c-: !AI Ex-Officio Member. Q Z lD E. L. WORSHAM, c>c-: State Entomologist and Secretary of the Board, Atlanta. A. C. LEWIS, -c~c: ..lD.... ~ Assistant State Entomologist, Atlanta. oZ ~ ~ W. V. REED, Z FIeld Assistant Entomologist, Atlanta. !AI :t I- >- G. R. CASEY, CD Deputy Inspector, Marietta. Q 2 W. W. CHASE, Deputy Inspector, Atlanta. ORIGIN AND DISTRIBUTION. The San Jose Scale is by far the worst pest with which thb fruit growers in Georgia have to contend. this Bulletin is intended to be a summary of the experiment conducted in the tate on this in ect by the Georgia State Board of Entomology, it has been thought best to give a short ketch of its origin, di tribution and life history, Origin. The San Jose Scale, as the common name indicates, was first tabli hed in this country in the early seventies at San Jose, California. Mr. Lick, in who e orchard the scale was first found, died before a study of the in ect wa begun and hence it wa impossible to tell from what country it was introduced. ~Ir. Lick was a great lover of plants and had imported many from hina, Japan and other Eastern countries. From this it wa upposed that the scale must have been imported from the Orient. From investigations carried on by Professor Comstock and others, it was found that the San Jose Scale occurred in th ITawaiian Islands in hiIe, in Japan and in Australia. In 1 97 it was found in Japan, and as it had been previou ly . hown that none of the other countries where it had be n found wa it. oriO'inal home, they thought it must have originated in' .Japan. By ]900 it wa concluded that the original home of the an Jose cale was either Japan or hina and we are indebted to Prof. . L. Marlatt, of the U. . Bureau of Entomology, for determining its original home. In 1901 Profe or Marlatt made a visit to both of these countrie and after very careful investigation located its original home in hina and gave us A most interesting account of San Jose Scale in its native home. Distribution. The pread of San Jose Scale from San Joe California, to other tates was very rapid. By 1887 it had reached ew Jer- sey, and was introduced from this State into Georgia in 1889. In 1897 it wa .present in 18 counties in Georgia' in 1904 in about 0 counties of the State; and now in at least 100 counties. Of late years its spread in the State ha been slow on account of the rigid laws enforced against it by the State Bo~a~r~~~~..... tomology. 3 '(o.t. UNIVERSITy - ' J 'L\ IB~ARIES OF GEORG\~ Habits and Life History. 'l'he San Jose Scale OCClli'S on all parts of the plant attacked: stem, leaves and fruit. A they increase very rapidly an infested tree will soon be entirely covered. When this happens the scales lie very close together on the limbs and the bark soon loses its natural rich, red color, and becomes light or dark gray; it also be ames rough and looks a if covered with wet ashes. In the summer, if an infested tree is exaJ:,ined, there will be found several yellow crawling scales; lig],'-,-colored young with the scale just formed; bla k ones al,Olit one-half grown and old grayish ones. Fig. 1. A Peach Tree badJ~' infested with San Jose Scale. The (ree are injured by the extraction of the plant juices and al a by a poisoning of the sap through the punctures made by the in ect. Young trees are injured much sooner than old ones, young peach trees dying in two or three year if nothing is done to check the in ect. On old trees only a limb or two may be killed, which will cause new shoots to sprout out, so that a badly infe ted tree will look very much like the one shown in Fig. 1. Food Plants. While the San Jose Scale may attack a great many deciduous 4 plants, uch a fruit, ornamental and hade trees, it has not been found on a great many different spe i s of plants in Georgia. In Georgia it has been found on the following: apple, .herry, peach, pear, plum, blackberry, raspberry, ro e and walnut. '0 far a w know it ha' never been found on any of the native hade tree except the willow. It has been found on the English walnut and pe an, but does not eern to be able to Ii\" long on the latter. One year an infested pecan tree was found at airo, the next year it wa free from scale. Since then it ha not been found on any pecan trees in the State. Life History. The waxy cale, commonly seen on the tree , is a covering under which the true in ct liv s. The life of this insect is pa sed under this covering except for a few hours in the larval 'tage, and the brief winged en tence of the male. The San Jose Scale pas es the winter in Georgia in nearly all tages, from the very young to the full grown adults. If the winter is cold a few of the young and many of the old ones perish. The young have been found crawling here as late as 'ovember and December, and a early in the spring as March. The an Joe Scale differs from most other cale insects, in that the female gives birth to living young instead of laying eggs. According to ob ervation made in. 1907- by W. V. Reed, A sistant Entomologi t, there are four generations a sea on in t he latitude of Atlanta. The newly born larva is pale yellow and almost micro copic in ize. After crawling about for a few hours the young larva ettles down and slowly works its long, slender proboscis through the bark of the plant. little before thi take place the caly overing begin to form from waxy se retions, which pring from all parts of the body. The caly covering is at fir t almost white or pale yellow, but lowly change in color with ea h molt of the in ect. After the rst molt the male and female cales are round and jet black except for the central nipple. The e round black cales are \' ry characteri ti of the an Jo cale, and easily distinguish it from nearly all the cale in ect. A th sale. matur they 10 e this characteristi black color and when full grown ar of an ashy gray color with a pale reddish or yellow nipple in the center. The above is a de cription of the outward appearance of the female scale. The male an Jo e S ale differ from the female by being 5 Q. ~ It'ig. 2. A twig infested with San Jose Scale. To tbt' rIght is a portion of twig much enlSlged, showing relative ize and hape of male and female scales. oblong-oval instead of round, and is nearly twice as long as wide. In size the male are smaller and often darker in color, and the central nipple and fir t ring will be at tbe anterior end of the elongated ale in tead of in tbe center, a in the female sc:ale. Fig. 2 repre ents the comparative ize and bape of th male and female scales a they appear on an infe ted twig. PARASITES AND OTHER NATURAL ENEMIES. The San Jo e Scale has a number of parasites, predaceous insects and fungus diseases tbat prey upon it. Though a great deal of attention and study have been given to these in the last few years, none of them are of sufficient economic importance to hold this pest in check. Prof. C. L. Marlatt found tbat in China and Japan the chief natural agency in keeping in check tbe San Jose Scale was a mall lady beetle, Ohiloco1"us similis 1"08 i. f He brought home with bim some of these beetle and in 1902 and 1903 an effort 6 wa mad t e tabli h them in e eral different tate. In Augn t, 1902, ome of them were liberated in an orchard near :Mar hallville, Ga. .An examination of this orchard made in July, 1903, indicated that the beetles were rapidly spreading, and the outlook wa promising but in 1906 and 1907 all had di appeared and not a specimen could be found in adjoining orchards. It i probable that they were killed b cold weather and praying operations. From this it would appear that this. beetle, from which at first much was hoped for, has been a di appointment. In ew Jersey Dr. J. B. Smith made extenive te t with negative re ults, and in none of the States north of the Di trict of olumbia where the Bureau of Entomology liberated pecimens did it become establi hed. Experiments in Georgia With the Red-Headed Fungus. The red-headed fungus, phaerostilbe coccophila, is parasitic on a numb r of cale in ects in Florida, and it i in trumental in keeping them under control in that State. Thi fungus is pr ent on the Gloomy cale A pidiotus ob CUTa, in many sections of Georgia, but only in a few in tance have we found it on the San Jose Scale. In the spring of 1907 experiments were conducted for the Department bv A. C. Lewis. Assistant State Entomologist,. to determine whether or not thi fungus could be made of economi importance in controlling the an Joe cale in G 01'gia. The fungus was introduced in several peach orchards in different part of the tate where the scale wa pre ent in great abundance. One method employed in introducing the fungus, wa to tie pie e of oak bark with the fungus, on peach trees. Again we tried prayinO' th fungus on the tree, and the following method was used: The oak sticks overed with the fungus were soaked from one to two bours in a small amount of water. 'l'hen the fungus was scraped off and stirred bri kly 0 as to liberate the spores. This was then mixed with water and one package of commercial gela~ine added for each gallon of water. This was done with the idea that the pores would adhere more r adily. ome tree were al 0 sprayed witbout the gelatine. The fungus wa introduced by the e different methods in badly infested orcbard at Millen Waynesboro and Richland, Georgia. The result so far secured may be summarized as follQws: By all metbod , except tbe last, we succeeded in getting th funO'u to take bold and grow. Where the ticks were tied 7 on, in one year the fungus had spread and nearly covered the trees below the stick . where the fungus was the thickest it had killed many of the cale. At Waynesboro, where the fungu was prayed on the trees by the water-gelatine method, the r ult were about the same in regard to the pread of the fungu and the effect upon the scale. One year after the fungus was introduced in a mall orchard of about 50 trees at Richland, practically no scale was found, but whether the fungus or some other agency killed it out, we are not able to state. The orchard had never been prayed, and on the ame date several other orchards around Richland were examined and many live and crawling scales were found. This would seem to indicate that the fungus, or some other agency which wa not pre ent in the other orchards, killed the scale. At Cairo, Ga. there i a pear or hard 10 y ar old in which the San Jose cale and red-headed fungus have been present, to our knowledge, for 5 years. The scale is as abundant this year as it was two or three years ago, but many of the trees have been greatly injured by its attacks. From our experiment and observations 0 far it appears that the red-headed nmgus can not be relied upon to control the an Joe cale in Georgia; and furthermore, that at present 1he fruit grower who is not willing to spray .vill tind fruit growing quite unprofitable. SPRAYING EXPERIMlENTS FOR CONTROL OF SAN JOSE SCALE. The first of a serie of experiments for the control of San J 0 cale, extending over a period of three year , was made at Fort alley in 1906 and 1907. combination of causes in some unexplained way prevented a material increase of scale in the orchard (which was un prayed with the exception of the tree used in the experiment), and for thi rea on it was not possible to make proper compari ons between the prayed and the unsprayed tree. The re ults of the work for the two season, 1906 and 1907, must be regarded as lacking definite data and need not be considered. ircular o. 8, published in October, 190 , by this Department, contain a report on the work for the sea on 1907 and 190 . and i partially quoted herein. The original plan of the experim nt wa intended to embrace all the mi cible oil then in general use. Thi plan wa adhered to throughout the series. Some of the oils were dropped from year to year as their manufacture was discontinued, and other , of more recent introduction, were tested. This Bulletin contains a report on the results obtained from seven different oils three manufacturers' preparations of lime and sulphur, and home-made lime and sulphur. At the time when these experiments were planned it had been the general observation that soluble oils yielded no strictly dependable results. They were obviously not consistent at all time. .In some instances they left nothing to be desired, and then again, under almost identical conditions and under nearly identical methods and means of application, they were entirely in ufficient. It was because of this apparent inconsistency in re ults obtained from oil preparations that the experiments were repeated. The results of a single test could not be relied upon a conclusive and final. While the manufacturers of soluble oils usually recommend their products to be diluted at a proportion of 1 to 15 or 1 to 20, each one used in the test was applied at three different dilutions j one at the proportion fixed by the manufacturers, and two application at a greater strength. The data obtained from these sprayings embody the results that can be expected from the application of each material at all proportions that can be considered from a practical, economic standpoint. Each compound wa , therefore, treated at three different strengths and each h!ld a trial as a fall treatment, as a spring treatment, and as a double treatment. The first spraying of the double application was applied the first week in November, and the econd on the 15th of February. The application of the e different materials was conducted with the greate t thorougbnes ; the actual field work and the ubsequent examinations being done in person by the junior author. Care was taken with everyone to completely drench every tree that was sprayed. Wherever there is failure properly to control the scale by these treatments it is not attributable to work poorly done, but must be ascribed to some inherent inefficiency in the material it elf. Experiments at Goggins, Georgia, in 1907 and 1908. Through the courtesy of Mr. J. Kimball Zellner, we were extended the use of his orchard at Goggins to conduct the experiment. Condition in thi orchard were very favorable to the 9 "ork. 'l'he tree were in their third year, had never been prayed at all and were badly infested with scale. The fall praying were begun at this place on ovember 13th, 1907, and the pring prayings on February 20th, 190 . Ob ervations were made twice during the summer of 190 to determine the re ult of the work. The material tested were Scalecide, Target Brand, Kil-O-Scale, oluble Pretroleum, Schnarr 'ompound o. 1, Schnarr's 'ompound o. 2, and prepared lime and ulphur manufactured by the Thomsen 'hemical ompany. Experiments at Fort Valley, Georgia, in 1908 and 1909. We are indebted to Mr. George H. lappey, of Fort Valley, for allowing u the use of a part of his orchard in which to complete the series of experiments. Thi s ction of tr es was four years old and sprayed with a soluble oil the preceding year. On November 2nd, the date the fall praying was begun, live crawling scales were present in large quantities. In this experiment, as in the other, individual tree offering good conditions for the test, were selected to be prayed. The materials here u ed were the arne a those tested at Goggan , except that Kil-O- cale, who e manufacture had been discontinued for use on peach trees wa dropped. One new oil ( an-U-Zay) was added to the list and two lime- ulphur compounds, viz.: Prepared Lime ulphur olution made by the ras elli hemical Co., and Prepared Lime ulphur manufactured by the Merrimac Chemical o. The pring spraying were applied on February 16th and 17th, 1909. The examinations of the work were made during the summer of 1909, one in June and the other the :fir t of eptember. REPORT ON RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED DURING 1907-8-9. The data given below on the re ults obtained from all materials tested is conden ed in order to avoid useless repetition. Wherever there was a decided variance in result obtained from any soluble oil, attention is called to that difference. Mechanical Appliances for Spraying Oil. The selection of pump and nozzle i of extreme importance where oils are u ed. To obtain the best results from them the pump must be capable of deYeloping and su taining a high pre ure at lea t 100 pound.. and the nozzle . houlrl throw a 10 finely divided pray. Very often the pressure at the nozzle is reduced by rea on of leaky pumps or hose. This can be avoided by getting only first-clas appliances for spraying, and by due diligence in keeping them in good working order. Target Brand Emulsion. Thi oil is manufactured by the Horticultural Distributing Company, Martinsburg, W. Va. The material used in the experiment at Goggins in 1907 and 1908 was so essentially different in composition from that used at Fort Valley in 1908 and 1909 that it is given separate space in the report. The two compounds, although bearing the same name, were really different altogether, and are treated here as though they were made by two different manufacturers. The Target Brand te ted in 1907 and 1908 was light yellow in color; very vi cid in composition. The water-diluted mixture wa milky white in color. The following excerpt from Circular o. 8 (1908), Georgia tate Board of Entomology, gives the results of work done by Target Brand at Goggins in 1907 and 1908: "From the fall application (November 14th) of this material excellent results were obtained. A few live scales were found at the last examination of the trees, but they were confined to smaller twigs and leaves. This treatment must be regarded as being very effective. The double treatment at the same strength was almost Identically similar In results as the single fall spraying. There were possibly a few "Dlore live scales left after the latter treatment, but the difference was very slight. "It should naturally be expected that the greater the strength of the dilute mixture the more effective the treatment. With the fall application of the Target Brand at 1 to 15 and 1 to 10, however, this was not the case. Neither was as effective as the 1 to 20 dilution. Although both were successful in degree, at the end of the season neither compared favorably with the weaker dilution. This seems strange, indeed, and can not be accounted for satisfactorily. The double applications at 1 to 15 and 1 to 10 were highly effectual, only a trace of the scale remaining at the end of the season. There was a dying out of the trees in the plat sprayed twice at 1 to 10, for which it would seem that the material itself was partially. at least, responsible. The evidence afforded by this plat is that the dilution was not sufficient to prevent the Idl1lng of the trees. "At 1 to 20, the spring application (February 20th) yielded poor results, the spread of the scale being checked scarcely at all. At 1 to 15 the results were very good, except on trees that were heavily infested at the time the material was applied. At 1 to 10 the spring treatment was efficient in Its results, although trees worse infested when sprayed showed an abundance of live scale when last Inspection was made, even 11 more than the 1 to 15 strength. Here again the results, when compared, seem most inconsistent. "Target Brand showed conflicting results that can not be accounted for, all the way through the test. At a strength of 1 to 20, the fall treatment yielded excellent results. The double treatment at the same strength also gave good results; but the fall sprayings at strengths of 1 to 15 and 1 to 10, respectively, yielded decidedly inferior results when compared to the 1 to 20 plats. Double treatment at 1 to 15 and 1 to 10 destroyed practically all the scale. On July 30th only a few live scales could be found on trees sprayed at this strength. There can be no doubt that this compound was properly mixed and the trees thoroughly sprayed. Every tree was completely covered, care being taken to wet the smallest twigs, as well as the body and main limbs. "The spring sprayings were ineffective at every dilution. On trees that were badly infested at the time they were sprayed, the summer spread of scale was scarcely checked at all. After standing over winter the material used in the experiment was somewhat insoluble in water, a feature not true of it when the initial spraying was made. The weakening of the dilute spray consequent to this partial insolubility was, of course, measurably responsible for the poor results obtained. It must not be taken that the material was not at all beneficial. ot sufficient scale was killed, however, except by the fall spraying at 1 to 20, the double treatment at the same strength, and the double treatment at 1 to 15 and 1 to 10, to keep the new infestation from reaching very undesirable and, in most cases, dangerous proportions." Target Brand Emul ion a was ent by the manufacturer for trial in the experiment at Fort Valley in 1908 and 1909, was greeni h-black in color, and carried a pronounced odor of carbolic acid. The material was much Ie viscid than that u ed in 1907 and 190 , though the resultant color, obtained by diluting with water, was the same. Both articles were completely soluble in cold water at all proportions. At 1 to 20 the fall spraying, the double sprayings, and the . pring spraying, were all very effective. Of these three plat, the one sprayed in the early spring wa the least effective and on this was nothing more than a mere sprinkling of live scale, not sufficient to do additional damage to the trees if means are taken to control it. The fall spraying at 1 to 15 yielded excellent re ults. The summer re-infestation wa very slight and can be controlled by ubaequent sprayings if properly conducted. The double spraying at this strength was nearly perfect, but the spring treatment was not so effective a the fall treatment, there being a considerable scattering of scale on the plat, particularly on the leaves and young wood. The examination made in June 12 howed ome of the fruit to be slightly infested. This spra~ring wa disappointing in its results. At a trength of 1 to 10, the fall spraying and double spraying were highly effective, and the spring treatment also did good work, but there was enough living scale on the latter at the time of the last examination to cause urprise when the strength of the material was considered. t every dilution this material affords a striking example of the great effectiveness of fall prayings over spring sprayings. There were no evidences whatever of damage by the oil to the trees themselves. A comparison of the data on these two materials shows the 190 product to be easily superior to that manufactured in 1907. Scalecide. 'calecide i a soluble oil product of the B. G. Pratt Co., No. 11 Broadway, Tew York. Of all the brands of soluble oils mentioned in this report this one is best known to the fruit growers of Georgia, and has been most extensively used by them for ev 1'11.1 years. It is almo t black in color, diluting, on the addition of water, to a milky white solution. It is perfectly soluble in cold water and spray easily and smoothly when diluted at a proportion 'of 1 to 15, the proportion recommended by the manufacturers. At a greater trength, say 1 to 10, it hows a di po ition to spray in large drop, or clot, which do not spread out evenly on the bark when the spray strikes the tree. To l'ompletely cover a tree at a strength of 1 to 10 requires more material by mea urement than the same tree would require at a trength of 1 to 15. Thi material was applied at three strengths, viz.: 1 to 15, 1 to 12 and 1 to 10. At all strengths, for the fall, spring and double treatments, it yielded re ults of the highest order' nothing more than a scattering of live scale being found on the last examination. Only on one plat, that was sprayed in February at 1 to 12, were the results in the least disappointing, and in this plat the trees were unu ually h avily inf sted at the time they were sprayed. This probably accounts for the fact that there wa more living scale found in this plat at the end of summer. There wa no injury to the trees from this material. The double treatment were all nearly perfect in their results, and it is not po ible to better them. For both years' work, Scalecide maintained about an equally high degree of efficiency, and it is safe to ay that it can be relied upon to kill cale wherever it is carefully applied. 13 Soluble Petroleum. This petroleum oil i manufactured by the Thom en hemical 0., Baltimore, l\Id. It i a heavy oil, yellow in color; the diluted petroleum pray being a dirty white. At Goggin , Georgia, in 1907 and 1908, the material mixed perfectly with cold water and was highly effective in eradicating the scale. The strengths used in thi te t were 1 to 20, 1 to 15 and 1 to 10, respectively. The test to which it was here subjected was severe, most of the trees b'eing heavily encrusted with living scale when they were treated. Throughout the entire te t, at all strengths, the material sustained it elf well and did very effective work. 'fhe second year's te t, however, was not productive of su It good re ult. The material, in the fir t place, wa only partially soluble in cold water. Much of it remained afloat in the spray tank as insoluble oil. The strength of the diluted spray was correspondingly reduced in consequence. All the fall sprayings were applied without' any effort being made to correct this feature. al soda was added in mall quantities to the spray as it was made up for the spring spraying, which rendered the insoluble oil perfectly soluble in water, and brought the diluted mixture up to full strength. At the manufacturer' uggestion, a slight change was made the econd year in the proportion of oil to water. The greate t proportion at which the oil was used wa 1 to 15, the lowest 1 to 20 with an intermediate dilution of 1 to 1 . Fall pra)'ing at 1 to 20 yielded poor re ult. The pring application of thi material was more effe tive than the fall praying, a fact .0 contrary to the re ult obtaine 1 with all other oil that it can be explained only on the hypothe is that .1h former pray wa rendered stronger than the latter by the addition of the sal soda. and the complete re ultant solubility of the oil. At a proportion of 1 to 1 the pray wa noticeably more effective although th re wa a con iderable l' -inf tation during the summer from the scale which it failed to kill. At 1 to 15 the re ult were good for all application . particularly the double treatment, which wa nearly perfe 1. It would seem, from the data et forth above that this oil is very effective when it mixe tboroughly with water, and that it is un at~ fa tory when only partially olubl. By the addition of a little al oda to the il and wat l' mixture as it i being 14 pr par d for the 'pray tank this objection i obviated, and the pray material brought up to it full tandard of effici ncy, Kil-O-Scale. ':' Thi material al 0 is made by the Thom en 'hernical Co., Baltimore, Md. They no longer recommend it for peach trees, and it ale has been altogether discontinued except as a control for cale insect affecting apple , hedge plants, hade trees, etc. It was tested in the experiments at Goggin, and, although the material is made up of the highest grade of ingredients, it wa unproductive of good re ult. The ingle fall prayings, applied ovember 14th, failed to kill sufficient scale on the trunk of trees to prevent a very appreciable re-infestation during the ummel'. omparatively speaking, the 1 to 20, 1 to 15 and 1 to 10 trengths were about equally un ucce ful in controlling the cale. As a double treatment, the 1 to 20 strength, though slightly more effectual than the fall spraying at 1 to 20, was, nevertheless, poor. At 1 to 15 and 1 to 10, the double tr atment were highly efficient, e pecially the latter, which wa nearly perfect. The spring spraying at 1 to 20 and 1 to 15, re pectively, were practically valuele s, there being but little difference between the trees sprayed at the e strengths and the unsprayed trees. Live, crawling scale was abundant when the la t examination of plats was made. At the greatest 'trengtb, 1 to 10, the spring treatments gave only fair results, and mu t be called un ati factory wben the strength of the mixture i considered. Schnarr's Compounds Nos. 1 and 2. o. I.-This material is a light, yellowi h oil containing some aponified matter. On being mixed with water and agitated, the pre ence of this soap is indicated on the surface by tbe heavy formation of sud . The material, a tested the first year, wa of little value except a a fall treatment at 1 to 15, and 1 to 10 as a double treatment. The fall treatment at 1 to 20 was practically worthle s, the tree sprayed at that strength and at that time being badly infe ted on trunk , limbs and foliage. The fall application at 1 to 15 killed nearly all the cale, and tbe 1 to 10 trength was 'In special circular which was I sued by the Department In 1909, we stated that the manufacturers had cea ed to recommcnd this preparation as a scale remedy. This wa based npon wrong Impression and we wish to correct same. 'They no longer rccommend Its use on peach trees. 15 almost perfect in it results. All the double treatment "ere exceedingly efficient, leaving only a mere trace of live scale. At all dilutions the spring treatment was an absolute failure, . no good having been accompli hed by any of them. t Fort Valley in 190 and 1909, markedly better re~ult were obtained with this compound. At all proportion , eyen the single prayings in the fall and in the spring at 1 to 20. there wa only an inconsiderable percentage of scale that "a not killed by the spray. The double treatment for each of the three strengths tried was nearly perfect, and the fall and spring treatment at 1 to 15, and at 1 to 10, respectively, left 0 little scale alive that it could be found only with difficulty. It must be noted that the test was not so severe at Fort Valley as it was at Goggins, and this fact may account, in a mea ure, for the wide variance in result obtained for the two year. J. ~o. 2.- chnarr's Compound did not arrive until it wa too late to include it in the fall praying at Goggins in 1907. and hence it wa used only a a pring treatment. From one-fourth to one-third (estimated) of the oil refused to mix with water and the result from the partial mixing were ab olutely worthIe . When la t examined the tree were a badly infe t d a they had ever been. _\lthough the trees upon which the material was te ted at Fort Valley were Ie s heavily infe ted than those elected at Goggins, the results were of slightly greater value. Whenever a tree bore a heavy infestation of scale the oil failed ignally to control it well. aturally, the double treatments were more effective in their work, but all of them left an easily noticeable scattering of live scale. The second lot of material was freely soluble in water. Compound No. 1 is unque tionably the better of these two materials for use against San Jose Scale. Schnarr's Insecticides are manufactured by the J. chuarI' In ecticide Co., Orlando, Fla., and are used mainly in that State against White Fly and cale in ect affecting citru tree. San-U-Zay. This material is made and sold by F. G. Street & Co., Rochester, . Y., and is the last soluble oil which the Department ha received from any source for experimental purpose. The manufacturers pecified that it is to be used with a mall amount of sal oda, which i added to the oil in process of mixing with water ~s a olvent for the oil. Only a mall quan- 16 titr of al oda i nece ary for thi purpo e, say about 1 pound to 50 gallon. an-U-Zay, except as a spring treatment at 1 to 20, was pro- ductive of excellent re ult. The double treatments at all proportions, viz., 1 to 20, 1 to 15 and 1 to 10, killed nearly all the eale. The fall and spring treatment at 1 to 15 and 1 to 10 repectively, were about equally effective, though in the plat prayed in the fall at 1 to 20 there was a considerable scattering of young scale, particularly on the wood growth of 1909 and on the leave. Aside from the spring application at 1 to 20, which wa not successful, San-U-Zay gave praiseworthy results and rank well up among the best oil compounds. Prepared Lime-Sulphur Solutions. Enterpri ing chemical manufacturers have introduced into the market prepared solution of lime an~ sulphur. These compound were intended to displace the omewhat unsatisfactory u e of oluble oils, as well a to give to the commercial orchardi -I a ready-made lime- ulphur pray which would be ready for u. e after the simple addition of cold water. Mter a long experimental period the present spray compounds have been perf ct d, and have thus far proven them elves equal to every requirement. The undiluted material as it is received by the customer is a reddi h liquid, free of all solid matter and mixes easily and thoroughly with water at all proportions. It sprays without the lea t difficulty and the only objection common to the standard home-made preparation of lime and sulphur, is its causticity. There is none of the old, familiar trouble from clogged nozzles and the consequent loss of time and temper. As a simple economical lime and sulphur wash, easy to handle and apply, it seems to have solved the problem. Prepared lime- ulphur spray are commonly recommended to be diluted at about one part of olution to ten or eleven parts of water. In the tests mentioned here the proportion was 1 to 12 for the first year's trial and 1 to 11 for the second. Thomsen Chemical Company's Prepared Lime-Sulphur Solution. This spray was first tried at Goggins in the spring of 1908, and the treatment resulted in the almost complete destruction of the scale. It was tried again in the fall of the same year at Fort Valley, and again in the spring of 1909 in the same place, and every treatment yielded result of a high order. When last 17 examined the trees prayed with this compound were practically free of all scale, the old coating of dead scale had been sloughed off and. the trees showed a healthy, clean bark. Orchardist who used the solution during the past season are generally pleased with its work, and it is being used on quite a large commercial scale again this year. It is known as Orchard Brand Lime and Sulphur Solution. Grasselli Chemical Company's Prepared Lime-Sulphur Solution. This olution is manufactured by the Grasselli Chemical Company, Birmingham, Ala., and recommended for use at a dilution of 1 to 11.. It possesses practically the same physical properties as the compound described above, and at Fort Valley, where it wa tried during the season of 190 and 1909, it was very succe ful a a scale insecticide. It left only the slightest trace of living scale on the trees, and this trace had multiplied, by the end of summer, in numbers so small that they could hardly be -observed. This make of material is also extensively in use this season in the peach orchards of Georgia. Home-Made Lime-Sulphur. For the sake of comparing the prepared solutions of limesulphur with the home-made article, a plat of trees was sprayed with the latter alongside the plats in which the manufactured products were used. So far as the mere insecticidal value of the two kind is concerned no difference could be discerned. Both were equally effective in the eradication of the scale, but the .home-made goods, carrying a heavier percentage of free lime, eyentually cleaned the trees more thoroughly of rough bark and dead eales, Powdered Lime and Sulphur. Lime and sulphur in a dry powdered form was sent for exp rimental purpo e to the Department by the lerrimac Chemical ompany, Boston, Ma ., and recommended to be used at a proportion of 5 pounds to gallons of water. When added to water the latter is changed to an olive green color, much like the color of properly boiled home-made lime and sulphur. It pray easily, there being no particles of matter large enough to afford obstruction to the nozzles. The re ults obtained from this powder were gratifying, but as it was used only once and then' as a spring treatment, the data .regarding it must neces arily lack confirmation. 18 Summary. While ach oil wa applied a' a 'pring treatment and as a fall treatment it was found in every ca e that the fall treatment wa of uperior effectiveness. The earlier the spray can be applied after the leave have fallen, the better will be the net re ult , all other conditions being equal. The mechanical appliances of the application are extremely important, e pecially with soluble oils. A good pump developing a high pre ure and a nozzle throwing a direct, forceful pray, are very.neces ary to obtain good re ult . The concentrated lime and ulphur olution , being free of all solid matter, offer no more eriou 00 tacle. to easy spraying than the oils. They are much more cau tic in nature, however, and it i well to be protected from continuou contact with them. nder well regulated condition they spray as easily as water might, and are no more harmful to the per on. ompared to the soluble oil compounds for efficiency, they yield quite as good re ults as the best oils even when the latter are used at a greater trength than that l' commended by the different manufa turer. A tr e well prayed with lime and ulphur alway offer a cleaner, brighter and healthier appearance than a tree equally well sprayed with an oil. Besides its strictly in ecticidal value, lime and sulphur po e es fungicidal properties to a much greater degree than it is po sible to incorporate in a oluble oil. There i hardly any danger of injuring tree even when used at much greater trength than tho e r<,commended by the manufacturer.. SPRAYING ACCESSORIES. econd only to the importan e of u ing a dependable insecticide in praying for the control of cale in e tithe election of the praying outfit. Individual preference mu t necessarily playa part in thi , but with particular refer n to the pump, the selection hould be modified to . uit the ize of the orchard to be treated. SprayinO' i O'reatly facilitated by using only the be t grade of ho e and nozzle and by the u e of exten ion rOds, ut to suitable length , and fitted out with cut-Qffs. For the information of the orchardi t, the different parts of the praying outfit are briefly di cu eel in the following paragraphs: Barrel Pump : Fig. 3 show a type of pump adaptable for prayinO' mall orchard of from 500 to 5000 tr ea. A good 19 Fig. 3. Hal'l'el pray Pump. barrel pump is capable of developing and maintaining sufficient pressure to operate two leads of ho e. The working parts of the better makes of the e pumps is made of brass or hardened bronze to resist the corroding action of the spray compound, and will last indefinitely if properly cared for. Wherever sprays carrying solid matter are used, it is highly important that the pump be fitted with an agitator uch as is shown in the accompanying figure. This class of pump may be bought at a nominal cost and d pended upon to do excellent work. Fig. 4. Double Cylinder Pump. Double Cylinder Pumps: In Fig. 4 may be seen a double cylinder pump capable of developing more power than the regular barrel pump. It 1 intended for use on wagon tank. 20 und i '0 con tructed that the working part do not extend into the spray mixture at all, the latter being drawn into the cylind r 1y mean of a suction tube, thereby Ie sening the liabiliti of corrosion from the mixture. From the fact that thi pump an ustain a much higher pre ure than the ordinary barrel pump, and that it i almo t a easy of operation, it i r commended for use on wagon tanks. The additional co t ov r the fifty gallon barrel pump is practically off et by it. !!1' at l' lllll'ability and efficiency. Pig.;:;. Wagon Tank. \YaO'on 'lank: Fig. 5 how a type of wagon tank in common u e over th tate. In large r hard the e tanks a1' valuable a time aver. They are made to hold from 150 to 250 gallon, and it require nearly half a day to empty one of th larO' l' kind with two lead of ho e in operation. The hilly character of many orchard ite, pecially in the northern part of the tate i almo t prohibitive for the u e of the e tank, but this objection may be overcome by filling them to a point where they can be moved by the team power. Wagon tanks cost about eighteen or twenty dollar, a cost so small when their value a time avers i on idered, that it repreent a aving in dollar and cent at the end of one eason' u e. Ga oline-Power pray Pump: pray pump operated b~' ga oline have been used in a few of the large orchards in th pa t few years and are rapidly gaining in favor and number . They can develop a higher pre ure than it is possible to develop by hand and maintain thi pI' ure con tantly and uniformly. Fig. 6 show a gasoline engine of the most recent and improved manufacture mounted on a wagon with pray tank attached. Gasoline pray outfits have been used in Georgia with O'reat ucce., they can be purcba ed at a moderate cost 21 Fig. 6. Gn oline Power Pump. and we believe that the larger commercial orchard grower of the State would be benefitted if they equipped themselve with the e machines. Hose: In his efforts to minimize the co t of the prayinO' apparatu , the orchardist often make the mi take of purclla ing the cheaper grades of ho e and too little of it. l 0 ingle lead of hose hould be less than twenty-five feet long. Much worry and waste of time may be avoided by using only the very be t quality. The average cost of the be t quality one-half inch hose is about fifteen cent per foot. Other and inferior grade may be bought at from ten to twelve cents per foot, but from an economical standpoint, we believe that the higher priced good are the cheape t in the end. Under a high pre sure, uch a i nece ary for really efficient spraying. cheap ho e quickly becomes leaky and i of no account. are hould be taken to secure the hose tightly to the pump and ext nsion rod in order that it may not be blown off under pre - ure. Exten. ion Rod . light, durable exten ion rod may be made from ordinary one-quarter inch piping. The rod may be cut to the de. ired length to suit the occasion for which it is needed, and threaded at both ends for attaching to the nozzle and the top-cock. Bamboo extension rod are somewhat lighter than the e iron rod but are much Ie s durable. Stop-Cock 0 spraying outfit i complete without this nttachment. The pray material that ""ould be wa ted in moy- 22 iug from tree to tree wi thout a stop-cock for cutting off the flow, would very quickly represent a money 10 of considerable proportions. Fig. 7. Double Vermorel Nozzle. Fig. . Mistry Jr. Nozzle. ozzle: The requirements of a nozzle for ordinary spraying purpo es are that it be simple of constrqction and easy to clean and that it throw a finely divided spray. Nozzles throwing a forcible, mist-like spray are very essential to successful oil spraying. While lime and sulphur wash should always be applied to the tree with considerable force, it is not so necesary that it be a fine spray as in oil spraying. Fig. 7 shows a double Vermorel nozzle, and Fig. 8 show a nozzle of more recent manufa lure, the Mistry Jr. Both of these have proven themselve to be highly efficient in the fight against San Jose cale. NOTICE. The Bulletlns of the Georgia State Board of Entomology, which are o present practlcal value and still available, are mentloned below. (The numbers not mentioned are either out of date or exhausted). Application for any of these numbers should be addressed to the State Entomologist, Atlanta, Ga. Bulletin No. 12.-Mexican Cotton Boll Weevil. Bulletin No. l3.-Some Common Insects Injurious to the Apple. Bulletin No. 1S.-Pear Blight Disease in Georgia, and Pear Leaf Blight. Bulletin No. 20.-Part I. Report of State Entomologist for 1905. Part n. Crop Pest Law and Regulations. Bulletin No. 21.-.spraying to Control the San Jose Scale. Bulletin No. 22.-Black Root Disease of Cotton. Bulletin No. 23.-The Apple Woolly Aphis. Green Apple Leaf Aphis. Remedial Measures for Same. Bulletin NQ. 24.-Cotton Anthracnose and Cotton "Rusts." Bulletln No. 2G.-Peach Leaf Curl, Yellows, Rosette and Little Peach. Bulletin No. 27.-Proceedlngs of Horticultural Society for 1908. Bulletin No. 28.-"Black Root" Disease of Cotton in Georgia and Its ControL Bulletin No. 29.-Codllng Moth or "Apple Worm." Bulletin No. 30.-Proceedings of Horticultural Society for 1909. CIrcUlar No. G.-The Use of Soluble Oils Against San Jose Scale. Circular No. 7.-The Hessian Fly in Georgia. Circular No. 'B.-Report on Experiments for Control of San Jose Scale, 1907-1908. CirCUlar No. 9.-The BrownTall Moth. E. L. WORSHAM, State Entomologist. THE UNIVERSITY AT ATHENS. I. FRANKLIN COLLEGE. (The College of Arts.-Established 1801, otrering the Degree of Bachelor of Arts, and including: 1. General Courses in the Liberal Arts. 2. Special Courses. II. THE GEORGIA STATE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND THE MECHANIC ARTS.-Established 1872, otrering the Degree of Bachelor of Science, and including the following: (a) In the College of Science and Engineering: 1. The General Science Course. 2. The Civil Engineering Course 3. The Electrical Engineering Course. (b) In the College of Agriculture: 4. The Full Agricultural Course. 5. The Forest Engineering Course. 6. The One-year Agricultural Course. 7. The Winte! Course in Agriculture. 8. The Experiment Station (at Experiment). 9. The Farmers' Institutes. m. THE GRADUATE SCHOOL.-Otrering the following De- grees: 1 Master of Arts. 2. Master of Science. 3. Civil and Mining Engineer. IV. THE LAW DEPARTMENT.-Otrering the degree of Bachelor of Law-A Two Years' Course. V. THE UNIVERSITY SUMMER SCHOOL.-Founded in 1903. Five Weeks' Session, offering courses in 1. Common School Branches. 2. Pedagogy and Related Subjects. 3. High School Studies. 4. Selected College Studies VI. THE SOHOOL OF PHARMACY.-Otrering the Degree of Graduate in Pharmacy-A Two Yee.rs' Course. VII. THE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION.-Esteblished 1908. For pa..'1;iculars address the head of the Department or the Chancellor, Athens, Ga. both lime and arsenate of lead rapidly settle out of the water unless well agitated, a pump with a good agitator hould always be used in spraying with this material. The heavierthan-water materi!!,l is better kept in suspension if stirred occasionally from the bottom of the barrel with a paddle. The original plan called for the first spraying to be applied immediately after the petals had fallen, the succeeding applications to be applied at interval of ten days or two weeks. This plan was adhered to throughout the series except when rain made it necessary to postpone the sprayings. The results obtained in each plat are given below in tabulated form. The tables show the percentage of infestation of every plat. Comparison of these figures with those obtained from the check plat will leave no doubt of the effectiveness of the lead in holding curculio in check. What Arsenate of Lead Accomplished in 1907. Plat 1. This plat was sprayed twice, the first spraying being applied April 2nd, and the second April 11th, or nine days later. The peache from the selected trees representing this plat are taken together and averaged. 18 Plat 1. Plat 1, 4 trees Check plat, 7 trees. I I Arsenate of Lead. 2-3-50 Formula. No. of No. of \per cent. ofl Per cent. of infested uninfested infested uninfested I I I 1 peaches / 503 peaches 1056 peaches I peaches 32 68 1468 687 68 32 There was only a very slight defoliation of the trees of thi plat, and the fruit was well colored and comparatively free of blemishes from curculio feeding punctures. Reference to the table will show that there was 36% more peaches free of curculio in plat 1 than in the check plat. Plat 2. This plat received three treatments, the :first on April 2nd; the second on April 11th and the last on April 19th. As in plat 1, the fruit from the four selected trees is added together in the table and the average taken. Plat 2. Arsenate of Lead. 2-3-50 Formula. Plat 2, 4 trees Check plat, 7 tree ---I-No. of lper cenC ofl Per cent. or l 1 uninfested infested uninfested I peaches 1426 peaches I peaches 3-0- / - - 7 < J - 1 6, 68 32 Only thirty per cent. of the entire crop from plat 2 was worminfe ted, or, for approximately the same number of peaches in each of the plats included in the table, there was 38% more wormy fruit in the unsprayed check plat than in plat 2, thrice sprayed with arsenate of lead. The peaches in plat 2 were highly colored and free of SUllscalds. The defoliation, although a trifle greater than that in plat 2. was nevertheless more beneficial than otherwi e. The leaves began to drop slightly about the time the third treatmen1 was applied, but they had practically ceased to shed by the fifteenth of May. Plat 3. Plat 3 was sprayed four times. The :first application was made April 2, the three remaining treatments being applie 1 on April 11, 17 and 25 re pectively. A fourth part of this same plat was given two additional sprayings, the :first on May 3rd and the last on May 10th, making a total of six sprayings for the one-fourth part. Plat 3 proper, i represented by the fruit from three trees in the table. which is taken together and averaged. 19 Plat 3. Arsenate of Lead. 2350 Formula. Plat 3, 3 trees Check, 7 trees No. of No. of Iper cent. ofl Per cent. of , . infested I peaches I 340 I 1468 uninfested peaches 699837 infested peaches 6285 uninfested I peaches 75 32 The difference here between the percentage of infested fruit in the check plat and that in plat 3 is 43%. This is the highest percentage of sound fruit gathered from any plat so far considered. About one-third of the foliage shed off the trees of this plat and there was some sun-scalding of the fruit. The injury from this, however, was very small. The peaches over the whole plat were deeply and beautifully colored. Plat 4. This plat is simply a one-fourth part of plat 3 sprayed twice more. The fifth application was applied on May 3rd, and the sixth and last, one week later, on May 10th. Two trees were selected as representative trees. The fruit from these total,led 969 peaches, infested as set forth in the following table: Plat 4. Arsenate of Lead. 2-3-50 Formula. Plat 4, 2 trees Check, 7 trees No. of No. of \per cent. ofl Per cent. of infested peaches 1 237 . 1468 uninfested peaches I I 732 I 687 infested peaches 24.5 68 uninfested II peaches 75.5 32 It will be noted that only .5% more peaches were worm-free in this plat than in plat 3, although it received two more I!5prayings. The fruit on this plat, although brilliantly colored, was considerably damaged from sun-scald. A great number of peaches were thereby rendered unmarketable. The trees, also, were heavily defoliated and the effect of the material on the newly formed buds wa disastrous, and noticeably reduced the yield of peaches the following year. It is doubtful if any tree, no matter how vigorous, would not be injured if sprayed as many as six times. The peaches on all the plat in the work with ar enate of lead were very highly and beautifully colored, gaining superficial attractiveness as well as comparative freedom from curculio. 20 PYROX. Pyrox, a mixture of arsenate of lead and Bordeaux: mixture, is manufactured by the Bowker Insecticide Co., Boston, Mass., and recommended to be u ed at a proportion of five pounds to fifty gallon of water. It was used at Mayfield according to the above direction without the addition of lime. The experimental work with this material was done alongside of that conducted with arsenate of lead and in plats of equal size as the arsenate of lead plats. There were only three plats sprayed, these being treated on the same days that the lead sprayings were applied. Plat 1 was sprayed three times, plat 2 four times and plat 3 (a one-fourth part of plat 2) was treated with two additional sprayings and corresponds to plat 4, arsenate of lead. The results of these sprayings were obtained in the manner all' ady outlined and are recorded in tabulated form below: I I Plat 1. Pyrox. Sprayed 3 times. 550 Formula. I No. of o. of lper cent. of I Per cent. of "peaches peaches peaches peaches 1 I I I PClhaetck1,, 47 ttrreeeess infested uninfested infested uninfested 1416982 564875 6285 3725 I I Plat 2. Pyrox. Sprayed 4 times. 550 Formula. I No. of No. of lper cent. ofl Per cent. of peaches peaches peaches peaches I' I I 'I infested uninfested infested uninfested Plat 2, 2 trees1 131 389 25 75 Check, 7 trees 1468 687 6il 32 I I Plat 3. Pyrox. Sprayed 6 times. 5-50 Formula. I No. of o. of lper cent. of Per cent. of I peaches peaches peaches peaches I I I I infested uninfested infested uninfested Plat 3, 2 trees 1 115 541 17.5 82.5 Check, 7 trees 1 1468 687 68 32 Plat 1 is the only one of the above that did not how injury from the treatment. Plat 2, sprayed four times, was considerably defoliated and the fruit wa damaged slightly from sunscald. Plat 3, a one-fourth part of plat 2, and sprayed six times, lost over a half of its crop of foliage and quantities of the fruit was so badly burned that it was unfit for anything. Pyrox is intended as a combined insecticide and fungicide for the control of curculio and brown rot. One of its constitu- !1 ents is Bordeaux mixture, and it i this lement of the COlllpound that acts as a fungicide. As there are superior anu more certain means of controlling brown rot (treated of ~lsewhere in this bulletin), and as Pyrox is too drastic a treatment at the strength recommended by its manufacturers, it is inadvisable to use it, except, possibly, at a reduced strength. Pyrox, like arsenate of lead, has the power to paint peaches in gorgeous colors and to gain for them comparative immunity from infestation from curculio. However because of its drastic effect on fruit and foliage it is not recommended. Arsenate of Lead Experiments in 1909. The experiments at Bagley, Ga., in 1909 were worked out along parallel lines to those conducted at M1ayfield in 1907. There were certain marked differences in the results, however, occasioned by various causes, and these differences are mentioned and explanations offered for them. In the first place the putting-out of foliage in the orchard under treatment presented very unusual conditions in 1909. Although the trees bloomed and shed their blooms about the normal time, the leaves were extremely slow in making their appearance. As late as the 22nd of April the trees were almost devoid of leaves, although young leaves were beginning to push out, promising a full crop of foliage ultimately. At this time the peaches were about the size of a thimble and had completely shed their calyces or "shucks." Two applications of arsenate of lead had been applied to these slightly protected peaches by the date mentioned, and it is to the slow growth of foliage and the consequent long e~posure of the fruit, as well a to the action of arsenate of lead, that much of the injury resulting in two of the sprayed plats is ascribed. Many of the trees had been weakened materially by the San Jose scale. These trees were naturally more susceptible to injury than the more vigorous, scale-free trees. The plan of the work was much the same as that outlined in the Mayfield experiments, except that one plat was sprayed with three pounds of arsenate of lead to fifty gallons of water, and that the sprayings were applied at longer intervals. Al 0 the plats were larger, and more trees were selected from them 22 as representative trees. The records were kept in identically the same way, and the figures show the exact percentage of the two classes of fruit yielded by the trees. The following tables and paragraphs give the number of sprayings to each plat, with the results obtained, etc. : Plat 1. Plat 1 was first sprayed on April 2nd. Three pounds of arsenate of lead were used with fifty gallons of water, without the addition of milk of lime. This formula was used with each of the three applications, which were applied at intervals of three weeks. The second treatment was applied on April 22nd, and the third and last was applied May 14th. At this time there was very little of the material showing on the leaves from the first two applications, there having been only a few leaves present, but the young peaches were well coated. The trees were heavily leafed and required nearly twice as much spray material to cover them well a the first application required. The following table gives the percentages of infested and uninfe ted peaches gathered from the nine trees representing this plat. I Plat 1. Arsenate of Lead. Sprayed 3 times. 3-50 Formula. No. of No. of lper cent. ofl Per cent. of Plat 1. 9 trees Check. 10 trees " .. " . peaches peaches I infested uninfested I I I ~24 3958 peaches infested 8 peaches uninfested 92 978 622 59.5 41.5 The number of wormy peaches for the entire nine trees as recorded is only eight per cent. of the entire product. This is a remarkably low figure and represents 51.5% more freedom from curculio than the check plat. But however much the peaches were protected in this particular they were injured severely in another. By the first of July the trees were heavily defoliated, the peaches everywhere sunscalded and disfigured, and some were beginning to drop from the trees. Many fine, highly colored peaches were gathered from this plat, and a considerable number was too lightly burned to be a total loss at the packing shed. Yet, of the 1,218 peaches gathered on and after July 6th (the ripening period), 520 or 42% were too badly cracked and sun-scalded to be classed as anything else than culls. 23 .,. ~ Fig. 9.-Peaches showing Injury from arsenate of lead. The peach 011 the right is an extreme case; thaL on the left Is more typical and better. shows how the frnlt sometimes splits when nearing maturity. Natural size (original). The injury did not stop with the ruin of the peaches, for the wood growth of 1909 was killed out noticeably in places, and more was injured. These burned areas on the wood bore the characteri tic reddish, discolored splotches Oll the bark. When the last examination of these trees was made on July 21st, it was apparent that many of the newly formed buds had been killed. It must be borne in mind in considering the above figures and conditions that this plat was treated at a considerably increased strength of material and without the influence of the lime to modify the burning effect of the lead; also that the trees were not as vigorous as they might have been and that they were very tardy in producing their full crop of foliage. Plat 2. This plat was sprayed but once, ar enate of lead being used at the proportion of two pounds to fifty gallons of water, with the standard solution of milk of lime made from three pounds of lime. This single spraying was made April 9th. Although there was less than one-fourth part of the normal crop of foliage at this date, the peache were well developed and had shed most of their "shucks." The peaches from the nine trees representing this plat were classified as shown in the accompanying table: Plat 2. Sprayed once with arsenate of lead. 2-3-50 Formula. Plat 2, 9 trees Check, 10 trees No. of No. of \per cent. ofl Per cent. of infested uninfested infested uninfested I I I I peaches peaches / 802 . 978 2131 622 peaches I peaches 29 71 59.5 41.5 It will be seen from the figure that even thi single spraying was productive of good results. As against 59.5% of wormy peaches in the check plat, only 29% were infested in plat 2. The coloring of the peaches was better than that in the check plat, and there was no injury whatever. Plat 3. Two applications of arsenate of lead were made to plat 3, the first on April 10th and the second on April 28th, nearly three weeks later. The standard 2-3-50 formula was used. Results were as follows: 25 Fig. lO.-eage in which curcullos were conlined with an arsenically poisoned food supply (originall. 28 the pray allowed to dry and th dr nching repeated. On the 11th of May 372 curculios, which had been confined for fortyeight hours without food, were relea ed into the cage which had been fitted over the tree subsequent to the spraying of the latter. The cage wa set upon a white cloth pread beneath the limbs of the tree in order that any curculio that might eat the poi oned bait and die therefrom ould ea ily be seen when they fell upon the white cloth. This tree was closely watched for ten days but not once was a curculio discovered feeding on any part of the tree. Of the eight unpunctured peaches that the tree originally bore, only six were finally punctured with a total of eight punctures. The e were very small punctures, scarcely breaking the kin of the peach. 0 eggs were laid in these cavitie . The curculios, for the most part, seemed to have the trongest aversion to the tree, and their lives were spent in trying to escape from it through the wire gauze. Some few smaller beetles did escape in thi way, and at the end of ten days there was not a ingle live curculio within the confine of the cage. Arsenate of lead unquestionably kill curcubos when they a similate it in feeding actively, but in the above instance it acted more as a repellant, there being no part of the foliage or fruit, however small, which was not well coated with the poison. JARRING FOR CURCULIO. A block of Elberta peach trees embracing twelve hundred trees was jarred at Bagley, Ga., in 1909, for the sake of determining the absolute value of jarring for the control of curculio, as well as its comparative value as opposed to liquid spraying. It was planned to jar the plat every two days, but labor conditions were such that it was not possible to follow the original plan. Although the jarring was carried out irregularly, the results are of interest as showing the direct influence which the close proximity of timbered land has upon the orchard from the standpoint of curculio infestation. The block of trees selected for the jarring operations was forty row long and extended thirty rows into the orchard. It lay parallel to the woods and was separated from it only by the width of a farm road. 29 2'.".. ~ '0o". "...'c..."".o,.. :s o 1 o~ r,Qn I r...l. 30 Jarring Equipment. The equipment used in the work consisted of two canvas covered wooden frames, each four and one-half by nine feet, and a leather-padded maul for jarring the trees. The maul was fitted with a handle five feet long. Fig. 11 shows the style of frames employed and the "gang" at work. This outfit can be operated by five people. Usually four women were employed to carry and place the sheets, two to each sheet, and one man to carry the heavy, padded maul and jar the trees. Method followed in Jarring and Determination of Results. Beginning with the row nearest the woods (row No.1) each row was jarred as quickly as possible, the sheets spread upon the ground at the end of the row and the beetles picked from them by hand, counted and placed in bottles. Counting the "catch" from each row separately, it was po ible to obtain the exact number caught per row for the season. Jarring was first begun March 27th and continued at more or less irregular intervals until June 11th. The operation was begun as early in the morning as it was possible to see, and continued until the heat of the sun caused the curculios to become active immediately after they were jarred to the sheets. The weather was cool during the first days of the operations and it was po sible to jar the full rows of forty trees without making an intermediate gathering of the harvest; but later in the season no more than 20 trees could be jarred before it was necessary to gather up the captured beetles to prevent their escape. Beetles have often been observed to fly from the sheets as early as 5.10 a. m. during May and June, and in these months it is practically useless to jar after 6.30 unless the beetles are taken from the sheets every fifteen or twenty trees. In the following table, beginning with row 1, nearest the woods, to row 30, farthest from them, the number of trees in each row, the number of beetles per row and the percentage of beetles per tree, are given. It is interesting to note the gradual reduction in the number caught from each row, as we move away from the wood . 31 Row I No.-I-- No--I-No. of of /' of beetles tree s beetles per tree 1 26 2 28 4" 32 35 5 3Q 6 36 7 33 8 35 9 33 10 32 11 33 12 30 13 32 14 34 15 31 16 30 17 34 18 36 19 30 20 32 21 36 22 36 23 32 24 35 25 37 26 35 27 39 28 34 29 26 30 33 806 31 739 26.4 682 21.3 627 18.9 497 16.5 477 13.2 -709 21.5 573 16.4 619 18.7 590 18. 476 14.4 589 19.6 493 15.4 357 10'.5 271 8.7 241 8 323 9.5 284 8 179 6 268 8.4 268 7.4 275 7.6 229 7.1 211 6 197 5.6 178 5 112 4.1 95 3.4 101 3.4 161 5.3 Totals 985 11,626 11.8 The percentage of infested and uninfested fruit was reckoned just as it was in the sprayed plats, i. e., by opening all the windfalls and the ripe peaches and classifying them as they properly belonged. Ten trees were selected from the block for this purpose, and eight trees were selected from the nearby section of the orchard for the check plat. The percentages of the two kinds of fruit yielded by the jarred plat and its check plat are given in the following table: No. of No. of lper cent. Ofl Per cent. of Jarred plat, 10 trees .. , Check plat, 8 trees .,. peaches Infested 1739 1664 peaches Iunlnfested I 2599 I 851 peaches Infested 40 34 peaches Iunlnfested 60 66 Comparison of the figures in the third column shows that only 6% more peaches were uninfested in the jarred plat than 82 in the untreated check plat. This is a poor showing considering the large number of beetles caught from the trees in the jarred plat. Spray.ing vs. Jarring. When jarring is compared to spraying on any basis, it suffers by the comparison. The heavy cost involved in the operation of a sufficient jarring force, its comparative ineffectiv~ness and the brevity of the season at which effective jarring can be done, unite to make it inferior. Unless labor is abundant and cheap, the cost of jarring for even two hours in the early morning is decidedly di proportionate to the good accomplished. It is impracticable from an economic standpoint and inefficient as a remedial measure. In small orchards, and under conditions which permit the control of the labor side of the question, it would be feasible. In large orchards jarring presents too many serious obstacles for successful manipulation. METHODS OF CONTROL. The results of the two years' experiments discussed in this bulletin show that curculio can be controlled largely by arsenate of lead at a ratio of 2 lbs. to 50 gallons of water, to which is added a milk of lime solution made from 3 lbs. of stone lime. Two applications are recommended, the first to be applied a the calyces or shucks are shedding, and the second two weeks later. In thrifty, healthy orchards where the foliage growth is dense, three applications are recommended. It is unsafe to spray weak trees m01'e than twice. Curculio and its relation to brown rot are discussed in Part II of this bulletin. The two are intimately associated; in proportion as the one is active, the other is in evidence. It is hoped that the reader will see how the control of curculio will not only reduce the number of "wormy" and punctured peaches, but proportionately eliminate brown rot as well. 33 PART II BROWN ROT EXPERIMENTS IN 1909. By A. C. LEWIS. INTRODUOTION. All peach grower are more or Ie familiar with brown rot, and a detailed description of the di ease is not nece sary. Many grower know from dear experience how it may cut down the yield and profit from their orchard ; and many more know how in some ea on the peache rot in tran it. The 10 s from brown rot varies at different sea on , the severity of the disea e depending upon the weather and the number of curculio present. The loss from brown rot i frequently 25% to 50%, and sometimes as high a 95%, of the crop in some localities. We have not, heretofore, been able to advise any sati factory treatment for brown rot. With the promising re ults thu far obtained from the experiments that have been conducted in Georgia, and from the commercial tests made, it now seems that we will be able to control brown rot and curculio by the self-boiled lime- ulphur and arsenate of lead. EARLY EXPERIMENTS. For a number of years many experiment have been carried on at different places in the United State to determine whether brown rot of peaches could be controlled by spraying with Bordeaux mixture. The Georgia State Board of Entomology experimented with the Bordeaux mixture three different seasons. From these experiments it wa concluded that brown rot of peaches could not be successfully controlled with the Bo~ 35 deaux mixture. Others experimenting also arrived at the same conclusion. In 1907 brown rot experiments were begun by Prof. W. M. Scott of the Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, with the self-boiled lime-sulphur solution. The results of the first season's work were very promising. In 1908 and 1909 Mr. W. T. Ayres, under the direction of Prof. W. M. Scott, carried on extensive experiments with the self-boiled lime-sulphur in Georgia with very satisfactory results. For Prof. Scott's report upon the experiments of 1908, see Circular o. 1 of the Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. Department of Agriculture. In Prof. Scott's experiments it was found that curculio sometimes made it very difficult to control brown rot. The observations of the writers in Georgia have been that when curculio was abundant brown rot was more severe, if the weather conditions were favorable, than when the curculio was not 80 abundant. Experiments conducted by the Georgia State Board of Entomology for the last three years, have shown that the curculi can be controlled to a large extent by praying with arsenate of lead. For a complete report upon these experiments up to and including 1909, see the first part of this bulletin. Previous to 1909 it was not considered safe to combine the two remedies, arsenate of lead and the self-boiled lime-sulphur solution, for it was not known just what the results would be. lt was cited that in many cases arsenate of lead alone was injurious to the fruit, and it was feared that if the two mixtures were combined the injury to the fruit might be still greater. PLAN OF EXPERIMENTS. In planning the experiments for 1909 we decided, fir t, to compare the self-boiled lime-sulphur mixture with the selfboiled lime-sulphur and arsenate of lead; second, to te t' the oncentrated lime-sulphur and the Bordeaux mixture. Different Materials Tested. The following different materials were tested: 1. Self-bolled lime-sulphur and arsenate of lead (8-8-2-50). 2. Self-boiled lime-sulphur (8:8-5(}). 36 3. Bordeaux mixture and arsenate of lead. 4. Bordeaux mixture (3-6-50). 5 Lime-sulphur boiled (10-15-50). diluted 1 gallon to 25 gallor.a of water. + 6 Same as above 2 IDs. arsenate of lead to 50 gallons of water. 7 Lime-sulphur boiled (10-15-50), diluted 1 gallon to 50 gallons of water. + 8. Same as above 2 lbs. arsenate of lead to 50 gallons of water. 9. Lime-sulphur solution prepared (Grasselli Co.), 1 gallon to 50 galJons of water. + 10. Same as above 2 lbs. arsenate of lead to 50 gallons of water. 11. Prepared lime-sulphur solution, diluted 1 gallon to 75 gallons of water. 12. Pratt's Sulfocide, 1 gallon to 75 gallons of water. + 1ii. Same as above 2 lbs. arsenate of lead to 50' gallons of water. 14. Prepared lime-sulphur, 1 gallon to 75 gallons of water. 15. Pratt's Sulfocide, 1 gallon to 100 gallons of water. Condition of the Orchard. These experiments were carried on in Betts Bros.' orchard at Woodbury, Ga. The orchard is located on Pine Mountain ridge, at an elevation of 900 to 1100 feet. The trees were 6 to 7 ~'ears old. In 190 from 50% to 75% of the fruit was lost from brown rot and curculio. In the winter of 1908 the orchard was prayed with the home-made lime-sulphur solution for the San Jose scale. In the spring the trees received a heavy application of commercial fertilizer, and during the season of 1909 made a rapid growth. In 1908 no effort was made to pick up the fallen fruit or gather the mummied peaches. From this it will be seen that the conditions were ideal for curculio and brown rot. Time of Application of the Different Sprayings. It was the intention to spray three times with the different materials, but on account of injury to the leaves and fruit some of the plats were only sprayed twice. It may be well to mention here that before we made the first application of lime-sulphur the trees were sprayed with arsenate of lead (2-3-50), between :March 26th and 31st. That is, the whole orchard was sprayed except the three check plats mentioned further on in this report. The first application for the control of brown rot and curculio 37 was made April 15th (as the calyces or shucks were shedding) ; the second May 11th and 12th; the third June 10th and 11th. RESULTS SECURED. Solutions that Injured the Fruit and Foliage of the Trees. The following solution injured the fruit and foliage when used with or without the ar enate of lead, and were only applied twice; Bordeaux Mixture (3-6-50), lime-sulphur mixture (10-15-50) boiled, diluted 1 to 25 and 1 to 50; lime-sulphur mixture prepared (Gras elli Co.), diluted 1 to 25, 1 to 50 and 1 to 75; Pratt's Sulfocide diluted 1 to 50, 1 to 75 and 1 to 100. Soon after the second application of the above materials the leaves began to drop off, and in ome ca es the fruit. For this rea on no attempt wa made to keep the picking records on the plats where the e different materials were used. At picking time it was noticed that the fruit on the trees sprayed with the solutions mentioned above did not ripen properly. Where arsenate of lead wa u ed the fruit was hard and of a deep red color, and was not considered salable. The Self-Boiled Lime-Sulphur Mixture. The re ults secured with the elf-boiled lime- ulphur, and the self-boiled lime-sulphur and ar enate of lead mixture are well shown in the following table; 38 I Plat Sprayed three No. times Variety Sell-boiled Iime- t sulphur. anenate 2 Ibs. 01 lead Elberta to 50 !rals. water. 2 Same as above \vithout arsenate Elberta of lead. --- - - - o/cStuD!r by Curcu~ %of Brown Rot --- %of Scab 0/0 of Sound Remarks ------ 16.72 3.46 Less than I I --- --- , 49.23 9.2 Lesa than 1 42 It was the curculio that reduced the 0/0 01 sound peaches. --------- Check platA Not sprayed. Elberta Check plat B Not sprayed. Elberta Sell-boiled lime- t sulphur. 2 Ibs. Belle 01 arsenate of lead Geor!ria to 50 !rals. waler. 2 Same as above without arsenate 01 lead. Belle 01 Georria Check Not sprayed. Belle 01 Georll'ia Orchard "See f 00 I below. note Elberta 66.4 32.2 50.3 32 ------ --- 50.65 35.39 7\.7 P..aches with only 34 a little scab were considered sound. --- --- 9 2.44 91 ------ --- 13.3 3 ISprayed once with 87 anenate of lead March 31st. --- --- 32.85 18 55 --- --- 10 to 15 1010 12 I I Per cent determined by countinll' the peaches at the pack'&, house lrom 85 time to time did not include fallen lruil nor all the lruit picked lrom trees. 1: Whole orchard was sprayed twice with self-boiled lime-sulphur and arsenate of lead (lime 8 lbs., sulphur 8 lbs. to 50 gallons of water) and once (first spraying) with arsenate of lead and lime (2-3-50). Size of Plats. In these experiments each plat contained from 50 to 68 trees, The results as given in the above table were determined by actually countin~ 1111' the peaches from each plat that w~re Sll picked from the trees and those that fell on the ground, after picking wa begun. No account was kept of the early windfalls. The plats were situated on one side of the orchard near the woods, and in the part of the orchard that was affected the most the season before with curculio and brown rot. It must also be remembered the whole orchard was sprayed as preyiously mentioned. SOME NOTES ON THE RESULTS. The above table shows, in a graphic way, how ucces fully the brown rot and curculio were controlled. By comparing the results in Plats No.1 and No.2, it will be seen that much better results were secured with the self-boiled lime-sulphur and arsenate of lead mixture, than with the self-boiled lime-sulphur alone. It will be noticed the scab or black spot was reduced to less than 1 per cent. This alone in some years would pay for praying. The difference between a sprayed and unsprayed peach in this respect is well shown in Fig. 1. When the peache from the unsprayed trees were brought to the packing house they were so specked and looked so inferior when compared with the sprayed peaches, that they were not put in the same car but packed by themselves and shipped by express to the local markets. Injury to Tree and Fruit. The self-boiled lime-sulphur did not injure in the least the leaves or the fruit. The self-boiled lime-sulphur and arsenate of lead only hot-holed a few leaves, and did not hurt the fruit. The results in the orchard spraying compare very favorably with the results in the experimental plats, both as to control of brown rot and curculio and effect upon the trees and fruit. The whole orchard, as mentioned before, was sprayed once ",ith arsenate of lead and lime, and twice with self-boiled lime- ulphur and ar enate of lead. Where treated this way no damage was done to the leaves or fruit, except on a few tree that weI' much weakened by the borers and San jose scale. 40 In one part of the orchard the curculio was very abundant even after two praying.. once with ar enate of lead and lime (2-3-50), and once with self-boiled lime-sulphur and arsenate of lead, so that part of the orchard wa sprayed once more. In this spraying 3 lb . of ar enate of lead was u ed to 50 41 gallons of water without lime. The results of this praying were very disastrous. Over 50 per cent. of the leaves dropped and 25 per cent. of the peaches were burned, and the remainder of the fruit was much damaged. The fruit on these trees never ripened properly, but was hard and highly colored. The injury to the peach by arsenate of lead takes a very characteristic form. It will first begin as a small, round, brownish-red burnt place. In course of time this burnt area will become larger and depressed, and the rest of the peach will be dark red. Many of the injured peaches crack open, the gum oozes out and the peaches will be in a condition like those shown in Fig. 9 (Part 1). COMMERCIAL TESTS IN 1909. In 1909 Mr. J. J. Stranahan prayed his entire orchard, once with arsenate of lead and lime and twice with the self-boiled lime-sulphur and arsenate of lead, with very good results. Mr. Ward, whose orchard is near Mr. Stranahan's, sprayed his orchard twice with ar enate of lead and lime, with very satisfactory results. Mr. Betts, as previously mentioned, sprayed with arsenate of lead and the self-boiled lime-sulphur with very gratifying results, except where he sprayed the third time with 3 lbs. of arsenate of lead to 50 gallons of water. Profs. W. M. Scott and W. T. Ayres in their experiments for the control of brown rot at Fort Valley, Ga., in 1909, sprayed 1100 trees as follows: "First, on March 31st (as the calyces were shedding), with arsenate of lead 2 lbs. to 50 gallons of water; second, on April 22nd with 8-8-50 self-boiled lime-sulphur and 2 lbs. arsenate of lead; third, on May 21st with selfboiled lime-sulphur alone; fourth, on June 9th with self-boiled lime-sulphur.' , "When assorted and counted the fruit from five trees had only 4112% affected with brown rot, about half of which was caused by curculio. Only 6Y2% of the fruit showed scab marks, and these were mostly small inconspicuous specks. The curculio infestation was 27112%." For a detailed report of Prof. Scott'8 experiments, see page 96 of Bulletin No. 30, Georgia State Board of Entomology, "Proceedings of the Georgia State Horticultural Society for 1909." LOSS OF CROP PREVENTED BY SPRAYING. The gain from spraying is greater than the difference in the percentage of sound fruit on unsprayed and sprayed trees. To illustrate how much greater the yield of fruit is on sprayed than unsprayed trees, we give the following figures: On 53 unsprayed trees the total number of peaches was 304; on 54 trees, sprayed once with arsenate of lead and three times with the self-boiled lime-surphur, the total number of peaches was 782; and 68 trees sprayed once with arsenate of lead and three times with self-boiled lime-sulphur and arsenate of lead, yielded 1154 peaches. To compare with the above we need only to give the yield in an orchard near Mr. Betts that was not sprayed. The crop was light in this orchard but the owner thought he would have five cars of peaches. He shipped one car and about half of another; the rest of the peaches were lost on account of the curculio and brown rot. There were other growers in the State that had the same experience last summer. CARRYING QUALITY OF THE FRUIT. Another factor worthy of consideration is the increased carrying quality of the sprayed fruit. The firm that bought Mr. Betts' peaches put them in cold storage. When the peaches were all picked Mr. Betts went to New York and saw some of the peaches that had been in cold storage for 8 or 10 days. He made no exact count of the peaches to determine what per cent. was affected with brown rot. Mr. Betts and the commission men were well pleased with the results. 43 SHIPPING TEST MADE BY W. M. SCOTT AND W. T. AYRES. In the experiment conducted at Fort Valley, Ga., by Prof. W. 1. Scott and W. T. Ayre ,a hipping test wa made. Their I' port on this hipping test wa a follows: "In order to determine the difference in the carrying quality of the sprayed and unsprayed fruit, two test cars of peaches from the experiment plats were shipped to ew York. examined on arrival and sold in the usual way through a commission house. The fruit in the first car was picked on Friday, July 9th, in the rain, and although due on the market Tuesday morning was delayed en route, and was not sold untlI Wednesday morning. The market was almost glutted with poor fruit and the prices ranged low. The test car contained Elbertas and Belles-sprayed and unsprayed. The sprayed Elbertas from the lime-sulphur arsenate of lead block sold for $2.00 a crate, and the unsprayed Elbertas from the adjacent unsprayed block sold for $1.5{) a crate, making a difference of 50 cents a crate. The sprayed Belles sold for $1.25 a crate and unsprayed Belles for $1.12 An ex- amination of the Elbertas showed that 34 per cent. of the unsprayed fruit was specked with brown rot, while only 6 per cent. of the sprayed fruit was affected. "The second car arrived Wednesday night, and was sold Thursday morning, July 15th, at the following prices: Sprayed EIbertas at $1.45 !leI' crate. Unsprayed Elbertas at 1.25 per crate. Sprayed Belles at 1.50 per crate. Unsprayed Belles at 1.14 per crate. "This shows a difference of 20 cents a crate for the Elbertas and 36 cents a crate for the Belles. Another significant fact is that all the sprayed fruit in each case was sold before the buyers began pur- chasing the unsprayed fruit. It wlIl be seen that the difference in market value in favor of the sprayed fruit, to say nothing of the loss In the orchard, pays the cost of spraying several times over." COST OF SPRAYING. The co t of 'praying d p nds upon 0 many factor that it is difficult to give figur that will apply generally. The following figures are given as a g neral guide to the cost of praying. The elf-boiled lime-sulphur-arsenate of lead mixture will cost a trifle over one cent a gallon. One hundred o-allon of the Read at Athens, Ga., 1909, and publlshed by the tate Board of Entomology and State Horticultural ociet~. 44 mixture will pray from 50 to 100 tree , depending upon the size of the tree . Four men, one to prepare the mixtul'e and three to pray, can pray from 500 to 00 tree a da , wi th a 200-O'allon tanle FigurinO' on this ba i , for good- ized 6-y ar-old tree, it would co t about 11/2 to 2 cents per tree for each application of the self-boiled lime- ulphur-ar enaie of lead mixture. When a power pray r is used the co t may be less. Prof. cott found in hi experiment at Fort Valley, Ga., wbere a power sprayer wa u ed, that the co twas 5 3/5 cents per tree for four application of tbe self-boiled lime-sulphurarsenate of lead treatment. When we take into con ideration the benefit derived from praying-larger yield, higher per cent. of sound fruit, increased carrying capacity of the fruit and the enhanced value of the fruit-the co t is in ignificant. PREPARATION OF SELF-BOILED LIME-SULPHUR. 1'b preparation of the self-boiled lime-sulpbur mixture i6 n t diffi ult, but great care bould be exercised to see that it i properly made and not allow d to boil too long before diluting. Tb following directions sbould be carefully followed: Weigh out 24 lb . of lime and 24 lb . of ulpbur. Place the . ulphur in a 50-gallon barrel and make into a thin paste by .'Jowly adding cold water and stirring until the ulphur is all llloi t. If this i not done the ulphur will be in lumps and will not mix readily with the lime. To this sulpbur paste add enough cold water to make six gallons, then add tb lime. Stir well and add more water as required to keep the mixture from becoming too thick. (We found that we had to add from 4 to 6 gallon of water during the cooking proce .) Wben the lime is all lacked, which should not be more tban 15 or 20 minute. top further cooking by diluting witb cold water. Dilute to 150 gallon and strain. If arsenate of lead is to be u ed add 6 lb . to 150 gallons after diluting to tbe required amount. Tbe ar enate of lead should be di solved in a small amount of water before addin~ it to the mixture. If tbe cooking i not topped when the lime is slacked the !\ulphur will continue to dis olve and the mixture may get 45 strong enough to injure the peach foliage. What is wanted is a. good mechanical mixture of the lime and sulphur with as little of the latter dissolved as possible. The straining is important, and should be carefully done, or the nozzles will clog while spraying. It is best to make the strainer out of copper gauze of 20 to 25 meshes to the inch. If more convenient the straining may be done when the mixture is diluted to 50 or 100 gallons, and the remainder of the water added afterward. In straining all the sulphur should be washed through if possible. If the mixture is strained before diluting to the required amount, the sulphur can be washed through with clear water from time to time as necessary, keeping account of the amount of water added 0 as not to make more than the required amount of the mixture. When the arsenate of lead is added to the mixture a great change in color takes place, it becoming a dark brown. This is due to the chemical change that takes place. To determine just what takes place, or what were the compounds formed when the arsenate of lead was added to the mixture, we had samples of each analyzed by a chemist. To secure the samples we prepared 150 gallons of the selfboiled lime-sulphur and took a sample fron{ this. Then the arsenate of lead was added and another sample taken. The analysis of the samples by Dr. Edgar Everhart, hemist of the' tate Geological Survey, gave the following re ults: The lime-sulphur wash, as given to me, consisted of 172 cc liquid and 7.2968 grm. solids. The filtered liquid carried 0.076 per cent. sulphur in combination with lime as a calcium sulphide. The solid matter contained: 37.40 per cent. free sulphur, and 32.63 per cent. lime ( aO). There was also found a large percentage of magnesia, showing the lime used was magnesian. The "lime-sulphur-Iead-arsenate" wash consisted of 160 cc liquid and 6.6225 grm. solids. The filtered liquid carried 0-.068 per cent. sulphur as a calcium sulphide. There was found no trace of arsenic in solution. The solid matter contained, beside lead arsenate: 31.57 per cent. free sulphur, 2.62 per cent. lead sulphide. 30.91 per cent. lime (CaO). This lime is also magnesian. The presence of lead sulphide indio 46 cates the contemporaneous formation of calcium arsenate, which would be found in the soUd matter." It will be noticed there was found no trace of free arsenic, but the greatest trouble with many brands of arsenate of lead is the presence of water-soluble arsenic. RECOMMENDATIONS. Based on the experiments and commercial tests that have been made, we recommend the following treatment for brown rot and curculio: Spray first about the time the calyces (or shucks, not the colored petals) are shedding, with arsenate of lead 2 lbs., lime 3 lbs., to 50 gallons of water. Make second application three weeks later, using the selfboiled lime-sulphur and arsenate of lead (8 lbs. of lime, 8 lbs. of sulphur, 2 lbs. of arsenate of lead to 50 gallons of water). Make the third application about four weeks after the second, using the self-boiled lime-sulphur alone, without the arsenate -of lead. If the curculio is numerous and the trees are hardy and have not been injured by the two applications already made, arsenate -of lead may be added to the self-boiled lime-sulphur at the third spraying. For earlier varieties such as Carman and Hiley make two applications: 1st, when calyces are shedding, and 2nd, about three weeks later. While we believe that to secure the best results three applications should be made as outlined above, fairly good results may be secured from two applications. In this case make first .application as calyces or shucks are shedding, using the selfboiled lime-sulphur and arsenate of lead. Make second application four weeks later using the same kind of mixture. CAUTION. In view of the fact that in the experiments mentioned in the forepart of this bulletin, arsenate of lead did, in some cases, injure fruit, and that Mr. Betts injured some of his trees and fruit with arsenate of lead as previously mentioned, we would not recommend it without due caution. But if the mixture is 47 not made too trong and applied a du'ected in this bulletin, and the tree are in good condition. we believe the arsenate of lead can be u ed with safety. When the re ults of the exp rim nt with ar enate of lead are compared with the elf-boiled lime- ulphur and arsenate of lead mixture, it appear a if it is afer to apply the ar enate of leao with the self-boiled lime- ulphur mixture than alone. Further experiments will be carried out along thi line the coming ea on by the State Board of Entomology. THANKS FOR ASSISTANCE RENDERED. We de ire to :stend our thank to the following parti Profs. W. 1\1. Scott and \\T. T. yre for ad:vice and ugaestions given. Bett Bro . for their hearty co-operation with us in the work, and for a istance rendered. Gra elli hemical ompany for material furnished. B. G. Pratt 'ompany for material furnished. Manufacturers of Arsenate of Lead. Bowker Insecticide o. 43 Chatham 1.. Bo ton. ::\la Gra elli nemical 0.. Bu'mingham, Ala. )lerrimac Chemical Co., 33 Broad t., Bo ton, la.. herwin-William 0., )l"ewark, N. J. Thomsen hemical 0., Baltimore. ld. Yreeland hemical 0., New York. . Y. 1\10t of the above companies have local agents at different point in the State. For information in regard to the name and address of these write the manufacturer direct. Many drug stores in the larger town handle ar enate of lead. but u ually better prices may be ecured by buying dir ct from the manufacturer . 48 NOTICE. The Bulletins ot the Georgia State Board ot Entomology, whIch are ot present practical value and still avallable, are mentioned below. (The numbers not mentioned are either out of date or Qxhausted.) Appllcatlon tor any ot these numbers should be addressed to the State Entomologist, Atlanta, Ga. Bulletin No. 12.-Merlcan Cotton Boll Weevil. Bulletin No. 13.-Some Common Insects Injurious to the Apple. Bulletin No. IS.-Pear Blight DIsease In Georgia, and Pear Leaf BUght. Bulletin No. 20.-Part I. Report ot State Entomologist tor 190&. Part n. Crop Pest Law and Regulations. Bulletin No. 21.-BpraylIig to Control the San Jose Scale. Bulletin No. 22.-Black Root Disease ot Cotton. Bulletin No. 23.-The Apple Woolly Aphis. Green Apple Leaf Aphil. Remedial Measures tor Same. Bulletin No. 24.-Cotton Anthracnose and Cotton "Rusts." Bulletin No. 26.-Peach Leat Curl, Yellows, Rosette and LIttle Peach. Bulletin No. 27.-Proceedings ot Horticultural Society for 1908. Bulletin No. 2S.-"BJack Root" DIsease of Cotton in Georgia and Itl Control. BulleUn No. 29.-Codllng Moth or "Apple Worm." Bulletin No. 30.-Proceedlngs ot Horticultural Society for 1909. Bulletin No. 31.-The San Jose Scale and Soma Experiments for Its Control. Circular No. 6.-'1'he Use of Soluble Oils Against San Jose Scale. Circular No. 7.-The Hessian Fly in Georgia. Circular No. "B.-Report on Experiments for Control of San Jose Beale, 19071908. CtrcuJar No. '.-The Brown-Tail Moth. E. 1.. WORSHAM, State Entomolqlat. THE UNIVERSITY AT ATHENS. I. FRANKLIN COLLEGE. (The College of Arts.-Established 1801, offering the Degree of Bachelor of Arts, and including: 1. General Courses in the Liberal Arts. 2. Special Courses. n. THE GEORGIA STATE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND THE MECHANIC ARTS.-Established 1872, offer. ing the Degree of Bachelor of Science, and including the following: (a) In the College of Science and Engineering: 1. The General Science Course. 2. The Civil Engineering Course 3. The Electrical Engineering Course. (b) In the College of Agriculture: 4. The Full Agricultural Course. 5. The Forest Engineering Course. 6. The One-year Agricultural Course. 7. The Winter Course in Agriculture. 8. The Experiment Station (at Experiment) .,: 9.. The Farmers' Institutes. m ~ GRADUATE SCHOOL.-Offering the following De greeh (. ,1 lJrt&ster of Arts. 2.. Master of Science. 3. Civil and Mining Engineer. IV. THE LAW DEPARTMENT.-Offering the degree of Bachelor of Law-A Two Years' Course. V. THE UNIVERSITY SUMMER SCHOOL.-Founded in 1903. Five Weeks' Session, offering courses in 1. Common School Branches. 2. Pedagogy and Related Subjects. 3. High School Studies. 4. Selected College Studies VL THE SCHOOL OF PHARr,iACY.-Offering the Degree of Graduate in Pharmacy-A Two Ye9Xs' Course. vu. THE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION.-EstBblished 1908. Por particulars address the head of the Department or the Chancellor, Athens, Ga. ~ ~ Georgia State \. Board of Entomology BULLETIN No. 33. NOVEMBER 1910. , Proceedings Of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Meeting OF THE . Georgia State Horticultural Society Held at Sparta, Georgia, January 26-27, 1910. Published by the State Board of Entomolo8Y and State Horticultural Society. Georgia State Board of Entomology Bulletin No. 33 November, 1910 Proceedings of the Thirty-fourth Annual Meeting of the Georgia State Hortic.ultural Society HELD AT SPARTA. GA. January 26 and 27. 1910 Published by the State Board of Entomology and Slate Horlic.ullural SOCIety ATLANTA. GA.: CHAS. P. BYRD. STATE PRINTER 1910 THE DEATH OF DR. P. J. BERCKMANS PRESIDENT OF THE CEORCIA STATE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY OCCURRED ON NOVEMBER THE EICHTH NINETEEN HUNDRED AND TEN Georgia State Board of Entomology ORGAN IZATIO hairman, T. G. HUDSO , ommis ioner of Agriculture, Atlanta, Ex-officio Member. Pre ident, P. J. BER KMANS, lale Horlicullural ociety, Augu tao Ex-officio :Member. Presidcnt, J. J. eo~ ER, tate Agricultural oci ty, Ex-officio 111 muer. artersville, E. L. WORSHAM, Slale Entomologist and ecrcla ry of lbe Bard, Atlanl.a. A. . LEWI , A i tan t tate Entomologi. t, tlan tao W. \. REED, Field A' i'lant Entomologisl, Atlanla. W. W. eHA E, Depuly In pectoF, Atlanta. G. R. CASEY, Deputy Inspector, :Mariel tao Georgia State Horticultural Society OffICERS 1910-1911 PRE IDE T, .1'. J. BER K1.IA S Augusta VI E-PRE IDENTS, 1 t Con!!'ressional Di [riel-I.. R. FARMER Louisville 2nd Congres ional District-H. C. ,YHITE DeWitt 3nl Congressional Distriet-]<'RA~l\: O. MILLER Fort Vallil.Y 4th Congressional Dislricl-J. J. STRANAIIA:T Bulloehville 51 h COl1O're~siollal Di triel-JULIA J FIELD Allanta 6th COllO're ional Di lriet-A. D. WILLI M, Yale dlle 7th COIl!!"ressiollal Di'lriet-OEO. II. 1.ULLER 8th COllO'rc 'iollal Di lricL-B. "T. H NT Rome Eatonton !JUt C 110'1'05 'iollal Di I ri I-I. C. IVADE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. omelia 10th Congres iOllal Di lricl-\\-. I. lIARLEY parln. lllh COIlO'l'C sional District-'i". \\. THOdA Valdosla SECRETARY, J. B. WIGH~'............................................. airo THEA 'h.L.;R, La I.' A. DEll 'K&J l\R Angusla STANDING COMMITTEES Prof. T. R. 1 Hallon L. A. I3erckmalls J. B. 'Yi"ht II. R. , laight. IIcrucrt . Wbite . R. C. I3cL'ckman II. B. hase O. II. :!IIiIIcr N NEW:BR ITS. ON, Y~Ol'nIH. : Albells Augusla Cair0 D more t DeWilt Angusta Ilunl \'i lle, Ala. Rome, Ga. Prcsidcnt Bcrckmuns dicd Noyelllbcl' 8tb, 1910. 5 ON OR AME.r TAL A D USEFUL TREES. B. W. Hunt Eatonton Prof. Alfred Akerman Athens H. L. Boone Valdosta B. W. Stone Thomasville o VEGETABLE CULTURE. Prof. H. E. Stockbridge Atlanla H. L. Long Leesburg Jno. A. Cobb Americus Charles S. Bohler Augusta F. A. Ruggles Dawson ON PACKING VEGETABLES AND FRUITS AND TRA SPORTATIO OF. J. Moragne Fleming Geo. White, Jr T. R. Lombard A. M. Kitchens T. F. Murph Atlanta Sparta Cornelia Baldwin :M:arshallville W. H. Felton, Jr Judge H. L. Long J no. T. West. M. J. youmans ON LEGISLATION. 1lfacon Leesburg Thomso:l Dawson ON BIOLOGY. E. L. Worsham, State Entomologist. A. C. Lewis, Assistant State Entomologist Atlanta Atlanta 6 ROLL OF MEMBERS FOR 1910-1911 Akerman, Prof. Alfred Alston, Dr. . E Berckmans, L. A -Berckmans, P. J Berckmans, Mrs. P. J Berckmans, R. C Berckmans, P. J. A. Jr Black, R. II Boone, H. L Bohler, Chas. S Boyd, Willis ~f. Carroll, J. S Chase, H. B Christian, ~ Clark, Jno. W Cobb, Jno. A Coffee, Joel Cuthbert, Alfred Deckner, Chas., Fort McPherson Dozier, O. A Farmer, L. R Felton, W. H., Jr Field, Julian Finney, J. T Fleming, T. M Fleming, Jas. L Fort, Jno. P Fugazzi, M., 204 Sixth St.. Gilmore, Geo Griffing, C. Moo Harley, W. 1. Hendrickson, F. W 7 Athens Richland Augusta. Augusta Augusta Augusta Augusta Cornelia Valdosta Augusta Adairsville Baltimore, Md. Huntsville, Ala. Atlanta Augusta Americus LuI a. Augusta Atlanta Athens Louisville Macon Atlanta Haddocks Atlanta Augusta Athens Cincinnati, O. Wartben Jacksonville, Fla. Sparta, Ga. Milledgeville lIelldrickson, 1. n Illledgevilte Hood, . J............................................. ommCl'ce IIllghc, Dudley L " Danville IIunnieult, G. F Allanta IIunl, B. \Y :1lonlon Yilchcns, A. :M Baldwin Lewis, A. ., Assistant Enlo!Uolo"i I ALlanla Lillie, T. II............................................... pm'la Lombard, '1'. R........................................... orn lia Long Juuge H. L Lce burg .l\Iidd! lon, W. S .l\Iiller e. H liller, J. . .l\1iIIcr, Frank Ie Ie 'ky, L. L "T M Halton, Prof. T. II .l\IorriII, . 1I[unJh J. }"., T'rrs. la. Fruit I~~:<:h:lngr> Powell, J. r Clarks IIi11, S. r . Rom , .. Rome Fort v'alley ALlallla Alhen l\laeon Mal hal1ville Dill:1l'11 Rag rs, J. N H)wlanrl \\'. l\J.. JHlria Aug'II"la , roll, \Y. 0 C!:lI'ks IIill, H. C. ,colt, Eo IT.................................... lillcclgc\'ille, 0:1. heppal'tl, Cco. \Y Tallap 0':1 Simmon, P. B. Gaine \'ille Staight, H. R Demore t Stone, B. IV Thoma. \'ille Stoekbrido'e, Prof. II. E., 20 For:'.dh t.. : AlIanla Swain, J. P \Tarnell Teasley, G. J Thoma, \1". IV '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ~Inlon Yaldos!a Von H ril, n., 93 T a. an , I. X IV York if)' Wade, I. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. ol'nelia, \ aCl'nic'kr, 11. K, nOll P:l. ,\ \C' \Y:lshing[on n. r. 8 "'l'~f Jilt). '1' ThOI1l'oll "'lialey, 'W. T Whaley 'Yhite, Il. E Spada "Thite, 0 o. Jr............................................ parta Wbile Herbert, DeWitt "'hituey, . E '..uo-usta "'io-ht, J. B Cairo "'illiarn, A. D Yatesville William, J. '1'........................................ IIaddoel: "-or;;:ham E. L., laic ElltolUolo!!i:l. Allanw. Youmans, l\I. J Daws n HONORARY MEMBERS AIWOl1d, 1'1'0[.\\'. D 'a. Clmr!ollc',:ij]r, Bailr.'", Prnf. L. II. orncll ni,el'sity Illia a, . Y. Brackett, Col. G. B., hier, Diy. of. PomoIo' y W'a bino-lon, D. C. -Bush, I ador Bushburg ~Io. Crayl n, Hon. B. 1<' Anderson, S. Fnnlllss, II II. D. l!~., Ex,G ". of I'cbra ka Brown "ille, Keb. -Gray, Prof. Asa... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. IImbrido-c, Tlfa~~. Green, ?Ill'.. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. laylon, Ala. lIaIe, J. H South Glaslonbury, onn. -llexamer, Dr. F. 1\1. , lanford, onn. -Jol.\", 'ha Pari, France -,Hechan, Tlioma Germ, nlo"'Jl, Pbila. ?lfnn on F. Y Dalla , '1'exa -.'cwman Prof. J. S Walhalla, ,. C. Pear on, T. G. (f:ec. Audubon Socicty) Oreen boro, N. C. -Quinn, P. '1' ~-c\Yal'kf J. "'ims 01. R. 1\1........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. olnmbill S. C. - trayman, Dr. D. J Leavenworth, Kansas. Thurber, Dr. Geo. (Editor Am. Ao-rie.) Pas aic, . J. -Wilder, Hon. lIar hall P., Ex-Pres. Am. Pom. Soc Boston, :l\I:J.ss. "Decea ed. 9 PREFATORY. The attendance at the Sparta se sions was much larger than heretofore and was graced by the presence of many ladies and numerous persons from the surrounding country. Many new members were added to our roll, and the interest which was manifested in the deliberations of each day, was gratifying to the officers of the Society, who had many months previous arranged a most attractive program. As was expected, only a small quantity of fruit was exhibited, the session being too late. But the citizens of Sparta were most hospitable and showed their appreciation of the session being held in their midst, by incessant courtesies. At the conclusion of the first day's proceeding an elaborate banquet was tendered the members of the Society and Visiting friends by the hospitable citizens of Sparta, at which the Pre ident presided as Toastma tel'. The occasion was a very pleasant one, a pirit of good fellowship prevailed throughout the evening, and after the dinner was concluded, several delightful speeches were made by those called upon by the Toastmaster, who .took occasion to thank the good citizens of Sparta, e pecially the ladies present, who took such an interest in making the sojourn of the members of the Society as pleasant as possible. This event will long be remembered by those who were fortunwte in being present. His Excellency, Governor Joseph M. Brown, (who has always evinced a friendly interest in the work of the 10 Society) had promised to attend during the last day's session, but at a late moment telegraphed that important State bu iness prevented him from being present. This was much regretted by everybody. It was made evident that the action of the Society taken at a previous s~ssion, in changing the time of holding its Annual Meeting from August to January, was wise. Owing to the fact that the American Pomological Society will hold its Biennial Session at Tampa, Fla., on January 31st, the 35th Annual Meeting of the Georgia State Horticultural Society will be held at Thomasville, Ga., on January 26th and 27th, giving an opportunity to some of our members and friends to attend the session of the oldest and greatest of our National Pomological organizations. Reduced fare will probably be given by the Florida railroads. 11 PROCEEDINGS OF THg THIRTY-FOU~THANNUAL MEETING OF THE GEORGIA STATE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY HELD ~T SPARTA, GA., JANUARY 26th and 27th, 1910. Pre id nt P. J. Bel' 'bmw. alled the meeting to or- der pl'omptly at 10 :30 a. m., a. ]:1l'ge ait ndanre bein o- pI' ent. In the all ence r th c1'ctary, fl'. J. B. "Tight, of airo, Ga., Prof. . L wi of tlle 'tat Bonrl of Enlomology, \\'a: j'(,fJ!H'slcfllo acl n,',' cr tal'Y pro lem. The ev. j\fr. Britt, of 'pm'la, Ga., invok d the di \'ine ,bl ., ing for a nrr ,~rnl ant11>cn ficia] mc ting. lIon. Thoma, F. Fl min o', of ill pnrta Bar, deliv- ered the addre f wclcorne, i!1"itino- thn oci ty and each member to partake of their h 'pitality, and a ur- ing the ociet)' that the itizens of Sparta ould do all :in tll ir power to make the me ting proli.t [I]'C pre's nl in s:lC'h n1lmh I'S to hclp ns ",ilh tbeir ,~'mp[llhy in out' wOl'k. 'Ye ean nhray" a('c TI11,li.. h hcllcl' I'l',ult. when '" h:l\'e their pI' ,ellce [lnd co-opel'atiun. l:! It has been said lhat for many year past hOrliculture has been tardy in it development becau e of the difficulty in ecurin'" reliable practical teachiug from tho e who have given thi pUI uit the attention which it required, and further becau e horticulture half a century ago was con ider d as of small importance when compared with agriculInre. This opinion W:J enlerlnined by mnny writer upon a"'l;cultnral 'onomy f tho e tim,. They beld that al1 of OUl' th u productive ]' ouree were ub er,i nt to the ullil'ation of colton, and caused al~ OUl' effort to be concentrated upon tIle O't' at mon y crop. However, a few fat' eeUlO' men for aw tbat tbi COUI"Se mu t e\'entnally be modified wilh lhe incren in'" wealth of ur rural population, which bl'ought wilh it the neces ity of pI' \'i ling for the incrensiug ne d, in the pt'oO'rru, of OUl' dom .lic economy and, ocial ,y tem, which is continually advancin'" and on. I)uenlly adding to human w::mls and pt'oducing tb mcnn for tI'eit' sllpply. From lhis beO'an a forward mOl'e ill our h rlicultural progress. Men of k cn observation eeing lh , gr at pos.'ibilities of ihi climale and of the lil'er ified soil for t1 ces fully growing a large ran"'e of fruits and plant, began to experiment along ,these lines. oting their ucc ,other became O'radually inter ted, until the re ults of th .'I~ experiments were made kno\\n t1u'Ough the pet'iodical then published. We have now reached the oonelu ion Hmt horticultural education and the application of it eientific principle i in k epinO' with the present rcquirements of life, Our pI' uece or began to advocate the cultivation of fmits and a larger varicty 'Of culinary veO'etables. This was followed by the ailitie, which a gen l' u.' .'oil, climate llll,l transportal ion fncilili s hal'e gil' n YOli. W'ilh intellio'enL pl'ogres~i\'e ,pirit yon h.w made your .'ection nmong the mosL au\'anc d in OUl' late's pI' duclil' l'C'SOlIl'C'S, and l' cognizing the, e advnntagc, wvth the application of the b ,t modem scientific m thol you have nchieved an ll\'iabl reput,ati 11 as a highly ec1ueated, social and refined community. 13 Weare glad Lo be with you, make new friends, and strengthen Lhe bonds which are engendered by a common pm'Suit, where the only strife for advancement is one where each of us aspires to grow beLter crops than our neighbor and to tell him of om' more succes ful methods, that by so doing he, as well as others, may be henefited. While of lart:e Y0aI'S horticultm'e and especially its commercial features, have made such rapid progres , there is some danger in overreaching one's capacity for succe sful results. Of Lhis we frequently have a painful evidence in the numerous peach orchards which have been gradually abandoned, frequently at great pecuniary loss. The causes which brought about these failu.:.es are many, such as sometimes the unsuitableness of soil, situation, great distance from transportation facilities, selection of the Wl'ong market varieties, insect depredations, and fungous di eases; but oftener they arise from planting a larger area than can be properly cultivart:ed, fertilized, sprayed, and the products profitably disposed of. The principles which should govern everyone of us is how to gather the lm'gest and most valuable prowl/cts {rom a given surface of land in any givelJ number of yeals. This is advanced by all agricultural economi ts, and should nevcr be forgotten. Therefore if you should gather from one acre a very large and profitable crop, owing to careful cultivation, high fertilization and the application of all the scientific methods which are available, do not think that the same re uIts will be secured if you e)..i:end your 'area of cultivation beyond where you can concentrate your labor and attention. There is a limit.to successful and regular results in every class of our products. TIlE SOCIETY'S FRUIT Lr T. Each section of our great State holds out pos ibilities for the profiible famine, lJecau c the ratio f pI' ducfion 1 ]c ' than Ihat of <1 maud, tile only remcdy i- au increa ing yield in our food j)l"olucl . Thi call be 'l'curcd by the applicatioll of iu/cusiL'e fanniuf} me/hods, thc kllo\\'lcllg of \\'!rich i 1I0W frcely utrer d by a \\'i e tale and Fed ral Gb\'crnment to ~11l who will 'a\'ail lhem ch'c' f lhcse opporlunili . 'Ve a adnmccd 1 rlicultul'i I .hould do all iu oUt' po\\"et to aid in ihi iu rea ed yield, pracl1cally d 01011 trali~lO' that this is po ible by advo ating and adoptulO' mOl'e intelliO'ent m thod of cultivation than are generally pracliced and promoting greater coheion among 'Our rlli'al people ill liv1n'''' more c]o-ely together where the same pursuit prevail. INSBCT DEPnED.tI.rlO~ . In 1894 the anllual Jo s to our agricultura] crop. from illscct I esls had reach d the va t um of $200,000,000. In 190 , the tatistic of the . Department of AnTi ll]tUt' tate that thi terrible fiO'ure had been more 1han doubled and the annual ]os- cau d by inse t amounted to $700,000,000, 01' len per CE:nl. of Ihe entire value of OlU' aO'ricultural and horticultural crops. The boll u:eLt'il los in the cotton belt ha amounted to from $20,000,000, to $2 ,000,000 annually. The straw- ben'y u:cc'Vil d fro ed $700,000 worth of fruit in one county in Jorlh arolina. These figures are appalliuO' and admonish aJI cultivator of the soil to use the utmost yigilance in protectioO' in ectivorous birds that can de troy more noxiou in ect than all the prayinO' that is done. Our tate has wi ely made a special appropriation to the Bureau 16 of EntolUolog-y which will give ils officers additiunal meaus fur ex! Ili"e field and laboratory work, but i it not imperative that all our progre sive tiller of the oil should acquire some knowledge of in ect life and the means to eradicate the noxious species? Free lectures upon economic entomology are offered by the State College of AgricuHure, Why not avail yourseh'es of this opp01'tuniiy and thus aid in lcssening the grcat los to 'our field prouuets and in a manner off ettillg the direful predic,tion for a pos ible food supply By doing we will haye the sati 'faction in sbaring in tbe work of lhe world's nice, TI; 'IWLOGY. lJoc/or cil i11dn-ne:;: A felV days "tf'lcl' our Jast s~ssioll at Athcns lhe llumcr us frienlls of Dr. McInnes received lbe tlUUOUllCClDeut of !lis dealh at a waleI' cure in Pennsylvania, whcre he Iiad O'Olle in hope of bcing rclieved of a slight ailm ni fr m which lie had suffercd for 'evel'al monlh pa t. This be ame rapidly 'agg'l.'a"at d, and ended his life shortly aftcr bis ani,'al lh rc. lIe was grcatly onc rllccl because of his inabilily to b pre nt at our la t annual e. sion, and we will m; this genial fljend and coworker who for 19 year sen'ed you as the Vice-President from the 101h ConOT _sional Di triet. Doctor M"dnne was bol'll in ScoHan] in 1834. A a yonng man he became bief Enoiueer ill the Ancbor Line of team hip, which pursuit he followed for many years. Graduated aftcrwards in medicine at Philadelphia, he lhere practiced his profession for two year before coming to Augusta, where he made his home during thirty years. He was a true philanthropi t, eonneclinO' himself with every public in litution where he could add to the welfare ()f 0lhe1 , and where hi con taut work wa freely given without any other reward than the ulliver al esleem in which he was held in his community and by ,those who knew him as a co-worker in his efforts to pr'omote the ethics of ihis Society. DOCTOR JESSE PHILIP HENRY BROWN. Dr. Brown was born in Maryland in 1830, 'and followed dental surgery as his profession. He resided a few years in Atlanta and in 1 64 mo,ed to Augusta, where he made his permanent home, and where he died in September, 1909. He was a scientific investigator, espe- 17 cially in agriculture, of which he made a success. He introduced the first bees 'Of the Italian breed and wrote extensively upon this branch of industry. All of his manuscripts, intended to be published in book form, were destroyed by fire together with his residence. He served you as Vice-President of the 10th Congressional District from 1876 until 1889, during which peliod he annually contributed many valuable papers. In later life he became a most successful strawberry grower, his berries being always 'Unusually large and commanding a high price. He aJ 0 originated a few excellent cro s-bred varieties. THE PRESIDE T: "All of our members are not yet present, but more are expected this afternoon. However, we should be glad to enroll the names of any present who wi h to become members of the Society, and the old members who have not paid the trea urer their dues' will now be given an opportunity to do o. We will take a sho~t rece s for this purpose befo~e we begin our regular program. "We have as the first thing on our program an address on Soil Fertility by Prof. Fain, of the State College of Agriculture. He has, however, written me desiring that this should go over until tomorrow morning. I regret to announce that everal members have sent their excuses. "Prof. J. S. ewman, of Walhalla, . C., who has a paper on the Home Garden as Auxiliary to the Farm. advises me that his health will not allow him to attend our meeting. His son al 0, Prof. C. ewman, a native of Sparta, who was to have delivered a paper on Clover Crops in Orchards, has been called to the Experiment Station at ummerville, S. C., and will be unable to attend. "Mr. Swingle, of the Department of griculture, Washington, D. C., is also unable to be present. I made 18 every effort to get some officers of the U. S. Department of Agriculture to attend this year, but everyone that has been addressed has replied that no man was available at this time of the year to send South except Mr. Swingle, who promised to come at the reque t of our friend Mr. Hunt. However, as just stated, he writes that he can not come, but sends a paper, many photographs, and also some fruits. Our secretary, Mr. Wight, of Cairo, is unable to come on account of the illness of his wife, who has a severe attack of la grippe. He says th'at it is a great disappointment to him, and it is al 0 to us. "Prof. Akerman, of the Georgia State College of Agriculture, whom I introduce to you, will now present his paper." NATIVE TREES FOR ORNAMENTAL PURPOSES. By PROF. AL:h'RED AKERMAN, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga. When I was "llsked to discuss this topic before the Society, Ire fused, but afterwards consented, against my better judgment. My chief study has been of native trees for commercial purposes, and naturally I feel myself at a great disadvanmge when I come to discuss ,their ornamental values. However, in spite of long training along utilitarian lJines, I, in common with most people, must confess to an appreciation of the beautiful in trees. Nearly every one admir~ trees. In some cases this admiration amounts almost to idolatry. Omen trees of inferior ornamental value are kept on streets, lin parks, 'and on private grounds for n'o better reason than the lack of courage to attack a well known fetich. When one considers our mvtive trees for ornamental purposes' one is overwhelmed with the length of the list to choose from. When I beg'an to write tbis paper I made out a Jjst of trees native to Georgia that I considered well adapted to ornamental purposes. After I had made my Jjst I counted, the h'ees on it, and found that I had over forty. I dare say that the landscape garde!1er can find the materials for nearly any kind of composition within this State and often within the bounds of one county. 19 Taking the conifers flL- t, thcre arc the pine with ten repre ~nta tiy in Georgia, at lea t fh'e of which are valuable for ()l'J1'amentJI as well a indu trial purposes. In ~he extreme nOl'thern part of the State we ha,e the white pine, Pinu trobus. Tbi trec with its delicate grey-green foliag ,it incomparable eriect when een aO'ainst the I.;) a a background, and its quick 0'1' wth make it a mo. t desirable Iree a in nol'lh GeorOOiri. d lInt I class il among the ol'llamenial tre . bnl I b lieve that if you will consid [' it fairly . u will come to the c nclu ion that it ha aIm t if not quit the yaluc of the, etch pin, Pinus yll;e 'Iris, which has been ,'0 exlen. iyely U d in ol'l1amental planting. The loblolly pine, Pinlls laNla, occm in ,{ hc Piedm nt and i he roa. tal plain. It" "'eneral appearane i imilar to thc horflcaf. It ha. one ach'alllage o"cr thc horfleaf in ils "cry rapid O'ro\\'[h. The longl af Pinu. 1'a1u f ri aud uban I inc, Pinu helerophyllu, oc lIL' in the c aslal plain. Both, becau.e of [h ir dark tufted foliuO'e, larg ou an 1 tall straight trunk, are c mmeuded for me kind of ornamen1a1 work, such a' groups and avenue... 'l'he bald CypL' Taxodiwn eli tichml1, llative to the bay and \l'amrs of the c a tal plain, i ometime n ed for ornamental pur- poses. The cypress, unlike mo. t of the conifeJ sll d ils foha~' in the winter. Thi giYes it a weird apl earance which appeal the fan y; il tart one to thiJlking of owl and browni ". The juniper ba. h 0 rcpre en'lati"es in Georgia, Juniperus virginiana and Juniperu uarbadensis. The J~tniperu 1:il'gilliana occur throughout the tate and the otber in the coastal plain. The juuiper i exten i"ely planted for ornament. I do n t recall ha\'ing een a community of a dozen house. or more where ,thi tree had n t been planted. I )nt~st ay, that O'i\'en normal health and flppetite, I do not rflre f I' the juniper. It ombre a"pert i. nlto elhel' 100 sngg .ti,c of h :ll,es, funeral., and 0']'.'1\' yards. Thc hemlork i. repre. ent d in G orgia by two. p ('irs, T.ur/a COlla,zrll.,i. and T.~1tga ('aro7iniana. They occnl' only in the nodhern counIi.. Thry ha\'c Illng'. c nicfll crow!ls an<1 <1:11'" nTCen roling-e. Th T.ugn Nllladrnsi i. Ih lIlor COIllPfl('t of the f\l'o, :lnd ill g-eneral lhc sn]J<'rior orll:JlIlcnlal Irce. Fod fortune to O'et two fruits to stick. One of lhem a common orange crossed with trifoliate pollen, yielded one bybrid; tbe other, a trifoliate crossed with orange pollen, yielded eleyen hybrids. This work was a part of a general plan of citrus breeding undertaken by Dr. H. J. Webber and myself. In 1 9 I went abroad for the Department of Agriculture and Dr. "-ebber undertook to care for liata 'f good flavor, excellent for making ade. The lorton, grown from the seed of the same cro ed fruit, looks exactly like a giant orange. The smaller specimens are 0 like the orange that they can not be distinguished from it. Tbe skin is rather thick, contains an abundance of oil; the pulp i acid and only lightly bitter. When fully -ipe the M'Orton i edible from the hand if covered with ugar. The illits is still another type from seed of the ame cro sed fruit. This is a small, light-colored fruit, howing ridO'e and often developing a series of projection or e,en plitting to w that the few seeds found in the citranges (unlike the trifoliate which i literally packed with eeds, the citrange i u ually eedle ) give ri e to seedlings apparently reproducing the mother type almost exactly, so that there is very little hope of a break in the second generation. Accordingly, in 1~07, Mr. E. M. avage was engaged to make additional citranges in Florida. This work was continued in 1908, and in 1909 he carried the work to outhem California while I went to Florida. The two of us together made over ten th<>usand crosses in 1909, a great majority of them containiu'" trifoliate orange blood. 'Ve have on hand in the greenhou e at Washington nearly a thousand new varieties of citranges. In view of the enormous difference between the original fruits which have been tested ds which have been found desirable after twelve years in growing citrus hybrids. In the fil t place, it is now pos ible to recognize the citranges as Soon as the seeds germinate. If the seedlin'" contains blood of the trifoliate, it looks so unlike the ordinary orange seedling as to be readily distinguished from it. The first lellves instead of 'being rather large and placed exactly opposite to each other as in the orange, are small scale-like, and scattered along the stem near the base. These are followed by a couple of smaller leaves with toothed margllls. The rest of the leaves vary from unifoliate to trifoliate. Unlike the trifoliate parent, the middle leaflet is laI'ger than the two side leaflets. 41 Only 'a small proportion of the seedlitl!!'S from crossed fruits tunis out to be 'true hybrids. If the true hybrid can be recognized, as has been stated, and given special treatment when still very young, the growth can be much accelerated. At the same time much expense and trouble can be saved by ejecting the worthless fal e hybrids. It shoull be stated that the orange and other citrus fruits often produce two 01' three seedlings from each seed, only one of which is the true hybrid. FORCING CITElUS HYBRiDS UNDER GLA s. There can be no doubt that much time can be gained in forciu~ citrus ~brids in the green house under rather high temperatures. It is our practice now to pick the fruits as soon as they begin to ripen, not waitin'" for them to reach full maturity, since tbe seeds reach full size before the fruit itself is fully ripe. The seeds are ex- h'acted and planted separately in thumb pots in a greenhouse kept at a high temperature, usually from DO-IOO during the day and 80-00 degrees F. at night. Under these conditions, if properly watered, the seeds sprout very ra'Pidly and within some ten day or two weeks have developed suf- ficiently to make it easy to recognize the t1'Ue hyb1ids. " These are then picked out and reported and "'iven special treat- ment. They are usually repotted in three inch thumb pots wben about two months old ' came into bearing a year later. llbsequently several 50 :n\'oice of ;ree were rec ive 1 from aliiornia, but a a rule the treeS were all PO'lrJy rooted and gave in liffel'ent result; ufficient matenal, howe\Ter, WIS ecul'ed to beO'in their exten ive propa~tion upon seeuling stocks )f our naLive type. The profu ion of their yield and pree city in bearing s on made the e fruits very popular. KEL EY PLU~I: The horti ultnral pre of alifornia ""ave such a glowing deRtripLion 0 i thi: plum t hat efforts were made 10 secure it. Alt hough inLrouu ed fl'om Japan in 187"*, by Mr. John Ke1 ey, it had not been dis eminaLc1, and no nm eryman ould upply it. l!lortunately, in 1 3 a few O'rafting cions were. ecured through a fLiend. The e were in crted in lhe top of large plum tree and et fruit the following yea~. Immediate'y a larO'e propagaLion beO'all. The carrying capacity of this plum i 1"( 'llarkab1e. Two different shipmenLs were made Lo the Pari Exposition. and after 14 dnys in tran it, reached there in perfect condiLion. TI ey kept und f l' three weeks lOllO'er. In fbis conncction il may be f inLere t Lo grower of Japan plums to . u6g" I !lHIl ire be I lanfcd in fronO' clay oil, the. mface of the Jailer not ~o be disLurued xccpt to keep it free frolll weed. Th~ harler Lhe O'rolUld is kept Lhe le decay will occur in the fruit of Lhe ReI ey plum. From 1 5, in followinO' year lllany varietie of Japane e plums were re-~.ci\ ed through a1ifomia importers, Luther Burbank, Leonard Coate and oLher , and tbose that proved of go d qualify were propaO'aLed. In 1 fl the Japan Blood peach was received. H pro\-ed of econd qualiLy but ripens early in June. The same year came the Japan ehe Lnut , which are very precociou in bearinO' fruit, but the trees very horf li\'ed after the fir t production of nut. During 1877 the laLe R. R. Hunley, of Talladeo'a, Ala., sent me bud of whal he called the J aplll family of peaches, a originated by JudO'e ampbell of Pen aco1a, urO'in"" Lhat they be propagated as b~ ing upelior to any of the varieLie of hiu c peaches Lhen known. Ther were eyen varieLies; Lhe be I of which proved to be Lhe General Icc, tonewall Jackson aud poll. wood, which are . till retained i:l cuILi\'ati n. The earli t exeell nt laLe peach whi h was di seminaLed i the PicqueL's laLe, one of Lhe be t of laLe August ripening free tones. It wa fou1l(l in the oTchal'd of Lbe late Antoine Picquet of Belair, Ga., and graft seeur d in 1 59, Lhe tree dying oon afterward. 51 In 1 65 ix trees of the Hales Early weL'e purcha ed. It was held by one nursery at a wO'h price. FiL'st fruiting, June 2d, 1868, it proved large, excellent and prolific, but many orchardi t oon condemned it owing to its liability to rot. Pel onal experience howed it to be avery valuable early variety, reliable a blooming very late, and fl'Om 110 tree 8 years old upwards of $800 wa realized in the ew York market. Onchundred tr es of the AlexandeL' pea h werc plll'cha ed when fit. t dis eminated ~n J\lfarch, 1877, and 011 May 21 t, 1878, the first ripe pecimen was gathercd, and on .May 2:3th, thre ba hIs each holding one peck were forwaL'ded to Jew York where they realized the unprecedented price of $32! During the year 1873 to '78 roOL'e than 300 vaL'ietie of pedigree peach were originated by my father the late Dr. L. E. Berckman. at hi. . ummeL' orchard neal' Rome, Ga. Of thi remarkable en are the followinO' which w re O'radually di seminated: Pallas, a . eedlinO' of Honey, of snp rior quality; Berenice, Au"'11. L; yellow; clinO'; Dl. Berckrnans Jnly; free fone, of surra.. in'" C]uafity; Robert, Augu t free ton Tllttl'bel' middle f July' free tone; Jtme} Augu t; linO'; Oriole} Augu t; cling. At uthbert, Ga., wa found the Ever BearinO' peach who e season of maturing extend from early in July to the end of Augu t. The right to propagate it wa. joiutly I urchased by us and Mr. Ge rge Miller, of Rome, and tL'ee di eminaled in 1 59. STUBB ' MULBERRY: Thi was discovered some twenty years ago in Laurens County, Ga., by our late lamented friend and co-woL'ker 1. John M. Lublr, who ent u ,,"rafting wood with the reque t that thi variety be propagated and eli eminated. It belong to the type 'Of our native red mulberry. The fruit i. UllU ually large of a plea. ant vinous f1avoL' and ripens during two month. The tree 1. remarkably I roducti\-e and surpa in'" ther known \al'ieties. 'Ye gay it the name of if dicoverer. ApPLE: During excur. ions III we. tern North m'olina we found many goo 'I . eedling apple. The HarO'ro\'e ripcns in a tobcL' aUfl o\'emb r, is of fine ,app arance and be. t qnality. "e named it a fter fl'. H:lI'gro\'c, 52 who called our aitention to it. The Haywood, a seedling of Hoover, is an excellent fall ripening apple. It wa found in a mall mountain settlement in Haywood county. GRAPES: Berckmans, a ero between Clinton and Delaware wa originated by the late Dr. A. P, Wylie, of he tel', . C., and the privilege of dis eminating given to us, It ha larger bunches than the Delaware, and i of equally excellent quality. Since 1857, up to tbi time, eveL'y new fruit appearing in this country 'lind in Europe, ba been ccured at lhe earli t pportunity, carefully tested, and if found uited to tbis climate, 11a been retained, bnt not O\'C1' ten pel' cent. of these novelti became permanent additions. Upward of 400 vari ti . of foreiO'n O'rap s were introduced from lhe Crimea and Africa bnt none nrvived many years. ORNA1\fE JTAL PLA TS A DTREE. Pr~A T PER ONALI,Y ORIGINATED. Eo e-Climbing Clothilde oupert. In a block of everal thousand plant of the bu h form grown on om' own root , we found one that had emitted two long branches. The e were propaO'ated and sent out. It i one of the very few e,erbloomlng 1'0 es of climbing habit that can withstand the winters of New York. It merit were soon known and the variety catalogued by norlhern and European 1'0 e grower. Conifel' : The old Golden Arbor Vitae (Biota aUI'ea) originated in England about 1850. In 1872, Biota SemlJlH' aUl'ea came out. Tills was an improvement. of the older form. ix plant were imported, everal thollsand eedliu!!'S were grown, and from that lot three plant which showed very distinct };1abit and coloring, were selected. The dwarf form was named Biota aUI'ea nana, and i now known among commercial O'rowers as Berckman' AI'bor Vitae. It. merit are of it being perfectly hardy in northem ections, wbere the older form is injured by cold. It very dwarf, compact and ymmelrical habit and bright color make it mo. t desirable where very dwarf O'rowing conifers are needed. The Biota uw-ea cOllspicua i of compact and erect growlh, The foliage is or inlen. e golden hue, .ome or it. branche. heing of a olii! metallic tint. Biota uurea pyramidali -attain. a heiO'ht of 15 to 20 feet, i of compact and ymmetl'ical habit, anc1 lIas foliag {If a golden tint. 53 These three forms were produced from the seed of one tree and as they are perfeclly bardy in tbe latitude of New York, tbey are immensely popular. While maJlY other forms came from ,tbis batcb ,)f seedlino'S, the aboYe are unql:e lion ably the most perfet of tbe Biota type. Wilhin the past 15 years fully 200,000 of these plants bave been grown, and tbe original trees are still in our grounds. Amoo?' R'ivel' PTivet: PLANTS INTRODUCED. In 1868, wbile visiling tbe nursery of Mr. Eugene BaUDllln in New Jersey, be drew my attention to six plants of a new privet which he bad imported from Europe, but did not tbink that it would resist tbe winters there. He advi ed me to try 'lbese, ,believing tbat tbey would make an excellent hedge plant for the Soul h. His prediction is verified by the innumerable beautiful e,-ergreen hedges which are now found in every section of the Soutb, and tbe middle states. It is greatly superior to tbe California privet (Ligustru?n ovaZifolhlm) , as it foliage retains its brigbt vivid green color during winter, and is even harclier than tbe latter for northern se tion . Biota jiZ'i{01'mis penduZa. In 1884, dLU'ing a vi it to England tbree small trees of this new conifer were secured from Mr. Harry Veitcb, London, wbo shortly previous to that year had n:ceived a few plants from Japan. There is none more graceful of OLU' bardy medium sized conifers, which has proved to be well suited to the middle tates and e pecially the southern. Our specimen trees aI': now ten feet high and eight feet wide at the base. We can not find any lengthy descriplion of it in the catalogues of a few Europeans who grow it. From this we infer that it is slill sparingly known. The nearest that we can find in tbese is Thuya filifo?'mis stricta, described as a round beaded dwarf bush, witb upright ,tbread like brancblets, but some more erect. While of a vivid green durinO' the larger part of lhe year, tbe ext~'emities of the branchlet assume a slight brown tinO'e after a severe frost. This disappears wben the new gl'Owlh begins in the spring. Possibly 30,000 plants bave been eli seminated elming the past fifteeu yOO1'S. It would enlarge tbis list to such an extent, were mention made I)f all of om introduclions since 1857, as to be tedious. As wilh fnut tr es it bas been om aim to collect whateyer plants from this and foreign countries, might add to tbe borticnltural weallh of Georgia, including materi-al ror the open ground as well as O'reellhouse cultintion. Among the immense variety of plants thus collected, we feel 54 that in the few sorls sele ted and named in Ihis paper, we have added something 10 ou!' fruit and u eful ornamental h'ea ures. After a full test during everal year before being di sem.inated others are: Texas umbrella, 1870. Cut-leaved chinaberry' tree. While berried caJica pa. 'Vhile f1o\\'ering calycanthus. Wislaria, wbite, 1857. "7i taria, doll blue, 1 71. OL. HUNT: "I think it proper at this point that the que tion box hould be op ned. We have the advantao' of Dr. Berckman., we can fire a many que tions at him a we plea e, and bring him out." fR. MORRILL: "I hould like to know what ucce the horticulturi t of thi State have had with Japane e plum. I have tried many varieties, and the Abundance i about the only one I con ider of any merit., The Burbank rots every year." DR. BER KMA "We have had, fir t and la t, perhap thirty varieties of J apane e plums on trial. There i some fine fruit amonO' them and the only objec- tion I have to the whole race is that the trees die so early. Very frequently aft l' two or three years they go very suddenl . I have found no rea on for thi , but po ibly Prof. Wor ham could inform you. The Kel ey and the 'Yick on, which are of the arne cIa , hould be planted on heavy hard clay land, and one hould never di turb the soil at all except to keep it from weed." MR. MORRILL: "I have orne Wick on plums and I have n vel' bad a decent plum from ihem, they all rot." 55 DR. BERCKMANS: "Then you ought to :spray them." MR. 10RRILL: '(I do pray them." DR. BERCK UN : "But you don't spray them enough. We had a good looking orchard of Japanese plums, but they have all disappeared gradually. We still replant all the time. That is true of blight in pears. The idea i , when you 10 e one tree, plant two others in its place." COL. HU T: "I think everyone who has raised cattle, or horses, and had an opportunity of di posing of a worthle s animal at a high price, has his conscience to contend with, but Mr. Berckmans ha never introduced into thi country a plant that did not come up to the recommenda tion. 'What tremendou de truction he must have carried on all these years with things that did not prove successful. It is with peculiar pleasure that I look through' his catalogue, because he always gives notice of ju t what to expect from any particular variety. " THE PRESIDE T (resuming the chair): "At this point I wish to announce the organization of the following committees:" THE COMMITTEE 0 EXAMINATION OF FRUITs-Prof. McHatton, Mr. Simmons, Mr. L. A. Berckmans. THE COMMITTEE ON RESOLUTIONs-Prof. Worsham, Col. Wade, Mr. Hunnicutt. THE OMMITTEE 01 TREASURER'S ACCOUNT-H. K. White, B. W. Hunt, Jno. . Rodgers. 56 "We have very little fruit on exhibition this year, but next year I hope there will be enough to require the appointment of several committees. "I will now invite your attention to Col. B. W. Hunt, who will read y-ou a paper on the Smyrna fig." HORTICULTURAL NOTES ON THE SMYRNA FIG. By B. W. HUNT, of Eatonton, Ga. The introduction and pl"opagation of a new desimble fruit is a ource of great pleasure to the planter. All people fond of gardening resident from middle Georgia outh to the Gulf of Mexico, have the opportunity to experiment with the Smyrna fig, a new impor.tation from A in. Thi fig bears a fruit in ize, quality and flavor superior to all other figs heretofore grown in America. The first fruit .horue by my Smyrna trees ripened subsequent to the date of our la t annual meeting. The fil t fruit were artificially pollenated by me. That is, I took the p'oIlen from a Capri fig and by hand introduced it into ome half gro\yn Smyl'llafigs. The previous crop at my place'all had dr pped half O'rown from the tree. Several yea! ago Mr. Roeding had done the ame thing in California. Afler capr;fication the fig remained on the trees until ripe. It is well known that Smyrna trees ,that bear only female flower will never produce fruit without the introduction into the young growing fig of the pollen from the wild fig, or Capri, r. it is ailed. The Smyrna is a female tree, absolutely dependent upon ,the pollen fl"Om a non-edible fig. The artificial pollenation i a difficult matter, because the flowers of the fig are all inside of the fig it elf-not accessible as the flowers of other fruits. Nature has solved ,the difficulty. Her pollen carrier is a small insect called Bla tophaO'a. This fig wasp winters in the egg in a larval state in ide a third crop of immature fruits borne late in the season by the ,Capri fig, and called mammal. The entomologi ts tell us that 'When the insects emerge from winter quarter'S in the mammae the females immed~ately lay eggs in the fir t crop of Capri fig , ealled. profichi. The profichi contain male pollen bearing flowers, and When the fig wa p emerges therefrom cO\'ered with the pollen of the Capri he immediately . eel; to enter :lI1Y fib- acces ible. The fig 57 raiser therefore removes the proflchi fig from its parent tree, the Capri, and attaches the non-edible fig oontaining the Bla tophaga in a larval stage, to tbe limb of an edible fruit bearing Smyrna. The result is the in ect upon its emergence from the apri fig seeks to perpetuate ils kind by cntering the myrna flg to depo it eO'!!'S. In entering the femalc myrna fig lhe Bla tophaO'a alrea ly co\'ered with the pollen of il host, the pI' fichi, cal'1'ies the life giving pollen to the fiowel of Ihe stigmatic myrna. The uccess of the myl'l1u flO' Cl'Op is tbus abso- lulely dependent upon the female Bla tophaga for it i the female alonc that enlers the fig to lay hcr eggs, aud thus carries the pollen ab lutely ncce ary to pel'fect the fruit. nlike our mule figs, tbe myrna fruit will all drop from the tree b fore ripcninO', if no pollen from the Capri is introduce 1 iuto tbe cav- ity of the edible fig. nlike OUI' Georgia flo , too, the eed of the myl'lla will grow as readily a orange or apple eed, while lhe 0- all deed of thc elestial Ischia, Brnnswick, elc., arc only hollow shells, containing no embryo, In 1 99 the fir t ucces fnl colonization of Bla tophaga in Califor- nia was accomjli hed. The e in ecl were shipped by Mr. W'alter T. wingle from AIO'ier , Afri 'a in Capri figs. The . GovernIDeilt authoritie~ d ire that no more fig in eets be imported, fearing the introduction of a para itical di case of which the Amei'ican wasps are now free. I am sorry ,to ha,e to 'ay 0 much nbout the in ect and pollen a- tion of the myl1la figs which the entomologists know already, and all of which the literature on the ubject ha told before, but thi matter of pollcnation con titute UlC main objection 10 the myma fiO'. Hence, to state only the pleasant side of the ubject an 1 leave the difficulties for other to learn by experience would be unfair. ' Out ide the dependence of the Yucca upon the Yucca motb for pol- lenation, and the' Yucca moth's dependence upon the O'rowinO' fruit of the Yucca for hou inO' and feeding its larva, I know of no other 80 beantllul an iIlu tration of beneficent inter-dependence of insect antI plant life. The Yucca moth is useful only to the Yucca, but the apri flO' i necessary to the life of the Bla tophaO'a and the Blastophaga in return not only is the cau e of perfectinO' thc eed of lhe Capri fig, but is the only mean of ripening another fruit entirely different from it host. A study of thi ubject is nece sary in Smyrna flO' culti\;1.- tion, and i a ource of plea nre a well a profit to the horticulturi t. As the myrna fig can not be fruited withol1t the Bla tophaga, the providing of a succession of apri figs each maturiNg fruit at the time 58 the llifferent broods of females emerge, is most difficult. The wintering over of the llisects in the mammre that remain dormant in winter is a till more difficult problem. This means for myrna fig raisers in middle G orgia, the buying of Capri figs with Blastophaga in them from California, where they are now offered for sale, or from the warmer parts of Florida. We read that in myrna, the home of the best fi!!S in the whole world, the apri crop ometime i killed by winter fro t , and tben ship loads 'are brought in from the Greek I lands, and old to the far inland raisers. I am sure it will be cheaper r,) buy the apri fi!!S carrylloo the inse,ts, rather than to keep se\-eml of tbe large growing wild fias under gla_ in our own green bou es. There i no known way of dwarfing the growtb of these trees, as we do with many other fruit tre . Surely we who buy oranges fr'OID Florida, banana from ent ral America and grapes from California, can import the few apri figs needed for pollenization of our edible figs. I do not advocate the raising of myrna figs as a commercial crop in middle GeOlO'ia. That side of the propo ition may be left for others; but I do h'ongly recommend tbat tbis fruit be rai ed for home u e. There are other, but only minor drawbacks to the introduction of the Smyma figs. The tree them clve in A ia and Caliiomia gr'ow larO'er, forming like apple trees a sinO'le trunk. Mine orne years ago tried to develop as their progenitol had grown for untold age, but they learned better after a few winters had killed thei.r rampant new g-rowth of wood. Now they take on the hrubby growth characteri tic of our middle Georgia mule figs, growing with many small stems from hlcir 1'001., and they are fruiting closer to Mother Earth' warm bo om. TLte thermometer regi tered ten Fahrenheit thi winter and la t year at my place and I can see but little cMerence between the effect of the cold on the myrna and the mule fio. Both have the tips of their limb damaged with frost but I expect both varietics to produce a cr'Op thi year, as they did after the cold of la t year. Tbe larO'e size of the be t of myrna incline them to crack open like the sepals of a poly epalous flower. Jot all beha,e thr;s, but some have fed their secd and pulp to the bi.rd by bursting open, when they should have kept their inside within the fig's shcath. I belie,e the myma fig is of ufficient merit for the people of Georgia and Florida to breed :l ,oaroiety suited to our 'Conditions of temperature and summer rain fall. Caliiornia and myrna have only dew for summer moi ture, while we ha,'c down pour of rain ill every summer month. To thi end I have planted hundreds of myma seedlingso Some of them appear already more cold resistant than their paTents. Sev- 59 eral fruit d last year when no slaminale fi . could be fouud 10 pollenate them, 0 all the fruit uf my eedlin"" wa wasled, I want 10 origillale a myrna fig' of the best quality as old l"esistaut a' our Cele lial. A long fruit talk, or ) cclicel, i' preferr I tbat will tum the eye downward to pre\'cut lh rain entering and onring lhe. fig, Many fj ha\'e yery 'hort fruit talks and Tipen wilh the eye of the fig tumed upward to 1"ecei\'e lhe rain if any falls into the heart of the fjO", Thi position of the fl'uit if not objectionable ill the home of the fig where no rain fall from pril to November, in vites ourin')' of the fruit in Georgia, Iaize or c rn, our indigenou grain bas adapted it elf ped'eclly to our climate, by holding the ear upright to eatcb the pollen and UD !line in it "rowing' state and then tumin" completely over with its water-proof huck co\'er keepin" the ripencd ear dry regaI'dle of rai11 now, or ice. Any ear that failed in tbi;: particular would our and poil the grain. If we could develop a fig with a I n" fruit. talk tbat would bend dowu with tbe increasing weig'ht of the growing fiO', as does Ihe ear of com, we would fix a mo t de irable habit of growth lhat would prevent the oULing of the fi" from wet. Mr. 'Valter T, wino-Ie ha already ob en'ed onc ficy in alifornia that exude a little juice after tbe entrance 'Of tbe Bla tophaga which finally harden into o-um, t:alin" tbe orifice a"ain t the entrauce of moisture. To be de irable a fig mu't be prolific iu it yield of fruit, fox no fruit bearing tree of auy kind is worthy of cultivation that i. lingy in it yield. Wben we realize that all the figs now cultivated are but tbe continuation of orne eedling port bl'OUg!Jt from Europc or A'ia to America, and tbat no American unlil rcccntly ha plant'3d fig eed, I beIie\'e one need not laim to pO"es thc ,!; will g"row without. laburiou cultur, fruit without Iollenation ha\'e a ucce, ion of crop" and orne \'arieti mature excellent fl'Uit. By all mean let u herish the fig that yields most liberally, planted in any out of the way place and f10uri bing wuere no other fruit will "TOW. To my friend, I' ident. north of the a climatilied home of tbe fiO' family, I say, rai 'e the 0', eitber under 0'1 a, or out of door. In the latter ca e you will ha\'e to plant tbo e \'arieti that can bend to the ground and pa. the winter eo\'ered and protected, The l!:ngli hand "7 other orlh European gardenel for O'eneration ha\'e uccessfully rai ed the fruit and 0 an you, e all ha\'e room on OUl' b ok belves for the literature of the Greeks and Latin, ill trauslati u, if not in the oriO'inal, for tbey are tbe foundation of OUl' culture. The fiO' was one of tbe priueipal article of u tenance for tho e wIlD wr te our ancient literature, 'Yith them it wa a food taple not eaten a a luxury, a with us. The 0' \Va al 0 idealized and u ed as a ymbol in their ril1i00i u ceremouie, The tll;ll fOlwders 'Of R me are pictured under the proLecting branches of a 0' tree, J b lie\'e we can more economi- cally find 1'00111 in our gardens for the fruiL' of the ancient, than we ean make room for their literature iu our dwelliJ1 o ' The e teem in which we hould hold the fig i ju Lified by it hi t<>rieal a ociation wilh man' ad\'allcillg civilization as well as from it OW11 merits. Tboughtless man i alway ready to take the altrui Lie low e timaLe of bim elf a the true tau lard, and po~sibly the fi'>" reputation uffer, from it hllmble habit of thri\'illO' and fruiting' even when neglI'cled. 6l The fig is a' dome ti ated as the do0", and a k a place to grow neal' the home f man, preferably with its bran be cares ing Ule walls, and it. roots elltwini]Jg tbe fouudation of the bujldillg tbat sheltcrs the family, THE PRE IDE T: "The cultivation of the fig is po ible much farther north than a great many people of that section imagine. For many year I would go to ewburO'h, . Y., and during the month of eptember my ho t alway had a dish of ripe fio's on the table. I a ked, "How do you manage to O"et the e fig "and he said that at the fir t appearance of cold ""eather he took every limb, peo'o'ed them down, and then put a little traw over th m, and in the prin o' of the ear, aft r dan o'er of fi'o t i over, let th m come up, and that he thus obtained a nice crop of fiO", Oth I' have tried the ame thinO" in N w York, and they now have ripe fig wherc they were never een before. "There wa a man, Mr. ewman, in V\ a hington WllO ""rote a pamI blet on the cultiva tion of fig. in the North, and he advocated the ame thing. Another point that I remember: In my native country, Belgium, fiO' an not grow unles they are covered in winter. We used to put a laro'e traw hou e around them; thcn we had a few to stay, but they would carcely ever ripen, and final1y in Italy my father found the "a to ha ten the maturity, and tha t was to take a drop of oil on the nd of a needle, put it on the blo am end"and then it would ripen, a very easy proce . "Gentlemen, we have a o'ood deal of work to do tomorrow and there are on or two paper that ought to be read tonight. ome of our friend who promi ed to be here were unable to come, but I hope to have their papers publi hed. " Col. Wade, of Cornelia, is here, and has an address on Commercial Apple Orchard in the Piedmon t Regions of Georgia, and if it suits him ju t as well we will now h ar from him." THE COMMERCIAL APPLE IN NORTHEAST GEORGIA, By 1. C. WADE, of ' omelia, Ga. The commercial apple is aHogelhcr different from our home apple, which is lu cious, soft, juicy, melling lo touch an I la teo I can only feel sorry for tho e who are so ilualec1 as 10 he unable 'to partake of the Dorthea L Georgia apple fr hly picked fl'Om the tree in ummel', or early fall in all it glory. Neverlheless, what we call, slrictly peaking, "a commercial apple" will be found a beautifuJ, juicy and good kceping apple. The term implie, as I undel tand it: 1 t-a good seller; 2nd-a good keeper; 3rd-one po e inO' fair or good quality. A good seller is one that will not only compele with all northern apple, bnt surpas them in our outhern markel. Examples are the Beu Davis, Yates, Willow Twig, Wiue aps, Arkansas Black, etc. The apple must also be able to hold il own a a keeper. The WinteL' Queen, for example, with propel' carc and handling, will keep until apples come again in June. n i slll'pri ing what a different kind of apple the Ben Davis h:lS pro\'en in northea t Georgia from what it is when grown in New York or 1\lichio'an. There, its quaJily is like a pnml h.iD. Here, wbile its qualily i only fair, il splendid appearance on the fl'llit tand, its bright lich, red color, and good size make it greatly ought after by the fm;t peddlel of our southern cilics, ot eqnaJ in quality to the otbers . named abo\'e, it is till as good, or even betler seller. The W"inler Queen with its O'olden color, la ling from now on till June will I think commaJld the best price later in the season. It Tecu color, at fir t, i objectionable to many of our southern market. Yet so many norlhern people wintering in the outh, know the nol'cen apple in the North as the best and higb t priced apple, and cL'ealc a dcmand for it here. It Teally belongs to the large class of 63 pIppins. In fact, :i believe it is the "Albemarle Pippin'; transplanted and grown in the Cumberland plateau, something like one hundred miles from its home in southw tern Virginia. We have many new varieties eeking recognition fl'Om our ection, some of the finest summer and fall apples I ever saw, including many new varieties. Thi fact, by the way, shows emphatically the true home of the apple. There are, probably, fifty new varieties, hybrids, etc., indigenou to our ection. I ent thirty-three new varieties. to Washington to the Pomological Department. Of very few had they ever heard. We also have several new summer varieties, which we esteem veq highly. I am trying to te t them out. The summer apple in contradi tinction.-to the winter apple'i shipped North. A good market for all June and July apples is found North when the market i bare of all its large fruit. Therein is the o-reat "alue of the ummel' apple, for like the Elbel'ta peach, it ha no eoml elition at the time of it coming to maturity. I. am being con tautly impol'luned b~' nOl'thcl'l1 commi ion me,'chants to hip them early ummel' apple, We ha,e the Red June, Yellow Trail parent, and Red A trachan. The la t is a faH apple in pIe in >the Jorth, but a delightful summer apple with u. We need more varieties for thi sea on, The fall season is really, omewhat overstocked. So many of our so-caHed winter apples are really good catino- and cooking apples in October 31 tl To\'ember. nch are the Ben Duvi, Yates, Shockley, Winesap, - top, Kennard'. hoice, etc. Another new . cdling' is being' d \' loped in our eetion by Mr. Seton While, Col. John Fort and other.. I refer to that beautiful a\ pIe that won 01. Fort Ihe prize in comp tilion with all the outherll tate at the National Apple how at po ane in 1908 and again in 1909, and which I believe ha been name( 10rt's Prize. I doubt if a more beautiflll apple grows. I et out a number of the e la t year and hall do the ame thi yeat'. While it ha by DO mean reached the commercial tao-e, yet I believe it to be of the be t fall 01' early winter varieties and it succe in wiuuing pi-izes at the National Apple how bespeaks a great future fOl' it. It i to be hoped that tho e havin'" the matter in charge will ad\'ance it, for if it i as good as appear-. ance indicate every nurseryman ouo-ht to be propagating it. There; no reason why we bould not have from fifty thonsand to one hundrcd thousand of them bearing in a few years. In the fall of 1901, Robt. Bercham and I disco\'ered tbe Winter Queen in thi section, after it had been bem'in'" in a small way for 64 one-fourth of a century. i ow, there are over one hundred thousand planted, and many in bearing-just a little "push" sets things going. Our many winter visitors from the orth ha'-e brought with ',hem and pread throughout tue Gulf states a strong liking for apples. So tho e coIlling to spend tbe summer in Olu' section bave seen for them. Ive., and ta ted Qur ]elicious summer varieti and bave left order for fall and winter shipmenl. All this bas created a market today Ihat we can not begin to supply. This very month apples are bringing two dollars per bu hel box, f. o. b. at omelia, a bigher price iban orange bring. I am eating oranges daily for breakfast and apple for upper. A O'enlleman in Florida wi bing some apples, asked me to exchange box for box-apple for oranges. I replied ihat I would, but that my best apples were gone, and only the bockleys left. He wrote tbat they would do, and sent me two boxes of fine oranges, and I sent him the Shockley in excbange. 0 I can say that I have the equivalent of my own l'aisinO' of both citrus fruit and apple. With ihe eaboard cities 'Of avannah, Brun wick, Jacksonville, Tampa, Pen acola and Mobile, a11(l with all tbe in land cities lying between them and omelia con tantly increa ing in population and all wantiug apples, I conclude our market i good, stable, and will Ulldoubtedly keep abead of the production. Fall apple sold all over the northern state in the orchard this fall at 23 cents pel' bushel, while our lowest prico \\'a $1.00, and is now for winter apples $2.00 per bushel. 'Ve lie b tween citrus fruits two hundred miles south of us, and th' northern apple belt five hundred Illile norlh of us. Our soil and waler condition arc perf'ct. We have 60 to 70 incbes of water, annually, with several million acres of nortllea. t Georgia soil lying in wailing ill the foot-bill of the Blue Ridge. The po . ibilities are limiled only by mall's endeavor. The land is mostly rough and hilly; but we cultivate tbe hill- at water level and mules do not seem to care for ide-bills even if they do occasionally slip and roll over. The native GeorO'ia farmer may be incredulous wben I state tbat I have rai ed forty busbels of corn to the acre on hills 1,800 feet above tbe sea level,' wbile tbe average crop of Georgia is only about tbirteen busbel per acre. I plant my orchards in rows 20 feet apart, diamond fa hion, alternatiu'" witb tbe apples a peach tree as a filler to be removed when tbe apple tree mature. I planned my orchard to plant one-quarter of iho total in apple., that is 10,000 apI Ie trees and 30,000 peacb trees. I h:1\'e nearly this amount now. 65 Such land can be bought for $10.00 to $20.00 per acre. The wood on it usually pays for the clearing. I plant COl'll between the row'> the first two years. The next two or thl'ee years, I plant peas or soja beans instead; thereafter, crimson clover. I have now planted as a test some five kinds of clover besides alfalfa and vetch. We have demonstrated that we can rai e first-class apples in spite of the codling moth, or any kind of insect. I sprayed twice with ar senate of lead for the former and had very few apples infested. Iy neighb'ors, :Mr. H. L. Staight, and Mr. D. H. Hesket have fiue orchards and spray two to five times. Theil' orchards, however, are much older and smaller. I think about three times will be found necessary to make almost perfect apples. I had never yet u ed fertilizer of any kind until I planted some new trees in 1909. It has been my practice to haul all my stable manme and spread it around the tree a foot away from the trunk and four feet out each way. When this is exhausted I put in a good strong fertilizer, spreading it about the trees. I plant a new orchard of one thousand apple trees each winter. My first thousand are now just six years old and promise a fail' crop for 1910 when I will spray them three or fom times. Meanwhile I am hauling out my table manme and spreading it about the tree. Around some treil that need potash I am spreading hardwood ashes. I trim my apple orchard in January and February. The chief enemies of the apple orchard are the codling moth, the aI pIe tree borer, and the aphis. Our different sprays will keep them in check. In case of aphis, apply tobacco dust. The borer has to be dug out and killed. Pear blight can be controlled, so far as I know, ou]y by cutting out and burning the infected limbs. Recent shipments of trees infected with crown gall have been made into our section. These have forttmately been detected and burned, owing to the dangerous character of the disease. The shipping of the infected trees should be made a misdemeanor by law. As cultivation, fertilizing and spraying more properly come tUlder another subject, I will leave lhat open. I will imply say that all the e things mu t be pracli ed to make orchard a succe s. It is true we can show native apple trees, three feet in diameter, bearing forty to seventy-five bushels of apple, and seventy years old that have really never had any care at all, but the fruit would not pass as a merchantable apple. Such then, taken together with the long list of apples indigenous to this seclion show what a wonderful natural country for apples we have. 66 I havc two I each trees on my farm at Cornelia said to be forty ycars old. I ha,-e known them to bear for the 11ast ten years. We haye not grown Elbertas and commercial varieties of peaches long enough to ascertain the longevify of the peach in our di trict, but we do know De of the healthy pecan, and the Frot cber is also good in re i ting di ea e, except in north Georgia, Where it does not do so well. You take a section Ie humid and it will resi t disease better. That brings out the point about the distance of trees. You want a splendid di tance for pecan tree, becau e plenty of ventilation will keep down fungou di ea e. There i no variety -so far as our ational ut Grower A _ociation know that laim to be perfe tly free from cab in all 89 sections. For instance take some of these Texas vari ties thai are prized in Texas, and plant them in our eastern section, and they simply succumb to the scab." THE PRESIDE T: "vVe have with us Mr. Lewis I our Assistant State Entomologist, who will now read a paper that will interest the ladies. His subject will be 'Insects Common in Green Hou es and Flower Gardens.' He will give you the history of insect depredations to plants and also some remedies to get rid of them. After he is through I know he will gladly answer any questions that he may not have included in his paper." INSECTS AND DISEASES OF HOT HOUSE AND FLOWERING PLANTS; By A. C. LEwI , Assistant State Entomologist. SCALE IN ECTS. Scale insects are very common on hot house plants, but as the different species are all h'eated in the same way we will only mention a few. OLEANDER SCALE. (Aspidiottls hederae Vall.) This scale is distributed over most of the wOl'ld, and is very com- mon upon many green house plants, such as palms, cycads fllld citrus trees. The female scale is circular, nearly white, with a pale orange-col- ored center; the male scale is lightly elongatel, but of about the same color as the female. Reproduction is by eggs which hatch in a few hours after being deposited. The youug complete their growth in from 70 to 80 days. . THE cmCULAR SCALE. (Ghrysomphalus aonidum Linn.) This is the se-ale most commonly fOlmd on palms, rubber h'ee, citrus plants and the oleander. 90 The scale is round, nearly black, and quite large, being larger than Ihe San Jose scale. The nipple in the center is grayish, surrounded by a reddish brown ring. The scale of the male is smaller, slightly elongated, and the same color as the female scale. The female deposits about 200 eggs in the course of her- egg laying period, which is about 20 da)s. The young matlll'e in from 60 to 70 days. REAIEDIAL MEASURES. Where olle has good water pressure, scale insects may be wa hed off of palms and other flat-Iea,ed plants, by laying each leal' upon a Oat, smooth surface and directing Ihe stream of water npon the leaf for a few minutes. Whale oil soap is the best and most effective insecticide that can be used against scale insects on hothouse plan Is. On palms, rubber plants, cycad, and oleander , one should nse one pound of whale oil soap to each gallon of water. Scales on ferns should be treated with fir-tree oil or lemon oil, 1 part oil to 15 or 20 parts of water, as the ferns will not stand the whale-oil soap treatment. Small plants in pols may be dipped instead of sprayed. While this process is not as fast as spraying, it is more effective, as eve1"y insect is sure to come in contact with the solution. PLANT LICE. THE BLACK APHIS OF CHRYSANTHEMUM. (Nectot'ophora cht-y anthemicoleus.) The black aphis o{ chrysanthemum is found wherever chrysanthe- mums are grown. It is a black aphis about Ys of an inch long. The agamic female gives birlh to about 200 living young. Most of Ihese aphids are without wings. At intervals winged ones are produced which are _also agamic females. Every now and then, just how often i not known, true females and males are prodnced. This female lays eggs; Ihe eoogs hatch into agamic females, and thus Ihe life cycle is eontinued. The lice congregate on the young tender leaves and stems, and the terminal bud. On account of their rapid rate of increase, they may lOon do a great amount of damage if not checked. THE GREEN APHIS OF THE ROs-e:. (Nectot'ophora t'osae Linn.) This green aphis is about as common on roses as the black aphis 11 on the chrysanthemums. The wingless female is shining green, with 91 I ng I and bla'k knee' and feeL The winged female has a black head and thorax. There are \'ery few of the winged females, the winO'les fcmale calTying 011 mo t of th!! l' production. The lifc hi tory of thi aphi' i' about the ame as that of the cl11')" anthemum aphis. nEM~;DtAL MEA URE A the plant lice secme their food in the ame way as the scale insects, that is by sucking, t.he same remedies may be u ed for both. A simple, effective and harmless remedy for plant lice is the tobacco decoction, which is made by boiling 3 lbs. of tobacco stems in 3 gallons of water for three hours, and then adding enough water to make the gallons. The plants can be sprayed or dipped intQ this solution without injuring them in the least. Another method of treating plant lice is fumigatulg with tobacco or potassium cyanide. This will be referred to more in detail later on. RED SPIDER. The red spidcl' is a small brown or red mite, with eight legs. They work on a great number of hot house plants. They are especially bad on 1'0 es, carnations and violets, sometilnes inflicting great damage to these plants. They work mainly on the under ide of the leave, and frequently are not noticed until thcy become very numerous. The injury to the leaves is very charactcristic. The le..we at fit t tlu'n brownish red in PQt, later they become reddi h brown all over, withcr and dry up. The life hi,t.<>ry of the red spidel', accordinO' t.o the observation:; made by Mr. A. B. Gahan of the ~faryland AO'ricultural Experiment talion i in brief a follow : Th~ eggs are laid mo tly on the under ide of the leaves at the rate of five to ten a day until from sixty to one hundred are laid, The eggs hatch in a few days and the young mature in about two weeks. Work now being carried on by Mr. W. V. Reed will determine this and many other interestulg points. REMEDIAL MEASURE At present the be t remedy we know Qf to control the red pider i by thoroughly spraying the plants with the following solution: Sulphur, 5 Ibs.; lime, 5 Ibs., to one hundred gallons of water. This is prepared by boiling the lime and sulphur in ten gallons of water for thirty minutes and then diluting to one hundred gallons. Experiments have proven that the red spider can not be killed succe sfully by fumigating with potassium cyanide, as they can stand more of the gas than wost ho~ houie plants. 92 THlllP . amalions and ro es are frequently aUacked by tiny insects called lhrip. They ~I'ork in lhe flower bud, cau ing un. ightly blotche ou tbe petal, which ometime render the flowers un alable. If the infestation is very severe the buds may bla t and never open. REMEDIES. Plenly of waler is death to thrips, and when the insects occur on roses this is an effective remedy. When the thrips occur on carnations some other remedy mu t be u ed, as carnations will not stand much water. .A. weak tobacco decoction may be used. Ro E CHAFER. This awkward 10noo-IeO'O'ed, liO'ht brown beetle frequently OCClli'S upon 1'0 e in great number, eating the bloom, bud and leaves. When lhe beetles appear in great numbers hand picking is the best remedy. ome one has reported that the e beetle can be driven away by praying the bushes with carbolic acid, using one part carbolic to 100 part water. Thi migbt be offensive to the beetles, but it would have to be applied every day a tbe carbolic acid would 001l evaporate. FUMlGATI 'G. TOBACCO FUMIGATION. Plant lice may be killed by fumigating wilh some form of tobacco punk. Viole! must not be fllmilffite'l with tobacco as the fumes injure the le8\'es. The tobac 0 leav and tem hould be placed in a hallow dish and burned slowly. Du-ections for bmning the punk and the amolU1t to u e are given on the packaO'es. When the concentrated tobacco extract are u ed as fllmiO'ants they are u uaJly diluted with water anJ \'aporized Qyer an oil stove, Qr by tbrowing hot irons into tbe pans. POi'A I M CYANIDE FUMIGATION. l<'llmigating wilb pota Slum cyanide is an effeclive remedy agarnst the white fly, mealy bugs, till'ips and aphi. It can al 0 be used again t the cale in eel when the infested plants will . tand enough of the gas. It is also one of the most effective means of ridding the green hon e of rat and mice. In fumiooating with pota sium cyanide it must be remembered that all plants can not stand the same amount of gas. So if there are a 93 number of differcnt kind of planls in a green house and it is desired to fumigate them all at once, lhe gas mu t Dot be used stronger than the tenderest ones will stand. The amount of gas a certain plant can stand without injury can only be delermined by trial. We have never c;uTied on any experimenls of lhis J1<\lure in Geor"'ia, so as a "'uide wc will "'ivc a table from Bullclin o. 119 of the 1arylaud Agricultural Experiment Slation, by A. B. Gahan. TABLE FOR CYANIDE F MI ATION. Plant. yanide per 1,000 cu. ft. Length of Expo ure Rcmark . Violet -4 oz Primula l oz Chry anthemum t of an oz- Begonia l oz- a turtium l oz- Alternanthcra 1 oz. Lantana 1 oz. Verbena loz. Orchid loz- Snapdragoll f of an oz A p:uagu' fern_of of an oz . weet p2ll.------1 of an oz C riop,i _------1 of an oz Mignonette -1 of an oz Carnatio:l --of of an oz Croton 2 oz yclamen 2oz Ea tel' Lily 2 oz Geranium Ro e 1 oz1 oz- Coleu 1 oz. "ago Palm l oz- .'.-::aranthe 1 oz To:n",~o Cucumber. Lettuce -f of an oz t of an oz- 1 oz- 2 hour. _ OvcrniO'hL_ OvernighL_ 01 I plants will stand mol' . OvernighL_ vernighL_ OvernighL_ OvernighL_ verniO'hL_ vemiO'hL_ Tri d once at thi trength. OvernighL_ Tried but oncc. OvernighL_ Tried but once . OvernighL_ Tried but once. OverniO'hL_ OvernighL_ OvernighL_ OvernighL_ Does not kill red pider. Only two varieties te ted. O\'erniO'hL_ OverniO'hL_ OvernighL_ Half hour __ Half hour __ One houl' _ ne hOUL __ O\'crniO'ht __ Tried many time . Two hours__ One hour _ Tried but oncc. When one ha only a fcw plants to fumigate at a time it eems ~lS if it would pay such parties to construct an air tight box of 500 cu. ft. capacity for the purpose. Then all the tender plants could be pot in and fumigated at once, and then the ones that could stand a stronger charO'e, etc. From experiments carried on at different places it has been found that green house plants are not injured as readily at night as in the day time, so the plants should all be fumigated at night. 94 METHOD OF FUMIGATING. The following is the standard farmula for fumigating with potassium cyanide: To each 1,000 cubic feet use: Potassium cyanide Sulphuric acid (commercial) , Water 1 oz. 2 ozs. 4 ozs. To fumigate proceed as follows: Having determined by meaSLU'ement the number of cubic feet in the box or house, measure out the required amount of water and place in an earthen vessel. Next slowly pOLU' into the water the required amount of sulphuric acid; then add the proper amount of potassium cyanide. The potassium cyanide should be previously weighed ont and put in paper sacks, each sack containing one charge. Drop in the sack containing the cyanide and quickly close the door. The time of exposure will vary from 30 minutes to one night. For nUl'Sery stock, such as June budded peach, expose 40 minutes. In fnmigating with potassium cyanide it must be remembered that the pota ium cyanide and the fumes are deadly poi on. DI EASE. ROSE MILDEW. (Sphaerotheca pam1'osa Lev.) Very frequently the foliage, young shoot, and flower buds of the rose are covered with a dusty white mildew. Mter it has started it spreads very rapidly, especially during damp cloudy weather. The effected leaves CUl'l and drop prematurely. ummel' and winter spores are produced. The summer spores are spread by wind, insects, etc. The spores of the winter form germinate the following spring. PRE\'ENTATIVE MEA:-1EA, URES. A moisture favors the development of tile di. ea. e, water shonl] he withheld from the plant as much as possible. ,At the first appearance of lhe di ea e the plants should be sprayed wilh Bordeaux, the ammoniacal olution of COPt er -carbonale or formalin solution. The formalin solution shonld be u ed very weak, one part formalin to 400 parts water. All three of these solutions were used \vith good results by Mr. F. M. Kinard, who had charge of the green house in Atlanta where tbe carnation spot was so severe. The ammoniacal solution of copper carbonate and the formalin solution do not stain the leaves or buds, and for this reason they should be used when spraying such plants as the carnation. It is very difficult to control the carnation spot by spraying alone. In conjunction with spraying all the diseased leaves should be gathered and burnt and the plants should receive no more water than is necessary for their growth. 96 In conclusion, we would call attention to the fact that in many cases insects may be kept out of green houses by dipping all plants in a strong soap solution (1 lb. of Ivory soap to one gallon of water) before they are brought in the house. Or instead of dipping, the plants may be fumigated with potassium cyanide. In many cases diseases are carried by spores in the soil. To prevent tbis all soils u ed in the beds of the hot house or pots should be heated to kill the spores that they may contain. During the annual cleaning np the benches should be sprayed all oyer with a strong Bordl:lllL\': mixture before they are filled with soil. That will kill many fungi spores, and reduce the cbances for different bench fungi to gain a start in the beds. THE PRESIDE T: "Mr. Lewis has prepared this paper e pecially f{)r tbe benefit of tbe ladies. I know there mu t be a great many plant di eases prevalent in thi town as well a anywbere else, and the means of detruction are brougbt 'before you. If tbere are any point that Mr. Lewi ha not illu h'ated and you wi b to a k tbem, I know he would be glad to answer." l\fRS. OHLMAN: "Mr. Lewis tbere is a little worm tbat I notice every pring on my flower tbat completely destroy them. " MR. LEWIS: "Tba t devours the leave. " MR . OHLMAN: "Ye " MR. LEWI : 'Tbe be t way i to get a little Paris green and mix it with a little flour and air- lacked )ime. Take a table poon of tbe Pari O'reen ~nd five or ix {)f the air-sla ked lime and du t tbat on tbe plant, and tbat will kill all the leaf-eating in ect . MR. STO E: "We are troubled a great deal about OUr Blll. t I1'i. h potntoe. In tbis ection of the country 97 we can not rai e them becau e the bug cut the bushes down before they are mature." fR. LlDWI : "Y;ou pobably refer to the potato beetle, and you may al 0 have .the potato blight. The beetl i Lilled the ame way, with the Pari green and flour, or Pari gr en and lime du ted on." lR. STO E: "How about lice on cabbage?" fR. LEW! : "The be t thing for lice on cabbage is kero ene ernul ion." lR. STONE: "What are you gomg to do about eating the cabbage " MR. LEWIS: "Begin with the fir t appearance of the lice. The lice generally do the mo t damaO"e on the young plants when they are very mall. lake about a ten per cent. olution of kero ene ernul ion and apply that from two to three tim s, until you exterminate the lice. A OTeat many people dip their plants :in the emulion before they are set (mt. fR. STONE: "I hard a lady peaking about chicken mite, i there any remedy?" lR. LEWI : "The be t way generally is to pray the hou e with lime and ulphur 0 as to drive out a much as po ible, and keep it a clean a po ible, and then keep the roo t clean, and put lime and sulphur around the ne t , and in that way try to exterminate the dwelling place of the mite. They most always leave the chicken and tay in the hou e. Or you can put tobacco du t or tobarco terns in the ne t." 9 TilE PRE IDE T : " II'. Frank I ou P, of AlWU ta, who wa to read a paper on the canning iudu'try, i not pre ent, we will now h ar from MI'. H. K. White, who ha a I ap I' on peach oTowing." SOME ESSENTIALS TO PROFITABLE PEACH GROWING. By MR. H. K. WHITE, of parta, Ga. To cover all tbe pbases of tbe question sugge ted by tbis title would invoh-e a paper of sucb lenO'tb as to try tbe patience of tbis audience, and require more ability tban i posse sed by the author. E\7ery tep in tbe way of commercial peacb oTOWinO' i marked by some detail so e ential ,tbat the omi sion of anyone means a reduction of profit, and in many in tances failure it elf. Fortunately, boweYer, thanks to our able tale Entomologist and bis a i tanl , failure need no longer be feared in the work of growing the tree and producing the fruit; and now Ulat the GeorO'ia Fruit Ex hange ha 0 jO'ually proven il ability to cope with the problem of markctillg the crop we feel our difficulties in this direction have disappeared. till witli all this, tbere lie between the spberes covered by tbe e two departmenls a field of aclion in wbich only the grower can operate and wbere no oul ide aO'ency can come to bis rescne. What ,profits it if we produce lhe fine t peacbe in the world and fail to put them up in good marketable bape'! What benefit has tbe ExchanO'e to offer the gro'wer whose fruit leave the packing bouse unfit for market The topic proposed in tllis paper is the' gathering, packing, and gradinO' of peaches for market, and if any apology be needed for this di cu ion, I offer the fact that the 0Teat majority of failures can be traced to this point. Whcre\-er you hear of a grower who has attained any succe in this busines , you will find that man with a reputation for fine fruit. Too long indeed has tbe old idea prevailed among Georgia sbipper that the dealers and consumers in northern markets lmow nothing about fruit, therefore anything will sell regardle s of quality. The fact is tbe Georgia peach comes into competition with the orchard products of the world, and it is a shame for such magnificent fruit as 99 Georgia can produce to enler thc arena handicap! ed by carele s or incompelent handling. I am fully aware that much if not all contained in this paper will be considered lrile among' experienced growers, for e\7CI1' branch of Ihe subject ha been presented at various times by abler writer, but if anytlIing said shall induce any discusion empha izinO" thc imporlance of thc matter, tbat re ult will be amply worth while. GATlIERING THE FRUIT. At fir t glance lhi may appear a maller of slight importance, seemino-Iy no special expcrience 0[' traininO" being neces ary. Let us remember, howO\-er, to put up a fir t-clas package we must have fil"tcIa fruit, and io ha\-e tbat it mu t be o-alhered at exactly the right tage. There is ju t one period in the development of a peach at which it is ready to be gaUlered for bipment, and tbis period is really limited to about twenly-four hour. Pulled prior to tbis time, we have 3n immatme peach, not fully developed in eitber size, color, flavor or keeping qualitie. Gathered late~" the result is a peach too ripe to calTY to distant markets. In determininO' when the fruit has reached the proper condition, one ha to be O'uided by the appearance of the under or green side rather than by the expo ed or colored ide. The color may begin to show senral days (in orne varieties more than a week) previous to maturity, but not until the l1l1der side has changcd its deep O'reen for a whitish or creamy tint is the peach mature. When tbi has taken place the peach has attained full size, tbe color is that brilliant, velvety blush so much desired, the flavor almost the same a if allowed to fully ripen on the tree, the keepino- quality at the best. Wonderful indeed the difference one day will make iu the general character of the fruit. It i hardly to be denied that a large proportion of the Georgia crop is marketed entirely too green, and the 10 s to the O"rower is not measured alone by the difference in price obtained. During the forty-eight hOUl'S immediately precedinO' maturity a peach will increase in ize at lea t fifteen per cent., and this loss in quantity, plus the Ie er price receiyed, will equal a um ufficient to show a ub tantial profit on the sea on' bn ine . One of the greate t difficuJlie i to see that the fruit i not "'athered too O"reen all 1 at the same time no ripe fruit is left on the tree. Only the mo t careful and most intelligent supel'Vi ion of the picking force can eyen approximate the desired re uIt, and it is a question whether one man can properlY ban- -dIe more tban a balf dozen hand. Weather conditions during the ga.thering period will call for a large display of judgment. An exce s of moistme cau es tbe fruit to soften more rapidly, in wbicb case we 100 are compelled to pick a litLIe earlier than otherwise. It is hardly necessary to call attention to the extreme care "ith which the fruit shortld be handled from the tree to the packing house. Especially must no picker be allowed to drop the fruit into the picking basket, nor must it be poured from one basket to another. At no point will efficient labor and intelligent effort pay better dividends than in the orchard at gathering time. PACKING TilE FRUIT. Assuming now that the fruit has been gathered at as nearly the proper stage as possible, the first important step in the packing is to assort it, removing all the imperfect specimens, and at the same time separating the sizes, which of course is done as the fruit is placed upon the packing tables. Just a word here as to what is meant by imperfect specimens. It appears that the average shipper considers his fruit well selected when he has rejected all showing signs of decay, or that are over-ripe, or have some such patent defect, but lmder this term I would also include every peach showing cm'culio sting, everyone with slightest break or bruise in skin, and everyone which if broken open would prove faulty. A quick and well trained eye is required to detect at s. glance each one coming under this class. In order to accomplish this s~lection most effectually it is important that the packers also be required to rejeet all imperfect fruit, it being well-nigh impossible to get it done thoroughly at one operation. The rejected fruit should be reassorted, the best of it being packed and shipped as culls. In packinO' a crate the aim should be to have every peach a perfect one, approximately the same mnnber in each till, each till packed in the same style, the colored side of each peach placed so as to show to best advantage, and the crate just full enough for the top when nailed to gently press the fruit. The bottom tier of baskets should in all respects be fully equal to the top tier. .In order to get this, it is nece ary that the packing be supervised by a capable inspector, who must as nearly as possible see each layer of fruit as it is put into each crate. It will not meet the requirements simply to have a set of rules fot' the packers to follow, for, no matter how efficient, they arc human, and therefore will become careless if not indifferent. GnADING 'I'lIE FRUIT. When the fruit has been selected and the different grades and sizes packed into their respective crates, comes the comparatively simpl~ work of grading or brancfulg. And yet, frequently a grave error is committed just here. Some shippers seem to know but one grade- 101 "Extra Fancy." Others contend that the be t !rrade possible to be packed from a given lot of fruit is entitled to the highest mark with- out taking into consideration whether the general character of that fruit will warrant it or not. As yet there i no well defined standard as to what constitutes a crate of choice fancy, or extra fancy peache , therefore each shipper becomes to some extent a law unto himself. The writer has always held to the idea that .t/Je only difference in these grades should be that of size, or color, or both, and that really defective fruit should be packed only as cull. The wise shipper will h3 very careful to see that when a crate bears his name with the brand "Extra Fancy" it contains only the most perfect fruit, packed in the best style, -and that every crate so branded is of the same character. Under no other method can a reputation be built, and when so estab- Ii hed it hould be deemed too valuable to be trifled with. To illustrate the practical value of all thi care in putting up fmit for market, allow a concrete example. We will suppo e th~ ca e of two neighboring growers, each with a crop of ten thousand crates on his trees. The one packs his in a fairly careful manner, and they bring an average of $1.50 on the market. The other 0 carefully selecls and 'Packs his as to reject fifteen hundred crates, and gets for his eighty-five hundred an averaO'e of $1.75. Even at this small difference, the latter's net returns will be about one thou and dollars more than his neighbor's, not countinO' what he may obtain for the culls. As a matter of fact, hiO'h grade fruit will in mo t in tances command a premium of from fifty to seventy-five cents. All that has been said here is well known to every rower pre ent for it was not my aim to inlroduce new or startling i'lea. Indeed I have not attempt~d to touch upon all the details of the subject, omitting many things of perhaps equal importance, but my endeavor has been to emphasize tho e e entials in which we all frequently fail. The burden of my plea i that in no busine i painslakinO', intelligent and persistent effort more nece sary, nor will it '8.Il where bring urer success than in packing fruit for market. Can we not by united work along this line hasten the day when the brand "Fancy Georgia Peache " insures the purcha er the be t 'Product of the be t State in the Union THE PRE IDE T: "Thi paper is from an expert and successful peach grower and I am very glad indeed that we have had the benefit of having Mr. White with us on this occasion. 102 "In deference to orne of the gentlemen who desired to read their papers this morning, as they have to take the train thi afternoon, I have ignored my friend Mr. Roger, who wa on the program the first thing this morning. I hope he will not take it ill j and I will now call upon him to peak. I know he can give us a very good talk upon the review of the work of the Agricultural School of the Ten th ongre ional Di triet." A REVIEW OF THE WORK OF THE AGRICULTURAL SCHOOL OF THE TENTH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT. By MR. JNO. . ROGER, Granite Hill, Ga. :My subject is what we have done at the Di trict Agriculturnl School. A great many of you who have not visited ours or any other Di trict Ao-ricultural chool may need some preface by way of explanation of what we have ha 1 at the e chool and what is being done. I had the plea UTe and the oTeat privilege of addre ing this society in 1907, three years a0-0, at their annual meeting, as to what these schools would be, and my prog'uo tication, if some of you will refer back and read the files of that meeting, ha proved correct as to wh:lt the public entiment would be with reference to these schools, especially that of tho e who do not take the trouble to find out what we are doing. There is one thing I wish to state in the beginning, because it is one problem that has been ompletely solved at our school. I will take it up first out of its order, and that is the question of ,the attendance of giTls at the e school, and of their occupying the sphere in the school that the law intended should be occupied by the female portion of the student body. It is the only succe ful part of OUl" chool so far, it was the simple t problem and the easiest solved, and the mo t fer.tile oil for development connected with these schools. If everything el e was as completely solved as the dining room and kitchen department and the sewing room and the culture of roses and small flower, then we would be on high growld and ready for fair sail- ] 03 ing, and ready to fill our buildings to their capacity. We have not a girl there who doesn't go with alacrity and pleasure to the kitchen or the sewing room or to whalever deparlment her work may call her. We ha,en't had there any two girls who could not, after three months attendance, go inlo the kitchen and in two hours time prepare a meal for fifty people, and you can not find two negro women in this counlry wbo could do lhe ame thing in lhe same length of time. n is not nece ary that tbe e O'irl should con tinue to do thi , but lhey,will always have the b nent of this trainillO', and lhe futnre bU3bands of our Stale will thank the patriolic people of the Slate of Georgia wbo made it possible for these girl lo learn to do the e things. 'What a mi erable life it i lo have to suffer from lhe abu 'e of tho e lyrants on whom in the majorily of in tance we have to rely to prepare our meals. If lhe bou ewife only knew how, Ulld knew how to do it better, you would soon see the abu e coming from the olher side, and from our !!irl it will come from the other side. (Applause.) Our boys have learned from obseryation of lhe work that by bringinO' the wood and thoroughly I reparinO' for the meal, the lattet is robbed of ils drudgery and lbe e girl are going to demand tbat such preparations be made. Our southem homes are not prepared for ma unO' the work of the woman liO'ht; and our boys and girls are learninO' the e tbin!!"S. If the housewife employs negro labor or any olher labor to do the work of the kitchen, it can be done at half the cost lhat it is done now in the average home--one servant doing more lhan lwo can do under lh~ ordinary conditions. But lbe greate t CUI e to the e choo] - I lhink tbere are in lbiaudience two or tbree tru lee from olher schools-i -that lhey haye been regarded by a great many people not a place to take the inlelligent pro!!"re ive farmers' son and deyel p them alonO' lhe lines of their fathers' vocation, but as good places for tbe derelicts and defecti\'es, tho e that can not be tauO'ht anylhing for a lack of brain, and those who from perver e nalures can not be controlled in the town cbool. Fifly per cent. of lhe applicalions we ha,e had from boy ba\'e been that clas , and it will take two or lbree more years to convince tbe people that the e school are not reformatories and lhat there are good institutions in the State where such boy can he reformed, Whe.l lhey do send such a boy to the e schools lIe is going to leaye it in a worse condition than when be went there, becau e lhe discipliJle i.-n t such that he can be taken down acro a log and a buO'gy tra.ce applied until he snbmil. The e schools can not be rll~ lhat way becau e the 104 di cipliue mu t be simply lhaL of per uasion, and lhe boy who is not amenable 10 good treatment should not be sent to them. That has been one dJ:awback to the progress of lhe schools and to the development of them in a popular way. That cIa s of student should be discouraged. We have not had lhe pitfalls that some have had because we haye discouraged that class ,'ery largely. We have a few that have slipped in. The credentials brought seemed to be good and they got in. But in all instances where we knew lhey were of this clas they have becn refused admission, and \\"e ha\'e been very successful ill avoidinO' lhem. But when an applicant i turned down it makes him an enemy of the school in his con\'ersalion and talk about it. I think that one of the greale t re ults lhat we have had in Lhe training of the boy is in accuracy and punctuality. We have no bells except the rising bell to wake the boy up. They have not learned how to train the mind to operate 0 as to fix thei.r minds on a certain hour and wake up at that time, but the 'five o'clock bell for rising in the morning is the only bell these boys now have except the dinner bell. They meet their own engaO'ements by theu: own timepiece, and if they have no watch there is a clock in the dining room. TO teacher says it is lime for clas ; no teacher say~ it is 8 :40 and you must come to my room. The pupil keeps his own engagements, and when he goes ont in life he will meet his own engagement. He will not be a year behind in meeting some of his 'Promises Lo pay. He is forced into the habit of punctuality in everything he does. Now, of course, everything has been as much directed to the farm life as possible, and many of our boys who came there expressing their determination not to make farmers, have gone out to engage in that profession. One young man who left the school this fall on account of lack of fund, had declared when he came that he would never be a farmer, had found everything distasteful to him, and was discouraO'ed with all kinds of farm work, yet accepted work with a farmer in the country when he left there in preference to accepting work behind a counter in a slore, perhaps at a less salary. He had been aeou ed to the possibilities of an intellectual development that would fit rural condition , and he ees today in lbat a chance of greater pay for his talents than he can see in ome of what have been termed the more learned professions. However, I must hurry along, I have already spoken ten minutes aud have not started. I will keep you not more than five more, as I do not want to talk to a htmgry audience. I do not say it with any egotism, because it would have happened with anybody else in the 105 school, but its outside influence has been remarkable. Even men who opposed the school, before it was e tablished, some in almost hailing distance of the school have indirectly benefited. These men, in order to keep it from being said that better farming was done at the school than was being done by them, haye doubled their yield per acre. There are men that are making twice the amount of cotton to the acre than when the school was put there, and they are not pecial friends of the school either. It does not matter from the standpoint of the tale whether the citizen profil from motives of pite or whether he does it for good purposes, the State is going to get the same taxes out of it. But that is not the majority. The majority are willing to barn and I am proud to ay that I am a member of the Farmers Union I)ver at Culverton and of the twenty-five members not one of them will te tify that he is not doing better farming today than when he joined the Union. Therefore I can speak of it as a pel' onal matter, farming by profession. Some of them h'ave made some remarkable improvements in their methods and e pecially in economy of labor. What profits it a man if he makes five bale of cotton to the acre and it costs him the price of six to make it It is more profitable if he make 300 pounds to the acre, and half is profit. During the pa t year we had the boys keep a record on the grain crop. We made 500 bu hels of corn on the farm this year and we made it at a cost of less than an bour's work to the bushel. On one plat sun-ounded by woods we made corn cost le_s than seven cents per bushel for labor. These boys went so far as to make a calculation as to how far they could have toted corn cheaper than they could make it, and they al'l'ived at the conclusion that a man could not carry the corn on hi back over two miles, if it was given to him, cheaper than he could make it right at hi~ door. Every boy who has been in that school is cognizant of that fact that you will never sell any we tern corn to the e boys, for they realize that they can make it for less than one-fourth of what you can buy it for in the market. This one fact WOll1d result even in this county in a sufficient increase in the yield of corn thi good year to more than offset what it cost the State to maintain the chool! We are teaching them to diversify more. The way these boys have fallen in love with beanfl out there is going to crowd out cotton from the e old hills and cau a them to blossom as the rose. We have found this soil more adapteq to some plants than what has been called their native habitat. From the great northwest we have secured a corn that'we find will do mora on our old red hills that heretofore 'lVg~~H ~~~ ~~k~ com at a)11 tp'a~ 10l} any of our native sorts. The virility of the corn enables us to get a good nubbin off of any stalk that we can get to grow. The Soy bean has conrinced our boys that they can raise 5543 pounds of good hay to the same amount of ground that would be required to produce a bale of cotton. It is a superior hay too, and all the authorities put it down as ranging higher in protein than any of the hays; it is better ihan wheat bran for milch cows, ranging high as a nutrient, and if not relied on too exclusively it is just as nutritious as wheat ,bran, and by that I mean the real wheat bran, and not any of the substitutes. These boys axe carrying these things into their homes. Some of the boys, with my permission, have selected enough cotton seed ginned from a selected bale of cotton to plant their fathers' farm ; others have selected enough seed corn and carried it home with them Ch.ristmas to plant nearly a one-horse farm tills year, showing that they are taking an interest in encouraging them to do these things. The average farmer does not know how to select an ear of seed corn, and it has been demonstrated that of two seed-ears taken from the same row of the same variety of corn, one may make 90 bushe13 of corn to the acre and the other 15, on the same kind of soil; but if you mix the two together you never' discover that fact. If you go into the plant laboratory you can select the one which is going to makc the beUer corn and thereby plant an ear that will make you 90 bu hel instead of one that makes only 15. In Ie s than twenty years Georgia will be one of the leading cattle and corn States of the nion. That, twenty years from today, in proportion to the farming population, G orgia will be raising as many cattle as any other State, is my prediction. You can't afford to raise cotton, there is not enough money in it. You can make too much out of almost anything el e. We are not going to quit cotton on account of the boll weevil, but just as soon as we find out how much there is in other crops we are going to quit it. We raise cotton becau e we want to show the boys how they can rai e it more economically than they do it at home. We can not convince them unle s we make cotton along side the other crops, and see the fertilizer required to make that bale of cotton at a selling price of $60 to 75 and the other crop they have "Town with the same labor that will sell for $150 beside it. 'If the colton is grown at home and the e other crops at the school they will not be convinced. We are not going to turn out cotton farmers there. They will know how to raise it, but they will see more money in something else. We can 107 raise hay cheaper in Georgia, we can rai c caLlIe cheaper ill Georgia, we can rai e everything except wheat, and that could be done in the northern p'arts of our tate. Then why should we keep alive so many raih'oads by paying the freight We teach the boys that the paying of fl'eight is to be avoided if possible. I have said more than I intended to say along some lines and have not touched but two or three of the things we have laid down here. Just one more thought as to what these schools should do. ow I am going to get on some body's toes here, for some aspiring politician may be expecting to be appointed fertilizer inspector next year. The income of the e schools would be increased $1,000.00 a year without any los of time practically among thei.r teachers if the fertilizer inspector was appointed from the faculty of these schools. It would bring in enough to pay anoLher teacher in each of these school, and it would only take six weeks in the year to make the guano inspection, and if the Legi lature should say that guano inspector shall be appointed from these schools, it would save $1,000 a year and bring the people in contact with the e schools, and they would not have to wait twelYe months for him to come. I invited ~ fertilizer inspector to come here and inspect a carload of guano but he has never come. They are' sometimes men that can barely read and write and know nothing of the different con tituents of fertillZers. There is another point that I would ask all the people to encourage, and that is the very beneficent work being done in Georgia by our government in this demonsh'ation work. These schools should be in as close touch with it as po si.ble, and in some of the schools one of the professors should take it up. Under peculiar circum tances I had to decline the work in our school, though it should be operated from the school, going out from the school in the county and further out in the district wherever a school is located. If you have an opportunity to encourage this work in the county where you live be sure to encourage it because it is doing wonderful good under the management of Dr. Knapp, and his corps of able workers. I wish I had time to tell you about the social and moral feature of our little school. It is a happy little family, and we have our Saturday night amusements and entertainments, and they are looked forward to with a great deal of pleasure by the students. We do not have any comting there. It i just like a large family. We almost 108 make lhem fall in love wilh lhe whole buue!i, so lhey can !Iol discriminate as lo one. Come out and see how it is done. I lhan k you for this much of your time. DR. STONE: "1 am interested in corn and I wi h to know how to select the be t kind of seed corn." MR. ROGERS: "~gentleman once rode 40 mile to my school and said he had only 15 minute to by. He said he had eight acres 'On which he had made a bale of cotton to the acre for ten years pa t, and he wa'nted to know in 15 minutes how to make 16 bales on these eight acres. 1 asked him how much he thought 1 would be worth to the State if I could tell him in 15 minutes how to double his cotton crop. rfy reply to Dr. Stone is that WP. hnven't the time here to tell him, but if he will come over to the school 1 will SllOW him. 1 w.ill say thi much: Never plant a grain of corn that is only going to put out one primary root; get tho e that have four if possible. Remember that if one grain of corn on an ear puts out four roots, it is very likely that every grain on that ear will do the same thing, and if one grain only put out one root, don't plant a grain: from that ear." DR. STO.r E: "Then you mean to take a grain from each ear and sprout it'" MR. ROGERS: "Yes, that gives an idea of the virility or the strength with which it starts off. That one rooted grain will grow faster, strange to say, for the first four weeks, than the one with more r,oots, but not afterward. It will finally develop into a barren stalk." l09 fR. TONE: "What i the be t variety of seed corn " MR. ROGERS: "The be t seed ordinarily for average land i the eed right where you are. 1 poke of tbi we t rn corn for very bare lay pot. We went in the rib and elected the large t and mo t promi ing ears but found they would not grow on the e banen pot, so we had to get a seed that would start on them, and we got it out we t. We don't plant tbi we ,tern corn on our be t land, it take more di tance than we can afford to give corn on good ground. You hav~ to give it a distance of three by five f et. The corn di eminated by Prof. Duggan la t year, the Bethany COl'll, commonly known a the ampbel1 county corn, 1 find very well suited for gray land, and it will bear thi k planting, bearing omething like 0 ear to the bu hel." COL. HU T: "1 don't know any man, whether he work for dailywaO'e , or whether he rent hi land, or how he work, who can not make enough money, if he ha o'ood judgment; but it eem to me that the s hool of which 1 happen to be a no-account trustee i neglecting that part of life that makes life worth living. We are neO'lecting all the 'ornamental part. Anybody can make a living, but what i the use of living if you haven't a beautiful hom and om thing 'around ou to make you happy when you are not at your bu ine . We spend our live hunting a b autiful woman who ha a face and mann I' that II a u, for life and if we can not o-iv her the sUlToundinO', to make her happy, we have nobody to blame but our lve (appIau ). What we need is a school to teach our boy to know the difference in the 110 ornamental, how to make urn , how to beautify their home. The State of ew York i sues every year tons of educational literature, and it is all economic, none of it i on the ornamental ide. I think it is high time that we were looking after that part 'of our children's education." MR. ROGERS: "I would like to a k Brother Hunt to read tho e 1907 minute and he will find an an weI' there. I aid the e school would be failures until such time a w could do the e thinoo. You can not do everythinO" in a ear. It" ill take a. lif time. He mu t give u. a little tim. 01. Hunt ha a very beautiful home but he didn't have it the fir t year he went there. He .JlOuld be pati nt and help u me t the critici m we arc re eiving from the public. How could we do these thinO" when many of the teacher have O'one six months without a dollar' pay! Where would we istrunk Per Cent. dead. 55 55 55 11 Variety Per Cent. dead. Hawkins 515 Lewis' Prize . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 57 Tool's Prolific 58 Rowden 59 Augusta Cluster 60 Triumph 60 Dongola 61 Bates 61 Drake's UJuster 62 Texas Wood 62 Allen Big Boll 64 Layton 64 Pride of Georgia . . . . . . . .. 64 Willett's Red Leaf . .. 64 Bank Account 65 Keenan 65 King's Improved 65 Storm Proof . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 65 Baughn's 66 Variety Per Uent. Texas Oak dead. 66 Southern Hope 66 Columbia 70 Gold Standard 70 Hardin it Rosser o. 1 75 Poulnot 77 Excelsior 78 Broadwell's Double-jointed " 80 Brancroft's Herlong 0 Gold Coin llO Hasting's Su re Crop 80 Peterkin 81 Hasting's Mortgage Lifter . . . 5 King's Early '; Simpkins 90 Cook 95 Culpepper ~,;) Ru sell 96 Long Staple Cottons. Mitafifi Floradora unflower Allen Griffen 22 Sea Island 66 50 Boyd's Prolific 66 50 Clarkesville "0 63 Ounce Boll 70 64 Edisto 'ea Island .. . . . . . . . .. 3 Tests of Dillon and Dixie Cottons. These two varieties of cotton were originated by Prof. W. A. Orton, of the Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. Of the varieties tested in 1900 by Prof. W. A. Orton, the Jackson Limbless was found to be the most resistant to the disease. By continued selection of the most resistant plants from this variety he has secured a strain of this type of cotton which Is very resistant to the wilt disease of cotton. This resistant strain he has designated as Dillon. The Dixie originated from a selection made by Prof. W. A. Orton, in Alabama in 1901. In 1905 Pro!. Orton kindly furnished us seed of both of these varieties. Each year in our tests they have proven to be quite resistant to the disease, only 10 per cent. to 15 per cent. dying. where 75 per cent. to 95 per cent. of the ordinary varieties died. Fig. 1, Plate I, sbows tbe comparative resistance of the Dixie and ~ative Green Seed. RELATIO OF EMATODE WORMS TO WILT. Many farmers in Georgia know from dear experience that cotton frequently dies very badly when planted after the common cowpea. That this is due to the fact that the cowpea Increases the number of nematodes in the soil and that their presence in the cotton roots increases the severity of the wilt disease of cotton is well known. 12 The nematode worm, Heterodem Tadic..iwZa (Greff. l\1ul.) is a par asite which infests the root of many plants, and causes the knots commonl~' known as nematode galls. Affected plants are very much stunted and sometimes killed. A few weeds and a great numher of cultivated plants are subject to attack by the nematode worms. The most common of these in Georgia are: Cotton, cowpeas (all varieties except the Iron), watermelons, cucumbers, cantaloupe, sugar cane, okra, cabbage, collard, potato, tobacco, mulberry, peaches, and figs. Fig. 1, Plate 2, shows nematode galls on cotton roots. In addition to the above Prof. Atkinson mentions the followi-ng plants as being badly atrected in Alabama: Citron, bird's foot clover (Lotus corniculatus), rutabaga, parsnip, and salsify.1t In Farmer's Bulletin o. 333 Prof. W. A. Orton mentions the following weeds as being subject to attack by the nematode worms; purslane, pigweed, (Amaranthus), "May-pap," "lndian potato," and 'Saw brier." Prof. Orton also states that "Bermuda grass, chufas, and summer oats are slightly susceptible, but probably can be used in rotation when root knot is only slightly prevalent:' ROTATION OF CROPS FOR CONTROLLING THE NEMATODE WORMS. The rotation of crops for controlling nematode worms is so important that we will give in detail some of our observations anu experiments along this line. In 1905 Col. W. D. Hammack, of Coleman, Ga., had a field of cotton that well illustrated the result of planting cotton after the common cowpea. In 1903 the field was planted in cotton and the cotton nearly all died with the wilt disease. In 1904 the field was planted in corn and common cowpeas, two rows of corn and then a row of cowpeas. In 1905 the field was planted in cotton. Over 75 per cent. of the cotton died in the rows that had been in cowpeas, while in the rows following the corn only 25 per cent. of the cotton died. At Vienna, Ga., on Mr. Ed Howell's place, a field was SOwn in oats in the fall of 1906. The next summer after the oats were cut, part of the field was sown in Unknown cowpeas. In the spring of 1908 the whole field was planted in the Dillon and Dixie resistant cotton. The cotton planted after the cowpeas, died very badly, in spots, from 25 per cent. to 50 per cent., while on the other part of the field not over ten per cent. to 15 per cent. died. In 1905, in our experiments at Zellobee, Georgia, a plat of land was own in sorghum, on which in 1904 from 75 per cent. to 95 per cent. of the cotton died from the wilt disease. In 1906 this plat was planted In corn anu just before the last cultivation Iron cowpeas were sown. In 1907 the plat was planted in Dixie and Native Green seed cotton with the following results: About 25 per cent. of the Native Green seed cotton died and only 5 per cent. of the Dixie cotton. Another very marked difference 'between this anu another adjoining plat which had been in cotton continuously for five years, was that the cotton on the plat which had not been in cotton for two years was twice as II-Alabama Experiment tatton. Bulletin No.9. series, 1 99. 13 Fig. 2. On left cotton after Iron cowpea; on right after cotton. Original. tall as that on the other plat, and yielded at the rate of a bale to the acre, while the latter yielded one-half bale. In 1909, in our experiments at Vienna, Georgia, on Mr. Ed Howell's plantation, a plat of land was planted in the Iron cowpea, on which in 1908 over 75 per cent. of the Dillon cotton died from the wilt disease and nematode worms. This land was very badly infested with the nematode worms as was shown by the numerous galls on the roots of the Unknown cowpea, a few of which were growing in the field. Fig. 2, Plate 2, shows nematode galls on roots of Unknown cowpea. On both sides of.the plat cotton was planted in 1909. In 1910 the different plats were all planted in the same variety of cotton, the Modella, a resistant strain. The results were as follows: ...rbout 5 per cent. of the cotton died in the plat planted after the Iron cowpeas, while on the other plats planted after cotton, from 50 to 90 per cent. of the cotton died. The difference between the two plats Is we11 shown in Fig. 2, Plate 2, and Fig. 2 on page 14. In 1909 we also carried on a similar experiment on Col. M. B. Council's plantation at DeSoto, Georgia, with almost as marked results. In comparison with this we would ca11 attention to the field shown in Fig. 3 on page 15. This field had been planted for three years in oats and the Unknown cowpea. In 1910 the owner planted it In cotton, just to see what the cotton would do. The result was that nearly a11 the cotton died where the nematode worms and wilt were present. In a part of the field no wilt disease was presellt, but the nematode worms were very numerous and here the cotton was very 14 much stunted, and it also "rusted" very badly. In July, 1910, the writer visited Mr. J. P. Coffee's plantation near Valdosta, Ga., to examine some of his cotton that was not growing well. A careful examination of the cotton roots showed the presence of nematode worms. The small feeding roots were all rotted off and small nematode galls were found on many of the roots. ear a patch of sugar cane the cotton roots howed numerous nematode galls, as shown in Fig. 1, cd Ol C. ~ 0v ;<::: 0 s:l p<:: '0 <::.....; "'cd s:l ",.- .... bD 0cd..-.. .... 0 2. ..... cd cdOl "" 'g~ .... 0 s:l C) -cd ~s:l "..".0.. .,'"8.... '" o~ ~cd Ol'O B'OO~l cd cd .8,';5. Z '0::3 _s:l0 cdC) ;::...0.. ~.~ .;0>..'-" .0 '0 .... Ol ;>,Ol .0...... '"cpd. gjs '00 '00 Q; q:; s:l ...9.. 0 ", bD is 16 Plate 2. About ten acres of cotton were badly stunted by the nematode worms but not so much of the cotton was dead, as there was not much wilt 'disease present. Later the writer was informed that the ten acres made a little over two bales of cotton. Whether the cotton is suffering from the wilt disease or nemat.ode worms, 01' botb, can be determined by examining the roots. The nematode worms do not always produce large galls like those shown in Fig. 1, Plate 2, but the small feeding roots are nearly all destroyed. If the wilt disease is present, the roots and stem near the ground will be black inside, in the woody portion. These observations and experiments have been given in detail in order to impress upon the cotton growers the importance of rotation of crop in controlling the nematode worms and wilt disease of cotton. There are many fields of cotton in the tate, like the last one mentioned above that are mucb stunted and the yield greatly reduced on Fig. 4. Nitrogen fixing nodules very numerous on Peanut roots. Original. account of the nematode worms and wilt. These fields could be made to yield a bale to the acre by a proper system of rotation, and the planting of a resi tant strain of cotton. The following crops may be used in the rotation, as they will not support the wilt fungus nor increase the number of nematode worms in the soli: corn, wheat, rye, oats, Iron cowpeas, velvet bean and peanut. We can not too strongly advocate the planting of the Iron cowpea on land Infested with nematode worms. In the above and other experiments we failed to find any nematode galls on the roots of this cowpea. The roots of the Iron cowpea are shown in Fig. 2, Plate 3. In Fig. 1, Plate 3, the roots of the Unkntlwn cowpea are shown. Notice the galls on the roots of the nknown cowpea. 16 DIFFERENCE BETWEEK l,;:UATODE GALLS A:\D ~ITROGE FIXIl G -OD LE . The nitrogeu fixing nodules are mistaken by some for the nematode galls. The nitrogeu fixing nodules appear on the roots as small round shot-like bodies, as shown on the peanut roots in Fig. 4 on page Hi. When -ematode Worms attack the roots they become distorted as shown in Figs. 1 and 2, Plate 2, and can not be pulled off without injuring the roots like the nitrogen fixing nodules. SELECTIO OF SEED FROM RESISTANT PLANTS. a doubt many cotton planter haye noticed that in a badly affectea area where nearly all the plant die, or are badly stunted, there may be a few plants tbat are apparently thrifty and resisting the disease. Evidently these plants are xposed to the di ease to a greater or less ext nt, but do not _uccumb froUl some inherent cause. Knowiug that Prof. W. A. Orton had by careful selection greatly improved the resistance of the Dillon cotton, we at ouce began work along the same line to see if we could se ure a I' sistant strain of cotton from some of the varieties commonly grown in Georgia. METHOD OF SELECT] GEED. Some cotton growers make a practice of going through their fields, picking cotton from the best stalks, and planting the seed to improve their cotton. By continuing this process year after year the cotton Fig. 5. ematode galls on Cantaloupe roots. Original. 17 may be improved to a certain extent. Our experiments and others show, however, that mass selection is a very poor way tu secure a resistant strain of cotton, and that even when working for yield alone, individual selection is the better method to use. In individual selection, or pedigree breeding, a number of the best and most resistant plants are picked, and the seed of each plant saved to Itself. The next season a short row is planted from each stalk. The rows are planted side by side and this gives a good opportunity for comparing the progeny from the different stalks, and finding out which selection is the most resistant and has the strongest transmitting power. This is an important point to determine, for it has been found that plants, like animals, vary greatly in their power to transmit certain qualities to their progeny. Thus, ten stalks may be selected which to all appearances are resistant and the progeny rows the next season will show a great variation in resistance to the disease. If anyone of the progeny rows shows great resistance and a good yield, it is saved to itself and planted the next season in a multiplying patch. The seed from this in turn is saved and the following season as many acres as possible are planted with it. From this it will be seen that from one stalk in three years a large quantity of seed may'be secured. As an illustration of this variation in different selections let us notice in a brief way the benavior of a few selections, those from the ltussell and King's Improved. In 1905 ten plants of the Russell and ten of the Peterkin cotton were selected, all of which seemed to be more or less resistant to the disease. The seed from these different selections were planted in 1906 with th!! following result: Russell Selections. Selection Per Cent. No. dead. 1 35 2 20 3 42 4 65 5 76 6 80 7 51 8 56 9 .................... 70 10 74 Peterkin Selections. Selection Per Cent. No. dead. 1 16 2 46 3 43 4 75 5 50 6 77 7 .................. 50 8 87 9 66 10 70 In 1906 all the Russell selections were discarded except a few good stalks, from os. I, 2 and 3, as over fifty per cent. of the others died. The Peterkin selections were all discarded except a number of good stalks from o. 1. We have each year continued these selections, by re-selection, but have not yet secured a resistant strain of either variety. Many other varieties of cotton have been taken up in the same way as the Russell and Peterkin, but as to take each up in detail would make too long a report, we will give the results in a general way. 18 RESULTS FROM SELECTING RESISTA T PLANT::;. In I~05, 77 different selections were made from 9 different varieties of cotton. In 1906, the progeny of only 11 of these selections were considered worthy of further testing. In 1901, the progeny from only four of these were sav.ed, and in 190 , only two of these were saved for future planting. In I!lU9, one of the two proved to be quite resistant and was saved and planted in 1910, with very good results. Thus it will be seen that from the 77 selections made in 1905 we now have one resistant strain of cotton. In 1905, at Vienna, Ga., 50 selections were made from several different varieties of cotton. In 1906 there was one selection that showed such marked resistance, only 16 per cent. dying, that the whole row was saved for planting the next season. This selection is shown in }t'lg. 1, Plate 4, beside two rows from unselected seed taken from the bin. This strain was propagated as rapidly as possible and seed distributed in 1908, 1909 and 1910. Each year it has proven to be quite resistant to wilt so we have named it the Madella in honor of the Modella farm which belongs to Egleston & Howell, at Vienna, Ga., wbere the selection was made. In 1909, at De Soto, Ga., fifty selections were made, from several dltrerent varieties of cotton. In 1910 the progeny row from one of tD.ese selections showed great resistance to the wilt disea"e. Thts row Is shown In Fig. 2, Plate 4, beside two progeny rows from selections from King cotton. This is the most prolific resistant strain of cotton we have yet secured. We have named it Grant, in recognItion of the valuable services rendered us by Mr. C. W. Grant, superintendent of Mr. M. B. Council's plantation at De Soto, Ga. This strain wl11 be multiplied as rapidly as possible and seed distributed as soon as we bave ufficlent quantity. HYBRIDIZI G EXPERIME TS. ( CROSSING VARIETIES.) In 1905 we began crossing different varieties of cotton with the Dlllon and Dixie to see if we could in this way secure a prolific strain ot resistant cotton. While it is yet too early to make a detailed report Upon the different hybrids, a few of them will be mentioned in a brief way. In 1905 a number of crosses were made with King's Improved and the Dillon, in the hopes of securing an early resistant strain of cotton. We now have a hybrid from one of these crosses that is very promIsing. In Fig. 6, the comparative resistance of this hybrid with the CUlpepper Is well shown. While this hybrid is not so early as the' King, it is a few days earlier than the Dfllon. Next season we hope to have seed of this hybrid for distribution. In our variety test it was noted the Egyptian cotton, the Mltafifi, was much more resistant to the nematode worms than any other variety. In 1906 the Dixie was crossed with the Mltafifi to see if we could secure a strain of cotton that would be very resistant, both to the nematode worms and the wilt disease at cotton. 19 Fig. 6. Shows comparative resistance of Hybrid with Culpepper cot ton. Two rows on left Hybrid Dillon X King; two rows on right Culpepper. Original. In our progeny rows this season some of these hybrids showed great resistance to the nematode worms and wilt. We think this one of the most promising hybrids we have. It may take several years of careful selection to fix this hybrid so it will not revert to the Egyptian type, but if we succeed in this, we will have a valuable strain of cotton. From the results thus far secured we believe this poase or tne work, hybridizing, gives promise of some valuable results. Up to date 15 varieties have been crossed with the Dillon, Dixie, King and Mitafifi, and from some of these we hope to secure a strain of cotton that will be more resistant and much earlier than any we have at present. DISTRIBUTION OF RESIST ANT COTTO T SEED. The object of the work and experiments on wilt is two fold: 1st, to secure strains of cotton that are resistant to the disease; 2nd, to propogate these resistant strains of cotton and distribute the seed to the cotton growers who have to contend with the disease. On account of the great cost of this work, we were greatly handicapped (rom lack of funos up to 1909 when the Legislature gave the state Board of Entomology a spet:ial appropriation of $10,0'00 to carryon this and other phases of our work. This timely appropriation enabled us to enlarge the work on the wilt disease of cotton. The growth of the work Is well shown by the following statements: For planting In 1906, seed were sent to twenty different farmers, in 1907 to 81, in 1908 to 89, in 1909 to 125, In 1910 to 2670. For planting in 1910, 1054 of the 2670 also received samples of the Iron cowpeas. 'We sent each 20 party from 10 to 20 pounds of cotton seed and to each of the 1054 about 10 pounds of Iron cowpeas. From the above it will be seen that for planting in 1910 we sent out altogether 3724 sacks of seed. The Southern Express Company very kindly offered to haul the seed at a greatly reduced rate and the Railroad Commission granted the request. This enabled the State Board of Entomology to send out the seed to the farmers without any expense to them. We feel sure that the farmers appreciated this favor from the Southern Express Company and the Railroad Commission. The importance.of this phase of the work, distribution of good reo slstant see'd, is at once apparent to all. It enables us to determine from personal inspection of many of the fields, and from the reports received, whether the cotton is resistant or not and how It yields in different sections of the State. The farmer, though he only gets enough seed to plant an acre or two, can from this start soon have enough to plant his whole farm in this strain of cotton if he so desires. PLAN OF FUTURE WORK. Arrangements have now been made to carryon the work in 1911 and 1912 on a still larger scale than heretofore. We expect to have for distribution for planting in 1911 a larger quantity of seed of 'both the Iron cowpeas and the resistant cotton than we had in 1910. We hope to be able to furnish each applicant one bushel of the resistant cotton seed and one peck of the Iron cowpeas. In order to serve as many cotton growers as possible we are planning to send the seed by freight and let the party receiving the seed pay the freight on same. This will be exceedingly small to each farmer in comparison wIth what the seed is worth. The work on selection and hybridizing will be continued as heretofore. The main effort will be still further to Improve the resistance of the strains we have already secured. At the same time an effort will also be made to secure an increase in the yield of these resistant trains of cotton. Other varieties will be tested and an effort will be made to obtain a strain of cotton that will be resistant to the nema odes and the wilt disease of cotton. We are also trying to ecure a re istant strain of cotton that will yield a very nigh per cent. of lint. In 100 selections in 190 the yield of nnt ran from 1 per cent. to 43 per cent. The coming season the progeny from the sele~tion yielding 43 per cent. of lint will be watched with a great deal of Interest, as last season, 1909, some stalks of this strain made 40 per cent. of lint. All of our selections that do not yield 33% per cent. of lint are discarded, even though they are resistant, as we do not believe that the farmer as yet wants to raise cotton for the seed. THE MEXI AN COTTON BOLL WEEVIL AND THE WILT DISEASE OF COTTO. That dreaded enemy of cotton, the Mexican Cotton Boll Weevil, is not in Georgia yet. but it is coming at the rate of 50 to 75 miles a year, and may reach here in two or three years. The best way to fight 21 this insect is by certain cultural methods and the planting of a very early variety of cotton. By referring to the list of the different varie, ties of cotton testea for resistance to wilt on page 11, it will be seen that 87 per cent. of King's early died from the disease. This is the variety that has been so successfully used in Texas in fighting the 0011 weevil. Hence an effort will be made to secure a resistant strain of cotton from this or some other early variety of cotton, so as to be prepared in a measure for the boll weevil when It arrives in the State. For the past two years we have been making a number of selections from King and other early varieties of cotton but so far none of these has proven to be very resistant. Two progeny rows from King's selections are shown in Fig. 2, Plate 4. While this season none or the progeny rows from King s'elections was resistant, they contained a number of good stalks and many of these were selected for testing next season. This season, in oue of our resistant strains, the Modella, there were a number of cotton stalks that were much earller (about 7 days) than the others. A large number of these stalks were selected. This we think promising, and we will endeavor to secure an early resistant strain from these if possible. From this it will be seen that it may be a difficult task to secure all early resistant strain of cotton, but judging from the progress ll.lread)' made we hope to be able to develop an early resistant strain by the time the Mexican Cotton Boll Weevil reaches Georgia. SUMMARY OF REPORTS FROM INDIVIDAUL PLANTERS WHO HAVE TESTED THE RESISTA T COTTO. Up to date we have sent seed of the resistant cotton to 2685 planters who have the disease on their farms. Each season a number of these filds have been inspected, and from the most of the others reports have been received. In the following paragraph some of these reports will be given in brief, to show what the results of the tests have been in different sections of the State. Col. M. B. Council, Americus, Ga., reported that "None of the Dillon cotton died, except in a spot where there had been a watermelon patch the year before, and that 80 per cent. of the adjoining. cotton died from the black root disease." The reason for the cotton dying where the watermelons had been was that they had increased the number of nematodes in the soil. Hon. R. T. Humber, Lumpkin, Ga., reported: "I have planted the seed sent me from your department the last three or four years, 'and also planted seed raised from them. I find where 75 per cent. of the common cotton will die, 75 per cent. of the immune will live on the same land." Hon. C. C. Richardson, Byron, Ga., reported that but very little of the Dixie cotton died, where the year before 75 per cent. of the cotton died. Mr. J. Q. .daB, Sandersville, Ga., reported that but from one to five per cent. of the Dillon cotton, and 50 per cent. of the adjoining cotton died from the disease. The Dillon cotton yielded 1,000 poundS of seed cotton per acre, other cotton only 750 pounds per acre. 22 ~lr. Oscar Aycock, Shellman, Ga., reported that 10 per cent. of the Dixie cotton died, and 50 per cent. of Truitt. The Dixie yielded 900 pounds, Peterkin 1,000 pounds, and Truitt 60\! pounds of lint cotton per acre. Mr. S. S. Sauls, Shellman, Ga., repOrted that 5 per cent. of the Dixie and 50 per cent. of the adjoining cotton died. The Dixie yielded 1,600 pounds of seed cotton per acre, Hawkins, 1,080 pounds per acre. Mr. George May, Warthen, Ga., reported that 5 per cent. of the Dillon and 25 per cent. of the adjoining cotton died. Yield of Dixie 1,200 pounds of seed cotton per acre, yield of other cotton not given. Mr. O. A. Bozeman, Ashburn, Ga., reported that very little of the Dixie cotton died. Yield of Dixie was 2,260 pounds on 3,480 square yards, less than an acre; yield of Russell was 1,350 pounds per acre. Both received the same amount of fertilizer, 600 pounds of a 9-2-4 home mixed guano. J. W. Edmondson, Moultrie, Ga., reported: "The cotton seed you lent me were planted on a piece of land where 1 had cotton last year except I ran the rows on through where a cane patch had been the previous year. This year I have not been able to find a stalk of wilt where the seed were planted that I received from you. Nearly all of my own variety of cotton died, where cane was planted last year." Mr. J. U. Hollingsworth, Dover, Ga., reported: "I counted three rows and they averaged nine stalks to row affected. Other cotton planted by it averaged 61 hills per row affected." Mr. A. E. Lewis, Hazelhurst, Ga., reported that 75 per cent. of his cotton died and only 25 per cent. of the resistant cotton. On Jesse Fausts' place, Plains, Ga.. in 1909 only 1 to 5 per cent. of the Dixie cotton died from wilt, while 25 to 50 per cent. of the adjoining Peterkin died. Many other reports similar to these could be giYen, but these show bow the resistant strains of cotton compare with the other varieties of cotton when grown on diseased land. Many fields have been visited each year where the resistant cotton was planted, and we have seen fields where not 5 per cent. of the resistant cotton was dead, and from 50 to 75 per cent. of the adjoining cotton was dead. Whenever more than 10 to 15 per cent. of the resistant cotton dies, it is due to the presence of nematode worms in the soil. We would recommend that such lands before being planted In cotton, be planted for two or three years in crops that will not IUppOrt the wilt fungus, or increase the number of nematodes in the soil. These as mentioned before are: corn, wheat, rye, oats, Iron COWpea, velvet bean and peanut. 23 COTTON ANTHRACNOSE. 1 TRODUCTION. The fungus di ease of cotton known as Anthracnose Is present every year to a greater or less extent in nearly every cotton field in the State. Some seasons, like 19uLi, "hen the IV atber conditlOns were favorabl for the growth of the fungus, the disease may ao a great deal of damage. For the last four ) ears, the tate Board of Entomology bas been conducting experiment on this disease. For two years the work was conducted at FloVilla, but witb negative results on account of the failure or the disea e to de\'elop to any great extent. E'or the past two year, the experiments have been conducted at Darien, Ga., on Butler Island, where the conditions are ideal for the development of the disease. The results already secured are promIsing, hence it i deemed advi able to is ue this preliminary report. \Ve found this summer that many planters mistook the cotton an thracnose for the work of some dreadful cotton insect, and became greatly alarmed, fearing that the Mexican Cotton Boll Weevil occurred in their fields. Hence in the following pages the author has tried to describe the cotton anthracno e, and also the work done by some sucking insects, so that the planter may be able to tell the difference between the two. Fig. 7. Anthracnose. Early stage of, on nearly mature cotton bolls. Original. 24 PLATE III. Fig. 1. Nematode galls on roots of Unlmown cowpea. Original. Fig. 2. Roots of the Iron cowpea, free from Nematode galls. Origin:!l. Fig. 8. Cotton Bolls nearly destroyed by Anthracnose. Showing how the bolls are prevented from opening normally. Lint all de stroyed except in one or two locks. Original. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISEASE. Anthracnose affects the bolls principally, and causes them to rot and decay. It first appears on the bolls as minute specks which look very much like insect punctures. But unlike insect punctures, they continue to grow until sometimes onehalf or twothirds of the boll is covered. The color of the diseased area varies with the age, becoming a darker brown for a time until the spores are produced, when they have a pink center and border. Later the diseased area may be overgrown with a white fungus and then the pink color will be apparent throughout the diseased area. At first the small brown spots enlarge in every direction, but if numerous they soon coalesce and become irregular in outline. As lOOn as the fungus reaches the cotton in the boll it spreads very rapidly and the cotton soon turns black and rots. This happens very frequently when the digeased area is no larger around than a lead pencil. When young bolls are attacked they frequently rot and shrivel np. Such bolls never open, or at least only slightly at the apex. Sometimes only one or two of the carpels of a boll are affected but even then the boll does not open normally. The different stages of the disease are well shown in Fig. 7. In Fig. 8, the manner in which the diseased bolls open and the different degrees of destruction are weU shown. It will be seen that all the cotton is destroyed in the boll In the center, and. the others all but one lock. Hence it will be leen that the disease destroys many bolls completely, and many more Partially. Cotton may be picked from these diseased bolls and the lint and seed In such a case is very liable to be covered with the Ipores of the fungus. This will again be referred to under remedies. The author has never found the disease on stems of mature plants but aCcording to Prof. Atklnson,a it is sometimes found on mature Items Where they are wounded, or at the leaf scars. Thls disease, -The Cotton Plant Bul. No. 33, Office of Exp. Sta. U. S. Dept. of Agrlc. 25 however, ver:r frequently attacks the stems of young cotton causing them to wilt and die. Anthracnose also ~ttacks the leave of the plants, and especially the sickly or weak ones. Prof. Atkinson also found that the cotyledons or seed leaves suffer from a characteristic injury probably caused by the spores that remain on the lint germinatip.g and attacking the cotyledons as they slip through the seed hull and adhering lint. On the fleshy cotyledons the diseased area has the characteristic pink color that is found on the diseased bolls. CAUSE OF A THRACNOSE. This disease, Cotton Anthracnose, is caused by afungus, Oolletotrichum gossypii (Southworth) which attacks the bolls, leaves, cotyledons and sometimes the stems of young plant, causing the bolls to rot as described in a previous paragraph. The life history and botanical character of this fungus have been studied and described by lIss Southworth,a and Prof. Geo. F. Atkinson.b The fungus has been isolated, grown on different media, and inoculations made, so it has been proved beyond a doubt that the disease is caused by the fungus men tioned above. The question as to just how the fungus grows upon the plant through the summer is not yet definitely settled. Prof. Atkinson failed to find the fungus in all parts of the plant. He thinks there is no evidence to show that the fungus grows in the stem and up to the leaves and the bolls. From the evidence at hand he thinks it very possible that the spores may grow on the diseased leaves and at the leaf scars, producing spores at frequent intervals, and in this manner keep the fungus alive until the bolls appear on the cotton stalks. RELATION OF I SECTS TO THE DISEASE. Many reports came out in different papers during the season of 1906, stating that the boll weevil, or some kind of cotton insect was destroying the cotton bolls. All of these reports that we investigated proved to be anthracnose, and not the boll weevll or any other cotton insect. In fact, no cotton insect was found except the boll worm, and a brown bug, Oalocoris rapid-us. a few large green soldier bugs, ezaria hilari8, and these only in very small numbers in a few places. In no instance were they numerous enough to do any great amount of damage: but in many of the fields, in nearly all of the rotten bolls, there were found a number of small beetles. These were the Insects that the cotton planters always pointed out as the ones that were causing the damage. During the examination by the writer, of many fields of cotton in dif ferent parts of the State, these beetles were never seen feeding or breeding in sound cotton bolls. They were always found feeding and breeding in the diseased and rotten bolls. They seemed to follow and not precede the rot. Hence it is thought they did not cause or even start the disease. After a bOil a-Jour. of Myco1.. Yo\. 6. No. :l:l. 1 !l0-!l1. p. 100. grI b-The Cotton' Plnnt. Bu\. 33 p. 293. Office of Exp. Sta.. U. S. Dept. of A c. 26 bas been partially destroyed they take possession of the 'interior, feed ing and laying eggs in the decaying cotton in the boll. Some of these beetles were sent to the Bureau of Entomology, Washington, D. C., where they were identified by Dr. F. H. Chittenden as Oarpophilus dimi/latus, a beetle very frequently found breeding in diseased cotton bolls. This season, 1910, we frequently received cotton bolls that were destroyed by anthracnose with !lower beetles in them. The parties always thought these beetles were responsible for the damage. This beetle which somewhat resembles a June bug has never been known to attack a healthy boll of cotton. They are also sometimes found in peaches and figs where a bird or brown rot has started decay and made a place of entrance for the beetles. Fig. 9. Cotton boll showing punctures of Oalocoris rapidus, also shows the unequal growth of the boll. (After Sanderson, Bul. 57, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Bur. of Ent.) The injury from bugs such as those mentioned llibove, the Cotton Leaf Bug, Oalicoris rapidus, and the Green Soldier Bug, Nezaria hilaria, is readily distinguished from anthracnose. The wounds made by these bugs become depressed and turn dark, as does the anthracnose in the early stages, but they do not continue to spread like the anthracnose spots, and upon microscopic examination the fungus is not found to be present. This of course is the crucial test and the only reliable one. Small bolls if punctured many times, by insects, very frequently dry up and drop without rotting. Larger bolls if punctured many times, in one or two locks, or on one side, develop one sided as shown in Fig. 9. Sometimes where the insects injury is very severe the boll becomes soft and mushy inside, but do not rot in the same manner as the bolls affected with anthracnose. In Texas, in 1904, the writer saw a number of fields that were very much affected by the brown cotton leaf bug, Oalicoris rapidus, and the effects were in every case as mentioned above. But strange to say, many of the planters there thought thE' Injury was due to anthracnose. To determine this point beyond a dOUbt Prof. E. Dwight Sanderson, who was then Entomologist in Texas, bad some of the bolls sent to Dr. A. F. Woods, Pathologist of the Bu- reau or Plant Industry, . S. Dept. of Agriculture, who reported: "'These resemble somewhat the early stages of anthracnose, but we have been unable to find any fungus present, and the spots have not enlarged or developed fungus even after several days in a moist ehamber."a The bug that caused this injury is shown in Fig. 10. t-BUIlI. :'i7. Tll'oort on MIRCcllnnl'Ol1S Cotton In ects In TexRs. p. 45, Bur. of ., . S. Dept. of Agrlc. 27 b Fig. 10. Brown Cotton Leaf bug, OaZocoris rapidus; a, mature bug; b. young nymph; c. fourth stage of nymph; d, fifth stage of young. (After Sanderson, Bu!. 57. U. S. Department of Agriculture. Bur. of Ent.) . The writer. during the season of 1906. made a microscopical examination of a number of diseased bolls in different stages of the disease. These examinations failed to reveal any injury from insects, even in the smallest brown specks, which many planters thought to be punctures made by insects. But in each and every case the fungus was present Furthermore, from observations made in the field, it was found that one of these little brown sunken spots developed in from 24 to 62 hours into a spot as large around as a quarter or half dollar. And In from three to four days two-thirds to three-fourths of the boll woul.d be covered. So from watching these spots one may determine very accurately whether cotton bolls are affected by insects or with anthracnose. The writer also made some inoculations of healthy bolls by puncturing them with a needle which had been stuck into a diseased boll, and also by rubbing a diseased boll against a healthy one. In each case however, the disease became established on the boll. The disease first became evident on the punctured bolls, on the others a few days thereafter. This shows that the fungus can, under favorable conditions. succeed unaided in attacking and destroying a boll of cotton. From these facts, mentioned in the above paragraphs and from ob servations made In many fields in different parts of the State. the writer believes that insects play no part whatever in causing anthracnose, aside from the possibility that certain ones may aid in spreading the disease from one boll to another, or from plant to plant by carrying the spores on their feet or beeks. Biting or sucking insects after feeding on bolls affected by anthracnose would be likely to inoculate healthy bolls. VARIETY TEST. For the past two years we have been conducting a variety test to find out which was the most resistant to the disease. The following table gives the varieties tested and the per cent. of bolls, by actual count. that were affected by the disease. 28 Variety. Per Cent. of bolls atfectea. Bates 38.rdinary seedling pecan tree and increase the size of the nuts by fertilization and cultivation. I would like to hear from Mr. Wight on that question. MR. WIGHT: The experiment mentioned in my paper is not necessarily conclusive, but it was carried out by Col. Chas. A. Van Duzee at a pecan gr<>ve twelve miles from here. He got these results exactly as I gave them-he got 50 per cent larger nuts, and increased more than 50 per cent a year. My experience with pecans is that, if you will take good care of them and feed them well, you will grow more nuts and you will get larger nuts. COL. FORT: The nuts in my orchard are not very large. I think the orchard is probably twenty years of age. I have never thought it paid to cultivate them at all, but if I thought they could be incre'ased in size and yield by cultivation, I would take that up. The larger growers near DeWitt insist that you can't increase the nuts by cultivation, and I therefore, brought that question up. MR. WIGHT: I think, if you will reason by analogy, and look into experiments along this line, you will find it to be true. MR. STUCKEY: Have you experienced much trouble with this little beetle that bores into the nut, down there' MR. WIGHT: The husk-borer Yes sir. 84 MR. STUCKEY: About what per cent do you lose' MR. WIGHT: The husk-borer aoes not seem to dimin~ ish the quantity of the crop. The main trouble is that he disfigures the nut, makes some of the hUll adhere to the nut, and makes it a little unsightly. MR. STUCKEY: The experience there at the Experiment Station is that about 40 per eent. -are destroyed. They bore right on inside of the nut into the meat. MR. WIGHT: That's not the husk-borer. We don't have that. MR. STUCKEY: If that should become very numerous, I believe it would cause trouble. They had it in Texas. I got 200 lbs. of nuts for planting, and I noticed in a lot of them there was a little round hole about the size 'Of a lead pencil, where the worm had bored out. Do you top-work your trees' MR. WIGHT: No, sir. MR. STUCKEY: If your yield is not satisfactory, it would be better to do that. A gentleman told me that he had a tree three feet in diameter, and it bore about five pounds of nuts. It ought to bear nearer 500 than five. So it is best, under those circumstances to top it. If your tree does not bear well after it gets 8 to 10 inches in diameter, you can easily top it j cut that sorry head off and put a better one on it. QUESTION: What is better-12 trees to the acre or more' MR. WIGHT: If your land is good, 12 trees to the acre is best. If you put them much closer together than that, our gr~d-children will find that those trees are getting so thick that they will get in eac.n o~.nere way. MR. STONE: In regard to increasing the size of nuts by the application of fertilizers, I will state that there is 85 one nut that it is not necessary to apply any fertilizer to, to increase. That is an artificial nutmeg made by machinery. (Laughter.) MR. WIGHT: A cent to a cent -and a half a pound ought to covel' the cost of gathering. My method is to get you a large sheet, and shake them off and gather them up. CHAIRMAN HUNT: Prof. McHatton is next in order. We will be very glad to hear from Prof. McHatton on the subject "Horticultural Education at the State College of Agriculture." HORTICULTURE AT THE STATE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE.. T. H. MCHATTON, State College of Agriculture, Athens, Ga. In 1908, when the re-organization of the State College of Agriculture took place, the Department of Horticulture was one of the minor ones in the institution, offering only a very elementary course in. the subject, and giving no chance for specialization or further study in the field pertaining to pomology, olericulture, and other horticultural subjects. At the time of the occupancy of the new college building in January, 1909, the equipment of the Department consisted principally of a pair of pruning shears and one saw. All the orchard and fruit trees had gone when the old University was sold, and before the present organization was perfected, the orchard in the new University extension proper had been removed to make room for experimental plats. From the begiuning of the College to the year 1908, horticulture had been in charge of an instructor, but in that year of re-organization it was decided to place this Department on a par with the others with a full profllll80r at its head. Imagine the feelings of one who was enthusiastic in his work when it was thoroughly realized that everything had to be built from the bottom, and that before a really good course could be given in horticultUral subjects a Department had to be built. This was a strange thing indeed in a State which has the horticultural possibilities of Georgia; and which has for a number of years stood in the limelight as one of the peach producing centers of the country. othing conld be gained by standing around and talking. It was necessary to hustle if the institution was to take its place in the State, as it should, and really the development in the past two years has been marvelous. Old red clay hills have been turned into orchards; gullied fields have become vineyards; small fruit plantations have taken the places of blackberry thickets and old hedge rows; where the implements were sheltered by the sky now are found sheds, barns and spray houses with laboratories, furnishing ample room for the storage of all horticultural imple- 86 ments, as well as places for instructing the young men who are taking courses in the Department. Something near forty acres has been reclaimed and put into horticultural crops. This season, provided the frosts do not stop it, there will be a crop of peaches, small, it is true, but a beginning, and in a few years the apples will be bearing. The vineyards will produce this summer, as well as the small fruit plantation. Within a few years more sect.ions of the departmental farm will be in condition for experimentation with truck and vegetables. The aim now is to so treat this land with legumes and general farm crops as to bring it up into condition of tilth fitted for the production of truck crops. For the past two years the work has been mainly constructive, not only in the building up and the construction of the Department, itself, which acts as a laboratory both for practical instruction and scientific investigation; but also the courses of instruction had to be mapped out and worked into shape so that those desiring information and instruction along horticultural lines could obtain the same, and going hand in hand, in this way the equipment of both the students' and private laboratories, as well as the furnishing of the shelves in the library with books necessary to the good fruit grower or vegetable gardener. Where there was nothing before in the way of equipment to facilitate in the way of instruction, today the College is only too proud to show anyone the departmental laboratories in which can be found all the necessary apparatus for handling a section of twenty men in any branches of horticultural work. Besides, the private laboratory is also now in a condition to be used for research work along practically all lines in which the horticulturist should be interested. Where before the most elementary lines of work were offered, today there is found in the catalogue of the University of Georgia twelve courses offered in the Department of Horticulture. Three of these are compuJsory in the Freshman year, and their aim is to place the Georgia boy who graduates from the State College of Agriculture, no matter in what branch, in a position that he will be able to produce and enjoy the many kinds of fruit and vegetables that are so well adapted to his home State. Possibly the main object of this course is to show the young man that success in fruit growing can be obtained only through "stick-to-itiveness" and a proper knowledge of the plants with which he is dealing, as well as methods by which they may be protected and improved. It is hoped that every young man who takes this course will know enough not to plant out an orchard and turn it over to Providence. He should know when finishing this course that such a method of growing fruit is not a paying proposition. After this year's work courses beginning in more or less the specialized line of horticulture are offered as electives in the Junior year. A study of small fruits, the harvesting, marketing, and storing of fruits. l"" well as the history and description of fruits, green-house managcnn-" floriculture, construction of green-houses, the study of orchards, gardens, diseases and pests, as well as the method of controlling the same, are found in the Junior year. The Senior year offers a course in landscape garden 87 ing. It is mainly for the owner of a country home or a small city home. Later on in this year a study is given in the literature of horticulture, and a man who is about to graduate in horticulture as his major is allowed to specialize in some special line and runs in connection with it some experiments. In this way it is possible to give any young man of this State a fairly good knowledge of horticulture and graduate him as from the other institutions in this country; that is, putting him into a position to go out into the world and make his living out of the growing fruits or vegetables or some of the allied branches of horticulture. As mentioned above, up to the present time the main work has been construction, and now besides the head of the Department, there is attached to it an Extension Horticulturist, who is carrying the work out into the State and among the people for whom it is ultimately designed to serve. Such conditions make it possible for those remaining at home to take up some line of scientific investigation. Exactly what this line will be has not yet been given out. There will be undoubtedly something of a scientific interest to the horticulturist who loves his business as a science, as well as other experiments along very practical lines to be disseminated throughout the State for the benefit of fruit growers and orchardists. It was indeed a pleasure to be asked to give a sketch of the horticultural work at the State College, at this meeting, because the Department feels that unless it gets in touch with the people of the State, and through them comes in contact with the young men who are growing up, it is more or less a failure. The object of the College is the instruction of the youth of Georgia, and the main object of the Department of Horticulture at the present time is to better the fruit conditions of the State, and to put the people of Georgia in a position to be able to turn to horticul- ture for a livelihood when they are harassed by such troubles and pests as the cattle tick and boll weevil. To do this, it must be assisted by the men of the State Horticultural Society, for without their aid it is almost impossible for this Department to develop to this extent. There are, of course, many things necessary for the future development, but as there are other Departments developing also, it is impossible that all the money necessary can be put into anyone of them. Before the development of the courses in horticulture for the Georgia boys, a green house will have to be built, as well as enlargements in laboratory equipment and grounds equipment be made. These things, however, will only come when the Legislature of our State does its full duty by the College of Agriculture. I am not here begging, but as you have put me on the program for this IUbject, and I feel that you must be more or less interested in the condi tions of the Department, as well as the College as a whole, I feel at liberty to say that whenever you find a good chance to do so, you should consider it the part of a citizen of Georgia, and especially a horticulturist, to pull for appropriations for the institution, whose aim is the betterment of Georgia's agricultural conditions in all lines, and the education of the youth of this State. I have not covered this subject as thoroughly as I might, and I gave you a very short paper, because I thought it would be late on the program, but 88 if any body here wishes to ask any questions relative to the work of the Department, I will be very glad to answer them. One other thing. The College library files of Georgia Horticultural ociety are not complete. There are a few missing numbers. I had a list on my desk to read to the Society, but I came off hurriedly and forgot it. I wanted to request, if any of you have extra copies of the reports, that you will please be good enough to let me know. I am very anxious to complete my library files, and I will be glad to notify any body just exactly what the numbers are that are missing, if they will let me know that they have extra copies. MR. BERCKMANS: I think you are short the proceeding of 1882, and at the present time there are only two copies in existence, one in my father's library, and one on file with Department in Atlanta. We have a number of copies of different year's proceedings, that father left, and if there are any members who would like to complete their files, not merely out of curosity, but to complete their files and bind them, we will be glad to furnish them as far as possible. Of orne we have probably only a half dozen copies left, and they were published by the Society alone in tho~e days at enormous expense, and it has always been father's idea to try to preserve them a much as possible. COL. WADE of Cornelia then took the chair and tated: "We will now have the pleasure of Ii tening to an address that we have been looking for by Col. B. W. Hunt. BEA TIFYING RURAL Hmm SURROlThTDINGS A m CIVIC BIPROVEME T. B. W. HUNT, Eatonton, Ga. Beautifying Rural Surroundings and Civic Improvement was assigned to me as a theme by the late Dr. Berckmans. How he preferred the subjects treated I do not know, and it is eDflless. The word rural as used in the text, T take it, refers to country as well as suburban and village homes, with sufficient space for ornamental grounds to be made the dominant feature in connection with the residence proper. And civic improvement, I understand, includes the making of attractive streets, parks, sidewalks, and the beautifying of private grounds exposed to public view. The treatment of streets in cities and villages is necessarily one of formal gHrdening in contrailistinction to !HDrlscHPe gnrclenmg. The latter term being restricted to the creation of rural pictures by 89 the landscape architect, views pleasing to the art sense of the observer. The successful landscapist creates a' rural scene that obscures all the artificialities of his labor, following apparently the lines of nature's own work from a totally different standpoint, toward a result as formal as the exigencies of the case may require. To be specific, if the civic improver be engaged in planting shade trees on a straight street, he must keep them in perfect alignmeut, and all should be of the same variety, all of similar size and height. Otherwise the formal straight line will prove a more or less disappointing failure. On the contrary, the beauty of the landscape gardener's planting is enhanced by the different varieties of the trees he may plant, by their varying sizes, colors, shapes, and manner of growth. The artistic grouping of trees and shrubs, allowing large open spaces carpeted with grass, makes a beautiful picture of his design. To realize where the formal treatment is necessary, where the natural grouping is most pleasing to the art loving observer, where the one may best blend into the other manner of treatment, constitutes the successful landscape architect, the true creator of ornamental gardening. There must be some formal treatment in all home grounds, I take for granted, because the dwelling itself is the most formal of objects, and he of the informal school must tame ature's wild mood at, or near, the residence. Otherwise we would be as savages dwelling in the jungle. How to blend the natural with the formal and artificial, succe sfully, appears to me to be the key to the treatvIent. Here is where the endless improvement of grounds enters into the home life of the occupants. The very entrance to a home from a street is obliged to be formal and straight. The walks Dear the house made dry and kept free from grass and weeds, all tell of formal treatment-the taming of nature's moods. Here, then,. near the dwelling may be placed the sun dial, the large vases for the blooming tender plants, the true architectura features of use, or apparent use, in the grounds, placed only where formal treatment is in good usage. The most attractive architectural embellishments about home .grounds may be quite inexpensive. Some waste irons and wire for a skeleton, portland cement for the shaping, with a mason's trowel and a varnish brush for tools, directed by artistic hands, will create vases, sun dials, and aece ories and all at the most trifling cost. Vases four or five feet high that would cost $25 to $50 each may be created at home, costing from 25c to 50c each, with all the enjoyment of creation, thrown in for good measure. There is planting to be done for present and immediate effect, planting for the future, planting for color winter and summer, planting for all blooming seasons. Planting of trees and shrubs that are of themselves ornamental and willing to grow out of grass borders, planting for roses and crinums and similar plants that to reach perfection of bloom demand raw earth and clean culture, impatient of verdure, of grass, and such honM be relegated to a convenient place out of sight, when one is viewing hl' ornamentals. ~Iy conception of beautifying rural home urroundings does not mean 90 excessive expenditure of money on the part of the city or town. To be specific, my home town was paying one dollar a tree for uncertain, irregular and bad planting. The Ladies' Improvement Society of which my wife is president, took up the work and planted in one winter 1300 street trees at a cost of 13c a tree, losing only about 5 per cent of the whole plant. No other improvement at 80 slight a. cost could have added so much to the beauty of the small city, and the benefits increase year by year, as the trees grow larger. Ladies are the best of economists in such work, and they are the most willing civic improvers. In connection with tree planting, both for street improvement and for shade in home grounds, in our semitropical, sunburned section, please bear with me while I state what I believe is true about sunshine, which is not the orthodox view. The white race is absolutely dependent on shade for life in the tropics. Sunshine is as deadly there as the cobra's bite, but slower in effect. I fully believe that mental and physical health cannot be enjoyed in Middle and Southern Georgia, except by protection of shade from the sun's rays. The effect of the X-Ray and Roentgen rays on the human body afford an explanation why this is true. We will not argue or try to explain why shade is necessary to the white race, further than to say a whiteskinned race has never been found indigenous South of the fiftieth degree of latitude, and we dwell near the thirty- third. The survival of the fittest makes no exceptiol18o If we remain here as a white race and would save our skin from the pigmentation of the Hindustan races, shade is our only savior. Beauty may be a sufficient reason to the art lover for tree planting, but the economic law of the preservation of the flower of the human race must appeal to all people with overwhelming force. Without shade our race is doomed to a ehange in color of skin or extermination in this latitude. To endeavor to do good planning and planting without familiarity with the work of the best artists, would be as impossible as to write good English before learning to spell. He who would layout and beautify his own grounds, must at least have a working knowledge of landscape gardening. It is well for us to know the work of those who have laid out the grounds that we most admire. Perhaps some of those present may not remember that Andrew J. Downing, whose work made an epoch in American rural planting, said that Andre Parmentier, the Belgian emigrant of 1824, by "his labor and example effected, directly, far more landscape gardening in America than those of any other individual whatever." It is well for us to realize the debt we owe to little Belgium, who gave us both Parmentier and Berck mans, the latter doing more for Southern horticulture than any other mall who has yet lived. There is a reason underlying Belgian influence, I fully believe, but to name it would be too much of a digression at this time. Downing's landscape gardening published in 1841, changed for all time my point of view of this art, as it doubtless has others. Downing's was the first American published book on the subject. Since Downing 's deat~, possibly the calling of landscape gardening has been most advanced lJl America by the work of Calvert Vaux and Frederick Law Olmstead. I only know from reading, and not from personal observation, the landscape 91 creations of the more recent artists, Samuel Parsons, Jr., and the original treatment of grounds by Warren H. Manning, and the work of our contemporaries, generally. The Wade grounds here in Thomasville I have read criticisms of, and I understand they are original in treatment and most successful in actual results. I do not intend to wander far from my tl1eme, but the temptation is irresistible-especially to one who sees and feels the difference between each landscape gardener's work. That is, a close student of this subject may tell wl1ere one man's work has ended, and a landscapist of a different lIChool commenced. A musician will recognize Wagner's music, even if he does not know the score, likewise the student sees and feels tile master's hand and touch in this creative work. And what is it all worth' How shall we, who love the beautiful creations of the landscape gardeners, answer the parsimonious economist, wl10 would rob life of all beauty just to increase a hoard of gold' He may have feelings, but he does not feel wl1at we feel-he has eyes, but he does not see what we see; l1e has capacities undeveloped, perhaps, but he does not enjoy what we enjoy. To us the garden, the landscape, the trees and shrubs, all justify themselves. The garden ministers in some way to our yearning for the companionship of the beautiful and true. Is it not better to see, to feel, to enjoy, than to analyze' PROF. CRAIG: I would like to take this opportunity of calling the attention of the members of the Society to the meeting of the American Pomological Society at Tampa on Thursday, Friday, -and Saturday. I am sorry that I have not a program, showing the bill of fare. ~ assure you, however, that there has been prepared a very attractive program, covering a wide range of subjects of pre ent day importance to fruit growers. I might say that last year, when the question was raised as to meeting South, the question of the time came up. We had to arrange the time in accordance with the convenience of OUf hosts, The Florida Horticultural Society and the Tampa Board of Trade, and we put it ten days later than originally intended. I hope, ,however, that this present arrangement will result in a large attendance on the part of your Society. The morning session was then adjourned, the Society to reconvene promptly at 2 :30 p. m. 92 AFTER OON SESSION. The afternoon session was called 'to order at 2 :30, and the paper on the subject "Beautifying Home Surroundings" by Mr. P. J. Hjort, of Thomasville, was called for. Mr. Hjort's son responded in his father's absence, and read his paper for him, as follows: BEAUTIFYING RURAL HOME SURROUNDINGS. In taking up the question of beautifying rural home surroundings, one would naturally infer that what is meant is the making of a flower garden, planting shade trees, etc. The last half, so far as it goes, is correct. The first half does not exactly express the idea. In making a flower garden it is natural to suppose, that one would proceed to select a suitable spot, which will answer the purpose as regards location, soil, exposure and drainage. In beautifying home grounds, we are usually deprived of the advantage .of selecting the location, and find ourselves confronted by conditions often adverse to the object. We have to deal with conditions as we find them, and if possible turn the obstacles into advantages. Incidental mention may be made of an unsightly sink hole on a nearby private estate, which was skillfully turned into a beautiful flight of terraces, and which is now one of the show places of the vicinity. OBJECTS TO BE ATTAINED. The main objects to be attained are the screening of unsightly buildings and other objectionable features, providing the proper roads and paths, in a manner to obtain a maximum of convenience, and at the same time making the least possible display of bare dirt. The making of the ornamental parts of the grounds comes much easier after these preliminaries have been attended to. SCREENING. Outbuildings are always more or less unsightly, unless dwarfed by planting something in front of them. Even if the trees set in front are only a fraction of the height of the building, they soften the outline, and produce a far different effect. For this purpose the various conifers are most suitable. The idea can be easily demonstrated, if one will only compare the looks of a place, where these details have been attended to, with one where planting for ornament has been n.eglected, and the latter class is, unfortunately, in the majority. In planting of shrubs near a residence, one may plant for both openness and seclusion, by arranging the shrubs in such a manner that passers-by may see very little that transpires within, while those inside can see all the traffic on the outside. This requires some skill in arranging, but it is weD worth the trouble. 93 ROAD MAKING AND GRADING. In making a drive, one should be careful to avoid ungraceful lines. A IItraight road will answer in many cases, and can often be made to convey an idea of a much greater distance than there really is, especially if lined with plants of a low growth, and with gray or bluish foliage. A curved road where it matches the SUTTounding landscape is very pretty, provided it is true, but a curve that is not true is always an eyelore. Besides laying a curve off geometrically it is also necessary to look at it from various view points, as it sometimes needs some changes before it looks right. The road beds should be rounded some in the middle, leaving a gutter on each side, the depth of which will vary with the drainage necessary for carrying off the surplus water. Where the general contour of the ground is on a level, all small irregularities in the surface should be graded before planting, as it is difficult to do this afterwards, without injury. Where the land is hilly, sometimes terraces come in handy, if properly arranged, and the possibilities of beautifying are really greater on hilly land than on that which is level. It should always be borne in mind, however, that the terraces must be absolutely level; otherwise they are likely to prove troublesome, as they will wash during a rain. It is also advisable to plant a low hedge on the crest of a terrace, where conditions allow it, as they help to keep the soil in place. NATURAL LANDSCAPES. Natural landscapes possess all the essential features sought by the landscape gardener. One can learn many a lesson by studying the arrangement of low growing shrubs in front of a piece of woodland. This leads 111 to see the advantage in planting objects of a lower growth in front of taller trees or shrubs. The masses of trees, the single specimens, the flower beds, the wide expanse of green grass, even the low border defining the path made by man or beast, all the features are found in the wild landscape. Some features thus tound are well worth imitating. RULES. There are certain rules laid do'lrn for laying out grounds, but the rules ot different authorities vary so much that it is pretty much a matter of individual taste bow the grounds are 'Planned. On a few points the au~orities agree, for instance, that the shortest distance between any two liven points is a straight line. That it is not in good taste to dot your Ihrnbs all over the grass, because it makes the lawn look smaller, and the pel'Bpective is lost. That it is not advisable to mix evergreens and decidu~ plants in the same cluster, because the evergreens will look bare in the 1finter, where they have been in contact with the others. HEDGES. One idea, which seems to be universal among modern landscape men is, that hedges have no place in the landscape. Still, there are very few of the IlOaessors of beautiful hedges who would willingly abandon them simply 94 because they are not fashionable. A hedge is nearly always appropriate 88 a means of defining the boundary between the 110wer garden, near the residence, and the outlying grounds, which should be planned to some extent in conformity to nature, and therefore do not readily absorb the arti ficial garden near the residence as an integral part. In planning a hedge, it is well before choosing the material to study the conditions of the locality, as well as the purpose. There are various plants that make good hedges, the most co=only used here being Amoor privet. This answers admirably for a hedge anywhere from six inches to ten feet in height, and will make a hedge in less time than any other plant known. Where the white l1y is plentiful, it may be best, however, to use something else. Some of the privets are more resistant than the Amoor. If the soil is heavy clay, a low hedge can be made of boxwood and a taller one of arbor vitlll, especially the co=on Chinese. Many of the 110wering shrubs also make good hedges, especially Spirea Thunbergii and Cydonia Japoniea. FLoWER BORDERS. The 110wer border is always appropriate where a walk can be arranged parallel with a line of shrubbery, and may be made into a catch all for quite a collection of things that the owner may take a fancy to. The 110wer border can be made to bloom nearly the whole year by properly selecting the material for it. Hardy herbaceous stuff is not nsed here to the same extent to which it is planted at the North, but this is because we are beginners here, at least in a manner. It will, perhaps, be a surprise to some of those present here to know, that nearly half of the species of herbaceoUi plants sold in this country are indigenous to the Southern States. Many of these are capable of further improvement. The greater part of the annual plants, which are available for borders, are all but unknown here, but are gradually coming into use. Cannas, Dahlias, etc., might properly be classed as hardy herbaceou8 stuff here, as they can be safely left in the ground during the winter, and form excellent border plants, which need to be transplanted only when they become crowded. This applies also to certain Holland bulbs, especially Narcissus of the Polyanthus class, and the jonquils. Hyacinths nsually deteriorate in a couple of years, and so do the daffodils. Tulips are not generally successful here, but the late May 110wering kinds will thrive under certain conditions. Many 110wering shrubs of a low-growing character are appropriate for borders. Among these the Azalea comes first, and is largely used for this purpose in places around Thomasville, especially the last few years. They are used by the acre, where they """ere formerly nsed by the dozen. The evergreen Indian Azalea is the most useful here, as the deciduous kinds are not entirely successful with us. We have, however, repeatedly used Azalea mollis as a bedding plant, with the understanding that we would throw them away after the blooming season, as they are low priced and very effective. A border may be appropriately lined with Santolina chamaecy parisS'Us, which with its gray leaves, gives an idea of distance, especially to a straight border. 95 SHRUBBERY. In this class there is such a bewildering mass of material available for beautifying grounds here, that a list would be tedious, and as lists of the better known ones have been so often given, we will only mention a few of the less known kinds of real merit. Among the coniferous class of trees and shrubs one of the very best is the Cunninghamia sinensis, which forms an excellent single specimen on a lawn, and takes the place of the araucaria, which does not succeed with us. Of the Cupressus lawsoniana there llJ'e numerous garden forms, compara tively little known in this country, although well known in Europe, where they are much admired. Almost all of these cypresses do well with us. In broad leaved evergreens the Ternstroemia japonica deserves to be mentioned, as it forms a beautiful compact shrub, and does finely with us, but is, so far, the only Phillyrea that has proven successful. JAPANESE PLANTS. It is a well known fact that a large proportion of our ornamentals come from Japan. It is not so well known, perhaps, that the Japanese species of the same class are of a lower and more compact growth than the American species. This fact is well worth considering when making a selection for any special purpose. For instance, you would choose the Cercis canadensis, or American Judas tree, for a distant effect, or where a tall tree is required, but the Cercis chinensis for a near-by point,w here a lower, more compact tree is requiJ'ed. The Japanese wistarias are better suited to this locality than the Ameri can kinds. VINES. Where nothing else will answer the purpose, a good effect can be had with vines and climbers, as they will climb poles, trellises, chimneys, wires, fences, or anything, or crawl on the ground. Of course, they are not all adapted to the same purpose, the wistaria looks best overhead, with the 1l0wers banging down, while the vinca, or ground myrtle, bugs the ground, with its flowllrs erect. The native yellow jessamine will do either way, going or coming. In conclusinn allow me to say that no amount of improvement will bll llUecessful, unless the work is kept up afterwards. With proper attention the grounds once beautified will increase in attractiveness as the years pass, and prove a constant source of pleasure. CHAIRMAN HUNT: The next paper on the program is an address by Mr. E. L. Worsham, State Ento-' mologist. MR. LEWIS: Mr. Worsham, as you know, left last night, and the article that Mr. Worsham was to read lVas on "Spraying Apparatus for Scale Insects." It 8truck me that, as there are not many, a.nd as those who 96 are here know all about spraying apparatus, that it might be well to read the title of the paper, and pass it to the Secretary to be embraced in the proceedings. Later on, upon the opening of the question box, I might make a little talk on blight. SPRAYING APPARATUS FOR SCALE INSECTS. By E. L. WORSHAM, State Entomologist of Georgia. The title of this paper designates a consideration of spraying apparatUli and accessories particularly with reference to their use in controlling Coccidre. Generally speaking, any good modern pump is equally well adapted to spraying both fungicides and insecticides. In certain respects, however, which are primarily concerned with the physical nature of the spray material, the efficiency of the various types of spray pumps is somewhat variable. The reason for this variation is hereinafter discussed more fully under the head of pump construction. There is spraying apparatus of all kinds and sizes, and the selection of an outfit is, therefore, based on its service requirements. Beginning with the smallest of all, the bucket pumps whicb may be had for a few dollars, the sizes and costs will increase on a more or less graduated scale up to the 200 gallon power pumps which cost several hundred dollars. Strong competition in the spray machinery business is responsible for the rapid improvement in the construction of pumps and accessories. It is now possible for the purchaser to obtain good, durable and efficient pumps from a number of manufacturers and at a cost entirely commensurate with their value. Individual operators have a large field in which to exercise their choice, though such choice would necessarily be founded more upon some peculiar mechanical device than upon cost. BUCKET AND KNAPSACK PUMPS. These two styles are grouped together because their field of usefulness is so limited. With sufficiently long leads of hose they may be used on small orchard trees, but they are designed ane! built ostensibly for use in spraying green house plants and shrubs. Their relatively small cost places them easily within the reach of all who have ornamental plants to protect, both indoors and out, from scale insects, and in this field they make valuable acquisitions to the garden, the green house, and in the growing of small ornamental plants. The bucket pump as a rule is constructed so as to extend into the bucket, to which it is attached by a clamp; a foot piece extends to the ground and by placing the foot upon this, the pump is held in position while it is being worked. The cost varies from five to ten dollars. The Knapsack pump, being more portable and somewhat larger, is a more desirable contrivance for use in the sphere above assigned to the bucket pump. It is attached to the back after the fashion of a knapsack, and is worked by a lever extending over the operator's shoulder. The 97 details of construction vary between the di.fl'erent manufacturers, but the general plan is much the same in all. They are of five gallon capacity, and are fitted with 3- inch hose, to which any style nozzle may be fitted. The tanks are made of brass or galvanized iron, and the prices are governed by the metal used in their make up. The listed prices vary from ten to eighteen dollars. BARREL PUMPS. Barrel pumps, as the name denotes, are pumps intended for mounting in barrels, and their size, cheapness, and general efficiency for spraying on both large and small scale renders them, perhaps, the most important type of spray pump. When fitted out with good accessories, they are capable of spraying the largest fruit trees under ordinary conditions and by far the larger part of all orchard spraying is done with pumps of this class. Practically the same principals are incorporated in the manufacture of the different makes, though the details of construction vary greatly. It may be well in discussing this pump to consider what the essentials of a good pump are. To begin with it is necessary to have an air chamber to insure a steady, consistent spray, otherwise the spray would be intermittent and pulsating. This air chamber part may be either separated from the working parts of the pump or combined with them. In some styles it is on top of the barrel, but in the more satisfactory types it is within, and in the latter the stability of the pump is greater. A large air chamber on the top of the barrel renders it top heavy, and this top heaviness is likely to become responsible for accidents in spraying on rough land. One feature of the barrel pump that is yet far from perfection is the agitator. In most forms the paddle agitator is used, but these, while they are all that could be desired for spraying materials free from solid matter, will not and cannot keep sprays such as the home-made lime and sulphur thorougWy mixed. The tips of the paddles describe an arc of about 45 degrees and work so slowly that the lime quickly settles to the bottom with the result that the first part of the material as it comes from the barrel carries much more free lime than the last, which has but little. The question of the agitator for barrel pumps is an important one and one that has not heretofore been solved. It is only in gas power sprays that this feature is perfected. However, for the materials now being used against scale insects which are uniform in composition, and carry no solids, an agitator is wholly unnecessary. The working parts of a pump, namely, the valves, valve seats, plunger and cylinder, should be made of metal resistant to the corrosive action of. the spray material. These are usually of brass, bronze, or porcelain substances, not corroded by the action of the liquid. A pump should be compactly built with all the working parts closely fitted so as to prevent leakage and attendant loss of power. All parts should be easily removable for cleaning purposes and to make repa.irs. Much trouble may be avoided by using only the best packing for the plunger. The sta.ndard asbestos is far superior to leather or cord, being 98 more resistant to the caustic action of the spray and in every way more durable and satisfactory. The spray pump market supplies a large number of different makes of barrel pumps. Those best known to the author are the "Deming," manu factured at Salem, Ohio; the" Friend," manufactured at Carport, N. Y.; the" Gould, " at Seneca Falls, N. Y.; the" Bean," at Cleveland, Ohio, and the "Hardie," at Hudson, Mich. The last has the pump mounted in the side of the barrel instead of the top, and this feature makes it particularly adaptable for spraying on rough steep hillsides. By building a framework to the front trucks of a wagon and attaching the barrel thereto, the pump may be operated by the driver from the ground. The frame work being a continuation of the shafts, gives the barrel an angle which brings the pump handle to a position from which it can easily be worked by the driver. The pump "When so arranged is especially valuable for use on land not really accessible to a wagon. AJJy of the above named are good, reliable makes, and with proper care will last indefinitely. They are sufficiently powerful to generate and consist ently maintain pressure for the two leads of hose carrying a total of four nozzles. HORIZONTAL PUMPS. This type of pump is designed for spraying on an extensive scale. It is larger and more powerful than the barrel pumps, and is capable of supplying four leads of hose. The air chamber is of greater capacity and therefore capable of storing more air pressure than the smaller types. The plungers are usually differential and thus an equal pressure is exerted on both strokes, making the pumps double acting. With these, as with the barrel pumps, the principal of construction is practically the same. There are many differences in detail, and it is in the details that each manufacturer claims superiority over his competitor. Horizontal pumps are intended for attaching to wagon tanks of from 100 to 200 gallons capacity. They may also be bolted to a heavy lead and operated in connection with an ordinary fifty gallon barrel. Primarily, however, they are designed for tanks and for heavy work on a large scale. This style of pump may be, and usually is, operated by hand, but they are also usually fitted up with a pitman or similar device for connecting to a gas engine. The Bean Pump Co., manufacture a pump of this kind that includes a heavy coil spring for equalizing the efforts necessary to operate the pump handle. On one strike energy is stored into the spring by the pull against its resistance and the resultant compression, and in the return stroke the stored energy contained in the compressed spring is ,released and the expansion 'helps the operator in forcing the liquid into the air chamber against guage pressure. The working parts of the horizontal pumps are not immersed in the spray material as is the case with most pumps of smaller size. The air chamber is connected to the material supply by a piece of heavy rubber piping, and is filled by suction. Repairs are much easier effected than with b&rrel pumps, which have to be removed from the barrels, sometimes wheJl 99 the latter a,re full of spray material, before the seat of the trouble can be reached. The cost of the horizontal pump ranges from twenty-five to fifty dollars. Nearly all the pump manufacturers have their cheaper and their better grades with an accompanying price list to match. POWER PUMPs. Power pumps are of two kinds, (1) gasolene and (2) compressed air or compressed gas. With these machines it is possible to maintain the air pressure at a higher and more constant figure than with hand motive power. The maximum degree of successful spraying against scale insects is obtained only when the spray is driven onto them in a finely divided state and with force. The greater the force the greater the efficiency of the work, all other conditions being equal. Power outfits meet this essential requirement better than those operated by hand for the reason that they can maintain a higher pressure and hold it practically constant. For general efficiency and labor saving they are superior to other types, especially in large commercial orchards, parks, etc. GASOLENE POWER PUMPS. All the leading power pump manufacturers turn out regular power pump outfits, and they are giving general satisfaction, wherever used. The origiDal purchase price is, of course, much higher than for hand pumps, but thereafter they may be operated at a smaller cost and the additional cost in the beginning represents economy in the end. Power pumps can constantly maintain high pressure for four leads of hose and have a capacity of two hundred gallons per hour. Their greater weight makes them ineligible for use on land of a rough or hilly nature, but on flat land they are the most efficient and most rapid sprayers on the market, their value as time and money savers being more generally understood and appreciated than ever before. They are cheaper, too, than at any time in the past. A spraying outfit with gas engine, pump, lead, hose, etc., may be bought for sums varying from $135.00 to $300.00. The gasolene engines may be used for other farm purposes as well. One feature of the gasolene outfits wherein they outclass any other type of pump is the matter of the agitator. By attaching the agitator to the engine the padcUes may be run at a rapid rate of speed and the spray material kept in a violent state of agitation. When home made lime and 8Ulphur or other materials carrying solid matter are used, this form of power pump is superior to any other. CoMPRESSED Am PUMPS. This class of pump is of two kinds, i. e., those that are air charged at a fixed station, and those that compress the air into a cylinder by ;eans of an apparatus connected with the rear wheels of the spray wagon. oth of these types are worthy of reco=endation under certain condi. ~ons. Where no part of the spray solution will settle out, as when miscible ?ila, prepared lime and sulphur, etc., are used, and no agitation thereof 18 necessary, pumps that are air charged at the renewal station are highly 100 efficient. Pumps that depend on the automatic compression of the air from the turning of the wagon wheels are efficient only when the trees are small and can be rapidly sprayed. They are failures among large trees that require some minutes to spray before an advance is made. Neither of these types have adequate agitation equipment, and other means must be employed wherever necessary to keep the material well mixed. CARBONIC ACID GAS PUMPS. The working principles of carbonic acid gas pumps is almost identically like the compressed air type, except that the cylinder is charged with carbonic acid gas instead of air. It is an efficient, serviceable pump, but with respect to the agitator it is equally as inefficient as the compressed air pumps. SPRAYING ACCESSORIES. No pump, no matter how capable, will give service without the complementary support of good spraying auxiliaries of the best quality and design. As much attention should be given to these as the pump itself. These accessories consist of hose, extension rod, stop cocks, and nozzles. HOSE. Nothing need be said of this save that it should be of the best quality and ample length.. As a matter of economy, it is cheaper to buy the best grade four ply goods. This will easily last a full season or longer with proper care. Cheaper grades are quick to leak and are generally unsatisfactory. The better grades of hose cannot be bought for less than fifteen cents per foot. EXTENSION RODS. No spraying outfit is complete without an extension rod. It is an indispensable adjunct in reaching to all parts of the trees, expediting the work and improving the quality of the spraying. Besides the advantages, it is a protection to the operator, enabling him to evade a wetting from the spray mists as it is blown or drifted about. Rods are usually made of 1-4 inch piping and are cut to any desired length based upon the requirements. Bamboo rods are also used for the same purpose. Piping may be cut in short lengths and lengthened or shortened at will to suit the occasion, by means of couplings. SToP CoCKS. Stop cocks are very serviceable and almost imperatively necessary in large spraying operations. By