . ... .. .... . ... .... 2 Purpose and Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Methods. ... . ......... .. . .... .... ............ .. ... .. . ............... ... ... ..... 3 Ichnology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 SYSTEMATIC ICHNOLOGY. ... ................ .. ..... .. .... .. . ...... ........ 6 Amphorichnus sp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Ophiomorpha sp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Phycodes sp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 lchnogenus Planolites Nicholson, 1973. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Planolites sp. A ............ . . ............... .. .. ........... , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Planolites sp. B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Skolithos sp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 lchnogenus Thalassinoides Ehrenberg, 1844 ... ................. .. ......... . . . .. 22 Tha/assinoides sp. A.................................................... .. 23 Thalassinoides sp. 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Undifferentiated Thalassinoides species..... ... .......................... . . 33 Trypanites sp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 "Arenicolites-like burrow"...... .. . . . ... ....... .. ........ . ......... . ........ .. . 45 "Ferruginous cones" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 "Fraena" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 "L-shaped burrow" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 "Large sinuous shafts" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 "Parallel ferruginous tunnels" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 "Rhizocorallium-like burrows'................................. ... .......... ... 63 Bioturbate textures in muds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 PROBLEMATICAL STRUCTURES .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. ... . .. .. .. .. 68 "Large conical structures" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 STRATIGRAPHIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL DISTRIBUTION OF TRACE FOSSILS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 CONCLUSIONS.............................................................. .. 85 REFERENCES CITED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 APPENDICES.... . .............................. .. .......................... ... 91 A: Stratigraphic Descriptions .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . 91 8: Grain Size Distributions ............................................. , . . . . 124 Figures I. Map of study area, showing localities studied . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Representative stratigraphic sections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3. Preservational classification of trace fossils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4. Amphorichnus sp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 5. Amphorichnus sp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 6. Ophiomorpha sp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 7. Ophiomorpha sp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 8. Phycodes sp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 9. Phycodes sp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 10. Planolites sp . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 II. Planolites sp. B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 12. Skolithos sp............................. ..... . .. . .. .. ........ . .. .. .... .... .. . 21 iii Figures (continued) Page 13. Thalassinoides sp. A . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 14. Thalassinoides sp. A ... .... . .. .. . .. .. .... .......... .... ............ . ..... .. . . 25 15. Thalassinoides sp. A .......... .. ... ... ......... , ............. .. .......... .. .. 26 16. Thalassinoides sp. A . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 27 17. Thalassinoides sp. A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 18. Thalassinoides sp. A and burrowed upper surface of the Tuscaloosa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 19. Thalassinoides sp. A: small version.............................. . ...... . .... . 30 20. Thalassinoides sp. BI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 34 21. Thalassinoides sp. BI on vertically jointed surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 22. Thalassinoides sp. BI on vertically jointed surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 23. Thalassinoides sp. B2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 24. Undifferentiated Thalassinoides species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 25. Undifferentiated Thalassinoides species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 26. Undifferentiated Thalassinoides species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 27. Undifferentiated Thalassinoides species and "L-shaped burrow" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 28. Undifferentiated Thalassinoides sp. and "L-shaped burrow" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 29. Bioturbate textures in sandy sediment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 30. Trypanites sp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 31. "Arenicolites-like burrow" ...................................... .......... .. , 45 32. "Ferruginous cones"............................................ ............ . 47 33. "Ferruginous cones" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 34. "Ferruginous cones" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 35. "Fraena" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 36. "Large sinuous shafts" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . 54 37. "Large sinuous shafts".......................................... .... .... ..... 55 38. "Large sinuous ~hafts". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 39. Transverse section through a "large sinuous shaft" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 40. "Parallel ferruginous tunnels" .................................... ..... .... . . - 59 4!.' "Parallel ferruginous tunnels".................................... ...... ... . .. 59 42. "Parallel ferruginous tunnels". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 43. "Parallel ferruginous tunnels" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 44. "Parallel ferruginous tunnels" ................................... ........ .. .. .' '62 45. "Rhizocorallium-like burrows". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 46. "Rhizocorallium-like burrows". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 47. Bioturbate textures in mud . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 48. Bioturbate textures in mud . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 49. "Large conical structures" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 50. Longitudinal section through a "large conical structure" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 51. Oblique section through a "large conical structure" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . 70 52. "Large conical structure" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 53. "Large conical structure" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 54. Sediment fabric deformation(?) associated with a "large conical structure" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 55. "Large conical structure" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 56. "Large conical structure" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 57. "Large conical structures truncated by horizontal faults"............................................ ..... . ..... . 74 58. "Large conical structures truncated by horizontal faults"...................... . .................... ............. 74 iv Figures (cbntinued) Page 59. Pillar structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 60. Pillar structures truncated by horizontal faults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 61. Locality "A": Stratigraphy, lithology, trace fossils, and environmental interpretation 76 62. Locality "B": Stratigraphy, lithology, trace fossils, and environmental interpretation 77 63. Locality "C": Stratigraphy, lithology, trace fossils, and environmental interpretation 78 64. Locality "D": Stratigraphy, lithology, trace fossils, and environmental interpretation 79 65. Locality "E": Stratigraphy, lithology, trace fossils, and environmental interpretation 80 66. Locality "F": Stratigraphy, lithology, trace fossils, and environmental interpretation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 67. Locality "G": Stratigraphy, lithology, trace fossils, and environmental interpretation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 68. Locality "H": Stratigraphy, lithology, trace fossils, and environmental interpretation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 83 69. Locality "H": Stratigraphy, lithology, trace fossils, and environmental interpretation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 70. Outcrop at Locality "A" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 71 . Measured sections at Locality "A" .............. . ... .. . .. ........ . ... . ...... . 93 72. Sediments at Locality "A" ................... .. .. .... .. ........ . .. .. ... .... . 94 73 . Sediments at Locality "A" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 74. Outcrop and measured sections at Locality "B" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 75. Sediments at Locality "B" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 76. Sediments at Locality "B" ...................... ......... .... ... .. . ...... ... . 99 77. Outcrop at Locality "C" ........ .. ..... ............... ... . ....... ... . . ... .. .. 101 78 . Measured sections and vertical fluting at Locality "C" ... . .......................... . . ..... ... ..... . . .... . ... .. .. 102 79. Sediments at Locality "C" ....................... .... ... ... . ....... .. ... .. ... 103 80. Sediments at Locality "C" ........................ ..... .. ... ......... . ... .... 104 81. Outcrop at Locality "D" ......................... . ... .. . .. . ....... . . ......... 106 82. Measured sections at Locality "D" .............. ...... .. .... . .. .. ............ 106 83. Sediments at Locality "D" ............. ......... .. . .. . .. ......... . . .. ...... . 107 84. Sediments at Locality "D" ................... .. . ........ . . ................... 108 85. Outcrop and measured section at Locality "E" ... .......... .. . ........ ........ 110 86. Sediments at Locality "E" ....................... ..... . . ..... .... .. . . .. . .. . . . 111 87. Outcrop at Locality "F" .. . ............ .. ... .......... .. . .. ... . . . .. .. .... . .. 112 88. Outcrop and measured sections at Locality "F'' ... . . . ......... ..... ..... . .. ... 113 89. Sediments at Locality "F'' .. ..... . .............. . . .. ... . .... ... ........... . . . 114 90. Outcrop at Locality "G" .......... .. ............ ....... .. . .... . .. . . ... .. ..... 115 91. Outcrop at Locality "H" .. . .. ... .......... , .. ......... . ... . ........ .. . ...... . 118 92. Outcrop at Locality "H" ......... .. ... . ......... .... ...... . ...... .. ... ... .... 118 93. Measured sections at Locality "H" .............. ........... ... . ............. . 119 94. Sediments at Locality "H" ...................... ... . .. .. . .. .......... . ... ... 119 95. Sediments at Locality "H" . .... . . . . .. . .. ..... . ....... ... .. ... ... ... .. ....... . 120 96. Sedim,ents at Locality "H" .................... . . . ........... .. .. ...... .. ..... 121 97. Sediments at Locality "H" ....... ...... . . ....... . . . .. . . . ... . . .. . .. . . ........ . 122 98 ~ Sediments at Locality "H" ...................... .... . .... . . . ... . . . ..... .. .... 123 Tables I. Stratigraphic terms used herein and currently accepted equivalents........... . ........ . . . . ...... .. ....... .. ......... . . 4 v TRACE FOSSILS OF THE OCONEE GROUP AND BASAL BARNWELL GROUP OF EAST-CENTRAL GEORGIA Charles H. Schroder ABSTRACT Analysis of trace fossils, grain size, and physical sedimentary structures of the kaolin-bearing Oconee Group and overlying basal Barnwell Group of east-central Georgia reveals new information about the depositional and diagenetic histories of these sediments. Understanding of paleoenvironmental parameters such as salinities, water depths, current energies, relative rates of erosion and sedimentation, amounts of erosion, and degrees of consolidation is increased significantly. Twenty trace fossil types and one problematical structure are systematically described and discussed. A new method of staining kaolin to enhance biogenic structures is presented. Interpretation of traces sheds considerable light on the timing of erosion, sedimentation, consolidation, jointing, faulting, and environmental change. Information gained from Oconee Group traces provides a unique view of biological activity and environmental conditions in sediments devoid of body fossils. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many friends and associates have contributed toward the successful completion of this work. I am most grateful for their contributions. A special debt of gratitude is owed to Vernon J. Hurst, who encouraged my graduate education, inspired my interest in the Georgia kaolins, and provided patient assistance which was essential to my success. Special thanks is due Robert W. Frey, who stimulated my interest in ichnology. His many comments and criticisms regarding the trace fossil sections greatly inproved their quality . Thanks is also due Mark Rich for his assistance in dealing with sedimentological aspects of this study, to Paul Huddlestun for his comments on the stratigraphy, and to both gentlemen for their review of the manuscript. Ken Czyscinski and Paul Basan gave valuable assistance and encouragement. The following people contributed considerable time and other resources which aided my success: Susan Donald, Terri Bryson, Turner Bryson, Ruth Meier, Neal Meier, Scott Meier, Fran Swan, Randall Davis, Cathy Waller, Barbra Ruff, Elly Shaw, Priscilla Preston, Ann Rogers, Bill Thomas, Dave Orgen, Greg Mack, AI Staheli, and Bruce O'Connor. Others who have aided my efforts include Tony Atkins, Oswaldo do Arujo Filho, Dora! Mills, Lois Jones, Charlie Waag, Fred Manley, Jerry Elkins, Travis Paris, Jim Neiheisel, Wayne Burgamy, Jim Howard, Marilyn Thoroman, Colleen Gregg, Mike Hacke, Mike Luckett, Steve Alcorn, Bill Marsalis, Roger Austin, Bob Carver, Dave Baskin, Ed Wells, Suzanna Attaway, Sylvia Young, Carter Bays, Janet Hollingsworth, and the Georgia Geological Survey. Access to good exposures was provided by Homer Meier ofM and M Clays, John Smith ofYara Engineering, Leo Gornto of United Sierra, Paul Thiele of Thiele Kaolin, and Bill Mallory of Anglo American Clay. I wish to thank the people of Georgia who have, in part, supported my education and research with their tax dollars. It is hoped that this work will, in some way, compensate the people of this State for their generosity. Finally, I wish to acknowledge the contributions of my family . The constant encouragement and moral support provided by my mother, father, and brother Tom carried me over many obstacles. Also, I am deeply indebted to Melanie Younger, who contributed more time and energy toward the completion of this work than anyone other than myself. 1 INTRODUCTION Sediments of the Late Cretaceous to middle Eocene Oconee Group (H uddlestun, 1980) and of the overlying late Eocene Barnwell Group (Huddlestun and Hetrick, 1979, p. 6, 7) are exposed in the Upper Coastal Plain of east-central Georgia. These sediments form a homoclinal wedge which thickens southeastward and rests unconformably upon crystalline rocks similar to those exposed in the adjacent Piedmont. During the past few years, the stratigraphy of these sediments has undergone significant revision. Table I places earlier terms and subdivisions in perspective with current stratigraphy. Other stratigraphic terms applied to these sediments are contained in Cook (1926), Smith ( 1929), Carver (1972), and Pickering and others ( 1976). The reader should note that, despite the fact that Oconee Group sediments examined in this study are from the group's uppermost portion and therefore probably assignable to the Huber Formation (Buie , 1975, p. 1-3, tab. 1), no attempt is made to differentiate the Oconee into the Huber and "Cretaceous Undifferentiated (Post-Cenomanian)" (Hurst and others, 1979, p. 7, fig. 2). Sedimentology Oconee Group sediments in the study area (fig. I) typically consist of light-colored, irregularly distributed sequences of poorly sorted gravels, sands, and muds. The term "mud" refers to detrital sediment composed of silt and f or clay. Common lithologies are crossbedded and parallel-bedded muddy sand to sandy mud. Well-sorted materials make up a small percentage of the total sediment volume. Scour surfaces overlain by fining-upward sequences are common, as are mud clasts generated within the basin of deposition by erosion of semiconsolidated muddy sediments. Vertical and lateral lithologic variation are great. Identifiable beds or bed sequences are typically less than 6 m thick and traceable laterally over distances of a few meters to a few tens of meters. Exceptions are sinuous, elongate massive mud (kaolin) lenses, which reach lengths of 1.5 km (Kesler, 1963, p . 7), and the persistent massive mud unit which constitutes the upper few meters of the Oconee Group in most places. Mineral assemblages are almost entirely composed of quartz and kaolinite. A mature heavy mineral assemblage is nearly ubiquitous (Austin, 1976, p. I0). Occurrences of lignitic materials, goethite, hematite, marcasite, pyrite and montmorillonite are minor and sporadic. Minor occurrences of bauxite (gibbsite) have been reported from the upper few meters of the formation (for example, La Moreaux, 1946, p. 45 after Warren , 1943). An exception to the general pattern is again provided by the massive mud unit occupying the upper few meters of the Oconee Group. This unit contains appreciable montmorillonite. Kaolinitized muscovite(?) and extremely embayed quartz occur throughout, indicating pervasive leaching has affected the sediments subsequent to deposition (Austin, 1972, p. 80-83, fig. 26). The only animal fossils which havebeen observed within the Oconee Group of east-central Georgia are those of marine invertebrates transported down Barnwell age burrows which extend downward from the disconformity at the Oconee's upper surface. Basal Jackson Group sediments encountered in this study consist of massive and parallel-bedded sand to sandy mud, variably fossiliferous and gravelly, and crossbedded sand to muddy sand or sandy mud. Sediments are both oxidized and reduced, often within the same exposure . Pisolitic cobbles and boulders <2m in diameter are occasionally present. Fossils frequently are decalcified and, in some instances, are silicified. Dominant minerals are quartz, kaolinite, and montmorillonite. Minor amounts of iron are present in the form of oxides, hydrous oxides, and sulfides. Barnwell Group sediments generally contain more iron than those of the Oconee. Purpose and Scope The purpose of this investigation was to document the trace fossils and lithologic characteristics of the Oconee Group and to utilize this information in an attempt to determine depositional environments and diagenetic changes. Penetration of the upper surface of the Oconee by Barnwell-age burrows necessitated inclusion of basal Barnwell Group sediments in this study. This investigation was concentrated in two areas: (I) northwestern Washington County and (2) western Wilkinson County (fig. 1). 2 Figure I. Map of study area, showing localities studied. For specific locations of Localities "A" through "H", see appendix A. Adapted from parts of I:250,000 topographic maps NI 17-7 (Athens) (1965) and I'< 1 17-10 (Macon) (1956), (U.S. Army Map Service, Corps of Engineers). Methods Lithologic characteristics described in this study include grain size, color and physical structures. Grain size was estimated visually. Samples of most units were scrutinized under a 32X binocular microscope equipped with a micrometer eyepiece. An effort was made to distinguish between mud (< 0.0625 mm), fine sand (0.0625-0.25 mm), medium sand (0.25-0.5 mm), coarse sand (0.5-2.0 mm), and gravel(< 2.0 mm). A sand gauge prepared from corresponding sieve fractions was employed for comparison. Grain size of unsampled units contained in the stratigraphic descriptions (appendix A) was estimated by inspection at the outcrop. These units are listed as "not sampled" in appendix B. Color was estimated at the outcrop using a GSA Rock-Color Chart. Description of physical structures included primary sedimentary structures and deformational structures. Some sedimentological terms are defined in Appendix A. The presence of marcasite and pyrite in burrows at one locality was determined by optical reflectance and confirmed by x-ray diffraction. 3 Table I. Equivalence of currently accepted stratigraphy with formerly accepted stratigraphy. (Ad apted from LaMoreaux, 1946, p. 42-44, fig. 4; Hurst and others, 1979, p. 4-7, fig. 2; H uddlestun and Hetrick, 1979, fig. 4; H uddlestun, 1980.) CURRENTLY A- CCEPT EO STRATIGRAPHY Und iff ere ntia led Barnwell Group Sands Irwinton Sand Member Dry Branch Twiggs Clay Member Clrnchfreld Formalron Huber Formation Cretaceous undifferentiated (post Cenomanian! s s s E R ,-- I GROUP sE y s T E M E -R I Es GROUP FORMERLY ACCEPTED STRATIGRAPHY ~ARNWEL ~ E -JACKSON E Barnwel l c 0 0c p \ '""'" E E R NT N E E R E E s u T M I E 0 I-p A A R y I-p A L L E E c 0 0 c E E N N E E 0 I A B s E N T c Irwinton Sand Member Twiggs Clay Me mber 'Chann el Sands ' 0 N E E c G u L F I A N R E T A c E us0 u G L F I A N N 0 T N A M E 0 Tus caloosa Formation Ichnology Ichnology-the study of fossil and recent traces of animals- has provided much information of value in such fields as sedimentology and paleoenvironmental reconstructions and, though little utilized thus far, has a large potential for contribution toward our understanding of diagenesis (Frey, 1973, p. 6). Trace fossils provide a record of life of soft-bodied animals unavailable from any other source. Several advantages of trace fossils over body fossils are that trace fossils (I) directly reflect behavior patterns, (2) are likely to be preserved and even enhanced by diagenesis, (3) are governed in their abundance and distribution by environmental conditions, and (4) are not ordinarily reworked or transported (Frey and Chowns, 1972, p. 25). Of particular relevance to this study is the observation that trace fossils commonly provide the only evidence of animal life in otherwise nonfossiliferous sediments (Hakes, 1976, p. 13, 14). This is the case with the Oconee Group in east-central Georgia. Trace fossils have been sporadically reported from the Oconee Group for 50 yea rs. The most widely recognized of these is the '"worm-cast' structure" (Smith, 1929, p . 39). This type structure has also been recognized by Hinkley ( 1965, p. 1869) and Austin ( 1976, p. 5) and undoubtedly corresponds to Planolites sp. A of thi s work. Networks of burrows originating at the upper surface of the Oconee have also been described and used in a limited way in diagenetic interpreta tion (Austin, 1972, p. 44, fig. 16). These burrow networks probably correspond to structures herein assigned to Thalassinoides. 4 Locality H (W. Wilkinson Co.) Locality E (Deepstep) 42 km ? unnamed Barnwell Group Sa nds . -~ - .. ~ ... ;__. ;_~ .:G-.~: i ,.~-~~~-~ :_: -::- - - - - - :- - .- . - :;=: - Clinchfield Formation Locality A (NE of Deepstep) Figure 2. ~ cross ~ bedded sands O mass1ve sands r==:==~ inter- R =:j l::....=..:.:lbedded sands -=-- - muds and muds Representative stratigraphic sections from the study area. These sections and others are presented in greater detail in appendix A. Terminology Most of the descriptive ichnological terms used are precisely defined in Frey ( 1973). Other terms are described below. The reader is also referred to the preservational classification below (fig. 3B). commensalism- a close association between two kinds of organisms, in which one benefits and the other neither benefits nor is harmed. duodecimal - divided into twelve parts. ethological - in ichnology, of or pertaining to the study or interpretation of the behavior of organisms as reflected by their traces (Frey, 1973, tab. 2). flabellate- fan-shaped; spreading like a collapsible hand fan. latero-vertical - diagonal; movement with appreciable sideways and upwards components. lebensspuren- fossil and recent traces produced by the activity of organisms. mammilla- a nipple-shaped protuberance. meniscoid -a concave or convex surface whose periphery contacts the inner wall of a cylinder. omission surfaces- discontinuity surfaces of the most minor nature, which mark temporary halts in deposition, but involve little or no erosion. Where omission surfaces occur repeatedly in a vertical sequence, the sequence may be referred to as omission bedding (Bromley, 1975, p. 400). spreite-a blade-like to sinuous, U-shaped, or spiraled structure consisting of sets of closely appressed, serialed, parallel or concentric feeding or dwelling burrows (fig. 3A) or grazing traces (Frey, 1973, p. 10). thixotropy-the property of certain colloidal substances to lose cohesiveness and flow when disturbed and to gain cohesiveness when left undisturbed. 5 e~ pichnial groove epichnial ridge . up . . epichnia r casting medium oa endichnia hypichnia retrusive hypichnial ridge hypichnial groove Figure 3A. Examples of protrustive and retrusive spreite. Figure 38. Last tunnel constructed is shown unfilled. Toponomic preservational classification by A. Martinsson ( 1965, 1970), based upon trace fossils and the casting medium (Frey and Chowns, 1972,fig. 1). SYSTEMATIC ICHNOLOGY Ichnogenus Amphorichnus Myannil, 1966 Amphorichnus sp. Figures 4, 5 Description: short, vertical,'conical to subconical structures, 1.5 to 4.0 em in diameter, having blunt, convex downward apices and smooth, unlined walls (fig. 4); enlarged crowns (fig. 4A, 48) common; apical mamillae (figs. 58, 5C) rare; maximum length observed, about 10 em. Preservation: exichnia, subjacent to omission surfaces; burrow fill, exclusive of apical mamillae, is unpatterned coarse sand, unlike enclosing sediments; apical mamillae filled with fine sandy mud, somewhat similar to enclosing sediments, and arranged in concave-up, meniscoid laminae. Occurrence and distribution: occurs in parallel-bedded , poorly sorted muddy sands and sandy muds, within a few meters of the upper surface of the Oconee Group at localities "B" and "F"; individual structures having crowns and those lacking crowns commonly occupy separate stratigraphic horizons; maximum density observed, about 100m2 on a vertical face; lateral crowding common (figs. 4C, 40); latero-vertical succession rare (fig. 50). Interpretation: dwelling or resting structures produced by an anemone or anemone-like animal; truncated burrows, especially those which occupy adjacent positions at the same stratigraphic horizon, and the striking difference between most burrow fills and enclosing sediments, suggest omission bedding (Bromley, 1975, p. 400); latero-vertical succession probably represents the animal's response to sedimentation, a type of"escape structure". Discussion: Although these specimens show affinities with various other ichnogenera, they are here assigned to Amphorichnus. Hantzschel ( 1975, p. W36, W52), following original descriptions by Myannil (1966), differentiated Amphorichnus from Conichus by the presence of a distinct apical "mamilla" in the former and its absence in the latter. However , I agree with Frey ( 1978, personal commun.) that presence or absence of an apical mamilla is an insufficient criterion for creation of separate ichnogenera. Mamillae aside, these specimens conform well to the morphology and dimensions of Amphorichnus as described in Hantzschel (1975, p. W36). 6 A oo a a . ~ _ , , , _ . _, 0 o - , , , , , .o o o - 0 M - 0 , 0 , 0 , , - - - , ~ ! . : B , .. .. - .. . . - . . ...~ i c . .. --- . . . . -- -.. ....... ........... .. D ............. - -- ..3... ...e..m.. .. ...... .. .. ..... ... , , , _____ __--.. E Figure 4. Typical examples of Amphorichnus sp. Vertical views. outc rop face. Dark parts of photos large ly indicati ve of a reas of relatively high hydrous iron oxide concentration . A, specimens illu strating e nl arged crowns (top). B, adapted from /\ ,w ith distance between s pecimens s hortened. C, specime ns illustrating lateral c rowding and erosional truncation . D , adapted fr o m C. E. speci mens truncat ed a t sa me omission s urface. Apparent to nal differences in fill due to differences in hydrous iron oxide concentration. A-D . from locality "B"; E, from loca lit y "P'. 7 These specimens also show affinities with Conostichus (Chamberlain, 1971, p. 220-221; Hantzschel, 1975, p. Wl46) and Bergauria (Albert, 1973 p. 919; Hantzschel, 1975, p. W45, W46). However, Georgia specimens do not exhibit internal duodecimal or medusoid symmetry such as that associated with these ichnogenera. Amphorichnian structures are morphologically and dimensionally similar to dwelling burrows produced by some modern sea anemones (Stephenson, 1935, p. 104-106; Frey, 1970, p. 308, 309). Two rarely observed features further support this view. Crudely radial shallow depressions in the substrate surface surrounding enlarged crowns (fig. SA) are filled with "clean" sand similar to burrow fill. These radial depressions are similar to tentacle impressions produced by some modern burrowing anemones, "especially during low tide in the littoral zone" (Frey, 1970, p . 31 0) . Also, apical mamillae correspond closely to the shape of physa, which are used by modern anemones in digging and rapid retraction of upper body parts into the burrow (Stephenson, 1935, p. 104-106; Frey, 1970, p. 308). Except for vertically nested "v"-shaped laminae, unlined anemone burrows are poorly suited for preservation in thixotropic substrates, such as "clean" sand (Shinn, 1968, p. 888, 889; Frey, 1970, p. 31 0). Not surprisingly, traces in the fossil record attributable to burrowing anemones are associated with substrates composed of various combinations of sand and mud (for example, Chamberlain, 1971, p. 221). Such combinations may provide suitable substrate for the animal and afford a high potential for burrow preservation, if b-uried . The poorly sorted, muddy sand/sandy mud substrates in which these structures occur must have been stable enough to support themselves about the burrows from the time the animals vacated , at least until filling. Distribution of anemones is worldwide, ranging from brackish intertidal situations to the abyss (Stephenson, 1928, p. 81; Kaestner, 1967, p. 109; MacGintie and MacGintie, 1968, p. 117). Thus, their lebensspuren do not appear to be good indicators of bathymetry or water temperature. They do appear to be useful indicators of salinity, in that all known modern burrowing forms occur in brackish or marine waters (MacGintie and MacGintie, 1968, p. 117). Distribution of Amphorichnus sp. in the study area is confined to parallel-bedded muddy sand /sandy mud in the top few meters of the Oconee Group at locations "B" and "F". The presence of these structures argues strongly in favor of brackish or marine deposition of sediments containing them. Typical density of Amphorichnus sp. is about 20 to 30/ m 2 on a vertical face. Lateral crowding (figs. 4C, 40) is common. Chamberlain ( 1971, p. 221) observed similar relations in anemone-produced Conostichus, which he attributes to the "gregarious, ubiquitous, and hemivagrant nature" of anemones. Latero-vertical succession (fig. 50) is less common. This array probably represents the animal's response to erosion andjor sedimentation. Adjacent burrows which terminate upward at the same bedding surface commonly show a similar degree of erosional truncation (figs. 4A, 4E). Truncated burrows are more abundant than complete ones, suggesting that periods of minor erosion commonly preceded periods of deposition. This sequence constitutes "omission bedding" (Bromley, 1975, p. 400). Further evidence of sediment omission may be gained by comparison of burrow fills with enclosing sediments. Burrow fills, exclusive of apical mamillae, consist of unpatterned, "clean", coarse sand, thinly encrusted with hydrous iron oxide. This lithology is in sharp contrast to enclosing sediments, which are muddy, bedded, and generally lighter in color (fig. 4C). The absence of suprajacent sediment similar to burrow fills is suggestive of sediment trapping at an omission surface (Bromley, 1975, p. 401). Also of interest regarding omitted sediments are differences in the concentration of hydrous iron oxide in fillings of adjacent burrows truncated at the same surface (fig. 4E). This relationship is suggestive of original differences between burrow fillings. These differences may have resulted from differences in the times of escape of the animals coupled with changes in grain size and j or composition of sediment travelling over the omission surface. It also suggests that encrustations of hydrous iron oxide on sand grains are or are related to an original property of the fill. 8 crown 1 em shaft radial depression "----~ 2 em apical mamillae surfaces Figure 5. Rarely observed features of Amphorichnus sp. A-C, drawn from same specimen, illustrate complete range of morphological components observed among A.mphorichnus sp. in the study area. A, plan view of specimen top. B, vertical view, outcrop face. C, same as B, but rotated 90 about a vertical axis. Note difference in diameter of apical mamillae between Band C. Unstippled areas at base of Band C indicate presence of white muddy fill, more like substrate than "nornial" burrow fill, which is stippled . D, vertical view, outcrop face, showing latero-vertical succession. Burrows apparently are both truncated and linked together. A-D, from locality "B". 9 lchnogenusOphiomorpha Lundgren, 1891 Ophiomorpha sp. cf. 0. nodosa Figures 6, 7 Description: complex, ramified, dominantly horizontal burrow systems, thinly lined, exhibiting vertically stacked, retrusive spreiten structures and sparsely nodose exteriors; irregularly "Y"- or, less commonly, "T'-branched; individual burrow segments cylindrical, smoothly curved or straight, and 1.5 to 2.0 em in diameter (fig. 6); spreiten up to 30 em in height; maximum length of burrow segments observed, about 30 em. Preservation: endichnia; except for spreite, fill is unpatterned and similar in appearance to enclosing sediments; thin lining consists of mud-size material, lighter in color than burrow fill or host substrate; exterior slightly nodose to irregular (fig. 6); coherence of lining causes burrows to stand in positive relief on erosion surfaces (figs. 6, 7B). Systems truncated at clay-ball-gravel horizon (fig. 7A). Occurrence and distribution: occurs in coarse sand fill of shallow channels cut into upper surface of Oconee Group at Locality "A"; confined to lower 50 em or less of channel fill, where systems may occupy more than 75% of the substrate volume. Interpretation: dwelling structures of a species of thalassinidean shrimp, possibly a callianassid; retrusive spreiten probably represent animal's response to slowly aggrading substrate surface; high density of burrows indicates that, at the time of burrow construction, channel fill was relatively stable and no longer subject to strong erosive currents which cut the channel originally (R . W. Frey, 1979, personal commun.); thin lining and poorly developed nodose exteriors represent animal's response to moderate instability of the sandy substrate with respect to burrow construction and maintenance. Discussion: These structures seem to be identical to the blade-like form of Ophiomorpha described by Hester and Pryor ( 1972, p. 678-681 , figs. 2, 4, 5). These authors assigned to their blade-like forms the name 0. nodosa var. spatha. Their practice is not followed here, due to the poorly preserved nodose exteriors of these specimens and the resultant difficulty in differentiating them according to ichnospecies (Frey and others, 1978, p. 222-225). The vertically stacked, blade-shaped spreiten structures exhibited by Ophiomorpha sp. and Ophiomorpha nodosa var. spatha are reminiscent of Teichichnus (see Frey and Howard, 1970, fig . 8g). However, Hester and Pryor ( 1972, p. 686) and Frey and others (1978, p. 207) considered ramified burrow systems exhibiting spreiten structures and knobby exteriors to be a form of Ophiomorpha, not Teichichnus, which lacks a nodose exterior. Several morphological details exhibited by these specimens deserve mention. Although burrow segments are dominantly horizontal, some are vertical or inclined. Also, burrows are occasionally inflated at points of bifurcation. Some intersections are merely points of burrow interpenetration and not true branchings (fig. 6). Such interpenetrations may account for the absence of inflations at some points of intersection. The presence of inOations at points of bifurcation is a regular feature of many occurrences of Ophiomorpha and its modern analogues (for example, Frey and others, 1978, p. 201). In addition, this occurrence of Ophiomorpha probably represents an extensive, integrated burrow system, typical of the "communal structures" of Frey and others ( 1978, p. 20 1). Finally, the poorly developed nodose exteriors of Ophiomorpha sp. were also observed in specimens of 0. nodosa var. spatha by Hester and Pryor (1972, p. 680), who noted that the nodes are easily destroyed by gentle abrasion that accompanies surface weathering. Such abrasion probably accounts for the poorly developed nodose exteriors of Ophiomorpha sp. Knobby-walled burrows and burrow systems similar to Ophiomorpha are constructed by some modern thalassinidean shrimp, most of which are species of Callianassa (Weimer and Hoyt, l964, p. 763; Frey and Howard, 1969, p. 428; Frey and others, 19 78, p. 2 l2, 214). Knobby-walled burrows are also produced by Upogebia pugettensis (Frey and others, 1978, p. 209, after MacGintie, 1930). 10 10 em Figure 6. Typical configuration or Ophiomorpha sp. from lower 0.6 m of U. Eocene channel fill at Locality "A". Oblique view of nearly horizontal surface. Spreiten truncated by erosion, exposing internal laminae (1). (sec Hester and Pryor, 1972, fig. 4). 11 ;,. ' , . . " :. -: ' . . . 1 m A 8 Figure 7. Cross sections of fill of U. Eocene channel cut into upper surface of Oconee Group at Locality "A". showing distribution of Ophiomorpha sp. in lower portion. Upward extent of burrows limited by la ye r of large mud clasts. above which channel fill is "structureless". A, adapted from B. Correct interpretation of the function of these burrows depends in large measure upon determination of the feeding behavior of producer organisms. Among mqdern shrimp capable of constructing such burrows, three types of feeding behavior are possible: filter-feeding (M acG intie and MacG intie, 1968, p. 289, 291, 292); deposit-feeding (Weimer and Hoyt, 1964, p. 762; MacGintie and MacGintie, 1968, p. 284; Braithwaite and Talbot, 1972, p. 265; Ott and others, 1976, p. 72); culture of edible microorganisms within burrows (Braithwaite and Talbot, 1972, p. 280; Ott and others, 1976, p. 72, 73), which may also be considered a form of deposit-feeding. Multiramos burrow systems are generally thought to indicate sediment exploitation by deposit-feeders (for example, Braithwaite and Talbot, 1972, p. 265), suggesting these structures may have served a combination feeding-dwelling function. However, Frey ( 1972, personal commun.) points out that, although such burrows may begin as feeding structures, during the excavation stage,they are essentially domiciles by the time pellets have been added to the burrow walls. Paleosalinity implications of Ophiomorpha range from brackish to marine (Smith, 1967, table 5; Frey and others, 1978, p. 220). This salinity range is apparently compatible with field relations in the study area, because sediments occupied by Ophiomorpha sp. are channel fillings demonstrably associated with a marine transgression (p. 86, this volume). The high density and dominantly horizontal orientation exhibited by the occurrence of Ophiomorpha suggest construction under conditions of reduced current energy. In a survey of Callianassa major burrow densities in an eastern Gulf of Mexico shore area, highest aperture densities were found in shallow protected areas and in deeper offshore areas (Frey and others, 1918, p. 215-217). Also, among Ophiomorpha and modern equivalents, "boxworks" and "mazes" predominate over "shaft~" in low energy environments (Frey and others, 1978, p. 218). Moderate substrate instability with respect to burrow construction and maintenance is indicated by the presence in these specimens of a thin distinct burrow lining and sparsely nodose exteriors (Frey, 1971, p. 116; Bromley and Frey, 1974, p. 324; Frey and others, 1978, p. 205-207). Previous authors have advanced several theories on the origin of spreiten structures associated with burrows attributed to thalassinidean shrimp. For example, the shrimp's attempt to eliminate unwanted sediment or waste, not pumped out of the burrow (Fursich, 1972, p. 131; Frey and others, 1978, p. 207) and upward migration away from putrifying substrate conditions have been suggested as possible causes (Hester and Pryor, 1972, p. 685). However, the most plausible explanation for spreiten-producing behavior manifested by Ophiomorpha sp. from the study area seems to be upward shifting of a dominantly horizontal burrow system by the animal in response to a slowly aggrading substrate surface (Frey and others, 1978, p. 207). Ichnogenus Phycodes Richter, 1850 Phycodes sp. Figures 8, 9 Description: straight to smoothly curved, somewhat flattened, tubular structures, which may anastomose into closely appressed bundles, suggestive of spreiten structures (fig. 9B); segments commonly grade into boudinagelike segments or elongate, discontinuous, pediform structures (fig. 90); cemented to, or otherwise associated with, "parallel ferruginous tunnels"; typically originating on ventral side of"parallel ferruginous tunnels"; with closely appressed individual tubes curving around and obliquely upward, toward dorsal side (figs. 8A-C, 9A, 90); true branching not observed; rare, short, tonguelike protusions may extend obliquely outward from walls of structure (fig. 9C); terminations rounded; distinctly lined by I mm thick sheath; apertures or interconnections with "parallel ferruginous tunnels" not observed; diameters range from 0.5 to 1.5 em and are rarely constant, even within individual tubes; maximum length observed, about 15 em. Preservation: cndichnia; fill apparently unpatterned, similar to enclosing sediments, and loosely cemented by hydrous iron oxide; lining cemented by dense concentration of hydrous iron oxide. 13 Occorrence and distribution: occurs in close association with "parallel ferruginous tunnels" in weathered, crossbedded (?),poorly sorted, mudd y, medium sand of channel fillings(?), supraj ace nt to the Oconee Group, at Locality "G"; commonly confined to external surfaces of ve ntral sides and termin a tions of "para llel ferruginous tunnels" (figs. 8A-C, 9A, 90); distribution irregular. Interpretation: feeding structures produced by vermiform, sediment-ingesting a nimal ; close association with parallel ferruginous tunnels" suggestive of commensalism; discreet , thin , hydrous iron oxide linin g suggest ive of original organic lining; structures formed later than "parallel ferruginous tunnels," with which they arc associated. Discussion: Bundled, spreitenlike versions of these structures conform well to Ha nt zsc hel's ( 19 75, p. W93- W95) description of Phycodes, except for the absence in these specimens of"delicate an nulati o n beneath thin smooth , bark" on free tunnels. However, Phycodes sp. have been preserved through diagenetic concentration of iron compounds, suggesting absence of annulations and "bark" may be a prese rvational matter. Also, so me bundl ed. spreitenlike versions of these structures (figs. 8B, 8C) close ly resemble the specim e n of Ph,rcocles pal111atwn (Hall) illustrated in Hantzschel (1975, fig. 59, 2e). flabellate burrows, such as certain examples of Phycodes sp. (9B, 9C), have been interpreted as feeding structures probably produced by a sediment-ingesting vermiform animal (Hantzsc hel, 1975, p. W94; Simpson, 1975, p. 50). I agree with this interpretation . The closely spaced, anastomosing pattern exhibited by these burrows (figs. 8B, 9C) is suggestive of foraging behavior. Burrow segmentation observed in so me instances (fig. 8A) is uggestive of fecal backfill, further supporting this view. A 8 c Figure 8. Three views of a specimen of Phycodes sp. from Locality "G". Specimen is attached to and curves upward around the termination of a " parallel ferruginou s tunnel" . A, to pview; B, s ide view (see Hant zsc hel , 1975, fig . 59. 2e); C, bottom view. 14 A ' 0 I 2 B c F ig ure 9. Phycodes s p. fr o m Loca lit y " G" . A , s pecimen curvin g up wa rd aro und th e te rmin a ti o n of a " pa ra llel fe rru gino u tunne l"; B, C, t o p a nd bo tt o m vie ws res pec ti ve ly of a sma ll a nas t o mosin g s pecime n; C, sma ll t o ng ue-li ke fea tures protrud e fr o m burro w wa ll ; D , disc ont inu o us structures gra dation a l with Phycodes sp ., a tt a ched to lowe r s ur face of a " pa ra llel fe rru gino us tunn el". 15 The close association between Phycodes sp. and the exterior walls of "parallel ferruginous tunnels" suggests lining material of the larger structures may have provided a source of food for the Phycodes sp. animal. However, no breaks or deformations are discernible in the walls of"parallel ferruginous tunnels" where they are contacted by Phycodes sp., suggesting linings of the larger structures were not consumed as food by the Ph.rcodes sp. animal. These observations seem to increase the likelihood that the Phycodes sp. animal was in pursuit of nutrients passing through the walls of the larger structures. Other distributional aspects also suggest this relationship. Most Phycodes sp. occur or originate on the ventral side of "parallel ferruginous tunnels." Relatively dense liquid or liq uifiable wastes collecting on floors of the larger structures probably would have enriched the subjacent sediment in materials useful to microorganisms. Resultant concentration of microorganisms probably would have tended to attract sediment ingestors, where grain size and other substrate characteristics were favorable. Also, in some cases, Ph.rcodes sp. is conspicuously associated with terminations of the larger burrows. These terminations were probably among the more stagnant parts of the larger burrows, places where wastes would have tended to collect and migrate into the surrounding sediment. The close association of Phycodes sp. and "parallel ferruginous tunnels" suggests a genetic link between these two structures. This link is based on feeding behavior of the Phycodes sp. animal and food production of the "parallel ferruginous tunnels" animal and is suggestive of a commensal relationship. Preservation of Phycodes sp. and related structures is a direct consequence of the diagenetic concentration of iron. Hydrous iron oxide is densely concentrated in thin, well-defined linings. Lesser concentrations cement fill materials. The resulting indurated structures are surrounded by loose sands and weather out in positive relief (figs. 41, 42). Ichnogenus Planolites Nicholson, 1873 The current confusion concerning the ichnogenera Paleophycus Hall, 1847 and Planolites Nicholson, 1873 has been noted and dealt with by a number of authors in a variety of ways (Osgood, 1970, p. 375, 376; Frey and Chowns, 1972, p. 32; Alpert, 1975, pt 512; Hantzschel, 1975, p. W88, W89, W95-W97; Hakes, 1976, p. 32). No attempt is made to resolve this controversy here. Assignment of the two burrow types described below to Planolites is based on a broad interpretation of this ichnogenus (see Frey, 1970, p. 16, description of Planolites sp.). Planolites sp. A Figure 10 Description: closely spaced, unbranched (?), sinuous, randomly oriented burrows, I to 4 mm in diameter, frequently truncating or interpenetrating one another (figs. I OA, I OB); unlined walls leathery in appearance due to poorly defined, discontinuous, circumferential ridges (fig. I 08); maximum length observed, about 5 em. Preservation: Endichnia; burrow fill is segmented, relatively porous mud; fill segments of larger diameter specimens, about 5 mm in length, each having a convex and concave end which are concentric with one another (figs. I 08, I OC); some fills contain appreciable void space. Occurrence and distribution: occurs in massive muds and slightly sandy muds; widespread, but confined stratigraphically to upper few meters of Oconee Group; at Locality "A", maximum density of nearly 100% of substrate volume occurs in the 2 to 3 m depth interval below upper Oconee surface. Interpretation: cumulative feeding-dwelling structures of sediment-ingesting vermiform animals, possibly oligochaetes; actively backfilled with fecal trains; voids within some fills may have been created by surface casting or by diagenetic destruction of undigested organics. 16 Discussion: These structures are similar to Planolites as originally envisioned by Nicholson (1873, p. 309). Burrow morphology and regular annulation and segmentation of fill (fig. IOC) suggest active backfill of burrows with material passed through the alimentary canal of a vermiform animal, possibly a species of oligochaete. Unfortunately, little description of the nature of subterranean structures produced by earthworms is available (Satchell, I96 7, p. 295), necessitating reliance on indirect evidence to support this view: i.e., the nature of the unit to which these structures are restricted and the apparent timing of their construction. Planolites sp. A was observed only in the massive muds that constitute the upper few meters of the Oconee Group at widely separate locations. Evidence indicates that these massive muds are a paleosol (p. 85-86). If these muds are a paleosol, structures preserved within them are quite likely related to soil development or were constructed after soil development had ceased. These conclusions follow from (I) the well-known homogenation of pre-existing structures which accompanies soil development generally, and (2) the physical evidence of such homogenation here (p. 86). The excellent preservation exhibited by these rather delicate structures, even those subjacent to the upper boundary of the Oconee, suggests soil development processes had all but ceased by the time of their construction. Thus, the time interval in which Planolites sp. A could have been constructed appears to lie between the ending of soil formation and burial. This leaves open the possibility of burrow construction during the time of exposure of the substrate to brackish and / or marine conditions associated with transgression (p. 86). However, regarding production of Planolites-like structures under such conditions, Curran and Frey (I977, p. I46) state that "few modern vermiform animals known to us produce actively backfilled burrows of the classical Planolites type." Furthermore, infaunal worms require a source of oxygen. Depth and density at depth of these actively backfilled burrows suggest the producers spent considerable time deep in the substrate. It seems unlikely that such behavior could be sustained under flooded conditions (Dales, 1967, p. 95, I05; Schaller, 1968, p. 61) . Modern earthworms of the tropical savannah provide us with an example of burrowing mainly at depth, in response to seasonal drought (Wallwork, 1976, p. 67). These points seem to strengthen the case for an earthworm producer, which, in turn, suggests construction prior to the late Eocene transgression. These structures were examined in some detail at Locality "A". Here, high porosity of burrow fills relative to the adjacent substrate is apparent in some instances. Obvious void spaces are especially prominent in some burrow fills near the top of the unit. Also, some burrow fills stratigraphically lower in this unit exhibit greater apparent whiteness than the adjacent substrate. This is due to greater dryness of the fill, probably caused by its greater porosity. Increased porosity is suggestive of the former presence of relatively soluble constituents within burrow fills. However, an alternative explanation for the noticeable voids which occur within burrow fill near the upper surface of the unit is that they may be spaces created by surface casting (defecating above ground). Surface casting is of minor importance in increasing soil pore space (Satchell, 1967, p. 297), presumably because of the relatively short time earthworms spend above ground. The amount of pore space attributable to voids within Planolites sp. A at Locality "A" is small, making it compatible with Wallwork's observations (Satchell, 1967, p. 297) . Concentration of these voids near the upper surface of the Oconee at Locality"A" may reflect the decreasing importance of surface casting with depth to production of pore spaces. 17 ~ ~...fo:P.! ' 1 em A concave ends convex ends 5 mm B ( :c=c:. c Figure !0. Planolites sp. A. A, characteristic random orientation of burrows; B, interpenetrating specimens , showing poorly defined circumferential ridges (I) and annulations (2) at fill segment junctions; C, internal structure of burrow fill. 18 Planolites sp. B Figure II Description: sparse, unbranched, smoothly curved, cylindrical or subcylindrical slightly sinuous shafts, tunnels, and inclined burrows, I to 3 mm in diameter (figs. !Ia, II B); diameters within individual burrows constant; walls smooth, thinly lined; burrows commonly exhibit preferred orientation with preference vertical, horizontal, or inclined in order of decreasing frequency; maximum length observed, about I m. Preservation: Endichnia; burrow fill unpatterned mud, similar in appearance to enclosing sediments; distinctly lined by somewhat diffuse concentrations of hydrous iron oxide (figs. II C, II D) . Occurrence and distribution: occurs in some massive muds of the Oconee Group in northeastern part of study 2 area at Localities "D", "E", and "F"; maximum density observed, 20 intersectionsjm on a vertical face. Interpretation: dwelling structures or feeding-dwelling structures of infaunal vermiform animal, possibly a species of polychaete; probably originated as open, lined burrows that were later passively filled. Discussion: Although these specimens show affinities for several other ichnogenera, notably Skolithos, Paleophycus, and Sah ellar(f'ex (H antzschel, 1975, p. WI 06-108, W88, W89, WI 02) they are here assigned to Planolites, in the broader sense of this ichnogenus (see Frey, 1970, p. 16, description of Planolites sp.). Small, simple, slightly sinuous, open, lined tubes similar to Planolites sp. B are constructed by modern polychaetes in brackish and marine environments (Howard and Frey, 1975, p. 52-63; Curran and Frey, 1977, p. 146, 148, 150). These animals utilize their burrows generally according to feeding mode: as dwelling structures for filter-feeders and surficial deposit-feeders (Howard and Frey, 1975, p. 51-54, 56-61). In some cases, burrows of subsurface deposit-feeders may consist of thinly lined, more or less permanent, "main" burrows from which unlined, ephemeral feeding burrows protrude (Howard and Frey, 1975, p. 57). Construction and maintenance of these structures as open, dwelling burrows are suggested by the absence of segmentation or annulation of burrow fill and the presence of a distinct hydrous iron oxide lining. Lined burrows filled with unpatterned material similar to enclosing substrates are considered suggestive of passive fill of open burrows(Freyand Howard, 1972,p. 173, 179; Frey, 1973 , p. 10, II). Recognition of Planolites sp. B is entirely dependent upon the presence of hydrous iron oxide concentrations associated with the walls of these burrows. These concentrations occur as burrow linings (fig. II C) and as rarely observed liesegang bands , concentrically arranged about the burrows (fig. II D). In a commercial kaolin at Locality "E", specimens of Planolites sp. B cut across and are undeformed by extensively developed bioturbate textures (fig. 48). These relations indicate that construction of Planolites sp. B postdates activity which generated the bioturbate textures. These relations also suggest that Planolites sp. 8 was constructed in relatively stable mud substrates not subject to pervasive soft sediment deformation. However, if the hydrous iron oxide linings of Planolites sp. B represent original organic linings, some sediment instability is indicated (Frey, 1971, p. 116). 19 ~ ~::=r; =c~;m=:=:::.:::::-::::::::::::=========~ A 1 em c il :p,~:: >/ 1 em 0 Figure II . 8 Planoli1es sp. B. from muds of the Oconee Group. A, B, burrow segments showing typical morphology and orientation; C, tra nsverse sections; stippled areas show distribution of hydrous iron oxide; D, specimen from Locality "E", showing delicate liesegang bands of hydrous iron oxide surrounding the burrow. Ichnogenus Skolithos Haldemann, 1840 Skolithos sp. Figures 12, 47A, 48, 49, 50, 56 Description: unbranched, discontinuous, straight to slightly sinuous shafts and steeply inclined burrows, roughly circular in transverse section, and I to 2 em in diameter; maximum observed length, about 1 m; unlined walls exhibit colliform or irregular structure (fig. 12). Preservation: endichnia or exichnia; burrow fill is unpatterned and consists of mud of greater whiteness than adjacent substrate (fig. 56); burrows may grade into bioturbation textures (fig. 47A). Occurrence and distribution: occur in massive to vaguely horizontal1aminated muds and slightly sandy muds at Localities "F" and "H"; observed within upper 5 m of the Oconee Group; structures may occur as isolated burrows (fig. 12), with maximum density observed, about 25 intersections per horizontal linear meter on a vertical face, or as closely spaced burrows within "large conical structures" in muds (figs. 50, 56). Interpretation: feeding structun:s or feeding-dwelling structures of a vermiform deposit-feeding animal; burrows were probably constructed in soft, unconsolidated mud substrates; greater whiteness of burrow fills relative to adjacent sediments is apparently due to relative absence of iron compounds within burrow fills, which is probably, in turn, related to passage of burrow fills through the gut of the tracemaker. 20 Figure 12. Skolilhos sp. Burrow fill consists of very white (N I0) mud, whereas adjacent sediment is generally darker, very pale orange (IOYR 8/2) mud. Bioturbate textures (I) also present 'I )-~:/ ! i y l ;.. l '.. , .t ~) '.l.'~ ': l;~ .!.........\...~ 2 em Discussion: These structures are assigned to Skolithos based on comparison with the description of the ichnogenus by Hantzschel ( 1975, p. WI 06, W 107). Both burrow types consist of parallel tubes that are roughly cylindrical, vertical, perpendicular td bedding, and of similar dimensions ( Hantzschel, 1975, p. WI 06, WI 0 7). The discontinuity and elongate, tubular morphology of these structures, their unlined, irregular to colliform walls, and their occurrence in mud substrates suggest that the tracemakers were ethologically similar to muddwelling, vermiform sediment ingestors. The discontinuity of these burrows and their irregular to colliform walls are also suggestive of construction in a soft, unconsolidated substrate, soon after deposition. This idea is further supported by observations of these structures grading into bioturbation textures (figs. 47A, 48) that were clearly generated in soft muddy substrates. Vertical, tubular burrows such as these are "normally" constructed as dwellings in response to environmental extremes and / or a high potential for erosional disinterment (Frey, 1971, p. Ill), suggesting sediments containing Skolithos sp. may be intertidal to shallow subtidal in origin (Rhoades, 1967, p. 161). However, dwelling burrows constructed in soft, muddy substrates are generally lined to prevent walls from collapsing (Frey, 1971, p. Ill). No evidence of burrow linings was observed among specimens examined, supporting the idea that these structures are feeding burrows of sediment ingestors. Burrow fills consist of mud of greater relative whiteness than adjacent substrate: burrow fills are generally very white (N 10), whereas adjacent substrates are generally very pale orange ( IOYR 8/ 2), creating a subtle contrast that in many places is difficult to perceive. These color differences appear to be due to the absence of hydrous iron oxide within burrow fills, relative to enclosing substrates (see Ekdale, 1977, p. 176-178). Similar relationships exist between bioturbation textures and adjacent mud substrates (p. 139, fig. 47 A) and between roughly horizontal, deformed laminae and enclosing sediment (for example, fig. 49), both of which commonly accompany occurrences of Skolithos sp. The apparent absence of hydrous iron oxide in burrow fills relative to surrounding sediments is most likely a direct result of the fill materials having been passed through the tracemaker's gut (Frey, 1911, p. 108). Assuming original distribution of iron was homogeneous on a scale smaller than Skolithos sp. burrows ( Hanor and Marshall, 1971, p. 130), present iron distribution must have involved diffusion of iron away from these burrows. Iron depletion within burrow fills was probably a two-stage process: ( l) solubilization of iron due to high acidity in the tracemaker's gut (Anderson and others, 1958, p. 190) or acidity produced by respiration (Ekdale, 1977, p. 177, 178); (2) subsequent outward diffusion of solubilized iron into the surrounding sediment (Ekdale, 1977, p. 177, 178). 21 Ichnogenus Thalassinoides Ehrenberg, 1944 Figures 13-29 Description: cylindrical to subcylindrical, smooth-to slightly irregular walled burrows, 0.7 to 10 em in diameter, forming branching systems that connect with substrate surface (figs. 15, 208); branching typically dichotomous and "Y"-shaped (figs. 15, 208, 23C, 25). Preservation: exichnia; burrows open, or filled with unpatterned or graded, commonly fossiliferous, sandy material, similar to suprajacent sediments; burrow walls and fill commonly exhibit hydrous iron oxide impregnations or encrustations (figs. 12, 13, 24C); structures show varying degrees of truncation at top of Oconee (figs . l8A, B, 258). Occurrence and distribution: occur throughout study area in muddy substrates at top of Oconee and within Clinchfield; lateral distribution, patchy; typical densities, 2 to 6 intersections per horizontal linear meter on vertical exposures, 30 em below substrate surface. Interpretation: feeding-dw elling structures excavated by various burrowing crustaceans, most of which apparently were species of shrimp; probably excavated and inhabited in warm, intertid a l to shallow subtidal marin e environments under a broa d range of current energies; Oconee substrates were firm or coherent at the time of Thalassinoides excavation, Clinchfield substrates were les s so. Discussion: These specimens are assigned to Thalassinoides based on comparison with descriptions of the ichnogenus by Kennedy (1967, p. 132) and Hantzschel (1975, p. Wll5, Wll7) and with the description of Spongeliomorpha paridoxica by Fursich and Palmer ( 1975, p. 172, I 76). Following the arguments of Bromley and Frey (1974, p. 329), Sp ongeliomorpha is considered a "nomen dubium" and is abandoned in favor of Thalassinoides for designating burrows of this type. The great variability of specimens of Thalassinoides observed in the study area necessitates some elaboration and qualification of the foregoing description. Most specimens are circular or subcircular in transverse section. However, a few display ovoid (fig. 238) or semi-circula r (fig. 20C) transverse sections (see Kennedy, 196 7, p. 134; Fursich and Palmer, 1975, p. 172). Wall structure ranges from smooth (fig. 208) to slightly irregular (figs . I3, 23C) (see Bromley, 1967, p. 162; Fursich and Palmer, 1975, p. 172). In the latter case, pits a nd , less commonly, gro oves sculpted by burrow inhabitants adorn the walls (fig. 16C) (see Bromley, 1967, p. 163). Although diameters of burrows range from 0. 7 to 10 em, typical diameters range from I to 5 em . Diameters in excess of 5 em occur mainly in chambers and chambered intersections (figs. 15, 16A, B) (see Kennedy, 1967, p. 142; Fursich and Palmer, 19 75, p. 172). Branching is typically dichotomous and "Y"-shaped (figs. 15, 20B, 24A) (s ee Kennedy, 1967, p. 132; Hantzschel, 1975, p. W 117). However, "T"-shaped branching is common among some examples (figs. 15, 170, 19B) (see Fursich and Palmer, 1975, p. 172). Swellings at points of bifurcation (figs. 15, 21 B) are common, but not ubiquitous (see Kennedy, 1967, p. 132; Hantzschel, 19 75, p. W 117). Absence of these features at some points of bifurcation may be a function of the coherent nature of substrates at the time of burrow excavation (Bromley , 196 7, p. 159). Overall burrow distribution within a given system may be two- or three-dimensional. Two-dimensional arrays appear to coincide with vertical joint surfaces in the substrate (figs . 21, 22). It is possible that such jointing may result from burrowing activity (Basan and Frey, 1977, p. lb). However, the coincidence of normally three-dimensional Thalassinoides systems with essentially two-dimensional vertical joint surfaces, coupled with the absence of Thalassinoides on some joint surfaces, suggests jointing predated associated Thalassinoides and, to some extent, controlled burrow system excavation. Thalassinoides in the study area extend downward from the surface of substrates in which they were excavat ed (figs. 15, 20A, 25A). Although connection with the substrate surface is not always visible in outcrop, burrow fill is clearly related to suprajace nt sediments (figs. 24A, 25B) (see Curran and Frey, 1977, p. 155). Some specimens of Thalassinoides are unlined (figs . 19A, C) (see Fursich and Palmer, 1975, p. 172). A few examples have a thin, well-defined , smooth lining of hydrous iron oxide (figs. 20B, 24C), suggestive of replacement of an original organic lining (see Curran and Frey, 1977, p. 155). Such well-defined hydrous iron oxide linings are rarely associated with a thin carbon residue (for exampl e, the system in fig. 24C), further suggesting the existence of an organic precursor. However, the walls of most specimens exhibit irregular impregnations and / or encrustations of hydrous iron oxide. 22 Several decapod and stomatopod crustaceans are capable of producing burrows attributable to Thalassinoides. Most prominent among these are species of the shrimp Callianassa. .4/pheus. Upogebia (Bromley and Frey, 1974, p. 319-324), and Axius (Pemberton and others, 1976, p. 790,791, fig. 2). Also, fossil Glyphaea have been found in association with Tha/assinoides from the Jurassic of England (Sellwood, 1971, p. 589, 590). Less prominent arc species of the crabs Sesarma and Eurytium (Basan and Frey, 1977, table B, pl. 4a), astacid lobsters, crayfish (Bromley and Frey, 1974, p. 3 19-321), and the stomatopod, Squillaempusa (Frey and Howard, 1969, pl. 4, fig. 2). Comparison of burrows constructed by these animals with the various forms of Thalassinoides observed in the study area is made in the following pages on a case by case basis. Thalassinoides systems probably performed a dual function. Although initial excavation or these structures probably served as a means of sediment exploitation, the structures ultimately served as dwellings (Bromley and Frey, 1974, p. 325). Recent studies suggest open burrows may continue to play a role in feeding-related sediment exploitation through use in the culture of edible micro-organisms (Braithwaite and Talbot, 1972, p. 280; Frey and Howard, 1975, p. 285, 294; Ott and others, 1976, p. 72, 73). Evidence suggests Thalassinoides in the study area were excavated and occupied in an intertidal to shallow subtidal, warm marine environment with a broad range of current energies. Overall configuration of these burrow systems ranges from shallow, dominantly horizontal systems (figs. 23A, B) to deep, dominantly vertical ones (figs. 15, 17A). Analogous modern burrow systems are excavated in intertidal and shallow subtidal environments. Dominantly horizontal systems are excavated in relatively low energy situations, whereas dominantly vertical systems are excavated in relative high energy situations (Frey, 1971, p. Ill; Basan and Frey, 19'17, fig. 4; Frey and others, 1978, p. 217,218, fig. II). Thalassinoit!es are generally absent from highly irregular, boulder-strewn surfaces at the Oconee-Barnwell disconformity (for example, fig . 34). This absence may be due to strong scour operating at these places during times when Thalassinoides otherwise would have been excavated, or to their subsequent removal by erosion. Fossiliferous suprajacent Clinchfield and, in many instances, fossiliferous burrow fill, are suggestive of marine conditions. Furthermore, at Locality "A", suprajacent Clinchfield consists in part of abundantly fossiliferous decalcified limestone. This material contains gastropods, pelecypods (including abundant pectens), bryzoans, and solitary corals. This assemblage is generally indicative of warm shallow marine conditions. Also suggestive of marine conditions is the presence of abundant and diverse crustacean burrows such as the various Thalassinoides which occur at the top of the Oconee. The state of preservation and the presence or absence of linings of Thalassinoides may be indicators of substrate stabilities in the study area. For example, in the upper 3-5m of the Oconee the presence of unlined, open burrows up to I0 em in diameter, many of which show no signs of deformation (fig. 168), attests to the high degree of coherence of substrates in this stratigraphic interval during and after burrow construction. However, lower portions of some Thalassinoides, which penetrate this interval to depths in excess of 2 m, show signs of compactional del'ormation, such as "pinch marks" and irregular diameters along some burrow segments (fig. 12). Additionally, Thalas.1inoides in overlying Clinchfield sediments commonly are thinly lined and show signs of compactional deformation (figs. 24, 28), suggesting these sediments were generally less coherent than those penetrated by Thalassinoides in the Oconee below. Thalassinoides sp. A Figures 13-19 Description: Thalaninoides composed of systems of irregularly "Y"-or "T"-branched, slightly sinuous tunnels, I to 5 em in diameter (figs. 13, 14, 16, 19); typical orientation of systems, dominantly vertico-horizontal, with some systems becoming more random in lower portions (figs. 13, 14); intersections dichotomous and innated, or multiple and chambered, with 5 or 6 intersections per chamber (figs. 15, 16A, B, 17B, 19B). Chambers may exceed I0 em in diameter (for example, figs. 168, 17A); walls are unlined, moderately to slightly irregular, commonly exhibiting small, bluntly conical pits (fig. 16C); maximum depth of penetration observed, about 5 m. Preservation: "Pinch marks" and irregular diameters apparent along some segments of lower portion (Cig. 14); truncation of tunnels observed at substrate surface in some instances. 23 Occurrence and distribution: Occurs in massive muds and slightly sandy muds at Localities "A" and "C"; structures originate at upper surface of Oconee; density typically 2 intersections per linear meter on a vertical face, 30 em below substrate surface. Interpretation: Probably excavated by a thalassinidean shrimp, possibly a species of Callianassa, in an intertidal or shallow subtidal, marine or estuarine environment of high current energy; observed truncations indicative of post constructional erosion; "pinch marks" and irregular burrow segment diameters may be an indication of post constructional compaction. Discussion: An additional aspect of burrow system morphology is included here. Where these systems are dominantly vertico-horizontal, "Y"-branching is produced in the following manner. Subjacent to intersections, otherwise vertical shafts are steeply inclined for a distance of about 5 em. At such intersections, inclined shaft exit directions are opposite exit directions of tunnels (fig. 15). Also deserving of mention is the occurrence at Locality "C" of a smaller version (fig. 19) of the Thalassin oides sp. A morphotype . These smaller systems typically consist of interconnected segments I0 to 15 em in length and I to l. 5 em in diameter. Maximum observed depth of penetration into the substrate is about I m. These smaller systems particularly resemble larger Thalassinoides sp. A systems (for example, fig. 15) in that chambered, multiburrow intersections, "T'- and "Y"-shaped branching, and stratigraphic occurrence are common to both burrow sizes (see figs . 15, 19B). Also common to both is the interconnection of shafts with 5 em-diameter tunnels (see figs. 170, 19E). However, this feature was not observed among many examples of smaller burrows, leaving confusi.on as to whether such interconnections were accidental or by design. Apparently, the only major morphological differences between these two burrow sizes are a lesser degree of chambering and the absence of inclined shafts subjacent to intersections to produce "Y"-branching (for example, fig. 15) in the smaller burrows. Thus, the major difference appears to be one of scale, making differentiation of large and small systems unwise a t present. Morphologically similar burrow systems of different scale may be produced by adults of the same species living under significantly different environmental conditions (Ott and others, 1976, p. 68), by juveniles and adults of the same species (Frey and Howard, 1975, p . 283), or by different, but ethologically similar species. No determination as to which of the foregoing was responsible for the smaller scale version of Thalassinoides sp. A is made here. Burrow systems assigned to Thalassinoides sp. A are morphologically similar to shaft-dominated Ophiomorpha described by Frey and others (I 978, p. 202, fig. 2A), except that Thalassinoides sp. a Jacks an exteriorly mamillated lining and "apert ural necks." The validity of morphological comparison between these two ichnogenera is confirmed by observations of knobby-walled Ophiomorpha passing into smooth-walled Thalassinoides as substrates become more cohesive due to grain-size change or other factors (Ager and Wallace, 1970, p. 4, 8; Frey, 1971, p. I04, 116; Bromley and Frey, 1974, p. 324, 329, 330; Frey and others, 1978, p. 205). Such shaft-dominated Ophionwrpha systems are constructed by Callianassa major(Say) in the foreshore of Georgia beaches (Weimer and Hoyt, 1964, p. 763; Frey and Mayou, 1971, p. 57, 58, fig. 3). However, Callianassa major has been observed to avoid "highly coherent," relict marsh mud exhumed by erosion along some Georgia beaches. The animal show:.. a decided preference for sandy substrates in this setting (Frey and others, 1978, p. 209). Substrates penetrated by Thalassinoides sp. A producers are though to have been at least as coherent as these "highly coherent" marsh muds (p. 85-86). Other callianassids and thalassinideans, including the deep-burrowing Axius serratus (Pemberton and others, 1976, p. 790, 791) are possible modern analogues to Thalassinoides sp. A producers (Frey and others, 1978, p. 204). Deeply penetrating, shaft-dominated burrow systems similar to Thalassinoides sp. A are characteristic of high energy environments and of situations where a buffer is needed as protection against environmental extremes or erosion (Frey, 1971, p. Ill; Frey and others, 1978, p. 217, 218, fig. II). These conditions are most commonly obtained in beach-associated intertidal and shallow subtidal zones, although this may not always be the case (Frey and others, 1978, p. 218). The lower portions of some deeply penetrating Thalassinoides sp. A systems (for example, fig. 15) were possibly excavated in a less coherent substrate than the upper portions of these systems. Some shaft segments in these lower portions exhibit roughly horizontal "pinch marks" along their lengths (figs . I3, 14). According toR . W. Frey ( 1978, personal commun.) such features are indicative of soft sediment compaction following burrow construction. Other evidence suggestive of compaction is variability of burrow diameters along some segments (figs. I3, 14, 27, 28A). 24 Figure 13 . Fig ure 14. Fi g u re IJ. Thalassin oides s p . !\.fro m Loca lit y " A" , illu s tratin g ty pi ca l morph o logy a nd orie nt a ti o n. Dark sta inin g of burrow fill a nd ome areas s urrounding burrows du e to conce ntra ti o n of hydro us iron ox id e. U pper surface of Oconee Group at to p. Ve rtica l view , o ut crop fa ce. Rul er is 15 e m long. F ig ure 14. View o f ri g ht s ide of Thalassinoides s p . A sy te m s illustrated in fig ure IJ, s ho win g "pinch m ar ks" a nd irregular diam eters a long so me burrow seg ment s in lowe r cente r of figure. Rul er is 15 e m lo ng. 25 10 em Fig ure 15. Tha/assinuides sp. A from Locality "A", adapted from figure 13. Upper surface of Oconee Group at top. vertico-horizontal orientation is pronounced. (See Frey and others, 1978, fig. 2A). Inclined shaft exit directions (I) are opposite exit directions of tunnels. 26 ;~ : . ' ' . ' 10 em 8 i: 10 em c Figure 16. Thalassinoides sp. A from Locality "A". A, B, burrow systems showing pronounced vertico-horizontal orientation and chambering. Upper surface of Oconee Group at top; C , longitudinal section of a Thalassinoides sp . A burrow segment, showing pitted wall structure . Distribution of pits is not always this uniform . Vertical views, outcrop face. 27 d ') ( I. ~; ,f.) 50 em B ;j n l20 em c :i ~~r::: ~ 10 em D Figure 17. Thalassinoides from Locality A, opening onto upper surface of Oconee Grour. Vertical views, outcrop face. A, B, Thalassinoides sp. A systems; C, D, possible examples of Thalassinoides sp. A. 28 \ . ., . ) I 10 em A 30 em B 10 em c 10 em 0 Figure 18. Burrowed e ro ion su rface at th e top of th e Oconee Gr o up in no rthwes te rn Wa hin gton Cou nt y. A , Thalassinoides s p. A sy te rn from Loca lit y " A", show ing erosiona l truncation of tunnels (upper center a nd uppe r left). Oblique view outcrop face; B, hori zo nt a l view of erosion surface at Localit y "A" , showing man y truncat ed specimen of Tha/assinoides a nd Trypanir es. Truncated tunnels of Thalassinoides sp. A sys te m illustrated in fi g. A vi ible a t ex tre me ri g ht ; C, det ai l of B, hawing trun cated Thalassinoides hafts (larger, subcircul ar dark hol es) a nd tunn els (groove ) a nd trunca ted Trypanires (smaller, circular lig ht a nd dark h o les); D , hori zo nt al view of erosion surface a t Loca lit y "C", showing fea ture s similar to tho se seen in B and C. 29 A 10 em c -20 em E 20 em 0 Figure 19. Small version of Thalassinoides sp. A from Locality "C". Upper surface of Oconee Group at tops of A-E . A, oblique view of vertical face, showing chamber nea r upper surface; B, adapted from A. Black spots indicate roughly perpendicular intersection with outcrop face ; C, vertical view, outcrop face; D, adapted from C; E, 1.0 to 1.5 ern di a meter shafts connected to 5 ern diameter tunnels . 30 Thalassinoides sp. B Figures 20-23 Description: Thalassinoides composed of regularly or irregularly "Y"-branched, sinuous to slightly sinuous, inclined burrows, 0.7 to I0 em in diameter, typically anastomosing downward (figs. 20A, 21 A, 23A, B); intersections inflated; branching is dichotomous (fig. 228) or multiple (fig. 23C); walls slightly irregular and unlined or thinly lined with non-mamillated exteriors (for example, the system illustrated in fig. 208); overall configuration, two-or three-dimensional; maximum depth of penetration observed,about 2 rn. Preservation: fill unpatterned; burrow linings, where present, consist of hydrous iron oxide encrustations and may also contain some quartz sand and carbon residue; where sands are penetrated, structures grade into bioturbate texture (for example, the system illustrated in fig. 23C). Occurrence and distribution: occurs in massive muds, slightly sandy muds, and rarely in bioturbated sands at Localities "A", "D", and "E"; originates at upper surface of Oconee Group or within Clinchfield Formation; density ranges from 4 to 6 intersections per linear rn, 30 ern below upper surface of Oconee. Interpretation: probably excavated by burrowing shrimp, possibly species of Upogehia and I or .4/pheus, in an intertidal or shallow subtidal, marine or estuarine environment of moderate current energy; excavation of two-dimensional systems probably was controlled by vertical joint surfaces (figs. 21, 22). Discussion: Thalassinoides sp. 8 differs from Thalassinoides sp. A in the following respects: sp. A components are dominantly vertico-horizcintal, whereas those of sp. 8 are dominantly inclined; sp. A may be "T"- or ""-branched, whereas sp. 8 is almost invariably "Y"-branched ; sp. 8 systems tend to anastomose downward, whereas sp. A systems do not. Two types of sp. 8 systems are recognizable. These two types are herein referred to as Thalassinoides sp. 8 I (figs. 20-22) and Thalassinoides sp. 82 (fig. 23). Comparison of these two system types yields the following results: Thalassinoides sp. 8 I is typically composed of slightly sinuous, steeply inclined, "Y"-shaped components, O.l to 2.0 ern in diameter, with diameters tending to be uniform within a given system; Thalassinoides sp. 82 is typically composed of sinuous, gently inclined, "U"- and "Y"-shaped components, 2.0 to 10 ern in diameter, with chambers and burrow segments of variable diameter within a given system. These two burrow types will be discussed separately. Thalassinoides sp. 81 systems were observed at Localities "A" and "D". Several unique morphological features of Thalassinoides sp. 8 I not mentioned in the foregoing descriptions are included here. Although most transverse sections through Thalassinoides sp. 8 I burrows are roughly circular, one example of a section with flat floor and arched roof was observed (fig. 20C). Orientation of the burrow segment displaying this section was nearly horizontal. Transverse sections similar to this one have been observed in modern burrows of .4/pheus.floridans (Shinn, 1968, p. 882) and Axius serratus (Pemberton and others, 1976, p. 790, 791). Three observed features , a subspherical chamber (fig. 20A), a constricted interconnection between burrows of slightly different diameter (fig. 20A), and a bluntly conical "dead end" (fig. 208), are similar to features constructed by modern Upogehia a/finis (Bromley and Frey, 1974, figs. 9, 10; Frey and Howard, 1975, figs . I, 3, 4). However, construction of these features is not restricted to this species of shrimp. At Locality "D", an occurrence of smaller, dominantly vertical , "Y"-branched burrows, I to 7 rnrn in diameter, emanating from "normal" Thalassinoides sp. 8 I was observed (figs. 20A-C). Similar associations have been observed in Thalassinoides from the Upper Cretaceous of Utah and in systems of modern Alpheus hetrochaelis (Basan and Frey, 1977, pl. 2e), Upogebia affinis (Frey and Howard, 1975, p. 287, figs. 2, 68, 7), and Callianassa kraussi (Forbes, 1973, fig. 4). In such cases, the smaller burrows are presumed to be the work of different aged juveniles of the same species as larger burrow producers (Forbes, 1973, p. 363, 364; Frey and Howard, 1975, p. 287, 290). The dominantly vertical orientation of smaller burrows associated with Thalassinoides sp . 8 I may be due in some way to their occurrence on a vertical joint surface. Occurrence of Thalassinoides sp. 8 I at Locality "D" is not restricted to essentially two-dimensional vertical joint surfaces (for example, fig. 21 8). These burrows may also occur as three-dimensional systems where vertical jointing of substrates is not pronounced (fig. 20C). Coexistence of two- and three-dimensional configurations of Thalassinoides sp. 8 I in the same outcrop and association of these configurations with strongly and weakly jointed strata respectively, suggest that jointing, where present, largely controlled lateral burrowing directions. The distribution of burrows and joints at Locality "0" also suggests that jointing preceded burrowing. 31 Burrow systems assigned to Thalassinoides sp. B1 have several notable affinities with modern systems produced by the thalassinidean shrimp, Upogebia a.ff'inis. Burrow systems of Upogehia a./finis typically consist of irregularly branched networks of"Y"-shaped components (see Bromley and Frey, 1974, fig. 10), thinly lined, and enlarged at points of bifurcation (Frey and Howard, 1975, p. 286). Burrow segments are I to 2 em in diameter and diameters tend to be constant within a given system (Curran and Frey, 1977, p. 156). Openings to the surface are multiple and constricted. Individual systems may extend in excess of 50 em vertically and 2m laterally. Burrowing seems to be restricted to muddy substrates (Curran and Frey, 1977, p. 156). Aside from the general absence of linings and a pert ural necks in specimens of Thalassinoides sp. B., comparison with burrow systems of modern Upogebta a[(inis on the basis of individual burrow components is favorable. However, comparison of the overall configuration of illustrated Upogebia a/finis systems (see Frey and Haward, 1969, pI. 4, fig. 5; Bromley and Frey, 1974, figs. 9, I0; Frey and Howard, 1975, fig. 3) with that of observed Thalassinoides sp. systems (see figs. 20B, 0, 19A, 21 A) shows no such favorable comparison. Consideration of the occurrence of Thalassinoides sp. B I yields plausible explanations for these three o bservational discrepancies. The substrate penetrated by Thalassinoides sp. B I was presumably a highly coherent one (p. 85-86, this volume). This could easily account for the general absence of linings in these specimens. Many other types of Thalassinoides penetrating this stratigraphic interval do not show definite linings. Given the apparent high potential for variability of burrow system configuration displayed by modern Upogehia a./finis systems (see previous references), the unusually firm substrate could co nee iva bly account for differences between them and that of Thalassinoides sp. BI. Variation in morphology of Thalassinoides systems caused by variation in substrate firmness was observed by Bromley ( 1967, p. 158-164). Where the tracemakers burrow in hardened substrates. they tend to (I) follow paths of least resistance and (2) enlarge existing burrows. Finally, the upper surface of the Oconee, which Thalassinoides sp. B I open onto, is an erosion surface. A pert ural necks constructed just below such a surface easily could have been removed by erosion prior to burial. The foregoing comparisons serve to illustrate the many similarities between Thalassinoides sp. B I and modern burrow systems constructed by a species of Upogehia. The morphological and dimensional similarities between these burrow systems suggest ethological and possibly ecological similarities between tracemakers. The comparisons are not intended to infer that Thalassinoides sp. B I producers could have been only from this genus of shrimp. Other possible producers include various species of callianassids, alpheids, and fossil glyphioids (Curran and Frey, I977, p. 155). Burrows of modern Upogehia a,[(inis are characteristic of lower intertidal to shallow subtidal, muddy estuarine, lagoonal, and nearshore substrates swept by gentle waves or tidal currents at near normal salinities (Frey and Howard , 1975, p. 286; Curran and Frey, 1977, p. 156). Of special interest here is a modern occurrence of Upogehia a,[finis in a relict marsh mud. This deposit is exposed as a low tidal flat adjacent to a protected inlet on St. Catherines Island, Georgia (Morris and Rollins, I977, p. 123, 124, fig. 28). Beach sand is swept over this mud flat at high tide, and some is deposited as veneers of variable thickness on the mud surface (Morris and Rollins, 1977, fig. 28) and as burrow fillings. Relict marsh muds exhumed along the Georgia coast by erosion are "very coherent" (Frey and Howard, 1969, p. 435), a property quite likely shared by substrates penetrated by Thalassinoides sp. B I animals at the top of the Oconee. Furthermore, a thin sand bed of the Clinchfield covers the unit containing Thalassinoides sp. B I and burrow fill is clearly derived from this material. Thus, it appears that environmental conditions on the St. Catherines Island mud flat (Frey and Howard, 1969, p. 435) may be somewhat analogous to those in existence on the upper surface of the Oconee at Locality "0" during excavation and .occupation of Thalassinoides sp. B 1. One other aspect of this occurrence of Thalassinoides sp. B I deserves mention. At Locality "0", Clinchfield sediments suprajacent to the upper surface of the Oconee are of two types: reduced interlayered mud and muddy sand and oxidized slightly muddy sand (appendix B). Thalassinoides sp. B I was observed only beneath the latter sediment type, which also constitutes its filling. The occurrence of Thalassinoides sp. B I at Locality "A" also displays this association in its positive aspect. These associations suggest the tracemaker may have preferred an environment with open circulation and moderate to high current energy. Thalassinoides sp. B2 systems were observed at Localities "A", "0", and "E". Two additional aspects of Thalassinoides sp. B2 deserve mention here. In transverse section, burrows arecircular,oblate, or irregular. /\!so, irregular hydrous iron oxide encrustations and impregnations were observed along burrow walls generally. 32 Burrow; systems assigned to Thalassinoides sp. 82 have affinities with modern burrow systems produced by certain alpheid shrimp. Of particular interest in this regard are the descriptions and figures of .4/phew heterochaelis from muddy sediments along the Georgia coast by Basan and Frey ( 1977, pls. 2d, e, 3a, table 3; see also Howard and Frey, 1975): A lpheus heterochaelis -complex but finite system of multibranched, well integrated U- to Y-shaped components, 2-5 em in diameter, circular to oblate in cross section, anastomosing downward into a single, irregular trunk .... Walls thinly lined; more irregular on roof than on floor. Numerous apertures .. . . lead to gently inclined or nearly horizontal components enlarged at points of bifurcation, like trace fossil Thalassinoides, with dead-end tunnels and enlarged "turn-arounds". Lower trunk exhibits approximately right-angle bends, and terminates in nearly horizontal tunnel at sediment depth of about 60 ern. System commonly includes components made by juveniles and commensals. This description is barely distinguishable from that of Thalassinoides sp. 82. Also, the Thalassinoides sp. 82 system at left in fig. 23A bares striking morphological and dimensional similarities to Alpheus heterochaelis systems illustrated in Bromley and Frey ( 1974, fig. 8). Additional descriptions of the burrow systems ofalpheid shrimp are contained in Shinn ( 1968, p. 881-883, pl. I09, fig. I) and Farrow ( 1971, p. 482) . These, too, are generally compatible with observations on Thalassinoides sp. 82. Other possible, although less likely, producers of Thalassinoides sp. 82 are fossil glyphioid and callianassid shrimp, including various species of Upogehia (Curran and Frey, 1977, p. 156). Also capable of producing shallow versions of Tha/assinoides sp. 82 are the stomatopod, Squilla empusa (Frey and Howard, 1969, pl. 4, fig. 2) and the mud crabs Panopeus herhsti and Sesarma reticulatum, where populations are locally dense and burrows of individuals are interconnected (for example, 8asan and Frey, 1917, pl. 3d and 4a respectively). Alpheid shrimp and their burrow systems are characteristic of muddy substrates of the intertidal and shallow subtidal zones (Shinn, 1968, p. 882; Farrow, 1971, p. 482; Basan and Frey, 1977, p. 60). They have also been reported from subtidal sands (Braithwaite and Talbot, 1972, p. 281). These conditions are compatible with substrates and postulated surface environments with which Thalassinoides sp . 82 is associated in the study area. Undifferentiated Thalassinoides species Figures 24-29 As mentioned previously, many thalassinoid burrows within the study area cannot be differentiated consistently. Examples are given in figures 24-29. 33 . ..:..:~.~..:. : 2 em A 10 em 8 c h~urc 20. Thalassin oides sp. BI fro m uppe r 2 m of t h..: Oc o nee Gro up . Ve rtica l views. outcrop laces. f \ , ouoouw seg me nt s of sli ghtl y differe nt diameters. ex hibiting constricted interco nn ection ; B. typical downward a nas to mos ing patt ern ex hibited by Thalassin uides s p. BI. Upper surface of Oco nee a t to p; C. spec im e n showi ng three dim e nsion a l aspect of Tha/assinoides sp. 8 I in a bse nce of ve rti ca l jointing. Transverse section of burrow a t lo we r left shows a rch ed roof and n at noor. A-C fr o m Loca lit y " D" ; D. Thalassinoides BI from Loca lit y "A". Upper surfa ce of Oco nee a t to p. 34 A B Fig ure 21. Tha/assinuides s p. B 1 c;O nfi ned to vert ica l joint sts urfaces at Locality o". Ri g ht side of A ove rl aps left sid e of B. Upper sur face of Ocon!e Group at t op. Sys te ms1s in A int e rconn ec t w ith those of B. Rul e r is 15 em lon g. 35 5 A B Figure 22. D etail s o f fig ure 21 B. s how in g int e rco nn ecti o n o f s ma ll e r a nd la rge r di a mete r burrows. A . numerous s ma ller diam e te r burro ws of d o min a ntl y ve rti ca l o ri e nt a ti o n e ma na te upward fr o m la rge r burro ws. fo llowin g th e ve rti ca l j o int s urface; B. la rge r a nd s ma ll e r burrows ex hibit Y-bra nchin g t ypical o f Thalassinuides. 36 . L -- r ~ --r----oO ooooo- "'-.--~ --..4 .. .. , , __ , .. ,.,,,.,, ,., , ,. ,, , , , ,,,. _ .. , _____ ,, .. _.,_ . ..._ A 20 em i _ ,~- ..,_ - " 0 '-"-~ ' '"_ '_ _., ,,,,,._ , _ , __ , ,, , _,,_ , , ,, _ ~,,,_ l ' .. ........ ........ 20 em c Figure 2J. Thalassinoides sp. 82. Vertical views, outcrop face. Burrow systems open onto upper surface of Oconee Group, which is overlain by Clinchfield Formation. A, Tha/assinoides sp. 82 sys tems (I) from Locality "A" . Other burrows attributable to Thalassinoides are undifferentiated. B, from locality "D". C, system from Locality "E" which extends downward into crossbedded muddy sand, where it grades into bioturbate texture. 37 .. . .. - ~ ~ E <..) . . \' 3 em ,... ...~- c .. ::.:.~ ~ Figure 24. Und iffere nti a ted Thalassinoides 'peeics from Locality" A". Burrows open into upper s urface of Oconee Group . Bla ck \rots represent point s o f burrow e ntry int o ou tcrop face . /\ , Trypanites sp. ( I) a lso exposed Up is to left ; B afte r C; C. darkness of burrow walls indicative of hydrous iron oxide e nc ru s tation . 38 20 em 10 em B 10 em c '\ Figure 25. Und ifferent iated Thalassinoides species fro 111 Locality";\". Up per surface of Oconee Group at top of figures. ;\, B, undifferentiated Thalassinoide.1 species (I), other burrows of probable crustacean origin (2), and Try panites sp. (3). Oblique views of vertical outcrop face : B, detail of left end of;\, showing early filled abandoned aperture (4) : C, Y-branched dual apertures typical of many undifferentiated Thalassinoides sp. at Locality";\" (see rig. 21 ;\), 39 2 em ::.. D c 10 em E Figure 26. Undifferentiated Tha/assinoides species from Locality "A". Vertical views, outcrop faces . A-D, burrows ope n onto upper surface of Oconee Group; E, top of figure about 1.2 m below upper surface of Oconee. 40 1: ... : .. : .. ::-:::-: .' . ... ... . .~. .. . . !,:_. :..- . '..~.':.':.'-: . !-'- - --- - ....-.---- -- - ~ .. .... ....__ .... -- - -.. -- ......... _.......,_.. ._,........... ................... --- ... -~-- -..--...........- ..- --- ....------- 5 em Figure 27. Undiffere nti a ted fh a/assinoides sp . and " L-s ha pe d burro w" fr o m C linchfield Fo rm ati o n a t Loca lity " D", a bou t 2m ab ove upper surface o f O co nee. Ve rti cal view, o ut cro p fa ce. Burro w fill s co mp osed o f d a rk foss ilifero u sand y mud , simibr to ma teri a l in upperm ost unnt in fi gures. A aft er B. 41 A B Hgurc 28. Detail s of figure 278. A , broad U-shaped, Y-branch ed undiffe rentiated Thalassin uicles s p . constructed in mud and filled with fossiliferous sandy mud, s imilar to s uprajacc nt sediment. Laminae wi thin fill a pparent ly deformed; 8, "L-shaped burrow"' (right) a nd undifferentiat ed Thalassin uicles s p. imilar t o burrow in 1\ (kft) cons truct ed in sa nd y mud and mud and filled with fossi life rou s sa nd y mud , unlike supraj acc nt sed iment. suggest ing omission bedding. f-igure 29. 10 em Probable Thalassin uicles from Clinchfield Formation at Lo ca lit y "D"' , g ra ding la te rall y and ve rticall y int o bioturbatc text ures. Den sit y of st ippling indicates re la ti ve co nce ntra tion of hydr o us ir on oxide. OconeeBar nwell di sco nfor mit y a t center; Thalassin uicles s p . 8 I (I) ; mud c lasts probabl y derived from Oconee bel ow (2); unb u rrowed area s (3). Vertical view, outcrop fac e. 42 Ichnogenus Trypanites Magdefrau, 1932 Trypanites sp. Figures 18B-D, 24A, 25A, B, 30 Description: short, cylindrical straight to slightly curved , steeply inclined borings, having constricted upper necks and enlarged, bulbous lowerterminations(fig . 30A); diameters range from 3 to4 mm across upper openings to 10 to 12 mm across lower bulbous portions; maximum length observed, about 40 mm; walls are unlined and commonly ornamented with circumferential striations (figs. 30A, B). Preservation: exichnia, subjacent to erosion surfaces; boring fill s arc clearly related to suprajacent sedim e nts and consist of unpattcrned or, less commonly, horizontally laminated mixtures of sand and mud; complete specimens arc commonly capped by a short plug of sandy hydrous iron oxide; complete individuals occupy substrate alongside severely truncated ones (fig. JOB). Occurrence and distribution: occurs in massive, slightly sandy muds at the upper surface oft he Oconee Group at Localities "A" and "C"; distribution is patchy, and borings may occur,as isolated individuals or as laterally crowded aggregations (fig. JOE); maximum d ensity observed, about 1000 / m-. Interpretation: dwelling structures of a marine borer, probably a species of pholadid bivalve; borings probably were excavated into a firm mud substrate under intertid a l to shallow subtidal, intermediate to high current energy conditions; truncated borings indicate scour and their coexistence with non-truncated borings suggests these structures continued to be excavated and inhabited up to cessation of scour and burial. Discussion: Th ese specimens are assigned to the ichnogenus Trrpaniles Magdefrau, 1932 , as redefined in Hant zschcl (1975, fig . 76) and Warmc (1975, p . 193, fig . 11.9), both after Bromley (1972) . Trypaniles sp. are morphologically and dimensionally similar to borings and burrows produced by some modern infaunal clams. For example, borings of the pholadid clam Nel/aslomel/a roslra/a are "clubshaped" and gentl y curved, penetrating 2 to 3 em into rock substrates (Warme , 1970, p . 517, pls. lc, 3a) . Other evidence in support of a pholadid excavator is the obse rvation of a poorly preserved mud cast of the anterior portion of a bivalve, snugly fit inside a partially eroded boring . Ornamentation , shape, and s ize were similar to that of the modern pholadid clam Penile/fa penila, illustrated by Evans ( 1970, pl. 2) . Oconee Group substrates penetrated by Tr.rpaniles in the study area arc slightly sandy muds which are overlain by the Clinchfield Formation. The presence of these borings indicates substrates into which they were excavated were at least firm or highly coherent at the tim e of excavation (Frey and Howard, 1969, p . 435; Evans, 1970, p . 12 7; Warmc, 1975, p. 210). The highly coherent nature of these substrates also is indicated by several other independent lines of evidence (p. 85-86). Another indication of substrate coherence is circumferential striations observed on some boring walls, especially those of some lower' bulbous enlargements (figs. 30A-C). These probably were sculpted by shell prominences during rotary movements of the borer (Evans, 1970, p. 129; Warme, 1975, p. 210, 211). These striations consist of transverse parallel ridges and grooves of moderate (I mm) relieJ'. War me ( 1970. p . 210, 211) correlates sculpture on the walls of pholadid borings directly with substrate hardness: deep grooves are produced in "soft mudstones" and polished surfaces in hard rock. Thus, at the time of boring, substrates penetrated by Trypani1es proba bly were harder than Warme's "soft mudstones" but not his "hard rock". Borings of pholadid bivalves have been reported as indicators of intertidal or shallow subtidal marine conditions (Bromley, 1970, p. 64; Evans, 1970, p. 128, 139; Radwanski, 1970, p. 371, 372; Warme, 1975, p. 187). However, Evans (1970, p . 128) points out that Nellas/ome//a roslrata has been reported from depths of 100m . Thus, caution should be exercised in assigning occurrences of fossil pholadid borings to intertidal-shallow subtidal environments, even though they may represent optimum conditions for the growth or these organizations. Where borings occur, densities are typically 500 / m-' ([ig. 18C). However, distribution is uneven. Densities in some laterally crowded patche~ are as much as 1000 perm-. Typical densities of Trypaniles sp . are within the limits of 50 to 500 individuals perm- for shallow water species of pholadid bivalves reported by War me ( 1975, p. 19 I) . Trypaniles is associated only with the disconformity at the top of the Oconee Ciroup, where it constitutes part of the omission suite ichnocoenosc (Bromley, 1975, p. 399-402). The varying degree of truncation exhibited by adjacent individual borings (fig. JOB) and the relative abundance of truncated versus complete individuals, suggest these borings were excavated and inhabited up tot he cessation of scour ( Rad wanski, 19 70, p. 365; Warme, 1975, p. 210) . Fill is clearly similar to suprajacent Clinchfield sediments , suggesting borings may have remained open until burial (Bromley, 19 75, p. 40 I). It is also possible that some borings may have been filled by sediment in transit across a periodically scoured seafloor, prior to final burial. 43 :/ ' \ ...... 20 mm ....."'' B c D E FigJre 30. Trrpa nit es s p. from upper s urface or Oconee Group at Loca lit y "A". A. ty pica l complete s pec ime n. s ho wing circumfere ntial striation s on walls. Ve rtica l face view. after C; B, sc hema ti c three dim e nsiona I view or trun ca ted and complete bo rings: C. boring pictured in A: D. de ta il of E (left ce nt e r ): E. la te ra ll y crowded Trypanitcs ~'j) .. s howi ng e ros io na l trun ca ti on. Obli4ue view. 44 Complete individual borings at Locality "A" are commonly capped by a plug of hydrous iron oxide. Also, the adjacent surface is discontinuously encrusted and impregnated with hydrous iron oxide. Such "ferruginous impregnations" are common where "hardgrounds" have been exposed to seawater at omission surfaces (Bromley, 1975, p. 400, 401). "Arenicolites-like burrow Figure 31 Description: U-shaped burrow perpendicular to bedding; diameter highly variable, ranging from 2 to 17 mm; maximum depth of penetration of substrate observed, about 6 em; limbs not closely appressed, with distance between limbs of "U", about 5 em; walls unlined and highly irregular (fig. 31). Preservation: endichnia; burrow fill consists of unpatterned, nearly mud-free sand, slightly darker in color than surrounding sediment, due to absence of white mud fraction. Occurrence and distribution: occurs in parallel bedded muddy sands, about 4 m below the upper surface of the Oconee Group at Locality "B"; only one specimen observed. Interpretation: probably feeding structure or possibly combination feeding-escape structure or dwelling-escape structure; possible producers include species ofholothurians, echiurids, enteropneusts, polychaetes, and ethologically similar animals; fill may represent substrate material washed free of clay and fine silt by the tracemaker in the course of feeding and respiration. Discussion: This structure has affinities with the ichnogenus A renicolites (Hantzschel, 1975, p. W38, fig. 2). Both burrow types consist of simple U-tubes perpendicular to bedding and lacking spreiten. However, the highly variable diameter of this specimen, together with the absence of other specimens with which to compare it, makes its assignment to Arenicolites tenuous at best. Schafer (1972, p. 299) listed several animals which produce U-shaped burrows in modern marine environments. Of these, the most likely producers of these burrow types are polychaetes, holothurians, and enteropneusts. Polychaetes and enteropneusts produce U-shaped burrows with more or less vertical arms, at least one of which intersects the substrate surface (Schafer, 1972, p. 301-305, figs. 174, 175). In the case of the polychaete A renicola, one of these arms serves as a fecal tube, the other, as a feeding tube. The fecal tube is relatively permanent compared to the feeding tube, which is ephemeral and may be missing altogether (Schafer, 1972, p. 302). This description compares favorably with the U-shaped burrow specimen described here, except for its lack of a well-defined, lined arm corresponding to the fecal tube of Arenicola. Other possible, though less likely, producers of this specimen include species of echiurids, and other species of polychaetes (Schafer, 1972, pi 30 I, 305-309, 317-34 7; figs. I 77-181, 187-190, 205). U-shaped burrows similar to those described and discussed here are constructed in "water covered" (Schafer, 1972, p. 298) and intertidal (MacGintie and MacGintie, 1968, p. 202) marine sediments. Such environments are compatible with that proposed for Amphorichnus sp., with which this specimen occurs at Locality "B". omission surface 1-igurcJI . "Arcnicolites-like burrow", showing probable collapse features: pinch marks (I) and irregular diameter. Burrow fill is loose sand; enclosing sediment is sandy mud. -1-em- 45 "Ferruginous cones" Figures 32-34 Description: short, subcylindrical, straight, vertical to steeply inclined, elongate, pouch-like structures, having pointed upper terminations and blunt lower terminations (fig. 32A); exteriors commonly bear longitudinal ridges (fig. 33A); most structures have major and minor transverse diameters (fig. 32A), the former typically 5 to 6 mm, the latter, 2 to 4 mm; maximum length observed, about 5 em; length to width ratio, about 5 or 6 to I. Preservation: endichnia; fill is unpatterned and compositionally similar to enclosing sediments, except for abundant hydrous iron oxide cement; lined with thin, well-defined, slightly irregular sheath of hydrous iron oxide (fig. 33B); orientation of some structures suggests they are reworked (fig. 33C); some structures seem to be composites (fig. 33A). Occurrence and distribution: occurs in large-scale, cross bedded, slightly muddy medium undifferentiated Barnwell Group sands suprajacent to the upper surface of the Oconee Group at Locality "H", where densities locally 2 reach 105/ m on a vertical face (figs. 32, 34); possible reworked examples occur in upper portion of unit H-2 and in unit H-3 (appendix A). Interpretation: dwelling structures, possibly of polychaetes similar to Pectinaria; longitudinal ridges (fig. 33A) may represent differential coll a pse of wall structure; thin, distinct hydrous iron oxide lining (fig. 338) strongly suggestive of original organic lining; hydrous iron oxide cement in structure fill suggestive of original presence of organic material (fig. JJB). Discussion: The thin, well-defined hydrous iron oxide lining exhibited by these structures argues in favor of an organic precursor, suggesting these structures are of biologic origin (R. W. Frey, 1978, personal commun.). These structures are morphologically and dimensionally similar to portable arenaceous tests constructed by the foraging marine polychaete , Pectinaria (Schafer, 1972, fig . 202, p. 340, 341; MacGintie and MacGintie, 1968, p. 20 I. fig. 69). Such tests are portable body extensions and, thus, are not considered biogenic structures (Frey, 197 3, p. 1). Nevertheless, these structures are included here based on their trace-like nature and the importance of fossil data from otherwise nonfossiliferous sediments. Portable arenaceous tests of modern polychaetes are constructed of carefully fitted sand grains. set in mucous so that tube exteriors are smooth (Schafer, 1972, p . 340). Although sand grains are embedded in the lining ol "ferruginous cones," distribution of these grains shows no sign of regularity. Careful examination of structure linings reveals a possible explanation for the apparent lack of regularity. When viewed in longitudinal section with a lOx lens, one can see somewhat regular, lateral "pinch marks" on either side of some segments. These featur es probably are related to vertical compaction of the structure (R. W. Frey, 1978, pe rsonal commun.), which presumably also would disrupt existing grain fabrics. Several other aspects of these structures may be explained by assuming construction by a Pectinaria-like animal and a preservational environment of rapid deposition. The abundant hydrous iron oxide cement present within these structures is suggestive of an original concentration of organic material (Berner, 1969, p. 20-22). Pecrinaria does not abandon its test (Schafer, 1972, p. 340). Thus, the suggested original organic material may have consisted of the inhabitants' bodies . Although Pectinaria can burrow upward with some efficiency (Schafer, 1972, p. 342), habitation oJ' a rapidly prograding cross bedded substrate would seem to be particularly perilous behavior. These structures, except where possibly reworked, are invariably vertical or steeply inclined (figs. 32, 34). These orientations seem to represent escape and feeding positions respectively (Schafer, 1972. p. 342). If so, the escape response was probably geotactic, decreasing the animals' chance of successful escape in cross bedded, prograding substrates (Schafer, 1972, p. 344). However, the absence of clearly disturbed bedding laminae subjacent to these structures argues against this hypothesis. Scattered specimens of "ferruginous cones" whose long axes are horizontal (fig. J3C), occur in angularly tabular crossbedded sands, 2-3 m above the dense, vertically oriented occurrence previously discussed. The orientation of these horizontal specimens suggests they are reworked. If reworked, t hesc specimens must have been coherent at the time of their erosional exhumation and transport, raising the possibility of penecontemporaneous ha rdening of these "cones" through syngenetic deposition of iron minerals. 46 a . < 5 mm A -- ... -- - - ...... .. . ............ ...... .. ...- ' ....... ... . ,,,, ... '' '""" ........... l o I' ' --- ,,..- ' I .0' . - . ~ .. .. . . . . .. t . , .. .... - ... ... ... - .. ..... .. . ..... ............... _....~.-............ 0 . ' -t r:.__ .. .... .... .... ':.i -~--..~: :::: ~ -~~- . . ~..... '1"....,.::--. . ~---...... :::~ - ... ." 1it- A~ --.....:.J I '---I'Jt._, ..,...... ... JI_ "-.i 1- .; -... ,. .-.. -..-~-....... .. ...,.... ,...., ....... z--u........ - ---. . ---"'-..... -.... - ~- ---,..~ !-t ::::- ,:~:-~-:~-:~~1 : =--i~~-- '. . . ':.~-- --. l r~:-:-;:;_~:~:;_:_~-i;;~_-=-~-: .::.~~:~: -~=:;_:=:=_::~-L:~ -~~~-: j ::~=~:=__ ; .... ..... ..... ~ ..., ..... .. -- ... .. . . ' ._, ~~.:.:..:.:..,..~::~--:-.::;...,,,~~~-~-:.":':~-- - ~~---:~.:::.~.~:t.... .... _,,~.::.;,';:,,, , ..........:.:.:::.:::..:-..... - ~.:::::::~.. ...,_..::.:.-...J _ , .~-~--~~ ----t .... ....::...::..').____ ____ j 5 em B I1gure 32. "I--erruginous cones" Irom undil lerentiated Barnwell Group sands at Locality "H", 0.5-2 m above upper surface of the Oconee Group. A, individual specimens and their cross sections; 8, in situ orientation of structures with respect to bedding; vertical view, outcrop face. 47 A B c Fig ure JJ . Fe r rug in o us co nes" fro m undiffe re nti a ted Ba rn we ll G ro up sa nd s a t Loca lit y " H". /\. seve ra l s pec im e ns rem oved fr o m sedi me nt s. S pec im e ns in to p row co r rec tl y o ri e nt ed with a pi ces up . Lowe r s pec im e n a nd o ne a t far left seem to be co mp os ites. Lower s peci me n s hows lo ng it udin a l rid ges a nd g rooves; B, lo ngitudin a l sec t io n t hr o ug h a s pec im e n. s how in g di s t inc t linin g of h ydro us ir o n ox id e: C. ho riw nt a ll y o ri e nt ed . poss ibl y rewo r ke d s peci me n fro m sa nd s 2.5 m a bove in s itu occ urre nce o f fe rru g ino us co nes pi c tured in fi g ure 34. 48 -- - --- - - -- .... .......................................- ... ..... -- - ..- ... - .........._.,_- .......... _ ...... ....... - ...-- .....- ................... ............... .__ j 10 em Figure J4. "Ferruginous cones" from undifferentiated Barnwell Group sands at Locality "H", showing distribution relative to cross beds. Forcsets in figure more steeply inclined than those in actual sediments. Pisolitic boulders rest upon upper surface of the Oconee. Vertical view, outcrop face. 49 "Fraena" Figure 35 Description: unbranched (?),simple sinuous trails, consisting of a central furrow, llan ked by a pair of low ridges (fig. 35A, B); total width, about 3 mm; width of ridges and furrow, about I mm; maximum length observed, about5 em. Preservation: hypichnia or possibly endichnia; central furrow apparently enriched in dark heavy minerals, as is flanking substrate surface (fig. 35C). Occurrence and distribution: occurs in thinly parallel bedded fine undifferentiated Barnwell Group sands rich in heavy minerals, 3 m above the upper surface of the Oconee at Locality "H"; only one specimen observed. Interpretation: crawling or grazing trace of an animal moving upon, or possibly immediately subjacent to, the substrate surface. Discussion: This specimen generally fits the description of" Fraena" species A of Frey and Chowns (1972, p. 35, 36, fig. 3 E). The primary function of this structure cannot be determined with certainty from the single specimen examined. The presence of nearly straight and markedly sinuous portions is suggestive of crawling behavior and grazing behavior respectively (for example, Frey, 1973, table 4, p. 12, 13). Concentration of dark heavy mineral grains in the central furrow and on the adjacent bedding surface (fig. 35C), suggests this specimen was formed on the substrate surface, rather than beneath it. However, as Seilacher ( 1964, p. JOO) points out: .... for many benthonic animals it makes little difference whether they creep at the surface or along bedding planes inside the sediment, and for the paleontologist it is often impossible to differentiate these two types of motion. "L-shaped burrow" Figures 27, 288 Description: cylindrical, sharply curved, steeply to moderately inclined, L-shaped burrow, having an "enlarged" aperture (figs. 27, 288); burrow diameter about 1.2 em; maximum diameter of aperture, about 5 em; observed length, about 15 em; walls unlined and slightly irregular (fig. 288). Preservation: exichnia, subjacent to omission surface; burrow fill unlike suprajacent sediment, more closely resembling sediment about 20 em above aperture (fig. 27); fill consists of sandy, slightly fossiliferous mud. Occurrence and distribution: occurs in horizontally to irregularly bedded mud and sandy, gravelly mud of the Clinchfield Formation, about 2 m above the upper surface of the Oconee at Locality "D"; coexists with an undifferentiated form of Thalassinoides (figs. 27, 288); only one specimen observed . Interpretation: dwelling structure, probably of a fiddler crab; probably constructed in a protected, sandy, intertidal substrate, under conditions of normal to near normal salinity; "enlarged" aperture (fig. 288) may be remnant of hooded entrance. Discussion: The "L-shaped burrow" described here bears little resemblance to trace fossils described in the literature. However, this burrow is nearly identical to descriptions and illustrations of some modern dwelling burrows constructed by the fiddler crabs Uca pugilator and Uca pugnax (Frey and Mayou, 1971, p. 64, 65; Allen and Curran, 1974, p. 542-546, figs. 2, 4, table 2; Basan and Frey, 1977, table 2, fig. 4, pis. 4f, 5b, c, f, g). The "enlarged" aperture exhibited by this specimen is similar in appearance to hooded entrances constructed by the fiddlers Uca minax (Allen and Curran, 1974, p. 543) and the mud crab Sesarma reticulatum (Allen and Curran, 1974, table 2, fig. 4) . These morphological comparisons suggest that the "L-shaped burrow" tracemaker was a small, intertidal crab, probably a species of fiddler. 50 1 em A 1 mm 8 c Figure 35. A specirmen of"Fraena" from undifferentiated Barnwell Group sands, about 4 m above the upper surface of the Oconee -u a:Z A-13 restricted circulation, lagoonal . 0~ 1/mnssivc grave ll y muddy sa nd/sandy mvd , abun- \ r::o V dantly fossiliferous; intertidal to shallow ~--~--~~--~--}--+---+---+--; ~ ~~\at j t1 ~------~-_~ A-~l~~---i :X: subtidal marine, high energy, open circulation ~--+.--+---~~--+--1---+---1---i base . channel fill ol' massi.ve muddy ~ ancl, po~sl!>ly AXXX X X XXX X X X X X ~ :J U - M . . bioturbated; estuarine or marg1nal mar1ne, ~\1ower energy than A-lla probably due to rising 1 r base level . -/ channel fill of massive sand; estuarine or marginal marine, moderate energy; slow, s t eAdy ~ I deposition in response to rising base leve l . X X X X X X LU A-10 - LU . massive slightly sandy mud; paleosol developed on argillaceous sediments (possibly flood plain or marsh deposits); upper surface scoured. z .. ~--.... .........-----------------------------------+---+---+---+--+-+--lf--lf--f--i X . A-2 through A-9 . t--_ - A-1 channel fills, complex lithologies; poorly sorted gravels, sands, and muds, some lignitic; estuarine or possibly fluvial, variable energy, swamp/marsh complex . massive mud; low energy, possibly a cut off meander fill; upper surface scoured . X X X . Figure 61. Locality "A" : stratigraphy, lithologies , environmental interpretations, and trace fossil distribution . 76 Cl) .... -2 Q) 9 ~ Q) ~ a: E 0u.. c:: a: - 0 Q) - c.. ::;) a0 : ~ u CD Cl) u - :I: c.. 2 : p. p. Ul <>: Ul 'U Ul Q) Q) H p. Ul ..., Ul QJ p. .;.:.,I Ul 'U ."-1' 'UQ) (/) u .-1 ..., .-1 ;:I Ul .Q..J, 0 >:: .:: QJ 0 p .-1 H .-1 Ul .Q..J, .H.., Ul .-1 Ul QJ Ul .-1 .--1 0 p <0 .--1 "' ""' "' Ul ""' Ul .--1 .-1 .--1 .., <0 .--1 .--1 H .-1 p.. ~ ;:J~ ~ p. ~ >-(..) co :<: : ZC . C-7 massive mud, sparsely fossiliferous; low energy, restricted circulation, lagoonal . ~ c:::l ....J UJ u:::: --- c 6 :,_ J thin veneer of massive to bedded fossilife X rous sand/muddy sand; intertidal to X shallow subtidal marine, high energy, open X X X X X :::I: (..) z C-5 \'-cl-rcu~lation~~------~~~.....--~.....~~~--.....~ ~--X--~--X--+--X--~----~--X--t-----1 ::::::i (..) 1-- ,. .... ..' ,' .., ' .~,.-. massive sandy to slightly sandy mud, in places containing layers of pisolitic spheroids overlain by vertically fluted mud; paleosol developed on argillaceous sediments; upper surface scoured. . C-4 . UJ \ J basal mud clast gravel bed, fining upward into bedded muddy sandy gravel/gravelly muddy sand; decreasing high to moderate energy; probably deposited by vertical accretion. UJ v basa into l mud c bedded last to gravel bed, crossbedded fining upward muddy sand/sandy ' \1-----+-----+--~~----~----~--~ C-3 mud; decreasing high to moderate energy; z 0 (..) C-2d --........... c-2c C-2b 0 .... ~ "''--------------------------------------' C-2a basal bed probably a lag; upper surface scoured. trough crossbedded gravelly muddy sand/ gravelly sandy mud, fining upward to cross- bedded sandy mud; decreasing high to modera t e energy; upper surface scoured. ~~----~---+----~---4----~--~ crossbedded to bedded muddy sand, fining upward; moderate to high energy; upper C-1 0 . ~ surface scoured. I massive mud; low energy, possibly a cutoff meander fill; upper surface scoured. ~ Figure 63. Locality "C": stratigraphy, lithologies, environmental interpretations, and trace fos sil distribution. 78 ...Cl) z 0 Q) i= ...... <( Q) a::::i:iE E 0u.. c:: a: - 0 - c.. Q) :I a0 : ca (.!) (.) Cl) u - :I: c.. z <( a: 0 - -(.!) 1u 1- u.J <( (f) a: 1-. (f) LITHOLOGIES A N 0 ENVIRONMENTAL INTERPRETATIONS DISTRIBUTION OF TRACES <11 ~ D. D. Ul Ul Ul Ul Q) Q) '-' '-' rl rl .-I .-I 0 0 ~ ~ .""-"I' .""-"I' rl N ~ ~ Ul D. Ul -, D. D. Ul '"C Ul Q) Ul Ul '-' Ul 0 Q) Q) 'ctl Q) H Q) H ::l '-' I>< Q) '"C '"C rl '"C H rl 0 rl 0 '-' rl ~ 0 .:c:l '-' Q) ~ ~ Q) ~ rl rl H rl '"C Ul Ul Q) Ul Q) Ul rl "'..c: "'E-< Ul .-I "'..c: "'E-< '+< Ul '+r-u ao<::aC::Z. D-5 00 massive mud, sparsely fossiliferous; low energy, restricted circulation, lagoonal. ' :;~-.., D-4 ....J ':t.. i" crossbedded to mainly massive bioturbated sandy mud; moderate energy, intertidal .to shallow subtidal X X ....J u.J 3: f'aZ: <( 00 . ..D.. .-..3..b.........'.>.:~... j .1-....,.....,...-----:---:--~-:--~--:--::-:--:--~-~ D-3b ; massive to lenticularly bedded sandy D-3a \ mud, abundantly fossiliferous; omission bedding; somewhat protected intertidal sand / V mud flat, subject to minor erosion. X X . ~-----r 1L---------------------------------~ ~--~~~~---+---+--~--~ X X X D-3a: interbedded trough crossbedded gravel/ D-2 ly sandy mud and bedded mud, fossiliferous; X X . intertidal mud flat, possibly with small channels. X X u.J . u.J D-1 z . massive muddy sand/sandy mud, fining upward, X vertically jointed in places; paleosol developed on argillaceous sediments, possib- ly flood plain or tidal flat; upper surface scoured . massive mud, coarsening upward slightly; X low energy, possibly a cutoff meander fill; upper surface scoured . X 0 u . 0 . . - Figure 64. Locality "D": stratigraphy, lithologies, environmental interpretations, and trace fossil distribution. 79 Cll u z 0 ~ -.... Q) Q) :X: a.. z :aE: E 0u... - a0:: ca (.!) u en u - ::::t: z 0... <( a: 0 - -(.!) 1- u 1- L.U <( Cl) a: 1- Cl) LITHOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL INTERPRETATIONS DISTRIBUTION OF TRACES Ul Q) ~ 1"1 ;:l p. +J Ul :><: p. Q) ~ Ul Ul Q) +J H rl 0 p "'rl p.., p. +J Ul - Q) Ul +J .0c +J "'..0 ~ H ;:l rl +J ..0,.: 0 'H CJ1 ..0 weathered JI basal mud clast and quartz grave l bed grades \ 1/ upward int o poorly bedded grav elly mudd y sand;\ ...... .~ -.....~ modera te to high energy, probably marginal marine. F-3 bedded to trough crossbedded sandy mud; omission bedding; marginal marine, possibly X F-2 estuarine, intertidal to shallow subtidal, with deposition interrupted by minor erosional events; upper surface scoured. .. ... . . . - covered L.U . L.U . ! . ' . z .. .' ,I F-1 I 0 massive mud; low energy, possibly cutoff meander fill. X X X X X X . 0 F igure 66. Locality " F" : stratigraphy, lithologies, environmental interpretations, and trace fos sil distribution . 81 z 0 ~ :E .U..). -Q) Q) u - :I: c... <( z a: E 0u.. a: 0 c:::: - - a: 0 -(!) Iu c... Q) I- w - ::::;, a0 : ctl <( Cl) a: (!) u I- U) Cl) LITHOLOGIES AN D ENVIRONMENTAL INTERPRETATIONS DISTRIBUTION OF TRACES UJ .--! Q) ~ ~ ;:J '-' UJ ;:J 0 ~ .-I btl ;:J H H Q) A. 4-< (/) .--! UJ Q) Q) .--! '"0 .--! 0 ell H ell ..<>cJ. :p. Po< ....... ...u 3z : a: . weathered .... .... ... .. '1----- - -- -- - - - - - - - - -- - --1--+- -+--- -- - - - -- -t ~~ z .... G-3 massive to crossbedded (?) sandy mud/muddy sand, partially weathered; moderate energy, X X C<( ~CI) possibly estuarine or marginal marine channel fill. X X <(c... -::::;, Ia~-:a(0!:) uuw.... 2z i ::::;, . G-2 . . G-1 X X V partially pisolitic massive mud, partially weathered; probably paleosol developed on '-,'1----+---- - argillaceous sediments; upper surface scoured. ~--~----,____ _ }~ J G-1: crossbedded (? ) muddy sand/sandy mud; . : moderate energy; upper surface scoured. / . w .. ~overed . w . Z . 0 . u . 0 . . . Figure 67. Locality "G" : stratigraphy, lithologies, environmental interpretations, and trace fossil distribution. 82 ...(I) z 0 Q) !;;;: ..... :::!!: Q) a: 0u.. E a: 0 t:: - c.. Q) - ~ a0 : co (.!J (.) (I) u - :I: c.. <( z a: (.!J 0 - - 1- 1- u <( LU a: Cl) 1- Cl) LITHOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL INTERPRETATIONS DISTRIBUTION OF TRACES Ul -1-J '+-< ..cct! Ul Q) Ul ~ 0 Ul (J ;:J 0 Ul ;:J ;:J ~ 0 rl ~ Ul rl bO Q) ;:J bO ~ ~ ~ ct! Q) r-i '+-< Ul Q) (J ct! ~ -1-J bO ~ rl -1-J Ul Q) ~ '"0 ll 0 p., >, (J Q) r-i Q) p., Ul ;:J 0 ~ rl bO ;:J ~ ~ Q) '+-< r-i Q) r-i Ul r-ir-i ct! Q) ~ ~ ct! ~ P.,;:J : -1-J H-6 and H-7: Tabular crossbedded sand; H-7 moderate current energy; lateral accretion; H-7 upper surface of both scoured. . t- graded bedded gravelly sand with mud - - - - ,- - - -1-- - 1-- -+- -1- -lt----i . Cl) z 0 H-6b cobbles and boulders; high to moderate energy. H-6b X X <( . Cl) c.. ~ laterally into sand; low to moderate energy; a0 : upper surface scoured. (.!J :l . . .. ~- .. .. " . B-6a --1 --1 LU 3z : a: ~~~~~/ :=:: R~G~ ~ . ~ ~~~ ~ H-4d: bedde~ to energy; posslbly mc raorsgsibneadld emda rsi na ne d ;c hma nondeelr aft iell'.\l!NH:--S---~-+---+--11--+-X-+--11-X--t \/ ,\ I x <( /' '"' . \ \\..__ _ __ _ _ _ __ __ _ __ _ _ __ _-.J L---+---+--t,..---t-- t---+---1 aJ c LU ... H-4d H-4c: trough crossbedded sand; moderate energy; possibly marginal marine channel H-4b X !;;;: fill. iz = aLU: LU u.. au.. z H-4b , ' ./ H-4a ~ tabular and trough crossbedded sand; moderate energy; possibly marginal marine channel fill. ~ ~ poorly crossbe- dded sand - containing- detrital H-4a ~ . pisolitic boulders and cobbles at base; H-3 possibly marginal marine channel fill . LU H-3 \ massive sandy mud; pisolitic spheroids and iron concretions present; paleosol developed on argillaceous sediments; upper surface scoured. LU z 1/ be d ded to crossbed ded muddy sand fining upward into sandy mud; moderate energy . \ 0 u H-2 H-2 0 1\ ./ . ~~-m-a-s-s-iv-e--p-y-r-i-ti-c--(-?)--m--ud-;--l-o-w--e-n-e-rg-y-,-----~\ ~ / possibly cutoff meander fill deposited under H- 1 ,/ ~" covered marine influence. H-1 X Figure 68. Locality "H": stratigraphy, lithologies, environmental interpretations, and trace fossil distribution 83 en 2 ..... -0 Q) !;i :!! Q) a: E 0u.. - a: c:::: 0 c.. Q) - :::1 a0 : ctl (.!J (.) en u - ::::1: c.. 2 - ct a: 0 -(.!J 1u 1- u.J ct en a: 1- en LITHOLOGIES A N D ENVIRONMENTAL INTERPRETATIONS DISTRIBUTION OF TRACES :1 >:1 Ul .-I Ul 0 u ..0c:: QJ bO ,.Hc.U, QJ bO ,.Hc.U, ,..,'-' .-I ..0,. Cfl ec n c w !;i 2 ct en c.. 1- :::1 auu2ww..:.. a0 : (.!J ....J ....J au.~ 23: :::~a2: . weathered Vmassive to poorly small scale trough cross bedded muddy sand/sandy mud, pyritic (?); moderate energy, possibly protected inter- . ' ... H-17 tidal to shallow subtidal . . I~ l arge scale tabular crossbedded muddy sand; moderate to high energy; upper surface scoured. \ X X ac::ti J. X H- J ..,.. Vmassive pyritic (?) mud; low energy, possibly\ X ... . ...... . ... .. .!\ '-- cutoff meander fill deposited under marine influence. . J-..-,x,...--l---~--1--------1 J X X X X X . u.J H-ll/ H-15 massive mud, faintly pisolitic; low energy, possibly cutoff meander fill. . u.J 2 . 0 . u . Figure 69. Locality "H" : stratigraphy, lithologies, environmental interpretations, and trace fossil distribution . Stratigraphic section after parts of Figs. 738, C. 84 CONCLUSIONS Probably the most significant finding of this study is the discovery of traces of animal life, in some instances abundant, in Oconee Group sediments which are completely devoid of body fossils. These traces provide a view of animal activity and environmental conditions unavailable from any other source. Absence of fossils has often been cited as evidence for a nonmarine or fluvial environment of deposition for these sediments. Furthermore, observation of Amphorichnus sp. within bedded sediments near the top of the Oconee in northwestern Washington County strongly suggests deposition of this portion of the Oconee was marine influenced. Deposition of Oconee sediments seems to have (I) occurred in shallo..y water environments of highly variable current strength, (2) been interrrupted by numerous erosional events, (3) been accompanied by high turbidity, and (4) been rapid for coarser sediments. Great lateral and vertical variability and discontinuity of bedding types and grain size among Oconee sediments is suggestive of shallow water deposition by currents of highly variable strength. These conditions are reflected in the two major facies which are recognizable in the Oconee. The dominant facies is composed of highly lenticular, fining-upward sequences of bedded and trough crossbedded gravelly muddy sand to sandy mud which rest on scoured surfaces. These sediments were probably deposited by floods and/ or laterally shifting currents, at least some of which were marine influenced. The other recognizable facies constitutes a much smaller volume. This facies consists of elongate, sinuous massive mud (kaolin) lenses, possibly deposited in cut off or flooded meanders in a marginal marine or deltaic setting. A possible third major facies which is recognizable within the Oconee is the massive mud unit which occurs at the top of the group in most places. The characteristics and genesis of this unit are discussed below. Numerous interruptions in deposition are apparent throughout the Oconee. These interruptions are suggestive of widespread reworking of Oconee sediments.These depositonal interruptions may be grouped into two classes: (1) periods of considerable scour, exemplified by surfaces at the base of fining-upward sequences; (2) periods of minor scour or nondeposition,exemplified by omission surfaces associated with Amphorichnus sp. Ubiquitous mud lumps derived from underlying or adjacent strata are also indicative of numerous depositional interruptions as well as widespread reworking. Poor sorting and appreciable mud content of most Oconee sediments suggest most deposition occurred during periods of high turbidity. High turbidity of bottom waters may also have contributed to the generally low abundance and diversity of trace fossils in Oconee sediments. Low abundance of traces among sandy and gravelly sediments of the Oconee has contributed to the excellent preservation of primary physical sedimentary structures exhibited by these coarser materials. Low trace abundance and excellent preservation of bedding are suggestive of rapid deposition and burial. The massive structure of the more muddy Oconee sediments, combined with evidence of pervasive bioturbation of some mud bodies, suggests rates of deposition of these finer sediments were considerably slower than for coarser deposits. At most localities, the uppermost few meters of the Oconee are occupied by a laterally extensive massive mud unit of variable thickness. Much of this unit may have accumulated as argillaceous sediments immediately prior to the emergence which produced the disconformity at the top of the Oconee. Regardless of the depositional environments of materials included in this massive mud unit, several of its features suggest the unit was a subareally exposed, hardened mud paleosol prior to innundation and burial: (I) This unit is the only one within the Oconee which is laterally continuous over a wide area. The few instances where this unit is ~bsent are probably due to its removal by erosion. (2) Materials consist of massive slightly sandy mud to sandy mud which grades downward into a wide variety of bedding types and grain sizes, suggesting homogenization of sediments by soil-forming processes. (3) Pisolitic spheroids, similar to bauxite spheroids which form in some tropical weathering profiles, occur within this interval at some localities. Pisolitic cobbles and boulders litter the Group's upper surface at several localities. These large clasts probably are lag deposits derived by erosion of the Oconee's weathered upper surface. Also, a zone of vertically fluted mud similar in appearance to the structure of some tropical weathering profiles occurs in the upper l to 2 m of the Oconee at Locality "C". (4) Quartz grains which show evidence of solution occur throughout the Oconee, indicating these sediments were subjected to an episode of acid leaching in situ. Acid leaching is the rule where materials are weathered in a warm, humid climate. (5) The widespread occurrence in this unit of fecal backfilled burrows. (Planolites possibly produced by oligochaetes, is compatible with, if not suggestive of, a paleosol origin.) (6) Unlined, large diameter Thalassinoides, similar to various species of this ichnogenus from Locality "A", have been observed elsewhere in limestone "hardgrounds". Also, the occurrence of Trypanites sp. borings at the 85 upper surface of the Group at Localities "A" and "C" is indicative of a highly coherent or firm substrate. (7) A high degree of sediment coherence is also indicated by the blocky, often highly irregular, eroded upper surface of the Group and by channels, some with steep sides, cut into this surface. (8) Finally, vertical joint surfaces which extend down 2 to 3m from the upper surface oft he Oconee at Locality "D" predate Thalassinoides sp. BI burrows which are associated with these surfaces. This relationship places consolidation and jointing of this interval prior to the Barnwellian transgression which was accompanied by excavation of Thalassinoides sp. Bl. Barnwell Group sediments rest disconformably on the Oconee Group. Deposition of these sediments was related to the Barnwellian (Late Eocene) marine transgression. Although all basal Barnwell Group sediments examined were probably deposited under marine or marine influenced conditions, sediments of northwestern Washington County differ markedly from those of western Wilkinson County. During the initial stages of the Barnwellian transgression, environmental conditions across northwestern Washington County were both varied and changing. Evidence of changing environmental conditions is contained in the omission suite ichnocoenose excavated into the hardened, eroded upper surface of the Oconee Group. Of particular interest are species of Thalassinoides which occur in close proximity and exhibit dominantly vertical and dominantly horizontal orientations. These two classes of Thalassinoides are generally indicative of higher and lower current energy respectively, suggesting surfaces from which these burrows were excavated were subjected to at least two separate levels of current energy over time. Excavation and habitation of Trypanites sp. and various Thalassinoides were likely accompanied by erosion and/ or nondepositon under intertidal to shallow subtidal, brackish to marine, moderate to high current energy conditions. Truncation of some of these burrows and borings indicates that erosion of the Oconee's upper surface continued in some places after the transgression had at least partially covered the area. Burial of this surface signaled the transition from a nondepositional and/ or erosional environment to a depositional one, presumably with lower current energy, slightly deeper water, and possibly more truly marine salinity. The first Barnwell Group sediments to be deposited in northwestern Washington County were probably laid down in channels and shallow depressions in the eroded upper surface of the Oconee; for example, Basal Barnwell Group channel fillings, attributable to the Clinchfield Formation, occur at Locality "A". The lower one-third of these fillings consists of massive coarse sand, containing Ophiomorpha sp., which imply conditions of brackish to marine salini'ty. The high density and dominantly horizontal orientation exhibited by these burrows suggest construction I under reduced current energy. Ubiquitous retrusive spreiten probably resulted from the tracemaker's response to slow aggradation of the substrate surface. Lower portions of these channel fillings are frequently separated from upper portions by scour surfaces, upon which rest cobble and gravel-sized mud clasts derived from the Oconee. The upper portions of channel fillings consist of muddy sand, whose massive structure may be due to complete reworking by burrowers, suggesting a slower rate of accumulation for these materials than for those in lower portions. Thus, accumulation of basal Barnwell Group channel fillings seems to have taken place under conditions of rising sea level, resulting in (I) reduced and diminishing current energy, (2) brackish to marine salinity, (3) slow and possibly diminishing rates of sediment accumulation, rarely interrupted by scour. Basal Barnwell Group depression fillings are less positively identifiable. A probable example of such deposits occurs at Locality "D". These sediments (unit D-3), also attributable to the Clinchfield, are reduced and consist of intercalated bedded mud and small-scale trough cross bedded sandy gravelly mud, overlain by massive to lenticularly bedded abundantly fossiliferous sandy mud, which contains undifferentiated Thalassinoides species and an "L-shaped burrow". The presence of the "L-shaped burrow" sugggests that deposition of these materials occurred in a protected intertidal setting with brackish to marine salinity. Also, fossil and sand contents increase upward in these sediments, suggesting a trend toward higher energy and open circulation with more marine salinity over time. In addition to their occurrence as channel fillings, massive sands, muddy sands, and sandy muds. occur as laterally extensive beds, in some places greater than 4 m thick, at the base of the Barnwell. Such deposits constitute the dominant basal Barnwell lithology at the westernmost localities studied in Washington County. These beds are typically underlain by an Oconee erosion surface which is penetrated by various species of Thalassinoides, suggesting deposition was accompanied by shallow subtidal, moderate current energy conditions. The massive structure of these sediments was observed to grade into clearly bioturbate texture in some instances, suggesting all such massive sandy basal Barnwell deposits have been thoroughly reworked by burrowers. This, in turn, suggests slow rates of deposition for these sediments. 86 Eastward, the laterally extensive massive sandy basal Barnwell is clearly assignable to the Clinchfield Formation. This unit becomes fossiliferous and more muddy and decreases in thickness to as little as a few centimeters. In some instances where the Clinchfield was virtually absent above the disconformity, its sediments were well represented below the disconformity as the fill of Thalassinoides. In addition to overlying the burrowed and bored upper surface of the Oconee, these deposits overlie basal Barnwell channel fillings previously discussed. They are overlain, in turn, by the Twiggs Clay Member of the Dry Branch Formation, a sparsely fossiliferous, reduced, lagoonal mud , which seems to occupy a position of time-stratigraphic equivalence to much of the thicker sandy basal Barnwell to the west. The thinness and lateral extensiveness of these fossiliferous deposits combined with their stratigraphic position subjacent to the Twiggs Clay suggest they represent a lagoon margin facies, laid down as deepening marine waters swept across the area. In western Wilkinson County, the only clear view of the eroded upper surface of the Oconee and suprajacent basal Barnwell Group sediments was provided by outcrops at Locality "H". Here, the upper surface of the Oconee varies from slightly irregular to highly irregular, showing as much as 4 m of relief locally. Two observations suggest this surface seems to have undergone more erosion than its northwestern Washington County equivalent: (1) the upper surface of the Oconee shows greater irregularity in western Wilkinson County than in northwestern Washington County: (2) the massive mud paleosol which is laterally continuous at the top of the Oconee across most of northwestern Washington County is preserved only at high elevations on the erosion surface at Locality "H". This latter observation also suggests that erosion of the Oconee's upper surface in western Wilkinson County postdates paleosol development. A slightly irregular portion of the Oconee's upper surface at Locality "H" is penetrated by numerous "large sinuous shafts", dwelling burrows which probably are the work of supratidal crabs. These burrows probably were constructed in a marginal marine, supratidal environment related to the approaching Late Eocene transgression. The excellent preservation of these burrows suggests their construction was closely followed by deposition of suprajacent materials, an event which probably was accompanied by at least partial transgression. Most basal Barnwell sediments at Locality "H" consist of trough to mostly tabular crossbedded sand to muddy sand deposited as laterally extensive beds and as channel fillings . Deposition of these sediments probably took place under shallow water moderate to high energy conditions in a deltaic or intertidal to shallow subtidal marine environment. Preservation of bedding structures in most basal Barnwell Group sediments at Locality "H" suggests these materials were deposited more rapidly than the massive sandy sediments which typify the basal Barnwell in northwestern Washington County. REFERENCES Ager, D. V. and Wallace, P., 1970, The distribution and Austin, R.S., 1972, The origin of the kaolin and bauxite significance of trace fossils in the uppermost Jurassic deposits of Twiggs, Wilkinson, and Washington rocks of the Boulonnais, northern France: in Crimes, counties, Georgia. Unpub. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. T.P., and Harper, J.C.,eds., Trace fossils, Geol. Georgia , Athens., 195 p. Jour. Spec. Iss., v. 3, p. 1-18. _ _ _....., 1976, The origin of Georgia's kaolin deposits, Allen, E.A. and Curran, H.A., 1974, Biogenic sedimen- in Twelfth forum on the geology of industrial miner- tary structures produced by crabs in 1agoon margin als, Georgia Geol. Survey Info. Cir. 49, p. 10-15. and salt marsh environments near Beaufort, North Basan, P.B. and Frey, R.W., 1977, Actual palaeontology Carolina : Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 44, p. 538-548. and neoichnology of salt marshes near Sapelo Island, Alpert, S. P., 1975, Planolites and Skolithos from the Georgia: in Crimes, T.P. and Harper, J.P., eds., Upper Precambrian-Lower Cambrian, White-lnyo Trace fossils 2. Geol. Jour., Spec. Iss., v. 9, p. 41-70. Mountains, California. Jour Paleontology, v. 49, p. Berner, R.A., 1969, Migration of iron and sulfur within 508-521. anaerobic sediments during early diagenesis: Ameri- Anderson, A.E., Jonas, E.C., and Odom, H.T., 1958, can Jour. Sci. v. 267, p. 19-42. Alteration of clay minerals by digestive processes of Braithwaite, C.J .R. and Talbot, M.R., 1972, Crustacean marine organisms: Science, v. 127, p. 190-191. burrows in the Seychelles, Indian Ocean. Paleogeography, Pal~oclimatology, Paleoecology, v. 11, p. 265-285. 87 Bromley, R.G., 1967, Some observations on burrows of thalassinidean Crustacea in chalk hardgrounds: Geol. Soc. London, Quart. Jour, v. 123, p. 157-182. 1970, Borings as trace fossils and Entobia Cretacea Portlock, as an example: in Crimes,T.P., and Harper, J.C., eds., Trace fossils: Geol. Jour., Spec. Iss., v. 3, p. 49-90. 1972, On some ichnotaxa in hardsubstrates, with a redefinition of Trypanites Magdefrau. Palaont. Zeitschr., v. 46, p. 93-98. 1975, Trace fossils at omission surfaces: in Frey, R.W., ed., The study of trace fossils: New York, Springer-Verlag, p. 399-428. Dromley, R.G. and Frey, R. W., 1974, Redescription of the trace fossil Gyrolithes and taxonomic evaluation Thalassinoides, Ophiomorpha and Spongeliomorpha. Geol. Soc. Denmark, Bull. 23, p. 311-335. Buie, B. F., 1978, The Huber Formation of eastern central Georgia in Short contributions to the geology of Georgia, Georgia Geol. Survey, Bull. 93, p. 1-7. Byers, C. W. and Stasko L.E., 1978, Trace fossils and sedimentologic interpretation - McGregor Member of Platteville Formation (Ordovician) of Wisconsin: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 48, p. 1303-1310. Carver, R. E., 1972, Stratigraphy of the Jackson Group in eastern Georgia: Southeastern Geol., v. 14, p. 153-181. Chamberlain, C. K., 1971, Morphology and ethology of trace fossils from the Ouachita Mountains, southeast Oklahoma: Jour. Paleonotology, v. 45, p. 212-246, pl. 29-32. 1975, Recent lobensspuren in nonmarine aquatic environments: in Frey, R.W., ed., The study of trace fossils: New York, Springer- Verlag, p. 431-458. Cook, C. W., 1926, Correlation of basal Cretaceous beds of the Southeastern States: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 140. Curran, H.A. and Frey, R.W., 1977, Pleistocene trace fossils from North Carolina (U.S.A.), and their Holocene analogues: in Geol. Jour., Spec. Iss., v. 9, p. 139-162. Dales, P.R., 1967, Annelids: London, Hutchinson Univ. Lib., 200 p. Ekdale, A.A., 1977, Abyssal trace fossils in worldwide Deep Sea Drilling Project cores: in Crimes, T.P. and Harper, J.C., eds., Trace Fossils 2: Geol. Jour., Spec. Iss., v. 9, p. 163-182. Farrow, G.E., 1966, Bathymetric zonation of Jurassic trace fossils from the coast of Yorkshire, England: Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology, v. 2, p. 103-151. ------. 1971, Back-reefand lagoonal environments of Aldabra Atoll distinguished by their crustacean burrows: Zoo. Soc. London, Symp., v. 28, p. 455-500. Forbes, A.T., 1973, An unusual abbreviated larval life in the estuarine burrowing prawn Callianassa kraussi (crustacea: decapoda: thalassinidea): Marine Bio., v. 22, p. 361-365. Frey, R.W., 1970a, Tracefossils of the Fort Hays Limestone member of Niobrara Chalk (Upper Cretaceous), west-central Kansas: Paleontology Contr., Univ. Kansas, no. 53. 1970 b, The lebensspuren of some common marine invertebrates near Beaufort, North Carolina. II. Anemone burrows: Jour. Paleontology, v. 44, p. 308-311. 1970 c, Environmental significance of recent marine lebensspuren near Beaufort, North Carolina: Jour. Paleontology, v. 44, p. 507-519. - - - - - . 1971, Ichnology- the study of fossil and recent lebensspuren: in Perkins, B. F., ed. ,Trace fossils: a field guide to selected localities in Pennsylvanian, Permian, Cretaceous, and Tertiary rocks of Texas and related papers: Sch. Geosci., La. State Univ. Misc. Pub. 71-1, p. 91-125. _ _ ___, 1973, Concepts in the study of biogenic sedimentary structures: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 43, p. 6-19. Frey, R. W. and Chowns, T. M., 1972, Trace fossils from the Ringgold Road Cut (Ordovician and Silurian), Georgia: in Chowns, T. M., ed., Sedimentary environments in the Paleozoic rocks of northwest Georgia: Georgia Geol. Survey Guidebook 11, p. 25-55. Frey, R. W. and Howard, J.D., 1969, A profile of biogenic sedimentary structures in a Holocene barrier island-salt marsh complex, Georgia. Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Socs., Trans., v. 19, p. 427-444. Frey, R.W. and Howard, J.D., 1970, Comparison of Upper Cretaceous ichnofaunas from siliceous sandstones and chalk, Western Interior Region, U.S.A.: in Crimes, T. P. and Harper, J.C., eds., Trace fossils: Geol. Jour. Spec. Iss., v. 3, p. 141-166. Frey, R.W. and Howard, J.D., 1972, Georgia coastal region, Sapelo Island, U.S.A.: Sedimentology and biology. VI. Radiographic study of sedimentary structures made by beach and offshore animals in aquaria: Senckenburgiana Maritima, v. 4, p. 69-182. Frey, R. W. and Howard, J.D., 1975, Endobenthic adaptations of juvenile thalassinidean shrimp: Geol. Soc. Denmark, Bull. 24, p. 283-297. Frey, R. W., Howard, J.D. and Pryor, W.A., 1978, Ophiomorphia: its morphologic, taxinomic, and environmental significance. Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology, v. 23, p. 199-229. Frey, R.W. and Mayou, T.V., 1971, Decapod burrows in Holocene barrier island beaches and washover fans, Georgia: Senckenbergiana Maritiana, v. 3, p. 53-77. 88 Fursich, F.T., 1973, Thalassinoides and the origin of nodular limestone in the Corallian Beds (Upper Jurassic) of Southern England : Neues Jahrb. Geol. Palaont, Mh., 1973, p. 136-156. Fursich, F.T. and Palmer, T.J ., 1975, Open crustacean burrows associated with hardgrounds in the Jurassic of the Cotswolds, England: Proc. Geol. Assoc., v. 86, p. 171-181. Hakes , W.G., 1976, Trace fossils and depositional environment of four clastic units, Upper Pennsylvanian megacylocothems, northeast Kansas. Paleont. Contr. Univ. Kansas, no. 63. Hanor, J.S . and Marshall, N.F., 1971, Mixing of sedi- ment by orga nisms: in Perkins, B. F., ed. : Trace fos- sils: a field guide to selected localities in Pennsylvanian, Permian, Cretaceous, and Tertiary rocks of Texas and related papers: Sch. Geosci., La. State Univ. Misc. Pub. v. 71-l, p. 127-135. Hantzschel, W., 1975, Trace fossils and problematica: in Teichert, C., ed., Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Part W, Supplement I: Geol. Soc. America and Univ . Kansas, p. 269. Hester, N.C. and Pryor, W.A., 1972, Blade-shaped crustacean burrows of Eocene age: a composite form of Ophiomorphia: Geol. Soc. America, Bull. 83, p. 677-688. Hill, G. W. and Hunter, R. E., 1973, Burrows of the ghost crab Ocypode quadrata Fabricus on the barrier islands, south central Texas coast. Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 43, p. 24-30. Hinckley, D. N., 1965, Mineralogical and chemical variations in the kaolin deposits of the Coastal Plain of Georgia and South Carolina. Amer. Min., v. 50, p. 1865-1883. Howard, J.D. and Frey, R.W., 1975, Estuaries of the Georgia coast, U.S.A. : Sedimentology and biology. II. Regional animal-sediment characteristics of Georgia estuaries : Senckenbergiana Maritima, v. 7, p. 33-103. Huddlestun , P. F. and Hetrick, J . H., 1979, Stratigraphy of the Barnwell Group of Georgia, Georgia Geol. Survey, Open-File Rept. 80-l. Huddlestun, P.F., and Hetrick, J.H., 1981, Upper Eocene stratigraphy of central and eastern Georgia, Georgia Geol. Survey, Info. Circ. 55, in press. Hurst, V.J., and others, 1979, Field conference: kaolin, bauxite, fuller's earth , 'Ann . Mtg., Clay Min. Soc., 107 p. Kaestner, A., 1967, Invertebrate zoology: New York, lnterscience Publishers 597 p. Kennedy, W.J., 1967, Burrows and surface traces from the Lower Chalk of southern England: British Mus. Nat. Hist. (Geol.) Bull 15, p. 127-167. Kesler, T.L., 1963, Environment and origin of the Cretaceous kaolin deposits of Georgia and South Carolina: Ga. Min. Newsletter, Georgia Geol. Survey, v. 16, p. 3-11. La Moreaux, P.A ., 1946, Geology and ground-water resources of the Coastal Plain of East-Central Georgia : Georgia Geol. Survey; Bull. 52, 173 p. Lowe, D.R. and LoPiccolo, R.D., 1974, The characteristics and origins of dish and pillar structures: Jour Sed. Petrology, v. 44, p. 484-501. McGintie, G. E. and McGintie, N., 1968, Natural history of marine animals: New York, McGraw-Hill, 523 p. Martinsson, A., 1965, Aspects of a Middle Cambrian thanatotope on Ol and. Geol. Foren. I. Stockholm Forhand. , v. 87, p. 171-230. 1970, Toponomy of trace fossils: in Crimes, T. P., and Harper, J .C. , eds., Trace fossils: Geol. Jour. Spec. Iss., v. 3, p. 323-330. Morris , R. W. and Rollins , H. B., 1977, Observations on intertidal organism associations of St. Catherines Island, Georgia I. General description and paleoecological implications: American Mus. Nat. Hist., Bull. 159, p. 89-128. Nicholson, H.A., 1873, Contributions to the study of the errant Annelides of the older paleozoic rocks: Geology, v. 10, p. 309, 310. Osgood, R.G., 1970, Trace fossils of the Cincinnati area: Paleontographica Americana , v. 6 (41), p. 281-444. Ott, J .A., Fuchs, B., Fuchs, R., and Malasek, A., 1976, Observations on the biology of Callianassa stebbingi Borrodaille and Upogebia litoralis Risso and their effect upon the sediment: .Senckenberg. Marit., v. 8, p. 61-79. Pemberton, G.S., Risk, M.J. , and Buckley, D.E., 1976, Supershrimp: deep bioturbation in the Strait of Canso, Nova Scotia : Science v. 192, p. 790-791. Pickering, S.M., and others, 1976, Geologic map of Georgia. Georgia Geol. Survey, scale 1:500,000. Radwa nski, A., 1970, Dependence of rock-borers and burrowers on the environmental conditions within the Tertonian littoral zone of southern Poland: in Crimes, T.P. and Harper, J .C. , eds., Geol. Jour., Spec. Iss., v. 3, p. 371-390. Rhoades, D .C., 1967, Biogenic reworking of intertidal and subtidal sediments in Barnstable Harbor and Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts: Jour. Geol. , v. 75, p. 461-476. Rickard, D. T., 1974, Kinetics and mechanism of the sulfidation of goethite. Amer. Jour. Sci., v. 274, p. 941-952. Satchall, J.E., 1967, Lumbicidae: in Burges, A., and Raw, F., eds. , Soil biology: New York, Academic Press, p. 259-322. 89 Schafer, W., 1972, Ecology and paleoecology of marine environments: Univ. of Chicago Press., 568 p. Schaller, F., 1968, Soil animals: Ann Arbor, Univ . of Mich. Press, 144 p. Seilacher, A., 1964, Biogenic sedimentary structures: in Imbrie J., and Newell, N., eds., Approaches to paleoecology: New York, John Wiley, p. 296-316. 1967, Bathymetry of trace fossils: Marine Geol., v. 5, p. 389-412. Sellwood, B. W., 1970, The relation of trace fossils to small sedimentary cycles in the British Lais: in Crimes, T. P., and Harper, .J.C. , eds., Trace fossils: Geol. .Jour., Spec. Iss., v. 3, p. 489-504. ------. 1971, A Thalassinoides burrow containing the crustacean G~rphia udressieri (Meyer) from the Bathonian of Oxfordshire: Paleontology, v. 14, p. 589-591. Simpson, S., 1975, Classification of trace fossils: in Frey, R. W., ed., The study of trace fossils: New York, Springer-Verlag, p. 39-54. Shinn, E. A., 1968, Burrowing in recent lime sediments of Florida and the Bahamas: Jour Paleontology, v. 42, p. 879-894. Smith, K. L., 196 7, Callianassid crustacean burrows as possible paleoenvironmental indicators: Unpub. M.A. thesis, Univ. Delaware, 63 p. Smith, R.T., 1929, Sedimentary kaolins of the Coastal Plain of Georgia: Georgia Geol. Survey Bull. 44,482 p. Stephenson, T.A., 1928, The British sea anemones, I: Ray Soc., London, 148 p. 1935, The British sea anemones, 2: Ray Soc., London, 426 p. Taylor, J.D., 1971, Reef associated molluscan assemblages in the western Indian Ocean: Zoo!. Soc. London, Symp. v. 28, p. 501-534. Wallwork, J.A., 1976, The distribution and diversity of soil fauna: New York, Academic Press, 355 p. War me, J. E., 1975, Borings as trace fossils, and the processes of marine bioerosion: in Frey, R.W., ed., The study of trace fossils: New York, Springer-Verlag, p. 818-228. 1970, Traces and significance of marine rock borers, in Crimes, T. P. and Harper, J.C., eds., Trace fossils: Geol. Jour. Spec. Iss., v. 3, p. 515-526. Weimer, R.J. and Hoyt, J.H., 1964, Burrows of Callianassa major Say geologic indicators of littoral and shallow neritic environments : Jour Paleontology, v. 38, p. 761-767. 90 APPENDIX A Stratigraphic Descriptions Terms Some terms used in the following stratigraphic descriptions are defined below. unit- a bed or, more commonly, a set of related beds which may be differentiated from enclosing strata by differences in bedding type, grain size, color, and/ or prominent scour surfaces. Beds within a unit may be related by apparent continuity of deposition, in addition to similarity of bedding type, grain size, and/ or color. Nearly all units are lenticular. mud intraclast - large coherent fragments composed of mud which is similar in appearance to nearby sediments of the formation in which the fragments occur. apparent foreset width - the length of inclined bedding laminae as exposed in outcrop. Letter/ number color designations used in the following stratigraphic descriptions are taken from the Geological Society of America Rock-Color Chart (Goddard and others, 1963). The designation N 10, "very white", is used to describe the extreme whiteness of some kaolins. This designation is not found in the Rock-Color Chart. Descriptions Locality "A": Cyprus Mines Clay pit, Renfroe property, Washington Co.; N33 2' 54" W 82 55' 13". Figures 7, -61-64 4.5m+ A-1 (fig. 72): massive mud, grading upward into slightly sandy mud in upper 1 m of unit; where overlain by sand or gravel, color subjacent to upper contact is 10 YR 8/2 to 10 YR 8/1 with 10 YR 7I 1spots; where overlain by lignitic materials, color subjacent to upper contact is 5 YR 8/1 to N8; iron sulfide occurs as nodules ~ 2 em in diameter scattered throughout unit and becoming more abundant upward, as irregular, discontinuous crusts :;;;; 1 em thick on upper surface of unit, and as sparsely abundant liesegang bands subjacent to upper surface. ~ .5m A-2: (figs. 72B,C): graded bedded to massive muddy, slightly sandy gravel, composed largely of mud intraclasts ~ 6 em in diameter (fig. 72B); intraclasts welded and/ or deformed in places (fig. 72C); color of intraclasts is 5 Y 1/ 8 or rarely 5 YR 8/ I; color of slightly sandy mud matrix is 10 YR 6I 2 to I0 YR 5I 4; irregular iron sulfide concre- tions =::;; 5 em in diameter sparsely scattered throughout unit, showing slight increase in abundance upward; upper contact slightly gradational and irregular. 2.0m A-3: angularly to tangentially tabular crossbeds containing dark mineral laminae along some foresets and ranging in grain size from slightly muddy coarse sand to slightly muddy fine sand and muddy fine sand; unit shows fining upward trend; mud intraclasts =::;; 5 em in diameter are scattered along bottomsets of coarser crossbeds; apparent foreset width, typically 15 to 20 em in angularly tabular crossbeds and 1 min tangentially tabular crossbeds; angularly tabular crossbeds are typically 5 to 10 em thick and tangentially tabular crossbeds are 20 to 30 em thick; distinct grain size differences occur at 15 to 50 em intervals; color of sands in basal 1 to 2 em is N4, due to presence of abundant iron sulfide, grading upward to 5 Y'R 8/4 to IO YR 6/6 in lower 30 cm;above 30 em, sands are 10 YR 8/6 to 10 YR 8/2 or N8; mud intraclasts are N9 to N 10; upper contact is gradational. 0.3m A-4 (fig. 73C): angularly tabular crossbedded muddy sand, containing dark mineral laminae along some foresets; apparent foreset width, typically 1 m; single bed constitutes unit; color is 5 YR 8I 1to 5 Y 8/ I; upper contact is sharp and slightly irregular. 91 :::;; 2.5m A-5 (fig. 73D): angularly to tangentially trough crossbedded sand, increasing in mud content upward; apparent foreset width, typically 2 m; beds are typically 30 to 60 em thick; upper contact is gradational. $ 2m A-6 (fig. 73B): cycles of interbedded slightly muddy fine sand and muddy fine sand; sand layers contain spheroidal iron sulfide concretions ~ '0.3mm in diameter; sand beds are typically 2 to 5 em thick; muddy sand beds are typically <: 1.5 em thick; beds of small scale angularly tabular to trough crossbedded fine sand :::;; 50 em thick are present; color of fine sand is typically N5 to N4; color of muddy sand is 5 Y 4/ 1; upper contact is sharp and highly irregular. 0.6 to 0.8m A-7 (fig. 73E): angularly to tangentially trough cross bedded gravelly, slightly muddy sand, fining upward to sandy mud and containing mud intraclasts :::;; 5 em in diameter; intraclasts commonly occur as lenses of welded grains; apparent foreset width, typically 2m; beds are typically 30 em thick; color of sand is N5 to N7 or 5 Y 8/ 1; color of intraclasts is typically 10 YR 8/2; upper contact is gradational. :::;; 2m A-8 (fig. 72A, C): interbedded lignite and sandy lignite, grading upward into similar material intercalated with lenses of trough crossbedded sand and finally into lignitic mud; beds are 5 to 30 em thick; sand lenses are ~ lm long; color of lignite is Nl; color of muddy lignite becomes lighter upward with increasing mud content ranging from Nl through 5 Y 5/ I, 5 YR 2/ I, and 5 YR4 / I; sand is 5 YR 8/ I to 5 YR 6/ I; upper contact is gradational. $; 2m A-9 (fig. 73A, B, E): interbedded sandy lignitic mud; abundant mud intraclasts. < 5 em in diame- ter are present at lower contact; tree limbs are common and bedding and tree limbs show evidence of compactional deformation; tree limbs show upward increase in abundance; beds are typ- ically < I em thick; color oflignite is N I; color of lignitic mud and slightly lignitic mud is 5 YR 6/ 4 to I0 YR 7j 4; upper contact is gradational. 7m A-10 (fig. 7) : massive slightly sandy mud; channel fillings 3 to 7.5 m wide and 0. 5 to I.0 m thick occur 30 to 40 m apart, 3 to 5 m below upper contact and are composed of small scale trough crossbedded muddy sand / sandy mud; color of massive mud is I0 YR 8j 2 except near upper contact, where color is 5 Y 8/ I, mottled 10 YR 8/6to 10 YR 7/4; upper contact is sharp and irregular. < 0.6m A-ll a (fig. 7): massive slightly gravelly coarse sand, extensively burrowed; mud and sandy mud clasts .$ 20 em in diameter, some armored with quartz pebbles embedded in a crust of hydrous iron oxide, occur near base of unit; color of sand is 10 YR 4/ 2 to 10 YR 6 j 6; grades upward into A-ll b. ~ l.Om A-liB (fig. 7): massive slightly gravelly, muddy medium sand; mud clasts :::; 15 em in diameter litter lower contact; color is 10 YR 6/2; upper contact is gradational. < .5m A-12 (fig. 7): massive to poorly small scale trough crossbedded highly fossiliferous sandy mud, gravelly in places; color is 10 YR 8/2 1to 10 Y 8/ 6; upper contact is slightly gradational and unit may interfinger with lower 30 em of A-13. 5m+ A-13: basal 30 em is horizontally bedded sparsely fossiliferous sandy mud grading upward into massive appearing sparsely fossiliferous mud; grades upward into soil zone. 92 ground surface A-13 ....-A-12 5.~,'.."'C. .' .r7/~-:-~ ~~:;...;...~.--c..2..~.-..~-,-~-_.;...:~-,.;... ' covered ~--.-~_..-.;.;__..;..~:;~L~=.=iA~-1~0=]';-;:;;;;~: A .......... H .... J - ' ;::>,c=.=. ..=. ==-~...:... ~_~A_;;:;~l;~ B Fig ure 70. Portion of outcrop at Locality "A". A, after B. Contact between units A-10 a nd A- 12 is disconformit y se para ting Oconee Group below from Barnwell Group above. (see fig. 7 1). A-13 A-13 A-12 A-13 A-13 A-12 A-10 A-10 A-10 A-10 A-8 A-9 A-5 A-4 A-1 A-1 A-1 A-1 A-13 A-13 A-12 A-10 A-10 A-13 ---"" 1 \ A-10 A-1 A-1 3 Figure 7 1. Representative stratigraphic sections from Locality "A". Units A- 1 through A- 10 are part of th e Oconee Group; A- ll and A-12 are part of the Clinchfield Fo r mation. A-1 3 is of the Twiggs C lay Member. Dashed line represents a pproximate position of Oconee-Barnwell disco nformity between sections. Dotted lines represe nt gradational contacts. 93 A 8 c Figure 72. Sedim e nt s o f Oco nee G ro up a t Loca lit y " A" . Rul e r is 15 e m lo ng. A , unit A-8 , le nti c ul ar bed s of sa nd a nd lig niti c m ud ; B, unit A- 1ove rl a in by unit A -2, ove rl a in in turn by unit A -8; C, unit A- 2, s h o win g de fo rm ed mud clas t a t lo we r left , ove rl a in by unit A-8. 94 A 8 c E Figure 73. Sediments of Oconee Group at Locality "A". A-C, ruler is 15 em long. A, unit A-4 at base, overlain by bedded lignitic muds of A-9; B, bedded sands and muds of unit A-6. overlain by A-9 at upper left; C, tabular cross bedded muddy sand of unit A-4; D, E, pole graduated in feet ; D, massive mud of unit A- 1, overlain by trough crossbedded sand of A-5; E, massive mud of unit A-1 , overlain by trough crossbedded gravelly muddy sand of A-7, overlain in turn by A-9. Locality "B": Anglo-American clay pit, Washington Co.; N33 I' 25" W82 55' 5". Figures 74-76 2.5m+ B-1 (figs. 75C, D): massive mud, N9, occasionally mottled 10 YR 816; lower contact covered, upper contact sharp and slightly irregular, showing compaction faulting, with deformation extending into overlying sands; thin irregular hydrous iron oxide crust present on upper surface of unit. 0.5m B-2a (fig. 75C): large scale, tangentially trough crossbedded gravelly, muddy, coarse sand, containing abundant dark mineral laminae; apparent foreset width, about 1.3 m; beds typically 10 to 20 em thick; color is N9 to N8, mottled 10 YR 816 to 10 YR 616 along some laminae; grades upward into B-2b. 0.5m B-2b (fig. 75C): small scale, tangentially to angularly tabular crossbedded gravelly, muddy medium sand, containing mud intraclasts ~ 3 em in diameter; apparent foreset width, about I0 to 15 em; beds typically 5 to 8 em thick; color is N9, mottled 10 YR 616 to 10 YR 416 along some laminae; terminated upward by 5 em thick bed of deformed mud intraclasts < 8 em in diameter; thin hydrous iron oxide crusts present on upper surfaces on intraclasts; color on intraclasts is 5 YR I I 8 or N9; thin bleached zones common on lower sides of 5 YR I I 8 intraclasts; grades upward into B-2c. 0.4m B-2c (figs. 75A, C): large scale, tangentially trough crossbedded muddy medium sand; apparent foreset width, about 60 em; beds typically 15 em thick; color is N9, mottled 10 YR 616 along some laminae; unit overlain in places by~ 20 em of tangentially crossbedded to bedded slightly sandy mud, N9 to 10 YR 816 along some laminae; upper contact sharp and slightly irregular. Compaction fault (figs. 75C, D) originating in underlying unit extends into lower 0.6 m of B-2. Thickening of affected beds, especially apparent near base of B-2, suggests fault was growing during deposition of B-2. 0.3m B-3a (fig. 75A): large-scale, tangentially crossbedded muddy medium sand, containing numerous dark mineral laminae and deformed mud intraclasts ~ 8 em in diameter; apparent foreset width, about 1.2 m; beds typically 8 to 15 em thick; color is 5 Y 81 I to 5 Y 814, mottled 5 Y 41 I or rarely 10 YR 616 along some laminae; grades upward into B-3b. !.2m B-3b: bedded to tangentially crossbedded slightly muddy and gravelly medium sand; mud intraclasts ~ 8 em in diameter concentrated along some bedding surfaces; intraclast diameter generally decreases upward; color of sands is 5 Y 814, mottled 10 YR 6I 6; color of intraclasts typically 10 YR 812, with lower surface rims of 10 YR 616 near top of B-3b; grades upward into B-3c. !.Om B-3c: bedded to tangentially crossbedded muddy, slightly gravelly coarse sand, N9 to N8, with 10 YR 8I 2 mud intraclasts ~ 2 em in diameter, con- centrated along some bedding surfaces; near upper contact, colors are 10 YR 812 to 10 YR 616, with 10 YR 8I 2 mud intraclasts .::;;; 30 em in diameter present; upper contact gradational. 1.4m B-4: bedded to massive micaceous sandy mud, grad- ing upward into slightly sandy mud; color is 5 YR 81 I to 10 YR 812, rarely mottled 10 YR 61 6; upper contact sharp and irregular. .$" 0.5m B-5: lens of tangentially crossbedded to bedded muddy medium sand, 10 YR 81 2; apparent foreset width, !.2m; beds typically 15 to 20 em thick; upper contact gradational. $; 1.4 m B-6 (fig. 75B): massive mud, composed of welded mud intraclasts, typically 5 to 8 em in diameter; color is N9 to 10 YR 812; intraclasts vaguely separated by 10 YR 616 sandy mud matrix; flattened mud intraclasts :::;; 20 em in diameter litter upper surface of unit; upper contact sharp and irregular. :s; 0.5m B-7 (fig. 75B): bedded gravelly, slightly muddy medium sand, containing abundant flattened mud intraclasts .::;;; 15 em in diameter; color of sands 5 YR516, IOYR 714,and IOYR616to IOYR416; color of intraclasts is N9 or I0 YR 8I6 to I0 YR 61 6; unit grades upward into soil zone. < 0.6m+ B-8a (fig. 76C): bedded to tangentially cross- bedded fining upward muddy, gravelly medium sand, containing deformed mud intraclasts ~ 5 em in diameter; color of sand is 10 YR 816 to 10 YR 6I 6; color of intraclasts is N9 or I0 YR 812, with N9 rims; grades upward into B-8b. 0.3m B-8b (fig. 76C): bedded to tangentially crossbedded fining upward muddy, slightly gravelly medium sand, containing flattened mud intraclasts ~ 6 em in diameter; color of sand is I0 YR 812 to I0 YR 6I 6; color of intraclasts typically I0 YR 812, some with N9 rims (fig. 76D); upper contact undulatory and slightly gradational. 0.8m B-9 (figs. 76A, C, D): alternating beds oflarge scale tangentially cross bedded and bedded slightly sandy mud, N9, mottled 10 YR 812 to 10 YR 616 along some laminae; apparent foreset width, defined in some cases by dark mineral laminae, is about 1.5 m; beds typically 15 em thick; flattened mud intraclasts 5 60 em embedded in upper surface of unit (fig. 76B): color of intraclasts is N9; upper contact sharp and undulatory. 3.lm B-10 (figs. 76A, B): tangentially crossbedded to bedded, fining upward sandy, slightly gravelly mud, 5 Y 814 to 10 YR 816; flattened mud intraclasts ~I 0 em in diameter are scattered along some bedding surfaces or occur as thin beds of welded grains; color of intraclasts is typically N9; upper contact is sharp and irregular. ~ 0.4m B-11: massive slightly sandy mud, 5 Y 7I 2; unit grades upward into soil zone. 96 ground surface weathered s~ n ---. ground surface weathered B-7 B-1 0 B-6 ._____ 50 m-------e4 .......... ... .-s:"5 B-9 ~:.:.:: .e.:~:a-.P.-=:=:::: B-8a A .. .. surface B-3 , -' ,'--, B-2 - -..:-- ... .......8..-..1...-- to- v.-ere d 2 m c B-4 B-3c B- 3 b ....--s-: 3-if-- = ac B-2b B-2:a_;:... B 0 Fig ure 74. Re prese nt a tive strat igra phi c sections from Loca li ty " B". Oconee- Barnwell disconformity probably in weathered zo ne a t to ps of secti o ns. A a nd B a t ap prox ima tely sa me elevat ion ; B, from ce nt er of D; C , a lso from center of D; D po rtion of o ut cro p at Loca lit y " B". 97 B A c 0 Figure 75. Sediments of Oconee Group at Locality "B". Ruler is 15 em long. A, unit B-2 cat base, overlain by B-3a and B-3b; B, unit B-6 at base, overlain by B-7, which grades upward into weathered sediments at top; C, unit B-1 at base overlain by B-2a-c; D, detail of lower right of C, showing a small horst and compaction faults extending into overlying sands. Thickening of overlying sediments on downthrown blocks evident at left , suggesting fault s were "growing" during deposition of suprajacent sediments. 98 B A 0 c Figure 76. Sediments of Oconee Group at Localit y "B". Rul er is 15 em long. A, unit B-9, with large flattened mud clast embedded in upper surface of unit , overlain by B-10; unit B-10, containing light colo red mud intraclasts and Amphorichnus sp. with dark fillings ; C, unit B-8a in lower half, overlain by B-8b, conta ining A mphorichnus sp. at center left , overlain in turn by B-9 at top; D , mud clas ts from unit B-8b, showing bleached rims. (see fig. 74A). 99 Locality "C": American Industrial Clays claypit, Washington Co.; N33 I' 26" W 82 55' 22". Figures 77-80 3.0m+ C-1 (fig. 79C, 80C): massive slightly sandy mud, containing scattered mud intraclasts(?) :5 I em in diameter; color of mud is I0 YR 81 2; color of intraclasts is I0 YR 8I 6 or N9; irregular hydrous iron oxide stains 10 YR 616 to 5 YR 414 and associated aggregates of small hydrous iron oxide spheroids occur sparsely in upper 0.5 m of unit; an irregular discontinuous hydrous iron oxide crust .:::;; 5 mm thick is present on upper surface of unit; lower contact is not exposed; upper contact is sharp and slightly irregular. 0.6m C-2a (fig. 79 8): tangentially tabular cross bedded to bedded muddy slightly gravelly coarse to medium sand, fining upward and containing flattened mud intraclasts .s;; 15 em in diameter; some intraclasts occur as lenses of welded grains; apparent foreset width, where present, is typically I. 5 m; beds are 5 to 25 thick; hydrous iron oxide is concentrated in lower few em; color of sand is 5 YR 516 or 10 YR 616 to 10 YR 816 near base of unit to 10 YR 816 near top; color of intraclasts is I0 YR 812 to N9, with some showing I0 YR 8I 2 cores and N9 rims; grades upward into C-2b. O.Jm C-2b (figs. 79A, 8): bedded to tangentially cross- bedded muddy medium sand, fining upward in places to muddy fine sand; mud intraclasts< I em in diameter are sparsely abundant; apparent foreset width, where present, is 15 to 50 em long; beds are typically 5 to I0 em thick; color of muddy medium sand is 10 YR 8/ 2; color of muddy fine sand is N8 to N9; upper contact with C-2c is gradational to sharp and slightly irregular. 0.3 to 0.5 m C-2c (figs. 79A, 8): trough crossbedded gravelly muddy sand to gravelly sandy mud, grading upward slightly gravelly muddy sand; mud intraclasts :5 5 ern diameter decrease in abun- dance upward; apparent foreset width, typically 2 rn; beds are typically 30 em thick; color of sands is IOYR8 16, mottled IOYR616orrarely5YR5 16; color of muds is N9; color of intraclasts is typically 10 YR 812, some showing N9 rims ; upper contact with C-2d is sharp and slightly irregular. 0.8 to I.Om C-2d (fig. 79A, 8): interbedded trough crossbedded muddy fine sand, sandy mud, and muddy, slightly gravelly medium sand, containing scattered mud intraclasts :::;; 7 em in diameter; apparent foreset width , I0 to 60 em ; grades upward into bedded to tangentially crossbedded slightly gravelly, sandy mud, containing scattered mud intraclasts < 5 em in diameter; apparent foreset width where present, about 1.5 m; throughout unit, beds are typically 10 to 15 em thick and color is N8 to 5 Y 8/ I. Upper contact is sharp and slightly irregular. I. Om C-3 (fig. 80A): bed of slightly sandy gravel, about 30 em thick, consisting mostly of mud intraclasts ::; 5 em in diameter, grades up into bedded to tangentially crossbedded muddy medium sand to sandy mud, slightly gravelly in places due to scattered presence of mud intraclasts .:::;; 5 em in diameter; color is N8 to 5 Y 8I I; upper contact is sharp and slightly irregular. 4.5m C-4 (figs. 80A, 8, D, E): bed of slightly sandy gravel, ~ 15 em thick, consisting mostly of mud intraclasts :::;; 15 em in diameter, grades upward into bedded muddy, sandy gravel to gravelly muddy sand, containing abundant deformed mud intraclasts _:::; 5 ern in diameter, concentrated along bedding surfaces; individuallamine are I to 2 em thick; grades upward into poorly bedded gravelly, muddy sand and gravelly sandy mud; color is 10 YR 812 to N9, mottled 10 YR 816; upper contact is gradational. I. 5 to 4m C-5 (fig. 80C): massive sandy to slightly sandy mud; in places, pisolitic spheroids are present I to 2m below upper contact; vertical fluting (fig. 68C) occurs in upper I to 2 rn of unit. in places and is associated with observed occurrence of pisolitic spheroids; upper contact is sharp and irregular to highly irregular. < 20cm C-6: bedded to massive fossiliferous muddy to slightly muddy medium to coarse sand. 2.0m+ C-7: bedded to massive-appearing sparsely fossiliferous mud. 100 5 lrc~-77----:::==========~c-7==::::----::::::::===r-c - s t_7 ....:'.::=-------------'...._,.___~--~ covered-Iii:.......... ~ ........ C-4 ----------- -- ? .__:--c~3 ___ ---- ~ ----------- ------------- C-2 ......., ~ . .. . -.. covered .. A ....C-1 ...- -. 8 Figure 77. Portion of outcrop at Locality "C". A after B. Contact betwee n units C-5 and C-6 is di co nformit y betwee n Oconee Group below and Barnwell Group above. (see fig. 78). 101 C-7 pisolitic spheroids C-5 A C-7 C-6 C-5 C-4 C-3 C-2d .............- - C-2c ---------- c-2b C-2a C-1 c B Figure 78. Representative stratigraphic sections from Locality "C". A, B, units C- 1through C-5 belong to Oconee Group; C-6 belongs to Clinchfield Formation; C-7 belongs to Twiggs Clay Member. Dashed line represents approximate position of Oconee-Barnwell disconformity between sections. Dotted lines represent gradational contacts. (see fig . 77); A, after C; B, after figure 77 B; C , portion of outcrop, showing lighter colored Oconee, overlain by darker Barnwell. Vertical fluting evident subj acent to disconformity, underlain by zo ne of pisolitic spheroids. 102 A Figure 79. c Sediments of Oconee Group at Locality "C". Ruler is 15 em long. A, corner view of a portion of unit C-2 from left end of B; B, fining upward sequence of unit C-2a through C-2d . Thermos bottle rests on upper surface of C-1. C, massive mud of unit C-1. 103 10 em B D c E Figure 80. Sediments of Oconee Group at Localit y "C" . A, unit C-3 at base, overlain by C-4, overlain in turn by C-5 (led ge at top); B, tra nsition between unit s C-4 and C-5; C, complete section depicted in figure 78 B; D, E, ruler is 15 em long; D. unit C-4, showing mud intrac la sts with highly irregular outlines ; E, contact between units C-3 and C-4. Large mud intraclasts visible at contact. 104 Locality "0": Washington Co.; N33 I' 33' W82 55' 50". Figures 21, 22, 27-29, 81-84 6. 7m+ D-1 (figs. 83C, D): massive mud, grading upward into massive slightly sandy mud in upper 60 em of unit; color is typically N9 to 10 YR 8/2; muddy fine sand intraclasts(?) occur between 3. 5 m depth and upper contact, showing a gradual increase in abundance upward to a maximum of 20 percent of sediment volume, I m below upper contact, above which abundance drops sharply; color of intraclasts(?) is 5 Y 8/2, with some showing 10 YR 6/6 rims; intraclasts (?) may stand out in negative relief on erosion surfaces (fig. 83C). Upper contact sharp and undulatory, with an irregular hydrous iron oxide crust :S 6 mm thick present in some places. 3.0m D-2 (figs. 21, 83A, B): massive mudcy fine sand- /sandy mud, fining upward to sandy mud; color is 5 Y 8 / 2 to 10 YR 8/ 2, rarely mottled 10 YR 6/ 6; color to depths of I m below reduced Barnwell sediments is N7; planar vertical jointing (fig. 21) well developed in some places; slickensides common in places near top of unit, but not associated with vertical jointing; mud may have hackly appearance in places where dessication has occurred; upper contact sharp and variably irregular. 1.5m D-3a (figs. 84B, C): intercalated bedded mud and small scale trough crossbedded sandy gravelly mud, the later containing variable quantities of mud intraclasts < 10 em in diameter; color of muds is 5 Y 8I 1to 5 Y 4/ I; color of sandy gravelly muds is 5 Y 6/ I, mottled 10 R 6 / 6 to 5 YR 5 / 6; color of intraclasts is N9; beds are .:S 10 em thick and are typically I to 2 em thick; laminae in mud beds typically ::;: 1 mm thick; grades upward into D-3b; grades laterally into D-4. 1.5m D-3b (figs. 27, 28, 84A): massive to lenticularly bedded, abundantly fossiliferous sandy mud, 5 G 6I I, mottled 5 Y 6/ 1; upper contact slightly grada- tional and nearly flat; grades laterally into D-4. !.Om D-4 (fig. 29): generally massive, bioturbated sandy mud, showing patches ofunbioturbated trough(?) crossbedded material in lower 0.5 m (fig. 29); color of unbioturbated areas is N9 to 5 Y 8/ I; color of bioturbated areas is 5 Y 8f 4, mottled I0 YR 6/6 to 10 R 4/6; layer of mud intraclasts :::; 18 em in diameter occurs 50 em above base of unit. Upper contact slightly gradational and nearly flat. 2.0m+ D-5 (fig. 29): laminated, sparsely fossiliferous mud; thin lenses of fine sand and decalcified fossil shells occur sporadically. 105 ................ ~......_..... - '\ ~-i ('' =. .. ...,. . ....; i...... / f (_ ,/ 0-3 covered ,i' _.,.......... ... ....... ...... ) i , .,.,.. ..i '"\ Irwinton Sand ' ......._-.... 0-2 ..........., ,............._. ....... ~'......... ... .......... - , ,~ - ~ .. ... .. .... ......... - - ..,.., , .. ... .. .. .. .. ...............1;-......... - . covered A B Figure 8 1. Po rtion of outcro p a t Loca lit y " D". A, afte r B. Contact bet wee n unit D-2 a nd suprajacent units is disconfo rmit y se para ting light er co lo red Oconee G ro up sedime nts below from da rker Ba rn we ll sediments a bove. Units D-3 a nd D-4 belo ng to Cl inchfield Fo rm a tion . Unit D-5 belo ngs to T wiggs C lay Me mber, which is ove rlain by Irwinto n Sa nd Member, both of th e Dry Bra nch Fo rmati o n. 0-5 lo-- --30 m-- - 0 -4 0 -3b 0 -2 B 0 -2 Figure 82. Re prese nt a ti ve stra ti gra phic secti o ns fro m 0 -1 Localit y " D". Oco nee-Ba rn well disconfo rmit y a t to p of unit D-2. Heavy das hed line indicates a pproximate position of disconfo rmit y be- twee n secti o ns. Dotted lines indicate g rada- ti o nal contact. A 106 A 8 c 0 Fig ure 83. Sedim ents of Oco nee a nd Ba rn we ll G ro up s a t Loca lity " D". A, mass ive mud of uni t D-2, showing hack ly a ppea ra nce a nd egme nt of Tha/assinoides sp. B I a t ce nte r; B, unit D-2; C, mass ive m ud of unit D- 1, show ing pisolite wea th erin g o ut in nega ti ve relief; A- C, fro m Oco nee Gr o up. Rul er gradu a ted in ce nt imeters a nd inc hes; D, p o rti o n of o ut cro p a t Loca lit y " D". showi ng lig hte r colo red Oco nee Gro up ove rl a in by d arker Ba rn we ll G ro up. 107 A 15 em B c Figure 84. Sediments of Clinchfield Formation at Locality "D". A, fossiliferous sa nd y mud of unit D-Jb. Scale graduated in ce ntim eters a nd inches. B, irreg ul a r surface of Oconee-Barnwell disconformity benea th rod. Below is unit D-2. above is unit D-Ja , overlain by D-Jb in upper ha lf of fig ure; C, interbedd ed mud a nd sa nd y mud of unit 0-Ja, showi ng li g ht-colored mud clast probably d eri ved from underl ying Oconee Group sedim e nt s. Rul e r is 15 c m lo ng. 108 Locality "E": Deepstep Sanitary Landfill, Washington .Co.; N33 I' 31" W82 58' 32". Figures 85, 86 2m+ E-1: massive, bioturbated mud; color in unbioturbated areas is 10 YR 8/2; color in obviously bioturbated areas is NIO; upper contact sharp and slightly irregular. 3.5m E-2: sandy mud at base; physical structures and other details unknown due to outcrop cover. 0.6m+ E-3 (fig. 86A): large scale tangentially to angularly tabular crossbedded muddy sand to sandy mud; color of sandy mud is N9; color of muddy sand is 10 YR 8/2, stained 10 YR 8/6 to 10 YR 6 / 6 along some foreset laminae; foresets are 0.3 to 1.0 m long; beds typically 15 to 20 em thick; lower contact may be covered (see E-2); upper contact sharp and irregular. .$0.6m E-4a (fig. 86A): lenticular bed of welded mud intraclasts :s;; 20 em in diameter, grading upward in places into bedded muddy, gravelly sand, containing mud intraclasts .$ 5 em in diameter; color of intraclasts is typically N9; color of sand is N9 to 5Y8/I,mottled IOYR8/2to IOYR6j6inupper portion; grades upward into E-4b. 1.4m E-4b (fig. 86A): small to intermediate scale angularly to tangentially trough crossbedded muddy coarse sand, with sparse, flattened mud intraclasts .$ 4 em in diameter scattered along some bedding surfaces; apparent foreset width, 8 to 30 em long; beds typically 5 to 20 em thick; color of sand is I0 YR 8/2 to 10 YR 6/6, stained 5 YR 5/6 along some bedding laminae; color of intraclasts is N9 to I0 YR 8/ 2; irregular, concave up "bleached" zone 10 YR 8/2 occurs at top of unit (fig. 858): upper contact sharp and slightly irregular. :::; 2.0m E-5 (fig. 868, C): small to intermediate scale angularly to tangentially crossbedded to bedded < muddy coarse sand; mud intraclasts 13 em in diameter abundant in lower 60 em of unit and tend to be concentrated along certain bedding surfaces; petroleum-like material concentrated along some bedding surfaces and on underside of mud intraclasts (fig. 86C): apparent foreset width, I0 to 30 em long; beds typically I0 to 30 em thick; color of sand is N9 to 10 YR 8/ 2, mottled 10 YR 6 / 6 or 5 YR 5/6; color of intraclasts is N9 to 10 YR 8/6, mottled 10 YR 6/6, with bleached rims present in some cases; color of petroleum-like organic material is N I; upper contact is gradational to sharp and highly irregular (fig. 86C) 1.2 to 1.4m E-6 (fig. 868, C): massive gravelly, sandy mud,coloris IOYR8/2,stained 10YR6j6along burrows; upper contact is sharp and highly irregular. 4m E-7 (fig. 860): massive bioturbated (?) slightly gravelly, coarse to medium sand; color is N9 to N8, mottled extensively 10 YR 6/6. 109 r------------____.... E-4b -..... ....................- OoO' ' ' ' " ' ' ' ' ~ - o HOM0 00 oooo , o ' o - - oo --- - :: -~ E-4a .. E-3 / .. ...... ' covered A 3 E-7 E-6 ...."'~ E-5 E-4b E-3 .. .. .... ... . ... :., B covered \.- E-2 - ---....... ..... E-1 c Figure 85. Represent a tive stratigraphic section from Loca lit y "E". Contact between unit s E-6 and E-7 i di sco nformity separating Oconee Group below from Clinchfield Formation above. A, after B; portion of outcrop at Localit y 110 A B c 0 Figure 86. Sediments of Oco nee Group at Locality "E". Ruler is 15 em long. A, unit E-3 at base, overlain by E-4a. overl a in in turn by E-4b; B, unit E-4b at base, overlain by E-5, overlain in turn by E-6 at top; C, detai l of top left portion of B, showing dark streaks of petroleum-like residue in unit E-5 and gradational transition between E-5 a nd E-6 .above; D , irregular surface of Oconee-Barnwell disconformity, sho wi ng unit D-6 below a nd burrow(?) mottled Clinchfield sands of D-7 above. 111 Locality "F" : American Indu strial C lays claypit , Washington Co.; N33 I' 15" W 82 59' 53". Figures 87-89 3m+ F- 1 (figs . 89A, B) : massive slightly sandy mud , grading upward into mud and back into slightly sandy mud ; mud contains iron oxide and hydrous iron oxid e liesegang l.,ands and a few deformed , discontinuous horizontal laminae 5 to 10 mm thick; slightly sandy muds are highly micaceous; color of sandy mud and mud is 5 YR 9 / I, mottled 10 YR 8/ 4or 5 RP8 / 2to 5 RP 7/ 2along Planolitessp. B (?), in small spots, and along liesegang bands; color of di scontinuous laminae is N 10; upper contact is gradational. 2.0m+ F-2 (figs. 89, 79C): bedded or tangentially to angularly trough crossbedded sandy mud, containing mud intraclasts .::; 15 em in diameter; intraclasts commonly occur as welded lenses; beds are 5 to 30 em thick ; upper contact is sharp to slightly gradat ion al. 3.5 to 4.5m F-3 (fig. 87, 79C) : bedded gravelly muddy sand, containing mud clasts.::; 20 em in diameter concentrated in basal few em of unit along bedding surfaces el sewhere grading upward into massive , finer grained material of soil zone; color is I0 YR 8/ 6 to 10 YR 6 / 6. weathered \ground ~urf~ce \F; F-3 ~ r-------------------------------------------~ .......... - -.. F-2 -....... . -..--- - covered - .. .... 2 m A B Figure 87. Portion of outcrop at Locality "F". A, after B. Contact between un its F-2 and F-3 is disconformity separating Oconee Group sediments below from undifferentiated Barnwell Group sediments a bove (see fig. 88). 112 ground surface ground surface ........ ~ we ath ere d~~--------4 0m----_,~... we ath ere d F-3 F-3 r---------t----------------------t---~~-1 F-2 covered A N 3 F-1 8 c Figure 88. Representative stratigraphic sections from Locality "P'. A, after center portion of figure 87 B; B, after C. C, portion of outcrop, showing unit F-1 at base of ve rti cal face. Contact with F-2 covered. Light colored sediments of F-2 in upper central portion overlain by dark F-3 sediments . Rod is~ 3m long. Dashed line between A and B represents approximate position of Oconee-Barnwell disconformity. 113 A 8 15 em c Fig ure 89. Sedim e nts of Oconee Group a t Loca lit y "F" . A, mass ive mud of unit F-2 , showing poorl y defined bi oturbat e textures a nd iro n o xide / hydro us iron oxide liesega ng ba nds a bo ve rul er. Rul e r is 15 em lo ng. Deta il of B, cent er left ; B, po rti o n of o utcro p showin g unit F-1 a nd multidirectiona l liesega ng ba nd s. Rod ~ J m; C , deta il o f ce nt ra l po rti o n of fi g ure 87 H, sho win g lig hter sediments of F-2 , o ve rl a in by d a rk e r Ba rn we ll Gro up sedim ent s of F-3. 114 Locali ty "G": roadcut about 0.2 mi. E of Cowper Creek, Wilkinson Co.; N32 48' 2" W83 14' 20". Figure 90 2:5m+ G-1: crossbedded (?)muddy medium sand / sandy mud; color is N9, mottled 5 YR 5/ 6 or 5 R 5 / 4 to 5 R 3f4; irregular iron oxide concretions, some vaguely resembling tubular burrows, occur in upper 0.5 m of unit and are especially abundant at upper contact; upper co ntact sharp, irregular, and broadly undulatory. $ 2. 7m G-2: lens of partially weathered, slightly pisolitic, massive mud ; color is 8, 5 YR 5/ 4, or 5 R 6/ 6, mottled 10 R 6/ 6 to 10 R 4 / 6 along some joints; irregular to tubular iron oxide concretions, some resembling "parallel ferruginous tunnels", occur sporadically at upper contact; upper contact is sparsely littered with pi so litic boulders< 0.5 min diameter ; upper contact is sharp, highly irregular, and undulatory. I.0-3. 7m G-3: cross bedded (?) sandy mud to muddy medium sa nd , containing a few piso litic boulders $ 0.5 m in diameter at lower contact; color is 5 YR 5/ 4 to 5 YR 6/ 4, 5 YR 5 / 6 to 10 YR 6/ 6, or 9. Sporadically abundant "parallel ferruginous tunnels", Phycodes sp. and irregular hydrou s iron oxide concretions occur throughout unit; grades upward into soi l zone. covered weathered . ........ . G-2 A G-3 ... B Figure 90. Portion of outcrop at Locality "G". A, after B. Contact between unit G-3 and subjacent units is probably disconformity between Oconee Group below and Barnwell Group above. Occurrence of "parallel ferruginous tunnels" and Phycodes sp. at center right. 115 Locality "H": M and M Clays claypit, Wilkinson Co.; N32 47' 30" W83 17' 30". Figures 34, 49, 55-58, 91-98 0.7m+ H-1 *(fig. 94A) : massive mud, similar in color and shrinkage properties to H-12; upper contact sharp and slightly irregular. :::;; , 1.5m H-2* (fig. 94): bedded muddy sand, grading upward into small-scale angularly trough crossbedded muddy to slightly muddy sand and finally into bedded sandy mud; upper contact gradation al. l.5to 5.2m H-3 (figs. 94A, 95B, C): massive to poorly bedded, pisolitic, sandy to slightly sandy mud; irregular iron oxide concretions and pisolitic spheroids (fig. 95A) VJ 50 em in diameter are common, especially toward top of unit; spheroids show liesegang bands which roughly parallel upper surface of unit; color of mud is lO YR 9I 2 to lO YR 812, mottled 10 YR 616 or 10 R 714; color of pisolites is 10 YR 812 to 10 YR 712 and diameter is 0.5 em to 2.0 em; color of iron oxide concretions is 5 R 216 to I0 R 212; slickensides common in some places; upper contact is sharp, highly irregular and undulatory, with a thin crust of iron oxide present. 0.5 to 2.5m H-4a* (94A, 95B, C, 96C): poorly crossbedded slightly muddy, gravelly sand, containing pisolitic boulders and cobbles :::;; 2m in maximum diameter (fig. 94A); iron oxide liesegang banding js present in some boulders and cobbles show no preferred orientation; color of sand is 5 YR E/4, mottled 5 YR 516 or 10 R 416; several broad, diffuse hydrous iron oxide liesegang bands are present in sand, ranging upward in color from 10 R 4 / 6 and 5 YR 5/ 6, through 10 YR 6/ 6, 5 YR 414, and 5 YR 5/ 6, to 10 R 416. 3.1 to 1.6m H-4b (figs. 34, 95B) : tangentially to mainly angularly tabular or trough cross bedded, slightly muddy medium sand, containing dark mineral laminae along some foresets; apparent foreset width, about 1.0 to 1.5 m; beds are 0.5 to 1.0 m thick and laterally continuous up to at least 10m; sand-sized white spots of mud are suggestive of in situ weathered feldspar; color of sand is mainly 10 R 714 or N9 to 10 YR 6 / 6. Upper I m grades laterally into H-4t and H-4d. !.Om H-4c. (figs. 96A, B): small scale trough cross bedded (festoons) slightly gravelly medium sand, mainly N9 to 10 YR 616 or 10 R 7/ 4 in color; apparent foreset width, 20 to 30 em; beds are typically 10 to 20 em thick; hydrous iron oxide concentrations, 10 YR 616 in color, commonly occur along bottom sets, where adjacent sands show evidence of "bleaching" (fig. 968): pelecypod resting traces(?) penetrate some bottom sets (fig. 968) (see Curran and Frey, 1977, pis. 3b, 4b, d) : multidirectional iron oxide / hydrous iron oxide liesegang bands present. .:::;; 0.6m H-4d : bedded to tangentially crossbedded slightly muddy medium sand, similar in color and iron oxide 1hydrous iron oxide distribution, in- cluding liesegang bands, to H-4c. Contact between H-4 and H-5 or H-6 is slightly gra- dational and irregular and relatively flat. 0. 7 to 0.3m H-5 (fig. 96A): lens of interbedded muddy fine sand to sandy mud, grading laterally into fine sand; beds are .:::;; 2 em thick; color is typically N9 to N8; upper contact is sharp and irregular. 0.6 to 0.3m H-6a (fig. 960): graded bedded gravelly, slightly muddy coarse sand, containing abundant mud boulders and cobbles ::; 0.5 m in diameter and typically 2 to 5 em in diameter; color is 10 R 416 to 10 YR 616, due to concentration of iron oxide 1hydrous iron oxide atop relatively imper- meable H-5; color of boulders and cobbles is typically 5 YR 81 I; grades up into H-6b. 2.8 to 2.4m H-6b (fig. 960): angularly tabular crossbedded slightly muddy fine sand, containing sparsely scattered mud boulders and cobbles ::;0.4 min diameter; apparent foreset width, 0.5 to 1.0 m long; beds are typically 0.3 to 0.5 m thick and some are laterally continuous in excess of 20 m; color is 10 YR 714 to 10 YR 816 or N8 to N9, mottled 5 YR 5/ 6 to 5 YR 3/ 4 or I0 YR 7/ 4; color of mud boulders and cobbles is 5 Y 9/l; upper contact is sharp, slightly irregular and broadly undulatory . 3.6 to 5.6m H-7 (fig. 95B): angularly to tangentially tabular crossbedded slightly muddy medium sand; apparent foreset of angularly planar foresets is 0.3 to 0. 5m; apparent foreset width, of tangentially planar foresets is$ 2m; beds are typically 0.2 to 0.4 m thick and some are laterally continuous in excess of 20m; color is 5 R 5I4 to 5 R 7I4 or lO YR 8/6to IOYR616or IOYR 714inplaces,mottled5 YR 51 6; upper contact sharp and slightly irregular where unit is overlain by channel fillings; otherwise, unit grades up into soil horizon. H-8 (fig. 91 ): large scale angularly tabular crossbedded sandy material, light in color, probably representing laterally accreted channel fillings; upper contact sharp and slightly irregular. H-9 (fig. 91): same as above 116 H-1 0 (figs. 9 I; 97): large scale angularly tabular crossbedded muddy sandy, containing abundant mud cobbles and pebbles on bottom set and lower portion of fciresets (fig. 97 A); unit cut by several c-losely related normal faults, which die out about 7 m below basal contact (figs. 97 A-C); grades upward into soil zone. 3.4m+ H-11 (figs . 49, 55-58, 98 C-E): massive, faintly pisolitic mud, containing a few deformed, thin, discontinuous, horizontal mud laminae (figs. 49, 98C) and iron oxide liesegang bands; color of mud is N9; color of pisolites is 10 YR 714 10 YR 812; color of horizontal mud laminae is N 10; color of liesegang bands and irregular mottling is 10 YR 816 to 10 YR 616 or 5 R 714 to 5 R 314; nearly horizontal faults present at several levels, cutting "large conical structures" and pisolites (figs. 54, 56-58): where unit is overlain by H-12, upper contact is gradational and irregular (for example, fig. 52); otherwise, upper contact is sharp and irregular. 0.2 to 1.4m H-12(figs. 51, 53, 55, 92) : massive, pyritic(?) mud; color is 10 YR 612, mottled 5 YR 7I 2 and 5 R 5I 4; unit interfingers laterally with or grades abruptly into H-11; upper contact is slightly gradational and irregular. ~ 1.8m H-13 (figs. 92, 988): interbedded medium sand and sandy mud, with a few mud beds similar to H-12 material in lower portion; many beds show signs of soft sediment deformation due to loading; mud and sandy mud beds are typically ~ I em thick; sand beds are typically 4 em thick; color of mud beds is 10 YR 6/2; color of sandy mud beds is N8 to N9; color of sand beds is N7 to N8, mottled 10 YR 714 or 10 YR 616 to 10 YR 8/6 toward upper contact; upper contact is sharp and highly irregular. 2.5m H-14 (figs . 92, 98B): bedded to tangentially crossbedded slightly gravelly coarse sand; large mud clasts:::;: 0.4 min diameter and typically 5 to 10 em in diameter are concentrated at lower contact; mud clasts typically ~ 5 em in diameter are scattered throughout unit and tend to be concentrated along certain bedding surfaces; color of sand is 10 YR 616 to 10 YR 816 or 10 R 416; color of mud clasts is typically 10 YR 8I 6 to 10 YR 7I 6; grades upward into topsoil(?); lower contact about 7 m below ground surface. 3m+ H-15*: massive faintly pisolitic mud; same as H-11, with upper contact covered. I. 5m+ H-16, (fig. 98A): tangentially to large scale angularly tabular crossbedded to bedded muddy, slightly gravelly sand, containing sparsely scattered mud intraclasts ::::; 3 em in diameter; apparent foreset width, where present, is typically 2.5 m; observed bed thickness is 0. 5 to I. 5 m; color of muddy sand is N7 to N8, mottled 10 YR 8I 6 to 10 YR 416 or 5 YR 516 near upper contact; color of intraclasts is N9 to NlO; upper contact is sharp and slightly irregular. 2m+ H-17 (fig. 98A): weathered bedded to small scale trough cross bedded muddy, slightly gravelly sand; bedding is poorly defined, apparently due to partial homoginization of primary structure by soil- forming processes; color is I0 YR 7I 2 to I0 YR 612, mottled 10 YR 616 to 5 YR 516 or 10 R 416; grades upward into soil zone. 117 ' .... covered H-7 H-6 H-5 H-4 b. C. d__.......... 1fc4a- -- ...------ . H-3 -- - - :..._..........................._... ----~---..... ----- A Figure 91. 8 Portion of outcrop along eastern margin of surface mine at Locality "H". A, after B. Contact between unit H-4 and subjacent units is disconformity separating Oconee Group below from undifferentiated Barnwell Group sands above (see fig. 93A). ~ spoil ... ...... ............. ... ...... ...... . .. .. ... ............ ..................... .. .. ..... .... ....~ ...., .... -. . ~~ - _._... _ _ _ _H_-1_4_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ J H-13 - H-12 H-11 ......... .......... ....... .. .... . covered .. ., ... ... .. ... .... .... . .. .............. .. - ... .. ................ ........ .... . - - A 8 Figure 92. Portion of outcrop along northern margin of surface mine at Locality "H". A, after B. Contact between units H-13 and H-14 is disconformity separating Oconee Group below from undifferentiated Barnwell Group sediments above. (see fig . 93B). 118 ground surface weathered H-17 H-14 H-1 6 H-7 H-13 cov ered H-12 H-6 H-15 H-11 H-5 ' c H-4c . 'H -4d A .. B H-4b N 1-' 1-' co 3 H-3 H-2 ~-:-l covered A Figure 93 . Representative stratigraphic sections from Loca lity "H". Asterisk (*) indicate points of approximately equal elevation. A, after right end of figure 91 B. Contact between units H-3 and H-4a is disconformity separating Oconee Group below from undifferentiated Barnwell Group Sands above; B. after right end of figure 92B. Contact between units H-13 and H-14 is disconformity separating Oconee from undifferentiated Barnwell sediments above; C. from western margin of surface mine at Locality "H". Figure 94. 8 Sediments from Locality "H", taken from lower right of figure 91 B. (see also fig. 93A) . Ruler is 15 em long and rests on upper surface of unit H-1. A, unit H-1 at base overlain by muddy sands of H-2, overlain in turn by lighter massive mud of H-3 containing pisolitic spheroids and iron concretions, overlain in turn by slightly darker sands of H-4a, containing pisolitic boulders at base of bed . H- 1through H-3 are of Oconee group . H-4a is of undifferentiated Barnwell Group; B, detail of lower right of A, showing bedding in unit H-2. H-1 at base, H-2 at top. A B c 0 Figure 95. Sediments from Locality "H", taken from right end of figure 91 B. (see also fig. 93A). A, detail of pisolitic spheroid from base of unit H-4a; B, stratigraphic section, showing Oconee-Barnwell disconformity in lower part, sloping irregularly to left. Shovel is 95 em long; C, detail of disconformity, showing lighter colored sediments of unit H-3 overlain by darker sediments of H-4a. Ruler is 15 em long; D , slickensides in massive mud from unit H-3 . Scale in centimeters. 120 A B c D Figure 96. Undifferentiated Barnwell Group sediments from Locality "H", taken from right end of figure 91 B. (see also fig. 93A) . A, trough cross bedded sands of unit H-4C, overlain by interbedded muddy sand / sandy mud of unit H-5 at top . Ruler is 15 em long. B, detail of left central portion of A. Iron oxide / hydrous iron oxide concentrated in darker areas, as along bottomsets and in liesega ng bands . Probable pelecypod resting traces at center right. Scale in centimeters and inches; C, unit H-3 at extreme lower right, overlain by H-4a co ntaining pisolitic boulder. Ruler is 15 em; D, tabular crossbedded sands of unit H-6 B. 121 A 8 c Figure 97. Conspicuous channel filling (unit H-10) in undifferentiated Barnwell Group sediments at Locality "H", taken from left end of figure 91 B. A, light colored bottom sets and lower foresets composed of gravel and pebble sized mud clasts . Normal faults at left center; B, C, details of faults near base of channel. Photos courtesy of Tony Atkins. 122 A 8 c D E Figure 98. Sediments from Locality "H". Ruler in A, B, D , E is 15 em long. Scale inC is graduated in inches. A, from western margin of surface mine, showing contact between lighter colored unit H-16 of Oconee Group below and darker Barnwell Group sediments above "Large sinuous shafts at center right; B, from northern margin of surface mine, showing contact between deformed bedded sediments of lighter colored unit H-13 of Oconee below and darker Barnwell above. Mud boulder rests on disconformity; C, pisolitic texture and deformed white laminae of unit H-1; D, "large conical structures" truncated by horizontal faults, unit H-11 ; E, breccia-like pisolitic texture, unit H-11. 123 APPENDIX B Grain Size Distributions Samples from most units described in appendix A were returned to the laboratory where grain size distributions were visually estimated using a 32x binocular microscope (see pages I, 3). The results are presented below. Grain size distributions of a few units described in appendix A were estimated by inspection at the outcrop. These latter units are listed in appendix Bas "not sampled". Grain Size Distribution Unit Remarks A-I A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7 A-8 A-9 A-10 A-lia A-lib A-12 A-13 I m below upper contact Rhizocorallium-like burrow fill, upper portion 15 em below upper contact 30 em above lower contact I m above lower contact sand beds muddy beds 15 em above lower contact 60 em above lower contact, mostly lignite I m below upper contact undifferentiated Thalassinoides fill, 30 em below upper contact Trypaniles sp. fill Planoliles sp. A fill. un burrowed sediment Ophiomorpha sp. fill. boulder from lower contact at lower contact intercalation with A-13 intercalation with A-12 30 em above lower contact B-1 B-2a B-2b B-2c B-3a B-3b B-3c B-4 B-5 B-6 B-7 B-8a B-8b B-9 B-10 B-11 30 em below upper contact lower 0.5 m middle 0.5 m upper 0.4 m lower 0.3 m middle 1.2 m upper I m lower 1.3 m upper 0.8 m upper 0.3 m 15 em below upper contact Amphorichnus sp. fill. upper portion only fine mud sand 90 10 10 70 30 3 60 20 40 5 5 50 not sampled 5 95 35 65 not sampled 65 10 100 TR 92 5 highly variable 55 5 100 I I 55 25 20 15 70 7 50 5 85 5 100 97 2 20 10 40 5 30 5 10 10 5 3 25 I 60 25 95 5 25 25 98 7 30 20 25 45 5 I 5 90 10 65 3 not sampled med. sand coarse sand gravel 15 5 2 5 60 5 10 5 25 25 5 40 5 20 5 2 20 10 10 30 65 5 20 40 20 5 10 7 5 35 10 7 3 I 15 45 10 30 15 10 40 25 I 60 20 I 60 30 2 25 45 5 15 45 5 2 30 4 30 35 I 20 20 25 5 15 70 10 15 7 10 124 Grain Size Distribution continued fine med. coarse Unit Remarks mud sand sand sand grant C-1 C-2a C-2b C-2c C-2d C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6 C-7 D-1 D-2 D-3a D-3b D-4 D-5 50 em below upper contact internal grain size of intraclasts(?) 15 em below upper contact lower portion 30 em below upper contact laminated mud beds sandy mud beds highly fossiliferous undifferentiated Thalassinoides fill nut sampled not sampled not sampled not sampled not sampled not sampled not sampled not sampled not sampled not sampled 90 8 2 30 65 5 95 3 I 50 40 10 75 20 5 98 2 60 35 5 65 5 30 55 5 20 60 15 25 100 TR E-1 E-2 E-3 E-4a E-4b E-5 E-6 E-6 E-7 F-1 F-2 F-3 G-1 G-2 G-3 upper 1.4 m covered grain size distribution highly variable Tha/assinoides sp. 8 2 fill central portion of unit muddy beds sandy beds pisolitic spheroid "parallel ferruginous tunnels" fill 100 TR not sampled not sampled not sampled 25 3 25 25 5 25 55 TR 2 55 5 30 3 15 65 I 5 30 100 TR 65 2 25 not sampled 45 10 40 100 TR 60 35 5 15 35 55 98 I I H-3 60 5 30 H-4a not sampled H-4b 5 30 65 H-4c I 10 55 H-4d 30 em below upper contact 5 10 55 "parallel ferruginous tunnels" fill, hydrous iron oxide in mud fraction 40 55 5 H-5 30 em above base 45 50 5 H-6a 30 em below upper contact 10 5 15 H-6b 5 50 40 H-7 5 5 50 H-8 not sampled H-9 not sampled H-10 dark portions only not sampled H-11 3m below upper contact 100 TR 1.5m below upper contact 97 3 "large conical structures," 100 TR discontinuous laminae 100 pisolites 100 H- 12 H-1 3 sand beds I 20 75 mud beds 60 40 H- 14 10 40 H-1 5 not sampled H- 16 30 em below upper contact 40 10 20 "large sinuou s shafts" fill 35 10 25 H- 17 20 em above lower contact 40 5 15 2 I I I 15 5 I 45 2 45 18 25 10 15 65 10 TR 5 2 5 30 5 30 65 5 5 40 5 45 5 25 5 30 TR 35 5 125