. .I . ,-' -r" Report.and Recommendations 01 the Georgia Teacher , Salary Study Commission .to the State Board 01 Eelucation dUDe .980 '.... Report and Recommendations 01 the Georgia Teacher Salary Study Commission to the State Board 01 Education Georgia Department 01 Education Atlanta, Georgia 30334 Charles McDaniel, State Superintendent 01 Schools June .980 Table of Contents Letter of Transmittal 3 Commission Members 4 Members of Executive Committee 5 Commission Staff 5 Background and Development of the Commission 5 Summary of Recommendations 5 Summary of Commission Work 6 Recommendations 8 Appendix A - Rank Order of Southeastern States Beginning Teacher Salary - 1979-80 9 Appendix B - Teacher Salaries for Southeastern States 1979-80 12 Appendix C - Georgia Teacher Annual Salary 1979-80 14 Appendix D - FY 1981 Pay Schedule and Teachers 18 Appendix E - FY 1982 - 20 years - $11,547 Base 20 Appendix F - Comparison of Schedules for Teacher Pay State Level 1980-81/1981 -82 22 Appendix G - Teacher Salary Schedule Current Index - Base $10,323 24 Appendix H - Recommendations for Further Study 28 2 WILLIAM O. RILEY PRESIDENT ATLANTIC STEEL COMPANY POST OFFICE Box 1714 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30301 June 11, 1980 Mr. Roy A. Hendricks, Chairman Georgia State Board of Education Post 0 ffi ce Box 177 Metter, Georgia 30439 Dear Mr. Hendricks: As Chairman of the State Board of Education Salary Study Commission, it is a pleasure for me to report that the work of the Commission has been completed and that a recommendation for a new salary schedule is ready for your consideration. I would like to take this opportunity to commend the members of the Commission for their diligent participation during the course of the study and to account to you the many hours of deliberation and study by the Commission members. It has been a pleasure working with fellow citizens from our state in such a worthwhile project. The Commission's specific recommendation is presented in this report with the expectation that the Board will accept it for implementation. Very truly yours, wor:nad 7Lr<--?~7't::(/' - (/ William O. State Salary Riley, Study CComh~ai'i~an- Letter of Transmittal from Chairman Riley to the State Board of Education 3 Commission Members Chairman William O. Riley President, Atlantic Steel Atlanta Susan Aft Teacher Georgia Federation of Teachers Marietta Buford Arnold Superintendent Cartersville City Schools Georgia Association of Educational Leaders Cartersville Charles Daniel Past President Young Farmers Association Nashville Sherman Day Dean Georgia State University Atlanta Claybon Edwards Mortician and Funeral Director Fort Valley Langdon S. Flowers Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Flowers Industries Thomasville Garland G. Fritts Business Consultant Georgia Business and Industry Association Atlanta Lyda Hannan Retired Principal Georgia Retired Teachers Association Columbus Charles Harris Businessman Ocilla Raymond Head Jr. City Commissioner Georgia Municipal Association Griffin Glenn Heck Manager, Cable TV Georgia School Boards Association Warner Robins Kathleen Hires Teacher Georgia Vocational Association Jesup Anne Huey Homemaker Canton Jewel John County Commissioner Association of County Commissioners Athens James Johnson Associate Superintendent for Staff Personnel Atlanta City Schools Atlanta Ted Key Teacher Forest Park Charles M. Miller Senior Vice President C&S Bank Atlanta Don Murphy High School Principal Professional Association of Georgia Educators Marietta Fern B. Patterson Teacher Georgia Association of Educators Gainesville Robert A. Roper Probate Judge/Businessman Greensboro Rep. Ben B. Ross Chairman House Education Committee Lincolnton Sue Spivey Chattooga County Board of Education Summerville Alice Washington School Counselor Georgia State PTA Atlanta John W. Weitnauer President, Richway Stores Decatur Everett Williams Chairman of the Board Sea Island Bank Statesboro 4 Carvin Brown Consultant University of Georgia Athens Members of Executive Committee William O. Riley Sherman Day Charles Harris Jewel John James Johnson Fern B. Patterson John H. Weitnauer Commission Staff Werner Rogers Staff Assistant Georgia Department of Education Atlanta Ellis Bateman Budget Officer Georgia Department of Education Atlanta Background and Development of the Commission Following completion of its budget preparations for the 1981 fiscal year, the State Board of Education, accepting recommendations of Charles McDaniel, State Superintendent of Schools, committed itself to a comprehensive review and study of how Georgia teachers are paid. The board voted to accomplish this task by creating a Georgia Teacher Salary Study Commission composed of a cross section of citizens from throughout the state. During the fall of 1979, each State Board of Education member was asked to nominate individuals to serve on a salary study commission. Professional, business and industry groups and the legislative and executive branches of state government were also asked to nominate members. The final commission of 26 members represented all geographic regions of Georgia. The members came from varied backgrounds, the majority being lay citizens and the remainder coming from the education profession. The selection was conducted during September and October of 1979 and completed in November. William Riley of Atlanta was selected to chair the commission. At the chairman's request, a seven-person executive committee was formed to coordinate the work of the commission. It was composed of Riley and commission members Sherman Day, Charles Harris, Jewel John, James Johnson, Fern Patterson and John Weitnauer. Summary of Recommendations The teacher salary schedule recommended by the commission contains the following features. 1. The beginning salary is increased above $12,000. 2. Experience increments are a true 2.5 percent of the previous year's salary. 3. Experience steps are included through the 19th year of service. 4. The difference between levels of certification remains at 13 percent of the base teacher's salary. 5. Merit incentive for the beginning T-4 teacher is tied to the requirement of performance-based certifica- tion. 5 Summary of Commission Work The first meeting of the commission was held in conjunction with the December meeting of the State Board of Education. State Board Chairman Roy Hendricks charged the commission with the task of reviewing the current salary index schedule for Georgia teachers and making recommendations to improve the present system of paying teachers. Carvin Brown of the University of Georgia, who worked as a consultant to the commission during the study, presented background material and a thorough discussion of index salary schedules. State Superintendent of Schools Charles McDaniel outlined the need for the study and challenged the commission with the following list of issues for discussion. 1. Should the current salary schedule index be retained and future increases tied to that index? 2. Should across-fhe-board increases be used for the next several years in order to raise the entry level compensation with the result being higher percentage increases for the lower end of the current schedule? 3. Should the current percentage increments between years of experience be retained? Increased? Decreased? 4. Should the number of years for automatic increment increases be extended beyond the current 14? 5. Should years of experience be grouped to reduce the number of incremental steps currently in effect? 6. Should the current percentage differences between levels of certification be retained? Increased? Decreased? 7. Should a separate salary index schedule be developed for each level of certification? 8. Should administrators and supervisors be on a separate salary index from teachers? During December through May, the commission met monthly on the first Tuesday. The executive committee met on the third Tuesday to review the previous commission meeting, make preparations for the upcoming meeting and develop recommendations for action by the commission. Individual members of the commission were given opportunity to present to the entire commission any recommendations they felt would improve the present system. A number did so, addressing these issues specified by the commission. 1. What form should any future salary schedule take? 2. If the index schedule is desired, what would the schedule you recommend look like? Contrast your recommendation with the current schedule. 3. What are your recommendations as to the experience factor? (Currently the index stops with the fourteenth year.) 4. What is your reaction to across-the-board increases as recommended by the State Board of Education and the Governor for next year (1981) vs. percentage increases (not the amount but the concept)? 5. What are your views on administrators and supervisors remaining on the teacher salary schedule? 6. What other issue or issues are specifically important to you or the organization you represent? Other members of the commission expressed their recommendations in writing to the chairman, and they were shared with the full commission. Commission members were urged to seek input from the organizations they represented and the communities in which they lived in order to ascertain the thoughts of as many Georgia citizens as possible concerning salaries for teachers in the state. These concerns were shared with the commission. In addition, the executive committee asked the Georgia Department of Education to use its public information network to achieve feedback from citizens. Numerous comments were received by the commission following television, radio and print media requests. Commission members presented several approaches to improving the index schedule. National trends in teacher pay were explored and a survey made of the southeastern states to determine Georgia's position compared to that of other states (see Appendix A). In terms of the structure of salary schedules, the commission worked from the very general to the very specific. Members presented specific forms of schedules for discussion and debate in the general meetings. 6 From the presentations, from comments by citizens and discussions during meetings, the following conclusions were reached by the commission. 1. The salary for teachers, particularly the beginning teacher, must be improved. 2. Reimbursement to local systems for teachers should remain on some form of index schedule. 3. Additional years of experience beyond the current 14 should be recognized by any index schedule. 4. Experience step salary increases should be based upon a true percentage ofthe previous year's salary. 5. Some form of merit incentive should be added to the salary schedule. Using computer facilities of the Georgia Department of Education, the executive committee was able to develop models of various schedules for consideration of the full commission. Following numerous computer runs and lengthy discussions, the commission took a series of straw votes to set priorities for the development of a schedule. The following priorities were identified and presented to the executive committee as direction for the development of a salary schedule. 1. Basic teachers' salaries, as provided to local school systems from the state, shou~d be continued on an index salary schedule. 2. The index salary schedule should begin with a base salary that is significantly higher than is currently in force. 3. The increments for years of experience should be a true percentage difference from the previous year's salary. 4. The increments for experience should be extended beyond the fourteenth year. 5. A merit incentive should be included in the beginning T-4 teacher's salary calculation. Taking these priorities into consideration, the executive committee developed a salary schedule and returned to the commission with a recommendation for action. The commission met on May 6, 1980, to finalize its recommendation. The recommendation of the executive committee was fully discussed and an opportunity was given for members to comment on any aspect of the study. The members then voted the unanimous decision to accept the executive committee's recommendation. (It should be noted that one letter of dissent was received from a member who could not attend. This letter was read to the commission by the chairman prior to the vote.) During the study many questions were raised about fringe benefits for teachers as well as other areas concerning the profession. The commission did not attempt to address all these concerns during its deliberations, choosing to remain within the scope of the charge. However, the commission recommends that the state board study these identified areas (Appendix H) and address them further as soon as practicable. 7 Recommendations The commission recommends that the State Board of Education accept the following specific criteria and implement a new salary schedule based upon them for inclusion in the 1982 fiscal year budget. 1. An index schedule should be maintained. 2. The percentage between levels of certification, i.e., T-4 - T-5, T-5 - T-6, T-6 - T-7, should be maintained as 13 percent of the base salary. 3. Experience steps should be 2.5 percent of the previous year's salary rather than a percentage of the base salary. 4. The experience steps should be extended beyond the fourteenth year through the nineteenth year of experience and, as funds become available, additional years of experience should be added to the index beyond the nineteenth year. 5. For the beginning teacher with the T-4 certificate, the zero, first and second years of experience should be collapsed into one salary. Any increases during that three-step period should be based on additional monies granted by the legislature as base salary or by a merit increase. The possibility of a merit increase should be tied to the requirements for performance-based certification, with such an increase to be given upon an individual's completion of all requirements for performance-based certification. This recommended merit incentive would work as follows. A beginning T-4 certificated teacher currently is al!owed three years to meet all the requirements for performance-based certification. Included in this requirement are completing an approved course of study, passing with an acceptable score the subject area criterion-referenced test and being assessed on the job at an acceptable level of performance. A beginning teacher with aT-4 certificate who meets all requirements for a continuing renewable professional certificate would automatically be moved the following year to the third step on the salary schedule. The commission feels that this would add a merit incentive for new teachers to complete all requirements for the performance-based certificate as early as possible. The commission suggests that providing the incentive for moving to the third step on the salary index schedule as early as the end ofthe first year would significantly increase the career earning power of a teacher. The Georgia Teacher Salary Study Commission's work would not be complete without repeated urging of the acceptance of the recommendations included in this report and the inclusion of the requests to fund these recommendations in the 1982 fiscal year budget. A prototype of the recommended schedule is found in Appendix E. 8 Appendix A Rank Order of Southeastern States Beginning Teacher Salary - 1979-80 Mississippi Georgia South Carolina Louisiana Kentucky Tennessee North Carolina Alabama Florida $8,650 9,328 - 9,561 * 9,360 9,457 9,780 9,835 10,385 State grants to local systems Local boards bargain with teachers 'Beginning teachers were paid as a teacher with one year of experience by action of the appropriations act. 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix B 11 TEACHER SALARIES FOR SOUTHEASTERN STATES 1979-80 State 4 YEAR Professional Certificate Yrs. Minimum Maximum Req. State State for Salary Salary Max. 5 YEAR Professional Certificate Yrs. Minimum Maximum Req. State State for Salary Salary Max. 6 YEAR Professional Certificate Yrs. Minimum Maximum Req. State State for Salary Salary Max. 7 YEAR Professional Certificate Yrs. Minimum Maximum Req. State State for Salary Salary Max. Mississippi 8,650 11,590 12 9,450 13,160 14 10,250 14,525 15 x x x Georgia 1 9,328-9,561 2 12,593 14 10,821 14,459 14 12,080 16,325 14 13,340 18,191 14 South Carolina 9,360 13,684 17 10,717 15,491 17 11,653 16,427 17 12,589 18,959 17 Louisiana 9,457 12,008 10 9,686 13,087 11 10,030 14,287 12 10,487 14,527 12 Kentucky Tennessee3 9,780 13,290 10 11,630 15,140 10 13,480 16,990 10 13,480 16,990 10 9,835 11,820 15 10,645 12,835 15 U ,670 13,860 15 12,470 14,650 15 North Carolina 10,385 14,543 13 11,330 15,834 14 11,697 16,202 14 12,810 17,315 14 Alabama Alabama has no state salary schedule. Funds are allotted to local systems as follows. 12,353 14,188 15,153 15,153 Florida Florida has no state salary schedule. Funds are allotted on a weighted per pupil basis. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -- ---~--- (1) Amount shown is annualized for 1979-80 and consists of September 1979 salary schedule and the additional 3% increase effective December 1979. (2) Salary schedule begins with $9,328 for T-4, 0 yrs. of experience. $9,561 indicates what a beginning teacher received for 1979-80 at the direction of the Legislature. (3) Tennessee requires that local systems supplement the state beginning salary by $850. This schedule includes the required $850 local supplement. X-State has no entry for this column. Appendix C 13 "'VOIO-lil RUN [;Al[ ,,6/29179 O[PAAlflNI Of [DUrA HON G[OAGIA I[ACH(H ANNUAL SAlA~Y SCHEDULE SCHOOL nAA 197980 (ff(CI1Y( SrHI.'OL /lONIHS 1 1 HROUGH 3 6-1/2% INCREASE HAR~ --------------------------------------T-Y-P-[ --o-r--(f-A--IH--I-C-A-I-E----------------------------------------------------------- Of fJ -7, IS-b, 1-5, 1-", l~PUHN(L Y-7 11-6 v-s p-s v-.. B-'I *1-3 *1-2 v-;> V-I C 1.2,116 11,526 10 ,3 37 9.1" 3 9,1"8 9.03" 8.919 8.691 13,0 S;> 11,8"1 10,f> 1 2 9,99'1 9,317 9.n3" 9,1"8 8.919 '- 13,If "8 12.11,7 1U .8 f6 I {l,2"6 9 .605 9,03" 13,813 12. 4B 1 II ,161 10, "9 7 9,83" 9,03" .. I ...1 19 12, S.O 7 11 ,,, 35 10,1"9 10.063 9.03 .. 9.317 9.605 9.8311 9,1"8 9,377 9.6Qs ~ 1 ... 5"S 13,127 11,709 II,ODO 10 .29. 9,03'1 10.0b3 9.8311 I" .911 13, "" I! 11 ,91l'l 11.25 ;> 10.520 9,03'1 1 15.211 1 ~, 768 12 ,.58 11,50'1 IG,1"9 9,03" 10.292 10.520 10.0b3 1 0,292 1 ~.6 43 1 ... [;88 12,533 11.155 10.918 9,03q ... ., 16.309 1",'108 12,801 12, (107 11 ,206 9,a311 ~ 10 it, .315 1".72 e 13 .OS2 12,258 11." 35 9.a3" 10.7Q9 10.918 1I.20b 10.520 10.1"9 10.978 II Ib.1"1 1 ~. 0'4 8 13,356 12,SIa 11,6b'l 9,03'1 11." 35 11.20b 12 J 1.1 V7 Is,3b9 13,631 1 16 I 11,89. 9.03'1 11.66Q II.Q35 J3 11 ... 13 1 S. b8 9 13,905 13.013 12,121 9.a3Q 11.892 11.66'1 J" 11.839 J b. fl09 I" .1 79 13,2b5 12.3~O 9.03" 9,1"8 8.919 12.121 II.S92 Annual supplement for visiting teacher and curriculum director is based on $700 for the provisional certificate and $1230 for the professional certificate. Annual supplement for principal is based on $60 per teacher for the provisional certificate and $100 per teaciler for the professional certificate with a maximun of 30 teachers. Superintendent's base salary is the same as teacher except that the superintendent is paid for twelve months'work. Superintendentls supplement is based on average daily attendance and certificate as follows: A.O.A. Provisional Certificate (AS-I,) ProfessIonal CertIficate (A-5, AS-5,A-6,AS-6,D-z) 3,000 or less 3,001 to 6,000 6,001 to '2,000 Above 12,000 *These certificate3 no longer issued or renewed. have the maximum 14 years of service. $ 600 900 1,700 $1,500 2,000 2,500 1,500 3,000 All active teachers currently holding these certificates **In accordance with the FY 80 Appropriations Act 2 beginning teacher will be paid the same salary as those ",",Ii th o:--:e yr:,lr IS ('xpe .. jcnc~. Authorized by the State Board of Education March 8, 1979 Reissued June 29, 1979 REPLACES ALL PREVIOUS SCHEDULES. PH10l(l-R1 RUN UAT[ U&/;{'j179 OfPARHlfNT OF fnUCA TlON GfORGIA TfACHfil ANNUAL SAlAR~ SCHU)Ulf SCHOOl Y[ AR 1979-RO [fHC T1Wl SCHOOL MONTHS 4 THROUGH 10 9 - 1 /2 INCREASE YEARS --------------------------------------T-Y-PE---O-F--C-f-R-I-I-F-ICAH----------------------------------------------------------- OF 1)-7. TS-I> 1-5. 1-4. f XPfRHNCl V-7 V-& V-~ p.-~ V-4 b-4 *T-3 *1-' V-2 V-I 0 13.074 11.852 1U.1> Z9 10.017 ** '1.4Gb 9.18P 13._ ~I 12.161 10.911 10.17& 9.&41 9,2se 9.171 9.40& 8.931> 9.171 2 13.821 12,51i.., 11.193 10.5:r~ 9.Pl& 9.188 9.&41 9.406 14.103 12.839 II .4 7~ 10.793 100111 9.2811 9.&71> 9.&41 4 14.~ 19 13. I b8 11 7 ~8 11. C~ 2 10.347 9.2811 r, 14.9 ~b 13.498 1<' .040 1 1.311 10.~82 9.28 e . I ~ .332 13.827 1203;>2 11.~&9 10 .817 9.2,8 P 10.111 10,347 10.~82 9.R7& 10.111 10.347 I ~ .708 14, I ~ & 12 ,b 01+ 11. H2 R 1) ~ O!".2 9.288 10.817 10. ~82 8 1&.08_ 14. 48 ~ L,'.88& 12.087 11.287 9.28R ..... 9 1 & ._ &1 14.1114 U.l &8 12" 3Cf 'J II ~2 2 9.283 U1 10 1 &.837 1~.144 U.4 ~I 17.&04 II 7~8 '1,788 II.o~2 II.1R7 11.522 10.817 II.O~2 1 1.287 II 17.2 Il lS.413 13,733 12.',81> 3 11 ,993 'I. 28,~ 12 17.~89 1 ~ .RO 2 14.015 13012 I 12.228 9,78f. 11.7~8 11.993 1 1 512 I 1 758 13 11.9/5 1&0131 14.2,97 130380 1~.4f:3 9.288 12.228 1 1 '19 3 14 18.342 Ib.4&1 14,579 13,63'1 1 Z.1>911 9,7811 9.4G& 9.171 12.41>3 12.228 - --- --- -- ---------- -- ---- -- ---- Annual supplement for visiting teacher and curriculum director is based on $700 for the provisional certificate and $1230 for thee professional certificate. Annual supple~ent for principal is based on $60 per teacher for tIle provisjonal certificate and $100 per teacher for the professional certificate with a maXi~IJ~ of 30 teachers. Author1zed by the State Board of Education March 8, 1979 Rev i sed June 29, 1979 REPLACES ALL PREVIOJS SCHEDJLES. SuperintcnJel'1t's base salary is the sar:le as teacher except that the superint~ndent is paid for t ..,.'elve months ...,'Qrk. Superintendent's supplement is based on nverage (,. tly attendance and certificate as follows: Provisional Certlficat~ ProfessioIlal Certificate A.O.A. _ _ _ JAS-4_l _ ~\S-5-,_i\::ii.,_.AS-(,, ~~::71 3,000 or less 3,001 to 6,000 6,001 to 12,000 Above 12,000 600 900 1,200 1,500 $1,')00 2,000 2,500 'l,()()O *These c crt i fica tes no lo:1ger issued or rC'ne....'ed. All active teachers c llrrent 1y holding these certificates have the r.l<1XiP.1t\ffi If. years of service. **In accor2nncp with the FY 80 ApIJrOpriiltions Act a heginJling tcacllcr will be raje] (he sa~e salary as tl10SC witl] (lne year's cXI1Prience. "12010-111 I 5 SlO,323 S10,194 Sl1 ,613 S12,414 S13,214 sn.814 Sl6,414 20 2-:J 0 6 2,048 ?8 1,375 37 2 3,542 6 SIl.355 S 11.613 SlO,323 S10.194 S11,872 $12.637 S13,523 SI5,175 Sl6,827 21 29 0 2 1,954 13 1.673 72 7 3,116 S11.613 Sl1,872 SI 0,323 S10,194 S12. 13 0 $12, 9i 1 S13,83l Sl:>.536 S17 ,240 12 H 0 4 1,627 ?2 1,162 103 9 3.510 ..... 00 8 Sl1,872 S12,130 $10,323 S10,194 $12,388 S13,2,5 S14.Hl SIS. 898 S17 ,652 10 19 0 2 1,3'10 13 1,871 135 16 3.452 9 $12,130 H2. 388 $10,323 S10,194 S12,646 $I 3,549 S14,452 S16.259 Sl8,065 3 15 0 3 1,116 11 1,830 156 11 3.151 10 S12,388 SH.646 S10,323 S10,194 S12,904 $13,833 SI'h762 Sl6.620 $18,418 4 If! 0 2 943 6 1,651 160 15 11 $12,64& $12,904 S10,323 S10, n4 $I}, 1~2 $14.117 SIS, on $1,,981 Sl8.891 1 14 0 4 %1 8 1. 31 ~ 194 19 2,807 2.511 12 Sl2.904 SU,b2 1I0,323 S10,194 S13.420 SI 4, 4J 1 $15.381 S17,343 Sl9.304 1 9 0 0 824 6 1.194 171 25 2,230 15 $13,162 S 13,420 S10,323 S10,194 S13,618 S14,635 S15,691 $11.104 Sl9.117 1 10 0 0 696 3 1,015 167 15 1,901 14 S13,420 S13,678 $10.323 S10.194 S13 ,936 $14.9,8 S16.001 S18.065 S20.130 4 11 8 1 8,917 n 9,728 2.663 :110 ?1.669 ALL 156 30 'J 'I 3'31 33,083 310 TOTAL ~UMiER OF TEA: HERS 640,>34 TOTAL :OSTS 11-........ _ $1,0 OB ,598,200: SAL AU E S-S 881,487,630: RETIREMENr-$ NOTE - ALL NON-CERTIFICATED ASSUMED TO 'IE r-4 25 TEACHERS r-2 CERro 14 nAR S OR ~JRE ASSUMED AT $1 0 06 5 26.043 3.889 444 ,4,659 94,054.13,: fEALTi INS" RAN: E-S 33,0:;5,78" BUDGET ,ERVICES & FEDERAL RELATIONS 5/,U/80 Appendix E 19 BUDSALY-0019 SALARY STUDY COMHISS IJN FY 1982 20 YEARS - Sl1,541 BASE ALL TEACHERS ON 3/13/80 PAG~ 2 YRS EXP V-I 0 Sl O. 970 0 V-2 Sl1. 258 0 T-3 Sl1.S ... 7 0 B-4 Sl1 ....03 0 J-~ V-~ S12.U2 0 8-S S12.2~B 0 T-S V-5 S13.0B 0 TS-' V-& S1',5"'9 0 0-1 V-l $16.050 0 TJUL EA:HERS 0 $ll.2~'" 18 Sl1,539 1& Sl1,5'll 0 Sl1 ....03 239 S12.132 ~. 513 S12. 60 S ,2 $13.314 335 Sn,913 1 $16.451 0 S.184 2 Sll.525 S11.827 Sl1.5'll Sl1 ....03 S12.132 S12. n 0 S13 .103 SIS, 286 $16.862 25 2& 0 75 2.89& 52 ...85 3 1 3.563 3 Sll.813 S12.123 Sl1.5,.., S 11 ....03 S 12 ....35 Sl 3. 2~ 3 $1.... 051 SIS. 668 S11.28 ... Z'" 38 0 3& 2.790 ~2 100 3 0 4 S12.108 $12 ....26 S11.5'll Sl1 ....03 $12. n6 S13.51 ... $14. "02 SH., 060 S11.116 12 ... 7 0 23 2.H2 31 1.095 2" 8 3,633 3,658 $12. HI 20 $1Z.737 26 Sl1.5H 0 Sl1. "03 6 S 13.055 2.0"8 Sl3.913 28 SH.l&2 1.375 S1.. 462 37 $18.159 2 3.542 6 $12.721 S13.055 Sl1.5H Sl1 ....03 S13.372 Sl .... 2; 1 $15.131 Sl&.814 $18.613 21 2'1 0 2 1.95" 13 1.613 12 1 3.776 Sl3.033 12 S13.381 31 Sl1.5H 0 Sl1 ....03 ... S13.721 1.627 $1 .... 618 22 SlS.503 1.162 S11,296 103 $1'l,018 9 3.510 N 0 8 S1:303&5 S13.11& $11.5'll Sl1 ....03 SH.070 S1 .... n3 SIS. 831 S11.128 U9.55S 10 19 0 2 10 380 13 1.811 135 16 3.4S2 'J Sl 3. 699 $1'.05 'l Sl1. S,.., Sl1 ....03 S 1 .... 422 $15.3'18 S16.23\ SlB,l'l S20.044 3 15 0 3 1.11& 11 1.83J 156 11 3.151 10 Sl"',O"'l SH.41 0 SI1.5,.., S11. "03 $1 .... 183 S15.1 ... 2 S16.101 SI8,625 S20.S4S ... 18 0 2 9 ... 3 & 1. 65~ 160 IS 2,801 11 $1 .... 392 S 1.... 770 Sl1.5,.., S11 ....03 SlS,153 Sl6. 13 6 S11.1B S13,O'll S21.059 1 14 0 ... %7 8 1,3H 1'1" 19 2.511 lZ Sl"',752 Sl50 13 9 SI1.5,.., Sl1. "03 SlS. 53 2 Sl6, 539 S17. S., S13,568 S21.585 1 3 0 0 82 ... & 1.19\ 111 25 2,230 13 Sl5.121 SIS. 51 7 Sl1. SH Sl1 ....03 SlS.920 Sl6, ':152 S17.98; S20,057 S22.125 1 10 0 0 636 3 1.01 i 161 15 1.901 lit S15 ....33 S15.'105 Sl1.5'll S11 ....03 Sl&.318 Sl7,376 S18. H; S20,558 S22.678 2 7 0 0 72 ... ... 928 163 28 1,856 15 Sl5.886 S16,303 SI1,5'17 S11 ....03 S16.726 Sl 7. 81 0 $18.891 S21,072 S23.2 ...5 1 ... 0 0 &81 6 801 111 23 1.693 16 Sl6.283 Sl&.111 sl1.5H Sl1. "03 S17.H ... Sl8.2j5 Sl9.3&3 S21,599 S23.826 0 0 0 0 586 1 70; 151 10 10 460 17 $16.690 $11.129 $11.541 $11.403 S11.573 $18.711 $19.853 $22. l.59 S24.422 1 0 0 0 5&8 2 661 1&0 21 1.421 18 Sl 7.107 S11.557 S11.541 S11.403 S18.012 $19.119 $20,341 $22,692 $25.033 0 0 0 0 522 1 61> 119 15 1, 273 19 $I 7. 535 S11.936 $11.541 S11.403 $18,462 $19.658 $20, 85~ $23,259 $25.659 0 0 8 1 5.836 13 &,002 1,893 213 13,96& ALL 15& 309 8 397 33. OB 3 310 TOTAL MUH8ER OF TEA: HE~S 64.559 TOTAL ::OSTS $10194 .802.400: SAL ARI E S-$1.0 H.2 25,100: RE TIRE ME NT-~ NOTE - ALL NON-CERTIFICATED ASSLJMED TO BE T-4 25 TEACHERS T-2 CERT. 14 YEARS OR 'ORE ASSUMED AT $100&5 26.04 l 3,889 444 S4,634 111.418.820: H::ALTrt INSLJ RAN: E-S 39.1)3.441 BUDGET SERVI CES & FEDERAL RELATIONS 5123/80 I..\.). CLJRRENr P~OJECT::D P~OPJSE) PROJ::CTED FY 1982 COST 20 YEARS - COST $ 1,008,598.200 $ Id9~B02.400 COST TO IMPLEMENT $ 186.204,130 FY82 SUTE BUDGET S 142.052.720 NOTE: THE PROPOSED SCHEDU_E ODES FOUR HAJOR THIN:;S: 1. PROVIDES THAT T-4 0-1-2 Yt:ARS SHALL:lE PAID $12.132 JNTIL PRO"ESSIOHL CE~TIFICAfION IS :JHPL::TED. 2. l>ROVIDES A 2.5% I'ICREASE ON THE PRIen YEAR'S SALARY. 3. PROVIDES A 13& INCREASE D~ THE BASE =OR CERrIFICATION LEVELS FOR r-, fO T-5 TO T5-6 fD 0-7. 4. l>ROVIDES FOR _ 20 Y::AR SCHEDULE, AN INCREASE OF 5 STEPS OVER fHE :U{R::NT SCHEDUL::. Appendix F Base Salary Beginning Salary Collapsed Years Experience Steps N umber of Experience Steps Percentage Between Levels of Certification Merit Incentive Comparison of Schedules for Teacher Pay State Level 1980-81/1981-82 Current 1980-81 $10,323 $10,581 0-1 collapsed Based upon a percentage of the base salary of $10,323- T-4 = 2.5 percent T-5 = 3.0 percent T-6 = 3.5 percent D-7 = 4.0 percent Through the 14th year 13 percent of base salary None Proposed 1 981 -82 $11,547 $12,132 0-1 -2 collapsed Each step increase would be a true 2.5 percent of the previous year's salary for all levels of certification. Through the 19th year Remains 13 percent of base salary For T-4 certificate, a merit incentive tied to the requirements for performancebased certification. 22 Appendix G 23 BUOSALY -00 20 E.CHER SALARY SCHEDULE CURRE NT INDEX = BASE $10,323 = PO~OSEO I:IASE $11,5~7 BJ DGET SE~ VICES & FEDERAL RELATIONS 5123f8Q = PROPDSED SCHEDULE 13% C'RTIFI:ATION LEIELS, 2.5% PRIOR EAR'S SALARY, & 2Q YEAR SCH~JJLU AOV \ NCES. YRS T-~ T-5 TS-; 0-7 EXP V-I V-2 T-3 B-" V-~ B-5 V-5 V-& V-7 0 2.5% PERCENT $ 9,807 $ 10,970 CHANGE FROM 11 .B59 $ U,O 65 $ 10,323 $ 11,258 S 11,5" 7 CURRENT SCH~DULE: 11 .853 11.857 S 10,19" S ll,~03 11 .860 $ 10,581 S 12,132 1 ~ .&58 S 1Q ,J9" S 12,291:1 11.1:161 Sll,6;5 S 13,0~3 11 .1:15; S15,007 S 1\ ,5"9 II .855 S 1"03"9 S 16,050 11.85 .. 1 2.5% PERCENT S 10,0&5 S l1,2H CHANGE FROM 11.7H $ 10,323 S 10,323 S 11,539 $ 11,:;"7 CURR EN T SCHE DULE: 11.H10 11 .857 S 10,19.. S11,~03 11.8&0 $ 10,581 S 12,132 1" .658 S 11,271:1 $ 12,'>05 11.7&5 $ 11,H 5 S 13,.H~ ll.&n $ 15 ,3&8 S 1\ ,913 1L .557 S 1 ",762 S 16,"51 11."" 2 2 2.5% $ 10,323 $ 11 ,525 S 10,581 , 11,827 S 10,323 $ 11 ,5.. 7 S 10,19.. S 11,~03 $ 10,839 , 12,132 ,S 11,5&2 12 ,320 $ 12,2H S 13, 7B $ 13,730 S 1> ,28& $ 15,175 S 16,8&2 PERCENT CHANGE FROM CURRENT SCH::OULE: 3 2.5% , 11.6.... 10,581 $ 11 ,813 11 .776 $ 10,839 $ 12,123 11.857 S 10,323 , 11,5.. 7 11 .860 , 10,19" , 11 ,~03 11.'n9 , 11,097 S 12,~35 11.7~5 S 11 ,3"6 S 13,'''3 11 .5J 2 S 12,5H , 1",0';1 11 .333 , 1.,091 , 1;,668 11.117 S 15,588 SI7,2B .. PERCENT CHANGE FROM CURRENT SCHEDULE: 11.6 .... 11.846 11.857 11 .1:160 12.057 11.133 11.5'd 1l.ln 10.830 I\) ~ .. 2.5% PERCENT , 10,839 $ 12,108 CHANGE FROM , 11,097 S 10,323 S 12," 26 S 11,547 CURR EN T SCHE DULE: S 10,19,. S 11 ,~03 $ 11,355 S 12,7,.6 , 12,130 , 13 ,5H $ 12,3H S 1",~) 2 $ U ,,.52 , 1,,060 $ 16,001 S 17,716 11 .708 11 .376 11.!l5 7 11 .860 12.250 11. J 0" 11.6B 1L .126 10.718 5 2.5% PERCENT ,S 11 ,097 12,"11 CHANGE FROM 11.8"1 , 11,355 , 10,323 , 12,737 , 11 ,5.. 7 CURRENT SCH::DULE: 12.171 11 .857 6 2.5% PERCE;I'iT 7 2.5% PERCENT $ 11 ,355 $ 12,721 CHANGE FROM 12.030 , 11 ,613 S 13,039 CHANGE FROM 12.279 $ 11 ,013 , 100323 $ 13,055 $ 11,547 CURRENT SCHEDULE: 12 ... 17 11 .851 , 11 ,871 , 100323 S 13,381 , 11,541 CUIlRENT SCH::DULE: 12.720 11.857 , 10,194 S 11 ,403 11 . 03 $ 11,B71 , 13,392 12.813 S 12,130 S 13,727 13.166 , 12,,+13 $ 13 ,J13 12.08" , 12,,97 , 14,2'>1 12.313 , 12,J81 , 14,,11:1 12.; 11 $ 13,213 $ 14,1,2 11.723 S 13,523 S 15,131 1l.8H $ 13,1:1'>'> $ 15,5B 12.11 ; , 1\ ,814 $ 1,.,.'>2 II .125 , 1>.175 S 1; ,B7,. 11 .19'> S 1';,336 ,11,29& II .329 S 16, .. 1 .. $ 18,159 10.'; 31 s 16.826 S 1B.'>13 10.620 S17,239 S 19,078 10.668 8 2.5% PERCENT S 11 ,871 $ 13,365 CHANGE FROM 12.585 , 12,130 S 10,323 Sll,716 S 11,547 CUll R EN T SCH E OULE : 13.075 11 .857 S 10,194 $11,403 11 .860 S 12.388 S 1 .. ,070 13.578 S 13,265 S H .~83 12.~51 $ 1" ,H3 S 15,831 1?4J 2 Sl;,897 $ 17,128 II .518 '17,652 $ 19,555 10.781 BUDSALr-0020 TnCHER SALARY SCHEDULE CURRENT INDEX = BASE SI O. 323 = PUPOSEO BASE Sl1.547 = PROPOSED SCHEDULE BJOGET SERVICES & FEDERAL RELATIONS j/23/80 131 CERTIFICATION LEVELS. 2.51 PRIOR YEAR'S SALARY. & 20 YEAR SCHE[)JLED ADV\NCES. YRS T-' T-5 TS-; 0-7 EXP V-I V-2 T-3 B-4 \#-, B-5 V-5 \#-; V-7 9 2.51 PERCENT S 12.130 S 13 .699 CHANGE FROII 12.935 S 12.388 S 10.323 S 14.059 $ 11,547 CURRENT SCHEDULE: 13.489 11.857 S 10.194 $ 11,403 11.860 S 12,,,46 S 14.'22 14.044 S 13,5'1'3 $ 15 ,358 13 .352 S 14.452 S 16,2H 12.H' S 1 259 $ B.171 II .760 S 18.065 S 20.044 10.955 ~o 2.51 PERCENT S 12.388 S 14.041 CHANGE FROII 13.344 $ 12.646 S 10.323 $ 14,410 S 11.547 CURRENT SCHEDULE: 13.949 11.857 $ 10,194 $ 11.403 11.860 S 12.904 S 14.783 14.561 $ 13.~33 S 15.742 13.300 $ 14.1>2 $ 16.HI 13.U5 $ 1> ,620 $ B ,625 H.064 $ 18.478 S 20.545 11.186 11 2.51 PERCENT S 12.646 S 14 .392 CHANGE FROII 13.801 S 12.904 S 10.323 S 14.770 S 11.541 CURRENT SCHEDULE: 14.461 11.857 S 10.194 S 11.403 11.860 S Lh162 S 15.153 15.127 S 1',111 S 16.13, 14.302 S 15.072 $ 17.11J 1 3 .5~ 1 S 1 981 S H .091 1~.426 S 18.891 S 21,059 11.476 12 :>.51 Pt.RCENT S 12.904 S 14,752 CHANGE FROII 14.321 S 13.162 $ 10.323 $ 150139 S 11.547 CURRENT SCHEDULE: 15.021 11.857 S 10.194 S 11.403 11 .860 S 13.420 $ 15.532 15.738 $ 14.Hl S 1&.539 14.346 S 15,331 S 11.5H 14.0H S 11 .343 S H .568 H .829 S 19.304 S 21,585 11.816 13 S 13 .162 S 13.420 S 10.323 S 10.194 S 13,678 $ 1'.;84 $ 15.6H S 11,104 S 19.711 N (11 2.51 S 15,121 S 15.517 S 11.541 PERCENT CHANGE FROII CURRENT SCHEDULE: S 11.403 S 15.920 S 16.952 S 17.9H $ 2).057 S 22.125 14.8!!4 15.626 11.857 11.860 16.391 15.' 45 14.62, 15.291 12.213 14 2.51 PERCENT S 13.420 S 1!J.499 CHANGE FROII 15.492 S 1. 3"fo 78 S 10.32' S 15.905 S 11.54 CURRENT SCHEDULE: 160282 11.857 S 10.194 .. 11.,403 11.860 S 13.3.~6 .' 'J.t.;\,Ji;a 17.092 S U.J68 S H.B. 16.088 S 16.0H $ 18.43, 15.2U S H ,065 S 21.558 15.800 S 20.130 S 22.678 12.658 15 2.51 PERCENT S 13.420 S 15.886 CHANGE FAOII 18.376 S 13.678 S 10.323 S 16.303 S 11.547 CURRENT SCHEDULE: 19 .191 11.851 S 10.194 S 11.403 11.860 S 13.936 S 16.126 20.020 S 14 .J68 S 17,810 18.981 $ 16.001 S 18.8H 18.099 S B .065 S 21.072 1 645 $ 20.130 S 23.245 15.474 16 S 13.420 S 13,678 S 10.323 2.51 S 16.283 S 16,111 S 11.541 PERCENT CHANGE FROII CURRENT SCHEDULE: 21.334 22.174 11.851 S 10.194 $ 11.403 11.860 S 13.936 S 17.144 23.020 S 14 .968 S 18.255 21.9.0 S 16.0U S 19.3,9 21.0B S B .065 S 21.599 U.563 S 20.130 S 23.826 18.3&1 17 2~!II~ PERCENT S 13.420 S 16,690 CHANGE FRO" 24.361 S 13,678 S 10.323 S 17,129 S 11.547 CURRENT SCHEDULE: 25.230 11.857 S 10.194 S 11.403 11.860 S 13.936 S 17.573 26.098 S 14.968 S 13.111 25.001 S 16.001 S 19,853 24.013 S U.065 S 2l.139 2! .552 S 20,130 S 24,422 21.321 BUDSALY-0020 PROPOSED SCHEDULE YRS EllP V-I TEACHER SALARY SCHEDULE CURRENT INDEX BASE = S1 0, 323 ~JPOSED BASE = $11,547 BJDGET SERVICES & FEDERAL RELATIONS 5123'8~ T-' 131 CERTIFICATION LEVELS, 2.5X PRIOR Yi:AR'S SALARY, & 20 YEAR SCHE)JLE~ AOVlNCES. T-5 TS-; V-2 T-3 B-. V-' 8-5 V-5 V-6 18 S 13,'20 $ 13,678 $ 10,323 2.51 $ 17 ,107 S 17,557 $ 11,547 PERCENT CHANGE FRO" CURRENT SCHEDULE: 27.474 28.359 11.857 $ 10,194 $ 11,403 11.860 S 13,336 $ 18,012 29.248 S 1,,~68 S U ,179 23.133 S 16,031 $ 20,3H 27.17 3 S 13,065 $ 2!,692 2i.613 1':1 2.51 PERCENT $ 13,420 $ 17 ,535 CHANGE FRO" 30.663 S 13,6 7B $ 10,323 $ 17,996 S 11,547 CURRENT SCHEDULE: 31.569 11.857 $ 10,194 S 11,403 11.860 S 13,':136 S 18,462 32.477 S H,H.8 $ U ,,58 31.33' S 16,On $ 20,853 30.354 S 13,0&5 S 2S,259 2~.752 0-7 V-7 S 20,130 S 25,033 24.357 $ 20,130 $ 25,659 27.4&6 N 0) Appendix H 27 Recommendations for Further Study The commission recommends to the Georgia Board of Education that the following areas be topics for further study by the board. These were discussed by the commission during its deliberations on the index schedule. The commission, in trying to fulfill its mandateto develop a new index schedule, did not have the time to investigate each of these areas to the extent necessary to make proper, well-thought-out recommendations. The commission, however, strongly recommends that the state board give consideration to a more thorough study of the areas of concern and questions listed here. 1. Supervisory/Administrative Personnel- Should supervisors' /administrators' salaries be tied to the teacher index salary schedule? A secondary concern is the adequacy of state supplements provided supervisory/administrative personnel. 2. Paraprofessionals/Instructional Aides - Many supplemental instructional personnel are employed in Georgia schools. Should instructional aides' salaries be tied to the teacher index salary schedule? 3. Teaching Field Shortages/Incentives - Many teaching fields have critical shortages, i.e., industrial arts, math, etc. Should the state provide incentives for teachers and prospective teachers in shortage areas? Such incentives might include scholarships or supplements. 4. Teacher Absenteeism - Teacher absenteeism has reached critical proportions in some instances. What can be done to reward teachers for being in the classroom? Should the state provide incentives for perfect or near-perfect attendance? Is the state allocation to provide for leave benefits adequate? 5. Merit Pay - Should the state initiate some opportunity for merit pay in addition to the index salary schedule? At present there is no way to reward outstanding service. Some index schedules, for example, allow merit increases to five percent of the teachers for outstanding performance. 6. Inservice Education - Staff development/inservice education programs often take teachers away from classrooms or force them to attend using personal time. Should the state increase the number of paid contract days to allow for inservice/staff development activities during periods of time when students are not in session? 7. Fringe Benefits - Fringe benefits are as critical to workers as salary. Should the present state fringe benefit package be revised? What fringe benefits could be presented to make the teaching profession more attractive to new teachers and more desirable for experienced teachers? 8. Extending Years of Experience - Some attention should be given to adding one year of experience to the recommended schedule each year for the next 10 years to extend the schedule through the 29th year of experience. 9. Personal Leave - The whole area of personal leave should be reviewed with consideration of whether personal leave should continue to be tied to sick leave. 28 Federal law prohibits discrimination on the basis ofrace, coloror national origin (Title VI ofthe CivilRights Act of 1964): sex {Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972 and Title II ofthe VocationalEducation Amendments of 1976); or handicap(Section 504 ofthe Rehabilitation Act of 1973) in educational programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance. Employees, students and the general public are hereby notified that the Georgia Department ofEducation does not discriminate in any educational programs ar activities orin employment policies. The following individuals have been designated as the employees responsible for coordinating the department's effort to implement this nondiscriminatory policy. Title 11- Loydia Webber, Vocational Equity Coordinator Title VI - Peyton Williams Jr. Associate Superintendent of State Schools and Special Services Title IX - Evelyn Rowe and Myra Tolbert, Coordinators Section 504 - Jane Lee, Coordinatar of Special Education Inquiries concerning the application of Title II, Title VI, Title IX or Section 504 tothe policies andpractices of the department may be addressed to the persons listed above at the Georgia Department of Education. State Office Building, Atlanta 30334; to the Regional Office for Civil Rights, Atlanta 30323; or to the Director, Office for Civil Rights, Education Department. Washington. D.C. 20201. \ Geoqla Departm_t .. Edueadoll Atlanta, Geo..... 30534 . .. I'"Charles McDaalel, State Superintendent 01 SCh....